Asmongold TV - Mainstream Media Is cooked | Asmongold TV

Episode Date: September 23, 2025

Mainstream Media Is cooked Asmongold show for all of his stream highlights, competitions, reactions & more. ---------------------------------- -------- Keywords: streamer reactions, gaming commentary, esports commentary, twitch streamer Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Are you telling me? No. No. No, there's no way. There's no way, bro. So this is from the Guardian News. Now, what are they guarding? In fact, this might be surprising the news.

They don't want you to get it. Where's the audio? Including, if there was African-Farm- Trump was asked a question about his unsubstantiated of white genocide claims. Genocide. I can bet you. These three gentlemen would not be here, including my minister of agriculture.

He would not be with me. So it will take him, President Trump, listening to their stories, to their perspective. Let me see the articles, please, over you would, and turn, excuse me. Trump then, oh, there's the word. Ambushed Dramophoso with footage he said was evidence for his claims. So white genocide or white extension or white replacement theory is a national conspiracy theory that claims that there's a deliberate plot to cause the extension of white people. So this is a, what they're doing is they're painting with a deliberately broad brush because there is a conspiracy theory of the replacement theory that exists. But that doesn't mean that there are not instances of anti-white racism that exist also.

So this conspiracy theory is something that is contextualized inside of America and Western societies. So you can't apply the white genocide conspiracy theory, propaganda, white supremacist thing whenever you're talking about it with another country. It is contextualized around it being a conversation that's being had inside of Western culture. That's the difference. It's a straw man. It's dishonest. Yeah, exactly. And this is what the media does.

Yeah, that only works when it's in a white majority country. They don't even know the racism. Yeah, they don't even understand. People don't understand how to be racist anymore. It's embarrassing. I'm doing my best to try to teach them, but it's going to be a roll. It's a long road ahead. Sorry, but genocide is a different definition, man.

Sure. I'm not going to argue with you about the name. we turn the lights down turn the lights down and just put this on it's right behind you the footage showed a montage of clips are we going to see

Cheeby reviews thanks for 10 subs I appreciate that including former South African president Jacob Zuma and the far left opposition Julius Milliman yep yeah thank you Cheeby I appreciate that man I hope you're doing well after the footage was aired

Cyril pushed back against Trump's remarks How does it get worse? And these are people that are officials, and they're saying that kill the white farmer and take their land. That's what they're doing. And I have other friends in South Africa. I have people that left, one in particular that says it's, you can't go there. He said they want to take your land, they take your land and they kill you. It's okay.

And they say it's okay to do. Now, we're going to talk about it. But this is a tremendous, look, this is a story recent. These are all people that recently got killed. Yeah. And I don't know how it can get any worse. Let me clarify that. Yeah. Let me clarify that because what you saw, the speeches that were being made, one, that is not government policy. We have a multi-party democracy.

Yes, it is, because it's against the law to say that stuff, but they're not in jail. It's against your laws, but you're letting them say it. It's just, which law? the law for advocating and inciting violence. South Africa has that. That allows people to express themselves, political parties to adhere to various policies. And in many cases, or in some cases,

those policies do not go along with government policy. Our government policy is completely, completely against what he was saying even in the parliament. And they're a small minority party. 25%. It is allowed to exist in terms of our constitution. But you do allow them to take land. No, no, no, no.

You do allow them to take land. Nobody can take land. And then when they take the land, they kill the white farmer. And when they kill the white farmer, nothing happens to them. No. There is quite, nothing happens to them. There is criminality in our country. People who do get killed, unfortunately, through criminal activity, are not only white people.

Majority of them are black people. Oh, man. Man, this really sad. 25% is huge. Yeah, it's a lot of people, right? It definitely is. And it's really crazy. And search on a Twitter flashback president of South Africa.

I say he'll take away land without recompensation. I don't know about that in general. But, and you can see, obviously, people are completely rejecting this. Nobody is in favor of this. Everybody hates it. And I'm very happy about this. I'm extremely happy about it. Hopefully this continues to be the case.

And bullshit like this basically just keeps dying. I think this is what's going to happen in general. And so it's okay to kill white people because blacks also get killed? Well, of course, right? And they're just trying to downplay it and act like it's not a big deal. because it makes them look bad because they're letting it happen. Oh, God. Although, this is it here.

Okay. Yamish, good to see you. Thanks for taking the question. Sure. The president showed a video that he said showed more than a thousand burial sites of white South Africans and he said were murdered. We know that that was not true and that the video wasn't doing that. So I wonder, why did the president choose to show that it's not true, Yemish.

It's not true that the video was showing a burial site. It is unsubstantiated that's the case. No, it's, it is true that that video showed the crosses that represent. And so this is the funny thing is that it is technically not a burial site. The crosses are put up there as a, like, for example, they're buried somewhere else, but the crosses are put up as a memorial. So they're trying to say that Trump was lying because it wasn't, they weren't actually buried there. It was just a memorial.

