Bankless - David and Anthony on Monolithic vs Modular Blockchains

Episode Date: October 9, 2021

Hey Bankless Nation Here's some weekend content for you! Every now and then, Anthony Sassano and David hop into a live stream and chat about things. We thought the conversation was especially useful this week, so we're putting it on the podcast feed.  Enjoy! ------ 📣 ZERION | Your Gateway to the Metaverse! https://bankless.cc/Zerion ------ BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS: 💰 GEMINI | FIAT & CRYPTO EXCHANGE https://bankless.cc/go-gemini​ 💧LIDO | DECENTRALIZED STAKING https://bankless.cc/Matcha 👻 AAVE | LEND & BORROW ASSETS https://bankless.cc/aave 🦄 UNISWAP | DECENTRALIZED FUNDING https://bankless.cc/UniGrants ----------- Not financial or tax advice. This channel is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. This video is not tax advice. Talk to your accountant. Do your own research. Disclosure. From time-to-time I may add links in this newsletter to products I use. I may receive commission if you make a purchase through one of these links. Additionally, the Bankless writers hold crypto assets. See our investment disclosures here: https://newsletter.banklesshq.com/p/b...

Hey, Bankless Nation. We have some weekend content for you guys today. Every now and then, Anthony Sizzano and I from the Daily Gway, we hop into a live stream every Friday evening, every now and then. And today, I'm deciding to post the live stream that we did because I think it was really useful in information. And I want to make that more available for the people who only stick to the RSS feed and don't know that we do the live streams every now and then. Anthony and I talked a lot about this new concept that's going around in the Ethereum sphere called modular blockchains. If you listen to the weekly roll-up, I was going on about that there as well. And Anthony has been also talking about this on the Daily Way.

And so we talked about it here on the weekly live stream. And I hope you guys enjoy it. Without further ado, we get right into the conversation. But first, a moment to talk about some of these fantastic sponsors that make this show possible. The era of proof of stake is upon us. Proof-of-stakes systems like Ethereum, Terra, and Solana allow the industry to move away from the hot, loud, and wasteful proof-of-work systems, and return back to a cottage industry of individual stakers and individual validators. And that is what we need to make this industry stay decentralized.

Individuals must play their part in crypto network validation. And that is what Lido is here to do. Lido makes staking accessible to everyone at the click of a button. By delegating your stake to Lido's network of nodes, you can access the yield offered by proof-of-stake systems and claim your share of the network transaction rewards. Do you have 32-Eth and want to stake it to Ethereum, but running a node sounds intimidating? Or maybe you have less than 32-Eth, and you need to pool your ETH with others so you can access staking yields. Lido offers a solution for both. Simply go to Lido.fI, choose which assets you want to stake, and deposit them to the Lido

validating network. The best part about Lido is that you receive staked versions of your deposited tokens. If you want to stake your ETH, you can't. receive staked ETH tokens in return, which you can take back to DFI to do your DFI activities. Lido is working to make sure proof of stake stays as decentralized as possible, and is committed to decentralizing its own validating network to eventually become a completely permissionless protocol. So if you want to stake your ETH, Terra, or Seoul, and get liquidity on your stake, go to Lido.fI to get started. Gemini is the world's most trusted cryptocurrency exchange. I've been a customer of Gemini since I first got into crypto in 2017,

and it's been my main exchange of choice to make my crypto buys and sells. Gemini is available in all 50 states and in over 50 countries worldwide, and on Gemini there are markets for over 30 various different crypto assets, including many of the hot defy tokens, and it's one of the few exchanges that has liquid dye markets. Gemini just launched their Earned program, where you can earn up to 7.4% interest on 26 various crypto assets. If you're tired of paying fees in defy or you don't want to worry about defy exploits, but you still want to earn interest on your crypto assets, Gemini Earn is the product for you. Another product I'm stoked to get my hands on is the Gemini crypto back credit card, which gives you 3% cash back on all of your purchases,

but paid to you in your preferred crypto asset. When I get my Gemini credit card, I'm going to make sure that I get my cash back in ETH. So whenever I buy something, I get a little bit of ETH bonus back to me at the same time. You can open up a free account in under three minutes at Gemini.com slash go bankless. And if you trade more than $100 within the first 30 days after sign up, you'll be gifted a free $15.00 Bitcoin bonus. Check them out at Gemini.com slash go bankless. There we go.

We've been online for the last like 15 seconds. What's up, Anthony? Hey, man, what's going on? You know, just another good old Friday night live stream with my best bud, Anthony, lose in Australia so it's Saturday morning for him. Hey, we're two in a row in last two weeks. I was going to say that. Like we, we typically do these kind of like randomly, I guess, but like two in a row, I guess you're not traveling right now. So it's just easier. Yeah. Yeah. Well, we started these off. I kind of think I was a mistake,

mistakenly towards the end of COVID rather than at the start of COVID. And so we had like a good like four or five that were all like every Friday. But then at least in America, like COVID is like over. And then I started doing real life things. But then I also moved down to San Diego, started traveling a bunch. And so like now for me personally, it's just like I go out to like New York, Colorado, all the crypto conferences, get absolutely exhausted for like 10 days and then come home to San Diego, which is kind of like a party town. But I just come home and just like, no, quiet, quiet, peace and quiet, please, peace and quiet.

Yeah, yeah. And I just did here fomoing by Twitter. Hey, the conference season is back on. So I heard you recently got Vax. So congratulations about that. Yeah, fully vaxed finally. Whenever Australia lets you out. Like, we're waiting with open arms, brother.

Yeah, probably next year at this stage, but it's okay. I mean, it's summer. Oh, it's not summer yet, but like it's getting warmer. And I love that in Melbourne, like when it's warm here. I just like getting away when it's cold, like during the winter months. It's not, it doesn't get that cold. It doesn't snow or anything, but I'm just not a person who likes the cold. Funny enough, though, like when I was,

in Denver. It was during like winter in February. Like what was it? 2019, 2020. And it was a different cold. I didn't mind it. But like the cold you get down here is like a shit cold. I don't know if that's a thing. But like it just felt different. Denver is like it's the Denver's really, really cold and also really, really dry. And so like it makes the cold not so bad because it doesn't like wet cold is always worse. Wet cold or wet temperatures is transfer heat or like if it's colder, it's worse, if it's hotter is worse. Every time I go to Denver, I just get immediately just like all the moisture just sucked out of me, like immediately chapped lips.

Everything is so dry. Like I breathe out and I just feel just like the vapor just leaving my body. I'm sure this is why people tune into these Friday conversations to hear exactly this. Yeah, yeah. I mean, it's not like we haven't got things to talk about with Ethereum land. I mean, like, how amazing has the last week been just watching the merge stuff going on? I think that's been the most exciting. exciting thing, right?

Yeah, there is like this semi-regular ceremonious time on Twitter where all the Ethereum non-technical people watch all the technical people post screenshots of code in some compiler. And the people, the client developers, whether it's Layer 1 Ethereum, or excuse me, not Layer 1, Ethereum 2, which I know

we're not calling it that anymore, but anyways, we all just view the code and pretend we know what we're seeing. But all the people that are spitting out the tweets and the pictures about like, oh, merge consensus, like our nodes are syncing. They're all like, yay. And then all the other people around the non-technical people see these tweets. And we're also like, yay, happy times. Don't know what it means, but like the devs are happy. So if the devs are happy, we're happy.

