Bankless - ROLLUP: Silvergate Liquidate?! | Elizabeth Warren vs. Binance | Bankless 2.0 Announcement | SEC Taking Ls?
Episode Date: March 10, 2023Bankless Weekly Rollup 3rd Week of March 2023 ------ 📣 RhinoFi | Makes DeFi Frictionless https://bankless.cc/rhino ------ 🚀 JOIN BANKLESS PREMIUM: https://www.bankless.com/dashboard --...---- BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS: 🐙KRAKEN | MOST-TRUSTED CRYPTO EXCHANGE https://bankless.cc/kraken 🦊METAMASK LEARN | HELPFUL WEB3 RESOURCE https://bankless.cc/MetaMask ⚖️ ARBITRUM | SCALING ETHEREUM https://bankless.cc/Arbitrum 🚁 EARNIFI | CLAIM YOUR UNCLAIMED AIRDROPS https://bankless.cc/earnifi 👻 PHANTOM | CROSS-CHAIN WALLET https://bankless.cc/phantom ------ Topics Covered 0:00 Intro 3:23 Markets 8:04 Total Crypto Market Cap 8:50 Fed https://www.reuters.com/markets/rates-bonds/feds-powell-previews-tougher-rate-hike-path-starting-soon-2023-03-08/ 10:00 Warren vs. Powell Address https://youtu.be/8Kz4pm5l4Og?t=126 14:35 Records of the U.S. https://twitter.com/kobeissiletter/status/1632408557101432833 15:50 Stablecoin Check-In https://www.coingecko.com/en/categories/stablecoins 19:32 Silvergate https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/03/08/crypto-bank-silvergate-announces-voluntary-liquidation/ 26:49 Warren https://twitter.com/SenWarren/status/1633611272372486144 30:21 Binance https://twitter.com/MikeBurgersburg/status/1631489833838297088 https://archive.ph/w7QNe 36:20 Voyager https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-snubbed-as-voyager-wins-court-approval-for-sale-to-binance-us 37:43 Grayscale v. SEC https://twitter.com/jeffjohnroberts/status/1633130559353372672 https://www.reuters.com/legal/court-set-hear-arguments-grayscales-lawsuit-against-sec-over-bitcoin-fund-2023-03-07/ 42:57 Bankless 2.0 https://www.bankless.com/dashboard 47:12 Bankless ETH Denver Interview series https://twitter.com/BanklessHQ/status/1633559479588454401 49:33 Coinbase https://twitter.com/coinbase/status/1633473042000101378 51:35 One River https://www.coinbase.com/blog/coinbase-has-acquired-one-river-digital-asset-management 52:20 Commercial https://twitter.com/coinbase/status/1633222932255358976 54:25 Tornado Cash Contributors' Proof of Innocence https://twitter.com/ameensol/status/1629942658008514560 https://www.privacypools.com/ 57:25 Uniswap Wallet https://twitter.com/uniswap/status/1631691330031169537 58:21 Rocket Pool https://medium.com/rocket-pool/rocket-pool-atlas-upgrade-7c69e39a3d5f 1:00:00 rETH Collateral on EulerFinance https://twitter.com/MacroMate8/status/1633490076511666176 1:00:50 Arbitrum Token https://twitter.com/PolymarketHQ/status/1632815834858164225 1:02:10 Cosmos Interchain Security https://blockworks.co/news/cosmos-greenlights-interchain-security 1:05:58 Sovereign Rollup on Bitcoin https://twitter.com/RollkitDev/status/1632438374513676288 https://twitter.com/ercwl/status/1632460687069913088?s=20 1:09:55 Yuga Labs $16.5M Bitcoin NFT Auction https://twitter.com/yugalabs/status/1632878847778512898 1:11:31 Casey’s Take https://twitter.com/rodarmor/status/1632573965897170948 1:13:05 Ordinals Not dead! https://twitter.com/zackvoell/status/1633879858915704846?s=20 1:13:59 Amazon NFT Marketplace https://blockworks.co/news/amazon-nfts-real-world-assets-token 1:15:13 Multicoin Capital’s Hedge Fund Lost 91.4% in 2022 https://www.coindesk.com/business/2023/03/04/multicoin-capitals-hedge-fund-lost-914-last-year-investor-letter-reveals 1:17:58 Emojis https://therug.mirror.xyz/TZVv0Y5TG74q3ARKa8DcTSiGgAyeKAOIlndW4MHya1M 1:19:37 Cooper Turley new Music NFT podcast https://twitter.com/invinmusic/status/1633543529493577728 1:20:02 Scroll $1.8B Valuation https://www.theblock.co/post/217340/ethereum-scaling-scroll-50-million-funding-round-1-8-billion-valuation 1:21:10 Jobs https://pallet.xyz/list/bankless/jobs 1:23:48 Questions from the Nation 1:30:25 Takes https://twitter.com/mdudas/status/1633571193344126979 https://twitter.com/pmarca/status/1633738311922782209 https://twitter.com/joonian/status/1632899301230669824 1:34:00 What David’s Bullish On https://twitter.com/TrustlessState/status/1632479927093035009 1:35:30 What Ryan’s Bullish On 1:39:12 MEME of the Week https://twitter.com/BanklessHQ/status/1632066015428497418 1:39:53 Risks & Disclaimers 1:40:07 Moment of Zen https://imgur.com/6H07xT1 ---- Not financial or tax advice. This channel is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. This video is not tax advice. Talk to your accountant. Do your own research. Disclosure. From time-to-time I may add links in this newsletter to products I use. I may receive commission if you make a purchase through one of these links. Additionally, the Bankless writers hold crypto assets. See our investment disclosures here: https://www.bankless.com/disclosures
Transcript
Discussion (0)
We got something called Bankless 2.0 that's just dropping at 12 p.m. today, Eastern on March the 10th,
20203, a whole new website, a whole new experience for members. A whole new bankless. A whole new bankless.
A whole new era. My God, it's a whole new everything, whole new media company. What else, David?
The bull market starts today. Bankless Nation, it is the second Friday of March. David, what time is it?
Ryan, it's the Bankless Friday weekly roll up where we cover the entire weekly news in crypto, which is
There's always an ambitious endeavor, especially in this economy, yet we persevere nonetheless
because we've got coffee with us.
We have coffee.
We've got news.
We've got crypto.
What more could you ask for this morning?
We've got some topics of the week, too.
The Silvergate liquidation event.
We've got to cover that.
This is Crypto's Tradfied Bank.
Did the politicians cause a bank run here?
We're going to get into that story.
What else we got, David?
Elizabeth Warren versus Binance also on the table.
Liz Warren on a rampage.
It's not Gary Gensler this week.
It's Elizabeth Warren.
And then after that, the SEC
taking an L.
So as Elizabeth Warren comes into
the main character, Gary Gensler,
taking a back seat.
Maybe two L's.
Is it too good to be true?
We'll talk about all of that and more.
And perhaps the biggest news of the week,
Ryan, which I know you're excited about.
Tell me about it.
Tell me what's the biggest news of the week this week.
We got something called Bankless 2.0
that's just dropping at 12 p.m. today, Eastern. All right, so listen to this on a Friday morning,
maybe later. If it's later, this thing has dropped already, 12 p.m. Eastern on March the 10th,
2023, a whole new website, a whole new experience for members. A whole new bankless. A whole new
era. My God, it's a whole new everything, whole new media company. What else, David? The bull market
starts today. We're calling it. The drop of bankless 2.0. Guys, we're
super excited about this because we've been working on this for a while. This is a new experience
for our free members and then for those of you who are bankless citizens to upgrade. So go check it out.
Bankless.com. We'll talk about it a little bit more in the episode. David, before we get in here,
got to talk about our friends at Rhinofi. Tell us about the Rhino, David.
Rhino, it is the one-stop DeFi app to do all of your layer two things. So if you don't want
to do any more bridging, if you don't want to do any more network switching, if you don't want to
deal with native gas tokens, but you still like doing defy things like trading, swapping, investing,
pooling, and generally earning yield wherever yield is available in Defi. Rino is available for you.
It gathers all of the best multi-chain opportunities and puts it all into one specific,
beautiful interface unless you do your defy stuff in a bankless way on layer two's without all
the layer two complexity. There is a link in the show notes to get started. You can go to app.riano.f.f.i
to check it out. That's the key in a bankless way. So don't have to depend on the block fys or the
Celsius. This is all bankless technology. This is all defy chains. All the chaniness. We want to support
this without all of the surface area for, you know, having to deal with what chain you're on.
All the chainingness. All the chaniness, zero of the Michinskyness. We got to work on this.
All right, markets. What are the markets this week? Bitcoin. Bitcoin down. It's a, it's a
sad week and we're going to talk about Y's shortly.
Started the week at $23,500,
down 8.7%
oof, down to $21,500.
Did the Fed do this? Is this one?
The Fed did this one.
The Fed did this.
I'm not some sort of market guru,
but my sentiments were like, bully, bully, bully,
and then the Fed came and it was like, no, no bully.
You can't have that.
Not this week.
Not yet, not yet.
You're telling me Powell doesn't care that
Yeth Denver was going on and he was just
strike us down anyway.
He's not coming off.
the high of Heath Denver and he's just like pushing down crypto prices. Can you do that to us?
We were just having way too much fun out there. He's like, that is an illegal amount of fun.
So I'm going to raise rates. That's what happened. How about Eith Price? We got to affect
the year. Eiff Price, also sad. Started the week at 1650, down 7.3% to where we are now at 1525.
Well, you know what? We had, what did we have? Three, four good weeks in a row?
It was a pretty good, we had a good attempt. It was fun while we lasted.
we're back down to Goblin Town.
Down we go.
This isn't Goblin Town.
I'm just saying we're going now.
Well, like, what is Goblin Town to you right now, this phase of the market?
If we get down to 1,200, maybe below 1,300, I will say we are.
Bitcoin.
No, Ether price.
$1,200, $1,200,000, okay.
Oh, God, if we're a $12,000, Bitcoin price.
We are in the nine circle.
We did something wrong.
Yeah, right, so this is maybe this is the run up to like $1,700 that Ether had and like whatever Bitcoin got to, $25,000.
Maybe that was the mid, the year high.
Maybe.
Look, man, I still think it's the same people.
It's still the same people that are in.
So like if you were holding three weeks ago, you're holding last week, you're holding the week before, you're still holding now.
I feel like this is the same crowd.
It's not like.
Yes.
There's no.
Yeah, right.
A minor run up.
and we're like, oh, crypto's back.
That has not happened yet anyway.
So we're just grabbing with the same people in the market.
And I'm not surprised.
I think this is just part of the build market that we're in.
Here's my take is that I'm always, I'm the pervable.
We're both peribles here.
I think that there's like regulatory fud that keeps on hammering at us.
And crypto is scared of that.
And it's always been scared of regulatory fud.
Like regulatory fud comes in, crypto dumps.
And it dumps.
for like a day or a week, but it never is sustained. It's always a short-term blip. My bull case is that
that is also true of this rising interest rate fears. It's like, yeah, crypto's like, oh, no,
interest rate's still not over yet. And then we're like, we're ready to move on from all of
this shenanigans. And so it's going to, we're going to keep on taking these blows, but they're
not systemic blows. They are short-term blows. And so so long as the blows keep on coming,
the prices are going to be suppressed, as soon as they stop.
coming, Ryan, I think it's bullish.
So like there's, yeah, Chris Berniske put out the sweet not too long ago.
It's like, Bitcoin is a beach ball that's trying to like rise to the surface.
As soon as the Fed and soon as Elizabeth Warren goes away, that ball is poking right up.
But right now they're doing a pretty good job of pushing it down.
But it's like beach ball underwater.
Underwater, excuse me.
