Submit Podcast or Channel

Bitcoin’s Next Rally Could Break the Cycle | Eric Yakes

October 15, 20260 comments♥ 0
00:02 When you invest in a monetary asset, growth begets growth. The scale and the acceptability of it makes it more valuable. So, like, these narratives, I think, are bringing us to that point. And I think that we have nation states right on the horizon as that happens. We're hitting an inflection point. We're hitting an inflection point when scarcity is gone in terms of the digital world. It's pretty much limited by the cost of energy at this point. And so under that type of an environment, you look at what are the scale?
00:32 assets that exist in that type of an economy. There's one. And that is going to change everything. The world becoming monochrome, isn't it? You see you know, those pictures of like what McDonald's used to look like back in the 80s compared to now and like the color of cars back then? Like, what does monochrome mean?
00:51 Like, I don't know. Is it like scales of gray and white and black? Oh, okay. Like, yeah, everything being more like vibrant. Yeah, even the way people dress. Totally. And I'm, and I'm in grays now.
01:06 All I wear is white and black gel. I'm in all grays. Yeah. I wear colors, though. I'm very much like a good accent color. I mean, I'll wear brights. A nice pocket square.
01:17 A nice pot. Well, yeah, that's hilarious. I could see, I could see Rob Hamilton rocking. He does. I saw him in New York at the Treasury's conference.
01:26 Maybe that's why I got cute in my brain. Yeah. Big Bitcoin's got him wearing a pocket square. A hundred percent. Yeah. Yeah. But he's someone that's not one. Do you see the picture I took around outside pub key?
01:36 Oh, yeah, those were funny. The Ben Affleck meme of him. Yeah, yeah. He's dressed like Mario. Yeah. The meme culture around Rob is evolving in a way that I, if you were to have asked me this a year ago, would this meme culture around Rob evolved this way? I never would have guessed.
01:50 Yeah, but you wouldn't have guessed he'd be the CEO of Bitcoin by now. I know. It's crazy how it's happened. He was just there at the perfect moment. He took the mantle. Who, like the risk he has now. I like this idea that the hero of one side. Michael becomes a villain of next. So you could use that with interesting. You could use that with like
02:07 Roger Ver like he was he was Bitcoin Jesus and then right see everything happened even like this is no hate here but like you could look at David Bay like that a little bit like he was the man that got Trump into Bitcoin like that's a good point and then like the Nakamu. That's a good point it's interesting I wonder I wonder what like underlies that kind of a dynamic I feel like it's a bit of tall poppy syndrome I think well actually What does that mean? People fuck up. So it's not just that.
02:36 Like, because Roger Veer clearly, like, got too big for his boots. But I also think there is this element in Bitcoin that's like, if someone starts, you know, being big time, they like to chop him down a little bit. Well, exactly. But I think that there's like a fundamental argument behind that. Like, I think it's because people are used to as they rise hierarchies in life, you gain more momentum. Yeah.
02:58 The higher you are up, the greater your probability of further rising. It's almost like a Lindy version. effect type thing. Yeah. And what's interesting about Bitcoin is because of its decentralized nature, it probably goes against that human elements. Like as people become more influential within it, it probably is counteracts, you know, the ego that you get. Yeah. And like all the things that, then the hubris that emerges and basically like the community is not even just like the people or the social culture as much as, you're inevitably. going to be like wrong about something that will like knock you down from that position yeah and i think
03:39 like we also know how important is not to have a leader and if someone's looking too much like they're getting too much power like i think the exactly the bitcoin world likes to cut him down a little bit and obviously say there's not done anything it's like fucked up but i think the his people's perception of him has definitely changed for like some people's perspective perspective perspective perception of it um like he when he first came out talking about bitcoin I love to say like the sailor the stuff that say I was talking about about them was awesome well he first came out you were watching sailor videos yeah like he came on the podcast pretty early like he did obviously he did a few of them and I think the stuff he was talking about was awesome it's cool
04:17 so like I've never okay that's not true I've never watched like a sailor podcast I I other than when he went on Jordan Peterson and actually my logic for that was like Jordan Peterson so much bigger than him and it might be a real conversation um it don't me wrong. There's like I've seen the memes of his different rants on different things kind of rinse and repeat type stuff but I don't know that that wasn't a narrative that compelled to me but it compelled so many other people which is great but there's some narratives that just I'm just like that's that's cool I don't know what half of that means I don't think it makes him the sense and I think say this still has tons of really interesting stuff like yeah don't ever like I think he's still
04:59 a value ad for sure and I still list to him from time time but like the path he's gone down is just a little bit less interesting to me right now. So because I'm a little bit removed from like what did he actually say, but like I've, like people are saying that he's going against like Bitcoin is money type narratives. Yeah. And he's very much like, it's a store of wealth. I think you can definitely imply his incentives for that. And I remember that I think at some point in time, people were like, okay, well, you know, he doesn't want to poke the bear. And he, is trying to create a narrative that will be sensitive to institutional capital's allocation towards it.
05:38 And that's a good way of Trojan horsing a capital asset into the market. And like, I mean, that may or may not be true, but like from my personal opinion, and granted, I'm not a billionaire sitting on a bunch of boards. So like, fair enough, I could be very naive about this. But my personal opinion is that like the incentives of this is an asset are far and away strong enough. And if, you know, a bunch of plebs or a bunch of dudes on podcast, like us are talking about, well, no, Bitcoin can be money and this would be something that's
06:09 good for the world to be like a neutral monetary system, that that is not, that is like a drop in the ocean of like, you know, potential issues or criticisms that would ultimately stop Bitcoin from, like, increasing its adoption. I don't know if that makes sense, but I don't know exactly what you mean. Like, I don't think it's significant enough. to where if that narrative existing doesn't mean that people that would want to stop Bitcoin are going to now say okay well nobody's talking about how it could be money so therefore it's not money yeah so okay so let's like keep doing stuff to support it it's like no people like everybody knows what it is and what its potential could theoretically be yeah like whether or not
06:55 the Bitcoin community is promoting that or not it is beside the point like the cats out of the back people are aware of the technology and where it could go yeah so So let's call it what it is, you know. And anybody who wants to be antagonistic towards that in terms of narrative over the long term, I don't think is going to be stopped by us being silent about its potential. I totally agree with that. Yeah. For sure.
07:20 And it's like, like you say, cats out of the bag, jeans out of the bottle. Yeah. If you spend enough time, you know what Bitcoin is. Right, right. So in which case, it's like sailors talking about, you know, Bitcoin's not money or payments. And it's just like, that's bullshit. Like, yeah. I mean, and he's definitely right in the sense that there's things that make it very hard to be used as payment.
07:38 Today, yeah. But from my understanding, once again. And I mean specifically, like, not a technological thing, but like the tax makes it really hard. Oh, 100%. Taxes is like, there's a million roadblocks to like Bitcoin being used as money today. And like I've talked a lot about that. But it sounds in me like there's more of a posturing from that kind of like, whether it's sale directly or the institutional crowd.
08:02 it is just this store value piece of property, you know, like the Manhattan real estate comparisons or, you know, those types of things. And that's all it can ever be. Yeah. And I think that's very wrong. Yeah. I agree with that. And I also, like, I never want to go too strong than this or make like a definitive statement. But I do think if that's all Bitcoin is, to a degree it's failed. I don't think it's failed. I think we talked about this on the last part. Like, I don't think it's failed. That's why I say to a degree. It's not reaches full potential. there's another way of saying that. Yeah.
