American Thought Leaders - Infertility After Vaccination? Dr. Kimberly Biss Explains the Data

Episode Date: May 23, 2024

Sponsor special: Up to $2,500 of FREE silver AND a FREE safe on qualifying orders - Call 855-862-3377 or text “AMERICAN” to 6-5-5-3-2“I noticed that my miscarriage rate from year to year had gone up by 100 percent.”Dr. Kimberly Biss is a board-certified OBGYN who has grown her Florida private practice to a five-provider group that delivers roughly 300 babies a year. Having been involved in more than a thousand pregnancies herself, Dr. Biss observed some disturbing trends in her patients once the COVID-19 genetic vaccines rolled out in 2021.“Now that people are getting the documents from the trials, there were bad outcomes in there. The miscarriage rate was 80 percent in the Pfizer trials. They knew that,” she says.“This information was first reported by my colleagues Naomi Wolf and her team at Daily Clout, and extensively reviewed by Dr. James Thorpe. Of the 270 women who got pregnant, only 32 were followed up on, and 26 miscarried. 81%.”Dr. Biss began tracking and comparing her data in real time, the bulk of which was published in 2022 on Dr. Jessica Rose’s Substack.“A lot of medical schools—over 50 to 60 percent of their money probably comes from Big Pharma,” says Dr. Biss.We dive into the data Dr. Biss compiled, and discuss how pressure campaigns from federal health agencies and Big Pharma influenced the vaccine roll-out in pregnant and breastfeeding women.“In the beginning, they locked us down, we’re all eating Uber Eats, all processed junk, can’t go to the gym, can’t exercise, don’t go outside, don’t get in the sun, which is your vitamin D. So, we were all deficient in D. I mean, everything that doesn’t promote any sort of health they told us to do,” says Dr. Biss.Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times. This text was updated with a clarification from the author.

Now that people are getting the documents from the trials, there were bad outcomes and the miscarriage rate was 80% in the Pfizer trials. They knew that. Dr. Kimberly Biss is a board-certified obstetrician and gynecologist. She's grown her Florida private practice to a five-provider group

that delivers roughly 300 babies a year. Once the COVID-19 genetic vaccines rolled out in 2021, she observed some disturbing trends in her patients. I noticed that my miscarriage rate from year to year had gone up by 100%. She began tracking and comparing her data in real time and made waves when she published her findings on Dr. Jessica Rose's Substack in 2022.

A lot of medical schools, over 50 to 60% of their money probably comes from big pharma. This is American Thought Leaders, and I'm Janja Kellek. Before we start, I'd like to take a moment to thank the sponsor of our podcast, American Hartford Gold. As you all know, inflation is getting worse. The Fed raised rates for the fifth time this year, and Fed Chairman Jerome Powell is telling Americans to brace themselves for potentially more pain ahead. But there is one way to hedge against inflation. American Hartford Gold makes it simple and easy to diversify your savings and retirement accounts with physical gold and silver. With one

short phone call, they can have physical gold and silver delivered right to your door or inside your IRA or 401k. American Hartford Gold is one of the highest rated firms in the country with an A-plus rating with a Better Business Bureau and thousands of satisfied clients. If you call them right now, they'll give you up to $2,500 of free silver and a free safe on qualifying orders. Call 855-862-3377. That's 855-862-3377. Or text American to 65532. Again, that's 855-862-3377 or text American to 65532. Dr. Kimberly Biss, such a pleasure to have you on American Thought Leaders. Thank you for having me. Well, I remember we met at a hearing in Congress about vaccine injury, and you were talking about, of course, in your profession, what you found as a gynecologist.

Why don't we start with your practice, what you do, and how this all evolved? Sure. So I graduated from Tufts University School of Medicine in 1993. I then went to Atlanta, did a year of general surgery training, and then in 94 to 98, I completed an OBGYN residency in St. Petersburg, Florida. And I started private practice in 1998, just doing general obstetrics and gynecology, and I've been there ever since. In 2007, I actually broke off and started my own practice, and I've grown it to a five-provider group. And on average, we deliver about 300 babies a year. So if you include my residency training, I've probably been involved in about 8,000 pregnancies. I don't have any articles that I've ever printed.

