Alastair's Adversaria - Biblical Reading and Reflections: July 3rd (Daniel 12 & Acts 25:13-27)
Episode Date: July 2, 2021Michael, the Prince of Israel, arises. Agrippa and Bernice visit Festus. My reflections are searchable by Bible chapter here: https://audio.alastairadversaria.com/explore/. If you are interested in ...supporting this project, please consider supporting my work on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/zugzwanged), using my PayPal account (https://bit.ly/2RLaUcB), or buying books for my research on Amazon (https://www.amazon.co.uk/hz/wishlist/ls/36WVSWCK4X33O?ref_=wl_share). You can also listen to the audio of these episodes on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/alastairs-adversaria/id1416351035?mt=2.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Daniel chapter 12. At that time shall arise Michael, the great prince who has charge of your people,
and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never has been since there was a nation till that time.
But at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone whose name shall be found written in the book,
and many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life,
and some to shame and everlasting contempt, and those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the sky above,
and those who turn many to righteousness, like the stars for ever and ever.
But you, Daniel, shut up the words and steal the book, until the time of the end.
Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase.
Then I, Daniel, looked, and behold, two others stood,
one on this bank of the stream, and one on that bank of the stream,
and someone said to the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the stream,
How long shall it be till the end of these wonders?
and I heard the man clothed in linen who was above the waters of the stream.
He raised his right hand and his left hand toward heaven,
and swore by him who lives forever,
that it would be for a time, times, and half a time,
and that when the shattering of the power of the holy people comes to an end,
all these things would be finished.
I heard, but I did not understand.
Then I said,
O my lord, what shall be the outcome of these things?
He said,
Go your way, Daniel, for the words are shut up,
and sealed until the time of the end.
Many shall purify themselves and make themselves white and be refined,
but the wicked shall act wickedly,
and none of the wicked shall understand,
but those who are wise shall understand.
And from the time that the regular burnt offering is taken away,
and the abomination that makes desolate is set up,
there shall be one thousand two hundred and ninety days.
Blessed is he who waits and arrives at the one thousand three hundred and thirty-five days.
But go your way till the end.
till the end, and you shall rest and shall stand in your allotted place at the end of the days.
Daniel chapter 12 is the conclusion of the fourth vision, received in the third year of Cyrus
and the final chapter of the book. Daniel receives this final vision in response to his distress
and lengthy mourning at that time, presumably provoked by discouraging news from the returned exiles
in Jerusalem and the stalling of the rebuilding efforts. In the vision he sees Michael, the angelic guardian
and glorious high priest of Israel, a figure who should be likely identified as the pre-incarnate
Christ. Daniel has given an outline of the history that will follow. In Chapter 11, he was given a preview
of the events from the middle of the 6th century through the rise of the Empire of the Greeks,
the Six Syrian Wars, the persecutions of Antarcus, the Fourth Epiphanes, the Maccabian Revolt and the
Hasmanian dynasty, and through to the rise of the Herodian dynasty. The concern that drives Daniel
is not some general uncertainty or anxiety about what sort of things are going to happen in the future.
The vision is aimed at addressing something more specific.
We arrive at the climax of all of this, in this chapter,
the arrival of Michael, the angelic guardian, the glorious high priest, and the messianic prince.
The nations were ruled over by angels at this time.
Israel, however, was the Lord's special possession.
Michael, or the angel of the Lord, or the angel of the covenant, is the divine guardian of Israel.
Daniel saw him back in chapter 10, falling down as dead as a result of the glory of the vision.
In the last days, the time when the whole order of the empires will come to its end,
the time anticipated in Daniel chapter 2, with the stone crushing the statue,
or in chapter 7 with the granting of authority to the people of God,
Michael himself will come on the scene.
The Advent Michael, however, will be accompanied with unprecedented tribulation.
Those whose names are found in the book will be delivered,
we should think here of the various references to names written in the Lamb's Book of Life in the Book of Revelation,
which is framed as the fulfillment of the prophecy of Daniel.
Verse two is one that many have seen as a rare Old Testament testimony to the resurrection.
The resurrection here, however, seems to be more complicated.
First, it is of many, not necessarily all.
Second, if this is the final resurrection, it is happening far, far too early.