The beach ball is underwater.
Yeah.
And so crypto wants to rise.
It just keeps getting pummeled.
But the point is the equilibrium is that crypto wants to rise.
It needs external forces to keep it suppressed.
That's my take right now.
Good take.
Good take.
I support that take, David.
I made that one up just now.
How about the Bitcoin Ether price?
What do you think?
We are up 1.5% on the week above 0.07.
For the first time in a while, we are at 0.071.
I want to thank Cracken for providing these incredible charts.
This is all by way of Cracken Pro.
And let me remind you, Cracken was a crypto exchange and a crypto platform that did not fail
you in 2022.
These are one of the good guys, one of the OGs that have been with us from the beginning, doing things the right way.
And putting out some great charts that even allows an amateur like me.
If you want some history, like go back a year from and now on the weekly roll-up, like go to a 2021 weekly roll-up and see just Ryan floundering on the charts.
Sorry.
And now look at him, man.
Look at me go.
Now look at how good these charts are.
I got candles.
I got ratios.
Look at that nice little green candle at the end.
Man, that's just great.
I got the sole Bitcoin ratio if I want that.
How's that doing?
It's down.
Still not great.
It's still not great.
No, I don't, but I like to keep it there just for fun because I can.
Crypto market cap.
Are we above a trillion?
Yeah, but not by much.
We are at 1.02 trillion.
Just holding it there.
Yeah.
Below a trillion is starting to feel bearish.
It's starting to feel not Goblin Town.
Goblin Town for me is like 600 million.
I don't think we got to.
I've got a 600 million.
800 million is Goblin Town.
What did we do?
Let's look at it.
I think we got down to the high 700 million.
What do I have to do, max?
See, this is not a nice...
This is not Cracken level charts.
Let me see.
Their charts are not charts.
I can't see it here.
Yeah, you're fine.
Oh, actually, whatever.
I've given up on this chart.
Cracken, can you guys do a total crypto market cap chart?
Please, Cracken.
Please.
Let's get into some market news.
Okay, so we alluded to this, but here's a Reuters.
headline. The Fed Powell's previews, the Fed's Powell previews tougher rate hike path starting
soon. Here's a quote from Fed Chair Powell, who controls all things. Marcus, of course, we know.
He is the god. The dollar is God. And Powell is the word of the dollar. High priest.
Powell's the post. Yeah. The Pope. Nothing about the data suggests to me that we've tightened too much.
Indeed, it's just that we still have work to do. It's getting a
getting hawkish on the rate hikes there.
It's hard to make the case that we've,
that we've overtightened means we need to continue to tighten.
That's what he said.
There was a, I saw this clip, David,
and I want to play it for you.
I don't know if you've seen this,
but this was Warren versus Powell on this very point.
And as we get into this clip,
basically Powell is saying,
hey, we need to fix inflation.
Here's how we have to do it.
You keep tightening until inflation is fixed.
And Warren is saying,
but what about a recession?
What about the jobs? What about the voters? Right. So let's play this. I'm going to get your reaction to this. You ready? I haven't seen this.
Okay. Putting two million people out of work is just part of the cost and they just have to bear it.
Will working people be better off if we just walk away from our jobs and inflation remains 5, 6 percent?
Let me ask you about what happens if you do this. Since the end of World War II, there have been 12 times in which the unemployment rate has increased
by one percentage point within one year, exactly what you're aiming to do right now.
How many of those times did the U.S. economy avoid falling into a recession?
You know, it's not as black and white as very, very infrequent.
Just looking at the numbers. It actually is pretty black.
Alan Bliner's written a book on this.
There have been 12 times that we've seen a one point increase in the unemployment rate in a year.
That's exactly what your Fed report has put out.
the projection and the plan based on how you're going to keep raising these interest rates,
how many times did the economy fail to fall into a recession after doing that out of 12 times?
I think the number is zero.
I think the number is zero. That's exactly right.
So there you go.
She's like trying to do a checkmate on on Powell.
Gotcha. We're going to lose jobs. You're going to send us into a recession and Powell's responses,
inflation is worse.
Inflation is also not good for American citizens, nor workers, nor there's two million people.
It erodes.
And Warren is saying, but you're going to cause a recession this way.
And then he says, yeah, you're right.
And she's like, gotcha.
And he's like, you idiot, read a book.
I feel for him because he's like trying to explain himself, but she won't let him.
And when I see this clip, I just see like, this is the politician playing the politician game.
And it's so cringe, man. It's so cringe. Let's remember that politicians are definitely influencers,
and they are happy to throw anyone under the bus, including central bankers, if it scores them
influencer clout points, right? This is the state trying to politicize the money. This is what this is.
But the fact that obviously this is working, because we just played the clip. Like, it was just, that's the
exchange. But I do think that there is a pressure from Congress coming to Powell saying, you can't cause a recession,
Powell's going like, well, what are you guys going to do about inflation?
What's interesting to me, David, is Congress doesn't, they don't have answers to what we're
going to do about inflation. In fact, I would argue that a lot of the consumer CPI inflation is
actually not Powell's fault. You guys know we are not Powell Sims at bankless, right?
There's a lot of things that central bankers do that are not awesome for like all sorts of
things, right? They definitely have their hands on the money printer. You know who else?
does fiscal policy, Congress, our executive branch, they can also print money and they did a lot of that
fiscal spending during COVID. They only print money. That is up into the right chart. I think you can say
central bankers are largely responsible for massive wealth inequality, massive asset price inflation
since like the bailouts of 2008. It's been a flawed policy from the beginning. But I don't think
you can point to them and say, hey, you are the sole reason for the last two to three years of CPI
inflation. You can't. You have to take responsibility for fiscal policy and the fact that
countries are overspending relative to the tax earnings. And so you have to either increase taxes
or you have to not spend as much. And there is no accountability on Congress to actually do.
So I feel like they're kind of throwing Powell under the bus. And I can't believe I'm defending
Powell right now. I said the same thing. It's like, wow, I'm on Powell's side on this Elizabeth
versus Powell debate. My gosh. Anyway, like what does this mean for crypto?
look, battles back and forth.
It means that fiscal policy
and the money printer will continue to go burr.
I think no matter what.
I think some of that's going to come from Congress,
some of that's going to come from central bankers.
The political influence of aggregate congressional members
is significantly more than what the Fed can probably withstand.
Right.
And no one wants to pay.
We don't want to swallow the difficult medicine.
We don't want to get off the morphine trip.
We don't want to reduce our quality of life.
Because that's ultimately what this means.
It's like, do we want to pay back our debts?
Do we want to increase interest rates?
Well, we all need to start consuming less.
We all need to start being more efficient.
We all need to stop having this extravagant American lifestyle that we're used to over the last 50 years.
And no one wants to hear that.
Especially not the boomers.
Let's talk about that.
Sorry, boomers.
Debt.
What about the debt here?
Read this tweet out.
The U.S. now has a record 16.5 trillion in household debt.
A record, 11.9 trillion in mortgages.
a record 1.6 trillion in auto loans, a record 986 billion in credit card debt. This is what I was talking about. This is the extravagant lifestyle. We're beyond our means as a country. We have been for my entire life, probably all of these listeners and tires lives. Total mortgage debt is on double the 2006 peak right before the 2008 crash. Meanwhile, 30% of Americans have more credit card debt than savings with balances rising at the fastest pace since 1999. This is all while mortgages rates just hit 7.1%.
and credit card debt hit a record 25%.
We are fighting inflation with debt.
This cannot end well.
Wow, that's a long tweet.
Yeah, okay.
By the way, how long can tweets be now?
That was a really long tweet.
My gosh.
Like, you can keep going.
It's not only whatever.
They're almost limitless, dude.
Limitless tweets.
I don't know if I like that, but it's not a list.
You know, we're inflating.
Inflation is the name of the game these days, including tweet length.
Got to inflate tweets.
It's like inflating our tweets.
The Twitter money printer keeps going to burn.
stable coin check in let's talk about crypto markets for a second though um us d t is on the rise it's the
highest level in 15 months that is of course tether david why is tether going up it should be going
up as a result of outflows from b usd right so b usd going down usts going up right that's got
be the conclusion here i think that's what's happening yeah tether's gain came mostly at the expense
of b usd after the paks of announcement we talked about that last week announcing they were
halting new minting of BUSD, and it's grown 5.3 billion to a total of $71 billion in Tether,
which is Tether fully backed? We think so, kind of, mostly. I don't know.
That's not Tether's product, brother. Tether's products is being an offshore stable coin.
That's right. And that's what BUSD was maybe filling part of, and Tether is just going to take that.
So the U.S. system has no ability to go find hunt down Tether. Can they do?
that? I mean, this is outside of the bounds of U.S. jurisdiction. Right. But the U.S. does have
jurisdiction over some other things. We're going to talk about that when we come back.
David, what are we covering next? Silvergate liquidate was the only two words I'll say about that.
Elizabeth Warren returns versus Binance. And the SEC taking an L perhaps too is the tide
turning against the SEC. And we'll probably talk about some Yth Denver chatter as well,
among other things. Also, of course, beyond all.
of that, the biggest news of the week, Bankless 2.0, you know that's coming.
So we're going to get to all of that and more right after we talk to some of these fantastic
sponsors that makes this show possible, especially Cracken, our strategic sponsor for
2023, who supplies this market section of the Bankless Weekly roll-up with the most beautiful
charts that you've ever seen. Here we go. Cracken has been a leader in the crypto industry
for the last 12 years. Dedicated to accelerating the global adoption of crypto,
Cracken puts an emphasis on security, transparency, and client support, which is why over now,
9 million clients have come to love Cracken's products.
Whether you're a beginner or a pro,
the Cracken U.S. is simple, intuitive, and frictionless,
making the Cracken app a great place
for all to get involved and learn about crypto.
For those with experience,
the redesigned Cracken Pro app and web experience
is completely customizable to your trading needs,
integrating key trading features into one seamless interface.
Cracken has a 24-7-365 client support team
that is globally recognized.
Cracken support is available wherever, whenever you need them,
by phone, chat, or email.
And for all of you NFTs out there,
the brand new Cracken NFT beta platform
gives you the best NFT trading experience possible,
rarity rankings, no gas fees,
and the ability to buy an NFT straight with cash.
Does your crypto exchange prioritize its customers
the way that Cracken does?
And if not, sign up with Cracken at crackin.com slash banklists.
Learning about crypto is hard.
Until now, introducing Metamask Learn,
an open educational platform about crypto,
web three, self-custity,
wallet management, and all the other topics needed to onboard people into this crazy world of crypto.
Metamask Learn is an interactive platform with each lesson offering a simulation for the task at hand,
giving you actual practical experience for navigating Web3.
The purpose of Metamask Learn is to teach people the basics of self-custody and wallet security
in a safe environment.
And while Metamask Learn always takes the time to define Web3 specific vocabulary,
it is still a jargon-free experience for the Crypto-Curious user.
Friendly, not scary.
Metamask Learn is available in 10 languages with more to be added soon, and it's meant to cater to a global Web3 audience.
So, are you tired of having to explain crypto concepts to your friends?
Go to learn.menomask.io and add Metamask Learn to your guides to get onboarded into the world of Web3.
Crypto Bank Silvergate announces voluntary liquidation.
David, why would you voluntarily liquidate?
What's happening here?
You would voluntarily liquidate when things look so bad that you don't see any bio-evalued.
paths forward. And so crypto-friendly Silvergate Bank, of course, has said that is going to unwind
its assets and wind down operations of Silvergate Capital Corporation. A quote from Silvergate,
in light of recent industry and regulatory developments, Silvergate believes that an orderly wind
down of bank operations and a voluntary liquidation of the bank is the best path forward.
