Asmongold TV - The catgirl has been INVESTIGATED | Asmongold TV

Episode Date: September 29, 2025

The catgirl has been INVESTIGATED Asmongold podcast for all of his stream highlights, competitions, reactions & more. --------------------------- ------------- Keywords: twitch clips, gaming drama, streamer podcast Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

People do not want to let this go. They still think that this person is, uh, is aimboding. We got him. Catgirl using soft aim bot in Battlefield 6. Uh-oh. Disclaimer. Call of Shame is a commentary and an investigative critique channel that focuses on gameplay. Okay.

Aembody. Call of shame. I like that. I haven't heard this before. I just got fucking permaband. Oh, oh, oh, cheating the assholes. People getting banned. Get that ass band, get out of here.

Roger that and thank you. These cheaters have been punished by the men and women from Rikishay. All streamers are guilty until proven innocent. When Riley first joined Team EXE, a team clouded by cheaters and controversy. Wow. He was welcomed into the aiming community by Shimmy. By February this year, Riley claimed his aim could now rival aim assist, posting yet more suspicious gameplay clips, once again backed by his friend Shimmy.

I was very curious to know who Shimmy really was. I decided to dig deeper. Yeah? As his teammate, I needed more information. Who's Shimmy? What I found was concerning to say the least. Shemmy himself had been banned from Call of Duty for cheating using soft aim. And for those that don't know...

So the guy gassing him up was a cheater? This cheat artificially adjusts a player's aim within a certain distance of the target. So it's kind of like the aim bot that you'd have in console, like where you have aim assist. Where it's like, you ever play Halo back in a day and it'll kind of like move your crosser a little bit closer to like an elite's head or something? Pulling the crosshair toward enemy players once they enter the aimbots field of view. Exactly. So it's not hard.

Can you remember in a recent video I showed this on Riley's gameplay with the little aim bubble? That in essence is a. how soft aim works. And I'll go into more detail on it later. But for now, I want to go back to Shimmy. Team E.C., or XE, whatever you want to call them, I don't really care. They had to make a public statement and admit he was using soft aim. And because the situation was so public, so they already had a cheater before in there in the first place. They really had no other option. He eventually admitted to cheating, knowing the game was Okay.

So he's actually just... Holy fuck. The cheats were only used in casual lobbies just to farm switching clips. Sure. So you're cheating. He claimed Clara had given him the cheats and that he only used them once, like they always say.

Of course. He also insisted his aim trainer scores were legitimate. Yeah. But that too was proven false. He cheated in those as well. What really stood out to me was his reasoning. He said he only, cheated for clips.

So you just cheated for popularity and money? Oh, okay. Oh, that's totally fine. Oh, okay. What we've long suspected these players do. Yeah. That's why they keep lists of alt accounts in little text files.

Because once one account gets banned, they just switch to another and keep farming those insane clips. Riley's CS captured on day one of the Battlefield 6. Battlefield 2 beta. Oh, boy. Valerant Logins. Interesting.

Look at that. What a fucking surprise. Now it's all starting to make sense. The problem is none of them realized he was cheating. Everyone called him a brilliant player. Oh my God. The aiming community is so gullible. Wow.

Look for yourself. Wow. Look how good he is. All these people believed he was legit. Just like they do with Riley. The truth is they simply don't know what cheating looks like. They haven't got a clue. I think the reason why a lot of people don't understand

it is because a lot of people think that aim-botting is like a magnetic thing where you instantly target a person's head and you never lock off of it. But what people obviously don't understand is that as with everything else, I mean, you're going to make things like that a little bit less obvious in order to deter, in order to avoid detection. And you know things are bad when AIMBot Amy is backing you. The very same person who vouched for Riley. Here's some gameplay where Shimmy was caught using Softame. As I mentioned earlier, Softame works when a cheater initially misses the target. I want to say also that if this is the audio and this is the video that's caught whenever this person was caught using Softame,

isn't it interesting that their movement and their pattern is the exact same as the Battlefield Catgirl one? It's the exact same. Do you remember what I said before about how it always centered in on center mass and the body right underneath the head? That's crazy. ...amated aim correction gradually pulls the crosshair toward the enemy. Yep. It can fool the human eye, but not AI. And this is when my cheat analysis comes in.