I haven't written any books, but I've had quite a bit of experience taking care of pregnant women. And I started to notice some pretty concerning things once the injections rolled out. I don't call them vaccines because we know they're not vaccines. So I started to really do a deep dive and track my data. Well, so what I remember is that you were, as all of us were very concerned, you know, there's this new virus. We don't know where it's from, coming from China, maybe there's a lab origin. Anyway, there's all this information swirling around.

So what did you see in 2020 versus 2021? In 2020, I didn't see anything that was concerning. Actually, if I go back now, that's the best year we had with regards to how many deliveries we had that year. From that year since, it's gone down each year, the number of deliveries we've had. But we actually had very many deliveries, wink, wink, due to the lockdowns in November and December of that year, as did most other obstetricians. I did not see any increase in any miscarriage rate that year. As a matter of fact, we had the most new entry newly pregnant patients

register that year and I didn't see any of the other problems like premature labor they were threatening that was going to be increased due to the infections preeclampsia which is high blood pressure in pregnancy. We didn't have any increase in the normal rates of those conditions during that year. And we didn't have one patient in my practice, granted a small practice, out of 350 pregnant women that ended up being admitted for COVID or placed on a ventilator, and we had no mortality.

I was the chief of staff for four years, which started in January of 2020. So I got the analytics from our delivery unit, which delivered that year about 3,700 babies. We didn't have any maternal mortalities. As being chief of staff in my county in Florida, I would have been aware if there was mass amounts of maternal mortality in my community, and there was not. That's remarkable in a way. There were more successful deliveries essentially in that year. Yeah, more people getting pregnant, more people having babies, not a lot of bad outcomes, no increase in infertility.

Fascinating. Okay, so 2021 rolls around. And I mean, first of all, how did you approach this product, I'll say, because I know you don't like using the word. So how do we, these, I'll call it COVID genetic vaccines you don't like using the word. So how do we, these, I'll call it COVID genetic vaccines. How about that? That's perfect. Okay. Yeah. I was amazed that we were even going to contemplate giving this to a pregnant woman because we never give a pregnant woman for very obvious reasons, anything new out of the gate. There's two drugs we should have, you know, remembered and learned by, diethylstilbestrol and thalidomide, which both had poor obstetric outcomes and were taken off the market with regards to use in

pregnancy. And I mean, prior to 2020, if I had ever given a pregnant woman a new product or medication, that's malpractice. And I was just amazed that this was going to be considered. But the way that they marketed it to us, meaning our governing body, ACOG, was that if a woman gets a respiratory infection and she's pregnant because of all the changes in her body during pregnancy. She's going to get a lot sicker and could potentially die from this as opposed to a non-pregnant person, female rather. And they've been using that tactic for years to get us to give our pregnant patients the influenza vaccine. And in 30 years, I've never had a pregnant woman

die of the flu. I had already made a decision I was never going to promote this, and I never recommended it to anybody, any of my patients. I'm going to jump in here briefly, but just as someone who's not a medical doctor at all, a totally different profession, obviously it seems to me there's no way we could have had the information that would be required to determine whether this would be safe for pregnant women, ultimately. Even if these trials that were done by Pfizer and Moderna were crystal clear, which they weren't, we know that now, but even if they were, that still wouldn't have meant, oh, good to

go right correct right so pregnancy is nine months and then what happens to the newborns and you know they were already saying safe and effective in April of that year and women were getting it sooner than that because we were you know deeming them immunocompromised and they were getting to the front of the line in order to get these injections you know but and even in the Pfizer trials they obviously they didn't enter somebody in the trial knowing they were pregnant but they had accidental pregnancies and they knew something was had to be they even presented that yesterday in one of the talks where men weren't supposed to have intercourse with women if they were in the trials they knew something was going

to be transmissible potentially and you know now that people are getting the documents from the trials there were bad outcomes and there the miscarriage rate was 80% and the Pfizer trials they knew that one of the things that I've learned in the interim is that you you know, all gene therapies, which of course these products are gene therapies, all gene therapies have shedding studies done on them. In fact, because all gene products have some level of shedding that's likely, that was never done with these genetic products. But what you just said makes me wonder. I think some people understood that there might be some kind of shedding, which was why they were told that this close contact