Yay. That's exactly what it is. And the funny thing is like a lot of these devs just don't really post the Twitter very often or their tweets may not get much engagement. but like now they're posting Yeah, yeah, exactly their heads down building But yeah, I mean this week We've seen like tons of those screenshots on on Twitter

And then today, I mean, I woke up to this We had Ben Edgington who Who publishes the What's New and ETH2 newsletter Which is an amazing newsletter by the way, guys, ETH2. News, it will keep you up to date With everything happening with ETH2 But like he posted a picture of all the, I think it was like three or four of the clients

On either side on the ETH one and ETH two sides being in sync with ETH with each other and then all the kind of like, well, not all of them, but like a lot of the core devs kind of just in another picture, like celebrating. And I looked at that and I'm just like, this is so awesome. Like I commented on and I'm like, this reminds me of like a space shuttle launch and all the kind of like, you know, scientists, NASA scientists like in the kind of like little room and they're all like, oh my God, yes, it didn't blow up, right? Didn't kill the astronauts. It kind of feels like that with, with that picture. But I mean,

we're so close, man. Like seriously, I don't know. Like I don't want to give any kind of dates or anything because I don't have any kind of like dates to give, but it feels like the merge is a lot closer than people think it is. And I've been, you know, beating the drama that the merge is coming. I'm not going to give a date. But I don't know. I feel like the... Anthony says I'm not going to give a date as if he would be a person to give a date. Hey, I can guess. I can guess. I can estimate, right? Like, I see what you're saying. I see what you're saying. Yeah, yeah. You're not saying like the date that you're just saying you're not going to guess rather than like, oh, I'm not going to be the official bestower of the date. Yeah, yeah.

because people will quote me and be like, you know, thought leader, Anthony Sassano said the merge is going live on January this date. But no, no, it's just been super exciting, man. Like, I think we're almost there. Like, this is something that's been coming for a long time. It's the biggest upgrade in Ethereum's history. And the fact that we're so close to it now is incredible. And I feel like everyone is just so energized.

Like, not just like us, but like the core devs themselves, everyone in the community. We're all like, you know, going towards this one goal, like as fast as we can. It's just, it's so good. Yeah, and it's a long time coming. It's a, and perhaps the original one promise that Ethereum promised. Vitalx Vision, right? Yeah, Vitalx Vision, yeah.

It's the utmost, like, commitment that Ethereum has committed to, and a significant reason why Ethereum gets a lot of flack for not upholding his commitments, if you view Ethereum from the outside, if you view it from the inside, you understand it a little bit more. Like, there's so much just, like, But denial that Ethereum gets at this phase just because like everything is in the rearview mirror, right? And like for everybody in Ethereum is like it's another one of these ceremonious times where we get to watch people like move the goalposts back. Keep on moving back.

Keep on moving back. Like we're now on proof of the stake. Like what you got next. The goalposts always shift. Like there was a long, for a long time the Bitcoin Maxis kept saying, you know, ETH two is never going to launch. ETH II is a pipe dream, blah, blah, whatever. Then the beacon chain went live and they moved the goalpost and kind of said, well, that's not really ETH too.

And I mean, okay, technically it's not like the full vision or whatever. But I think that, you know, the goalpost just keep moving. And then once the merge happens, like, I'm sure they'll come up with something else. And I think it's just kind of annoying having to deal with the goalpost keep shifting. And like the hilarious thing is, is that like the market is kind of like rewarding ETH for its progress, I think, especially not just against USD, but against Bitcoin. Like we believe in the flippinging and things like that. And it's going to take longer than we all would like it to take.

But I feel like the market is definitely rewarding Ethereum for that, but also punishing it for its weaknesses. Like Ethereum taking longer to scale than people would like. It's punishing Ethereum somewhat by, you know, some of the value flowing to other chains. And that's fine. I guess it's a little short-term stuff to me anyway. I don't consider it anything like a big deal there.

But it's funny how like, you know, the narratives can probably maybe, you know, work in the short term ish but like medium long term man like i don't know i i always believe that like the fundamental stuff wins out yeah i i do want to go down that path but there was a question in the youtube comments from reed uh when i said like oh we're not supposed to be calling it eith one two anymore he goes what are we um supposed to be calling it now i think that's something worthy to tap into uh and so uh i'll take my stab at answering this question and two devs two non devs are going to try and answer this. Okay, so previously we had Ethereum 1,

and that was the proof of work Ethereum chain where everything is inside one chain. And then we have Ethereum 2, which is the future proof of stake, sharded chain that is also a bunch of like roll-ups. As it turns out, this has, rather than being like a binary, like first we're here and then we're there,

it's turned into a phased rollout. And we can, as a result, to that phase rollout. There is no one, like, canonical line between, like, Ethereum 1 and Ethereum 2. With proof of stake versus proof of work, that is only talking about the consensus layer of Ethereum, and there's two layers.

There's the consensus layer, and then the execution layer. And the execution layer is where, like, you send your transactions, some nodes, some minor, like, processes them, and then makes a block, and they execute the transaction, and then they go from the execution, of the transaction part to the consensus part by adding that block to the blockchain.

And so these are two separate things. There's two separate components. The execution layer is the EVM, and then the consensus layer is proof of work. So we're keeping the execution layer, which also includes all of the state of Ethereum, right? All of the history, we're keeping that. And we're just replacing the consensus layer and going from proof of work to proof of sake. So it's not like there's a new chain. There's no new ether.

There's no new anything. there's this one canonical state and then we're just swapping out the consensus layer which is proof of work and so where the developers are trying to get away from this whole ETH1, E2 thing because it puts bad images into people's minds we're just replacing one of the components

about what makes the blockchain a blockchain with something else, a new component that also makes it a blockchain but now instead of proof of work is proof of stake. So it's more of a seamless migration. Is there anything I miss or anything you want to add? No, that's kind of the gist of it. Yeah, I mean people will have seen

execution layer and consensus layer be thrown around. I mean, the simplest way to explain it, I mean, to your point as well, it's just like the kind of like execution layer is like, you know, eighth one that we know and love today, proof of work, everything. Consensus layer is the beacon chain where we're doing staking. And once the merge goes through, literally all that's happening with the merge is that we're replacing proof of work with proof of stake. Everything else stays the same. Like the Ethereum we know on love stays the same. You said it the states that stays the same. there's no new eth or whatever, nothing like that. We're just replacing proof of work with proof of stake. So now the stake is other ones who process transactions, you know, compile blocks,

verify blocks, all that sort of stuff and put them into the chain. And it's, it's kind of like the same job that the miners we're doing. It's pretty much the same thing. But we're just kind of swapping it out. Now, I mean, the reason why everyone's excited about this, even though it may seem like I'm kind of like maybe downplaying it a little bit is obviously because we get rid of proof of work, which we consider to be, you know, not great. We don't consider it to be it. Yeah, it was definitely a means to an end.

Yes, yeah, exactly. And the Ethereum community just generally doesn't like proof of work, at least for Ethereum. Maybe they, they fine with it for Bitcoin,

but for Ethereum, we prefer proof of stake for a number of different reasons. And I guess the other big reason people are excited about the merge is that the new issuance, the new ETH issuance, is going to drop by about 90% instantly.

