Badlands Media - Badlands Daily: 9/23/26 - Chris Murphy's Loneliness Cure, Greenland Bases & Trump's UN Blitz

Episode Date: September 23, 2026

CannCon and Ashe open Ash Wednesday with a Senator Chris Murphy clip arguing that regulating the Internet and fixing loneliness is the way to inoculate voters against Donald Trump, which the hosts find both revealing and a little rich given what Badlands events do every year. That leads into a candid exchange about whether elections are really the mechanism of consent. The bulk of the show works through yesterday's UN General Assembly, from the Greenland and Denmark Arctic security agreement and two new military bases to pointed remarks on Iran, the Western hemisphere, and a globalist push around AI that the hosts promise to unpack further. Along the way there is JD Vance on fraudulent Obamacare enrollments, a Minnesota Senate candidate's campaign video raising eyebrows, and the usual sponsor breaks and chat banter.  

The Badlands, one of the Badlands, explain those Badlands. That's a hell of a name. Why am I muted? All right, good morning, Badlandia. Welcome to Badlands Daily. Ash Wednesday, so Got Ash joining us here. They're rocking out with the limited edition Badlands Trucker Cap. Yeah.

I did not get my blue one. Why not? I don't know. I didn't, I just forgot. I have the black one. I have the olive drab one. I don't have the baby blue one. Wow. It's only for House of Tallow. Oh, then I definitely don't want it. I don't ever want to be associated with that house.

We are a warring faction. We are at war with the House of Tallow. They are too soft and they don't have beards. Is, uh, is Cam a member of your house? No, he's, he's, um, he's hired to help. Against his will. No, uh, Cam is a member of the house of beard oil. Uh, did you not see like Cam's grown his beard out, man?

Yeah, I saw it. Cam's coming for me. He's coming to get me with that beard. It's getting long, man. Yeah. You have the superior beard, I think, though. For right now. For right now.

I've kind of reached a stalemate with my beard. It doesn't, it doesn't grow. Any, well, it does, but it gets like way out of control. Are you brushing and, and oiling regularly? Yeah. Yeah. And I have collagen too. Yeah.

Why is Rumble not working? Rumble's not working? Oh, yeah. All the people are saying there's nothing here, there's nothing here. Oh, but then some people say Rumble is okay for me. Hang on. Let me go see. Working fun for me.

We're fine. We're fine on Rumble. We are A-OK on Rumble. So I'm not sure what's going on there, but we will persevere. If Rumble isn't working for you, try unplugging it and plugging it back in. Well, they can't hear you. Oh, you know, last night's why we vote, we were talking about the Missouri case. the Missouri case. And I brought in a point about ballot measure,

people's ballot measure petition. I was conflating the Missouri case with the Michigan case for non-citizen voting, and that was my error. But both of those petitions were denied by Kavanaugh, which is where I think I got confused. Yeah, I thought I or I thought I amended. that slightly by mentioning the Michigan thing, but I have in the past because there was

a confusion with that as well. And you have like glaring hypocrisy in the way that those two petitions were handled because in, you know, Missouri, they had to have 3,000, 300,000 petitioners in order to get the petition on the referendum, a referendum vote. And there was very little scrutiny. Well, there was scrutiny, but then the courts overturned. that scrutiny, you know, Secretary of State Hoskins deemed it insufficient, mainly because they don't have the authority to do that. Like there is no law allowing them to challenge the General Assembly passing a redistricting map. But when you go and look on the other hand with Michigan, where they went above and beyond the necessary signatures for petition, and then they took a small

little sample and found just enough that if you expanded it based on that percentage, it would have made the Michigan petitions have enough fraudulent or unknown signatures that it wouldn't have passed. But then they turned around and I talked to Patty McMurray about this. They turned around and they said, hey, look, we've got affidavits from enough people to validate the signatures saying that they did in fact sign this, even though you guys are saying they didn't sign it. Here's their sworn affidavit saying they did sign it. And they, They still ignored it. And this was in Michigan.

It was essentially the Save America Act, essentially, requiring proof of citizenship and voter ID in Michigan. And they don't want that on the ballot, like, at all. So, yeah, that is a glaring difference there between Missouri and Michigan. Yeah. Are they both under the Eighth Circuit? I don't know. I just know that Kavanaugh denied both of those writs.

Well, because Kavanaugh presides over the 8th Circuit. Just the 8th Circuit, though? No, he's probably more. It has to be more than that because there's only nine justices and there's what, 12 circuit courts or 13 circuit courts? Appeal appellate courts. While you look that up, let's talk about our sponsors. And guys, this episode is brought to you by Cacao Bliss from Earth Echo, a ceremonial-grade a cacao drink with seven superfoods to curb cravings and protect your heart and arteries.

What if I told you the healthiest thing you could drink every morning tastes like hot chocolate? Forget green smoothies and protein shakes prepared the right way without all the fillers and sugars. Chocolate is actually super healthy. Researchers found an island tribe in Panama that drinks five cups of cacao per day. And guess what? They have one-tenth the heart problems that we do in America. Today's sponsor figured out how to bring that drink to the United States. The Chocolate most of us grew up on eating has been processed, heated, and chemically treated until almost everything beneficial is gone. Studies show that modern processing destroys up to 60% of cacao's active compounds. But raw, ceremonial-grade cacao preserves all those powerful nutrients, and that means that you get 63 times more antioxidants than broccoli.

Cacao Bliss from Earth Echo starts with 100% ceremonial-grade cacao and combines it with seven organic superfoods. One scoop in hot water taste just like velvety hot chocolate. Learn more and get your special discounts and free shipping today at drink chocolate.com slash badlands. D-R-I-N-K-C-H-O-C-O-L-A-T-E dot com slash badlands. And if you were considering getting cacao bliss before and went to the site and scrolled through to infinity and never found the shop button, they have fixed that. And we're all quite happy about it.

So check it out. We love cacao bliss. It really does have kind of mental clarity and focus benefits that coffee doesn't have, like noticeable ones. I have some in my cup right here along with my collagen. So Kavanaugh is over both the Eighth Circuit and the Sixth Circuit. And the Sixth Circuit is Michigan. Eighth Circuit is Missouri.

Ah, but it's still him, though. I mean, so. Yes. So, yeah, my apologies for the misinformation last night on why we vote. It was not disinformation because disinformation includes the intent to deceive. And I was just being retarded. Well, fair enough. Somebody clipped that.

And, Ash, you want to talk about Benson, honey? Well, I don't have it up. Oh, well, you need to check the private chat. Welcome to Benson, Honey Farms, where every jar is pure gold. Benson Honey is excited to be back on Badlands Media with their honey harvest straight from their Nebraska farm. While they've been busy working to improve our state politics from the ground up, they never forgot the importance of sharing the best honey around. Did you know, honey isn't just a sweet treat. It's nature's medicine.

Perfect for alleviating allergies, soothing upset stomachs, or as a delicious natural sweetener for baking. Benson Honey is never heated, ensuring that you receive it and it's pure, raw form, full of natural goodness. And at Benson Honey Farm's quality and purity is top priority. and they're committed to providing the finest honey from hive to home. Visit badlandsmedia.tv slash honey and use promo code Badlands to get 20% off your purchase. Benson Honey Farms savor the authentic taste in Nebraska and support this America First business. You can follow them on Facebook at Benson Honey Farms and TikTok at Mo M-O-E. Mo Benson Honey, please.

And you can also check them out on episode one of America First Stories. And if you haven't checked out America First Stories, yet go to rumble.com slash badlands media click on playlists find America First Stories and Benson will be the very first episode and Benson Honey great to put in your

coffee cup in your cacao bliss coffee as well as a natural sweetener Benzincere agreed like I mean like almost half of our ad you know sponsors go into my coffee go into the coffee cup I know Christine

good brew native path Benson, honey. Yeah, it's... Yeah. I'm sure Jordan, I've got a couple... Well, that's another drink, but it's not in my coffee. But yeah, okay. All right, let's get into the show.

So yesterday was... Well, by the way, smash the thumbs up. If you have not done so yet, share the show out. Help us grow badlands since Rumble does not like us anymore and never features us. So we need you guys to do it organically and hit that little share button.

This little screen will pop up right here. Share it out on X, Truth, Social, WhatsApp, email, even Facebook. And we appreciate that very, very, very much. So off the bat, did you see John's midterm message? I did see his midterm message. I also saw Ship responded. And she thinks she's getting kicked off of Badlands. No, you're not going anywhere, Ship.

Where do you see that? She put out a response here. I just saw it. The only response I saw from her in John's comment. was a Kardashian meme. Oh, no, they said a bunch of tattletails. Really, though, I understand everyone's desperate need to cling to the voting system. Comes from hope.

I can emphasize, empathize with that, not agree, but understand. Scaring us into voting with events that haven't happened while not doing anything to set right, the events that did happen is nothing more than a sick game that I refuse to play. So I'm going to utilize my time and energy or something else, and no amount of name calling or attempts at cancellation is going to change that. Voting doesn't matter, and that's the truth. You don't like hearing it, but that doesn't make it false. What is she responding to?

The message. From John? Yeah. Oh, weird. Yeah. I mean, it's fair. I totally get her sentiment. There's a lot of people that feel that way.

Oh, what happened to her yesterday when she, so she puts out a post, what, what if we all get together and don't vote? And it was like a swarm attacking her and kind of all over the place. we don't there's a bunch of people at badlands that uh you know openly say they aren't going to vote i'm not sure of anyone who tells other people not to vote right like we're pretty self-directed and you know sovereign minded here um and you and i have talked about this a bunch like i i i will vote in this midterm election but i will never tell anybody that they have to vote alpha and i had this argument in 2023 when i went on his show to talk about my case and we talked about voting and i'm like

listen, I'm not going to tell anybody that they have to vote because it's a choice. The choice to not vote is as sovereign as the choice to vote. And Alfo was like, oh, I'm going to tell you all you have to vote. And he's, you know, very consistent in that position. We're highly frictional and we can argue about it and debate it and go have a beer and, you know, not, it's not a disagreement is not an attack on your life. And everybody needs to calm down, but also elections are fake and thinking, if you think, if you think, that voting is your only power. I think that's the only way that you can exercise power in our society is by voting, then you've already forfeited your power. What I'm seeing right now in the mainstream is, you know, competing narratives coming from the mainstream media. And yesterday we covered an article where CNN is saying that, you know, Republicans are outspending Democrats 8 to 1 in Texas and they're kicking our butts in spending, and they've spent over $680 million, and Democrats only have $480 million spent.

