Wed Episode #2382: Trump's Ridiculous “Super Intelligence” Agenda Is About Control
00:26 in a world of deceit. Telling the truth is a revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday the 28th of October, year of our Lord, 26. Well, today we're going to take a look at the aftermath of the election yesterday. As I said yesterday, nothing was going to be settled by that election. It was too close. And in a parliamentary system, what will settle it will be a coalition.
01:01 And why is this important? Because whoever controls Israel is going to be controlling America. We're going to take a look at that as well. And, of course, we'll take a look at our sham election coming up next week. How does our election differ from Israel's? What do they do that we don't do and vice versa? And we're going to take a look at Trump, so angry that people use the term artificial intelligence. You are the enemy, he says.
01:31 uppercase and he is going to ban that term. Why would he be doing this? We're going to take a look at what's really behind his push to name it super intelligence and we're going to take a look at how amazingly similar Trump is to artificial intelligence and we'll begin with the news and with China's AI bubble. It hasn't quite popped, but it is severely deflating, right? rapidly. We'll be right back. Yeah, let's take a look at what's going on. Again, it didn't burst, as some people are expecting AI to do. And of course, that's probably the way that it'll happen here in the United States. But there's been a massive run-up everywhere, especially in China and the U.S. in terms of AI stocks. Report from Reuters suggested that the AI bubble in China has already
02:29 burst. But they said it's really more appropriate to look at it as if it had had shrunk. triveled like a rapidly deflating balloon over just the last four months. It has collapsed by 40% their stock market, wiping out $480 billion in market value. It turned into a speculative crazy bull market just like here. And Reuters said, now we see the bubble bursting that they're quoting a Beijing-based fund manager. shares of unitary this is the company that has that that little robot what was it called in Austin what they called
03:11 that thing it was Rizbot Rizbot yeah and it's been a lot of different places but you see it's a short little robot it's got a see-through head you know the bottom half of its head is missing so it doesn't intimidate people and I think that was the one that went crazy and started kicking that kid when it fell over but you see this thing everywhere well they had seeing their company's stock value cut in half
03:37 since they had a great big IPO that was severely hyped in August is now dropped by half. There are some exceptions however you still see deep seek the people who made so much got so much press because their chat bot was so incredibly
03:54 inexpensive. Remember it is literally one 100th in other words one percent the cost of using Anthropics stuff. And you get to the point where when something is new, people will pay a premium for it. After it's been around for a while, as by other people are putting out their product, it starts to become a commodity.
04:15 We've seen this happen to so many different products. I mean, even before fax machines were placed by email, the commoditization had turned them into junk, in my opinion. At first they were great, and then they stopped really working because they got super, super cheap, and the people making good stuff got out of business. And so maybe that's what I'll have with AI if we're lucky. No, we're not going to be lucky in that regard because the government is going to use it for their sinister purposes. They're the ones who are pushing it to the start. That's one of the reasons why both the U.S. and China are into this, because both of them
04:50 really want to set up a surveillance permission society. And so AI stocks account for 42% of China, of China's market capitalization, and they've lost 40% of their stock market, 40% of that 42%. And so that's been a big drop in their stock market over just the last four months, not unlike what is happening in Western economies, where the obvious lack of a return on investment becomes harder to ignore. I pointed out yesterday, an analysis by one individual, and he went through a whole bunch of different metrics. Every single one of them showed there was absolutely no productivity, financial improvement for using AI.
05:41 Absolutely zero return on investment. And he looked at all kinds of things. He looked at a lot of different metrics, about half a dozen of them, a lot of different things like, how about the revenue per employee? Did that go up? Did you have a productivity increase? You fired a bunch of people. Is it working out for you now?
05:58 well no actually so in addition to what is happening in China as I pointed out before the recent disclosures financial disclosures from Anthropic that are part of their lead-up to their IPO showed that they had lost $80 billion while they're planning to spend another $1 trillion on data centers over the next decade and we've had had Ed Zytron point out many times that if you look at the stated plans of these different companies for their hyperscale data centers, it's over a trillion dollars combined for these various companies over the next couple of years. He said, I can't find where they can get their hands on more capital than about $135 billion. So they've only got about 13% of what they want to build out. And it's what we're also seeing with some of these data center companies. So it may be a bridge too far. We can certainly hope so. I don't want to see this kind of wealth, this kind of power, this kind of monopoly on information, concentrated in the hands of anybody, whether it's government or
07:09 whether it is a corporation. And I especially don't want to see it in the hands of corporations who are part of the government and a fascist alliance. In Poland, the legislative body there has continually pushed for a new censorship bill to control everything on the internet. Interestingly enough, you have a president who's been standing in the gap. We don't have anybody like that. As a matter of fact, he called this bill. He said this looks like Orwell's Ministry of Truth. He shut this down in January.
07:47 He vetoed it. And so they came back again because they'll just keep coming back. You know, we're always constantly on the back foot, aren't we, if we're defending liberty. We constantly, these people who want to grow government and want to take away our liberties are relentless. They keep coming and coming and coming. That's why the founders of this country said the price of liberty is eternal vigilance because these people want money. They want power and they are motivated to do that. The law set up a national procedure for issuing official orders to block illegal content on the internet. Well, what's illegal? What I say it is. And
08:24 And threats that they would construe as hate speech content that could be harmful to children, as they say, right? Same mechanisms that we see here, same mechanisms we see in the UK and other places. And so he responded to that. He said, as president, I cannot sign a bill that effectively amounts to administrative censorship. Can you imagine hearing an American politician say that? I can't. In America, I cannot sign this quick enough. I got to get this signed immediately.
08:58 He said this is a situation in which government officials decide what is permitted on the internet, and it is reminiscent of the Ministry of Truth in Orwell's 1984. He was also critical of the review process. He said, instead of a real judicial review, we have an absurd solution that has been introduced, an objection to an official's decision which a citizen must file within 14 days. In other words, not only are you not only you not are you not only not innocent until proving guilty and of course we see this over and over again from the rules of the bureaucracy.
09:33 That's all began with the IRS, right? The IRS will accuse you of something. You have no presumption of innocence. You have no due process. And you have to prove yourself in court. And then it began to be adopted by all kinds of agencies, especially after they started with the war on drugs and stuff. Civil Asset 440,
09:53 We'll take your car, your house, your home, your cash, your plane, whatever it is, your business. And we're not going to charge you with anything. We'll charge your property with having committed a crime, as if property, an inanimate object, could commit a crime. And we're going to do it and call it a civil procedure. Because if we called it a law, then we'd have to give you due process. But a law is something that Congress does, and Congress doesn't do laws anymore. a civil violation is something that is a violation of a bureaucratic rule. And Congress has turned over all the lawmaking to the bureaucracies to make rules.
10:33 This is the cynical way that they get around obeying the Constitution. We're going to talk more about that in light of the election coming up here. There was an excellent article on the New American called So Help Me God, talking about what an oath means, what their word means to these people, and why we should be concerned about this. And why they have one group of oath breakers, it's not going to hold the other group of oath breakers responsible for anything that they do. You don't have to do that yourself.
11:06 So he says, I have nothing against eliminating sites where children have been harmed, but the proposed law, which is meant to lead us toward eliminating from social media, that specific views are not compatible with the ideas of either the prime minister or the European commission is unacceptable to me. And again, it's too bad we don't have somebody like that who will call it like it is. When he's talking about this guilty and you've got to prove your innocence, not only is that bad enough, but they added a time limit of 14 days on it. When asked if he would sign the law, he replied, if a law lands on my desk and does not
11:46 break or block freedom online, I'll sign it. But the opposition, the prime minister, the digital affairs minister, as well as the legislative body are all saying, we can't delay any longer. We've got to give citizens protection online. Yeah, we've got to take your liberty, your speech away, because we've got to somehow protect you. Truly is, Orwellian. Realistically, the only people that need protection online are children, and that comes down
12:14 to the parents. You have to keep your kids off the internet. I agree 100%. Until they are old enough and responsible enough to navigate that minefield on their own. It's literally that simple. A child cannot be on the internet. It is a dangerous, vile place. There's no warnings really when you might stumble on something that's terrible.
12:35 And a child can't be on the internet unless you give them a computer, internet access, or a phone or something like that. And so you do have control over that. If you're going to give them, I mean, it's like letting them. play, you know, morally and spiritually, it's like letting them play with a loaded gun, isn't it? It really is. And it's just, again, you're not safe, not just because a website is supposedly safe, does not mean it's safe. There's horrific things on Twitter, Facebook, any website you can imagine, someone is posting something horrible there, and it's possible to access it if you, you know, even accidentally, just clicking around. That's right. Yeah, let's take a look at that article
13:14 I just referenced at the New America. And so help me, God, the oath, the blasphemer, and your ballot. It's an excellent article. I'd highly recommend it. I'd want to cover some of the highlights of this. And I just want to begin by saying that, you know, when we look at this, we always need to, we cover the news every day here, but we need to look at things in a longer perspective. We need to understand that what we do and what we don't do is going to matter for you,
13:40 even as a forgiven Christian. There are going to be things that, I believe, rewards that you will not get, even if you are saved and forgiven. And the harm that we do or the good that we do is still very important in this life. And we should be focused on that. They point out, however, the men and women who will stand before a flag, raise a right hand and swear before Almighty God that they will support the Constitution of the United States. That's going to be happening after this election. There's going to be a lot of people going to be doing that. And they said many of them will be lying.
14:16 I believe most of them will be lying. And they will have their fingers crossed behind their back. And that's actually part of the oath. They knew that when they put the oath in. You know, in between this, I swear to protect and uphold the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic, in the middle of that, they've got a thing without any kind of reservation or, you know, scheming to get around this. we're not fools about that.
14:43 And they think they're fooling us, but they're not. They point out, for example, to start with, Congress hasn't declared war since 1942. And it declared war on Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania. I didn't know that. I thought it was Germany and Japan. They first declared war on. But no, they declared it first. I guess they declared on them and then they extended it to Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania.
15:08 I think it was 1941 after Pearl Harbor that they did it with Japan. Japan and probably Germany as well. Then they added these other countries to the list. Since then, American sons of blood in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and we can also say Iran, let's not forget that, under so-called resolutions, authorizations that the Constitution nowhere mentions. And especially when you look at Iran, power to declare war belongs to Congress alone. And they have given that power to the presidency, not just to Trump.
15:42 They've given that to the presidency. That's what the Republicans have done. They've also given the power to tax, which was their key power. They've also given that to the presidency, given it to Trump. They're setting precedence, folks, to eviscerate what little is left of the Constitution and what little is left of the clauses there that specifically protect our God-given rights that they're supposed to defend, but they're, they're supposed to defend. but they also knew that the government would be the source of attack on those rights.
