Bankless - 15 - ETH is Undervalued

Episode Date: June 2, 2020

Episode: #15 June 3, 2020 The bankless boys think ETH is undervalued and they explain why. Also, a talk on governance why putting it on-chain is a money killer. Join Ryan and David in this special bonus episode. Covered: ETH fundamentals are fire Metrics  Gas usage at all time higher Daily active users up Stablecoins on Ethereum up BTC tokenized on Ethereum up Network fundementals up! So why isn't price up? Maybe ETH is Undervalued! New Crypto.com wallet is protocol sink thesis! Maker on Coinbase is a big deal On-chain gov hurts store-of value  Decreases credible neutrality Handing the keys to plutocrats Join us next Monday for a fresh episode! ----- Tools from our sponsors to go bankless: Ramp - the fiat onramp for DeFi (mention Bankless!) Monolith - holy grail of bankless Visa cards Aave - money lego for lending & borrowing Multis - bank your business without a bank (1 mon. trial!) ----- Resources discussed: (Article) ETH is doubly undervalued (Tweet) Why ETH is headed to bull market ----- Episode Actions: What do you think - is ETH undervalued? Give Bankless at 5-star review on iTunes! ----- Subscribe to podcast on iTunes | Spotify | YouTube | RSS Feed Leave a review on iTunes Share the episode with someone you know! ----- Don't stop at the podcast! Subscribe to the Bankless newsletter program Visit official Bankless website for resources Follow Bankless on Twitter | YouTube Follow Ryan on Twitter Follow David on Twitter

Welcome to bankless, where we explore the frontier of internet money and internet finance. This is how to get started, how to get better, and how to front run the opportunity. This is Ryan Sean Adams. I'm here with David Hoffman, and we're here to help you become more bankless. David, this is a special bonus episode. Why are we doing this, man? We are doing this because so much good stuff has happened in Ethereum in the last couple weeks. And also, our interview with the Winkle boss twins was absolutely. fantastic. So it was just too much good content to be put into one single episode. So we're splitting it out and releasing this as a bonus episode. The big picture stuff, the topics that we have

today, I think are crucial and they definitely deserve their own episode. So we're recording this extra episode for all you bankless fans. Speaking of bankless fans, if you guys could, please go to wherever you listen to podcasts and give us those five-star reviews so we could show up higher on the charts. There is a bunch of old crypto podcast. that haven't released episodes in months, in years, ever since 2017. And just because they came out in 2017, they still are there. So if you could go to iTunes, Spotify, wherever you listen, and give us those five-star reviews, so we can get bankless to the top of the crypto podcast charts, we would really appreciate it.

Let's spread the revolution, guys. Let's do it. Before we begin, want to talk about our fantastic sponsors today. Our first sponsor is Monolith. If you guys have your assets inside of Ethereum, but you all, also want to live your life. Monolith for our European customers might be the product for you. They have their defy card, which is a Visa card connected to a smart contract wallet on Ethereum, so that when you go to the store, you buy your coffee, you buy your groceries, you swipe your

monolith card, and then your die gets deducted out of your smart contract wallet, sold for dollars, and then you make both a transaction on Ethereum and a transaction on the Visa network. really crucial infrastructure for people that want to live a bankless life, but don't really want to compromise and be that weird friend that doesn't have any real money. So you can download the app at monolith. XYZ to get your bankless visa card today. And then you can get some of the world's economic activity placed onto the Ethereum network. All right, guys, I am super excited to introduce you,

to our next new sponsor ramp. What is holding crypto back? It's really getting fiat into the crypto system. That's what's holding defy back. The problem is a new user has to create an account with an exchange to buy some crypto. They have to wire funds. They have to go through a whole bunch of steps. What's holding defy apps back the exact same thing? Users drop off in the sign-up process. And it really limits the defy market to hardcore crypto people, but no longer, Ramp solves that. Ramp has a delightfully easy Viat on-ramp service. So it lets users get crypto, ETH, D-USDC in five minutes or less. That's right.

Five minutes or less. No exchange needed. And a new user can have crypto right into their account and start using the app. So if you are a developer, this takes about 10 minutes to implement. They've got very easy to use APIs. apps like DeFi apps like Zerion, Ethereum, Taurus are using Ramp. You can visit ramp.network to see how easy this is. This is really an opportunity for Defi developers to 100x their addressable market size.

This is like the ultimate growth hack. And here's what's cool. If you mention bankless, they will on-ramp the first 100K from your app of USD free. So that's 100K free when you mention bankless. ramp. Network and check it out. R-A-M-P-D-Network, mention bankless, and check it out. David, first topic. We're going to talk about four things today. First topic. Does it feel to you like there is a massive mismatch between fundamentals and price going on right now? And specifically, I'm talking about Ethereum. Bitcoin's been covered a lot.