And, you know, they're setting the ground for why Democrats aren't going to win Iowa, New Hampshire, Alaska, Texas. You know, these states that they've been saying are turning to purple states, right? These are becoming purple states. And now they're, well, I mean, New Hampshire's a blue state, allegedly, and it's going to turn red. is what they're prophesizing here. And when you see something like that being seated,

they're already, like, they're preloading their excuses for why they didn't get the blue wave that they are, that they are, you know, pushing for. At the same time, you have, you know, this, this kind of disruption going on within the social spheres, not so much in the mainstream. The mainstream is saying that Trump is waging war against the GOP, which I've been saying for well over a year now. but you know we're we're starting to see um not just in the mainstream the the gop thing but in the social spheres we're seeing uh influencers coming out and saying i'm not voting and whatnot

and and people freaking out like the freak out over this is absolutely insane and you know i understand like if trump were on the ballot i totally get like get out there and vote right with with this midterm i mean you've had two years of the gop and like Chris paul always says you're asking to get the hose again. And, you know, at some point, like, Trump is going to be fine with a Democrat Congress. I mean, most of what he's doing now is, is having to circumvent Congress as best he can legally do because Congress is feckless. They're useless. They haven't done a damn thing. They haven't done shit. So as long as the Democrats don't get a super majority, it's going to be business as usual. I mean, what are they not going to

be able to do? Get a spending bill through? Well, we root for that anyways. right we root for the government shutdowns yeah because it's it's it's an overbearing government to begin with it's like it feels like a vacation too when they're shut down right like we can just kind of take a moment relax for a minute and then they gavel back in and the anxiety starts again exactly i love this in the chat people are saying you have to vote because it's your civic duty so if elections are fake you have a duty to participate in that process. I don't think that's right. I don't. I mean, again, I'm still going to vote. Yeah, yeah, me too. Yeah, but at the same time, I'm, I'm just saying I can like, like ship said,

I can empathize with people. I'm in the opposite vote that she is. I can empathize with people that say they're not going to vote. I get it. I get it. You've had a Republican majority in both houses for two years and we're still bickering over the Save America Act. Maybe that was the intention, perhaps. Maybe that's why President Trump put that out there so that he could show how feckless they are. Like I said, he's been waging war against the GOP for over a year now. Yeah. So. It's delightful.

All right. Let's, so again, we had the UN General Assembly high level meeting yesterday, and there's a lot of clips from that. So we're going to go through all of them. I think it's very important. So we're going to go through a lot of those clips. There is some non-U.N. General Assembly news that I want to get to to start with. And I want to start with this clip here from Senator Chris Murphy. And this is fantastic, basically telling us that populism is the cure for Donald Trump. And so government should build a set of rules in which people feel more powerful. That's why the minimum wage is so important. And people feel more connected.

That's why rebuilding healthy institutions in your town should be a project that government is involved in. That's why regulating the internet so that you're spending less time alone on Instagram should be an important government project. And if people are feeling more powerful and less lonely, then they are going to be less likely to fall for a bullshit demagogue like Donald Trump.

And so my book is about how do you rebuild a sense of connectedness to your neighbors, a sense of power in your life so that it becomes a prophylactic to demagogues like Donald Trump? I'm just going to go with the opposite has occurred since the demagogue of Donald Trump has emerged. And that's why we just came from Badlands, Gart in Vegas and Gart in Deadwood and all these other events where we are connecting with American patriots from across the country, neighbors that, you know, I wouldn't otherwise know if they hadn't seen a Trump sticker and came by and, you know, asked me about it or said, hey, I voted for him too, you know, that kind of thing. and for for for for for for for chris murphy to be saying at the in the same breath we need to regulate the internet like he's just asking for more the government's asking give us more power

and that's going to make you guys feel more in touch with your local community because what what logic what mental gymnastics does that take yeah it's so what what i what i got hooked on was the minimum wage we need we need to do we need to do that take yeah it's so my it's so my what i what i got hooked on was the minimum wage. We need solutions to make people feel more empowered, such as the government setting wages. What? These, these arguments don't make sense, but, you know, nobody pushes back on the governor, I guess.

They don't have an answer for Donald Trump. And now they're trying to fabricate them out of thin air while at the same time trying to delegate themselves more power and authority in doing so. Yeah, you know how you don't get a demagogue like Donald Trump? You don't suck and run us $41 trillion in debt and manipulate us with psychological operations that have been run in Forever Wars and everything else for the last 20, 30 years, just in terms of the Forever Wars and going even further back in that regard. That's how you don't get the ilk of Donald Trump.

But, you know, we welcome that. We welcome. We embrace that. There's a lot of a people. to authority fallacies in the chat now as well of Trump says what we should we should vote. We should vote like he's on the ballot. Trump says that we should vote. Now, again, Brian and I are both voting. We both still think it's important. I'm not going to put words in your mouth, but I think elections are a battlefield. I do not think elections are the real mechanism through which we

consent to be governed in our society because the process, the system is designed to defraud, in my opinion, based on the information available. But I do think it's a battlefield because the power of elections, it's still there. So I will vote. But I will not lie to people and try to emotionally blackmail or mentally manipulate them into believing that this process is going to deliver a legitimate outcome. That's, that's intellectually dishonest and I won't do it. And I believe, I don't know if it was at the UN or at the speech, a different speech, but he talks about the midterms. Does he not? Yeah. He says, I'm not. I'm not. I'm not. I'm not. I'm not. I'm not. I'm not going to give credence to the elections in regards to Iran. Well, he does say in regards to Iran.

And if you listen to the whole context of that, what he's saying is that like my decision making on Iran, what we're going to do in Iran does not directly relate to the election. Like, I'm not going to pander to people and end the war in Iran in order to win a fake election. Yeah. You know, I get it. I mean, he said before like the midterms don't matter. He said that before. You know, he's giving mixed messaging. There's clearly mixed signals on this. Again, this is an argument that I also had with Alpha. President Trump can't come out and say, don't vote.

He can't say, like, if he did that, it would be like the meltdown over firing CNN, which is our next story. We're going to get into that more. Everyone knows I'm frozen. Am I frozen for you? No. Frozen, glitching, frozen, ashes audio is cutting out. You're having no issues on my end.

it looks it looks fine on rumble on my side I don't know but he he can't come out and say don't vote like that would just be that would be literal suicide for his for you know for his presidency if he came out you know that's just like he can't come out and say don't pay taxes he can't come out and say there's a lot of things that you can't say as as president just because it's socially irresponsible

I don't disagree with him if he did come out and say it in fact there's probably a pretty good size chunk of people that would be like, yes, he finally said it. And maybe it's an awakening for people. But I totally get why he doesn't say that. Okay. I will say this. I agree with you on that point. And on X and YouTube, they say it's fine. So it's a Rumble thing or it's a your internet thing. Rumble's crushing it this morning, guys. All right. He's crushing it this morning. All right. So let's jump into some of of the fallout now from the CNN meltdown. And here's Marco Rubio making almost the exact same point that we were making yesterday.

The White House feels very strongly and the president feels very strongly that the coverage he gets. And I can't blame them. Look, I got to be honest with you. Maybe you're not going to like to hear this. But I watch a lot of American news coverage. And it sounds in some cases, for example, like they're rooting for Iran. It sounds like they highlight anything Iran says and all their public statements as true. And they downplay everything American officials say is wrong.

I don't think that that is what's behind this. But I think there's a trend line here that's very positive. So look, the White House very strongly. With all the respect, should media outlets be banned because the president doesn't like their coverage? Should you be able to ban? They're not banned. They're banned. They're banned from, they're banned from. No, we're not closing CNN.

Well, that's different. What they want is access to the workspace that the president is. Does he sit right with you? I think the White House feels very strongly. Does he sit right with you? The president feels very strongly that why should I have people working in my building and in my office that I believe are not honestly covering my administration? That's how he feels. We're not closing.

CNN. There aren't a bunch of police officers or soldiers kicking down the doors of MSNBC or MSN now, whatever it's called, and arresting people and I'm plugging it from the grid. They're just not allowed to work from the workspace at the White House. But there'll be no changes to your traveling pool of reporters. Well, we haven't discussed it, but again, I think, you know, every, the administration, this is a decision the White House made about coverage in the White House. I'll do a press conference today, and I imagine there'll be reporters there tomorrow, and there'll be reporters there from every outlet. I don't ask them who they're with and so forth. And I don't think the White House is saying they're not able to cover the president what he is saying. They're going to all write stories

and do stories about the president. What he is arguing is, why should I have these people? What right do they have to be embedded in this building? They can cover the White House that just can't have a desk there. The White House. Amen. Yeah, access to the White House is a privilege for the press. It's not a right. The institutional press, by the way, has no separate rights than citizen and journalists, bloggers, podcasters. This is precedent in the Ninth Circuit in the case Obsidian versus Cox. That was about a blogger. And you don't have to have press credentials to have the same rights as the institutional press.

There is a, and it's NGO driven, there is a network that has kind of, you know, scaffolded its way into power projection over White House reporting. We talked about this with the White House Correspondents Association and the changes that were made to that in the first part of this second Trump administration. And it is a privilege to access to access the White House. Now, we know that because we're not given access. We still cover the president. We cover the president. I would argue more accurately and authentically and critically than most of the mainstream press because they're, you know, operating on a directive, I personally believe. I think it's, you know, CIA-driven press predominantly that is the

five networks. And they collude. And we know that they collude. They colluded on this story. They also colluded back in 2009 when Obama said he was preventing Fox News from having access to certain administration officials for reporting. And all of the networks came together and said, well, if Fox can't cover them, then none of us are going to cover them. And Obama bent the knee. I don't think Trump's going to bend the knee. You know, maybe there's a deal that struck or something, and I don't know what that would look like. But the idea that the institutional press has this right, you know, a right of access to continually, you know, do what they do, which is deploy narratives and I think undermine the administration. That's not a right.

it's not a right that they have. And I hope that he holds the line on this. I hope he doesn't bend the knee because they're that they, I don't understand why people are still listening to the institutional press. They're not. Well, many are. They're tuning out in droves. There's way too many people out there still parroting headlines back at us when we, you know, when we put out our positions based on our research and, you know, our well, well, grounded, well formed opinions. There are still people. that throw headlines from CNN or MSN or Fox News back in our face. And, you know, those people are not going to make it, but it is what it is. So President Trump twice yesterday pointed out the same thing he pointed out with, with ma'am Downey the other day. And that is that even though they're banned, they're still reporting. They're still following them when they can.

So it's an honor to be here. I'm surprised that CNN is here covering me. You shouldn't be here. You should not, you should not be here covering me. You said you weren't going to cover me. You shouldn't be covering me. But I. So we had that case there.

And then we had this one here with the new prime minister of the UK. Two questions like that. One related to the UK and one related to the press issue. If the district court decides against you, will you let the three media outlets back in? Well, probably will because this is a judge who's. not a particularly fair judge. And so you never know. But I'm talking about national security.

I think we have a right to clean out fake news, you know. News is fake. And by the way, they said they were going to be here, but they came. I knew that would happen. What are they not going to be with President Xi tomorrow? So, but they said, we will not cover Trump. This is something you don't have to know about. You won't have this problem.