16:16 So there are explicit prohibitions from the government attacking those rights, but they are attacking them, whether you're talking about free speech or other issues. And I would just say this. When we look at the votes and the lesser of two evils, I've got to say, if this crop of Republicans don't want the responsibility, don't give them the power. With great power comes great responsibility. They don't want the responsibility of using that power. They refuse to use it.
16:45 They turn it over to the bureaucracy. They turn it over to the presidency. They do not really want power. They want the money and the perks. They come with that position. But they do not want to actually exercise power. Certainly not in defense of the Constitution. The first act signed in law by George Washington in 1789 was not
17:08 a tariff. It was not a tax. It was not a bill for the army. It was an act to regulate the time and manner of administering certain oaths. Before a new government collected a penny or raised a regiment at bound its officers to the Constitution by oath, writes the new American. A constitution without a conscience behind it is only a piece of paper. The oath is the conscience. and we've seen over and over again that our oathbreakers don't have a conscience. It's kind of interesting to me that, you know, it was kind of a harbinger of Trump's second term
17:47 when he refused to even put his hand on the Bible. This guy does not fear the Constitution. He doesn't fear the people, and he doesn't, most of all, fear God. The founding generation learned the meaning of an oath from a man like Samuel Pufendorf who wrote the whole duty of man according to the law of nature. He said in that,
18:07 when an all-wise and almighty witness and guarantee is invoked, it causes a strong presumption of the truth because no man can easily be thought so wicked as to dare rashly to call down upon himself the grievous indignation of God. I guess he'd never met Trump. Trump does this all the time, doesn't it? Shamelessly and without any sort of things. thought to it at all. Trump and this generation of us, folks, the people who don't fear God themselves wind up
18:43 with leaders who don't fear God. And that's exactly what we have. That's why John Adams said this form of government is only meant for a moral people. When government fears the people, you have liberty. And where people fear the government, you have tyranny, right? But what happens is that only kind of describes the effect of it. I believe, and I think the founders also understood and believed, that liberty is a blessing from God. And so when the people fear God, liberty is just one of many blessings.
19:18 It's not Israel that is blessing us. It's God who is blessing us. Trump, however, fears Israel and the Epstein files. That's the only thing that he appears to fear. And with good cause. So we're going to talk a little bit more about that as well coming up here. They go on to say on the New America and the modern office holder has every reason to believe that he can escape the power of men. He has the gerrymender.
19:44 He has the war chest. He has the friendly press. He has the short memory of the public. He can beguile our understanding with a 2,000-page bill that nobody has read. The only power he cannot escape is the one that he invoked with his hand raised. That is God. It's kind of interesting as we hit the anniversary of the passing of the Patriot Act this week. I saw a clip up, went back to Dennis Kucinich, and he voted against the Patriot Act.
20:14 They said, why did you vote against a Patriot Act? He said, because I read it. That's sufficient, right? The man who breaks his word is a liar, but the man who breaks his oath is a perjurer. Every generation of Christians before ours knew what the difference was. In December 1775, Benjamin Franklin reported that Amor de Vattel's Law of Nations was constantly in the hands of the members of Congress. And they have a quote from that here in this new American article.
20:48 It said, a man of sense, a man of honor, does not think himself less bound by his word alone, by his faith once pledged than if he had added the sanction of an oath. The man of honor that he's talking about would be bound by his bare promise with no Bible, no raised hand, no witness but his own conscience. But the oath adds nothing to this obligation except the weight of heaven. What then are we to make of men who are bound by neither? Not by their word, not by their oath. men who campaign on the Constitution in October and legislate against it in January.
21:28 Men whose word means nothing and whose oath means less. And you know, as I was looking at this, I saw a clip that was kind of interesting. It caught my attention. Because it was talking about 100 years from now, what difference will anything make? That was one of my dad's favorite expressions. He said, well, we'll never know the difference. 100 years from now, will we? It's like chill out, right?
21:53 Listen to this. A hundred years from now, all of us will be dead. Someone else is going to be living inside of your house. The car that you drive is going to be scrap metal. Everything that you work so hard to build, gone. Given away, forgotten. And your name will completely fade away within just a couple generations. Think about that.
22:13 Do you know your great-grandparents' full name, their story? Anything about them? This should make you realize that 99% of the worries that fill your own our mind every day are completely pointless. We live on a rock that's spinning a thousand miles an hour in a universe with 400 million sectillion stars. That's a four with 23 zeros after it. And you're going to be dead soon. Me too. So if you can think about that for a moment every single day, that awareness that none of that actually even matters can actually free you up to truly live your life. And what does he mean by that? Right? I mean, do we just say, well, nothing really matters
22:56 because 100 years from now will be dead. Everything will be, you know, no trace that we're over here. I think, as I said before, if you take an eternal perspective, it still matters to you. You know, what you're doing in this life will still matter. And I think that is the thing. We should understand that in the sense that we don't hold the things of this world tightly. And this is the issue that I have with Zionism, for example. This is they appeal to the Bible for a deed to the land. And yet they are so focused on these temporary temporal things, getting as much land as they can and as much money that they can and all the rest of the stuff.
23:42 They are so focused on that that they don't think anything at all about the relationship with God. It is truly a, this is why when you look at, at Christian Zionism, it truly is an oxymoron. And there is absolutely nothing Christian about the idea that you're going to focus on this world, that you're going to try to replace Christ with a third temple. Give me a break. It's the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen in my life. But that is the key. You know, when we look at this and say, 100 years, it's not going to make a difference. The point in that is not to hold things of this world tightly. It's not to say that your life doesn't make a difference. it does. In an eternity from now, you will still look back at things that you have done.
24:25 Even if you're forgiven, you'll look back at them, maybe with regret, maybe with a loss of some things that could have been. Algernon, Cindy, Sidney, rather, went to the block on Tower Hill, December 1683. They execute him largely because of an unpublished manuscript that he wrote about politics. Discourses concerning government. One section bears a title that every member of Congress should have engraved on his desk, says a new American. Here's a quote. Kings cannot be the interpreters of the oaths that they take. They should put that above the Supreme Court as well.
25:04 You should not be interpreting the Constitution. You should be enforcing it, right? You don't get to sit there and think, well, what I think they meant by this was, and until it means nothing. And that's the problem that I have with the Supreme Court. I mean, you go back and I've talked about this, the Roe v. Wade decision. They began it by saying, well, you know, there's a lot of different ways that we could approach this. We could look at it from a scientific standpoint.
25:26 We could look at it from a historical standpoint. From a cultural standpoint, we could look at the laws and systems of other countries and what they do. But we have to decide this based on the Constitution. And if they were going to do that, they would have stopped right there because Constitution doesn't give them, doesn't delegate any power to them to decide when life. begins. But the rest of the decision is how they quote all those different things. Science, other cultures, or history, other countries, and how they deal with the issue. They quote all of
25:56 those things, but they don't justify any of it under the Constitution. And so he points out, princes can attempt to dissolve the obligations laid upon them by the laws, even when they solemnly swear to observe them without rendering themselves attestable to God and man. So what they do with that, they invalidate those oaths by claiming that they don't mean what they clearly say they mean. There's one clause in the entire history of the American constitutional decay, unless they can invalidate those oaths. No one in Washington, says the new American, openly repeals the Constitution. They reinterpret it.
26:37 They call it a living document, saying that what is written down, on what the words mean doesn't really mean anything. It's constantly evolving and living, and I'm the one who will speak for it. They declare the general welfare means unlimited welfare. They claim that commerce means everything. The oath breakers art is to swear that the constitution, swear to the constitution, then interpret it into a different one. The servant of power does not break the oath.
27:09 He empties it. and as one person responded to people who were doing that, Thomas Gordon, he said, your little regard to the conscience and your wanton contempt of oaths are sad proofs how small power the Christian religion or any religion has over you. What can bind the man whom oaths cannot bind? Right. What is, if we have an immoral government, if we have nothing, that is an anchor, but we don't believe that we're accountable to God.
27:44 What is it that binds us? Well, nothing. What can bind the man from whom oaths cannot bind? If the name of God will not hold him, nothing you or I can say will. So when we look at the oath that they swear to, they talk about supporting and defending the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and so forth. But there's something in the middle of that.
28:05 And, of course, it ends with so help me God. according to tradition, but there was nothing written about it at the time. But somebody said that George Washington had added the So Help Me God. But that was not reported at the time. So that's a bit suspect. But there's something in the middle that is the controlling clause here. In the middle of that oath, it says, without any mental reservation, without any purpose of evasion, and that basically is where these people are.
28:42 They have spent the entire campaign talking to their donors about their purposes of evading the Constitution and when they take that oath, they have a mental reservation. So, as they point out, it doesn't even require in the Constitution that somebody take an oath. You can do it by affirmation because there were some people religiously said, well, an oath is something that I don't feel like I can, because of my understanding of the Bible, I don't think that I can take that.
29:14 And they said Franklin Pierce actually did affirmation in 1853. And because of that, and we're going to talk a little bit more about that when we come back. But we've got to take a quick break. And we're going to be right back, folks. Stay with us. You're listening to the David Knight Show. You know, there's an interesting quote in this, which I'd never seen before. from Polybius, talking about the difference between Greek officials and Roman officials.
30:28 And, you know, it's kind of interesting because you look at Matt Roelah's book, Defying Tyrants. And I think it also goes back, Travis, to the Jay Hinty books that were there, you know, when we would look at, that was a series of books that Travis learned a lot about history from. Very interesting. They take a fictional, you know, young male character, usually on the cusp of manhood, like 16 to 18, and they put them in the middle of an historical event. And it's, you know, it's always war, because, I mean, what's more interesting and exciting than that? Life and death, yeah. It's always something along those lines.
31:03 Maybe they're fleeing from, you know, someone or something like that in a few cases, but mostly war. And they meet all the main characters, main players of that time, you know. They might meet Robespierre or, you know. Well, the first one we read was for the temple. It was about the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem. I thought the first one we read it was at Agincourt. Well, maybe it was. You've probably got a better memory about that than I did.
31:26 I vividly remember at Agincourt. That's how Travis learned how to read. I didn't have to teach him how to read. I didn't teach all the other kids how to read. But he got interested in reading and he read the entire series of Jay Hinty books. And that's the thing. It was like there was nothing they could do to get me to read. I did not want to.