No. Instantly. He's detected for soft aim. So, this is what my software detected. A micro adjustment to the center. of the player's bounding box. This is simply not natural, especially since it had already flagged similar pattern matches before this. Players miss targets all the time. The issue isn't the flick. It's the micro adjustments that follow. Sometimes they're subtle, sometimes obvious, but either way, we can still detect them. Man. First they miss, then the aim gently pulls toward the enemy, and it's not constant. Sometimes they'll toggle the cheat off and play another 20 minutes legitimately. it's all about farming the right clips. Yeah, of course.

Remember the guy who defended Riley CS? He tried to argue it's not cheating because anyone with enough practice can snap like that. Then you just practice that for five hours a day for three years and you get the absolute aim demons that you see popping up today. Again, for some, gaming is just a bit of time to chill out and relax. For others, it's about drinking three white monsters and trying to beat your personal best in an aim trainer or farming some clips.

But in Shimmy's own confession, he admitted to spending 3,000 hours in an aim trainer. That's a lot. And he was still caught using an aim bot. Man. How do you, dude, how do you cheat whenever you have all of that? This is crazy. Optimus is worst, downvoted video to date. I think that a lot of people, there was definitely a lot of pressure to avoid criticizing this,

like the Battlefield 6 Riley CS cheater person because people thought, I don't even know like whether is this person trans or not. I don't even fucking know. But either way, I think that there was a

lot of people that didn't want to criticize it because the person was trans and because people are being labeled this transphobic for criticizing them. That's it. Who cares? I don't think anybody really gives a shit. That argument is weak and should never be used to justify someone as legit.

It's not about the snaps, it's about the aim correction. This is Shim's own gameplay recorded on Aim Trainer. Looks pretty solid, right? Sure. Well, now we know he was actually using an aim bot. So anyone claiming that great aim from Aim Trainer alone proves legitimacy can throw that argument out the window. I've just proven it false. When Carl Jost put out a video attempting to defend Riley's CS,

I was honestly confused because he has. has some actually pretty amazing videos. He does. And then I quickly realized why he did it. If you're going to make an impartial video, you should never let a blatant cheater dictate how you tell your story. I would be happy to talk and share my side of everything. Oh, so we just talked to him. Well, I guess, oh, big surprise. I've seen a lot of opinions about Riley CS recently. Yeah. While everyone is entitled to their own opinion, the defenses of him are simply misguided. I've written an entire PhD level white paper on computer vision-based cheats and the...

Oh. Oh, no. Oh, Jesus. Here we go, guys. Urgent need for anti-cheats to step up against AI-driven exploits. Wow. In it, I go in depth on soft-a-metechology and the broader dangers that modern AI... Bro, this guy's actually, like...

So you've got a PhD versus... versus some retard? Oh, no. This guy's eyes for cheaters, yeah. Over the past six months, I've been investigating, researching, and reverse engineering external cheat devices to determine the most effective ways to combat them in first-person shooters. Yeah? The result is a groundbreaking anti-cheater. Look at all the sources and everything.

Oh my God. This system uses the same class of computer vision technology that powers self-driving cars, but applies it to gaming. It doesn't just record gameplay. It monitors every pixel of every frame in real. time with... Is it... Bro, the title of this video is, we got them. We got them.

Multiple tools constantly analyzing for unnatural behavior. Oh no. We measure key factors such as crosshair velocity, trajectory smoothness, aim decay, overall entropy, and the entry speed of the crosshair into bounding boxes. This data is recorded, patterned, and processed through dedicated data nodes, building a signature of behavior that separates human... that separates human play from assisted aim. But this is precisely how we are able to detect soft aimbots reliably and early.

The human eye cannot reliably spot soft aim because it is deliberately programmed to mimic natural play. Sure, yeah, of course. ...plain in detail in my white paper. Watch closely as Guardian flags the same robotic smoothness, repeated consistently across multiple identical patterns. And just like that, we can expose soft aimbotting with confidence. The yellow boxes are guardians overlays, creating its own bounding boxes on top of the cheat visuals.

So basically what he's doing is he's looking for any time that a player makes a movement that is so erratic that it's outside of human behavior. It can detect it at a frame by frame basis and then measure it. Oh my God. This guy actually, yeah, he reverses it. Oh, no. Record precise data directly from the. It analyzes a pattern, yeah. The robotic slow aim movement that tracks toward the enemy is then detected with high confidence.

