TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - False Flag Alert: Moscow Says USA Plotting Chemical Attack in Ukraine to Blame Putin
Episode Date: December 21, 2021Russian President Vladimir Putin today told his military officers that Moscow will deliver a technical-military response to NATO. President Putin made remarks to the Collegium of the Ministry of Defen...se. Russia’s Defense Ministry is managed by a council chaired by the Defense Minister, deputy defense ministers, the heads of the Main Defense Ministry and General Staff Directorates, the commanders of the Joint Strategic Commands, and the three services of the armed forces.Defense Minister Segei Shogu also spoke to the defense council. Gen. Shogiu accused the United States of sending private military contractors to Ukraine to plot a false flag event involving chemical weapons that could be blamed on Russia. Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 12/21/21
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The following program is made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support of listeners just like you.
To find out how you can help, visit nothing but the truth, so help us God.
I'm Rick Wiles.
Russian President Vladimir Putin today told his military officers
that Moscow will deliver a technical military response to NATO.
President Putin made remarks to the Collegium of the
Ministry of Defense. Now Russia's Defense Ministry is managed by this council, this
Collegium, chaired by the Defense Minister, the Deputy Defense Ministers, the heads of
the main Defense Ministry, and the General Staff directorates also in that council, the
commanders of the Joint Strategic Command and the three services of the Russian armed
forces.
Defense Minister Sergei Shagou also spoke to the defense council.
General Shagou accused the United States of sending private military contractors to Ukraine to plot a false flag event involving chemical weapons that could be blamed on Russia.
Doc Burkhardt and I have the full details today.
Well, Doc, the soap opera doesn't stop, does it?
Right. So is this the false flag that we're going to be needing to watch out for now?
It appears, if the Russians are correct.
Have we seen the script before?
Yes, in Syria.
Right.
The West would plant chemical weapons in Syria and then blame it on the butcher Bashar Assad.
He was always a butcher.
You know, he woke up in the morning and said, I'm going to kill my own people.
I'm going to kill little children today.
I'm going to gas my own children in this country.
And so then the Western propaganda, the London and New York newspapers, the Washington Post, New York Times, BBC, Fox News, CNN, they would all run with the stories.
The butcher of Syria, Bashar Assad, he must be stopped.
We have to send in NATO troops to stop this man.
He's using chemical weapons on little children.
And then as time would go by, the truth would come out.
Right.
And it would be a staged event, a false flag.
Of course, they would never admit that. But then the evidence would come out. Right. And it would be a staged event, a false flag. Of course they would never admit that, but then the evidence would come out.
You'd see people with garden hoses spraying people off and stuff and everything.
It was just ridiculous after a while.
And you notice they don't try to defend it anymore either.
No, because the public's forgotten it.
Sure.
There's another headline.
We're now into another stage of propaganda.
Right. Omicron. All right. That's this week. Omicron. Omicron is taking over the whole world right now.
We'll talk about Omicron later. Right now we're going to talk about this possible false flag.
We'll see, you know, are the Russians correct? Has the U.S. sent commandos, General Chukwu said private military contractors, to plant chemical weapons in
Donbass, the Russian-dominated province of Ukraine where a lot of fighting has been going
on.
So if this is true, then we can expect any day to hear allegations that Putin has gassed the Ukrainian children.
Probably going to do it on Christmas Day, Doc.
Right, because you've got to do it Christmas Day.
That would be horrible, just dastardly.
Putin would get up on Christmas Day and gas little Ukrainian children just to destroy their Christmas Day.
Can you see the headlines?
Just imagine the headlines next week all over the Western nations.
The Christmas Day attack in Ukraine.
The butcher Putin massacres children on Christmas Day.
See, when you see these stories enough, you see a pattern that develops.
Absolutely. So let's take a look see these stories enough, you see a pattern that develops. Absolutely.
So let's take a look at these stories.
This story comes from Navasti News Service.
This is General Chagoo.
He's also a retired general, but he is the Secretary of Defense, the defense minister.
In the United States, he would be secretary of defense of their Pentagon. So Chagoo said the United States was preparing a provocation with chemical weapons in the east of Ukraine.
So if you were living in Russia, this is what you read in your news reports today.
This is what you saw on television in Russia today.
This is what you saw on television in Russia today. This is what you read on the Internet.
The United States plotting a false flag to blame Russia.
And it wouldn't be the first time that they've accused of that.
But General Shogu here goes on to say,
U.S. private military companies located in the Donetsk region are preparing a provocation with chemicals in eastern Ukraine,
said Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shogun.
Tanks with unidentified chemical components have been delivered to the cities of Adivka and Krasnyi Leman
to commit provocations, he said at an expanded meeting of the Defense Ministry Board
with the participation of President Vladimir Putin. According to the ministry,
about 120 representatives of American PMCs, private military contractors, who train Ukrainian special forces have arrived in the region. And so this is usually how it begins, right, Rick?
Private military contractors show up and... Pentagon can say we had no involvement in it at all, right?
Defense secretary can stand in front of
news
Reporters in the United States and absolutely deny that the Pentagon
Was involved there US troops were involved if they get caught if they get caught red-handed in a false flag
Then the US Pentagon can say we absolutely had no role in this at all.
Oh, but the private military contractors do it.
Put in plain language, paid mercenaries.
That's all they are, a private military contractor.
And so they're in it for the money.
Toss is also reporting.
This is President Putin said Moscow will not permit NATO infrastructure near Russia's borders as well.
And so Russia will by no means permit the deployment of NATO infrastructures in the territories of neighboring countries.
The chief Russian delegate at the military security and armed control talks in Vienna, Konstantin Gavrilov, said on the YouTube channel Soloviev Live on Tuesday.
I believe, yes, or there will follow a very different response, he said when asked,
if Russia was determined to prevent the deployment of NATO's infrastructure near its borders.
Gavrilov recalled that NATO regularly held military exercises near Russian borders
and its planes made reconnaissance flights over the Black and Baltic seas.
The so-called rotation, in fact, means permanent presence of military units while we're urged to
pull back our forces as far as the Urals, he said. And so you combine these two stories together,
Rick, about the possibility of private military contractors, mercenaries in Ukraine right now.
Russia, of course, is aware of this.
And you can label it any way that you want to.
But really, that's a NATO presence, isn't it?
Of course.
By extension.
Of course it is.
And what this Russian official at the arms control talks in Vienna, what he was saying was that you
already have NATO troops in Eastern Europe along the Russian border.
Right.
When he talks about rotation, so they bring in a couple thousand troops, and then they,
let's say Britain sends in a thousand troops.
They're there for a month.
Then they bring in the French. Then they bring in the French.
Then they bring in the French.
Then the French leave and the Germans come in.
Then the Germans leave and the Americans come in.
And what he's saying is it doesn't matter how you cut it.
At the end of the day, there are thousands of NATO troops on our border.
They just change faces.
But the numbers remain the same.
The same troop strength is constant at all times.
They're just different soldiers. And so the other thing is that he said,
Russia will by no means, there's no doubt here in what he's saying,
we by no means will permit the deployment of NATO infrastructure in the territories of neighboring countries.
Anything left to doubt there?
No.
By no means means what?
He means business is what it means.
Means they're going to take them out.
Right.
And I'm standing by this. I honestly believe the Russians have made the decision.
