Bankless - The Art of Spending Money: How to Get Rich and STAY Rich | Morgan Housel

Episode Date: October 6, 2025

How do you spend money in ways that actually make life better? Morgan Housel, author of the new book The Art of Spending Money, explores status vs. satisfaction, the hedonic treadmill, and why money’s best use is buying independence. We also cover quiet compounding, a practical 15-stage path to financial freedom, when to spend vs. save, helping kids without spoiling them, and small experiments that raise the utility of every dollar. ------ 📣SPOTIFY PREMIUM RSS FEED | USE CODE: SPOTIFY24  https://bankless.cc/spotify-premium ------ BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS: 🪙FRAXNET | MINT, REDEEM, EARN  https://bankless.cc/fraxnet 🦄UNISWAP | SWAP ON UNICHAIN https://bankless.cc/unichain 🛞MANTLE | MODULAR L2 NETWORK https://bankless.cc/Mantle 🌳KGEN | REQUEST A DEMO  https://bankless.cc/KGEN-podcast 🐂BULLISH | U.S. EXCHANGE LAUNCH  https://bankless.cc/bullish 💠BIT DIGITAL ($BTBT) | ETH TREASURY  https://bankless.cc/bit-digital We’re being compensated by Bit Digital (NASDAQ BTBT) for this segment promoting their company and BTBT. The compensation is paid in cash as a one time payment. You can find additional information about Bit Digital and BTBT on their Investor page at https://bit-digital.com/investors ------ TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Intro 2:29 Who’s The Book For? 5:49 There’s No Universal Formula 12:59 What People Want 19:36 Money as a Curse 22:03 Taking a Step Off 26:59 Holding vs Spending 30:26 Identity Traps 33:50 Secret to Contentment 37:32 External vs Internal Benchmarks 40:41 Making an Impact 42:37 Social Debt 50:51 Quiet Compounding 55:10 Financial Freedom 1:02:20 Money & Parenting 1:09:48 Balancing Saving & Spending 1:14:44 Small Purchases 1:16:59 Trying New Things 1:19:29 Morgan’s Financial Decisions 1:21:37 Closing & Disclaimers ------ RESOURCES Morgan Housel https://x.com/morganhousel?lang=en  The Art of Spending Money https://www.amazon.com/Art-Spending-Money-Simple-Choices/dp/0593716620  ------ Not financial or tax advice. See our investment disclosures here: https://www.bankless.com/disclosures⁠

Dopamine doesn't care how much you have. All it wants is more, more, more. What would feel better? Your net worth is $100,000 during a bull market or your net worth is a million dollars, but it's going to be a million dollars for the next decade. Yeah. What feels better? The bull market feels so much better. The growth is what feels good. And so because of that, no matter what your net worth is, the right amount that you think is going to satiate you is always 2x. A lot of people think getting rich is the key to solving their problems. Are they right? I think they can be right.

They can be right. So the answer is not no, but it's not a resounding yes either. I think it is very easy for everybody to assume that if you wake up in the morning and you're like, oh, I'm not satisfied with my life. I have this hole that needs to be filled. It's very easy to assume that that hole needs to be filled with more money. Why? Why is that the assumption? I think one of the big reasons why that is so easy to make that assumption is this.

Money is so quantifiable. And so you can measure your progress and I can measure myself relative to you very easily, very, very easily. I give the example of this. If I said I wanted to be a better husband, I'd like to be a 10% better husband. Great goal. Very noble goal. I would love to be a 10% better. What the hell does that even mean?

How do I measure that? There's no husband points. There's no husband points. If I were to say, like, who is a better? father, me or you or somebody else. Who knows? But if I said, I want to increase my net worth by 10%, I can track that. If I said, I want to have a higher net worth than you, I can track that down to the penny, a purely objective. So I think because it is so easy to quantify, it's easy to overestimate the importance. And again, if you wake up with a hole in your life,

the knee-jerk assumption is very commonly that a hole needs to be filled with money. Now, again, I think that can be true sometimes. I think everybody can use money to live a better happier, more fulfilling life. But I think we overestimate the extent of what it can do. And so there is a long list of things that money can do to give yourself a better life. There is an even longer list of things that it cannot do for you. And so many times in life, that whole that you have in the morning might be what needs to be filled in there is a different career, better relationships, better health, those kind of things. And by the way, you can use money to help those things. but it's not a direct one for one, you know, if only I had more money, that whole would be filled

and everything would be great. That's rarely the case. Got it. So you're saying basically money should not be the default. I want to get into the case that you're making. So the book is called The Art of Spending Money. And this is after, Morgan, you've written books on investing, basically, the psychology of money, same as ever. These were books on how to earn, how to save, how to invest, particularly how to work your your mental and your brain software to be oriented towards those things. You call spending money in art. So it's not a science, right?

There's no universal formula is what you're saying. It's just like investing from that perspective. I think a lot of people, though, think they won't need to read this book and pay this book any attention until after they've made like a lot of money, many millions of dollars, because they'll say, come on, Morgan, you know, the easy part is spending it. Okay, the hard part is actually making the money. Should people be thinking about spending money now, or is that a problem that rich people have

that they can delay until their risk? I think it's a very good point. It's a fair point. I thought about that a lot with the book when I was writing the book of, is this only a topic for people who have tons of excess money lying around and they don't know what to do with it? I think the answer, it could have been written in that way.

But I actually think for some of people who have lowered income, average incomes or lower incomes, this can impact you just as much. Those tend to be a lot of the people who are really struggling with things like if only, like the if only questions. If only I had a bigger house,

if only I had a nicer car. And like that's when the rap, that's when the hamster wheel begins in your life is when you are, you at least feel like you're at a lower level and the aspiration of your, like the gaze that you have of where you want to be

is really starting to form. And some of the most powerful, I think, misconceptions and issues that people have spending money, tend to be when they are younger and don't have very much of it. I use this example that, like, my desire for a Ferrari and a Rolex and a mansion and a private jet, that desire that I had really peaked when I was like in my early 20s. Before you could afford any of these things. Before I could afford any of it whatsoever.

And it's not that I don't like those things anymore. But when I didn't know this at the time. But when I tried to like pick apart my life now, I think a lot of why I wanted those things so badly is because when I was 19 or 20 years old, I had nothing else to offer the world. I had no intelligence. I had no humor. I didn't know how to be a good spouse or good. I had nothing to offer. And so by default, I think in my little teenage brain, I was like, oh, if only I had a Ferrari, then people would value me. Because there was nothing else that there was nothing else I had to offer. And so I think something like that of if you don't,

if you feel like you don't have a lot to offer the world, it is very common that people will fault to, well, maybe people will respect me for my car, house, clothes, jewelry, whatever it might be. That's a very common thing. And that really inflicts, tends to inflict people who are younger and poor. So that's one example of, like, no, I think this can really impact everybody. And I think I had the biggest issues with spending, whether it was spending too much or not spending enough, or having kind of a flawed social aspiration of like, where do I want to sit on the hierarchy? I struggle with those the most when I was younger and had less money. Yeah, I think that's a great point.

I mean, I think in order to understand where you're going to invest your life, you have to understand the things that money can do for you and the things that it can't do for you. And that's why this book was incredibly powerful for me. You also called it an art. So let's get back to this. Why is there no universal formula that we just plug in that tells us exactly how to spend our money and to optimize happiness.

I think there's two parts to this, why I call it the art of spending money and not the science. One is the very simple, you and I are completely different. We have different backgrounds. We have different experiences. Maybe we're a slightly different age. We have different family dynamics. I'm socially scarred from my past in a different way than you are.

We're both socially scarred from our past, but it's always going to be a little bit different. No two people are alike. If I were to talk about this in terms of our taste in food or in our taste. taste in music, people totally understand it. If you said you like Italian food and I say, I don't, it's fine. Nobody has any issue with that. And they understand like, it's subjective. There's no right answer. There's no formula for what food tastes good. And so people assume, like, people understand it with those topics and they assume that money should be the same. And I think most financial debates of how much should you, like, how should you earn your money? How should you

invest it? How should you save it? How should you spend it? Most of the time people are debating with each other. They're actually just people with very different preferences talking over each other in a way that they would never do with food or music. And so, you know, people have very different views on this. Ramit Setti is a great financial author, financial writer. And he talks about this a lot where his personal situation is he loves clothes. He loves fancy, expensive clothes. He dresses very well, always looks super sharp. And he couldn't care less about his car. That's like, that's his rough spending outline. So he spends a fortune on his clothes and not that much on his car. Now, somebody might be listening to this and be the exact opposite.

