Asmongold TV - Trump is sure this won't happen again | Asmongold TV

Episode Date: June 25, 2025

Trump is sure this won't happen again Asmongold show for all of his stream highlights, competitions, reactions & more. ------------- ------------ Keywords: gaming podcast, online gaming, mmo gaming, streamer podcast, streaming highlights Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

not happen again, say in a couple weeks. I'm tired of it. I think they don't want it to happen again. And Iran's not going to have a nuclear weapon, by the way. I think it's the last thing in their mind right now. I'd make any commitments yesterday about uranium enrichment? What? About uranium enrichment.

They're not going to have enrichment and they're not going to have a nuclear weapon. And they know that. They're going to get on. OK, well, there it is. To being a great trading nation. You know, they're very good traders. And they're going to be a great trading nation. I didn't know that.

They have a lot of oil. It's a surprise. Wow. They're not going to have a nuclear weapon. They already said they're going right back to making nuclear weapons. They might say that publicly, but he's going to know whether it's happening or not. Right? I mean, he's obvious, like, I mean, who do you think has a better idea of whether they're making nuclear weapons?

The president or you? I mean, just think about it. Do they promise? The last thing on Iran's mind right now is nuclear weapons. Can you clarify what you meant when you mentioned regime change in your truth social post the other night? Regime change? Do you want to see regime change in Iran? No.

If there was, there was. But no, I don't want it. I'd like to see everything calm down as quickly as possible. Regime change takes chaos. Why are you tweeting about it? And ideally, we don't want to see so much chaos. So we'll see how it does. You know, the Iranians are very good trade.

very good business people, and they got a lot of oil. They should be fine. They should be able to rebuild and do a good job. They're never going to have nuclear, but other than that, they should do a great job, which is exactly where I've been saying for years, you cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon. But we're going to be with, where's Marco?

I think Marco's here someplace. You know our great secretary of say, but we cannot let them have a nuclear weapon. They won't have a nuclear weapon. And I will tell you, the last thing on the United States. their minds, just nuclear weapons. Yeah.

They don't even want to think about nuclear. And our B-2 pilots made this all possible. They had a magnificent hit in the dark of night with no moon, no light, no nothing. They hit the target perfectly, wiped it out. And the press is very disrespectful. I saw CNN fake news going, well, maybe it wasn't a perfect hit. It was perfect. They said, maybe it did destroy it.

We agree. It did destroy it. but maybe it could have destroyed it more. No, no, it couldn't have destroyed it more. Oh, God. Hit the target perfectly? There's never been a more perfect target hit than this. Yeah, it was a full moon, exactly.

Everyone hit, and it's very disrespectful to those great geniuses and patriots that flew those planes through tremendous dangers. So CNN and MS, DNC are disgrace. And so are the others. I mean, they're pretty much all in disgrace. but it's The whole mountain is gone Either they hit the wrong place or they got it all

I mean Look I mean I would assume they got them What happened to the enriched uranium In my opinion there's a chance that They just they sold the enriched uranium To Russia or to China

Or something like that Or they were allowed to hold on to it As long as they didn't move it somewhere Like there's probably some sort of back channeling deal that they have with that. It's not like, I mean, can we just rule out the option that this is just some unknown wild card that they have no awareness of? They obviously know what the fuck happened with it. Yeah, we 100% know where it is.

Yeah, exactly. An amazing period of time. Now we'll go to NATO and we'll get a new set of problems. It's most likely. We'll solve a new set of problems. You think you'll meet with Zelensky when you're there? I'm going to sell it to him. Yeah, probably, I'll see him.

What would you say to him? Say, how you doing? That's tough. He's in a... Zelensky when you're there? Yeah, probably. I'll see him. Yeah.

What would you say to him? Say, how you doing? Uh, I just... Guys, holy shit. He's in a tough situation. Should have never been there. Sir, he's not a couple of days ago that you didn't think that you didn't think that he the U.S. should have to agree to the 5% increase in GDP on defense?

No. Do you want to work on that. So I was the one that said that's what they should be paying, as you know. No, I should do something. And they're having a problem with Spain. There's always a problem with Spain, because Spain's not agreed, which is very unfair to the rest of them, right? So the U.S. won't be increasing our GDP to 5%.

We should pay what everyone else. You know, they're in Europe. We're not. You know, a lot of that money goes to rebuilding their bridge. their roads so it can take heavy equipment. And, you know, we don't have any roads in Europe. We don't have any bridges in Europe. Well, why don't they just pay for it?