Third, it is a resurrection that includes many of the wicked, which makes a resurrection.
it difficult to identify as a spiritual resurrection. Elsewhere in scripture we see a number of different
ways in which resurrection is referred to. For instance, there is a sort of resurrection in the advent of
new spiritual life in a person or a nation. In Revelation chapter 20 verses 5 to 6, we read of the first
resurrection. In the first century following the resurrection of Jesus, Old covenant saints who had rested
in Sheol were raised up by Christ to sit with him in the glory of heaven, whereas they had been
formally in the exile of the grave, now they enjoyed God's very presence and participation in the
divine council itself. What death means for the people of God radically changed at that point?
This being raised up from the grave to God's presence is the first stage of the resurrection.
The later, greater stage still awaited is the raising of our bodies and the fullness of the new
heavens and the new earth. In Ezekiel chapter 37 and the vision of the valley of dry bones within it,
we have not individual bodily resurrection, but the spiritual resurrection of Israel as a nation,
its re-establishment as a people. In John chapter 5 verses 25 to 29, Jesus talks both of a form of
resurrection that is already occurring through his ministry, and of a resurrection yet awaited.
Truly, truly I say to you, an hour is coming and is now here, when the dead will hear the voice
of the Son of God, and those who hear will live. For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted
the son also to have life in himself, and he has given him authority to execute judgment
because he is the son of man. Do not marvel at this, for an hour is coming when all who are in the
tombs will hear his voice and come out, those who have done good to the resurrection of life,
and those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment. Jordan argues that the resurrection
in view in verse 2 of Daniel chapter 12 is principally the raising of the nation through the ministry
of Christ and his apostles. Some here respond and are raised up to new life, and others hearing and
rejecting are marked out for destruction. Jesus is the one who brings about the fall and the rising again
of many in Israel. This time of national resurrection to judgment and new life comes in the period
from Christ's ministry to the end of the age in 80s 70, with the removal of the old covenant order,
with the destruction of Jerusalem and its temple. It would be accompanied by extreme tribulation,
as Christ declares in the Olivet discourse in Matthew chapter 24 verses 21 to 22.
For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, no and never will be.
And if those days had not been cut short, no human being would be saved.
But for the sake of the elect, those days will be cut short.
It would be a time when the judgment of the entire old creation would occur.
All of the blood from Abel to Zachariah would come upon that first century,
generation, as Jesus said in Matthew chapter 23. The arising of Michael at that point in history
was the advent of Jesus, his atoning work, and his rising again in the resurrection. He is exalted
as the representative and great high priest of his people to the father's right hand. He raises up
the Old Testament saints with him from the grave and vindicates them against the unfaithful of their
people in the events of AD 70 and the destruction of Jerusalem. Michael would wage successful war in
heaven and the old covenant demonic authorities would be subdued as we see in revelation chapter 12
verses 7 to 11 now war arose in heaven michael and his angels fighting against the dragon and the dragon
and his angels fought back but he was defeated and there was no longer any place for them in heaven
and the great dragon was thrown down that ancient serpent who is called a devil and satan the deceiver of the
whole world he was thrown down to the earth and his angels were thrown down with him and i heard a
voice in heaven saying, now the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority
of His Christ have come. For the accuser of our brothers has been thrown down, who accuses them
day and night before our God, and they have conquered him by the blood of the Lamb and by the word
of their testimony, for they love not their lives even unto death. Coming through the tribulation of that
time, the faithful martyrs will be raised up to God's presence, they will be vindicated,
and their enemies will be judged in the downfall.
fall of Jerusalem in 8070. Those who are wise and righteous would shine like stars,
reigning with Christ and sharing in his victory, testifying to him in the darkness of the world.
In Philippians chapter 2 verse 15, Paul describes Christians as shining as lights in the world.
Daniel must seal the book until the time of the end. His prophecies concern a time long distant.
While the book of Revelation is constantly stressing that the fulfillment is near at hand
and is about unsealing a sealed book.
Daniel's prophecy awaits a far-off future.
In Revelation we see the fulfillment of the events foretold by the Book of Daniel,
the advent of Michael, the coming of the Son of Man and the saints
into possession of the kingdom,
the destruction of the beast, empires, and victory over the angelic powers,
the elevation of the saints, the great work of atonement,
and the consummation of the destiny of the people.
