Bankless - "The Fed Can't Print Moore's Law" - How the AI Crash Sends Bitcoin to $1M | Arthur Hayes

Episode Date: June 22, 2026

Arthur Hayes is back on Bankless, and he’s taking the W off the table. After selling HYPE, NEAR and ZEC, Arthur walks through why the AI trade started to look less asymmetric, why oil and geopolitics may still be the bear case no one wants to price, and why ETH may offer one of the cleaner setups in crypto today. Then the conversation turns bigger: AI capex, circular revenue, China’s cheap models, GPU depreciation, and the moment Arthur thinks the Fed discovers it can’t print Moore’s Law. --- 📣SPOTIFY PREMIUM RSS FEED | USE CODE: SPOTIFY24 https://bankless.cc/spotify-premium --- BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS: 🔮POLYMARKET | #1 PREDICTION MARKET https://bankless.cc/polymarket-podcast 🧭OKX | TRADE, EARN, PAY to OKX | 120M+ USERS WORLDWIDE https://app.okx.com/join/USBANKLESS 🦊 METAMASK | DOWNLOAD NOW https://go.metamask.io/BL-Pod-Download 🌐BRIX | EMERGING MARKET YIELD https://bankless.cc/brix 📊BITGET | TOKENIZED STOCKS 2.0 https://bankless.cc/bitget-stocks 🎯THE DEFI REPORT | ONCHAIN INSIGHTS https://thedefireport.io/bankless --- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Why Arthur Sold HYPE, NEAR and ZEC 4:26 The AI Trade Starts to Look Crowded 6:25 How Arthur Is Positioned Now 7:15 Crypto’s Strange Market Dispersion 11:09 Oil, Iran and the Fake-Out Risk 14:16 Why the Iran Deal May Not Be Durable 17:29 Can AI Survive Higher Oil? 21:20 The AI Bubble Thesis 26:11 China’s Cheap AI Threat 30:38 The Credit Event Arthur Is Watching 35:51 The 2028 Perfect Storm 39:45 Why AI Is Draining Crypto’s Bull Market 44:28 Arthur on Inventing Perps 48:11 Why Perps Could Eat Wall Street 51:18 Socialized Loss Explained 53:21 Onshore vs Offshore Perps 55:50 Why Hyperliquid Can Flip Binance 56:30 The Perp Inventor Does Not Use Leverage --- RESOURCES Arthur Hayes https://x.com/CryptoHayes --- Not financial or tax advice. See our investment disclosures here: https://www.bankless.com/disclosures

you can't change the fact that a chip gets better every two years if you pump $10 trillion into the economy. So what's the first response going to be by the financial authorities to try to save the banks? We're going to say, oh, we just need to shovel Fiat money in. And at that point, investors are going to say, I do not want to put any new capital, whether it's free or not, into AI because it does not meet its cost of capital. So therefore, this capital goes straight to crypto. And this is the implosion of the AI bubble and the follow-on money printing that's going to happen, especially in the United States, to try to stick-shave the system from this gross capital misallocation that's happened over the last, let's call it, six to seven years.

By that point, is going to dwarf subprime and is going to take us to Bitcoin a million or whatever. Bankless Station, I'm here with Arthur Hayes. Arthur, welcome back to the podcast. Thanks for having me. Arthur, I originally asked you to come on back in May because I saw you were getting bullish on some of the tokens that I was also bullish on hype near Zcash. So I was like, sick, let's get Arthur on the show. We can be bullish together.

We can talk about tokens. It's going to be great. And then you sold them. So now I don't have any tokens to talk to you about about why you're bullish because you told them all. What happened? So I'm always analyzing my thinking, especially on this AI narrative.

