Asmongold TV - JD Vance: "India-Pakistan is none of our business" | Asmongold TV

Episode Date: August 30, 2025

JD Vance: "IndiaPakistan is none of our business" Asmongold show for all of his stream highlights, competitions, reactions & more. ----------------- ------- Keywords: gaming commentary, gaming opinions, gaming hot takes, world of warcraft, reaction videos, esports commentary, pc gaming, streamer content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

J.D. Vance says India versus Pakistan is none of our business. This is the way I think a lot of people feel about it. Let me see if I can find it. India has its gripes with Pakistan. Pakistan has responded to India. What we can do is try to encourage these folks to de-escalate a little bit, but we're not going to get involved in the middle of war that's fundamentally none of our business. We're going to cover. Holy fuck. Jesus. I covered this now from India and from Pakistan.

Jesus. Islamabad Pakistan, as Matthew Chance is in New Delhi. Nick, you visited the line of control recently. You hiked into Kashmir. What is the situation on the ground right now? Yeah, right now along that line of control, there's intense shelling. People are beginning to flee the border area and exodus. Some of the locals there are describing it. So that's pretty hot, pretty active. Jayvance describing it as a war. That's going to sound right to those people here. In the rest of Pakistan, 29 drones over the past 24 hours came over from India. They went to Karachi in the south.

Four soldiers for military personnel injured in Lahore. That's the massive city, 30 million people, just 30 miles from the border with India. Just down the road from here, 10 miles away in Rao Pindi, where there's a massive cricket tournament going on. Foreign Minister saying the stadium there was hit by one of those incoming missiles. The country's on edge. You tell me the stadium was hit by a missile? I mean, couldn't you, like, wouldn't that be like 100 people would get killed if it was

stadium that got hit by a missile? Here in Islamabad, tomorrow, major exam across the country are being canceled in Punjab along the east of the country here at Borderway, Indura, of course. It was empty. Schools all closed there. So there's a real feeling that this is rolling on in a way that the country has not experienced before these drones. This is different.

And as far as these sort of cross-border that Pakistani officials here are telling us about what the Indian government is saying on their side, they're saying. India is mounting a phantom defense. So not just drones, not just rockets, not just artillery, not just gunfire, the War of Words ratcheting up too. And Matthew, Indian officials. This isn't even what the India, this isn't even what the Indian news is saying. Why is CNN even saying this?

CNN was just saying they said, hey, we bomb terrorist installations and that's it. We're not going to bomb anybody else. Because I watched this for hours. Just south of Kashmir will be close. Indian news is fake news propaganda? The next three days. It sounds as though Indian Pakistan are prepared for the possibility of even more escalation. Yeah, I don't know.

Yeah, it does sound like that. You're right. Schools in Punjab are going to be closed for the next few days, as are schools in Indian administered Kashmir and universities as well. Why would CNN why? Because CNN is owned by the people that own a lot of the companies that would stand to gain if the United States got involved in one of these conflicts. And I think that media plays an active role in trying to escalate conflicts and keep the American people on their toes and worried about this stuff all the time.

And so, like, for example, I think that really any time that there's any conflict, you think about it. So there's like there's an ulterior motive and then there's a direct motive where the direct motive is that if they can create a state of panic, more people will watch the media because they're more afraid to know what's going to. going to happen, right? So, like, they're going to be paying attention more because they want to know what's going to happen next. So that's the, that's the immediate gain. And then the secondary gain is that I think that almost all mainstream media, if not all mainstream media, operates as a vehicle to, you know, escalate tensions and dial up the American people's rhetoric for different types of overseas wars in order to indirectly fund the military industrial complex. Because the people that own these companies are the same people that have ownership and have friends that have

ownership in these military companies. So that's what I think is happening. Straight up. Like I do. Also, the Indian government has cancelled all leave, the civil service. You only watched two hours of Indian propaganda and based your whole view on that. Bro, the Pakistani defense minister used as a frame of reference to look on social media for the images of the planes that were shot down and the images that were being posted were pictures from Ukraine.

How do you, how does that, like, we literally watched the interview with them. If you came out of that interview thinking that they're not lying, you're delusional. You're totally fucking delusional if you think they weren't lying in that interview. Yeah, Pakistan just shared audio

from down planes, you can look it up. So they shared audio. And we're supposed to assume that all of that means that these planes were crashed and everything. Really, so there's no video, right? So every single thing that happens is recorded from seven different ways except for this. It's bullshit. It's bullshit.