Like literally, as soon as the merch happens, we cut 90% of the new ETH being issued because we pay stakers, you know, a lot less than what we pay minors because you're only paying the people that are staking. So with proof of work, the issuance takes, sorry, the new ETH being issued is kind of like over all the ETH supply. You're paying it to minors. And then within kind of like proof of stake, we're only paying ETH to what, the $7 million that is staked right now or probably a little bit more than that. So the issuance just drops like 90%. And we get more

security for that, actually. I won't go into all the technicals there. But that's kind of like the reasons people are excited about it. So you'll see like execution and consensus layer be be kind of like used. And that's the terminology that we used going forward. I know it's confusing to follow along because these things can change very often for people. And then everything else just falls into that, right? Like you mentioned the phased rollout. The thing about the phased rollout is like even that changed where it's kind of like we don't have phases anymore. It's like, okay, well, we know that there's these major roadmap items that we want to deliver. Whenever one of them is ready, we'll deliver it. Because originally,

sharding was supposed to come before the merge. We were going to do sharding on the, remember, on the beacon chain, and then the merge would come. It was like phase one for sharding, phase 1.5 for the merge. And, you know, it just got, it kind of got to a point where everyone's like, 1.5. Yeah, it kind of got to the point where everyone's like, okay, let's just do the merge, right?

Like, it makes more sense to do the merge first, and then we'll do, we'll do kind of like sharding after the merge, or we'll do statelessness if that's ready before sharding. But I think sharding will be ready first, like a data sharding, actually, not execution sharding. But from that perspective, yeah, it's kind of like not really a phase rollout anymore. And then, you know, people think, okay, what does rollups fit into this? Well, roll ups kind of like, you know, they still sit on the Ethereum kind of like execution layer.

But then when sharding comes into it, they also kind of like post their data and kind of like their proofs to kind of like the shards as well. So it's, you know, it may seem like a bit chaotic right now and maybe a lot of terms flying around. But like once it all kind of comes together, it just. simplifies things a lot. We won't have to kind of like refer to Ethan 1 and E2 and all this sort of stuff. It'll just be Ethereum. And you'll still see people talking about consensus layer versus execution layer. But I mean, you know, the funny thing is, is that unless you really kind of like want to get into the weeds of this stuff, like everyday users don't need to understand this at all. Like I see some of people complaining sometimes, oh, this is all too complicated

for end users. It's like, well, this is not something the end users should even be thinking about. Like if they're just casual users of Ethereum, they don't have to worry about this. The whole point is that like the, you know, the core of the union community does this stuff, upgrades the chain, comes together, comes to consensus on things, stewards the chain, you know, basically, so that the end users can enjoy it. And that's exactly why the merge is such a seamless process where it's not like, oh, the network's going to be offline for 24 hours while we do these change. No, it's going to be literally one, one block to the other sort of thing. So. Yeah, exactly, exactly.

And there's no, there's kind of no kind of, you know, if it's, if it's, if it goes well, there's no disruption at all. There's nothing that changes for the end user. They're just processing their transactions as normal. And we're now on proof of stake instead of proof of work. So, yeah, I know I rambled a little bit about that, but I think it's important to understand all the little differences there. Right. And so there's two, like, dynamics that you said that.

You said it's, like, important to understand. And then you also said, like, regular users don't need to understand. And I think what when people make the claims of, like, this other L1 can scale. Well, okay, well, then you just put yourself by saying that. you just put yourself into the camp of somebody that needs to understand this. And this is kind of what we wanted to talk about today. When we talk about this concept of modular blockchains for any of the listeners that

were listening to the weekly roll-up today and also Anthony's content for like the past week or so, modular blockchain just means that there are a number of things that blockchains do. And it's easier to and better to do those things if you can separate the division of labor out into different modules. right one of these modules is the consensus layer one of these uh modules is the execution layer and another module is the data availability layer which is actually the same as the consensus layer um and and so like when you separate these three which these are the three things that blockchains do uh and it'll take a while to explain why it's just those three but if you take it on take it for granted that those are the three things that happen uh it's like okay make transactions and

somebody does that computation to don't do that transaction. The state of that transaction is stored in the data player and then there's a consensus system of what is true as in what is the data that is stored. So these three things make up a blockchain. And when you separate these things out into different components, you can actually optimize each one so that each one is maximized. And when you talk about like proof of sake reducing ether issuance, like, by 90%. What you are saying is, hey, we've been able to, like, modularize proof of state, the consensus layer to Ethereum,

by pushing the execution layer onto rollups, like prioritizing roll-ups as the execution layer, and then putting the consensus, optimizing for the consensus layer. And what this means is that you don't need big blocks, which big blocks are an unoptimized consensus, this property, small blocks are really, really good at making consensus because the packets of information can move all around the internet really, really freely and easily, and that what makes a chain identify itself easily to all the nodes. Small blocks, good for consensus.

The way that you have small blocks and scale is that you push the execution layer to the layer twos, right? You let people execute their transactions on the layer twos. The rollups compress a lot of the data and make all the data in the layer twos, a very, very small footprint. so that when it actually does come time to deploy a transaction onto the Ethereum L1, it's actually like 10,000 transactions at once. And so you get to have small blocks because you've compressed 10,000 transactions into a small little bundle of information. And then we are able to retain very, very strong consensus by having small blocks.

And by having small blocks, you actually also generate high fees. We see this on Ethereum. I don't feel like I have to justify that. we all know that the limited amount of block space creates high fees. And when you create high fees, you also create ultrasound money because those high fees are collected and they burn the eth. When ether is ultrasound money, you actually have to issue less of it to incentivize security of Ethereum. So there's like this flywheel effect by modularizing all of the components that make up a blockchain and optimizing for each one individually. And each one of those things benefits all the others.

things. It's such an elegant system. And like the reason why like you've been hitting on this and we hit on this this week at bank list is because like I think the Ethereum community has finally just learned the way to like illustrate this and like why the Ethereum roadmap is the roadmap that it is. Yeah. I mean if as you said like if people have been watching kind of my content or reading my newsletter over the last couple weeks, I've been talking a lot about this and it was actually Paulinear, a kind of Twitter user and also a Reddit user. They've got a different username there called Dubroesist that pioneered this and really kind of, I guess, align my thinking on all of this and taught me a lot that. I mean, I already had all the pieces in my head, but they brought it together for me, for kind of like lack of a better term there.

But essentially, I mean, you're right. Like, I think what people, I kind of want to focus on what people kind of maybe get wrong and don't understand is that Ethereum layer one being where most users sit is a temporary phenomenon. It is not supposed to be the angle. It was never meant to be the angle. Yeah, exactly. It's basically an accident of the layer two's not not being ready yet or like, I mean, up until recently. So the fact that we now have these layer two is and you can use them and they're still rolling out, it's still early days. But you said it. Like the layer two basically compress the transactions. So they're happy to pay the high fees to secure those transactions on layer one,

because essentially what they're doing is they're just bringing lots of small kind of like transactions together and then adding them all up. And it's kind of like in aggregate, it pays the layer one fee. but they only have to pay one fee to get to post to the chain. It's not like they have to pay a massive fee that that kind of like individual users do because they've done the heavy lifting off chain. It's kind of like the analogy I like to use as like a zip file, for example. Like when you zip something up into a zip file, you have to do heavy computation on your PC to do that, right?

So instead of doing that at just your one PC. Yeah, exactly, just your one PC. Like imagine doing that across, you know, the globe and having to extend the consensus with every other node out there to do it all at once. and it's costly and it's hard. And that's why the fees are high and all that sort of stuff there. So, you know, you zip it on your kind of like PC, but then you would put that zip file onto kind of like the chain, for an example.

And that is like a compressed version of it. Now, if you wanted to unzip that, you can't. This is the beautiful thing about true roll-ups is that you can actually download it locally if you want and you can run the code yourself to make sure that everything was fine, that all the transactions process as they should have. and you can actually verify the information. But because of the compression technique that is used by the cryptography that is used, you don't need to do that.

