Ask Haviv Anything - Episode 52: Why do people hate Jews, with Dara Horn
Episode Date: October 17, 2025Dr. Dara Horn, award-winning novelist and scholar of Yiddish and Hebrew literature, joins the podcast to help us dig deep into the Jewish bookshelf, the whirlwind of antisemitism in which so many Jews... find themselves, and, unavoidably, into Judaism’s most successful go-to solution for seemingly every problem: Education.We talk about Jewish “anti-literature,” about why people (and museums and politicians) so often seem to love stories about dead Jews but get uncomfortable with living ones, and about how American Jews, the biggest, wealthiest and possibly most Jewishly illiterate diaspora community in the history of Jews, reclaims the richer, deeper Jewish culture it abandoned in generations past.We also discuss Dara’s new nonprofit, the Tell Institute (at https://www.thetellinstitute.org), which aims to enable a new generation of Americans to learn about Jewish life, history and civilization, tackling head-on the ignorance in which antisemitism spreads.This episode is sponsored by the Greenberg family, Freyda, Bob and their daughter Sara Rose. For them this podcast is not only essential in the struggle for the survival and thriving of Israel and Jews everywhere, but it has become their “headspace” where Haviv provides both the enrichment, and the calm reason so needed in the midst of so much chaos.(Thank you to the Greenbergs for this dedication.)The Greenbergs would also like to recognize their cousin, the award-winning playwright Richard Greenberg, who passed away far too young on July 4. Richard represented all that was right and wonderful about being a Jew. His work was filled with insight and the irony and humor of being a Jew in 20th century America. And more important than his work was who he was as a person. He created his own family and community based on the values of listening and doing good to others.This episode is also dedicated to the memory of Tal Movshovitz, a young reserve soldier who fell in Gaza in June of 2025, amid the war with Iran. Tal served as a deputy company commander in the 7086th Combat Engineering Battalion in reserves. He was killed by an explosive device planted in a building in Khan Younis. Tal left behind a wife and two small children. His death was swallowed up in the news cycle and so we wanted to take the time to remember him here.If you like what we do here, please join us on Patreon to support our work: https://www.patreon.com/AskHavivAnything.If you would like to sponsor an episode, please email us at haviv@askhavivanything.com.Musical intro by Adam Ben Amitai.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hi, everybody. Welcome to a special episode of Aschaviv Anything.
I'm very, very pleased. I'm honored to have brought on to this podcast, one of my teachers.
And it's funny saying that because Darrah Horn and I have never met in person.
This is our first, I think, direct conversation.
Yes. I'm equally honored to be here and I feel the same way about you teaching me.
You heard it here, folks.
Yes.
But I have learned from Darra a vocabulary for dealing with a
lot of the insanity of the last two years. And in depth, in seriousness, and I want to ask her to
take us on a little bit of a journey into the Jewish bookshelf. If you're a regular
listener to this podcast, you know that I love my Jewish bookshelf. And occasionally we'll
just give some midrashic source for something or try to pull some meaning or deep advice
for difficult times out of that. I have a bit of a religious education.
Dad's a rabbi. I had no choice in the matter, and I'm very, very glad for it.
And reading Dara is therefore very much reading someone who's very much in that kind of mental space, mental world.
And one of the other things I want, I asked Dara to come on for was because she believes that this is a moment where Jews need to be strengthened and find within themselves the strength to deal with some of the very difficult problems and challenges that they're,
facing and that they're going to face going forward, and the way to summon that strength is to
know their story. And if you happen to have heard me say that on occasion, several hundred
times over the course of the last 50 or so episodes, then Dara has actually founded an organization
that is committed to that very task. So I'm glad she's here, very much an ally, and we're going
to try and parse out. First of all, we're going to have some fun with Jewish literature, because
it's more fun than that sounds, I promise.
I'm sorry for saying that.
Just as a literature professor, I just want you to know,
not everybody thinks that's exciting, but they're wrong.
Weird, weird.
And then we're going to dive into this moment,
anti-Semitism. We are recording on October 9th.
So, you know, we're a little giddy because
we are all following the news
of the hostage release deal that Israel has signed on to,
Hamas signed on to.
You might hear this after you know what happened three days from now,
10 days from now, but everything is really positive now,
and people are celebrating in the streets of both Israel and Gaza.
And there's no reason not to celebrate an end to just a massive tragedy.
And hopefully this is that.
So let me tell you that Darahorn is the award-winning author of seven books,
including five novels about Jewish life,
like fun novels about, for example, people who live forever,
but written Jewishly, not science fiction.
So it's big and complex, and we're going to talk about that.
A Passover-themed graphic novel and an essay collection
that is what I'm talking about.
That's when she came on my radar and on a lot of people's radar
and really became a teacher for a lot of people.
An essay collection called People Love Dead Jews.
She has won the National Jewish Book Award three times
and many other literary honors.
She writes frequently for publications and created the podcast Adventures with Dead Jews,
which sits unerasable on my phone.
She has a PhD from Harvard in Hebrew and Yiddish literature and taught at Sarah Lawrence and Harvard and Yashivina,
all that silly stuff.
And of course, of course, she's the founder of a new nonprofit called the Tel Institute,
devoted to educating the broader American public about Jewish history, Jewish civilization in K-12 schools, and other channels.
So I'm going to have this conversation.
I'm going to dive right into it.
But first, as you know, I want to tell you really quickly about our sponsors,
who they're wonderful sponsors in this episode.
First is the Greenberg family, Bob, Freida, and Sarah Greenberg.
They sponsored the episode, Freedabob and the daughter, Sarah Rose.
And they asked me to read this out, and it's embarrassing but wonderful.
For them, this podcast is not only essential in the structure,
struggle for the survival and thriving of Israel and Jews everywhere, but it has become their
headspace where Chaviv provides both the enrichment and the calm reason so needed in the
midst of so much chaos. Thank you. Please don't make me read things like that again. The
Greenbergs would also like to recognize their cousin, the award-winning playwright Richard Greenberg,
who passed away far too young on July 4th. Richard represented all that was right and wonderful
about being a Jew. His work was filled with insights and the irony and humor of being a Jew
in 20th century America, and more important than his work was who he was as a person.
He created his own family and community based on the truest values of listening and doing good to others.
And this episode is also dedicated to the memory of Tal Mofshovitz, a young reserve soldier who fell in Gaza in June of 2025
during the while the war with Iran was happening.
TAL served as a deputy company commander in the 7,086th Combat Engineering,
battalion in the reserves. He was killed by an explosive device planted in a building in
Chon Yunus. He left behind a wife and two small children. His death was a little bit swallowed up
in the news cycle. So we wanted to make sure to bring his name out here and remember him today.
And folks, last thing to tell you, I want to invite you to join our Patreon. It helps keep the
lights on. It helps cover our costs. And you ask the questions that guide the topics we choose to
talk about if you join the Patreon. There's a discussion forum there. We talk about I'm there.
Rechel is there. We discuss the episodes. News, thoughts are out the day. People bring all kinds of
new resources I hadn't seen. And once a month, we have a live stream where I answer your questions,
whatever they may be live, and it's fun and exciting and usually goes way longer than expected.
So please join us at www. patreon.com slash ask Javiv. Anything. The link is obviously in the show notes.
Dara, thank you for joining me.
Thank you.
Thank you so much for having me.
It is absolutely an honor to be here.
I want to start with the absolutely non-timely thing that secretly is the actual thing that matters over the long term.
I want to start with you as a literature professor.
You have a theory that I love so much and helps me articulate what's weird about Jews in a Western world.
that is obsessed with Hollywood redemption arcs,
that is obsessed with, you know,
the good guy's always winning,
but they're being an exact and specific arc of the hero
through exactly the particular kind of challenge.