might not be helpful. Absolutely. Yeah. Another comment I have is, you mentioned thalidomide. And it strikes me that the issue with thalidomide, if I recall correctly, was that when they did the trials on thalidomide, they used one process to make it, and the molecule that was actually mass-produced later was slightly different in its rotation. So a little bit of a detail I remember from years ago in organic chemistry, I think. But it created horrible deformities. And, you know, they just didn't think to look. And it strikes me there's an analogous situation here, because these products, you know, there was this process one PCR process that these trials were

done, right, even, of course, we know the trials weren't far, were far from perfect, and so forth. But nonetheless, the process that was used to create the actual vaccines, which were given to a billion people, had all sorts of other products, and they were made using E. coli growth. And so there's endotoxin, there's this DNA that's been found, and so forth in them. So there's these additional reasons why they could be damaging. It's very interesting because you often hear about spikeopathy, like spike protein is very destructive, very toxic, creates all these problems.

But you didn't see a lot of those problems in this very sensitive area of medicine in that first year of 2020 of the virus, but then 2021. Well, actually, why don't you tell me? Sure. Why don't you tell me what you saw, right? Yeah, so in November, I had sort of been, you know, tracking not officially and noticing things. But in November of 2021, a non-clinical staff member in my office, my biller, came to me and said, Dr. Biss, we've had a really large number of miscarriages this month. She said, we've had eight miscarriages, which in a practice that delivers, you know,

20 people a month, that's a lot of patients in one month. So I went back to January of 2020 and I started, you know, looking at my population and tracking the losses, the miscarriages, the new entry, which would mean, you know, newly pregnant women calling for an appointment, so less than 12 weeks in their pregnancy, and the amount of deliveries in that year. And I, moving forward, tracked until November of 2022. So I had three years almost completed of data. And I sent that information to Jessica Rose, and she published it in her sub-stack. And so it's nice, pretty charts of graphs, et cetera.

And sadly, I noticed that my miscarriage rate from year to year had gone up by 100%. So you will see quoted in some articles and even in my obstetric textbook that the normal miscarriage rate is 13 to 15%. I've never seen that clinically. There's a paper published by Naird et al. that showed in 2020, I think it was published, that the actual miscarriage rate is closer to 5% to 6%. I've probably never even been that high. In 2020, from month to month, the average miscarriage rate in my practice was 4%. Then when I went to 2021, the average rate, and it spiked in November of that year, which I don't know why.

Maybe it had something to do with a booster, was 7% to 8%. So it had doubled. And then in 2022, from month to month, it went up to 15%. Now, that was up until November. In December of that year, my miscarriage rate was 27%. And then in January and February of 2023, it was 30%. And it didn't normalize back down to 4% until June of 2023. I also went back and looked at my population and figured that 65% to 70% of my patients got these injections.

The majority had three. Very few had four or more. But the majority were receiving them in 2021 and early 2022, and yet we're still seeing these problems in 2022 moving into 2023. So that's concerning. Those were the miscarriages. Now, the bars on the initial picture in her substack, you know, the orange bars going up are the miscarriages,

the blue bars going down are the newly registering pregnant patients. So from year to year, we were seeing less pregnant women. That's either a reflection of they lost their pregnancies early and never called, made the appointment, or infertility, which I saw. I had pregnant women in 2021. Well, they couldn't get pregnant women in 2021. That had no problems prior to the injections.

We had delivered many other babies, no issues getting pregnant. Now all of a sudden they need in vitro fertilization. So there's a significant increase in requests for IVF. Yes, the infertility specialists in the United States made a lot of money in the last few years. They send us these five, six, seven-page consultation reports, not one sentence on whether or not the patient's been vaccinated. There's this paper that New England Journal of Medicine that ostensibly shows that it's safe to give these injections to pregnant women. And I imagine this is used in a lot of cases for people who are,

you know, concerned. They'll say, look, here's the evidence. It's published in, you know, Gold Standard Journal. Yeah. So in the New England Journal of Medicine, peer-reviewed, well-respected journal, Tom Shimabukuro is the lead author on this article and all the other authors are either government employed or involved in the vaccine, you know, committees to approve vaccines. So this article was published in June of 2021, and it was primarily looking at the V-safe data, the V-safe, you know, people that had their app and they could record, you know, bad adverse events from these injections. And interestingly enough, the majority of the people were nurses for some reason.