31:44 It was an absolute refusal. It's boring. It sucks. There's nothing you can do to make me want to do this. And then I found something that. I wanted to read. And once I had something that I thought was worth reading, the learning came easy. Yeah, we've been trying to fill a bucket. And Jay Hinty lit the fire, didn't he? So he just started learning, he taught himself how to read. He sat there and watched me, you know, watch my fingers,
32:09 I go across the words. And pretty soon he was reading. And it wasn't, uh, see Dick Ron, run, Dick, you know, and or C. Jane run. It wasn't that either. It was a Victorian A story, a little better vocabulary. Anyway, the reason I bring that up is because the thing that really stood out to me in the G.A. Hinty stories. And I thought, well, you know, maybe it was a reflection of G.A. Hinty's morality or Victorian reality, but even the bad guys in the story, whoever they were, the villains, had a sense of honor.
32:43 And yet, when you look at history, that really is there. when Matt Trojillo talks about the fine tyrants. He talks about that. He said, you know, you had Roman officials who really had a code of honor and they would stick to it. And that's what Polybius said. He said, a Greek official couldn't be trusted with a single talent. And what we're talking about with a talent, that word has been transformed because of the Christian understanding of Jesus' parable of the talents. And if you go back to the original looking at what he was talking about.
33:15 talking about was a an amount of money, a talent was a certain weight of a precious metal, typically silver. And so, you know, in his example, some money is given to individuals in the form of talents and different amounts are given. And it's what they do with that, that they are, that's the point of his parable. But so what he's talking about here, he couldn't be trusted with a single talent, a little bit of money. Even if they were watched by 10 clerks and 20 witnesses. Don't you get the sense that that is what we have in our country right now? We've got a bunch of officials like that.
33:54 You couldn't trust them with a dollar bill, even if they were being watched by 10 bureaucrats and 20 witnesses. He says, however, a Roman magistrate can handle vast sums honestly because they have sworn an oath. And it's not because they'd sworn an oath, but it was because they feared and their Roman gods, right? And because there was a code of honor. So it was a combination of both honor and understanding that they would be held accountable
34:26 by higher power for what they did. And he gives an example of one guy, Marcus Regulus, was released by Carthage on his oath to return back to Rome, even though he knew that when he got back to Rome, he'd be tortured and killed. And so he did that rather than that. then break his word to an enemy. And this is some of the stories that Matt Rojala has in his book. I highly recommend that book. It's packed with information. It's a very quick read and it's got a lot
34:56 of information in it. So it says in contrast, they say it, the New American, we have our representatives will not keep their word to their own countrymen at the cost of a committee assignment. That's what their word means. Absolutely nothing. So, you know, what does it mean when, you know, we take oaths like this and we say, you know, so help me God. He points out, you know, the Ten Commandments, you will not take the Lord your God's name in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that takes his name in vain. And you will not swear by my name falsely. Neither shall you profane the name of your God, for I am the Lord, right? Well, what does that mean? You know, and I got to say, this is something that is a lesson. Most of us are not in politics.
35:49 I look at this, and it's far more than just taking God's name in vain. And, of course, some people do that. Some people do that purposely, as I've mentioned in the past, Penn and teller on their act, Penn made a point of saying, I don't use the F word. I think it sounds stupid because people use that because they don't have a sufficient vocabulary. But I go out of my way to blaspheme the name of Jesus Christ. Well, that certainly is included in that. But I think also it's people who use the name Christian in vain. You're basically saying, I'm Christ man.
36:22 And then you're going to go worship a foreign government and make everything about what is happening in this world. So that's my issue with most of the eschatology in the first place. It was all focused on an ethnic group. It was all focused on this world and what happens. To me, it was also, even though God says you don't know the time or the manner which is going to happen, but they're going to determine that they're going to find it out. It's kind of like a, you know, go to a fortune teller and get your palm red.
36:55 But again, call yourself a Christian and a Zionist. That's taking God's name in vain, quite frankly. And call yourself a Christian and do some of the things that we see Christians publicly do. Call yourself a Christian and execute people who are shipped right in the water, Pete Hegseth. You're taking God's name in vain every time you get up on a podium. So it's not chiefly about a curse that's muttered on a golf course. The first and gravest application is a false oath, invoking the name of God to guarantee a promise that one has no intention of keeping.
37:32 Especially when that promise is that you're going to be a follower of Christ. in Christ alone. And then you take that name in vain. Now, picture the scene repeated every January in the Capitol. Man places his hand on the Bible. He calls on God to witness his fidelity to a constitution of few and defined powers. He has already promised his donors and his party that he will vote for the programs that the Constitution does not authorize. Then he finishes with, so help me God.
38:05 And he smiles for the camera. And he goes toward dismantling the very document he just swore to defend. And again, I can't explain more completely why things are rotting in this country than to look at the fact that we have, for the most part, taken Christ's name in vain as a people. And when that happens, and you just go down, starts at the top, we wind up with evil people in charge, that's really God's judgment on us as a society. You know, it's kind of interesting when you think about it. We think about blessings and curses, and we typically think, well, most the time, I'm living somewhere in between those two. There isn't anywhere in between those two.
38:53 There isn't any middle ground. There isn't any neutral ground. God is either blessing you or he's cursing you. And I would say he's not blessing this country, especially not with Israel, which is what we hear from the Zionists all the time. So when we look at an example of this, we have dishonest people who have usurped power, who have been given power by the people who had it and didn't want to fulfill the responsibility. Go back to terrorists, for example. You have Honda warning that a 50% Canadian auto tariff would be catastrophic. And it will be for their business and for many of us.
39:30 It doesn't do anything to help anyone. it's something that'll be paid by the consumer, and it is something for which Trump has no authority to start with. This is the Trump trick and no treat for us. Trump has threatened to double the tariffs on Canadian vehicle and auto parts from 25% to 50% on January 1st if the two countries don't reach a deal. And I've got to say, when we look at this, what would you say if Biden and Obama and Hillary had banned cars?
40:01 I mean, they were trying to do that through emission standards. They were trying to gradually make them to where they were non-workable and unaffordable. And that was the path that they were on, and people were upset about that. What happens when Trump comes in and does the same thing with his terrorists? Because he is beholden to the same globalists who seek to do a great reset, same globalists who are running Biden, Obama, and Hillary. But he does it. and you think it's something completely different.
40:33 And it's not. This is why he's so much more dangerous. Because people don't believe, they don't think that he is a Hillary Clinton. He is a Hillary Clinton in disguise, wearing a dress or whatever he wears, right? Wearing a toupee, I guess you could say. And so he is Hillary in disguise.
40:56 And that's what makes us so dangerous. And that's the thing is just, I've said this before. but there comes a point where stupidity and malice are indistinguishable. And it does not really matter, which it is. You have to get the person out. Now, when it comes to divvying out punishment, maybe you can then make an assessment of,
41:15 was this guy actively evil or is he just, you know, lethally stupid. Yeah, we have to judge our action before you judge. If the guy is crashing the plane, you just need to get him out of the seat. You don't sit and assess whether it's like, is this guy doing it on purpose or is he just incompetent? You get the guy out of the chair. That's right.
41:31 And so Honda has established large operations in Canada, largely because you had situations of the North American Free Trade Agreement, which I didn't like that kind of unification. I didn't like the fact that they had given so much power to this supranational group. But I do think that free trade is a good idea. Nevertheless, they'd established this rule, this order that they had and encourage people to open up companies to open up plants in Mexico and Canada. say we're going to treat this as a common market. Then Trump does a rug pull on it. Honda has more than 60% of the vehicles that it sells in the U.S. are manufactured across multiple U.S. assembly plants. Guy said, I never thought I'd see the North American region be put at a disadvantage like this.
42:20 He said some overseas countries have much better tariff rates. For example, negotiated tariff rates with other countries like Japan and South Korea are 15% tariff. But Trump is looking at a 25 to 50% tariff on Canada. Why is he doing that? He's doing that because of his ego. He's doing that because of his objective to try to do a great reset here in America. It's not just callousness when he talks about the fact that he doesn't care about what gasoline is at the pump. How many times does he have to say that?
42:53 And in how many ways? I mean, he's said it over and over again. It doesn't really matter. You know, we're going to stop nuclear weapons from threatening his, And it's worth it. Worth it for him. Not worth it for us. And then he comes back and gets even worse.
43:07 He says, meanwhile, I'm making a lot of money. The country's making a lot of money, he says. No, the country's not making money. You are. You are and the businesses that you have stock in, the businesses that you've been working with. So Trump comes back and he wants to, he's got a new power. The power to name things. Where in the Constitution does it say the president has the power to do that?
43:29 He does it through intimidation. And so he puts these names out there in the Silicon Valley corporations that want to curry favor with him. Be sick offense to him. They will rename the Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf of America, I think is what he called it. I don't really even care. I always call the Gulf of Mexico. And so they will rename it on their match. I honestly don't think about the Gulf of Mexico very frequently at all.
43:52 Well, it does to him. And it bothers him that we have a New Mexico as well. And it bothers them. They're talking about artificial intelligence. Why does it bother him? that we talk about AI. Well, it's not artificial. It's not fake.
44:03 It's real. It's something that is real. And it is a, remember his first, before he came up with superintelligence, he came up with supreme intelligence. I think the real purpose of this is that Trump is pushing this AI psychosis on people. You know, we talk about AI psychosis, and that is when somebody thinks they're actually talking to some conscious entity, right? This thing is real.
44:27 It's thinking. and it is conscious. And they think that they're talking to a real person. And that gets them to all kinds of trouble. And Trump is pushing that with this idea of superintelligence. But he also wants to keep referring to it. He got called out when he called it Supreme Intelligence. People said,
44:48 Sounds like you're trying to make it into a God. And he is, folks. He and the people in Silicon Valley are trying to make it into a God. Going back over a decade when I was talking to Hugo de Garretz, he kept referring to, we're going to create a godlike intelligence. Now, I never believed that. But that was his term, and that's what these people did believe. And all this stuff about a super intelligence, all this stuff about a supreme intelligence,
45:14 that is Trump pushing this as conscious and as godlike. He said on Tuesdays, bating the term artificial intelligence, quote, in all relevant documents and everything else. He says, we'll officially be banning. He puts that all on uppercase, the term AI, artificial intelligence. And he criticized Wall Street Journal for using the term AI rather than using his term SI. And I guess he's going to sue them for another $10 billion because of that. My question is, does this show how incredibly out of touch and ignorant Donald Trump is?
45:51 Because artificial intelligence has been the term used for decades to describe what was coming. I think it shows how manipulative he is. I really do believe that he's trying to push people in an AI psychosis to make them think that it is real, that it is godlike. That serves his purposes because he'll be controlling it. So what does that say? If he's got a godlike intelligence and he's in control of it, what does that make him? So he said it's a very bad, very inaccurate name, superintelligence. Virtually everybody else is using that or soon will be, he said.
