Asmongold TV - Iran is done | Asmongold TV

Episode Date: August 15, 2025

Iran is done Asmongold show for all of his stream highlights, competitions, reactions & more. -------------------------- ---- Keywords: world of warcraft, pc gaming, game criticism, streamer podcast, gaming reactions Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

B-2 bombers on the move. Uh-oh. Breaking moments ago, new reports from open source plane spotters show six B-2 stealth bombers from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri appearing to head toward a U.S. Air Force Base in Guam. The B-2 can carry two 15-ton bunker buster bombs that could be used to target Iran's heavily fortified photo nuclear site. Yeah. This is a second U.S. aircraft carrier will arrive in the Middle East this weekend.

President Trump will return later today to the White House Foreign Intelligence Briefing. Welcome to Fox News Live on a busy news weekend. So they're bringing in the bombers. New air strikes from the Israeli Air Force against missile storage and launch infrastructure in Iran overnight, as the IDF says it has killed a commander of the Kud's Force. Oh, I'll watch that. Who is a key coordinator of weapons deliveries to Hamas. Fuck.

Fuck them, bro. That's a rip bozo. Got his ass. This new senior foreign of air force force. Greg Palcott is live in Tel Aviv with war. Hello, Greg. Hello, Mike. Yeah, we are into now day nine of the war between Israel and Iran and there are more raids on key Iranian targets as well as individuals. So they left the airport with half a tank of gas so they can carry the bomb. The facility was hit for the second time by Israel. The IAEA confirms Reefihan.

damage was done to the centrifuge construction facility. And another assassination by Israel, Said Izadi, a revolutionary guard commander who played a key role in the deadly October 7, Hamas attack against Israel, was taken out. I mean, at this point, if I was part of the Iran military, I'd just be like, guys, listen, I got to go. like I I've got a I got to get out I got to get out of here man like this is yeah this is my last this is my last day guys like I would leave yeah I would just like I would be like all right everybody I'll see y'all tomorrow I'd be like all right honey pack the shit let's fucking just start driving away and the idea of claims to have shot down nearly all 40 Iranian drones headed towards Israel this morning Tehran has had less success with these relatively slow moving projectiles. Here in Tel Aviv, after we watched overnight, a barrage of some five Iranian missiles all not down by Israeli defenses.

It has been relatively quiet, Knockwood. Evening usually sees more activity. And as you noted, Mike Fox News citing sources is reporting that six B2 stealth bombers have left their home base in Missouri, said to be headed to Guam, which is a bit closer and a bit of an easier run to Iran.

Now, Mike, that aircraft... I'm just going to fucking self-report. Okay. Yeah. Don't leak it? Uh-huh. Yeah, I had no idea where the fuck it is. It's the only one that can deploy the much-discussed bunker busting bombs.

It's okay. They don't speak English over there. They couldn't read the map. Deeply dug and a crucial fordo nuclear facility. Back to you. Greg Calcott, starting us. Off live in Tel Aviv, Greg, many thanks. President Trump will head back to Washington later today for a briefing on Iran after he would wait up to two weeks on a decision to strike the Middle Eastern country.

Nate Foy is traveling with the president in Bedminster, New Jersey. Oh, what do you say? Hey, Mike, good afternoon. So, yeah, the pieces on the chess board and the posturing ahead of a potential decision from President Donald Trump, which he promises is coming in the next two weeks, continues to develop. see why the fuck we're getting involved. Israel said they can do it. Just let them fucking do it. Yeah. I mean, like, of course we, like, I think it's like if we, like, it's better that

we bomb the nuclear facility than them having the nuclear facility. But if Israel can do it and we don't have to do anything, that's a win-win situation. We don't do shit. They don't have shit. up with according to that open source flight tracking data, those six B2 bombers. And according to the data that we are seeing in the refueling pattern of those planes, it appears that they left without a full fuel tank, which could indicate that they are in fact carrying those bombs on board. But the White House has not confirmed this independently.

We are working for that confirmation. But President Trump is at his Bedminster Club here today in New Jersey. He's going back to the White House later today where he will meet. with his national security team. And he spoke yesterday about that two-week timeline that he's promised. What he said? He's sitting here. Just made it up.

