Astrum Space - We Will Be the Last Civilization on Earth
Episode Date: March 28, 2024Join with me today as we will explore the rise of our technologically advanced society, and learn what materials you need to build what we now have. And then we will discover how much of those vital i...ngredients are left.What did it do over the course of its nearly 26-day journey? The answer to that gains us a fascinating insight into how close we are to having a human on the moon once more.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Are we the last technologically advanced civilization ever on Earth?
It's possible.
Humanity has risen to the position of the dominant species on the planet 8 billion strong.
We have planes, cars, robotics, advanced computers, and the capacity to send our spacecraft
to distant celestial objects, and soon maybe we will even travel there ourselves.
And yet, Rome wasn't built in a day, nor without our own.
cost. It has taken billions of tons of coal, oil and natural gas to fuel the industrial
revolutions that have made society into what it is today. Those resources are not infinite,
and they will take millions of years to replenish themselves. Which begs an interesting question,
was this a one-time deal? If something were to happen to civilization, if some cataclysm,
or nuclear holocaust were to send us all technologically back to the Stone Age,
or even wipe us out completely, are there enough resources left that some future civilization
could rebuild? Or are we now the first and last civilization birthed by our Earth that will ever
reach for the stars? And if so, why? I'm Alex McColgan and you're listening to the Astorne
podcast, and today we will explore the rise of our technologically advanced society and learn
what materials you need to build what we now have, and then we will discover how much of those
vital ingredients are left.
But for the sake of this thought experiment, let's start by activating Doomsday right now.
Boom!
In one fell swoop, humanity has been sent back to the Stone Age.
technology has been annihilated, perhaps in a horrific nuclear exchange, human society has
collapsed. Whoever survived is now tasked with rebuilding civilization in a world with no buildings,
no machines, no books, and perhaps worst of all, no internet.
Let's say for the sake of this thought experiment that natural resources are unharmed, but
nothing can be salvaged from the civilization before. Like the ultimate survival game, everything
must be built from scratch.
Once our survivors have gotten over the shock of this horrifying turn of events, they will
quickly realize that they need at least three vital things if they want to live.
Food, clothing, and shelter.
Unfortunately, these are all accessible through various renewable sources.
These will not be the limiting factors when it comes to restarting civilization.
With wood, you have building materials.
or cotton can be woven into clothing. Animals, vegetables, and fruit can be hunted and gathered
for sustenance. Conveniently, these natural resources can be accessed with some very simple tools,
some sharp sticks for hunting and fishing, and some simple axes and knives for chopping
and fashioning wood, made out of nothing more than sharp stones tied to sticks with hemp and rope.
With this at its base, a civilization that develops after us could absolutely and easily
reach a thriving hunter-gatherer society.
We should even be able to get further than that, although if our civilization is ever going to get
to the stars again, they will need to start by stepping up from stone tools to bronze and iron.
For bronze, an alloy made from mixing tin and copper, wood-burning fires will be enough to get by.
Metal ores extracted from the ground need to be melted to separate the rock and impurities.
Smelting tin requires temperatures of 230 degrees Celsius, and smelting copper needs a little under
1,100 degrees Celsius.
Fortunately, a large wood-based bonfire can reach temperatures of 1,100 degrees Celsius, making
bronze just about accessible to our new civilization.
it is with iron that the problem comes into a focus. Iron is tricky. While this metal is
extremely plentiful in the Earth's crust, its melting point of 1,583 degrees Celsius means
our fledgling civilization would need to do more than just place it on a wood-based bonfire
to be able to smelt it. Fortunately, there are workarounds to this problem. By partially burning
wood in low oxygen conditions, you can make charcoal.
which burns at a higher temperature than the wood it's formed from due to the fact that
the initial combustion cost of getting rid of all that water and sap has already been paid.
This can be further enhanced by placing your fire in a kiln and controlling airflows.