But, you know, we have a lot of fake news. And I think when news is fake, and it's actually dangerous, I think we're right to clear it out. How is it dangerous? Could you just elaborate? How are these news media that's dangerous? Oh, when they make statements about the war, when they make false statements, false militias, and they don't have sources, but they say they do. No, no, it's very dangerous for our country, and I won't stand for it. I mean, when they say things like we have insider reporting that President Trump escaped, Air Force One on a catering truck and there's no news value to that whatsoever. You're just leaking classified SOPs, highly classified SOPs when they say that Air Force One is not

equipped to defend itself against missiles, missile attacks, which is absurd to think, but they say things like that. Putting Air Force One in a vulnerable position, again, there's no news value to that. There's no news value. Those are things that you can discuss with the. administration directly if you have concerns, if you believe that there's legitimate claims as to why Air Force One is inadequately prepared for a missile attack, which again is patentedly absurd to think that it's not. But these are all the things that we've seen over the last month or two, maybe three

months, that the news has put out there from sources unfamiliar with the situation and those types of things. That's exactly where I was going to go with it is the anonymous sources, the volume of narratives that are deployed based on multiple anonymous sources familiar with the matter that later turn out to be rugs and a lot of this is intended and deployed in an effort to enable, protect, preserve globalism. And as I've said many times, globalism is treason. It's aid in comfort to foreign adversaries, not Americans, right? Not American interests. Globalism requires that America bend the knee so the rest of the world can rise. And not the rest of the world, selected parts of the world can arise.

And I totally understand the anonymous sources, because it does happen. There are legitimate times when somebody tells you something and it's not a detriment to national security, but it's, it does have news value and you have to rely on protecting that source. I get that. I get that. But there's certain words that they use in the media. And these are things that people are taught at journalism school, like sources familiar with

the situation. Well, what is a source? I wasn't taught that at journalism school. You weren't taught to, no. When I went to journalism school in 1997, I was taught that anonymous sources are a last resort. That you should never put out reporting based on anonymous sources, that that's an absolute last resort. And you have to have second, third hand verification in order to even go after that. Nowadays, that's gone. But no, it's, yeah. My point is I'm making a distinction on what source is familiar with a situation means. A source familiar with the situation does not mean that they were in the room. It does not mean that they had firsthand knowledge of somebody that was in the room. It just means that they broadly have an understanding of what was allegedly discussed or what allegedly took

place or what is allegedly being claimed. It means absolutely nothing. Like you can quote me as a source familiar with a situation on almost any election story, right? Do I have firsthand knowledge of some of these stories? Some I do. Some I don't, you know. But let's play this clip here of Caroline Levitt. It's on the Hannity show, so bear with me. But she's out, I know, but she's outlining all of this. And again, you know, if you don't think that this was a planned deployment by the Trump

administration to put the former press secretary out there discussing this exact issue on Hannity's podcast. Also, why is Hannity trying to be the next Tucker Carlson and every other news outlet that's going by the wayside and trying to. return to podcasting because they realize they're bullshit. No, right, nobody's watching their 9 p.m.

Fox News slot anymore. Yeah, we've tracked those. Maybe I'll do that again in a brief take this week, but put out the latest numbers that are watching network news. And they're just, they've been plummeting. They've been plummeting hard ever since Fox got rid of Tucker Carlson.

MSN, MSNBC rose a little bit in the wake of that. But they're all pulling in dismal, viewers, it's, you know, John put out a video probably a year ago at this point of, you know, you should, you should allow us to interview. You should allow independent journalists to have access to the administration and access to interviews. And why are we still, why is it still that you're, the administration is propping these entities up by continuing to give them access to, you know, interviews and whatnot. And I think that's spot on. Also, can you, can you,

like who designed the logo and who came up with the name hang out with Sean Hannity because I can't if somebody said hey do you want to hang out with Sean Hannity nope hell no like I can't imagine any other answer to that then oh nope click change the channel find a different podcast yeah well you know he's just trying to be one of the bros man he's just trying to be like one of the bros I'm sure they've got you know drinks up there and they're probably you know just chowling it out having a good time this is how fake news is manufactured for your audience to understand you'll have a hack journalist who comes up with a narrative on their own that they think is true about the president or the white house and they love the palace intrigue stories this person's fighting with that

person and this that's like 90% of my job was batting down fake stuff right and they'll go find a source who has every day by the way every day all day from 6 a.m. till midnight and they'll find a source who has no idea what they're talking about, was not in the room, doesn't even work at the White House, maybe worked on the campaign as like a volunteer staffer for one day. And they'll say, a source close to President Trump told us this. Like, who's your source? Because I was in the room, so I'm a better source than them. And I'm telling you, this did not happen. Well, you know, we really trust this source and they'll still write it. All they need is two sources, one to say that happened, another for them to call and say, I heard this happened. That person will say,

yeah, that probably sounds right. And then the story's written. And you can have the White House aggressively on the record pushing back and they'll still print. It'll be in the front page of the paper the next day. So that's how things get written. They just seek to get a bad narrative and they'll find anyone who helps them push that narrative. And the other thing, if I may, the bias of omission is the most dangerous. You can see I get all fired up about this stuff. What you don't see in the news. I watch CNN when I was in my job. I watched all day every day. What you don't hear. Why? Because I got to know what the opponent's saying, Sean. I got to be prepared. No, but what you don't hear. The president would sign amazing executive

orders or give great speeches that they don't even cover. They don't even mention that the president of the United States did this or that on any given day. Like, don't you think your audience deserves to know what their president is doing? They don't think so. And I've gotten on the phone with the leadership of all those stations and said, why are you not? taking the president's remarks live like just let your audience decide how they feel about this oh well we have more important things to cover today the one the one part of that that i would take exception with is she started out with the premise that a reporter has an idea that they think is true and so that's how the story that's where the inception of the fake stories comes from i i call bullshit on that i think that the

inception of the stories is coming from the, at a minimum from the news and editorial leadership at the outlet. But I would argue it's even more sinister than that for a lot of these outlets, and it's coming from the intelligence community. Let's look at this background set, man. We've got the American flag hanging over there on the left. We've got a traffic light. There you go. red red red red red red yellow green all lit with a right hand turn arrow turn right uh we got a dart just in case you want to play darts on his totally fake set uh pool table there you go a little fake fireplace it looks like over your shoulder it a panthers jersey go cats um look at you look at you guys are teammates you and chan ha boys maybe i'll see him at a game

this season coming up flip it um fix bayonet says that he's trying to rip off the only only lands concept and i was like offended for only lands at the idea that sean hannity could ever come anywhere close he can't couldn't touch us can't happen close uh and then so let's see i i i've got this clip here of katelyn collins and mike waltz but i think we've i think we've you want to play it not really okay because i think we've killed this i want to do the u n speech oh well we're not there yet. We got to do our asso of an awe portion of the show now. Do you have the Kevin Kieski? Yeah. Just making sure. So here we have a DOJ talking about why we need the U.S. mail-in ballot executive order 14399. Just throw this right in the Supreme Court's face. Today, in conjunction

with the Office of the Inspector General of the Postal Service and Homeland Security Investigations, we are announcing the indictment of Damon Matai C. As alleging the indictment, the defendant, then a letter carrier for the Postal Service in Utah, destroyed over 300 mail-in ballots that were meant to be delivered to residence for the June 23rd primary. The defendant allegedly threw those ballots into a dumpster in a church parking lot, even though he knew that they were ballots and they were clearly marked as ballots. Election integrity, which includes ballot integrity, by the way, should be a non-executive. nonpartisan issue. The right of American citizens to have their votes properly counted is vital

to determining the rightful winner of an election, but the actions of even one malicious actor on the ground can fatally undercut that security. To address the chronically abused mail-in ballot system, the Postal Service recently issued a regulation that would have required mail and ballots to have special tracking and design features, ensuring both that ballots do not end up in the hands of people who are not entitled to them and also that the ballots do end up in the hands of those who are entitled to them again election integrity should not be a political or partisan issue who could be against properly tracking mail-in ballots the supreme court could because it's too close to an election because they waited six months in order to do anything about this case and

allowed a completely abs like the worst man like the press. Man like the press. that the Supreme Court allowed that judge in Boston to get away with here, taking an ultra-virus case, a Hail Mary, and saying we're going to err on the side that the Hail Mary is caught in the end zone for a touchdown, which is like a single-digit percentage play. We're going to err on that side because it's better to be safe on the single-digit percentage side, point side, that this case wins on the merits than it is to use loss. and secure elections. I just, it's the most de-legitimizing case that the Supreme Court has, has heard thus far.

I do love the way you say air. What do you mean? You're going to err on the side of the Hail Mary being caught. You're going to err. Yeah, we're going to err. You err on the side of caution. Come on. You err.

You're air on. You don't err. Air is spelled A-I-R. Okay. Er is spelled E-R-R. Er. There's no A anywhere in that word, Nevada. Let's ask Caleb and, uh...

Hey man. It's a, uh, a wrong person can always find a friend. Hmm. Especially when the friend is your son and your husband, who also agree with me on the proper pronunciation. of Nevada. Nevada. All right. So let's also, so there's our update from DOJ, 300 mail-in ballots thrown away. Now, I'd be kind of curious. Like, how did you determine that you were-

You say the word errant as errant? No, errant. E-R-R-A-N-T. Right, but that's where er comes from. Yeah, but there's an A-N-T after it, which changes the, which changes the sound of the E, because there's an you could say errant but it's not really a word so you have to grammar by can con okay i'm sorry let's cut it up it's not real so 300 mail-in ballots thrown away uh in utah 300 mail-in ballots how many how many times when you go back and look at the 2020 election and a lot of the things that we heard pennsylvania right ballots thrown away in pennsylvania ballots thrown away we've heard this story all over like now as a postal

cert man, right, as a post postal carrier, I guess you would call them, postal carrier, do you think it's more lucrative for you to throw ballots away? Or do you think it's more lucrative for you to say, instead of throwing these away, I'm going to sell them for 50 bucks a piece. And we've seen evidence of that as well, right? O'Keefe Media Group had some people on the phone, like, hey, oh yeah, I can get you, I can get you about 5,000 ballots. Yep, it's going to be about 50 grand. Okay, I got you. I got you, right? I mean, it's just, it's fundamental. common sense and the Supreme Court completely and totally shit the bed on this one. Kavanaugh, or not Kavanaugh, Alito and, and Thomas were correct.

Kavanaugh concurred, but also voted with the majority. And besides those three, everybody else is just absurd. And I'll leave that at that. Yeah. I think we should read this Rumble Ramp because it was relevant to the prior segment. Boom, Diggity for $20. Thank you so much. think Sean Hannity show should henceforth be named limited hangout and I agree that is a fantastic

idea uh for a show name for Sean Hannity it would not be an error to name the show that I if I ever run into him at a Panthers game I will be sure to tell him that you should name your podcast instead a hangout, you should change it to limited hangout. I will 100% back that. Oh, and then also, sorry, Brian, it's pronounced air, even though it's spelled er, but I pronounce Nevada just like you, Brian, but er is there when you say that odd three letter arrangement. Well, you're 50% right, boom, digity. You're right on Nevada. Nevada. You know what? If you want to, if you want to pronounce everything correct and I'm not taking shots at boom diggedy here I'm taking shots at everybody else. Start your own show and and I will listen and I will critique every single word

that you say when you're typically used to you know reading things and pronouncing pronouncing them pronouncing them however you want in your head so pronunciating them. All right let's jump into and by the way guys we we do we deeply appreciate the rants we do keep up And we will read them in real time as they come, especially if it's relevant to. Yeah, if you're commenting on the segment we're discussing, we will read it in the context of that segment. So Kevin Kieski, who was on why we vote about probably about a month ago now, we had him on to talk about this case with Jocelyn Benson, Secretary Benson, like quote unquote Secretary Benson. And one of the clerks up there that he was defending. And so let's go ahead and read this. Benson ordered clerks. to delete election records, a clerk sued. Benson asked a judge to throw it out.