If the U.S. and NATO refuse to negotiate, if they refuse to enter into serious talks and provide Russia with security guarantees that there will not be weapons and missiles and nukes and troops on their border. I believe the decision has already been made in the Kremlin.
They will take out all NATO troops and weapons and missiles on their border.
They'll take them out.
And I don't think there's anything to even ponder anymore.
We've crossed the line now.
War is so close at this point.
It's possible.
You know, one of the tabloids, we haven't run with it this week.
It was in one of the tabloids.
But you know how the propaganda people use.
The government propaganda, they put stuff in tabloids.
To test it out.
To test it.
To see the response of people.
And just to get the idea, get the headline out there.
Well, that's a tabloid.
Is that story for real?
We don't know.
But what the story was this week was that Western intelligence, or I should say British,
British intelligence, told the newspaper, you know, unnamed sources and the intelligence agencies in London told the newspaper that Putin would invade Ukraine on Christmas Eve.
Christmas Eve.
Well, he's got to gas the kids.
He's going to come down the chimney.
Are you dressed as Santa Claus and gas all the kids on Christmas Eve. But no, they really are saying that British intelligence has told the government in London that Putin may invade Ukraine on Christmas Eve.
Now, the Russians and Ukrainians don't celebrate Christmas on December 25th.
They celebrate January 6th.
Yes.
That's Christmas.
Right. Because they're Orthodox Christians. Right. They don't do the December 25th. They celebrate it January 6th. Yes, that's Christmas. Right.
Because they're Orthodox Christians.
Right.
They don't do the December 25th Christmas.
But they want you to think that coming up this weekend,
Putin may invade this weekend.
Or maybe they are thinking the Orthodox Christmas.
They didn't really say.
They just said Christmas Eve.
But the headline is the main thing.
They got the headline out there.
Intelligence warns government, Putin to invade Ukraine Christmas Eve.
Now we hear the Russians saying, and this was an official meeting of the Russian military today.
The Russians are saying there are tanks in Ukraine with chemical weapons.
There are 120 American private military contractors on the ground preparing a chemical attack that they're going to blame on Putin.
Is that going to happen Christmas Eve?
We'll see at this point. So maybe the reason they're giving us,
the West is giving us the dates of when the war starts
is because they know
when they're going to do
their dirty deed.
Right.
All right.
I want to go deeper into this
because Mr. Putin
spoke today
to the Russian military leaders
and there's going to be
a lot of text here
and I hope it's not
too boring to you. I mean, we are talking about here. And I hope it's not too boring to you.
I mean, we are talking about nuclear war.
I hope that's not too boring.
I mean, you can go to another podcast that's talking about something else.
But we're talking big boy stuff here.
This is real stuff, okay?
We're talking real big stuff here.
This isn't, we're not making up stuff here. This isn't, we're not making up stuff here. We're translating the Russian newspapers
and telling you what they're saying today. And they're talking about war with the United
States.
But no one's talking about it here.
No. They're talking about Omicron. Omicron's coming to get you. Omicron, which has all the strength of a cold.
Yes.
Instead, the Russians are talking about war today.
Yeah.
All right.
So let's go into this.
This is, well, the first one here, this is out of Germany, DW News.
Vladimir Putin threatens military technical reaction to NATO over Ukraine. I'm not quite sure.
It didn't go into detail. What is a military technical reaction? I know what a military
reaction is. I know what a technical reaction is. But this is combined. This is just military
technical reaction. But we have a quote from that story. So Russian President Vladimir Putin threatened a military technical reaction to NATO as he accused
the U.S. of an aggressive approach to Ukraine. And speaking at a meeting in the Ministry of Defense
in Moscow, Putin said, in case of continuation of the rather aggressive line of our Western
colleagues, we will respond with adequate military technical measures and we'll react
harshly to these unfriendly steps.
And so it doesn't leave much to the imagination.
We've talked about it over the past few weeks.
Russia's been testing hypersonic missile technology.
We know that.
That's an advance in technical warfare that they've made.
So if you were going to paint a picture and give me your impression of a harsh military technical response, what would that look like, Doc?
It would be messy. It would involve...
Blood?
Yes. That they're going to respond in a very unfriendly way to the unfriendly actions that have been generated toward them.
It's interesting that President Putin used the word unfriendly because it seems like Russia is doing everything they can to prevent everything from shaking down here.
You mentioned also the response that Putin gave, and Ria Novosti has this.
President Putin said the answer will be tough.
And so we're going to kind of take a deep dive into this, what President Putin discussed with
his leading generals at the collegium here in Moscow. And for several months now, the West
has been substantially accusing Moscow of preparing an invasion of Ukraine and threatening
with harsh sanctions.
At the same time, Washington and Brussels are pumping up the armed forces of Ukraine
with modern weapons and deploying military infrastructure along the Russian borders.
According to the president, the Kremlin is particularly concerned about the deployment
of elements of the U.S. global missile defense System in Eastern Europe. And that's the key part right there, Rick, in that, as President Putin said several weeks ago,
if you start putting a missile defense system in Eastern Europe, especially in the eastern province of Ukraine,
that minimizes the delivery of missiles to Moscow to five to seven minutes.
We have to respond to that.
We have to take that out.
We have an obligation to the people of Russia to defend them.
Doc, I have been reporting this story for so long.
I can remember as far back as President George W. Bush in the White House
and Putin was telling Bush the same
thing. This has been going on a long, long time. What I'm seeing in this is, it's just
like we said yesterday, this feeling of exasperation that the Russians have reached a point of. We're done.
A different tone now.
We're done.
We're not talking anymore.
We're not going to.
We've told them.
We've asked them.
We've done everything we can, and they just keep coming at us.
We're done.
We're going to punch them.
That's what I feel now.
It's so different.
But you can go all the way back to the days of George Bush,
and that's when this started, when Putin was warning Bush,
do not put missiles and troops on our border.
And so how many years have gone by now since George W. Bush?
So that's how long NATO and the United States has been inching its way to the Russian border.
And Putin knew then what the plan was, where we're at now in December 2021 is NATO has arrived on our border.
And the the evidence of this new level of concern is the meeting of the collegium in Moscow.
It's the war council.
Right.
That's basically what it is.
They had a war council today in Moscow.
And President Putin is putting this right in NATO's lap by saying what's happening now, the tension that is developing in Europe, it's their fault, Putin noted.
Today we are in a situation where we're forced to decide something. I want to emphasize again, we do not demand any special exclusive conditions for
ourselves. Russia stands for equal and indivisible security in the entire Eurasian space. Just leave
that right there. Putin said today we are in a situation where we are forced to decide something.
There's the line.
Underline that line.
Mind you, folks, he said this today talking to the Russian War Council.
Right.
The highest military leaders in Russia.
He said to those commanders, today we're in a situation where we are forced to decide something.
What do you think they decided to go to war with the United States?
That's what they decided today. Right. And he said, we're forced to do it.
We're compelled to do it because they will not listen to us.
They will not reason. They will not negotiate.
I don't want war.
We're going to have to fight.
Right.
That's what he's saying to the troops.
Let's go on.
Yeah.
The head of state stressed that NATO's eastward expansion is the consequence of the euphoria of the collective West victory in the Cold War
and an incorrect analysis of the situation in the international arena.