No, I wouldn't be quite the same thing. Yeah, what is this? But we're with them. Are you still limited to Article 5 of NATO? It depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right? But I'm committed to being their friends.

You know, I've become friends with many of those. Article 5 is the one where, like, you have to defend NATO countries if they get attacked, right? And I'm committed to helping them. Is that something else? Going forward once these other countries are spending work? By having a unified system, I think we're going to have stronger peace, better peace. And I think we have that.

The best piece. You know, when I went to NATO, they were broke. When I first started this whole thing, it seems like a long time ago, nine years. But they were broke. I knew it immediately. I said, you guys are broke. They weren't paying their dues. seven of the 28 countries at the time it was 28

were paying their dues but they weren't paying very much. NATO was broke and I said you're going to have to pay and we did a whole thing and now they're paying a lot. Then I said you're going to have to lift it to 4% or 5% and 5% is better. I don't see how anybody could be against that by the way. Like if there's an agreement that everybody pays a certain amount and you have people that aren't paying the amount,

I mean like if you do that with your internet provider, like they don't give you internet. if you do that with your car payment they take the car back if you do that with your house they take the house back there's never a scenario where paying like nothing out of the thing that you agreed to pay with yeah like you run yeah you out on your ass like what is this welcome to you i guess you're voting enough today but they're going to be lifting it to five percent that's good it gives them much more power if there's language in the final summit declaration about aggression by russia what do you be okay with that kind of language?

Well, I'll have to take a look at it. How the fuck? Yeah, what language? You know, I'd like to see a deal with Russia. As you know, Vladimir called me up. He said, can I help you with Iran? I said, no, I don't need help with Iran. I need help with you. You know what's crazy is that we have another three and a half years of this?

And that's at the minimum. Yeah. We're going to be getting a deal done with Russia. It's a shame. Seven and a half years? week. You're more. 6500.

So it's not last week. Russia, Ukraine. A war that never would have happened. I do think that there is a non-zero percentage chance that Trump runs for a third term. And I think that there is a high percentage chance that if Trump runs for a third term and at that point that he starts running, that he's effectively neutralized Iran, established some degree of, you know, in the Middle East and the Ukraine war is over, I think there would be a lot of people that would vote for him. I do.

And in my opinion, I think it would be, I think he would win. How can he run a third term just by doing it? Like, I don't support, I don't support him running for a third term. But I think it could happen. Yeah, don't forget the files. Yeah, like, yeah, exactly. The only one that can beat him is Obama. Well, how could Obama run for a third term?

He's already been president for two terms. That's unconstitutional. So Obama couldn't run against Trump. So enjoy your flight. You can ask you one more follow-up? In your comments just now about Article 5, that will probably make some people in Europe concerned. Can you clarify what you mean? Are you still committed to mutual defense?

I'm committed to saving lives. I'm committed to life and safety. And I'm going to give you an example. definition when I get there. I just don't want to do it on the back of an airplane. Okay. And one other question on energy. What's your take on the oil price situation right now and are you concerned? I love it. It dropped almost $10 yesterday. I put out a statement, get it down because a lot of people aren't able to do things when the energy goes down. Great. I have a lot less conflict. So it came down and our energy

department's doing a great job. We're we're drilling like we've never driven. We've never drilled before. We're keeping it down. We're going to keep it down until all these wars are settled. Thank you very much, everybody. I'll see you. Iranian sleeper cells in the United States. Iranian sleeper cells. He led a lot of supercells. And Biden was an incompetent president and no idea what he was doing. Hardly ever signed a document. Other people signed documents for him with the auto pen. It was gross incompetence. And among everything else, he let a lot of super cells in, many from Iran. But hopefully we'll take care of them.

What Biden did to this country should never be forgotten. Do you think you'll get the Nobel Peace Prize now, sir? Bro, the kind of questions and shit that these people ask is amazing. Back over to leader, Jeffers. Oh my God, bro. You got this guy like, people are, isn't it crazy that these people are so deranged that like, this has got them rooting for Iran making a nuclear bomb? That's crazy to me.

Questions? Mr. Leader, you just said that the president's characterization that the program had been obliterated was a misrepresentation. What is your assessment? No, I didn't say it was a misrepresentation. I said there have been no facts that have been presented to the American people or to the Congress to confirm that Iran's nuclear program has been completely and totally obliterated. What a stupid way to say it. What an idiot. What a dumb idiot. So, number one, the nuclear program hasn't been obliterated because they still have three sites that didn't even get bombed at all. So, like, you're already beginning on a premise.