They might be like, I'm fine wearing Levi's and a Target t-shirt, but I want to do it while driving in my super expensive car. Neither one of those people are right or wrong. It's just whatever fits you. And the idea that a lot of what we want in life is a product of our past and that the experiences that I've had, the experiences that you've had have led us to the desires that we have, whatever those desires are. I found this what I thought was a very fascinating headline

from the Washington Post in 1929. So this is the peak of the roaring 20s just before the Great Depression. And the headline in the Washington Post was the more you were snubbed while poor, the more you enjoy displaying being rich. And I thought that was so insightful that if you were somebody who used to be poor

and you were snubbed for being poor, people made fun of you, people discriminated against you, whatever it would be. I think it's true that there is a, much higher tendency that if you become rich someday, however you want to define that, those are the people that want to have the fancy car, the fancy house, the fancy clothes, almost as a trophy for what they've overcome. And I think it's so insightful.

And I think everybody is snubbed in whatever unique way there are. Some people who grew up rich were snubbed and made fun of and bullied because they were rich. Like, this can manifest so many different ways. But the idea that this is not a spreadsheet endeavor. This is not just, oh, the bigger house is better than the smaller house. The faster car is better than the slower car. It's not analytical like that.

There's like a psychological itch that all of us have in our own unique ways. And so one of the like just anecdotes that I used to make that point in the book was we have a family friend who grew up extremely poor. They were a foster child. They were homeless. They grew up as virtually as poor as you can get in the United States. And then he became a very successful businessman later in his life. And when his daughter was going to college, he told his daughter, please go to the most expensive school

that you get into. It was almost like he wanted, he was begging her, like the higher the tuition, the better. And the reason he did it is because he was like, in his scarred mind, paying the highest tuition possible

was like a trophy for what he had overcome. It was, I made it. And it was almost like, if you get a scholarship, please reject it. And you can look at that and be like,

it's so irrational. It doesn't make any sense. But I think that's an extreme example of what you and I and everybody has some version of that story of like this is not a spreadsheet this is all psychological of who we're trying to impress what we're trying to prove to ourselves or we're trying to prove to others what we find relaxing what we find fulfilling is very different person to person introducing at frax usd the genius

aligned digital dollar from frax it's secure stable and fully backed by institutional grade real world assets custody by black rock super state and fidelity it's always redeemable one-to-one transparently audited and built for payments, defy, and banking. The best of all worlds. At the core is FraxNet, an on-chain fintech platform built to align with emerging U.S. regulatory frameworks where you can mint, redeem, and use FraxUSD with just a few clicks. Deposit U.S.C. send a bank wire or tokenized treasuries and receive programmable digital dollars straight to your wallet.

FRAXNet users benefits from the underlying return of U.S. treasuries and earn just by using the system. Whether you're bridging, minting, or holding your FraxUSD works for you. isn't just a protocol. It's a digital nation, powered by the FRAX token and governed by its global communities. Join that community

and help shape FRAX nation's future by going to frax.com slash R-slash-Bankless. FRAX, designed for the future of compliant digital finance. Ethereum's layer 2 universe is exploding with choices. But if you're looking for the best place to park and move your tokens,

make your next stop Unichain. First, liquidity. Unichane hosts the most liquid Uniswap V4 deployment on any layer 2, giving you deeper pools for flagship pairs like ETHUSDC. More liquidity means at better prices, less slippage, and smoother swaps, exactly what traders crave. The numbers back

it up. Unichain leads all layer twos in total value locked for Uniswap v4, and it's not just deep. It's fast and fully transparent. Purpose built to be the home base for Defy and cross-chain liquidity. When it comes to costs, Unichain is a no-brainer. Transaction fees come in about 95% cheaper than Ethereum-made net, slashing the price of creating or accessing liquidity. Want to stay in the loop on Unichane. Visit unichane.org or follow at Unichane on X for all the updates. Bit Digital, ticker BTBT, is a publicly traded ETH Treasury company that combines the two biggest metas of our time, Ethereum and AI compute. Bit Digital believes that ETH will power finance, and AI compute will power everything. Bit Digital gives you direct exposure to both.

Bit Digital holds more than 120,000 ETH with institutional grade staking and validator operations. On top of that, the company owns roughly 73% of white fiber, an AI infrastructure business that runs high-performance GPU data centers that adds a meaningful exposure to the growth of AI compute with over 27 million shares. This is an ETH treasury backed by real operations, designed to capture staking yield today while positioning for the future of intelligent computing tomorrow. The ticker is BTBT. This ad is not financial advice.

Do your own research. Learn more about Bit Digital and try their MNAV calculator at bit-digital.com. That's bit-hyphen digital.com. Bankless is being compensated by Bit Digital for this ad. You can find out more information by clicking the link in the show notes. Yeah, what I appreciate it about this book is, you encourage people, you don't offer judgment on what people choose to spend their money with. And yet also you acknowledge the traps.

There are some psychological traps that people might fall into where they're, let's call it, investing money maybe in places that won't fulfill them and won't produce happiness. And that's why this is, I know you have two other books on investing. This to me, I know it's talking about spending, but it's also an investing book because this is about investing in all of the non-financial things that are worth investing in, right? It's kind of the criteria. It's like, what are the things, assuming your goal, your life goal is peace and happiness, what are the things you can invest in to make those things happen? And what are the things that money just won't solve for? So let's come to some of these money traps maybe. So one of the first ones

you mentioned in the initial chapters is, we think we want stuff, but what we actually want is admiration. So you say people think they want a nicer car and a bigger house, but what they really want is respect in admiration. Talk about that. I think that's by and large true. If someone told me that's not black and white, it's a shade of gray. I would accept that. But I think for the vast majority of people, if you actually dig into what your material desires are, they are a status. They are to get other people's attention. The way that I tried to think about this, it's a very imperfect exercise. but I always try to ask myself, if nobody could see how I was living,

if nobody could see my house, my car, my clothes, nobody could look. How would I choose to live? Or if I was on a deserted island with just my family, just my wife and kids, nobody else can see anything. How would we choose to live? What kind of car would we drive?

How would we dress? What kind of? And I think in that exercise, you start realizing the difference between utility and status and how much of our desires, my desires, are based off of status. And that's not a bad thing. That's not a indictment because a lot of the world is signaling and storytelling.

It's a competition between people and for different resources and whatnot. So this is not bad at all, but you start to see where these desires come from. That, you know, there's a really interesting anecdote from Harvey Firestone, the late tire tycoon made Firestone tires. He wrote a biography in 1926, I think it was. This was about 100 years ago. And he said, for reasons I don't understand, every single wealthy person I've ever met, including himself, the first thing they did when they got wealthy was they bought a gigantic house. And he said, every single one of them, including him, found it to be a gigantic burden, found it to be a giant pain in the ass. And he and his wife were reminiscing in this biography.

They were like, we were happier in the small little cottage that we used to live. It was so simple. It was so quaint. It was so easy to maintain. But he said, there's no going. back to the small cottage except as a broken man. As in, he was like, it was this incredible set of admissions where he was like, as soon as you get rich, you have to buy a big house.

You don't like the big house. It's a pain in the house to maintain. But you can't go back to the small house because that's an admission that that's, that's who you used to be. It's not who you are now. So I think there are all these psychological trophies that we have. They're trophies for ourselves and they are signaling mechanisms to other people of where you sit on the pecking water.

and it is extremely rare that you find someone who has made a decent amount of money that completely detaches themselves from that game. I've played this game like virtually everyone I know to some extent in their own individual way has played the game of I want to signal to other people. People signal in different ways. You're signaling to different kinds of people, but there's always some sort of like I want to get respect and admiration for the things that I have. Now, again, that's not bad and it's not a criticism.

I engage in this as well. But I think the question to ask is, who do you want to respect and admire you? And what do those people actually respect and admire you for? So Warren Buffett's definition of life success was when the people who you want to love you do love you. He said that's what success is in life. And I think for a lot of people, if you take a step back, you're like, well, who do you want? Who do you actually want to love you? And different for everybody, of course.

But for me, it was like, it's my wife, my kids, my parents, and maybe two of my friends. It's like a very small group of people. And what do those people admire me for? Not my car, not my house, not my clothes, not virtually anything material. They will respect and admire me if I'm a good husband, if I'm a good dad, if I'm a helpful friend. And you can use money for those things, of course. This is not an anti-spending argument. But if you really dig down to like, look, I'm doing this for respect and attention.

Okay, whose attention do I want? and what do they respect me for, you will probably get to like a different philosophy around spending than the knee-jerk one that you had, which was more stuff, bigger stuff, faster stuff, nicer stuff. I think that tends to be the case. I love that quote. I'll say it again, the Buffett quote.

When you get to my age, you measure your success in life by how many of the people you want to have love you actually do love you. Right. Incredible. And you can think that. I'm not naming any names, but you can easily imagine someone who is,

is 80 years old, multi-billionaire, decadionaire. And from the outside, from our perspective, you're like, what an amazing life. Such a cool life. But imagine that, that fictitious person. They're either divorced or their spouse doesn't love them. Their kids don't talk to them. Their community despises them. They're in poor health.

