David Byrne Explains How Forgotten Ideas Come Back to Life
00:00 There are some market stories where you want every detail. Joe and I have made quite a few podcasts on that basis. But sometimes you've only got 10 minutes and just want to know what's moving markets. Fast. That's the Barclays Brief Podcast. Every week, experts from Barclays Markets and Research get you up to speed on what's happening and what to watch next. Concise, focused, and brief.
00:22 Search Barclays Brief wherever you get your podcasts. AI is entering its most consequential phase where scale, safety and sovereign. will determine who leads and who lags. Join Bloomberg Tech in London on November 2nd and 3rd as global leaders across business, finance and policy examine the defining trade-offs shaping the future of AI. Thank you to our presenting sponsor, Salesforce and supporting sponsors, IDA Island and Schneider Electric. Learn more at Bloomberglive.com slash tech London. Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. I'm Joe Wisenthall. And I'm Tracy Al-Alawite. Tracy,
01:20 something that both of us have observed multiple times on the podcast by now. Longtime listeners are tired of our, tired of our observations. Tired of our stories and stuff like that. No, but something that we both have observed and it relates to our career is that sort of big times of big change, financial crisis, COVID, et cetera. Anytime there seems to be some big turning point, it sort of acts as like a clearing in the woods where like new ideas can be discovered and so forth. So we like sort of go down some path typically. I like to think of it as like a narrow path through a forest and certain ideas we sort of go with. And then suddenly something changes. Nobody is necessarily an expert on this moment. The gap in awareness between the smartest and the least informed person starts to shrink about what's happening. And then there's like there's a market for new ideas that emerges. Yeah. I think there's. There's. There's a market for new ideas that emerges. Yeah. Yeah. I think there's. There's a democratization process, I guess, that happens in times of crisis or major change. And we've talked about it in relation to the 2008 financial crisis where back then, you and I were in the early stages of our financial journalism careers. But we were basically on the same footing as people
02:31 who had been covering banking and finance for decades at that point because no one really knew what was going on. And so as you say, this opportunity opens up. And suddenly you start to see new ways of approaching it, new entrance, discussing certain things, new ideas, maybe. Right. So, for example, you know, people are like, oh, the works of Heimann Minsky, for example, right? They're like, oh, maybe this guy who most people, even in economics, had not talked about very much, maybe he, he shed some light. We could go back and revisit him or even, you know, certain forms of what I would call, like, antique Keynesianism, et cetera. It's like, let's go back and see what people. We're who we'd long discarded were saying, and maybe this could be a, maybe this could be useful.
03:18 Well, Minsky is a really interesting one because, again, I got into financial journalism in September 2008, and people were already bringing up the Minsky moment, right? And ever since then, it's become almost a cliche to the point where if I see, if I see a financial journalist talk about a Minsky moment as if they just discover it, I kind of get a little annoyed and it's a little bit cringe. But what I didn't know is that basically up until 2008, a lot of Minsky Minsky's ideas had been discarded. That's right. So we can, let's, we have an exciting guess so we don't have to talk forever.
03:50 We're going to be speaking with someone who is primarily known for rediscovering the works of Hyman Minsky. No, that's not exactly true. But someone who has, in fact, talked about Hyman Minsky. We're going to be speaking with musician and author David Byrne. He has a new book out called Sleeping Beauties, Why Good Ideas Go dormant and How They Wake Up. and he has a chapter on the Minsky revival.
04:16 So David, thank you so much for coming on the podcast. Thank you. Thank you. And here's somewhere, I could talk about Minsky. Of course, you probably know a lot about it by now.
04:27 Look, here's the thing. If we could spend the entire time in this conversation just talking about Minsky, as long as we also spend a minute talking about Moby Dick. I knew this was going to come up. No, I did not.
04:41 That's actually a legitimate example of what Sleeping Beauty is all about. Just to begin, give us the, in a nutshell, version of the book. What is the Sleeping Beauty and what are you trying to do here? It's not my term, but I stumbled on it. Sleeping Beauty is something that got a little bit of attention when it was first done. Could be an idea, could be a painter, could be an author. Then kind of faded from view, became kind of forgotten, maybe not entirely. but kind of, yes, sank below the surface.
05:16 And then at some point, for various reasons, got re-appreciated and came back and it was like, oh, yes, that is relevant right now. That's exactly what we're talking about now. And this person's already done it. Let's see if there's some information, some technique, some beautiful artwork, whatever it might be for us to appreciate. You guys mentioned the, yes, 2008, the crash, whatever you want to call it. Yeah, I have a whole section of the book on how catastrophes, including war, are kind of a way that these things get rediscovered. I decided to focus on how they got rediscovered as much as I could, rather than how. how they got forgotten.
06:11 How they got forgotten tends to be the same stories all over and over again that institutional hubris or racism or sexism or we think we know better than people knew in the past, all those kinds of things. But I thought, if we can find how they got rediscovered, that gives us a shot at finding the ones that are still out there because for sure there's some out there. So for the Minsky example, let's just start with that one, given our audience. But what's, you know, I think everyone knows what a Minsky moment is, but maybe talk a little bit about the time before that became a journalistic cliche. And then also talk about what's the relevance of discovering Minsky post 2008 or maybe even what the relevance would have been discovering him before 2008, other than it makes convenient, you know, anecdotes for, for, for,
07:08 financial columns. Wow. Yes. When did he do? He did a lot of his work. I think it's in the 60s. I think that's right. Yeah.
