Bankless - Making America Pro-Crypto | Congressman French Hill

Episode Date: July 18, 2024

Bankless Nation, the question today is: Is the U.S. flipping pro-crypto? The United States has either been anti-crypto or neutral since the birth of Bitcoin. That’s starting to change. For the first time, we actually have momentum in D.C. There will be many battles ahead, but right now, crypto is making progress. What would a pro-crypto America look like? What laws do we need to pass to get there? Who do we still need to convince, and how close are we? ------ 📣SPOTIFY PREMIUM RSS FEED | USE CODE: SPOTIFY24  https://bankless.cc/spotify-premium  ------ BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS: 🐙 KRAKEN | MOST-TRUSTED CRYPTO EXCHANGE https://k.xyz/bankless-pod-q2    ⁠  🛞 MANTLE | MODULAR LAYER 2 NETWORK https://bankless.cc/Mantle  🦄 UNISWAP | BROWSER EXTENSION https://bankless.cc/uniswap  ⚡️ FUEL | EARN FUEL POINTS https://bankless.cc/fuel    ⚖️ ARBITRUM | SCALING ETHEREUM ⁠https://bankless.cc/Arbitrum  🗣️ TOKU | CRYPTO EMPLOYMENT SOLUTION https://bankless.cc/toku  ------ ✨ Mint the episode on Zora ✨ https://zora.co/collect/zora:0x0c294913a7596b427add7dcbd6d7bbfc7338d53f/33?referrer=0x077Fe9e96Aa9b20Bd36F1C6290f54F8717C5674E ------ TIMESTAMPS 00:00 Intro 06:01 Trump's Assasination Attempt 09:28 Thought On VP Nominee JD Vance 12:59 Why is Crypto Important to You? 16:11 Legislation 20:36 Why Didn't Democrats Pivot? 23:32 SAB-121 Status Update 29:03 The Next Generation of Products 34:22 Gensler's SEC 36:52 Election Impact on Crypto ------ RESOURCES Rep French Hill https://x.com/repfrenchhill  ------ Not financial or tax advice. See our investment disclosures here: https://www.bankless.com/disclosures⁠

Bankless Nation, the question today is the United States of America flipping pro-crypto? I certainly hope so. The U.S. has been either anti-crypto or neutral since the birth of Bitcoin. And that's starting to change. It feels like for the first time we actually have momentum in D.C. By we, I mean the crypto movement. That's not to say there's not going to be battles ahead. There will certainly be battles.

But right now, crypto is actually making some progress. The question for today is what would a question for today is what would a problem? pro-crypto America look like. And what laws do we need to get us there? Who do we need to convince? How close are we? Today we have pro-crypto Congressman French Hill who gives us his take on how to get there. We discuss a few things today. Number one, Trump's new vice president. His name is J.D. Vance. Would he be a crypto-friendly vice president? Number two, what we learned from the SAB-121 repeal, the vote that got passed in Congress, and then Biden's veto of it. Number three, the legislative roadmap for crypto in the United States. Number four, Gary Gensler and the administration

state. Number five, how to keep crypto bipartisan. Number six, the impact of a Trump presidency on crypto. I want to do our usual political disclaimer before we get in today. Bankless, as you know, is not a political podcast. We don't divide on red or blue lines. We have no party affinity in the U.S. or any other country around the world. What we do care about is the values of decentralization and autonomy and power to the people that underlie this technology of crypto. And to the extent those values are political, so are we. But they don't necessarily divide on party lines. We'll continue to give a voice to those values no matter what political party they come from. So let me just say clearly, anyone from any party is welcome on bankless. And lastly, on a personal note, I started this conversation

asking Representative Hill about the impact of the Trump assassination attempt. It was just top of mind for me. I couldn't escape it. And I can tell you in preparing for this interview, the words assassination attempt against Trump were just surreal to write. They were even surreal to ask in the conversation. I almost had to will myself to say the words. It's like my brain couldn't fully accept the gravity of what actually happened. There really was an assassination attempt against the current presidential nominee, and it was almost successful. If there was a slight change in the wind, a different turn of the head, we'd have an assassinated president killed in broad daylight and witnessed by the entire world. These are just the times we're living in.

and through them, I'm hopeful we find ways to unify on the values that made this country great. We have disputes settled by protocols instead of political violence. The Constitution itself is a nonviolent coordination technology, just like crypto. The best American values are also crypto values. And that's what today's episode reminds us of. All right, let's get right to the conversation with Representative Hill. But before we do, I want to thank the sponsors that made this episode possible, including our recommended exchange, the place to go buy and trade your crypto.