Because the events foretold by the Book of Revelation
will occur within a matter of a few years after its writing.
In Revelation chapter 22 verse 10,
John is instructed not to seal the book,
because the time is near.
During the period of awaiting the fulfillment of the vision,
there would be a great deal of drama, wars and rumors of wars.
All of the events of Chapter 12, for instance, are important,
yet they are just milestones on the road to the awaited future.
The conflicts and persecutions foretold during that period are not the final end.
Nevertheless, as the time drew nearer, clarity of understanding the prophetic horizon of that future would greatly increase.
The faithful people of God would meditate upon the meaning of the prophecies of Daniel over the centuries that followed,
wondering what exactly their fulfillment would entail.
The man clothed in linen, Michael, is asked by an angel about the time of the fulfillment of the vision,
and the end of the times foretold.
The answer is given that it will be for a time, times, and half a time.
This length of time has already been mentioned earlier in other connections in the book.
It seems to be a symbolic means of referring to both longer and to shorter periods.
The time, times and half a time was mentioned in connection with the Little Horn in Chapter 7 verse 25.
In Revelation chapter 12 verses 6 and 14 and chapter 13 verse 5,
it's related to the period of the woman's time in the wilderness in 1,260 days,
and the period of the blasphemous authority of the Sea Beast as 42 months.
We should also recall the half week in the final of the 70 weeks of years in Daniel chapter 9.
The referent of the time, times and half a time is made a little clearer in verses 11 to 12,
with the 1,290 and 1,335 days.
The first number, as Jordan points out, is three times 430.
The significance of that number is seen in Exodus, chapter 10.
chapter 12, verses 40 to 41. The time that the people of Israel lived in Egypt was 430 years.
At the end of 430 years, on that very day, all the hosts of the Lord went out from the land of Egypt.
The prophetic symbolism of that number is also seen in Ezekiel's prophetic sign act of
of Ezekiel chapter 4, verses 4 to 6. Then lie on your left side and place the punishment of the house of
Israel upon it. For the number of the days that you lie on it, you shall bear their punishment.
For I assigned to you a number of days, 390 days, equal to the number of the years of their
punishment. So long shall you bear the punishment of the House of Israel. And when you have
completed these, you shall lie down a second time, but on your right side, and bear the punishment
of the House of Judah. Forty days I assigned to you, a day for each year. Of course, 390 days and 40 days,
added up, make 430 days, multiplied by three, and we get 1,290.
Jordan suggests that the time, times, and half a time refers to three periods of persecution,
following which there will be a period of Great Tribulation.
That will be cut short, the half a time.
In his reading, the 1,290 days takes you up to the time of the Great Tribulation.
Those who pass through those three Egypt-like times, and pass through the Tribulation as well,
reached the 1,335 days, receiving their reward.
These three periods begin with the cutting off of the regular burnt offering
and the establishment of the abomination that makes desolate,
all in the reign of Antiochus the Fourth Epiphanes.
In the Olivet discourse, Jesus also speaks of an abomination of desolation
corresponding to the time of the Great Tribulation prior to AD 70.
The three periods correspond to the period of towering in Egypt,
and are according to Jordan, the period of Antiochus Epiphanes.
the period of the Hasmanian dynasty and the period of the Herods. The half a time is the
great tribulation that precedes the final destruction of Jerusalem, which is the aftermath of the
fulfilling of the 70 weeks prophecy in Daniel chapter 9 verse 26, and the people of the prince
who is to come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary, its end shall come with a flood,
and to the end there shall be war, desolations are decreed. Jordan suggests that the 45 years
corresponds to the time following the departure from Egypt, the period of wandering in the wilderness,
and the conquest of the promised land.
Karen Newsom helpfully writes,
Hartman and Delella shrugged their shoulders and say that the symbolism,
undoubtedly obvious to the biblical writers and their original audiences,
eludes today's readers completely.
