Asmongold TV - Trump's Head of FBI is Wild | Asmongold

Episode Date: July 10, 2025

Trump's Head of FBI is Wild Subscribe to Asmongold TV on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@AsmonTV Disclaimer: This podcast is an independent project created by a viewer using content from the YouTube channel Asmongold TV. The purpose is to make his content more accessible to those who prefer audio formats, helping more people engage with the ideas presented in his videos. This podcast is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially associated with Asmongold. All rights to the original content remain with Asmongold TV. If there are any concerns or requests regarding this podcast, please reach out. ---------- Keywords: online gaming, gaming commentary, gaming drama, streamer reactions, gaming takes Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Say that the FBI headquarters should be shut down and reopen as a museum of the deep state? Mr. Chairman, are we allowed to go an extra time? Let's see. You get a second round. Before I call on Senator Lee. Could he just answer the question if he said that the FBI headquarters where they investigate cyber crime and terrorism should be shut down and open as a deep state? As a museum, did he say that the headquarters should be shut down? I think he did say that.

I deserve an answer to that question. He is asking to be head of the FBI, and he said that their headquarters should be shut down. Mr. Chair, parliamentary inquiry. You've got anything you want to say, Mr. Patel, before I go on to Senator Lee? Simply this. If the best attacks on me are going to be false accusations and grotesque mischaracterizations, the only thing this body is doing is defeating the credibility of the men and women at the FBI. I stood with them here in this country.

In every theater of war we have, I was on the ground. in service of this nation and any accusations leveled against me that I would somehow put political bias before the Constitution are grotesquely unfair. And I will have you reminded that I have been endorsed by over 300,000 law enforcement officers to become the next director of the FBI. Let's ask them. Mr. Chairman, I am quoting his own words from September of 2024. It is his own words. It is not some conspiracy. It is what. Mr. Patel actually said himself. Facts matter.

You'll forget that you have two minutes in the next round to say what you just said. Okay, I'll say him again. Okay. Before I call Lee, she's big mad. Just parliamentary inquiry, and it was on time. It wasn't disputing any of the debate, but I intend to keep to my seven minutes

and I appreciate you keeping everyone to it. If we go over, can we have that decrement against the time in the second round? Oh. If a member goes over, That was actually 10 minutes, Mr. Chair. I'm not sure that I want to. Sometimes it's faster to get things done here, just letting people shout and then it does to shut them up.

You're a wise man, Mr. Chair. Thank you. It's so stupid. Chairman. Mr. Chairman. Before we go to leave. Mr. Chairman. Yes, what do you want?

I love this guy. Oh, my God. Mr. Chairman, I'm like Senator Tell us. I mean, if we're going to start. I don't, I'm on the next three minutes. Well, now my friend's son of COVID-R. Oh, my God. So you hear what you're saying is the chairman.

Oh, my God. But not shutting her up. But I've gone through this before. See, this is, you know what? This is, I think, what they were talking about about, like, the federal government wastes a lot of time and money. I feel like this happens like, you know, this is like this sets the tone for the whole thing. And I think I know how to handle it and get this.

I think you're a star-spangled Austin chairman. I just want to say that for the record. But if you're going to let somebody over there go three minutes over, I want my extra three minutes. Well, let's see if it's abused by anybody else before we make that deced. I'm just telling you, I'm going to abuse it. It's so good, man. Oh, my fucking God, this is so good. Yeah, anyway, what is the rest of these?

I'll get to the rest of them. Oh, wow. They look old. Yeah, they look old because they are old. Oh, here we go. What is this? Fortunately, Senator, yes. I want to get into those details of my family here.

Let's get into a few of them. Tell me about it. Well, if you look at the record from January 6th, where I testified before that committee, because of my personal information being released by Congress, I was subjected to a direct and significant threat on my life. And I put that information in the record. I had to move.

