Asmongold TV - WTF are these senators.. | Asmongold TV

Episode Date: July 23, 2025

WTF are these senators.. Asmongold show for all of his stream highlights, competitions, reactions & more. --------- Keywords: streamer content, asmongold, esports commentary, streaming moments Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

MS-13's favorite Senator Chris von Hollen, best known for cozying up to illegal aliens of MS-13, got demolished by Marco Rubio. What is this? I have to tell you directly and personally that I regret voting for you for Secretary of State. Well, first of all, your regret for voting for me confirms I'm doing a good job. Man, watch the longer clip. That was, by the way, that was really good. Holy shit, that was good. Yeah, little Marco grew up. Yeah, bro, like, that was it. And let me see if I could find a Rubio refugee policy amidst the class.

Yeah, yeah, here it is. Here's the whole thing. And I have to tell you directly and personally that I regret voting for you for Secretary of State. I yield back. Can I respond? You may say. Well, first of all, your regret for voting for me confirms I'm doing a good job based on what I know. That's just a clip in statement, Mr. Secretary. Can I respond, Mr. Chairman?

Is it a fact? Mr. Chairman? You may? I didn't ask. Senator, please let the secretary. I'd be happy to, but then I can respond to his. He's getting mad, bro. He got him mad. Your time's up, Senator, and woefully used, I might add.

He's getting so mad. This is that, bro, this is that one loser that went over to El Salvador to talk to that illegal alien MS-13 member, right? Or at least, like, we're not sure that he's an MS-13 member. Only two separate judges found and, you know, credible evidence that he was an MS-13 member. He was found with MS-13 members. He was found to be trafficking a bunch of people in a state that he wasn't even a citizen in or a resident in. And all of the people seemed to have his same address. And he had the tattoos in MS-13.

But so, like, we're not sure that he was an MS-13 member. We're only 99% sure. Okay, guys? Yeah, we're only 99% sure. And his wife wanted to go, yeah, well, oh yeah, and he beat his wife. I forgot about that. Just a little bit of a bonus there, right? El Salvador would have sent him back if he wasn't.

Well, now he's safe. He's safe. Our immigration policy should be based on the national interest of the United States, period. End of story. If there was a subset of people that... Is this... Is there a follow-up to this? I feel like this is obvious.

What? How are we even thinking any other way besides this at all? They're easier to vet who we have a better understanding of who they are and what they're going to do when they come here. They're going to receive preference, no doubt about it. There are a lot of sad stories around the world. Millions and millions of people around the world. Yeah, people dying everywhere. It gives a fuck, bro.

We can't save everybody. It's heartbreaking. We cannot assume millions and millions of people around the world. No country can. Duh. So you have to have a process of deciding who do you prioritize, who do you allow in. We do a lot of. all the time. We do it in our immigration system now under our current laws. Unfortunately,

it's primarily based on family connection and not on what they're going to contribute to the society from a merit standpoint. That should be changed, but that will require statutory changes. But the bottom line is, this notion that somehow we have to accept. I do think people's family should be able to come over if they have a citizen there should be easier for them. I mean, I agree and disagree with this. Anyone who wants to come to the United States is absurd. No country in the world has an immigration policy like that. Well, I mean, Like, yeah, I don't know about that. I don't know about that.

I think Antarctica does, right? I mean, I'm not sure. Let's see here. There's some more of it. Oh, oh. Not with birthright citizenship? Great point. And I'm not counting that.

But if you were counting that, I would completely agree with Marco. Atchitory phrase says you are entitled to entrance as a refugee. If you demonstrate a well-justified fear of persecution. No, no, you're not entitled to allow. So can you have a different standard based upon the color of somebody's skin would that be except he really bro bro you're really trying it you're really trying to play these games huh he really trying to play these games oh here we go again not the one arguing that apparently you are because you don't let me turn it up a little bit i think it's a little bit quiet for you

guys persecution you're not entitled you're allowed as mont literally not a single other ms 13 member has those tattoos we can't pretend like they're guaranteed Guys, I love how, like, one number one, then why did this girlfriend cover him up herself? His girl, why would she cover them up? Actually, let me, let me just real quick. Can I find this guy? No, no, he's gone. And anyway, yeah, why would she do that?