Like, I'm sorry. Like, I'm not going to believe this, especially after they've already had a history of making shit up. How is it that they're bombing civilians, but notable terrorists just happen to die? What is this? How can anybody believe this for even a second? in the country in preparation for what it says is a potential emergency response and so that all gives that impression that the country is sort of bracing itself for further escalation within the past club of ours you mentioned it already but you know we were hearing these reports we can't go there

ourselves unlike nick over there in pakistan but we're hearing reports that the city of jammer which is one of the main cities in indian administered Kashmir has um been plunged into darkness. There have been explosions in the skies over the city. It's not quite clear what exactly has been going on. But there have been repeated drone strikes and aerial strikes against locations inside India, at least reported by the Indian authorities.

India has since then accused Pakistan of striking two military bases in Indonesia-Kashmir and one in that neighboring state of Punjab as well. So, yeah, you're right. Look, tensions incredibly high on both sides of the border, Jake. Back with more in our world lead and the conflict between India and Pakistan and joining us now, Pakistan's ambassador to the U.S. What's this here? Indian here, Indian mainstream media, CNN 2000X amplified. Don't believe shit they say. First post is probably the only legit source of news from the media. Well, I mean, I don't believe, like the thing is that, well, number one, that was the thing I was listening to. number two, like, I'm going to listen to what these people are saying and then base, you know,

things off of that. I think that's the smart thing to do. That's what a normal person would do. So, yeah, India has evidence when they publish and Pakistan makes shit up. Yeah, it sure seems like they're making shit up. Rizwan, Saeed Sheikh. Mr. Ambassador, thank you so much for being here. We appreciate it. So U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke separately with top officials from India and top officials from Pakistan today. The State Department says Rubio told your prime minister, Muhammad Shabasharif to quote, take concrete steps to end any support for terrorist groups. This comments as India is accusing Pakistan of harboring terrorist groups.

What is your response? Well, in this heavily securitized history of this region, where the two countries have actually fought three wars and the history has expressed itself in a security edium, you know, presumptuous pretexts like the Phehalgam attack having taken place from Pakistan without a shred of evidence, I think is preposterous. And nobody in this situation in this region, which has a nuclear capability, wants to set a template of going for attacks, aggression, provocative aggression that has been taking place over past 48 hours, actually more. started by India, escalated by India. It's the third night. Pakistan has exercised its right to self-defense.

But basically, this is not the kind of simplified version of the security situation in the region. Sure. I mean, how does nobody ask the question, if they were only attacking civilians, why did they just happen to kill a bunch of noteworthy terrorists? Because I feel like that's a really good question. Like, how has this, how does this work? The region that I think the world wants to see. So whatever has to be said has to be supported by evidence.

And Pakistan, at the leadership level, has certainly offered to conduct impartial inquiry, independent inquiry, mutual inquiry, and we would be participating in it. So Pakistan has called for this investigation, as you know. There's this little-known militant group or terrorist group called the Resistance Front. It's linked to Islamist extremists. Lakshari Taiba, and this group claimed responsibility for the attack on social media, though local reports also say they walked it back. Do you know which group was responsible for the terrorist attack?

They killed 26 tourists on April 22nd. Who knows? In the Indian-controlled part of Kashmir. Yeah, that's a good question. The 26 tourists killed in the Indian illegally occupied part of Jammu and Kashmir were basically an attack that took place to 30 kilometers plus from the line of control. He's saying it was illegally occupied, as if that's a justification for asking somebody their religion and then shooting them if they give the wrong answer.

It doesn't really matter whether it's illegally occupied or not. The civilians there weren't the ones committing the crime. You're targeting civilians and then killing them, like, systematically based off of religious grounds. How is this not just something that you can't immediately condemn? How can't, like, how is this, how is this hard to just immediately condemn this and say, this was horrible, it was bad, we're working to try to make it not happen? It's insane.

Asking for inquiry, because we want to know, why would we know, had we known, why would we ask for inquiry? And just going ahead and exercising provocative aggression on an arch rival is something that Pakistan has bearing with a degree of. restraint thus far, but as we were pointing out. They're exercising aggression against an arch rival. These are, you killed 26 civilians. Not you, but like, you know, they, what is this?

Like, an arc rival, is this, is this Pokemon? Like, what's going on? Note how he doesn't answer the question asked. Yeah. That we would not be the ones going for escalation. India did. Now the responsibility for de-escalation. is on India?

Well, I don't think so. I think that Pakistan knew that these things were happening and they let them happen. This is what I think. This is what seems like what's happening, right? I mean, like, I don't see how you can't come to this conclusion. This is the country that housed Osama bin Laden. They had multiple other, you know, like fucking MVP, you know, career terrorists there. They get bombed.

And then after they get bombed, after this terrorist attack, then you have the main generals from the Pakistani army that are at. the funeral for these murdered or not murdered i mean killed uh in some way murdered uh terrorists uh why would that even happen if they weren't working hand in hand and they didn't know each other it's it's it's so obvious and so blatant that it's amazing that they would even try to come on and defend it i feel like it would be better just to not make any comments like that's what i would do if i were them just don't say anything that'd be the smart thing to do Constraints on restraint.