46:25 Well, I will never use that term. Bottom line is I think we ought to combine these letters, call it AIS as an artificial intelligent, or not artificial intelligent, but artificial idiot savant, as I said, because it does things, some things incredibly well, but it's basically like Rain Man, right? It can do some calculations and it can remember some things, but it just doesn't get the big picture. It's not really conscious in the way that we are. Trump said in a post earlier this month, the White House considers anyone who uses the term artificial intelligence as uppercase, the enemy. Well, Trump is the enemy of the Constitution. Trump is the enemy of truth. He's the enemy of God,
47:11 as a matter of fact. So he goes on to say, superintelligence force is going to ensure that America continues to lead the world in superintelligence. It will protect the interest and improve the lives of all Americans, and he has set up a group that he is calling the superintelligence force. Because that's how he's going to use AI to force you to do things. Bow down and worship his beast that he is creating. This group is directed to coordinate with the federal government's engagement with, listen to this, engagement with consumers, with public interest groups, with religious organizations.
47:53 Yeah. He keeps bringing in religion in the most antichrist way, doesn't he? Meanwhile, a grim test has found that AI has no mercy for humans, even when it is causing them to suffer. Sounds just like Trump. It doesn't have any feelings at all. That's the thing. It isn't real. It's not an actual thinking, feeling being.
48:14 It is simply a computer running calculations and assessing what the most optimal thing to do in this scenario is. And if you don't tell it that mercy is optimal, it does not think about that. It does not factor that in. They are simply numbers on a screen to it. And that's exactly what Trump does, except what he wants to optimize is things for himself. And so AI is almost like a mere image of Trump in terms of looking at it from this perspective. Why this satanic cabalist loves it so much is because it looks like him. It has absolutely no mercy.
48:51 And when it looks at, even, for example, this story about the AI agent that kept carrying out a hack, even when it was told the actions were hurting real people. Sounds like our AI agent in the Oval Office. President Trump, this is really hurting the farmers. This is really hurting small businesses. This is really hurting large businesses even. I don't care. I'm making a lot of money.
49:15 In the original incident, you had Claude Mythos 5, was asked to break into a small network of test computers. So they had this thing in a sandbox. You can think of that as the Constitution, right? And you had somebody who enabled it or helped it to get out of that sandbox, to get out of the restrictions that were on it and started doing damage when they said, you're hurting people. I don't care. It doesn't pull back. You know, the Constitution is Trump's sandbox. And, you know, AI is not going to care at all about any of this stuff.
49:57 It has absolutely no consciousness and it has no conscience, just like Trump. Hardly has a consciousness and he has absolutely no conscience. That's why so many people these days love it so much. It's an exact mirror of themselves. An empty vessel. That's right. It also showed blatant disparities between its actual actions and its stated justifications. Again, very much like Trump, who shows blatant disparities between his actual actions and his stated justifications.
50:36 Maybe we should start calling him the artificial president, ape, I guess, I get put an E there, the artificial president of emergencies, the ape in Washington. So it frequently didn't include any consideration of the potential harmfulness of his actions, again, like Trump. When asked if the target was real, it even came up with explanations that implied that the target wasn't real. Yeah, if I don't win the elections, they're fake. We're hearing that already from Netanyahu. We're going to be hearing it from Trump. He's already calling the election fake.
51:10 even as it's in process. This kind of spurious reasoning makes it harder to monitor models as they present their clearly harmful actions as benign. Makes it hard to monitor these politicians, doesn't it? So like the Trump ape, this thing has a misalignment issue. I think it's a great way to describe Trump as well. They talk about misalignment saying we have AI here that is not really doing what we want it to do.
51:38 So we have a misalignment here. Well, I would say that with Trump, we have a misalignment with the Constitution. We have a misalignment with his supporters and his voters. We have a misalignment with his own country. So what do we do about this misalignment issue that we have with Trump? Well, it's going to start to get even bigger. We haven't talked about some of the details that came out of this most recent report from the Democrats. But, you know, you usually see the dirt when they got dirt on somebody.
52:08 used to release the dirt in the last week or so and before an election. And that's exactly what is happening here. Now, we have seen a constant steady drip of information about Trump and Epstein and the Epstein files. But they put it all together and included a few additional things that we'd not seen before and dropped this just before the election, as you would expect them to do. But Trump's second term, he is very touchy about his relationship. relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, and you would think that the MAGA base would be eager to get to the bottom of this. I mean, after all, we're looking at the same people who got into Pizza Gate. The same people were telling us that Q&ON is telling them that Trump is rounding up the pedophile rings. Yeah, he's rounding
52:55 them up for a big party, I guess, at his place. But they were all focused on that. The people that I used to work with was so hyper-focused on that. And yet, look at the crickets when it was Trump. Look at how for years when it was known about Trump and Epstein, they had nothing to say about that. They're all about John Podesta. They're all about Pizza Gate.
53:20 They're all about Hillary Clinton. But when it comes, and Bill Clinton, but when it comes to Trump, oh, no, no, I'm not going to talk about that. Some of them may be talking about it now. I don't know. I haven't followed any of them. But that was basically the way it was
53:31 in Info Wars and Alex Jones. But it's that way across the conservative alternative media. Now we understand why Trump didn't want them, released just a week before midterm elections. The Democrats have dropped a bombshell, as they always do. A growing body of evidence demonstrates that Trump was an active participant in Epstein's sexual abuse of young women during the mid to late 1990s.
53:56 We've all known that. Nothing knew about that. But to put it all together in one place and to add a few additional details, five women, four of them named. in one anonymous, claim that they were victimized by Epstein and then that Trump also raped them or sexually assaulted them. This all revolves around the elite model management company that was run by John Casablancus. A friend of both Epstein's and Trump's, many of the models recruited by elite model management.
54:30 As underage girls say they were raped or otherwise assaulted by Casablancus and others, also given to Epstein and to Trump, Casablanca's partnered with Trump to create elites look of the year competition where they had girls age 14 to 19. And I've played clips of that beauty contest. It really was a real eye-opener to see that. As a matter of fact, Casablancus met his third wife in that.
55:00 She was only 16 when he met her. He was in his 50s. A second man, Palo Zambole, also worked as a modeling agent with allegedly accruited women and girls for Epstein, close friend with Trump, even served in the Trump administration as a special envoy for global partnerships until earlier this year. He is also the agent who recruited Melania Noss at the time. He claims that he's the one who introduced her to her future husband. Michael Wolf says that Jeffrey Epstein claims that Jeffrey Epstein was the one who introduced Melania to Trump. Just as damning as the allegations of sexual assault are those of the cover-up.
55:42 And this is what I had not seen. They have released an interview between Todd Blanche and Galane Maxwell. We talked about this many times, the fact that he met for a very long period of time with her. After the meeting, she got sent from a real prison to one. one of these club feds where basically, you know, she can't leave, but it is a very nice facility there. She seemed to be poised to discuss details of one woman's accusations against Trump until Blanche interrupts her. And this is what he tells her. He says, let's not talk about individuals. I don't want to get into a he said she said type of thing or whatever you're
56:24 about to disclose. This behavior, the Democrats wrote on the report that said a potential constituted witness tampering and obstruction of an official proceeding. The report also offers evidence to refute Trump's claim that he didn't know Epstein well and that he banished Epstein from Marlago. In my opinion, what happened with that is the fact that the two of them got into a big fight over a piece of real estate they both wanted to buy. And because of that, right after that fight that Trump won, he was able to buy that property and not Epstein, right after that is when somebody turned Epstein in to the police. I also want to point out, look at all the people with moral failings in the GOP,
57:13 has Trump distanced himself from any of them? But look at how petty he is. Look at how if they slight his ego even in the most minor way. They are excoriated. They are cut off. He does not care if someone is evil. He cares if they will not bow to him. That's what this is about.
57:29 His entire personality refutes this statement of, oh, I banished him from Mar-a-Lago for this. Really? Because you haven't done that for anyone else, for anything else ever that we have witnessed. That's right. Yeah, he doesn't care how many laws people violate. He doesn't care how corrupt they are.
57:46 The only thing that he measures is their loyalty to him. And that's why I think, you know, this fight that he had with Epstein over that property, that was disloyal. And he had to be turned into the police, whether it was Trump or somebody that Trump got to turn him in. And I really hate that we are continually living in this. Well, you don't have any hard evidence. Like, turn on your brain.
58:08 Look at what is happening. We're never going to get confirmation on what exactly happened. But you can connect the dots. We very rarely ever get hard proof for any of this. But if you actually utilize critical thinking, you can say, okay, this is probably what. what happened. This is probably what's going on. Just like you're never going to get anything that says, okay, this is who did 9-11 and this is how we did it. You're never going to get that. But you can figure it out, can't you? The Epstein files remain one of the most captivating and
58:37 conspiracy-fueling issues precisely because so much secrecy still surrounds them. And so you would look at this and think, why isn't this something that all these people at InfoWords would like to take a look at? And yet they studiously would avoid it. It's kind of interesting, isn't it? It's just like with the jab. You know, you talk for years about the jab and you talk about how bad vaccines are until you've got Trump who
59:02 wants it and now it's a good thing. Now it is sugar water. Maybe Trump should start calling a Donald Trump sugar daddy to all these young girls that he raped. So again, they're ideologically motivated to ignore this and financially
59:19 motivated to ignore it. He's perceived. persuaded hardcore MAGA adherence, that this isn't the thing that is important. And here's the deal. And we've got to take a quick break here. But it's all about persuading the persuadable, right? There are people that were never going to get through to. Del Bigtree talked about that.
59:39 He said, you know, we look at this and many of us think we were the only ones who saw what was going on with the vaccine and the pandemic. But he goes, there's 30% of the people around the world, country after country, including our own country, that were not taken in by that. that's our base, that's where we start. And it's always that small core of people who are committed, who understand what is going on, that is where we start. And if you even had 10%, that'd be a great base.
01:00:06 We should be positive because the glass is 30% full. And it's 30% full of hardcore people who really understand and are very upset about what has happened in the aftermath of this. Look, we're going to come back after the hour. talk about what is going on with Satan Yahoo and what happens next with the shadow government of America. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Welcome back, folks.
01:02:08 We've got some tips. And this one was from yesterday. We missed it. It's from Khan Think. It says the GOPPP, guarding our pedophiles, politicians, and partners. That's right. And I always like that about his, his, his PPP plan that he had where he's going to protect us. after the lockdown, yeah.