07:19 And his idea was, it's kind of behavioral economics. He was kind of saying, well, we don't exactly behave rationally. We don't always act in our best interests. I'm kind of summarizing here. Some people will already know this, that when things are flush, we tend to assume that that's the way it's always going to go. We can just pile more, you know, invest more, do this. And we kind of ignore the danger signs and this and that.
07:49 Needless to say, he's, has been proven right. Yeah, he's saying we're human beings. We behave, according to, with these emotional instincts, as opposed, we don't always act rationally. there was a nice story about him going on holiday with his family to Italy and instead of going to see all the tourist sites, he started interviewing the people working in the little businesses in the towns they were visiting.
08:23 He wanted to find out how do you do this? How do things work here? Tracy and I can relate to that sort of thing. I think both of us, it's pretty, probably this curse of like trying to learn so much about the world. I don't know. Maybe you're a little bit better at turning off. No, I think we both have this curse. We go anywhere and like we just, you know, try to enjoy it, but also like, how does this work?
08:48 And why is the price this way? How many hours do you work? And how did you find your way into this job? So you go through in this book, Sleeping Beauty, is why good ideas, go dormant and how they wake up. many examples, including Minsky, including discoveries of Roman concrete, which we'll talk about, including the book Moby Dick itself, which we're definitely going to talk about. And then, you know, as you talk about your conclusion, maybe we can like find a pattern that helps us discover old ideas or forgotten ideas consistently. But before we get to that, why do you talk to us about
09:26 the process of assembling this book? Because there's thousands of sleeping beauties, et cetera. How did you, like, find the ones that you wanted to talk about, window them down, and, like, talk to us about how this book arrived here? There's lots of them. Yes. I'd write them up, do like a first draft of writing things up. And then, you know, oh, this one, this was a good story. Or I see they're starting to fall into categories of how they got rediscovered and remembered. And I thought, okay.
10:00 If I can, I need a nice little sampling in each of these categories, and then I think I'm good. I don't need to kind of overdo it. I'm not trying to be complete in-calgary. I'm going to tell you every single Sleeping Beauty I've ever stumbled on. Often I'd stumble on them and be an article about something like you said, Moby Dick or whatever like that. It would be something, you know, an article about Melville. And they'd say, like in one sentence they go. Moby Dick was a failure and he died penniless, something like that.
10:36 And then they'd go on to talk about something else. It was like one sentence. And you just go, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, you just buried the lead. Yeah. From my point of view, that's the story. How did that happen? Because now, yeah, that particular, that book is revered. Wait, how did that happen?
10:52 Yeah, let's, all right. Yeah, let's jump right into the movie. Yeah, let's just do Melville. Yeah, let's try to jump right into the, my favorite book, by the way, is it. Wow. You have to go back. wind back before that book, which makes the story kind of better. Before he wrote, started writing, he signed on as a kind of merchant sailor. And at the time, they would go whale hunting and
11:17 hunting for all sorts of stuff in the South Seas and in the Pacific. So he was doing that. He found it to be a torturous, horrible, horrible experience. He and some others jumped ship on some island. And I looked up in the island, of course, is gorgeous. And you go, I'd live there. I got it. But, yes. Except for the cannibal.
11:48 Except there were cannibals. Yes. There were cannibals. But he got away from that, got to another island where he became like a farmer growing potatoes on this island. And eventually he signs on with another boat. Goes to, I think, eventually ends up in Hawaii where the first boat, the one he deserted from arrives. and they go, you're guilty. If we're taking you back.
12:27 There's not much he can do about it. And as in the book, he's witnessed of floggings and just horrible, horrible conditions and horrible treatment and insane captains and all this stuff. I mean, it's all to there. So he writes a book, I think Tai Pi was the first one, about his South Sea adventures.
12:51 He didn't say it was him, but that's what it was. And the, I think it was the American publisher said, no, this is completely outrageous, could not have happened. But I think there was someone in England who kind of was a witness who said, yeah, it did happen. All these awful things that happened. All these often things, this crazy stuff happened. And so they published it. And it was a massive hit.
13:24 It was huge. It became like one of the most popular books. So he wrote a sequel. It was called, I think, Omoo, another kind of made-up island name that detailed more of these adventures. He didn't want to do another one. And he has friends with him. He was Nathaniel Hawthorne. They were friends up upstate or Massachusetts.
13:48 it's Western Massachusetts and whatever. And Hawthorne said, oh, you should, maybe the next one, draw in your experiences, but maybe the next one should be more allegorical. You should get away from just the adventure yarn. You should still spend hundreds of words
14:04 describing nautical knots. Yes, yes. But a little more fantastical. Yes. And so he did. Moby Dick. I think first it was called just, The whale.
14:20 And it was a failure. I think, oh, in England, when it was published, I think they sold maybe 500 copies, which is not so good. He forgot, or maybe he forgot, but he didn't put the epilogue. Yeah. The epilogue is where Ishmael says, kind of survives. Yeah. And so the English reviewers said, no, no, no, you cannot tell.
14:48 tell a story like this if everyone dies. Because who wrote it then? Who wrote it? Who's the witness? This is a rule of writing. And we didn't know this rule existed, but you can't do that. You can't have it where everyone dies because then... Especially if it's written in the first person.
15:07 Yes. Who's telling the story? And, yeah, where's it? Where's their information coming from? So right away, he's just getting bad reviews as well as not starting too well. and the Americans were kind of they looked up to the British reviewers. I don't know if that still happens, but yeah, they did. And so even though he now put in the epilogue where his mouth survives, it was too late.
