Bankless - Arc Mainnet, AI Agents, and Tokenized Markets | Nikhil Chandhok, CTO of Circle

Episode Date: September 16, 2026

Circle just launched Arc Mainnet, and its ambition is much bigger than putting USDC on another blockchain. Circle Chief Product and Technology Officer Nikhil Chandhok joins David on launch day to unpack the vision for an “economic OS” built around fast settlement, stablecoin gas, privacy, and institutional-grade financial infrastructure. --- 📣SPOTIFY PREMIUM RSS FEED | USE CODE: SPOTIFY24 https://bankless.cc/spotify-premium --- BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS: 🔓NEAR | TRADE CONFIDENTIALLY, GET 20% BACK https://bankless.cc/near2026 🎯THE DEFI REPORT | ONCHAIN INSIGHTS https://thedefireport.io/bankless 👑BANKLESS CONTENT MCP https://www.bankless.com/premium --- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Arc Mainnet Is Live 2:57 The “Economic OS” Vision 5:29 Validators, Privacy and Post-Quantum Security 8:27 How Private Is Arc? 12:24 Immutability and the Lazarus Test 16:14 What Gets Built on Arc First? 19:19 AI Agents Become Economic Actors 26:45 Agentic Commerce Gets Real 33:17 Reputation, Nano-Payments and Agent Credit 36:37 Tokenized Stocks and 24/7 Markets 39:59 Solving the On-Ramp and FX Problem 47:39 What Happens After Launch Day? 49:16 Closing Thoughts --- RESOURCES Nikhil Chandhok https://x.com/chandhok Arc https://www.arc.io/ --- Not financial or tax advice. See our investment disclosures here: https://www.bankless.com/disclosures

Bankless Nation, I am with Nikil. He is the chief product and technology officer over at Circle. And coming out of Circle, we've got a pretty big announcement. Nikil. Today is the day. Tell me about what day this is. Today is the day of our launch. We're launching ARC Mainnet.

We've been working on it for years. We're very proud of the launch today. So it's the first day of a very long journey for us. We're very excited to be here. Well, congratulations on Mainnet Day. That's always a very special day. Talk to me about what make Arc's. ARC unique?

Like what are the special properties? What are the unique properties that ARC is bringing to the table? Right. I think like, I think it's useful to step back and like talk about Circle a little bit. Like Circle started off as a stable coin issuer

and, and build what is now the largest regulated stable coin. Ark is taking that idea of like building regulated financial infrastructure that bridges like what traditional financial institutions and all this new innovation and takes that idea forward and brings it to the local, brings it to an L1 layer. So the core features of our things that people may have heard

about already. Like this is, we have something called, we have something called payment finality, which allows for transactions to be truly final within, once they're settled. Settlement time is half a second, which allows for minimizing risk along with the payment finality and allowing you to do rapid transactions on the network. Gas is in stable coins starting with USDC, so you don't have to hold a native network token. While for crypto users, this may feel like a small feature for companies that are transacting, that are holding treasuries that are transacting in RWAs, this is a very significant hurdle to cross because they don't know how to account for things like native network tokens.

And so not only do they have to hold inventory of native network tokens, but they also don't know how to count those native network tokens on their books. So that's a pretty big deal. We have other things that are launching that are really unique for a blockchain that sort of speak to our full stack nature. We have Arc Studio, which allows you to sort of talk to an AI and deploy a custom contract, which is how we think like all financial arrangements. in the future will happen.

We have our kits, which allow you to build like custom apps on top of our. So we've not treated this as just a network launch, but we've treated it as a full stack. Like, hey, you want to build a financial application today. How do you get started? What are all the primitives you need? All the way down from like the network layer, all the bit to the top being the application layer. So that's what's unique about us.

I mean, and we're very excited to get it out. I do want to zoom in and expand that tech stack and talk about the different components. But if we were to collapse the tech stack and really summate everything, how would you memeify arc chain? So, you know, Bitcoin is hard money. You know, Ethereum's North Star is like decentralization,

permissionlessness. Solana is NASDAQ on the blockchain. What's the meme for Arc? What is your guys as North Star? How would you collapse everything? you guys are doing into a simple idea. I mean, we've called it economic OS. And when we say economic OS, we think about things that when, like, I mean, I grew up

when phones came about. And when phones came about, like, when Android came about at Google, I was there. And there were six plus operating systems in the market at that time. So it wasn't clear you needed another OS in the market. And what Google did uniquely was it said, like, we have a problem that we have to solve for chipmakers. There's a problem that we have to solve for handset makers. We have to solve a problem for developers,

and we have to solve a problem for users. And if we solve all of those problems together, we will have a very successful operating system. When other operating systems in the past had taken like a sliver of the market and solved the problems for that sliver of the market. So when we think about ARC and we think about building an economic OS,

we're thinking about solving the full stack of problems. I want to solve application level problems. So like problems like sign this transaction or sign multiple transactions to do something as simple as sending USC from one wallet to the other should not be a thing that users have to deal with, right? Users should not have to think about things like gas. Like, what is gas? It's a very complicated concept.