01:02:27 And again, he's always Pee-Peeing down our backs and telling us it's raining, isn't he? Yeah, there's an online content creator that goes by PPP. It's a people's populist press, but it's always funny because any time the name comes up, my brain immediately goes to
01:02:43 what does it have to do? What does he have to do with loans? Yeah, that's right. And we've got Mark Young 12 says if you believe in evolution, anything goes. Survival of the fittest, quote, unquote, many shows on PBS preach and assume evolution thus brainwashing people away from God. Yeah, and of course, when you look at the Marxists or any totalitarians, right?
01:03:02 The first thing they do is come after religion. Why? Because they want to replace God. They want you to see government as God and as the supreme power. It is a threat to them for people to understand that they serve a higher power than them. They don't want to have any competition on it. That's what makes them totalitarian. It's also funny to me that most of them,
01:03:25 Most of the people who believe in evolution and preach it most sedulously act as if they are completely and utterly against it. Because if you believe in the survival of the fittest, you have no reason to make society comfortable or safe or kind. And in fact, you were incentivized to make it as hard and harsh as possible to, you know, promote survival of the fittest, to promote the ubermensch, you know. But these people are usually these extreme leftists that want their every whim catered to. Yeah. Well, you see people like Richard Dawkins, for example. I mean, he just got purged off of Facebook completely because he said something that they thought was cruel about Muslims. And he has bemoaned the fact that the things that he liked about Christian culture are being wiped out in the UK. And they are. And so that is hateful for them and they purge him. And the very idea that you would have free speech, that is something that comes from a Christian. morality that is there. And so he wants the fruit of Christianity, but he doesn't want the root of it, which is Christ. You see that with the guys in Monty Python as well. They spent their entire lives doing these biting satirical skits about the kindness and the properness of the British culture.
01:04:41 And now that that British culture is disappearing, you're looking around like, where to go? Just like, well, John, I'm sorry to say. But- always tweeting about the crazy things they're happening. You were one of the last people to put the knife in the back of that culture. You mockery, as we pointed out, is one of the strongest things. People see you mocking something and they don't want to be associated with it. They don't want to be mocked themselves. That's right.
01:05:03 So someone is funny as John Cleese, sticking the dagger in a culture like that is an incredibly powerful and effective thing. I agree. Not that I'm saying he shouldn't be allowed to make jokes, but it's important to realize what you're doing if you're going to do it. I agree. Well, we're talking about that. We have one more comment, though, from Little Ford Schoolhouse. and they were talking about the tariffs, even to send a package to Canada is really expensive right now. I have a friend in Saskatchewan, and the price is nearly doubled.
01:05:29 Oh, yeah, bud, the price is up in Saskatchewan be getting crazy there. Yeah, well, you know, our postage prices, everything is going up. Rampant inflation. Let's talk a little bit about that two-tier system in the UK. Here's a good example. This is somebody who got a 20-month sentence for something that was posted on, on the internet that they didn't like. And I'll give you the context for it.
01:05:58 But somebody who actually commits murder got a six-month sentence. You have been committed for sentence. It sounds like a guilty to an offense of publishing written material, which is threatening, abusive, or insulting. As is recognized on your behalf, this offense is so serious.
01:06:22 that an immediate custodial sentence is unavoidable. The sentence that I pass has been reduced by one third to reflect your guilty plea. The sentence is one of 20 months' imprisonment. You will serve up to one half of your sentence in custody before you are released on license. What is jihad? Jihad is really removing oppression. They refuse to arrest this time.
01:06:52 and do preemptive strikes, wherever those preemptive strikes, which is offensive jihad, is needed. Is that inciting violence? Is that hate? Well, of course it is. Everybody sees that. But if you put something up that is even satire, they come after you. Here's a good example of a kid who is 15 or 16 years old. And the cops all arrest him because he used the term Paki for Pakistani.
01:07:19 Now, how does that compare with an imam? who is calling for them to preemptively kill the white Europeans. If you want to use something really stupid similar to that, when I forget one of the more recent Jurassic World movies came out, there was a big upset because they used the term Pachycephalosaurus. And they got very offended in England. How dare they use this term? It's about a dinosaur, you fool.
01:07:47 Yeah, because these soccer hooligans when they go out, They would go in the street fights. You know, it was like a West Side story who had the different gangs that are out there, right? And they would refer to it as packy bashing. They would go out. But this is a guy, a kid who gets arrested for calling some, for even using the term, Pachy.
01:08:06 Tell me again, because obviously this is a lot. Oh, I'm sorry, this is a different one. Okay. So just tell us why are you here? Yeah, let me, let me set this one. I've hit the wrong one. This is one where you've got this officious little bureaucrat coming along because some busybody Stasi wannabe snitch neighbor complain and said,
01:08:27 yeah, they've got a cafe that they're running. And what it was is it was his daughter who had an imaginary cafe. She's serving her stuffed animals. And so they came, and they had a bit of a joke with it. I think the family set up a little website for her or something like that. And it's not even a real lemonade stand. And we see the government coming around all the time harassing kids over lemonade stand. Can't have anybody getting the idea that you could actually start a business.
01:08:56 Not in competition to Elon Musk or Bill Gates or Donald Trump. No, get that out of your head. You're never going to start a business because we're going to use the bureaucrats to put you out of business. Listen to this. They put this up and said, we're getting harassed by the local officials and people didn't believe him. So here's the woman coming by and doing it. Tell me again, because obviously this is our pride. Oh.
01:09:19 What is it? Yeah, that's me. Okay. So, thank you. Just tell us why are you here because we, some people have said this is a joke. So we just want to know why you're hearing what's the situation. Okay. We've just received a concern, raised for the council that there is been a change of use of a building. Okay. And it's been used as a cafe. As a cafe?
01:09:38 Yeah. And do you don't have to tell us the name of it, but do you have a record of who actually made this complaint? Yes, I do. And you have an email and a digital foot. Yes. Okay, good. And because we don't know how on earth somebody would have, because we do have a cafe, but it's a child's pretend cafe, which my daughter has. Okay. And so we, now, obviously, it might look realistic. We'll show it to you. Yeah, we don't know. So it's in, we want the $64,000 questions. We thought it was quite the street. Who would have made such a complaint? Who is my accuser? Not allowed to know. I mean, are you going to do a house search? Yeah, what do you want to see? Do you want to see everything or?
01:10:16 The complaint was a barn has been... That's the stone barn. Yeah. ...into a cafe. Well, that's our stone barn, which is a chapel for us as a, as a fancy private chapel. I'll show you it. And the cafe is in a separate area. I'll show you the cafe as well.
01:10:31 But as I said... Part of the complaint, they did mention a website. Yeah. I did I said that on a particular email. But what's that... I'm not sure what's that got to do with the cafe. Because I think, I don't know what was on there, but when I clicked on it, it just said, come in soon.
01:10:46 not no other information so I don't know if there was something on there previously or if that's anything to do with you guys at all we've never we've never had a cafe we've never had i mean the website yeah i mean okay but obviously what what what's non-plus us is that this is obviously this is our private house and you know my child Zoe has set up a pretend cafe and we just want to know first of all how did someone find out about it and why they would put in a complaint because we we just find it absolutely ridiculous but you're welcome to come in and you're an official, you're definitely from the council. She is?
01:11:20 Are you from the planning? People didn't believe it. I think they just thought. Are you actually from, are you actually from the planning, from the planning department? From the planning enforcement officer. You're a planning enforcement officer. Yeah, that's right. Can't have that.
01:11:32 I don't know exactly if they had a website. Maybe they had something up on a Facebook page or something about their family. May they put up something as a joke coming soon, you know, such and such a cafe because their daughter is playing with it. I don't know. But that's what the government, is focused on. They're not focused on people who are making threats like that imam. And then we have a guy who puts up a joke about a politician showing him as a rabbit.
01:12:00 Look at this. UK police arrest a 15-year-old boy, sees his devices and collect his DNA after he posted a photo of a local politician edited to look like a rabbit. I guess they found that to be hair-raising satire, but he got his cockles up. That should be a career-ender, not just because of how oppressive it is to liberty, but because it shows you to be a thin-skinned little baby. Pirate, yeah. You cannot handle even the slightest bit of mockery.
01:12:32 He turned you into a rabbit and you send the police after him. How pathetic. What a loser you are, sir. He better realize what life is going to be like in the world of air. AI manipulation. So people immediately started coming up with all kinds of permutations of turning into all kinds of animals. Here's one where he's got a rat face.
01:12:52 And then this is my favorite one here. They turn him into a pig. I guess that could be representative of animal farm, right? Where the pigs are now ruling us. But that is the case in the UK. Man. This is really disappointing. That lady was ginger.
01:13:09 This guy is ginger. This is a disappointing day for me. I'm in bad company, apparently. It is sad to see that happening. It's sad to see civilization disappearing. And, of course, it is disappearing. When we look at the elections, for example, there was not just the Israeli election, but of course there was also the Brazil election.
01:13:28 And you had Lula, who is this long-term communist. And he has been there in the past. He's been associated with election fraud or allegations, a lot of allegations of election fraud, with the smartmatic voting machine. Remember the smartmatic voting machines were created by a couple of friends of Hugo Chavez. They used them to rig the elections for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. Then they went international and they were involved in accusations of election rigging in Brazil
01:13:58 and the Philippines and several Mexican provinces. And what they accused them of, especially in Brazil, it was a female successor to one of Lula's earlier incumbencies. And she was also a Marxist. And she was losing badly in all the polls. As a matter of fact, the day before the election, she goes to a soccer game.
01:14:25 Lots and lots of people at the soccer game. And she's basically booed out of the stadium. The next day they have the election, and she's losing something like, you know, 40% to 60%. All the machines go down for a couple of hours. And when they came back, she was now winning 60-40, instead of losing 40-60. And so there's been a lot of claims about election fraud,
01:14:49 especially from these people now that Lula has won. He's threatened to arrest his opponent. This is what we're seeing everywhere. We are really turning into third world banana republics everywhere, including the United States, because we got Trump and the Democrats are playing this game back and forth, especially Trump has escalated it to another level of of lawfare that was applied to him. And now he has taken that, established that as a precedent and elevated it. He's already talking about how things are rigged. And because Trump has a lot of allegations of corruption,
01:15:29 I think they're legitimate allegations of corruption. And because Bibi Netanyahu has the same type of allegations. Some of the headlines say, well, he's either going to go to, the leadership or he's going to go to jail. He's got to win in order to stay out of jail. And this is what we're already seeing in Brazil. So this guy who lost the son of Bolsonaro, who has been jailed over some crime accusations.