15:33 The bad reviews had kind of set the tone and, yeah, I think he went back to Hawthor and said, what have you done to me? I'm destroyed, which he was. He wrote other books. He wrote some weird stuff. He wrote an epic poem about the Civil War, the battles in the Civil War, kind of told from both sides. In some ways, it was kind of an anti-war, but a poem telling stories of all the carnage and everything viewed from both sides. That did not do well.
16:15 one that came out was one called Billy Budd and that was discovered after his death in a breadbox in the house where he lived. That's where I keep all my unpublished manuscripts. Exactly. Yeah, my breadbox is just filled with manuscripts. So now he's, he's done. He's done. I think it was mid-1800s when he was publishing these. So kind of around the turn of the century, he's like nothing forgotten. There were, someone was asked, I think, in UK to write an article about him. And the Americans said, is he still alive? They didn't know.
17:00 Anyway. So we're going back to catastrophes and wars. After World War I, people were asking themselves, how could we do this? How could we be so much killing, carnage, bloodshed? What are we made of psychologically or whatever else that allows us to do this? And his book kind of deals with that. It deals with kind of the psychology of all this stuff. And it deals with kind of colonialism and racism and all sorts of stuff that.
17:40 So after World War I, people were asking, who are we? Before that, it was just kind of adventures and seafaring stories and westerns and all this kind of heroic stuff. But now it's kind of like the doubt has been put in. And he go, does this book help us understand who we are? There are some market stories where you want every detail. Tracy and I have made quite a few podcasts on that basis, but sometimes you've only got 10 minutes and need to know what's moving markets and why. That's the Barclays Brief Podcast. Every week, experts from Barclays Markets and research get you up to speed on what matters and what to watch next.
18:34 About the time it takes to grab a coffee, so search Barclay's Brief, wherever you get your podcasts. You've heard the chaos. Now you can see it. Hello. My gosh. Watch all your favorite podcasts from start to finish, right inside the free I heard. Radio app. Gets the blood going up.
18:50 Catch every laugh and I roll on shows like the Tom Green Farmcast and park the bus. Now with full video. We're building a ramp for Tony Hawk. It's the same hosts and the same chemistry with all the hilarious moments you've been missing. Right on your screen. Cheers. Open the free IHR Radio app. Search video podcasts and tap watch.
19:10 The Bloomberg This Weekend podcast, news, analysis, and the lighter side of Bloomberg, including our weekly news quiz. Which edgy American mall staple is being sold to the parent company of Spencer's and Spirit Halloween? I wrote Claire's. That's not edgy? What are you talking about? This is a place David Gurra has never shopped in his life. Hot topic.
19:34 The Bloomberg This Weekend podcast. Subscribe today on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you listen. You know, I mentioned my favorite book is Moby Dick. One of my other favorite books is this book. I don't know if you've ever. Mariners, Renegades, and Castaways, the story of Herman Melville and the world we live in by the author, CLR James. And he talks about this a lot, that the Ahab character that Melville discovered, I mean, he created him, but arguably he discovered the character, was this character that
20:07 sort of anticipated essentially the great authoritarian's, or the authoritarians of the 20th century, that when we go back and we might want to psychoanalyze individuals like Hitler and Stalin and so forth, that Melville in a way saw them coming, this new man sort of speak. Or at least it appears that way in retrospect. Yeah, right. It appears that way in this sort of maniacal behavior. And so the emergence of individuals later on suddenly makes Moby-Da did such a compelling read. I agree. I don't know if I have anything to add there. I totally agree. Yeah, that's, it's kind of amazing that something, I don't believe that somebody like an author like that can predict the future.
20:58 Sure. But I do think they can see something in ourselves. They can see something in ourselves. They've had these, he's had these kind of really incredible experiences and encountered kind of these really despicable people. Yeah. Where he can incorporate that and see that this is part of her. who we are. Yeah. And yeah, so that, yeah, later on after we've all, or everyone after who was around for World War I sees kind of how low can we go, you start to go, yes, is there some way to prevent this?
21:36 Can we understand ourselves so that this doesn't happen again? Can we talk about concrete? Love to talk about concrete. So I have an interest in concrete, which is, you know, when I was younger and I was traveling to a lot of far-flung places, some of the most common ads and billboards that I would see in places like India or Myanmar would be for concrete brands, which you never see in the U.S. or in Europe. You know, people aren't advertising by this particular type of concrete. So I was always really fascinated why concrete had like, like, this position in those economies. But you point out in your book that actually the way we produce concrete nowadays, the most common way, isn't really the optimal technology for doing this. And there's actually a very ancient concrete technology that might be better in some ways.
22:34 Can you describe what you found? Yeah. I'm going to go back to your experience, because I had a similar experience. I've been to different places around the world. and you see it seems kind of incongruous. The places where sometimes the vernacular buildings in one place are kind of beautiful. And then you see these concrete kind of bunker type things. And you go, that's what it was being pushed on people as being, this is what it means to be modern.
23:06 One of the people mentioned in the book is from Lithuania, I think. and she said she's from the University of Miami and she says that yes when she was growing up same thing concrete was pushed as this is the this will make modern housing yeah right trash shoots
23:26 clean kitchens big windows oh yeah all the stuff you're not going to have these falling little falling down wooden houses we're going to enter the modern world and in her words we'll be living in the future. And so it was a big campaign to sell the stuff all around the world.