You're not going to gaslight people into some bullshit, bro. Like, everybody see what's going on. The statutory phrase says you are entitled to entrance as a refugee if you demonstrate a well-justified fear of persecution. No, no, you're not entitled to. So can you have a different standard based upon the color of somebody's skin? Would that be accepted? Well, I'm not the one argument. The thing is, like, the obvious race-baiting, and you can see, like, this smug look on his face, right?

How he thinks, like, oh, I got you, because, like, I'm using the race card. and so now you have to capitulate to what I'm saying, otherwise you might be looked at as a racist. I'm not the one arguing that apparently you are because you don't like the fact that they're white and that's why they're coming. That would seem to be a very easy thing to say. The United States has a right to pick and choose

who they allow them to the United States. Even based on the color of somebody's skin. You're the one that's talking about the color of their skin, not me. These are people whose arms were being burned down and they were killed because of the color of their skin. Well, I'm... They turned them off. Bro, they really had to touch.

turn them off? Oh no. Well, you've demonstrated enough because you think anyone should be allowed into this country for any reason because they admit a certain criteria. Who has said that? We are going to prioritize people that come into our country on the basis of what's in the interest of this country. That's a small number of people that are coming. Yeah. But you said this week and that there would be more. But in other cases, it's harder to vet. In other cases...

Well, it's pretty fucking simple. Like, if you could bring in a person that comes from some random country that doesn't speak your fucking language that has no sense. skills, no money, and nothing. They're just coming into your country, delete your resources, and sit there and do nothing. Then, yeah, I feel like that person's going to have a lower priority on the list than a person that speaks English, has skills, has resources, and can contribute to the society. What are we talking about? Like, it's common fucking sense. Duh. It's more difficult. By the way, the United States admits people, every year. A million people come to this country every year legally. A million.

And now there is one group of people that have an easy pass into this country. For the first time this administration has said Afri-Conners get an easy pass and refugee programs for the remainder of the world are shut off and you can't say to the American public that we should apply this statute in an even-handed way. No, I think it should be applied in a way. You shouldn't be shocked. It should be applied in the national interest of the United States. it's very obvious that people that are coming from South Africa would probably have an easier job assimilating than people coming from some other random country that is totally different. Like for an example, Poland does accept refugees from Ukraine. It should logically make sense that you accept refugees primarily from countries that are similar to your own.

It's so simple. Yes. It culturally. similar. Yes. Duh. It's so weird how we've reached such an inversion of sense and logic that these obvious realities need to be dictated to people as if they're in first grade. It's unreal. Our immigration policy should be based on the national interest of the United States, period. End the story. If there is a subset of people that are easier to vet who we have a better understanding of who they are and what they're going to do when they come here, they're going to receive preference, no doubt about it. There are a lot of sad stories around the world. Millions and millions of people around the world. It's heartbreaking. We cannot assume millions and

millions of people around the world. No country can. So you have to have a process of deciding who do you prioritize, who do you allow in. We do it all the time. We do it in our immigration system now under our current laws. Unfortunately, it's primarily based on family connection and not on what they're going to contribute to the society from a merit standpoint. That should be change, but that'll require statutory change. This argument is so disingenuous? No, it's true. He's completely right.

Bringing in people with a similar culture, a shared language, and that have established skills that can immediately contribute to the American economy, I think they should be fast-tracked. I don't care about bringing in basket cases. How is bringing

in basket cases something that is in the best interest of the American public? It's not. But the bottom line is, This notion that somehow we have to accept anyone who wants to come to the United States is absurd. No country in the world has an immigration policy like that. And no one is arguing that we should. I yield back, Mr. Chair.