Today, he said no on every ground. The case in 30 seconds. The electronic poll book is the laptop record of everyone who checked in to vote at your precinct. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson's new state rule says that clerks must delete it seven days after the election is certified. Federal losses keep at 22 months. Destroy it, destroying it is a federal crime. My client, Bridgewater Township Clerk, Michelle McQueen, asked the state which law to follow. 11 months, no answer, so she sued. What happened today? The court of claims denied the state's motion to dismiss completely.

The state said she waited too long, denied. The court said, quote, it cannot fault plaintiff for waiting, end quote. The power to answer her, quote, was completely in their hands. The state said she skipped the process, denied. the court, it will not support defendant delaying in resolving, in resolving the administrative proceedings and then fault the plaintiff for filing suit. The state said a clerk can't bring this case in any court. Denied, the court said she sued to ensure that she complies with state and federal law and therefore will not be criminally charged. That's not the kind of case.

The state's cases are about. And the order protecting her records stays in place. The judge wrote that the state said criminal liability is quote unquote speculative because DOJ hasn't prosecuted anyone yet. The judge in footnote three says, quote, the court finds this contention to be quite remarkable and reckless. Footnote five says, quote, plaintiff suit also could derivatively save the secretary's state from being criminally charged federally. Read that one twice. So let's read it twice. Plaintiff's suit also could derivatively save the SOS from B. being criminally charged federally.

From the hearing on September 16th to the state's lawyers, the first sentence off the top, you lose on the latches. When Benson's lawyer argued the burden on the state said, quote, you're arguing practicalities, but you know what? I have to comply with the law. I have to follow the law. On calling out the state's species, species claims, species, species, species, species, species, species, species, claim that a clerk can't bring this.

case, quote, I'm with you on that. You're right. The state's own lawyer on the record says, you're not going to hear a merits argument from me. So the state now has to defend the rule on the merits, which it has avoided since the start. Benson's lawyers promised in court to issue rulings on her request within two weeks. Once those land, both sides file and the judge decides whether a state rule can order clerks to delete what federal law says to keep. It's incredible. It is. It's also. We didn't get to the end of the Missouri case, but the Missouri case dealt with this as well from the Eighth Circuit. And it had to invoke the supremacy clause because he was saying that you have a situation where the Missouri Supreme Court is holding the Secretary of State in contempt for trying to use the 2025 map when federal courts, now including the appellate court, have said you have to use the 20, you have to use the 2025 map.

You have to, yeah. Right. And so you had conflicting rulings in that case as well. Like the similarity. between Michigan and Missouri right now are very, very interesting. Yeah. And the 8th Circuit, of course, said, the Supremacy Clause puts federal law over your state law, especially when it's in violation of the Constitution. Yeah. And again, the Missouri, the reason that Missouri has to use the 2025 map is because they used the 2025 map already in the primary and using a different map for the general election, which changes the case. candidates, right? And it changes with that's unequal treatment and a violation of, I believe the 14th

Amendment is how they brought that case. The underlying constitutional question in Missouri, I wouldn't be surprised if they ended up back at the 22, 22 map or a different map following the general election, but they have to use the 2025 map in the general election. The Michigan situation of directing clerks to delete data that federal that's just a crime. I mean, like, and I still don't think we've gotten a satisfying answer as to why that directive was given in the first place. But it's, it, I love that sentence, the one that Kevin says read that one twice, that the, the lawsuit that they're trying to get thrown out could actually save Jocelyn

Benson from criminal charges. It's delightful. Oh, oh, oh, wait, hold on. Where did it go? Oh, there it is. Yeah, so this is the section from the Eighth Circuit's ruling in Missouri. The Supremacy Clause provides that, quote, the judges in every state shall be bound by the federal constitution, quote, anything in the Constitution or laws of any state to the contrary, notwithstanding. As the Supreme Court has explained, this clause creates a rule of decision directing state courts that they, quote, must not give effect to state laws that conflict with federal law. After all, the quote historical record makes clear that the

Supremacy Clause's exclusive function is to disable state laws that are substantively inconsistent with federal law. That's Haywood v. Drown. Given the conflict between Article 1, Section 2 with an interpretation of Missouri law that would suspend a congressional district map for general election after it's used in a primary election, the quote, Supreme Law of the land, Marbury v. Madison, prohibits using a different congressional district map in the general election than in the primary election. Now, replace the maps with order to destroy evidence, order to maintain evidence, the same case. Yeah. I wouldn't be surprised if Veski cites that in any follow-up briefs. The one thing I would say is that I think the criminal intent is greater, my opinion based on

information available. I think the criminal intent is greater in Michigan than it is in Missouri. I think in Missouri, they really were dealing with a underlying constitutional question and they were trying to resolve it and, you know, resolved it in a way that was disenfranchising to primary voters. And so, you know, obviously it's going to be the 2025 map. I think the directive in Michigan was was criminally motivated. Again, in my opinion, based on the information available. And that is an excellent, excellent point. The case in Missouri is, brought in good faith. The rule in Michigan, in my opinion, was intentively destruction with intent to conceal. And this goes back to

what went on with Matt DiPerno in following the Bailey case where they, you know, they tried to get him for being able to access machines. This is the ability. And there was, you know, cases back then were they tried to convince clerks following the 2020 election to change out their batteries. Like they tried to do it covertly where if you change out your battery and it's disconnected for X amount of seconds, it's going to reset the system. And, you know, so because it doesn't have a, it doesn't have a backup. So, so yeah, and that's along the lines of the trusted build in, in, in Colorado.

Like we're seeing a consistent friend here with, with the attempts to, indirectly or directly or subvert the federal law, the 22-month retention law. So, yeah, that's a good. And just, you know, manipulate elections, I would argue. Certainly if we're bringing up Colorado, you know, it's notable that in the Michigan case,

there's a directive to the clerks at issue. In Colorado, they avoid telling the clerks. because you can't just tell some of the clerks, right? If you're going to give a directive to the clerks, you have to tell all of them. And there are some really good clerks in the state of Colorado that will not let that subversion happen without the public knowing about it. And so what we find in Colorado is that they just don't tell the clerks. And that brings back up the 600 bios passwords thing because they were caught in the middle of a cover-up

and then the deputy secretary of state was caught on a phone call saying, well, we couldn't tell the clerks because it would have caused a media storm. well, you can't, you can't investigate the breach or potential breach if you don't tell the clerks because the clerks, one, have the equipment and two, have the surveillance camera that you would need to, surveillance footage that you would need to review to see if there was a physical breach, right? So they just didn't tell anybody. And it's like, okay, hang on a second. So you said that you resolve this. Did you resolve it remotely? Because that brings up a whole bunch of other questions that you say can't, you know, a bunch of other capabilities and access issues that you say can't happen.

And, you know, I still think that's going to come back around one day. We're not there yet. But I don't think that we've seen the administration go after Colorado yet in the way that we would expect based on, I think that there is an ongoing investigation. They certainly announced an ongoing investigation into. Tina Peters case, the U.S. attorney did on as to weaponization of government. And as I've said many times, I think all of this stuff falls under that umbrella of weaponization of government. And I don't think we've seen the end of it yet. But it is hilarious. There's, there's a lot happening with,

certainly with exposure. And it's not just happening in the press. It's happening in the courts. Weaponization could be what gets them to, uh, the actual, you know, attempts to cover up and, and whatnot. Like, it's just a vehicle to get there. Yeah. Well, that's been my contention all along is that trying to pursue, well, we can use Tina Peters as an example, trying to pursue the election, the election side of things with Tina Peters had a bunch of issues with it for the federal government. You know, she was state convicted. She wasn't. It was determined that she wasn't acting as a federal officer. There was a bunch of barriers to that. But if you take the same, set of facts and the same assertions and the same investigation and put it under weaponization

of government, all of a sudden, all of that stuff is relevant and can be a, I think can be a successful criminal investigation prosecution and conviction. And I hope that's my hopium is that that's, that's happening. And I'm not microdosing on that hopium. I am I'm overdosing. All right. So let's, let's shift gears here. J.D. Vance had a press conference, vice president Vance had a press conference yesterday. We are stopping Obamacare enrollment for about 750,000 people who we believe are fraudulently enrolled in the program and doing additional verification checks on about 419,000 to make sure that they meet the requirements. It sounds like that's about 1.69 million. And if you jump down here, it says that this will save 2.2 billion in taxpayer money. But what I want to actually

play is this clip here of Dr. Oz, also on I think this was on Hannity as well, unfortunately. A lot of Hannity today. What's going on? You're all right? You're all right, buddy? You know, they get all the good segments. But check this out.

This is mainly, I think it's only Dr. Oz. So there we go. Here's the numbers. Are you ready? Take it for the beginning. Obamacare had 10 million people on it for much of 2015 to 2020. All of a sudden, during COVID, it more than doubled to 22 million people. Sean, where you live in Florida, we have.

have a census. In the census, they tell you how many people and how much money they make. There are five times more people in parts of Obamacare in Florida than live in the state. It is impossible. More than a third of people in Obamacare have never used the insurance policy once. So you think about it if you're a viewer. Now, let's just pause there for one second. You're telling me that there's five times more people than there are in the state. I mean, granted, I'm sure this is like a small segment of the population, like a small area. But like this goes back to the same thing yesterday with the Haitian Colombian mercenaries that took out President Moise in Haiti in 2021 or 2023, whatever year it was, 2021.

If they wanted to catch this, there's systems in place to be able to catch this. You know, they're too busy worrying about, you know, you and I, deposit. more than $600 and making sure that that goes to the, you know, that we pay our taxes on that, but they ignore systemic fraud like this. If you're going to pay your hard-earned money to buy insurance for yourself, would you ever use it? The answer is yes. At least 85% of the time, you'd buy a prescription, you'd make a doctor's appointment, do something.

I'm saying it again, 35% of these folks never use it even once. And so there is no way it's all legitimate. And so we took major action today with the vice president. And President Trump, by the way, the state of the union made it clear that this is a choice as a nation. You choose to let illegal immigrants in. We chose not to. You choose to allow fraud in your health care system and increase the cost of the system and destroy the lives of Americans. We choose not to do that.

So today, we banned, effective immediately. We banned all new agents from Obamacare. Do not come steal money from the American people in Obamacare. We also took those 750,000 people off because they're not people. They're numbers. They are not real. We sent letters to them, carrier pigeons, phone calls. We asked every possible way of getting to them.

