Asmongold TV - Trump got real.. | Asmongold TV

Episode Date: September 20, 2025

Trump got real.. Asmongold show for all of his stream highlights, competitions, reactions & more. ---------------------------------- --------------- Keywords: twitch streamer, asmongold, gaming community, mmo gaming, reaction videos, streaming moments Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Right around the time that we were walking in here, the governor and the state attorney general said that they're going to sue you for sending the National Guard, and they're saying there's no invasion, there's no rebellion. The President is trying to manufacture chaos and crisis on the ground for his own political ends. Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the President's authority under law. Well, you know, it's interesting. You watch the same clips as I did. Cars burning all over the place, people riding. And by the way, we stopped it. We were able to make it much better, but it still looked pretty bad. And in watching clips last night, people were saying this is really a big problem.

And until we went in, if we didn't do the job, that place would be burning down, just like the houses burned down. They were in big trouble last night, Peter. You know it. And the night before and the night before that. And I feel we had no choice. I don't want to see happen what happened so many times in this country. I watched Minneapolis burn. I watched, look at what happened in so many different parts of California.

You take a look at what happened in San Diego. There's so many different places where we let it burn. We want to be politically correct. We wanted to be nice. Big mistake. We want to be nice to the criminal. Huge mistake. And what you're doing is destroying the fabric of our life in this country.

No, we did the right thing. We've been given credit by people that I would least suspect. I would say that some of the people that came in and said, thank goodness, they said some of them, thank God that Trump got involved. And I'm very happy I got involved. And I think Gavin, in his own way, is probably happy I got involved. Yeah, go ahead, Pidney. What do you make of the fact that he says, you want a civil war on the streets of America? No, it's just the opposite. I don't want a civil war. Civil war would happen if you left it. If you left it to people like him. Wait, what? And I liked him. You know, I always got along with him.

Never had a problem with him. Whoa. But he's grossly incompetent. Okay. Have you gotten an update from negotiators in London? Have you gotten an update from your team in London negotiated? Way on. Louder.

Have you gotten in an update from your team in London negotiating the China trade talks? I'll see if there's any more of these. We are doing well with China. China's not easy. I don't think we're doing well with China, guys. Just like your home country is not. not easy, Darra. I think we're doing very well. They're over there now. I'm only getting good reports just a little early, but they'll be calling in soon. In fact, probably when I get back,

I'll have my first call from them. We want to open up China. And if we don't open up China, maybe we won't do anything, but we want to open up China. It'll be a great thing for China, a great thing for the rest of the world. Are you willing to lift export controls when it comes to China? Did you give your negotiators any sort of limitations? We're going to see. Look, China has been ripping off the United States for many years. Nobody charged them 10 cents. No president had the courage to charge China for whatever reason.

They didn't want to do it. I took in hundreds of billions of dollars. I put on tariffs on China when I got in first term. And we took in hundreds of billions of dollars. And then I did it again, but I did it for a lot of others. You look at the stats, the deficit last month was cut in half. Everybody was shocked.

I wasn't shocked. I think a lot of the people at this table weren't because they saw the billions of dollars that were pouring in. And the tariffs hadn't even started yet just about. There weren't cars. They were in some countries at a very minor level. And we cut the deficit in half. And it was a big story a couple of days ago.

They said, I don't believe one of the announcers on a business network went wild. I can't believe these numbers. Those numbers are good. The numbers are going to be very good. I think we're going to have a great four years. You know, we had the greatest economy in history during my four years. Wow. I think this one's going to blow it away.

Yeah. Mr. President. Go ahead. Do you have a message for Greta Toonberg, and did she come up on your call with the prime minister today? Well, she's a strange person. She's a young, angry person. I don't know if it's real anger. It's hard to believe, actually, but I saw what happened.

She's certainly different. Anger management. I think she has to go to an anger management class. Oh, my God. That's my primary recommendation for her. Is she kidnapped by Israel? He does not give a fuck. Was she kidnapped?

I find it. I think Israel has enough problems without kidnapping Greta Thunberg. Secondly, are you going to get... Is that what she said? She was kidnapped by Israel? Yes, sir. Are you going to get rid of the Tesla and the Starlink service that you have here at the White House? Probably not. No, I haven't heard that.