The bank's wind down and liquidation plan includes full repayment of all deposits. So that's good news.
all deposits will be fully repaid, according to the liquidation plan.
The company did not say how it plans to resolve claims against its businesses.
Silvergate, as a crypto bank, is one of the two main banks for serving crypto companies,
along with New York-based Signature Bank is the other main one.
Just as a size comparison, Silvergate had over $11 billion in assets compared with $114 billion at signature banks.
Oh, I didn't know that.
Yeah, that's new to me.
Yeah.
Much bigger, yeah.
Okay.
The FDIC was in urgent talks with Silvergate to find ways to save the crypto-friendly bank from shutdown.
FDIC examiners arrived at the firm's headquarters last week and have been since reviewing the firm's books and records.
The department is evaluating compliance with all financial laws, as well as safety and soundness obligations,
and is working closely with irrelevant federal counterparts.
So I think there's probably a big question out there is like, was it Silvergate's fault or was it external forces that have caused this?
I don't, we'll have to find out.
I don't know if there's any reason to suspect Silvergate of anything, but I guess we're
going to find out either way.
Do you have a take on this, Ryan?
Well, a lot of people in crypto are saying that this is basically a run on the bank.
Sure.
Perpetrated by people in power, those regulators and politicians going on the megaphone and saying,
like the Operation choke point sorts of measures.
People like Elizabeth Warren, for example, broadcasting.
this and saying withdraw funds from these crypto banks, these crypto companies. And I would say the
broader point is like, remember, guys, we live in a fractional reserve banking system.
That means any bank, whether it's Wells Fargo, bank of them, any commercial bank that you use
operates on faith. And so if there was a run on the bank and you decided to withdraw,
all of us decide to withdraw all of our money at once, that's it. We can't all get it.
It doesn't exist, guys.
It doesn't exist.
It's a figment.
That's how the system works.
Yes, it's a figment of our imagination.
It's all kind of on the ledger and it all works as long as everyone trusts it.
And the FDIC has a 250K guarantee and all of these things.
So there is some element, David, where, yes, they probably were sloppy in areas.
This is kind of my take right now, based on the evidence I've seen.
Yes, Silvergate could have done additional AMLKYC in places.
They could have had some, you know, tighter.
risk policies.
But I don't think, this is not an FTCS type situation, right?
I don't think that there was anything incredibly nefarious going on.
At least the evidence hasn't borne that out yet.
But what I do know is there has absolutely been a run on this bank
and perpetuated in some cases by regulatory congressional influencers who are pushing
Sildergate towards the edge.
And to that extent, I mean, I would say that is extremely irrisome.
responsible. Right. Just to start this from the beginning of like a run on the bank is a fear and
emotion based phenomenon from all bank, from all customers, clients, depositors of that bank.
And so if there is this run on the bank that's happening and the reason why Silvergate is
shutting down is because there's just so much net outflow out of the bank because everyone is fearful
that Silvergate is going under and that fear perpetuates, right? It turns into a mind virus.
we have to ask ourselves, why did that fear happen in the first place?
Yeah.
What is the patient zero or the trigger of that fear?
Do you have an answer for me, Ryan?
I mean, I think obviously the entire market is incredibly jittery coming off of FTX.
I'm not sure who exactly the patient zero is or what.
I do know that the White House is making some comments on the back of this.
This is the Pressure Secretary at the White House.
In recent weeks, banking regulators have released guidelines
and how banks should protect themselves from risks associated with crypto.
As you know, this is a president that is repeatedly called on Congress to take action to protect
everyday Americans from the risk posed by digital assets, and he will continue to do so.
The risk by digital assets.
So that's what's being thrown under the bus here is crypto, is digital assets.
This is Senate Banking Committee, a friend of banks, I might say,
Sherard Brown, saying, as the impover.
impact of FTX's collapse continues to ripple outward, today we are seeing what can happen when a bank
is over-reliant on a risky, volatile sector like cryptocurrencies. So whatever is happening, David,
whether this is a bank run and kind of Silvergate is somewhat a victim in the situation,
or whether Silvergate did some things that were irresponsible and they're not a victim,
they are responsible. We do know that politicians are definitely ready and eager to throw
crypto under the bus and throw crypto banking under the bus. And to me, this is just like
the continuation of the operation choke point we've been talking about for the last,
like since the beginning of this year. Right. Yeah, this is such a nefarious line.
As the impact of FTX's collapse continued to ripple outwards, today we are seeing what can
happen when a bank is overreliant on risky, volatile sector like cryptocurrencies. FTCX was not
cryptocurrencies. FTCS was a bank that was pushed
offshore and with all of those quality products that drove people into FTX not enabled to be held
onshore by onshore banks. This was not a cryptocurrency problem. As we know, as we've reporting on
bank lists for quarters now, every single DFI app in the crypto world held up completely
solvently. FTX, which is a bank, which was ignored by the SEC, and all of the onshore regulated
entities were hamstrung by onshore regulation. And so the FTC,
FDX incident explodes, comes back to hit, this is a banking crisis. This is, it happens that
there are crypto rails. It is a banking crisis. That is the center of this whole thing. The public
opinion, the public's not going to understand the details. Maybe people in the crypto community will,
but like, they're going to paint this as a problem with crypto. I mean, Sherrod Brown continues.
I've been concerned that when banks get involved in crypto, it spreads risk across the financial system,
and it will be taxpayers and consumers who pay the price.
when banks get involved in crypto, what do you think that means?
They're going to continue to choke the banking sector from touching this whole asset class of
crypto.
That's very disturbing to me.
David, we have an Elizabeth Warren tweet here.
What does this say?
Oh, boy, my favorite.
Elizabeth Warren says, as the bank of choice for crypto, Silvergate's bank's failure is
disappointing but predictable.
I warned of Silvergate's risky, if not illegal, activity and identified severe due diligence
failures. Now customers must be made whole and regulators should step up against crypto risk.
So in my mind, Ryan, I'm just saying regulators putting undue burdens upon the crypto banking
sector and then as a result of those burdens and perhaps, you know, also other things,
FTX and interest rates, but also as a result of what Elizabeth Warren is doing here in this tweet,
putting undue burdens upon the crypto banking sector, then the big crypto banking sector fails.
And then she's like, I told you so, even though she's part of the problem.
that caused it to not be a well-service industry in the first place.
Remember Tyler Cowan's caution?
He wrote an editorial about this, came on our podcast,
and he was like, hey, I'm most worried that regulators and those in Congress will backlash
far too far.
And yes, there was problems with FTX, but you're really going to try to choke
United States citizens, U.S. citizens from this entire asset class.
I worry about that.
That's what's going on.
I think Nick Carter had a fantastic take here on Silvergate.
He said this, about Silvergate, about the.
situation we were just talking about. The politicians are now telling us that because a single bank
peaking at 16 billion in assets, that's Silvergate, wound down in an orderly manner, making
deposit's whole, no one lost money here, David. No deposit lost money. Effecting no one but
shareholders, causing no knock on effects that crypto firms must be shut out of the banking system.
Right. Those holding equity, the shareholders of Silvergate lost in this. That's how it should be.
That's how this works.
It's a risk asset. Holding equity is a risk asset that the company is going to go bankrupt. Of course.
So in that sort of situation, equity holders get liquidated. No one that deposited funds in Silvergate has lost anything.
So like a bank wound down in a correct and orderly fashion and Elizabeth Warren is like grave dancing.
Yeah. Is that what's going on?
I think so. I mean, Nick Carter, Nick goes on and says, they cry out safety and soundness will chipping away at the foundation and then act of
vindicated when the structure starts to crumble. I think that's what's going on here.
Yeah. Here's another take. Yeah, so this is a take from a Mike from Blockworks.
Liz Warren has a $67 million net worth, even though her salary is $285,000 per year. Either she
saved 100% of her earnings for 235 years, or she's making money another way. I love this.
Why do you love this? Well, this just calls into question the legitimacy
of what she's doing, right?
She's an influencer who is talking against other people's bags,
our bags, our crypto bags,
and then she's, what Mike is implying here,
is making money in ways that we don't understand.
And so as an influencer of this state,
he is calling into question the legitimacy
of where she has made her money.
I think that's a good thing to call into question.
Yeah, I get it.
I think if, and if people think that that's below the belt,
I think that what Lizzie Warren is doing is below the belt too.
I don't necessarily think it's below the belt.
I do worry a little bit about the kind of the,
just because someone's wealthy doesn't mean they made it in like nefarious ways.
We don't know the source of her wealth.
But yeah, I, yeah.
67 million dollars, brother.
It's a lot.
That's a lot of wealth.
Let's talk about this.
Binance under scrutiny as well.
That is happening this week.
This is a letter sent yesterday by, wow, Senator Warren.
I guess this is the Senator Warren episode.
Senator Warren is the main character of this week.
Van Holen and Marshall to Binance and Binance U.S.
It's absolutely devastating, this tweet says.
They are flat out accusing Binance of fraud and money laundering.
This is not good for CZ.
Have you read this letter?
What's the TLDR here, David?
Yeah, basically, well, it's a pretty damning accusation of CZ and Binance's operations,
basically saying that Binance has knowingly enabled money laundering,
reduced KYC compliance checks
allowed for higher and higher limits
of non-KYC accounts in order to trade on Binance
in order to just like make revenue, right?
Like that's their business model.
It also says that accuses them of creating Binance US
as like the compliant distraction
so that Binance itself could grow larger offshore
and do all of its perhaps illicit ways of, you know, generating revenue.
That part's true, right?
We all saw that.
That's probably true.
Yeah.
Now the thing is like,
I wouldn't necessarily rush to the defense of Binance here.
I think also we know that S.E.Z.
And Justin's son are buddies.
And we know that Justin's son used his ownership over Polonex.
Remember that one article?
Justin Sun was like,
just pass any KYC check.
Always pass.
Never fail.
Always pass.
Doesn't matter.
Remember that?
That's the story that came out, right?
And so, like, they're very close with each other.
This is kind of, I don't really think anyone's really going to rush to the defense of finance here.
So it's tough.
You know, it's tough.
Well, so is this the big, that's different than fraud.
Is that the big charge here that they were bypassing AML KYC?
Yeah, basically they were negligently enabling, like, money laundering and illicit use of finance.
Gotcha.
Whether or not they were the ones actually doing it is a different story.
I don't know if that's what this is charging them, but yeah.
This is the Wall Street Journal.
breaking some things about Binance too.
What does this say?
This says text from Crypto Giant Binance Reveals Plan to elude U.S. authorities.
So this was messages revealed from CZ and Binance leadership saying,
hey, we're totally going to do our best to circumnavigate, evade U.S. regulations.
We're going to spin up Binance U.S. in order to prop that up and have that be like the
fall, you know, the subject of their scrutiny and that thing is going to be totally compliant.
But meanwhile, we're going to do all the shady stuff.
from the back. And apparently that has been explicitly made in text form and leaked to the Wall Street
Journal. So what's the take here? Then are we back to like, okay, is this all true? Are the regulators
right? Are they right in stamping out this entire industry from the United States because it's
only full of scammers? Is that what Binance is doing here? What do you say to this? I say this is all
just so tiring, man. What part of it? I got it. I got it.
I got nothing. It's like, damn it.
It's like,
we need to have regulation,
but our regulators are being shitty at it.
Like, it's, there's, it's a double-edged sword.
Bad people on both sides?
Yes, it's like, no one's got it right, dude.
I just, I don't, it's like, I don't,
we don't know enough to, to know what CZ's doing.
I do know he's smarter than SBF.
That's for sure.
Just don't know.
And how would we know?
It's a centralized exchange.
We just don't know.