Yeah, they are. Let's see here if I find a few more of these. And I have to tell you directly and personally that I regret voting for you for Secretary of State. This is the whole thing. I yield back. And I respond. You may say. Well, first of all, your regret for voting for me confirms I'm doing a good job based on what I know.

That's just a flippin statement, Mr. Can I respond, Mr. Chairman? You may? I didn't ask questions. Senator, please let the secretary have before. I'd be happy to, but then I can respond to his. Your time's up, Senator, and woefully used, I might add. Man, it's a disgusting traitor.

I think he's a joke too, bro. Like, I do. Like, if, like, I honestly wish that they could find, like, I am the kind of guy that if it was up to me, I would want to have this Kilmar guy totally investigated. and if they could find beyond a shadow of a doubt that this guy was involved with MS-13, then I would try to try the senator with like frattingizing or like working with an illegal gang member. Like I would, as I said, I am a very, very much an Old Testament kind of guy. Like whatever, like basically I think about what is the worst possible thing that you can do?

Okay, we can be more creative than that. What else beyond that? Wouldn't that just be nice? Yeah, I think it would be. It would be. Yeah, that's the right way to handle this stuff. What do you if he's not MS-13? Well, then we just call him a retard. We call him a retard and we say,

hey, I wish you'd work this hard for the people that voted for you rather than the people that came to the country illegally and disrespected the laws, the country, and broke the law here. Your remarks do not represent the view of this committee. Well, Mr. Chairman. I can't respond to everything he said because much of these are untrue, but I'll go through a few. First of all, I'm actually very proud. He works harder for a life beater than his constituents.

That's crazy. Wow. Wow. Oh, ask you one on that one. Those gangs are labeled terrorists now, so now he's literally able to be called the treason. Maybe. Maybe. I mean, like, as I said, until sitting senators and multiple government officials are charged with treason directly, I sleep. That's a slippery slope? I know. That's what I'm

hoping for. Yeah, that's, that's the goal. The work we've done with USAID, for example, I don't regret cutting $10 million for male circumcisions in Mozambique. I don't know how that makes us stronger and more prosperous as a nation. I don't know. We cut in their dicks off over there? Damn, why are we going over there cutting everybody's dicks off. That's soft power? Damn. I raised psycho-social support services. I raised suit. And Mr. Secretary?

I mean, look, there's a part of me that, like, I do think that an uncircumcised penis looks like grave mind from Halo 2. So I do think that definitely it looks better if you are circumcised like aesthetically.

But, no, y'all, I'm not joking. Like, I wasn't joking about this. Like, this wasn't like, oh, yeah, I'm just going to say something funny. No, I'm just making an observation. That's all. It's just an observation. Senator, I'd ask you to suspend.

You had seven straight minutes. I chose to use my time that way, Mr. Somebody says that's the gayest thing I've ever heard. That's not even the gayest thing I've said today. Senator, I'd ask you to suspend. You had seven straight minutes. I chose to use my time that way, Mr. Chairman. That's my right to use my time that way.

Secretary Rubio. Well, I can go on. I mean, there's other things here. We spent $227,000 for Big Kat's YouTube channel from USAID. We spent $14 million for social cohesion in Mali, whatever the hell that means. So I can go on and on. I got the list here, and there's more. I didn't even bring the whole list.

In the case of El Salvador, absolutely. Absolutely. We deported gang members, gang members, including the one you had a margarita with. And that guy is a human trafficker, and that guy is a gangbanger, and the evidence is going to be clear. In the days to come, you're going to see who you went to the vote. I'm sorry, Mr. Chairman, Mr. Chairman, he can't make unsubstantiated comments like that. Secretary Rubio has the floor. Secretary Rubio should take that testimony to the federal court in the United States because he hasn't done it under oath.