I mean, I may move the Tesla around a little bit, but I don't think we'll be doing that with Starlink. It's a good service. you're going to move it to? Yeah. Move it around. What do you mean? I have a lot of locations. Actually, about the...

I got so many locations that I don't know what to do with the ball. About the Tesla, did you ever see Elon Musk get physical with the Treasury Secretary? No, I did. And I tried to have... I did have an argument, but I didn't see it. Was it physical? Was it physical? And there was this New York Times report that he did not want to talk about.

Elon Musk that alleged that he, towards the end of his time in the White House, was blurring the lines between recreational use of drugs and medicinal. Do you think he ever had drugs here at the White House? I really don't know. I don't think so. I hope not. Look, I wish him well. You understand. We had a good relationship and I just wish him well.

He's not taken the vein. Very well, actually. Yeah. Are you about Ada in Gaza? They're really trying to ban. Do you have a response at all about Israel intercepting this boat? And can you give us update on what's happening to the entry of aid into Gaza right now. We've had people being shot by Israeli forces who are trying to get from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Yes. Gaza right now is

in the midst of a massive negotiation between us and Hamas and Israel and Iran actually has involved and we'll see what's going to happen with Gaza. We want to get the hostage. It's all I can tell you. Yeah, please in the back. But, you'd say, but then on true social a bit later, you'd said they were insurrectionist. You're talking about in L.A.? Yes, sir, in L.A. I wouldn't call it quite an insurrection, but it could have led to an insurrection. I mean, that was a serious.

That was a lot of, it was a lot of harm that was going on last night. I watched it very closely. And it was amazing that the job that the National Guard did. And by the way, the police were working very hard also. But, you know, the police are given instructions. They can only do so much. politically correct. I said, no, no, you don't have to be politically correct. You have to do the job. And on the phone anytime soon, I know some... Which one? On Elon Musk, do you plan to speak to him on the

phone anytime soon? I haven't really thought about it, actually. I would imagine he wants to speak to me. I would think that. If I were him, I'd want to speak to me, but, and maybe he was already called. Did you have to ask him, ask him whether or not he's already called, but I'd have no problem with it. If he called you, pick up and speak with him? I don't want to say that, but I would imagine he'd want to talk to me. Mr. President. Yeah, please.

Phone tag, yeah. Iran today. Have you gotten that proposal? And what is the main impediment? We have a meeting with Iran on Thursday, so we're going to wait until Thursday. And what's the main impediment to getting a deal? Well, they're just asking for things that you can't do. Oh, okay.

They don't want to give up what they have to give up. You know what that is. They seek enrichment. We can't have enrichment. We want just the opposite. And so far, they're not there. I hate to say that because the alternative is a very, very dire one. But they're not there.

They have given us their thoughts on the deal. And I said, you know, it's just not acceptable. I would say, yeah. I know what else? I can talk about the weather. But pretty much, pretty much that's the main town. Jesus. Mr. President.

We talked about Lebanon also. Yeah, we did. Yeah. Well, Lebanon's working very hard. They have a great new ambassador. Wow. That I put there, man I know very well. He's very smart.

I didn't even know he was Lebanese. And I said, why would you want Lebanon? He said, I was born there. I love it. I love the people. I said, you know, it's very dangerous going to Lebanon. There are some ambassadorships that are wonderful. There are some that are dangerous.

Yeah, that'd be a bad one. Michelle, his name is. It's a he, Michelle, very elegant man. And I said, why would you want this? And he said, because I love my country and I love those people. I said, it's very dangerous. He goes, I don't care. Damn.

This is not a man that lived undangered. He's a very successful man from here. And he wanted to be the ambassador, despite probably a very dangerous situation he's going into. You see what's going on. Wait, you guys think he's talking about Michelle Obama? He loves that country. He loves that. He was born. Wait, really? He loves the country.

Mr. President, you've got a big, beautiful parade coming up on Saturday. We do. What's your biggest expectations for that? And I've got a second question. Counter-protesters. In regards to Gavin Newsom. Go ahead and talk about the big beautiful parade. It's such a,

thank you, Brian. It's such a I think important moment for this country. The glazer questions, man. Two weeks ago I was calling people and back and forth with leaders, including President Putin, including French president, including lots of different people.

And all of them said we're celebrating victory in World War II. Yeah. And I said, wow, is that amazing? We're the only one that wasn't celebrating, and we're the one that won the war. Now, Russia did help. They did lose 51 million people in all fairness.