Just time to see whether or not people come to this. I'm giving them a period of time. We're going to see what that period of time is. But I'm giving him a period of time. And I would say two weeks would be the maximum. Mm-hmm. Now, Mike Trump also pushed back on Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu's comments.

that Israel is capable of destroying Iran's Fordo nuclear facility on its own. So the extremist hate America, Israel and Europe? How did Australia get left off? They're like us? I don't know. Like, what the fuck does Australia do? Nothing. The president said Israel has a limited capacity.

He also said his own national intelligence director was wrong when she testified before Congress in March saying that Iran was not pursuing a nuclear weapon. Yeah, I saw that. What intelligence do you have that Iran is building a nuclear weapon? Your intelligence community has said they have no evidence that they are at this point. Well, then my intelligence community is wrong. Who would the intelligence community said that? You're a director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. She's wrong.

Now, Gabbard responded on X, writing in part, quote, The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading straight. Wow, I would have never expected. News as a way to manufacture division. America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months. Now, in that same testimony before Congress in March, Gabbard testified that Iran has an unprecedented amount of enriched uranium in the White House's point. Why the fuck is this even a conversation? Like, we don't ever have conversations about Zimbabwe building a nuclear fucking bomb.

We never have conversations about a nuclear bomb being. built by fucking, I don't know, Madagascar, it's pretty fucking obvious that they're trying to do that. Like, how is anybody even thinking about this for a second?

Really? Like, it's crazy. It's obvious they're trying to do it. To that as evidence that there's no daylight between her and the president in his view of Iran's capabilities in regards to her previous testimony.

Trump is set to leave Benminster for the White House later this afternoon. We'll set it back to you, Mike. Nate Foley Live in the Garden State with the president. Nate, thanks very much. I'm seeing. Yeah, I mean, like, I'm not even sure, right? But, like, I've got a pretty good feeling that, I mean, it's hard to say.

But if they're already moving a lot of those bombers over there, it's a lot. It's a shut up the yapping retards saying we're doing something wrong. Maybe. I don't know. I see Iran's not building a nuclear weapon. Supreme Leader is not authorized nuclear weapons. nuclear weapons program. He's suspended. The IC is closely monitoring to see if they reauthorize the nuclear program. Yeah, no, I obviously like it, but it's not about whether

they have the program. It's about whether they can engage the program, right? I mean, obviously, like, if you have the tools to be able to do that and you can do it within a small period of time, I think that's really the issue more than anything, right? I mean, I would kind of, I would kind of guess a big Russian push against attacking Iran going off to. Yeah, I mean, well, the reason why Russia and China don't want Iran to be attacked is because Iran is a compromising force against America. And if Iran has nuclear weapons, that's another ally that they have that puts, that removes America's hegemony, right? I mean, that's obviously the reason why. It's just simply a strategic win for them if they don't have it. So, I mean, it's so fucking common sense.

I never heard Russia pushing this? No, they've said it multiple times. Russia's said multiple times They don't want to get the U.S. to get involved. And Russia even has nuclear scientists in Iran. But the thing is that also, apparently those nuclear scientists, they already came to an agreement with the Israeli government that they wouldn't be heard anyway. So it shouldn't even be an issue. So what is Iran done against America? They funded multiple terrorist groups that have killed Americans that have shut down trade routes that have bombed and destabilized the entire region. It's probably cost us collectively billions of dollars.

The thing is, like, Iran not doing something directly doesn't matter whenever they're paying people to do it on their behalf. Like, that's the difference. Like, I feel like people can't understand this distinction, but it very much exists. Just because somebody has a proxy doing something on their behalf, they are still responsible for doing that. They're the ones paying for it. They're cutting the checks. because some country's allowed to commit genocide, others aren't allowed to defend themselves, of course. I mean, you can say whatever you want, but I just don't want Iran to have a nuclear bomb.

