99% Invisible - 429- Stuccoed in Time
Episode Date: February 3, 2021Santa Fe is famous in part for a particular architectural style, an adobe (mudbrick) look that came to be called Pueblo Revival. This aesthetic combines elements of indigenous pueblo architecture and ...the New Mexico's old Spanish missions, resulting in mostly low, brown buildings with smooth edges. Buildings in the city's historical districts in particular have to follow a number of design guidelines so that they fit this desired look; deviating from those aesthetics can stir up a lot of controversy. But this adherence to a single style hasn't always been the norm -- for a time, there was actually a powerful push to "Americanize" the city's built environment. Then, over a century ago, a group of preservationists laid out a vision for the look and feel of Santa Fe architecture, and in the process changed the city forever. Stuccoed in Time
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is 99% invisible. I'm Roman Mars.
Back in the early 2000s, an architect named Tray Jordan wrote a letter to Santa Fe, New Mexico's
Historic Preservation Division, laying out the details of a house he was hoping to build
in the city's historic district. The process started out pretty normal.
We were just not ready for what happened. I mean, I don't remember the process being that thorny.
The first indication that things maybe wouldn't go smoothly had to do with the color of the stucco that Tray wanted to use.
I do recall that in my proposal letter, I had mentioned that the stucco color would be a custom color similar to, I think it was cotton wood, which is
its standard color of a commercially available stucco.
Buildings in the historic district have to follow a number of design guidelines so that
they fit in with Santa Fe's traditional Adobe look.
Senior producer Delaney Hall
The style, called Pueblo Revival, comes from indigenous Pueblo architecture and the areas
old Spanish missions.
Think low-brown buildings with smooth edges.
In the historic district, buildings can only be so tall, windows have to be a certain distance
from the corners, roofs generally have to be flat, and stuccoes have to be earth-tone.
And the stucco tray wanted to use the
color that was close to cottonwood. It was an earth tone. It was just a little
different than usual. Still, the board approved it. But then things started to get
weird. When we stuccoed the house, it got back to me that two of the board members
were very upset about the color, and they
took samples of cottonwood over to the house to hold it up to the steka.
Well, of course, it didn't match cottonwood, but as I said in my letter, it would be a custom
color similar to, and I think it was quite obvious that it was.
There were other subtle ways that the house was different from the traditional Santa
Fe look.
The corners, for instance.
So the corners were sharp, not round, not the Ouy-Guy, Pueblo Revival look, but a little
more crisp than that geometric.
I've seen this house, and it's a bit modern, a bit angular, but honestly, it is not wildly
different from the surrounding homes, which
are done in a more traditional style.
And even with the bumps in the process, like the disagreement about the stucco, Tray just
wasn't expecting what happened next.
A few weeks after his clients had moved in, Tray got a call from them.
The house had been defaced in the middle of the night. You know, it was really, really frightening and really, really shocking
that someone would get so angry that they would terrorize another family
by defacing their house with the Shwastika
and writing the words Nazi architecture on it.
Nazi architecture had been painted on the side of the house.
They don't know who did it.
I was so just completely shocked and frankly scared. I was really, I just thought, what is going on?
Why do you think they wrote Nazi architecture?
You know, I don't know if they just felt it was too strong or too modern. We think it was a comment
about wanting to stop buildings like this from happening in the historic districts.
If you're not from Santa Fe, this whole incident probably strikes you as totally absurd.
And to be fair, even people from Santa Fe marveled at this when it went down.
You know, there was some period of time thereafter where people would want to drive by and see it,
because of course it became, in this unfortunate way,
it became notable.
And it was so funny, because so many people would call me
and they'd just say, I don't understand what the problem is here.
I just don't see it.
I don't get it.
I love the Pueblo Revival style.
It's part of what gives Santa Fe its very distinctive look.
It looks like no other city in the US, like no other city in the world.
And people here are proud of that.
But for some in the city, historic preservation is a very serious business.
The aesthetics of Santa Fe have been carefully crafted and preserved.
And deviating from those aesthetics is seen at least by some as a serious
events.