Anyway, they had a cohort, I want to say, of maybe 827 women. And they said in their article that the miscarriage rate was normal because it was 13.6%. But the problem with that is that they didn't do the statistics right because they used the whole cohort of women, which were either first, second, or third trimester of pregnancy. Miscarriage is defined as a pregnancy lost prior to 20 weeks, which would be the halfway mark of a pregnancy. If you lose a baby after 20 weeks, that's a stillbirth. So when you actually took the 20-week and under pregnant women in that study and used

the correct math, the miscarriage rate was 83%. Now there are people that actually looked at that study critically and figured that out and sent a letter to the editor and they published the letter, but they have not retracted the article. So women in that particular cohort that were 20 weeks or less in pregnancy when they received the injections, 83% of them lost their babies. It's almost unbelievable what you're telling me. And I can expand on my thoughts on this, but most physicians, they read the abstract.

They take for faith that this is reality because these are peer-reviewed articles. How are they going to get printed if it's not true? And we mostly read the abstract because you get a journal of 100 articles. You can't read every one in depth. And we don't all have degrees in statistics either. Well, and on top of that, if the result matches, let's call it the correct view, we breathe a sigh of relief. And it's a lot easier to take that position than to take the contrary position for all sorts of reasons that we've covered on this show extensively. What do you make of this? What's happened to medicine?

So my theory is I started medical school in the early 90s when the concept of evidence-based medicine was being employed in medical schools as their way of teaching. So, you know, let's say big pharma figures out the evidence, and there's now been algorithms developed for every condition. And just to be clear, the big pharma figures it out because the types of studies that are required for proper evidence-based are so expensive that only Big Pharma can really do them, right? That's what you mean by that?

Yeah. Big Pharma gives medical schools a lot of money. A lot of medical schools depend, you know, over 50 to 60 percent of their money probably comes from Big Pharma. But anyway, everything we try to figure out in a patient, if they come in with a set of symptoms, you know, falls in these algorithms. And we all follow the same way to figure something out. We order the same tests. We do, you know, we provide similar, you know, therapeutics, et cetera. And there's cookbooks on how to treat things. And if you veer

off the cookbook or the algorithm, you have to explain yourself to either peer review or your state medical board because now you're not practicing standard of care. The other thing that I think that created, which was very dangerous, is the lack of critical thinking. Because why do you have to think now? Everything's right in front of you. You just look up your recipe and do your recipe and you're fine. So that's been going on since the early 90s. And I think that that was why a lot of doctors didn't question a lot of things that made no sense

very early on with this pandemic. I mean, prior to 2020, if you had a respiratory infection and you followed your cookbook, you would get four prescriptions from your physician. You would get a Z-Pak, a steroid, a cough suppressant, an inhaler. Now we have another respiratory infection, and there's nothing to treat it. You just wait. You get your little oxygen monitor

and wait until the number's below 90, and then you go to the hospital. I mean, that made no sense to me. Wearing a mask, standing six feet away from somebody. I mean, I was everything. Just none of it made sense. But so many physicians, like a bunch of bobbleheads, you know, okay, okay, we'll do this. Because nobody thinks. That's my theory. What do you think makes you different?

Well, the fact that I, you know, I learned prior to when it was really hardcore evidence-based training, but I also personally, I mean, my journey in 2018, I started eating the ketogenic way and incorporating intermittent fasting and whatnot. And I watched a lot of podcasts and actually learned nutrition because we don't learn nutrition in medical school for obvious reasons. They don't want us to provide pharmaceuticals. They don't wanna let medicine be thy food

and food be thy medicine like Hippocrates said. So I learned a lot about nutrition and I saw the big pharma, big food disaster and I started to question a lot of things back then. So I think that made it easier for me to question things when the pandemic came along and to question the fact that we were going to give pregnant women a fresh, new, out-of-the-gate product. There was just this incredible fear around this virus to the point where we forgot about, we just assumed the harms could, we're so great of that thing that we're gonna do something you know before unthinkable and give a

completely new drug that again couldn't possibly have gotten the testing because there just wasn't the time to do it. Sure. Right? Is that what you think happened? Yeah, I think the fear was the main thing. I mean, you know, everybody was so afraid. You know, every day on the news, you're flashing the death numbers. I mean, the whole year of 2020. So everybody was afraid. And this was very heavily marketed towards women. Women make the decisions in

the household. They make the health decisions. They tell their husbands to go to the doctors. If you can convince a pregnant woman that in my 30 years of practicing, trying to get them to even take an aspirin to get these injections, game over. Because if a pregnant woman gets this, everybody's going to get this. Tell me about this infertility. We just touched on it a little bit, but what do we know about that? So I don't really think we know what's causing it because nobody's really looking at it that closely. But we know early on Pfizer, the rat trials that the Japanese through