Engineers understand it. Crypto users understand it. But like if you believe 5 billion users who are on phones today are going to be using this financial infrastructure, then I don't think we can explain gas to them. We need to be able to explain local money to them. So we have 16-ish stable coins launching on ARC today, and we want to make sure that, like, users are able to interact with, like,

the blockchain infrastructure using the currencies that they fully understand. They don't have to use Bitcoin or Ethereum or any other chain for that matter. So I think it is, like, economic OS, like, it's less of a meme. I know it's a little more nerdy than what a meme could be. Maybe a meme will emerge that'll, like, sort of sum up what in economic OS. could be.

But yeah, I mean, like, it's only day one. So I'm very hopeful that the internet will deliver. Let's do just a little bit of the homework that we need to do to understand ARC. What are the technical properties that like crypto natives, the hardcore crypto natives that want to like pop open the hood and compare ARC to our frame of reference, which is like Ethereum, for example? So ARC has a validator set. There's some parts of the validator set that are permissioned. Maybe you can talk about just like the basics of. the protocol and how that like diverges from what the standard is.

Yeah. So the validator set is permission. And we can get into why it is permission if you have to. But the deployment of contracts is not permission. Like so anybody can come deploy. You don't need a developer key from us. You don't need like you don't need to sign up a circle. So in that way, it is very much permissionless deployment.

We don't, we don't control like what contracts you interact with. We don't control what chains you interact with. Like it is truly permissionless infrastructure. It is a permission validator set because for the kind of traffic that we're hoping to get, in addition to core internet crypto traffic or the new kind of traffic that we want to get, those users want to know who the validators are. They cannot rely on unknown validators today. And we do believe, like, we are at the early stages of getting this institutional traffic

onto the chain. And so that's why we have a permission validator set. And like, it makes getting that traffic easier. So going back to the questions of like what else is like unique about the chain technically, we have, we announced that we're going to be doing post-quantum signatures. It should launch in beta very soon. And that will allow for post-quantum signatures, like, you know, essentially ballets can enforce like post-quantum signatures.

Other things are privacy sector. So like we've talked about privacy for a long time on chains. current private solutions are Clujy. I mean, I say Cluji as in like average user who's using a wallet is either giving up self-custody or is taking on significant financial risk when they're like engaging in privacy. What we want to do is do something as simple as like you toggle a switch and you can take a transaction that was going to be a public transaction and make it a private transaction. So you can have a mix of both public and private transactions using the same wallet in our case.

That's unique. there's other stuff under the hood that makes it possible for us to achieve the sub-second finality. We have a new consensus layer. We've already talked about it. We acquired this company to get the Malachite consensus layer.

All of these things together sort of build what is sort of unique about ARC from a technical perspective. There's going to be new innovation as well. We're going to be looking at other custom sectors for specific type of traffic, whether it's agent traffic, whether it's payments traffic,

so that we can have like fast transactions for these new economic actors like agents that are emerging, but that is still a work in progress. I see. Since you brought up privacy, let's just dive into that part. You said that there are public transactions and private transactions.

It feels pattern wise similar to Zcash. You have shielded Zcash. You have unshielded Zcash. But is the privacy on ARC complete? Like, does ARC and the validators, are they able to, kind of backdoor the privacy, or is the privacy actually like as strong,

for example, as something like Zcash, where if it is private, it is truly locked down and private, how would you qualify the level of privacy that you get on art? I'm not an expert on Zcash, even though I use Zcash plenty. I will say,

I will answer the specific question, which is like, validators are not going to be able to look at your transactions. That is not a thing that we want. That defeats the purpose of having privacy.

Like I don't, like the whole notion, the whole, all private transactions essentially run through TEEs, which is a trusted execution layer. And, and nobody's able to look inside those.

Even circle cannot look inside those transactions. So like when I say privacy, it is true privacy. And financial transactions is just, it's just day one of like what we think like these, these things can enable. I am looking forward to other kinds of applications. Like one of my favorite applications is sort of medical applications.

I'm sure everybody has this experience in their family where they have some medical data about that they're like talking to a GPT about. And there is some risk in that. It's not like risk-free in that. Like you will leak that the GPT might leak that information to whether itself or to others. And so one application I'm really looking forward to is essentially. being able to fire up like a custom VM that has a GPT and all of my like all of my health data being privately encrypted and and me being able to ask like questions in privacy and at the end of it being

able to destroy that BM and essentially get the answers I need and have all of the data encrypted and stored on chain. So that is not possible to it. And so and instead what I have to do is like I sign up for stuff. I don't fully understand. I give it information. I don't. I have to just trust them as to what they're going to do with my information. So privacy is just the beginning. Privacy is a, in my mind, a property of like verifiable compute in many ways, right? Like, you're telling me that this transaction is going to be private. And so, but there are many things in verifiable compute that are here yet to come. And I think blockchains and like, AR can play a key role as we evolve sort of like this core computing architecture that like we have come to rely on for the internet. And just to just to

make sure I understand the answer. The trust assumption for privacy on ARC is via TEEs. That is how ARC achieves privacy. That is the trust assumption. We have an ARC privacy sector. Like we talk about it in the white paper, like essentially. Yeah. Right.

