The DeVory Darkins Show - DOJ drops Disturbing Update as Democrats attack on Hegseth goes sideways

Episode Date: March 31, 2026

DOJ issues shocking update on Synagogue attacker as Democrats shame Pete Hegseth. This comes after it has been proven the attacker was affiliated with Hezbollah. Also, Democrats are now claiming praying over our troops is dangerous.EPISODE SPONSOR: Contact our sponsor Chapter https://askchapter.org/devory or call [phone].FOLLOW ME:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.x.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.rumble.com/c/devorydarkins⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://devory.wtf.tv⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠BUY ME A COFFEE:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://buymeacoffee.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SHOP OUR MERCH STORE:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://store.devorydarkins.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠BUSINESS INQUIRIES:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠[e-mail]⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

In today's video, the DOJ has issued a major update regarding the Michigan Synagogue attacker. Also, MS now hosts is now attacking Pete Hexeth for praying over our soldiers. And Idaho and Iowa just passed a bill that bans men going into women's restroom. So what is the issue exactly? Well, we'll answer that in today's video. But first, what is going on with this Michigan synagogue attacker? Listen to it for yourself. Hezbollah has been a notorious anti-American terrorist terrorist organization.

for decades. Remember that the terrorist from Hezbollah in 1983 drove a truck loaded with explosives into a building to kill Americans. That is exactly what this terrorist did a few weeks ago in our backyard. He methodically planned, armed himself, and then drove an explosives laden truck into a temple filled with American children. And SAC Runyon showed you just some of the other evidence that he supported Hezbollah. His phone and videos were filled with their terrorist propaganda, including his deliberate use of Hezbollah yellow. Third, this man acted under Hezbollah's direction and control. I've seen some odd attempts to explain away or even lessen this terrorist attack by claiming that he was an isolated lone wolf.

But that is misleading. Terrorist propaganda is designed to activate the so-called lone wolf to act on behalf of the terrorist organization. So why is this a major announcement from the Department of Justice and the FBI? agents who are leading up the case. Well, one, it, in my opinion, debunks the media narrative that this was a lone wolf. This had nothing to do with the conflict in Iran, has nothing to do with terrorist groups around the world who are looking to, obviously destroy rest of civilization, particularly the United States of America, and witness our demise. So there's that. And then secondly, it points to the overall problem currently with Congress, as they still have not funded the Department of Homeland Security.

So I don't know how many more deaths do they need on their hands as they continue to play games with the American people. Now, obviously nobody died in this particular attack, but other attacks people did. See Austin, right, for an example. And third, it shows you the problem with unvetted mass immigration that happened under the Biden administration. It's a huge issue. And the administration's still dealing with it today. Now let's go to this clip. Watch.

Although the assailants attack planning and mobilization to violent began in earnest on March 9th, which I will fully detail here shortly. A review of his online activity since January 2026 revealed a reoccurring search history of pro-Hesbullah news channels, Iranian news channels, and videos about shootouts and bullets. He regularly consumed breaking news and statements and live coverage of the current Secretary General of Hezbollah, Naim Kassim, and viewed news coverage about an Iranian fatwa for total jihad against the U.S. military. Beginning on March 9th, during the early mornings, the assailant started viewing webpages of local synagogues, and in the afternoon, he attempted to purchase a weapon from two

different individuals, both of whom we've identified and interviewed. After those people denied his request, he then purchased an AR-style rifle at a local gun store in Dearborn Heights, along with 10 rifle magazine. and approximately 300 rounds of 223 rifle ammunition. Now, when you hear that statement, you already know what people on the left will say about this. This is why we need to ban guns. And I guess it's not really a joke, but that is the initial reaction every time. The problem is that this man was committed.

This criminal was committed. This radical was committed. There was nothing that was going to stop him. So whether it was rifles or pistols or bombs or ICE. or homemade devices that could wreak havoc, he was going to figure it out. That's the part that most people never want to admit. And again, if we speak to the problem with our vetting system in our country, that's the source right there.