Their friends don't talk to them anymore. Like imagine a situation like that. And you're like, by Buffett's definition, the people who you want to love you do love you, You can imagine someone having all the money you could ever want, but not having that thing that actually matters. And you can flip that around. You can say, imagine someone who is decidedly middle class. They are like the typical median $75,000 a year, $200,000 net worth person. But they're in a fantastic marriage with their soulmate.

Their kids adore them. They sleep eight hours a night. They're in great health. Their community values them and loves them. They enjoy their career. and if you said, like, which of those two people would you rather be? And, you know, it's different for everybody. I wouldn't judge you even if you said I would still rather be the billionaire.

But I think when you take that step back, that's when you're like, yes, you can use money to live a better life. But there's a lot of boxes to check before to then before it's going to make much of a difference at all. Morgan, in reading quotes from billionaires in your book, like Firestone, for instance, why do you think so many of them just they almost act as if money has been a curse in their life? I think evolution is such a powerful force and the idea that this is life in many ways is a competition with other people. And the poll, the appeal is so strong that if I have a bigger house or a faster car than you do, that I'm going to sit higher on the social pecking order and I will get more attention from, mates, from employers, from friends, like, whatever it might be, and therefore I'm going to have

a leg up in life. That is, by the way, like, probably not a false assumption to make. I think by and large, that can be true. There's a lot of asterisks in there in terms of, again, who's paying attention and whatnot, but I think it tends to be true that we are wired to compete against one another. And gratefully, by and large, we don't compete with each other through war and violence anymore, as much as we used to at least. Now we can compete with each other with a competition over whose house is bigger and whose marble floors costs more. And so it's a, look, look, it's a much better battle to engage in than many of the battles have been historically. But it's very difficult in a world of limited resources to just say, I don't care what anybody thinks of me. This is all kind

of a peacock feathers, just, you know, mating game, display game, whatever you want to call it. And so I think that's a very strong evolutionary force. And because of it, because that force is so strong, it makes us harder. It takes a little bit of effort to take a step back and be like, well, who's actually paying attention? The strangers out there aren't. And the people who I want to pay attention don't really care what kind of car I'm driving or at least less than the strangers might.

It takes, because the knee-jerk reaction is so powerful, it takes us taking a step back and reflecting on what actually makes us happy in life to actually do it. I fall for this all the time. Never in a million years would I want to make the claim that because I wrote this book and whatnot that I've mastered this topic. I catch myself all the time with the assumption of, ooh, look at that car. Wouldn't that one that? Look at that house across the way. Isn't that great? And I have to remind myself like, yes, that house is great. That car is really cool. But don't pretend like it's going to make the difference in your life that the knee-jerk reaction tells you that it will.

You know that it's not going to. But it takes effort to do that. You have to take a step back and really force yourself to think it. You have to take a step back. I also feel like you have to take a step off. And by off, I mean off this treadmill. We're on this like hedonic treadmill of sorts where you talk about this well-known trend where people always say that they'll be happier if they had 2x more earnings. Yeah, it's always 2x. It's always 2x, right? So if you have 50,000, it's 100,000. If you have 100,000, it's 200,000. If you have a million in income, it's, it's 2 million. And so you get this, this effect of millionaires or chasing deca millionaires or chasing centa-millionaires and they're just not happy. And then you go and

and you look at the billionaires, and what did you say, out of the 10 largest billionaires in the U.S., there's 13 divorces, right? And you wonder, I mean, is that the marker of happiness and success? What were the costs of achieving that status? Can you talk a little bit about this dopamine addiction that we have, this hedonic treadmill?

Like, why is it always 2x more? Why do we actually have to take a step off the treadmill to realize that the, The thing we're on is not making us happy. There's a great quote from Will Smith where he said, getting famous is amazing. Being famous is okay. And losing fame is the most miserable feeling that you could ever have.

And I think there's, it's a great philosophy. He would know, exactly. He has experience with all three. Slap in the face. Exactly. He's speaking from experience. But I think that's, it's a great observation. And I think it applies to money as well.

that getting rich is awesome. It's so much fun. Being rich is merely okay and losing wealth is mortifying. But inherent in that is like the process of getting richer is what's fun. It's less about having a net worth that's going to let you live a certain lifestyle.

It's a process. It's the upward slope that actually feels good. That is just the classic dopamine process. Dopamine doesn't care how much you have. All it wants is more, more and more. And so I think that's a big part of this. And that's why, like, bull markets feel so fun. Like, what would feel better? Your net worth is $100,000 during a bull market or your net worth is a million dollars,

but it's going to be a million dollars for the next decade. Yeah. What feels better? It's so, the bull market feels so much better. The growth is what feels is what feels good. And so because of that, no matter what your net worth is, the right amount that you think is going to satiate you is always 2x. That's what it tends to be across incomes groups. I remember this for myself. I think I remember telling myself, if my net worth can be $1,000, like, that's all I would ever need. I remember telling myself that when I was 17 or whatever it was. And of course, that's silly to think about now. But I really had that feeling that that would be enough. And I can remember many variations of that. If only it was X, if only it was 2x, if only it was 4X,

then I'd be all good. And of course, it's never the case. Because what you like is progress, what you like is going up. This can really afflict people when they are in retirement. Because if, let's say you are someone who's had really good savings habits for your entire life, maxed out your 401K, saved every month, invested, low cost, did everything, everything you were supposed to. And now it's 70 years old, let's say you have $5 million. Awesome.

You won. You, like, you can, now you can go live a great retirement. So many of those people can't do it. They cannot bring themselves to spend because they're in. entire life they've been conditioned to, the number goes up every month. My net worth goes up every year. Last year, it was this. Now it's 1x. Now it's 2x. And the idea of they're going to start spending down their money feels so wrong. And this is the Will Smith thing. Like, gaining wealth is great. Being wealthy is okay. Losing wealth is miserable. And so at that point, the money is not a tool

anymore. The money is in full control of your personality if you're unable to bring yourself to spend it in a way that would make you happy. And that happens for a lot of people. If you get too addicted to the idea of it's only fun to go up and I'm never going to use this as a tool, then that's a crazy thing. I remember really, I forget which culture this was. I read this probably 20 years ago, but there's some other culture somewhere in the world. I forget which culture that this is, that the idea of having a house with more bedrooms than you could sleep in is just so completely, it's like indistinguishable from mental illness to them.

And in this culture, I forget what it was, even the very wealthiest people would be like, well, it's my wife and my kids, so our house is two bedrooms. And like, why would we,

and the idea of like, there's three of us who live in this house, so we need nine bedrooms is like, again, they would consider it like mental illness. And so that idea of, you only want more, you only have to have more.

And the idea of only having, what you need and just exploiting it for that tends to be for most people, like a really hard thing to wrap your head around. Yeah, I think this is also true in the crypto community. So we've been very much conditioned to like hold. And so you just hold your assets because number go up and it's a virtuous thing to hold. And why are you holding? Because you're holding for, you know, generations in the future, you know, for some lineage down the road. And so you never, you never sell. You never do anything with your life. You just hold, right? It's the complete opposite. of the fiat mindset, which is like spend, spend, spend.

Right. It was very interesting to your point in the book that you said many financial planners, the hardest thing they have to do is actually convince some of their retirees to spend their money. Because I guess you get into this habit set after a certain age where you're just, I mean, you turn almost miserly where you're like, why spend? I'm used to saving. I will always save.

And so the harder thing is to actually get them to spend, which is like, a fascinating thing in itself. Yeah. And again, at that point, the money controls you. It's a financial asset, but a psychological liability. Because you might want, in that situation, you might want to travel more, buy a bigger house, give some money to your kids, whatever it might be, and you can't because it controls your identity. And that's a, that's a tough thing to do.

I think this is a lot of, this is true very often with inheritance that I think if you're a wealthier parent, you might know that the best time to give money to your kids, When inheritance is actually going to have a positive impact on their life, is probably when they're between age 20 and 40. When they're just starting out in their career, they might need to buy a house, get married, have kids to put through child care. That's when they need your money.

But for a lot of parents, like, the idea of letting go of some of their wealth while they're still alive is like they can't do it. They don't want to see their net worth go down, their own net worth go down. And so the standard thing, of course, is like, I will hold this money until I die and then you can have it. And I think part of that is a safety mechanism of like, we don't know how long we're going to live.