That is Cracken. Go create an account. If you want a crypto trading experience backed by world-class security and award-winning support teams, then head over to Cracken, one of the longest standing and most secure crypto platforms in the world. Cracken is on a journey to build a more accessible, inclusive and fair financial system, making it simple and secure for everyone, everywhere to trade crypto. Cracken's intuitive trading tools are designed to grow with you, empowering you to make your first or your hunt. hundredth trade in just a few clicks. And there's an award-winning client support team available 24-7 to help you along the way, along with a whole range of educational guides, articles, and videos.

With products and features like Cracken Pro and Cracken NFT Marketplace and a seamless app to bring it all together, it's really the perfect place to get your complete crypto experience. So check out the simple, secure, and powerful way for everyone to trade crypto, whether you're a complete beginner or a season pro. Go to crackin.com slash banklists to see what crypto can be. Not investment advice, crypto trading involves risk of loss. token, don't let complex legal and tax issues slow you down. Toku provide specialized support to optimize your launch and ensure that you as a founder and your team and your investors get the most tax-efficient outcomes. The Toku team understands the crypto space inside and out and will

ensure your token launch is fully compliant while maximizing tax efficiency. Toku can connect you with the best attorneys if you need them to make sure that you have the best advice and Toku can help to optimize your taxes so you pay the least possible amount of taxes while still maintaining legal compliance. With Toku's guidance, you can concentrate on building your company while Toku handles the logistics. Token launches don't have to be complicated. Talk to Toku today to get a free initial token valuation. Introducing fuel, the purpose-built operating system for Ethereum roll-ups.

Fuel is revolutionizing the Ethereum ecosystem with features like paralyzed and state-minimimized execution, cross-chain interoperability, and native account abstraction. Plus, it supports wallets of all networks ensuring you can use fuel no matter where you store your crypto. But that's not all you can join the Fuel Points program today to earn points, unlock for rewards and qualify for future incentives as fuel margins towards main net. Fuel points are off-chain points earned by completing on-chain actions that positively contribute to the growth of the network and holding fuel points can automatically qualify you for future network rewards. So don't

miss out on the fuel opportunity. Click the link in the description below to get started. Fuel points are here. Go get it. Bankless Nation, Representative French Hill is a Republican congressman. He's representing Arkansas's second district. And I think of particular interest to crypto listeners, Representative Hill is the vice chairman of the influential House Financial Services Committee, and he leads the subcommittee on digital assets. So that's us in crypto and financial technology. He's also had a history in banking in finance, something that we affectionately in crypto call Tradfai, and he's previously served in the U.S. Treasury. Representative Hill, welcome to Bankless. It's great to be with you. Thanks for the invitation.

We're excited to talk to you. And these are very interesting times. May you live in interesting times as the saying goes. I actually think we need to start here, though, because this is on everyone's mind as we're entering this episode. I definitely want to talk crypto and legislation. Let that be the bulk of the episode. But there was a recent assassination attempt against President Trump during an election event on Saturday. So this is political violence in America. I can speak for myself. I was an absolute shock as this happened. I feel like many Americans were as well concerned at the fallout from this. Before we talk about crypto, just as you zoom out, what are the implications of Saturday's assassination attempt, just like for the future of this country? Like, what do you see on the horizon?

Well, unfortunately, through our 248 years of existence as a country, our country's been no stranger to violence and been no stranger to violent attacks on our political candidates and presidents. I mean, sometimes it seemed like it was a routine experience from Lincoln to Garfield to McKinley in the last quarter of a century in the 19th century to, of course, my youth where Jack Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and Robert F. Kennedy were all murdered in an assassination attempt. So I think it's part of our culture. We've got to recognize that. I feel horrified for the people at the event, the firefighter from Buffalo who was killed protecting his family, others that were injured. And as somebody who's been around presidential politics,