But, you know, people online will try to blame so-and-so instead of looking at the root cause of something like this. Now, speaking of unvetted, listen to this. Can you vet to ensure that a man like this, I think the words you used were a predisposition to go in this direction, don't end up becoming American citizens. And maybe you could have seen that he had relatives that were members of Hezbollah. But to the radicalization point, how do you vet against that? Let's say none of that cropped up.

I mean, we had four of these in a month, right? Were all of these guys somebody who should have been caught through a vetting process? Or were they guys who were in America, maybe through a family sponsorship, who weren't here to be good Americans, who were open to radicalization? After 19 years, they're back. Frankie Munes, Brian Cranston, and the rest of the family reunite in Malcolm in the middle, life's still unfair. After 10 years avoiding them how and lowest demand Malcolm be at their anniversary party, pulling him straight back into their chaos.

Malcolm in the middle, life's still unfair. A special four-part event, streaming April 10th on Hulu on Disney Plus. Yeah, I think the one thing that's clear, they certainly didn't have a high degree of loyalty to the United States when they're so susceptible to radicalization or anything else. So are we vetting for the risk? Maybe we can't do that. But are we vetting high enough for the loyalty, for the desire to contribute? And also the objective standard, which we've talked about, will this person objectively make the United States a better place? Not simply will they not harm us, but will they make us better? And how is that done with this individual? Because I do think it is very hard to vet people for crime or pre-dis business. But certainly certain countries, it's even harder because records and other things are harder to obtain. All right. So let's just take a break. I got to share this message because it's an important one, especially for the people watch my show who happen to be on Medicare or you're thinking about getting on Medicare. You have to reach out to my friend's chapter. Why is that exactly? I think by now you

would agree that the entire process is confusing, intimidating, frustrating. In some cases, you were sold that you were supposed to be on a particular plan. You actually go to use that plan and then you're stunned that you can't even use the doctor that you want. There are countless stories about how frustrated it is for seniors out there who are on Medicare. So the next logical step is to talk to people that you could trust. And the reason you can trust them is because they've been saving seniors at least $1,000 a year on their health care costs. And they might be able to do the same for you. But you have to call them 3-2-3-4-3-4-3-4-2-0. Take charge of your health care today. And here's the other thing I would add on. It's definitely going to be difficult

because one of the political parties in our country does not believe in the term illegal immigration. They don't believe in vetting people. If they had it their way, no one would have to prove anything. They could just walk across the border. So it's going to continue to be an issue, unfortunately. And if Democrats seize power again, yeah, there will probably be more people like him. We just have to understand what the reality is here. And here's the other thing.

Democrats do not like the word nationalism. They actually think nationalism equals Nazis. That's literally what they believe. And I'll prove it to you, which takes us to our next update. They're already trying to rip the Secretary of War Pete Hexeth for praying over our soldiers. Listen. Let every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness and our great nation. Give them wisdom in every decision.

Endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy. Secretary of Defense, Pete Hexas, says God. has chosen a side in President Trump's war with Iran and its America's side. Hegset, who's begun monthly Christian prayer services inside the Pentagon, is blending Old Testament wrath

with Christian nationalist holy war rhetoric and overriding hundreds of chaplain codes designed to respect and serve other religions. Military leaders, legal experts, and veterans across the country tell the Washington Post what Hegset is doing is dangerous. Okay, let me try to understand this. And you guys, please help me out in the comments section. What do you

believe is more dangerous? The mainstream media being sympathetic to this Iranian regime, continuing to create stories that purposely undermine the president of the United States, they almost sound like they're rooting for the president to fail, or the Secretary of War, praying over soldiers. I didn't know praying was dangerous. Now, we know the Hezbollah affiliated terrorists who attacked that Michigan synagogue. He's dangerous. The ideas he had in his mind were dangerous. I didn't know praying was dangerous.