You can if you want to, but you don't need to do that. You can actually have the assurance that, you know, through zero knowledge cryptography, that everything happened as it should have off-chain, which is the real breakthrough here. This is why people are so excited about ZK roll-ups is the fact that, the fact that you can have certainty that something happened without actually knowing it happened.

Like it's actually, it's like black magic zero knowledge stuff. It really is because you can, like the Ethereum Layer 1 chain can know and with kind of certainty that something happened off chain that was correct and that was actually following the rules, which is, you know, it's really wild to think about. But that is the key breakthrough here. And that is why people are so excited about the fact that we can now have basically everything we want. We can have the most decentralized and secure data availability layer that is Ethereum

layer one. And we can have an execution. layer, which is the layer two system, where users can have very, very cheap fees for their transactions and basically instant transaction confirmation, not finality. That's a different thing. Your transaction isn't actually final until it's kind of like posted to the layer one, but you get like very, very cheap fees. And we can start experimenting with things as well because at layer two, you're not limited

to the EVM. You're not limited to solidity. You can do anything. Like, DIYDX is built in Cairo, which is a language stock where came up with, and he's running on this on on um stark x which is like their they're they're kind of like new virtual machine that they built as part of stark OS so and it still verifies itself on Ethereum it uses Ethereum as its security and consensus layer. So this is why people are getting so excited I think about the modular blockchain revolution because we're shifting from these kind of like as Polyna likes to call

the monolithic layer ones that try to do everything like this is why I'm bearish on something like Salana because I actually don't think you can scale to the world at layer one and I don't think not just for decentralization purposes, because, you know, we can already see that, that Solano is definitely not decentralized because it's got a, you know, it runs in data centers, like super nodes and everything like that. Regulus just can't kind of like verify the chain and stuff like that, or this is very, very hard to. But like, I'm not even talking about that. I'm talking about actual scale because for them to scale up to millions of transactions per second,

they're not going to be able to do that all at layer one. They're going to have to do, you know, different kind of like techniques, like load balancing, they're going to have to do things like quality of service or QOS control, which means actually filtering out transactions that are considered spam. Which is subjective, by the way. Which is extremely subjective, right? Like, so, you know, when you kind of like take all this together, you have this beautiful grand design that I like to call it,

which I actually wrote about this in the Daily Way newsletter a couple weeks ago, and I called it the grand design because we've basically figured out how to invert the scalability Trilemma or kind of like the the Trilma that says you can't have all three, Scalability, security and decentralization. And we basically said, well, no, you can have all three. And the more decentralization you have, the better your scale. Because with proof of stake, with the consensus layer, the more validators you have, the more shards you can have, which means the more data availability space you have for layer two's,

the more scale you have. So we've basically, you know, we've solved blockchains essentially. Like I don't want to get too ahead of ourselves here, but we've basically solved that kind of like scalability trilema in such a grand way that I can't help but be excited about it. And that's why I've been talking about it so much lately is that it finally all clicked for me in my head where I'm like, holy shit, we are there. Like we can do this. It's going to take, you know, a few years to fully roll out and things like that. But we've got the design now and we have the path forward and everyone's kind of like in sync on that, which I'm, you know, super excited about obviously.

I think the one thing that I really want to hammer home as much as possible is that like this whole grand design that Anthony is talking about. This is a politically neutral construction. This isn't tribalism. This is technology. And Ethereum is working towards a specific, like, construction that is not just like, oh, this is the Ethereum construction. Like, no, no, no, no.

This is a construction that is inherently politically neutral. It's just a piece of technology, and Ethereum is working towards that. And, like, one thing I'm fearful on is, like, this design construction that Ethereum is chasing is going to be branded as like the Ethereum Maxi like choice, right? Like no, no, no, no. There are certain principles that guide us and then we go in that direction,

but it's not out of some, it's not like whatever, like roll-ups are inherently not an Ethereum piece of technology. And we know this is true because we're seeing Tezos and NIR go after the same basic construction, right? Like different flavors of the same basic construction, but it's the construction that we are going, going for, not that it's some sort of like

ETH Maxi political movement. Like it's actually the technology that we're going for. One thing I wanted to say is when you were talking about like the zip files and I cut in and said like it's important that just one computer runs the compression. Like when you were talking about monolithic blockchains, imagine just like it's actually if we can find a way, this is the simple way to illustrate the revolution of L2s. Instead of having every single note of the network all run the transactions, we are able to use the power of cryptography

for one computer to run the transactions and then submit a proof, which is a zip file, to all the other computers that they did it correctly. And so this is the whole concept of P equals NP, which is that like Sudoku puzzles, for example, hard to do, but easy to verify. And this is what a ZK proof is.

It's like it actually takes a decent amount of computation to compute it, but once it is computed, it is extremely verifiable that it's actually the right thing, right? And so instead of having a monolithic blockchain like Solana, where all super nodes compute all of the transactions

and they all check each other's work by doing all the raw computation, instead we can compress labor, we can compress computation by just having cryptography, create this zero knowledge proof thing from one computer, which we're not supposed to trust one computer.

That's sin. You don't trust one computer. but because cryptography enforces correctness, one computer says, hey, I did the computation. I did it also, by the way, I did it by the rules that we all said that we were going to do it by,

which is zero knowledge proofs. Here's my proof. And then all the other computers were like, oh yeah, that is the proof. Look at that. Let's accept it. And so we've actually reduced computation from all nodes to one

or just a handful of nodes. And this is, again, pairs very, very nicely with the optimizations of proof of stake. which is optimizations in a completely different direction for completely different reasons, but these things pair so nicely with each other. That is what Anthony here is calling an elegant design or grand design. The grand design, yeah, yeah.

I call it the grand design because that's normally what people refer to as kind of like God's creation, right? Like it's creating like the perfect grand design. It's a logical conclusion. It's not the Ethereum Vision. It's a conclusion of like crypto-economics and cryptography. Exactly, exactly. And you know, the funny thing is like people may be wondering, well, okay, if only one computer does it, can't that lead to censorship. And it can. This is the thing. The tradeoff with L2s is that if you only have one computer verifying all kind of like one node and one validated, one sequence are processing the transactions, then they, of course, can pick and choose which ones they want to process. But the thing is, is that once these L2s mature more, they're going to let anyone run a validator and anyone run a sequence are. So anyone, can collect the kind of like transactions, process them, and then put them on layer one. So essentially, we can have decentralization at layer two as well, or at least, sorry,

censorship resistance at layer two as well, because that's commonly something that people bring up as kind of a concern that is definitely a concern, but I don't think it's a long-term concern either. And on top of that, like, you're talking about, I guess, like, you know, the compression and kind of like the ZK technology, the funny thing is we can bring that to layer one as well. And there's actually a blockchain called Minah Protocol that does this right now, where they basically compress everything using, I think Snarks, maybe not Starks, like ZK Snark, which is a bit different. I'm not sure about the differences in the copy cryptography,

but I know that they're doing it right now. And I don't think you need a whole new blockchain to do this. I view them as kind of like, you know, Minas basically a research project into can this actually be done, which it can be, which means you can have an extremely small footprint at layer one. And then even with like statelessness as well, where you don't have to keep the state forever and you kind of like, you know, cycle out the state as time goes on. And you have kind of like, like,

proper light clients and stuff like that. Like the next kind of like, this is all going to be rolled out over the next five to 10 years. But essentially we're going to get to just such a great, a great design where we keep the kind of like consensus layer, the layer one, the security layer, decentralized and secure. And we do,

we scale to the world via kind of like layer two. So I don't, I mean, and the thing is like, Like you said, you kind of like said that people were, oh, this is going to be like the ETH Maxi design. Well, I mean, this has been the design that's been talked about for years. Like, this is not anything new.