You know, and I'm going to call you a Nazi level of events.
And this battle over style goes back more than 100 years.
Ever since a group of early preservationists set out a vision for Santa Fe's architecture,
and in the process dramatically transformed the town.
Adobe has a long history in Northern New Mexico, building with mud goes back hundreds and hundreds of years.
The technique was favored both by the indigenous people of the region and by the Spanish settlers who arrived later on.
But back in the 1800s, when New Mexico was vying to become a state, Santa Fe actually
tried to leave its mud-based architecture behind.
The city constructed buildings that screamed, hey, we're just like you guys.
They were Italian-ate business blocks on the plaza.
Architectural historian Chris Wilson.
Schools and kind of a red brick Romanesque style on 1900 neoclassical capital that would Chris Wilson. The local leaders hoped this architectural posturing would help convince Congress to let
New Mexico into the Union.
They were well aware that East Coasters viewed them with some suspicion.
The territory seemed like a dusty foreign outpost,
unlikely to integrate into mainstream American culture.
Eventually, in 1912, after more than 60 years of trying,
New Mexico became a state.
But all of these attempts to fit in,
they ended up being a bad thing,
especially for New Mexico's newly minted capital,
Santa Fe. Santa Fe was struggling economically. There was a railroad that went through New Mexico,
but despite being called the Santa Fe Railroad, it didn't go directly through Santa Fe,
and the city couldn't develop any serious industries without good rail access.
Santa Fe was rapidly shrinking, and so the mayor at the time put together a planning board
and told them to come up with a plan to save the city.
They landed on tourism.
Tourists had already started to come to Santa Fe in small numbers, but the board noticed
that when they arrived, they weren't that impressed.
Once they see our Americanized city, they press on, they press north to the Pueblos.
Tourism can be our salvation, but only if we reverse the ill-conceived Americanization of the last three decades.
The board wrote up a document that's become known as the 1912 Plan.
I recommended the city preserve its traditional Adobe architecture, but the
plan went even further. It said that any new development should also be done in the Santa
Phase style. They wanted to create a kind of city-wide architectural brand based on the
historical precedent.
The sweeping scope of the 1912 plan was pretty radical. At the time, most historic preservation in the US focused on the homes of important old-white guys.
Mount Vernon, Monticello, so preservation was focused on single buildings.
Santa Fe, on the other hand, decided to focus on the everyday architecture of its ordinary people, and it expanded preservation beyond single buildings to the entire community.
A city had never tried something so far-reaching.
But many of the leaders behind the effort believed that this could be Santa Fe's salvation,
not in pretending to be a conventional American city, but in embracing its difference and selling it
to outsiders. To those who are devotees of the great outdoors, to the splendors of its vastness and magnificent
scenery, the urge is west to the Indian country.
Santa Fe's tourism campaign took off.
By the 19 teens, a wave of mostly white newcomers began arriving in the state.
They were artists and anthropologists and health seekers.
Chris Wilson calls them internal expats.
The kind of people who might have gone to Paris,
but instead went to Santa Fe.
And one of those newcomers was John Gawmeam.
I became particularly aware of the New Mexican architecture while lying in bed.
John Gawmeam was a civil engineer who'd come to Santa Fe from New York to recover from tuberculosis.
And while he was recuperating, he became enthralled with the architecture.
And I decided in and there, even though I was, I thought getting very advanced in years,
I'd better change my profession and what I really wanted to be was an architect.
And so at the very advanced age of 27, meme switched careers and quickly became Santa Fe's go-to
architect, especially for wealthy transplants from the East Coast in Midwest.
But also then of important public buildings, churches, county courthouse, and so forth.
also then of important public buildings, churches, county court houses and so forth.
Meme became the leading architect of the Santa Fe style, and he helped to bring a very old building tradition into the modern era.
He didn't always use actual mud bricks. He used reinforced concrete and steel to create
an adobe-ish take on that old style. And his work helped the city of Santa Fe
actually create the architectural brand it had imagined.
And I think it's perfect in legitimate,
not only legitimate, but almost a duty.