Please help me out here. It absolutely is new in my entire 36 years of my military service. It divides our military. It does not unite us. Not only is it illegal under the Constitution, separation of church and state. It's forcing religion on those who perhaps do not believe in the same way. Our chaplains are there to provide religious, spiritual, to meet the spiritual needs of the military members and their families, provide counseling and hope, and to be the eyes and ears for the commander, and to be looking at the morale and the welfare of the units. Right now, those Christian nationalist ideas, especially Christian, are being prominent and they are not treating others with dignity and respect.

All right, let's try to dissect this intellectually. We know that this administration has not crammed Christianity down the throats of Americans. How do we know that? Because the president has not signed any official law, you know, forcing people to adhere to Christian values. That hasn't happened. Okay? They have not defunded people because they don't want to get on board with Christianity. That hasn't happened.

Nobody's been banned or censored as a result. That hasn't happened. So when you have them coming out and manufacturing this idea that Christian nationalism is a threat to democracy, and it's a danger to our society. They are deflecting. They are the ones who are truly dangerous, folks. Now, as you guys know, I'm a Christian, but I don't cram it down your throat. You could be whatever you want to be, okay?

But I'll tell you what, whatever you believe in, you've got to stand on it. And there's no doubt. This is not the language of a healthy society. This is not the language of people who truly want to see people win and be successful in life. No, this is a language that is directly targeted. in the very fabric of our country. Why? Well, as some people believe, they want to push us into Marxism.

Let's go to this Iowa, state senator who's been exposed for this very thing. New audio has come up, I guess exposing her. We're saying that Christianity causes violence. We have seen some pretty uncomfortable ways that faith and political power have collided. you know, seeing the flag and the cross conflated. We have seen religious actors supporting specific political candidates. Even when those candidates might not seem to match the values of that professed religious faith, there is this very strong allegiance to specific candidates.

And that confuses us and makes us wonder what on earth is going on. And we have seen religion and political violence showing up more and more in our public spaces. It's something that is just very in our faces and something that we're very concerned about and something that feels very threatening right now at this time. So when Pete Hexeth is praying over soldiers, they say that as a threat. Guys, what are we talking about? We're talking about what was written with George Orwell. they're changing the meanings of definitions.

They're changing the meanings of words. Why? Because they want to shift people's perspective on things. If they can control people's perspective, it's over. So what they're hoping for is the American public will see Christianity as the problem in our country. As you guys know, Christianity is not the problem in our country. Okay.

There's other things that are definitely problems in our country if you want to talk about religion. But again, they won't call that out. And just to make my point here, so we're all on the same page. Isn't it fascinating that they spend more time attacking Christians than they do actual ideologies that are committing terror attacks on our soil? I have not seen a terror attack go down in the name of Jesus Christ because they were a Christian. I haven't seen that.

All right. Let's just leave it alone. Okay. Easter and prayers. I went to ask you about something the Pope said yesterday. So Pope knew said yesterday, and I quote him, God does not listen to the prayer of those who wage war. Can you comment on that? I think our nation was a nation founded 250 years ago almost on Judeo-Christian values.

And we've seen presidents, we've seen the leaders of the Department of War, and we've seen our troops go to prayer during the most turbulent times in our nation's history. And I don't think there's anything wrong with our military leaders or with the police. president calling on the American people to pray for our service members and those who are serving our country overseas. In fact, I think it's a very noble thing to do. And if you talk to many service members, they will tell you they appreciate the prayers and support from the commander in chief and from his cabinet. I guess this begs the question, when did praying over our men and women in our own forces become more controversial than the actions of, I don't know, the Hezbollah affiliated attacker in Michigan, the terrorist attack in honor.

Austin, the failed terrorist attack in New York City, or what this Aradian regime has done to our soldiers abroad. Who knew praying over our soldiers would be more dangerous than all of that? Again, I don't know how I was to explain it than to just say plainly that Christianity is under attack in different forms. And what they're doing is very lazy. They wrap everything they disagree with religious-wise under the term Christian nationalism. And it's just really disrespectful to our intelligence. All right, let's move on. And when you really want to talk about disrespectful to our intelligence.