President Putin warned that Moscow would react harshly to unfriendly steps
and take military technical measures, as we talked about before, adequate to the threats.
In particular, for the military development of Ukraine by the North Atlantic Alliance,
if their infrastructure moves further, if the U.S. and NATO missile systems appear in Ukraine,
then their flight time to Moscow will be reduced to seven to ten minutes.
And if hypersonic weapons are deployed to five, Putin explained.
And so he's making it very clear if these weapons systems show up in Ukraine, we have to respond to it.
We have to respond because we have to protect Russia.
And of particular concern is the buildup of U.S. and NATO military forces directly on the Russian borders,
as well as the conduct of large-scale exercises, including unplanned ones.
Indeed, in recent years, maneuvers have been frequent on the eastern flank of the North Atlantic Alliance. Constance aircraft and drones from Western countries constantly visit Crimea and the
contact line in Donbass.
And he goes on to say the best way to react to such a situation is to prevent it.
Now, this is actually a statement by Leonid Ivanov, President of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems.
Right. And so he goes on to say the West is not our enemy.
It was necessary to legally formalize a ban for the countries of the former USSR on joining NATO.
Many of today's problems could have been avoided.
Of course, the United States is not eager to fight with us, but would be happy to knock us head on with Europe.
We need to negotiate directly with the Europeans, offer them a new system of collective security.
And of course, we must not forget China, which could become a strong ally.
So one of the other things that they're actually talking about.
Negotiating a a peace treaty with Europe.
Directly with Europe.
And we've heard that before.
Bypass the United States
and just work out a treaty with the European countries.
And we've heard that before, haven't we?
Yes.
So we heard it in St. Petersburg just a few years ago
when we were there for the International Economic Forum
at St. Petersburg.
Well, we heard Vladimir Putin basically offer to Emmanuel Macron, the leader of France,
hey, the U.S. isn't your only option on security here.
We're more European than you are American.
Why not join forces with a European nation for security, in particular Russia? So if NATO was established after World War II to protect Europe from the Soviet Union, the Soviet Union no longer exists.
But NATO does.
And NATO is now up on the border of Russia.
And Russia is saying to the European countries, do you want to fight?
We're not your enemies.
We don't want to fight.
We'll sign a treaty with the European nations.
We'll live peacefully with everybody here.
We don't need NATO.
That's literally what they're saying.
Why do you need NATO if the country that nato is supposed to fight
says to you we just want a peace treaty with you right why do you need nato with that you don't
it ceases to exist or its purpose but the warmongers need nato yes the warmongers need
war the warmongers need blood and the head head of NATO right now is a candidate to become
the governor of the central bank of Norway. So you go from warmongering to
money mongering. I mean, they all work together. It's the same group of people, international banksters, the Rothschilds.
They're running the whole operation.
And speaking of Mr. Stoltenberg, our researcher just sent me a note here just a moment ago
saying that NATO has rejected any kind of compromise with Russia regarding Ukraine.
Are you serious?
This just happened?
Right.
So there are.
So Jen Stoltenberg, this is from
Andalou Agency, saying that the alliance stands with Ukraine's right to choose its own path.
They just talked. They just this just happened, folks. Right. This just happened. NATO just slammed
the door in the face of Putin. And so NATO is going to do what NATO does, and that is provoke Russia at this point.
That's the guy right there, Stoltenberg,
who is now the candidate
to become the governor of the
Central Bank of Norway.
So it's the
banksters running
NATO.
And the banksters just
told Russia, we want to fight. Why? Because we're after your oil, your gas, your forest, your natural resources.
We're not going to stop until we take everything. That's really what they're after.
Right. Wow, that just happened as we're sitting here talking about this. It's almost kind of like...
Seeing it come to life right in front of your eyes.
It's almost like why even read the rest of these things where Putin's talking about negotiate.
We just witnessed in real time NATO telling the Russians, forget it.
We're not going to negotiate.
We're going to have war.
We're really moving to negotiate. We're going to have war. Doc, we're really moving
fast towards war.
Isn't that... If you were trying
to avert
a war, you wouldn't make that statement.
No, of course not.
Of course we will negotiate
with you. Of course we will.
Or at least do something along the lines,
let's talk about Ukraine. Yes.
But not just say, we're not talking at all about Ukraine.
And, you know, there is something to be said about all these former satellite Soviet states not having the ability to join NATO.
I mean, to create some sort of, you know, buffer, if you will, between what was, you know, what we consider Western Europe and the former Soviet Union.
But nation after nation, NATO's been picking them off one by one, one by one,
forgetting the agreements that they made, you know, 40 plus years ago, you know, 30 plus years ago when they when the Soviet Union collapsed.
And so so we're inching every day. Now we're taking big, giant steps toward a conflict with Russia.
And so keep watching us here.
Where did we leave off here in this story?
Well, we're at number 13 here.
So Defense Minister Shogu pointed out that American units with a total number of about 8,000 bayonets
are deployed on a rotational basis in the countries of Eastern Europe.
So this is creating a constant tension on Russian borders.
So in Ukraine, according to the general, more than 120 employees of American private military
companies are located in the settlements of Adivka and Priyazovskoe in the Donetsk region,
as we talked about earlier. They equip firing positions in residential buildings
and at socially significant facilities.
He's accusing them of setting up...
Firing zones.
Inside buildings where civilians are living, children.
They're preparing the Ukrainian Special Operations Forces
and radical armed groups for active hostilities.
In addition, tanks with unidentified chemical components are being moved in.
But this is something that he points out.
And so I want folks to really understand that this isn't unnatural for NATO to do.
NATO's been doing this for a long time, folks.
So he goes on to say,
it must be said that such actions are quite in the spirit of Western countries. Terrorist groups,
one way or another, connected with Washington and Brussels, have repeatedly used the chemical
trump card in Syria. After each such attack, the European and American media unanimously blamed the
attack on President Bashar al-Assad. In April 2017, NATO aircraft even launched a
missile attack on the Syrian air base al-Sharat in the province of Homs, citing yet another
unsubstantiated accusation of the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian authorities.
It is possible that Washington will decide on a similar adventure in the Donbass.
So you can pretty much bet on it.
It's probably going to happen.
This time the Russians are going to act.
This time they're going to act.
It's right on their border now, Doc. There was another member of the council who made a comment about chemical weapons.
This is Doctor of Military Sciences Konstantin Sivkov.
He said an extremely tense situation has developed in Ukraine.
There were more than enough private military contractor fighters there before.
The most dangerous thing is that they are now planning to imitate the use of chemical weapons and thereby justify the intervention of NATO forces in the war.
In addition, this may mean that the alliance is really ready to unleash an armed
conflict. And so this is, these are the discussions that the Defense Collegium is having in Moscow
right now. They're observing what's happening in the Donbass in Ukraine. They're seeing the
paid mercenaries starting to show up. They're seeing tanks with chemical components.
They have to assume that this is that tipping point that's going to cause, you're going to see
it in the press because journalists are going to go right along with the story too. They're using
chemical weapons in Ukraine. Those Russians have finally done it. They're killing kids in Ukraine
with chemical weapons. We have to do something.
We have to, you know, we can't let this keep going on.
Doug, I got another statement by Dr. Sivkov. Tell me if this sounds like a raving lunatic who wants war, has a blood lust. He went on to say, at the same time,
Russia's position is exclusively peacekeeping. We are actually taking up defense.