It's, by nature, it's,
trust-based. But we do know that no one is talking here about like, okay, centralized exchanges
are failing us in a variety of ways. Here's how we could shore up the regulation for centralized
exchanges, right? And by the way, isn't it cool, American citizen, that crypto has also
provided a self-sovereign option called decentralized finance, which you can audit on chain.
we never have to question whether it's a fraud.
We never have to question whether it's fully backed or has reserves.
It's proof of reserves built in.
They're not pointing people in that direction.
They're saying the whole crypto thing is a fraud, is a scam.
They're not engaging with the members of the crypto community who are like, yeah, we hate
FDX2 and SBF.
And by the way, we've been saying that for a long period of time that, like, we're worried
about centralized exchange as an attack vector,
they're not engaging with us at that level.
So it doesn't feel collaborative.
So I share your frustration.
I don't like, but they've got us in this spot
where they can just point to like five to ten scams last year in crypto,
bad things that happen and say, look, I told you.
Like Elizabeth Warren.
Crypto bad.
I was right.
I was right.
I predicted this.
I told you this was going to happen.
It's a difficult situation.
Yeah, I'll put on my libertarian free market anti-state hat and say that Binance has banked more people than any, with his technology and its crypto rails and Binance smart chain, for that matter, has banked more people using crypto technology than any nation state has ever done ever with a CBDC or any of their legacy traditional financial system.
So I'm sure there's nothing, I'm sure there's a lot of skeletons in the closet of Binance.
I'm sure there's money laundering happening.
I'm sure Ciz's aware of it, probably.
I don't know any of this stuff.
But I'm sure there's a bunch of stuff that pisses off the state.
But my Eric Vorhe's raw human perspective
is that binance is unequivocally a net positive for the world
in terms of banking the unbanked
and allowing financial freedom to proliferate.
That's my take.
I think there's a way for regulators in commerce
to cooperate with the finances of the world
rather than just attacking them
trying to stamp this thing out of existence.
David, this is somewhat related.
The SEC snubbed as Voyager wins court approval for the sale to Binance.
It's a Voyager that defunct, I guess, crypto bank,
crypto lending and borrowing platform is trying to sell to Binance U.S.
And is that going through?
Well, it looks like it.
The Voyager is the one that lent out that unsecured $660 million loan to three hours capital,
which I'm assuming they haven't gotten back.
It's safe assumption there.
But approval was granted by United States bankruptcy.
Judge Michael Willis, Whales, which came four days after arguments presented by Voyager and the United
States Securities Exchange Commission were processed by that judge. Judge says, this can proceed.
And so this is actually really good news for anyone who's lost money on Voyager. This article
is claiming that if you are a Voyager customer and impacted Voyager customer, you are going to
get back approximately 73%. Wow.
approximately 73%, which is a very precise number for saying the word approximately.
So that's great news.
That's great news.
That is great.
Definitely.
This judge's decision comes over a week after 97% of the 61,300 Voyager account holders
were voted in favor of the current Binance U.S. restructuring plan, according to a February 28 filing.
That's pretty cool.
That's what shareholders want.
It sounds like.
Brace Gale versus the SEC.
David, this next story is, I think, a win.
If you were asking yourself in the last two stories we were talking about, like, where are the
checks and balances here? How do we stop this type of activity? I think the court system is one
possible solution to that. So this is judges that are skeptical of the SEC's argument in the
gray scale versus Bitcoin ETF hearing. Can you tell us about that, David?
Yeah. So this is a court that has reviewed the facts and circumstances of the grayscale Bitcoin
ETF application. We want the Grayscale Trust, the GBT Trust, to fold into elegantly and cleanly
a Bitcoin ETF, a spot market Bitcoin ETF. We have a Bitcoin Futures Market ETF. Why not a Bitcoin
Spot Market? Why do we want that? We want that, Ryan, because right now, the GBTC asset trades at a 45%
discount to actual GBTC. And so of all the Bitcoins that are in the GBTC trust,
locked in there one way can't come out.
They are worth only 55% of their actual real value
because there's not enough demand for GBTC,
partly because of the whole like gray scale three hours capital like loop.
So retail is getting screwed basically.
Yeah, so there is like how much is the gray scale GBT trust?
Let me go look that up real quick.
And so as a result of that discount,
there is a $4 billion gap.
And what that means is that GBT owners collectively are short four billion.
billion dollars. There's four billion dollars of wealth that could be created if the SEC allowed for a
spot market Bitcoin ETF out of gray scale. They could make four billion dollars just appear out
of thin air if they did this. And so the judge is like, hey SEC, why aren't you doing that?
Why aren't you like, which is a really good question. Why aren't you protecting investors?
Right. This is like the second judge. Facilitating capital markets. Yeah. You know,
the whole vision on your website thing?
You can make $4 billion.
Why aren't you doing it?
For retail, the people that you're supposed to protect.
This is the second judge saying this, who's skeptical of the SEC's decision to approve the
future's ETF, but not the spot one, not the one that we all want.
The SEC hasn't offered any information that the petitioners are wrong, the judge says.
SEC has to explain why they're wrong.
Yes, they do.
Thank you.
Some accountability.
David, you and I can say it all day.
Crypto Twitter can say it all day.
A judge is requiring them to answer that question.
And that is a nice check and balance that's a product of our system.
And I'm glad that we have it right now.
Gary Gensler's like, well, well, so you know how.
Office hours with Gary.
Office hour.
Yeah, turn it into influencer video, Gary.
Yeah, so that's what's going on there.
And maybe some hope for the future there.
Some of this power gets checked by the court system.
David, what do we have coming up next?
Coming up next, we have an onslaught of Coinbase news.
All of it good, thank God.
So there's like four things that we're going to talk about
all related to Coinbase.
Tornado Cash 2.0 pulls a jiu-jitsu move against privacy haters.
We're going to talk all about that.
We got Uniswap wallet.
We got our ETH supply.
And most importantly, Ryan, the biggest news of the week,
which is Bankless 2.0.
So all those details and more coming right after we talk to some of these fantastic sponsors
that make Bankless 2.0 possible.
Uniswap is the largest on-chain marketplace for self-custody digital assets.
Uniswap is, of course, a decentralized exchange, but you know this because you've been listening to Bankless.
But did you know that the Uniswop web app has a shiny new Fiat on-ramp?
Now you could go directly from Fiat in your bank to tokens in Defi inside of Uniswap.
Not only that, but Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism, Layer 2s are supported right out of the game.
But that's just Defi.
Uniswap is also an NFT aggregator,
letting you find more listings for the best prices across the NFT world.
With Uniswap, you can sweep floors on multiple NFTs,
and Uniswop's universal router will optimize your gas fees for you.
Uniswap is making it as easy as possible to go from bank account
to bankless assets across Ethereum,
and we couldn't be more thankful for having them as a sponsor.
So go to app.uniswap.org today
to buy, sell, or swap tokens and NFTs.
How many total airdrops have you gotten?
This last bull market had a ton of them.
Did you get them all?
Maybe you missed one.
So here's what you should do.
Go to Earnify and plug in your Ethereum wallet,
and Earnify will tell you if you have any unclaimed airdrops that you can get.
And it also does POAPs and mintable NFTs.
Any kind of money that your wallet can claim,
Earnify will tell you about it.
And you should probably do it now because some airdrops expire.
And if you sign up for Earnify, they'll email you anytime one of your wallets has a new
irdrop for it to make sure that you never lose anirdrop ever again.
You can also upgrade to Earnify Premium to unlock access to airdrops that are beyond the basics
and are able to set reminders for more wallets.
And for just under $21 a month, it probably pays for itself with just one airdrop.
So plug in your wallets at Earnify and see what you get.
That's E-A-R-N-I.
And make sure you never lose anotherirdrop.
And we are back.
But first, watch this sick promo video for Bankless 2.0.
It's loading.
That's great.
I love that.
That gets me going, man.
Here it is. Bankless.com.
Bankless 2.0. It's here.
It's our new website.
We have fully migrated from Substack at this point.
Peace Web2.
We are doing this so that we can start being much more of a crypto-native media company.
And you know what's cool about this, David, is I'm not sure we entirely know what that means.
All right?
The point is, we can find out.
We're going to explore our own frontier.
We have our own frontier now.
Are we going to front run the opportunity here?
We're a front running the opportunity.
Yeah, bankless is going from just like, you know, being all web 2y to we, I think we have
one of the best platforms to experiment and innovate and iterate about Web3 things natively
because now we have our own settlement.
This is our settlement.
This is our home.
This is our home on the internet, on this protocol that we call home.
Everyone's welcome.
What are we doing here?
We're obviously we're posting the podcast.
This roll up that you're listening to will appear here.
here. We're posting our articles, everything we write. We have this thing called a daily brief.
If you only listen to bank lists and you don't consume it in your inbox every day, you should
start consuming it that way as well. It's a daily brief. It's a guide to crypto for every day.
We're posting that here. There is a fantastic ability to search for different guides, David.
If you want... You can tag your interests.
Tag your interests. If you want a guide to investing, all of our how-toes, if you want to get into
kind of opinion pieces, guide to arbitram, guide to optimism, guide to polygon. It's all here
on the website. The crypto-native features, all right, we had the hardest time. In fact,
substack would never integrate this for us, which is our previous platform, just paying via
crypto. Right. So people would be like, I'm trying to like sign up for bankless, but you're
making me pay with a credit card. And we're like, oh, well, there's this separate link. We can send
it to you. It's manual. It's quite much commerce. It was never. It was. It was. It was
never really connected. And so now it's all connected. Now it's all seamless. Now it all works. You
pay via crypto. That's just a simple thing. But you can also, we're going to add the ability to
log in with Ethereum. Right. So you can access this function. We're adding podcast NFTs to the post.
Obviously. Other things that I can't speak about right now, but that are coming soon that we are
super excited about and bullish on. And in general, we just want to grow this movement and grow this
community in crypto native ways and push forward into the frontier. So that's what we're up to,
man. Yeah, that's exactly right. And if you look on that far left, you have, you know, home,
listen, read tools for little icons, for little tabs to explore different places. The number of
icons there can grow as we grow the number of products and tools and things to do on bankless.com.
There's also native poap minting. So if, yeah, this is, we have built the best
native in the browser, in the website,
Poap minting apparatus that I think exists.
And so there is a Poap to mint for those that are already bankless subscribers.
We sadly can't open it up to everyone because we can't like spam attack Poap or allow
Poap to be spam attacked.
But if you are already a bankless subscriber, including free subscribers, you can go mint
the inaugural ship Poap because we are ship.
We're sailing west.
We're going into a new world.
ship season. So go mint that po-app. That's a big call to action. Go do that.
Bankless.com, guys. Thank you. Thank you for all the support. Thank you for everyone who got us here.
Thank you for listening to all the ads that helped finance the building of this website.
It's important. We got to build our settlement. So that's how we're doing it. Anyway, so much more we could talk about. David,
speaking of bankless content and cool stuff, you've got some Heath Denver video, a whole series that will make you feel like you went to Heath Denver and hung out with David.
and listened into all the conversations that he was having,
except for that one conversation last week with the lawyer,
where you talked about Lido.
Not that one.
All the other ones, though.
All the good ones, yeah.
All the good ones that bring back to the nation.
All right.
Well, so what is this?
Give us the highlights.
So this is part one of two parts.
Every other time I've done this.
And this has been a recurring theme of, like, what I do when I go to conferences,
is I interview people and I bring back interviews,
like 20-minute bite-sized interviews,
so you can feel like you were there.
This is, I did that twice, right, two times at September.
This is, so this is part one.
This is at the Axelar Interoperability Conference, which was like a who's who of interoperability.
Builders, right?
Builders, yeah, all the builders.
I was trying to understand like, all right, because like there's Ethereum layer two's and layer
threes here.
There's Cosmos people.