literally since the late 1970s and having done presidential advance for events before, I also as a member of Congress was shocked and appalled by the lack of preparation by the the campaign advance team and the Secret Service for leaving those vulnerable cutaway shot windows open. This is just a violation of what I call Advance 101 for a political event or any event, for that matter, if there's a security risk, which is that you don't leave an open line of sight to the stage for a political event from any direction. And so there'll be a major investigation. Speaker Mike Johnson has announced that. But look, let's all turn to each other, to our neighbors, to our friends, and really work to dial down the demonization of the people who don't agree with us on every

topic. I mean, by golly, I mean, we agree with on 90% of stuff. And there's just no reason to demonize people because they're in a different political party. I mean, it really, this is a new thing to me. I mean, I'm 67 years old, so I've been around the block. And I didn't pick who I went canoeing with or backpacking with or mountain climbing or playing golf on a Saturday morning with who, what their political party was. I didn't even know what political party they were or what religion they were. And this kind of obsession with this in the last 10 or 15 years,

has gotten really tiresome, and it lends itself to environments like we witnessed over the weekend. Yeah, well said, particularly on the point about unity. I guess political violence has been in the past in America. It is new for kind of a new generation who hasn't experienced it, but it's certainly not new for America. And speaking of new generations, so Trump's VP nominee was announced yesterday, a gentleman by the name of J.D. Vance. Curious, what do you think of this candidate? So he's on the millennial side, you know, like skewing towards maybe crypto interested. I think he's like 39 years old. If elected, would Vance be a crypto-friendly vice president? I think the short answer to that is yes. He has asked a lot of questions in recent weeks in the Senate about the prospects for crypto-related bills.

He's been drafting one of his own. And we've tried to provide everyone in the Senate a full look at what we've done for the past four years on this topic, both in stable coins and in creating a market structure bill, a regulatory framework bill, for digital assets. And I suddenly see some interest in the Senate, Senator Vance is one of those people, but Senator Haggerty of Tennessee. Obviously, Senators Loomis and Gillibrand have been leaders for several years. And then just last week, Debbie Stabenow of Michigan and John Bozeman of Arkansas, my senior senator in my home state, had an Ag Committee hearing with Chairman Benham from the CFTC, the Commodity Future Trading Commission, on the spot market for Bitcoin. And also just, and I think Chairman Benham did a great job outlining.

his general support for regulatory framework. So we're making progress over there. I think Vance would be a pro, lean pro-crypto participant if he's elected vice president. As you know, he's a Yale graduate. He's a former venture capital in Silicon Valley, venture capitalist from Silicon Valley. And President Trump has made some positive comments about our market. structure and crypto innovation. So I think that would be good. And we've made, for those of you listening, who are big Biden supporters or Democratic administration supporters, we've really worked hard the last

three years, three and a half years, building a consensus in the Biden administration that a stable coin regime and a market structure bill like Fit 21 that I wrote with G.T. Thompson and my colleagues is exactly the approach that we need to take to move innovation, venture capital, blockchain usage forward in our country. Yeah, that's fantastic. And as we move into kind of the legislation, I want to ask a higher level question of you, Representative Hill. So you get an A on a website that we often refer to. It's called the Stand With Crypto website for your track record on crypto. It's because you've co-sponsored the SAB-21 repeal bill, also co-sponsored Fit21, also co-sponsored the Uniform Treatment of Custodial Assets Act, also co-sponsored the anti-CBC

bill. So you've got the receipts. You were in crypto and doing things here with respect to legislation before it was cool. And I'm glad other members of Congress have joined you recently. I want to ask you, though, at the highest level, why is crypto important to you? Why do you support it? Well, for my whole career, I've always had a interest in financial services. Obviously, I started my financial services career back in 1979. I was a bond trader and a bank analyst early in my career. But I've also been on the operation side of banking and finance. And that's where my interest was piqued.