And so don't give all your money away because you might live until you're 97. But I think a lot of that is too is just like, I can't see my net worth goes down. Because I think for a lot of people, this also isn't a criticism because I think I have fallen for this fairly often as well. The idea that your net worth equals your self-worth is very common. That when I look in the mirror, I say, I am a dad and a husband and an author and a citizen and my net worth. worth is X. It's like it becomes part of my identity. And I think particularly for people who have somewhat of a higher net worth, like a medium to higher net worth, it could become a thing, that your net worth becomes part of your identity. And watching it go down is very tough. This is also

why the psychology of bear markets is so brutal for people. Because last year, you could say my net worth was X. And next year, you have to say my net worth is half of X. And that is brutal. It's like, it's not just numbers. It's not just. just money. It's who you were when you looked in the mirror. And I think this is true for a lot of people whose identities are really wrapped up in how they invest. Crypto is, of course, one of those, but there's many different flavors of that, the value investing community, the tech growth, you know, the SPAC community. There's all these different tribes that exist in investing that become part of your identity. And if that identity breaks, it can almost be like in the same idea of like

if you could say like, I used to be a husband, but then I got divorced. It's not part of your identity anymore. And that could be really tough for people to deal with. Yeah, I wonder how much of the challenge with, you know, billionaires being unhappy as kind of a result of this is just like, I'm a good businessman, businesswoman, therefore, you know, I can show that in my net worth. It's all on paper. And you can see, everyone can see how good I am at this, right? It's the same with, I mean, I think I've adopted an identity as an investor, for instance, a crypto investor. It's very easy to see how well I'm doing on that score. It's just, you know, what's my ROI for the year

or for the three-year period or for the five-year period of time, right? The numbers are on the screen. They tell me exactly. It is probably similar for you. I mean, Morgan, you've written books on investing, right? The idea that you wouldn't be good at this thing, that's got to be, you know, affronting to your sense of identity

if, once again, you tie your identity to being a good investment. How do we get out of that trap? I think it's different for everyone. So this also falls in the category of there's no science to what I'm about to say. But for me, it's, I think there's two things. The very classic Paul Graham quote of keep your identity small is very important. Anytime in life where you say I am a X, whatever X might be, I am a Democrat, I am a Republican, I'm a libertarian, I'm a crypto investor, I'm a value investor.

It doesn't matter what it is. Anytime you make that statement, you've attached yourself to a tribe, whether you know it or not. And once you fall into the idea of tribal thinking, it's very hard to think rationally because you don't want to be rejected by the tribe. It's very easy to outsource your critical thinking to other people within the tribe. That's true for everybody, no matter what the tribe is.

And there are tribes everywhere. Politics has tribes. Education has tribes. Industries have tribes. Investing strategies have tribes all over the place. And so keeping your identity small, I think, is very big. But the other thing is, of course, you're going to have an identity, make sure you keep it very,

that you're thinking long and hard about what that identity is. It's like tied to your core values. Tied to your core values. So for me, what I want my identity to be is husband, father, maybe author, friend, that kind of thing. I don't want to attach myself too much to anything. I want to stay, I want to have a mental liquidity to change my mind about these things,

about how I invest and whatnot. I've often thought, like, if you start a, hedge fund call, I'm making this up, you know, called like tech momentum LLC, whatever. You have to do that. You can't stop doing that thing. You just boxed yourself in. And like I want to have, again, the mental liquidity to be like, look, this is what I believe right now. But that's all subject to change. I'm, you know, in my early 40s. And a lot of things that I believe about life in general today is different than what I believe 10 years ago. And I hope that 10 years from now, when I'm in my early 50s, I'll have a whole new set of beliefs. I hope that's the case. And you can only

have that mental liquidity if you kind of reject the tribal thinking of I am a blank, whatever that might be. And so that's a big part. But like the uncompromising, I always want to say I'm a good dad. I always want to say I'm a good husband. I cannot fathom a life where I don't want to be those things. So I want to make those my tribe. That's, that's what I think it's just keeping your identity small and picking your tribes very intentionally. That's a great take. And I I love that idea of mental liquidity. Getting back to the 2X more thing and the treadmill that we all feel like we're on, how do you just, is it possible to?

I mean, there are people, you mentioned people like this that you've known in the book who've done this well and we all in our lives know someone who just seems to be happy with what they have. They just seem to be content. They just seem to not be on that treadmill that everyone else is on, where they're always wanting and expecting and hoping for 2x more, they're kind of like fine with what they have.

What is the secret to that life, to contentment? I think if we could, if there was a, not even a formula, but just a strategy on how to get there, nobody would struggle with this. The fact that people struggle with it is because it's so difficult for most people. But I think the insight for the people who are content,

who are just like took themselves out of the rat race, and they're like, I'm good. Like, I was in this little house with this, dirty car, I'm totally happy. I don't want anything else. I think a lot of those people who did it have a recognition of a couple of things. One, that the amount of recognition that you get from strangers for nicer things is much smaller than you think it would be. I think people who are content, just to use the example, with their 10-year-old car, know that if they got a brand new car, most people wouldn't care and that we overestimate. We tell ourselves, if I got this new car,

everyone's going to stop and stare and say, look at that guy, he's so cool. But the truth is they won't. Nobody's thinking about you as much as you are. That's a big part of it. And, you know, and so I think, I think the idea of just like they took themselves out of the game and they seek their dopamine, they get their pleasure from things that are not status games, are not rat races with other people. So I talked in the book about my grandmother-in-law, who was one of those people, who was just totally content. she found her pleasure just doing things that was not a competition with other people. Gardening, going for walks, talking with her friends. It had nothing to do with placing yourself on any kind of ladder.

The other thing that's like the insight that I think is important here is a lot of people, and I probably catch myself a couple of times in the book doing this. A lot of times what people will say is spending money to make you happier. They use the word happier. Now I think that's almost always the wrong target. That happiness is always a five-month. in an emotion at best, that if you're doing something that you really enjoy, it will create the emotion that you think is happiness. It's a fleeting thing. It's almost like humor. Humor is always

a 30 second thing. If you hear the funniest joke in the world, you laugh for 30 seconds. You don't laugh for seven days. It doesn't work like that. It doesn't work like that. And if somebody repeats the joke 47 times, you're like, stop. It's not funny anymore. I think happiness is like, that. It's a fleeting emotion. But the emotion that you want, most likely, is contentment. So if you are daydreaming about the bigger house, the bigger car, the plane, whatever it might be, by and large, when you are daydreaming and imagining yourself having a great life in that bigger house, what you are doing, whether you know it or not, is you're imagining yourself in that house being content with it, saying, this is all I need. I don't want anything else.

The more realistic thing that happens, though, is that if you are fortunate enough to get in that house, it's great for a little bit, but then you're on the back patio and you're like, whoa, look at the neighbor's house. They have a better view, right? It's the lack of contentment that's going to keep you going. So if you are chasing contentment instead of happiness, I think that's actually a pretty important mental shift of what you're actually trying to achieve. That's a great take. Another, I think, shift that you talk about was to unlock for me in the book is there are two benchmarks to measure how you're doing in life, one that's internal and the other that's external. The first, which is the internal one, is how happy you are

with yourself. And the second, the other is what other people think of you. Yeah. Talk about that. Well, I think there's probably a large group of people who their external benchmark is extremely high. Billionaires whose net worth is known and who show up on the Forbes list and the Wall Street Journal profiles their house that they just purchased. And their external benchmark is enormous. And maybe it's not even, it's not even just material. Taylor Swift has enormous external benchmark because of her talent, et cetera, et cetera. Athletes as well. And so that's one.

And that's, that's important. It's not a, that's not a nothing. But then there's the internal benchmark. Like, what does nobody know about you, but you're so proud of yourself? What have you overcome? How are you as a, as a spouse, a partner, a parent, a friend, a child? Like, how are, like, those things that nobody else gets to see. but are very important to yourself.

I think there's a lot of people whose external benchmark is very high and their internal benchmark is okay at best, if not low. And there's also the opposite group of people, people who are very happy with their life, very content with their life. They sleep eight hours and wake up,

feeling great about what they've accomplished, their legacy, what they've done in the world, the mark that they've left on the world, but their external benchmark is not that high. They're middle class people, average people, you would not think anything of them, of the house they live in, or the car that's your drive, or their job title, or their income, you would not think that much of them, but mentally, they're in a better state than some of the people who have higher benchmarks.

And so Elon Musk mentioned this. This is probably a year or two ago. I think he was on the Lex Friedman podcast. And he was like, you might think you want to be me, as in the richest man in the world, but he pointed to his temple and he was like, it's a storm up here. It's a mess up here. And so he's probably, I imagine, I don't want to put words. in his mouth or pass too much judgment. But I imagine his external benchmark is among the highest in the world. His internal benchmark, I bet, is mediocre at best. And part of that is a great thing.

I think people like Musk and many other entrepreneurs, what makes them great is that they wake up every morning telling themselves, this is not enough. You have not achieved enough. The products are not good enough. You're not going fast enough. You need to build more. That's why they're great.