No one can look inside a TE except for the manufacturer. Manufacturers probably not doing that. Yeah. Is there a plan to evolve the privacy to something like straight cryptography or are we satisfied with like the TEE as the trust assumption? For now, I think. think we're satisfied with the TE as a trust assumption because we also have like performance constraints that we want to implement. Yeah and that is one of the

features of a known validator set like we know what the TEs are where they're running. And that doesn't mean that you cannot engage in like private cryptographic transactions. Like that is a thing that we have post quantum signatures that we that like I said like we're going to go into beta with. Those are private like those are you can engage. in other kinds of cryptography on the platform. Like, for the purposes of, like, entering into a private send receipt between you and I, yes, we have a TE-based architecture.

I want to learn about immutability. Say, I am a user on the arc chain, and I mess something up, and I've lost a meaningful amount of USC, $10,000, $100,000. And I'm actually also, in this scenario, able to prove to you that that USC is like, actually gone, locked, frozen,

burnt, whatever. Am I able to get my money back in any particular way? What's ARC's relationship with immutability? It is all immutable. Like, it is not like, it is like any other blockchain. Like, unfortunately, or fortunately, like, I think there's pros and cons

to immutability. What you're describing is a con. I'm not interested in rolling back the chain for anything. Unless there is like a mass. Rolling back the chain is not a property. It is not a property of the chain, right? Like it is not like, it is a, it is such a significant event to do that.

I think users should be careful about like the USTC that they're using or for that matter, any token contract that they're interacting with on arc, much like they would be careful about interacting those interacting with those token contracts elsewhere. We don't have any special powers like essentially over here. like change the course of the transactions. There's like this right of passage that all successful blockchains go through when they are sufficiently successful.

And it's the Lazarus event. So Arc wants to be successful. I want you guys to be successful. I want you guys to have billions and billions upon TVL. Your success is going to attract Lazarus Group. Lazarus Group is pretty successful. They might get away with something and they might get away with something large.

what do you think about when you think about the potential future event of like the Lazarus group extracting a million plus dollars out of our chain. Have you guys discussed this possibility? What comes to mind when I put these words in your brain?

Look, security is a key concern. Like we are focused we are very focused on like making sure that the chain is secure. We're running audits 24-7. I think I mean more in the app layer. Like, say, AVE, for example, gets implemented

or some lending protocol gets implemented and they get exploited by Lazarus Group. And Lazarus Group has tens of millions of dollars, hundreds of millions of dollars of U.S.D.C. I don't want to speculate on, like, the specific scenario. And like, you know, I don't know what's going into, like, you know, this sort of security violation. But I'll say, what I'll say is, like,

the simple principle as it is an immutable chain. It is public infrastructure. There are 20 plus validators. Like, it's an immutable chain where we are, we're running public financial infrastructure. And we want to do that in good faith. Right. So, like, I don't know what the specific scenario is.

And I think there are a lot of such scenarios and there are a lot of different, like, input conditions that go into, like, the evaluation of the scenario. So, like, I don't want to speculate on, like, how we will handle it. But at least the principle, which, like, going into it is, like,

look, it's an immutable chain. We want to make sure that it follows the properties of other immutable chains that are on the public internet. And I think if you break that, I think you break trust at a level that like, I think people will have a hard time like sort of like establishing the trust again. But we want to be responsible actors in the market. We want to make sure that like our chains are secure.

Our apps are secure. We want to give like security service this offering to like, we want to make sure that like people who are deploying are like, know the chain's sufficient. that they're not deploying like insecure apps on the chain. Let's talk about what activity is going to be early in the ARC ecosystem. So there are some of like the usual suspects that we would see coming online with an EVM layer one.

I would expect to see a uniswap, an AMM come online, something like AVE. So talk to me about what the usual suspects are. And then also I want to hear about the unusual suspects, the new partners, the new economic activity that hasn't been found elsewhere in the ecosystem that you are hoping to see come to Arc in its early days. So talk to me about the usual and also the unusual suspects. Yeah, I mean, I think the usual suspects are like the borderline protocols are the AMMs. It's all the exchanges that are like all the big crypto exchanges that are in the market. We have the unusual suspects are, I guess the large asset issuers like they are they have

dipped their toes, but I expect them to be more proliferation. on arc than they have been elsewhere. Stable effects, which I've talked about, which is like our 4A into making sure that blockchains work not just for US dollars, but also work for other currencies around the world. And then there's a bunch of like a genetic activity. Like we have like, you know,

we have a whole agent stack that we've issued today. We are in the process of like issuing, creating more like agent primitives that allow for agents to prove provenance, agents to prove what they have done in the past, like essentially being able to prove history. And so I'm expecting more of that activity.

Like, you know, and it'll probably be around things that are like native to blockchain sports, which is trading and such. Like I think a lot of these agents will do that. I am expecting a ton of like credit activity to happen. And one of the things I'm excited about is agentic credit activity.

Like, you know, you start up an agent, you get a little loan. And then you go out on like, make a little money and then you pay the loan back. And then you sort of spend this, I mean, looping will take a whole new meaning once these credit markets start functioning on Arc and elsewhere.

And so I think that will be new. What else? And there's all, I mean, look, it's a public chain. It is fully connected to all of the other 35 chains where USTC is. It has deep connectivity. It has the ability to bridge any apps. asset to any chain.

