The DeVory Darkins Show - Democrats suffer BRUTAL HUMILIATION after Jeffries EXPOSED in failed interview

Episode Date: February 9, 2026

Hakeem Jeffries suffers BRUTAL HUMILIATION during disastrous interview. This comes as Democrats struggle to respond to multiple polls showing that Majority of Democrats support Photo ID. They even go so far as to accuse President Trump of seeking to steal the upcoming midterms. JOIN ME AD-FREE HERE:https://darkinsplus.comFOLLOW ME:⁠https://www.x.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠https://www.rumble.com/c/devorydarkins⁠⁠https://devory.wtf.tv⁠BUY ME A COFFEE:⁠https://buymeacoffee.com/devorydarkins⁠SHOP OUR MERCH STORE:⁠https://store.devorydarkins.com⁠BUSINESS INQUIRIES:⁠[e-mail]⁠

So it's official, you can add Hakeem Jeffries and Adam shift to the list of Democrats continuing to be humiliated on live television when they're confronted with the brutal poll that says 71% of Democrats support voter ID. But what exactly did Hakeem Jeffries have to say in response to this? Well, that's exactly what this whole video is all about and exposing how crazy his response really is. Now, according to Newsweek, Hakeem Jeffries is warning that President Trump attends to steal elections.

And again, I have to point this out, isn't it fascinating? When the president accused Democrats of stealing the elections, everybody laughed them off and said he was ludicrous. Now they're saying this exact same thing he was saying, but it's okay. Do you guys notice the hypocrisy there? Now, before I go any further, what exactly did Hakeem Jeffries say that led to his humiliation? Watch this. I understand you don't support things like a passport, for example. But requiring basic ID in order to vote is really possible.

A Pew poll from a few months ago showed 83% of Americans, including 71% of your fellow Democrats, support requiring an ID to vote. Why are they wrong? I haven't said that they're wrong. We know that states are the ones who are empowered to conduct elections, and every state should be allowed to decide the best way to proceed to ensure that there's a free and fair election. Here in New York, there are, in fact, voter identification requirements. The question is that what Republicans are trying to do is to engage

in clear and blatant voter suppression. They know that if there's a free and fair election in November, they're going to lose. In fact, Republicans have been losing every single election since Donald Trump was sworn in in January of last year, including most recently

decisively in Texas. And of course, losing all across the country up and down the ballot in the November, in the November off-year elections in places like New Jersey or Virginia or New York. Now, as a result of that crazy allegation from Hakeem Jeffries that the president's trying to steal the elections, that's why they're trying to push voter ID, which is obviously crazy. It just goes to show you that this party believes they can't win without banning voter ID, if that makes sense, okay?

That's why in California, it's against the law to ask for someone's ID. All right. Here's what the White House had to say in response. The president also urged Congress to pass the safety. Act and other legislative proposals that would establish a uniform standard of photo ID for voting, prohibit no excuse mailing voting, and in the practice of ballot harvesting to ensure the safety and security of our elections, the media should not uncritically amplify these conspiracies. You know, it's interesting.

Where the heck is the statement regarding making election day a federal holiday? Why do we continue to overlook that? I'm not understanding. If we really want max participation, what do you make election day a national holiday? I wonder what Hakeem Jeffries has to say about that. Well, let's continue. Yeah, and they've been losing, I mean, Virginia is a good example. They have a requirement to show your ID, and Democrats won very, very handily across the way.

So why not maybe even just take that off the table and say, okay, maybe not a passport or birth certificate, but show ID? idea? First of all, every state is empowered to be able to make the decision on their own, and we completely and totally support that. What Donald Trump wants to do is try to nationalize the election, translation, steal it, and we're not going to let it happen. All right, number one, the fact that Dana Bash is on board with this tells you there's something wrong with Hakim Jeffries. Secondly, in regards to Republicans losing the midterms, let me just give you the facts so you can cut through the noise. Since 1946, the president's party has lost seats in the House of Representatives in 18 out of 20 midterm elections, averaging a loss

of 28 seats. In fact, losing one or both chambers of Congress is common. You see, that's not what they want to tell you. It's the paradigm in our country. You get a new president. People are not patient. They get upset. He gets a low approval rating.