NATO is advancing on our borders, but there is nowhere to retreat.
Yes.
The main task of Russia is to exclude a direct military clash.
So he's saying nato is aggressive they're advancing onto our borders but we have nowhere to retreat
we're in our own country right where are we going to retreat to
the only option is you come into our country we're not going to let that happen but you know the russians aren't just sitting by letting things happen they're preparing for
whatever is going to happen next they're aware of the situation with the mercenaries
general shogu uh also recalled that in the outgoing year russian sailors have been carrying
out uh the umka operation in the arctic ocean The maneuvers involved more than 600 servicemen of various types of troops and civilian specialists,
as well as about 200 units of military equipment.
The central episode of the exercise was the simultaneous surfacing of three strategic
nuclear submarines at the North Pole.
Now, Rick, why do you think that this statement was included in this particular article?
That last sentence, the central episode of the exercise, Operation Umka.
I like Russian words like that. Umka.
OK, so the central episode of the exercise was a simultaneous surfacing of three strategic nuclear submarines at the North Pole.
Do you remember that story?
Yes.
We reported it.
We said to our True News audience, folks, do you understand what they did today was they brought up three nuclear submarines at the same time at the North Pole to show the West,
this is what we can do to you.
Those submarines armed with nuclear weapons
that will be able to fire missiles into the United States of America
that will arrive in minutes.
He made the point.
He brought it up today.
Yes.
Look, the Russians are not going to keep the military conflict confined to Ukraine.
Years ago, I asked the Lord, why is Vladimir Putin so patient?
Why is he putting up with the taunting?
Because the U.S. has been taunting him for years, trying to get him to start a war.
In my spirit, I heard the Holy Spirit say,
he will cut off the head of the snake.
And I immediately discerned
that Putin was a master chess player.
He was going to remain calm,
but he had his fists ready.
And when he, he knew he would get one punch.
That's all he gets.
One punch.
He knew he would have to take out the United States
with one punch.
That's what's coming our way
because of the insanity of Western leaders.
Tens of millions of people are going to die because of this stuff.
And Putin knows tens of millions of his people are going to die, too.
So when you read this in the Russian papers, you know that this is information
that they wanted to get out, that it's a message that they wanted to deliver. They wanted to make the West completely, make sure they were completely clear with what
they are going to do and what they're able to do. They're not hiding the fact. We will respond to
Ukraine and we'll even go so far. Remember those three subs that popped up at the North Pole?
We're ready to show you what we can do with them.
So there's nothing in here that is secret.
They're making it very clear.
You guys are crossing the line.
And we're ready to, you know, go toe-to-toe with you.
Yes, and turn your lights out.
Yes.
Well, let's change topics.
We'll take a look at what the Zionists are doing in Palestine.
Times of Israel reporting that the Israeli Defense Force has begun allowing their soldiers to shoot boys throwing rocks.
There's a line in this article, Rick, that I had to include here. What's different? They've been shooting.
I know.
It's just now it's going to be official.
You won't be punished for it.
The military says soldiers
are still directed to first try to make
an arrest without using deadly force.
I had
to put that in there because they never
try to make an arrest.
Their first response is
deadly force. The Palestinian
people don't have weapons.
They have rocks.
That's it.
That's it.
They have rocks.
That's the only thing you've left them is rocks.
That's the only thing they have is rocks.
You've taken everything else.
That's all they have is rocks.
That's right.
And out of their frustration, they throw rocks at Israeli Zionist troops that are on their land yes their palestinian
land they throw rocks at them go home leave go home where is home europe
go back where you came from you're not you're not Semitic.
The Palestinians are Semitics.
The Jews that lived in Palestine were Semitic.
The real Jews.
Not these fake Jews.
You got fake Jews occupying Palestine.
The Palestinian Muslims and Christians lived peacefully with the Palestinian Jews.
For centuries.
For centuries until the Zionists showed up, which started in the 1920s and the 30s.
And then by the 40s, they had enough infiltrators there and enough weapons that they were able to overthrow the Arab people and take their land and houses and massacre their children, which they're still doing to this day
doing it today and those are the descendants
The descendants of the people who were killed in 1948
Okay, that's their descendants
Okay, and they're left with throwing rocks and the Israeli military says, okay, we're going to make it official.
Our troops can shoot you.
So these Christian Zionists in America,
I'm going to say this to you again.
You're not on God's side.
You're on Satan's side.
If you're a Christian Zionist
and you're defending Israel,
shooting those Palestinian boys,
you're on Satan's side.
The God I serve is a God of justice.
And he knows.
He knows the evil that was done in Palestine.
And you better be careful about cheering it.
You know why?
Someday there may be Chinese soldiers in Texas and New Jersey and Idaho.
And all they have are rocks.
And you're throwing rocks at them.
And they're shooting your kids.
Okay.
That's how this can turn around.
Maybe 20 years from now but you your kids may be throwing
rocks at chinese occupiers that's why i defend the palestinian people they were wronged it's
one of the greatest injustices i've seen in my lifetime and the zionist controlled newspapers
and media in this country,
they've made the American people believe that all Palestinian people are terrorists.
Right.
They're all bad.
They're all evil.
They ought to be killed.
Yes.
No, they're not.
They're the nicest people you ever want to meet.
Amen.
And they've been wronged.
They've been grossly wronged.
And I will stand with them.
It's cost me.
There are a lot of people,
a lot of prominent people in this country,
in the evangelical church world,
who will not speak to me.
They treat me like I'm a leper
because I stand with the Palestinians.
I'm serious, Doc.
You know it.
They will not talk to me.
They won't associate with me. They will not talk to me. They won't associate with me.
They will not fellowship with me
because I stand with the Palestinians.
And it's a sad day.
It's a sad day.
But hey, they own that problem, not me.
If they want to cheer the killing of innocent people,
well, let's see how that goes on Judgment Day.
So anyhow, let's see how that goes on judgment day so anyhow let's uh jerusalem post uh israel was involved in general salamani's assassination says x idf intel chief to me no real news there
shut my mouth is that true i mean donald trump simply did what the Israelis told him to do.
He pleased them.
President Trump pleased the Zionists.
That's all he was doing.
He was pleasing them.
It was kind of like, you know, in the Bible.
And Herod saw that killing the Christians pleased the Jews.
Yes.
And so Trump saw that killing the Iranians pleased the Jews.
That's what that means right there.
Yes.
Trump pleased the Jews by killing Soleimani.
But this is the first time that someone at any level of, you know, in the Israeli military has confirmed that they were involved. We know it.
Yeah. We've known it
If we would have said it yet last year. Oh, you're anti-semitic, right?
But they can come out and say it and they're pro-semitic then right, right?
So it's okay for them to assassinate the generals of other nations
But if another nation assassinated their generals, that's an attack on Judaism, attack on all Jewry.
Yes.
They would have to be action taken.
But they can just kill people.
They can shoot Palestinian boys.
They can shoot generals in other nations.
They can do anything they want to do.
Why?
Because they're Zionists.
What are you going to do about it?
Yeah.
What are you going to do about it?
Nobody does anything about it.
Why?
Because of the fear of the Jews.
That's what the Bible says.
And so they're proud of that.
