Thinking Out Loud with Alan Shlemon - God Changes People’s Names. A Transgender Argument?
Episode Date: September 25, 2026Some argue that because God changes people’s names in the Bible, this provides justification for people who identify as transgender to change their names. Alan examines this argument and explains wh...y the biblical examples don’t support that conclusion.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Does the fact that God changes people's names in the Bible support the practice of changing
one's name as a part of a transgender transition process? Well, I want to answer this question
in this episode of my podcast, Thinking Out Loud with Alan Schleman.
There's a subset of Christians who are intent on enlisting scripture to justify transgender
ideology. And their latest strategy is to point to the many instances where God changes people's
names. So, for example, God changes Abram to Abraham, or he changes Sarai to Sarah, or he changes
Jacob to Israel. And the new names reflect a new identity, purpose, and or relationship. In Abraham's
case, Abram means exalted father, but Abraham means father of many nations, which represented Abraham's
new status and covenant with God. Now, God's renaming of Jacob to Israel is particularly
relevant for the transgender movement. And that's because since the word Israel means struggle with
God, transgender advocate and author Austin Harky says this about the imagery. He says,
quote, it is incredibly familiar to transgender Christians who have spent a portion of their
life grappling with their faith and their gender, end quote. And so many people who
identifies transgender will pick a new name for themselves as sort of part of their
social transitioning. And from their perspective, it reflects their new identity. Now, typically,
they'll choose a name that aligns with their gender identity or their self-perception. And Hartke writes
this, quote, when a transgender person changes their name, they often work within these same
categories, either taking on a name that highlights something true and establishes about their
personality and their connection to others, or embracing a name that shows
the world how they've changed and who they aspire to be. Now, the human rights campaign agrees with
this sentiment, actually, and they have an article called What Does the Bible Say about transgender
people? And in it, the authors explain how God basically set up a pattern for others,
especially for those who identifies transgender to follow. And here's what they say in their article.
They say, quote, the Bible establishes a precedent that name changes can be either an uncovering
of who God has always seen a person to be, or as a recognition of a new identity and a new
beginning. These two are important principles at play for many transgender and non-binary people
in being able to affirm their gender identities with themselves, with their communities, and
ultimately with God, end quote. And so, since God gives new names, it's inferred that we can
give ourselves a new name as well. And they're asking basically, what's the problem with that?
right? So let me give you three concerns I have with this. First, it's true that scripture
doesn't prohibit name changes. And personally, I'm not troubled by that practice either. And the reason
is, is because names are a matter of convention. They're neither inherent nor an essential part of a
person. Rather, they are arbitrary labels that function like a tag or a pointer. Now, while some
parents might choose a child's name because it has meaning for them, it's still just a name,
right? That could have been something else. And so therefore, changing your name is permissible,
even if it entails going from a very feminine sounding name like Sophia to a more
unisex name like Taylor. Okay. Now, having said that, I am opposed to changing one's name to an
obviously opposite sex name for the purpose of signaling a gender transition.
or transgender transition.
And that's because that kind of a name change
is part of an entire transition process
that's outlined by the World Professional Association
for Transgender Health.
And according to W Path's most recent standards of care,
which are SOC version 8,
people who identifies transgender can be,
and actually are often,
encourage the transition according to a three-stage process.
And this entails social, hormonal,
and surgical transitioning. And changing your name is a part of the first step of social transitioning.
And so I can't endorse a decision that partakes in this first transition step because it makes me
complicit in the three-step process that can lead someone to self-harm through the surgical
alteration and or amputation of perfectly healthy body tissue. So that's my first.
concern. Now here's the second problem. While it's true that God changes people's names,
he never once gives a new name that is incongruent with a person's biological sex. In other
words, he never renames Abram to something like Rebecca, right? Or he never renamed Sarai to
something like Isaac. So there is zero precedent for a cross-sex name. Every new biblical name
marks a new role, a new characteristic, or a new covenant, while preserving the name's connection
to the person's sex. Therefore, while name changes might be permissible, there's always still
boundaries that are rooted in God's created order. And finally, the third problem that I have with
this argument is that it kind of, well, not kind of, it, it does ignore the broader biblical teaching
about sex and identity. You see, scripture teaches that our identity is not detached from our bodies,
right? Our souls are embodied in a physical form that God declares very good, right? And crossing
sex-specific boundaries is always described as sin in the Bible. And so it's hard to imagine that God
would condone changing to an opposite sex name, since that would contradict what he's already taught in
scripture. So attempting to enlist the Bible as an ally of transgender ideology is not going to work,
right? The precedent that God sets with name changes has nothing to do with the modern notion
of gender transition. And basically, it's anachronistic to try to impose the latest sort of
component of gender theory onto an ancient biblical text. It's true that names are important and name
changes are certainly permissible, but there's no precedent set by God for the kind of change
that transgender advocates desire. Well, that's all I have for you today. If you've enjoyed this
episode, I encourage you to share it with a friend. And also don't forget to subscribe to my podcast
so that you don't miss any future episodes. And I thank you for listening. I look forward to thinking
out loud with you next time.