And, you know, I felt all the risks outweighed the benefits of being long, especially in these things and time to take some profit. There wasn't the same asymmetry there in terms of the awareness of the potential of things like mere and hype. On the Zcash front, a bit of a different issue. The way I view things, if I think that there is a risk of like pretty much a complete wipeout in my capital due to some technical issue, I can't in good conscience keep my capital in that particular situation. Obviously, the Zcash team is fixing this issue, adding formal vericification,

when the new shield of pool launches, hopefully this thing will be fixed, and I can evaluate then and see if I want to come back in. And, you know, I might come back in higher prices, but again, I've been doing this for a very long time and I still have most of my money. So I'm more of a concern about capital preservation and appreciation.

Trading is changing, not gradually right now. OKX just launched trading bots directly inside the OKX app. Grid trading, DCA, arbitrage. You set your strategy once and it executes around the clock. No staring at charts all day. No manual entries. No missing moves while you're asleep.

And for the first time, automated trading actually feels simple. But OKX is thinking bigger than just trading. They also launched the agent payments protocol, an open standard that lets AI agents execute full commercial transactions on chain. The Ethereum Foundation, Unoswap, and AWS are already building on it. And now it's live inside the United States. And new users who deposit in trade can get up. to $500 in Bitcoin through the bankless link.

The link is in the show notes to learn more, not investment advice, not available in New York or Texas. $100,000 is up for grabs. Metamask and Ondo are giving it away in the Ondo trading competition. Five weeks, three tiers. Whoever earns the best percentage return

and each tier wins the biggest cut. Pick from 260 Ando tokenized stocks, funds, and commodities to swap inside Metamask and let your portfolio do the talking. If you think you can out-trade everyone else, this is your chance to prove it. From now,

June 18th. Click the link in the description below and opt in on Metamask Mobile. Trade RWA's on mobile or desktop to compete. Not investment advice. In 2024, emerging markets generated over $115 billion in annual yield for investors, with yields ranging between 10 to 40%. These are some of the highest, most persistent yields on Earth. The problem, Defi can't access them. Bricks changes this. Built on Mega-Eath, Bricks takes emerging market money markets and solve them carry and turns them into imposable primitives you can access straight from your wallet. While Defy investors earned 3 to 6% on stable coins and T-bills, institutions have been harvesting 10 to 50% yields backed by sovereign monetary policy. Bricks connects these worlds with institutional gray tokenization, local banking rails,

compliance across jurisdictions, and real-time stable coin settlement. Bricks does the heavy lifting so Defi can finally access real collateral and structured products on top of real world yield. Even the best carry trades can be within reach. Bricks brings DeFi's promise to the emerging world and brings the emerging market yield to your wallet. Let the yield flow with bricks. What was giving you the jitters? What was causing you to, what did you see in the AI trade that caused you some jitters? So obviously we have the SpaceX IPO. It's done very well in the first two trading days, but that's a low-float high FDV shick coin in my opinion, and we know how those goes when you start having unlocks. And we start having unlocks in September. We have

anthropic and opening eye coming to market as well. And also we have this Iran war energy situation. You know, if you believe the authorities, they say it's supposed to be fixed. And then I guess read some headlines this morning that Israel says we're going to keep bombing Lebanon and supposedly Iran cares about Lebanon. We don't know. So that's like a whole thing. We'll see if this thing actually materializes anything. But at the end of the day, we have this underlying bid for physical commodities that isn't going away. And so there could be a situation where we wake up. in three, four months time and oil is at $120, but the straight is supposedly open. And what do you do then? Essentially, energy is the input for our entire civilization,

including the AI, because AI is just transforming energy into intelligence the most efficient way possible. So, you know, all these things were weighing in my mind, like, okay, I think the summer is going to be sort of a topping period for a lot of the markets. I've done really well on these calls. Let me just take the W and go chill. And, you know, if I need a buyback in other things, and let me find some asymmetry in other places, right? Like I got into hype in the high 20s, low 30s. It's now whatever they got out at like 70s something. 70s, right?