In fact, Israel Hayom is sending a very clear message here.
Israel warns it might assassinate senior Hamas members too.
Well, why not?
Why not?
We got more people to assassinate. The world is full of
people we can kill. What are you going to do about it? Nothing. They kill people wherever they want
to, whoever they want to kill. And they're proud of it. They boast of it. They printed in their
newspapers. So if Hamas said we might assassinate Israeli leaders. Oh my goodness. I mean,
the press would go nuts. Not just the Israel press, the U.S. press would go nuts. Of course.
Well, what's the difference? Fear of the Jews. No, no. You said the U.S. press and Israeli press.
This is all the same. Oh, I'm sorry. You're right. It's all the same. But do you see what I'm saying?
Israel freely talks every day about killing people.
And that's just normal.
And you're not supposed to say anything about it.
Right.
But if anybody else in another country said they were going to kill Israelis, oh, this is anti-Semitism.
This is hatred of the Jews.
We have to destroy that country.
Right.
And the same thing applies to nuclear technology.
So Iran's been working on nuclear technology. We've got to stop Iran, got to stop Iran, got to stop Iran.
But Israel has hundreds of nukes.
Has hundreds of nukes.
So why don't we stop Israel?
Because fear of the Jews. That's why.
I'm starting to get it now.
Yes.
I'm starting to get it now. Yes, I'm starting to get it.
Something interesting happened in South America over the weekend. They had their presidential election and a 35 year old candidate described as a leftist, a 35-old candidate won the presidency of Chile. Right.
Now, what's interesting, Doc, is he is openly anti-Zionist.
Yes.
And, of course, Jerusalem Post makes this very clear.
This is Gabriel Barik.
He called Israel a murderous state in a meeting with Chile's Jewish community during his campaign. Mr. Burke backs BDS, you know, the boycott and divestiture movement,
accused Israel of genocide.
How long is this guy going to last?
Well, that's a great question.
They'll have a quote from the article here.
You know, they do assassinate people.
That's right.
They've made it clear.
They publish it in all the papers.
And so two years ago, the local Jewish community presented him with a traditional Rosh Hashanah gift of honey.
And Bork responded by tweeting, the Jewish community gave me honey to emphasize its commitment to a more accepting, supportive, and respectful society.
I thank you for that step, but you can start by demanding that Israel return the Palestinian territory
it occupies illegally, his tweet continues.
Oh, I like this guy.
Thank you for the honey, but please give back the land to the Palestinians.
Right, that would be a great first step.
This guy's the new president of Chile.
Yes.
Now, one thing to keep in mind,
Chile has one of the largest populations of Palestinian refugees in the world.
That's true.
I remember you telling me that.
That surprised me.
Hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees are living in Chile.
I hadn't made that connection until just now.
That's a big voting block in the election.
So, you know, Jordan has probably the largest population of Palestinian refugees,
probably two million.
Right.
And then, you know, parts of the United States, Michigan.
But Chile is there in the top, you know, probably top five locations in the world with Palestinian
refugees.
Well, why are they refugees? Because the Zionists took their land.
Yes.
And they had nowhere else to go.
What do they do?
They have no country, no land, no houses, nothing.
It's all been taken from them.
All for the Star of David, the occult symbol.
Okay.
When's the last time you thought about Fukushima?
It's been a while.
What year was the Fukushima?
2011, wasn't it?
Fukushima earthquake and tsunami?
2011.
2011.
And most Americans have completely forgotten about Fukushima.
Hey, they fixed it, right?
They cleaned it up.
They fixed it. And everything is back to normal I still remember listening to you
on on shortwave talking about Fukushima back and back then oh yeah where were
you living then I would have been Korea so you were listening to me on shortwave
in Korea on shortwave in Korea and then I'd have to listen when I couldn't do
that to listen online so that was before I came on board here and did you ever think that you're going to end up 11 years
later that you'd be end up being working here you're listening I never imagined that on a
shortwave radio in Korea you're listening to true news and now you're working at true news and I it
dawned on me today was we were preparing for these articles here that we're going to be talking about that it brought me back to 10, 11 years ago where I was listening to
Rick talk about Fukushima here and here we are, we're still talking about Fukushima today.
Yes.
Well, I'm talking about it, but nobody else talks about it because, you know, 10 years
ago I told people this story is not going to go away.
Now they may cover it up, but you can't have a
nuclear meltdown as big as Fukushima and it's going to be fixed overnight. This is going to
take centuries. Yes. So are you aware that the Japanese government is still releasing radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean. It's still happening.
And they're trying to figure out ways to do even more.
So this story is in the Korea Herald today. South Korea expresses concerns
as Fukushima operator seeks approval for radioactive water release plan.
Right. So South Korea on Tuesday voiced concerns
as the operator of Japan's crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant
filed for approval for its plan to release radioactive water into the sea.
The Seoul government held an emergency vice ministerial meeting
after Tokyo Electric Power Company, TEPCO,
submitted an application for the planned release
to Japan's Nuclear Regulation Authority.
We express serious concerns as Japan is proceeding with its plan to unilaterally release the contaminated water into the sea,
despite our repeated expression of concerns and persistent calls for the withdrawal of the plan, the government said. All right. So, Doc, I stopped eating fish from the Pacific back in 2011.
I remember those stories that you were telling me.
I did.
I told our audience, 2011, stop eating anything that comes out of the Pacific Ocean,
unless you like isotopes in your brain.
How many isotopes do you have to eat to be radioactive?
One. That's it. One.
The fish are radioactive. Everything in the Pacific
is radioactive. Now, nobody's going to
admit to it,
but they've been releasing radioactive
water for over 10
years. Right. And most
people don't even know it. And so what's
going on right now is they're trying to figure out a way to
release the rest of the water
that they've got built up
at Fukushima. But they're going to be
releasing water because
the reactor is still boiling. This thing's not going to, But they're going to be releasing water because the reactor is still boiling.
This thing's not going to,
it's not going to cool down for a century
or a thousand years.
This is going to go on and on.
This water is going to constantly have to be released.
And so they're destroying the Pacific Ocean.
Really, the Pacific has been destroyed.
I knew that then in 2009. It's over. Pacific, the Pacific has been destroyed I knew that then in 2011 it's over
the Pacific Ocean is over
they've destroyed it
that's about a third of the waters isn't it
I read that in the Bible
a third of the fish die
so think about that
do not eat fish
from the
Pacific Ocean
salmon I had to stop eating salmon if it comes from eat fish from the Pacific Ocean. Salmon.
I had to stop eating salmon.
If it comes from Alaska or any place.
Well, Alaska, that's not close to Japan.
No.
Look at the currents.
Follow the ocean currents.
They go up to Alaska.
Okay.
Tuna fish.
Don't eat tuna fish.
It comes out of the Pacific. well i'm gonna start watching those
cans there i hadn't even thought about that that aspect of it so you you better get north atlantic
fish okay uh that's what i've been doing for 10 years i i make sure i know where the fish came from.
And you just have to, unless you like isotopes.
I prefer to avoid them.
But I want to show you one more story on Fukushima.
This is a Japanese newspaper, Japan's TEPCO, that's the Tokyo Electric Power Company,
to build underwater tunnel for Fukushima water release.
Yeah, we'll just pump that water from the reactor.