And every Hollywood movie is the same damn movie
is what I'm trying to say.
And also, I think,
a kind of a religious sensibility of perfectionism.
And you talk about Jews having,
not literature so much as anti-literature,
where we don't have perfect endings
and we don't have in Jewish literature
these very simple arcs
and it's to me so much more enjoyable
because we're also very sarcastic and funny about it.
Yiddish literature and can you tell us what that is?
What is Jewish anti-literature?
You gave a talk once titled,
what are stories for that put me on to this?
But what do you mean by that?
And then I want to just bat it back and forth a tiny bit
and then get into this moment
and anti-Semitism and the big heavy things.
Sure.
So this is a topic, as you mentioned,
I've spoken about it before,
and there's a chapter in my book, People of Dead Jews.
It's a little bit about this.
And in that chapter, I talk about just like a reader email
that I got about one of my novels,
I don't even remember how many years ago
where it was some reader who said something like,
you know, I got to this, you know, whatever depressing scene
there was in one of my books, which wasn't even at the end of the book,
you know, that she's like, you know, when I got to this scene,
you know, I threw the book across the room.
And then she says, I think the purpose of literature
should be so that people can laugh and enjoy and be uplifted,
you know, and then she's like, you know, love Denise.
And, you know, I wrote but did not send a reply.
to Denise, where I said, you know,
dear Denise, sorry about this, you know,
scene where someone's beating a horse,
you know, it was actually a reference to
Dostoevsky's crime and punishment,
which is another book that you really ought to avoid.
And that I'm like, you also should steer clear of the Hebrew
Bible, not a great book for people who like to laugh
and enjoy. However, I do have, you know,
some Garfield comics I can recommend to you.
You know, but I was sort of thinking about this.
And, you know, yes, well, right.
And so I did not actually send this.
to Denise now, yeah, no.
But I, you know,
I was thinking about this because this,
you know, was sometime around,
you know, my second novel,
and I had, was finishing graduate school
and studying comparative literature.
And I had just sort of noticed that there was this
idea of this narrative arc, as you say.
And there was this expectation that,
well, let me put it this way.
I was, at the time, I was studying literature,
and doing this doctorate,
but I also was writing novels at the same time.
So for me, this was, you know,
it was almost like, you know, to me it was like training
and like, you know, like,
how should I be writing a book?
How should I structure a book?
And it was kind of fascinating to me
that I had these readers like Denise
who were like writing to me asking for these happy endings.
But the thing is that this work that I was studying
was actually Hebrew and Yiddish literature.
And I just started to notice that
there's this very different expectations
in these,
literature's in Jewish languages.
And I started thinking about what English language readers expect from a book.
And, you know, some of them are explicit, like Denise, who just, like, want to laugh and enjoy, okay.
But even people who are more serious readers, there's this expectation, as you say, if it's narrative arc.
But, like, often people would use this language, like, you know, if they didn't want a happy ending, at least they wanted a, you know, the main character has to have an epiphany, right?
or there needs to be a moment of grace, right?
It's like, you know, or like even in, you know, a Hollywood movie, like you said,
it's like, you know, the good guys have to be saved.
And I just sort of thinking like how Christian these terms are, you know, grace and epiphany
and, you know, the characters being saved.
And I noticed how Christian these terms are.
And then I also noticed that, you know, I'm studying, you know, I'm reading all these sort of,
you know, classics of Hebrew, modern Hebrew and Yiddish literature.
and these writers, like, none of them give you any of these things.
Like, you know, the characters are certainly never saved, right?
Like, nobody ever has an epiphany.
Nobody realizes anything.
Nobody has a moment of grace.
But instead, there's this sort of endurance and resilience,
and that's the structure of the story instead.
And I'm going to, you know, I'm not going to, like, teach my whole, you know,
course in modern Hebrew English literature,
but I'll just give one example that,
A lot of English speakers, I think they think they're familiar with it, but they're not,
which is the Tevia, the Derry Man stories, which were ostensibly the basis for Fiddler on the roof.
But Fiddle on the roof left out a lot.
You know, I don't even know where to begin.
Tevia in the book does not live in a shuttle.
You know, I mean, one of the daughters kills herself.
Like, I mean, there's all kinds of fun stuff that happens.
What's interesting about that, I mean, that book is interesting for a lot of reasons.
But the way that book is written is actually, there are very few other books in which this happens.
It's written, is published serially in real time.
So it covers 25 years of Teviya and his family's life.
And it's published serially over 25 years.
So the characters are aging.
Like when you first meet Tevi, he's like a young man with little kids.
And then at the end, he's a widower and, you know, all of his children are grown.
and, you know, and also his environment has changed.
25 years have passed.
There's, you know, been the first Russian Revolution.
And, I mean, there's all kinds of, you know, political upheavals.
And there's been a Russo-Japanese war.
And, you know, what's amazing about it, though, and it's,
Tevia never changes.
Like, he doesn't, like, he never realizes anything.
He never really words anything, right?
He doesn't really, you know, he certainly never gets the moment.
moment of grace. He's definitely never saved. But instead, what's amazing about it is how he sort of
keeps enduring. He's like this. And the structure of the book is he's, it's, it's, it's conversations
he's having with the narrator, who's the author Shulmalaim. And he just keeps meeting him again and
again at these different, really horrible, tragic moments in his life. And the way the book, it doesn't
even end. I mean, the way the book ends, um, the last line is something that would never make it on
Broadway where he just says to Shalom Alechem, you know, you're a writer, please, when you publish
your book, tell all of our Jews everywhere that our old God still lives. And it's like just this
masterclass in resilience. I mean, it's just, there's just no structure of like, you know,
that there's some kind of redemption or we're tying something up in a bow. It's that's just not
the story. That was just just really fascinating to me as a reader and a writer.
one of my favorite moments in
Hebrew literature
is Mendela Mochell-Sferi,
Mendele the bookseller.
I would call this Yiddish literature,
but he actually wrote it in both languages.
He has versions of that book and both languages.
Yes.
My Yiddish is rusty in the sense that it's just four curse words.
But in the beginning of this book,
there's this moment that I've never forgotten
and I've literally read to my kids
where it's this bookseller
and he's bent over on his card going between the little Jewish villages, the little Stettles,
and he's bent over a book.
And I hope I'm saying it right.
I'm saying it from memory, but he's looking at his book, and he's reading his book like a good Jew should.
And all around him, the birds are singing, and the flowers are blooming,
and the sunshine is gorgeous, and the spring has come.
And his eye sort of pulls aside to it, but no, he pulls back because he knows he's,
a good Jew and he's back in the book and he's
depressed and he's sad and he's in the book
and then he pulls it. And every single
time the beauty
of the world around him attracts him he says
but that's not my point and he moves
on and but that's not my
point is this recurring theme and every single
time he says but that's not my point
that is exactly his point
what he is talking about is the thing
that he says but never mind
that then you should be paying attention
and it's these kinds of
what's real
is the little stuff, is the nitty gritty stuff, is the experience of the world rather than is the being pulled by the tradition and being pulled into the beautiful world.
And there's also a little bit of a modern critique of the old world and all of these things all at once.
But that grittiness, that grittiness to it.
And then you start to read the Bible the way Jews read the Bible, and you notice that none of the heroes are perfect.
There is no Jesus.
There's no Muhammad in the sense of perfection.
They're all terribly broken, disastrous people.
They're all living bad, like, really painful lives.
And how they're living those painful lives is the story.
The brokenness is the narrative, is the information, right?
Is the actual arc.
The Kotska Rebbe famously said there's nothing more perfect than a broken heart.
Leonard Cohen's line, what was it?
The world is broken.
That's how the light gets in, something like that, which is just drawn directly out of this Hasidic version of exactly this kind of,
Anyway, anti-literature is for me a way to frame.