It's a decent trade, right? I think to go from the 60s to the 150, my original call, not that it's going to be impossible. I think it will happen at some point, but it's going to be a harder slog than the first part of this run. And so, okay, as an investor, in least in how I view things, is I want to find those asymmetric trades

where I can deploy a little amount of capital and get a big return. And then I can put the rest in sort of low income yielding, you know, bond-like structures or Bitcoin. So how are you positioned right now? Are you in cash looking at opportunities trying to find the opportunities?

How are you positioned? So obviously, very long Bitcoin, as always, I'm perennally long. Bitcoin, I got a lot of cash. When you sell these tokens, like sell hype and near and Z-cash, which I imagine are shorter term positions than Bitcoin otherwise would be, Do you sell into Bitcoin?

Depends. So I haven't this time. I'm just sitting in a lot of T-bills, just earning some yields. And, you know, if I'm able to find some asymmetric opportunities before I really check out for summer vacation, then I'll do that. Otherwise, you know, I'll just be compound my rates at whatever, three and a half percent. Like, not exciting. Obviously, there's a big bull market going on. But thankfully on a decently large capital base, it doesn't really matter.

To me, I more care about my mental sanity. Right. Right. Okay, so if you look at the crypto markets, there are pockets of dispersion everywhere. You have some of the majors, Bitcoin, Ether, which Bitcoin is sitting at its 200-week moving average. Ether is like 30% below. It's 200-week moving average. You know, Mr. Market is coming to us today with a deal on these assets. Meanwhile, some of the other assets that we were just talking about, Zcash, VV, VV, NIR, Hype, are breaking through at all-time highs.

you know, hype especially is at all-time highs. And that's not really something that we've ever seen before in the crypto world. And so while there's like some, in some parts of crypto, there's a bear market. In some parts, there's applications and protocols that are breaking through all-time highs. Have you seen this before? And like, what do you make of this? What does this tell you about the state of the industry? Well, obviously, there was a great trade conceptually at least back in the day when I really

went long, Eath back in like, you know, when it was to trade $100 to $200, which was there was some chart that was going around about the value of all applications on top of Ethereum were worth more than Ethereum. I think it was either one Ethereum undervalier or two, the applications are overvalued. And we were in this sort of a, you know, pseudo bull market at the time. So let me just go along, ETH. So I guess fucking back the truck up in ETH and 20X, right, or 10X, whatever it was. So.

That was in 2020 to 2021? Yeah, around that time period. That era. Yeah. That era. And so, yeah, I mean, speaking of ETH, I think ETH has one of the probably the cleanest setups for something that could really rally off of, you know, a very big safe, crypto safe, market cap, right?

Like, I don't, it has a lot of issues, but it ain't going to zero overnight. At least I don't think so, right? Actually, I could, but the risk of it going to zero overnight is much less than hype or any of these other tokens, not that I don't love hyperliquid or some of these other projects, but it has a certain Lindy effect and a certain largeness and stickiness that I could just deploy a lot of capital in the ETH and turn my phone off for a year and a half and be happy about that.

I would not do that in the same notional with anything else in the ecosystem other than probably Bitcoin. So I think that's probably one of the best setups I see out there for a mega cap coin because, you know, ETH is trading well below. It's 2002 all-time high at 5,000,

whereas pretty much every other token of value that has existed at that time period, at a major, at least broke through that. You know, Bitcoin did. Solana did, you know, pick your, you know, bigger cap dino coin. And it got through those levels. It might not be training there now, but at least it got there. Heath hasn't even gotten to that point yet.

So I think there is, if Eich starts to move, people are really going to jump on that train because they so badly want ETH to just like, why isn't ETH at 15,000 or some level? And there's obviously structural reasons why it's not, but people would love to believe that could get there. What do you make of ETH trading well below as 200-week moving average? Do you pay attention to the 200-week moving average that much? No.