Nobody will even see it going into the ocean.
We'll just have a big old drain pipe into the Pacific and we can do this all day long.
Don't see this story in America, do you?
Let's read this.
So the operator of Japan's crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant intends to build an underwater tunnel to release water from the plant into the sea, it said
on Tuesday, as part of a project to treat and dispose of
contaminated water. A decade after a massive earthquake and tsunami ravaged the northeastern coast,
disabling the plant causing the world's worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl,
nearly 1.3 million tons of contaminated water has accumulated at the site.
The water, enough to fill about 500 Olympic-sized swimming pools,
is stored in huge tanks at an annual cost of about 100 billion yen or about a billion dollars a year.
Space is running out, Rick.
So this year, the Tokyo Electric Power Company outlined plans to discharge more than a million tons of the water after treatment and dilution from a standpoint about one kilometer offshore from the power station. TEPCO submitted detailed plans on Tuesday to the Nuclear Regulation Authority for approval.
Janichi Matsumoto, a company official, told reporters,
pumps would move the treated water from the tanks to the seashore
and through a seabed tunnel to release it at a depth of about 12 meters
and about a kilometer out at sea, the firm said.
But what they don't tell you in this
is you can't take radiation out of water. So all you're going to end up with is purified radioactive
water at that point. Did you catch the word diluted? Yes. So they're going to add water to it.
They're going to dilute the radioactive water. And I think you're right. The reason why they're
doing the tunnel is so no one will see
the water. And, you know, the old saying, out of sight, out of mind. So you're not going to be
worried about it. You'll say, well, I don't see any radioactive water going into the ocean.
Well, no, they're making sure that you don't see that. That's right. This is going to continue
for hundreds of years, Doc. The Pacific Ocean has been destroyed. Where are the environmentalists?
That's interesting.
Why are they quiet about it?
That is an interesting point.
You never hear it.
Initially you did, right at the very beginning.
But nowadays there's no outcry or anything like that.
There's a little snot-faced girl from...
Snot-faced girl?
Yeah.
What was her name?
You've got to narrow that down.
The one that goes to all the
UN meetings and cries. Oh, Greta.
Greta. Where's old sour
unhappy Greta? Where's she at?
Why isn't she over
at Fukushima? Protesting.
Yelling and screaming, you've destroyed
the Pacific.
Why? Because that's not on.
It's not on the agenda, is it?
Here's a good story.
Praise God on this one.
In Haiti, several weeks ago,
12 missionaries were kidnapped by a Haitian gang.
And this is a New York Post story I read today.
12 missionary hostages in Haiti made escape after receiving a divine sign from God.
These missionaries were Amish and Mennonite church members from the United States.
And in Haiti doing good works for the Haitian people.
Haiti is a dangerous place to be. And so they were kidnapped. And the article doesn't, they didn't describe what the divine sign was, but
the one person said they received a nudge from God. And they had asked God for a divine signal,
a divine sign that they should run, they should escape.
And the very sign that they asked for was given to them.
Right.
And they fled and they made it and they're free.
You know, and it's appropriate this time of year, too.
At Christmas.
At Christmas time because of the message the angel gave to Joseph.
Yes, flee to Egypt.
Flee to Egypt.
Hey, there's, you know, sometimes it's okay to flee. Sometimes it's okay to Joseph. Yes, flee to Egypt. Flee to Egypt. Hey, there's, you know, sometimes it's okay to flee.
Sometimes it's okay to flee.
Sometimes it's smart.
We talked about that in Proverbs in our Bible study here at the ministry.
And so sometimes the wise thing to do is to flee,
especially if an angel is telling you to do it.
And so, but a great story here and no loss of life
among any of the kidnapped folks
with a Christian Aid Mission.
Praise God for that.
And so, and they're all in Florida now.
And so.
Well, Doc,
Bette Midler made some rude,
snarky comments
about the people of West Virginia.
And she's angry at West Virginia Democrat Senator Joe Manchin. And she said, what Joe Manchin, who represents a population smaller
than Brooklyn, has done to the rest of America, who wants to move forward, not backward, like his
state, is horrible. He sold us out. he wants us all to be just like his state
west virginia poor illiterate and strung out that was nasty that was nasty i like bet
better when she's just singing hello dolly
i don't like her when she's mean. Why do you have to be so mean? She's really mean on Twitter at times.
But how do the folks in West Virginia feel about Joe Manchin and everything?
Well, the question was asked by Fox News.
Do West Virginians back Joe Manchin's opposition to Build Back Better?
And just to fill you in the blanks for you here,
Joe Manchin has been the lone Democrat that has stood up to Joe Biden's Build Back Better plan,
the two trillion dollar boondoggle they're trying to push through.
And Joe Manchin has basically he's been the key point of discussion about this because without his support, they can't make it happen. In fact, a question about two questions came up about Joe Manchin in the
press conference that President Biden did on COVID today. They asked him twice about Manchin
and you could tell he was getting angry and getting fed up with questions about it. And he
cut the the press conference short by saying, I'm not even supposed to be doing a press conference
right now and walked off. And so but how do the people in West Virginia feel about Joe Manchin standing up
against Joe Biden? Well, let's hear from West Virginians themselves, and you might find that
you agree with them too. For Joe Manchin, 120 percent. Absolutely supportive supportive For him not backing down to
Biden
Nothing in that bill was going to help West Virginia
And in fact it would cost us jobs
For which we of course
Would be paying as tax payers
I think it was the right thing to do
Too much money going in the wrong direction
I think he did a good choice of
Denying it
I gotta admire the man for sticking to his guns and doing what's right.
I'll stand for Manchin for going against Biden.
Because West Virginia's suffering for Biden's choices.
I'm praising him.
I may consider voting for him next time if he runs.
I do have mixed feelings, but I also think he has West Virginia's in mind,
and West Virginia's what to do.
I think he's doing
a good job. Give him enormous credit. They're putting our young people in a debt that they'll
never see the end of. I think the bill itself is a little bit too much myself and I think it's
what he's fighting to get it reduced down to with more manageable and and of it, actually.
I didn't see anyone illiterate or strung out there, did you?
No, Doc.
That was a Fox News report,
and Fox News did that interview with the citizens in Charlestown, West Virginia.
It's a place I'm well acquainted with.
It was across the river from where I lived in Western Maryland.
So I've always had friends and relatives who live in West Virginia, in Charlestown.
And that's the area.
I'll tell you why they went to Charlestown.
There's an Amtrak train station in Harpers Ferry.
Okay.
And so Harpers Ferry is very close to Charlestown.
So my guess is the Fox News team justerry is very close to Charlestown. So my guess
is the Fox News team just rode the train up to Charlestown and then did
the report and went back to DC. Charlestown's a very nice town. It's a
great town. It's right on the border of Maryland and Virginia, West Virginia. Also known for a horse race track there,
something I knew about a long time ago.
Not in recent years, but...
Observing the horses.
Yes, yes, taking care of the horses there.
Always wanted to see how beautiful the horses were.
But it's a good town, and good people there.
And Joe Manchin, you know, I don't know the man.
I've been acquainted with him for years because the Manchin family have deep roots in West Virginia,
and they've been deeply involved in politics in West Virginia.
I think his father was governor also, if I recall. Just the name Manchin has been around forever in West Virginia.