23:48 It happened in the U.S. too. There was all these books about make your house out of concrete. Anyway, yeah, the story is that the pantheon, the building in Rome, the temple in Rome, is 2,000 years old. has the largest un-reinforced dome in the world, still, doesn't have a crack in it. And it's 2,000 years old. The companies that make concrete now for parking lots and all kinds of stuff, of course, it's reinforced with rebar. They rate it themselves to last 50 years, 5-0, 100 if we're lucky. So you've got to ask yourself, what happened?
24:42 And yes, did we just lose the recipe? Sort of, but, you know, it's a little more complicated than that. The Romans used it a lot. These were big civic projects. They cost a lot of money. and to build the Pantheon or the Colosseum, which is also made of concrete blocks, or the aqueducts which are made of concrete blocks, all this kind of stuff costs a lot of money, a lot of manpower.
25:18 And in the course of empire, as the empire spreads out, more resources are going to kind of keep the borders intact and all that kind of stuff. and the communities on the far-flung parts of the empire they're not so interested in using concrete the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul is made of brick and mortar they have their own way of doing things but so when the Roman Empire collapses I think in 470 somewhere around there
26:00 that's it they don't make it anymore nobody makes it anymore and so it's not like the recipe got completely lost there's this guy Vitruvius who wrote a book
26:19 about architecture and he includes how to make concrete in it I think it was in 20 boy I'm remembering my dates I think it was 20 BC that he did this it was rediscus discovered in the Renaissance 1400s. So that's quite a few years later.
26:37 But it was considered, oh, this is an historical bit of curiosity. We don't need to do that. But they liked his information about proportion. So Palladia and all these other architects in that period took inspiration from him. Now I'm losing my date, but I think it's an end. 1800s, a guy in England makes something called Portland Cement. So we've really gone a long time.
27:09 It makes something called Portland Cement, starts a factory in the UK. And this is the precursor to modern concrete. It's not as good as the Roman stuff. Takes more energy to make. It puts out a lot of CO2 in the process. It doesn't last as long, but it is back and it's a French guy. I forget his name. It's a French guy maybe 30 years later comes up with the idea of putting rebar in to give it some tensile strength.
27:44 So it's going to be better for bridges and all this kind of stuff. And yeah, so, wow, by the 1800s, 19-hires, it's being pushed. It's like, this is the stuff. You can build big things. bridges, highways, buildings, everything, you know, all this stuff you can build out of it. I mean, and then I can go into, I mean, what a huge energy cost this is.
28:17 And of course, the stuff, as we know, doesn't last. So it's like, oh, China does more of it than pretty much anywhere else. Yeah. But the guy who invented, Portland cement. Was he just unaware of the Roman recipe or was he maybe thinking about other things like, you know, it's cheaper to build. We don't have to get special ash from Mount Vesuvius or whatever it is. Did he have other considerations? Yeah, there was a thought that they'd look at the Roman recipe and think, oh, oh, it's special because they have, they used the ash from Vesuvius.
28:52 They got this, you know, the secret sauce. And we don't have that. So we have to do with what we have. have. They also saw the Roman stuff, this kind of was going to lead to the kind of the solution. The Roman stuff has all these little white specks in it. And I thought, they just didn't know how to mix it well. They didn't have the mixing technology. We can do that. So, yeah, we're okay.
29:22 To ours is better, basically. Basically, ours is better. It's kind of a bias, prejudice, whatever, that we have. that whatever we know is better and smarter than whoever went before. That's just another example of how irrational we can be. But it was these little specks. They're called lime karsts that there was some material scientists at MIT who started looking into it about 50.
29:57 15 years ago or so. And they did a test where they had the Roman stuff and they had some contemporary stuff and they poured water on it. And the water eventually went through the contemporary stuff. Which leads to cracks, right?
30:16 That's how cracks happened. Yes. Especially if it gets cold. But even if it doesn't. And then with the Roman stuff, it goes in and some of the lime car stuff
30:26 these little white specks dissolve and the cracks heal up. It's self-healing. But the other stuff, especially if it's got rebar in it, the water gets in. If it hits the rebar, the rebar is going to rust and crack and expand.
30:42 The rusting rods expand and make more cracks. So, 2023, the folks at MIT started a company and they're going to start making, they've started to make the the Roman stuff, whether the world kind of beats a path to their door, it remains to be seen,
31:05 but it has been rediscovered. I would have loved to hear the initial conversation that's like, what do you want to study at MIT? And I really want to look into those little, you know, like discolourations on Roman cement. That's the cool thing about universities. People can just have the time and space to find niche things. I'm curious, you know, obviously you have been a famous, successful artist, musician for a very long time. Recently, or back in 2023, A-24 released, re-released the 1984 Talking Heads Concert Film Stop Making Sense, sort of re-energizing, maybe introducing a new generation of listeners to the talking heads and so forth.
31:56 Is that a sleeping beauty? Is that like, I mean, there was no period in which there weren't people listening to the talking heads. But perhaps, like, there was like, at least among some people, some like respark of interest. Yeah, it's definitely been that. It's definitely been an increased interest. What's been your experience of, okay, something happened. Someone says, you know what, this 1984 concert film, maybe it would be right. relevant again. Maybe there's people who would appreciate it again. What's been your experience
32:23 with at least one specific cultural artifact of yours sort of gathering new life basically 40 years later? I've been doing the whatever, the music thing. The music thing. The music thing long enough that I've seen my career go up and down. In the 90s, it might have been the music I was doing. It It might have been whatever, but my career went down. I was back to playing little clubs in lots of places where I'd been playing much larger venues. Now I'm back to playing these sizable places again. That feels, yes.