There's the Axelar team.
There's like all of the people doing like Omni Chain and Layer Zero and all that kind
of stuff.
Like, what is the theme of this conference?
Like clearly it's interoperability.
when I was writing about this for the newsletter,
this is also going to turn into a newsletter
on the bankless newsletter coming out today.
So you will already have that in your inboxes.
The theme, Ryan, is like literally everything
that's not the Ethereum Layer 1 or Bitcoin.
That was the theme of this conference.
Anyways, so like Layer 2 content,
eigenlayer content, Cosmos content,
Axler content.
So that's part one.
Part two is me and Luke running around
with a microphone at a shelling point,
and Heath Denver, just randomly ninja interviewing people.
We got Kevin Awaki and Simonea Pop from Shelling Point.
We got Jesse from Base.
We got Victor Bunin from Coinbase Cloud.
We got Lisa from Aztec.
So many different interviews of people actually out at East Denver.
That is part two.
That is coming soon, TM.
Absolute Chad of a production team that is pushing this content out within one week post
East Denver.
They helped me film it.
They helped me get the audio.
They're processing.
tip of the hat to the bankless pod squad tip of the hat absolutely and of course you can go find all
of that content right now at bankless.com.com. Bankless.com. Bankless.com. Bankless. Bankless.com.
Bankless. Coinbase is doing some things too. Not just bankless that's been building. Coinbase
has been building some things. Today we introduce wallet as a service. What is wallet as a service?
This is a coin base offering now that makes it seamlessly seamless to onboard users to web three.
What is this, David?
Yeah, so it's an API.
A wallet inside of an API.
I never really thought that was possible,
which allows companies to create and deploy
fully customizable on-chain wallet.
So users can create access and restore,
mainly their wallets with authentication
as simple as a username and password
without needing to worry about seed phrases.
So they have built a way to allow,
I'm assuming, the rest of Web2
to easily spin up a wallet on demand, on notice.
And like, I think the most obvious use case
that I'm just going to imagine,
imagine off the top of my head, Ryan, is like, you know, the digital collectibles in Instagram?
Yeah.
What percentage of Instagram users have a wallet?
Not zero, because there's some, but very...
Less than 1%.
Yeah. Less than 1%.
Less than 0.1%, I would say.
So say NFT creators who are now able to promote and share their NFTs on Instagram, that is a feature
that is all throughout Instagram now, say one of their fans wants to buy that NFT.
And that fan does not have a wallet.
Well, Instagram could just ping the Coinbase wallet API and be like, serve this, serve this
user a wallet because they want to buy that NFT.
And they could buy that NFT with Trad payment rails, like with Striper whatever.
And all of a sudden, there's a wallet inside of Instagram that is accessible by the Instagram
authentication service that's already built in.
I think that's really what this is.
Guys, that's a bankless wallet.
That's, yes.
Non-custodial.
This is multi-party computation technology to make this non-custodial.
It can be non-custodial.
and it can also be custodial. It's customizable for both. It is really the wallet infrastructure that
we need to be able to push wallets into every single corner of the internet. This is insanely.
It just makes crypto adoption so easy. It lowers the barrier for getting a wallet down to
at the absolute minimum. We got Stripe for crypto wallets. They also, Coinbase has also acquired
One River Digital Management. Now we just released our episode with Eric Peters. He's the
CIO of One River. He is kind of the institutional crypto,
guy. I mean, all the kind of the billionaires with with a lot of money, respect Eric Peters,
and Coinbase has now acquired their company as, I guess, a bridge to institutional investors
increasing that. Do you have any other takes on that?
I, it's just, they're doing everything, man. They're going in every single direction it was.
It's pretty cool, including the direction of public relations. And I think repairing crypto's image,
their brand image.
I know, David, you wanted us to take a look at this commercial.
I think this is just good content.
So we're going to watch this Columbia commercial.
They don't even pay us for this.
What is this archaic system?
Mother's maiden name?
Eboid.
You're telling me, this guy is how things get verified.
That's my job.
I'm just saying, you shouldn't have to buy $10 worth the gum if you just want $79
worth the gum.
Why do you get charged your money to take your money from your account?
And if you're out of money, they charge you for being out of money?
What?
An overseas transfer takes five days.
Business days.
Why?
What are they used?
A Zeppelin?
I deposit the check Monday.
But money was a big holiday.
Why is this the way it is?
A bank holiday?
This system makes a bank holiday.
This makes no sense.
This makes no sense.
Who desired this system?
Mayup.
Is this really the best we can do?
Hello?
We deserve better.
Nice.
It's time to update the system.
It's a Coinbase ad, obviously.
It is the best PR, one minute of PR for the crypto industry as a whole that I've ever seen.
It's basically the bankless, it's basically banks suck.
Yeah.
And we can do better.
Finance sucks.
Let's use crypto to update it.
That is the message.
And it's a much better message.
I feel like then the 2022 message that crypto was sending, which was come here to get really
rich.
And because we have, come get yield.
Yeah.
And because we have like social boosting NFTs, which yeah, sure, but this is the message.
This is the better message.
This is the long term message.
We also are coming out with a podcast with Brian Armstrong.
So we just talked to him earlier this week.
I think it's a good kind of recap on everything that crypto is doing.
You know, we spend a lot of time on regulatory in this episode, David.
And I think that's because that's where crypto is right now.
That episode comes out Monday.
but if you are a citizen of the bankless nation,
that means you are a premium subscriber,
you should have access to that episode right about now, early access.
On bankless.com.
There you go.
On bankless.
That's what we were waiting for.
David, some cool news with tornado cash,
which is an illegal and not crypto privacy anonymizing?
It's on the OFax.
No, no, no.
It's not illegal.
It's just illegal for us as U.S. citizens.
Okay.
It is illegal.
It is an agnostic neutral piece of technology.
It's just illegal for you and me.
Well, what do they do?
So, well, this isn't anything to do with tornado cash specifically.
This is not the tornado cash team.
This is Amin Soleimani announcing privacy pools V0, which he is calling the sequel to tornado
cash, also similarly branded as tornado cash.
I think the TLDR is, it's tornado cash and this additional fun little mechanism that
lets you prove the specific anonymity set.
What does that mean?
You can prove that you are not a tornado cache user
who is of a certain address,
as in your, you can achieve privacy
versus with this brand new tool
without being associated with any other specific address
that you determine, aka one on the OFAC sanctions list.
So you can prove that you are not
and are not interacting with an address
on the OFAC sanction list.
So let's say,
The OFAC FinC-Finson identifies this particular set of addresses.
This is North Korea.
This is a well-known terrorist group.
These people are bad actors.
You can prove your innocence, essentially, using this tool now.
And so this should defang all of the reasons that the code itself,
and let's remind people, the Tornado Cash code itself,
the smart contract on chain, if you live in the U.S.,
OFAC, Finson, the U.S. has made it illegal for you to have on-chain privacy because they're saying,
you might be one of these bad actors, but now you can prove your innocence. So doesn't this, David,
defang the whole like, I guess, front of Finson saying, yeah, this is because terrorists and criminals
and it takes away the whole entire premise of making the tornado cash smart contracts illegal
in the first place. There you go. Your move. Your move. I think, I mean,
I mean, everyone, people who I listen to bankless know I have, like, infinite respect for Amin.
He's the guy that will go toe to toe with the, with Goliath, uh, in a heartbeat without
things a shit disturber, man.
Yeah, he really, oh, he's a sower of chaos in the best of ways.
Like chaotic, the embodiment of chaotic good. Um, I hope he deploys it on base.
On base. On base chain? Yeah. Privacy pools on base chain. That'll be fine. I'm sure, uh,
coin base compliance and legal has really appreciated that you just said that, David.
I, well, permissionless code. You know, they made.
They made their chain permissionless.
They know what they signed up for.
Let's see.
Let's see how it goes.
I mean, we want a free permissionless open internet.
So let's push that boundary.
Here's privacy pools.
Yeah, privacy pools.com is the place to go.
There we go.
All right.
Also bankless.
com.
Also after bankless.
com.
Yeah.
Make that your next visit.
Uniswap Labs.
They introduced a mobile wallet.
David,
you and I got a chance to stand with Cal,
who is kind of the lead product design of this wallet.
It's pretty cool.
I really liked it.
I'm very bullish.
It's Apple has blocked them
from launching in the app store right now,
but it is available on test flight.
Unfortunately, we don't have an access code for you.
In order to get that, you had to be listening
to the conversation we had earlier this week,
and there were about 100 of them.
But here's David, he's showing off.
I got $48.
$87 and a crypto coven.
Well, that's worth something.
And the access code itself is worth something
because it'd be pretty cool to use this wallet.
I don't know.
I'm pretty bullish on the future of this.
I really like the design.
It's nice and clean.
I think Uniswab is dedicated towards iterating on it.
A lot of cool things in store and bullish wallets in general.
Wallet innovation in general.
Certainly.
Moving on to Rocket Pool is set to launch their eight ether mini pools.
Okay, how does Rocket Pool work?
You have the node operator who spins up a node in the decentralized Rocket Pool network.
They need to put up a bond to make sure that they don't do anything funky with the other people who come and deposit Ether into their node.
So what do you do?
you put in 16 ether, one half of what it takes to spin up a node,
other people backfill that with 16 more ether,
and boom, you have a rocket pool mini node,
and 16 our ether is minted and distributed into the wild.
That is a capital-intensive way to produce a staked eth token,
and while that is the capital intensivity is how we get decentralization and security,
it is still capital-intensive.
Rocket pool has created this system called mini-pools,
which actually lowers the collateral requirements,
down to eight. So instead of putting up a 16-eath bond, you put an eight-eath bond. And instead of that
being a one-to-one ratio of your ether to other people's ether, it is a one-to-three ratio where you put in
eight ether and then 24 ether comes in to create three different rockerpool mini-nodes. And so
the capital efficiency of RPL doubles. And then also, if you are a node operator, you increase the amount
of fees that you charge the people who use your node to stake as well. So you, if you are a node operator,
you're getting more yield and the total supply of our ETH goes up. This is a very long awaited upgrade
from the Rocket Pool community by Rocket Pool. It's actually not launched yet. It's coming. It's
in no later than early April, which is one month away. So that's pretty high, very hype. This is
Rockapole getting more capital efficient, which is bullish. And also, our Eath is now on Euler, which is
a lending and borrowing marketplace,
a permissible,
lending and borrowing marketplace.
Similar,
I guess, to AVE and Compound.
It's cool to see
liquid staking derivatives
saturating all of our
defy lending platforms.
Yeah,
our friends at Coinbase staking
and others liquid staking
tokens,
I would have requests
that you call them
liquid staking tokens,
not liquid staking derivatives
because derivatives
have a very specific legal meaning.
Somebody's going to slap me.
Yeah,
someone's going to slam me.
Yeah, but no worse.
Disclaimer.
Sorry.
They are derivatives, though, for real though.
Sure.
Semantics.
Semantics.
Yeah.
Disclaimer.
Bankless holds a bunch of RPL, and we also run Rocket Pool mini nodes.
And then Ryan and I are also angel investors into Euler.
And Bullish Heath.
Certainly.
Polymarket tweeting out here, David, looks like someone knows something about the Arbitrum
AirDrop.
What is this?
What is this graph we're looking at?
Polymarket is a predictions market that allows people to gamble about the probability of future events.
and the theory behind prediction markets is that if one or a very low number of people know something,
that they can sway the entire market because they can make a gamble.
So if they know that the arbitram air drop is coming by March 31st,
they would go to this polymarket market, and they would bet that on the knowledge that they have.
And so as of recently, the probability that an arbitram air drop comes by March 31st on polymarket
has moved to greater than 50% chance.
and so the implication here is that someone
knows something and has taken a bet on that market.