All that's new is that someone like Polynau came along and gave it a name, right? And brought it all together elegantly. And like, you know, illustrated how it actually works in ways that non-debts can comprehend and digest it. Exactly. You know, they just came along and said, okay, well, this is what I'm calling modular blockchains. And this is how it all works. This is the separation of concerns.

And this is why it makes sense. But like for years prior, there have been disparate kind of like parties working on this. Sharding has been in the pipeline since basically day one Ethereum, staking, layer two's as well. Roll-ups were just to kind of, I guess, like natural extension of plasma, which has been in the works for quite a while. So it's not like any of this stuff is new and that Ethereum has just pivoted to this to be like, oh, well, you know, we're better than these other chains because we can do it this way. This is the culmination of years and years of research and development to get to this point. And that's why

a lot of us in the, in kind of like the Ethereum community get a little bit kind of like offended by these other chains who are like, well, we can do everything at layer one and we can remain decentralized and whatever. And it's like, no, you can't. Like that is not true at all. Like I would actually wager if kind of like, um, nation states wanted to right now, they could shut down most of these other chains, especially the monolithic ones, because all you need to do, especially something like, I mean, I don't want to fud kind of like any one project too hard, but like I use salina as an example because it is on the extreme side of let's just like scale everything at layer one. Now, for, for, for, to shut the,

down Salana, you just, like, all the validators that can hold the chain, the 19 validators that can hold the chain, they're all registered businesses. They're all public, right? You just go to them and say, hey, you know, you need to be shut down. Or you go to Amazon and AWS, or like, whatever data centers, these are on and say, you need to shut this down. This is not, this is not legal. I'm not saying that I want nation states to do this, but I'm saying that we are building a system that is supposed to resist the final boss, which is a nation state, and especially with something like the US. And if you don't have a system like that where it's just, you know, where it becomes very easy to shut it down, then everything else you build on top of it is pointless. And it's not,

you know, and that's just a decentralization aspect. As I mentioned before, there's also the fact that you hit the limits of scale if you're trying to do everything at layer one, because you're doing everything with, with hardware. And hardware doesn't, doesn't improve like it, like it has in the past. Like Moore's Law is pretty much dead. It is not going to improve exponentially, but software will. Zero knowledge technology will. the extra kind of like capacity that we're adding via sharding with horizontal scaling will enhance that even further and we'll get to millions of transactions per second in a few years and maybe by the end of the decade we can get to billions of transactions per second

using all this technology. So software in my mind beats hardware on this front because you and the thing is though hardware isn't like inconsequential either. The better the hardware gets the more stuff you can do at layer two because the more powerful the layer two hardware because more powerful the computers are. But the thing is, as we mentioned before, you don't need thousands of these things, right? You only need, realistically, you only need one. Like, yes, that's not very censorship resistant, but you only need one. And they can do, like, all this, you know, processing and process like tons and tons of transactions

per second as long as they can post it to layer one with sharding. So, I mean, yeah, I don't know. Like, I just feel like it's not an eth-maxy thing. It's a logical conclusion. And you mentioned Tezos and Nia, which are projects that are pivoting to this design or have been, you know, kind of on this same roadmap. Like, Nia did sharding. Nia, to me, is pretty much like 8th-2's design.

They just did it earlier because they didn't have to kind of like inherit Ethereum. They did it earlier without and forgot about the community. Yeah, yeah, pretty much. And then Tazos, it seems to have like its own little community going there. I haven't kept up with what they're doing. They seem to get some hype around NFT stuff, but they've pivoted to the roll-up centric roadmap as well, which is like doing scaling via layer too, which is, which is cool.

But, you know, I think some of these L-1s will actually pivot of just being L2s on Ethereum as well, which is a very controversial thing. The other day, actually, Justin Bram on his YouTube channel, he asked Doe Kwan, the founder of Terra, this question. And it wasn't a question that came from me directly. It's just something I spoke about on the refuel. And then Justin kind of like, ask me, hey, can I ask Do this? And I'm like, okay, that's fine.

So he asked him, is like, would Terra ever consider becoming like a layer two on Ethereum and outline the reasons why that actually would be beneficial for Terra as well? And they don't have to give up the lunar token or anything like that. And Doe didn't answer it. I'd rather not answer that question. He straight out didn't answer it. So yeah. So it's controversial to even talk about this because people just assume you're being an eth-maxi, when on reality, we're just kind of explaining how these technology is just better. It's got nothing to do with Ethereum and being an eth-max or whatever. It's just better technology. So, I mean, I was kind of

shocked that he didn't even bother answering that. You know, I know the reason. He probably thought in his head, oh, Anthony Sasano, this eth-maxi, you know, I'm not even going to bother applying to this. But the thing is, is that I think as the years go by, it's just going to become undeniable that you're going to get a better kind of like experience on the technology side by just simply being a layer two and outsourcing your consensus and security concerns to Ethereum layer one instead of doing it all yourself. I don't know. I feel like the next five years we're going to see plenty of L2 spin up. The L1s, I think the L1s are done. I don't think we're going to see any new L1 spot, maybe one or two, but like barely any. I think that kind of chapter is closed now and the L2 is

going to be the new thing. 100%. You know, you know that the meme of the man, the guy feeling is face feels good meme. That's going to be what happens when like all of this energy to spin up an an Ethereum killer or an alternative L1, when all of the monetary incentives to do that, which has been true since like 2013, even before Ethereum was around, all of that energy gets like redirected towards spinning up an Ethereum L2. Like an Ethereum L2 generates as much economic incentives to spin up as the L1s the last four or five years, it feels so good.

You can it feel so awesome. Finally, finally some tailwinds behind Ethereum. The narrative is going to shift pretty drastically, I think. It really doesn't make sense to bootstrap a new layer one anymore because, as I said, like you can still keep your token. Like you don't have to use like, kind of like ETH. You can use ETH for just gas fees on your network, whatever,

or kind of like the fees that will be on your network. But you can use your token as the same that a lot of these kind of like things use their token as in a staking token, right? or kind of like their economic unit for their kind of like chain. And there's going to be, all the L2s are going to have tokens and everything like that, like Starkwell optimism, arbitram, you know, ZK Sync. I mean, Polygon already has a token, Madik, but obviously their POS chain isn't an L2. But that token is going to play a big role in their L2 rollout as well.

So yeah, I don't know. I think, as you said, the economic incentives are definitely going to be there on the L2 side. Once people figure out that, hey, okay, you know, launching an L1 is actually redundant at this point. It's more work than it's worth. And we actually basically have to compete with all the other kind of L1s. But why not just like build an L2? And then all you have to compete with is kind of like the other kind of like ecosystems. But you compete with them with Ethereum at your side, essentially.

And like I actually really, really, this is exactly where I wanted to go next. Before we go there, however, we are a little bit over halfway through this live stream, through this Friday semi-regular bankless illegal live stream. So bankless is proud to be supported by Uniswap. Uniswap is a new paradigm in asset exchange infrastructure. Instead of a cumbersome order book system where trades are matched with other humans, Uniswap is an autonomous piece of software on Ethereum, which is what Ryan and I call a money robot.