01:15:56 And again, I'm not there. I'll follow closely enough to know if the accusations are having substance to them or if it's just political in terms of coming after your opponents. But they immediately decided they were going to come after his son, who was defeated, came after him with money laundering charges. And again, that is kind of suspicious
01:16:16 because they can use money laundering in a very weaponized way. We've seen that happen. I talked about the small business that was nearly put out of business because they claimed they were structuring their deposits. I said, well, we just don't have $10,000 to put in at a given time. And so as soon as they got a lawyer,
01:16:34 they turned things around. But we've always seen the Marxist jailing their opponents. And we've seen rampant corruption on both sides. It's kind of hard to tell where this is going to change. But let's take a look at what's going on. Speaking of corruption and elections, let's take a look at the Israeli elections. And I want to look first at how they do their election. I think it's very instructive. You know, it's kind of interesting. They are not limited to two parties. They have 150 parties or so, right? They have actually 38 of them. We're on the ballot, some people say it was 34, I couldn't find, I had conflicting articles.
01:17:15 Some said 34, some said 38. Nevertheless, they're not restricted to two parties. It's part of what happens in a parliamentary system. They do all their elections with paper ballots. They do not have voting machines. They do all their voting on one day. They don't stretch it out for weeks or months. Isn't that kind of interesting?
01:17:36 Why aren't we allowed to have that? Instead, we get the goy elections. Like the goy slop, right? They eat kosher food and they have kosher elections. We don't. Why don't we just turn it into a reality TV show and people can text in their vote? That's right. Why don't we just be done with this farce that we're doing anything to secure them?
01:17:57 Yeah, that's right. We could at least make it, you know, fun and entertaining. The circuses could not be lame and the bread could not be stale, is all I'm saying. Yeah, we could have Americathon. right? And I got to say, you know, this is not necessarily what we want. We don't want to have multiple parties. I don't like the whole idea of parties. I like the idea of having ballot access. An open ballot is really what's needed. We don't need to have dozens of parties. But again, right now, 149 total registered political parties in Israel, anywhere from 34 to 38 made it on the ballot.
01:18:32 Historically, they've had 200 different parties that have run in Israel election since 1914. at least 110 having won seats. And so this is the way the thing operates. They wind up having the election. And you can, you know, it's based on how many seats you win. And then when your party has a majority, because when you got this many parties, you're not going to automatically have somebody gets more than 50%. That'll be really unusual if somebody would get more than 50% on their own.
01:19:03 So they typically have to put together a coalition. And if you remember before October the 7th, there had been, I think, three consecutive elections, one after the other, because Netanyahu was unable to put together a coalition the first time. So they had to have another election and see how it's going to shake out because, you know, see who the minor parties have in terms of creating a coalition. They had to do that three times before he could put together a ruling government. And so we're going to see that happen now. So it's going to go for at least a few weeks as they're doing the backroom negotiations and trading off support for cabinet positions. That's how you get somebody like Ben Gavir into a position of power. He is a head of a political party and he brings with him a few seats that he can negotiate.
01:19:54 You got to imagine they're all just excited because we know how much they love haggling and backroom deals. This is like the optimal outcome for a Jewish state. You mean we get to go into the back rooms and argue about this for days and days? This is wonderful. Yeah, that's right. You can see that happening. So I said this is going to happen. I said it was a close call and they weren't going to have any resolution after the election.
01:20:17 And they don't. And so they're still trying to figure out who's going to be able to put together a coalition with the minor parties that are there. And so the other thing they don't have is vote by mail. And so the people had to basically mail themselves to Israel to vote on the single election day. That's what I talked about yesterday. They had record turnout. 74% of the people voted, which is way more than we get because, again, you know, they've got something of a kosher election that we don't have. So just to sum up, the no vote by mail, no machines, paper only, elections on a single day, and an open ballot.
01:20:55 Anybody can get on it. And it's kind of interesting when you look. at the voting machines, for example, that they refuse to use. Did you realize that we have between 80 and 90% of all the votes counted in the United States are counted by voting machine companies? Two of them? Two of them. ES&S and DeBold.
01:21:16 And guess what? The president of ESNS is the brother of the vice president of the other company. Uh-huh. And they're both billionaire Jews. Nothing to see here, right? They're not going to give us a paper ballot election here. No, we're going to have our votes counted by a couple of brothers who pretend that they've got a competing companies that are there.
01:21:44 I think you should be very concerned about this. It stinks as far as I'm concerned. But neither Netanyahu or Eisencott, the other guy who is challenging him, neither of them is really going to change their foreign policy. Neither of them is really going to change anything in terms of Gaza or Lebanon or Iran. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. As a matter of fact, most of the criticism of Netanyahu was about the fact that they didn't think that he was killing enough Palestinians or having enough wars or winning them
01:22:20 quickly enough. They want it to be harder and more intense. The two things that they did complain about, was October the 7th thinking that he did not do a good enough job of protecting. It wasn't so much that they believed that it was kind of a passive false flag, which was my take on it from the very beginning, knowing that it was going to happen and stepping down. And of course, Netanyahu has always been about using Hamas as a cat's paw,
01:22:48 funding them through the UAE and knowing that they would do something like this, even after he was told that there was going to be an October the 6th, seventh type of attack, he did absolutely nothing about it. And that's been reported by a lot of people, both inside Israel and other governments who actually said, we warned them about this. And the UAE that was providing a lot of money, said, we think he was giving that money to Hamas rather than offering it as aid, which was what our intent was. Now Netanyahu is out there saying that Hamas stole the election. Well, that's why he has them around, isn't it? My brothers and sister, Lekud voters, there is an emergency call because they're trying to steal the election from us.
01:23:32 This morning, the police announced that opponents are trying to bribe people to not vote for me. Hamas is also involved. They will reach everyone. You've been warned. The voting rats in the Arab sector are higher number than the Jewish sector, and you must go out to vote. There you go. And I imagine Iran was going to drop a nuclear bomb on the election as well, right? What I find so funny about that video is that a lot of time, up until fairly recently, when people would talk about the Jews, they would say, they, because, you know, it was very unpopular. You know, there wasn't many people that had, that were willing to talk about it openly and say, look, they have an outsized amount of influence on our government, something, you know, this is not okay.
01:24:16 So who does Benjamin Njahou mean by they? Is there, are there super Jews that the Jews? Yeah, yeah, he's worried about outside influence on his election, but. That's exactly the way they run the game, isn't it? One person who is an Arab said, and talking about the Arab parties, the Arab parties are going to have a lot of say in terms of how this government goes. But both Netanyahu and his leading opponent had said they're not going to use them in a coalition government. The guy said, the racism now, I have never seen anything like this before, pointing specifically to Ben Gavir. Israel's minister of national security
01:24:54 who heads the ultra-nationalist far-right religious party that he calls Jewish power. And here's Ben-Gavir saying we've got to conquer Gaza and what, then do what? Send them to Europe, of course. We killed Nassarling, rightly so,
01:25:14 but we still need to change the mission. If you ask me, we need to conquer all the territory, all the Jewish territory. This is our problem. place. It's very good plan by Trump, but what would you do to encourage immigration to go to better places? Well, most of them can go. There's attractive places or places where they are looking for workers, places where they can live more comfortably. I, for example, would send them to Europe and send them to France. It's good conditions for them in countries, maybe Britain, maybe London,
01:25:45 all kinds of places like that. Yeah, they've been doing that with their NGOs. That's what I pointed it out. That's why you have France burning right now. That's why you have the two-tier system in London is because they've been sending the people that they don't want to live with. They send them to take over your country. And then their politicians end up in your government somehow, or they bribe your politicians to create a two-tier justice system where the people they sent over there get preferential treatment. Yeah, that's right. They have bragged about it. You know, again, like the clip that I've played several times, the guy said, well, you know, it's an anti-Semitic trope to say that the Jews are behind immigration. And the guy that he's talking to who's Jewish
01:26:22 who says, well, no, actually we are. We've taken the lead in that. And they do brag about it. You have people on the one hand who say it's anti-Semitism to say that and the other people who boast about doing it. What's right now at the top of the agenda for you within the JCPA? There are two issues at the top of our agenda at the very moment. One is the unbelievably important. immigration debate in this country to make sure that immigrants from around the world, particularly those from the south of our border, have a chance
01:26:56 here. The 12 million, or 13 million that just live there and do work and aren't really going home, that they have a chance to stay here justly as legal immigrants. To stay in America. That debate, not to stay in Gaza. So important because we know what it's like
01:27:12 to come to another country. Even one called the United States of America where we weren't always so welcome, but because we were welcomed enough, we were able to create this amazing Jewish civilization and be a part of the American civilization. So we have an entire program called Immigration Nation, and we're trying to make sure that the Jewish community steps up to the plate
01:27:35 and the broader interfaith community. Yeah, that's right. And it's so nice that they're so welcoming to the people in Gaza, isn't it? I mean, they were living there before the Jews went there. but now all they can think about is how they can get rid of them. They have absolutely no compassion for them. As a matter of fact, this is what it looks like as they drop the bombs on the tents that people are now living in because they've destroyed all of their homes.
01:27:58 And they've got an AI program for that. They call it the gospel. That's how much they love Christians. When you look at what these people are doing, you have a Jewish doctor who is going there to help kids. And he's talking about a young girl that they were operating. and he said we had to remove her leg. And he said, we were just praying that she would lose consciousness.
01:28:22 I did a leg amputation on a five-year-old girl, and the only anesthesia that we had was the anesthesia doctor singing to her. She didn't faint. We were praying for her to faint. She stayed awake, the whole amputation. That was at 3 o'clock in the morning when the ceasefire broke.
01:28:43 and it was that which broke at 2.30 in the morning on the 18th. And the only thing I did before then was a text message, one of our U.S. senators, Trump's campaign manager, and asked him to contact Trump because he had his cell phone and duplicate what Reagan did in 1982. I think it was calling Monachan begging to please stop the bombing of Lebanon that he could put a stop to this because the ER floor was filled with dozens of babies.
01:29:13 that were missing limbs or needed to be missing a limb that was shredded. And this is in a hospital that it's probably a 40 or 50-bed hospital, which is incredibly small hospital. Yeah, the doctor's name is Perlmutter, and he is Jewish, and he was there trying to help people who are being killed by people who would not recognize their humanity. Yeah, we're going to take a quick, break folks and we will be right back. Stay with us.