Like, I mean, whatever your genocide, emotional argument, bullshit, what about this other thing? I don't care about any of that. I don't want to have a bunch of psychos that chant death to my country with nuclear weapons. Are you fucking retarded? Let me look at the other one. Straight to our top story this morning. Israel says it's currently striking military infrastructure in Iran after killing an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander, who they say funded and armed Hamas ahead of the

October 7th attacks in Israel. Mike Tobin is live in Tel Aviv with the very latest details. What a surprise. Good morning, Griff. Good morning, gang. Israeli fighter jets are active right now in the southwestern portion of Iran, according to the IDF, their striking targets. And this follows another round of Iranian missiles that flew at Central Israel last night. those missiles once again creating fireballs in the sky as they reentered the atmosphere Israeli missile interceptors in hot pursuit in the sky.

The town of Hulon next to Tel Aviv took a hit resulting in a fire on a top of an apartment building, no reports of injuries. This is the second time Halone has been hit in the past three days. Israeli war planes have been on the hunt in Iran. The IDF reports the assassination of key Iranian figures. One of them was struck in a car. Benham Shahriah. He is his name.

The IDF says he was a commander of the fourth. wars of transferred weapons. Say he was going up in a car? Damn. And I didn't even fuck up any of the other cars either. To Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthi rebels. The IDF also says he assassinated Said he is Adahi. Wait, two of them? God damn. He has said to have been one of the architects of the October 7 massacre and a key person in the relationship between Iran. I mean, I just, I can't see how anybody thinks that Iran is coming out of this ahead when they constantly have their guys getting murked like this. Really?

Like, yeah, I mean, it's happening over and over and over. Yeah, so Israel can be surgical? Yeah, clearly. And Hamas. He was killed behind out apartment in the Iranian town of Kuhm.

The destruction of Iran's missiles continues. The IDF estimates they have destroyed more than half of Iran's missile capability. What was to make sure that they are in disarray? That they have a hard time care. percent like five days ago or four days ago. So it seems like they're making good progress. Being out operations, obviously, if you don't keep pushing all the time, they're telling the truth, obviously. They might regroup. They might rearrange. But we're pushing all the time.

We're hunting down their commanders. We're hunting down their missile launches, making sure they don't have a second to regroup. See, this is the reason why I think they were trying to get, they were trying to come to the negotiation table with Trump and trying to, oh, we'll negotiate now. It's because they're going to try to leverage the possibility of them negotiating to try to get Trump to get Israel to stop attacking them so they can regroup. I think it's very tactical. They've rearranged their operations. And Iran's foreign minister Abbas Aradhi says the regime will not return to the negotiating table as long as Israeli strikes are going into Iran. Yeah, exactly, because they, yeah, they want to leverage that in order to hopefully have time to.

regroup. Back to you. Yep. And no indication, Mike, that's going to stop. Anybody could have expected that. It seems Israel is continuing to pretty much have a full core press, if you will. Yeah, sure. It's pretty obvious. Right. They have freedom of the skies over around having decimated their air defenses. And again, updating what we talked about just at the top of my life shot here, Israeli warplanes are active as we speak over southwest Iran. Go ahead. No, please. Mike, when we talk about Iran's air defense, going into this operation, there was a little bit of ambiguity over what air assets Iran may have, if they had some fighter jets, even some old American ones.

Yeah, I don't know about that. There are no air force for Iran at this point? It doesn't seem they got many aircraft off the ground at all if they had any. They had things like... They're cooked, bro. Like, that's it. Yeah. U.S. F-14s.

They had purchased 79 of them before the Islamic Revolution. They wanted to get 80, but the revolution happened. I remember about a decade ago, speaking with an Israeli F-16, I pilot, he said, please put one of those things in the air against me, the F-14s, as much as they're part of U.S. history, they're antiquated compared to the things that the Israeli Air Force has now. They got better shit, yeah. They peaked at Top Gun. My question about the American citizens there, and especially outside of Tel Aviv, my girlfriend's parents, for example, in Jerusalem, they got separated. The dad actually was on vacation or visiting the children elsewhere. And now the mom's going to get on a 16-hour bus ride to Egypt to get out.