But Ether, the asset, is there a mismatch going on? What's going on? Yeah, it's really hard to value Ether, because it's really hard to value these systems as a whole. whole, right? Like, crypto systems are inherently impossible to value. There's no price to earnings ratio. There's no, none of these fundamental metrics that we know about in the legacy world to price these assets. But at the same time, Ether has been, you know, volatile but flat over the last two years. And the fundamentals of Ethereum have never been greater. Spencer Noon has put out some fantastic charts on the tweet thread, which we are definitely going to link in the show notes. And if you guys are on Twitter right now, you should definitely just open that up and find his, his charts, because we're going to go through some of these.

It's pretty crazy, the fundamental growth that we have seen in Ethereum metrics. If you guys have listened to episode seven, Ether's value mechanisms, a lot of the charts and graphs and data that Spencer put out in this thread directly relate to some of the concepts that we talked about in that episode. What this data and information show is just the increase in fundamentals according to the concept. that we put out in that episode. So we're going to go through some of these today. Yeah, let's take, let's take seven from that thread. I think it's a great thread. So the first is right now on the Ethereum network, we are charting the highest gas that Ethereum has ever consumed. So that's higher than 2017 at peak mania when, you know, everything was going crazy and everything was bogged down. It's higher than any time in 2019 and 2020. It's higher than it's

ever been. What does that mean, David, like gas usage? What are we talking about here? You know, why does that matter? The gas usage metric is a really interesting one. And it really talks about a couple of things. The complexity of transactions being made. So a normal ether transfer uses the minimum amount of gas at 21,000. And then more complex things like depositing money into a maker vault, drawing dye, doing anything in compound, takes more gas because there's more complex. transactions. And so what this means is that people are using Ethereum for more complex economic activity more often. A larger amount of fees per block is being spent on Ethereum block space. So Ethereum block space is being sold at a higher, faster rate than previous. Yeah. So it means

network usage is at all time highs. So more smart contracts, more token transfers, more moving of ETH. It's all at all-time highs. And as you said, that's another metric. And maybe we'll talk about this as number two. Transaction fees on Ethereum are about 200K per day. So all of the gas that's being used, as you know, every time you use an Ethereum transaction or interact with a smart contract, you're paying gas. All that gas culminates in a total, all those gas fees culminate in a total revenue amount. Right now, that revenue amount per day is 200K on Ethereum. It's been higher in the past, but this is still a very high number. And really, when you compare the transaction fee revenue to all other blockchains, the only comparable blockchain here is actually Bitcoin.

So Bitcoin's doing about half a million a day, 600,000 a day, something in that range. Whereas Ethereum is hanging out at the 200k range. Everything else is like $100 a year, like $1,000 a year, basically nothing. The only that. valuable block space on the market today is the block space of Bitcoin and Ethereum. And I'm just saying that from a market perspective because no one else is paying for any of the other block space. They're only paying for the block space on these two networks. This is such an important metric. This directly reflects how much people value these systems. Like how much are people willing to pay to have a transaction included into the respective blockchain?

So Bitcoin and Ethereum have really high daily revenue of block space sales per day. And this really relates to how well you can depend on these protocols being here into the future. All blockchain protocols need some amount of sustainability through fees. And so the higher fees being paid per day to the blockchain just kind of illustrates the longevity that these systems are going to have. Like all businesses need revenue to survive. and blockchains are the exact same thing. So if you see your blockchain of choice bringing in a ton of fee revenue, you know that your product is in demand.

And that's exactly what's going on with Bitcoin and Ethereum here. And Ethereum especially, I don't know if you guys have been trying to make transactions over the last month, but gray prices have been super high. And that just means that everyone wants to use the network. And so it just means it's just a fantastic indicator that the demand for Ethereum is increasing. And the cool thing, like we've had higher transaction fees on a daily basis that you've said, Ryan, but I don't think we've ever seen it this high sustained for so long. It's been a very high number for like two months now where previously it was maybe just a couple blips,

you know, a couple days of really high transaction fees. This is slow, steady growth in daily revenue from transaction fees, which I just think is super bullish for the long term health of Ethereum because that's what blockchains need. but then also we need to talk about EIP 1559. When EIP 1559 comes in, the majority of these transaction fees are burned, which means that the scarcity of ether is increasing because we are burning all of these transaction fees. Got to plug episode seven again, because that's great. We go over that in episode seven.

Every time a transaction on Ethereum is used and consumes gas and consumes some fees in the future, ETH will actually be burnt. So ether the asset will be burnt and the amount of ether in existence will actually decrease. That is a scarcity mechanic that is going to be coming to Ethereum possibly this year and certainly in ETH2.0 when it ships. So that sort of links all of this usage to actual scarcity of ether, the asset, establishing it further as a store of value. So super exciting to see that. Now, some people are concerned that the gas fees are high and transaction fees are high and they can't get their transactions through. The gas is too damn high, right?

