Asmongold TV - Democrats are 100% cooked | Asmongold

Episode Date: July 11, 2025

Democrats are 100% cooked Subscribe to Asmongold TV on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@AsmonTV Disclaimer: This podcast is an independent project created by a viewer using content from the YouTube channel Asmongold TV. The purpose is to make his content more accessible to those who prefer audio formats, helping more people engage with the ideas presented in his videos. This podcast is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially associated with Asmongold. All rights to the original content remain with Asmongold TV. If there are any concerns or requests regarding this podcast, please reach out. -------------- Keywords: world of warcraft, mmo gaming, gaming news, gaming community, streamer content, pc gaming Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This was really funny to see happen. It was. This was really, really funny. Let me see if I can find this and pull it up. Apparently, they're having a, they're having a crisis. They are. Like, things are looking dire. After this, after this speech, this speech was a really, really bad one for him. I'll go ahead and I'll play this.

President Trump right now is giving remarks from the White House. House from the Oval Office, and as soon as we get those taped remarks, we will play them out for all of you to see. But in the meantime, Democrats are in panic mode, reportedly calling an emergency meeting yesterday of a dozen House Democrats. Now, this comes after that embarrassing display during President Trump's joint address to Congress, including the moment Al Green shouted and waved his cane that led to his censure. That's your warning. Oh, by the way, he's now claiming that the reason why he got removed is, and I know you won't believe this, racism. That's right. He got removed because of racism. Now, why is that? Why is that the reason?

Nobody really knows, but let me see if I can pull this up and show you guys. Just so, because this just came out today. There we go. Al Green accuses Speaker Mike Johnson of kicking him out of the Trump address due to his skin color. Uh-huh. Right. That's the reason. Yep. I'm sorry, but like, that shit is D-R.

Nobody's believing that anymore. They kicked you out because of your skin color. No. So stupid. Hello, everyone. This is out numbered on this Friday. He was kicked out because of the content of his character. He's kicked out.

He's fucking yelling interrupting his speech. Literally any other situation where a person is doing something and other people have come to observe that person doing something. If one other person in the audience starts interrupting everything, that person eventually gets thrown out. You do that in a concert, you get thrown out. You do that in a movie, you get thrown out. There's no situation and no place. You do that in a comedy show. They make fun of you. Then you get thrown out. And then that's it. At school, yeah, you do that at school. You get

detention. His dumbass is skin color? It's a mindset. Unfortunately, you mentioned optics before. Do you think this Democrats made, do you think the Democrats made him interrupt because of his skin color? No, I don't think so. I think he acted by himself.

Billy McAnne, here with my co-host, Emily Campano. Also joining us, Molly Line, Fox News correspondent. Marie Harf, Fox News contributor and former State Department spokesperson under President Obama. And look who it is for the Oh, boy. Very first time on the couch. House Speaker Mike Johnson. So good to have you here, Speaker Johnson. So good to be with you. I've been wanting to do this for a long time. So thanks for the opportunity, ladies.

We've been wanting to have you and we are quite excited. You know, I woke up this morning and I'm reading and, you know, all the congressional publications, Politico, Punch Bowl, Axios. Here's what they said. Majority did the same thing. She wasn't kicked. Well, they should have kicked her out. like if i was byd not to kick their ass out yeah i mean like happened fuck yeah i got rid of this is after the censure of al green you have political playbook citing axios that says there was a very unhappy house democratic leadership meeting they had to come to jesus meeting with a dozen house lawmakers surprised they called that elucidating on that said that this included maxwell frost jasmine Crocket to very outspoken Democrats, and they used the word that they were be rated for their behavior. How ordinary is it? Good. They acting like clowns, and nobody likes that shit.

They're obnoxious and fucking annoying. Yeah. That's the real reason. Members of their own party. That's what it is. And were you surprised by this? I wasn't surprised. It is extraordinary, but they did make fools of themselves on the House floor. And everyone saw it. Everyone in the country. It was a reminder to them why we won so decisively in this last election cycle and why they're lost. No, he right. He 100% right. No, people don't want to vote for that fucking bullshit. It's annoying. People hate that shit. Fossed. It's obnoxious. They're really a party in total disarray. As you see it on vivid display right now. They don't have an identified leader. They don't have any vision for where they're going. They don't have a

platform that they can run on because it was repudiated overwhelmingly in the election. And so they're sort of flailing about. And it blew up on the House floor, and I think they deeply regretted. At least some of them do. Others apparently didn't get the message of the election. No, I guess not. No, Al Green among them, he becomes the fourth House Democrat to be censured in the last four years. And Hakeem Jeffries, your counterpart on the other side of the aisle, had this to say about the censure.