I took this tweet into the Arbitrum
our telegram with the Arbitrum team Ryan
and I was like, hey, you guys,
you guys wouldn't drop a token
without scheduling a live stream with us first, right?
And they were like, they didn't say anything.
They didn't say anything.
They said, you never know,
but you'll be first to know when we do,
if we do, that kind of thing, right?
Yeah, exactly, yeah.
As we'd expect.
So here's something
that is not news, but it's perhaps news.
We don't know.
Another rumor, David?
Another perpetuating?
Thank you, Ryan.
More rumors of rumors.
Koso's governance.
They gave the green light to interchange security.
I remember Zaki telling us a little bit about this
when we had them on the episode for the Cosmos thesis.
If you want to hear about that, you can go listen to that episode in the archive at where, David.
Where can they go find that?
Bankless.com?
That's it.
Bankless.com.
That is at it.
Bankless.com.
Go there right now.
Yes.
Anyway, they're actually doing it.
So what does this mean?
What is interchained security?
Right.
So Cosmos is the app chain mesh network vision.
It is basically the Ethereum layer two, layer three vision without the layer one.
So if you take out, if you only have networks connected to other networks and you don't have
the single shared security model of Ethereum, that's Cosmos.
It's a mesh.
It's a mesh.
Cosmos has given the green light to interchained security.
That is Cosmos becoming more like Ethereum.
So they are starting to enshrine Cosmos Hub as the central security provider for the rest of all app chains that opt into that security.
Which is kind of like the Ethereum L2 thesis.
And so Adam is starting to fill these shoes that Ether is for Ethereum.
That's a token.
It's a Cosmos token.
Cosmos token, yes.
Yes.
Exactly.
And so like when I was talking to something,
sunny Agarwald about this forever ago. He's like, yeah, the Cosmos and Ethereum long-term
conclusion of that design pattern is actually the same pattern. They have just started at different
paths. Arbitrum, excuse me, not Arbitrum. Cosmos, got an arbitram token on my mind. Cosmos has
opted in to prioritize the app chain mesh network vision first, shared security later.
Ethereum did the shared security layer one first, also ETH's money first, and now is now moving
into layer two's and layer threes. The conclusion is the same. This is as the Ethereum layer two,
layer three, super chain, hyper-scaling vision starts to unfold. Cosmos is also doing shared security
and atoms as the reserve asset of Cosmos if the market wants it. And I think this means if you're
launching an app chain on Cosmos, rather than bootstrap your own validator set, you just get to
hire the atom holders as mercenaries. For a fee. For a fee. For a fee. Right, you hire them.
gas fee, perhaps.
They're mercenaries.
Use their military instead, but you've got to pay them because they're mercenaries.
So that's cool to see.
And I think his value accrual related to Adam the token, at least it should be on the fundamentals.
In theory, yeah.
Let's talk about another token that started this whole crypto thing off.
It's called Bitcoin.
Bitcoin.
Bitcoin's a token.
You just offended every single Bitcoin Maxi that listens to bankers.
It's a token, guys.
They're all tokens.
No, no, no, no.
It's a coin.
I say Bitcoin's a token.
the difference between a token and a coin? A token is a asset that is issued on top of another
blockchain. A coin is the asset that is the native currency for the crypto economic system.
Ether, Bitcoin is a coin. Uni token, any ERC20 token is a token. Coins are innately related to
blockchains. You can't have a crypto system. You cannot make a blockchain without creating
an economic security model. And so therefore, every single, you know,
crypto economic system has to have the, you know, the economic part, the security part,
which is the coin, the currency, the gas, ether, Bitcoin.
I feel like this is a simple answer.
You win this round, David Hoffman.
You win.
You got that.
That was a good answer.
Maybe I was teeing you up for that fantastic answer in a bankless explaining.
We just wanted to teach a quick lesson.
All right.
So this is roll kit saying you can now run a sovereign roll up on Bitcoin.
Wait a second.
I didn't know Bitcoin could have a roll-up. Is that possible? What is this?
Apparently, it's been possible for a very long time. Just no developer has wanted to actually do it.
Yeah. So sovereign robs on Bitcoin. Now a thing. This is a tweet out of a roll-kit dev and modular
framework for roll-ups. And so this is a toolkit to produce sovereign roll-ups on Bitcoin.
Okay. Why are we emphasizing this sovereign word? A sovereign roll-up is different from a side chain,
which is a chain that just, what is a side chain actually?
It's just like a normal independent blockchain.
It's own validator set that like checkpoints to a different blockchain kind of.
It doesn't have to.
I mean, it could just checkpoint to itself.
A sovereign chain, a sovereign roll-up is a roll-up that puts all of its data on a dominant chain,
a bigger chain, and all of the data that it puts onto that chain can be used to reconstruct
the roll-up state.
So it is much more trust-trustless than a side chain.
So Bitcoin has advanced in the layer two, trustless layer.
two phase well beyond liquid god all the ass hats at liquid i hope they're just embarrassed i know
they're not though that anyway can i ask though can we call this give me give me the case for why we
can call this a roll-up i understand it's a you're saying it's a sovereign roll-up but is it really a roll-up and
this is a tweet where uh that that i'm going to read where i think somebody was asking eric wall
that question let me pull it up this is maha'halo asking eric wall like commenting on his tweet
being excited about this and Mahalo says
that is not a roll-up though
there are no fraud ZK proofs
you're not actually doing the fraud ZK
proof on the layer one
you're just doing the data layer
the data storage on the layer
which does that make it a roll-up
David or is this something else
I'm going to answer your question
with a really annoying response
a ZK roll-up doesn't have ZK proofs
Ryan
what do you mean
a ZK roll-up does not use ZK
knowledge proofs
no fraud or
ZK proofs. I'm going to, I'm quoting Mahalo here. So, okay. Sure.
Validity proofs is what, uh, a ZK roll up actually uses. This is somebody who went to
eat Denver and I did not. Actually this one, that, that little bit of knowledge came from
Starkware sessions. Um, well, look, there's advantages to being a conference war. Yeah. Uh, this is
going to break my brain to try and explain. This is one of those, I have to like go back to basics about like,
okay, how does it work again? Oh yeah, this works like that. I don't know. I ask me hollow, Ryan.
I think we lose something here, and I'm not sure what we lose.
As far as settlement assurances, I don't think that this is quite the same as a ZK roll-up or a optimistic roll-up on Ethereum because it's not doing the fraud and validity proving on the layer one.
But I'm not sure, like from a user perspective, what we've lost here, what security guarantees, settlement guarantees we've lost.
I'm going to let you be the negative Nancy of Bitcoin of this episode.
I'm going to say, I am just happy that the pendulum in the Bitcoin ecosystem has moved very quickly away.
That they're even having these conversations.
Yes, exactly, that this is happening.
Right.
The fundamentalist Maxis are losing their control over the Bitcoin narrative.
And the builders and innovators and optimists of the Bitcoin ecosystem are getting pigeonholes to finally grasp onto and take back Bitcoin from the crypto bloodites of the world.
That's it.
Build back Bitcoin.
Yes.
Take it back.
Maybe this is happening. Maybe the builders are coming and taking it back. Yeah, no, I'm not going to be bearish on that. I'm actually very bullish that these types of conversations are happening. I was just wondering like what the difference is. So we'll flag that. Maybe I'll ask Mahalo or somebody else who could tell me. It's not some magical cool new roll-up that's any better than you can do on a smart contracting layer. That's for sure.
Yes. And I think it might be. But it's something. It's something. It's huge. Good for Bitcoin. I'm very bullish about this. You go.
Labs. This is also maybe good for Bitcoin.
Yucal Labs just made $16.5 million in the first Bitcoin NFT auction.
What is this, David?
So they have created a set of NFTs on the Bitcoin Ordinals Protocol.
They did this funky little auction mechanism where they took in Bitcoin deposits from
people and then took in their bids for what those Bitcoin transfers would be.
And then they said, okay.
And then they did the auction and then they returned.
and then they returned all the extra bitcoins that people lost.
And so $16.5 million in revenue for Yuga Labs for their 288 NFTs that they minted.
The top bids were 7 Bitcoin and 4 Bitcoin, which was insane.
And they made $16.5 million in 24 hours.
Were people upset at how this was done?
Extremely upset.
Really?
Why?
Because of the auction mechanism.
Basically, they were their own, I don't even know what to call it, custodian.
So people would say, they would say, hey, send us your Bitcoin and your bid amount.
And then we will run this auction in our like private black box closed environment.
And then we will determine the winners and spit back out all the money to the auction.
Oh, that is terrible.
That is not decentralized nor credibly neutral at all.
Hence the limitations of a blockchain that doesn't have a native smart contracting layer on it.
Yes, it's very not bankless whatsoever.
The auction mechanism itself.
But the actual NFD storage.
was bad and broken.
Yeah.
I mean,
I don't think
there did anything
bad or anything,
but the point is,
is that like...
Well, we don't know,
do we?
This is, here's
tweet, which is
extremely spicy.
Dear Yuga Labs,
this Ordinol's
Twitter account
that he's retweeting
is correct.
Actions like this
prove that for some
entities and for people
once a shit coiner,
always a shit coiner.
If I,
personally, Casey,
Rotamore,
ever see you,
Luga Labs,
the entity,
fuck around with
degeneration bullshit like this,
again,
I will wash my hands
of you forever
and encourage others,
including those
close to me to do the same. Get effed, you highly regarded morons, Casey Bordamore.
Wow. Who's this guy? Who's Casey Rotomor? He's, he's, I had him on bankless with Eric Wall.
That's, oh, it's that case. This is the creator of the Ordinals protocol, bro. And he is really
pissed that they're using it in this way. Well, I don't think he really cares about, like, them being
bad. He thinks that they are setting a precedent for spammers and attackers. Like, see any bad person
who sees this model. He's like, oh, I can just, like, copy what.
what Yuga Labs did and people will send me their bitcoins and I'll tell them I'll just,
you know, give back the losers, but then I'll just run off with it. It does set a bad
precedent. Do you know what? I, I wasn't on that episode of Casey, but I listened to it. I really
like this guy. I respect this guy. He's a new class of Bitcoin builders and look at him taking a
stand against like faulty auction mechanics. He's got like the spicy sharp edges that Bitcoiners
have and he's also got this like builder. It's like it's a new character arc of Bitcoiner.
You're totally right. I like it. And of course, a whole bunch of
Bitcoin fundamentalists hate him for even doing this.
Certainly. Yeah, but I'd have never aligned with the fundamentalists ever.
Okay, so here is the update of Blockspace, Bitcoin Blockspace fees.
Because of the Ordinals, Bitcoin Blockspace demand was up for four weeks in a row.
It then became down for two weeks in a row.
And that was last week.
In the last 10 days or so, it is up very big.
I'm pretty sure that spike in the very far end has got to be this Yuga Labs ordinals
demand.
but the power shifting back into the favor of ordinals are here to stay.
So we'll see how this pendulum shifts left and right.
But we had some very big weeks in Bitcoin blocks-based demand in the last week or so.
I like it.
I love this.
This is so fun.
Yeah, it's been a while since Bitcoin put a big smile on my face.
But like, it's doing some cool stuff.
I'm enjoying this arc.
I'm loving the pluralism coming out of Bitcoin.
I like this new season of Bitcoin.
Yeah, 20203 season is great.
Good job creators of the show.
Bankless listeners are like, I never thought this was possible.
They just had to do stuff.
Yeah, they had to enable builders, man.
This is Amazon news that hit crypto this week.
Amazon NFTs will be tied to real world assets.
Tokens are possible.
Amazon stepping into the NFT world, it sounds like.
Yeah.
We're not exactly sure what this means.