I don't know if I'm just rambling,
but anti-literature is for me a way to frame
why the Jewish bookshelf to me is such a more living place.
Now, I love Terry Pratchett, and I read Terry Pratchett to my kids, okay?
I just want to say, I love arcs, I love humor,
I love when the story ends the way Hollywood wants it to end.
I love it.
Not at all critiquing Denise.
But then there is this other world, which is funny,
and you can be very shallow there, and still it's very,
it absorbs you and it entices
and I find it absolutely
amazing and people don't read it anymore.
The Jewish literature is...
Yeah.
Well, so a couple things about this.
I just want to say about Mendelah Mojahsforam,
I know him as Mendelah Mojarsforam,
as, you know,
Melmendamuhrm, you know,
that line when he's looking at his book
and he doesn't want to be distracted by the landscape.
Of course, this is from, I mean,
this is from the Talmud, right?
If you were to look up from your studies, you know, studying and say, how beautiful is this tree, then, you know, that you've sinned against this text or, you know, something like that.
You know, that's like, he's building a parody of that, right?
I mean, that's like what I think is so.
And this is what made me into a Jewish writer, honestly, was because I remember, like, you know, well, I, there's more I could say about this.
But, like, I felt like there's, you know, I found these layers in Jewish literature that I didn't find in,
literature in
what American Jewish literature
in English I felt like was lacking these layers
and this is what I was sort of trying to build
into it in my novels
like a moment like that in Mendoly-Moharsvari
and where he's basically he's making an inside joke about
the Talmud, right? And it might go over your head
and it might not, but like for his audience
it's probably not going to go over their heads.
And also about the modernity and also about the
Yes, of course. Oh, exactly that's what it is.
It's the attraction of the West. It's the
attraction of
of, of
Haskalah Europe and
in Yiddish, there are two different words for
books for
Sephiram and Bihla.
So it's like, Aram are
religious, you know, books that are
about the tradition and
and then Yiddish books that are about
you know, other things. And but there are
a lot of people who are merging these. I mean, like you mentioned
you know, like, oh, I like reading Terry Pratchett
and fantasy and all that. You know who did this is
Nachman of Bratislav.
Nachman of Bratzlov studied the brother's grim.
and studied Russian folklore. Yes, oh, his stories are rewritings of the Brothers Grim,
but without the redemptive endings. So it's like, you know, his story about the lost princess.
It's about, you know, this princess is, you know, taken and, you know, her father, you know,
the king, you know, accidentally curses her or whatever, and she gets put into this castle.
And then it's got all the same elements. There's like a quest, a knight goes on a quest to go rescue her
from the palace and whatever.
But at the end, he doesn't rescue her.
Or like, or it doesn't tell me.
No, it's not that.
He says, eventually he did free her, but I can't tell you how.
So, but the thing is that the reason, so Nachman did this, like, where he took these
brothers grim stories and he rewrote them without happy endings.
And for him, this was a religious purpose because he's writing about living in an unredeemed
world, right?
For him, this is like, it's like a Kabbalistic idea about, you know, that we're,
living in this broken world and our job is to reconstruct it, right? This is like this very,
and that's exactly, and you know, I mean, and for him, it's like the lost princess is like, you know,
the Shkina, the presence of God and, you know, there's all these kinds of religious elements to it.
But what's amazing then is then Kafka reads Nachman stories and he rewrites some of Nachman's story.
So it's like, you know, there's all just like this like long chain of layers and layers.
To me, it's like an archaeological tell, right? It's like all these layers of stories of stories.
and civilization that are building up above on top of each other. And I, you know, when I was
growing up, I found this, I mean, there's a deeper story about this about how I became a writer,
which has to do with my, I mean, my subject is the writer is time. And, you know, just this idea of,
you know, how do we live in a world as mortals in a world that outlasts us? And I didn't have
the language to understand that that was my interest as a child. I just sort of thought like I
would get into bed at night and be like this day that just happened is gone. Where did it go?
And I was sort of, to me, my interest, my purpose in writing was to preserve this lost time.
Preserve lost time was like my purpose as a writer.
And I sort of, as a child, I was drawn to so many aspects of Jewish tradition because I felt like here was like thousands of years of people who to my child's mind seemed to have solved this problem.
Because by creating this historical consciousness, right?
like this whole idea of, you know, all of us came out of Egypt, all of us were standing at Sinai, right?
Yosef Chaim Yeroshami says in his books, Ahor, the past is not a series of events to be contemplated at a distance,
but rather a series of existential situations into which one is drawn.
And the reality is like, I feel like that is how people experience time.
And certainly in the Jewish community, this is so resonant with how we experience.
our reality, right?
I mean, it's never, I mean, and we've seen that in the past two years of this war, right?
I mean, it's never just this war, right?
It's about so many other things.
And, you know, I, but what I loved is like the language and what I started to notice when I
learned Hebrew and Yiddish and was able to read books in those languages was like how,
look, I mean, every language has an archaeology of belief that's under it.
There are these aspects of a culture that are, um, you know,
that are illustrated in a language that are so basic to the language that like native speakers
don't even hear it. So I'm going to give you a couple examples. So like as an English speaker,
if I say to somebody, go the extra mile, I'm not sitting here thinking like, oh, I'm quoting
the gospels, but I am, right? Nobody knows that. I mean, you know, maybe religious Christians
know that, but like it's part of the language because that's the, you know, that's the culture from
which this language evolves, right? Or like, you know, if I say, well, you know, well, you know,
for better or for worse, this is what's going to happen.
I'm not thinking, oh, I'm quoting the Anglican marriage ceremony.
But of course I am.
Right?
And it's like, you're not even conscious of it.
So like in what I, and this was sort of just like really stood out to me as a, you know,
as I was learning Hebrew and Yiddish was like how all of those kinds of just expressions
are built on this archaeology of the Torah and the Talmud.
and the Soudoir and sort of like, you know, this whole edifice of text.
And in a way, again, that, like, you know, Native speakers wouldn't even necessarily hear.
I just felt like there was, this was missing from, you know, the American Jewish life felt
very kind of thin to me and culturally when I was growing up.
And I eventually sort of attributed that to the lack of a Jewish language.
And when I first started out as a writer, my purpose was to write in English as though
English were a Jewish language.
And so what I mean by that is not like I'm going to write books with a white.
of words in italics, but that I'm going to write the kind of books that are built on this
archaeology of meaning and stories in a way that any English language reader could understand.
So, yeah, that's the, that's the archaeological tale of stories.
That ended beautifully.
Yeah.
Episode two of this podcast is an argument that I brought from Arthur Hertzberg about American Jewry,
which is that they're all the peasants and all the elites stayed behind.
and there was a lot of anger at the elites
because of the Tsarist recruitment
that the elites would all send the poor kids' children
to the Tsarist armies
and all these different reasons that he lays out
for why American Jews are actually
the first generation of American Jews
are actually the most ignorant,
the most Jewishly ignorant,
the most impoverished, the most desperate,
the most who don't care about Europe
and the most who, inasmuch as they care
about the Jewish communities they left behind,
don't like those communities.
And so there's this rebellion
of turning to American-ness
and forgetting the
culture that they left behind, a shedding of it that's purposeful.
And so one of Arthur Hertzberg's conclusions is that there is this thinness, there is this
ignorance, there is this forgetfulness, and it's for deep and powerful and important reasons
that if American Jews learn the reasons, that itself is the beginning of the construction
of more depth and understanding of who and what they are.
So it feels like from the literary side you stepped into this kind of gap that is enormous,
yawning, desperate, other than Jewish literal religion.
I mean, literal, what is an American Jewish culture?
Is that too far?
Am I taking that too far?