The censure resolution put forth by extreme mega Republicans is not worth. my god. Just sit down and listen to the fucking speech and quit yelling. It's not hard. It's so easy. It's so fucking easy. Why can't you just do that? Oh my god. That's not extreme that it was written on. Wait what? He says it's not worth the paper put forth by extreme mega Republicans is not worth the paper that it was written on. He says it's not worth the paper, and House Freedom Caucus members are asking to put forward a resolution to remove Al Green from his committee assignments. What are your thoughts on that? Well, the interesting thing is he was censured for disrupting the proceedings of the House.

And while I was reading the censure that was voted in, by the way, by 10 House Democrats who joined Republicans in that, they disrupted the proceedings of the House. So there's some irony there. We have to keep decorum. We have to keep control of the proceedings because we're the great- Exactly. Fucking exactly. Like there's a time and a place to act like a fool. And in the middle of the speech is not the time.

And I think this is like more kind of like, you know what I was saying about how people like on the internet, they have like this mindset that if they are morally outraged enough, it justifies any bad behavior that they do. So like if I'm mad, I can do anything that I want. And I think that just like average Americans are tired of that fucking shit. They're tired of having people that have no self-control. And not even that he does. I think the Al Green has self-control. I think he's doing it as a political stunt, right? He does.

But I think he represents people that have no self-control popping off like that and then causing trouble and then acting like victims. It's exhausting. It's childish as fuck. Yeah. It's so, we're tired of letting mentally unstable people run the show. Yeah. It's like, and this is the same thing with other issues where somebody just gets really mad about something.

And they think that if they're sufficiently aggrieved, that now they're justified to do anything that they want. Fuck that. It's the limited body in the world. We need to act like it. And I think this went way over the line. By the way, these censures, this is not a normal thing. I mean, he was only the 29th member of the half. Off base? I'm not off base. Watch his response. I'm not off base. It's in the middle of a speech. Shut the fuck up and listen to the speech or get the fuck out. Imagine if every time we had to have everybody sit down and listen to a speech, somebody popped off because they didn't want to hear it. Do you imagine the chaos that would be? Do you imagine how insane that would be? You wouldn't be able to do a fucking thing. You couldn't get anything done. You got to think about this.

That happens every time, bro. No, it doesn't. He took accountability. They all do it? I think that that's your argument is that it's okay for him to be stupid because the other ones are stupid. No. That doesn't work. That just makes you stupid too.

It was above the pale. He's the first person to ever be removed from the floor during a presidential address. It was appropriate. And we've got to maintain control. You know, Emily's going to hop in here, but just to follow up, what about his committee assignments? Do you think that's on the table? Well, I talked to Freedom Caucus members and other Republicans who are deeply concerned about this. They say, we have to restore control one way or the other, and they need to be real consequences,

and it's something we'll be looking at early next week. So, Mr. Speaker, it seems that there are some reasonable heads prevailing, right? We have Michigan State Senator Mallory McMorrow. She says, look, these Democrats are sick and tired of performative nonsense. We don't want to see our elected officials trying to be. Yeah, that people are tired of not being able to afford food. and then having all these people show up in pink dresses and pink pantsuits and then holding up a sign that says not true. Or like writing on a whiteboard.

Cute or clever, she says. So back to Tuesday night. Peggy Noonan, Democrat, esteemed WSJ opinion editor, wrote a thoughtful op-ed today where she said, look, I came to three conclusions after Tuesday. She said they're not serious people talking about her own party, these elected officials who refused to stand up, who refused to clap, Two, their job was to show they are an alternative to Mr. Trump, and instead they proved why he won. And then her third and most important, she said, they will continue to lose for a long time. And she talked about how to stand and cheer, to show support for these incredible Americans that were there that evening was to show love. And instead, she said they brought the hate.

So my question. Is she right about this? Yeah, they look like retards. They look like angry retards. Quote the black eyed peas, which I got to see in concert a hundred years ago. Where is the love speaker? And do you think that Democrats will listen to these reasonable voices? I think most of them won't.

And you saw that. He's right. They won't because they've been totally captured by their radical side. That's it. And you're even seeing this happen with, like, there's been a lot of people on the internet that were really mad at Gavin Newsom for saying that like he didn't support like transgender women and women sports. they were mad at him for that. And so now, like, I feel like there's been so much extremism. And I feel like one of the really big components of the extremism,

I think was probably like the Israel-Palestine thing. And that's probably the biggest example of the divide. I think that's the biggest example of the extremism really kind of being dialed up to 11. Like, Gavin made a Calian abomination. Fuck Gavin. I'm just saying that, like, a lot of people that are on his side are now against him because they're mad that he said that. There's a lot of extremists.