No, you don't. I mean, I don't really look at technicals too deeply, more of a narrative, gut-feel kind of guy. I guess look at the chart, right? And if you look at the troughs of the last five years we're trading near those levels, I mean, yeah, it'd be great to get an ETH at $1,000. But, like, okay, cool.

You're great to Bitcoin at $5,000, too. Like, yeah, sure what it coulda. Sure, sure, sure. Okay. So, well, I'll kind of present the question again. Bitcoin is above the 200-week moving average. ETH is 30% below it. Does that happen? Do you like Ether as a better deal than Bitcoin in this moment? Yeah. So if you gave me a dollar via capital, and so choose one, I'd choose ether over Bitcoin purely just on a chart perspective. And is that what you're doing? Is that what I'm doing? I'm evaluating it. We'll see. Okay. Okay. Okay. So one of the things I want to ask you about is like, I know you're a big hydrocarbons guy, you're a big energy guy.

We just got the peace deal in Iran. As you said, it's like, sure, you know, Israel can do its thing. But like WTI and a lot of the oil tickers are trading down at the lowest have been since the start of the Iran war. Is this durable? How is this input into your trade and into your like attitude towards the markets? I believe that this is a fake out, and we're going to be at uncomfortably, uncomfortable levels of hydrocarbon prices.

Now, I'm not saying oil is going to be at $200, but it's going to get up to uncomfortable levels. And I basically subscribe to the theory that you have all of this restocking effect. So let's say that this deal holds and the straight opens for, what do they say, like 30 or 60 days, whatever it is, and you have to pay your environmental fee, but it's not a toll, you know, Of course. You know, love the environment.

And these ships go through, volumes get back to some level close to where it was pre-war, but you have two issues, right? So the governments that spent down inventory to keep the price not going crazy, like the United States and a lot of other countries, have to rebuild. You have commercial inventories that have to rebuild. And then you have everybody else who has caught short or caught unprepared is going to be forced to restock their inventory to acceptable levels because let's say that Trump and Netanyahu

decided they want to bomb Iran again after the U.S. elections in November, then you can't be a politician. Go back to the people like, yes, the Americans bombed around and we didn't have enough oil supplies because we trusted that America would keep sea lanes open and all those things.

Fine, fine, you can be wrong once. You can't come back to the same people. They're like, oh, well, they did it again 12 months later. And we didn't learn our lesson. and we still kept holding treasury bonds and big cap tech stocks. And for that reason, you guys can no longer get on a plane and go on vacation because we have no jet fuel. We have no diesel. We have none of these things because we refuse to sell them these financial assets and buy these real assets.

I think that's over. I think countries are going to start looking more like Japan and the U.S. and China and having 100 plus days of imports ready of hydrocarbons and these refined products. and that additional demand is going to slowly push up prices to levels that we have it, you know, maybe we get through $120 to $2 on W.Tai oil in six to 12 months. So I think this is a great buying opportunity for ExxonMobil, you know, oil services funds, natural gas companies, Latin America energy plays that are within sort of the U.S. orbit. it. So I like these investments because if I'm correct, then you're getting them at great prices for something that if you believe the commodity math is almost not a certainty,

but a higher probability outcome than the market is assigning it. There are a couple of things that I think align with what I understand to what you're saying. First, we have 60 days to figure out what a lot of the nuances of this deal actually look like. To be honest, like some of the deal is like we're just going to punt on the details because we both want a deal signed now to signal to the world that we're signing this deal. But like what happens with nuclear material TBD,

what happens, how does this rate of from use actually open TBD, like what that environmental fee actually is and how it's enforced to TBD? So these are all like jittery surface area for the deal to fall through for this to actually not actually manifest into a long-term truce.

And we kind of just punted the problem into the future. So that's one problem. And we also have 60 days for that to figure out. So the straight isn't going to necessarily be open for that time. The other time is that like we've been drawing down the United States. China, Japan, as you said, have been drawing down on their oil reserves. And so they need to bring them back up.