I am concerned about that a little bit in the short run, but I think in the medium term, what that's going to do is put more pressure on layer two scalability options on Ethereum and get more of these transactions off chain, still secured by Ethereum, but push them off chain. there's some roll-up technology coming down to the pike for that. Even Edomar, our guest in the last, the previous episode, episode 13, I believe it was. He talked about incorporating that in the Argent wallet. So I think this kind of pressure, while painful a little bit in the short run, these high gas fees, will actually lead to a more scalable Ethereum with more transactions per second in the medium to long term. So I'm bullish there. But let's talk about the third fundamental indicator here.

And that's users. So daily active users is now 300k wallets. So 300K, possibly individuals, groups. We don't know exactly who they are. But this is close to the highest it's ever been. So in this number, David, hasn't been seen in over two years. So we're at the highest amount of users we've been since the previous bull market. What does that mean? That just means that there are, there's a lot of life on Ethereum, right? And so the ICO mania was the last time that Ether really experienced this bull market, right? So for a couple months, the Ether price was between $400 and $1,400. And that's the last time we had, you know, 380,000 daily active addresses. Addresses are never a perfect measure of users, but daily active addresses is actually pretty, it's actually much closer than just raw aggregate

addresses because, you know, if you're using Ethereum, you're probably using the same address in a single day period. So it's more reflective of the actual raw number of people using the Ethereum blockchain on a daily basis. So like the interesting thing is, is that the last time we've saw this amount of daily active users, ether price was, you know, $1,000, $800, somewhere around that mark. And, and today it's $200. And so there's this just mismatch. Not to say that the right price of ether was $1,000 back in 2016. 17, but that's also to say that maybe the right price of ether today isn't $200 either. It's likely somewhere between those two numbers. And maybe $1,000 or $1,400 was too high.

But if we have the same amount of daily active users as we did when it was, it was then, maybe the $200 price range for ether is a little bit too low. One other thing about daily actives is it's important to think that each Ethereum address is really, it's like a bank account. So, you know, I own multiple eth addresses. I'm sure you do two, David. So it doesn't necessarily map one to one to a user. But the second thing I'd say is, you know, some of these addresses can actually represent

entire companies, entire organizations, entire capital pools. So in that way, it's a, it's sort of a one to many kind of mapping. So we can't tell exactly how many users are using this. we know we've got 380k bank accounts that are active on a daily basis on the Ethereum network. Some of these are individuals with multiple addresses, but some of these are entire companies, entire capital pools with just one single address. So it definitely is a positive indicator. And it's also worth noting that Ethereum and blockchain systems care much more about capital being

used more so than individuals using them. Like the fundamentals of blockchains depend on the total amount of capital being. push through their system rather than the total individual number of users. And so I really like that analogy. There's 380,000 individual bank accounts. Never mind if that's 380,000 bank accounts owned by one person, which would be ridiculous. But just for the example that I'm about to talk about, like, that's still 380,000 different users of Ethereum.

Like that's still kind of the metric that we're really going for. Yeah. One of these addresses is Coinbase, for example, right? and Coinbase has billions in assets under its purview and under its care. So, yeah, that's absolutely the right way to think about it. Another really interesting metric here is the sheer amount of stable coins that have been issued on Ethereum in the past few months, really, we're at $7 billion in stable coins.

What's this about? So this is definitely a function of the macro environment at large. like everyone wants dollars and crypto dollars are especially uh especially sought after because of some of their advantages like you don't need a bank account to use them there's no there's they're very easy to get a hold of they're very easy to transport uh but what this really goes towards is the narrative of ethereum as an internet settlement layer a settlement layer for value so if you have an asset you might as well put it on ethereum and you know since the world wants dollars, there's a global squeeze for dollars, and especially a global squeeze for dollars that

are not hosted in a bank account, Ethereum is just a great platform to use that for. So for the, for the dollar, the international dollar market, Ethereum is being leveraged as a settlement layer to manage internet dollars, crypto dollars. And it's just a fantastic use case of Ethereum. So on that theme, there's also an increasing amount of Bitcoin getting sucked into the Ethereum gravity well. So that number has has drastically increased as well. There's now 25 million in Bitcoin. Now, some of these are Bitcoin IOUs, basically secured by BitGo, a custody agent. The example of that is WBTC. But 25 million in Bitcoin on Ethereum, many of this amount starting to use other D5 protocols like Maker, it just seems like Ethereum is establishing this use case of sucking

all of these other assets, assets like gold, assets like US dollars, now assets like Bitcoin into its economy. What's your take on that? Bitcoin tokenized on Ethereum. Yeah, we've had WBT for a pretty long time and it's kind of just been quiet. You know, there's been some amount of BTC issue and it got integrated into compound, but it really wasn't this like rocket of a product that that really launched. And, you know, there's plenty of criticisms about WBTC because it's, you know, just a, it's basically an ERC 20 token that the centralized company commits to redeeming for a real Bitcoin if you ever use it. So it's not really that crypto economic pure system that we really are looking for. But it's kind of like the beta of Bitcoin on Ethereum, in my opinion.