What do you make of this?
Do we have any details?
I don't have too many details.
They are working.
Here's a statement.
For instance,
people would be able to purchase a fashion-oriented
NFT tied to a pair of jeans.
So I think this is real-world
high-value physical items paired with an NFT.
How they managed to do that?
I don't know.
It's not clear what's going on here,
but it is clear that something's happening.
My take here is that someone is advising Amazon
on what to do and how to do it.
Or maybe do you think there's a small skunk works team
working inside of Amazon that are like
bankless listeners and are hearing this and give us some tips and hit us in telegram and
someone hit us up give us some details so that we know more about this yeah but not break any nDAs of
course of course of course not yeah it's cool i'm not journalists we're not journalists
we're thesis driven media company that's right not journalists at all yeah that's right bankless
dot com we keep we keep secrets let's find let's let's uh monitor that as we get new news
david multi-coin capital their hedge fund loss 91% in 2022 that was
Last year, of course, big loss.
Is this a big loss or is this just like the average crypto investors portfolio?
What's your take here?
It is a big loss.
It's certainly worse than the average crypto person's portfolio.
I've been known to be a multi-coin disagreeer at the very least.
I was initially like ready to like grave dance, but then I looked at my portfolio.
I was like, well, okay.
You're down, you're not down 91%.
I'm not down 91.4%.
Not nearly that bad.
But you can like,
20202 was a bad year.
Multi-coin had very significant exposure to both.
I'm assuming FTCS, I think.
Rumors on that one.
Oh, they lost,
David, they lost funds in FTAX.
Oh yeah, they had money in FTCS.
Yeah.
Right.
The old-fashioned way, they got scammed by SBF.
Had a ton of exposure to Solana.
And so like, yes,
multi-coin capital down 91.4%.
That looks pretty damn bad.
That sucks.
They should have sold more, obviously.
But also a reminder, like, 2020 was a very bad year.
And they were probably up decently big in 2021.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
Do you remember Ryan Selkiss?
You fly very high.
You fall very fast.
Ryan Selkis' end of the year report, Multicoin were like the big winners of 2021.
Yeah.
I would just like to talk to some of the multi-coin LPs and investors because,
Like it's really the real signal here is like are they happy and I would like to
Hear more about that I've heard my rumors I've heard that people are upset
I haven't heard anything more beyond that yeah there there's also rumors should we get we shouldn't say any more rumors
Rumors we let we got slapped last week but you know when hedge fund founders sell the top as well
It tends to leave a bad taste in everyone's mouth and also calling this thing don't take a zoom call and a Ferrari
Don't do that that's not a rumor that did happen
By the way, that did happen. That is confirmed. Yeah. It's, it is, I think, odd sometimes when people hear the term hedge fund, which is supposed to hedge you against risk. And they see a 91.4% loss. It's really not how these funds operate in crypto. They're more like just liquid VC firms almost. I don't operate a hedge fund. I don't intend on operating a hedge fund. I think if you are up some bajillion percentage points and at some point it's your duty to hit the sell button. Is it?
I wish I could take my advice.
I don't do that personally.
I never hit sell.
Well, you're not operating a hedge fund.
You're operating a media business.
True.
David, what's this story?
This is crazy.
I think this is a follow-up to our story last week, right?
Yeah, so last week, a judge ruled that rocket ship, upward chart, and money bags emojis are, can be construed at as financial advice.
A second judge has ruled that the shruggy emoji completely nullifies all previous emoji.
Are you serious?
This is great news.
Yeah.
So you can just say whatever you want and then you end your tweet with a shrug.
Wow.
Not financial advice.
Yeah.
That's all you have to do.
That's a disclaimer.
So a shrug can be a financial disclaimer, not financial advice.
At least this is according to the rug.
Dot mirror.
XYZ.
I'm getting the sense that Ryan did not get rug this week.
No, I saw the agenda.
It almost got me and then I clicked it this time.
Yeah.
All right.
This is a pretty good one.
So, I mean, I think that's a, I think if you can, I think this is actually a pretty good.
This is a fair take.
fair. This is a fair take. I think that if a rocket emoji means you're you're pumping your bags
and you are soliciting or its financial advice, then a shrug emoji should mean you are not doing
those things. Yeah. So there's that meme out there where he's like the crypto investor just tells
his friend, you know, totally buy this token and it's going to make us rich. Yeah. I don't know though.
You always finish up with IDK though so that you don't ruin their life. That's what the shrug emoji is.
Oh, that's great. All right. I don't know, though. Perfect. We have a new disclaimer, actually, at the end of the bankless podcast. We'll just replace it with, I don't know, though.
The Shrug. Thank you for bringing a little levity to the situation here. What's this? Invest in music. Welcome to invest in music. Fans become collectors. That's cool. Sounds cool. What is it?
Yeah, this is a brand new podcast. New podcast on the scene for people who want to consume more podcasts than what bankless can offer you. Although that's probably a surprise.
if you are into the world of music NFTs,
this is a podcast out of Cooper Turley.
And so if you want to keep up
with the world of music NFTs
and the growing economy
that relates to investing in
and sharing Web3 music
and other things of that nature,
invest in music is the new podcast for you.
That's a good idea.
Very cool.
All right, on the raises this week,
there have been a bunch,
but here's the one notable one.
Ethereum layer two scroll,
which is a ZK EVM layer two,
reaches $1.8 billion in valuation.
in their new funding round.
That's a big valuation for a bare market.
Yeah, that's right.
They raise $50 million.
So $50 million in the bank
at a $1.8 billion valuation.
And disclaimer, Ryan and I are angel investors
into Skull.
You said it in the bank.
What bank do you think they use?
Hopefully it's not Silvergate signature?
Oh.
Who knows?
I mean, that was the metaphorical bank.
I bet you was USDC.
Yeah.
When we invested in Scroll, we said USC?
When is our language going to adapt to, like,
rather than say in the bank
or like I still catch myself I say
we got money in the bank or like I'll write you
a check and I'm not literally writing
a check anymore
it'll take some time to kind of catch up
I think we still use the words
it just means it starts to mean something different
okay okay yeah it just landed in my account
because you sent it five seconds ago
yeah that feels a lot better
and I didn't have to wait
jobs this week of course
we got companies raising that means we got companies
hiring big one to point out this week
Bankless is hired a course, but I want to point this one out.
A mutable wants a protocol blockchain engineer.
This is layer two.
It's a very technical.
Yeah, fantastic.
Work in gaming, gaming, infrastructure, gaming platform.
Go check this out.
There's a whole bunch more jobs I could list, but I won't right now.
Go check that out of the banklist.
com job support.
David, what do we got coming up next?
Coming up next, we got questions from the nation,
as well as the hot takes of the week,
as well as the meme of the week,
as well as what Ryan and David are bullish on.
We'll probably chatter about some ETH Denver stuff as well
for those that want to stick around after all the news
and just hear about what Eith Denver was like.
So all of that and more coming up
as soon as we talk to some of these fantastic sponsors
that make the show possible.
The Phantom wallet is coming to Ethereum.
The number one wallet on Solana
is bringing its millions of users
and beloved U.X to Ethereum and Polygon.
If you haven't used Phantom before,
you've been missing out.
Phantom was one of the first wallets
to pioneer Solana staking inside the wallet
and will be offering similar staking features for Ethereum and Polygon.
But that's just staking.
Phantom is also the best home for your NFTs.
Phantom has a complete set of features to optimize your NFT experience.
Pin your favorites, hide your uglies, burn the spam,
and also manage your NFT sale listings from inside the wallet.
Phantom is, of course, a multi-chain wallet.
But it makes chain management easy,
displaying your transactions in a human-readable format
with automatic warnings for malicious transactions or fishing websites.
Phantom has already saved over 20,000 users from getting scan,
or hacked. So get on the Phantom waitlist and be one of the first to access the multi-chain
beta. There's a link in the show notes or you can go to phantom.com slash waitlist to get access
in late February. Arbitrum 1 is pioneering the world of secure Ethereum scalability and is
continuing to accelerate the Web 3 landscape. Hundreds of projects have already deployed on Arbitrum 1
producing flourishing defy and NFT ecosystems. With a recent addition of Arbitrum Nova,
gaming and social daps like Reddit are also now called.
Arbitrum home. Both Arbitrum 1 and Nova leverage the security and decentralization of
Ethereum and provide a builder experience that's intuitive, familiar, and fully EVM-compatible.
On Arbitrum, both builders and users will experience faster transaction speeds with significantly
lower gas fees. With Arbitrum's recent migration to Arbitram Nitro, it's also now 10 times
faster than before. Visit Arbitrum.io, where you can join the community, dive into the developer
docs, bridge your assets, and start building your first app. With Arbitrum, experience.
Web 3 development the way it was meant to be. Secure, fast, cheap, and friction-free.
Question from Siogi this week from the bankless discord. Here it is. Is there some economic or
technical reason that chains cannot use a stable coin as the native token for gas? I know Tara did,
but that was a unique setup, which didn't work. Yes, it didn't. Why is there no chain using a fully
collateralized stable coin as gas and providing non-inflationary staking rewards based on these for
block space? Seems like a good idea.
interesting question. Yeah, I really love some of these questions that really illustrate to me where the question asker is on their journey down the crypto rabbit hole. This person is that like the very like starting to get into some like really technical like level questions. Like why can't we use stable coins for gas? Yeah, it's a good place to gas. It's a good place to gas. Thinking of novel ideas here. Right. Yeah. Um, asking why can't we do this is a great way to learn. Okay. So great question. Uh, why can't we use a stable coin for gas? Tara did. Uh, and so they said, is there some economic or technical reason? And the answer is yes. Both.
Going back to when we were talking about tokens versus coins, Ryan, we need ether, the coin of
Ethereum to be the gas.
Why do we need that?
Well, because in proof of work, so this also applies to Bitcoin, you need ether and Bitcoin
to have value because they are the things that economically secure systems.
The outside world calls the crypto industry like blockchain.
These are blockchains.
A blockchain is actually just one part of a grander system of technologies that combine.
together create what we know as like Bitcoin or Ethereum. The way that Vitalik and I've been using
this language have called these things, crypto economic systems. And so it's a semblance of
cryptography at blockchain for a database and economics. You must have a native currency of a
crypto economic system to be self-sufficient and independent and autonomous. Because that's what
secures the thing. That's what secures the thing. Miners don't mind Bitcoin unless Bitcoin has value.
stakers don't stake ether unless stakers have value where does that value come from it comes from
the enshrined relationship between the economics of buying block space from bitcoin and buying box
block space from ethereum using the native currency if you don't have that relationship between
block space demand and currency of the chain then why does that currency exist at all that that that has to be
intrinsic that that relationship must occur that has to be and therefore on the ethereum layer one we cannot
use dye, for example, to pay for gas because we must enshrine the value of ether. So that is the
economic reason. Also in EIP-1559, this made this formal. So before EIP-1559, people were talking
about like, oh, you can just like pay miners, you know, OTC. You can like Venmo them to process
your transactions. And that could have worked. And actually, actually still is true for Bitcoin,
actually, not enshrine. Miners can put things into the blockchain for, you know, zero Bitcoins.
pay them in the pocket. So that's still a thing for Bitcoin. In EIP-1559, it formally enshrined
ether as the native currency of Ethereum. So you can't route around ether. Ether must be
burnt in order to make a transaction on Ethereum. So that is the technical reason that you can do
this. Now, what's cool is that that is true of the Ethereum layer one. That is not true of
layer two's. You can use any token that you choose on a layer two to pay for gas. However, that
layer two must pay for ether for layer one block space, but any layer two could use a stable
coin or any other type of asset for that matter as gas. Coin base chain, they would be violating
securities laws, could tokenize the coin security and the coin equity, turn that into a token
on base, and that could be the gas token for base. That's not what's happening. I just made that
up. By the way, that would make a theoretical possibility. Make way more sense in my opinion. Like
securities laws aside, that would be like a much more aligned kind of ecosystem.