And so I'm expecting meme coin activity to, like, you know, what I call, like, you know, culture apps. They, like, memes are not, like, some part of the internet, like frowns on memes. I think memes essentially create culture, like culture used to begin elsewhere, but now culture begins on the internet. And so I expect a ton of that activity as well. I'm like, we welcome all kinds of activity. Like, you know, the internet is not just for sending emails or doing video calls or

or like doing banking information. And the internet doesn't split up the traffic saying like, well, this part of the internet is just for banking. This part of the internet is just for playing games. We want to make sure that everything is possible. As new layer ones have come online, we've seen layer one teams really make like venture style bets on a specific type of activity,

a specific type of app. Like, if you guys want, you can go toe to toe with Ethereum on borrow and lending inside of Ave or, you know, AMM swaps inside of uniswap. I don't know if that's where you guys are going to be the most successful. It's kind of like tablesakes to have it, but I don't know if ARC is ever going to beat Ethereum

on Ethereum's slow defy near monopoly. So what are some of the venture-style bets? I think you mentioned agents a bunch of times, but what are it going to be the activities on ARC that you guys are betting on that bring one billion transactions to ARC like soon? So what are the new activities that you guys are better big off.

Yeah. First, I'd say, like, you know, Ethereum is the granddaddy of everybody, right? Like, so, like, we are not here. Like, I think if all we did was we took activity from Ethereum and moved it to work, we didn't really grow the market, like, you know, it doesn't really help our business.

Because we are the largest, USDC has a, the biggest chain for USDC is Ethereum. And so, like, one of our interest in, like, getting arc out is to make sure that, like, USTC, like, gets benefit from work. And if all we're doing is moving, you know, like deployment of USDC from Ethereum to to ARC.

Like it's not, and we don't grow the market. That's not really exciting to us. So that's one. Second, I'd say is like, yeah, I do think, like, the agentic activity is going to pick up. Like, agents should become, like, independent economic actors. Today, all the agents are sort of private. Like, I can't share my agent with you very easily.

Like, I share a skills.m.D. file. You run it through your agent VM, and you're able to sort of, like, fire up the same agent and even then you're not getting the same guarantees I have. I do think like these agents will become economic actors. They will sort of present themselves on the internet. They will have to prove that they have done a certain amount of activity. The question is like, how are you going to come to rely on the proofs that the agents are presenting? I think they have to be cryptographic proofs. So we will be a home for these agents where they can actually record their activity, provide proofs

around the activity. What agents do in the next three or four years will be no different. than like what websites did like 20 years ago. Like 25 years ago, websites were HTTP. They were not secure. You could go and like, you know, you could have all kinds of attacks, man in the middle attacks. Like, you wouldn't even know if you're talking to the website

that you think you're talking to. Like all of that gets, all of that got solved by like new protocol layers, like new actors coming in, giving certificates to websites and like, and making sure that you were actually, your browser was truly talking to the website that you thought you were talking to.

I think agents will have, have a higher bar. It's not just that you're talking to the agent that you think you're talking to, but the agent actually has the work history, has the economic output that they claim that they have actually done. So how are you going to verify all of that? All of that should move to work. And if you make payments really easy, especially for nested agents, if I'm an agent and I have a policy and I want to fire off another thousand agents and I want to give those thousand agents a wallet and a policy and some money and those thousand agents can essentially

transact with each other and for the fire of other agents. We keep sort of like reasoning about this in terms of like how nested the activity gets and how connected the activity gets. The only real way to do it is to do it using stable coins and is to make sure that and to do it in a place where you're carrying minimal risk when these agents are transacting with each other.

That's why payment finality matters, right? That's why sub-second finality matters. That's why credit markets for these agents matter. So all of that traffic is new and novel, and like we are going to be using everything in our stack to essentially enable all of that traffic. So it's not just about like, hey, can your agent get a, you know, can you get, can your agent get a method of payment

and can they go transact somewhere on the internet using X4 or two or some other protocol? It is much more than that. It is like, hey, what are all the things that agents need so that they can truly become fully, economic actors and like much like you have a social security number, you have a work history, you have like an ability to prove all of that, how does an agent get all of that? That infrastructure doesn't exist. And I'm hoping this is not just on ARC. This is truly distributed on the internet,

right? Like we want everybody to be able to access this infrastructure and we want this infrastructure to be in the open. That's what that is sort of like a core thesis for us when it comes to like the agentic platform that we're launching on ARC. I've been trading crypto for almost a decade. and I've used so many different wallets, exchanges, aggregators, different front ends over the years, and I'm always kind of looking for the same thing. Just one interface with deep liquidity across a bunch of chains and assets

where I can access all the markets like perps, earn yield, trade confidentially, and still control all my own funds. And I've never really found this experience, and I'm always switching wallets, juggling gas fees, and just getting eaten by slippage. Near.com is not that.

It feels fundamentally different to me. I can do everything I want from any chain and I keep all my activity confidential. I can even earn yield confidentially. It's the way crypto should work. The near.com wallet is powered by NIR, and it's moved over $25 billion cross-chain using post-quantum signing

and has run over five years on main net with zero downtime. Near.com is simply the best way to be on-chain and be in control. Get 20% of your trading fees back using the bankless link in the show notes, not investment advice. Bankless Nation, we've built something for you. Introducing the bankless MCP.