In the part of the world where we have
a native architecture with these wonderful shapes
that we should recall them.
It's worth was every.
That's something I dreamed of doing 100% about Matt, as you know.
All over town, new buildings went up in this Adobe style.
And as far as attracting tourists, it worked.
Between 1920 and 1930, Santa Fe went from 200 hotel rooms to 600.
Everything was going great until a pesky new form of architecture showed up on the
scene threatening to ruin everything.
In the 1950s, architectural modernism was spreading, even in Santa Fe.
The city was growing, the tourist industry was driving more development, and there was
a sense that Santa Fe was losing its grip on the style that had made it so distinct.
And the traditionalist community
that had reached this consensus
around the revival style becomes alarmed
and they react against it.
And so the preservationists with John Gaul meme
as one of their leaders doubled down.
In 1957, the city passed an ordinance
that required the Santa Fe style.
It elaborated a number of substiles and created a large historic district in the center of the city,
which included some of Santa Fe's oldest neighborhoods.
They were full of Hispanic families.
Some of them had lived for generations in Adobe Homes built by their ancestors.
With this new ordinance, any changes to a building in the district
now had to be approved by a design board.
And at first, critics worried mostly about aesthetics.
They thought the look of the city would become boring
and homogenous, or that it would turn into
a kind of hokey, old west stage set.
They weren't against the city having a distinctive character,
but they just doubted that the style guidelines were going to do it in the most vibrant living way.
And were there questions raised about what the ordinance might do to affordability in the central city?
No, there weren't arguments about, you know, potential gentrification, as we would call it now. Finally tonight, the sound of moving
that roar you hear in the American Southwest these days
is the traffic heading to Santa Fe, New Mexico.
The population is up 12% over the past decade.
Over the next couple decades,
Santa Fe got hit with a huge wave of tourism and resettlement.
In the 1970s, there was an oil boom in neighboring Texas, and a bunch
of newly-rich Texans moved to Santa Fe.
Then, in the 1980s, as international travel became more of a thing, Santa Fe became not
just a national destination, but an international one. The city had spent decades perfecting its
tourist identity, figuring out how to package and sell itself. Maybe two effectively.
The readers of CondiNess, Travel magazine
in the early 1980s, but Santa Fe,
their number one tourist destination,
and not just in the United States, but in the world.
A million, sometimes two million tourists
started coming every year.
This was in a town of 50 or 60,000 residents.
Santa Fe started to get totally
overrun by these visitors. And some of these visitors decided to buy up more of the city's old
historic homes. This was gentrification, but like, on steroids. These are the one percent or the
one tenth of one percent, the very wealthiest of people who start to have multiple homes.
They have a Pietatera in Manhattan and they've got a house in Antarctica and maybe a
Pietatera in Paris and now they want to have a house in Santa Fe.
In Santa Fe the neighborhoods are changing as fast as the builders can put up new buildings.
There aren't a lot of barrios left, they're all becoming playgrounds for the rich. For the first time since 1600 there are now more anglos here than there are Hispanics.
It was during the 90s that Tray Jordan, the architect, started working for an architecture
firm in Santa Fe, and he loved learning to build in the Santa Fe style.
It's a vernacular that I think a lot of people find it easy to like.
I mean, there's something
quite charming about it. But he could also understand the irony of what was happening. How this old
tradition had become invogue with Santa Fe's wealthy newcomers. It's more or less a vernacular of
poverty and a vernacular of survival. And we spend extraordinary amounts of money
to nowadays reproduce a style that was really, you know, born out of necessity.
Over time, the city implemented more restrictions and more code. The historic districts
expanded. Limits were placed on the height of buildings. Commercial districts were encouraged to
adopt the Adobe look. And so Santa Fe began to have stuff like a fake Adobe iHop and a fake Adobe
Panda Express. A wave of brown stucco washed over the city. The 80s and 90s were a tough time for a
lot of people in Santa Fe. I asked one old timer, Joseph Montoya,
what it was like living here during those years, and he thought for a couple moments before
saying, it sucked. I think what happened, whether it's appropriate
or not, a building resentment over like, gosh, we've got a lot of fine restaurants now
in town that we didn't have before, right? I can't eat in them. Joseph's family connection to Santa Fe goes back generations.