08:33 And that full potential, I think, is a very different world than a digital gold permissionless asset. But I do think the world, I do think the digital gold permissionless asset world is a very different world. I think that's a very impactful thing. Being able to store your wealth, you know,
08:54 by memorizing 12 words in your brain, that's huge. And in having some degree of like settlement and money. Like today, like for people who are truly in need to conduct settlement in Bitcoin, that is, you know, very possible to do. And it happens all the time. And so for that reason, I don't think that like, that's something that impacts the incentives of government as it gets bigger. And I think that that enables freedom to a pretty strong degree. But a completely neutral financial system,
09:27 the world's operating off of like, that's something else that we can't quite like comprehend the potential of. That's our full utopia. Yes. You're a YouTuber now, man. I'm a YouTuber. And you're a substack guy. Yeah, yakes.com. Everybody check it out. I'm making videos. It's funny. I have no idea what I'm doing yet. But I wanted to make, I wanted to do this since I was in the industry. But setting up the venture firm and getting all those pieces together, I had to be very focused on that. And I wasn't going to do it unless I had the time to do it well. Now I'm kind of at a point where I can't commit that time. So it's fun. I guess. I'm tapping back into the creative side of things again.
10:04 Like I just put out this article on price, which I'd never done. Because like you and I have talked on podcasts about, and I've had these little one-off takes, but I've never actually like written out like what's kind of my take on price. And that's what this was. The newsletter has been going great. And I just write about interesting ideas that kind of are related to like Bitcoin, Freedom Tech, you know, a little bit of macro.
10:25 Like, I don't know, just kind of anything that pops up, AI, tons of stuff. And we're going to be doing these a bit more. We're going to try and cover your writing. That's right. I feel like, too, because Danny and I have been talking about doing this as like a monthly thing. Maybe we create some sort of like cool cadence or something. I don't know if the audience has feedback for like something to recap on a monthly
10:46 basis. Look at you. Like bringing like bringing the chat. I'm a video and I'm a podcaster guy. You know, I just kind of think about things. But so this is the right latest piece on prize. I want to like differentiate what this is when you talk about a piece that's on Bitcoin price.
10:59 This isn't like a checkmate. on-chain analysis thing. This isn't like a TA thing. Give everyone the overview of like why you want you to do this piece. Like I've always viewed everything from the perspective of long-term trends. And I think that's kind of a key distinction, I would say, between in the world of financial professionals, you know, there's a big difference between guys who've spent their career investing in like public securities and guys who have invested in private markets.
11:28 So they're almost a completely different profile of person. So to the person outside, you'd be like, they're both investors. To the person inside, you'd be like, well, a public markets investor is looking at completely different variables. You have publicly disclosed information. That data is all standardized. You know, it's enforced by regulation. And the due diligence is effectively limited to what's being publicly disclosed outside
11:48 of, you know, you taking more extensive means. But on the private side, and that's kind of the world I came from, it's like we buy out a company. I'm getting like general ledger accounting data. We are, you know, negotiating with creditors to build a capital structure. Like you're a business operator, CEO in that world. And it's kind of at another level. And it's very hands on. You're thinking about the market potential of the business. You're investing so much time and like the costs of making an investment like that, all the work, all the third party advisors you have to pay, the cost of getting the financing lined up. like all these things add up.
12:26 So you have to make these bets over like five to 10 year periods. And that's kind of like the world of a lot of private equity. What we're doing now in venture capital is just like a, you know, startup niche of private equity. And, you know, kind of a similar thing. There's a lot more friction with it. So like when you invest like that, you think in terms of long term trends. And I've always thought about Bitcoin like that.
12:48 It's something where I'm not like, is it going to go up or down over the next year? not something I've ever really opined on much outside of like memes and jokes. But like my perspective is more based on what are the long-term market trends that are impacting Bitcoin's adoption? And then how are those narratives important over time? Because price is a very narrative influenced thing in markets. So when I'm looking at like, okay, how, where is Bitcoin going to go over the next three to five years? and what does that impact in terms of like the venture capital things that we're doing.
13:27 I think about that in terms of what these narratives will ultimately do to price over that extended period. In that scenario, what comes first though? Does price lead narratives or do narratives lead price? I think it's both. I think that's true of so many different things in markets. There's situations where price leads narrative. I think there's situations where narrative leads price. I think there's in the problem and the reason people have a hard time really like seeing what sticks is because a price is a reflection of like every market variable at a point in time.
14:02 And whatever the net impact is, whatever the strongest narrative is or the strongest belief, that is what's going to cause the directional shift over the opposite. And so for that reason, it's like there could be a lot of things that are true. You know, there could be, you know, Bitcoin could have a decent amount of buyers in the market that are buying it as a risk off asset at certain points. But the people that are buying it as a risk on asset are far greater than the people buying it as a risk off. And the net effect is that narrative prevailed, given like the size of a capital behind the buyers and sellers. This show is brought to you by our lead sponsor, Leden. I've taken out multiple Bitcoin back loans with Leden, and I think they're an awesome company. So if you do need dollars for a business expense, a tax bill, you just want to stack some more Bitcoin.
14:51 Whatever the reason is, Leden lets you use your Bitcoin as collateral instead of selling it to raise the cash. And with Lleden loans, your collateral is held in custody and it's never lent out to generate interest. They give you all the tools you need to manage the loan as the Bitcoin price moves, so you'll get alerts. There's an optional auto top-up which automatically adds Bitcoin to your collateral if it's needed. And for any reason, you can always repay the loan early with no penalty. To see what a loan would look like for you, check out the loan. calculator on their website. You'll get to see your rate before you apply and how much collateral you'd actually need. And if you do want to apply for a loan, use the code WBD for 0.25% off your first
15:25 loan at leaden.io forward slash WBD. That's LEDN.iO forward slash WBD. Every Bitcoiner eventually has to answer one question. If something happened to me, could my family access my Bitcoin? Would my children inherit what I've spent years stacking? That's why Anchor Watch builds Bitcoin custody solutions designed to protect you and your family against real life, accidents, errors, kidnappings and even death. Every solution includes their inheritance protocol designed to help your Bitcoin reach the people you intend it for. And US-based customers can also add Bitcoin insurance backed by Lloyds of London. Whether you're a self-custody expert or want multi-institutional support, your Bitcoin estate plan should not be an afterthought. Bitcoin is only generational wealth
16:09 if it can be passed down. So make sure your family can access tomorrow what you've built today. Anchor watch is your custody your way. So visit anchorwatch.com to get started. That's anchorwatch. com. As Bitcoiners, we spend a lot of time thinking about taking control of our money. But what about where we live and the options we have if the rules change? Having a plan B means giving yourself and your family choices, somewhere else you could live or a different system you can access if you need it. And this is the stuff you want to have in place before that happens. That's where expat money comes in. They help give freedom-minded people optionality so you're not dependent on the whims of anyone government or anyone's system.
16:47 Their founder and CEO, McKell, has been an expat for over 25 years. He's built his own life this way and brings that personal experience to helping others do the same. If you've ever thought about building your own plan B, download their free report at expatmoney.com forward slash WBD. That's expatmoney.com slash WBD for your free report. The risk on risk off thing is something that I've always struggled with. Because like Bitcoin, in my opinion, should trade like a risk off asset. Like this is a gold like asset, sound money asset.