It's a, it's a signal of what's to come. And as soon as Maker Dow put WBT into Ethereum, we saw the amount of WBTC on Ethereum just skyrocket, right? One day, in one single transaction, the amount of WBTC. BTC doubled from like 1,500 to 3,500. And then a couple days later, we saw another minting of 1,000 BTC on Ethereum. So the gravity well of Ethereum is definitely pulling in all assets. And Bitcoin is definitely one of the lowest hanging fruits for assets to come to Ethereum. We've seen Bitcoin have difficulties in finding utility other than just being held by

your people's ledgered, by people's cold storage wallets. and the Lightning Network really hasn't done what Bitcoiners have wanted it to do. And I think Ethereum is offering a very compelling alternative settlement network for Bitcoin because you can do things in Defi with Bitcoin. And so the compromise of using WBTC apparently isn't that big of a deal for people who are interested in getting their Bitcoin inside of MakerDAO, inside a compound, doing a non-taxable event by minting dye so you don't have to sell, your Bitcoin, all the things that we love D5 for, ether for, but now you can use it for Bitcoin.

And that's just WBT, right? So Ren Protocol BTC has also just launched, and it launched a couple days ago, starting with 2BTC, and now I believe there's 35 in there today. I haven't checked this morning. TBTC is having some struggles to get out the gate, but when it does, I suspect that people will also be minting TBTC. So the race for tokenized Bitcoin on Ethereum is on. is on. Yeah, absolutely. So one of the big questions I think people are asking, and you asked,

as we're going through those metrics, David, is great. So why the mismatch here? Why isn't the price of ETH up right now? Now, I think there's a really important distinction that people have to get in their minds. And I think we've talked about this at numerous times across our previous episodes, David, but that's this. The asset is not the network. So there are two things here, two commodities within Ethereum. The first commodity that we talk about a lot is ether, the asset. So this has limited scarcity. There's 110 million eth, you know, producing at about 4% per year.

That's going to drop to close to 1% after ETH2 is deployed. That's an asset with some level of scarcity. But there's also another scarce commodity within the Ethereum. economy, and that's actual block space. So block space is produced at a rate of about $6,000 per day. Each block has about space for $10 million gas. So those are the computational units that you can fit within block space. But those are two separate commodities. You've got the asset and then you've got the network. So Ethereum block space and Ethereum asset. And those are two separate markets as well. So people can be bullish and excited about ether the asset independent of being bullish and excited for Ethereum block space.

So those two markets don't have to go up in tandem. That said, they often have in the past. So when there has been increased demand on Ethereum the network, that is highly correlated with increased eith price. So previously when we saw the highest gas ever consumed on the Ethereum network that was back in late 2017, early 2018, we also saw the highest ETH price as well. So one question about ETH prices, well, will that sort of revert to its mean? And will all of this network activity start to translate into more direct short to medium term price increases of ether the asset? What's your take on that? So we need to remind ourselves that this is the early days of these systems, right? And so, you know, really you only find true price discovery after a strong period of maturity. And we are simply not there yet. Like Ethereum, the fundamentals change on a whim. We don't have that much historical comparisons to make. Like price discovery for not just ether, but also Bitcoin still hasn't taken hold, right? Like that's why these systems are so volatile. And it's, it's,

It's worth reminding ourselves that Bitcoin is not a store of value. It is a speculative store of value. People are speculating on it becoming a store of value like gold into the future, but it's not one today. And the same goes true for Ethereum, right? Ethereum is a speculation on Ether is a speculation that Ethereum will be the internet economy platform for the whole entire world. It is not that today. And so I've heard people call like Bitcoin is an option on a store. store of value and if ether is the same thing for the world economy.

Like, ether is an option for the fundamental asset of an internet settlement layer for value. And we're not there yet. And so when prices change, these markets are so incredibly reflexive because the value of these things are really inside of people's heads. They're not on pen and paper. They're not. They're the fundamentals of these things are not yet discovered. Price is not yet discovered.

And so really what dictates price is people's opinion. as to what other people will value these things, not necessarily by the fundamentals. So over time, as these systems mature, I expect fundamentals to really start to take over, but I don't really expect that to happen anytime soon. I'm talking like plus five, ten years out before fundamentals really start to dictate the price. We're going to be in this long speculative period where speculation dictates price. But at the end of the day, speculation is determined by fundamentals, right? Like I would hate for my asset of choice to be something like Eos or a light coin, which doesn't have any meaningful like blocks based demand or utility, right?