And then they switch to the next party during the midterms. That's exactly what happens. Now, on this point about the president potentially stealing the upcoming election, What's funny as Governor West Moore was on that same show and he was pressed about doing that very thing. He is disenfranchising voters in his state by getting rid of the only Republican district. Watch this. You are pushing hard to redraw Maryland's congressional map to further benefit Democrats. And what that means is eliminating the only Republican held seat that exists right now.

The map as it stands is already really gerrymandered done before you got there. is it good for democracy to pursue a map that makes your state even less representative? Well, actually, the map that the Maryland House passed would actually make six of the eight congressional districts more competitive than less. And frankly, one of the most gerrymandered seats inside of the state of Maryland is actually the Republican seat. Yeah, guys, they think you're that stupid. Okay. Hey, I'm going to get rid of all of the Republican districts and then we'll just tell the people that this will make it more competitive. In fact, that Republican district that we're getting rid of was actually gerrymandered.

Okay, you guys make it make sense. I don't understand how to explain that. But they try to do a good job of it. All right, let's go to Adam Schiff because I told you he also got humiliated today. Watch this. But in one recent Pew poll, 83% of adults support requiring photo ID to vote. 71% of Democrats favor requiring photo ID. Is that something that you can support?

And if not, why? It's still going to be something, Jonathan. It's still going to be something that disenfranchises people, that don't have the proper real ID, driver's license ID, that don't have the ID necessary to vote, even though they are citizens. This is another way to simply try to suppress the vote.

And the last thing I think we want to do is discourage more people, more citizens from voting. And if he loses the vote, and I think the Republicans now expect they'll get a real drubbing in the midterms. He's prepared to try to take some kind of action to overturn the result. And we really shouldn't question that. We saw him try to the point of insurrection to overturn the 2020 election. We see him now taking these extraordinary steps with an election now five years ago.

He's basically telling us he intends to interfere in this upcoming election. All right. The only way to respond to people like him is the following. Multiple surveys over the past 15 years, including from academic institutions and government commission studies consistently show. Number one, that the vast majority of U.S. adults possess some form a government ID. Two, large majorities of low-income individuals also possess ID. And three, participation in programs such as Section 8 housing, Medicaid, CHIP, SNAP, WIC, public school enrollment for children, almost always require identity verification. often including government issue ID or documents that can be converted into ID.

You see, they're making the wrong argument. What they should be arguing about if they are going to is which ID will be acceptable when someone goes to vote. No, they're just saying ID in general is going to suppress votes. That is so far from the truth. And I've continued to say it. The only healthy compromise here would be, hey, federal government, you pay the bill on people getting an ID.

You want people to have an ID to vote in our elections? you got to pay for the ID, make it free. That's the only compromise I'm willing to hear, if that makes sense. Now, let's go to this. The big argument here is Republicans are now nationalizing voter ID. Is that the big pushback here from Democrats, is they feel like it's federal control now? No, it's just that Trump's doing it.

That's the big pushback from Democrats. Trump is trying to not, you see those headlines. Oh, nationalizing federal. No, it's just because Trump is doing it. And I'm very concerned because if you move out of state, So if you're maybe you're from Michigan, you move to New York, you can register to vote here, but they don't actually talk to each other. And you can still receive a mail and ballot from Michigan while you're still voting at polls in New York. Now, there's another healthy debate to be had because if you're not in favor of government overreach or government control, you would push back on the idea of nationalizing our elections.

I actually am in favor of decentralized elections. Essentially, we should leave it up to the states. and that's what we've been doing as a country. However, I do believe there's a healthy compromise here where these states are required to prove that they verified people's citizenship status and they are who they say they are. Now, how they go about doing that, that's kind of up to the state. But if the federal government says, hey, you need to prove that this person who lives at this address in this city and your state is who they say they are and they are a citizen,

you should be able to provide that supporting documentation. I think that's fair. I think that's fair. But again, here's the other problem. Do Republicans actually have a good chance of getting this pass? Some people say no. Watch. It's hard to get this through the Senate is going to be the problem here for Republicans. You might get some that are on board with it, but will it actually pass and get through? I think probably not again because I think organized, there will be such organized Democratic opposition. And look, I think the idea of nationalizing this is actually counter to a lot of what Republicans would typically be in favor of because Republicans are generally in favor of letting states decide this kind of thing