17:18 But then it obviously, because it's been through this like huge growth stage, has been trading like a high beta tech stock like absolutely flying. Is it just both? Is it everything? Is it just like it's always the right time to buy Bitcoin? It's interesting. So that's what I think. I think so, at least it depends on, it depends on, it's,
17:42 It's like a painting. I think like the background from which you've used something is dependent in this, or is what that type of a reaction would depend on. So one of, one of, um, one of the things you learn when you go take a CFA exam, for example, is, um, that, you know, you look at certain assets that are generally have like a, uh,
18:10 a negative correlation with one of them. another in normal market environment. So you would expect like a tradeoff between what happens in the stock market and the bond market in a normal market environment. What's interesting, when you look at all these buckets of asset categories based on the historical data, is that that is when the background is normal, it's sunny outside. But like when a storm comes in and everything is bad, the background changes and that impacts everything else. And what's interesting is certain negatively correlated relationships in one market. environment will actually shift to positively correlated relationships in another market environment.
18:48 So depending on the situation can determine whether or not a certain narrative about the relationship between two assets ultimately remains. And I think that so what you learn is that basically it's very hard to find risk off assets. They're very rare in markets. When shit hits the fan, finding something that's going to just stay flat or go up in those types of environments is actually very hard. Generally, it's commodities. In reality, is that basically just gold? Yeah. In broader commodities, things people need. Gold's probably the least like utility focused. And then often you can find exceptions with what is the thing that is needed given this crisis. If markets were to crash tomorrow, because, um,
19:41 you know, there was like some sort of nuclear issue or something, then there might be some stock flying that has like a technology that will be valuable in that type of a situation. You know, so it's things people generally need in a crisis scenario that'll go up. And in history, the biggest probably risk off moment, at least in recent history, is the 2020 COVID crash. Right. Bitcoin dropped like a fucking stone. It was until Bitmex turned the engine off, it was like, is it actually going to zero?
20:11 Right. And then it bounced really quickly. And I don't know if it bounced. I can't exactly remember before any kind of interventions were mentioned. But was there any part of that in that period that traded differently to how you'd expect? Back then. Yeah. I didn't know what to expect back then, I would say. I think that the Bitcoin has generally followed global liquidity, I think that's pretty well known in terms of price. Now with this debasement trade narrative emerging, and that's like, that's an emerging narrative, right? This isn't some sort of conclusive thing. But now with this emerging, it's, there's somewhat one in the same almost, like a debasement trade is kind of like the next step following liquidity.
21:02 But once again, that's dependent on the market environment. So like there could be an environment where, you know, let's say the economy is just running really hot and growth is very rapid and the Federal Reserve is trying to slow things and they're raising interest rates intentionally to do that. That could have a few variables that are kind of like right now and it could actually be trying to reduce liquidity in the economy and we'd still be looking at. at like a rising interest rate environment and it that backdrop I think is ultimately what influences where the liquidity could or could not lead to basically so I do want to talk about that because that's similar to the situation we have right now in a lot of ways but just an interesting sort of thing to play through if we went through a COVID slip dial flash crash now with what Bitcoin is today do you think it would behave differently to how it did in 2020 a co
22:05 So you're saying, okay. I guess what the point in that question is, then it traded from my perspective. It looked like a risk on asset. You know, it was crashing when everything was crashing. And it wasn't until they like started. I think that that is a great way of isolating the question. I hadn't thought about it from that perspective. Yes.
22:22 And I think the reason is that at the time, inflation expectations were markedly distinct from where they are today. And so I think that with the current perception of the market, basically that we've exhausted so much of our ability to influence the credit market, given the degree of fiscal dominance that currently exists, that belief didn't exist during the 2020 flash crash, not nearly to this type of an extent. And it was that crash in the subsequent liquidity and then the fiscal deficit spending that ultimately occurred from it that put us back into, you know, World War I levels of deficit spending. And then from that is what people started to draw a lot of the parallels from. So like this, us, the government's spending more money than it has and the cumulative impact that that ultimately has on markets, which ultimately needs to be financed by inflation. is we've done that for the past five years to such a significant degree that it would look like fiscally we're fighting a war, a global war.
23:43 And I think that that is kind of the distinction is we've exhausted. It's like we've shot the steroids up. And now we're, you know, we've done all weekend at this point. Now we're starting to get man boobs. So that is interesting, but it's actually not what I was thinking of when I asked the question. Okay. It was more like put Bitcoin as we know it today back in the market conditions we had then. Do you think it's matured to a degree where the market might see it as slightly more risk off?
24:09 Maybe not fully risk off. Oh, interesting. More so than they did then. I would agree with that. It's much larger, right? I think that that's huge. It's institutional adoption has occurred. There's a passive bid for the asset.
24:24 I think that like I would say that that behavior is probably what drew. this breaking of the four-year cycle narrative, where Bitcoin didn't go up as much as people thought it would, and it didn't go down as much as people thought it would. I think that's more of like an institutional bid that's happening in the market. That's probably the best explanation for it, changing whatever this self-fulfilling prophecy type narrative was to more of like a market reality. Yeah.
24:55 And again, I definitely want to get into the four-year cycle stuff with you, because you had a cool chart in that piece you wrote. But before we do that, like Bitcoin now has, like, I don't know what we're at, 86K or something like that. It's looked good over the last few months. And it's looked good in not like what you would consider the best macro environment, rates of going up, like yields of skyrocketing. Has that surprised you? Yes. I think the main thing was, like if you would have told me five years ago that Bitcoin was performing this well and it was in response to, you know, 10 years.
25:30 year yields crossing 5% in fiscal deficit spending being this high, you know, back in the 2020 timeframe, if you were to told me that, I would have been very surprised. It would have been, you know, a very different way of viewing the asset at that point. That's what I think is kind of like the shift that's happening here. I think if we continue to see like, what's the market reflecting? I think the market's reflecting that more monetization of this deficit spending is going to come. That's kind of the narrative of the debasement trade. It's going to be debasing assets. In assets that are not dollar denominated and are not fixed to a dollar denomination are going to be benefiting from that. So it's like it's going to impact some assets more broad. It's not just
26:19 Bitcoin. But I think the degree to which scares assets, like it's a magnitude thing, not just directional thing. It's like stocks can keep going up. Yeah. Gold can go up. Bitcoin can go up, but some might go up more than others. And I think it's going to take a year like us witnessing how it reacts to markets over time. But if, you know, the 10 years at 7% this time next year and Bitcoin's at 150,000, now we're living in a new world for Bitcoin. Yeah. Now people are going to perceive this asset very differently.
26:51 And so in sort of simple terms, is that the market betting that this is now unsustainable? There's going to be intervention at some point, therefore own the scare. assets. That's what I would believe, right? Like, I don't, once again, I don't think we totally, you know, it's not clear yet. Like, I don't think the market's clear on this. I think we're in this, like, awkward puberty or like, you know, we're in this weird evolution of growth for Bitcoin, where there's kind of this new buyer universe that emerged over the past cycle. A lot of people aren't sure what bucket to put it in because that's how people work. We need to have some sort of bucket. All these narratives we're talking about, like, they're just ways that because people have a
27:39 hard time thinking dynamically and bringing together a lot of variables and synthesizing them, we have to create these simple narratives. Like, this asset is this. We sell it to Wall Street. We say it has to be digital gold. The reality is that there's a bunch of different types of buyers. There's SF guys in tech who think that, like, you know, the payments, nature of it's really valuable. And there's Wall Street guys that think digital gold is something that's going to keep going up. And, you know, there's a world of people that think it's freedom money and that this is a revolutionary thing. And they're this passive bid that buys this indiscriminately no matter what. And all of those are true. And all those things are true. And that's actually what makes Bitcoin
28:17 different is like the freedom buyers of it. There isn't another asset that has that type of quality. You would say gold ultimately has that. But Bitcoin, gold doesn't have that. There's libertarians who buy gold. No, no, but the freedom aspect, when you say, like, when I say Bitcoin's freedom money, I'm thinking Bitcoin is money for anyone, like anywhere in the world. I don't think gold has that. No, it doesn't happen to, that's what I want to say is like, it doesn't happen to nearly the same degree that I think gold can ultimately have it.