There are certain decisions that were made by American Jews at different points
that made sense for the times they were in.
And a lot of those decisions actually do have to do with anti-Semitism, very much so,
in ways that American Jews themselves.
don't even appreciate.
They think...
The kind of culture to Americanize more quickly and easily and...
That's a simple way of putting it, but it's actually more strategic...
I mean, that's true for any immigrant group of the United States.
I mean, that's part of...
You could see that trajectory with any immigrant group.
It isn't just, oh, we decided to assimilate, you know,
like all immigrants do.
It's not that because...
I mean, it isn't just that.
my friend Rachel Gordon, who's a, she teaches Jewish studies at University of Florida.
She has a book that came out about a year ago called Post-War Stories.
That's about really the active decision-making on the part of American Jewish cultural leaders
and even rabbinic leaders in the mid-20th century, basically to rebrand Judaism as a religion.
and this was a very deliberate and explicit effort, which was made in part, you know, after the Nazi Holocaust because the Nazis had defined Jews as a race.
So part of it is moving away from that.
Part of it is that there was this, you know, as happens periodically in American life, there was like a religious revival going on at that time in the 1950s.
This is when a lot of these, you know, suburban churches are being built, and then you have, and suburban synagogues get built.
And, you know, you have, you know, this is also part of the Cold War where, you know, we're all, you know, on team, you know, team God against the godless Soviets or something like this.
You know, there's sort of like a moment where this is actually, you know, in a sense of strategic decision on a part of American Jews to become sort of an American religion.
And, you know, also like, you know, and part of that is in the effort of fighting anti-Semitism.
you know, she traces a lot of these sort of what she calls anti-anti-Semitism books and films from that period,
things like gentlemen's agreement, other books and movies like that, that were sort of, you know,
making anti-Semitism look anti-American.
And the way they did that was really by pushing this idea that, like, you know, you shouldn't hate Jews because Jews are just like everybody else.
Right. And that was, you know, and they're just go to a different kind of church or something like that.
Right. I mean, and this was sort of, this was a decision is my point. And it wasn't,
a, I mean, you know, it wasn't a bad
decision at that time.
You know, because, you know, there's this
mythology now that we hear that like, oh, you know,
after the Holocaust, you know, anti-Semitism
just died down because, you know,
non-Jews felt guilty or something. That's not completely false.
I mean, you know, I
when you think about that movie, the gentleman's
agreement, that movie was made in 1948.
It wasn't made in 1938.
Right? And it's about this just like
abject, you know, this abject
discrimination against Jews. I mean, you know,
what is the movie about the people who haven't seen?
Oh, I'm sorry.
So gentlemen, I mean, there's, I mean, there's like a classic of American film.
It's called Gentleman's Agreement.
It came, it's, I think it's 1947 or 48.
I think it's 48.
It's about this, it's Gregory Peck, who's this, like, you know, was, you know, this movie star at the time, not Jewish actor.
But he plays this non-Jewish journalist who decides to go undercover for six months as a Jew
to see if it changes how people treat him.
Spoiler word. It changes how people treat him.
You know, and it's, that's, that's the movie.
And, you know, this is like, you know,
and everybody like, you know, words are a lesson.
And it's an American movie, you know, we all were not to be bigoted
after all.
Do, don't, dot.
So, you know, it's that.
And, but what's the thing is that, like,
and Rachel Gordon, my friend who wrote this book about this,
she tells about this joke that was told about that movie,
which was one of this,
know, the screenwriter was on the set and one of the stage hands comes up to him and just said,
you know, I just really want to say how much I love this movie.
You know, I think it's wonderful.
It has a really great moral.
And, you know, the screenwriter's pleased and says, you know, what do you think the moral was?
And he says, I think the moral is that you shouldn't be mean to a Jew because he might turn out to be a Gentile.
He might turn out to be Gregory Peck.
Not any Gentile.
He might turn out to be Gregory Peck.
Well, but this is what it tells you is like, you know, basically there was this embrace of
this idea in America that, you know, you know, the, that anti-Semitism was wrong because Jews are just
like everyone else. Right. And, you know, you shouldn't, and that's, you know, you shouldn't be
big against Jews because Jews are just like everyone else. I mean, and ultimately, the problem, yeah.
Well, the problem with this premise is that Jews spent 3,000 years not being like everybody else.
Yeah. You know, uncoolness is Judaism's.
brand.
Yeah.
Right?
I mean,
this goes back
3,000 years
to the ancient
to New East to,
you know,
everybody else is
worshipping their
Marvel cinematic universe
of sexy deities
and the Jews are the losers
in the school cafeteria.
They have their bossy,
unsexy,
invisible god.
Like, you know,
Jews have never been cool.
And that's actually the premise.
And,
you know,
I mean,
I could go deeper into this.
But like,
to me,
this is,
and, you know,
ultimately the idea that
by,
by turning,
by sort of rebranding
American Judaism,
by rebranding Jewish identity in America as a religion,
you know, I think that what has happened is
then people did not, we're not able to sort of,
we within the Jewish community understood
that actually know we're not really a religion.
Right, I mean, or we have a religion, but we're not a religion.
Right.
But like we deliberately did not take on that project of presenting ourselves,
in any other way to a non-Jewish public.
And, you know, that has come crashing down our heads in the 21st century
because suddenly, you know, you have people are like, you know,
why does a religion need its own country?
And it's like, you know, first of all, you know, there are 50 Muslim countries
and 30 Christian countries or whatever.
But in the meantime, also there's another thing, which is that Jews aren't a religion.
I often speak on college campuses and in the United States.
And it often happens as someone will sort of ask this question that are like, you know, are Jews or religion or Jews are race or Jews in nationality.
And, you know, there's actually, this isn't like this baffling thing that we have to have a long conversation, but there's actually a very simple answer to that.
Jews predate all of those categories.
Predate the concept of certainly the modern concept of race the way we think about it.
America, obviously, not relevant.
Predate the modern concept of nationality.
Preate the concept of religion.
I mean, I don't remember from, I think it's Eliezer God, Yehuda.
when he has to come up with, yes, he has to, like, pick a word to mean religion,
and he picks the word dot, which is like, you know, it's in the, it's in the, it's in the
McGuilla, you know, when the, you know, when Hamon tells Ahashviros, you know,
there's this people whose customs are not ours. It doesn't mean what people from
universalizing religions like Christianity in Islam used to mean that word. And, but it's like,
my point, my point only is that like, it's like modern Hebrew linguists had to sort of come
up with a word in the 19th, you know, in the late 19th century.
to mean religion because Hebrew didn't have one, right?
Like that's how like alien this concept was.
And you know, there's actually an answer, a very simple answer to who Jews are.
Jews are a joinable tribal group with a shared history, homeland, and culture.
And that was a sentence in English and in Hebrew, it is one word and it is two letters long.
Um, yeah.
Yep.
Jews are Am Yistra L, the people of Israel.
And that's who we are.
Yeah.
Yes, exactly.
That's what I mean when I say about
the language change. And so, you know, when you're speaking in non-Jewish language,
you're using all of the frameworks of that culture that do not fit a Jewish culture. So, yeah.
Okay. So we don't remember where we were going with this. Yeah. You need to find a word that
means I'm in English and produce a bookshelf that you have begun to produce that is rich
Jewish context and content that creates connotations in depth and real baggage to vocabulary
so that there is this cultural world.
And it is rooted and also gives access to ordinary Jews
into the older, greater, bigger, gigantic, you know, complex Jewish world,
which has anti-literature in it, which is the best kind of literature.
Okay, so that's where...
And many other things as well, yes.
Great.
So we've opened it, we've sorted it all out and never...
I personally am never done with literature.
I'm never done with literature, but yes.
I thought we've encompassed at all.
Okay.
All right.