They're doubling down, tripling down on their failed policies and their message. And it does not resonate with the people. Peggy Noonan used to be a speechwriter for Ronald Reagan. I mean, she's pretty keen observer of politics and human nature. And what she's seeing here is a trend that no one can deny. Actional like goofy fucking retarts. That's it. Nobody wants to see that.

And like also the majority Taylor Green, or where the fuck her name is, when I think of a retard, if I turn to a page on a dictionary, I wouldn't be surprised if I saw her face. Really? Somebody got to say it, right?

Damn. Democratic Party has left the American people. When I was a kid, I grew up in Louisiana in the deep south, there weren't many Republicans. I didn't know many. That party left the people of my state and every other state over the years. And now they went through that

woke progressive nonsense. They went so vigorous and aggressive. They did. This is a disagree. We got, we'll pull them up real quick. Just real quick.

Why was it in Democrats of Power? You'd not look at all the antics was right at the time? I did. I had a video about January 6th. Like, it's also I didn't cover as much of that topic in general. This is the only argument

that people like this have. But they do it too. That doesn't work on me. It doesn't. It doesn't. It doesn't work on me. It doesn't work. Like, because I don't support that either.

So it's not relevant. Like, you're arguing with somebody that doesn't exist. Maximum cope. Yeah, this is crazy cope. Like, that's not it. The classic argument, destiny loves using. Oh, that's, I don't know about destiny, but like, I'm saying it's hypocritical. And not that they're right.

I disagree with Al Green. Okay, well, they were bad. No talking during downtime like you're doing now with Trump? No, it's, it's. simple. Like if you're interrupting the speech, then you're wrong. It's that simple. That's it. That's it. That's the end of it. You're wrong. You sit down and listen. It's almost like the pendulum swung all the way to the left. It's not hypocritical. And now it's sort of moving back. And what President Trump represents in our party by extension now is a force that is moving that pendulum back to what President Trump says is common sense. And that was long overdue. And the people embrace it. And The polls verify that they're in favor of what we're doing, restoring common sense and our conservative principles, which I know that we can demonstrate are good for everyone.

It will lead to human flourishing. And then we'll keep these new demographics of folks that we gained in this election cycle and governed for many years to come. Yeah. Speaker, it's so interesting. A lot of Democrats remember Joe Wilson yelling, you lie at Barack Obama and Marjorie Taylor Green and Lauren Boebert saying some really awful things to Joe Biden. So the state of the union in general has become a little bit more of a circus, I think. So Democrats will also remember that. But you're right in saying that Democrats are searching for a message and a leader.

No, I'm a Democrat. I looked at what happened on Tuesday night and did not like a lot of it, right? What I did like was Alyssa Slotkin, the senator from Michigan, who was the official response, who's a moderate, worked for- literal dog shit, terrible fucking response, joke response, another fucking, like, uh, It was just terrible. Like, I, I'm trying to think, like, how could I even explain the way that I was thinking about it? Uh, it's a Karen response? Yeah, it's a care.

Basically, I mean, I don't even know. Like, it just, it was just weird. You know what it reminded me of? It reminded me a lot of, like, I don't know. I'd have to really say it. Like, Bernie Sanders about what'd she say? Just a bunch of stupid shit. Like, I don't remember even looking at all of it.

Can you find it and show it? Why do you first on how the Democrats behave, now on what Trump said? How is this more egregious to you? Because it's ridiculous to act like this. You look like a fucking idiot. The George W. Bush CIA, right? Worked on Iraq and other intelligence issues.

And she came out and said, prices are higher. The thing, you know, they're firing veterans all around the country. We are hearing in town halls that voters, you know, Democrats may not be winning them over quite yet, but Republicans are starting to lose them. So I'd love your thoughts on sort of her message. There is a moderate wing of the party, and it was on display in that speech, but also what your members are starting to hear.

The moderate wing isn't what those people want. That's the problem. That's not what, there are too many of them that have been radicalized. We're seeing these town halls where members are getting berated. You know, I lived through the Obamacare town halls. And I learned as a Democrat, you know, once you start getting those, you know, canceling town halls, things don't look good for you. So what do you make of sort of this moment and that part of the party and also how your members are hearing from folks? Well, look. And are they going to cancel town halls?