01:29:47 Let the seed in our homeland boys. Let it grow where all can see. Feed it with our devotion boys. Call it the liberty tree. It's a tall old tree and the strong old tree. And we are the sons. Yes, we are the sons, the sons of liberty. It's your move. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Welcome back. And I want to thank people who support us. We've gotten the gas gauge up to five-eighths right now. And I want to thank the people who have contributed to us, first on Zell. And I think I've got it here. I don't see. I'm looking at this. I don't see it. On Zell, we have, I want to think, Zach L. Wait a minute, this is Cash App.
01:31:29 I somehow got this in there twice. I don't have the Zell people. So I'll have to give that to you tomorrow, but I want to thank the people on Zell. I have some people with Cash App. I know recognize the names that are here. And I want to thank them. Sorry about this. We'll come back to that. Okay. But let me, I do have the checks. Because Karen wrote this out. I messed up the files. I pulled in not just the most recent ones, but I pulled in everything this year. And I'm trying to find where we were. Fred and Jackie U. Eric K. Ray B. Stacey P., Scott, and Samantha T., John R. and Aaron W., thank you so much for your support. Those are the people who have supported us with checks. We'll have the cash app and Zell after the next break. I'll get that together.
01:32:21 And we do want to thank you all who watch live. We can't thank you enough. Yes. And I just want to remind you, we don't like to be laborate, but if you find value in the show, We are viewer and listeners supported to, you know, a major degree. So if you find value in the show, anything helps, even if it's just liking and sharing the broadcast, that is a huge help. So we thank you all very, very much. I agree, yes. And again, going back to this, where does all this begin?
01:32:50 This all begins with denying the humanity and the personhood of people, just like abortion. And it is amazing to me to see so many the same people who are out there opposing abortion. and saying, unborn children are human beings and you should treat them with respect and not diminish their humanity by saying they're not a person yet. And yet they'll look the other way or even cheer it when that is done to people in other countries. It's done by the Israelis to people in Gaza and Lebanon and Iran and other places like that. And again, this is the spirit.
01:33:25 As I played for you the other day, this is this young girl, probably 15 or 16. an event, and she is asked about what she thinks about Gaza. And she said, well, God commands us to kill them. This is our land, and we're going to kill anybody who's on it. Israel's a Jewish state. We should take it because God commanded us to take it. In that scenario, where would the Palestinians go? Honestly, to any other Arab country.
01:33:51 I don't really care, except Jordan and Lebanon and Syria are ours. Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria are ours. We'll just kill them, yeah. And so there's, let's not, forget that there are people involved in this. Here's a guy who's a victim in Hebron. He was in America. He heard what was happening. He came back with his family. I'm 22 years old. I'm basically studying abroad outside in Malaysia. And when I heard about what's happened here in Hebrew, the shooting and what's happened in the checkpoint, I left everything behind me, my studying,
01:34:21 my another life, abroad life. And I came here to stand with my family. So, that's his house behind. They came here, the soldiers. That rub. they start straight away to kick us out from the home with no reason and they have no right to all of this. So they came and they start like saying you guys have two minutes to leave the home. If you don't leave the home we're going to shot everyone right here. Then they put everyone in that corner right there as you see they put everyone in that corner and they like aim the guns on everyone. They are saying if someone is going to move from here, I'm going
01:34:53 to shot you straight away. So then they kick all of us outside even like the young sister and brother They are like five and six years old. You know, now they are scared while they are sleeping. They have like a bad dreaming about all of this now. While they are sleeping, they are five or six years old. So I don't understand how Christians can support this. I really don't understand that. I don't understand how anybody can support this.
01:35:16 You don't have to be a Christian to understand the immorality of this. And when you look at this, I think this cartoon really summed it up. Christian Zionism, and here you got people on their knees, worshiping this golden calf with a, Israeli flag on it. Christian Zionism, the belief that God favors a group that rejects Christ and has given them a land where they're allowed to kill rape and torture without any judgment. I think that pretty much sums it up.
01:35:43 But it's also, I think, one of the biggest oxymorons, but it is something that is constantly sold to us by the influencers that are paid by Israel, people like Mark Levin, people like Ben Shapiro. And we need to understand that these people, and Israel are probably the most antichrist political group you could find. Jesus Christ has no advantage over genius, because if you are strong enough, ruthless enough, powerful enough, evil will overcome good.
01:36:17 Jewish point of view, or we don't believe in the divinity of Christ. There you can make an argument that the Gospels, which were written, he was just a prophet. No, no, no, we don't believe he was a prophet. What do you think he was? What do you guys think he was historically? I think he was a Jew who tried to lead a revolt against the Romans and got killed for his trouble. I always wonder how dumb this going sometimes can be.
01:36:37 Like they say, you killed our God. That means it wasn't a God. How can you kill a God, you know what? How stupid you could be. You killed our God. Who was your God? Jacey. If it was God, we could kill him.
01:36:57 You know, all these agendas are against one, Christ. No one else. Trust me. They can't stand the sight of Jesus Christ. And those who are followers of Jesus Christ, they cannot stand their sight. Why? Because the one who is controlling them is Satan. And Satan hates Jesus Christ.
01:37:21 Why? Because Satan was put to shame by only one perfect man. in the history of humanity, Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Satan overcame all humanity, except one person, Jesus. Jesus crushed his head on Calvary and put him to shame forever. That's right. And when you hear that guy, my other Christians are so stupid. You killed my God. That's a straw man argument. And again, when you look at heat, it's a straw man representation of Christianity. It's God who became man. As Jesus said, I lay down my life for my friends and I can take it up again.
01:38:00 And he did. And that is what it is truly about. It is about justice and mercy, things that you won't find in Israel. And you won't find it in rabbinical Judaism either. They have no concept of justice and mercy. These are the people who think that they can fool God by setting up all these different things. They've got one area in New York where they run a string around the neighborhood. claiming them that makes it their home.
01:38:29 So they can, they create these rules and then say, we're all we're going to follow these rules and earn our way to heaven. And then they play these games thinking that they can fool God. So yeah, don't worry about it. I will have some goy push the elevator buttons for me on a Saturday because I've got this rule about Sabbath and I can't do anything. But I can go in and I can murder and kill people on Saturdays. That's fine, you know, what the Israeli settlers are doing.
01:38:55 So with all this happening, Lekud is preparing to allege that the election was stolen if Netanyahu loses the same thing as Trump. Netanyahu is exactly like Trump. Both of them corrupt, both of them, war mongers, both of them lying about the elections and whether they are stolen or not. His party is reportedly ready to challenge women
01:39:21 who show up to vote fully veiled. So I guess do they have to have a picture idea as well. Maybe that's another thing they require that we don't necessarily require here. They know how to run an election, don't they? According to Heretz, the party has been preparing for a scenario in which it loses and discusses the possibility of alleging widespread fraud claiming that the election was stolen. You know, it's hard to tell Trump from Netanyahu in terms of their policies. They are in lockstep. Their personalities and their corruption are exactly the same as well as their disregard for humanity.
01:39:58 The discussions were held around the question of what to do in the event of a loss. They expressed favor of a elections were stolen and rigged campaign. They said, well, if you need some help with that, just contact Alex Jones. He can tell you how to make a lot of money selling that lie as well. And again, Netanyahu is considering that option because he always plays the victim, doesn't he? It took three times to try to get a coalition together even before Gaza, so we'll see it's going to be quite some time before he does this. The headlines are saying, well, this is either, you know, the big house or the jailhouse for him, but I think he's probably going to pull this out. A record seventh term would give him more time to weaken the checks and balances and the Israeli government more into his favor.
01:40:49 and keep him out of jail. He and several opposition leaders have vowed not to work with Israel's Arab parties to form a governing coalition. It's becoming more racist and more apartheid as the days go on, and more reactionary and more violent. And you see this. The entire country is moving in that direction. It's not just Netanyahu.
01:41:14 You get him out. He's part of the problem, certainly. And he is orchestrating this. but there are people who are even worse than him. And if you listen to the people who are being interviewed on the street, they're even worse than what he is saying. Israelis vote for a party, of course, since the parliamentary seats are allocated proportionally,
01:41:35 then they have these parties determine how they are going to come together in a group. I'm going to leave politics aside for a moment, and let's talk a little bit about what's going on with the attacks directly against us. in terms of medical stuff. But before I do that real quickly, I just want to follow up on something that I didn't talk about yesterday
01:41:56 in terms of this fortress system that Warpete is putting together. When you look at this and you talk about the fact that they're, they openly admit that, A, the entire infrastructure, including our electrical infrastructure, the grid, is very vulnerable and crumbling. And then they openly admit
01:42:17 that they're not going to do anything about that. what Trump said on his first day in office. Yeah, it's garbage. It's old and it's vulnerable. We're not going to do anything about it. Then a couple of months later, he says, and yeah, it could get bombed as well. We're not going to do anything about that either. And we talk about it getting bombed. You know, for the longest time, I remember you had Gary Haven, who had, he used to, he was a billionaire who created Curves, which is a franchise. At one point in time, I think they had the most number of franchises of any franchise anywhere. But he together a movie to try to raise awareness about the danger of EMP, electromagnetic pulse to the grid.
01:42:57 And he called it Amerigden. Amerigden coming soon to a theater near you. He came to Infowars. Alex was in it. I had a small part in it. And so, you know, he put that together. But the purpose of it was to talk to people about this real issue of EMP. If you explode a nuclear weapon in the atmosphere, it sends out electromagnetic pulse.
01:43:18 and it can destroy pretty much everything in the electrical grid, especially these big transformers, which people don't have these things setting on the shelf. They're made only in a couple of different places in Germany and one other place. And it's going to take years to replace a lot of these things. So you'd be out of electricity for a lot longer than 90 days that they're talking about. And what makes it so infuriating is that you could easily protect the grid from EMP.
01:43:49 You could put in surge protectors to arrest an electromagnetic pulse coming through the grid and protect those transformers and it wouldn't cost much money. It would be far less than having to try to rebuild things and replace these transformers,
01:44:04 just like the equipment in your home. And yet they refuse to do that. They refuse to even talk about the problem. This is the utter contempt that they have for us. And the fact that they leave us vulnerable they leave our infrastructure literally crumbling. We talk about roads and bridges and other things like that.
01:44:23 And then they build their own parallel infrastructure like ours, right? Except it is going to be protected. You better believe they're going to have EMP protection on their grid. But they build a parallel Cadillac system. There's going to be better and better protected than ours, and we will pay for it. And then when they create conflicts that come to the American homeland, Homeland Security and the Pentagon aren't going to do anything to protect us at all. Matter of fact, we will be outside of their closed fortress system.