Oh, I don't go to the plaza because it's no longer my plaza. I don't feel comfortable in my own town.
Joseph joined the city government in 1990. He's now the executive director of the county housing
authority. Back then, he was also working on community development and housing issues.
authority. Back then, he was also working on community development and housing issues. And the first thing he did was review some studies the city had already done, trying to
understand why locals couldn't afford to live here anymore.
He says that there was even one study that tried to actually quantify the cost of the Santa
Phase style, like the exposed wood beams that support the ceilings in many homes.
How much de do they cost?
Is there a cost difference between the kind of windows you have to put in or not or different doors?
And they tried to add up that cost over and above what you might have to pay anyway.
And yeah, the car of wood beams and the ornamental corbling, for example, did add some costs.
But that wasn't really the central issue.
More relevant was the
number of wealthy buyers flooding the city and driving up the cost of everything, including
land. The city just couldn't build enough subsidized housing to keep lower income people
housed.
And that was partly because some of those newcomers began to fight new construction.
Not just in the historic district, but across
the city. Joseph talks about the arguments they would make at community meetings. They
would speak out against more density, more infill housing, taller buildings. They would
say, this is going to ruin the quality of my life. I bought here expecting it to always
stay the same because the community character is important to me.
And it was seen as you were being a good citizen, right?
And, you know, I think that's something that worked for a lot of people, right?
That, oh yeah, development is what ruined this city, and now we're going to stop it.
But all they talk about community character always frustrated Joseph.
Because what community were they talking about? And what character?
So it was like, my God, you know,
I know exactly that place are talking about.
We used to hunt rabbits there.
And so that was the community character back then.
And previous to that, that was a Native American cap ground.
So what character were you taking?
You know, the character that was created in 1973.
Joseph watched in dismay as the Nimbis gained political power
and influence.
I felt that if we've gotten to the point
where there's a majority of people
that the politicians were listening to,
they can make this arguments and win.
The city has been lost.
It was sad to see the demise, the complete demise of families and history and legacy being washed away.
In some ways, Santa Fe had become a victim of its own success.
The early preservationists set out a vision for protecting Santa Fe's historic look, and
they helped create a tourism industry that's still the foundation of the city's economy.
But the popularity of Santa Fe has also helped to create serious inequality.
The town became an increasingly expensive place to live, and lots of people work in hospitality,
taking care of tourists and
making service economy wages.
Locals who were pushed out of the historic district moved to the more affordable south side.
Now many of them can't even afford to live there.
Of the 80 cousins Joseph grew up with, he says only five are still in the city.
These days, more than half of the people who work in Santa Fe don't live here, including Joseph.
He lives in Albuquerque, commuting from an hour away
to fight for affordable housing in his old hometown.
Up until recently, I lived on the historic east side
of Santa Fe in a blocky and frankly,
unattractive yellow
stucco house surrounded by gorgeous multi-million dollar Adobe homes. And it
was a strange place to live. I would sometimes find myself walking through the
neighborhood as evening approached and the sky got dark. And I was always struck
by the number of homes in which the lights just never came on.
The neighborhood was eerily quiet.
Down the street from me, there was an old adobe house that no one seemed to live in.
There was never a car in the driveway.
I literally never saw someone come or go.
But landscapers would come in a couple times a month to mow the lawn and trim the trees.
It was a beautifully maintained, seemingly empty specimen.
We have been very intent on preserving
the architectural character of our historic districts,
but what has fallen through the cracks
has been the community character and how that has really changed.
This is Lisa Gabioli Roach.
She first worked in the historic preservation division as a senior planner, and she said it
often felt like they managed the districts as if the buildings were works of art in a museum.
There was little discussion, she said, of the people who actually lived in those neighborhoods.
She started to question everything about her field, and then she became the head of the
division, which put her in a position to try and about her field. And then she became the head of the division, which
put her in a position to try and make some changes.