And we as society benefit from that. Like, I want to live in a world where most people wake up in the morning feeling inadequate. That's where progress comes from. But at the individual level, you realize, like, how hard that can be to grapple with. It's probably the opposite of what you're trying, of what you are chasing in many ways. Like, people want to have progress in what they're pursuing. But the idea of waking up and saying, like, God, it's not enough. Like, I'm falling behind.

I'm not doing enough might be the opposite of the feeling that they're actually tracing during the day. I think that does some of this though, maybe some of the pushback here is like if you don't, if you're not entering the ring, if you're not competing with others, if you don't have these external benchmarks, then you're just not going to have an impact on the world. Like you're not going to do anything. What's, what's your issue? Like is that akin to giving up? No, so for me personally, and you can take this or leave it for however it would impact your life because everybody's different. But all I want out of money is independence. I just want to be independent.

Now, being independent means I can totally control my schedule. I wake up Monday. I wake up Wednesday. I wake up Sunday. I can do whatever the hell I want that day. Nine days out of 10, what I want to do is work and be productive. And for me, write and try to be creative. That's what I want to do.

But I'm doing it on my terms. I'm doing it independently. So you write that if being independent means you become a monk and live out in the woods and don't talk to anybody, then, yeah, for the vast majority, of people, that's going to be a low quality life. But doing it on your own terms, even if what you want to do is be productive, I think is a wonderful thing. That's my personal goal. And that's how I've tried to mix these of like, yes, I think taking yourself out of the game is tough. Remember 10 or 15 years ago, there was a big surge in the fire movement, financial independence, retire early.

It kind of petered out, but like 2012, 2015, it was like the biggest thing in the world. So many of those people who saved a ton of money and retired when they were 27, Six months later, we're clinically depressed because they took him the slums out of the game. Their whole goal was like, I'm going to retire, and then life will be great. And then they did it. And then you're waking up on a Wednesday morning. You're like, what am I doing? What am I doing my life?

Everyone out there is being productive and building and being productive members of society, and I'm just sitting here in bed in my sweatpants. And so, yes, there is a distinguishing characteristic between being independent and still being productive in the world. Yeah, that is interesting. there are a lot of things that we've talked about so far that money can't buy, right? And people think they can, you know, that it can, but it can't. But there is one thing that, yeah, you say money can buy, or one of the things money can buy is actually independence, financial independence and freedom. I want to pause that and come back to that because there's still some other things that I feel like are money traps that I want to cover that are in your book.

What is this concept of social debt, a type of social liability? And this is when the way you spend money influences how other people think of you. Maybe they have a bit more envy or jealousy. Maybe they're asking for favors. This was a powerful concept for me because it's one of those hidden costs of having wealth, I suppose, in particular in spending wealth and show in ostentatious ways or earning it in public. Can you talk about the concept of social debt? I first started thinking about this, probably about five,

years ago. I did like a consulting session with a group of NBA rookies. And the idea was, everybody knows so many professional athletes make millions of dollars in their 20s and they're bankrupt by 30. It's like the most common path. So this consulting thing was like, hey, for these NBA rookies who just signed their contract, let's talk about money and good financial behavior. And one of the rookies said this thing, I thought was so insightful. He was like, the reason that athletes go bankrupt, it's usually not because they bought them. a mansion and a private jet. It's because they bought their fifth cousin where they don't even know a modest house. And he was like, there is so much social pressure when you make that money.

He's like, particularly if you come from inner city poverty, as a lot of them did. He was like, you can't go from that and then sign a $10 million contract and tell everybody back at home, like, screw you guys, I got mine. Best of luck to you. He was like, when you sign that contract, that's not your money. That is mom's money, dad's money, cousins money, grandma's money. grandma's cousin's money. He was like, you have to share it with everybody. And so he was like, yes, you sign a $10 million contract, but you probably have this like this phantom social debt overhanging it.

That is more than $10 million. Shack once told this story too. He was like when he signed his first contract with the magic back in the 90s, he was like, his signing bonus was a million dollars. And taxes took half of that, so he has 500 grand. And he says, the first thing he did is he went to the Mercedes. dealership and bought a Mercedes S-600, drives at home. As soon as he gets home, he pulls in the driveway and his dad walks out and says, where's mine? So he drives back to the dealership,

buys his dad and S-600. He pulls back, they all drive home together. And whether this is apocryphal or he's exaggerating, they pull back into the driveway and his mom comes out and says, where's mine? And so he goes back and then buy her like a Mercedes convertible. And I think that, like, that's what social debt is. And it is not just for athletes or billionaires. The idea that, your expectations and other people's expectations are a debt that has to be repaid, just like any other debt, but it's hidden. It's not on any balance sheet. You can't even measure it, but it's there. And whether that's like, if you make some money, your spouse wants you to spend differently. Your friends expect you to pay for dinner. Your own expectations are that you should be living

in this neighborhood, driving this car. You have to dress a certain way if you have a certain job title, there's an endless list of those. And because it's not actual debt, it's a phantom. like psychological debt, it's very easy to ignore, but is very real. And to use an extreme example on this, too, I did another one of these consulting sessions for a family that were multi, multi-billionaires. And if you search their name on Google, nothing came up. Nothing. They're not on any list. There's no, they're like they give all their money away anonymously. there is literally nothing about them that you can look up. And that was very intentional.

They did this very intentionally because they didn't call it this, but they are very aware of the concept of social debt. That as soon as your net worth is public and people know you have money, nobody treats you the same ever again and not in a good way. Everybody wants to be your friend. Everybody's asking for money. And it's not a very fun life to live. So unlike the extreme examples of the MBA athlete who's like,

I have to spend all my money on my friends, and this multi-billionaire family who was like, nobody knows it but us. They, the billionaire family had a way, way better life, not because they had more money, but because they could just be themselves.

People treated them normally. And they themselves and other people were not overhanging them with this social debt that can creep up on so many people. Do you believe, I think Naval has this line where it's best to be wealthy and anonymous.

Do you believe that? Yeah, rich and anonymous. And he said the opposite of that is poor and famous, which the only example I could come up with is like Monica Lewinsky or something, like poor and famous. Yeah, that's absolutely worse. Like everybody knows you, but you didn't even make any money from it. That's the worst position to be in.

But rich and anonymous is great. I think Jim Carrey had a similar saying. He was like, if you think you want to be rich and famous, just try rich. Just try just rich. Because fame actually kind of sucks. So, yeah, there's a lot of that. If you can be rich and anonymous, that's the best spot to be in. Introducing Kijen.

aka Verify, the world's largest verified distribution protocol or VDP. If you're trying to grow a real protocol or app, you need real users doing real actions. If it's not Verify, it's just noise. At the core of Verify is Poggy, K-GEN's identity and reputation framework. It helps you reach humans, not bots, and proves what your users actually did, so your budget goes to the right people. With Verify, you can run verified user acquisition with confidence, keeping people coming back with retention tools,

like loyalty rewards, quests and achievements, and even power AI training and evaluation using trusted verified user groups, ensuring your models learn from clean data. And when it's time to reward your community, there's the K-Store, a global rewards marketplace where users can redeem perks that connect directly back to your app. Put simply, when growth is built on real users, you grow faster. And that's exactly what Verify delivers. If you're building a Web 3, AI, or gaming, request a demo to grow your protocol at www.kagen.io slash demo.

That's www.k-GEN.io slash demo. Bullish Exchange has officially launched in the United States and is now open to institutional clients. Built with institutional-grade infrastructure, Bullish offers deep liquidity, low latency, and compliant rails. It is already one of the top regulated BTC and ETH spot venues worldwide, with over $2 billion in daily trade volume. On Bullish, you'll get more than just trading.

Custody, liquidity, and execution are all tied into a single global order book. Fees are designed for scale. with zero percent maker fees and ultra-low taker fees for institutional accounts. High throughput APIs support programmatic strategies and onboarding is already seamless across 20 states with more coming soon. Markets may be unpredictable, but execution should not be. Access the new institutional standard at www.b bullish.com. That's bullish.com.

There's a link in the show notes for more information. Imagine a world where traditional finance meets the power of blockchain seamlessly. That's what Mantle is pioneering with blockchain for banking, a revolutionary new category at the intersection of TradFi and Web3. At the heart is UR, the world's first money app built fully on chain. It gives you a Swiss I-Ban account, blending fiaturacies like the Euro, the Swiss franc, the United States dollar, or the RIMB, with crypto, all in one place. Enjoy real-world usability and blockchain's trust and programmability.

Transactions post directly to the blockchain, compatible with Tradfai Rails, and packed with integrated D-Fi futures. UR transforms Mantle Network into the ultimate platform for on-chain financial services, unifying payments, trading, and assets like the MI4, the M-E-C, protocol and functions FBT, backed by developer grants, ecosystem incentives, and top distribution through the UR app, reward stations, and by-bit launch pool. For M&T holders, every economic activity in UR drives value back to you, embodying the entire stack and future growth of this super app ecosystem.