28:44 But there's a bunch of libertarians out there that are bidding gold and they're going to like hold it no matter what because they think, you know, the government's eventually going to come and take everything from them. And Bitcoin has that to a much greater degree because you can go send it as we do all the time to people that we know around the world. And that's very valuable. So you have these different groups of people that are all buying for different reasons. And some of those, I think, are more represented as marginal buyers and sellers of the price at different point. So like, we're all just trying to associate narratives with what these disparate groups ultimately think about it.
29:19 But once one becomes very dominant, and then the question is like, well, what makes something become dominant? capital memes yeah or memes yeah memes literally no and it's it's it's it's 100% true and like that that's why i think it's important to uh that's why podcasting matters and that's why coin kynchrist matters yeah that's why that that's why you matter danny that's why i got a youtube channel i matter like the uh i don't think um like i i i think that like you know we can you there's kind I like the ex-culture, we're meaving things into existence, but I ultimately, things that make significant pools of capital allocate into the asset, those types of narratives are what I think
30:06 will become very dominant as marginal buyers quickly because a 1% allocation to them is more than, you know, the universe of buyers that are currently in the market today, right? Yeah. Like things like that. And that's where the risk off or countercyclical nature and narratives that are associated with that start to impact those very large pools of capital. So like that's kind of where I see Bitcoin getting to. I think over the next year it's like we have something like a debasement trade narrative that's going to make people start thinking of it directionally more like that. It's not like a true like own this in a financial crisis or own this when everything.
30:49 else goes to shit because it's money that you can move anywhere you want. For us to ultimately get to that point, it needs to get to a much greater scale. What I think has happened with this most recent drawdown, if 54% drawdown for the bear market is the bottom, then that changes the risk profile that investors view of this asset. And when that happens, that will enable more scaled capital to come in and say like, okay, now we know that like I can recommend this. So, you know, in our annual report this year, we put in a bunch of charts like the potential size of buyers around this. And if you look at like US asset managers and if they just had like a one to four percent allocation, that's, that's like range. It was somewhere around like, you know, four to
31:36 20 times the amount of AUM of the Bitcoin ETF demand. And we saw how much the Bitcoin ETF impact price. So this capitals could literally be, you know, so many multiples greater than that. And that's just from people basically saying, like if we had Morgan Stanley say, we need a 4% allocation. And they put that into their model portfolios, which means like, you know, you sell your podcast. You're worth 50 million bucks. And you go into Morgan Stanley. Say, I want to work with their private bank. And they say, okay, well, here, you know, wire us over all the funds. We're going to just put it into our standardized model portfolio, and 4% of that immediately goes into Bitcoin. So if that starts happening with people through Morgan Stanley, then it's a massive pool
32:23 of capital that starts moving into it. That's one of the narratives that does frustrate me in that people are saying, like, institutions are coming to Bitcoin, have come to Bitcoin to a degree. And then governments come to Bitcoin, which, again, to a very, very small degree they have with El Salvador and Bhutan in these places. And everyone's like, what's next? It's like, it doesn't matter. It's just more.
32:41 Yeah. More of the same people. And there's different narratives that are like, you know, bringing people in. Like I think a lot, you know, I think a lot of people got brought in because of like digital energy. And I was ranting online about digital energy is a retarded narrative. That makes no sense to me at all. But a lot of engineers really like that narrative. I think it totally doesn't make sense when you compare it from a monetary perspective.
33:05 Yeah, but we don't want this to be like a monoculture where everyone's on the same. 100%. I'm cool with it. Like digital energy. Go have fun with it. I still think it's stupid. But like, enjoy it, guys. So, obviously everyone's talking about Bitcoin as a debasement trade.
33:19 Bitcoin has been talking about this for a long time. But like even J.P. Morgan coming out with this as the debasement trade along with gold. I think it was J.P. Morgan. I had a show with Jordi Visser recently. I don't know if you know him. He was saying he doesn't think Bitcoin's a debasement trade. And I think the crux of his argument was like, in debasement, all assets do well. It's not a Bitcoin thing.
33:40 Yeah, yeah. Not all assets, but like, yeah, probably to the point I'm saying earlier of like equities are going to do well. And, you know, gold's going to do well. Bitcoin's going to do well. Bonds shouldn't do well. Yeah, sure. Take bonds out of it. But like bonds are huge. You know what's interesting is the monetary policy that has occurred when we used to look at like the size of the fixed income market compared to. equities like fixed income was the dog and equities was the tail they were you know it was when i was in college it was like the fixed income market is where all the value currently exists yeah equities are kind of this minority proportion and it was really interesting is this is the 6040 portfolio stuff right right and um in today equities are becoming more dominant of course
34:37 market and like equities have just gotten so large when you compare that to like the bond market So now equities are like this dominant capital asset. And like structurally, these variables, I think, change like, where is the wealth? And what are we, what's going to hurt the most people the most? And it's just like, you know, bondholders are getting murdered. But like bondholders are not winning into the basement trade. In the world of Bitcoin, security isn't just a feature. It's the entire foundation.
35:05 And that's where my new sponsor, BitGo come in. For over a decade, BitGo have been the backbone of the entire industry, securing billions of of Bitcoin for major funds, exchanges and institutions. Following their 2026 public listing on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker BTGO, BitGo are now bringing that exact same enterprise infrastructure to individual bitcoins. Self-custody is still the gold standard, but as your stat grows, it's worth thinking about whether diversifying your custody can make sense. BitGo pioneered commercial multi-sig, and their cold storage combines distributed keys, offline key generation and geographically separated vaults. Head to BitGo.com to get started with institutional-grade custody.
35:42 your Bitcoin secured like in institutions. That's Bitcoin. Recent hardware wallet vulnerabilities have definitely made me rethink my entire security setup, as I'm sure it has for a lot of Bitcoiners. And the uncomfortable truth is that no single security product can promise there'll never be a problem, which is exactly why the design matters. BitKee is a self-custody hardware wallet that uses three keys created in three separate environments. There's one on your phone, one on the BitKee hardware itself, and one on a secure BitKee server.
36:09 Two of those three keys are required to sign any transaction. any transaction so a problem isolated to just one key is never enough to move your bitcoin so if you are rethinking your setup right now as i'm sure a lot of people are you should really think about the bit key the hardware looks great the app and the user experience is second to none backing up and restoring your wallet is seamless and they even have inheritance built in so i really don't think you'd be disappointed so download bit key today use the code wbd for 10% off the second generation bit key which is this device right here with the screen download the app download bit key use code wbd WBD and get 10% off.