Do you think this is legit? You're dumb? Really? I don't know. I think this seems pretty obvious. You could do something like this. I mean, I don't know. I think it's pretty obvious. Seems pretty simple. While the cheats are visible on screen, this highlights how effectively Guardian confirms aimbot activity. The pattern is matched, the cheat is detected, and the data nodes execute flagging this behavior. To the human eye, it may look like natural gameplay, but that's exactly the design. These so-called professional gamers and overnight experts claim Riley's CS isn't cheating because much like this clip, they simply can't spot soft aimboding. Aimbots are engineered to mimic human-like behavior, and they have no idea what they're really looking at.

It's built to evade the human eye and they fell for it. So this guy used to fucking, he used the self-driving car AI to determine this? Yeah. Is this AI Slop? Now that you've seen what's- This is AI Slop that's being designed with AI Slop in order to detect other AI Slop. This is like third or fourth level. Soft aim looks like.

Let's compare Riley's CS side by side with Shimmy. But I'm going to use the actual gameplay that got him banned. the gameplay is identical. The same snap behavior is there. But let's be clear, the snap itself is not. And you guys remember, this was the thing that made me suspicious. It was the fact that every single time that this person zeroed in on the character, it always zeroed in on the backpack of the character.

Cheat. The soft aim bot is the mechanical auto correction that takes over as the cross-haired years the target. Is that what you said? Yeah. The so-called pro players and Riley Defender. from that strange little list they created just don't recognize what soft aim really looks like.

So they gaslight the clips by over-analyzing and debunking the snaps. So the person that he's friends with that was on the same team as him, who has the same gameplay as him, was also accused of cheating, but accusing this person of cheating is transphobia. Huh. How about that? What a surprise?

Who could have guessed? But the snaps were never the issue. What matters is the underlying soft aim correction. And here, the gameplay is a dead match. It's exactly the same. This is a closed case. There's nothing more to be said. Wow.

Same org, same software, same circle of friends, same community. They can't defend it. So instead, they make lists of people they claim are credible. They even included Huskers and metaphor. Two clowns who think anyone that kills them must be using an aim body. It's laughable. I brought facts to the table and what did they bring

permanently banned streamers and washed content creators I did run right I think it's also I mean it doesn't really matter like all you need to do is if you can run this through an AI analysis on a pixel by pixel basis and then

basically through a million different iterations figure out what is within human capacity of behaving and then be like okay this is totally different I think this is case closed, right? I mean, like, that's it.

...game play through Guardian Trucite, and while it clearly picked up soft aim-like behavior, the analysis was based on the call of Dune datasets. Those models are much smaller than what we're building for Battlefield, which means some detections were missed. When presenting evidence of cheating, I need it to be 100% accurate. No room for doubt.

Once the Battlefield data sets are fully integrated with TruthSight, I'll release a complete video show, casing all of the findings. So wait a minute. This isn't even the final version. Oh, God. I love this. This is amazing. Yeah, is it case closed until Riley is abandoned? Call of Shame comes out as a clown.

Well, I don't know about that. Yeah, do we really need a video telling us a cheater's a cheater? Well, I wasn't sure that they were a cheater. Right? I wasn't. I wasn't sure that they were a cheater at all. Like, I mean, I was, if I had to guess, I assumed they were cheating, right? I thought they were cheating. But like, I mean, I wasn't 100% sure. Yeah, that's what I said before. The evidence out there to show Riley cheating is excellent.

The micro adjustments and aim corrections just ignored. The previous bans on platforms for cheating in multiplayer games. Wait. They already got banned before for cheating? What are we doing? What is this? Oh my God. Ignored.

Valerent logins and suspicious macro config files. Ignored. Crosshair overlays? You guessed it. Ignored. A member of Team XE. The little aiming club surrounded in controversy that will use propaganda to gaslight members caught cheating.