No human counterparties or centralized intermediaries, just autonomous code on Ethereum. Input the token you want to sell and receive the token you want to buy. Something brand new in the Uniswap ecosystem is the Uniswap Grants program is now accepting applications for grants. We have been saying this for a while and we'll say it again. Dow's have money and they are in need of labor. If you think that you have something to contribute to the Uniswap Dow, apply for a grant to Uniswap.

Just look at the size of the Uniswap treasury. It's almost $3 billion. This mountain of capital is looking for labor. Do you have something of value to contribute to the Uniswap Dow? No matter how big or small your idea is, you can apply for a UniGrant at Unigrants.org and help steer uniswap in the direction that you think it should go. That's exactly what we did to get uniswap to be a sponsor for bankless and you can do the same for your project. Thank you uniswap for sponsoring bankless. When you shop for plane tickets, you probably use kayak, Expedia, or Google to compare ticket prices.

So why would you limit yourself to just one exchange when you trade crypto? When you make your trades, you want to make sure that you're getting the best possible price on your trade and that you aren't paying high gas costs that you could have otherwise avoided. That's why you should be using Macha. Macha routes your orders across all the various defy exchanges on Ethereum, Polygon, Binance smart chain, and gives you the best possible prices without taking any commission. Masha has smart order routing that splits your order across multiple liquidity sources if Masha sees that it gets you better pricing. Trading on Macha is super

easy because it pulls the liquidity for me into a single easy-to-use platform and that has even saved me multiple times from accidentally picking the wrong decks to trade on and accidentally getting a bad price. Masha also allows you to make limit orders on chain so you can set and forget your defy trades and they will go through automatically while you're away. New to Macha is an integrated fiat on ramp so you can purchase crypto directly with your, you can purchase crypto directly with your credit or debit card and have that fiat be instantly traded for any token that has liquidity. When you're making a trade, head over to macha.xyz slash bankless and connect your wallet

to start getting the best prices and most liquidity when you trade your crypto assets. If you guys are enjoying this conversation, you're watching it on the bankless YouTube. But go ahead and go and click that link that I just dropped in the comments to go to Anthony's YouTube, where he talks like of stuff of this nature, five days a week, plus a few extra bits of content every now and then on the weekends. And also writes about it every single day as well. Okay, so you talked about how you get Ethereum on your side if your token spins up an L2, right? And there's a very significant dynamic as well as why that would be good, right? What does it even mean to have Ethereum on your side?

And this goes back to the whole monolithic blockchain concepts. If you have a monolithic blockchain where the execution environment is also inside of the L1 rather than it being on a separate roll-up on an L2, what that means, and you also want to scale, what that means is you have to open up block space really, really far and wide. You need a lot of supply of block space. and the reason why consumers like this is because a large supply of block space comes along with cheap fees. And so, like, Solana, or this is also true for Polygon also,

is actually issuing an insane amount of inflation as a ratio of how much fees are being captured. And the way that that is how Solana and these other, like, scaled chains are surviving is because there is a large amount of issuance going on to the validators. Well, there's only like, you know, there's like a half a million dollars of days collected in fees. I think Solana is even as low as like $20,000 of fees collected per day. They're subsidizing the cost with issuance, essentially. Exactly. They're moving the cost from the users to the validators essentially.

Right. And we saw the same model with EOS, where EOS, like, hey, free transaction fees. Well, you actually just pay it in a much more insipitous way via inflation, right? And so, so like there's three Solana issued per block on the Solana chain. And then there's 0.02 Salana collected in transaction fees. If you have an economic monetary unit that issues like 96% issuance and 4% fee capture, that is just inflation. And the reason why it works in the short term is that there's an insane amount of speculative

fervor. Like, oh, is Solana the future? Is Solana the future? Maybe if it's the future, I'll buy the bags, right? But like, if there's that ratio, that insane amount of ratio of issuance versus fee capture, it is literally the opposite of what is ultrasound money. It's money that just leaks itself in order to sustain the actual costs of validation and security. And so this is why Solana can't be, have any sort of monetary premium is because it comes at a rate of insane amount of inflation.

And it's something like 5 to 10% per year, whereas Ether, under proof of stake, after the optimizations of the modular blockchain revolution, actually reduces by 2%, right? And so you lose all the monetary premium, and the value of the native unit that's issued to secure the blockchain, if that's higher, you actually need to issue less, which makes it even more ultrasound. If the monetary premium is lower,

you actually have to issue more, which makes it even weaker. So there's a negative feedback loop towards L1 issuance if you just expand the supply of your block. block space to really, really large. And so that's why Ethereum with small blocks makes Ether ultrasound money. And going full circle to what you said, you want to ally with Ethereum as an L2. If you, instead of Solana being an L1 or Avalanche being an L1, it can just be an L2 and not have to pay for security.

All of the security is paid by the decentralized L1. And so you actually don't have to issue so much because you, have already outsourced security to Ethereum. And so like, I mean, you technically, you're paying, but you're not paying through inflation. You're paying the transaction fees to post to layer one. Right. You're paying the minimum amount of the actual data that you actually create, right?

Rather than just having like 75% empty blocks just in case there's extra scale, you just literally pay the bare minimum. And that actually allows for better value capture because all of the economic activity that happens on Solana, which is a lot, could actually be meaningfully captured in the sole token because they don't have to issue so much because they put it on the Alto. Yeah. And an analogy that I like to use, you know, with the subsidization thing in mind is Uber. Remember when Uber first came out, the rides were like really, really cheap.

Everyone's like, oh my God, it's so much cheaper than a taxi. Like taxi industries are scam, blah, blah, blah. And do you know why those rides were cheap? Because VCs were subsidizing it. They were throwing hundreds of millions of money. billions of dollars into this company because they knew it would be big, right? And they knew that could be able to be able to cash out eventually when it IPOed. And they were subsidizing these rights.

Now you look at Uber. This is a business term called penetrative, penitri, gosh, penetrative pricing. Can you see that for a minute? Yeah, yeah. Penitriety. Yeah, God, you're mixing me up now. Penitrived. Penitif pricing.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. But yeah. And now when you look at kind of like the Uber prices for the rides, they're basically the same, if not more than it's. taxi because there's no more subsidization going on, right? So when you kind of look at, and I think what's most important for people to kind of look at is the use of the block space, because right now, not only is kind of like Salana paying, you know, an insane amount for kind of like to secure the network or to kind of like pay the validators, their blocks are empty, mostly. There's 50,000

transactions per second, right, in the blocks. But right now, they do 2,000 transactions. per second. And that's, most of those transactions are validator related. They've got nothing to do with anything except the validator stuff. And they're the only chain that does this, by the way, where they include validator kind of like voting and rounds in the transactions that are happening on the kind of like execution side. So their real TPS is probably much lower than that. I haven't looked lately, but it's much, much lower than that. So they're basically paying all this kind of like issuance for these validators to run a network that is 99% empty right now. And where, it does, if it does eventually fill up, you know, the fees are going to go up.

The fees are going to go up anyway. But then what happens is that if they want to keep the fees low, they have to increase the capacity. They have to double it or triple it or whatever. But what happens when you do that? Exactly. By making the hardware requirements even more kind of like beefy. So this is what I mean. This is something that's really technical and a lot of people don't understand.

They just see cheap fees. But the thing is is that cheap fees come at, you know, the costs are just shifted. There's no free lunch. You guys aren't getting something for free. You're paying through it for it through other means. And as you said, David, you're paying through inflation of the native token to secure. And like really lots of inflation for this sort of stuff. So yeah, I don't know.