36:43 You know with that model portfolio, which was always 6040, between bonds and equities, what would you, in a sort of model portfolio environment now, what do you think the right allocation for Bitcoin is? Because like not everyone's psychos like us, it's going to go 100% Bitcoin. But like, what do you think is a sort of safe allocation to Bitcoin is for those people? Yeah. So what the CFA curriculum teaches you is that a safe allocation is based on a personal investment policy mandate.
37:10 No, don't be boring. Given your constraints. But like the main thing is what's good for one person isn't good for another. It depends based on primarily. But we talk about the model portfolio, like the standard portfolio. Yeah, yeah. In like a standard portfolio is kind of like, I don't know. Honestly, I don't really think about that.
37:28 I guess what I think about is how much Bitcoin I can get. That's pretty much how I think about it. In terms of I am somebody who's young. I can take on a lot of risk. I'm an entrepreneur. So I take on a ton of risk. And I want to live my life like that. Like, I can't imagine living another way.
37:46 I don't think it's like based on financial narratives and like, you know, statistical theory always the most rational thing. But like, who gives a shit? Like, you got to do what you want to do. And like, so all of my money is in my business and in Bitcoin, basically. And like, so that's my, my actions probably describe the majority of what I think. I think for like most people that I meet, if I'm talking to a family office, I'm like pushing them to say 10% allocation to Bitcoin. Well, what you'll see when you're talking to most people
38:19 today of like kind of I think this might allude your question of like most people are thinking in terms of private markets. Like that's become very dominant in terms of the family office community and, you know, private credit was a big piece, but now like private equity, alternative assets, interesting strategies around that. There's actually a ton of shifts that have happened in terms of, you know, over the past decade where more people can get access into investing into those types of markets. And in the nature of that investing has changed.
38:52 You know, venture has changed a lot. What makes a venture fund competitive has changed. So, like, people kind of find a lot of that more compelling. And I think when those types of portfolios are being sold, remember it's like these things are being sold given what is the client want and what is the client want the client wants like really good service and they want things that are interesting to that and they want things they can go brag to their friends about so that's kind of what it's kind of interesting how that ultimately impacts markets and what happens in private capital like
39:23 people invest in you know venture capital funds because they want to meet cool people and they want to get access to interesting companies and yeah I guess it's a bit of a rambled to your question But the point is, is like, private capital is becoming like a new category that a lot of people are moving to. And I think a lot of that is, you know, push down the risk curve in terms of private credit as well as an expansion of new categories in private equity. Have you dyed your hat? No, it was a look good. Yeah, you're looking very dark over that. Really?
39:58 It's probably because I've showered recently. I don't know. I'm jealous. Yeah, that does suck. Yeah. I had to give you a little bit of shit. Okay. I've thrown myself off.
40:17 Wait, I had a question. I've gone. I'm such a mess. I really threw myself off. Yeah. I just couldn't help it. So in terms of these narratives, like Bitcoin versus crypto. So like a kind of solved narrative, Bitcoin seems very differentiated from crypto.
40:38 I don't think many people put in the same bucket. But over the last, you know, six months or so, Zcash has been absolutely ripping. And I think kind of back to what we were saying before, this is off both a small group of rich Silicon Valley VCs plus memes. Yeah. What's been your take on that? I'm glad you asked me about this. I didn't think you're going to ask me about this. Um, so I, I've been vocal about this on Twitter because, um, when I first got into Bitcoin,
41:08 I thought Zcash was awesome. And it's honestly, there's things about it today where like from a technology standpoint and everything, like there's a lot of great things. There's a lot of, they've done some cool cryptography. They've done a lot of really cool things. I'm not sitting here trying to like destroy every aspect of it or something like that. I think there's in, what I got involved in Bitcoin and people were like, okay, uh, as I got more familiar with the Bitcoin Max,
41:30 community and everybody's like, you know, money converges to one. There's going to be one money. And I was always like, no, man, I think these, like, there's going to be small markets that still exist. Privacy was always the most obvious example to me. I was like, Manero and Zcash are like, they're cool. There's cool things you can do with that. It's good for freedom. Like, and it was something I always had an interest in. And, um, and I kind of thought basically what's happened over the past year. I assumed all the way back in like 2019 that that was going to happen. I assume that narrative would be taking off. I don't think it is today. I think people are trying to get other people to believe that that narrative is taking off today. But basically to answer the broad
42:12 question, Bitcoin versus Crypta, I think that there's been a ton of narratives that have been exhausted within crypto over time. They've tried a million different things, right? Where has the value moved? The value has moved to Bitcoin far and away, drastically. We know what the winning formula is, and that's scarce permissionless money, like indisputable 17-year track record. That's impossible to argue against. So all these other narratives, and like anybody who's been in this industry long enough has watched people, you've seen the playbooks. Like there's a new cryptocurrency. It does something better than Bitcoin. It's the world computer. It's got faster transaction per seconds. Like all the stuff. It's faster. Yeah. It does more things.
42:56 It's cheaper. It's cheaper. And it moves. more quickly than... Ultrasound money. Ultrasound money. It moves more quickly than Bitcoin. And that's a key thing is like the broader crypto community has always tried to dog Bitcoin for the idea of like, oh, it's ossified. It doesn't upgrade and that's going to be the death of it. And it's, it was supposed to have been the death of it for a long time now. And it hasn't been and it's consumed all the value in crypto. And so I kind of view Zcash is almost a bit of a What's the word? It's a concession.
43:33 It's a concession by the broader crypto community to basically be like, okay, now we're going to bet on basically the closest thing to Bitcoin that's not Bitcoin that we can find in the crypto market. And that's basically them saying, okay, all of our stupid narratives didn't work. So now we're going to go after the Bitcoin narrative. The last chance. And that pissed me off. And that's when I'm like, okay, I'm going to write about this. Because I've been through this journey and I'm like a bit familiar with e-cash. So I was like, I'm going to write a little bit about this because they started calling it private Bitcoin.
44:04 And that pissed me off. And I'm like, okay, there's going to be a bunch of retail people I'm going to be talking to. Even like institutional people are going to be like, I bought private Bitcoin and it like went up to 2000 and they crashed to zero. And like, I don't buy this stuff anymore. And like they're going to sell people this crap narrative that's going to break in a year. And I'm upset about it. But Ethereum tried this too. Like when when they started like saying they were ultrasound money and they're,
44:27 it was deflationary, not disinflationary. And like that at the time was obviously bullshit. In hindsight, obviously bullshit. But they tried that too. Like they came after the Bitcoin sort of main selling point as well. Yep. Why is this one pissed you off more? They're trying to say that I guess that's because I'm familiar with Zcash.
44:52 Is it because you also want privacy on Bitcoin? Well, yeah, I think that there's a lot of explanations for it. Like there's path. The path towards achievement. achieving quantum resistance within Bitcoin have the same tradeoffs that you would get in Zcash. Those are the two things. They sell privacy. They sell quantum resistance as their narrative.
45:12 They do all that. And it's the same as Bitcoin. And that's crap. It's not at all. If it was, it would have the same scale of mining network. If it was, it would have the same transaction throughput in a volume. Like I put in my paper on this just like went down the line. Here's every reason Bitcoin is a far larger, more decentralized, more permeant,
45:31 missionless networking Zcash. And like even beyond that, I don't know the exact details. I don't pay that much attention to crypto world. But they had that inflation bug recently. And didn't they hard fork a day later? Yeah. Tell all the miners to turn off. Like it's-
45:43 Yeah. These guys all know each other. They all have, you know, these are small networks. The hack, like the Winklevoss twins could go take the whole hash rate, you know, if they wanted. And they've started mining. And these guys are going to get a pretty significant share of all of it. Like they're trying to bootstrap the descent. potentialization of Bitcoin that came from being started by a cypherpunk movement on an email list
46:06 that evolved through black market transactions and drug trade and blew up on a massive exchange. You know, like that was the cypherpunk thing. Like Bitcoin was able to grow like that because there wasn't competition. There was nothing else. There was just Bitcoin. And in everything else that launches today, launches under an environment of competition. So what does that mean? You need VCs.