I'll say this. The president is now, what is it, 45 days into his administration. Something like that. We're transitioning from binomics in the terrible economy that was delivered by the last administration. It takes a while to turn that ship around, but we are doing that. And the Congress is working to codify all the executive orders that the president is doing. But with regard to the town halls, look, I mean, we have Republicans who want to be. want to go out and be among their constituents and hear their concerns and dialogue with them.

It's a big part of the job. But the problem is they're being ambushed right now by, but or some, in many cases, paid protesters. You've got George Soros funded groups. They're very well organized. It's actually just got, people are figuring out that a lot of these groups that are protesting Tesla are being funded. Yeah. That's one thing Democrats do very well is this organization, right? And they go in, they go an hour or two early before the event. They fill all the seats. And so the actual constituents. I mean, it makes sense, right? I mean, a lot of these people taking off work. Like, how can this many people come and take off work? Well, of these Republican members can't actually make it into the arenas. And so it's not a productive dialogue at all. They're just walking into an ambush.

So we've, we've encouraged our members to think thoughtfully about that. There are a lot of ways now with technology. This is why I generalize the country. It's annoying. It's literally 50-50 right now. I think that there's a lot of people like that, there's a lot of people that don't like the way that Trump acts, but they agree with a lot of the things that Trump says. And I think that there are enough people, like Trump is like a super polarizing person. And so I think that there are a lot of people that probably are against a lot of the extreme radical viewpoints. And those viewpoints are the ones that are really alienating people. It's not 50-50?

Yeah, clearly it's not. I think that if you go and you ask a lot of average people like what they think about this stuff, because like, again, like you're talking about issues. Like look at opinion polls. Like you're thinking about like Donald Trump. Like that's like thinking about one person. It doesn't really matter, right? What you really should look at are what the opinion polls are for different issues.

And you'll see that in a lot of these opinion polls, it's not 50-50. It's not. It's like 60-40, which again, 60% is half again more than 40%. That's like if you have two people, they have three. If you have 10, they have 15. That's not even close. You're thinking about one issue? I'm thinking about multiple issues.

Look at mass deportation, transports. Those are two issues right there. Be in constant dialogue with their constituents. You can do telephone town halls and get 10,000 people on the phone at the same time. You can have small group meetings with industry or organization groups or various parts of your community and to be very productive. So we want to do the job, do it well, do it efficiently and effectively. and going, walking into a stage production like that doesn't serve anyone's interest. Speaker, Johnson, I know Molly has a question for you, and we're going to get to that in just a moment.

For vaccine transport, yeah. I noticed something this week. I looked back at Biden's State of the Union last year, and I saw you stand when he mentioned John Lewis. And I saw you stand when he mentioned standing as America to get the hostages freed from Hamas. You were able to recognize those common humanity moments, and it doesn't appear that your colleagues on the other aisle were able to, to do that for DJ Daniel, a cancer survivor. Why do you think you could recognize that, but they could not? It's a great question. It was shameful. I mean, they didn't stand for the families of, you know, Lake and Riley and victims of crime and all of these things. The hostage

who was released after his elderly mother pleaded for all of that from the tragedy in Israel. I mean, they missed their opportunity. And look, a state of the union or a joint address is meant to be, they're supposed to be unifying moments. It's something we all join in together. It used to be a celebrated event of America. Not anymore. And so you look for those moments that you can join and all join together. President Trump provided many of them, and they just sat through it all.

And so I think it sent a profound message to the people. It was shameful. And I don't know how they explained their way out of that. Yeah. Well, you know, we talk about the bingo cards and the waving the cane. At the same time, there's an opportunity here for more moderate Democrats. Marie was talking about this to... They get pushed out.

That's the reason why. They're getting pushed out. Yeah. So, emotional nonsense, it is. Too many mask off moments? Yeah, exactly. And how could it stay a union unifying when 50% of the speech was ego boosting?

Well, I mean, like, the fact is that, like, I mean, again, if you're not standing up and clapping for, like, people getting rescued from, like, being a hostage or whatever, I mean, the reality is that if you're not doing that, Like, it is definitely an optics play by doing that, right? Like, number one, it's like you're, you are doing optics by doing this. But if you don't play into that, what you signal the people is that it's more important for you to play on your side than for you to acknowledge obvious truths.

And a lot of people are exhausted by that. It's exhausting to have to deal with somebody who cares more about making, you know, like looking like, looking like. they're on the right side than doing the right thing. And I think this has been like an ongoing resentment that's been building for a long time that people are tired of performative like behavior whenever the people that are performative are then when they're faced with actually like being able to set aside differences for a greater good. They're unwilling to do that.