That's a lie. Like, that was never the conversation. It was not about them having any uranium or about having any nuclear. It was about them making bombs. Timu Obama? I mean, no, don't bro, don't disrespect Obama like that. This guy's not even that.

This guy's just a clown. Isn't this the guy that had the 24-hour crash out for nothing? He filibustered nothing? This is the same guy, right? Yeah. No? I'm pretty sure it is. It's Cory Booker.

Oh, right. No, I got it. No, no, you're right. I got it wrong. I would not agree that the world is safer now than it was a month ago? We have repeatedly made clear that the Iranian regime should never be permitted to become nuclear capable. One of the questions that the administration needs to answer is why did they abandon the aggressive diplomacy that was successful during the Obama administration, partnering with Great Britain, France, Germany, China, and Russia to reach an agreement with Iran

that actually did set back Iran's nuclear ambitions. For sure, guys, for sure. 100% guys, yeah, definitely successful. Yeah, very successful, extremely successful. Of course. In what way? That's a question that needs to be. I don't know.

answered by the administration, which is why it's perplexing that if the Trump administration really does believe they have the high ground, why are you hiding from the American people and their elected representatives? How can they prove a negative? How can they do that? There's no, like, what do you, what do you think you're going to, how could they prove that? Who's hiding? Yeah, they showed the screenshots of the thing that's blown up. Hexas said Iran's nuclear program was obliterated without evidence. He's responding to that. What are you talking about? Well, I mean, do you really think that they don't have any evidence of that?

What about the fact that the entire thing looks like it got collapsed and it got hit by bunker busters? Like, what evidence do you need? Do you want them to go in and, like, you know, there's like a nuclear bomb and it's like broken half? Like what do you expect to see like what would be evidence in your mind? They dropped 12 bunker buster bombs on that. People were discussing if two would be able to destroy it. Before the bombing happened, the conversation was, would you need one or two? They dropped 12.

What the fuck do you think? What do you think? Yeah, Iran agreed to a ceasefire right after it? Yeah, of course. course. No, 200 foot of a solid mountain rock, absolutely no guarantee. All the centrifuges are destroyed. There's no guarantee.

You're right. There's no guarantee. But I think there's a pretty high probability. I'll tell you that. Definitely a pretty high probability. I don't deserve clear evidence. The cracks in the earth were not there before the bombs dropped. Yeah.

They should draw a big red X on the site so people know it's destroyed. That's true. That's what they should do. Yeah. If they want evidence on it, just release another picture of it with an X over the site and be like, see, the X indicates that we've destroyed it. This is the proof that you need. A health bar. Yeah, like an empty health bar.

I like that. We have major breaking news into CNN. Three sources tell CNN that according to an early U.S. intelligence assessment, the U.S. military strikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities last weekend. Did not destroy the core components of the country's nuclear. program and likely only set it back a few months. That's right. So this is an assessment that actually is out from the Defense Intelligence Agency. That is the Pentagon's intelligence arm. And it was based on a battle damage assessment conducted by US Sentcom after the strikes, according to one of the sources. Let's go to CNN National Security correspondent and Tasha Bertrand, who has this exclusive

new reporting. This is to that question that has been asked about how much damage has been done. This is a real question. It's also a political question that has been to something that Donald Trump has been sort of dealing with here recently. What are you learning? All right. Anyway, let me go back a little bit. And, yeah, not good news. We'll see what happens. It's unclear right now. It's still very unclear. And we don't really know what's what's going on. They were calling, I guess I'll just say straight up what it was. He was asleep and they were calling for a confirmation. Oh, what insurance does he have for the 50th fucking time? What, you know, what pharmacy does he use for the 50th fucking time? It's like I spent an hour filling out your fucking tablet that the information is already in the system. And so now you're calling to the same thing again. But then they told me, let's see, is there anything else? They told me. They still think it could be potential pneumonia.

They're still not really completely sure. You know, it's really kind of hard to say. And trying to steal even more money. They're asking about, like, you know, like a discharge. Right now they're thinking about, you know, they don't know if he's going to need oxygen after this. I mean, I'll be totally, you know, blunt about this. I really do not want him to be on oxygen.