And so speculation does get driven by fundamentals, but it's always speculation first. Yeah. So I read a post a post on bankless this week about ether being potentially double undervalued. So it's undervalued in two ways. Like the first way we talked about, Ethereum network is going crazy in terms of usage. and eth price really isn't following right if ether Ethereum network usage is all time high but ether price is like 85% down from all time high right so there's a delta there and that's the first sort of undervalued potentially undervalued like like way the market's thinking about it right now but

there's a second too and that's I don't think the market has fully priced in that ether the asset can become a like a store a speculative store of value in the same way that that Bitcoin does. And everything you were saying about ether, the asset being sort of the underlying reserve asset of this whole decentralized economy, I don't think that the market has fully appreciated that and priced that in. And if you look at some of the charts back in 2015, they didn't really appreciate that about Bitcoin either. So back in the first five years of Bitcoin's existence, the narratives were a little bit different. Yeah, Bitcoin as a as a as a as a digital gold was part of it, but it was a tiny part of it. A lot of the narrative was around

Bitcoin being used as a peer-to-peer cash system. So a payment system, if you will, transactional system, and the value of Bitcoin being used to pay for block space was a huge part of the value proposition. But that started to split off in 2017. And for the past three years, we've seen a massive delta between the market of a Bitcoin block space use and the market of Bitcoin, the asset. Bitcoin has sort of blasted away from that and the asset is valued far more than the network is valued because it's established itself as a store of value asset. That happened in the second five years of Bitcoin's life, not the first.

And now we're approaching the second five years of Ethereum's life and ether, the asset's life. And it feels to me that that second narrative, that, you know, second area where ether is undervalued might start to kick in. People might start to see this more as a speculative, non-sovereign, you know, store of value asset that's going to be important to the future of money. I believe it was Chris Berniske who said this a while ago. But he talked about how Ether is in its 2015 bear market for Bitcoin, where in Bitcoin in 2015, And it was not certain. And it was not certain that Bitcoin was going to be what it is today.

There was a lot of uncertainty. There was a lot of doubt. People were not sure about the future of Bitcoin. But at the same time, there were still some believers that saw this coming, right? Saw that the fundamentals of Bitcoin were destined to improve. And that's exactly what happened in the following two to three years. the 2013 bubble popped and it was this slow drawn-out bear market where there were definitely some fundamentals building like companies were building on Bitcoin but it was just uncertain and

ether is in Chris Berniske said that ether is in that same bear market right there's this very long very slow drawn out brutal bear market where people were really doubtful about the long-term certainty of ether and Ethereum. Fortunately, things are, like we talked about in previous episodes, these fractal patterns repeat, but they're not always the same. And because we saw Bitcoin come out of it, there's a lot more indication that we're going to see Ethereum come out of it. And people like me and you, Ryan, are really beating this drum talking about how the fundamentals

of Ethereum are really going to carry it forward. And there's really not too much to be uncertain about. And so we are, Ethereum is in its big bear market where it's just getting hammered by Bitcoin and maxis telling it telling all Ethereum, Eith heads that it's totally worthless. But me and me and Ryan are here to fight back and say, like, look at these amazing fundamentals. And so I'm extremely optimistic about the future. I wake up every single day saying like, man, the future of Ethereum is going to be sick. I can't wait for it to show up. And I still feel that to this day. Yeah, I agree. I mean, it's hard not to be bullish when you see data like this for sure. Of course,

this could take a long time to play out. And, you know, it's a thesis. So, we could be wrong on it, but take a look at the data for yourself and come to your own conclusions on that. Another thesis that we've talked about in the past that we're seeing some more evidence for is the Protocol Sync thesis. So we went over this in episode 12. And just last week, a week and a half ago, crypto.com, which is a non-custodial crypto bank, actually took a step to proving this thesis, at least, you know, in my mind, they rolled out a non-custodial wallet. So previously, crypto.com primarily facilitates lending and borrowing in a custodial way. So you have to deposit your assets, whether it's ether or Bitcoin or die with them.

You have to give up your private keys. They essentially become your bank. But they took their first step in releasing a totally non-custodial, non-banked app. that you can deposit Bitcoin and Ether into. So you own the private keys. And it seems like they are starting the process of rolling out DFI protocols as well on top of that. So, David, is this the protocol sync thesis playing out? This is absolutely the protocol sync thesis with a healthy dose of settlement assurances as well.

Non-custodianship is settlement assurances. You get the assurances that the centralized company that you're storing your assets with, can't mess with your funds. You get the assurances that your funds will be available to you and to you alone, which makes the crypto.com offering much more compelling. It's much less of a crypto bank and much more of a be your own bank. And so crypto.com, what they're doing is they're saying, we are going to go with a settlement, or we are going to follow along with the protocol sync thesis because we want to be dense. And that makes our users and future customers able to depend on us, as infrastructure into the future.