We could not find these people. They do not exist. They're phantoms, their ghosts. And if I can get that message across Sean, if you can help you deliver that to our colleagues on the other side, who could, I do believe, benefit from understanding this is a legitimate crisis that we are facing. And then you'll have done a wonderful job. They're not real.

It's almost like we were saying that was the purpose of Doge. We just talked about this again last week when they're bringing up, you know, you should criminally investigate Elon Musk for sending emails out asking for federal employees to tell us what they do at their job. That wasn't to actually figure out what they do at their job. That was to figure out who is going to respond because then you have a foundation, a baseline for determining how many of these federal employees are real versus how many are fake the entire system and and whenever you see something like this whenever you see a story like

this it gives significantly more credence to what chris has been saying that there aren't 330 million people in this country or 8 billion people in the world or 8 billion people in the world yeah that is nuts that it's not real hey you speaking at that which blocks you out from your microphone. So it could not hear of words. I was quoting the TMF. TMFINR. Yeah.

That mother is real. All right. Let's jump into this story here right here from X Alerts. Minnesota Democratic Senate candidate makes a video wearing a hijab and thanking the Somali community while the women, woman to her right is under investigation for fraud. You remember this video? That's old. Yeah.

Yeah, this video is old. My name is Peggy Planigan. I am the lieutenant governor of Minnesota, and I'm really honored and humbled to be here with all of you today. I am incredibly clear that the Somali community is part of the fabric of the state of Minnesota. So, yeah, the story, though, is not that she did that. The story now is that the woman who's circled right there, her name is Nimco Ahmed, is a Minnesota. a Democratic Farmer Labor Party activist and is listed as the CEO of Milestone Development Centers, which along with Spectrum Therapy Center is part of an open investigation for Medicaid fraud.

Milestone has been accused of not providing comprehensive autism services and of billing the government for clients who do not even have autism. Ninko says the allegations are biased because she is Somali. So there we go. How can they tell that somebody does or does not have? have autism? I mean today, I think like almost all of us are autistic in some form or fashion. It's a, it's a, it's a spectrum diagnosis, right? And I think it, I think that the determining, the determining factors vary from port to port on that. If you want to identify as autistic, you can

identify as autistic. Certainly many people do. For the sake of benefits. Yeah, it's crazy. Okay, so just a quick story here. And then I think we're, no, actually, we're not ready yet. But so we talked like a week ago

about Colonel Teresa Long investigating 2,544 deaths in the military reported to VERS from military deaths and how she's going to be spearheading this new investigation. Trial site News has another little edition that I did not know either. And Colonel Long, like I said, she is tasked with investigating approximately 55,000 Vairs reports involving armed forces personnel,

including 2,544 deaths. But I was not aware of this. She says, quote, I have firsthand knowledge, meaning she personally knows this. I have firsthand knowledge of over 29 deaths. of service members after vaccination with the COVID-19 vaccine. What you don't understand, like, people might be like, oh, 29 people and 2 million man force. No, that's 29 people that she has firsthand knowledge of. We're talking about, you know, maybe a battalion, maybe a regiment, right? A big number of people, but not the entire force.

If there were 29 deaths from anything in the military, you know, following a certain event, that event would immediately be shut down. It would immediately be, you know, gone through with a fine tooth comb to see why these were happening and everything else. And with the vaccine, they continued to deny anybody

any medical, religious exemption and forced them out of the service when this was going on. I cannot wait to see her report. Yeah, I mean, it's super safe, right? It's your duty. You have to do it or you're going to lose your job, lose your livelihood. Anybody telling you that it's dangerous is dangerous and is lying to you.

And, you know, you've got to save grandma. Also, we'll give you donuts and weed and free fries and all sorts of otherwise unhealthy things. And to coerce you. and then when the carrots don't work, we'll bring out the sticks. All the while, knowing in the back end that it was killing people. And I mean, when you think about it like horrifying

that they would do this to people in the military, they also did it to kids. They did the same thing to children in order to let them go to school, play sports, all those, you know, all of those different ability to access things and you know some of those kids have their lives ruined.

They now have heart issues and it's someone in the chat earlier I think was Ian was saying you know I get that elections are fake but how do we how do we know when elections are real and my answer has always been there has to be honesty and accountability

about that I feel the same way about the medical industries, the health industries is that there there should be zero trust with the way that these industries came together in the very deadly pandemic to transform society and coerce and manipulate people into dangerous health outcomes. There should be zero trust in those industries until there is honesty and accountability for what was done. Yeah, that's why when those British tards on the man on the street interview, when John pulled me into that conversation

and they're like, where's your evidence? And I said, the problem is, there is no evidence. Either way, it's unverifiable. And until you have, until you have verifiable elections, and now granted, there is evidence that there was fraud in 2020. They didn't want to sit there and look at it, of course,

because it's not, and that's another, like, that's a deflection right there when somebody's like, well, where's your evidence? Show me your evidence. Your evidence is going to require you doing things like reading state election board complaint,

2023-025. That is going to take you a couple hours to read through that. You have to have, you have to have a desire to actually see that. I mean, you can get the cliff notes if you read some of my articles on the Gateway Pundit. I'm here on Badlands, watch why we vote. You can get the cliff notes of that. We've done that legwork for you.

And, you know, and I know I hate saying, you know, trust us, but we've gone through it. And we're, we're articulating that to you in a condensed form. These people had no desire to see any of that. They just use that term because that is what they are told. by the media without evidence. Well, there's a ton of evidence. You guys just don't want to be journalists and do your jobs. You don't care about that.

And it's not a 15 second answer, right? Like, you can't the, the, the, we were talking about this last night with those Brits that we interviewed when John was doing, man on the street. And it was, well, you don't have any evidence. Actually, I can, I can tell you the evidence. I, you know, if you, if we had a computer with us, I could show you the evidence. but let me give you the framework, fake voters, fake ballots, fake counts. I didn't even get through saying fake ballots until I was hit with, well, that's not evidence.

Well, I'm not done yet. I can't show you the evidence of a very complex centralized system of election corruption in 15 seconds. But people that are hitting you with that, you know, but there's no evidence. There's no evidence in your face. They're not looking for evidence and they're not in good faith trying to pursue the truth. they're repeating headlines to you. They're repeating mainstream media what they believe is true because they trust the people on the TV that told it to. We've never asked people to trust us on this. We've had every, as far as I know, every person that has been engaged in election research and

litigation and trying to get the truth of elections, we've had them on. Those are, you know, 60 to 90 minute shows going through detailed documents and, you know, and evidence of election fraud. This is also the one issue where witness testimony is not considered evidence. It's like, well, you don't have any evidence. Well, we have a bunch of people that witnessed what happened, right, in various jurisdictions. Well, that's not evidence. Actually, it is. Actually, if you go to the federal rules of evidence, you can see that witness testimony is a whole body. of evidence, but for the purposes of obstructing the truth about elections, now it doesn't. When people say there's no evidence, what they're actually saying is you don't have a sworn

admission of the crime is what they're saying. And that's true. We don't have a sworn admission of the crime. We do have a ton of evidence. So much so that you can't change my mind that elections are real. Not because I'm believing the headlines that somebody has told me, but because Brian, and I have done hundreds of hours of content going through with people who have done the analysis, people who were persecuted by the government, people who have the firsthand knowledge across the

states, across the country. And so like that's the this whole there's no evidence baselessly asserted. It's your if you tell me that, if you come at me with well, there's no evidence and all the the election fraud stuff is is just baseless noise. I instantly you you you lose. any credibility with me because it means you haven't looked and you're just repeating headlines. And if you're British, it's like minus 10 points on top of that. Okay. Let's get into the next story here and briefly, just another one of those cultural war issues here. Converse is under fire now. Have you seen this story, Ash? I don't know. So Converse is under fire for this ad right here.

and I will let you try and tell me what the converse issue is. Is that a video or just the picture? It's just a picture. Oh, okay, okay, okay. Hang on. I'll give you like five seconds. It's got to be something white nationalist white supremacy related. You got to be a little more descriptive.

Nazi? The star. Is it the star? Okay, so let's go through it. First off, this is an ad for Kate with. K-pop star Marina, standing with the star-shaped Converse logo, surrounded by Converse shoes. That is a picture from her, I guess, from the waist of K.

K. Pop. And then let's go ahead. KK.K. K.K. Pop. No, it's not from KK.K. Pop. Let's get into why this is racist. There happens to be a national issue, particularly in the southern parts of the nation. where black people are being, what is it term strange fruit? What? Interesting, the timing that converts comes out with an ad that looks like this.

So you have a steeple there and the way these shoes and these other shoes are all positioned in a way that if someone was standing in them, they would be looking up. And it looks like these shoes are just dangling as shoes would dangle. Oh, I see it now. So, as I was saying. So there it is. It is racist because the crest of the star, I guess, the shadow makes a clanhood. And she's holding sneakers. And that means that somebody's hanging.

Well, you could, you could take. the imagery that way. I think it's a bit of a stretch. And I think, you know, in the age of the SPLC being outed as funding the KKK that it is, you know, that they really need to revive the narrative. But that's a, that's a stretch. Also, the marketing director for Converse is black. So this is, this is the, this is the marketing director, Rodney Rambo. Did he say anything about it? Not that I've seen, but he's the one who signed off on it, the marketing director for Converse. So that term strange fruit apparently is a metaphor for African Americans who were lynched.

I never heard that term before in my life. Strange fruit. Strange fruit. I guess like it's a strange fruit if it's hanging from a tree. Yeah. I guess. Here's the takeaway. All right.

And this is my point that I want to. make. And I made this point about Target when they had that costume of the the child in a pumpkin outfit. And they said it's racist because it looks like the Jim Crow just because the picture was a similar like position, like the way they were standing. Not because the outfit looked anything like the Jim Crow rendering. But so TMZ put this out that Converse apologizes for add. Come on, Converse. KKK lynching. And this is the, so I did this this morning. I went and looked at TMZ and I was trying to find the apology post and I searched Converse and this is what you get. Never get involved in this bullshit and when you do don't apologize. Kamala Harris

explains why she loves Converse Chucks. Converse will pay salary of WMBA star who forfeited season to focus on social justice reform. Converse sued by man who says classic chucks don't protect his feet. There was some more of the woke stuff. There's the WMBA one again. I think this story supports the contention that there is a lack of supply of racism to match the demand and it needs to be fabricated. Yeah. Ingo. When you're a hammer. It's Jesse Smolley.

It's whatever. When you're a hammer, everything is a nail. And if you are going to be a perpetual victim, you're going to find. racism and everything. Yeah. It was just a little Asian woman in a, in a country that has no KKK. I mean, maybe they do. Maybe Korea has a lot of KKK, maybe.

Yeah, I mean, I don't know. Do we, do we have an idea? It's South Korea we're talking about. Yeah. What is it? Do we know? No, North Korea. We're getting converse ads out of North Korea.