Gat ChbT and Claude are great at a lot of things, but ask them anything beyond the basics of crypto about protocol mechanics, tokenomics, or just what happened last week in crypto, and the gaps will start to show. The problem is context. Bankless, on the other hand, has spent almost a decade building

one of the deepest archives of crypto data anywhere. More than 2,000 podcast transcripts, 10,000 articles, and countless conversations with the people actually building this industry. And now we've structured all of that data into the bankless MCP. So you can go and connect it to your Claude

or ChatGBTBT, and suddenly your AI can answer your crypto queries with the entire bankless archive behind it. And every new bankless article or episode gets added automatically so the context keeps staying up to date. The bankless MCP is exclusively available to bankless premium subscribers.

So you can go to bankless.com, upgrade to premium, and connect the MCP in just a few minutes and all of a sudden your crypto queries to your AI, LLM, whatever you use, will get a thousand times better. So go check it out. There is a link in the show notes.

And once you become a bankless premium member, you can hop into the bankless Discord and let me know how you like it. Some exciting news. We are launching a new podcast to help people figure out the crypto cycle, how to navigate it. The best crypto cycle investor I know, his name is Michael Nato. He runs the Defi Report. This is the guy that sent me a sell alert before the 10-10 price drop happened.

His cycle analysis has been absolutely on point. I've been following him for years. And this year, we started recording weekly podcast episodes. Each one we get into his portfolio, what he's holding, the market structure, entry targets, fair market value of Bitcoin and Ether, and where we are in the cycle, there's new episodes that are released every Wednesday. They're 30 minutes. They're short. They're punchy. I think this crypto cycle is harder to navigate than most. So let's do it together. Go subscribe to this podcast. Search the DeFi report wherever you get your podcast, YouTube, Apple, Spotify, or find a link in the

show notes. There's a new episode waiting for you now. Can you tap me and the listeners into what the current state of play is in the world of agenic commerce? Because I'm waiting for the world of agentic commerce to kind of come to me. I'm not really pursuing it. I'm not deep in those weeds. But I do know that agentic commerce is a very big buzzword and people love to talk about it. I haven't yet experienced it. So what gives you and Arc the confidence that there is something there actually real worth pursuing rather than like a bunch of buzzwords that get people excited on podcasts? So like tap us into what's going on in that neck of the words. What's real? Okay, let's talk about like agents as actors like essentially and then let's talk about agentic commerce as

well right like so agents as actors agents are trading um they're trading like people are fighting up agents uh everybody has an idea like a specific idea like specific alpha that like they'd like to go after and they are fighting up a pool of agents that are being used right now to do the trading activity right we see it on chain we see the traffic patterns on chain um agents are doing it what you don't see enough of is like your agent taking your credit card and making a purchase for you. That I think is what you mean by like agentic commerce not being there. I do think in the last week or two, we have seen a bunch of new agents come out that are starting to use like they are essentially taking your credit card, storing it in a

wall, using, like creating one time ought essentially and policy to go and spend that, spend that money somewhere. That is just, I want to say those agents themselves are only. a month hole. They are not like very well distributed in the world right now. When those agents become much more distributed, like you will see like those agents not just transacting using credit card rails,

but also transacting using stable coin rails. And at that point, they'd be buying, they'd be buying things that you use like in the real physical world or the meat world as we like to call it. Like they would be using it to buy like, you know, whether it's a plane ticket or whether it is like, whether it is something you want to,

like, you know, piece of clothing that you're looking to, looking to buy. I don't think the interface for that has existed so far. I don't know if you've kept up to these agents like in the last month, but like now I have my credit card enabled with an agent. And my first agentic purchase is actually a funny one. My cat needed fee medicine. I went to the vet. I got the prescription and I had my agent go and buy it from Chewy.

And I was like, I don't want to deal with this. Can you please just make sure that this lands at my house? And it did. And so that is an example. of agentic commerce, commerce transactions that you really don't want to engage with yourself. But on the other side, on the blockchain side, we still have like agents

essentially like training. Like I mean, the agents are like, uh, agents will be getting credit very soon. Like they will be taking, they will be sort of managing risk very soon, like, at more scale than they are able to do right now. Do you think so there's already commerce on the internet where you have like Web 2 commerce.

Yeah. How much of agentic commerce will simply consume normal Web 2 commerce or? Or is it more that there is net new commerce that will be discovered, built, built for the first time with agented commerce? Or is it a little bit of both? Look, if it's goods and services, like you're buying,

like goods is like, what we just described is like goods commerce, right? Like you're out there trying to buy a widget and you want to make sure that the agent does a good job of buying the budget and deals with the complexity of it. Services commerce is very different. Like I think services commerce is agents as essentially doing, human-like work and sort of presenting that they can do full end-to-end human-like work. That I think is totally new.