32:59 And I thought, but in some cases, I'm playing the same stuff. Yeah. I didn't change. I mean, I had gotten older, but it's all these other, it's all the context. if the audience, the demographic, the another generation, whatever it might be, those things have changed. Just like a lot of the things in this book, the paintings of Botticelli or whatever haven't changed.
33:29 But they go in and out of fashion. And I realized, oh, yeah, I've experienced that. How does that feel? How does it feel to go out of fashion for times? What's not? Do you get, does it get more comfortable when there's another wave? You're like, I've been here before, like, this isn't as painful. I know that this is a pendulum, et cetera.
33:50 I'm very curious about this. Oh, yeah. After it's happened once, if something happens like that again, you go, yes, I know, don't take this personally. Yeah, yeah. Don't take it personally. The work might be good. You may have, or you may have done something terrible or not so good, but don't assume that it's because the work is bad.
34:10 Yeah. But at the, I remember at the time, I just felt like, no, you just have to slog on. Just kind of keep going. Obviously, you can only keep going like that for a while until, and if things go lower, you go, I have no income. But to some extent, yeah, I think you just have to keep going. How do you tell the difference between, oh, I was unlucky or the audience wasn't ready for this or the audience doesn't appreciate how special this is versus I have failed to create something that resonates with my audience? Because I'm sure everyone has experienced this in their professional or creative lives at one point or another. if you do something or you make something and it doesn't get the result that you want or the reception that you want, the temptation is to, you know, just kind of blame it on something else or excuse it away.
35:12 You know, it's not that I'm out of touch. It's the children who are wrong, that sort of thing. So how do you balance those two things? I realize it's a little bit of both. In that period, I did a couple of records where I worked with Latin musicians and I was doing all Latin. rhythms and all that. I was having a great time. It went down really well in Latin America and in parts of Europe. But in the U.S. in particular, it's like, no, you've betrayed us. This is not what we want from you. And I realized, oh, okay, I get, I get that. I can maybe, I probably thought, I can maybe temper this somehow. Yeah, I do understand. Yeah, if you completely betray what your audience is expecting or hoping for, yeah, that's not going to work for it. But there's a way to still do something interesting, something exciting, and acknowledge a little bit what they're hoping for.
36:20 And I thought, okay, I can kind of self-correct a little bit. You've heard the chaos. Now you can see it. Hello. My gosh. Watch all your favorite podcasts from start to finish, right inside the free IHare Radio app. Gets the blood going up. Catch every laugh and eye roll on shows like the Tom Green Farmcast and park the bus. Now with full video.
36:56 We're building a ramp for Tony Hawk. It's the same hosts and the same chemistry with all the hilarious moments you've been missing. Right on your screen. Cheers. Open the free IHRR Radio. app, search video podcasts, and tap watch. Now, Bloomberg.com subscribers can shape the conversation on Bloomberg Radio. We got a weak and smart question.
37:16 Can be part of the conversation. Submit questions for experts and guests you hear on air. Visit Bloomberg.com slash Ask Radio to send questions to our hosts. You may just hear them asked on the air. Exclusively for Bloomberg.com subscribers. Get answers on today's headlines. Breaking earnings news. And big market moves.
37:33 Visit Bloomberg.com slash Ask Radio to do. join the conversation right here on Bloomberg Radio. Speaking of your interest in Latin American music, you tell a story about, and I think it's actually the first chapter of the book, the Brazilian artist Tomse, and you went down to Brazil, and you tell a story of someone getting a big stack of records, and the cover of this one record was a little different. You checked it out, and it was amazing, but it was an artist that not many people had been familiar with, you repopularized him from your label. But rather than just talk about that per se,
38:10 I want to ask, like, you know, something that I've observed that has really changed in my lifetime is that it used to be that anything that was sort of avant-garde, whether it was music, whether it was political ideas, et cetera, it used to be really hard to find. Like, it used to be that, like, if you wanted to read sort of heterodox political philosophy, you had to go to obscure bookstores. When I was younger, if I wanted to seek out a sort of indie music of some sorts, I used to literally write letters to record labels, and then they would like send back the catalogs. This was like in the early 90s, et cetera. The thing that's changed is that very mainstream musicians are, and very avant-garde musicians are both just a one-click away now.
38:55 You just type in a different name on Spotify, et cetera. And so the digitization process of everything removes that sort of physical link that used to exist between sort of like you really had to put in work to find the avant-garde thing before. Physical work enough in many cases. Go to location. Go to Brazil, et cetera. Now you don't. How does that change the sort of discovery of the sleeping beauties when the sort of physical constraints are no longer there? Everything is just a surge way.
39:29 I'm going to agree and also push back on it. Okay, great. On some of that. I think not everything is on streaming or on the internet. I remember hearing a talk, I think, from Bob Woodward or someone. When we talked about some research he was doing from a book, and he realized that there was something in somebody's basement. They had boxes full of files, and it was physical stuff.
40:00 I mean, the internet was there, but those things just weren't on it. And he had to go and go to this person's basement. And I thought, yeah, there's still stuff that's kind of hidden from view. But that said, I definitely agree that with streaming music, to some extent, with films and other kinds of information, I know especially with music. a whole generation. If they want to, if they're interested in something that's old, they can just listen to it. And if they like it, add it to their playlist.