Now Lisa says it's a mistake for preservationists to focus exclusively on the built environment
of a neighborhood. Neighborhoods aren't just a collection of buildings.
It's not just visual character that you're looking at. It's the sounds that you hear, the
smells that you smell, the people that you interact with, all of those things contribute to a community's character.
And those things have been dramatically altered in the historic neighborhoods of Santa
Faye over the past few decades.
You don't often hear kids playing or see neighbors talking to each other over a fence.
You're seeing tourists taking photos and you yourself start to feel like you're just like a character in a diorama or something.
You know, it starts to feel very different.
The transformation of Santa Fe's old neighborhoods is complex. It's not like historic preservation is entirely at fault, but Lisa does think it's played a role. The city's approach to preservation is highly prescriptive down to every single detail.
Any exterior change has to come through our office and most of them need a permit, even
if you're fixing your fence or repainting your windows or, you know, the little minor
things like that.
It feels very invasive, I think, for many people.
And the process is also expensive.
It often requires hiring an architect.
It's just one more thing that can make it hard
for old-timers to stay in their homes.
You know, I was speaking to a homeowner just last week
who was talking to me about her experience,
renovating her grandfather's home.
And she just said the whole time that she was going through it,
she really felt like it was tearing her family apart and she just wondered what
are we preserving. She just kept saying that what are we preserving because
certainly my family's not being preserved, my family's connection to this place
is not being respected and it's so arduous just to get through it. Over the past
eight months or so the Historic Division has been working on a study to quantify
the changes that have happened in the city's historic districts over the years.
They've found that between 1980 and 2018, even as the population of Santa Fe grew, the
historic districts emptied out.
Old families left, and their homes turned into second homes or short-term rentals.
The people who now live in the historic district are generally white, wealthy, and old.
The gentrification of our historic neighborhoods is all but complete, and in many ways it's
not reversible.
And I think instead of just singularly celebrating historic preservation for creating and maintaining this tourist economy,
we have to recognize that there have been other experiences here as well,
and that the outcomes for our community are not all good.
Is this really what we want? What do we value now in our community?
It's not 1957 anymore, it's not 1912 anymore.
There was one person I met while working on this story who embodied the complicated and sometimes contradictory relationship that Santa Fe has to its own past. Like Joseph,
Ray Edetta's family has lived in Santa Fe for many generations. Ray grew up building and
maintaining his family's old Adobe homes. Everybody built with Adobe back then. I
guess you could say it's in your blood. If you're a local Hispanic like me, whose
parents and grandparents and great grandparents were from Santa Fe, you know,
originally. Ray still lives in the historic district.
His family is one of the few remaining
so-called legacy families,
and he's watched as many of his neighbors and friends
have been forced to leave.
But he still supports the work of historic preservation.
In fact, he's extremely committed to it.
I was there at every meeting for 20 some years.
Every week, Ray would show up at the H-Board meetings to it. I was there at every meeting for 20 some years. Every week, Ray would show
up at the H-Board meetings to testify. He would remind new homeowners about the history
of the neighborhood, about who used to live in their houses, and about what Santa Fe used
to be like. The buildings speak for the people that were here a hundred years ago.
Ray says his family and friends don't really understand his interest in preservation.
For many of them, the historic districts and the whole project of preservation seems to
be entirely in the interest of white homeowners.
And my relatives and friends that don't live here anymore. They tell me, why do you spend your time fighting for the anglos?
And I said, I'm not fighting for the anglos.
I'm fighting to protect the small town feeling of sanity.
That's what I try to preserve.
You know, if we were up to these home builders and developers,
we'd have homes running up and down the Sanafee River.
And you don't think it's worth it, even if it's say,
let Hispanic people who've been here for generations be here.
The thing is that it's sort of too late to say that anymore because 90% of the Hispanic families have moved out.
It's almost as if unable to preserve the actual community of his neighborhood, the people he used to know, the neighbors he grew up with.
Ray now has to be content to preserve the buildings they left behind.
Over the years, Ray has fought every kind of development you can imagine.