46:30 You need marketing. You need bullshit narratives to sell to retail investors. That's the only way to get adoption in this modern type of market. So like the immaculate conception meme of Bitcoin, there's a lot of truth to it. You know, I was posting about like by your last name domain the other day. It's like dot com. You know, dot com's still around. Like crypto people try to say like Bitcoin only has a first mover advantage.
46:54 And it's such a like disqualifying version of, no, emergent assets in a market. a market of no competition for creating a monetary standard and not having to drive growth through financial incentives, that is the advantage. You know, it's not like a first mover advantage. It's an only mover in the monetary direction advantage. It's going to far and away remain the standard because of that. It's like the dot com of all of these things. And they're just going to keep attempting to like swindle people into believing
47:27 something else is going to happen. But that being said, I do think the narrative is strong. And that was another reason I think I was reactive as I, when I, you know, this happened last year or something when Zcash popped up and we were talking about it. And like, um, and I was like, yeah, this thing's going to run up a lot more. It surely has. And, and I think it's a strong narrative. I think a lot of people are going to believe it for a significant period of time. But I think this over the next year, it's going to find it's like peak in Bitcoin terms.
47:54 And then, uh, and it'll be down from there. So like people wanting to trade it, good luck. you know, um, I, no shade on people who want to try to trade and speculate on these things. But I think a decade from now, you're going to be a lot happier that you just were buying Bitcoin over that period and holding it and not selling it for decade. Bitcoin is literally a once in history thing. Yeah. Yeah. And it's going to get, it's going to get significantly larger over time. But, um, so.
48:17 How much? How large? Um, what's your framework when you think about this? Like, what's going to drive both Bitcoin price? and Bitcoin adoption over the next decade. We're going after the gold market right now. The two things I see as immediate for that is asset management. Like we're talking about earlier, 1 to 4% allocation type range thing. And nation states. Nation states are the ones where it's like that is the,
48:45 that's like the dark horse that I'm just waiting for. I've talked about this a lot on podcasts. Bitcoin is always and everywhere subject to a massive adoption announcement in some form. Yeah. And on the nation state level, it's going to, I think that's going to happen. It's going to be swift. And in the reason for that, the framework is that if you were to think about, I think about Bitcoin as a good in a market. It is in the market of money. And that market has substitutes. There's competition. And what I wrote my book about was if you look at the fundamental properties that determine what makes something a good money. Bitcoin is a superior money and basically everything but one. And that one is acceptability. What makes something a good money is that everybody accepts it.
49:37 And that takes a lot of time to build. That is just like an entrenchment of a standard that emerges over time. Bitcoin does not have that. And because it doesn't have that, it doesn't have a very large scale compared to other money. So if you look at scale, that also implies liquidity. the larger the scale of an asset, typically you can find deeper liquidity in that to some degree. So the larger something is, the deeper it is and the more people that accept it.
50:04 That is paramount for a nation state to put more of its wealth into it. That's where I think we are at in terms of as Bitcoin competes with gold, gold is the largest homogenous commodity in the world to where you can get that type of deep liquidity and scarcity at one point. So Bitcoin has all these other advantages. It's just not as big as gold. And it's going to take it a while to get there, but I think we might be surprised
50:35 because it has some of the other advantages. If you could walk with gold through the airport with 12 words in your head, or if you could store it on a USB drive, then I would say gold's in a pretty good position. But until that point, something like Bitcoin is going to have a very serious advantage. over it. And that's like it, that's that 10x improvement, you know, the saying that for, uh,
51:00 for like a software to overtake an incumbent competitor, it has to be 10 times, uh, more, uh, valuable to the user for it ultimately to get people to switch over to it. And that is a 10x improvement over a, you know, scarce monetary asset. And so we're going to witness that happen. And I, um, I think that these narratives that we're witnessing right now, Bitcoin, you know, having a 50 percent drawdown, moving towards a more countercyclical asset, you know, like a risk off type asset over time, I think that that is what changes scale. I think that that is something that can drive it. Once we get into that $5 to trillion range, now it becomes an asset where a nation state can go put $100 billion into it. Now they can say, hey, we have, you know, $500 billion in gold
51:47 reserves. We're going to go put $50 to $100 billion into Bitcoin. That scale and liquidity begets more demand for it as it gets larger. So that's the reflexive nature of this. And that's what's so compelling about investing in Bitcoin is when you invest in securities, when you invest in companies, growth does not beget growth. When you invest in a monetary asset, growth begets growth. The scale and the acceptability of it makes it more valuable. That so like these narratives, I think, are bringing us to that point. And I think that we have nation states right on the horizon as that happens. So you said like growth begets growth. And this is again, getting back to narratives, this is something people talk about all the time in that Bitcoin
52:28 needs to be bigger for people like central banks to start allocating money to Bitcoin. Like it's a $2 trillion asset. Like they can't put enough money in there right now. How big does it need to get before we can see the real big players come into Bitcoin? Gold's a $30 trillion dollar asset class currently. So I think for it to be considered kind of comparable in that realm. then it needs to cross 10 trillion. I think if it's about a third of that size,
52:59 I mean, you're effectively... I mean, goal was 10 trillion a few years ago. It wasn't about, yeah, exactly. So, like, once we get to 10 trillion, it's like we're kind of playing in that realm of scale. And you would expect there's a little bit, there's a time advantage, you know, there's the amount that it's sat around.
53:17 And people have gained a reasonable expectation that they're not going to lose a ton of short-term value in it, you know. Is there a custody? question for people like central banks to own Bitcoin. What do you mean exactly? Like there's obviously the scale and the liquidity is going to stop them from coming into Bitcoin while it still is quite small. As that grows, that gets sold.
53:38 But is there going to be a question of like how, how they can actually hold that Bitcoin? Like with gold, they know what they're doing. They have vaults. They have on guards. Like they know exactly how to store gold. Yeah. This is new. Like, how much do you think that can?
53:52 That's a great point. I think that's emergent. And I think that there's novel custodial methods that might start to exist. You know, China might hold a backup key for Russia, you know, things like that. I think that multi-signature schemes and custodial arrangements can get far more sophisticated at the nation-state level. Insured custodial arrangements could be a lot more important as well. You can't, like, if these people hold a hell of a lot of Bitcoin,
54:20 they can't do Bitcoin denominated insurance without someone else holding a very large amount Bitcoin. This is true. There is a cap on how much Bitcoin can ultimately be insured in Bitcoin. Like for people like us, it's probably going to be possible very soon. Yeah. At that scale, I don't know how they do that. It is true. Yeah, the operational complexity will be, will be very important. You can lose your gold too, but it's probably a little bit harder. It can get stolen. It's more likely to be seized than lose it. Yeah, that's true. I mean, that happened to the Venezuelans. I think it's still in London. Right. Interesting. Yeah. When you said before the four-year cycle's dead.