People say, oh, he's sticking up for Russia. No, they lost 51 million people. Bro, Russia. And, you know, You know, can't forget that. He's right. Respect. France was celebrating.

And, as you know, Hitler made a speech at the Eiffel Tower. But when I spoke to President Macron, he said, oh, we are celebrating the great victory of World War II. And I think that's great that he was doing it. But we're the one that won it, and we weren't celebrating. I said to myself, isn't that crazy? And I think it's time for us to celebrate a little bit. You know, we've had a lot of victories. We won two world wars.

Yeah. And then we go out and change. the name of the forts where we won the wars. You go out, we win World Wars from Fort Roberti Lee, from Fort Bragg, from all the different forts. And what do we do? We change the name of the forts because we want to be politically correct. So a lot of them were changing back.

You probably know this is Fort Bragg and others. But I think it's a time to celebrate our military. You know, we've rebuilt our military largely. Little low on ammunition. That's because it goes out very fast. other countries, one in particular, but we'll get that back very quickly. But we have a military, the likes of which nobody has. Nobody comes close.

We have the best equipment in the world. We make the best equipment in the world. There's no military like our military. We showed that with ISIS. I was told by the television generals that would take four years to win, and we did it in three weeks, and it was headed by General Raisin-Kane, who's now the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He's great.

He just left him. No. I think it's time that we celebrate. And I sort of have to laugh at these people. Well, you know, you're going to spend a lot of money. A lot of that money is being paid for by me and people that make donations. I don't know if you know that. A lot of it won't even come out of the military. I think I can say that, Susie, right? We have people putting up money to do it. Not that it's necessary, because I think it's a great expenditure. We have many tanks. We have all sorts of new ones and very old ones. So he's paying for the military. One and World War II. It's really a celebration of the Army. So the Army is a year older than the country. So next year we celebrate 250 years, but we're celebrating the Army on Flag Day. And it's not my birthday. It is my birthday, but I'm celebrating Flag Day. It happens to be the same day, so I take a little heat. But Flag Day is the appropriate date. And we're celebrating 250 years of the Army, a great service. And remember, you know, you know, Think of it. We won so much. I didn't know that. World War I, World War I, World War II, so much else. And then we became politically correct. What a coincidence. But I can only tell you that I was told that ISIS would take anywhere from four to five years,

and we did it in three weeks. You were there, you watched, right? We have the greatest military in the world. Nobody can beat us. As long as we have our right leadership, nobody can beat us. If we have stupid people running it, like you had in Afghanistan, when you look at that, first of all, Afghanistan should have been an easy victory as a war, but we were so sad the way we fought it, so ridiculous. We fight not to win. But we didn't used to be that way.

And we're celebrating because I think the day in Afghanistan was the saddest period of time in the history of our country. I was run by, I was a Biden mess with bad generals like Millie and others. They were bad. They were incompetent generals. I know all the good ones and the bad ones. We got rid of most of the bad ones. But it was time to celebrate, and that's what we're doing. So it's on June 14th.

And it's going to be a parade, the likes of which, I don't know if we've ever had a parade like that. It's going to be incredible. We have Arab, even though it's the Army, we have a lot of those Army airplanes flying over the top, and we have tanks all over the place. Isn't the guy from thousands and thousands of soldiers? Going to bravely march down the streets.

It's going to be a beautiful day. Was that him? And we're going to celebrate our country. You spoke of leadership. And real quickly, speaking of Gavin Newsome, is he the right leader for California, considering how massive their economy is and all these U.S. investments coming in? Is he the right governor and leader for the future of California and for U.S. investments? I mean, I think he's done a terrible job.

And, you know, he's a guy. I always got along with him. You look at his past statements about me. I was a great president. I always took care of California, you know, all that. Well, he helped with the wildfires. I'm just talking on results. You look, here's the advantage of beautiful weather,

maybe the best weather of any state when you think about it. Beautiful weather, beautiful ocean, beautiful everything. You have all the advantages, and he didn't take advantage of that. And he's let people come in by the millions who are overrunning your hospitals, your education system, and your police are being overreacting. run. Look at what's happened. That was bad.

That was real bad. He should only be happy I sent in the military because if I didn't send him in, you would have had a problem there, the likes of which we haven't seen in a long time. Yeah, please. Thank you, Brian, very much. On supersonic flight, on supersonic flight. Yes, sir. I know you just signed an executive order on it.