FOIA requested the information which clearly showed that the lipid nanoparticles which is the fatty envelope around the messenger RNA goes everywhere in the body and it was designed to do that because early on chemotherapeutic agents they were trying to get into the brain they used lipid nanoparticle technology in order to get it across the blood-brain barrier so we've known that for a long time but these went all throughout the body but very mostly highly concentrated in the female rat ovaries it also goes to the testes so you know that may have something to do with the infertility if these things

are getting into you know our patients ovaries now the spike protein may also play a role in me my theory would be also you know the the lining of the uterus where the pregnancy is going to implant if you're having any micro clotting you know that may somehow prevent the blood supply to the implanting pregnancy, and maybe that's what's causing a loss. The other thing that somebody, Michael Yeadon, brought to everybody's attention way early on

is that the spike protein is very similar to the proteins on the syncytial layer, which is the layer around the embryo as it's traveling down to implant. Those proteins in that layer are similar to the spike protein, so if there's antibodies made to the spike protein, maybe somehow that's involved. These are all my theories I

don't know nobody's tested but we're definitely seeing an increase in infertility and that's also explained and the birth rates are down globally the birth rates are higher in certain parts of the world and it had been you know prior to 2020 it had been trending down a little bit. But now there's in some countries, there's drastic drops, you know, in the curve. Have you tried to plot that against, you know, high levels of vaccination, COVID vaccination versus not? Well, in my own practice, it was very hard for me to exactly say, you know, Mary Smith had a baby and she had this vaccine because I have a general sense that up to 70% of my patients have been vaccinated. But the problem is I'm the only practitioner in my office that asks all our patients, have you had COVID? How many times

have you had any of those shots? Which brand? How many? Because like it or not, that's part of your history now. Right. So none of my other providers do that. So if I haven't seen the patient yet and it's not in her electronic record and they come in with a miscarriage, you can't really ask them that information then because you don't want to come off as accusatory to the to the patient and make her think that she did something wrong to cause the loss of the pregnancy. So I don't have that exactly plotted. Now when I have a gynecology patient come in and complain that she can't get

pregnant, you know, I will ask her that and I will have that data. But I don't think that I'm'm it's pretty rare I mean most physicians aren't connecting those dots or asking those questions right but basically it could happen at different stages and that's what you need to look for it could happen right at the you know just can't get pregnant for some reason and then there's that's something there's this increase in miscarriages and then the possible increase in stillbirths. Is it an increase in all of these areas or it's just not clear?

It's just the overall number. Yes, the overall number, there are certain parts of the world in our country where the stillbirth rates had increased quite a bit and I actually had analytics run on our delivery ward at my hospital which would have been out of 10,000 deliveries and our stillbirth rates from year to year were the same there was no spike so I haven't seen that or the anomalies I haven't really seen in my practice I haven't seen so okay so that's interesting so that so there's it. So there's a decrease in pregnancies, and there's an increase in miscarriages, but there isn't any change in stillbirths. That's

interesting. I think it provides a lead for others to do their own research or look at the data from their own practices. I think that's, I mean, it seems very interesting to me that it would stack out that way. You know, we've talked a lot on this show about different, you know, governing bodies, associations, ACOG in your case. How did they approach this question? So ACOG, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, they told us very early on in 2021 that we needed to vaccinate anybody thinking of getting pregnant, pregnant, or breastfeeding. Safe and effective. There's no other options for your patients. They early on also did not want us providing our patients hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin. And I will tell you that's ridiculous because we've been giving pregnant women

hydroxychloroquine for decades because they have lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, other conditions. And that's safe at the same dose we would give for five days if they had COVID. But all of a sudden that's dangerous. So that never made any sense. And just incidentally, my lupus patients and rheumatoid arthritis patients never got COVID because they were on hydroxychloroquine their whole pregnancy. And of course, you know, ivermectin is commonly given to pregnant women, as I understand it. It is after the first trimester, but hydroxychloroquine you can give in any trimester. Fascinating.