In that threat, I was called a detestable. I know what he's going to say. Go back to where you came from. You belong with your terrorist home. He was called a sand inward. Yeah, that's what it was. friends with the hard R and he dropped it right there in front of everybody that's what was sent to me that's just a piece of it yeah but that's nothing compared to what the men and women and law

enforcement face every day and that's why they have my support i mean i guess so right in the collective all of those statements are taken out of grotesque context and anyone that thinks my 16 years of service is an exemplary on how I would proceed if confirmed as FBI. If you get called it, you're going to pass. That's not true. Into the public ether and creating more public discourse. The only thing that will matter if I'm confirmed as a director of the FBI is a

de-weaponized, depoliticized system of law enforcement, completely devoted to rigorous obedience of the Constitution and a singular standard of justice. Wow. Wow. Yeah, that sounds like a pretty good idea. That would be great. Imagine than that. And this guy, he did talk about the Jeffrey Epstein Black Book.

And this is what I think a lot of people want. They want to have this shit get exposed. So who has, for instance, who is currently holding, this is way off the topic, but who has Jeffrey Epstein's Blackbook? Blackbook? FBI. But who?

That is, I mean, there's. Oh, that's under direct control of the director of the FBI. Just like the manifesto from the Nashville. So if we get this guy in charge, he puts it out there, right? School shooting of the Catholic school.

We still haven't seen that, right? It's not the Nashville police or PD saying we don't want this out. The FBI airmailed into that operation and said, this is not getting out. So there's a good chance. Well, Trump would be on, well, they just won't release that page. That page would be like page, you know, like 66. 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 74. Wait, what? Don't worry about it. 75, 76. You know, like, that's it,

right? And so, page 69. Yeah, sure. And anyway, yes, that's, I'll be very, very curious. Like, I would, I would want to see that happen just by itself. Yeah, just by itself. I would love to see that. The rest of the interview. This is why snippets of information are often misleading and detrimental to this committee's advice and consent process. If you consent, I would love to have five hours of questions and then I could read the whole transcripts. You've got two minutes. Wow.

The rest of the interview. Jesus Christ. Yeah, okay. Wow. Did you say that the FBI? This is the same one. Let me see if I can find the other one. Mr. Patel.

I think you know that I have great respect for the men and women of the FBI. Yeah. Hi, dear, can you open? Jesus, what the fuck is this? Anyway, your Twitter algorithm is so biased? Well, I'm just looking up Cash Patel, right? I mean, like, I don't think there's really a bias there. You just look it up, and that's what's going to come in.

Yeah, I don't know if that's a bias or not. I'll go back and make sure I get through the rest of these, but I feel like that's the majority of them right there. and what were you doing on that day? On that day specifically, January 6th. Preparing to mobilize and deploy the National Guard once we got the lawful request

from the local governing authority, which was the mayor of D.C. and the Speaker of the House. Yeah. Now, how many days in advance were you working to prepare the Department of Defense to help secure the Capitol on January 6th? Days in advance, Senator. We were in the Oval Office

on an unrelated national security matter with the President of the United States, the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and myself, and the President authorized up to 20,000 plus National Guard's men and women to secure any security measures necessarily related to the Capitol. So we were moving to the fullest extent of the law before the requisite request came from a local governing authority days ahead of time. And while you were Chief of Staff at DOD,

how many times did DOD approach Capitol Police and ask if they needed National Guard assistance? I believe those letters are well-documented, numerous instances, and numerous of those instances, those requests were shut down. So they didn't take in the National Guard for January 6th? I wonder why. I mean, they should have known it would have been a shit show. Why would they not do that? Am I correct that the Capitol Sergeant at Arms said assistance was unnecessary?

That's correct, Senator. Who did the Sergeant at Arms report to? The Speaker of the House. That would have been Nancy Pelosi at the time. Is that correct? Yes, Senator. And would that also be Chuck Schumer, then the Senate Majority Leader? The Sergeant at Arms, yes, Senator, reports up there.

Did Mayor Bowser, the Democrat elected mayor in D.C. Either request or allow National Guard assistance. She put in writing on the... days leading up to January 6th, a declination for National Guard additional support. So she said, why? Why would she do that? Because they had FBI in the crowd whose job it was to rile people up enough to get a riot going and then use it to blame the right and gain power. Yep. That must be it. And that letter is available publicly to the world. For sure. So, so and just to speak English for folks at home, a declination meant she said no, don't send National Guard.