My question was how many black people are in South Korea. We know Dennis Rodman was in North Korea. So like that's, but, but you know, again, the SPLC still, as I understand it, under, uh, prosecution for fabricate for, for funding the KKK to fabricate racism. So the, the supply doesn't meet the demand. Yeah. Um, before we get into, because now we're onto the UN general assembly. Before we get into that, fix bayonet says to understand KANCon. You must first embrace the brianemite of it all.

Yeah, I love that one. I was waiting for you to mispronounce something before I pulled that one in. I have been waiting for that for the moment to read that rant. Thank you. I don't mispronounce things. You misinterpret and understand. False. No, not false.

Not at all false. Not at all false. All right, so let's get into the New York Post. Zelensky calls on Trump to use Graham sanctions act against Russia, says he's ready to talk with Putin. Quote, I'm very thankful to the American Zelensky said of the sanctions legislation passed by Congress and signed into law last week. I hope the president will use this instrument.

Goes on to say that the new law allows targeted tariffs up to 100% on the largest importers of Russian crude oil or natural gas. In his speech, Trump indicated that he's open to using his new tariff powers, which could hit China and India hard, quote, unquote, if necessary. Zelensky also declared that he's, quote, unquote, ready to meet with Putin face to face as part of potential U.S.-led trilateral discussions. Quote, I'm ready. I'm ready any time, he said, adding that the three sides, quote, need to move as quickly as possible. Zelensky said his willingness to sit down with the Russian strongman

who's previously rebuffed overtures for a face-to-face meeting should serve as a signal that he's ready to negotiate an end to the bloody conflict. Quote, you're ready to speak or not. You're ready to sit and negotiate, question mark? This is a signal, and you hear from Ukraine, yes, we don't hear it from Russia. Trump's meeting with Zelensky focused on two points, an energy ceasefire with Russia, and U.S. supplied Patriot defense systems for winter warfare. Over the summer, Ukrainian forces pummeled Russian diesel production facilities with drone strikes, prompting the Kremlin to stop exporting the fuel, which has sent prices skyrocketing. Quote, I'm not sure that Russia is ready, but we spoke about an energy ceasefire, Zelensky said. If they want us to attack their diesel and

refineries, if they don't want us to attack their diesel and refineries, we are ready if they will not attack our energy system, electricity, heating systems, and water supply. Quote, God bless the American side. God bless the American side will find a way to bring them to any kind of negotiation, said the Ukrainian president, emphasizing that he's ready for any kind of negotiation. Lastly, Zelensky appeared to cautiously optimistic that Trump would be able to provide Ukraine with a much-needed winter package of Patriot missiles. What's that? I don't want to give these people anything. Oh, I know.

And I don't think we should support them in any way, shape, or form until they hold an election. I agree. Nobody said no, Zelensky said in response to the ask. He wants to end the war, Zelensky said, of Trump. He would do everything to help end that war. Yeah, like not giving you anything else. Yeah. Like, give us credit.

Yeah. Definitely. You have a text and a telegram from Jessica. Oh, okay. I don't have a text from Jessica, but I do maybe have a telegram. Oh, I do have a text, but I had a miss call that took precedent. No, my phone's kind of weird, the way it does that. So I don't know.

All right. Let's, yeah, on that note, let's go ahead and hit another sponsor here. and get ready to go. And apologies for missing that. But since I've got it, I got to give the thumbs up here. And all right, guys, this is a paid advertisement for Rumble Wallet.

They are sponsoring this portion of the show. This is a real talk, guys. If you want to grab our attention, there's now a clear line to it. Here's how it works. We are prioritizing rants, send through one Rumble wallet. If you send one,

I see it and I respond. It's as simple as that. For limited time, you can start your wallet with $20 in U.S. Stablecoin for tipping Rumble creators like us by entering our exclusive promo code Daily 20 when you sign up now. Questions, hot take, stuff you really want us to react to. Don't bury it in the chat. Put it in a rant because let's be honest, regular chat flies by, but when you use Rumble wallet, it cuts through everything. So here's the move. Scan the QR code or use the link in the description.

Download Rumble Wallet and try it yourself. And don't forget to use promo code Daily. and claim you're $20 for tipping in U.S. Stablecoin. Sending a tip is easy. Just open the chat like you're sending a Rumble rant and hit pay with Rumble wallet. It's basically the VIP line, Lane. If you want to shout out, if you want us to actually engage with what you're saying, use Rumble wallet and claim $20 in U.S. Stablecoin with promo code Daily 20.

And then go ahead and send the rant. We'll be watching for them. Restrictions apply. There's a limited number of entries available. Terms and conditions apply. See the description below or visit rumbl. dot com slash promo official rules for details. All right. Let's jump back into the Zelensky story. So the interesting thing about the Russia, like Zelensky is now ready to meet with Putin and Putin

like rebuffed him. I can remember going back to the beginning when I and I couldn't find this online, but I remember very clearly that Zelensky was the guy that was like we will absolutely not negotiate with Russia in the beginning of this war, quote-unquote war. Then you have Putin coming out and Putin did say I'm not meeting with Zelensky unless there's a deal that he's proposing. Like I'm not just going to negotiate. I'm not going to go meet with Zelensky. That would be legitimizing him as an unelected leader.

He is well past his statutory limits, you know, in the Ukrainian constitution. So I'm not going to legitimize him unless there's a plan being proposed. to end this conflict. And so there still is no plan that we know of. Whitkoff and Kushner are allegedly working on one. And any plan is going to require Ukraine seizing land to Russia in the in the Donbass. That's pretty much non-negotiable. Russia already controls and occupies most of that land anyways.

So we'll see. Trump has a very tough terrain to navigate with this. and the fact that he's meeting with Zelensky, you know, Zelensky's taking that as if me and Trump are boys. No, Trump is telling you, bitch, you're the one that is going to give up here. Otherwise, I'd be meeting with Putin. If Putin was going to be the one to make concessions, then I'd be meeting with him. So that's just my take on this.

Babof you for $5 Rumble rant. Every time President Trump makes headway and gets Russia to stand down, Zelensky uses it to attack Russia again. Yes. Yeah, it is Ukraine keeping this conflict going. and I've never, I've never been, you know, maxy on this topic, except that I don't believe that we should be engaged in the level of foreign interference that we are in, you know, around the world. However, that White House meeting where, you know, a lot of it focused on J.D. Vance,

stressing down Zelensky, a lot of the commentary, that White House meeting made me hate that guy with the passion of a thousand sons, fire of a thousand sons. And it hasn't subsubes. sided and the idea that we would give them more funding, more arms. It makes me angry. Yeah. JD dressed them down and Trump dressed them down. Yeah. You know, you got to hold the cards. You don't hold the cards. Do you have a suit? Remember that? Like, do you have a suit? Like, you think you come into my house and you don't even put on a suit? You come in here and your little military clad like you just came from the front lines. Military sweatsuit. Yeah. Military. military track suit.

You know, little freaking whatever. And then when he went and hung out with globalists, he wore a suit, which tells you everything that you need to know. He's a character. He's a character. Well, it tells you, I think, everything that you

need to know in that the real backing of the real Ukraine is a front for its global's proxy state is what I'm attempting to say. So is Canada, by the way, right? And there are, and there are many others. But you can see where his, where Zelensky shows respect is not to the American people. I think the little gremlin needs to be

removed. And I think they need to hold an election. If they're going to continue to pretend to be a real country, then they need to hold an election. And I'm honestly fine if they just become Russia again. All right. So here's President Trump talking about the diesel problem. We mentioned this yesterday. I'm a fan on diesel exports. Chuck Grassley called for the same thing. Like Rogers called for the same thing. Is that something you're considering it? Well, I'd call for that too.

I'd say, it's not to send out to diesel. We make a lot of diesel. And it could have a little bit of an effect on regular automobile gasoline. Because when you do that, you know, it's a sort of a flow, it's a balance. But no, I've called for it. I've called for it within my people. I've been talking about it. Scott, you want to talk about that.

Yeah, we're examining that whether the, whether it's feasible in terms of the overall refining capacity and whether a full or partial band would work. Is there a timeline for decision on that basis? Yes, one way. Okay, so basically an embargo, talking about an embargo on U.S. exports of diesel to the rest of the world, we are the largest producer of diesel fuel, refiner of diesel fuel. We talked about this yesterday.

The notion that somehow Iran, Strader Hormuz is somehow the driver of this and not Russia, Ukraine. Russia has the three largest companies, corporations, that refine it, but as an as an and a whole, we are the largest refiner as a whole. Russia has a three largest company. So it, you know, it could be the Ukraine-Russia thing, but they're trying to put this on on Iran. And, you know, that's because it would be a shot at President Trump if they put it on Iran. Again, I think all of this is going to come to is going to come to heal as soon as this midterm is over. So. Yeah. And that leads me to this section right here.

talking about the prosperity of our country right now. Since I took office, we have created more than one million new private sector jobs and more Americans are working today by far than ever before. I just want to pause right there because we just heard about the Obamacare thing and we talked about the Elon Musk sending the letters out to all the federal employees. One of the things that we saw the jobs reports kind of sucking, not sucking, but not being as great as we were hoping. with President Trump early on was the fact that there was a loss of federal jobs. And if you go back and look, me and Chris Paul used to read the jobs report every Friday during the Biden administration.

Every single jobs report was inflated by federal positions, government jobs, state, you know, state jobs. Trump has added none, right? Like all of the jobs that he's creating are private sector jobs. Now, I'm not saying that he's not hiring federal employees, but it doesn't. it equates to a net negative. I don't think that he's hired more than they fired. No, that's what I'm saying. It's a net negative.

Yeah, I'm agreeing with you. But creating private sector jobs, there's also, I don't have the stat, but there's also a big, a lot of growth in entrepreneurial Americans going into business for themselves, which is fantastic. Exactly.

And the follow-up of this tracks more with honesty and the reporting from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics now than what we saw during the Biden administration. And it's talking about the poverty rate right here. Last week, it was announced that the poverty rate has reached this lowest level in American history. We lifted 1.5 million Americans out of poverty last year alone, another record. The African American and Hispanic American poverty rates are at all time lows. real household incomes for Americans have soared to the highest level in history, 87,000 on average, surpassing the prior record that I set in my first term.