So we are speaking on a day where it's easy to be happy, but also in the middle of horrific tragedy, constant everywhere.
And this podcast deals a lot with the war.
I mean, literally earlier today, I recorded a comment on the war and on strategy and on Hamas and what it means and what Trump did.
So not going anywhere near that.
I want to ask you about the other half of the Jewish experience of this two years, which is anti-Semitism.
I know too many, at this point, thousands of Jews that I personally have met, traveling the Jewish world, who have experienced the last two years as an absolute shock to the system.
They didn't know it was there.
They didn't know it was powerful and mobilizing.
They didn't expect it from the pro-Israel right of the Republican Party around Trump with the Tucker Carlson's.
They did not expect Tucker Carlson to elevate a Darrell Kruil.
Cooper who is apparently a Nazi.
Mother Jones has this whole profile of his alter egos on the internet.
He's just literally a Nazi pretending to not be a Nazi.
Why is everyone calling him a Nazi when he's constantly platformed by Tucker Carlson
explaining that Hitler wasn't that bad?
And that's new.
It's not that Joe Rogan will occasionally platform weirdos like Ian Carroll
talking about the great Jewish conspiracies.
It's that that's ubiquitous now.
millions of young people, especially in his case, young men,
watched the interview with Ian Carroll,
watched Tucker Carlson, watch Candice Owens.
It's a vast media experience,
and it's not happening to the 70-year-olds,
so they don't know what's happening.
But it is happening to the 20- and 30-year-olds.
These concerns about his social media contagion making our kids trans
was a whole discourse in the last three years.
Well, it's definitely making kids Nazi.
not all the kids, not most of the kids, but wow, surprising numbers of the kids are being swept into through these social media networks that their parents have no idea.
I think everybody learned on the Charlie Kirk assassination that there's these weird sections of the internet.
None of us have any idea what our kids are doing on TikTok.
And it's there and it's powerful.
Anti-Semitism is back in a big way.
I have heard that hundreds of times.
I've heard that among right-wing Jews and left-wing Jews.
I've heard that among surprising number of non-Jews who want to show up to my talks,
which are very self-selecting kind of groups of Jews who do believe there's an anti-Semitic problem,
and who say it's huge and it's everywhere, and we don't know where it came from.
So I want to start this systematically.
First of all, I want to get into people loved dead Jews, your whole thesis,
and just walk through it a little bit for people.
Some of the people listening to this podcast have heard it.
About 40% of the listeners or viewers on YouTube don't come from America.
They might not have heard it, and I want to introduce them to your work.
Let's start with what is anti-Semitism?
What is happening?
Why?
Who cares about Jews?
You know Jews?
I know Jews.
They're not that amazing.
They're not that special.
I know that if you live in the particular part of Manhattan, all the Jews are clever
bankers.
But you know what?
My car mechanic is a Jew, too.
They're not all clever bankers.
They're every kind of person on earth.
They're not a conspiracy to take over the world because they're not that organized.
why? Why do Jews solve Tucker Carlson's problems with America's social decline as he sees it?
And also anti-colonialism on the left. And also all the issues in French culture and society and also in Islam.
And also, why the Jews? There I said it.
Okay. I'm going to, I'm going to fix this all for you. So, yeah. So you had it here, folks. Here we go.
Yes, here we go. So, look, people love dead Jews was a book I wrote. It was like,
a detour from my novels. I had been avoiding this topic of anti-Semitism for 20 years as a writer.
And I actually got there. I only started thinking differently about this a few years ago.
This was in 2018 when, so the origin story of this book is in 2018, an editor from Smithsonian
Magazine, American Magazine, asked me to do a very long essay for them about Anne Frank.
And I got this assignment. I was full of dread because I'm like, wow, I really don't want to have to write.
long, pious essay about Anne Frank that's going to, you know, be distributed in doctor's offices
across America. That's what happens to Smithsonian Magazine. And, you know, the smart thing to do would,
you know, or like, you know, the normal thing to do would be to turn this assignment down,
but, you know, I'm a writer, so I'm not a normal person. And instead I'm like, this is interesting.
Why don't I want to do this, right? And that was what I remembered, a news item that I had read
a few months before again, this was in 2018, about a young man who worked.
at the Anne Frank Museum in Amsterdam, right?
This is where, you know, this young Jewish woman who was, you know, hiding from the Nazis
with her family, this is like this building where in which they were hiding.
It's now this blockbuster museum.
They got, you know, several million visitors a year.
The young Jewish man worked at this museum, and the museum would not allow him to wear his
kippa to work.
They made him hide it under a baseball hat.
He appealed this decision to the board of the museum, the board of the museum, then to let...
Your book opens with this.
What was the reasoning again?
Oh, the museum wants to be neutral.
You know, we have a position of neutrality.
You know, we don't want to do anything.
They literally don't want to be too Jewish.
It's the Anne Frank House, but they don't want to be too Jewish.
It's even better than that.
Yes, yes, exactly.
And then it's like, you know, he appeals his decision to the board of the museum.
Board of the Museum then deliberates for six months.
And then finally relents and lets this guy wear his keep how to work.
as I put it in the book, six months is a very long time for the Anne Frank House to ponder whether or not it was a good idea to force a Jew into hiding.
Like you'd think they'd know this, right? And then, you know, I discovered and I remembered that story, but then as I was looking it up, I discovered something equally stupid and perhaps more relevant to our experiences in the last few years, that it happened at the same museum, a few months earlier in 2017.
this was a, you know, it's a big international museum.
They have, I don't know how many languages, 10 or 15 languages for their audio guide.
And visitors had noticed, like, in whatever the places where you pick up or download your audio guide, you know, it says English and there's a British flag.
And it says, Francie, there's a French flag.
Espaniel, Spanish flag, Hebrew, no flag.
No flag.
And, you know, I mean, the museum has since corrected these things.
But I'm like, you know, at this point, I'm like, these are PR mishaps.
They are not mistakes.
And so I went to Smithsonian Magazine and I said, you know, I will write that piece for you.
And it was not the piece they probably expected because the first line of this piece was,
people love dead Jews, living Jews, not so much.
Right? Because it's like the museum, like you said, what was their reasoning?
It's like, you know, they didn't want to do anything that would disrupt the visitors' experience of the Jews' humanity.
The humanity of the nice Jews, right?
the dead ones, not the ones who did anything gross, like practicing Judaism, or living in Israel where half the world's Jews live, like that's gross.
We like the dead Jews.
And so ultimately, like, you know, I leaned into this topic and I sort of just dove into this and I traveled around the world and wrote up and just like this phenomenon in many different contexts.
Ultimately, the thesis of people loved dead Jews is that Jews are only a.
acceptable to a non-Jewish society when they are powerless, whether that means politically
impotent or dead.
And there's many, many ramifications for that, which we've been living with in the past
two years.
But ultimately, so to go to your larger question about what is anti-Semitism, what is
sort of, like, your question is not that, it's like, what is its purpose?
So I have, you know, been evolving on this topic for a long time, and there's many steps between
me public.
I mean, that book, People have Dead Jews.
Oh, but I want to go to this.
So let me go to this.
So I wrote this book.
To me, this was a detour from my real life as a novelist.
I was like, okay, I've been writing a lot on this topic.
Let me just staple this together.
And then I'll publish this book and I'll go back to writing novels.
After I published people of Dead Jews, it was at the end of 2021.
You know, it's like, it was like a, the floodgates open because, but it was just my personal experience
because suddenly I have like every Jew in America telling me their horror stories
of their own personal experiences with anti-Semitism.
For example, is this something that sticks out?
I mean, there's many things, but I mean.
I want to, there's a one, I knew this at some point in some way.
I've read so many of these history books and learned very well.