Is that right? Yes, sir. Oh, let me ask you a simple question because from the questioning for my Democrat colleagues, they might think otherwise, do you condemn violence against law enforcement? All of it. Wow. Okay. That's crazy. This guy's radical. Oh, man. It's almost like they wanted to get out of hand. I mean, they mismanaged it. The thing is that here's my opinion on it. It seems obvious that they should have had the National Guard there. And there could have been a degree of malicious noncompliance or. Like basically, like, we're going to allow this to happen or at least increase the probability of this happening because it could be advantageous for us politically in the long run. That's possible. But it's also possible that they just didn't think it was going to happen. And also, it's not the government's fault when, like, the people that were walking into the Capitol building, breaking into the Capitol building, you know whose fault it is?

Their fault. They're the ones doing it. It's not like, you know, the FBI is holding their arms and legs by strings and making them walk in. They were let in. Oh, hey, I have no problem with people that walked into the Capitol building and they didn't do anything and then they just left, right? I don't care. I don't think, and really most people care about that. People don't really give a shit about that.

But, like, you can look at the videos of people that are smashing the windows and stealing things. And I don't think that that's the FBI's fucking fault. I don't. I think that's their fault. If an FBI agent says, hey, why don't you just go, you know, go rob a 7-Eleven? Are you going to go do it? Well, if you do, you're going to have a bad fucking time. So no, I think it's ridiculous. It's absolutely ridiculous that you're blaming grown adults, you're blaming the actions of grown adults on other people. These are adults. These are people. They let it happen. They let it happen implies that the people were doing it. You see what my point is? They were doing it. They did it. They're wrong. They should not have done it. It's not a question. Both can be correct.

Yes. Both can be correct. It was mismanaged. But also, I'm not going to go and say like, oh, well, they caused this to happen. The people that did it caused it to happen. Both things are true. I think so. Yes, both things are true.

Accurate and true. Do you think there were instigators in January 6th? I would assume so. Maybe not even just from the government. Maybe anarchists. Maybe people that just want. wanted to fuck shit up. Sure.

I bet that's the case with the BLM riots. Like, I remember when the BLM riots were happening. And my mom was like, I'm so glad you're not, you know, this wasn't 10 years ago. And I'm like, why? And she goes, because you and Cody and Jeff would be down there looting. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, for sure. You know, I stopped police brutality. Yeah, yeah, definitely, guys.

All right. So, oh, wow, look at that. You know, like, yeah, of course. Of course, right? And so I think that for sure there were agitators. Absolutely. But there's agitators and everything like that. I don't know. But anyway, let's move on. That's my viewpoint. I think it's pretty fair. Colleagues, I created a cash bingo card that I have available to any of my colleagues. Man. Colleagues who would like it on the other side of the aisle. I love how the blank spot in the middle is just an American flag.

view this as an unserious caricature and not appropriate for this committee. Sadly, I consider it a serious caricature of what I expect to be witnessed today. Oh. I think we'll have words like enemies list in deep state. I've already exed out four boxes in the opening statements alone. The fact of the matter is, some people will be here to simply substantiate a false. false narratives. Colleagues.

That's probably true to an extent. Yeah, people trying to talk a bunch of bullshit. Is this the same one? The FBI headquarter? Man, she really, people don't like her. You know why? It's because the haircut. She got a new haircut.

She looks like a Karen. She looks like she'd get mad at you for writing her name wrong on a Starbucks cup and want a free one next time. I'm just saying it. Everybody's thinking it, but I'm just saying it. Patel, before I go on to Senator. simply this. If the best attacks on me are going to be false accusations and grotesque mischaracterizations, the only thing this body is doing is defeating the credibility of the men and women at the FBI.

I stood with them here in this country. In every theater of war we have, I was on the ground in service of this nation, and any accusations leveled against me that I would somehow put political bias before the Constitution are grotesquely unfair, and I will have you reminded that I have been endorsed by over the United States. 300,000 law enforcement officers to become the next director of the FBI. Is it? Is it? I didn't know if it was or not. Let's see here if I can figure out the rest of it.

And it sounds to me like we need to get some new conspiracy theories. Sounds to me like we need to get some new conspiracy theories because all the old ones turned out to be true. I love this guy. I do. I think he's so funny. Just like the way he says shit and everything. is so good.