Talk to us about the tenor there with the Americans and whether indeed they are staying put or want to come back. Well, you do have a lot of Israelis anyway who are very interested in being here. You have a lot of Israelis who are trying to get back into the country just to show solidarity. Wait, really? But you do have some of the American Jews who are here. What the hell is wrong with them? They're nervous about traveling through Arab nations, going out through weekend. They're trying to show up.

They're like, oh, look at us. world. God damn. Amen, through Jordan. A lot of them are nervous about going out through Jordan. They're nervous about going down through the south of Israel, through the Sinai Peninsula, and through Egypt. But people

have done it. They can make that trip. They've got options. You've also got some transportation that's being arranged through the U.S. Embassy here. So they've got options to get out, but it's a nervous thing for Jews who are visiting Israel. I bet. I'm Steve Ducey. Yeah, bro.

I would want to be fucking out of there so fast. Like that would be scary. Even though there's not bombs going off everywhere, I would still be afraid even in a little bit, man. They're American and name only. We should get rid of dual citizenship. We should get rid of dual citizenship. I don't agree with that.

I don't think that somebody who's a dual citizen should be able to run for government. But I think that somebody can be a dual citizen. I think that's ridiculous. That's just it's my opinion, right? I mean, I know everybody's going to think about it differently, but that's what I think. So they're actually sending in the B2 bombers and they're getting them closer.

I don't know whether this is going to happen or not. I really don't. But it seems like there's a very high probability that things are going to pop off. Much has been repetitive, same info. Some out there are like the B2 bombers, point of covering the same old info. Well, I don't think this is really old info.

I feel like this, wait, what do you mean? It's old info. This is three hours ago what happened. It's literally three hours ago. way, if somebody goes and they say, oh, well, they said it was for testing, well, what do you think they're going to say? Do you really think they're going to say, oh, yeah, we're sending them over there in case you want to blow up Iran? No, they're not going to say that. They're not going to fucking say that. Like, they're not going to go and be like, yeah, so the plan, basically,

is we're going to send a ship over there and then we're going to attack them from that direction. Just like when Bush invaded Iraq, just because Iraq was enraided under a false. premise doesn't mean that all future premises are immediately false. Like, do you understand how dumb that sounds? So because we had one war that was started by a bad premise, that means that we can no longer start another war ever. It's retard logic. You should look at each situation individually.

Yeah, I don't even understand this at all. These new attacks happening just ahead, of course, of high stakes meeting beginning in Switzerland, Iran's foreign minister, sitting down with top European diplomats in Geneva after French president Emmanuel Macron said his country, Germany and the UK are ready to make an offer to Iran for what he described as complete negotiations. Well, before meeting the Iranian minister leveled criticism at Israel, take a listen. Oh, wow. We were supposed to meet with Americans on 15 June to craft.

This is Iranian. Israeli strikes for a betrayal of diplomacy. Really? Very promising agreement for peaceful resolution of the issues fabricated over our peaceful nuclear program. It was a betrayal of diplomacy and an unprecedented blow to the foundation of international law and UN system. I can't believe people believe this should.

Let me be clear. If there is any use of cost, systems and mechanisms we have created for the past 80 decades to preserve human... It's the nuclear bombs of peace. But to be fair, he's talking about nuclear energy, right? The implication is that they're not building bombs. They're just using it for nuclear energy. Price and dignity, now is the time to do it.

Well, with Donald Trump's announcement that he wants to leave the door open for diplomacy for as long as two weeks, I want to talk about this European push for negotiations or at least a dialogue with the French foreign ministry spokesperson, Christoph Le Mouin, who is joining me this hour from Paris. It's good to have you, sir. Thank you very much indeed for joining us. Foreign Minister Barron briefed the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the planned approach for today's meeting. What exactly is that approach? Sir, can you explain? Well, there was a call yesterday between French minister Barreau and Secretary of State Rubio on, you know, considering the situation that it is now and presenting the press.

I don't see how people can straight tell, can't tell this kind of bullshit and they're going to believe what they say. I think the reason why they believe this kind of stuff is that there's a lot of people who have been conditioned into believing that everything that the United States or any Western power does is bad, and anything that a non-Western power does is good. So basically, you're beginning with a bias that just automatically assumes that everything that you hear from this group of people is wrong. So that's it. And also, like, haven't terrorists, public acts, good people in France?