And that is either you can argue is like replacement of the like, you know, human labor or is additive to human labor or sort of fills in the gap where human labor has not been able to fill in the gap because it's just too expensive for a human to do it or the task is not big enough for a human to go create a company to do like $2 tasks like that like an agent will take on. I think that's the opportunity, which is to say, like, hey, I can either go do all of these things myself by using my own agent virtual machine and then building my own agents to do all of that,

or I can go hire a bunch of agents on the internet who can go do these things for me. We're not there yet. I think they're closer to the goods commerce right now because I see that as like superbly imminent. Like I think like I just give you an example of something of commerce that I didn't want to engage with that I was able to like utilize an agent to do that. But like when somebody is able to come in and say like, hey, look, we have an agent marketplace. You can, we can see listings in there where people are able to say things like, can you translate this text for me?

And then an agent will come back and say like, yeah, I'll do it. You can pay me over X-4 or two and it's going to cost you 30 cents. That's an example of something that is, I don't think a human setting up that company today to go translate like, you know, a paragraph of text and like, you know, is going through the entire economic negotiation of like, hey, are you going to pay me? And like making sure that like the payment happens and making sure, like, that the work comes out and the work and making sure that the work is of high quality. So those piecemeal work that currently that humans either cannot do or are like not

incented to do will get outsourced in my mind from like your private sort of like workspace or your private life onto the public internet. And there these agents will become specialists in what they are able to like do, whether it's like an agent that can, maybe there's an agent that all it does is like figures out like how to order cat food or like how figures out how to do like, you know, pet medication or anything like that. And that agent is going to be far superior to anything I can build. And so,

and much like there was this specialization on websites that happened, I want to say, 20, 25 years ago. And like, it's about like, you know, in the 2002s that it started. I think the same thing will happen with agents. I think the current agents are like overly simple.

They are like, we also currently assume that all agents have access to all data. none of those things are going to be true in the future, right? Like, I think there's going to be a desire for people to sort of, like, preserve their data. There's a desire, there's going to be a desire for people to sort of want to isolate their data and make sure that they're only sharing data that is necessary. And all of those things will lead to, like, specialized economic actors existing on the Internet. And then, like, transactions happening between them, with humans and then, or, like, three-way transactions.

Like, a lot of times when I get a ping at work, I'm not sure, like, if I'm getting that a ping from an agent or I'm getting it from a human. So in this world of agentic commerce and agents with money, agents with private keys, what parts of this stack is ARC and Circle really taking ownership over in terms of like building and innovating and refining versus what other parts are like blockers for you guys that you guys need other parties, other startups, other tech companies to build to really complete this whole holistic agentic? What part of the agentic stack do you guys?

touch and then what other parts of the agentic stack are you guys needing to like partner with and collaborate with? Yeah, the part of the agentic stack that we touch is like basically bottom up, right? Like we are not an application level agent. We're not going to build an agent that says like, hey, here's a, I don't want to say, never say never, but like, you know, be an example that is like really adjacent to us. That is that's not something that we're going to be building immediately is like go figure out like what like stocks to buy to go invest. Right. Like all of these assets that are issued on ARC. If you come in and you say like, hey, this is my portfolio, is my, this is my sort of like investment horizon.

I am pretty sure there are better agents out there than like what circuit can build or like is building or plans to build that will get built. And so like I'm not interested in going and building that agent. What I am interested in building is like all the primitives that are needed to discover that agent. All the primitives that are needed to like approve that this agent comes from a good economic actor who is not going to steal my data and like is going to try to happen. me using whether it's like directly or through social engineering or something else.

Right. And and I will, I want to be able to sort of prove to the user that this agent has an excellent work history. Like they are like, you know, they have sort of done this for 10,000 other users and they have had excellent results. All of those primitives we want to build. Right. That means now the agents can live on ARC.

They can transact on ARC. And as they build history on ARC, they are able to like essentially prove to users that they are good economic actors. And they're able to prove. to other agents as well. Like, it's not just users who will care about this. If I have an agent and I tell them to go hire another agent, they have good incentives to make sure that that agent that they are hiring is a good

agent, has all of these like properties. So towards that, we are building an agent marketplace. We are building an agent reputation system. We are building ways for agents to pay each other, very small amounts of money, like almost a millionth of a dollar using Circle Nano payments. We're making it so that agents can, get credit and make sure that like if you are able to prove that you are able to run a book and that is a profitable book, like, how should you get credit?

Like, you know, and when you start up, like, you have no money. How are you supposed to on rent as an agent into the money? So like all of those problems at the lower level we will solve or we are hoping to solve over the next like a year or two. And the problems on top of that are like the applications themselves, which I think others will build. And I don't think those applications are just financial applications. Those could be any number of applications. Travel, commerce, education, like, all of these, the underpinning for all of these activities is value exchange, and that value exchange

that needs to happen, needs to be trustworthy, and that value exchange needs to be final, and that value exchange needs to be fast. All of that arc can enable. Yeah. I want to turn to the world of tokenized stocks, because that's also a phenomenon that is happening in the crypto industry right now. are you guys going after trying to compete with things like the NASDAQ or the New York Stock Exchange in the sense that those two things are dollar denominated with ARC we have a dollar denominated blockchain. Blockchains are asset transaction ledgers. Are you guys trying to go and be competitive in the world of liquidity and training volume for tokenized stocks or are you more passive on that front?