Do you want to see a supersonic Air Force one in the next 10 years or so? Oh, well, I don't care too much about that, but I would like to see, you know, if you think about it, flight, the word flight's an international. interesting word, but it's probably the only category where we've actually gone backwards, because we used to have the Concord, and we could fly to London, Brad, very quickly. Concord. Nicely. And today it takes you two times and three times as long.

You have a lot of money, right? Regress. By the way, the Concord did my way of thinking, to this day, Michael, because you're very much into aesthetics, I know, but to this day is one of the most beautiful pieces of art. I've ever seen. It was a piece of the beauty of the Concord. It was the most beautiful plane. But it was, you know, got you there in half the time. Now you spend a lot of time. Trump's bringing back Concord. He's going to make Concord green again. There's no reason for it. Because, you know, they have the sonic boom. It's not a huge problem, but they have the sonic boom thing pretty well figured out.

The technology changes, the change in the skin, a change in weight, all of the other things. There's no reason why we shouldn't do great. So we are making it possible. for them to do supersonic and get us back on the track. I mean, we've, think of it, 30 years ago, we actually had planes that flew much faster than we do now. Well, because they were too expensive. I'm pretty sure that's why. So we've regressed, and we're going to progress.

Five sonic big booms. Sort of an amazing thing, isn't it now? We've gone backwards. On Wall Street, they haven't done that. If Goldman Sachs was like that, you wouldn't have Goldman Sachs anymore. Yeah, please. Are you planning to deploy Marines in California to address the situation in Los Angeles? Are you going to deploy Marines in California? We'll see what happens.

I mean, I think we have it very well under control. Yeah, they don't need to. I think it would have been a very bad situation. It was heading in the wrong direction. It's now heading in the right direction. And we hope to have the support of Gavin, because Gavin's a big beneficiary as we straighten out his problems. Surely he's going to be okay with it.

I mean, his state is a mess. And I'd like to get somebody involved in the rail. because I look personally it should have never been built because you can fly there for two dollars and what are you doing they're doing that you could drive you could do lots of different things you know if they did a study if you gave every passenger the finest limousine service in the history of our world the most expensive chauffeur driven white glove limousine service back and forth that's good we would have saved billions of dollars as opposed to building this monstrosity that's going up and I've never seen it anything. Does everybody get a limousine now? I'm a person. I've always done well on cost overruns. I don't have them. But I will tell you, I have never seen cost overruns. You see it where they're

20% more, 50%? 100% more. These are thousands of percent. Nobody even knows. They have no idea. And it was supposed to be from San Francisco to Los Angeles. Well, they just made it way outside of Los Angeles where it's stopping in the middle

of... I don't want to say nowhere. I happen to like one of those little cities. very much, but it's way short of the destination. And our government is saying, you know, why are we involved in this thing? It's been handled so badly before him, but he really blew it. So, you know, all right, one more question. What are the questions that were had there in the purpose of that retreat? Your time at Camp David, can you speak to what discussions were had there in the purpose of that retreat?

Probably not. Well, I don't want to speak to discussions. I mean, I told you what we were there for a little bit. We had discussions in many topics. We had a group of people, a large group of people, including generals and admirals and lots of others. And all I can say is our country is in great shape. We're in great shape economically.

The bill that Mike and Jason and all the people are working on is going to be, I think, amazing. I think it's going to be one of the most important pieces of legislation we've ever had in this country. It's going to do things that you wouldn't believe. and we're going to, you know, I have a very simple phrase. We ran an election on very simple words, make America great again. That's what we're doing. We're making it great.

We're making it safe. We're making it beautiful. And we're making it very wealthy again. You know, wealth is okay. You need wealth to take care of lots of other people. We have to make our country better. It has to heal from four years of abuse. Our country was abused badly by a very encouraging,

competent person and a group of people that weren't incompetent, but they were radical left lunatics, and they ran the country with an auto pen. And I hope that law enforcement's looking at that very seriously. That's like a takeover of our country in a certain way. That is weird. Because this guy had no idea what he was doing. You saw that during the debate? You saw that in other cases? I mean, I saw it years ago. By the way, 40 years ago he had no. He was bad 40 years ago. We're not just talking about. And they always like to say age, it's a retard. I know people 88, 89, 92. Bernie Marcus, who just passed away was 95. I spoke to him a year before he was 100%.