I'm a huge believer in a blockchain operating system that it resolves so many of the concerns that I've always had in my career. What are those? How do you have a more efficient system? How do you reduce errors? How do you have less fraud and less confusion? How do you compress agency costs in the distribution of a product, thereby offering consumers, business to business or business to consumer? products that can cost left and have more accuracy. And I believe that many of those challenges are solved in the use of a blockchain operating system. Another thing that I've been engaged in,

when I was in venture capital, private equity and then owning my own financial services company, we were very involved in private placements of private securities for, you know, our own portfolio or for other clients, and those over-the-counter markets. One of the broadest, I guess, in the history of the country until Bloomberg came around in a way, was the municipal bond market, small public finance issues around the country. But like the remittance business that you referenced a minute ago, large, over-the-counter, thinly traded securities also have a high bid in spread and high agency costs, like in 144A debt securities or in some municipal finance,

although that's narrowed. You get my point. So I've always been curious about putting stock ledgers and bond ledgers out on a blockchain and then also facilitating a secondary market through a blockchain. And I think, and look, there are many people do this is not, we're not, you and I are not talking about revolution now. People are doing what I'm describing now because it's an obvious place inside the financial services industry where people want to deliver better service, more effective, less fraud, more accurately timed with a tokenized payment and do it at lower cost. And that's why I think as blockchain methodology improves, you'll see that expand. The metaphor of a blockchain is a financial operating system. I think it's more than the metaphor, too.

It's like a reality. I hope that gets more widely distributed in terms. terms of the U.S. government's knowledge on this subject. But we stand with you in our hopes for this space and kind of our vision for this space as well. I think it could be a revolution in the way the U.S. does finance and bring benefit to an extraordinary number of Americans. Let's talk about how we get it done. So let's talk about legislation. And I want to go through some recent legislation, some victories, some almost victories, some defeats. Let's talk about the SAB-121 repeal. Okay, and I'm naming legislation here. I think bankless listeners will be familiar with it.

We did an episode with Patrick McHenry, you know, the week that Fit 21 was going out, and, you know, Sab 121 was just on the back of that vote. But let's talk about Sab 121. So bankless listeners will remember this is a pro-crypto bill that cleared up, that would clear up an accounting loophole that the SEC was using to prohibit essentially U.S. banks from holding crypto. And it passed the house. And it even passed the Senate.

This was the surprise. It passed the Senate with bipartisan support. So you had Democratic senators. Even Chuck Schumer in the Senate voting yes to the SAB-121 repeal. So SAB-121 made it all the way to Biden's desk. This is kind of the first major pro-crypto legislation, pretty simple legislation for his signature. And he turned it back.

He vetoed it. So it was vetoed, dead in the water. last week it went back in front of Congress again. But this time, of course, to override a veto, we need a two-thirds vote in Congress. It couldn't make that two-thirds threshold. I'm just curious from this whole experience. What did we learn? What can we learn from SAB 121? What are the takeaways? What did you learn? Well, number one, I learned that the SEC, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff, and perhaps some of its commissioners, don't know what they're doing and don't understand. understand custody. Number two, I learned that this could have been crafted in a much more effective,

narrow way and maybe met the standard that the SEC was looking for, but not sweeping up all these other participants. Number three, I learned that the SEC once again demonstrated to me they don't coordinate their activities with other major financial services players in Washington. candidate Yellen, Treasury Secretary, and Jay Powell, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, both have testified before our committee. They were not consulted on staff accounting bulletin 121, changing custody rules. Now, this is ridiculous because custody is really a bank supervisory thing. It's not an SEC thing. SEC issuers, markets, investors, brokers, right? 33 Act, 34 Act. and brokers use custodians. And so to impose their staff accounting bulleted on here without coordinating it, I think gave the SEC, perhaps a black eye in the interagency process. And then finally, I found that, look, common sense prevails. Wait, what? What common sense prevails and is bipartisan? That this was not coordinated, not effective, not the right approach. We had 21 House Democrats vote with us.

on our Congressional Review Act, led ably by Mike Flood of Nebraska, my good friend and colleague from Nebraska, entrepreneur, businessman from Lincoln, Nebraska, before he was in the state legislature and now in Congress. Mike led that effort. And then as you point out, we got 12 Democrats voting with us in the Senate, including the majority leader Chuck Schumer. So, it's bipartisan. We have a better way to go about it. And in Fit 21, with which members could then vote on the very next week, we correct all this custodial confusion. So those are some of my takeaways. I wish President Biden, I mean, it would have been okay if he'd, I mean, he has his right to veto it.

But in the veto message, he could have said, and I have directed the SEC to work with bank regulatory agencies and do this in a different way. Or I've asked him to pull it back and start over. You know, I don't know. But they didn't do any of that. I think it was a black eye to the administration on crypto once again by, I think, a mistaken judgment by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Do you have any speculation as why this was vetoed?