Here's another point, okay. There is a division in our government between the federal branch and the judicial branch. No judge, and the judicial branch cannot tell me or the president how to come. He's getting really mad. Now, if this guy ever did get charged with treason, it would be really funny if we sent him to El Salvador. I will say, that would be the most entertaining outcome. No judge can tell me how I have to outreach to a foreign partner or what I need to say to them. And if I do reach to that foreign partner and talk to them, I have under no obligation.

to share that with the judiciary branch. Just like a judge cannot order me to negotiate with a foreign minister of Russia, they cannot order me to negotiate with a foreign minister or the president of El Salvador. And if I did negotiate with them, which we have responded to them, and we've told them we've had communications with the President of El Salvador. I am under no obligation under our division of powers in this country to share with the judicial branch how I conducted diplomacy of the United States. It would actually be counterproductive. If I started sharing with courts, or frankly, with the means, media, my conversations with foreign leaders and all of their details, no foreign leader would talk to me again and we would break trust with them. So I have complied with every court order. What I won't comply with is in order to disclose what I'm saying. And this is again, this is

remember what I was saying before about how like they were, I think this is the reason why they crashed out on Zelensky is that they had some private conversation. And then I think Zelensky went and said something publicly and made something public. And I think that's why they crashed out on them. What we're talking about with a foreign leader, because then they won't talk to me. Diplomacy doesn't work that way. About the student visas, let me say this, I don't deport anybody. And I don't snatch anybody.

The State Department does not have officers in the street snatching everybody. What I do is revoke visas. And it's very simple. A visa is not a right. It is a privilege. People apply for student visas to come into the United States and study. That's right. And if you tell me that you're coming to the United States to lead campus crusades, to take over libraries and try to burn down buildings and acts of violence, we're not going to get.

Get the fuck out, bro. Get them the fuck out. This is what I voted for. This is, it's crazy that, it's crazy that left-wing people have gotten flanked so bad that this is now a position that they have to fight against. like they've gotten outflanked on a degree that is actually impressive like to fuck up this bad that's amazing that what Ms. Osdorke did we're not going to give you that what she did look how mad he is

just a minute we're at 324 you see that I think he hit his enraged face he got enraged I did come on Mr. Secretary and every single one of these things are blowing smoke The bottom line is if you're going to stir up trouble on our campuses, we will deny you a visa. And if you have a first amendment to you will revoke the United States.

And we're going to do more. It shouldn't. Absolutely fucking not. There are more coming. We're going to continue to revoke the visas of people who are here as guests and are disrupting higher education. That's right. People are paying money. These kids pay money to go to school and they have to walk to a bunch of lunatic to

are here on students. To are here on students. I want to do more. I hope we can find more these people. That's pathetic. taking over a building is and then supporting an organization that kills people this.

In fact, the other day, the other day, some guys let a riot, I forgot what university it was, and I asked, please, can you find the arrest records of all the people that were arrested at that riot at that campus? Because if any of them have a visa, we're going to revoke it. I feel so much... That's right. That is exact...

Dude, this is exactly like, that's exactly what I want them to do. Just take every single person that got detained for being in a place they weren't supposed to be in if any of them aren't supposed to be here now they're not here anymore

gone instant one strike you're out that's it because it'll stop future bullshit yes did Trump earn your vote by now if I could go back in time and vote for him I absolutely would I did not think that he was going to go this hard at all and to be fair I still think that he's only

me at like a five or a six. Like maybe even a four for what I want to see happen. But this is, it's better than the first time around. It was like a one. All right. Lock up people like Ms. Ostrick, Ms. Secretary. We've had enough. We've had enough time. Raffa, thanks for 100 subs. I appreciate it.

I'm on the subject. Thank you very much. And we're going to move to Senator Lee. So he getting his feelings hurt, bro. He getting real mad. Damn, bro. Like, wow. Let's see if I find any more of these if there's any more of this stuff and uh where there's any more of this yeah it's embarrassing bro it's so sad and uh yeah these guys honestly is really uh it's really funny to see them crashing out over this bullshit man and this is the guy this is the guy what was the last time he went and he got drinks with people that were part of the people that voted for him when was the last time what's he doing like what is this what is going on

Should have not even let his ass come back. That would have been fucking funny. Maybe you couldn't do that, but it would have been funny if you did.