It's not age. It's something else. But whatever it is, you can't have that in this country. The damage he's done to this country is unbelievable. But the good news is we've got much of it fixed already, and the rest of it will happen. Thank you all very much. Thank you. Well, there it is. Contrary to what some people would have you believe, the amount of pushback and the amount of support for, you know, holding these people accountable and arresting them is at an all-time high. I think that the majority of people want to see these guys and these people get arrested. So take a look at this.

You know, if we just take a look at the baseline numbers here, this is Trump's net approval rating on immigration. It's gone up like a rocket. Compare now versus eight years ago during Trump's first turn. Look at this. In his first term, Trump was way, way, way under water at minus 21 points. But look at this. He's up over 20 points. Now in the aggregate, he is in positive territory at plus one point on his net approval rating.

Some other polls even have it a little bit higher than that. There is no issue on which Trump is doing so much better than he was in his first term more than the issue of immigration. This is the reason why I think he should use the military if necessary and also the National Guard to just completely shut this stuff down. everybody is agreeing with him on this everybody's on in favor of this like everybody is but really i mean like people voted for this do it i think the problem that a lot of people have right now this is what i'm frustrated about personally why are there not 3,000 arrests from yesterday why are why do they not already have the national guard patrolling making sure this doesn't happen

build the camps. Yeah. Yeah, it's too soft. They're way too soft on this. It's embarrassing. And you can see very clearly, this is what the public wants. So don't let social media and other content creators and people like this gaslight you. This is the popular opinion. The popular opinion is to put these people in jail and remove them from the country. And it is overwhelmingly the popular opinion. And this, like the crash out that's happened over the past few days will only serve to make it even more extreme. No wonder the Times has written it up the way that he is. Trump is waiting for a fight on this because he knows what he's doing so far.

To put children in jail? This emotional manipulation doesn't work anymore. I understand, like, I don't care. If you're bringing kids over and you're trying to use them as, like, a shield for your bad behavior, then, yeah, I guess they're going to jail with you. I don't care. I don't think most people do. I think a lot of average Americans are sick of having their own empathy

and their better nature weaponized against them in order to justify a bunch of illegal aliens and criminals coming over and doing stuff that they shouldn't be doing and they shouldn't even be here in the first place. Yeah, bring your kid to riot day? What the fuck is wrong with you? Where are the parents? Where's the parents' responsibility for taking care of their kids?

It's insane. No, you're not going to claim the moral upper hand whenever these people are willingly putting their kids in danger by doing this. It's outrageous. It's working with the American electorate. It's massively working. Where is the immigration rank on issues for him?

And guys, I wonder, where do you think that it's going to push? Like, whenever you see a bunch of random people in masks, flying every single flag except for the American flag, lighting self-driving cars on fire, and standing in the middle of the street and, you know, like driving around in motorcycles around, again, like cars on fire in the middle of the intersection.

I wonder if that's going to help Trump or not. Ah, geez, I wonder. You might not be seeing this? And you might not see this, but I am a legal immigrant myself and all my extended family and I are pro-Trump. Leftling media is lumping legals with illegals and it really bothers all the legal immigrants. Well, of course it does.

I mean, I went to school with a lot of Eric Hernandez's, okay? And, you know, like David or like Bill Rodriguez. This is extremely fucking common. What is he doing compared to others? Yeah. So I think what's so important is it is his top issue so far. And the reason it is his top issue is because take a look at the individual nuggets in here. Why are people approving of Trump on immigration, approve of these different immigration actions?

While Trump's administration's program to deport those here illegally, look at this, 54% approval. How about agents searching your hometown for those that they think are here illegally? Again, positive territory here above. There it is. And you can see, obviously, people do support this. And again, the majority of people support this. 50% for Donald Trump. So it's not just on the broad issue of immigration where Trump is doing well. It's on the specifics. When you dive into the issues, Trump is above 50% and his actions are above 50% at least with those

most directly connected to what's going on right now out in Los Angeles. So Donald Trump, the president, picking a fight on this, and to an extent, you see Los Angeles mayor, Karen Bass, a Democrat and the California governor, Gavin Newsom pushing back. So what a voters see in terms of their perceptions of

Republicans, the president, or Democrats say Gavin Newsom on this issue? Yeah. How is it not higher? They're literally illegals? I think that the reason why it's not higher is because he's talking about doing this whole sale. So there's a lot of people out there that want the deportations to happen, but they just want it to be for the people that are criminals. But what I'm saying is that mass deportations for anybody here illegally is actually the consensus opinion.