From day one, my administration has worked to remove every single unnecessary regulation and obstacle to doing business in America. We passed the largest tax cuts in American history, and as a result, more money is being invested, in the United States right now than has ever been invested in any nation anywhere in the world. U.S. stock markets have set 80 all-time records, and that's just in the last 12 months. We've secured commitments for $21 trillion in new investments from all over the planet compared to less than $1 trillion in four years in the previous administration. two years ago our country was dead and now we have the hottest country anywhere in the world

so you hear that and i know a lot of people get discouraged when president trump talks about those things all of those things are as far as we can tell those things are all true the jobs rates the the the wage growth the tax cuts all of those things are true so why are we still doing so poorly as people tell us and and and and it's energy prices, right? It all boils down to energy prices. And a lot of people want to blame, of course, the U.S. Iranian war. That, look, I think that the energy crisis, the price increases, spikes that we're seeing right now, I think those were inevitable. I think they were going to happen whether or not there was a war. And, you know, going back to President Trump's first term,

you had, you know, countries like Ecuador, Qatar, Indonesia. They all left, well, Indonesia was before Trump, I believe. But they all left OPEC. And then what did we just see like a couple months ago? The United Arab Arab Emirates left OPEC as well. That's the oil cartel is being broken up. Like their production, their production is limited based on what OPEC says you can make. It has nothing to do with profits. It has all everything to do with price manipulation, market manipulation, export manipulation, producing just enough to keep the price per barrel, you know, where they need it to be. It's a. cartel. And, you know, it ties into the globalist banking cartel and everything else. And so when

President Trump says, we're doing fantastic, when the midterms are over, you're going to see the oil prices, the energy prices come back down. And it's, the war's going to end. And you're going to see kind of normalcy. Maybe that's the ushering in of the golden age, you know, but I'll land that there. Yeah. I mean, gas prices suck. I saw a video. My buddy Darren, you know, Darren. He lives down by you. He sent me a video and I was looking to see if it was a link. I don't have a link for it. It was just an embedded video, but it was a guy going through gas prices over the past 25 years adjusted for inflation and peak gas prices in the George Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden administrations were all higher than peak gas prices in Trump 1 and Trump 2. And it's so I think a lot of the

Now, I fill up my car too, right? And I drive a Jeep SUV. And so it's, you know, I just, I just drove to Las Vegas and back. And it's a little like when you, you know, have $100 to fill up your gas tank. It's frustrating. I don't think it's long term. I agree that it's going to change. I also think if we remember back to Trump one, the first two years of Trump one were,

tumultuous, angsty, by the end of Trump, by the 2020 election, even with the COVID pandemic, the economy was roaring. And that's, and that was structural changes put in place to unleash the economy for the American people. And then we had four years of Biden undoing that. And I think, I think that now we're seeing those, in Trump two, first two years, we're seeing those structural changes, you know, in some ways. ways being put back in place, in other ways being the systems that allowed them to be unwound so quickly being dismantled. And so we're seeing structural changes to make the economy work for the

American people. Again, this is, you know, the kind of birth of globalism, as we know it, was 1948. It has taken us from 1948 until, you know, 2040s. 2016 to get into this dystopian nightmare. And it's not just who's in a seat of power, who won a fake election. It's what are the underlying systems and structures and, you know, the incentives, the carrots and the sticks that are driving, guiding our reality. And that is what, what we see the Trump administration dismantling. I think we had a lot of progress towards that in Trump one. I think Trump two are, well, Trump two would have been Biden, right? The Biden administration was a exposure operation in large part, but a testing of some of those changes.

And the changes that are being made now are much more structural, like getting into the trade agreements and the incentive structures for corporal. in a way that is going to be harder, I hope, I think, I hope, going to be harder to unwind in the post-Trump era. Yeah, I see the chat, you know, blaming Democrats, blame Democrats. This isn't this. Democrats aren't real, guys. It's a uniparty. Exactly.

And I don't, you know, I would love to be able to say, yeah, blame the other side, right? But again, that's going back to that tribalistic mindset. This is much larger than Republicans versus Democrats. This is the globalist London banking system. This is the oil cartels. When you see something like the deal that President Trump and Delci Rodriguez announced with the Venezuelan 65 billion barrels of oil reserved secured for the American fuel reserves, that should have brought down futures prices.

But it didn't. It didn't. They went up. And that is all the indication you need. And I feel like Trump was giving us that as a way to shine a light on this situation. So when he comes out and says after the midterm elections, when they retain power, in the system when they have not they don't retain power well they will retain power but when they put in a way to overtly push back against president trump right now they can't the republicans in

congress right now cannot overtly push back against trump they have to do it in a nuanced way the filibuster's there we can't do this we you know we can't do that that is all nuanced they're the same party they have to maintain the status quo while at the same time appearing that there is still some form of a system in this country. There's not. So now in the midterms, if the Democrats win, they can outright defy President Trump. They no longer have to do it subtly. And that is, I think, what he's shining a light on saying that the prices will come down. And they're going to want the prices to come down if the Democrats take over because they're going to want to be able to give you that that facade, that this was all because the Democrats took power. Oil prices came down because the Democrats

took power. It's all a game, guys. It is all a game. All right, let's jump into... Gizmo's mom, just because we're talking about gas prices, Gizmo's mom says price set by global exchanges, such as Brent crude futures exchange in London. The entire incentive structure and control structure for global energy prices is a scam. And it's a centrally controlled cartel.

I personally believe that that is what the age of Trump is about is dismantling globalism, because I think globalism is, treason. It's certainly for the United States of America. It has been crippling. It's crippled the United States of America. It's it's reduced our prosperity, our way of life, the mental aspects, the sustainable development goals, creeping into every single aspect of our lives. That is what we're

fighting. But, you know, we're going to have to see what happens. One other Rumble rant, Brian, do you remember Jaron Jackson? No. He was back 2020, 2021 election integrity movement. Kind of get local, get, you know, get. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. So Diane LaPortee club. I haven't heard Darren Jackson's name in ages, years. And she posted a link. Apparently he was just speaking to the Court of Appeals in Tennessee. So I am definitely going to check that out. Very cool. Okay. Thank you for sharing that, Diane. Let's jump into this story here. So President Trump signs the deal. with Greenland and Denmark. We've got the story here from Reuters. U.S. to open two new military bases in Greenland, sources say, Caroline Levitt.

According to three people familiar with the matter, the sites are Narsar Suak, Narsarsar Suak, whose population has dwindled to a few dozen people since the U.S. closes. Bluey West, one military base in the 50s, and Mester Svig,

a military outpost used by the serious S-I-R-I-U-S, the serious dog sled patrol, a Danish Special Forces unit, said two of the people familiar with the situation. Denmark says the agreement puts Arctic security under the watch of the NATO, rather than leaving it solely to the U.S. in Denmark. During the Cold War, the U.S. maintains 17 KEC military installations and more than 10,000 personnel in Greenland. Today, only Petufic space base remains with some 150 U.S. military personnel.

So I feel bad immediately for anybody that is getting stationed in Greenland. I want to go. I volunteer to feed the special operations dog sled. I will feed the dogs and rub their bellies. I was about to say, I'll be the volunteer like puppy cuddler. Like just let all the dogs. Yeah, there you go. We have the pop patrol up in, up in the Arctic.

So the White House put this out. President Trump inks historic Arctic security agreement. And I thought it was really interesting because it goes through and starts naming like quotes from all these people. President Trump said, as I announced just days ago, the U.S. has also reached an unprecedented agreement regarding the northern frontier of North America, the large and strategically vital piece of land known as Greenland. This agreement gives the U.S. permanent. control over security and all other needs on that territory, we will have the complete ability to do what is necessary to defend the American continent. And then it goes on and starts naming all these other people. And just look how many people they get quotes from. Chancellor Merz from

Germany, the Norwegian prime minister, Maloney from Italy, Sanka from Estonia. I mean, the U.S. ambassador is Denmark, the U.S. Special Envoy to Greenland, former Speaker of the House of House New Gingrich, former National Security Advisor, KT. McFarland, Claremont Institute Senior Fellow, and they're all basically all like, this is going to be great, this is going to be great. I just don't see badlands here where it's like, we told you, you're our bitch. Greenland will be ours. And that should be the only message right there. Canada is like, we're going to be a part of the EU.

We're going to have an associate membership. And Trump's like, oh, yeah, we just took Greenland. What are you going to do about it? Checkmate. Yeah, I was looking for it because I wanted to put it in a brief take. But on the day that that happened, I think it might have been in one of the telegram chats for Gart, but I never could find the meme. But there was a picture of Canada as a cat's face. And it was smushed all in between these, you know, all the other American, you know, American flags. Delightful. As I said before, I think that Canada is a globalist proxy state. I think they're designed. to join the EU sort of underscores my point on that. I also think, as I've said, for years at this point, that Canada is our greatest national security threat because it is globalism on our northern border. And there is this failure to accept the risk associated with that. Not Alberta. I love Alberta. Stand with Alberta. I always get that whenever I say that Canada is.

the national security threat. What about Alberta? No, we love, we love Alberta. We'll take it. But yeah, we have to deal with the Canadian threat. And it's really a, you know, British crown, you know, Chinese Communist Party threat sitting on our northern border. But great.

Now they're boxed in. They're boxed in by borders, you know, U.S. defensible borders. And I love everything about that. Yeah. I would, I would keep. your eyes on the Falkland Islands in the next couple days. There's a posturing there between Argentina, the UK, Israel, and the U.S. is remaining neutral in that for right now. I would, I suspect that the U.S. is going to back Argentina in the claims over that territory because it's right off their

coast. And the U.K. and Israel believe that they have rights to the oil in the ocean there. And Malay is fighting back against that. And I think you're going to see the U.S. get a base down there in exchange for supporting Argentina's claims to sovereignty over that land or claiming it as sovereign land of Argentina. So you shall see. Yeah, me and, me and I, I think it was me and Alpha. We're talking about this in Vegas. And, you know, he was saying it's going to be somewhere south. And I was saying it'll be the Falklands. So we'll see. President Trump also talking here about Iran, and I've got two clips on Iran. We'll get through these quickly.

But I have a big decision to make. Will a deal be made with Iran that lets them rebuild and create a far greater country than it ever was before? Maybe one of the greatest in the Middle East or even the world. Or do I annihilate the Islamic Republic? and do it quickly, never giving them a chance to kill and destroy people and countries again. Do I drive them into hell with no chance of survival and no hope of future greatness or generations? But I believe we'll make a deal right after the election because it doesn't make sense for them not to. They're waiting to see how I do in the midterm election.

And what they don't realize is that I'm not running. I did that already and won in a landslide. We won in a giant landslide. And I'll be here for two and a half years. The Republican Party is running and I'll be helping them. But I am not running. I gave absolutely no credence and will not give credence to the election when it comes to Iran. It doesn't even enter my mind.

the only thing that does is that Iran will never have a nuclear weapon. So there's that credence quote. And I mean, it's very interesting the way that he says that. And I can see, you know, we talked about this earlier in the show about him saying credence, meaning, you know, I don't believe, I'm not going to give legitimacy belief in the election. But at the same time, understand. Right, as real, exactly. But at the same time saying, you know, that the way I think that it's supposed to be interpreted is Iran is not going to dictate, like the election is not going to dictate what I do in Iran.

But I mean, that's not what he said. Like as he said it, like replace credence with what he actually said. And I place no belief that the election is real in regards to Iran. That's not the same as I'm not going to let the election influence my decisions in Iran. But that's what is supposed to be meant by that. But it's not what he said. So anyways. Can I put my screen up for a second?

Thank you to boom diggedy for finding it. I looked for this for way too long the other day and couldn't find it. No, I'm very happy. I love it. I love it so much. You also do like that could be Christy when she goes to sleep with with me, cash. and tango. It could be...