Follow Mantle on X at Mantle underscore official for the latest updates on blockchain for banking. That's X.com slash mantle underscore official. You've got another chapter on this, which is just sort of a way to follow that path a little bit. You know, it doesn't need to be, you know, multi-billionaire status, but the idea of quiet compounding, can you talk about that? What is the case for quiet compounding your wealth? I think a lot of it is just this idea that it's a good goal to live in a humble bubble. Yeah, I meet up that term, but like I want to live in a bubble where all of my goals and my aspirations don't leave the roof of my house. I have goals for myself and my kids and my wife of the life that I

want us to live, whether it's material or values, whatever it might be, but I don't want to have a lot of influence outside of my roof. Because as soon as I do that, especially in the world of social media, it's just a nonstop torrent of like, well, they want us to believe this. And if I anchor my expectations to that person and their house and their lifestyle and their beauty, it just spins out of control. There's no end to that game. I want it to be a humble bubble because I don't want to be ignorant to the rest of the world. I want to be aware of what else is happening in the world and grateful for what we have relative to other people, other cultures, whatever it might be. And so I think that's the best you can do is the opposite of quiet compounding is when you are

very loud and vocal, either online or with your material possessions displaying what you've achieved in life. I think it's a really tough thing. It inflates your own expectations. It inflates other people's expectations of you. It makes this so that you can't handle loss very well. And so the idea of I want to be an empathetic person. I want to be aware of the world. But for my financial goals, I want to live in a bubble. I just want to have. And I think in that situation, if you're not constantly comparing yourself to other people, you can be pretty content and live a great life at a much lower level than you otherwise could. If nobody's watching, which by the way, most people are not paying attention to you or me or anybody else. And if you come to terms of that, by and large,

it makes it so much easier to find your joy in life for things that are not a competition with other people, being a good parent, being a good spouse, being a good friend, learning, being funny, being helpful. And so that's, I think that's what, it's one of things that I've tried to do in my own life for the past five years. It's like, how can I live in a humble bubble and make sure that my expectations and my desires don't leave the roof of my house where the only people who I truly love and care about reside. The idea of quiet compounding as well is you can do it slowly, right? It doesn't have to be

overnight. It can be gradual over time and you can use the power of compounding. I mean, this gets back to some of your other books on investing itself. Yeah, if I'm comparing myself to you and you outperform me last quarter, then I'm going to try to chase you and do a bunch of crazy things and maybe lever up so I can catch you again. And like, it's not an easy way to invest for the long term if you are constantly comparing yourself to other people. I think

one of the very underappreciated aspects of Warren Buffett's career and why he's been so successful. Number one, it's because he's been doing it for 85 years or whatever it is now. And so the compounding just gets absurd at that point. But I think very intentionally, since he's been about 20 years old, he set himself up to have a permanent source of capital, where if he had a bad quarter or a bad year, which of course he does from time to time, it wasn't going to matter. The capital was not going to flee. It was not going to, people were not just going to liquidate their, you know,

Berkshire being public meant so that even if you didn't like it, like you can sell the stock, but you can't pull your capital from the company. It's not how it works. And so the idea that he could just pursue his own thing with the time horizon that he wanted to do was important. I think there is a graveyard of investors who, in their souls,

wanted to be long-term investors. They knew it's the right thing to do. They knew it's the right that you just focus on the next 10 years. Don't worry about having a bad quarter. They knew that, but realistically, they couldn't. They had to pander to the, the short-term investors who are like, if you don't perform this quarter, we're going to pull our money and it's all over for you. That is such a common story. And that's why successful investing

is not that difficult. This is not rocket science. It's just like diversification, patience, long-term, low-cost. Like, it's not that hard, but it's so much harder to implement than it should be because we get wrapped up in all these external pressures. Morgan, up to this point, I feel like we've emphasized all of the money traps and maybe the curse of money. And so somebody might come to this point in the conversation, be like, what the hell? I don't even want to make money. You know, it's just such a hassle. It's, you know, it's full of all these traps. Like, I give up. I'm done. But there are some things back to kind of the first question I asked you, that you believe that money actually can buy. Everything we just talked about are things that

people think it can buy it really can't. But there are truly some things that it can buy. And you talked about financial independence as being one of those for you. Let's kind of sharpen that argument a bit because I do think that is maybe the main thing that money can actually buy that yields benefits and true ROI for people. You talk about this idea that every $1 that you put in investment or savings is buying you $1 worth of financial independence, $1 worth of freedom. You talk about it being a spectrum of freedom rather than a binary. Spell out a little bit more your mental model here for financial independence and how is that something that money can truly buy? I guess one of the ways I think about it is I've been a big saver for my entire life

and I never really viewed it as saving money as much as I viewed it as buying independence. I feel like I purchased independence with every dollar that I saved. And I think that mental shift is important for a lot of people because if you are, think about the process of saving money, it is inherently like I'm saving today so that I can spend it tomorrow, which of course for a lot of things that is the case, if you're saving up for a house or a car, but if you view it as I'm purchasing independence, I might not ever spend this money,

but the fact that I have it there, maybe throwing off dividends or just there if I were to need it, means that I can live a life that is much closer to my true self. I can live where I want in the job that I want, pursuing the activities that I want, I can say what I want, I can do all these things, I can be independent, I can truly be myself. And it's true, again, as we talked about earlier,

this is an art because everybody's different. But it is a very common denominator that almost everybody across generations, across cultures, wants to be independent. It is such an innate human desire to want to be ourselves and not be pushed around dictated by the whims and the pleasures and the ideas and the goals of other people. And so if you can use money to do that, I think that to me, and for most people, is the highest purpose of money, is buying yourself independence. So you can be who you are. You define it as the ability to do what you're. want, when you want, with who you want for as long as you want, which I think is as good a definition as any. And getting back to the ideas, a lot of people think that, again, they fall into maybe

this trap of thinking that's a binary of, okay, if I just have X millions of dollars, then I'm financially independent. Then I've kind of made it. And so, you know, they won't feel financially independent until they reach a certain level of net worth, let's say. And then they often fall into the trap of like, well, are we sure X amount of millions is enough? Maybe it'll be, maybe it'll be, maybe I actually need more or something like this. You actually go through 15 different stages of financial independence in your book. And just, I think the emphasis here is that, look, it's a spectrum, right? Like, you can be more financially independent next year than you were this year. And in five years from now, then you were five years previous. Talk about that, if you will.

Yeah. So like, let's start with some of the time. who has zero net worth or negative net worth. Relative to that person, somebody who has a thousand dollar net worth. Does having a thousand dollars in the bank make you financially independent? Of course not. Does it make you more independent than you were at zero dollars? Of course, if you were to have a medical emergency, if you were to lose your job, if your car broke down, this is all a spectrum. I had a friend in college who was like, I'm here. He said to me one day, he was like, I don't save any money. I live paycheck to paycheck because what's the purpose of saving 50 bucks a month? It does nothing for me. And I kind of get that logic, but I also feel like every dollar you save is a dollar

of your future that you own and nobody and somebody else does not own. And viewing that as a thousand dollars is more independent than zero, $10,000 is more independent than $1,000. There is no limit to where you are on that spectrum. And I think once you have that mindset, I'm purchasing independence and independence exists on a spectrum, it is so much easier to build wealth. It is so much easier to be like, do I want a new car or do I want to be more independent? Do I want a bigger house or do I want to be more independent? It makes answering that question so much easier than it used to be. Yeah, I agree. There's also, I think, the concept of, I think there's diminishing returns with respect to financial independence. So there's some number that is you kind of like maximize the utility for financial

independence. Like, you'll get an example, how much more financially independent is a billionaire, say someone like Peter Thiel versus somebody who has, I don't know, $10 million. Right. Maybe a bit more. But like Peter Thiel, I guess he's got an underground bunker in New Zealand, but like if shit hits the fan and the world goes under, I mean, we're all kind of in this together. So is he really more independent than someone with $10 million? It's just like it's not that much more, right? And so. Yeah. It definitely diminishes. I mean, for most people, different for everybody. Your results may vary, of course. But for most people, if you have a net worth of 10 or $20 million, you can be if you choose to be independent for the rest of your life. You can max it. You can, you can live off of that. But if you talk to someone like Peter Thiel and you said $10 million, you might be like, that's, that's, that's, that's, that's, that's, that's, that's, that's this property tax bill per quarter, you know, so it's this, this, this is this, this is this, this is this idea of, the idea of financial independence means billionaire or something close to that. And so this gets back to the humble bubble. If you're living within a humble bubble, you can live for the rest of your life on $10 million without any issue or less than that.