Oh, my God. Yeah. I'll get some conspiracy theories because all the old ones turned out to be true. Yeah. Facts matter, Senator. Yeah. I mean, conspiracy theory is something like 37 and nothing.

Okay. Well, wow. Okay. Let's see if I find the rest of these called Democrat. What's this here? Oh, the Epstein list. Here we go.

All right. finally got to talk about it. Their questions, and it has led me to one thing. Why are the Democrats so afraid of you? I don't know, Senator. You'd have to ask them. Well, I tell you what I think, and listening to their questions, and your responses, which we appreciate, they know that you're going to go in,

and you're going to clean up that political cabal that has been over there for years, you are going to reposition the FBI to its core mission. You stated that earlier in this hearing, and there will be no more political persecutions and no more two tiers of justice, and they have liked having two tiers of justice. They have enjoyed it, and it has helped them. They think in their political mission,

they've enjoyed targeting Catholics. They've enjoyed targeting Catholics. parents. But the American people have said they want no more of that. Okay. And our colleagues know you're going to clean it up. I want to talk to you about the Epstein case. Here we go. Because like in my opinion, I feel like, um, in terms of like importance, the Epstein list is like, a hundred times bigger than the Diddy List. Because the Diddy List is just a bunch of weird celebrities and maybe like random local,

you know, like people, right, or whatever. The Epstein list, that's the big one. Yeah, that's the big one.

Yeah, in our prediction, exactly, right? That's, yeah, that was, yeah,

we're talking about presidents, royals, heads of state. Like, oh, man. multi-billionaires, crazy shit. I have worked on this for years, trying to get those records of who flew on Epstein's plane and who helped him build this international human trafficking, sex trafficking ring.

Now, earlier... It's crazy how everybody is an agreement that he was doing sex trafficking, but nobody knows who was being, like, who was it being trafficked to? How is it that we don't know all the names? That's crazy. I urged then-Chairman Durbin to subpoena those records. Yeah. And I ended up being blocked by Senator Durbin and Christopher Ray.

They stonewalled on this. And I know that- Is Trump on the list? So a lot of people bring up Trump being on the list. Trump was on the list of flights. There is no evidence. that he was at Epstein's island. But there is evidence that he was on Epstein's plane and he was friends with Epstein.

So, like, you can take with that what you will. Is that the correct, is that the correct evaluation? Yes, it is. Okay. All right. And so I, and again, I'm not, like, my perspective is if you did weird stuff with trafficked kids, you should go to jail, right? I mean, so like, if Trump did that, you should go to jail.

jail. Like, I mean, it's not even a quick, like, what are we talking about? So, yeah, I mean, of course I would want everybody to know. Yeah, death, not jail. I mean, like, breaking up these trafficking rings is important to President Trump. So will you work with me on this issue? So we know who worked with Jeffrey Epstein in building these sex trafficking rings. Absolutely, Senator. Child sex trafficking has no place in the United States of America. America and I will do everything, if confirmed as FBI director, to make sure the American public knows the full weight of what happened in the past and how we are going to... Thank you. That's the thing. This is the reason, I think that one of the problems is that a lot of the, a lot of the distrust from the government comes from the government being opaque about where the

distrust came from. And I think that that's why I thought it was a good thing that they released the JFK and the MLK files is because especially with Martin Luther King there is so much like I feel like it was like pretty much common knowledge that the FBI was fucking with Martin

Luther King right? Like how many of you guys knew that this was happening before any of this stuff went public? Right? We all knew this was happening. And so like the way that you solve that and the way that you get beyond that because like that's a racial barrier

because Martin Luther King is like probably one of the most influential people in civil rights. Like fucking absolutely, right? So like this is a huge racial barrier and it's like a scar that has existed for like 60 years, right? And it's not about making the scar go away, but it's about healing it. And the way that you do that is you show people the transparency. This is what happened. This is 100% it. And if the government did something bad, you take accountability.

You say, we fucked up. that's our bad, but that's how you move forward. Because you can't move forward if you can't even acknowledge the past. You see what I'm saying? So that's why I was such a big advocate for this kind of stuff. Yeah, it's the only way. Exactly. And so I want to see all this stuff happen.