I was a history major at Hebrew University with some.
really, truly phenomenal teachers, but I had never really known it. I read in People of Dead
Jews, your explanation of Anne Frank was fascinating because the turning of Anne Frank into the
symbol of the Holocaust is a complete misrepresentation of the Holocaust. Anne Frank is the Jew who
looks like me. But what if 85% of the Jews killed are the Jews from the provinces of Hungary who
didn't look like you, who spoke Yiddish, not Dutch, who looked weird.
What if they're actually strange?
What if they don't look like me?
Then what does the Holocaust mean?
Then can I access it?
Then, in other words, if in order to get people to have a serious grappling with the human
catastrophe and collapse of the Holocaust, you have to erase the difference of the people
who died, you're not actually grappling.
you're not actually teaching the tolerance you claim this is all about.
You are actually sanitizing, erasing their actual story identity.
Correct. Correct.
In order to actually just have it be something that serves my own little whim
and teaches me incidentally because I get to walk through the En-Frank house that I'm a good person.
It is exactly. So I mean, you know, there's a lot of things about this.
So, you know, look, that example I gave of the erasing of the Israeli flag, right?
is, you know, to me that was so, you know, poignant because Anne Frank's sister, Margo, was like a passionate Zionist who was active in Dutch Zionist youth groups.
She was studying Hebrew.
Her plan was to emigrate to the, to the land of Israel to become a midwife in the, in the Galilee.
That was her dream.
I mean, and that's her sister.
And number one, number two, so it's the, you know, but also, and as you say, 85% of the Jews murder in the Holocaust.
or Yiddish speakers, a huge percentage of them
are religious Jews.
You know, this is like we picked this person
who's the least like, you know, the most
atypical, also atypical for being saved
and, you know, not saved but protected
by her non-Jewish neighbors. I mean, you know, there's so many
stories about, you know, about
oh, these, you know, righteous Gentiles, like,
unfortunately, these people are statistically
insignificant, statistically
insignificant. So, you know,
it's such a... In the vast majority of places, the Nazis
could not have taken the Jews.
if the locals hadn't helped. That's the vast majority.
Yes, of course, of course.
So, you know, so that's exactly.
So, I mean, you know, it was extraordinarily rare what happened to her.
You know, not rare that she was murdered.
But the other piece of this is, you know, that exactly as you say, you know,
people tell stories about dead Jews that make them feel better about themselves.
And ultimately, you know, which is that's the whole emphasis on righteous Gentiles is an example of that.
The whole emphasis on Jews who were just like you and me is an example of that.
But also, I mean, to me, the deeper issue is that, you know, the Nazi project was not about murdering 6 million people who were just like you and me.
The Nazi project was about erasing Jewish civilization, right?
I mean, that's why they're also, you know, not just, you know, slaughtering Jews, but also, you know, burning books, you know, like ripping up Jewish gravestones, right?
Like, why would you need to do that, right?
I mean, it's literally like, it's a complete destruction of Jewish civilization.
So erasure, Jewish civilization.
So, you know, what my question is, is like, why would we participate in that erasure?
Right?
And that is what you were doing is participating in that erasure by claiming, oh, you know, the reason this is sad is because these people are just like you and me.
So, you know, that is like the beginning of this.
But, but ultimately, so that is the premise of people up dead Jews.
And, you know, I was writing about this.
And, you know, I write about this sort of phenomenon in other places.
I write about, you know, what are called Jewish heritage sites, you know, in various places around the world that used to have Jewish community.
and don't anymore.
And, you know, as I put it in the book, like Jewish heritage sites,
it's such a wonderful marketing term because it sounds so much better than, you know,
property seized from dead or expelled Jews, right?
Like, who wants to go to all that on their vacation?
Right.
You know, Jewish heritage sites.
It sounds so nice.
You know, there's many different circumstances where I looked at this.
And, you know, I, um, it's, it's, you call it moral branding at one point.
It's moral branding.
Yes, yes.
And it's about telling me that are great rather than about actually grappling with
a place where my society is not.
Correct. About the fact that, exactly, that, like,
why are there no more Jews in your country?
Right. And this is sort of...
Look, so I was...
I wrote this book as an intellectual exploration, right?
To me, it wasn't about my personal life. It wasn't about, you know,
here's something that happened, you know, to me or to people I know.
It really was, like, looking at this. It's like historical phenomenon and intellectual,
you know, exercise. It was just like a phenomenon I had noticed in my work.
And... But what happened...
was it turned out that for my readers, this was a very personal experience.
So I had this like flood of readers who were just like, as I said, just telling me their horror stories with anti-Semitism.
And I mean, I don't even know where to begin.
I mean, it's like, you know, violence, you know, I mean, it's like, you know, literally like, you only hear about it when somebody's, when someone's dead, right?
You don't hear about all the times when someone isn't dead, right?
Like I remember went to speak in Columbus, Ohio.
This was before October 7th.
It was like in 22.
And, you know, I get off the plane and this, you know, I'm speaking at some synagogue and the rabbi's picking me up at the airport.
And he says, you know, I get in the car.
And he's like, you know, we're going to have lunch.
And I wanted to just chat with you and get to know you in this car ride.
But I have to tell you what you're walking into.
He says, you know, there's a threat against the K to 12 Jewish day school here in town.
You know, they just arrested the guy last night.
Community just found out about it this morning.
so we're all really shaken, and I'm like, you know, wow, that's a really terrible thing.
And then he, I'm like, that's, then he goes, no, that's not the terrible part.
I'm like, what's the terrible part?
He goes, who was this person who is, he's like this person was planning to shoot up the school
and murder the parents on the carpool line at the pickup.
And then the terrible part is who was this person?
It was the school security guard.
So there's the kind of story we're talking about.
So, I mean, a lot of stories like that, many, many stories like that.
And then many, just like more interpersonal stories about, you know, people would lost jobs.
I mean, like, people who couldn't get jobs and they knew this was, you know, it was very, you know, the toll, but this was why.
I mean, this is bottomless, bottomless.
And that was before October 7th.
So since October 7, for me, it wasn't before.
Since October 7th was speaking in Florida at one point, in Illinois, in New York, people telling me that they'd had this, this run-in, this abusive conversation or this abusive actual violence or this, you know, defacing of synagogues.
Every synagogue I speak to now, this wasn't true five years ago.
Every synagogue I speak to has fences like banks.
And you just can't...
You kill me at my events.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, that's happened to me.
So, I mean, yeah, it's like, you know, this is sort of just, yes.
So since October 7th's just become outrageous.
And, you know, look, I got dragged into this even more.
I can talk more about this if you want.
Like, I was, right after October 7th, I got pulled into this anti-Semitism advisory group
at Harvard.
advising the former president of Harvard on this topic who did not take a whole lot of our advice.
It was an absolute disaster.
And in fact, it went so badly that I ended up as a witness in one of these congressional investigations of Harvard.
So that was a total nightmare.
Let me just ask.
You found them actually deeply uninterested.
The whole thing was an exercise.
And as we say in Hebrew, covering your ass.
Well, you know what?
It didn't start that way.
it did not start that way
because that was initially what I thought
and I was concerned about joining this group for that reason
and I was actually at first
very surprised that
I mean people were like oh this is just lip service like you said
I wish it was lip service because I was like at these meetings
with the president and the provost and like all these
the top you know administrators at Harvard like
twice a week for hours
I mean this was huge amount of time they devoted
to this
you know so it was not
initially that but what happened
was like, you know, it's like the, you know, the minute my name became public that I was on
this committee, it was just a fire hose of students coming to me and other people on the
committee asking for help. And it was just like this absolute, and then, you know, we're dealing
with it's just this fire hose of incidents that's just like nonstop all day long. And it's just
it's so overwhelming. And, you know, and we were giving them recommendations about what to do
about it and it was like
it just sort of
slowly became queer that like
at every step of the way it was like
we would give them a recommendation they just wouldn't do
there would be a reason why they wouldn't do it
there was specific to that incident
yeah right it was like you know we can't
do this video it's like you know there's
yeah it was it was everything right
and then ultimately what was revealed in that
congressional hearing you know the sort of infamous
congressional hearing where that you know she ended up
you know losing her position from this was
you know
Ultimately, I was like, you have to, like, the thing that you needed to say was this is a hostile environment.