40:40 So they end up, I think, sometimes with playlists that mix all these different genres. They come from different decades, different eras, which is kind of great. They're just putting it in there because they like it, not because of a lot of, oh, this is the cool thing that's happening right at this moment. On these services, there's very little information. Yeah. I mean, you can dig and get the information, but what's... But the liner notes used to be a really fun part of buying a record.
41:15 Yeah, and you know, like, oh, this is produced by so-and-so. It's done by that, and this is who wrote it. Looking at the art and stuff. Yeah, yeah. So there's very little of that, which I missed some of that, But it also has the advantage of when you don't know, then you're not kind of put off by any of those factors like how when it was done, the dates or whatever. You're just listening kind of blind and going, I like that. I don't know.
41:44 How it was received at the time, where it fits in. It's kind of a lot of the context is kind of removed. Conversely, though, the fact that all this information, and cultural content is now available on the internet or on streaming services means that in some ways discovery also gets harder. There's an information overload, I guess, like a curation problem. So, for instance, I went to L.A. recently. I went to a random Tiki bar out in the suburbs and they had on a haunted surf tiki playlist, which was a genre that I never knew existed. but apparently there are a lot of, you know, sort of like Halloweeny surf songs out there. I never would have thought to put that in the search engine bar on Spotify.
42:35 There's a playlist there, but I would not have gone looking for it. I would have been listening to any of the like hundreds of other songs that the algorithm was recommending to me. Today, when we're sort of overwhelmed by both informational and content choices, What does that mean for the rediscovery of old ideas? You're absolutely right. When there's so much out there, as I was doing some of this research, I saw the Condoleez of Rice who said that part of the problem with the Challenger explosion was a filter problem. The information and the warning about the O-Rings and all this stuff was out there.
43:17 It wasn't like nobody knew. it was out there. But when there's so much information, it doesn't like jump out and say, over here, take a look at this. Yeah, you can miss things, even if they're still there. Can I ask a question from one musician to another?
43:37 I have a band. We play country music. This is just a pure music question, actually. It has nothing to do with discovery things. Any particular kind of country music? No, I would say. it's like kind of like down the middle country, maybe a little bit classic, et cetera. But I'm like a very bad guitarist, so I write all my songs in G or C because those are easy chords for me to play.
44:02 Is there any difference between scales? So it's like if I write a song in G major and then someone else plays the song, it's like, I could have written it in C major or A major. These are all easy chords to play. In your experience, is there a difference? said, does something change when you transpose a song into a different scale? I only realized kind of recently that you can transpose a song into it when I'm in the writing process. You can move it into another key and try it a little higher, try it to different places.
44:37 And eventually you hit one and you go, oh, that's the sweet spot for my voice. For your voice. For my voice. But is the song the same? That's a good question. I know that sometimes, especially on guitar, you're saying like a G chord, has a lot of open strings in it. So you hit it and it just rings out. Whereas if you're playing, I don't know, a B flat or whatever, it doesn't ring out the same way.
45:01 Yeah. You might have to put a capo, a thing to adjust kind of where the neck of the guitar hits and all this kind of thing to get that kind of effect. You might be able to recreate that effect. but yeah the guitar itself sounds different which gives a kind of different feeling depending on what key you're playing it in the way the notes are stacked on a guitar or on a piano probably has a different feeling too but well the good news for me was you can which I thought why didn't I know this earlier you can move stuff until it hits kind of the sweet spot for your voice I don't have a music question I'm sorry
45:43 But maybe it relates to musicians. What's the cost of not recognizing good ideas, good songs contemporaneously? So, okay, maybe Joe isn't recognized in his own time as a great country music singer and we don't get good country songs from Joe or more good country songs from Joe. Maybe in the example of concrete, if we had been using the Roman recipe before, we would have had longer lasting buildings, less energy, expenditure, less global warming, things like that. Talk to us about the cost of not recognizing these things in their own time.
46:20 It's a little hard to talk about the cost of, say, not recognizing musicians or composers or painters or things like that. I think it's real. That cost is real, but it's hard to measure. The kind of pleasure and joy and satisfaction you get from something like that. And what it means for you, maybe giving you insights and kind of psychological and other kinds of benefits you get to, it's kind of hard to measure. So that kind of gets maybe pushed aside and disregarded to some extent. Whereas, as you said, something like concrete or the medical, medical things like there's a story on hand washing where people are just, people are dying. And all they need to do is for the doctors to wash.
47:10 their hands. And yeah, so you realize, no, in many cases, it's very measurable. These lives could have been saved. These buildings could have been lasted, had less energy intensive and they could have lasted longer. That's pretty easy to measure. One way that new ideas, old ideas could be rediscovered and then applied is, I think by an individual being sort of aggressively pluralistic about what they consume. So like read a lot of,
47:46 like, you know, read a lot of books that aren't necessarily in your beat. We cover markets, finance and economics, but I think we would be worse at it if we only read books about markets finance and economics. On the other hand, and maybe this is just me and maybe this is just the curse of how my brain works, I have this tendency to like read anything and I'm like, oh, that's really applicable right now. And then I'll read the next book. Oh, amazing. That's really applicable right now.
48:14 And then I'll read the next book. I'm like, wow, the lessons of this book. That just sounds like what's happening right now. And our brains can actually are very good at over metaphorizing maybe example. So like, I don't know if that's a word. But it's tempting to like look at anything. It's like, wow, that's like that's like. How do we avoid sleeping uglies?