For the rest of your life, no matter what age you are. These are big numbers we're talking about. But I think there's also a lot of people in society for whom it's like that level of net worth, particularly probably in the crypto community, would feel like I've barely scratched the surface. There was a whole debate about this, Morgan. I saw a Twitter thread that was just basically like, can you retire off of 10 million? and a whole bunch of people were saying, no, you can't possibly.

And a whole bunch of people were, of course, saying, that's silly, of course you can, right? But the fact that there's debate about this means it's an unsettled issue, I think. Like most comedians who actually get to the truth, Chris Rock said, if Bill Gates woke up with Oprah's money, he'd jump out the window.

And that's true. Like, there's, I think, of course, you can build a lifestyle for which 10 billion is not enough. Of course you could build that, and for which 10 billion would not cover your basics. Of course that exists. But I think you can also live in most parts of the country, a very wonderful life and probably

very close to maximizing your happiness and contentment for levels at which particularly people in the crypto community would not bat an eye at. Yeah, I completely agree. And if I were to summarize, like the main thing that you can buy, if there's all these things you can buy with money, the main thing you can buy. And therefore, it can be a focus for your net worth, you know, creation purposes is, financial independence, right? That's the thing that everyone is actually able to buy with additional wealth. There's another piece, though, for me, that's kind of tied to this. And maybe it is

for you too, Morgan, which is the ability not just to be financially independent yourself, but the ability to also take care of your family, let's say, right? Whether, you know, if you have a family, maybe it's friends, if you don't have a family. But having a safety net for your kids. And you don't know what your kids might need in life, but the ability to be able to provide for them to help them through different stages of life, at least for me, and I think for you probably and a lot of people listening, is another thing that money can actually pay for. But there's a curse that comes with this too, right? And this is maybe an age-old question, which is the question of how do you use your money to help your kids without spoiling them? Can you talk about that? Yeah, I mean, I'll

start with this little story from someone who, as a very wealthy person, came to Charlie Munger. And he said, Charlie, if I leave tons of money to my kids, is that going to ruin their ambition? And Charlie said, of course it will, but you still have to do it anyways. And the friend was like, why? Why do I have to do it? And Charlie said, because if you don't give them your billions, they will hate you. And he was like, so there's part of this. I think in general he's right.

So there's part of this that's like ultimate first world problem. If you're a wealthy person trying to figure out how to give it to your kids without ruining their ambition. It's a huge problem and there's no easy answers to this full stop period. I do think there is something to be said though that a lot of where spoiled kids come from is not necessarily because the parents were spending a lot of money. It's because the parents probably unintentionally sent a signal to their kids that the value of other people is their net worth and their material possessions, that that was the value of it. I think there's actually quite a few very wealthy people who live very wealthy lives and have all the

material trappings, whose parents probably intentionally sent a message to their kids that you value people based off of their intelligence, their integrity, those kind of softer values, and it doesn't matter what kind of car their drive or where they sent. I think kids, if you teach those values early enough, kids can latch onto it. And this is why you can have parents whose net worth is a million dollars with the most spoiled brat piece of shit kids you've ever that. Or you can have the children of billionaires who are very, very good, down-to-earth, decent people. It's less about how much you're spending. It's more about the values that you teach those kids. Now, the higher your income is, the more important it is to, like, force those values down your

kids' throats because it's going to be so easy for them to say, we live in this house and our friends live in that smaller house, and therefore we're better than them. That's a very easy, knee-jerk reaction for the child to make unless you are going out of your way to figure out and teach them what you actually value in life. So never easy, not easy whatsoever. The other thing I would say about this is that it's very common for wealthier people to want to teach their kids financial values, not intentionally, but through humiliation. And so you tell your kid.

Yeah, what's that? So I use this story from a wealthy friend of mine who said, whose grandparents were billionaires. And he said when he was a child, his grandparents, when they took him skiing, his grandpa would say, if you want me to buy you a lift ticket, you first need to hike up the hill for one run and ski down. And if you do that, if you prove to me that you can hike up and ski down, then I'll buy you a lift ticket. And he said, the lesson that we learned was not integrity and hard work and grit. The lesson that we learned was grandpa is an asshole. That was the lesson he took away from it.

But I think it was very well-intentioned. I think a lot of wealthy families are like, my kid needs to work hard just like I did. and that is very well intentioned. That is not bad advice. But with the child, particularly when they're younger, the message that they hear is not, oh, I should work hard. The message that they hear is, I'm below mom and dad. They're better than me.

And they're humiliated from it. Exactly. It's a very hard balance to get around. Well, you make a great point, which is like in order to teach your kids in kind of the right way, the parents have to live at the same lifestyle level as the kids. So like here's the thing you shouldn't. do. I mean, don't fly first class with the parents and then put your kids and coach, right? Just to kind of teach them the lessons because they haven't earned it, right? You don't want to live at a

different lifestyle than your kids or they probably will resent you. And it's an act of hypocrisy. I mean, it's not kind of like walking the walk. So you can choose a certain lifestyle in which to raise your kids based on kind of like your wealth level. And you can even undershoot it if you want, however you want, but it has to be the same for both the parents and the kids was one of your takeaways. I think there's even another lesson from this that I, my wife and I still talk about even grapple with sometimes, which is we were car shopping a couple years ago. And I had this thought of like, if we get a nice car and we raise our kids in that nice car, that becomes their baseline expectation of what a family car is. And then I was like, what if what if my son or my daughter

wants to be a kindergarten teacher and the appropriate car given their salary is going to be a Honda Accord. Sure. But we set their expectation that it was a higher car than that. Are we doing them a disservice? And therefore, should we buy the lower car? I don't know what the, I wish I could tell you my final thoughts on that. But I think about a lot of like, I don't want to inflate my kids' expectations of material

life because that becomes their baseline. That does it. They don't know that it's a good life. That's their baseline. There's this great interview with Zach Dell, Michael Dell's son. This was probably 15 years. I guess this is a while ago. And the interview, I'm paraphrasing,

but the question was along the lines of us, what is it like to grow up as a son of one of the richest men in the world? And Zach Dow, who was like a young teenager at the time? He was not the adult he is now. His answer was, this is all I've ever known. The private jets in the mansions are all I've ever known so it's completely normal to me.

And I think that's, of course, an extreme example, but so many people are like, you have to be careful with the lifestyle that you give your kids because that becomes normal. It does not become nice. It becomes normal. And so I think about that a lot. My wife and I talk about that a lot.

You think about it. You talk about it. I don't know if you have any conclusions on that. It's really interesting. I mean, would you advocate for maybe living under the lifestyle that you can afford just for the sake of your kids? That's why I don't have any conclusions on this because I don't know the answer to that. I also don't want to, I want to use my money to give my children a great life for them to live an amazing house in a great neighborhood next to great friends and going to great schools and going on great trips. of course I want to do that.

I also don't want to send the message that that is completely normal, that everybody does that. And that that is the baseline of what you should measure your adult life against 20 years from now. It's a very difficult thing to get around. And I don't have a lot of conclusions other than it's something I think about a lot. There are a lot of things with money in which you can't say, here's the answer. Here's the solution.

There are a lot of things that just are, and I think that's one of them. It's family dependent. It's a couple dependent. It's kid dependent. Everyone's going to have to make their own decisions on this. But of course, they should consider what the tradeoffs are. I think that's what's important here. Speaking of that, I think you're talking to a lot of investors in the audience. And again, as I mentioned earlier in the episode, a lot of crypto investors are, their disposition is hold. And certainly we all know as investor, the value of compound interest was the eighth wonder of the world. Is that a Charlie Munger thing? It's just once you see compound interest, and I discovered it is kind of a discovery, I guess, in my undergrad program, just like basic business school.

I was like, oh, my God, compound interest. And then for me, spending money after that, Morgan, was never the same, right? Because you kind of like look at the math and you realize that, you know, a dollar that you spend today could turn into $1,000, right? And so that thing that you're buying is quite expensive in today's value. So there's a balance for people who see compound interest, you know, they might not want to spend anything in life. And I guess this goes back to the retiree who's been saving their entire life. But there's kind of a balance here. And I'm wondering if you talk about it a bit, which is the stoic type of philosophy, which is compound interest, like discipline, let's just do the investor thing.

you know, saving for multiple generations later versus maybe this, you know, Epicureanism, which is, guys, like, life is short, okay? We got to live for today. And you're not getting any younger. And so do the math on your lifespan and realize that you're saving money to what end. You're not enjoying your life. How should people think about balancing that? I think probably disproportionately find on an episode of listeners like this.

they're probably more on the stoic camp of just like worshipping at the altar of compound interest. Maybe they need to be more Epicurean. But there's a balance here. I think the only way to settle that balance is with the idea of what you want to try to do. And to me, the definition of risk is what are you going to regret on your deathbed, whenever that might be. And that is different for everybody. And I don't think most people have a good sense of what they're likely to regret in the future. mostly because we don't know exactly how our life is going to play out.