And so there's no, even if crypto.com goes away, you still have your assets and they don't go away with crypto.com. And so because of these assurances, crypto.com's product is simply better. And then, like you said, Ryan, they're just rolling out defy apps on top of that. And the reason why they can do that is because they can depend on defy apps being there, especially the ones with strong settlement assurances and that are super dense that fall to the bottom of the protocol sync. Anything that you can depend and rely on gets customers because you can depend and rely on it. And so this is just the protocol sync thesis playing out. I'm really

glad that we put out that episode because it's already been super useful so many times over ever since we released it. Yeah, I heard someone call it the new fat protocol thesis just last week. and I think it's really a thesis for how this entire crypto space and everything in Defi plays out. And the beauty of it is these crypto banks like Crypto.com, you know, slick marketing, really seamless onboarding experience, but they become the recruiting mechanism and the onboarding experience to all of the other Defy protocols. So that Crypto.com app, maybe it'll be a year, maybe it'll be less. But I bet they will add a deposit, it your die to the die savings rate button within their app. And in a really seamless way,

somebody who's a crypto.com user and kind of new doesn't know defy, but they've connected their bank account to crypto.com. They've got that Fiat on ramp. They can just click a button and start using defy protocols. And what have we done? We just onboarded someone else to the bankless movement and the bankless system. That's really what we were talking about too with the Winklevoss twins, right, David, like, you know, they see Gemini as basically a bridge, an interface layer for money protocols. So they're the user experience that they provide the, you know, regulatory quarterbacking, if you will, to hold kind of the regulators at bay and appease them and provide a safe experience, right? But what are they doing? They're onboarding the world into

defy protocols, into bank lists. They're onboarding the world first into Bitcoin and Ether and assets like that, but then they're eventually going to start to incorporate these more dense assets or these more dense money protocols like the Dye Savings rate. It feels like the future to me. We'll see, right? But I mean, it feels like the thesis is starting to play out in real time. I really enjoy the fact that all these different centralized companies like Gemini, crypto.com, Zerion is a good one. Like they are all interfaces for the same protocols. And that's really what makes up a good protocol is that you can find it wherever you go on the internet you know one day you'll be able to access uniswap through coinbase gemini crypto dot com zirion you know

even uniswop dot exchange where you would find it normally but protocols appear everywhere right like they're part of the substrate and they just appear you know poking through the earth and wherever you find wherever you go and that's what makes a good protocol is it's dependably found no matter what so yeah i'm super bullish about it all right let's take take a moment and pause and tell you about our bankless sponsors. These are some fantastic tools for you. AVE is a defy lending and borrowing platform with some new cool features that you might not be used to compared to other borrowing and lending applications on Ethereum. First and foremost, the feature that stands out to me the most is their fixed interest loans. And so variable interest loans can get

pretty hairy, right? So MakerDAO launched at 0.5% and then it slowly skyrocketed, it slowly ramped up to 20%, which is a very wide range of possible interest rates. And it's not really sustainable for some of the more typical things. And so that's where AVE comes in with their stable, non-variable interest rates where you can lock in a specific interest rate and borrow assets using that interest rate and being able to depend on that fixed interest rate. Really important, a really important money Lego that we need in the DFI space to really have defy grow and mature in a dependable way. But that's not all you can do. You can also do flash loans on Ave, which is also a brand new money Lego where you can borrow, you can borrow assets

without any collateral so long as you also repay it back in the same transaction. So there's a lot of potential here in case you want. You have collateral in one application that you want to pay back, but then open up that same, a similar vault or some, if you want to, if you want to, want to pay back collateral, but open up a different loan with different collateral, you can do that all in one transaction without all the slippage costs. So AVE and their flash loans allow you to do that. They are the number four biggest application in DFI coming in at 70 million locked in DFI right now. The bankless community really loves Avey. And how do I slip in that we've been pushing them up up the, and we've just been watching AVE climb the ranks of the, of the defy market cap.

So check them out at AVEA.com. Deposit crypto to start earning or borrowing. Any Ethereum wallet will work. So try it out. I want to introduce you to a new sponsor on the bankless podcast, Maltes. Maltis is a way to run your business without a bank. So we talk a lot about the bankless lifestyle from a personal perspective. But what if you could run your entire? hire business without a bank. That's what Maltus provides. It's the first ever bankless bank account for entrepreneurs who want to use crypto and traditional stable coin currencies to run their business. So it has a multi-signature wallet. That means you can give teams access controls.

One person can have the ability to withdraw from an account, set limits. So it has a multi-signature wallet. That means teams can get involved here. You can set access controls. You can take your stable coins and some of your assets and you can earn interest with various money protocols while you have them parked inside of the Maltus account. You can streamline payments. They're also adding Fiat on ramps. So there'll be a bridge to traditional finance with US dollars and euros. You can open an account. This is super easy to do. We've actually featured it and written about it on bank lists. We will include an article in the show notes. But what you need to do now is open an account and try it out at www.maltus.co. So that's m-u-l-t-is.com. And of course,

we've got something for bankless listeners. Maltis is brand new. Their newest releases is new. They're on waiting list mode only now. But listeners of the podcast can jump the queue when you enter bankless podcast in the form when you sign up. So make sure you do that. Enter bankless podcast. and you'll be able to skip the queue, you'll get a one month free trial of Maltis. If you are a business trying to go bankless, this is the way to do it. That's Maltis.co. Check it out.