I think people see cheap fees like in the short term. They're like, oh, yeah, this is so much better than Ethereum, blah, blah, and that's fine. But like Ethereum layer two is just going to take the kind of market share back. You can't compete with the layer two ecosystem, especially ZK roll-ups and stuff like that when they're fully rolled out. because they're going to be near free transactions. With sharding, they're basically going to be sub cent transaction fees here, which people are happy to pay. I mean, who's going to complain about a one cent transaction fee?

No one, right? And also, like, it feels good to pay a fee, even if it's, even if it's minor, even if it's trivial, it feels good to pay a fee because that means no one owns you. You paid for your freedom that way. It's not Facebook where, like, sign up is free. It's not, it's not like the classic web too. But even those, like, things are like, you know, Facebook, free, Reddit, free, Twitter. I mean, it's ads, right?

Like, and they're harvesting your data, too. You're just extracted from in a roundabout way. Exactly. And maybe some people don't care about that, but like, I certainly do. You know, and but the thing is, like, I would love to see decentralized alternatives to those pop up. But it's very hard. Like, there's a lot of network effects around something like Twitter. So there's kind of tradeoffs to be made here.

But, you know, in saying that we shouldn't make those tradeoffs for things like, like blockchains, I think. And that's why, you know, you and I, a lot of, us in the Ethereum community fight back against this sort of stuff is because this is not the design that we think should be the sediment layer for the world. It should not be the backbone of a new financial system. It should not be the thing that kind of wins. And not saying that these other chains don't have their own kind of like use cases. They don't appeal to their own users. They do. But the thing is, is that what Ethereum is building for is very different to what these other chains are building for. And I think that's fine. But I wish these other chains would be more honest about this. Because a lot of them and a

of the community say, oh, it's going to kill Ethereum. It's so stupid. Like, it's literally the dumbest thing you can say. It was going to kill Ethereum. It's not going to kill Ethereum. It's not even competing with Ethereum. Like, it's not competing with Ethereum's layer one. If anything, it's competing with the layer two ecosystem on the execution side.

We just recorded a podcast with Roon Christensen after he wrote out that tweet thread about how like a multi-chain future is a multi-sig future. Multisigs. Like, they're great for a lot of reasons, but not for inter-blockchain consensus. That's not what they're supposed to be. before. Multi-sigs is just basically like, if you put your assets on Ethereum and then you send them over to Solana via a multi-sig, well, congrats.

You've gone from like Ethereum's 10,000 nodes to a five of seven multi-sig. Like that's your new security paradigm. Shit, where's how to go with this? It's like giving up an army for a personal guard, right? Right. Like that's what you do, right? You're like, oh, no, I don't need this army. I'll just have my one personal guard and I'll be fine.

Right. And so like the narrative that like minority blockchains, blockchains with lesser adoption needs to tout is like, their game theory suggests that they start talking about how it's a multi-chain world. Like if you are a minority chain, you want like, oh, there's going to be lots of chains. We're one of them. There's going to be economic activity everywhere. And it's also going to be with us.

But then as soon as you become like the dominant activity chain, the game theory flips. It's like, well, once you're the dominant chain, The game theory is like, well, no, it's going to be a power, a lot of distribution. The dominant chain is going to, like, take the majority of everything. Like, don't bother paying attention to the minority chains. Like, we're just going to eat their lunch, right? And so, like, for all the, and this is almost, like, explicitly a part of, like, the Solana strategy. It's like, oh, maximalism's broke.

Maximism's dead. Like, they're gatekeepers. Like, you have to accept Solana because we're going to be in a multi-chain world. Well, as soon as Solana in some hypothetical universe that we're never, ever going to be experienced, if Solana actually does take the lead, you can bet your ass that all the salana people are going to be like, well,

Salana's just going to eat everything, right? It's just going to eat the whole world. There's going to be one. There already are Salata Maxis, if you want to call it that, right? People who are just like on Twitter basically, you know, shitting on every other chain, saying salana's the one,

it's going to win everything. And this is just natural as communities get bigger and as people get more entrenched in their views. You become, I mean, I think maximalism is the wrong word, but you become like, you know, a part of that thing. And like, that thing becomes your identity. You want it to win for,

various different reasons. It means a lot to you. So that's naturally going to happen with anything that gets big enough. Like that's unavoidable. Not everyone's going to be like that, but it's going to happen for the people that are closest to the metal. And I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing. I think it's actually needed. I actually put out a tweet a few months ago, I think, where I said, maximalism, why it basically implied is maximism actually needed for these kind of things to survive long term? And I think there is. I think there needs to be even just a small group of people that would, like, are basically the last line of defense. against all this kind of stuff and can basically, you know, be, I guess, more maybe forward about

this sort of stuff than other people will to fight back against this. Because it's like my kind of like army analogy there. The army that fights for a country, right, they're basically, you know, they're called nationalists in that kind of like respective. But like, unless you're, unless you kind of, I guess, you know, betray your country, you're fighting as a maximalist of that country, technically, right? Like if you're in the US army, you are a US maximalist. Right. You're like, well, my country is the best. I'm going to protect my country and I'm going to go fight for it. And obviously there are people that kind of like, you know, traders and whatever, but like I'm talking about the majority here. And it's the same for for a crypto community. If you're fighting

for something you believe in and something you want to protect, well, I don't think that's a bad thing. I think that's just the way it is. And yes, there's nuance and maybe, okay, the nation you're fighting against is actually right in the war and that you're wrong. But that doesn't change what you are. You're fighting for kind of like what you believe in, where, you know, where you were born. and from various different reasons as well. So I think that analogy plays pretty well into these sort of stuff as well. Yeah, that's also a component of a book that's like really, really big in the crypto space, which is the sovereign individual.

There's a chapter in there that talked about like when two armies would go head to head. The bigger predictor of which army was going to win versus like over the size of the actual army was like which army has more to lose, right? And so like you would have like the invading army from some far, distant land, go up against, go up against, like, the natives, the indigenous, the actual people that had the land and had everything to lose. They were fighting for their home. They were fighting for what they believed in versus these foreign invaders, right?

And the foreign invaders would be, like, better equipped, better armed, and the indigenous, native cultures would be, like, less equipped. There would be fewer of them. But they cared ten times more, right? And, like, it's crazy. One of the, I can't remember the stats, but like the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the book, they talked about how like the people that fight for something that they care about will show up with way more energy and way more just commitment to fighting the fight

more than the people that are like a bigger army that are better equipped, right? Like if you believe in it, you'll fight far more strategically with far more energy than in any other circumstance. Exactly, exactly. Sorry, I think I was about to sneeze there. It's spring here. So, hey, fever. But no, I totally agree with you.

I think, yeah, it's different. Like when you have people just being like, okay, well, you know, to your analogy, we're going to go invade this specific place and oh, well, okay, it's just another place we're invading. Who cares, right? We can be just be blasé about it. But the people that are being invaded are not going to be blasé about it. They're going to be like, holy shit, like, I'm about to lose everything.