Development in the historic district, high-end housing developments,
affordable housing developments.
Anything greater than that was there fighting anything?
If I showed up to a meeting, everybody stopped and looked and said, oh God, what's happening,
Ray Reddaw is here.
After watching Santa Fe change so much over his lifetime, Ray now resists every change
he can.
He's holding tight to an idea that many in Santa Fe believe deeply.
It's a philosophy of urban planning that could be summed up as if we don't build it, they won't come.
Well, if we don't build it, we're going to stay the same. And we want to stay the same.
Joseph Montoya again. And that is simply not true, right? What happens is that the fittest survive, right?
And people eventually get priced out of their ability
to stay here.
Change is just a part of life.
And so either accept it and try to take advantage of it
or you try to deny it and you get run over by it.
The early preservationists tried to freeze Santa Fe
at a particular moment in time.
The style that they defined in 1912 and then codified in 1957 largely remains the style
of the city today.
Yes, this had not been done.
We would have lost, I think, the kind to see that Santa Fe is right now.
When John Gondonim said that, the city that Santa Fe is right now, it was 1964.
He and the other preservationists couldn't have predicted the changes that would sweep over
the city in the decades since then.
But in holding on so tight to the architecture of that time, we've actually already lost a lot of the people and cultures
that used to make Santa Fe what it was.
And people like Joseph Montoya believe that if we don't change course,
if we don't allow for more development and more housing,
the rest of Santa Fe will follow suit.
The whole city will become a kind of museum of cultures past,
with only the buildings reflecting who once lived here.
Coming up after the break, we'll learn more
about the Pueblo building traditions
that form the basis for the Santa Fe style.
So we're back with Delaney again, and you have another story related to the Santa Fe style that you wanted to share with us. So where should we start?
Well, I wanted to start with Roxanne Swensel. She's an artist and builder from Santa Clara Pueblo.
And for people who aren't familiar with the Pueblos here
in New Mexico, they're indigenous communities
that, in some cases, go back for millennia.
So they have a very long standing connection to this place.
Very long.
Yeah.
And I would say in general, San Fe has a pretty complicated relationship with the surrounding
Pueblos, you know, the city has built a tourism industry
largely around indigenous art and culture and so architecture
is just one example of that. And so when we talk about the
Pueblo revival style, it's right there in the name.
It's an interpretation or an appropriation of Pueblo design. And so I was curious to
talk with Roxanne about what she makes of the architecture in Santa Fe.
You know, there's a charming perspective. I can understand somebody coming in from somewhere else
and thinking, this is different, this is kind
of unique. For us that grew up here, I find it incredibly distasteful. And we joke, we call
Santa Fe Santa fake because of the fake Adobe.
So there were a couple of reasons I wanted to speak with Roxanne. One is that she has a long history of building
real Adobe houses.
She's built 20 over the course of her life so far.
And the other reason is that her mom,
Reena Swenzel, wrote a lot about the disconnect
between Pueblo ideas about architecture
and European or I guess Western ideas about architecture.
And Rina died in 2015,
but Roxanne told me about how she got interested
in architecture in the first place.
And it all went back to this conflict
at the Pueblo in the 1970s.
And what happened is that the government, HUD basically,
came into Santa Clara to build new housing.
But the houses had nothing to do with our cultural ways of life or values, but they were cheap
and free.
So, you know, people weren't going to turn that away, but my mother was desperate to see
if she could stop it.
And so, so why exactly did Rita want to stop it?
The HUD houses were basically suburban in their design.
You know, they were these single family homes.
Where it's individual thinking, you have your own yard,
you keep your neighbor out, you have your pre-fab house
that you didn't make yourself.
It's materials that you can't just go down the hill and dig up your mud and make a house.
You have to have money to buy the materials the way the houses were designed.
Had to do with a lifestyle that was foreign to poor blow lifestyle.
And so Rina actually enrolled at the School of Architecture and Planning at UNM in Albuquerque.
And Roxanne said that she really felt like she couldn't
fight this new HUD development without first
understanding the thinking behind it.