So as you said, yeah, common sense prevailed in Congress, but it didn't seem to prevail in the White House. There were multiple ways to handle it. As you said, you could veto it and you could say, Gensler, SEC, go take care of this in the background. It doesn't even need an act of Congress to resolve this. So go fix it. They chose not to. And this is at a time where I can tell you the crypto community was hoping that crypto would be bipartisan, was hoping that the Democrats in particular, the White House would sort of pivot over to the crypto side of things. And it seemed like this was an intentional choice not to.

Do you understand why? Yeah. I don't know that, but don't forget. They have pivoted. They've been very constructive on working with us on stable coins. And then on Fit 21, it is very important for the whole ecosystem to know that thanks to the leadership of Janet Yellen and others in the administration, the president did not threaten to veto Fit 21. They had a statement of administrative policy that's called a SAP, an SAP, and it said, hey, there's some things in that we would like to change. But we are not issuing a veto threat, and we'd like to work constructively in a bipartisan basis towards a regulatory framework. I mean, that is huge. That's huge. And as a result, we got 71 Democrats.

I think we could have possibly gotten more who joined all the Republicans in passing Fit 21, which is our market structure, regulatory framework bill across the House floor, 279 votes. Yes. And we had about maybe 10 or 15 people not vote. voting that day in the House. So that's not a bad, bad vote. So I think the administration is working constructively with us. I think they should not have vetoed the Congressional Review Act. They should have just said, you know, we're going to direct the SEC to withdraw it. They didn't. So we had a veto override message. We didn't hit the two-thirds. But I really do want to be on record. They are working constructively on a regulatory framework and solutions here. They keep being put in a bad

position, principally, frequently by the chairman of the SEC, Gary Gensler, who keeps going into court and losing. He's been told by federal judges that his rulings are arbitrary and capricious. I don't know any lawyer before any bar in America who wants to have on their resume that a federal judge says that what you wrote is arbitrary and capricious. Hester Purse. Please read what Hester writes. Hester is a Republican commissioner on the SEC. She has a marvelous writing style, and she's a very effective economic policy thinker. So she is a great voice inside the commission for common sense. Representative Hill, we never miss a Hester Purse dissent. She's fantastic.

I think she'd do a fantastic role in that job of chairman of the SEC. herself. Let's go back and tie the loop on Fit 21. So this is for bankless listeners that know about this. This is a major pro-crypto bill that clarifies basically which crypto assets are securities and which are commodities, you know, some clarity to the industry. So we don't have this power vacuum and a power grab by rogue regulators at the SEC or some other administration. So the passage you were talking about was a passage by the House. And it was another historic vote. It was bipartisan. So 71 Democrats in the House joined 208 Republicans to pass this. I'm kind of confused, though, as to what the process is now. So pass the House and now it's in the Senate. So kind of like,

now what? We were sort of hoping, I think a lot of people on the back of Sab 121 thought, okay, now the Senate votes and then Biden has a chance to veto or let it pass. But it seems like it's stuck in the Senate? Like, can you just give us some insight into the procedure? What has to happen there? Does a senator have to kind of pick it up? Do they have to recraft it? Like, how close are we from this getting to the president's desk? Super questions. And this is where everybody in the venture ecosystem in and around blockchain and crypto can be helpful. That is a strong, definitive bipartisan vote. And you combine it with the staff accounting bulletin.

That's why I'm glad you started there. Both those send a market signal that the House has done their homework, they've done their education, they've reached consensus, and they've moved a product forward. And I would say the same is true on stable coins, but we have not taken that across the House floor for a vote. But I do, I want to be clear that I think we've also found that consensus around payment stable coins as well. All right. The Senate has the following choices.