Okay, Ryan, here's a cool one that I'm really into. MKR, the token that governs the maker-dow system just got added to Coinbase today, this morning, as we are recording. So that's super interesting to me. The things that I think about is that's a really bold move by Coinbase, because people have been hesitant around adding MKR, especially to exchanges, because of the nature of the MKR token. People think that the buyback and burn model turns it into something like a security. Now, I've never heard any official legal opinion as to what MKR is in regards to a security or not,

but we have seen different companies kind of be hesitant with adding MKR onto their platform because it's security-like quality. So that's why you don't find it in set protocol. That's probably why you don't find it on any other exchange inside of the U.S. But Coinbase is rolling with it and just integrating it right into the platform. And the reason why this is so important is because, you know, MakerDAO is kind of like a private bank in a sense. Like it's a bank governed by shareholders. And the difference between shareholders of the traditional sense where you see like a big room with a bunch of dudes sitting at a table,

shareholders in this sense is whoever owns the MKR token. And it's really important that the MKR token is accessible globally and easily. And so getting it on to an exchange makes governance over the MKR system as free and accessible as buying Bitcoin and buying Ether. And that's really the difference between equity over a company that you can't have access to no matter what, especially the voting shares tokens, versus something like MKR where it's governance over the protocol. is available on the open market. And all you need to have is the capital to provide skin in the game. And so having MKR accessible to be of more and more mechanisms is really fundamentally important to how the protocol works because everyone deserves the right

to be a governor over Maker Dow. And that's exactly what Coinbase is enabling by putting MKR onto their exchange. Yeah, it really is the birth of a new asset class. A capital asset that has all of its cash. flows on chain and is settled completely on chain rather than off chain in the legal system. So everything that happens with respect to fees earned, revenue earned, and essentially a portion of that revenue used to burn maker tokens, that all happens not in legal meat space, but settled on the Ethereum chain. So that is a new type of capital assets, one with on chain cash flows.

And I really think this coin-based move is a further move into the protocol sync thesis. Not to get back to that again, but not only are they listing Maker and adding additional liquidity for Maker, which is good for the maker decentralized central bank, if you would, if you will, but they are also starting to incorporate other features. So the ability to actually vote with your Maker tokens in the governance process. So making that seamless within right now. It's on the Coinbase custody side. So it requires being a credit investor and some of these other details.

But I bet they will open that up as they can in the future. And essentially, Coinbase is providing a nice interface for us to do on-chain governance of some of these money protocol systems. So they're becoming an interface to governance of Defi as well. Absolutely. That's a really good point. I like that you brought that up. Maker Dow, its shield is the value of MKR, right? And not only the value of MKR, but the liquidity of MKR. And so on days like Black Thursday, where MKR needed to have been minted, as a result of Black Thursday events where MakerDAO lost some collateral and was a little bit underwater, MKR needed to be minted and sold to the market.

And if MKR is on markets like Coinbase, this makes MKR more liquid and allows MakerDAO, to have to mint less MKR to achieve the same result. So this is a really strong defensive barrier for MakerDAO the system. The more liquid MKR is, the stronger the backstop is then. And that ultimately protects dye and keeps dye at a dollar. So this is just the MakerDAO system spreading its roots and integrating itself into the world via these exchanges. And hopefully Coinbase is just the first of many. Yeah.

And while we're talking about governance, I'm actually. curious your thoughts here, David, because I truly don't know. So we were talking about maker on-chain governance, right? The ability to essentially you take your maker's stake and you can vote. That's what on-chain governance is. You get to control aspects of the protocol through a coin vote. There are some new base layer blockchains that are incorporating on-chain governance as part of their system. So Pocodot is one rolled out last week. It has on-chain governance baked in. So the more dots you have, the more you can change the direction of the protocol. You can influence issuance, for example. You could decide to create a proposal and vote on it to

issue more tokens for a specific investment that you want to make inside of the polka dot economy. What's your take on that? Is on chain governance a good thing or a bad thing? Well, let's go back to the protocol sync thesis, the thesis that keeps on giving. If there is on-chain governance, there is a commitment to have a vehicle, a pathway for changing the protocol. That's the whole point of on-chain governance, is that you want your protocol to be nimble and to be ready to change. That's the same thing with the Tezos blockchain as well. Tezos is also on-chain voting, which means that they can change the protocol as they see fit. And, you know, there's benefits to that.

Like, there's always benefits to being nimble and being able to respond to the environment. However, if we are looking through the lens of the protocol sync thesis, on-chain governance reduces people's ability to depend on the protocol. Maximum social scalability, the ability for these systems like Bitcoin and Ethereum and all these other protocols, on-chain or off-chain governance, the ability for these systems to scale up to be used by the entire globe. everyone is really a function of how dependable these systems are. And if on-chain governance is a mechanism for changing the protocol, that is going to reduce people's ability to depend on them staying the way that it is. And Bitcoin is the ultimate instantiation of this, right? So Bitcoin doesn't fork.

