Asmongold TV - Truth nuke about female police..

Episode Date: September 10, 2026

Asmongold reacts to https://youtube.com/watch?v=2NcYamwryiM► Asmongold's Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/zackrawrr► Asmongold's X: https://x.com/asmongold► Asmongold's Kick: https://kick.com/asmongold► Asmongold's Sub-Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Asmongold► Asmongold's Twitch VOD Rerun Channel: https://twitch.tv/asmongold247► Asmongold's Kick VOD Rerun Channel: https://kick.com/asmongold247Channel Editors: CatDany & Daily Dose of AsmongoldIf you own the copyright of content showed in this video and would like it to be removed:https://x.com/CatDanyRUhttps://x.com/DAsmongold Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Visit BetMGM Casino and check out the newest exclusive. The Price is Right Fortune Pick. BetMDM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor.

Free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming, Ontario. Here we go. We'll watch the next one later, okay? I'm not saying we're not going to watch it. I'm just saying we're not going to watch it right now. Think fast. You're behind cover and an active shooter is...

I'm going to turn it up real quick. Right in front. Fleeing civilians all around. You notice a figure dash... Think fast. You're behind cover and an active shooter is right in front. Fleen civilians all around. You notice a figure dashing next to you.

Do you A. to identify if it's a fleeing civilian, or B, panic and shoot. If you chose B, congratulations, you might be a female police officer. But let's confirm it. After panicking and shooting a civilian, the actual shooter advances. Do you A, hold your ground behind cover, or B, panic, run into the open and get shot? If you chose B, it's confirmed. The scenario I just gave is from a recent event, where a female police officer

successfully made every worst possible decision available. And it's reignited. Yeah, she randomly shot a civilian and then they let the gunmen go until somebody else shot the gunman. Say from surrounding women in combat roles, specifically law enforcement. Therefore, in this video,

I'll be ranking and debunking every argument in favor of women police officers. And if you enjoy the video, consider subscribing. It helps the channel. It's crazy, by the way, how popular this channel has gotten. four weeks ago. This is something.

I feel like people watch these videos. People like me watch these videos. And there's a form of just catharsis. It's like, yeah. Fucking exactly. You know? The argument here is that they are less prone to use excess of force. Women use less force.

When apprehending suspects. That's bullshit. Avoiding unnecessary harm and saving on potential. the lawsuits. Proponents use studies, showing that women are less likely to receive excessive force complaints compared to their male counterparts. To call this argument deceptive would be an understatement. Of course they use less force.

They're less able to. Additionally, male police officers are typically the ones who are made to handle more difficult physical arrests for obvious reasons. Since male officers are made to handle more difficult physical arrests, obviously they get more complaints. Naturally, this goes into MPC tier, as a classic mid-width argument. When a female officer is staring at a larger, non-compliant male, her options are... The only way they can handle it is by using a gun.

Enforcement, taser, or gun. Which brings me to my next argument. Women are less likely to draw their gun. This argument argues, again, citing studies, that female officers are less likely to draw their guns compared to male officers. Again, an obvious explanation is that men are being made to handle more difficult cases. Yes. Which is a demonstrable fact. These broad studies of poor control over variables prove nothing.

Furthermore, simple reasoning paints a different picture. A larger, non-compliant male poses an immediate risk to a woman in a way that it doesn't to a man. If a female officer feels threatened, her only recourse is her taser or gun, and tasers are not reliable tools. True. Anecdotally, we see... Yeah, they call it skill-based matchmaking, right?

So, like, yeah, they don't matchmake into the high-p-v-V-P-high-E-L-O lobbies, right? It's like, you're going to send out Fred the 6-4 former high school football player, right, that, like was a linebacker. He's fucking, like, 350 pounds. Like, oh, you know, there's like some crazy guy out there, send out Fred, he'll take care of it. After a case of women feeling threatened and escalating drastically when it's either not necessary, or wouldn't have been necessary for a male officer. Again, a failure of intuition and how to properly control variables, MPC tier.

Women are better communicators. Well, I mean, do we really even have to talk about this one? I mean, do we even really need to talk about this? I mean, what are we doing? What is this? You serious? The argument cites the claim that women tend to rely on verbal skills more often for their arrests compared to their male counterparts.