They can introduce their own bill. And as you know, Senators Loomis and Gillibrand have had legislation pending. Senators Stabino and Bozeman had their hearing on the commodity aspects of this last week. So they can introduce their own. legislation. And both Stabenol has been working on a bill. Loomis and Jillebrand have some legislation draft. Senator Vance, the new Republican vice presidential candidate, was in the process of looking at a crypto bill in the last few weeks. Secondly, a senator could introduce Fit 21. The House passed version. No one has done that, but certainly people from the venture community,

could encourage it. And any combination of those, they also could add a stable coin bill, you know, into the mix as well, which was really the Loomis-Gillabrand approach. So, yeah, we're called a little flat-footed now because we've done our work. We have only a few weeks left in this Congress. and the Senate just doesn't have very many legislative days left, you know. But we're going to work our tails off to find a bicameral, meaning House and Senate approval of something in this realm before the end of this Congress,

which ends at December 31 of this year, including a big lame duck session after the presidential election. We'll be pushing all during September last. last two weeks in July and all of September. But time is short. If for any reason we fail on stable coins, fit 21, or rectifying the staff accounting bulletin, these will be the top issues when we go into the new Congress in the new year. And I will be right there pushing and leading as soon as that Congress turns over. But I want to be clear on a podcast, I'm not giving up on this yet. We can't give up. As John Boehner once famously said, the former Speaker of the House, Congress moves

very slowly until it doesn't. So the fact that Sherrod Brown has indicated he might be interested in this topic, Chuck Schumer has said he's interested in this topic. Debbie Stabinall has had a hearing. You get the movement, but it may be too little too late for this Congress, but we're going to push hard and we need all of our friends who think Fit 20 Fun is a good market structure first step. We need we need that help over in the Senate. It does seem like the winds have certainly changed. We've got some momentum, whether it happens in this Congress or the next Congress. It's only a matter of time now. I want to ask you about other critical areas that are still unaddressed from a legislation perspective. So we mentioned

that the fit 21 clarity between the SEC, what are commodities, what are securities, that sort of thing. You've also mentioned stable coins. I know we're making progress there. That's seems to be like a chunk of legislation that we can do almost like a first generation i'm kind of glad you call these these products because that's sort of things is you know products these these bills are products for the american people of let's hope so what's the next generation of products after this it feels like we're still missing some clarity with respect to defy the regulators want to treat all decentralized finances if there's like intermediaries in between so it feels like we need something there privacy has been uh an issue

as well? I mean, do Americans have the ability to transfer something on a public blockchain in encrypted fashion or not? There are some other things that we really need to tie off as well. What's kind of after in the next generation of legislation you feel like we need to put forward? So smart that you phrased it like that. These are the initial steps. First of all, nationwide privacy law, I think is very important. We've passed that out of our committee. It is something that's percolating on both sides of the Capitol. This would be, be preemptive of state laws, create a national privacy standard, have some rights to data ownership, which I think is very, very important. You don't really have a digital future if you

don't have your own your own data. I would mandate the use of APIs. There's not consensus for that, but these are the kinds of things that are in these building blocks. Stable coins and the regulatory framework, you don't go to the next steps in blockchain development if you don't do the basic fundamentals. And that's what I think these bills are. They are the fundamental building blocks of a digital blockchain related future. What's next? We have in the Fit21 bill calling for a study on decentralized finance, how it would work, what are the pitfalls, what are issues, how does federal policy have to change to facilitate it, what are issues around it. And so we've already done one hearing on decentralized finance and we'll be doing some more on that.

on NFTs and sort of non-securities, non-commodity tokenized owned assets, the bill's silent on that. So I can see some future hearings on that as well. It connects right back to data ownership, right back to privacy, right back to the use of a blockchain. and the third category, I would say, would be just expanding blockchain generally in an analog context. So that would be like tokenizing an existing security, tokenizing another asset class like art. We started off the top of the show talking a little bit about, you know, illiquid. securities or thinly traded situations. That's really true out in a number of asset categories that could be made much more transparent

and effective on a blockchain from an auction point of view, documentation point of view, payment. So we're going to look at that. And there's a lot of experimentation with that in the markets right now. People aren't talking about it, but I can assure you, wherever there is a high agency call situation with lots of stops in the people process chart. People want to disrupt that through the use of a blockchain operating system. I find that exciting. I think everybody benefits. Compliance officers benefit, consumers benefit, businesses benefit. So you'll see us continue this development beyond these foundational. That's great to hear. And at some level, just like the

internet, part of Congress's job is to know when to act and to know when to just let innovation flourish and let the experiments take hold. I want to ask you another question. This is somewhat of a nuanced question, but it's something that's been on our minds in crypto recently, which is, you know, over the past couple of years, we've had kind of like an operation choke point