Absolutely. Transparency is vital. It is. It's 100% vital. Here, your answer, yes or no. Did you make money? I don't have those financial disclosure in front of me. You have that information.

So you refuse to answer the question. I answered 1,300 pages. You are, you are, no answer. And yet you spread dangerous misinformation. Here your answer. What the fuck? Oh, man. You're being considered for director of the FBI.

And here you did no diligence to find out whether people you were associating with now the President of the United States in song. were convicted of attacking police officers. Is that who we want running the FBI? I want you to turn around. They're capital police officers behind you. They're guarding us. Take a look at them right now. Turn around.

I'm looking at you. You're talking to me. No, no, no. Look at them. I want you to look at them if you can, if you have the courage to look them in the eye, Mr. Patel, and tell them you're proud of what you did. Tell them you're proud that you raised money

off of people that assaulted their colleagues, that pepper sprayed them, that beat them with polls. Tell them you're proud of what you did, Mr. Patel. They're right there. They're guarding you today. Tell them how proud you are. That's an abject lying. You know it?

I've never, never, ever accepted violence against law enforcement. I've worked with these men and women, as you know, my entire life. And I did not make a single dime out of it. How about you ask them if I have their backs? And let's see you about that answer. Mr. Patel. Let me ask you this. If an FBI director promoted a song of people who sprayed pepper spray in the face of an FBI agent, would you say they were fit to be director? Mr. Schiff? Yes or no. Would they be fit to be director? I am fit to be the director of the FBI.

If you were the FBI director and you promoted a song to someone who beat an FBI agent with a poll, would you say you were fit to be FBI director? Mr. Schiff, I am fit to be FBI director based on my 16 years in government service. And yet you did all these things, Mr. Patel. You can say, oh, I support law enforcement. I decry violence against law enforcement. You can say all that. It's what you did, Mr. Patel, that matters. It's what you did that matters.

Well, let me ask you about something else that you did, Mr. Patel. Did you claim that Donald Trump declassified all the documents at Mar-a-Lago? Did you claim that? In what proceeding? To the public ever, did you tell anyone that Donald Trump declassified all the documents at Marlaga? From publicly available information, President Trump issued a declassification order in a variety of materials. No, no, I'm just asking you, did you tell the public, did you tell anyone? Did you make the claim that Donald Trump had declassified those hundreds of classified documents that were Mar-Lago?

Did you make that claim publicly? From my best of my recollection, I said President Trump issued a declassification order to a large number of documents. Yeah, and were you present when he declassified all the Mar-a-Lago documents? Senator, I'm not saying he declassified all the Mar-a-Lago documents. I said President Trump declassified a large number of documents, and I would hope this committee and the rest of Congress would want to get those documents to the American people.

And Mr. Patel, before a president or anyone declassified documents, wouldn't... I think it's pretty easy to say, by the way, that, like, talking about a rap song where your pepper spraying police is like bad. Like if you're if you're like going to apply for a law enforcement role, it's pretty easy to say that. Yeah. I think that this is it, it's not good. It's bad optics, right?

You shouldn't do that. But who cares? I'm not saying it's a big deal. I'm not saying it's a big deal. I'm just saying it's bad. You ask my opinion, is it good or bad? I think it's bad. Is that fair?

I'm not saying, oh, wow, you shouldn't be the director because of the one thing. But, yeah, I think it's bad. You want to know whether making the public would cause sources to be killed? Wouldn't you want to know that before you just declare the Rald declassians? No, I'm not on the fence. I want this guy to be the director. I think he's great. I completely support him. I'm not a fence sitter on this at all. I like him. Yeah, no, I do. Wouldn't that be the responsible thing for president to do? It was the responsible thing for us to That's why we declassified the Duna's memo. And did Donald Trump declassified?

And did Donald Trump ever ask any of the agencies who produce those documents whether declassifying them would put people's lives at risk? Did he ever do that to your knowledge, Kach Patel? I don't know that he didn't. Do you? No, that's the problem, isn't it? That's the problem, isn't it? So let me just ask, Mr. Chairman, if you would. Mr. Patel has said he's no problem.