I mean, maybe, right? I don't know. But I'm just saying in general, That's the reason why. And people have been conditioned into doing this and to thinking this. And I think also it's very weird because this type of like anti-Western thinking has been like completely normalized to a massive degree. I mean, in my opinion, a lot of the countries that are like this are like just super fucking oppressive. They're paying terrorist organizations that kill civilians, et cetera.

Like I just wish these people would just go live over there. Like if you really think that it's so much better over there than just go over there. They would never do that because they know that like deep down inside, they know they're lying. But at the same time, it's very annoying to hear. It's the exact same bourgeoisie, proletariat, Marxist, retard logic? Yeah, exactly. It's just, it shouldn't even be taken. What I'm saying about it is that it should not even be taken seriously to begin with.

You shouldn't even look at it and approach this with any degree of, of good faith at all. It's just brainwashed retarts. There it is of the French diplomacy, which is, you know, obtaining a ceasefire and going back to the negotiations. And the presentation was...

Shouldn't be entertained at all. ...what was all about for today's meeting with the Iranians. And again, you know, the approach is based on, let's go back to negotiation. Let's do it in Europeans, with the Iranians,

and let's see, if there is a willingness on the Iranian part to restart negotiating. Of course they want to negotiate, because negotiating gives them more time. Does it help when the German Chancellor says Israel is doing the world's dirty work? He's right. Well, you know, there has been a common European approach on Iran for the last decades in terms of negotiation, and there have been an alignment between, you know, the UK, Germany,

Germany and France, and this alignment is still valid today. So this is what's happening in Geneva right now. Those three ministers, the E3 ministers are talking to the Iranians, and again, they are trying to re-engage them on the negotiation. Anything that happens on the military side must cease because there is no military solution. Well, it hasn't ceased. Iran and Israel have been exchanging strikes overnight. Why would they stop bombing them if they're,

winning. Why would they stop doing that? It doesn't even make sense. Yeah. Why would they do? Why would they? There's no reason for them to stop doing that. Yeah, why negotiate with terrorists? Yeah. The thing is that, and this is the issue, is that people that think that this is possible are so naive. unless you have like basically total control and autonomy over looking into it these people are just going to lie to you they're just going to lie to you they're going to tell you something that's not true because that's what they do useful idiots yeah they're just morons like i it's amazing to me that so many people can buy into such an obvious transparent lie Iran has just

unbelievable sent missiles into Israel we were just speaking to our correspondent in Haifa where the impact of one of those missiles is very very clear and very deadly the French president Emmanuel Macron has said that

the goal here is complete negotiations can you explain what he means by that what exactly does Europe mean by complete negotiations Complete negotiations means that we offered a package that was proposed today to the Iranians in Geneva, which is meant to be presenting a global solution for the whole situation, which means one part on the nuclear program,

one part on the ballistic program, one part on anything that Iran does in financing proxies in the region that is highly... Why are you even... why are you even playing playing with this even for a second? They're financing multiple groups that are going around killing civilians, bombing people, and disrupting international trade. These are clearly bad actors. I don't even know what, how is there, how can anybody not see that this is obviously a problem?

And this is, and by the way, this has nothing to do even with Israel. But if you really think this is all about Israel, it's nothing to do with them, that you're funding terrorists. Multiple groups of terrorists. And the biggest victims that these terrorists have are their own people. Their own people don't even like these guys. So it's not like, oh, well, they're trying to arm the resistance. No, when people resist against them from their own country, the terrorists kill them. So is America?

I don't think we're funding Hezbollah. If we are, like, I don't even understand. So, so what's your logic? So if we're funding Hezbo. Okay, so if there's somebody in America that's funding Hezbollah, then in the government, with our tax money, then I think we should put them in jail. So I have the same viewpoint. I do. I have the exact same viewpoint.