48:33 Yeah. How do you avoid this sort of find every new thing you come across? to say, wow, we should all be talking about that again because our brains are so good and maybe coming up with a tortured reason why this idea of old is actually very relevant to now. I have to say, I do the same thing and I think it's pretty good. Okay. There's a story in here about a woman scientist, Lynn Margulis, who basically ended up, she proposed, and it was later confirmed and proven.
49:08 that the cells in our bodies, the cells in plants, are the result of a symbiotic merging between an early kind of organism and bacteria. Yeah. The bacteria became the mitochondria that provided the energy from oxygen or from sunlight or whatever and whatever. So this evolutionary, big, big, big step millions of years ago came as a result of a kind of symbiotic cooperation. Yep.
49:40 And so I immediately go, ha-ha, cooperation is key. And there's another story about this Russian evolutionary anarchist philosopher guy, Kropotkin, who also says sometimes cooperation is a better strategy than competition. Not always, but sometimes. And of course, I thought, okay, wow, that is a kind of metaphor. that I can just cut and paste all over the place and see where it fits. I like the lichen guy who very early on caught on to the idea that lichens were an amalgamation of, I guess, fungi and algae. And no one believed him to the extent that his name became an insult in the academic community.
50:31 What was this name again? It started with like an S or? I can't remember. I can't remember. It sounded like a good insult, but I mean, poor guy because he was directionally correct. Yeah. Schwarzkopf or something like that. Yes. But yeah, I can't remember the exact name. But yes.
50:47 He's proved right. But that's interesting to say, I'm currently because AI is like everything right now. So I'm trying to learn a little bit more about that. I'm reading this interesting book. It's called What is Intelligence Kim Body year ago. And he says the exact same thing that actually evolution is co-evolution. That if you look at the history of things that basically, the way the world emerges is there's thing A and there's thing B, and they merge. And if it works out
51:14 really well, if this new structure works, then that becomes the thing A again, that that's the, that that becomes the fundamental unit. And then it's sort of like, gets bigger and bigger. And then that new thing will merge with another thing B. And if that works, that becomes a thing. And that life is essentially, or sort of like the growing complexity of the world is essentially, not necessarily a form of like Darwinian randomness where like maybe something, there's a bunch of mutations and some of them work out well, that actually it's a little bit more ordered and structured
51:51 by which new things emerge because they work out really well when they cooperate during that process of symbiosis and that that becomes the new unit of life or whatever it is. Maybe there were musicians, individuals, and then suddenly it turned out that a band could be a unit, economics or whatever and then so forth. So this idea of like, yeah, I don't know where I'm going with this, but this idea that like the symbiosis as the thing, cooperation as the thing that drives life and creativity forward, a lot of people seem to be, this seems to resonate with
52:26 a lot of people. Yeah, and it's coming from a lot of different areas, whether it's economics or biology or whatever. It's coming, yeah, as a metaphor, it's kind of, you're springing up here and there and you go, oh, okay, this is a real thing now. Yeah. Shwenderest was the insult. You're a real schwendorist. That's a good one.
52:48 Which sounds cutting. But the guy was right. It'd be unjust to his legacy. It sounds like it could be like a classic a Yiddish insult. Doesn't it? It's like, oh, the schwendorist. Can I ask, do you have any intuitions
53:02 or a gut sense of where we should be looking for sleeping beauties today? like particular places where maybe our biases have prevented us from seeing these old ideas. If I knew that for sure, I'd be a very rich person. Yes, I'd be coming on this show for a different reason. But like you mentioned earlier, one technique seems to be kind of a pluralistic... Cross-disciplinary approach.
53:34 Yeah, if don't be in your silo... You have to be to some extent, but don't be too isolated in your silo. Along the same lines, there's the idea of how things get labeled and classified. That puts them into a box or a silo or whatever, and they can stay in there. Various kind of academics are trying to use formulas and different things to find patterns. AI might be, might be interested. I mean, it is good at pattern identification. So you might see that in academic things,
54:18 where something's measurable like citations. Yeah. In science papers, if you see a little tiny uptick. If the uptick, if the ramp of the uptick takes a certain curve, you go, don't-na-na-an-na, alarm goes off. Something's happening there. But that's, again, something that, It's fairly easy to measure.
54:41 Some of the other things are a little bit harder. 20 something years ago, or you got into making art out of PowerPoint, was the world ready at that point? Or was that this sort of thing that like in the year 2050? Like, how old was the reception to that? And what would be like maybe it was a little bit too early like Moby Dick was. Yeah, I did. I decided that PowerPoint would be an art medium because you can throw everything into it.
55:07 You can throw type, you can throw pictures, you can throw films, you can show sound, and you can just, it's like this basket, you can throw everything in there, and it'll animate them and do all this things in a very clunky way, but whatever. So I wasn't, I wasn't dealing with whether it makes a good and accurate presentation or not. I was dealing with it in another way and saying, it's a creative medium. And, of course, a lot of people found this very funny because they have to deal with it. in their daily lives. And they probably hate it. Yeah, they probably all hate it. Okay, now wait a second.
55:42 I'm sure some junior analysts think that PowerPoint is indeed an art form. Really? You think so? I'm being facetious, but... They treated it that way. So I did this kind of presentation about this idea. And I told, as part of it, I told kind of the history of the development of PowerPoint. And I remember doing it, doing one of these in Berkeley. And of course, some of the guys that did it were there in the audience.