We want those applications to use us, right? Like, we are not the exchange. We are not the, we are the infrastructure on which you can build an exchange. We are the infrastructure for settlement. We, so, like, I mean, I think, like, that's fairly obvious. I think there's no, like, you know,

there's no secret there. We're not competing in the exchange market. We want these actors to use our, to do settlement, and to enter into complex, like, you know, financial transactions, have those financial transactions be expressed as smart contracts and have those be on ARC. That's our hope.

And so do we want more of these real world asset issuers on ARC? Absolutely. We're going after them and we're trying to solve for problems they may have, whether it is like core chain features that they have or whether it's liquidity issues that they are trying to solve core. Maybe it's like USDA on-off ramp issues that they are concerned about. Maybe sometimes these on-off ramp issues are combined with geographical issues being like, hey, I have an on-off ramp issue in the EU or in Japan as I'm trying to do

this specific trade. How does that work? But like, I do think, like, there will be, there is, there's two versions of this. One is like, hey, I'm doing an activity already. Can I do it on chain? Because I can then unlock 24-7 activity with all the same actors with no new actors participating because now you have this 24-7 infrastructure. And then there is the piece which is, well, I have like all this new demand that I can bring

to which I can bring to this asset because I can open up access to this asset all over the board. And USDA has both properties, right? Like you can, if you're in the US, you have access to bank accounts, but if you have USC, you can settle with each other 24-7.

But because you have USDC, you can now actually give people, people who are in emerging markets, people in the EU, people in South America, access to USC. I think the same thing will be true for stocks, right? Like, I think in the US, people will probably move on chain

because they can, like, trade faster and manage the liquidity better, manage risk better. Internationally, I think we will have new demand coming in. Because people who want to raise money, as like AI becomes more proliferated around the world, there should be more companies in the world.

There are more companies in the world because you can actually hire, go hire these economic actors around the world. Then these companies will have like stronger need for like capital formation. And these capital formation, like, well, they won't want to issue like, you know, some sort of token or some stock,

to essentially do that capital formation. And on the users on the other side, we want to get access to the best tokens or the best stock around the world to make sure that they're getting the best outcome for the capital that they're investing. So like this whole world is about to blow up

in terms of what access users have and then what access even the companies have in terms of like the investors that they can reach out to. What about the world of OnRamps onto ARC? Yeah, I think Circle and Arc is uniquely, positioned here in that Circle has some of the best banking relationships, if not the best

banking relationships in the entire crypto industry domestically inside the United States. What about building like kind of like a first party on-ramp system into the Arc blockchain and then also even extending that into non-U.S. jurisdictions where we can get like non-US dollar stable coins with direct banking relationships right on to Arc. Because the on On-ramp problem has never truly been solved at a large scale in crypto. And really, if you want to distill down what Circle is, it's like the best on-ramp ever. Like, that is what USDC is, like, the best highest, biggest conduit between bank dollars and circle dollars. What about building out, like, the richest best set of on-ramps?

Is that something on your guys' radar? Yeah, I mean, like, from an institutional on-ramp perspective, we have, you're right, like we are the best on-off ramps for the whole ecosystem. I was just looking at something the other day and we counted like almost more than $900 billion of like off-ramping that we have done over the span of USCC. So like and that means that that many people had sort of like USDC that on ramped into USC and that's almost a trillion dollars of like USDC

that is on off ramp or the of this over the lifespan of USC. So yes, we do have good institutional data on-off ramps. Users currently get access to these on-off ramps using primarily through exchanges. I think everybody understands that. We are working on more retail focused on-off ramps. They will be part of, like, they are part of the ARC launch. There's more coming in terms of making sure that users in, other markets can also get access to these on-off ramps.

And then from a liquidity perspective, like, I think if you're trying to on-off ramp into on-ramp into a local stable coin, the question is like, how does that liquidity work? And there we have a ton of experience in provisioning liquidity around the world. We understand the cost structure of provisioning that liquidity. We also, we talked a little bit about stable effects, which is our ability to sort of swap these local currencies, into USDC or some other stable coin.

We're working with market makers who can, on the maker side, who can go make these markets. We're also working with takers to make sure that, like, and these takers essentially represent end users. So these are large financial markets. I think everybody knows the size of FX markets. Like it's in the trillions traded every day.

And the dollar is like pretty dominant in terms of like, as a quoting asset. So we're just on day one of, like, like trying to figure out all of that. And a lot of these things are not exchanges. These are private pools that operate for like these on-off ramps. And so we are connecting into all of these private pools and making sure that these private pools have access to liquidity that is ARC native.

And then we have like a core protocol on ARC that allows for people to sort of like go and access these liquidity pools. So it's not just about the issuance. It's not just making sure that like, you know, Arc has finality. It's also like going and finding these liquidation. Pools and then connecting into those liquidity pools and making sure that those folks also have access to things like Circle Mint, which is a product from Circle, which allows people

to come in and get access to USC, and get on-off ramps into USCC. So that's where the full-stack argument matters, which is to say, like, yes, is it just not, is, is, is it like another L-1 or is, does it have applications on top of it? And absolutely it has applications on top of it, which is to say the applications are other stable coins. The market, to trade those stable coins and the pools of like liquidity that will make it possible for those marketplaces to exist and and the additional circle products that are needed to actually enable those pools of the pools of capital to be successful and like be profitable. All of that needs to fall into place and all of that needs to be compliant and all of that needs

to be like, you know, be okay with the regulators and all of that. So that circles value as it gets into this game. Right after agentic comment. I feel like for FX is like the next biggest golden goose that you guys, that Circle is really just right next to. I don't know if Circle has intent to go into like adjacent economies. I know that there's the Euro. The Circle already has like a Euro product.