Yeah. But they wanted us to pretty much inject everybody. And now it's come out, information's come out that through FOIA requests that ACOG received about $11 million through a trust funneled, money funneled from HHS, which is our tax dollars, to heavily market this product. And the contracts they signed, pretty much they can't ever reverse the course. So even though they have to be seeing what I've been seeing, they haven't changed their stance, and they're still recommending today. They recommended the latest booster. To pregnant women?

Yeah. Or even women considering pregnant, the same group? My partner, who I love, he's like a brother to me. When I brought concerns up to him early on, I said, I don't think we should be giving this to our pregnant women. I'm concerned we don't have any long-term data. He said, Kim, if ACOG's recommending it, those people are smarter than us. They're not going to tell us to give something to our patients that's dangerous. This is what they think.

And maybe the ACOG people say the same, right? That those people, those HHS people, they're smarter than us. Let's talk a little, you mentioned breast milk, and I want to talk about that a little bit, because I know there's been papers published that show that the spike, at least, is being passed through the breast milk, and there's been reactions from, ostensibly, this breast milk. This hasn't been written up in any article that I've seen,

but I remember, I want to say it was about a year ago where they had a cluster in Scotland, I want to say, of babies being admitted with myocarditis. Like never happened before? Well, I've never heard of that but and they and it wasn't they didn't have any infections you know usually prior to prior to these injections myocarditis which was rare but it was usually caused from a viral infection they didn't have any infections but my assumption would be that they were breastfed from moms that had been vaccinated i think sadly we're going to have a lot of things developing moving forward in these babies that were born to vaccinated moms or you know breastfed from vaccinated moms because we know these products travel everywhere through the body and the concern would be the brains. There's

at least one paper that I'm aware of that chronicles this transmission through breast milk and some sort of you know reaction if I recall I just want to kind of discuss that and whether and you just mentioned something else is it just the spike that's passing through is it the lipid nanoparticles yeah passing through as well yeah well I think it's both. In the Pfizer trials, they knew that this would be transmitted in liquids. Breast milk is a bodily fluid, very fatty, and actually babies are keto. So these lipid nanoparticles, you know, they're fats. And they found fully intact messenger RNA. So the whole package went through. And who knows? I mean, you brought up the adulterated product now. If there's DNA plasmids somehow getting into these newborns.

I mean, who knows? Who knows? I mean, sadly, we might be seeing a huge spike in cancers in babies and kids. I mean, I hope not. And so we're not seeing that at this point, is that right? Yeah. You know, but we're still kind of new into this right um okay if you're a mom who was vaccinated coveted vaccinated you know however many times and

you know you're concerned after watching this this interview what what do you recommend? First and foremost, no more shots. And same for your partner. I would try to seek out a functional medicine doctor, for one, to get your medical care. But for two, try to avoid processed foods, eat clean, intermittently fast. We've seen in literature a few fasts that causes your body to take out the trash, so to speak. Yeah, promote autophagy, as Dr. Palmarek likes to talk about. Right, because the spike protein, it was designed in such a way that our cells can't degrade this foreign protein down like they normally can with other proteins. It's very hard to get out of the body for one,

and for two, we don't know how long your body's gonna make it. So by fasting, that may help to get rid of the spike, and then there's some other naturopathic ways and supplements to take that can help your body get rid of the spike. But it's a problem because there's this shedding too, and we're constantly around other people that are vaccinated. And we're all getting exposed to spike every day. I think we all probably need to be on something to get rid of.

But then there's some, there's, you know, there's some people are very sensitive to it, but the vast majority of people, right, are not as sensitive, or at least not for the, in the immediate sense, right? I mean, that's what's come out in my conversations with people about shedding and what I've read about it. There's something that keeps coming up as I'm talking to people is there's basic lifestyle changes that will be very good for your health anyway that are also very good for this specific scenario. Good sleep, good sleep, exercise. That's the thing, you know, I weight train and weight training has been shown to boost your immunity. Remember in the beginning, you know, they locked us down. We're all eating Uber Eats, all processed junk. Can't go to the gym.