I started thinking about this a long time ago, 20 years ago, when I had a co-worker who I worked with. We worked at a ski resort in Lake Tahoe where I grew up, and he was buried in debt. He was probably mid-20s. I was like a late teenager. He was mid-20s. And at the time, he had $25,000 in credit card debt,

which to me at the time was unbelievable. Insomnia could have $25 grand in credit card debt. I could not even fathom when he told me that. Sure. And all the debt came from these, ski trips that he had done all over the world. He skied in Europe. He skied in South America. He went to Antarctica one time. He had been everywhere, all financed on his credit card. And I thought it was absolutely crazy. And the punchline of the story was not too long after that. He died skiing. He died

in a ski accident. And I remember thinking, I'm so glad he did those trips. I'm so glad he did, those things that I used to make fun of him with all the time. I'm so glad he did it. Because I think he was 30 when he died. And he lived more than most, he had seen the world in a degree that most people would never even dream of. And so the idea of what are you going to regret on your deathbed is very, very important to think about. Now, I can take the other side of this. As I mentioned earlier, I've been a big saver for my entire life. And those savings, of course, equal the trips that I did not take, the cars I didn't buy, the houses I didn't buy.

That's what my savings is. Now, if I were on my deathbed tomorrow, I would not regret any of that for one second because I would take so much pleasure knowing that, my wife and kids are going to be okay because I save for them. I would, that would be all that matters to me. So I would not regret it in the slightest. But now let's say I'm on my deathbed at age 97 and my kids hopefully are independent and on their own. If I had just saved my entire life, I probably would look back and say, I wish I had

spent it and given it away while I could have seen the fruits of that. And so it's going to change throughout your entire life. Regardless of what it is, having a good sense of your. future regret and taking a step back and saying, how good have you been up to this point in your life at knowing what you're going to regret? Everybody has some regrets. How good are you, how good were you at the time of taking an action and realizing that you might regret it in the future? It's not an easy thing to do, different for people from person to person, but it's never so simple as YOLO or compound forever. It's never that black and white. It's always a degree of what are you going to

regret in the future. I think that's great. And I think that comes back to your idea of mental liquidity, the ability to switch modes, right? So you could be a saver, a super saver, super investor for one portion of your life, one era. And then you could switch that and live for going on the trips all around the world, right? And you can switch that as long as you don't assume the identity of, I am a super saver, this is what I do. I'm programmed in this way. And so that's another aspect of keeping your identity light. Can we talk about the obsession over small purchases? Do you think that's a good thing, or is it a trap?

You can easily see how it could be one or the other, because we've been talking about compound interest, and the thing from compounding is how counterintuitive, how not intuitive the gains can be. So you and I could sit here and do the calculation of if we stopped going to Starbucks every day, what would that be, and invested that $4 instead,

maybe now it's like $8, all the prices have gone up. If we invested that money instead, what would that be worth in 50 years? We could do that calculation. It would blow our minds. Everyone knows how that works with compounding. This is another topic from Rameet Setti, though. He's like, people spend way too much time

talking about $3 problems when they should be talking about $30,000 problems. And I think this is why stop buying your latte became such a big thing in the personal finance community is because that is an easier topic to discuss than don't go to a private university where you're going to bury yourself

in a quarter million dollars in debt, you moron. Don't buy a house you can't afford, you idiot. And so it's much easier to talk about $3 problems because it's so fun and it just doesn't mean anything. But you can easily imagine someone who is like, I stopped going to Starbucks and I'm going to invest that money. Meanwhile, they went to a school that can't afford. They live in a house they can't afford.

They go to child care that that's, that they can't afford. They have health insurance that they can't afford. And so, yes, small things matter. The drips matter. The drips add up. But don't let that overwhelm the idea of asking much bigger questions in your life. For most people, the only spending that makes any difference whatsoever is your house,

your car, your education, your health care, your child care. That's it. Everything else is a rounding error relative to that. Another idea in your book is trying new things with your spending. So you talk about within the confines of your budget, budget, you should experiment with many different types of spending you can. And I think this is the idea of finding that high utility type spending, that the products or the things or the experiences that are actually adding value to your life, not the status

type spending, but the utility spending. And you only find that if you try a whole bunch of things. Yeah, it's not intuitive exactly what your thing is going to be. For some people, it's food, for some people's clothes. I'm not a wine guy. I like wine, but my wine taste caps out. out at like $16 a bottle. And I've had so many people who will hand me. They're like, oh, this is a $300 bottle. Take a sip of this. It'll change your life. And I drink it. And I'm like,

I don't taste anything. I feel nothing. It tastes like Trader Joe's two-bucked to me. I feel nothing. But I like that it is their thing. They found their thing, even if it's not mine. And I spend my money on things that other people might not appreciate and value as much as I do. And it's never intuitive what your thing is going to be. And the only way to find it is to try a million different things. So you have to have a bunch of small experiences in your life. Try eating at a fancier restaurant. Try staying at a nicer hotel. Try flying first class. Whatever it might be because it's not intuitive what that thing is going to be for you. Yeah. And do it independently. So you make the point that independent spending is kind of like independent thought, right? You know, you could tell

someone's taste by how they're not copycatting everyone else. They're establishing their own tastes and their own, you know, ways to spend their money. And that's why I love about someone like Remit, who is like he's going to buy super expensive clothes and drive a Honda a quarter or whatever he drives at the same time. That is someone who is obviously thinking independently. He's not doing the cookie cutter, rich person thing, right?

Exactly. What society told him to do? There's a thing in politics where it's like if I can guess your political beliefs on every topic, if you just tell me your beliefs on one topic, you're not thinking independently. So it's like if you tell me your thoughts on abortion,

and after you give me that piece of information, I can guess your thoughts on gun control and everything else, you're not thinking independent. And I think it's true for money as well. If there's not something in your life that doesn't really match your income, your net worth, you're probably not doing it independently. Everyone should have a thing, particularly if you're a higher income person,

you just have a thing that you spend way less than every other rich person would because it doesn't give you any value, whatnot. And if you don't have that thing, you're probably not thinking independently. Morgan, this has been gray. I wonder as we kind of close this out, if you could, I know obviously a lot of these thoughts people have to integrate into their own lives and customize for their own particular circumstances. But I want to ask maybe a more kind of personal question for you, which is when you put all of this together, just for your own life and

how you think about the art of spending money, what sort of decisions have you made? Like, what does it look like for you in your household? I think like we've, my wife and I have always lived a pretty simple life. We actually spend a lot more money now than we did five or 10 years ago because I think we've experimented with things and been like, oh, that was fun. Let's do more of that. So we do spend a lot more. We're still very big savers. But I mentioned this earlier, the extent to which I catch myself in my own head saying, if only I had that, if only I had this, then things would be great. And I have to actively take a step back and say, you know that's wrong. You know it would not make you as happy as you think as you're telling yourself it would.

It might make this and that a little bit happier. But what's actually going to make you happier are your health, your friends, your family. So can we use money to help those things? Could we use money to spend more time with our family, to spend more time with our friends? And maybe that's buying a bigger house so that we can have our friends over for dinner more often. Whatever it might be, that's going to make you happier. And so to me, the core has always been there's two ways that you can spend money. One is as a tool to give yourself and your loved ones a better life.

and the other is as a yardstick of status to measure yourself against strangers by. And when you stated that starkly, it's obviously like, well, I want to use it as a tool. But so much of society and modern marketing and our knee-jerk reactions push us towards the signaling, gaining status against strangers' side of the equation.

And it takes so much active patience and thought in your own life, almost on a daily basis, to ask yourself, am I buying this thing? Do I want this thing? because it's going to make my family happier or because I'm going to feel like it's going to give me the impression

of having a leg up on the social status ladder against other people. So did you write this book for yourself, Morgan? I write every book for myself. I'm a very selfish writer. I just want to try to figure out problems in my own life and tell stories that I think are interesting. And if other people can learn from them

and relate to them all the better, but I'm not trying to pander and I'm not trying to teach other people. I'm just trying to have a self-reflection about what I see in my own life and what I see in other people's lives and try to tell a story around it. It's a fantastic reminder.

The art of spending money, a great book, great reminder on how to use money as a tool, what it can be used for, what it can't be used for. And when does it come out? October 7th. Fantastic.

Thank you so much for joining us on bank lists and talking about this. It's been a pleasure. Thanks for having me. Guys, got to let you know, of course, none of this has been financial advice, maybe a little bit of spending advice.

We'll say that. You could lose what you put in. But we're headed west. This is the frontier. It's not for everyone, but we're glad you're with us on the bankless journey. Thanks a lot.