I think the first thing people do is they go on oxygen. and the second thing that they do is die. And so I'm really not a fan of him being on oxygen. I don't think that he is either. And so, you know, and also, like, by the way, his oxygen exchange rate, like, it was weird because he went to the pulmonologist like three days, three days before this whole thing happened, and his oxygen exchange rate was like 94-95. And so, like, the entire idea that, like, this is a necessary thing is just,

just like out of fucking nowhere. And I'd be okay with him having it three days. Yeah, COPD. He has like, he has a very minimal COPD, but yeah. And so that's it. That's not great, though. No, it's not great. You're right that it's not great.

But given his condition and everything, it's okay. And CO2 levels are high or O2 stats. As far as I know, I think CO2 is normal. But, yeah, not a fan, but if he needs it, you should. I have no problem, I have no problem resigning myself. to that reality and there will come a day that he needs oxygen but it is important to make sure that that day is as delayed as possible in my opinion and i think that through uh other types of you know like uh fucking what do you call it like uh therapy and things like that uh this is not as day

yeah like i want that day to be as far in the future as possible i know that's going to happen I know what's going to happen. That's just the way it is. But hopefully not soon. And we'll do whatever we can to prevent that and push that timeline back as much as possible. So, yeah, how much you pay for insurance? It's just the hospital trying to make sure they're doing a good job. Like, I never get mad at the woman there who's calling.

She's trying to do her job. She's trying to do her best. I'm not going to get angry at her, right? And so, yeah, that's about it. Is that way he didn't stream yesterday? Yeah, I was at the hospital all day. and let's see here she was active in the oxygen for a while now she does

yeah of course and uh they'll just do a walk test on it if he can walk around without gankshire breath he'll be fine without oxygen that's probably what they meant yeah it'll take some time and i think that they're talking about like physical therapy etc too and uh like earlier this week they were discussing like before he got sick him going to a pulmonary uh uh like therapy place where they were like helping him like learn how to breathe and like you know basically like advancing the capacity of his lungs and, like, his ability to, like, get around. And so hopefully that's what happens.

He should use the VA if you told, oh, my God. Yeah, no, that's definitely not what he would want to do. And don't think him in hospital. That's where folks die, right? I mean, he didn't want to go. And that's what he said last time, right? Like, I mean, honestly, like, it was the last resort. I mean, he and I have the same viewpoint on that, too.

Yeah, make sure he takes an inventive's spirometer home, too. I don't know what that is. but I'll find it out. But so, yeah, that's the plan. And Catawain-O-2 way too long. It's billable. Hang in there. Yeah, I know.

And, like, he's reasonable. He's smart. He knows what he's doing. And so, looking to oxygen, hyperbaric chamber therapy. Short-changing life-short-short sessions, life-changing. Yeah, I don't know. Any nebulizers are inhaled steroids? Yeah.

I mean, like, we'll see what's going to happen, right? You consider getting him a stem cell treatment. It should help a lot. I actually suggested that to him, but I don't know enough about it. I wish I knew somebody who did, and they could give me better insight into it. But, I mean, as I said, I mean, I would obviously pay for it, right? It would be no big deal. Like, I mean, I don't know what's really on the table, right?

I'm not a doctor. I'm not an expert. Joe Rogan. Yeah, I don't know. I know, like, Mel Gibson had that happened for his dad, too, and it apparently helped him. But, like, I don't really know Mel Gibson. So, who knows? but yeah go private as soon as possible well i i don't know what the right option is and it's got to be

what's what's best for him and so uh or what he wants to do to they might say he needs oxygen at home just so they can be discharged early but it's not permanent no i'd be okay with that uh if it's meant as a palliative thing in order for him to like kind of move past uh situation but how old's your dad he's 78 my dad's 78 uh you know everything else like you know heart rates normal blood pressure is like 100 over like fucking 60 or something like that you know every single other like vital that he has is like pretty much perfect it's just this long situation that's that's problematic and so yeah there you go 78's he's young these days with medicine and stuff uh no it's not a lot of people die uh but we're gonna do our best to make

sure that's not what happens with him and i'm gonna do my best he he he's trying, he's trying to stick it out. And so, you know, I'm realistic and honest and direct. And sometimes it can come off as bleak. But at the same time, you know, that's just the way it is. We'll see what happens. But yeah, that's where we're at. And so they had to call me. And that's just how it is. I took it back a little bit because, you know, obviously interrupt you. So we'll go back. We'll get this here. But I do appreciate it, guys. Thank you. has been asked about how much damage has been done. This is a real question.