I'm tired of repeating myself. Of course they are, since they struggle to physically restrain the suspect and less-compliant suspects are delegated. A-bist here. That's also addressed the root cause of these arguments. So far, they've all relied on an implicit sexist assumption that men lack self-control and default to violence, whereas women have more self-control. The studies we do have on this also don't support the idea of women be.

more in control. Women are twice as likely to suffer from anxiety or panic disorders as men are. There's no way it's only half. There's no way it's only twice as much. I think it's probably four or five times as much, if not more than that. To suffer from PTSD. Exactly what you don't. Like every girl I know is crazy. I only know like two guys that are crazy. From police officers. Ten times, maybe. Proponents of this argument cite the fact that men are responsible for more violence. But how do you control for the fact that men are simply more capable of violence or have greater incentives for it?

Additionally, since men have this capability, a lot more effort is used in training them to control it since boyhood, a process that is often neglected on girls, which explains a lot of modern phenomena. MPC tier. Better results with victims. This argument makes the case that women typically get better results trying to get victims of abuse or similar crimes to open up. This is actually true, and it's one of the ways the women have genuinely contributed. And the best part, it doesn't require women to be police officers or in combat roles.

That's right. They can be social workers, consultants, or other forms of outside help. A therapist. So that their unique talents can be fully utilized without having to put their lives and others at risk by doing something they're not suited for. Flood tier. Better community perception. The claim here is that the poplist's way.

prefer and trust female officers more, which is highly debatable. Oh my God, bro. Additionally, what happened to tearing down gender stereotypes? Public perception is just stereotyping. Why are we condemning stereotypes when it goes against the agenda, but using them as an argument when it's in favor? Because they love stereotypes when it's in their best interest. That's the reason why.

This is clearly just a rationalization. It's already been decided women are to be police officers. And now they're just finding excuses for it. Abyss tier. Garbage. Tazers negate physical disadvantages. No, they don't. Only the most delusional deny the obvious physical differences between men and women.

Oh my God. Which is why we have such reduced standards for physical ability when admitting female officers. Jesus. This begs the obvious question. Why are we accepting subparer candidates just because of their gender? Yeah. Their counter is physicality doesn't matter. The taser exists.

Already, this is foolish. Chases, wrestling takedowns are all part of the job. But even more importantly, how reliable are tasers? Not very. Well, for starters, a portion of the population are just flat out immune to them. The arranged option is extremely limited, inaccurate, and hard to reload. And a taser is often best used when already in a maley altercation, which involves grappling and wrestling.

Only an NPC can argue that physicality doesn't matter in law enforcement. Yes. Physicality is the only meaningful difference. Not only does this argument set aside a very important difference. This argument also contradicts earlier pro-women officer claims, as well as the statistics we have regarding likelihood of panic and anxiety disorders. And it goes deeper. Reaction time, spatial awareness, innate...

See, this is the reason why men beat women in every single competitive sport that has to do with anything that's like hunting related. Like, if you can imagine killing an animal this way, the odds are that men are going to be outperforming women by like a metric of like a hundred to one, a thousand to one, probably 10,000 to one. This is just the way it is. Even chess. Like, even chess. It's exactly it. Hierarchy.

Are all things men outperform women in and are invaluable in combat roles. the belief that the only differences between the genders are physical is quintessential midwitory. Yep. MPC tier. It's necessary for gender equality. This argues that even if the disadvantages of women and law enforcement and combat roles are conceded,

it's still necessary in the name of gender equality. The issue is... It's crazy how women always need to have the roles that are like high value, but we don't need... Why do we not have gender equality with garbage? men. Why do we not have gender equality with a janitor? Those are never discussed. If we need to accept worse performance and a higher risk to people's lives just to include women,

then gender equality does not exist, whether you include them or not. You can call reality sex as all you want. It won't change to accommodate your sensibilities. But you will get people killed by denying it. That's true. A best tier. Men and women are different, and if you can't accept that, that can't be blamed on just your stupidity. That's a choice, and one that's costing lives.

That concludes the tier list. If there are any other arguments with what you rank, please share them in the comments below. And I would like to give a special thank you to all our channel members, our patrons and those who bought America. We greatly appreciate your support, as this channel would likely not be possible without it. If you would like to participate in our supporter exclusive Discord, Make sure to check out the link in the description below. I love his videos. He tackles some of the most extreme and some of the...

He tackles the things that you're not supposed to talk about. He talks about him, and I like that a lot. I do. I love it. I love the animations. I do too. And watch the gay Hitler video. We'll watch the gay Hitler video tomorrow, okay? I'm just not ready to watch it today, but we'll watch it tomorrow.

Does that sound fair? Okay, you couldn't have said these things 10 years ago? No, you weren't able to say these things 10 years ago. Keep subbing to this guy. I want to see these channels grow a lot more.