Ignored. The fact that EA never featured his gameplay, even though it went viral with nearly 100 million views, completely ignored. On the second week of the beta, he failed to play on his original account, to a potential soft ban, yet was able to load another account already leveled. Wait, so the first account that they played as, they weren't playing at it for the second

and play perfectly fine, ignored. Man. From multiple battlefield forums because they know he's cheating. They banned me, L.O.L. The only people defending this guy are radical groups and mouse and keyboard players, as they somehow believe it's an attack on their gameplay. Well, I think that also what has... happened with this is that because the person was part of an identity group, people were

afraid to criticize them because criticism of this person was being mislabeled as criticism of the identity group. I think that's very clearly what happened. Yeah, bingo. Yeah, of course, right? I mean, that's it. It's always the same. Yeah, definitely. It's just idiots defending them. Well, people, like a lot of people, especially like people in these teams, right, like they don't want to come out and say they think this person's cheating. Number one, because a lot of people, like, you can't be sure about it. Most people are not really sure about it. I mean, whenever you're talking about, like, an AI system that's been developed, like,

on a Ph.D. level that can detect whether somebody is behaving in a way that's inauthentic. Whoa, okay, that's definitely going to convince me a lot more than, like, a professional player saying, I think this might be real. That's the difference. Developers insist this person is cheating. And their so-called defense, they copied his tweet and gaslighted it. Yeah. And simply ignored it.

They even pretended to be Battlefield 6 developers to virtue signal for the cat girl dude. We all compared Riley's footage to Shimmie. It's near identical. I ran it through my AI anti-cheat software and it found him guilty. And their defense? He didn't cheat because he said so. And everyone's... Didn't cheat because he said so.

Wow. That settles that. All right. Well, I guess we don't have to think about this anymore. Saying he is cheating are transphobic hating Nazis. Yep. With a KD of 0.3. That's the mentality of these people.

That is their defense. And it's diabolical. I find Riley CS guilty. Yeah. Game over. It is crazy that a person who is friends with a person, person who was an aim-bauder, who previously got banned for cheating, and whose gameplay is identical to the person who got banned for aim-botting, is considered to be innocent. I mean, I don't know, guys. It seems kind of bad.

Please be sure to like the video. That's fucking funny. That's really fucking funny. I'm call of shame. God bless everyone of you. Call of shame. On the other side. I've never seen this before. Wow. Okay. Well, there we go.

Oh, man. They were trained by the same aim master. Yes, that aim master was, in fact, a computer, though. Either you have evidence or you don't. You don't. Nobody holds the truth. Well, I mean, oh, there's the video right there. Give it a like. Call of shame. I love this. And Guardian TrueSight, the gold standard for computer vision cheat detection. I mean, I would definitely go based off of that, right? I definitely would. We need more of Yeah, I love this. And I guess so.

He's been a cheater for years. This AI shit is recent. Well, I guess so, right? I mean, Chatter's defending an obvious cheater. I think that some people don't, like, I'm not certain that the, like, I mean, at this point, I'm like 90. Like, I mean, if you have an AI detection and it's able to like, and this is like a Ph.D. level AI detection, am I going to really listen to the Ph.D. level AI detection? or am I going to listen to like a few pro players?

I mean, ah, geez, guys, I really wonder. And so, like, yeah, I'm going to listen to the fucking machine. Because, like, and this is what I think is funny, is that, like, people think that there's any level of machine-assisted gameplay that they can detect machine-assisted gameplay at all. The human, like, one of the fastest people in the world has, like, maybe an 80-to-100- millisecond react time, right? computers operate on microseconds. So the idea that you can't figure, like that you're going to be able to like out-maneuver

and be able to see through a computer and be able to identify this and be certain about it is totally wrong. It's naive. And it's like, yeah, nanoseconds, yeah, they're operating in, yeah, you're right, in nanoseconds, right? And so you have like a one versus, like a computer is probably, I don't know, probably, it can probably react a hundred times,

100,000 times faster than a human being can. Like, it's not even faster than that, but like infinitely faster. And so any of this type of behavior that looks legitimate doesn't necessarily mean that it's legitimate. Yeah, billions of times faster? Maybe you're right. I mean, I have no idea. And so anyway, yeah, it's only have drive assistance.

Yeah, you can simply tell by the movement. Yeah. I mean, and that was another thing that I said before is that whenever you looked at a lot of these other pro players with really great aim, you would also see that. them that had really great movement and really great awareness. But whenever you see somebody that the only thing that they have is really good aim, and then also there's all these accusations of cheating, they've been banned before. I mean, again, you can never be certain about everything,

but in a lot of cases you can build a fucking, like, what's the word for it? You can build a profile, I guess. I think that's the best way to say it.