It's also a political question that has been to something that Donald Trump has been sort of dealing with here recently. What are you learning, Natasha? Yeah, look, Brianna, this is the first assessment that we are getting that the U.S. intelligence community has found about the battle damage that resulted from those U.S. military strikes on these three Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. And as you said, it was produced by the defense intelligence agency, which is the Pentagon's intelligence arm. And it is worth noting that it is a very early assessment. The strikes were only a matter of days ago.

And the intelligence community is still gathering intelligence. They are still working to come up with a full comprehensive picture of what exactly happened here. But based on a battle damage assessment that was carried out by U.S. Central Command, essentially looking at the image. I mean, if they build it again, just blow it up again. I mean, I don't know what the fuck are we even talking about. That's obviously the solution. Yeah, I mean, that that's 100% what to do. So, like, I don't even know why they're even thinking about this.

And looking at what was actually damaged, the Defense Intelligence Agency has assessed that the core components of Iran's nuclear program are largely intact. And that Iran's nuclear program has essentially only been set back by months. Now, we presented this information to the White House for comment. And White House Press Secretary Carolyn Levitt, she did acknowledge the exact. the existence of this assessment, but she said in a statement that the administration disagrees with it. She said, quote, this alleged assessment is flat out wrong and was classified as top secret, but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous low-level loser in the intelligence community. The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump

and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program. Everyone knows what happens when you drop 14, 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets, total obliteration. Now, it is worth noting here that there has been dissent, I should say. There's probably, I mean, like, let's be real, they probably don't entirely know how much of it they destroyed because they can't go underneath and find, like, realistically, how can they figure out whether they destroyed everything? I mean, you have to go with some degree of extrapolation here. I mean, it's kind of reasonable. Within the intelligence community, within the defense community, about just how much of an impact these massive bunker buster bombs

would actually have on Iran's nuclear facilities. It was far from certain, given that these bombs had never been tested in an actual combat scenario, whether they would actually penetrate those very, very deep underground tunnels that lie underneath these nuclear facilities. And what we are told is that, as of now, this Defense Intelligence Agency assessment, it does conclude at this point, again, it is still very early, that those underground facilities, including the centrifuges, including the highly

enriched uranium that everyone has been talking so much about, those are largely intact. Now, of course, this does stand at odds with what President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegson has been saying in recent days about the impact of these U.S. military. Wait a minute. Let me listen to that again. Very, very deep underground. Certain, given. that these bombs had never been tested in an actual combat scenario, whether they would actually penetrate those very, very deep underground tunnels that lie underneath these nuclear facilities. And what we are told is that, as of now, this Defense Intelligence Agency assessment, it does conclude at this point, again, it is still very early, that those underground facilities, including the centrifuges, including the highly enriched uranium that everyone has been talking so much about, those are largely intact. Now, of course, that's not what it said.

It said that it said it back by months. That's not, it didn't say that the centrifuges weren't destroyed. Like, that's not what was said. It was largely, yeah, like, this is, this is obviously an extrapolate. They're extrapolating what this means and assuming that it turned into something else. She's purposely being confused. You can see what I'm saying here, though, right, about this? with respect you're wasting your time watching debates the places they got hit by are gone for at least 500 use due to the contamination that's buried underground these people are just talking nonsense i mean i agree with you

the bombs are tested on concrete but not on mountain rock etc so how deep is a penetration can only be speculated without inside data yeah i mean obviously that's why they dropped a bunch of them this does stand at odds with what president Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegeseth has been saying in recent days about the impact of these U.S. military strikes. Of course, President Trump said it was totally obliterated. And Secretary Hegzth did as well. And he actually also provided CNN with a statement. And he said that, quote, based on everything we have seen, and I've seen it all, our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons. Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran. So anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the president and the successful mission.

Now, our sources did emphasize here that there was severe damage that was done largely to the above ground structures at these nuclear sites. And so there was damage done, of course, by these massive bombs. But the core components of the nuclear program, we are told they are largely intact and it only set the program back by a matter of months. Boris Brianna. How could they even know that? Like, I'm not even sure. How do you even know that that's what happened? Like, I'm very, very confused by this.

They don't? Yeah. I mean, I feel like what are you even talking about? Yeah, this is good. Trump will release the video? That's a good point. Yeah. No, that's a very good point.

Is that maybe with all these people saying it didn't happen, it will increase the probability that they actually will release the video about this. kind of set the record straight. I mean, I would really, really like that. I would love that. And so hopefully that's what happens. I mean, we don't know if that's what's going to happen or not. But ideally, in a perfect world, it is.