And, you know, they were not willing to say that.
And even though it's just so, so it was so obviously clear.
Okay.
So all of that was fascinating.
These are things I have learned from you.
These are, as I said, the beginning of vocabularies.
I did not have to explain what was happening to Jews I knew.
And now I do.
And thank you for that.
But you didn't answer my question.
What the heck is anti-Semitism?
Where does it come from? Why does it make sense to anybody?
I mean, speaking as a Jew, what a wild thing to believe.
Yes. So, look, I actually have thought about this very much in creating the Tell Institute,
which is my new educational nonprofit.
So I'm going to line this up with a couple of things I noticed that this project came out of these two
experience of mine in the past couple of years. One was this experience of this
disaster at Harvard from which I concluded, wow, college too late for, you know, education people intervening.
But, you know, the other thing that was I had done a project the year before that for the Atlantic magazine where I spent, I spent about a year and just sort of studying Holocaust education in America.
And, you know, sort of just realized, you know, was this people of dead Jews thing where it was, you know, people were, you know, was this worship of powerless Jews.
And but what I noticed, though, is, you know, I'm all going to give just the one example is that, you know, I was at the Dallas Holocaust Museum and I asked the docents, you know, when the students come through the museum, what do they usually ask? And this one docent told me, he's like, you know what they ask. They say, are there still Jews alive today. Because, you know, if you went to this museum, like, you know, you kind of wouldn't know. Well, because like, well, because Holocaust education in America, like, there are no, their only Jews between 1933 and 1945 in Europe. And their job is, they have one job, which is.
to die.
Right?
And what I started thinking about
the actual Jews before
nothing, nothing, before
or after, right?
Nothing.
And so, you know, what you learned about Jews
is that there are people who died in Europe between
1933 and 1945, the end.
And if that's the only thing you knew about Jews,
and, you know, then TikTok tells
you that they're white
European colonizers who have nothing
to do with the Middle East. Like, you know,
that completely comports with what you weren't
in school, that Jews are these
people who died in Europe, right? It's like, you know, the sort of ridiculousness of like, well,
why aren't we teaching people who Jews are in public school, in public school? And, you know,
you could say like, oh, you know, there's, if you think about like a school curriculum,
like, you could say like, oh, look, there's a lot of people who are maybe not in this
high school history textbook. You know, the Yazidis probably aren't in that high school history
textbook either. But the problem with that argument is like, you know, Yazidis are not foundational
to world history and Western civilization.
I mean, yeah, if I was teaching history in Syria, okay.
But it's like you can't understand a lot of Western civilization and world history
if you don't know anything about Jews.
Like you can't understand Christianity.
You can't understand the Islam.
You can't understand the Enlightenment.
It's like, you know, there's so many things that make no sense.
So, but to go back to your question of anti-Semitism, why the Jews, at first I thought like,
okay, what's missing here is telling this like, you know, quote, positive story about Jewish
civilization and that's what's missing, instead of just telling this, quote, negative story about
anti-Semitism.
But I actually now have come to this realization.
And this is the realization around which I've built this Tell Institute.
My realization is that actually, these are not two separate stories.
They are the same story.
The story of the foundations of civilization and the story of the dynamics of anti-Semitism for, you
and I don't know, 2,500 years, it's the same story because the foundations of Jewish civilization
are, if you just think about the very basics of this, like monotheism, belief in one God,
resistance to idolatry, resistance to other gods.
You know, today we hear that, we think it's like a spiritual idea.
In the ancient areas, this is a political idea.
Because in the ancient areas, you have all these societies that have lots of gods, and usually
one of the gods is the dictator.
So when the Jews say that they don't bow to other gods, what they're saying is that they don't bow to tyrants.
And even if you think about the whole, you know, another basic premise of Jewish civilization is this like text-based law, right?
That, you know, in Jewish belief, this is a, you know, God-given law.
But, you know, when you can look at this and say like, oh, you know, some of these laws that are in the Torah, they're also in the code of Hamarabi.
But here's what's distinct about it.
What happens when Hamarabi dies?
You have this idea of this law that is above any, you know, that isn't tied to an individual
rule. It's not tied to a dictator, right? You have also in Judaism, this idea of interpreting
the law, that this is a constant ongoing process that's about productive debate, right? It's
about Mahloka al-ashem Shemayimayim, an argument for the sake of heaven, and that that's the only
way that you're going to get to the meaning of the law in a particular situation, that this is a
living thing. You know, those ideas are very, you know, natural to people who are Jewish, who
of grown up in this culture and civilization.
Ultimately, you know, Jewish civilization is an anti-terranical movement,
and it's an anti-hierarchical movement, and it's a non-conformist movement.
When you have an anti-terranical movement, it pisses off tyrants.
When you have an anti-hierarchical movement, when you have a non-conformist movement,
it pisses off dominant societies that need everybody to be just like them in order to validate their opinion.
And that, you know, so to me, so ultimately the way we've designed this.
And so every converting ideology, whether it's a monophistic one or Marxist or whether anybody who thinks everybody has to agree is going to have a problem with Jews.
Correct, correct. So ultimately, you know, this is an anti-teratical movement.
That's why, like, ultimately, this is like a foundational.
civilizational idea about freedom and responsibility. So I say both of those things,
freedom because we have this liberation narrative and responsibility because we have this legal
concept of interpreting law. I mean, those are foundational things. And it is always going to
piss off tyrants. And so ultimately, the way we teach about anti-Semitism in the Tell Institute,
so I'll back up for a moment what the Tell Institute is. I founded this this year. This is,
We are just, our website just went live, the tell institute.org.
Our purpose is to teach about, thank you, the foundations of Jewish civilization to a broader public starting in K-12 schools.
Not specifically, everybody.
The whole, oh, no.
Specifically everybody.
Yes, exactly.
So, you know, so I encourage your listeners, if anyone is a, you know, especially people who are educators who want to be involved, please come visit us at the tell institute.org.
we have created a sort of a start here set of curriculum lessons for introducing this idea of Jewish civilization and the dynamics of anti-Semitism.
And ultimately living Jewish civilization in public school.
And the way this is set up is like it's a frame for whatever you might already have.
Like it's a frame that can go around, let's say, if you already are required to teach Holocaust education in school.
right? If you already have, you know, ancient civilizations in your school, if you already have, you know, there's a variety of other places where it can go in a curriculum. We also have a program that's, we actually have one of our pilot sites is in the Jewish community. It's in a large reform synagogue where they're doing this as part of their Benay Mitzvah program. So again, that goes to your question about, you know, creating this thickness of Jewish experience. But our goal ultimately is in the same way that we now expect any educated American to know the very basic facts of the Holocaust, which
unfortunately, as you point out, is being eroded.
But in the same way, we expect any educated American to know the basic facts of the Holocaust.
I would expect any educated American to know the very basic facts of Jewish civilization.
So, ultimately, the way we teach about anti-Semitism in this curriculum, we do not teach it as, this is a social prejudice, it's, you know, bigotry.
We teach it as a lie that people use to gain or maintain power.
And the lie is always the same.
The lie is Jews are the obstacle to what you value most.
And the only thing that changes through different historical moments, different settings, is what you value most.
Yeah.
And the lie is consistent.
And so that is the way we structure this.