56:10 They came to see what was happening. And I said, they're here, so-and-so, will you stand up? Uh-uh. They wouldn't do it. They wouldn't show themselves. Yeah, it's not very loved. But I thought, oh, now you can have fun with it. When you wrote the song Glass, Concrete, and Stone by that point,
56:34 Did you know about Roman concrete? No, I did not. No, I did not. David Byrne, thank you so much for coming on novels. Thank you. Thank you. Tracy, that was a lot of fun. I feel like everything he writes about in his book resonates with us both on the specific level,
57:01 as in the specific things he identifies are very interesting and very us, like, concrete, but also resonates with us in the sense of like just finding things that like other people have forgotten or ignored or looked over. Absolutely. I mean, the virality of ideas is something that we've talked about before. It's funny to think, I never thought we'd be talking to David Byrne about concrete. And I had the song going through my head during the conversation. You may find yourself on a beautiful podcast in a random part of the world talking about concrete. We should have gotten into this. but he talks a little bit about the power structures that restrain good ideas from taking hold.
57:48 And it kind of comes up in the background of something like concrete, where there were vested interests who maybe don't want to use a particular concrete formula because they base their entire business on Portland Concrete. It comes up in his chapter about solar panels where, you know, it turns out there was an early iteration of solar panels that could have been groundbreaking for the world, but obviously there were vested interest in oil and things like that. And so there are these power structures that restrain a lot of good ideas from taking hold. I do think his conclusions, the sort of cross-disciplinary approach to resurfacing some of this stuff, is really interesting and harder than it seems.
58:27 Like this is almost a fundamental question when it comes to information science, because the tendency of human beings is to want to neatly categorize everything, taxonomize everything, slot everything into neat little categories. expertise is often very siloed. It's hard to become a generalist or it's hard to become a good generalist. And so really figuring out how to bring those different disciplines or approaches together, like that seems to be the real challenge here. Like, why aren't contractors reading, you know, like ancient Roman architectural texts? They could have been. You know, I bet like, so for example, I bet if you went to like an architecture school, I bet they are. Like in this sense, they're probably, you know, there's some sort of course. I know, I know a couple of architects. So I'll ask them if, like, as part of getting a degree in architecture.
59:15 Wait, but I said contractor, not architect. Someone who's, like, actually building materials. No, you're right. I think the contractors need to be reading that stuff. Read the classics. Read the classics of engineering. It's interesting to think. So there's a couple of things that, like, I think digitization of almost all knowledge now
59:39 is, like, going to be really important. And like, it's still day one. The internet's only been around for a few minutes and the feels longer. No, for real. Like in the grain history of things, like, we're just getting started. But digitization is going to be really important for a couple of reasons just because, like, the sort of like the physical effort that used to be required to, like, find some sort of a song or whatever. Like, that's kind of gone for the most part. And then, like, obviously, and I'm glad, like, we didn't waste our time talking forever about AI. But, like, A.I. is going to get very good at cross-disciplinary identification.
01:00:15 If the shape of one solution. If it's tagged correctly. No, but if the shape, like not necessarily because if the shape of one solution, I think this is actually what we're discovering with some of the math proofs, for example, is that if the shape of one solution resembles the shape of an unknown solution, it can then like fill it in. And there are all sorts of things in science like this. You know, for example, like, and this is obviously pre-AI, but like, you know, the shape of particle physics turns out it resembles the shape of stock market behavior in certain ways.
01:00:51 Yeah, that's true. That's true. And so forth. And I think that like, you know, in an AI model, like these shapes are going to be embedded in nearby multidimensional space. And like we may just sort of like, you know, we might get a flurry essentially of sleeping beauty rediscovery as. is people pursue a different problem. People pursue some new solution to something. And the model gets really good at sort of like pulling in something from a cross-disciplinary plane. It's like this shape could resemble the solution. So I think like it's possible, like we might just have the ultimate sleeping beauty discovery engine for better or worse. I just asked chat GPT if I can make Roman, ancient Roman concrete at home. And it says I can make a Roman style.
01:01:40 concrete test block with hydrated lime, natural pazolin, water and stone aggregate. It's telling me that I must not, under any circumstances, try the hot mixing method with quick lime at home because quick lime reacts violently with water and causes serious chemical burns. Wow. Okay. So that's valuable information. Be careful, Tracy. All right. Shall we leave it there? Let's leave it there. This has been another episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Allaway. You can follow me at Tracy Allaway. And I'm Joe Wisenthall. You can follow me at the stalwart. Check out David Burns' new book, Sleeping Beauties, why good ideas go dormant and how they wake up. Follow our producers, Carmen Rodriguez, at Carmen Armin, Dashel Bennett at Dashbot. Kale Brooks at Kail Brooks and Kevin Lazzano at Kevin
01:02:27 Lloyd-Lisano. And of course, you could chat about all of these topics 24-7 in our Discord. Discord.org.org. We even have a music channel in there. And for more OddLod's content, go check out our newsletter, which you can find at Bloomberg.com slash oddlots. And if you enjoyed this conversation, if you like it when we talk about music and resurfacing good old ideas, then please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. If you're watching on video and you like the show, then please leave a comment or hit the like button. Or better yet, subscribe. And remember, if you're a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad-free.
01:03:03 All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow. the instructions there. Thanks for joining.
There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click any sentence in the transcript to leave one.