He sleeps on the floor now. Oh. He's getting up there in years and it's difficult for him to get up in the bed. So he's content on the floor. Thank you, boom, digity. I appreciate you. One more. Actually, you know what?

Let's skip this quote. This is him saying basically the same thing. They can make a dealer. They can go to hell. And, yeah. I'm trying to, because we're going to run out of time. I'm trying to pick the ones that I think are most relevant. I love this because this actually gives an interesting take on the war, the quote-unquote war.

I don't think it's a real war. But check this out. I like this clip here. The entire world is being lifted by the wealth, strength, spirit, and momentum of a newly energized and a very powerful United States of America. And just as we moved quickly to address problems we inherited at home, We have acted with decisiveness and speed to reshape the world stage and solve problems that have plagued us for far too long. Every leader in this room and your great leaders, many great leaders, I know all of you very well, but they know that given only a short time to make this world better, safer, and more prosperous for our children, for the people on Earth, we have to take advantage of it.

As president of the most extraordinary nation in history, I have no interest in leaving dangers to grow for another day. I do not believe in letting problems fester. They only become harder to solve. So while others have talked, I have acted. While others have spoken of peace, I have made peace. While others have ignored threats, I have confronted them. while others have talked of courage, America has shown it, while others have promised strength,

I have used it to make America the most powerful country in the world. So that's a very interesting take. And I think, you know, when you look at what's taken going on geopolitically over the last couple of years, going back to last June with Operation Midnight Hammer, Trump has been saying you know and everybody thinks oh Trump's an Israel Simp and all that other stuff okay not the case

he went in and did Operation Midnight Hammer right the B two bombers flying over dropping all the bombs putting them under dust the plot of the Maverick movie yeah plot right yeah made right had to shoot it down the vent it's all very real it's all it's just totally real

we're glassing the desert and etc etc yeah he makes Netanyahu come out as the first person to say that Operation Midnight Hammer was excess. It wasn't Trump. The first person to come out and say that was Netanyahu. Then Trump says, okay, it's done. We took away. Iran will never have a nuclear weapon. We buried it under 50 feet of rubble. It's not coming back. Then they move the goalpost on it. Now it's ballistic missiles. Now they have ballistic missiles that can reach Europe. So Trump says again, okay, well, you know, let's stop the ballistic missiles then. Okay. We're moving, we're kicking the can down the road.

We're broadening the goalposts here on what is and isn't allowed. And then, of course, I think February 28th was Israel jumping the gun and the U.S. just went full bore on it. And now we're in the negotiation part here where, you know, obviously there's factions we've learned about, you know, Mossad segments inside of the IRGC and how much control they actually have over the IRGC versus the sovereign Iranian government, the Possackians of the region. and Trump is taking away the boogeyman that has existed for since 1979 since the Iranian Revolution. And that is really interesting when he puts it that way. You know, I've got a very short time to do all of this and I'm doing it.

I'm taking away the stuff you guys have been yapping about for 50 years, building up the military industrial complex, spending billions upon billions of dollars on bullshit, putting people in the Middle Eastern region. we saw the other you know a couple months ago or a month ago financial times Trump's going to pull people out of the Middle East yeah yeah we should go back to the Don Row doctrine as it's now for you know lovingly termed and and start putting our assets in the Western Hemisphere I love it that was a great clip right there yeah I think we're a lot of people that are not going to make it because they will say that the news is fake but then they'll take the assertions of the news as real have an emotional reaction about it and start attacking you. Like that's our society now is people responding to stimulus with emotion and hysteria. And the Operation Midnight Hammer was literally the plot of the Maverick movie. And most people had no, wouldn't, didn't even pause, wouldn't even pause to consider whether or not that was real. We're told by a bunch of big name journalists and, you know, some influencers. too, but I'm talking about like, you know, Glenn Greenwald and others who are a journalist,

we are glassing the desert in Iran. I don't know what the hell is going on in Iran. You don't know. You're responding to stimulus that you're getting from people who have incentives tied into the globalist control. And part of the big thing, you know, to go back to the story, we talked about at the top of the show with the, you know, the news media being kind of barred from access to the White House, when you have the accomplishments that have happened in this administration, Trump 2.0,

administration, and people saying, well, nothing has happened, 94, 95 percent negative news coverage undermining the agenda of the administration, the accomplishments of the administration, and they won't report them. And then you have people that used to call the, like, or probably still do, consider themselves truth community repeating globalist news headlines and having an emotional reaction to it, I'm sorry, I'm just laughing at you. And if you come bring that to my face, I'll mock you to your face about it because you're not a truth community person if you're regurgitating headlines. And you're not a truth community person if you're regurgitating Promethean action or other, you know,

influencer groups that are obviously pushing a very specific agenda. Being in the pursuit of truth means you have to take your jersey off and turn your brain on and critically think about things. And we don't see a lot of that. It's just heartening. Let's, we got one more, we got one more clip that I want to play. And this is about AI. It also totally rejects any attempt to construct a global scheme to control for the artificial intelligence being spoken of so much now, here and after officially called superintelligence, changing the name, and that the use of the word artificial makes intelligence fake.

It makes it sound fake, and it is not fake. It's actually amazing, but we have to be careful. In fact, it is exactly the opposite of what it purports. from this point forward, all of United States documents, and hopefully the world will be changed to use the much more accurate term, super as opposed to artificial. So it's super intelligence. In other words, welcome to the new world of superintelligence dash SI.

SI. Let's see if that sounds much better. It is much better and it's much more accurate. Let's see if I have any power. Let's pause there for just one second. And he put out the poll. I think it was over the weekend about renaming artificial intelligence

to superior intelligence what was it superior extreme intelligence and there was supremacy intelligence or not supremacy? What was the last one? Superior and there was another one. Super was not one of the options.

And the interesting thing about him saying let's welcome super intelligence is super intelligence is actually a long running concept in artificial intelligence. So, you know, I know you've read Scary Smart. And the progression of artificial intelligence is artificial intelligence, artificial general intelligence, artificial superintelligence. And AGI is where artificial intelligence is at our level of IQ in terms of IQ, respective to IQ, versus superintelligence, which is light years ahead of our intelligence. So is Trump alerting to us that super intelligence is actually here and we've we've already gotten past a GI

because super intelligence was not one of the options on his poll we do not we do not have enough time to have this conversation in the two minutes that are left however I think you're planning to join me on Monday on culture of change to talk specifically about this topic yeah yeah I'm down yeah so we'll we will talk about ASI, AGI, AGI, A.I, ADI, ADI, ADHD, all of the related topics associated with the deployment that we're getting about AI right now. So then we'll go ahead and save that clip because there's some more in that clip that relates to the topic and the globalist takeover of AI and President Trump fighting against that.

Real Aggie guy, Jedi Intelligence. I agree, that's what we should name it. Jedi intelligence. I'm there for that. 100%. Brian is an AI believing Maxi, by the way. AI believing Maxi? Like the, you believe scary smart.

Like you believe that journey story. The story of that journey. I don't believe it, but I'm going to give thought to it. Absolutely. You'd be naive and close-minded if you don't. I'm very open to AI. I don't know which way it's going to go. I'm also very cautious of it.

Like you believe that Skynet could be a thing, right? It could. Do I believe that that's what's going to happen? Probably not. I think could it? Absolutely. A lot of ways. But we'll talk about it Monday night on Culture of Change.

Well, Nvidia just came out and said there's zero percent chance that AI is going to kill humanity. Yeah. In response to that other guy that said 10%. Yeah. A ton of the hype is to, get the investment dollars. And the globalists admit that in their globalist meetings. I'll see if I can find those clips and pull them in for Monday show. They admit that when they're talking to investors, when they're talking to each other, when they're talking to common folk and news media, it's hysteria to 11. And that's how you know it's bullshit. All right. Let's, before we get out of here, well, we'll save the game of lotion for the very end because that is.

that stands on its own that you'll want to see that. Well, but hang on a second because if we are saving it until the very end, then, well, do the rants and then I'll give my pitch before you play that. I don't think there's any rants left because we've been reading once ago. Reberhardt did say Jaron is badass.

I shared link on X, Rebbe underscore 7. 17. Yeah, again, I haven't like thought about him in years, but I remember, I remember thinking he was a real one. you know, like that he was, he was committed to actually truth and kind of detached from a lot of the,

a lot of the election integrity movement noise and bullshit that came about. Gizmo's mom, price set by global exchange, such as Brent crude futures exchange in. We read that. Yes. Yeah, we read all those. Babbage, you got a YouTube super chat. Oh, I was going to check those. From C-shaft, 0812, Ghost just went on Rich does politics and blew open the Mediardium.

Mulderro Swiss Banks. Oh, nice. I have to check that out. He's had a bunch of our guys on. I wonder when you and I... Yeah, I'm behind on all of that too. Because I know John went on, Burning Bright went on, now Ghost has gone on. I need to watch all of those.

I haven't seen anything yet. I wonder when they're going to have us on to talk about elections. Seems like they're going. I mean, they had John on for Devolution, B.B. for Russia. Ghost now for Maduro and the Swiss banks. It's time to talk about some election fraud.

And it's time for us to get out of here. But soft disclosure.com, hydrate your elbows, moisturize your soul, join a house. House of tallow is the best one. And over a Green Star in the middle of the show, Green Star sent me a J.B. reaction video. Apparently, I think on Rattler Gator this morning or something, J.B. saw the ad for the first time. Or maybe it was Monday. But he, he seemed to, he seemed to like it. And we think you will too.

Hit the like button and buy soft disclosure. Also, when you're over at buying your soft disclosure, make sure that you sign up for the email updates. It's our Soft Disclosure Insider Club, and that is where you will get exclusive discounts, the best discounts that we give. You will get either in the Insider Club or at GART. We give the best discount for GART virtual ticket holders as well.

But you also get product information, testimonials, giveaways, all kinds of fun. stuff. All right, here we go. In a realm divided by ancient houses, a war has begun. In the house of Lipbaum. Jonathan of House Drake, you stand accused of defying the decree of Madam Margie and refusing the razor. I've never heard of what the actual consequences are if we don't shave off our beards. Waiting to find out, because I have no intention of shaving.

In this realm, even the beards. fall. You're one of us now. House of lotion. Tallow. House of many tallow. House of beard oil. And house of deodorant.

She can't get away with this. This would have never happened if she had Bitcoin. Eat a bag of Dragon D's, Gene. That's Kimmer Kate activated, punctured in Phil Spice. Wait, Mitch. He's a flashed down. It looks like you guys could use a little help. The God Emperor.

First of all, I've got to say, supporting six small American businesses, huge fan. Big fan of America. But I came here to tell you, you have a big problem at your border. A very big problem. An army of dry-skinned walkers is coming into your lands. And trust me, you do not want them here.

They're dry, they're cracked, they need to be hydrated. This is going to take conscious strength and lots of hydration. We have to spread the word. promo code walkers 17% off at softdisclosure.com What about Madam Marjorie and her beardless son? Already handled. I've got the brush on it. Put this on your beard to soften it, motherfucker.