So she was very highly educated for that reason
to really understand who these people were, how they thought, how
they functioned, and her whole life was always trying to understand why they thought the way
they did.
So you have HUD who thinks they're solving a problem by providing free or subsidized housing,
but they kind of have it all wrong, sort of based around individualism and suburbanism. And then you have that in conflict
with the Pueblo worldview.
Right, and Reena Swenzel really saw Pueblo architecture
as an embodiment of the Pueblo worldview.
She explained that you could understand a lot
about Pueblo life by looking at its buildings
and its village layout.
The way the village was structured portrayed that kind of community thinking in that there
would be the main central ceremonial house, the Kiva in the middle, with the outdoor spaces
that everybody used and then these individual spaces for storage and sleeping that surrounded that.
And then beyond that central space, Roxanne says there were buildings for more storage and
then there were the corrals and then beyond that there were the fields.
There was always this feeling like you could go deeper into the circle or further out, but you always knew which was your circle and that was your
village. So you could always find home. Home wasn't your individual house. It was the center of
the village. So I think I know the answer to this, but were the HUD homes, you know, connected to
this traditional structure at all? No, no, they basically weren't. They were built on the outskirts of the Pueblo,
and they didn't have a connection to that central ceremonial
place that Roxanne described.
I can also imagine that the shift away from building
your own home, instead of someone making it for you,
really does change that perspective as well.
Yeah, yeah, totally.
And making homes was one of the ways that the Pueblo
expressed its connection to this place,
where they'd lived for hundreds and hundreds of years.
So you know, you may watch a tree grow up
from a little baby tree to a big tree,
and then cut it down and use it in your house for a vika,
but you know that tree.
It's your family. The dirt you go get to
plaster or make your adobies with and stuff, it's just right there. So you know where the
good dirt is and where the not so good dirt is. It's it's absolutely having a relationship.
And when a people stay in a place for many generations
with that consciousness intact,
the depth of the relationship becomes profound.
And so is the houses then.
Of course, they would be.
Okay, so Roxanne's mom, Rina,
she went to architecture school and began writing
and developing all these ideas. She wrote about these ideas. You said that she opposed the HUD development.
Did she end up really trying to fight the HUD development in Santa Clara?
Yeah, she did. And Roxanne said that that part was really hard for her. She apparently talked
with everyone she could talk with about it, but it was kind of an uphill battle. And Roxanne says, you know, there was a disagreement within the Pueblo itself about whether the
HUD housing was a good thing or a bad thing.
Lots of fights, lots of disagreements and stuff because there's a lot of people in the
community that want to become mainstream and that's where they're going to go.
That's okay. Everyone has to decide. But with my mother's help and others like her, there's this
sense of like, let's really look at ourselves and see what is going on here so that we can choose.
so that we can choose, because if we understand who we've been for thousands of years, and then within a very short time we're swept into pieces, wow, you know, this is enough to stop and really look at and think about,
and start to really decide where we're going to go from here.
That makes a tongue of sense. I mean, you can see totally the perspective of HUD trying to solve this problem.
I mean, I grew up in HUD housing.
Like I would be homeless if it wasn't for HUD, making sure that I had a home when I was
a kid.
But I wish they would have came into the situation with the same mindset that Reena did where
she's like, I'm going to go to school and understand all of this.
They really didn't come in with that mindset, that's for sure.
That's true, that is true.
And I think in the case of the Pueblos,
it's a very particular context.
So these are places and people
that have experienced multiple waves of conquest
and settlement, and they've really had to fight
to keep their traditions alive.
And so I think Farina, this felt like one more way that changes were being forced onto
the community.
I remember my mother being very troubled because it was just one more way the government
was assimulating us into the American society.
But of course, you know, to your point about the importance of affordable housing,
yeah, that situation is complicated. Like, in Santa Fe, there can be this obsession with
traditional historic styles at the expense of just building out more affordable housing.
But then, in this Santa Clara example, out more affordable housing. But then in this Santa
Claire example, there was affordable housing coming in that just didn't do enough to acknowledge
traditional styles and practices when it comes to housing. Yeah, there's just gotta be this
balance between building affordable housing and being sensitive to the local context, like
all everywhere. Right. And you know, it was interesting.