I'm serious. Like you listen to this again. It's not true that the video was showing a burial site. It is unsubstantiated that that's the case. No, it's, it is true that that video showed the crosses that represent. It was what the president claimed. It wasn't a burial site. The video showed images of crosses in South Africa about white farmers who have been killed

and politically persecuted because of the color of. their skin. And those crosses are representing their lives. Those crosses are representing their lives in the fact that they are now dead and their government did nothing about it. Are you disputing that there's no... The video showed what the president claimed it showed because it did not show that. But even more, what I'm asking you is who at the White House... No, it did show that. It showed white crosses representing people who have perished because of racial persecution.

The White House verifies the videos that the president shows and what protocols are in place when there's unsubstantiated information... What verifies it? well unsubstantiated information being put out for the world and world leaders where is the unsubstantiated information this reporter's dog shit well I just I want you guys to see kind of and this is the way that a lot of media behaves and this is how you have to be aware of it is that they use really like one of the reasons why the mainstream media is so effective and has been so effective for so long is because most people do not have a strong grasp over the English

language. And so these types of rhetorical devices and, you know, like vocabulary changes and just different like little tricks people play with their words actually fool a lot of people because they don't have that, like the semantics, right? The semantics fool a lot of people. What's unsubstantiated about the video? The video shows. shows crosses that represent the dead bodies of people who were racially persecuted by their government. In fact, the- And by the way, she's approaching this in the right way. You don't engage with a dishonest framing that's based off of a deliberate misunderstanding. Because her point of contentioned is a deliberate misunderstanding that's done intentionally to try to make it look bad.

Some crazy shit? Yes. Never, never play into that game. Associated Press, of all places, has a picture of that very monument in the caption from the Associated Press is, each cross marks a white farmer who has been killed in a farm murder. So it is substantiated, not just by that video and the physical evidence that every... She's actually arguing because it's not a burial site that the president was wrong and he shouldn't have shown it. That's right. Yep. Everybody saw on display in the Oval Office, but also by another outlet in this from the Associated Press. So you should take it up with them if you believe the claim is unsubstantiated.

And that's a ridiculous line of questioning. John, go ahead. Go ahead. Thank you, Carolyn. The big, beautiful bill now goes to the Senate. Does, yes. A lot of the Republican senators have promised amendments that will water this thing down dramatically. What is the president's...

Some other bullshit. All negotiations will tell them to take off significant money from their Social Security. I just wanted to see that one right there. I just wanted you guys to see that that's the level of dishonesty that people like this engage in. That's it. That's it. Trump did describe the video as being a burial site. However, it still doesn't minimize the underlying issue.

So this is the problem that people like you have is that you think that you can play these small semantics games and that anybody is going to care. It doesn't matter whether the bodies were buried there or not. The idea and the word burial site means effectively the same thing. You are focused on the literal meaning of the words because you want to avoid the implication of the words. That's what you're doing. You don't care about using proper language. You don't care about any of that. The only thing that you care about is reframing it in a way that,

makes it look like he said something that was wrong. That's what you're doing. It's obvious this is what you're doing. Like this type of dishonest behavior is so annoying to me. He agrees with you? No, no, he doesn't. What people like this do, and the thing is that, I didn't say anything wrong, you misunderstood?

No, I don't misunderstand. A lot of other people do because they don't understand the, I don't think people are picking up on the manipulation that's going on. So what's being discussed here and the way that this is being approached is that President Trump referred to this area as a burial site. It's not a burial site, but it's a representation of a burial site. This is an irrelevant distinction that causes the White House to capitulate and for them to use a sound bite and say that Trump was technically wrong. It doesn't serve any other goal

other than to score semantics points and to undervalue something in a way that's dishonest. That's what's happening. They're intentionally trying to minimize the situation by creating a hyper-specific example where a word does not mean the exact specific thing. And I understand,

and the problem is that, again, you're not going to trick me with this kind of stuff because I am the master of lying. I've made videos about how to lie to people. I understand this better than any of these people do. That's why I do what I do. That's why, by the way, so many people watch this. I can tell this instantly. I was doing this when I was a little kid. Are you lying now? Yes. Okay, dude. No, I'm just telling you. It's very, very obvious when it's happening. It's gotcha media. Yes, it is. He did agree, though? Explain. No, the fixation on that agreeance is a intentional obfuscation in order to undermine what's being discussed. That's what's happening.

That's what they're doing. Yeah, it's disingenuous. Yeah, I mean, like, I can see through this instantly. Like, really? I mean, I don't know what to say. Or it's just very literal. No, people like this are not very literal. they're literal when it's beneficial and they're figurative when it's beneficial.

It's not about being literal or figurative. It's about using something as an advantage based off of what your viewpoint is.