And we have case studies where we look at this that are, some of them are, you know, there's certainly pre-Holocast.
There's even some that are pre-Christian.
We have post-Holocast case studies, including our last case study that we look at actually is the U.N. Durbin conference in South Africa in 2001.
It was a conference against racism that became this just the anti-Semitic hate fest.
We look at how that happened.
But ultimately, to me, it is intricately connected to the content of Jewish civilization because, and the challenge that Jewish civilization pulls that I'm going to say that again.
It is intimately connected.
Anti-Semitism is intimately connected to the content of Jewish civilization because it is a response to the challenge that Jewish civilization poses to any society or group of people who want to conform and dominate.
I want to say two things.
I have met a lot of young Jews on college campuses who came to my talks.
So I guess that would be self-selecting nerdy young Jews.
but nevertheless, they don't know their story.
And when they learn the most basic outline of their story, they are immunized.
If I see a kid on a campus, whether it's Harvard or Brown or Columbia,
and they say to me, everybody around me is anti-Zionist.
And then we have a five-minute conversation about how Israeli Jews are actually desperate refugees
who had literally nowhere else to go because of immigration quotas.
The British weren't giving them visas to India.
never mind visas to Britain,
including after the Holocaust,
where there are hundreds of thousands
rotting in DP camps
that are former concentration camps like Bergen-Belsen,
still on German soil
until 1946 and 47 and 48,
they literally are refugees with no other choice.
I, we walk through this history,
and these kids, you know,
dozens of times,
and from emails I've gotten from talks
that I did with this material online
hundreds and hundreds of times.
And I like to think not everybody
rates and email. I like to think many thousands
have told me
you know, I didn't just
become right wing instead of left wing.
Like that doesn't mean Israel is behaving okay
in, you know, I don't know what, settlement
policy in the West Bank. I
did not change your politics.
But what you will do if you
know the Jews actual story, your own
actual story is you're no longer
able to be, you're totally
inoculated and immune to the bigotry
to the demand that the Jews of Israel stop
existing, these last living Jews of the Eastern
hemisphere, you become immunized to the bigotry and you become better at actually preaching
your values and your own politics. In other words, if you have a critique of Israel, but you know
who the Israelis are, you can actually convince Israelis and talk to Israelis and you won't fall
into the traps that they're trying to sell you in these activist crowds, in these anti-Israel
crowds about Israel being dismantleable or, you know, they're being a morality and actually
wanting Israel destroyed. And so these kids find their footing. They feel a
kind of psychological stabilizing because they live inside this whirlwind, this libel campaign,
this attempt to minimize them and shrink them.
And the second point just I wanted to make about this is that just this deep phenomenal ignorance
is the Jews' weakness right now.
And American Jews and Canadian Jews and British Jews, their kids don't know their story.
And so someone else is stepping into write their story for them.
And it is a historical and deeply bigoted.
because if you're obsessed with the story of the Jews,
you're probably not telling it right.
That's just a thing.
Why would you be obsessed with?
And so you're solving,
I don't know other initiatives like this.
And this is phenomenally important.
And I want to use just this tiny little platform of this podcast to say,
people have to get behind you and download this material.
Teach it to your kids.
Okay, I'm not talking to donors here.
Also donors, by the way.
Derek could use the help.
This is the answer.
This is the answer to the great crisis on college campuses.
This is the answer of the great crisis in Jewish day schools.
This is the answer.
Dozens of people working in different day schools, including the heads of curriculum or the heads of schools all over the United States.
Literally Jewish day schools have asked me for help in history curriculum.
I'm an Israeli journalist who moonlighted as a side hustle as an informal history teacher.
And there's so little that they even find themselves coming to me.
And so this is the answer.
So this is what happened to me,
because look,
I was getting asked
to all these questions too
and I'm like literally
I'm a novelist
and my next book
is a comic book about a talking goat.
Right?
I'm like,
why are you coming to me?
But then I realize, as you say,
yes, you're in literature.
You're not actually.
Yeah, but like I,
what I had to do is like, you know,
but I'm not a teacher, right?
I mean, I'm a professor,
but like, you know, there's a whole different
skill set for teaching, you know,
classrooms and public schools
and all this sorts of things.
And I want to be clear, like,
you can't like go to my website
and just download this.
like this is like a trade, you know, um, what's going to happen is like, contact us, let us know,
you know, what kind of setting you're in. And then I can, you know, then we can talk about like,
I have this curriculum and then I would be able to train your staff on this is basically what
it comes down to. Um, in, you know, in public school in a, yeah, so like, yeah, no, I don't just like
slap stuff up online because, you know, the other, and I will tell you the reason we don't slap it up
online is because we're, this is new. We are testing this. I have a hypothesis.
right? This is a hypothesis that this kind of education can change people's minds and
attitudes. But, you know, I don't know if I'm right or right or not. So, you know, in each
place where I'm doing this, I'm gathering, you know, I'm going to want to do surveys and gather
data and things like that and adjust it to, you know, what works and what doesn't. And so that's
why I'm not just like, here's a curriculum that came out of my brain and my team's brain. No, I,
I want to refine it. So, but I, and I'm also looking for partners in this. And I will tell you,
this goes, you know, you talked about it from the Jewish point of view of people, you know, having this sort of core of integrity and knowing their story. And that is part of our project. We are, like I said, we, you know, we're doing this. And we have one of our pilot sites is a reform synagogue doing this as part of their Benadimits for program. Love to do more of those in the Jewish community. But this is our pilot sites already have been in non-Jewish schools. And we've already done. So we haven't, we haven't yet done the student facing piece. That was what we're testing now this fall. So I don't have like results back for.
that yet, but what I have seen already is the teacher trainings that we've done for predominantly
non-Jewish teachers. And I will tell you, it's kind of mind-blowing because there's just so much
more ignorance than malice. There is so much more ignorance than malice, and that is such an
opportunity. And the teachers who have come to our trainings, these are people who are not Jewish,
they're just like, this story is amazing.
Because it is an amazing story.
And, you know, I've had people, like, I remember this one woman who is an African-American
principal at, you know, Title I school.
This is, you know, a school that, you know, gets a lot of federal assistance.
It's a majority, you know, mostly minority students.
She came up to us after one of our presentations and just had her tears in her eyes and just said,
I, these are her words, I want to bring this story back to all of my black and brown students because they need this story.
I mean, I've had these, you know, I've, and it's been fascinating to me speaking to these teachers.
And, you know, from a very diverse group of teachers, you know, blue states, red states, you know, there are the teachers who are in there during the beginning of the training, you know, yelling about the genocide in Gaza at the beginning of the training.
And then at the end, we're having a dialogue.
and, you know, they're the teachers who are starting out by being like, you know,
the problem is people are so unchurched in this country.
And, you know, then we're having a dialogue.
And, you know, so, I mean, this is like something that is resonant with a lot of people
because ultimately it is a story about freedom and responsibility.
Right?
I mean, that's ultimately what it is.
And, you know, this is a story that's, you know, resonant, you know, for a lot of people
and certainly for a lot of Americans.
So, you know, I think that there's just an, I think that there's, yeah, there's a lot more ignorance than malice and that is an opportunity.
So, yes, I hope that some, you know, any of your listeners who are interested in this project will look into it.
And especially those of your listeners who are educators who will want to be involved.
Dara, people of dead Jews was felt like the opening shot of an American Jewish return, reawakening.
And that felt like to me, and apparently it's a bestseller, so I'm not an idiot.
Like that apparently was a lot of people.
Thank you for everything you do, and thank you for coming on.
Thank you for everything that you're doing.
And I hope this day that we're recording will fulfill our many hopes for the future
and looking to better days for all of us.
Thank you for everything you're doing toward that end.
Amen.