Like, anybody doing this is bad. It doesn't matter whether an American, they're French, whether they're Iranian, whether they're Israeli. It doesn't make a deal. difference. Stabilizing the region and one of the part on other security matters, including, you know, the stages and especially the financial stages that are still held in Iran. And also like a lot of people make arguments like, you know, oh, it's hypocritical because of X or Y thing. This isn't an argument of like who has the right viewpoint. This is a survival situation. Any hypocrisies or logical inconsistencies or anything like that, it's totally out the window. It's a survival situation,

and you have to act accordingly to that. It doesn't matter what you did in the past. It doesn't matter about what's fair. It matters about how to make sure that you are ensuring that the people that you're representing are not going to be in harm's way. That is the only thing that matters. So purely emotional? It's the opposite of emotion. This global package is meant to embrace the whole situation. This is a proposition and we hope it's going to be a platform on which there could be further discussions with the Iranians and in a broader format with the United States or others countries from the region. I just wonder whether these complete negotiations which extend beyond the nuclear file then reflect the scope of the American talks. with Iran that were scheduled, of course, in their sick round to happen on Sunday and haven't

materialized. Or is this Europe resting concessions and a wider scope out of Iran at a time when Iran is clearly weakened on its nuclear missile file and indeed the regime itself? Well, they're totally fuck. The last thing that they should do right now is let up on them. like yeah just keep going you know this proposition is to tackle the very core of the problem of the crisis that we're going through right now

you expect that like you're going to negotiate with them and then they're just going to magically stop doing everything that they were doing for the last 30 years it's such a naive perspective I can't even imagine that people think it now which is first you know the nuclear

program and be the ballistic program and see all the the proxies that they finance. So it's meant to be tackling this in a very pragmatic, in a very pragmatic way. So this is a proposition. This is a start for negotiation. We hope that we're able to move on on this and to progress and to reach an agreement. And I completely get that, you know, operations are still on and there are still, you know, strikes on Israel and strikes in Iran. But, you know, each war ends with the negotiation. And we hope that this...

Somebody says, why is the French involved? because last time I looked at the globe, I do know we're France is. Well, I know kind of where France is. They're closer to Iran than we are. So if Iran does build a nuclear bomb, France is much more in direct danger of that than America is. And I'm glad that France is saying something about this because it's like, why the fuck are we playing world police

when this is an existential threat to everyone? The initiation is happening right now. Emmanuel Macron talked about, quote, moving towards zero enrichment. Does that suggest that zero enrichment is no longer a red line, as stated by the US administration? Has Europe moved the goalposts there? Can I just try and understand a little about what the president meant? Yes, absolutely. That's what, you know, Emmanuel Macron stated today, and he stated it very, very clearly.

And it's a very, you know, it's a position that is very clear. You know, in the framework that we're imagining of those negotiations, all this is taking place within the framework of the non-proliferation treaty. And that treaty, you know, sets guidelines and sets, you know, obligation to the states that are parties to the treaty, which is the case of Iran. So zero enrichment is absolutely. It's something that we put on the table and that's something we think will guarantee some stability because there can be, you know, a military. I don't think that you're going to have any stability while that government is still in power.

Like, that's my honest opinion. I feel like as soon as you, it's like whack-a-mole, right? As soon as you stop their enrichment program, they're going to fund some other bullshit that's going to cause problems somewhere else. But the issue with that is that you can't really make that go away. I think that that's something that kind of has to go away on its own. Like just from like a political perspective. But you can stop them from making bombs. They won't get except 0% enrichment.

Trump just went through that with them. Well, every single day that they lose missiles and they have more of their people killed, accepting terms that are not advantageous becomes more appealing. Because eventually the people that are in the room making the decisions, are going to say, I don't want to be the next guy that's on CNN tomorrow with an X over my face. Nuclear program in Iran. That is not possible. So we have to set those kind of thresholds. We have to be clear about this.

And I think that's what President Macron said today. And that's what he wanted to state today, a clear position on zero enrichment. Yeah. Do you worry at this point in France that Iran may actually pull out of the NPT? They already did. It's a cosmetic agreement. I love how these people think that these agreements mean anything. It doesn't mean anything.