But really I think the picture gets completed when basically all of the Fiat currencies are tokenized in a high fidelity way all in one place. I don't know if Circle is trying to go and do the role of Circle in every single jurisdiction that has like a well-used Fiat currency, but that seems very close to what Circle is already doing and also very valuable. How is Circle and Arc thinking about that? I agree it's very valuable.

I think it is how things should work. They don't work like that today. So here are a few things that are happening. One is genius goes into effect in January. right? Like, so once genius goes into effect, we have a regulatory framework that is like, which is being overseen by the feds. What does that mean for other countries? The other countries are waiting for like the U.S. laws to be final. So they can finalize how they will do stable coin laws in their country. Right. And so this is true for a vast majority of the world.

So one, once genius happens, we expect the regulatory frameworks across the world to evolve. to support more local stable coins. Second, I don't think it is feasible for us to go operate stable coins in like, you know, over 190 countries around the world. Like, that's the number of countries in the world. We have, like, stable coins in the two large markets. We have the USDC and we have the EU. And for now, we're going to, when it comes to issuance,

like circle issuing the stable coins, I think we're going to stay with that. We're going to go partner with other stable coins because these local actors, they know the regulators well, they understand local law well, they understand local user needs well. They have good relationships in the market when it comes to money traders

and they understand how to make the economics work. We're going to keep working with them. Our value ad is going to be connecting these pools of liquidity and making sure that we are running like stable effects. which is part of ARC so that users can come in and they can just go query these pools of liquidity for the best rates that they can get

and they can get the liquidity they want. So it is currently in the market there is primarily AMM-based solutions for like for these things and you don't get a lot of liquidity over there. So like we have AMM-based solutions on ARC as well but like an RFQ-based system which allows for like this liquidity to be there and to make sure that like the transaction is successful

as in like you don't like put up your dollars and not get like the local stable coin or the other way around right just making sure that that whole protocol works in a permissionless way is what we're trying to focus on. Nikhil so today is launch today what are you guys focused on in the very short term so the end of this week next week as well what are your nearest term priorities that you guys have to get arc up and running and successful I mean look it is we're going to probably go to the ward room and hang out there and make sure that like things are working correctly it's a little bit of a relief because we've been working on it.

I think Circle is wanting to invest in this space for a long time. We have been working on this L1 project for, I think, close to 18 months at this point. So I think we might take an hour or two to just like have a beer and like take a break and then get back to it, which is to say that like we want to make sure that like, you know, we are serving our users. Like I'm expecting users to come in and start transacting on ARC. And we want to make sure that, like, you know, transactions are working. Privacy is working. Stable FX is working.

Like the institutional RWAs have the liquidity they have. Like that, like, we've promised a lot in terms of like how much functionality is going to be available on ARC on day one. So just making sure that all of that functionality is immediately available and is working as users expect. And it's working not just for us. It is working for developers. It's working for users. For the next three months, we have a very rich roadmap

in terms of like new privacy features. We have like new agent features coming out. We probably add more validators to the set as like things mature on our side. And so, and then eventually we're planning for a proof of state launch as well. So we want to make sure that we are ready for that as well.

So like those are the things that we're going to be working on. Yeah. A quick question. Does Jeremy have any pets? Do you know? As animals? Yeah.

Does he have a dog or a cat? he's never mentioned it to me. I've known him for five years now, so why do you ask? No pets. Okay. Well, because usually the name of a founder's pet is a pretty hot meme coin target. And so I know you guys are trying to do

I'm sure you can treat it. I know you guys are doing like a gent to commerce and all that kind of stuff. But the first thing that's going to happen on Arc is meme coins. And so if Jeremy's got a pet, I want to know its name. But maybe I'll have to dig around in a different location for that.

I'm very sure if you can you can tweet at him or like you can DM him and he'll get back. Jeremy's pretty open and Jeremy is pretty active on Twitter. So like, or X, sorry. And so, and Jeremy loves the internet. Like, I mean, like Jeremy's an old internet founder. Like he's sort of created two internet companies before this. So I think like while Jeremy presents well in a suit, which I love, he's truly at heart like a person of the internet. like, you know, and so I think he's looking forward to all of it, is like my take on it.

He's, he is so excited about this. He has been wanting this, wanting to work on this for some time. And like it has taken a certain sort of like, you know, certain path. Like we went public last year. So it has taken a somewhat like, you know, circuituous path to get here. But like I think he's very excited to be here. And I'm sure like he'll probably reveal the name of his pet himself. He might be able to be like yeah.

Yeah. Nikiel, this has been great. Thanks for coming on the show. Thanks, David. Bankless Nation, guys, know the deal. Crypto is risky, but not risky enough. The institutions have landed. So we're going even further west.

This is the frontier. It's not for everyone, but we are glad you're with us on the bankless journey. Thanks a lot.