They are on the right track in noting that 1,290 days equals 43 months of 30 days,
and 1,335 days equals 44 and a hundred and a hundred and a hundred and a hundred and a hundred and
half such months. What they fail to see is the pattern of what is left over from the original
prediction of a time, two times, and half a time, which amounts to 42 months. What remains is one
extra month in the first part and two and a half months in the second part. The length of the delay
would have the same numerical pattern as the original prediction, a time, two times, and
half a time. This pattern would also account for why the two parts of the final period are not
presented as of equal duration. The total number of days also lends itself to other symbolic numerical
play, which, whether intentional or not, would lend authority to the calculation. The total of the two
numbers is 2,625. If one calculates by weeks rather than months, seven years of 52 weeks of seven days
equals 2,548 days. Subtracting that from 2,625 leaves 77 days, a number of 7 days. A number of
of symbolic significance. The prophecy all refers to events far off, but the distant hope would
give the people of God the power to persevere in the interim. Those who are faithful to the vision
would purify themselves and gain insight into the promised future as they meditated upon the
vision. However, wickedness would continue and grow in others. Daniel himself is addressed in the
final words of the book. He must soon die. However, at the conclusion of the period of time,
he will participate in the first resurrection.
He will be raised up to God's presence,
to his allotted place of rule,
inheriting the kingdom with Michael,
the son of man of chapter 7,
and the prince of the people of Israel.
His kingdom, established in heaven at that time,
would end the reign of the beasts
and begin the reign of man.
Like the stone of chapter 2,
it would grow to fill the whole earth.
The great struggle for sovereignty in the kingdom,
which is the subject of the whole book of Daniel,
would finally be resolved,
as he would reign for ever.
and ever, his kingdom having no end. A question to consider, if the fulfillment of this prophecy
occurred in the first century A.D., how might it relate to Christians in the 21st century?
Acts chapter 25, verses 13 to 27. Now when some days had passed, a grip of the king and Bernice
arrived at Caesarea and greeted Festus. And as they stayed there many days, Festus laid Paul's case
before the king, saying, there is a man left prisoner by Felix, and when I was at Jerusalem,
the chief priests and the elders of the Jews laid out their case against him, asking for a sentence
of condemnation against him. I answered them that it was not the custom of the Romans to give up
anyone before the accused met the accusers face to face, and had opportunity to make his defence
concerning the charge laid against him. So when they came together here, I made no delay,
but on the next day took my seat on the tribunal and ordered the man to be brought. When the accusers
stood up, they brought no charge in his case of such evils as I supposed. Rather they had certain
points of dispute with him about their own religion and about a certain Jesus who was dead,
but whom Paul asserted to be alive. Being at a last how to investigate these questions,
I asked whether he wanted to go to Jerusalem and be tried there regarding them. But when Paul had
appealed to be kept in custody for the decision of the emperor, I ordered him to be held until
I could send him to Caesar. Then Agrippa said to Festus, I would like to hear the man myself.
Tomorrow, said he, you will hear him. So on the next day, Agrippa and Bernice came with great pomp,
and they entered the audience hall with the military tribunes and the prominent men of the city.
Then, at the command of Festus, Paul was brought in, and Festus said,
King Agrippa and all who are present with us, you see this man about whom the whole Jewish people
petitioned me, both in Jerusalem and here, shouting that he ought not to live any longer.
But I found that he had done nothing deserving death, and as he himself appealed to the emperor,
I decided to go ahead and send him. But I have nothing definite to write to my lord about him.
Therefore I have brought him before you all, and especially before you, King Agripper,
so that after we have examined him, I may have something to write,
for it seems to me unreasonable in sending a prisoner not to indicate the charges against him.
In the second half of Acts chapter 25, Agrippa and Bernice visit Festus,
and Festus invites them to hear Paul's case, as he would appreciate their insight.
Paul had appealed to Caesar, and so if Festus is to send him to Rome,
he wants to be able to give a clearer sense of the case.
help and counsel from two powerful people closer to Judaism would be very useful in this situation.
Herod Agrippa II was the only surviving son of Herod Agrippa I, who had died in Acts
12. He ruled over northeastern parts of Herod the Great's old kingdom. He was a faithful vassal,
trusted by the Romans, and he was allowed to appoint the high priest by them. He was pious,
he was an expert in Jewish matters, and his sister Drusilla was the wife of the previous governor, Felix.
He would later side with Rome in the war, and he was the last ruler of the House of Herod.
By asking this favour of him, Festus would also be strengthening his relationship with another key ruler within the land.
Bernice is the sister of Agrippa, although it was rumoured that she was also in an incestuous relationship with him.