With the right flow, even a wood-burning fire can reach temperatures of 1,500 degrees Celsius,
such as with the record-breaking Tsunan snake kill in Taiwan. But using charcoal comes at a cost,
You need a lot of forestry if you're going to get enough word to support a metal-hungry
civilization.
It will need to be replanted regularly, but more crucially, you won't be able to turn
that land into farmland, something your civilization will also need if it wants to grow and
develop.
This is why most nations use fossil fuels to produce their steel.
Coal or methane gas can be used to create incredibly hot fires without requiring
you to give up your farmland.
You might be wondering if our new civilization could do without these fossil fuels.
If we just grew a little more slowly, with a smaller population, couldn't we make charcoal work?
Charcoal is carbon neutral, as the trees that create it grow it by removing carbon from the atmosphere.
Couldn't a new civilization reach our level and get to space again without using fossil fuels in their production?
The answer is no.
The absence of fossil fuels would be devastating to a civilization trying to reach for the
stars.
This may be an uncomfortable thought, but just consider for a moment the degree to which our
own civilization uses coal, oil and gas.
Now, I'm not advocating that we don't need to do better, just because we currently use a lot
of fossil fuels as a species doesn't mean we shouldn't try and reduce and care better for
the planet.
When we talk about using fossil fuels, it's easy to think about them only in terms of electricity
production, which our new civilization would need to get to if it wanted to get back to space
travel.
In fairness, fossil fuels remain the world's primary energy source.
In 2022, 83% of the world's energy came from these sources.
But fossil fuels are also incredibly important in the production of four other vital ingredients
for our civilization.
I've already mentioned steel, for which our current global demand sits at 1.8 billion
tons a year due to its strength and durability as a building material, but there is also
concrete, plastic, ammonia and silicon.
Can you imagine a world without concrete?
Without fossil fuels, you would probably have to.
The sand and gravel that makes concrete up are easy enough to acquire, but the cement
that binds it all together, made from a mixture of limestone.
and clay requires temperatures of 1,400 degrees Celsius to melt them together properly.
If our new civilization wanted to make concrete, which would be useful, as it's an extremely
malleable, durable building material, useful for building a spaceport for launches,
and many other buildings and platforms, they would need to find a fuel that could burn at that temperature.
The civilization that comes after us would need a lot of charcoal to fill the gap if fossil fuels were no
longer on the table.
But that's not even an option for silicon.
Silicon has widespread use in our society, from ceramics to brickwork, but by far its most influential
trait is that, once refined and purified, it's the element used to make computer chips
thanks to its abundance and its properties as a semiconductor.
It's extremely easy to find in its raw form, but refining it is a complex process that requires
temperatures of 2,350 degrees Celsius. Charcoal does not burn that hot. Not for nothing have the last
100 years been referred to by some as the silicon age. Can you imagine our world without computer
chips? In terms of getting to space, the computers that guide and control the launch of a rocket
would certainly struggle without computer chips. There's more. Ignoring materials that simply need
high heat to smelt or refine, fossil fuels are literally a building material we use to make
our products and feed our population.
While we sometimes express concern about the amount of plastic being used in the world,
there's no denying its importance to modern civilization.
It makes keyboards, boxes, sterile tubes, and syringes for medical applications, polyester
clothing, car bumpers, wind turbines.
Yes, even green energy sources like wind turbines are made out of materials that require fossil fuels.
A wind turbine is around 70% steel and 10% plastic. Both are fossil fuel reliant.
Plastics are also used in rocketry. Having a lightweight material that's easy to mould,
fairly rigid, and above all, light, is extremely useful for rockets that are trying to shave
every gram of weight off. Launching without plastics makes rockets
much heavier, requiring more fuel or smaller payloads. Finally, let's consider ammonia. While you
might think we could do without plastic in our lives, without ammonia, it is likely that about
half of the Earth's present population would starve to death, which, while not directly related
to getting to space, is a bit of a problem on its own. Ammonia is used in fertilizer. Although other natural
fertilizers exist, they lack the potency provided by ammonia. Without ammonia, we simply would
not be able to sustain the amount of food production that we need to support the global population,
not by half. And ammonia is made from methane, which is mainly sourced from natural gases.