He acted a bit crazy. He would support the real problem. release of his grand jury testimony in that case. I would ask you, Mr. Chairman Ranking member, to join me in requesting a little bit. With Mr. Patel's approval, the release of those grand jury transcripts. And I would also ask Mr. Patel, would you support the release of volume two as it pertains to you of the special counsel's report? Any reference to you and the report?

To your truthfulness. Will you support? I can see the way that he acts, though. I can see why they call him shifty shift, though. Like, I could easily see that. Like, that was a good one. Yeah, like, you can immediately tell exactly the reason why they say that. Or the release to this committee of those sections of volume two, a special counsel's report.

I support following the law and providing whatever information the law required. But you said to the Wall Street Journal that you support transparency. Here's your chance, Mr. Patel. You support release of that to this committee. Yes or no? Your time's up. before I Oh, there it is.

Let me see. There's another one. I'll see if there's any more of these that are interesting. You're not doing your job right. My colleague and friend, Senator Durbin, called you a conspiracy theorists. You remember that?

I do, Senator. Is this how I... You were instrumental in review. that the Trump-Russia election collusion hoax was a hoax, weren't you? Yes, sir. It was a lead investigator. People are still going on about that even now.

They're still going on about it being a hoax from Russia. Yep. Sounds to me like we need to get some new conspiracy theories because all the old ones turned out to be true. Facts matter, sir. Yeah. I mean, conspiracy theorists something like 37 and nothing. So stupid.

Okay. Where's the rest of it? And I'm going to let good cops be cops and put handcuffs on the bad guys and put child molesters in America. And I'm going to let good cops be cops and put handcuffs on the bad guys and put child molesters in prison and put murderers in prison and make sure CCP fentanyl doesn't kill another one of your constituents. That's track one. Track one. to restore the trust in the FBI. Did he point at the Democrats and then say your constituents?

Because I'm pretty sure that like if... That has degraded, not by my opinion, by the Gallup poll, and only 40% of Americans have trust and faith in the FBI. It is a cataclysmic failure in leadership to get to that point that did not happen over time. And so what the FBI must do while tackling violent crime and protecting... That's what I was saying before about that MLK stuff. that's why people don't trust them is because they're opaque about it

they don't explain it and like if you don't explain things to people you're not going to have them believe you they're going to think that you're a fucking liar Americans national security and our sovereignty is work with Congress Republicans and Democrats to expose

any government corruption provide government accountability through transparency and get you all the documents that you are the custodians of the FBI to Congress. If I am confirmed as FBI director, I will report to Congress. And I will just save you with this one caveat here about my personal experiences with the FBI. The men and women of the FBI do the most courageous work on God's Green Earth. I was fortunate enough to utilize FISA 702 national security measures to prevent a shopping mall from blowing up in Houston and state capital from being attacked in California. Courageous men and women do that work every day. And these are cases you're going to. never hear about. Instead, the only things you hear about are the baseless conspiracy theories that attacks levied at me. Well, here's something for America. You can say whatever you want

about me. If I'm confirmed, bring it on. But you will not denigrate the men and women of the FBI that saved this country. Hey, there it is. I mean, like, I've had, for interesting reasons, they've all been extremely professional and really good. Yeah, I mean, to be honest, I've had to interact with a lot of law enforcement and interesting people over the years. And yeah, they're very, very competent. I'll say that. Let's see if there's any more of these real quick. Make sure I go through all the rest of them.

Uh-oh. But glowing? No, not necessarily. Sorry. Not the haters going wild. People getting mad. Yeah, I'll find. Because you work for Disney?

Do I work for Disney? Is that it? Yeah. Who would want an intelligence agency to be fully transparent? publicly? I think with controversies and issues that happen that are extremely public, it's in the best interest of the public, especially long after the fact, like, for example, with Martin Luther King, that bad blood like that is put under, is like put down. And the way that you do that is by basically explaining what happened, because you're never going to trust somebody

again who lied to you, who still won't tell you what they lied about. You see what I'm saying? like the first step to being able to trust somebody who was previously untrustworthy is for that person to tell you what they lied to you about, right? Of course. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Patel, do you believe that background checks for firearm purchases are constitutional? I don't know the in-depth of it, but I think that's what the Supreme Court has said, Senator. So the word would be YES, yes. Can you say yes?