against crypto banks working with projects. We've had overreach by regulators like Gary Gensler. Overall, it's been sort of an administrative state type of attack, I would say, on crypto that just like hasn't felt very good. It hasn't felt welcome for crypto entrepreneurs in the United States. We recently had a Supreme Court decision overturning Chevron deference, which is very interesting. So we've done entire episodes on this, but the short version of it is, this is a rein in a check on the power of the regulatory administrative state and the regulators

kind of imposing their will. But this power essentially gets transferred back to Congress. And it's now on Congress to make sure they put the proper legislation in place to kind of fill in the gaps where necessary. And I guess my question, I'm kind of like, I would love to ask this of everyone who works on behalf of the American people in Congress, but since you're the representative in front of us today is, is Congress equipped to do this well? And are you going to make, how can you make sure you do this well? And how can you avoid a failure mode of other regulators kind of like working, or even lobbyists outside sort of working with Congress and crafting bills in their favor? Just how's your overall assessment of how Congress can put together legislation

for something that is new and innovative like crypto? Because now this is really what, like in the wake of Chevron deference being overturned, this is really what we need Congress to do. Well, you've got a live action observation of this in place right now watching the last three and a half years of Chairman Gensler's SEC. He's creating. rules by enforcement. He's telling people, just come in and register the 40 Act and the 33 act and the 34 Act. They're all welcoming to you. Please, come forward. Meet with my world-class team. We'll take good care of you. It's, of course, nonsense. And then he's interpreted the Howie Test, which is a famous 1940s securities case that outlines what are the, I'd say, distinguishing

characteristics of something that is a investment contractor, is clearly an investment. We've legislated that in Fit 21 and a whole process around it. In fact, giving authority to the commission to play a major role. That's how Chevron should work. You don't just get to make up the rules and assume that they have the full faith and credit and responsibility and authority of Congress without a congressional direction. And so in Congress, Fit21 is precisely what we want to see Congress do, which is take a troubled area where the agency tends to want to write its own rules that are not in keeping with the core statute of the SEC,

and we are going to direct them in the right direction. That's what Congress should be doing. we've allowed the administrative state under both Democrats and Republicans to creep up into every oozing crack and hole in the roof of the American economic system for five decades. With periodics of victory, the Carter deregulations in the 70s, the Reagan deregulations in the 80s, although the Chevron case itself is a 1984 case, the famous justice of the Supreme Court, Scalia, Anton Scalia, said it was the worst decision he'd been a part of and spent the rest of his life regretting it. So we need to go to work in Congress in each of our areas of jurisdiction and reassert congressional direction and control.

It will not be easy to do, but it's absolutely doable. And I actually think what we're doing right now with the Commission and with the CFTC around crypto and digital assets is a prime exam. A good working example of it. Representative Hill, thank you so much for your time today. And thank you for your work in Congress on behalf of the American people and representing crypto. I have a final question for you as we close this out. So, 2024, crypto's actually seems like it's become an election issue.

We've got President Trump coming out and saying he's going to be the crypto president. He's actually going to a Bitcoin conference later this month. And I'm sure the security on that will be extra tight. Also, we talked about J.D. Vance, the vice president nominee who's being crypto-friendly. We haven't yet seen crypto come up in a debate, but perhaps it will. Let's forecast to the elections. What's the impact of the elections going to be on crypto? And America's position, the U.S. government's position on crypto. Of course, we don't know what the outcome is going to be. Congress could swing in one direction or another. The White House could swing in one direction or another. But with some of these

eventualities, what do you kind of predict about the impact of the elections for crypto-related issues? Well, first of all, we've spent four or five years educating members of Congress, the staffs in Congress, policymakers around Washington, D.C., on the importance of blockchain, how crypto or tokenized payments can work, and the benefits to the economy. Pro-innovation, pro-economic growth, pro capital coming to back to America, pro bringing innovation here, letting us set the standard on what a good payment stable coin is backed by the U.S. dollar. Let us set the standard on what a regulatory framework looks like, not Dubai. Come on. That's my Joe Biden invitation. Come on, man. You know, this is ridiculous. We should be leading here. And I think we've gotten that message

through to both Democrats and Republicans, so I'm optimistic, no matter who wins the presidency or how the House and Senate work out. I think crypto will move forward because of the education that we've delivered in Congress and that the whole ecosystem across the nation has helped deliver by describing the benefits, the use cases for an operational blockchain to benefit consumers and business, benefit compliance officers, benefit anti-fraud folks, any money laundering people. So I think we've really done a good job. I'm optimistic about that.