You know, it's just one of those names, family names. And so if the Democrats
think that they're going to intimidate him, they just made him more popular in
West Virginia.
West Virginia is kind of an odd duck as far as states are concerned, because you just about have to be Democrat to run in politics there, don't you?
Up until recently, West Virginia has switched Republican.
Right.
It's now a Republican state.
President Trump wanted big.
Because Joe Manchin is one of the few pro-life Democrats serving too. And so if they think intimidating him, what the left did to him
surrounding his automobile, pounding on his car windows, all the threats and just the shaming
that they put on it, if they think that they're going to intimidate Joe Manchin, they don't know
West Virginians because he's just going to double down and he's becoming more popular in West Virginia. You heard that one woman who didn't
vote for him. She said, I may vote for him the next time. That's what's happening. Right. But
I'll tell you something else that may happen. And I I'm starting to be more confident it's
going to happen. I believe he will leave the Democratic Party soon. He will either become
an independent or he'll just go ahead and join the Republican Party. And Mitch McConnell is saying,
hey, Joe Manchin, certainly welcome to join GOP, but don't get influenced by Mitch McConnell. I'll
tell you what, we'll trade Liz Cheney. Liz Cheney can have, you know, we can give her up to the Democrats and we'll take Joe Manchin for now.
So it'd be like, you know, baseball, baseball trade there.
And so. But, yeah, one vote, one senator switching.
Mitch McConnell becomes a Senate majority leader. That's right.
One of Joe Manchin switches to the Republican Party.
Mitch McConnell instantly becomes the majority leader again.
And Chuckie Schumer is back in the doghouse. Wow. I didn't even think about that.
Believe me, Doc. Wow. Even if he becomes an independent, he can vote for McConnell.
That's why this is so critical. What the Democrats are doing is just absolutely insane. Politically, it's insane.
The Senate is 50-50, and you're going to infuriate and insult the one vote that could switch and throw party control to the Republicans?
I think Manchin's already made up his mind.
He's just negotiating the best deal at this point, right?
And West Virginia has switched to the Republican Party.
He's one of the few Democrats that are now elected in West Virginia.
He would easily be reelected as a Republican.
They would welcome him.
I mean, it's not going to be a hard sell in West Virginia.
That would be like a trophy you put on the wall.
We got Joe Manchin now in the Republican Party.
He is socially, he's a liberal Democrat.
Right.
I mean, don't think that he's-
But then a lot of Republicans are too.
Yeah.
But he's not a pro-gun control Democrat. There's a lot of things where he votes right. And pro-life too. Yeah. But he's not a pro-gun control Democrat.
There's a lot of things where he votes right.
And pro-life too.
Yes.
So get ready.
I think he's going to switch parties.
They're going to do something really stupid.
What else we have?
President Trump is going to hold a news conference on January 6th.
No explanation. Maybe he'll invite us to go down to Mar-a-Lago and cover it.
Maybe. Maybe. So it's a nice place. So what do you think's behind this, Rick? I don't know.
It's unusual. You would think that he'd let it slide, just lay low, but he's going to say something on January 6th.
Do you think he's going to announce he's running?
Hmm.
Because that was my first thought when I saw the article today.
I thought, now this would be a perfect opportunity, the anniversary of January 6th, election stolen.
Now he says, we're going to get it back.
Well, you know what?
In the state of Florida, Florida passed a law, thanks to our governor, Ron DeSantis, that social media companies cannot censor political candidates in the state of Florida.
If he becomes a legal candidate, Twitter has to restore his account.
Facebook has to restore his account.
They can't censor him in anything.
Oh, that's powerful then. Because the state of Florida will go after Twitter and Facebook.
I forget what the fines are, like $100,000.
That's a ridiculous amount.
So I might declare.
I'm serious.
I'm thinking about it.
And then they can't censor me.
You know, you can play this game.
I might become a candidate for something.
I don't know.
And then they can't censor me.
Hadn't considered that before.
I have.
There's a lot going on inside my head now.
You didn't tell me everything, folks.
I might run as a Democrat.
That would mess things up, wouldn't it?
Right.
What if I challenged Biden in the Democratic primaries?
Oh, my goodness.
Can you imagine that?
I would just love to see the debate, see if Grandpa Joe can keep up.
Who knows?
Crazier things than that have happened.
The Pentagon has defined extremism in the military.
Okay, so let's translate that.
We're going to hunt down all the conservative,
patriotic men in the military and push them out.
Yes.
So if you're opposed to men wearing dresses in foxholes,
you've got to go.
So, yeah, that's a good point, Doc.
Are drag queens entertaining troops on a military basis?
Is that extremism?
In my opinion, it is.
But now the new military, the new army, no.
The extremism is if you're shocked by it.
Right.
But let's just go back in time 70-some years,
and let's say during World War II,
General Patton walked into a military building on a base,
and there were transvestites on the stage dancing before the troops.
What would General Patton have done?
He might have pulled out his pro-handle revolver and started shooting.
I think he probably would have.
You better believe he would have.
He would have defined extremism in the military.
Right.
Well, according to John Kirby, spokesman for the Pentagon, he said that this new definition is supposed to preserve a service member's right of expression, Rick, as far as possible, as far as they possibly can, while also balancing the need for a good order and discipline as well.
But they're also going to spy on the troops.
That's right. So they've got a list of 14 things that they'll go
through as a checklist to see if you meet the standards. The purity test. That's the good point.
So they're introducing the China way into the U.S. military, the social credit score.
You won't be promoted. You will have to pass the social credit score test to get promoted.
And it even goes so far as your social media accounts.
That's what I'm saying.
They're going to go through your Facebook account, your Twitter account.
If you're a service member, suddenly then that's all, nothing's off limits.
Including your social media prior to joining the military.
Yes.
Again, one more story I want to cover before we end.
This is an interesting one.
This came from Technofog.
I've never heard of Technofog,
but now I'm going to read it.
It's official.
Durham, this is Special Counsel John Durham, is investigating the Clinton campaign.
And we have two quotes from this, and we'll show you why this is really important.
Right. So the latest filings by Special Counsel John Durham revealed that lawyers for the Hillary Clinton campaign now represent Christopher Steele, a primary subsource, Igor Dechenko.
In doing so, Durham reveals something else, that the Hillary Clinton campaign
and multiple former employees of the Hillary Clinton campaign are under investigation.
So it's highly likely that the Clinton campaign was receiving updates on the Fusion GPS Christopher Steele work once
they were hired by Perkins Coie in the spring of 2016.
This is work the client, the Clinton campaign, paid for.
And the sharing of this info would be consistent with the Clinton campaign, notably Jake Sullivan,
receiving back channel updates on the whole Alpha Bank hoax.
Okay.
Right there.
Hold it, hold it, hold it, hold it.
I knew he was going to dive into that.
You see it?
Jake Sullivan.
Yes.
Who is working for the Clinton campaign in 2016.
Where is Jake Sullivan now?
Well, this week he's heading to Israel.
And what is his job?
He's national security advisor.
That's right.
He's the national security advisor for Joe Biden.
Yes.
He's under investigation in the Russia hoax.
He was involved.
He was involved in the plot to take down Donald Trump.
The current national security advisor was involved in the corrupt plot to take down Donald Trump as president of the United States.