There were affordable housing advocates.
I spoke to while I was researching this story who said, you know, in Santa Fe, if we're
interested in building a community that is rooted in historical building practices, the
public do have a lot to teach us.
So there are some traditional public communities,
for example, that are four or five stories tall,
they're dense, they're multi-unit,
and that kind of building is rare in Santa Fe,
which is mostly built around the single family,
single story model.
Wow, so basically, the style the style of public architecture that Santa
Fe sort of grabbed onto in the historic preservation was just this one really
narrow slice of Adobe architecture, but there's so much more to learn from that
they could be doing and creating dense housing. Yeah, yeah definitely. So in the
case of Santa Clara, did they eventually choose to include the HUD housing in their community?
Yes, they did.
And how did it affect the public? What does it like these days?
Yeah, I asked Roxanne about that. And she said the center of the village still has its old
Adobe buildings. But the middle of the village has emptied out of a lot of people. It's kind of like a ghost town of sorts, and it only gets filled up on feast days or
certain occasions.
There's a few houses that have people in, but most of the people have moved out to the
suburbs.
So it broke, it fragmented.
But Roxanne says on the positive side,
there's been a resurgence of interest
in traditional Adobe building techniques
and she actually teaches workshops on Adobe construction.
And she really credits her mom
with giving her that sense of possibility
when it comes to building.
When we were talking, she told me this great story about how her first major building project
was this family home that she built with her mom and dad.
And she was a young teenager.
She was in junior high.
I got to build my own bedroom.
And I'm a little kid, and I got to make my own bedroom.
So I built me a stairway up to a bed that had a neat pattern that went up around it and
the stairs were goofy, but they worked, but I could make my own room.
I'm so grateful that they gave me the knowing that you can.
And so, you know, it's kind of that sense of possibility that she got from her mom.
You know, that's what she wants to give other people in the Pueblo.
There's this very long tradition of building there, and that, you know, they can do this.
Wow, but it's so cool. Well, thanks so much, Delaney. I really appreciate you bringing this little extra part of the story to us.
Yeah, yeah. Thank you.
Yeah, yeah, thank you.
99% Invisible was produced this week by our senior producer Delaney Hall, edited by Emmett Fitzgerald and Katie Mingle, mixed by Bryson Barnes,
fact-checking by Frances Card Jr. Music by Sean Riel.
Crucoste is the digital director of the rest of the team, is Joe Rosenberg, Vivian Leigh, Christopher Johnson,
Abby Medon, Chris Barube, Sophia Klatsker,
and me Roman Mars.
Special thanks this week to Daniel Wuerweth,
Rose Simpson, and the Archives of American Art
at the Smithsonian Institution
for the John Gaul meme oral history interview,
which was conducted on December 3rd, 1964.
Thanks also to Audra Belmore, the curator of the John Gaul meme archives of Southwestern
architecture at UNM.
Finally, special thanks to the historic division's partners in the study they conducted.
They include New Mexico Health Equity Partnership, Historian and Preservation Planner, John Murphy,
Six Blooms, and little globe ink.
Little globe has been conducting interviews
with people in Santa Fe's historic district
and helped connect us with Ray Herrera.
We are a project from 91.7 KALW in San Francisco
and produced on Radio Row,
which exists in various corners of North America,
but in its heart will always be in beautiful downtown Oakland,
California.
We are a member of RadioOTOPIA from PRX, a collective of the best most innovative shows
in all of podcasting.
Discover, listen and support them all at radiotopia.fm.
You can find the show and join discussions about the show on Facebook.
You can tweet me at Roman Mars in the show at 99PI org.
We're on Instagram and Reddit too.
You like pictures of buildings made of mud? Well, I certainly do. me at Roman Mars in the show at 99PI Orc. We're on Instagram and ready to.
You like pictures of buildings made of mud?
Well, I certainly do.
And we got a bunch of them at 99PI.org.
Radio Topeo from PRX.