Later she would be the mistress of both Vespasian and Titus, and is mentioned by several ancient historians for this reason,
Deocassius, Soutonius, Josephus, and a number of others.
As Festus suspects that the case is really about matters of Judaism, these are good people to consult.
Paul here is protected by pagan procedure and by Festus's unwillingness to hand him over.
Nevertheless, we should not take all of Festus's statements at face value.
Festus, as commentators like Ben Withrington and Robert Tannihill observe,
is really serving his own interests here and putting a positive spin upon all his dealings with Paul.
In the Book of Acts, neither Roman or Jewish justice are portrayed.
in flattering ways. Nevertheless, Roman justice is generally the more desirable of the two for Paul
and the early Christians. The Jewish authorities don't even plan to administer justice. Their
intention is to have Paul ambushed and killed on the way to Jerusalem. Felix delayed for over two years,
while Fester seems to be more eager to deliver justice more speedily. However, he doesn't seem to be
able to bring himself to free Paul, even though by his own admission there don't seem to be any
charges that a Roman governor could reasonably deal with. Relating the case made by the Jerusalem
authorities, Festus makes clear that the substance of their case concerned religious questions,
which he was not competent to judge, nor were they within his jurisdiction. Paul had seemingly
done nothing contrary to Roman law. The situation is complicated by the fact that Paul has appealed to
Caesar. Paul understandably won't go to Jerusalem to be tried before his own people, as there is no
justice for him to be expected there. The Roman governor has a difficult relationship with the
Jewish authorities and can't easily free him, but doesn't feel able to condemn him either. Now Paul
has appealed to Caesar, but it isn't clear that he has done anything that should be tried within a
Roman court. Fester's has got to get a better sense of this complicated case if he is going to
inform Caesar. The following day, they all gather together with great pomp. This is quite the hearing.
there are military tribunes, prominent men of the city, Agrippa and Bernice, and Festus the Roman governor.
This is, among other things, a fulfilment of the prophecy of Christ in Luke chapter 21, verses 12 to 13.
But before all this they will lay their hands on you and persecute you, delivering you up to the synagogues and prisons,
and you will be brought before kings and governors for my name's sake.
This will be your opportunity to bear witness.
And then also in the calling of Paul in Acts chapter 9 verses 15 to 16, the Lord had said to Ananias,
Go, for he is a chosen instrument of mine to carry my name before the Gentiles and kings and the children of Israel,
for I will show him how much he must suffer for the sake of my name.
Verse 22 raises the possibility that Agrippa had already heard about Paul and was eager to hear him for himself.
He was curious about what this man had to say, given the opportunity to hear him by
Festus, he readily jumped at it. Festus presents Paul to the gathered authorities and dignitaries.
He describes the hostility that the Jewish people had against this man, and the way that their
authorities has sought a death sentence from him. Yet he had not found anything in Paul worthy of
death. As Darrell Bach notes, this is a second of three declarations of Paul's innocence within
these chapters of the Book of Acts. The first is from Claudius Lysius in chapter 23, verse 29.
I found that he was being accused about questions of their law,
but charged with nothing deserving death or imprisonment.
A similar statement is made at the end of this scene in chapter 26, verse 31.
Festus presents the situation as if he knew that he was not qualified to judge the case,
it belonged to the area of Jewish law,
and so as an act of reasonableness he was going to send him to Jerusalem to be tried there.
However, in the earlier account, we see that he was going to grant him to the Jewish authorities,
a far less favourable presentation.
He knew that he was sending Paul to his death,
that Paul would not get justice,
but doing such a favour for the Jewish authorities
would be to his advantage.
Paul's appeal to Caesar was in part to avoid this situation,
in hope that he might find more justice in another court.
The Caesar to whom he appealed here was Nero.
It would be absurd for him to be presented before him
without some sort of charge,
and so at this point, Vestus is largely fishing for a charge,
even though he's found nothing wrong in Paul
he can't set him free without causing friction with the Jews
and so he's going to send him to the emperor
but he needs some sort of charge to send him with
what follows is less a matter of Paul answering
specific charges that have been levelled against him
and more a matter of a hearing to ascertain
whether there any charges that he could reasonably be sent with
a question to consider
reading the narrator's description of Festus and his actions
and Festus's own descriptions of his actions
where might we see disparities and tensions?
How do you think Luke wants us to regard Festus as a character?