So what's happening right now is this viral clip on the Fox News after Idaho decided to ban men from women's bathrooms. And the Olympics has banned men from participating in women categories, if that makes sense. So I want to watch this debate happen. And then we'll talk about it. Watch. passed a bill on Friday to ban people in the state from using bathrooms or changing rooms that do not match the gender they were assigned at birth. Once it becomes law, the bill would make it a crime to enter a restroom or changing room designated for the opposite biological sex.

So for more on all of this and the legality of all this, let's welcome in, Judge Andrew Napolitano. Great to see you this. Good at this. What a pleasure. What a pleasure. It's like 10 hours earlier. I know. What a pleasure to be with you, my friend.

But this is actually a serious thing, like having a daughter myself. I would consider dealing with this in a very personal way, but this seems like common sense to me. Is there any law that you could think of that might allow someone to challenge this, some tranny to challenge this important? Right. Well, you know it's going to be challenged. So the way I just read it about an hour ago, the way the law is written, it applies to everybody. It doesn't apply just to transgender people. So no person shall use a restroom in, and it lists the type of restroom, government building, government building, public, accommodation, school, etc.

That is not theirs assignable by birth, except in dire emergency, except for law enforcement purposes, there's a bunch of exceptions. If this statute was written to target transgender people, and it probably was, although if you read it on its face, it's neutral, then the government has a higher burden. They're going for intent then. Correct, correct. Then the government has a higher burden to meet. Okay, but then my pushback to that would be, does that?

Does the court even recognize transgender people? According to the Supreme Court, they don't. Now, obviously, the three left this on that Supreme Court they do, but the conservative justices do not. They still recognize that there's only two genders. Again, this is the problem in our society's identity has superseded common sense, has superseded policy. When you're leading with identity, you're going to have all sorts of problems. And this is one of them. The fact that we even have to write a law that tells people that if you're a man, because you

have two balls, okay, you are not allowed to go into a female restroom, okay? I mean, it's kind of self-explanatory, right? We had no issues up to this point in our society or really across the world until now. I wonder why that is. I think we know why. I'm going to show you an example of why. I want you to listen to this woman on Fox News earlier today. Try to defend the Democrats' position on this. There's a law that which is passed in Idaho that criminalizes people using bathrooms, because people are terrified of trans people going into their bathroom. I've never been scared of a trans woman in a bathroom. You know what?

That's not about fear. It's about making sure that there are states in place. I've never been afraid of a trans woman in my bathroom. I'm afraid of straight men in my bathroom. That's who I'm afraid of. Well, that's who goes in under guys of pretending to be transgender. I also think the issue is not that Republicans have an issue with transphobia at all. It's that that's what the narrative pushed by the left to make everything about transphobia.

The issue about the material in school was about eroding parents' rights and inappropriate sexual material for young kids. This is about protecting biological women. So it's always like a different issue that is perverted by the left to say this is about transphobia but has nothing to do. I don't know. Maybe you're wearing your feelings on the outside too much. If we just keep saying transphobia a hundred times, I think you're just hoping that kind of takes up. I'm just loving this. The hill the left is going to die on apparently.

It's amazing. We started this by saying this. I started this by saying it's not going to be an electoral issue this year. I don't think that left is going to die on this. We're going to die on the war in Iran that we didn't need to go to and gas prices over $5 a gallon. That's what we're going to die on. But this issue I do feel pretty strongly about. That last comment that she made sums up the problem when it comes to politics in America.

Okay. I mean, on one hand, people just care about the economy. That's all they care about at the end of the day. Okay. A lot of the toxicity that you see online, a lot of this political, you know, fight that's happening online and how people are so divided, people are exhausted of that, if that makes sense. But at the same time, people aren't stupid either. They're not going to entertain men going into women's restrooms. And yes, you are a man.

I don't care if you call yourself Jamie or Patty or, you know, Sarah. If you were born a man because you have two balls, that's exactly what you are. And that's not attacking. And just by me saying this out loud, you know what they're going to coin this as? Oh, DeVore's rhetoric is dangerous. He makes me feel threatened. See, again, it goes back to trying to shift your perspective on things. If they're successful at doing that, you're not going to be able to see through this nonsense.