And I think that's really what the issue is. Yeah, they're selfish. Exactly. I'm exhausted by that shit. people are not standing up to clap people being used as political props well anything that's going to happen like that is a political prop what i'm saying is that it is a political prop but there are some political things that can be universal wins and if you are unwilling to give any ground to anybody who you disagree with because you're viewed you're viewing it as if optically this is giving them one point point, what you will do is you will actually subtract the point from yourself. Because now you're behaving in a reactionary way and you're not acting like a normal person based off of what you're seeing. To come forward and appear sane in comparison. So there is this window of opportunity as

the Democrats are trying to figure out where they're going to go and how they get back on the map. And while they're definitely throwing a little spaghetti against the wall in a lot of different respect, here we are. We're about to go into a pretty intense period where we're going to we're going to be talking about money. You know, this is what Congress does. And there's a lot of criticism right now, and the Democrats want to put language in about how much power President Trump has

and what Republicans in Congress will do to rein that in. What do you picture in the coming weeks ahead, hopefully not any, you know, Serbian legislative smoke bombs being tossed around. Expect a little more peace than that. Well, that's right. And this illustrates that the radical extremists in the Democrat Party have outnumbered.

I don't think they're going to pop off again. I don't think so. I think that it made them look too bad. I very, very rarely think that they're going to have another pop-off. I don't think it's going to happen. The moderates, there's only a small handful of moderates left, and that's been on display here over and over. And they tried to do it, to your point, in the appropriations process.

The Republican appropriators are negotiating in good faith. They're exchanging top-line negotiation numbers back and forth. And about two weeks ago, the Democrats threw into this outrageous requirement. the stipulation, hey, we won't fund the government unless you tie the hands of the executive branch, unless you put in all these stipulations and you take away the authority that they're duly allowed in our system. And we're not going to do that. They know we're not going to do that. So it looked like they were trying to engineer a shutdown of the government, which is terribly irresponsible. We're not going to do that. We will be running a clean CR next week. And what that will do is allow us time,

allow the White House time, the administration to continue the doge efforts, finding all these extraordinary levels of savings and waste from... Transgender mice. On abuse. We'll be able to incorporate that into the budgeting for FY26, which will start immediately after we're done next week. And so that's going to be a great

innovation. I think it's going to change the way government works. You're going to make gay mice next. Across this parking lot from the White House about a week ago, late at night, we're meeting and I said, we're both getting increasingly excited about all the savings that he's finding. I said, we're looking at this differently. You think of it as a data analyst and a

scientist. I'm looking at this as a constitutional law attorney and a historian. Elon, it's not just about saving money. This is revolutionary. We're going to restore the founder's original vision for the Constitution. They wanted a limited federal government that had careful oversight by Congress, but Congress hasn't been able to do that because they've been hiding the data. He's found it. It's going to change the way we do government. Speaker Johnson, you had a viral moment with Vice President J.D. Vance during the State of the Union. It was a, well, joined address to Congress, I should say. It was a hot mic moment. We want to play that. By the way, I think the speech is going to be great.

But I don't know how you do this for my audience. The hardest thing was doing it during Biden when the speech was a stupid campaign. Man. I mean, what's the backstory? Did you not know your mic was on? Oops. They turned these mics off all the time. I didn't know it was on.

And I, you know, I'm sorry. Sorry about that. But I was candid there. It was candid. It was funny. And I got to say, you know what, my sister is in social media. It says organic works. And social media loved that moment.

You joined the ranks of Britney Spears and everyone else who at Hot Mike moment speaker. It's totally cool. I think that's actually a really good point that this girl is bringing up is that a lot of the people view something like that as organic and authentic. And they view everybody coming with color-coated pantsuits and little signs that they're going to hold up all at the same time. They view that as performative and artificial. Well, you know, I'm a problem with what he's saying. makes him more personal. Well, he's not trying, like, it was just an accident that it was supposed to be private, but it, you know, they just had the mic on, right? So it's very different.

And the ranks about numbered here. Exactly. Yeah, no, I think that's exactly. People are tired of fake shit like that. Absolutely. But I did see this and I thought it was pretty funny. Authentic doesn't does not equal same. Yes, but people trust authentic more than they trust, uh, sorry, they trust authentic more than they trust anything else basically because at least they know they're getting a fair shake and they're being treated in a way that's like kind of accurate right and that's really the difference fake shit about transgender mice wasn't it transgenic it was trans something mice that's it they got to defund it guys

they got to stop it