He needs to be outed and he needs to be indicted and convicted and imprisoned. And he wouldn't be the first national security advisor
that has found himself in that predicament.
You mean like Susan Rice?
Or General Michael Flynn on the flip side.
Yes.
So.
Well, they took him out like the first week.
Yes.
They didn't even wait around for that.
Because they knew he knew how to investigate them
because of his position in DIA.
So they had to get rid of him really fast.
But Jake Sullivan is the big fish in this story.
Because he connects all the players at that level.
And so why do you think that special counsel Durham
is being allowed to continue with his investigation?
Why haven't they shut that down?
You know, his authorization was supposed to expire earlier this year.
And I don't remember the dates, but it was supposed to expire.
And I thought, well, this is just going to, he's just going to pack up,
quietly fade away.
My guess, and I'm just only guessing at this.
OK, my guess is. Sometimes old Mitch McConnell does some pretty shrewd, smart things.
OK, do you remember when he bailed out Chuckie Schumer on a vote on the national debt?
Right. That's been a while back, but yes.
I thought back then Mitch McConnell got something.
He got something from Schumer for that vote.
I think what he got was that they got the authorization to keep financing John Durham's investigation.
To what end, though?
I mean, what were they hoped to achieve with this?
This will take down the Clinton cabal.
Well, you had to know that Schumer and others that are players in this,
they had to know that that's happening.
Schumer had to get the debt ceiling passed
Wow, okay, I'm gonna show you Clinton's are on the decline in the shadow now anyway, so you know, I know, you know a lot of people
Dis Mitch McConnell, but he is one shrewd
Old turkey.
All right.
He does a lot behind the scenes that we don't know about.
Okay.
He does it in his own way.
And so I, you know, I, something had to happen. Somebody had to pressure Pelosi and Schumer into financing an investigation that would out them.
Because you know who else is going to be out in this?
Adam Schiff.
Because he's connected, too.
So what you're going to have, you're going to have Manchin switching to the Republican Party.
And very soon the Senate is going to be Republican.
That means all the committees switch to Republican.
All the chairmen of the committees become Republican. That means all the committees switch to Republican. All the chairmen of the committees become Republican. The majority members of the committees become Republican.
That could happen in January. Don't you think Manchin's going to get a committee?
If he switches, sure.
He'll get any committee he asks for. That'll be the term. I mean, Mitch McConnell
will have to say to other Republican senators, whatever
committee chairmanship he has for it, that's
what he gets.
Because we've got to have this.
Yes, because he puts us back in power
and they'll all fall in line
and one Republican
will lose out.
Manchin will take a
chairmanship of a committee.
He'll get something he wants.
Senate Armed Services. He'll take something that benefits West Virginia.
Could be Energy Committee. Oh, that would be powerful.
It would be very powerful for West Virginia. He'll take something that's that's good for West Virginia. He'll take something that's good for West Virginia. Then in November,
there's going to be a slaughter at the polls of the Democrats. They won't be able to cheat enough
to retain control of the House. Nancy Pelosi will move into her house that she bought here in
Florida. And there will be a Republican House of Representatives in January 23.
John Durham's investigation is going to continue throughout 2022,
so that by 23, they're ready to do the indictments.
Wow.
They're getting ready for the—
You're playing a long game here, Rick.
Well, you've got the 24 elections coming.
So they've got to make sure that...
They have to put this thing down.
They've got to put down this cabal.
Now, I want to show you something.
I want to show you, first of all, a screenshot of the court document that John Durham filed.
There it is right there.
In the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Virginia.
It says there,
the United States of America,
by and through its attorney,
Special Counsel John H. Durham,
respectfully moves this honorable court
to inquire into a potential conflict of interest
involving attorneys danny
ornato and stewart sears who represent the defendant igor y de shinko in the criminal
matter before the court mr ornato and sears are partners at the law firm of Sertler, Ornato, Meade, and Sears.
Get ready. Here it comes.
In addition to their representation of the defendant,
a separate lawyer at the firm is currently representing
the 2016 Hillary for America Presidential Committee.
We can put the next screen shot. There we go. So down at the
bottom, look at that. In addition to the representation of the defendant, a separate
lawyer at the firm is currently representing the 2016 Hillary for America presidential campaign
known as the Clinton campaign, as well as multiple former employees of that campaign in matters before the special counsel.
Oh, in multiple matters before this.
Matters. All right.
What this means, my friend, Hillary Clinton is under investigation by John Durham.
That's what this means.
Multiple matters and multiple employees
like Jake Sullivan,
the national security advisor
to Joe Biden.
There are multiple investigations.
Multiple investigations
going on right now.
And Hillary Clinton
was named in the investigation.
Where's this going, Rick?
Lock her up.
Go to take time.
Lock her up.
This is a
slow march.
But the Republicans are moving
towards
outing the entire hoax, the fake operation
that they ran, which involved the FBI and the Justice Department and the news media, the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, Adam Schiff at the Intelligence Committee.
There are so many players in this.
By the time they get to 2024, Donald Trump will have obliterated all of his enemies.
Watch. Watch.
Watch.
Wow.
Okay.
You see, this is where you get an education here, folks,
because I was just focusing on the Jake Sullivan part of it.
I had not considered the long game here that they're playing here
and that there were multiple matters before the special counsel, not just one.
They're not just focused on one aspect of this.
They're finding all sorts of stuff now, aren't they?
That's right.
That's right.
And he's going after them.
He's going after them.
And it's methodical.
Wow.
Okay, we've given you a lot of news.
Hey, we're down to the last couple days of 2021,
and we sure would like to have your support.
I encourage you to send something to True News.
Go to our website, truenews.com, and click donate or the heart,
and make your best gift where you can send a letter with a big old fat check donation to True News.
We would really appreciate it in the last days.
We're going to close our office at the end of this week,
and so we won't be here the week between Christmas and New Year's.
I'm going to give the staff the week off.
Almost all of our employees are non-natives of Vero Beach.
And so they've all moved here from various cities and states over the years. And I try to give them
an opportunity to spend time with family, to go home and visit. And so we work long, hard hours
here. So I'm going to do it one more year.
I'm going to give them that Christmas week that they can spend some time with their families.
And it gives me time that I'll work.
I just won't be here.
I'll just have time at home to catch up on some things before we get into 2022.
But it'll be at a much more relaxed pace. So anyhow, we're going to present some Christmas programming that we recorded a couple years ago, so I won't have my goatee.
It'll be pre-gotee true news.
But if you never saw it, you might want to watch it.
No news.
It'll just be just Christmas programming with some
biblical messages
and some Christmas hymns
and
if you didn't see it
it'll be a blessing to you
and if you did see it
and you'd like to see it again
well
it'll be a blessing to you again
alright
but we'll be around
we'll be back on January 3rd
but I sure would appreciate
it between now and
December 31st
you can get a donation to us and say,
thank you guys at True News.
Thank you for everything you've done for this year.
You've been faithful and you stayed on the job
and you haven't turned tail and run
and you faced down your enemies
and you just kept on trucking.
That's what we do here.
All right.
And if you appreciate it,
please give us a gift this month and send us
into 2022 with a full tank of gas and we're going to hit it hard again love you very much we'll see
you tomorrow god bless you The preceding program was made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support
of listeners just like you. To find out how you can help, visit www.truenews.com.