You know, we've got to fight. And, you know, people may think to kind of like the movie 300 where like the 300 Spartans were kind of like, these Persians have like a massive army. If they come here, they're going to destroy. our way of life, we're going to be wiped out, and they kind of, like, fought, and they were better at fighting than the Persians were, because the Persians were kind of like, you know, they didn't really believe in it. They were kind of like just, like, subsumed into this thing, to this thing that was kind of like going and just killing everyone and everyone that didn't want to be killed, kind of like

became a slave, whereas, like, the, you know, the 300 were just kind of like fighting for what they believed in, fighting, like, much stronger to your analogy. So, you know, I think maybe it may sometimes be like, oh, that sounds silly. Like, blockchains aren't like that. I was like, blockchains are like that, guys. Blockchains are the modern nation states. Like, they are the modern kind of like, you know, country, the modern kind of like land. And if Ethereum sees kind of like, quote unquote invaders, like other chains being hostile,

I mean like, we're going to take over Ethereum, why would the Ethereum community sit back and be and take it? Oh, oh, you are? Oh, okay. All right. Yeah, I'll just lie down and take it. With every single L1, the way that it's constructed, impart some sort of value. You actually can't get away from that. You can't code a valueless blockchain.

That is itself values. And so when you align with a certain blockchain, you are aligning with a certain set of values. And if you do that, like, intentionally, well, then that means that you actually believe in those values and so you're willing to fight for them. And then if you start a media company, you might find yourself on a Friday night,

weekly livestream with Anthony and David. Yeah. Yeah. And, you know, the funny thing is as well, as like something else we haven't kind of like touched on. We alluded to is the monetary aspects, you know, the fact that we have like bags of ETH, right, rather than bags of some other chain.

Of course we're going to protect our investment, just like anyone would. And, you know, I think like that accumulates over time and you become more entrenched over time. But in saying that, like, it's not just all ideology, it's technology as well. I believe Ethereum's technology or it's kind of like path,

you know, to kind of like improving over time was actually inferior, then I would for sure. kind of like, you know, a pivot from the Ethereum ecosystem to something else based on the technology. But I actually don't, I just don't see that. I don't think that at all. I don't think that the other kind of like chains are solving anything that Ethereum is not kind of like working to solve just in a different way. It's just different design philosophies, different architectures and ones that I don't personally agree with or align with. For me, it's got

nothing to do with, I mean, okay, maybe subconsciously it has some stuff to do with bags. But really, at the end of the day, like, I am a tech maximus. I want to see like the best tech win and the best tech when it comes to blockchains is the Ethereum roadmap right now. It is not doing everything at layer one. Right. No. And that goes back to what I was trying to say earlier is that like this whole technology like rollups not actually in Ethereum technology like modular blockchains, not actually

in Ethereum technology. Ethereum is choosing that path. And it's best positions to go down that path as well. 100%. And when I come into the crypto space and I come in with my certain set of values, I'm looking for a certain expression of those values and I will find a blockchain that expresses those values. I think Ethereum expresses those values. As soon as it doesn't, I'm out. I'm elsewhere, right? Like, I'm aligned with the values, not with Ethereum. The only thing that I'm really kind

of aligned with Ethereum on is that it tends to express those values better than any other blockchain and committed to the same values that I have. Yeah, by far, nothing even comes close. Like, I have studied all the other chains. I have looked at all of them. I looked at their communities. nothing even comes close. Like I don't think there's any other community that I actually kind of like vibe with that I do with Ethereum for various different reasons.

Like for Pocodot, for example, they have on-chain governance and they vary governance heavy. Whereas I'm governance minimalized. I want the layer one to be governance minimalized. I don't want it to have like token voting or whatever. And Pocod's kind of architecture as well, I don't think is ideal.

Salana, I mean, I just don't vibe with that community. It's very, very different to the Ethereum. community. You know, BSC, I mean, do they even really have a community? It's more like a kind of like a Dgen town. And again, I don't align with that community either. And you go down the list and, you know, you know, the funny thing is I actually felt like I aligned a little bit with the terror community out of all of them. And then I saw Doe, not answer some, you know, anything and like, basically just say that. I was like, okay, this is, this is really shitty. Because that was just one that I kind of like really like aligned with. But yeah, it's just all comes down to that at the day.

And I've looked at other things and I just, I don't. You know, I really don't. Ethereum is it for me at this point in time. Maybe there's something else in the future. But I don't know, the longer that Ethereum survives, the more Lindy it gets, the more entrenched people become, the more people build in it, the more network affects it, kind of like, is kind of gets. And yeah, I don't know.

Maybe in 10 years, something else is, is, it overtakes Ethereum. But at this point in time, I just don't see it happening. 100%. I think, like, the last thing I want to leave the listeners with is like, when you come into the space and you see crypto, do you see all these, like, merits? that crypto is going to bring for this world. It's like self-sovereign money, peer-to-peer transfers,

all these great technologies. And like you hear me and Anthony talking about like values and like alignment and like tribes of this specific blockchain. Well, if you don't think in those terms, you're, A, ignoring a very significant part of crypto, which is the way that the code

impacts the society that comes around it. If you don't think in these terms, you're going to, you're going to allow, perhaps at worst case, allow other people to think in those terms for you, but you're also just going to accidentally align yourself with values that you forgot to consider. And so, like, this is not something that you can actually opt out of. You actually have to consider the ways that these systems impact society by their very design in nature.

And that's what I'll leave with. Yeah, no, totally. And I think people who say, you know, crypto's too tribal or, like, tribalism is going to lead to crypto losing. I really need to go and study human history and how humans came to where we are today and how nation states performed and how humans actually were able to kind of advance as societies. It's all tribalism, guys. It is in our DNA. We're never getting away from that.

There is toxic tribalism. Then there is healthy tribalism. There is definitely distinctions to be made. But you're fooling yourself if you think that tribalism is going away ever. Like unless humans kind of like remove it from our DNA and remove kind of like the things that make us tribal, it's never going. away. So you need to kind of like deal with it and operate within that reality. You can't just like simply ignore it because eventually as you said, David, you're going to be kind of like, it's going to be forced upon you anyway by by people if you don't embrace it yourself.

As Kevin O'Walky says, it's all coordination and it always has been. And like what tribes are are the first manifestation of coordination. Right. And like some tribes are trying to coordinate for bigger tribes and actually to become such a big tribe that like it's actually just the whole entire human population all at once. Tribalism doesn't mean that there's an outgroup necessarily. It means that we were actually just trying to get people all cohere to like the same, same, like literally the same protocol, the same rules for operating how you live in a life, right? And once we can get everyone like abiding by the same rules,

we can actually unlock like the next phase of humanity. Because like all, almost all of humanity, in my mind, there's two phases of history. we're in the first one and the first one is like, hey guys, can we all get on the same page? And then the second one is like, all guys, now that we're on the same page,

what do we do next? Now that we're all here, where should we go? But like humanity's still in the first phase. Like, hey guys, like we're all trying to get coherent. Can we all make one tribe rather than have all the other tribes?

And like religion turned into nation states, now turned into blockchain protocols. We're getting closer and closer to everyone being on the same rules, which is really, really bullish. Once we get everyone on the same rules on the same protocol, we can now answer the question.

We're like, all, now that we've all gathered you all here today, what should we do next? Like, that's what's happening. Yes, yes, exactly. Exactly. I agree with that. But I think, you know, we'll come up on time here, so we'll leave it at that for now. All right, guys, thank you for turning into this Friday.

Send me regular bank list, Daily Gway weekly live stream. I just put Anthony's daily Gway YouTube channel in the chat once again. So you can go ahead and subscribe to his YouTube. If you want to hear more ramps and ramblings about this, Anthony. I will see you perhaps next Friday, maybe three. You know, Morrow. Not going to get to that one now. We'll see, we'll see.

But yeah, we'll see if we do one next week. All right. Cheers, everyone. Thanks for tuning in. Cool. Thanks, everyone.