Can't exercise. Don't go outside. Don't get in the sun, which is your vitamin D. So we were all deficient in D. I mean, everything that doesn't promote any sort of health. They told us to do. I guess the other thing is breastfeeding, we don't know how long that lasts. We don't.

Yeah. We don't. So, they're developing tests now, where probably we'll have a commercial test at some point where you can measure spike, just get a blood test and see how much your spike level is. There are people working on that. I think now that it's indirectly found in the testing now,

I think they're finding the spike in cells. It's like an indirect test, but they're trying to develop tests where they actually can find the spike. And some people are going to develop tests where they can find the spike determine from which vaccine it came even. Right okay well what's next what should happen now in your field? You know obviously all the big entities in Washington are very much captured by big pharma. All of our medical journals are corrupted. I mean, I don't think, as a matter of fact, my exiting speech as chief of staff in December, I told all my colleagues, read your articles very thoroughly and critically

because you just cannot take for faith that these peer-reviewed, you know, journal articles are true and they're not fraudulent. Medical schools, I don't know if you've seen the series Netflix Dope Sick, which is about the opioid crisis. Right. So the whole time I was watching that, I was trying to think, how did I know the Sackler name? It was driving me crazy.

I mean, I knew about, I think it was Purdue was the company that made OxyContin. I knew the gist, but I never knew the name of the drug family. It was bugging me. Well, in the very last episode, they were, you know, chipping their name off of the Louvre and all the buildings they had their name on because they they had lost in court and now they're a disgrace. Well there was a man standing under a their name Sackler Hall and he said I go to Tufts Medical School which is where I graduated from my brother died of an opioid overdose I want this name taken off the building that was my lecture hall for two years when I was in medical school.

I was like, ding. So medical schools get a lot of money from big pharma, so we can be taught the big pharma way, which is not health care. It's sick care. You have a problem, you get a pill or an injection or a biologic or whatever you want to call it. There's no looking you know, looking at the things that are important, you know, how you eat, do you exercise, do you sleep, what are you

exposed to environmentally, etc. You have a problem, here's a pill. You know, I just think there's so many things that need to change and I know there are parallel systems that are being developed now to help take care of patients you know and I mentioned sick care because if if big pharma made us better they would lose their business and if you think about it you know there's very few things you take and then you're cured I mean if you have an infection you take an antibiotic if you go to the hospital with a hot appendix they take and then you're cured. I mean, if you have an infection, you take an antibiotic. If you go to the hospital with a hot appendix, they take it out, you're cured. If you break a bone, they fix it.

But most medicines, when you get placed on them, you're on them for life. And there's a reason for that. And then you're on more medicines for the side effects. Any final thoughts as we finish? Go to the doctor when you're sick. This whole preventative care model is, I think, just to get you on drugs and give you vaccines. I would recommend that everybody just really do your own research and ask a lot of questions and don't take for faith what your doctor tells you is correct or is really going to help you.

We do as we're told. A lot of doctors today do as they're told, they don't think, they don't, everybody's treated the same way. I think you should be, care should be individualized and there used to be what's called the practice of medicine. You know, we're not all the same and I think everybody needs to be treated you know as an individual and not the same way but you know eat right take lots of vitamin D exercise get lots of sleep you know try to eliminate a lot of stress although in this world today that's hard and don't afraid. I mean, that's really what got everybody into trouble

with this pandemic was the fear. And, you know, God gave us a pretty cool body and we have an immune system. And I don't think we need all these drugs and shots in order to stay healthy. And, you know, last question, where do you look for doctors? That's a good question. Well, the FLCCC has a huge network of physicians that are, you know, like-minded with regards to COVID and the injections. And I would just say, you know, do your research and find, you know, a naturopath or a functional medicine doctor, which full disclosure prior to my ketogenic journey,

I thought were voodoo medicine doctors, right? Like they're crazy, but they're actually the real deal because they sit with the patients for hours and figure out, you figure out lots of things. And they don't use a lot of pharmaceutical drugs. And if you implement what we've already talked about, you're not going to need a lot of pharmaceutical drugs. Well, Dr. Kimberly Biss, it's such a pleasure to have had you on the show. Thank you so much. It was a pleasure.

Thank you all for joining Dr. Kimberly Biss and me on this episode of American Thought Leaders. I'm your host, Janja Kellek.