Like, they just sign it, and then they do whatever the fuck they want. What is stupid... How can anybody think like this? So everyone's allowed to have nukes except Islamic countries? I don't want Iran to have a nuke. Period. Like, I don't know why this is so complicated for you to understand. And you shouldn't either. We, you know, we notice that over the last two years, Iran has been escalating on its nuclear program. They've been, you know, going through threshold.

Proliferation and escalation, these words are not synonymous, but they're quite close. In terms of enrichment, in terms of production. And so when you're enriching something and you're escalating something, while you're also part of an agreement that's called non-proliferation, but oh, well, we're not proliferating, we're escalating. Guys, how does anybody believe this bullshit? It's amazing to me. In terms of not complying with their obligation within the JCPOA and within the non-proliferation treaty. And this for us was very concerning. very worrying. And this is why now we are engaging them into serious negotiation, which means

that they will have to comply with obligations and they will have to comply with verifications. And that's something that is very important. There is a question about the transparency that they must have of their program. They haven't had it before. And now they have... Somebody says, I don't want Israel to have nukes. Why is that so hard to understand for you? When have I ever said that I want Israel to have nukes? There's no response. You've been arguing about this. You've been creating these false dichotomies.

You've been arguing about this. And this is the mind of a person like this, right? This is the way that they think. The entire premise of every single point of their argumentation is built on something that's not even real. Everyone is allowed to have nukes except Islam. Who the fuck said this? I don't want Israel. Why don't you understand?

Why don't you understand? It's just, it's all based off of a lie. And you don't, and this person doesn't even explain themselves whenever they come, they get called out. That's the problem that you only focus on Iran. I don't want Israel to have nukes either. We're in agreeance. I don't think Israel or Iran should have nukes. Do you think Iran should have a nuclear weapon?

This is nothing to do with Israel, has nothing to do with Saudi Arabia, nothing to do with Russia, just Iran. Do you think it's good for them to have it or not? This is a yes or no? None should have a period. Okay, so then you agree. No, I want to hear you say it. Iran should not have a nuclear weapon, if that's what you believe. Yeah, just say it or not.

I mean, and if we're not, we can move on. I agree that Iran should. Iran, but if Iran can't, then none should. What do you mean should? What is about this should for you? like should like this is it's this childlike logic that's unbelievable to me it's amazing that people can think like this these are real adults that think like this to engage themselves in that in that way so again what he's proposing is a negotiation but with a stance that is very clear

because we want to have a solid agreement at the end that will be that would be fulfilled by everybody in the region their brainwash I guess so U.S. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, who your foreign minister has briefed, has reportedly just told your foreign minister that the U.S., and I quote Rubio here, is ready for direct contact with the Iranians at any time. Firstly, is that likely? Secondly, that sounds like the U.S. isn't putting much stock in these discussions that don't directly include them.

So is this Europe playing a bridge between the two at this point? I'm just trying to understand what the point is. I think he was making a point that no one including USA or any country on Earth should have nukes, but you hold this double standard on Iran. Of course it's a double standard. Duh. Obviously it's a double standard. What are you retarded?

No shit. What is this? think this is Reddit? This isn't Reddit. This is survival. This is about nuclear weapons. It's about people being able to destroy an entire fucking city. It's, it's not about, oh, it's a double standard, it's hypocritical. What the fuck is wrong with you? The point I think is to be pragmatic. Again, we are, you know, advocating some kind of diplomatic way out of that crisis and any anything, any effort, any initiative that will go into that direction will be, I think, welcomed by the Europeans. So we've kicked off something today in Geneva. This is a good start for

discussion. We'll see how the Iranians are reacting. But of course, we're ready, you know, to open the discussions to others and of course the United States. But anything that will go what we think is the right direction, we'll have the support of France and the support of the Europeans. Do you agree that only mature countries are allowed to have nuclear weapons? No, I don't think it's good for anybody to have a nuclear weapon at all. It's better for... So the best thing is for nobody to have a nuclear weapon.

The second best thing is for countries that you are aligned with to have a nuclear weapon. In any war situation, there is no positive benefit of you having a cement. advantage against an enemy. Every single military, and also, by the way, this is the case, this is what you would want, right? You do not want, you want to have an asymmetrical advantage against your enemy.