That would be very, very bullish for the coin asset, except for the fact of violating securities
laws. That part would be bearish. Yes. Now, okay, so tell me about, by the way, that was a,
I think that was a great answer. Thank you. A couple of things this triggered for me, but like,
tell me about this new account abstraction ability where through a smart contract wallet,
I actually don't have to pay for my Ethereum gas fee with ETH the token.
Is that a thing that's happening?
Is that part of what you meant by kind of the technical reason you can't?
Okay.
Now we're now onto new horizons.
Now we're talking about wallet design and account abstraction.
What account abstraction does is that say you've got a brand new wallet and you throw 25 U.S.
DC in there.
There's zero eth in there so you don't have any ether to pay for gas and you would like to send
that 25 U.S.
etc.
or do something with it or deposit into pull together.
But you don't got any gas.
Yeah.
Wouldn't it be nice?
It would be nice.
Wouldn't it be nice?
Yeah.
So with account abstraction.
you can have a different wallet
to pay your gas fee.
And so you actually never have to have ether
inside of your wallet
and you can still do crypto
and defy things.
Someone else on your behalf
pays for your gas,
but that person is still paying for gas.
Yeah.
The economic rules of you must use ether
still apply to someone somewhere.
But with account abstraction,
you can change who's responsible for those rules.
A relator could pay for it.
The smart contract wallet
could kind of provide some reason to pay for it.
all of those things.
You know, that was a great answer.
Do you know the other thing that kind of reminded me of is when you were talking about,
yeah, in Bitcoin, this is still an unsolved problem, that somebody could go in a telegram
group and send someone money out of bound in order to reward them for, you know, processing
their transaction in, like, first before everyone else.
This is the problem of any MEV, minor extractable value.
And we could call it minor extractable value in the case of Bitcoin.
All this kind of throws to me is, like,
With Bitcoin doing this ordnals thing and with blocks case demand going up, my God, they're going to have to go solve all of the same problems that Ethereum has had to solve or the past three to four years, including challenges with their monetary policy and enshrining Bitcoin as the asset for block space.
And also including, like, issuance.
And like, they're going to have to follow this exact same path and solve it, whether they know it or not.
Why?
Because if your block space is demanded in the same way that Ethereum,
is, then you're going to face the same challenges that Ethereum did.
It's hilarious to me, like, in a good way.
Like, oh, that's, like, that's sweet.
You're growing up.
Yeah, they're doing it.
You're doing it.
Yeah.
Anyway, they'll figure it out, I'm sure.
Okay, so that brings us to the take of the week, which, because you've said that,
I'd like to skip to the last take of the week, and we can go to the other ones first.
This one from, from, from, uh, Wong, John, Ian.
Thank, sorry for, for butchering your name, apologies.
who tweets out Ethereum culture and technology
is influencing Bitcoin culture and technology.
Now, for people that have been around
for a last bear market,
Nick Carter says this.
I believe Hasu also says this,
or previously said this,
is that Ethereum culture is downstream
of Bitcoin culture
in that Bitcoin, Bitcoiners, Bitcoin,
is at the spearhead of the crypto movement
and everything else is downstream
of Bitcoin, including Ethereum.
That was very true.
You and me, Ryan,
being like in Anthony Sizzano
and all the others,
seeing like,
ETH is money. That was us like being downstream. Trying to catch up. Trying to catch up, right?
Block space demand, security, all of that kind of stuff. I learned about settlement insurances as well
as you did from Nick Carter. Exactly. Right. And so so much of what is Ethereum today, we learn from
Bitcoiners. Bitcoiners have stalled out, man. And now I think the tables have turned. And so
ordinals, all of what you just said, just like Bitcoiners have to learn about like enthrining the value
of BDC, all that kind of stuff. Now they have to do all that.
hard work that Ethereum has done over the last five years. And they haven't done any of it because
the fundamentalists have been in the lead. They've had, they've had control. And so like now,
like now, now, like now we're finally bullish on Bitcoin builders, but it's also now bearish
because they now realize how far behind they are in this conversation. It's going to require some
protocol upgrades. And do they have the social layer, the layer zero that can can adapt and sustain that.
I don't think they do. Right? It's going to be an uphill battle and a challenge, but it's,
it's definitely cool to see. We've got some other takes of the week. This is one for
Mike Dutus.
Mike Dutis is retweeting two of Paul Kroogman's very old tweets.
One goes back to January of 2018 where Paul Krookman says, cryptocurrency lets you make
electronic transactions, but so do bank accounts, debit cards, PayPal, Venmo, all of these
other methods involving trusting a third party, but unless you're buying drugs,
assassinations, that's not really a big deal.
And so kind of disqualifying crypto as a payment.
All crypticers are criminals, aren't they?
So fast forward to his tweet just now, so five years.
later. I've been using Venmo for years, says Paul Krubman, but now it won't allow me to make payments.
I spent a long time in chat with representatives. They told me they can't explain why or fix it.
The software has taken control.
Mighty how to turn tables in five years.
Oh, Paul. You know, sometimes you don't realize it until it happens to you. I mean, like,
Paul Krugman is an economist, of course. He's said some pretty anti-crypto things in the past,
not seeing its utility, but until it happens to you in the country where you live,
when the situation that you have in front of you, you actually don't appreciate the value.
It just always brings me back to my like two mental models of people in the world.
There's people that see crypto for what it can be in the future and then therefore believe in it today.
And then there's people who see it for what it is today and see just like a fucking mess.
Yep.
Those are the two camps.
I totally agree.
Mark Andreessen, this is somewhat related.
He said this.
I can't convince you to want freedom, but if you do want freedom, it can't come to you in the form of a centralized system, whether that's communism, backdoored cryptography, or centrally controlled AI.
That was a good take. You want freedom. It can't come built on top of centralized systems.
Love it. Very true. It cuts so deep for like what we're trying to do here. Yeah. Like crypto's here to set you free.
Absolutely. David, what do you bullish about? Oh, God. I am bullish on the bankless nation, man.
Are you?
So people who listen to Bankless will know that I'm very, very bullish on Heath Denver as an event.
Because it was the place that I decided that I'm going to just yeat myself out of my previous life and do whatever this crypto thing means.
So I was like alone going off to East Denver with zero friends.
I just like awkwardly ask this strange.
Oh my God.
It is the first day in school picture.
I didn't know anyone at Heath Denver.
So I just gave this person my phone like, hey, can you take a photo?
of me in front of this sign.
And here's that photo.
Fast forward five years later,
we're at the first ever bankless meetup.
And there's 150 people here,
and we had to keep it a secret
because we knew that it was just going to be overwhelmed.
So shout out to everyone that came for the bankless meetup
and had the free beer at the brewery.
It was a fantastic time.
I enjoyed meeting absolutely everyone.
Ryan, I got up on stage,
grabbed a microphone, zero plans whatsoever,
and just started talking for a little bit
and ended up just like thanking all of the HQ
team for all of this support. It's cool. It's great to have company. It's dangerous to go alone.
And the fact that 150 people want to show up for the same movement that I saw five years ago.
It's just incredibly humbling. Yeah, it is. It's super humbling. This is the other how it started,
how it started, how it's going. Only in like a positive way. It's going pretty well.
That's awesome. Yeah. So that's what I'm bullish on. What are you bullish on, right?
Look, I'm going to say it again, bankless.com, bankless 2.0. I just want to take a moment because we
talked about it already so much about why we're doing this, I think. And the big reason is because
it was time to get more freedom, David, and kind of... Time to set sale. Yeah. At a high level,
I mean, substack is, it's kind of, it's its own platform a bit more, that's the platform we were
using for our newsletter and for bankless premium membership and that sort of thing. It was
constraining. We couldn't build crypto features on top of it. So,
We set sail. We created our own path. We created some more white space. It's been a tremendous effort. This is just the beginning, though. That's what excites me the most because now we can start building on top of this platform. And I just want to take a minute to thank the entire bankless team that has made this possible. In particular, I want to thank Jason and James, who are our key web devs and front end experts that actually brought this to fruition. And of course, our entire newsletter team, Alpha team, and the pods.
squad for populating all the content.
It's a fantastic job.
And I want to thank you, bankless listener.
We appreciate you guys, like a lot.
Like, the picture that David was just showing earlier, like, to have, I think you,
I was asking David, like, oh, so how is, how is the bankless nation?
When you meet people from the bankless community, how are they in, in person?
Are they, are they cool?
Like, do they have good vibes?
It was like, it's like.
Do they like us?
Yeah, it's like, these are all united people, like, with a share.
set of values and it's so cool. They're instant friends, right? Right. And we would not be able to
kind of launch this and carry this movement forward. We really consider ourselves in this whole
headless brand of the bankless movement, just torch bears. We're just trying to set the path.
Just trying to show the way. Yeah, bankless is for everyone. And now we have more resources to do it.
And we have those resources because you tune in every week on to this show and support us
because some subset of you have become bankless citizens and are taking that journey with you,
with us, and we just appreciate you all. It's just fantastic. So thank you, thank you to everyone
who made this possible. This is just the beginning. Yeah. We've been wanting a website for a while,
but we've wanted to also do it right. And this is finally a website that we just feel so damn good
about. And like Ryan said, it's just the beginning and meaning that now we have our own
vehicle, our own ship, our own structure to do cool things on top of. David, did you just send me
a cool thing? I just sent you a cool thing. And so the first thing that you can, you can already do
something, Bankless Nation on the Bankless website, which is if you are a, if you already are
subscribed to Bankless, if you already have given us your email address to receive the newsletter or
the podcast or whatever, you can go mint a Po app. And Ryan's about to show the Poe app on the
screen because it's ship season because we are sailing west. So this is the, the, you know, the
inaugural Po app for christening, if you will, the Bankless website is a ship because we're sailing
west. It's a ship because it's ship season. And it's just really just a badass looking ship.
It's the first time I've seen this, man. I love this.
Shout it to Logan who produced this for us. On his birthday, by the way. Sorry for making that
request, Logan. Thank you. And look, we got the black flags at the top. You see that?
It's so good. Yeah. So if you want to mint the Poap, you go to bankless.com,
sign in with the email address that you've already created an account. If you have not yet already
created account. I'm sorry, you can't mint the POAP because of anti-cibil and spam
mechanisms. We have to gate it to people who have already given us our email addresses. Otherwise,
people will attack the system. Go with the POAP and celebrate us. Sailing westward. We're going
west. This is awesome. All right, David, let's end here. Meme of the Week. What are we looking
at this week? So this was the toilet paper at Yth Denver. It was a roll of toilet paper.
Was this everywhere? Are you serious?
Quite a lot of places. Yeah. Wow. This is Sam Beckman-Fried on toilet paper.
So if you ever took a number two, you wiped your butt with San Bakeran Fried's face.
Did you get the opportunity, David? Or is that a personal question?
I'll leave that up for the Bankless Nation to wonder about.
For the imagination? Oh my God.
Please picture that.
That's been the end. That's it, guys. We've got a cool moment of Zen for you.
Again, celebrating the new bankless 2.0 website.
If you're listening, it won't really make sense. So watch the YouTube.
Yeah, watch YouTube.
Risk and disclaimers, guys.
crypto is risky. You could definitely lose what you put in, but we're headed west. This is the frontier.
It's not for everyone, but we're glad you're with us on the bankless journey. This has not been
financial advice. Shrug emoji. Shrug emoji.
And I saw that house for the first time in my wildest dreams, I never could have imagined something so gorgeous.