Or sorry, I guess consensus isn't the right word. It's the majority opinion. But whenever you add in, especially people that are committing crimes or doing anything wrong, then you have a lot more people. The American electorate believe that... What I'm saying is like, this is the most extreme way of asking the question. And even this extreme way of asking the question generates a majority yes response. So think about whenever you get more specific. The Democrats don't have a clue on the issue of immigration. I mean, you could just take it here. Closer to trust more in immigration, Democrats versus Republicans, got three different polls for you across the board.

They all tell the same story. Republicans lead on the issue of immigration. You see it here, CBS plus six. You see it here, CNN plus six. Man. You see it here. Ipsos, even bigger. Plus 19, no matter...

It is just not popular to burn down self-driving cars and protect illegal aliens over American citizens. Isn't that shocking? Who could have ever guessed that? What poll you look at, no matter which way you cut it, the American public is with the Republicans, the American public is with Donald Trump and to a much greater extent than they were in term number one

and it's not just on the broad issue. And this is why he needs to be decisive and he needs to act on this very quickly. If Trump actually does pretty much get rid of a lot of these people and he forcefully does it and you see mass arrests and even you have like, I think a big issue is that a big issue is that a lot of these community leaders and the people that push for these riots,

they never get held accountable. They spent four years trying to hold Donald Trump accountable for January 6th, but somehow we can't hold any of these people accountable for doing this for years? How does that happen? Of immigration, it's on the specifics as well. The flags are a charitable look. They are. In which the American public is with Donald Trump and the Republicans,

and that is why Donald Trump is eager to take on this fight and eager for those scenes at Los Angeles. I was just going to use that word eagerness. It explains some of that eagerness to push forward evermore on this as it escalates. Harriet, and thank you. Thank you very much. Yeah, I think that there's a good chance that he's waiting for it to hit a fever pitch, and then after he does, then he's going to

basically mobilize the military or National Guard in order to take care of it. I think that's definitely possible. That he's kind of waiting, he's waiting for things to get worse until he lets it pop off even more. Look at his most recent truth social post. Okay, let me see if I can find it.

Let's see here, if they split, we will hit. This is a statement from the president of the United States concerning the catastrophic Gavin Newscom inspired riots going on in Los Angeles. The insurrectionists have a tendency to spit in the face of National Guardsmen and women and others. These patriots are told to accept this if it's just the way life runs. But non-Trump administration, if they spit, we will hit such a promise that I will hit harder than we ever have hit before. Such disrespect will not be tolerated. I'm going to be honest, if you're spitting on federal officers and they hit you.

Ah, geez. Really? Oh, wow. Wow. Ah, man. I think that really, and this is, there's like a meta-level issue here. There is a normalization and there is a normalization of violence against people because you disagree with them or because you think that it's acceptable to be violent toward them. This entire notion needs to be dismantled at the core. This is, this is completely destructive and it's destructive for everything. And so, yeah, this is, I totally agree with this. It's left this ideology. Well, I don't know if it, I mean, I don't want to say that it's like one side doing this because it's ultimately the ideology is what's bad, not the people that are doing it specifically. So it doesn't matter who's doing it. Spitting is potentially a hazard depending on what disease they have. So yeah, that's fair.

Spitting out someone counts as a salt, you should expect them to hit you back. Yeah, exactly. And I think that we need to go back to a society where any sort of physical escalation, is treated like it's bad. This is the same reason why I've had the opinion that I had about throwing bricks at the police officers too. Like, in my opinion, if you throw a brick at a police officer, I think that they should be able to shoot you.

Straight up. Like, literally no restrictions. Like, if you're throwing bricks, you should be able to get shot. It's attempted murder. Yeah, absolutely. And there's no reason, by the way, there is no moral and ethical reason

that you need to tell, that you can come up with that tells me that this is a person who should endure a life-threatening attack on their life and not have the right to defend themselves. This is a deadly weapon. A brick is a deadly weapon. Yes, there are no bricks of peace.