And all updates to Bitcoin nodes require what's called backwards compatibility, which means that the first node ever running on Bitcoin is still in alignment with all the other nodes that also running on Bitcoin, even though there might be different software, the nodes still work with each other. And if you update the protocol, that breaks that. And this is what Bitcoin is really, really harping on. They always want the network to be able to talk to each other. That's one of the fundamental values of Bitcoin. And I believe you and me, Ryan, we also want that to be true for Ethereum one day after we innovate and get all the technological innovations of these crypto systems into Ethereum. That's also what we want with Ethereum, right? We don't want to be forking every

six months because that reduces the density of Ethereum. We want eventually Ethereum to calcify and be dependable. On-chain governance flies in the face of this thesis. It says that we are going to change and we are going to have a commitment to changing by on-chain voting mechanisms, which means that users of these applications won't know what the protocol is like in one year, five years, 10 years, 20 years. And so it really threatens the store value narrative because store of values, store of value assets require long-term thinking. And any protocol changes threaten that. Yeah, we're actually in closer alignment than I thought on that, David. So I think what you're saying is through the lens of the protocol sync thesis, if you have on-chain governance on your base

protocol, you're a less dense protocol. And you're maybe not even dense enough to sync to the bottom of the world economy and create a reserve asset that's a store of value. And I think like if people think about this for a minute, they can sort of see why. So if you are in a network with on-chain governance and the folks with the most capital hold the most tezos or hold the most dots in a given network, if they can buy vote through the social contract of the system and through the formal governance of the system, vote to issue more or less of an asset, basically at a whim, I mean, what you have is a plutocracy. It doesn't feel a whole lot better than the existing system of, you know, the Fed and 12 guys from

different areas of the country, different banks, setting rates. I mean, it feels maybe even worse because there's no democratic, elected accountability. It's like oligarchs and capitalists and plutocrats running the show. That doesn't feel like a base money system that you want to scale to the world. So what has to happen, I think, if we're looking at this through the lens of the critical sync thesis, is that networks go the way that Bitcoin has gone, which is no on-chain governance and you eventually ossify. And Ethereum is in the process of ossifying now.

Now, it's taking a longer time to ossify because it's essentially. essentially adding two things. It's adding one, this whole notion of programmability, but second, this whole notion of scalability so that it can be a more scalable base layer for the world. So it can be a more scalable base layer for the world, but its path is eventually to ossify and not change and not be subject to the whims of eth whales who hold their tokens. They shouldn't be able to print more ether. So that to me seems like a base qualification to compete as a reserve money, store of value for the world. And if you have on-chain governance, it's hard for me to see how you're competing on that dimension. I remember a few years ago, there was the issue of

net neutrality going around the internet where institutions like Comcast and, you know, AT&T and all these massive internet giants wanted to remove net neutrality and allow for the throttling of some websites in the benefit of others. And, you know, the people of the world, especially the people of the United States, vehemently rejected that concept. And that is because of the protocol density of the internet. Like the protocol synch thesis doesn't only work for crypto systems. The internet is a, the internet is a protocol. And it's more importantly a protocol with out governance. And what Comcast and these other big internet gargantrons wanted to do is they wanted to govern over the internet and say like, okay, we want to be able to choose who to throttle and who not to.

And that was the whole issue of the internet neutrality issue. And having a on-chain voting mechanism is commitment to non-neutrality. And that is the opposite of the protocol synch thesis. And maybe in an even less generous criticism of things like Pocodot or things like on-chain governance. The incentive system is totally fucked up, right? Because you have these massive VC funds who are investing millions and millions and millions of dollars because of the incentive to buy something that can be governed. Like, imagine if the internet had this governance token. It would just be bought up by the large head funds of the world. And then we would just have this internet protocol that is just managed by these people with a ton of capital. And it wouldn't be the internet

that we have today, this free, fair, and open internet. It would be something else. And so, you know, shame on all the VC firms who thought that they could just buy their way into this protocol that they thought would just, like, turn into what Ethereum really is, is this settlement network for the internet. And then they would just be able to be the gargantuanes behind, like, this new internet. Like, no, that's not happening. And the people reject it.

And that's why we're, that's why Ethereum is strictly a non-on-chain governance system. Yeah, I totally agree. I think one way to say this is the future of the internet of money will not be owned by Andresen Horowitz. That cannot be the case. That is not what the people want. Guys, this has been a special edition of bankless. This has been a bonus edition that we're providing you. I hope you enjoyed it. Guys, risks and disclaimers. Of course, everything that we talked about with respect to ETH is risky. So price may not go up. We have no idea what the short-term directs. will be crypto is risky. Defy is risky. The protocols we talked about are also risky, but we are headed west. We are on the frontier. This isn't for everyone,

but we are glad you are with us on the bankless journey. Thanks a lot. What non-custodianship is? Non-custodianship. Is that real? I think you made it up, but, you know, real? No, it's important.

We're rolling with it. Oh, good, good, good. Okay. I'm definitely putting that in the bloopers. Okay.