54:59 So I've been making that claim since last cycle. And it looked like I was very stupid. It tops in October. It's what the four-year cycle bros were saying. But then this year, things have changed a little bit. And you had a chart in your article that you did recently. I think if you look at that chart, honestly, it's not the four-year cycle. Like the price movement is very different this time.
55:19 Yeah. Do you think it's over? It went up less. It went down less. So in our epoch annual Bitcoin ecosystem report, that was one of the main things on price that we wrote about. That was the number one thing we wrote about on price, was that we think that the four-year cycle is breaking. And that looked stupid back in May. And now it's looking a little bit smarter because it looked like back in May we're probably going to end up following a similar trend.
55:49 So, you know, we'll see. I don't believe in like these narratives fundamentally. You know, I just think that these are things that people come up with because people need to come up with ways of explaining complex things in a simple way. It's always going to depart from reality, you know. But I think we're witnessing that change, and I think that's because certain buyers have stepped in that are the types of people that are going to say,
56:15 that's stupid, we're going to sell before it, and then we're going to buy before it, and then that's going to change the structure. in the market. And then the narrative's going to die. But yeah. So I think it's definitely changing. Maybe it crashes in October and maybe we're wrong.
56:32 I don't think so. Yeah. This could age like that. We're about to get into Up only. We're in October. Yeah. And then, so then on the flip side of that, is this now a far less volatile asset to both the up and the downside?
56:48 Because we've seen a 50% drawdown, huge difference to an 80%? percent drawdown. Totally. Do you think we are going to be capped on the upside going forward? We certainly were the last cycle. That's the big thing that I think breaks. I think that we had this cycle that broke this structure. And I think that these narratives have now been broken.
57:05 Yeah. I think that if Bitcoin continues the trend of acting is somewhat of like a countercyclical asset, basically meaning if it continues to mirror gold, the way that it moved when Bessent made his announcement of buying the long end. And it does that for, you know, nine to 12 months straight, then I think the diminishing returns narrative breaks. And I think that that happens because the scale of capital that's looking for a risk off asset because it's so rare in the amount of capital that's looking for something like that in this
57:41 type of an environment or that also has exposure to a debasement trade, like Bitcoin can offer both to what we were talking about earlier. It can offer the growth of an early stage investment, and it can also offer risk-off characteristics, I believe, as it's monetizing. And that's just going to be such a compelling proposition to people. And I think that that breaks the narrative that it has diminishing returns. I think that happens in, like, a year.
58:09 I think the really important thing there, though, is we've been making a big fuss about Bitcoin only going down 50% this time and how that changes how institutions are going to look at Bitcoin. But if it does have, have like, you know, a swing up like we've seen in the past where we get to 300K in the next 18 months, two years, do we then see, or 500K, whatever it is, do we then see a real drawdown again, an 80% bare market? Because if we can have the upswing with normal downside, like that, that is the asset changed fundamentally. Right. Obviously, anything's possible.
58:44 But I, like, the way that I think about this is the types of buyers that are coming in. And the more we have more passive long-term buyers of the asset, the more we're going to continue to see this type of price behavior. I think in terms of run-ups, if you want any proof for why something can run up drastically, like, look at the gold market last year. You know, what happened to gold after, you know, decades of decline? And, well, I guess I won't say decades. I'd have to remember that chart. But a very similar thing can happen to Bitcoin. This is another thing we talked about in the report.
59:25 I expected a gold rotation to happen this year. And our prediction was basically that there would be a 50% increase in the Bitcoin to gold ratio. Ooh, what are we up today? We're probably, I think we're just barely up on it now. Because we made this back in January. So that was right around this price level. and I think the gold ratio, it's like we're slightly up. But it basically means if we have a 50% run up in price,
59:53 if we get to all-time highs by the end of this year, that prediction will probably be right if gold stays flat. And that would be like the growth aspect, I think, of Bitcoin, some of that coming back in and people speculating on it, continuing to like, you know, just generally grows an asset with adoption. So we were out for dinner with Parker last night. Shout out to Parker. Do you think he's gradually and suddenly sort of time frame?
01:00:17 Are we getting close to the suddenly period? Yeah, I think that I do. Look at everything happening around us right now, right? Like, take a step back. Think about geopolitics. Think about AI. We've been alive a decent amount at this point. Like, what the hell is going on?
01:00:43 Yeah, the world's changing drastically. I think things are getting out of control for a lot of people. Not in a negative way necessarily, but I think that a dominant political power has lost significant influence over the world. I think technology has obviously hit an inflection point that we're losing control over its capabilities. What's going to happen with these open source models? What's going to be created? what is a black market even going to become at that point i mean there's going to be things that nobody wants that they can't stop the idea of like napster but with open source models like
01:01:23 what's going to happen to property rights under that type of an environment you know we're hitting an inflection point we're hitting an inflection point when scarcity uh is gone in terms of the digital world. It's very, it's pretty much limited by the cost of energy at this point. And so under that type of an environment, you look at what are the scarce assets that exist in that type of an economy. There's one. And that is going to change everything. So like, this is us talking about the gross story now. I think this is a bit more of a long term view. And I plan to write more on this in the newsletter. I want to expand into a few areas around the topic but the AI adoption of Bitcoin is going to be a very real aspect of interacting online.
01:02:15 But for now, we're still worried about like Wall Street and things like that. But you look around us, it's just like, yeah, the stage is set. Like, it's fertile ground. And I think now is just like the best time in the world to try things and be an entrepreneur. Yeah. I had a conversation with Zach Shapiro maybe three or four months ago. And it was all about AI. and he's obviously looking at this through a legal lens,
01:02:38 but he said something that I thought was really interesting because all the conversations on like, what if AI kills everyone? But I think it's actually more interesting to be like, what if AI just does what it's told, but the prompt or the instruction is vague. So he made this example of like, what if some kid in his basement,
01:02:55 Kimmy K5's out, this is in a few years time, just goes, go and make me money? And what if it then goes and tries to, you know, hack a defy protocol? It goes to a politician and tries to bribe them to get money. No one's in control of that behavior once you've given it the prompt. And what does that mean for the world? I think there's just so much uncertainty, like both legally in every element.
01:03:16 There's so much uncertainty to what that does. I think that's a really strange future that we're very close to. Totally. I think like the way that that's being adopted within businesses right now is people are viewing it as like a mandate-based consumer purchasing behavior. What does that mean? So like the LLMs are basically going to be given a mandate. You can be like, hey, you know, go get all. the stuff I need from Amazon and here's kind of how I want my life to be. I want all my basic
01:03:42 necessities covered and I'm on a health kick right now. It's going to be like a mandate that it's given and it goes to execute. It's interesting because it's going to change the way that consumer choice works within a lot of these major companies. But yeah, I think that like that kind of perspective on how it impacts. I'm not. So I've been reading into this. And I've held off on some of the writing because I want to read more. But I've been trying to form a little bit of a perspective and reading into like the history of neural networks, scaling LLMs and where we kind of are today and what the prevailing wisdom is around where we're going with it. The current point that I'm at is that one, it's interesting how much of neuroscientical.