one at a time. I think the basic premise of you ought to be able to have something that says you actually are who you say you are when you go to vote is absolutely true. And you leave it to the states who make up their laws. And from the Democratic perspective, if a state's laws are making it too burdensome for someone to show that they are who they are, then you challenge it in court and see if there's a case to be made. Yeah, I mean, in a perfect world, that's exactly the way things would work. But again, every single day, we have a perfect example of Democrats in their hypocrisy. I'm not saying Republicans are perfect. In fact, I'll sum up our political landscape in this way. The only reason why people will vote Democrat today, it's a vote against President Trump,

and they don't believe the economy's working for them. The only reason why someone would vote Republican today would be, yeah, I don't have a reason for you. Okay? I really don't. Republicans overwhelmingly will have better policies than Democrats. Democrats, but Republicans are shitty at selling them. That's just the bottom line to it. Now, this Senate Democrat wants voter ID for his campaign events, but not federal elections. Who are we talking about exactly? Well, Senator John Osoff, the Democrat out of Georgia, asked attendees at his campaign event on Saturday to show government-issued photo ID even while opposing similar standards for voters in federal elections. Isn't that fascinating?

Now, I think one way to really sum up, the best person to explain why Democrats are against voter ID is to go to the person who they believe should have been the next president of the United States, Kamala Harris. I don't think that we should underestimate what that could mean. because in some people's mind, that means, well, you're going to have to Xerox or photocopy your ID to send it in to prove you are who you are. Well, there are a whole lot of people, especially people who live in rural communities who don't, there's no kinkos, there's no office max near them. People have to understand that when we're talking about voter ID laws, be clear about who you have in mind and what would be required of them to prove who they are. are. Of course, people have to prove who they are, but not in a way that makes it almost impossible for them to prove who they are. Yeah, that's a great explanation, right? I'm sorry, I had to do it to you guys. It's going viral. It's a flashback clip back to 2020, by the way. Anyways, it's stupidity. It

really is. It really is. And then they come out and they say, well, people are going to have to go get their birth certificate. How many people you know have a copy of their birth certificate? Guys, you act like it's difficult for the average person to get a birth certificate in 2026. It's not. I mean, most people can order it online. It'll be at your house the following week. Okay, so that's number one. And here's the other thing. Is it too much to ask an individual to get a copy of their birth certificate so they can exercise a privilege that's been given to them in the greatest country of the world, which is to vote in our elections. I don't think that's too much to ask here, folks. If you ain't got what it takes to go get the right documentation to show that you're a citizen, if voting doesn't matter any more to you than that, I don't give a damn if you ever vote again because I don't care what you have to say. And if that's mean or elitist or whatever, I really don't care. And if you're a politician and those are the people you're advocating for, I really hope you lose to. Because if you're going to be in the greatest and most prosperous country world you should want to take part in it and give a little to do it. I mean, was it? JFK,

don't ask what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country, you can find your birth certificate and go get a free ID to vote. That's what you can do for your country. Now, to cap this video off, and I believe to deliver the ultimate rebukew to people like Hakeem Jeffries, Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff, we go to a country that's been embattled, filled with corruption, funded by terrorist groups, and represented by, a community that's under fire currently the Somalian community on Minnesota for fraud. Even their country has photo ID. Watch this.

Somalia's electoral authorities have started issuing voter ID cards across Mogadishu as the capital prepares for its first direct municipal council elections in decades under a one-person, one-vote system. Printing at the Somali Independent Election Committee headquarters operates around the clock in two eight-hour shifts, producing an estimated 30,000 to 40,000 cards daily. Bottom line is, if a country like Somalia has photo ID for people to participate in their elections, why wouldn't the United States of America? And the interesting part is, if we're going to make the federal government really be in charge of this, they should issue a ID specifically for voting. Makes sense to me. I mean, that's a worthy conversation to debate over. You let me know what you guys

think in the comment section below to all of the hypocrisy that you were able to witness throughout this video and whether or not you agree with what the president is asking for and what is your reaction to the claim that Democrats believe the president is seeking to steal the upcoming election. Give me your thoughts and everything you got in the comment section below. All right. So this next story is a little unfortunate. Woke Olympic athletes are speaking out against the United States of America, including bashing the Trump administration for immigration enforcement. Yes, these are American citizens. It begs the question, why are they there at the Olympics if they're there to bash the president instead of winning gold medals? Well, that's what we

answer in that video. So if you're interested, all you have to do is click on it because it's coming up right now.