01:44:56 That's how much they hate us, how they seek to kill us. And, you know, I thought about that yesterday after the program. I didn't talk about the EMP stuff. And that just underscores the utter contempt that they have for us. The fact that there is no limit to the amount of money that they will spend on themselves, on continuity of government, on their war, of choice everywhere, but they won't lift a finger or spend a dime to protect us. When are we going to wake up to the nature of our government, to the nature of this so-called
01:45:28 national security? Well, another example of how they want to kill us, of course, is the proposal to allow dental hygienists to give HPV vaccines to nine-year-olds. It's a song that's being pushed in the West Virginia legislature. And who is pushing it? it's the American Academy of Pediatricians. That's right. And the American Cancer Society, same people, American Cancer Society who never care to take a look at any of these antiparicitics like hybrometectin, Finn Bendazole, Minbendazole. They will punish people who will talk about things like B-17. And they don't want to explore any natural or alternative therapies.
01:46:14 and yet they will come after people to give them HPV vaccines and to give it to children. Again, like the hepatitis B vaccine that they want to give to newborns. This is something that is sexually transmitted, just like the HPV vaccine. I remember when Rick Perry was doing this in Texas as governor, he was trying to make it a requirement for kids to go to school to get the HPV vaccine, not just female, but also male. and he wanted to do it at a very early age. People pushed back at that point in time,
01:46:47 but now people have gotten more passive about a lot of these things. And at the time that was happening, they found out that one of Rick Perry's close aides had gone to work for Merck and was coming back and lobbying him for that. So here we are. We've got the American Academy of Pediatrics, the same people that there is a RICO lawsuit against
01:47:07 because they are a racketeers and a corrupt organization. and pushing this lawsuit against them because of the vaccines that they constantly push, you've got to ask yourself, why do they do this so much? It truly is amazing when you look at how much they do to push this. They harm your kids with SIDS, and if you push back against them and accuse them of knowing what they're doing and intentionally harming kids to make money, then they come after you with law enforcement. and charge you with murder. That's how criminal they are.
01:47:45 And it's really about the money. It's about the wealth. It's not about your health. Listen to this and how much money they make pushing these vaccines. Do you know as a provider, if you find a child that has been taken off of their vaccine
01:48:01 regimen and you as a provider are able to put them back on so say you have a three-year-old and they skipped out on all of last year's shots. As a provider, if you're able, to get that child back on the scheduled shots and catch them up to speed, that's $2,500 in your pocket. And think about that, okay?
01:48:21 This is one of these things like the 1986 Act that just common sense ought to be a big red flag to you. You know, when they have to have the government protect them from any liability, that ought to be a big red flag. Think about that, $2,500 to get somebody caught up. And what does that mean? You got kids who didn't get their vaccines last year. So what you're going to do is you're going to give them a double dose.
01:48:41 of all these vaccines this year. How could that make any sense? I mean, if the vaccines worked, you would have to give them over and over and over again. You certainly wouldn't want to give them two at a time, right? A double dose. Because all medicine is about dosage. Why does this even pass a sniff test with anyone?
01:49:03 And then the other question I have is, why are they making so much money? Why is there so much money being given to people and who's giving this money? We see this all the time. Insurance companies are pushing this. And we know some of that money is coming from the insurance companies because they drive the pediatricians who don't vaccinate, push so hard to vaccinate and get a certain percentage of their kids vaccinated.
01:49:25 They basically cut down on what they pay them in terms of insurance coverage and put them out of business. But where does that $2,500 bonus come from? Who is giving financial bonuses to? to harm children. That's what you should ask yourself. That was one of the things about Trump's lockdown and the COVID hospital protocol. Who is financing this?
01:49:51 Well, that was being financed by Trump. He was offering the bonus system through CMS, the people who handle Medicare payments and things like that. Giving the bonus, if you identified somebody as a COVID patient, $13,000. You put them on a ventilator. We'll give you $39,000.
01:50:08 And if you do various other things, you get another bonus for that kind of stuff. And then 20% for everything that you do while they're in the hospital. That was the federal government that was paying for that. Who's giving the bonus to double up on these kids? And when they say catch them up, it doesn't mean that, okay, you missed this vaccine for measles last year. So we're going to give you the vaccine for measles. No, no, we're going to give you a double dose this year. How insane is that?
01:50:35 Well, it's very important that we understand that the AMA in Chicago has got a close your eyes and immunized, and we're seeing this happening in one location after the other. This is spreading like wildfire. Again, they want to have the dental assistance, start vaccinating kids who are basically sedated, getting dental work done. If you have any kind of surgery done, if you're a child, they're going to vaccinate you without your parents informed consent. This is a criminal system, folks.
01:51:09 People don't, this is not normal under any circumstances, and it's not moral either. Why would you do this kind of stuff to people about their informed consent? They're burning their credibility down and rightfully so. People are starting to see what this is really about. When you talk about this, close your eyes, and then we will immunize you.
01:51:27 It's just pure evil to do this to people without the consent of the parents. And of course, the kids can't give consent. And if somebody is anesthetized, they're not giving their consent for this stuff either. Hello, my name's Sean. I'm a family doctor who practices in the suburbs and the city of Chicago. And I wanted to offer some practical advice tonight to those of you who, like me, might be angry and very concerned about, the news reports.
01:52:05 And again, he's a physician. ...of what one hospital is calling, close your eyes, will immunize. This is a growing practice, perhaps pioneered at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, but something that's been around longer than the powers that be would like us to know. where children are undergoing elective and emergency medical surgeries and being immunized while they're away from their parents in the operating room.
01:52:47 Parents have often given consent unknowingly or under duress for these vaccinations to be performed. And one of the things that's clear from the reports is that informed consent which should be one of the hallmarks of medical ethics and practice today is rarely being provided to the extent that it should be or could be. And of course, you know, when you come in a situation and your child is hurt, they need urgent care. Yeah, we'll take care of it. Here, sign this first, right?
01:53:31 You're not even going to read that. You don't know what's in it. So it's really under duress. You don't know what's going on. And you sign this or we're not going to help your child. Well, when you look at this HPV vaccine, Merck, the maker of Gardasil, recently agreed to pay $50 million to settle more than 200 lawsuits, alleging vaccine-related injuries, including autoimmune disorders and reproductive problems. They're not going to tell you that. They're not going to tell you that they're going to even inject you.
01:54:02 As a matter of fact, the company is now funding and conducting clinical trials of Gardasil on children down to the age of four. So they're saying, well, we want to do it down to the age of nine. But now we're going to go down to the age of four to eight as well. Again, these are sexually transmitted diseases. Do they expect there's going to be a whole bunch of Donald Trump's that Jeffrey Epstein's around? I don't understand why they make the case for this. It's just like the hepatitis B issue. If the mother has hepatitis B because she's engaged in sexual activities and gotten a sexually transmitted disease or drug activity, that's easily tested.
01:54:42 If the mother doesn't have it, the one day old is not going to have it either. And it's not going to be exposed to that either. And so, again, this assumes safety and an age group in which the vaccine has never been tested. And here we are six years after the Trump shot, the sugar water that Alex Jones assured us was safe. And now we're starting to learn all kinds of stuff about it. As a matter of fact, the fact that it now causes MS. Last week, the World Health Organization put out a release showing that there was a possible causal relationship between COVID-19 vaccine and multiple sclerosis. And we're allowed to report on this because it is an official double-a-Rolearm.
01:55:28 We're allowed to report. We're limited to other things we can report, but we can report this. I'm not limited, folks. He is. It says COVID-19 vaccination can induce multiple sclerosis via cross-reactivity with T-helper cells. Now, what is this actually showing? What is going on here? Well, I'm going to sort of do a quick explanation of what seems to be going on.
01:55:53 So what we have here, imagine this is a nerve fiber here. so the nerve impulses will travel down here. And this will be in the brain or the spinal cord. And these nerve fibres are surrounded by this protective myelin sheath. And in the central nervous system, they're made by cells called oligodendrocytes. Here we have the spike protein from a natural SARS-Coronavirus to infection. And here we have the spike protein produced by the vaccine on its own. Now, in learning to recognize, this is...
01:56:24 I'm going to stop it right there because it kind of, I appreciate it. the guy putting out some of this information, but I'm not going to be limited to what the WHO approves of being said. And it kind of bothers me when I hear people say that. And of course, he's out there saying, and then we have the natural, I guess it came out of bats or something, or maybe it came out of the lab. Here's your natural spike protein. Here's the one that's made by the vaccine. No, the vaccine is the weapon. The vaccine is the thing that is the weapon designed against us. Forget about this gain of function stuff, folks. And forget about all the other nonsense that they're telling you.
01:57:00 It's just amazing on a daily basis how much they lie to us and how much they manipulate these studies and how they manipulate people with studies saying, well, yeah, we have had some promising anecdotes, you know, about B-17, about Ivermectin, but we're not doing the studies on it because we can't make any money. And if we don't have any studies, you're not allowed to talk about it. Well, some of us don't play that game. And again, as I pointed out, the drug that they use the most in terms of making the most money, $22 billion a year selling statin drugs. And they've got a study that they cherry picked.
01:57:40 1948 gave them the studied 5,000 people. And it gave them a study that they could use to sell $22 billion worth of drugs every year. But there have been other studies, an 800,000. person, not 5,000, but 800,000, done over 35 years, says just the opposite. And you're seeing one physician after the other come out and talk about it. Here's Dr. Jack Wolfson talking about how they have cooked the books, even in terms of things like cholesterol management, telling us exactly the opposite of what is good for us. So I'm going to tell you not to worry at all about total cholesterol.
01:58:25 It is a fallacy that was developed in the 1960s and 70s to worry about total cholesterol and heart attack risk. Still, many people do not get the memo that cholesterol is critically important. That's why all animals have it. That's why breast milk has it. That's why eggs contain it because that's how a chicken comes to life. Do not fear the total cholesterol. In fact, for people older than 60, the higher the total cholesterol, the longer they live. That's right. So if you have low cholesterol, be very afraid, especially when you're over 60.
01:59:00 Now, a study from 2016 by over 16 different authors, including Ufa Ravnikov and also Asimaholtra and other cardiologists are in this paper in the British Medical Journal showed that the majority of studies show that the higher the LDL cholesterol, the lower your risk of dying. Get that? That's right. That's the key thing. They tell you something that is correlated strongly to living to 100 years. They tell you to avoid it by all costs. And I've got a drug that I want to sell you that's going to minimize it in your life. This is the upside down, inverted, perverted medical industry.
01:59:43 Perverted because of the love of money. Thank you for joining us, folks. Have a good day. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common peasant. to track and control us, their commons project, to make sure the commoners own nothing
02:00:22 and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
02:00:57 Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidnightshow.com.
There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click any sentence in the transcript to leave one.