Our background checks constitutional. I can say whatever the Constitution the Supreme Court ruled is the rule of the land. Fucking obviously. He's the director of the FBI. Yeah, this is already settled. He doesn't make that decision. Yeah, what kind of an asshole?

Yeah, why not? Well, of course he doesn't know. Yeah, Togatrigu. He's not a lawmaker. Yeah, what is this? So, yeah, the condescending? Yes, can you say yes, our background checks constituted? So the word would be YES, yes, can you say yes, our background checks constitutional?

What a nasty little bitch. Oh, oh, what a little. Oh, geez. No, she comes so you get grilled? No, if people have other ones, I had to look at those two. Center, as you can see, I took a photograph with an individual who showed up at a book event. I don't believe I'm guilty by association. Oh, so the Senate, they said he's a racist.

This guy's a racist. Does you know Cash Patel is a racist? Showed up at a book event. I don't believe I'm guilty by association. And I certainly don't believe that an individual who is the first minority to serve as a deputy director of national intelligence for this country is a racist. in any way. And I detest any conjecture to the contrary. What a ridiculous thing to say. So he takes a picture with somebody and he somehow endorses everything that the guy says? How the fuck does that make any sense? How does this guy so good

at defending himself? Because he probably has been told this 50 times. I bet there's nothing new that they're coming up and saying. Yeah, he's a white supremacist. Oh, of course. Well, that's it's what what people mean by white supremacist is that that's a person that you disagree with you brought up public trust at 41 percent so in a general way without going for an hour tell me what you're going to do to increase the public trust of the FBI simple make sure we don't have 100,000 rapes in this country next year make sure we don't have 100,000 drug overdoses from Chinese fentanyl Mexican heroin and make sure we don't have 17,000 homicides. Those numbers need to be cut in half immediately, and the public will regain trust in the

FBI and law enforcement once we achieve that mission. Yeah. Yeah, put the people that do crime in jail. Yep, that's right. And stop that from happening. Yeah, I feel like that's a really good one. And being ahead of time and, you know, being ahead of the ball and just making it happen before it does, like that bomb thing that they were talking about. This guy ain't stopped. stopping shit. Well, it sure seems like they're not stopping shit anyway, so why not at least try it? That's what I think. Here, your answer, yes or no, did you make money? I don't have those financial disclosure in front of me.

You have that information. So you refuse to answer the question. I answered 1,300 pages. You are, you, you, no answer. And yet you spread dangerous misinformation. Here. Oh, man. Oh, bro, why she's so pressed?

I don't know. I don't know why she crashed out like that either. It's nuts. Talking to herself, yes. Like, Jesus, man, what is that? On a clown, no answer. Yeah, I guess so. You've committed that the FBI will not be politicized.

So here's your first test. Will you commit that you will not tolerate the firing of the FBI agents who were worked with the special counsel's office on these investigations. Senator, I appreciate the time to visit with you. It is a yes or no answer, and it is your first test. Senator, every FBI employee will be held to the absolute same standard, and no one will be terminated for case assignments. And I'm not going to accept that answer, because if you can't commit

that those FBI agents will be protected from political retribution, we can't accept you as FBI director. All FBI employees will be protected against political retribution. Those individuals deserve to be protected from Trump retribution. That was your first test. You failed it. By saying all FBI employees should be protected? What a stupid, what, bro, who is this guy?

Yes, who is this guy? He just said it. Yeah, he literally just said it. Fucking class. so stupid. Yes, I know. Well, what you have to understand is that when this kind of stuff happens, the reason why it pops off like this is because what they do is that they're trying to convince people that they're making the right decisions and like this person is bad. So they try to turn something that's like maybe complex or whatever into a yes or no question.

change the question to be slanted in a way that is disingenuous. So then the person has to clarify themselves. And then in the context of clarifying yourself, there is the implication that because you can't say yes or no, then you are a liar. That's the logic, right? And that's the, that's the manipulation in play here. Everybody does this. This isn't a Democrat trick or a Republican trick. It's just this is what people do. They're farming clips. Yes. That's new.