I think President Trump, this would be one of the first bills we could get to his desk. If he's elected president to sign into law, if we don't finish our work this year. And I definitely think that a Trump-vance presidency would lean more favorably towards the work we're doing. But clearly, in the Biden administration, we've talked about it now for a few minutes, they're not fully on the same page, even if they set up the work and have been constructive on the framework, on stable coins. It's not been done with a lot of coordination or enthusiasm from all aspects of the administration. So let's keep the faith. Let's know that good days are ahead, and that this is a real bright spot.

And let's make sure we think about blockchain like we thought about the Internet, in the 90s. Let's let it flourish. And we can regulate and tax people with what they do on it, not block them from try. And that's why I'm so convinced we're in the right direction. Well said, as a child of the 90s, I say we should bring back the 90s with respect to America's posture on the internet to crypto and lead the world once again. So Representative Hill, thank you so much for being with us. I will say to bankless listeners, of course, you should get involved politically. All right. And if you want to get involved and want to see where various political candidates stand on crypto, you can go to the Stand with Crypto website will include a link

in the show notes. I will end with this. Of course, none of this has been financial advice, not even political advice. Crypto is risky. You could lose what you put in. But this is the frontier. It's not for everyone. We're glad you're with us on the bankless journey. Thanks a lot. New projects are coming online to the Mantle layer two every single week. Why is this happening? Maybe it's because Mantle has been on the frontier of Layer 2 design architecture since it first started building Mantle DA, powered by technology from EigenDA. Maybe it's because users are coming onto the mantle layer 2 to capture some of the highest yields available in Defy. And to automatically receive the points and tokens being accrued by the $3 billion dollar mantle treasury in the Mantle reward station. Maybe it's because the Mantle team is one of the most helpful teams to build with, giving you grants, liquidity support, and venture partners to help bootstrap your mantle application.

Maybe it's all of these reasons all put together. So if you're a dev and you want to build on one of the best foundations in crypto or you're a user looking to claim some ownership on Mantle's Defy apps, click the link in the show notes to getting started with Mantle. The Uniswap extension is here. The self-custody wallet created by the most trusted team in Defi Uniswap Labs, designed to make swapping feel effortless. This extension lives in your browser's sidebar,

letting you swap, sign transactions, and send or receive crypto without ever losing your place on the internet. Plus, with human-readable transactions, and messages, you'll always know exactly what you're signing. Navigate a multi-chain world effortlessly with support for 11 chains like Ethereum mainnet, base, arbitrum, and optimism. No more chain switching or token importing. All your assets are right where you need them to be. The Uniswap extension is designed to level up your swapping experience with other Uniswap labs products as well. Easily on board to the extension using the Uniswop mobile wallet to begin

managing your assets across platforms and take advantage of smooth, seamless synergies with the Uniswap web app. So go and download the Uniswap extension today by clicking the link in the show. notes. Just another way Unoswap is helping you swap smarter. Arbitrum is the leading Ethereum scaling solution that is home to hundreds of decentralized applications. Arbitrum's technology allows you to interact with Ethereum at scale with low fees and faster transactions. Arbitrum has the leading DeFi ecosystem, strong infrastructure options, flourishing NFTs, and is quickly becoming the Web3 gaming hub. Explore the ecosystem at portal.arbitrum.io. Are you looking to permissionlessly launch your own Arbitrum orbit chain? Arbitrum orbit allows anyone to utilize

Arbitrum's secure scaling technology to build your own orbit chain, giving you access to interoperable, customizable permissions with dedicated throughput. Whether you are a developer, an enterprise, or a user, Arbitrum orbit lets you take your project to new heights. All of these technologies leverage the security and decentralization of Ethereum. Experience Web3 development the way it was always meant to be. Secure, fast, cheap, and friction-free. Visit Arbitrum.io and get your journey started in one of the largest Ethereum communities.