Pakistan reserves the right to respond back. There is enough pressure from our public opinion on the government to respond and respond we will because this aggression has been going on now for too long. Earlier today, CNN interviewed the Indian ambassador to the United States. Take a listen to what he said. When we did this day before yesterday, our assumption was that we have completed what we set out to do ourselves vis-a-vis the terrorist. We, from our perspective, had brought a certain finality to it, but it was, of course, subject to whether Pakistan has brought finality to it. Pakistan chose to escalate it further. Now, it's duty-bound for us to respond to that. They say they were responding to the terrorist attack, the killed 26.

There is no situation like responding to the terrorist attack by attacking a sovereign country. Is that a template that the international community would want to set going forward without any... If you have terrorists there and you're working with them and the military is, yeah. Yeah, absolutely. And what they say, they say, yes, I mean, they can say what they want to say. But attacking Pakistan and expecting us to sit back like sacrificial lambs and not responding is something that they shouldn't even have thought of. And whatever is being done, it's the third night, has on each night by being initiated by India. Pakistan has only been responding in self-defense.

Our civilians have been killed. 30 plus civilians, 57 plus casualties. What kind of terrorist infrastructure they were attacking? Civilian lives. So there were 30-something civilian dies, people that died, but then 50-something total deaths. Well, what about the other ones? Who were they? They have been lost.

Why did the attack a cricket field? Where is the terrorist infrastructure expected in the cricket field? Is there any conversation going on at all between India and Pakistan right now? Yeah, 30 civilians and 57 casualties who were the remaining 27. Yeah, like, what is this? Like, I... I think there have been contacts at the level of NSA's, but then this escalation, both in terms of the actions that have been taken

and in terms of the rhetoric that is coming. I'm so glad these guys are so bad at lying. I don't know what it is, but I'm grateful. It's really impressive, isn't it? Like, I mean, this is really bad. Like, they need to do a better job at this. Doubt has to stop. We do not expect lectures from a regime that is operating on the basis of Hindutva philosophy.

I mean, that is preposterous. I mean, look at the record of India. They have hedgingistic designs for the region. Whatever they have been doing in Sri Lanka, in Nepal. Why is that this is the only country which has problem with every other country in the region? Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, says that Pakistan needs to, quote, take concrete steps to end any support for terrorist groups. You don't think you need to. Well, what terrorist groups, Pakistan followed the FETF requirements?

Oh, God. Oh, there it is, boys. Wow. Those structures that were there have been dismantled with a degree of finality, otherwise we wouldn't have gotten out of the the gray list under the fat of arrangement. So what, I mean, without evidence, how can just you fingerpoint and then start an aggression in a nuclear neighborhood? How responsible.

Without, in a neighborhood, yeah, right. And so, okay, yeah, there's no evidence. Who knows? Is that. I mean, and what kind of precedent we are setting in this kind of a neighborhood situation. Pakistan's ambassador to the United States, Rizwan Saeed Sheikh, we appreciate you. They have no responsibility to do anything for that or anything at all. Yeah, killing 26 innocent tourists as Casimir was the escalation.

Facts, India, no UN-designated terrorist groups. Pakistan hosts 69 UN-designated groups per NACTA. Wait, so there's 69 banned UN-designated terrorist groups. There's no way there's that many, right? It's probably only like 50 or something, right? Since the beginning, they're also the victim of terrorism. Yes, sure, right? and India's problems around America's problems.

Yeah, well, it's good to see that obviously J.D. Vance is, like, I don't, the way I see it is like, I don't want the U.S. to be involved in this shit either, right? I mean, I would love to, I would love to move past the idea of the U.S. being the world police. I don't think we need to do that. And, you know, these people can solve their own problems. So, yeah, the point is the people that killed the civilians were Pakistani or endorsed to some degree. I think that they were. I think that they were undeniably endorsed by Pakistan because when you had people that were terrorists that got killed, you had the Pakistani military go to their funeral. I mean, if that's not a red flag, I don't know what is. That's the biggest reg flag that you can possibly have. How can anybody not see it this way? I don't know. But that's really what it is. Is Pakistan planning giving nuclear blueprints? Other nations, too, what the fuck? Yeah, I don't know. And yeah, it's insane. Only are you. responsibility we have is to make sure they don't use their nukes. Yeah, definitely. Pakistan is

attacking civilians in India now with drones. Of course they are. Yeah, of course. I mean, absolutely. And so, yeah, I just... And also, by the way, it is fair to say that it's hard to know whether this is actually the military of Pakistan or a terrorist group that's taking advantage of the situation. It could be either one. But whenever I see this kind of stuff, I think it paints a really, really clear picture. Yeah, extremely clear picture.