When viewed through this lens, it's easy to see the scale of the challenge that would be
faced by a civilization trying to reach a technological level where they could explore space,
if they didn't want to or didn't have access to fossil fuels.
And let's be honest, the easiest to get to fossil fuels on Earth are now mostly gone.
You need serious equipment to get to the fossil fuels we are now extracting, which required
fossil fuels in the first place to build.
Our civilization has been built on the back of fossil fuels.
They provide our plastic, our steel, our concrete for our buildings, and our energy.
them, we would struggle to produce the metal for a rocket or the fuel that powers it with
the computers that guided.
And so, for the sake of our thought experiment, how much fossil fuels have we used?
And is there enough left so that the civilization that came after us could do it all
again if they really had to?
It's difficult to find estimates that accurately lay out how much fossil fuels have been
used up by this point.
Our current usage is at around 15 billion metric tons per year, although this figure has
been climbing for some time, so we'll likely continue to increase as our population does.
However, by projecting our current usage back across the past, and by factoring in the increase
in demand over time since 1800s, when the Industrial Revolution roughly began, it's possible
to arrive at a ballpark estimate of 750 billion metric tons of fossil fuels consumed by the
human race to get to where we are now, by multiplying our current yearly usage by the number
of years between 1800 and now and then approximately quartering the result, to reflect the
fact that demand was considerably lower most of that time.
Now, we do not know how much fossil fuels we have left.
Current estimates based on proven reserves suggest that we will start running out of fossil
fuels in just 50 years' time.
Coal will last longer.
All reserves should keep the lights on for up to 130 years, but oil and natural gas could
potentially all be used up in the lifetime of people around today.
Calculating based on our current usage, this works out to at least another 750 billion
tons of fossil fuels remaining, the same amount that got us to this point, only we're
currently burning through it much faster.
Of course, this number could be much higher.
This estimate is based only on proven reserves.
If more oil fields are found or technology is developed that can allow us to access fossil
fuels better, the amount of fossil fuels available in the planet could be a lot higher than
current estimates.
Still, this is enough information to provide us with our answer.
A civilization that rises after us would indeed have enough resources to get to the same
technological level that we are currently at.
But they would likely find it much harder, as much of those untapped fossil fuel reserves
are buried at much deeper depths than the ones our own civilization found.
We have burned the supplies that were easy to get to.
In 1950, the average depth you needed to drill to excess oil was 1.1 kilometers.
This now stands at 1.8 kilometers, but some oil and gas fields are as deep as 9.1 kilometers.
It wouldn't be easy, but the resources are currently there, for now.
If we ask this question again in 50 years' time, we might arrive at a different answer.
It might be necessary for future civilizations to get used to the idea of a more comfortable,
arable existence.
Still, if there is a ray of hope to shine on this, it is that necessity is the master
of innovation.
The materials we use are the most effective at what they do, but that's not to say that
with sufficient will, a new civilization that comes after us couldn't get to the stars again
even without fossil fuels.
They might need to go slower, their population might never reach our levels, and many
would have to make do with rougher tools or suboptimal materials, but where there is
a will, there is a way.
Perhaps the future civilization will one day harvest methane from bio-waste.
methane can be used as rocket fuel? Without fossil fuels, the civilizations that came after us
would look very different from our own. They would have different priorities, and would perhaps
use their land with a different focus in mind. But perhaps they could get to the stars in their own
way. Thanks for listening. If you've enjoyed what you've heard, please feel free to follow
us for more podcasts on other fascinating space topics. But for now, I'm Alex McCulligan and
This has been Astrom. All the best and see you next time.