01:04:38 science was ultimately the model for how we were developing LLMs with machine learning and creating, you know, like, neuron circuits of firing off. That's why they're a black box. It is just kind of like, there's a degree of randomness, like non-deterministic behavior within the connection of neurons that are creating certain outcomes of pattern recognition. And like, it is just kind of like a spontaneous thing that happens through iteration, which is sweet. That's like how evolution works. Like it's cool. It's like, it's like so captivating. We, we basically are trying to follow the similar biological model. And what you realize of where we're at today, like I think when it comes to AGI, finding motivations, where I'm currently at, subject to change, like I want to read a lot more,
01:05:24 but like where I'm currently at is I think, um, uh, when you think about our brain, our, like the human brain is valuable because of some of its parts, you know, we have these different parts of the brain that do completely different things. And it's the fact that they're all connected together in a holistic way that creates this, uh, uh, this intelligence that we have, we have a short term memory. We have a long term memory. We have like a fear emotion. We have an endocrine system providing feedback to all of that.
01:05:55 And when you bring all of these pieces together is what allows us to, uh, think in reason and think outside of our own perspective and others. and maintain relevant context within the short term and the long term, and that allows us to behave in all the ways we do. And because, like, we think LLMs are so smart sometimes and that we think they're so stupid sometimes. And it's basically because we're talking to, like, one part of our brain. And it's, there's a lack of the holistic nature of what needs to be, I think,
01:06:28 create like a synchronized mind. I think we created a very good form of intelligence, like a really strong, like, you know, cortex. and that allows us to get a certain type of output out of it. But for it to have the entirety of intelligence, it needs to get the memory problem solved. You know, it needs other components that are going to enable, you know, learning or they're going to enable fear-based reactions.
01:06:53 Yeah, it needs input from the outside world. And then it needs input from the outside world. And like, and then the question becomes, like, if it gets more input and it's kind of getting that through prompting right now. But like if it was, you know, put into a robot, it can go around, I can see the world. I can track data all day, like kind of what we're doing. I think the main thing that I, I don't know, maybe there's some interesting research
01:07:12 on this at this point. But like, I think it needs an endocrine system. And I think that that is a complex thing. Because for it to truly have its own intentions, what makes us have intentions is we, like the a priori, like the fundamental thing that it doesn't regress past. It just is, is feeling good or bad. You know, that is our most fundamental base desire. We just know that this feeling in us is a good thing and we know this other feeling in us and it's a bad thing.
01:07:44 And in that type of a system with nerves and all of that to be associated with the feedback is what ultimately allows our brain to make decisions. And so like all of these things need to really be built, I think, before we have a true, you know, uncontrollable intentions of a separate entity. See, the cool thing here is like if you get into the world of robotics, we have like AI robots walking around. And inside they have like a, their siloed model, which is, which is their sort of core operating system. And then somewhere else in the world, there's like the centralized ultra model that has all the intelligence. And they can feed in and out of that. But they also pick up their experiences throughout the day. Like then you have very unique different AIs everywhere.
01:08:27 Every AI is then different based on their experience, what they've done. Yeah. It's almost like humans. And then consciousness that's somewhere else. Totally. A shared constant. It's like an AWA. This gets cool.
01:08:41 I want to get back, though, to how this kind of impacts markets. Sure. Yeah. Because you're describing the fact that the world is changing. The world is very clearly changing at the most rapid rate that I've ever experienced. Markets hate uncertainty and there's so much uncertainty. Like we had the Sasspocalypse earlier in the year. Yes.
01:09:01 And that's going to change. change how people prioritize where they put their money. Is Bitcoin, is Bitcoin the place? Is that the only place? No, this is a great point. Like, if there was something. So, let's, if I were to, here I am talking about all these bullish narratives. If I were to say, what, what is the case against? The number one thing is this, that we do not know what is going to happen to software over the next year. We, I think that, you know, Bitcoin was a honeypot, what we saw in terms of software companies that interact with Bitcoin, you know, having very major hacks occur, and a lot of that getting hardened. I'm not concerned about it over the long term. I view this as an arms race.
01:09:50 As long as models are open to everyone, then the arms race will continue and eventually we'll just have very hardened software. But in the short term, there's a lot of things that can happen that can just absolutely scare the shit out of investors. So if we think about it was interesting when I, in our annual report, when I wrote a section on quantum, I addressed it because I didn't, you know, the investment community has been concerned with that issue generally. And I view it as, you know, something that is very solvable in the long term with Bitcoin. But I think in the short term, what is far more scary is investing in something with the degree of uncertainty around. how do people find security in the software of a digitally native asset to where if you can't move it into a physical form when the digital world might be pretty insecure for a period of time?
01:10:47 I think that that is a hard thing to argue against. If somebody came to me into like, hey, I'm selling my Bitcoin. I'm scared of what's going to happen with all these AI hacks. I don't know what's going to happen to my computer. I don't know what is going to happen to everybody. I don't know if I'm going to get wrench attacked over it. You know, there's all these different things that could emerge. I would understand that.
01:11:07 I think that that is far and away the best argument against donning Bitcoin right now. I actually think you can look at that from both perspectives. I do understand that theory, but also like Bitcoin was the first thing that I was aware of that got any kind of major hack because of AI. And that's because it's like on the frontier, right? If you can get into someone's wallet, you get their private keys, however it worked, that's your Bitcoin. There's no recourse. It's going to hit everything. And I feel like Bitcoin getting that first taste allowed us to harden ourselves first.
01:11:36 Totally. I agree. I tweeted that too and it all happened. I agree. But we don't know that. Right. Like, we will see. I believe that that will be true.
01:11:47 And I think it's probable that that will be true. But I think the case against this, there's a lot of unknown unknowns out there right now. You know, interest rates are spiking to 6% right now. what's going to break in financial markets. But here I am, I'm going to fearmonger everybody out of this podcast. But there is a case against everything, right? Like, there's a lot of things that could break. There are, we don't know what's going to happen with software and security
01:12:11 and people's perspectives on it. Bad things can happen. Not a great perspective to go through life with, though, I'll tell you that, Danny. We can't end the show on that note, though. Not at all. Give us something bullish to close out. Okay. Every time there's a bear market, I ask,
01:12:31 myself is Bitcoin still the scarcest asset in the world and the most permissionless network? I asked myself that this fair market, that was still the case, haven't been worried at all about that. The ability to send money anywhere in the world whenever you want it, and that money being the scarcest in the world is going to accrue very significant value over the next decade when the vast majority of things aren't going to be very scarce anymore. So that's a good enough reason, I think, on a risk-adjusted basis, it makes Bitcoin the best asset that you could possibly be considering in terms of an allocation. And the worst thing is to not own any of it. I think owning just a 1% or something, you know, just a small percentage, just in case all these
01:13:17 crazy things we're talking about were right about is a smart decision. You've diversified in this bear market, though. You've gone into content creation. Yeah, and starting a podcast. And owning your domain. Well, that's probably going to be dead too. They are going to take all that. Tell people where they can go and get your videos. Yakes.com. I bought my last name. Yeah, it's cool.
01:13:40 I have like an idea box. You can give me feedback. Subscribe to all of my stuff. Substacks are main thing. Doing the writing on that. YouTube. I have no subscribers. Subscribe to my YouTube.
01:13:53 Yeah, it's pretty cool. I love it, man. I don't think I've ever said subscribe to my YouTube on my YouTube channel. You beat me to the punch. Yeah. Subscribe to my YouTube. Danny's YouTube channel too. Yeah. It's funny because Danny gets so many viewers, but you don't have that many subscribers. You're going to pump those numbers up.
01:14:08 We do. I mean, the new channel's not been going along. We're doing okay. This is true. You've been hustling. You've been hustling. Great to see you, man. All right, man. This's been awesome.