All right. Let's go to someone who knows all about this. Chloe Cole, who was on Adam Carolla show, who had this to say. Having been on these drugs myself, I know just how disorienting it is. and I know just how much it can twist your mind. Just being told that this is going to make you happy, and then it just distorting you further and further. It's not an easy process to go through,

especially when you're young, and you don't know who you are yet. And I feel like on either side, there's, people are very black and white about this. There's the, a lot of the mainstream media is trying to suppress those incidents of these, these transgender shooters and not make the obvious connection between their mental health issues leading to their transition and then the tragedy that unfolds from that point on.

And then there's the people who, of course, are just immediately dismissing them as, oh, they're just, they're crazy, and they just have mental illness. And I think while that is true, I think the bigger picture is that there is a systemic failure on the part of these individuals to be able to figure out their real problems, and then the doctors worsening that, and then the mainstream media, by choosing to uphold the ideology rather than question it in its role and these violent incidents, is continuing that.

Yeah, again, she's just saying exactly what we all know in our hearts, whether it's social media, whether it's academia, or the doctors, there has been a coordinated campaign to convince people at the deepest level of their psyche by using guilt and triggering emotions like death to convince people that being trans is the appropriate solution. That is exactly what's happened. So while you have all these people protesting, no kings. It's fascinating.

We saw kings when it came to pharmaceutical companies, doctors and surgeons and mainstream media trying to coerce the parents into believing into this lie. And guys, if I was the devil myself, this is exactly what I'd be doing. I'd be targeting parents and educators and doctors, the people that you trust the most with this disease mentally. And I would infect their minds with this stuff. That's why people don't think twice about it. They think it's, yeah, this is the right solution.

It's not. Let me go one step further to prove my case. Here's a non-bionary lawyer from Canada saying this. for trans people is so that we can do our part to fight back against transphobia. Transphobia is a pattern of negative conduct towards trans people that begins with misgendering and can end with violence and murder. Every November 20th, on Transgender Day of Remembrance, we memorialize the hundreds of trans people who were killed that year just because they were trans. The most important reason to use appropriate pronouns for trans people is because of the message

sentence when you don't. If you make an assumption based on somebody's name or their appearance and say, hey brother, hey sister, you might be getting it wrong and you're saying to that trans person that you know who they are better than they do. But that's not how gender works. We all have the autonomy to decide what our gender is and the sensitive thing to do is to ask. Asking people's pronoun. So that was a training clip if that makes sense. Number one, I think anybody who's been violent against each other. It would have been transgender being violent against people who are not. I mean, we've seen it in the recent school shootings. There's no way to debate otherwise. Okay, that's first. Secondly, we know the playbook of the current Democrat Party as it is constructed,

particularly progressives. When they come across people they disagree with, automatically they believe their life is being threatened when it's not. What they mean to say is their ideas are being threatened. It means they are being challenged into thinking, which is something they haven't done much of. That's what's really going on here. And number three, if this individual is shooting videos like this, imagine how many more videos out there exists. Imagine that. That's the problem. And I just don't think a lot of people in the media truly respect that problem.

And obviously, people in the Democrat Party. So this brings this to a close here. Why don't we get your guys' comments below? First, what do you make of this whole, you know, Iowa banning men from going into women, restaurants? It kind of sounds like common sense to me. but trans genders would say this is threatening their very existence. And then what do you make of what happened earlier with the DOJ confirming the motivations of this attacker on the Michigan synagogue?

And then what do you make of them attacking Pete, Hex, F, for praying over our troops? Give me your thoughts, everything you got in the comment section below. Now let's go to our next video that involves the media once again crashing out because the president not only paid TSA and employees, which essentially proved Democrats wrong once again, but also his potential peace deal with Iran. You guys miss out on those updates and more. Click on the video because it's coming up right now.