And that also takes months of buying. And so like, you know, oil is cheap now, but it's not going to immediately go away. We have the inflation problem to deal with. So inflation is here today. it just started showing up after the oil spiked up three months ago when the Iran war started. And so we have at least three months of inflation to get to actually show up in the market because of the higher oil prices. And again, this problem isn't going to be solved for another one to two or three months before the straight can actually open if it does actually open. and all these countries do restock.

And that's all that's going to happen if Trump doesn't decide to reverse course and bomb Iran again, which I actually think should be in consideration of any investor. Like we could just be at this thing again in like one to two months. Did everything I say kind of like check out? Is that aligned with you? Yeah, and I think about it from the IRGC's perspective, right?

Every time that Trump has done a deal with them, it's either been a ruse to strike them again, whether it's Trump or his attack dog Netanyahu and Israel. So yes, there's this truce for 60 days, but you should be fired as a war general

if you believe that somehow you're safe. That this means anything other than Trump wanted a deal to stick shave the markets so that maybe Elon's deal goes well with SpaceX. And, you know, you can float these mega IPOs without any issues. but yeah to your point nothing's actually been solved it's just like the terror thing there was initial salvo the market did not receive it very well you know trump had to backtrack and then u.s and china basically engaged in these like nothing burger extensions extension and you know there's not been sort of a grand bargain if you will a sort of a status quo understanding of where things are but i think something similar could happen with the iran war you know they'd probably have some strikes between iran and israel and lebanon and whatever the deal is still

nominally in place at prima facie, but underneath the flows are nowhere near as much as they were, you know, February 26th. Yeah, yeah. I do agree that high oil prices could be, is the simple answer to like, why be bearish? The world cannot sustain like 110, $120 oil prices for more than a few months before. We already are seeing inflation kick in. And United States, we have it way easier than everyone else. And so like the bare case, the recession trigger is high oil prices. And so we know that that is a possible future.

So we have to be wary about that. Granted, the stock market knows this and the stock market has been doing great. It shrugged off the Iran war so easily. You know, it got a little bit jittery, but then the AI trade, you know, and the memory stonks all just went through the roof. And so like one of the other reasons why you cited

as like taking like a risk off position is because we have, Open AI, we have Anthropics, SpaceX coming into the market, at very high valuations, a low-float, high FDV shit coin, as you call it. What do you make of like the current health of the equity market? Like, is it too euphoric, too skittish? What do you think?

Well, the assumption that it's all AI, obviously. The equity market is literally just an AI story and any second or third derivatives from this, you know, capex buildout that is going to be probably bigger than the railroads. and the percentage of world GDP spent on building this infrastructure, whether or not it's useful, we'll see. And that's why all these stocks are rallying. And that's why, you know, if you believe that this is bigger than the railroad buildout,

does oil at 100 or 150 really matter in the next one or two years? Is Google going to stop their CAPEX build out because oil is higher? If they believe, you know, every single major U.S. tech CEO has basically said, I'm okay with my company going bankrupt if I don't risk that lose the AGI war, you know, risk being not at the table for AI. If that is the prevailing consensus among

these eight guys that this is why they need to spend 100 plus billion dollars a year in a CAPEX, the oil prices are relevant. The oil prices are irrelevant up to a certain point. True, up to a certain point. 90, $100 oil

is irrelevant. 120? Not so sure. We'll see. Again, if you listen to the rhetoric about, oh, we're investing for an S-curvan technology. Oh, this is going to be the biggest build-out since the railroads. And we're not there yet in terms of the amount of money spent as a percentage of GDP. So that would tell you that we're in the early part of the bubble. And given the sort of manic, utopic rhetoric out there about what AI can do and what it's going to mean for the world,

I don't know if materially higher oil prices are going to dent that enthusiasm. We'll see it's all about, does it, do these hyperscalers scale back on their CAPEX commitments because they believe that either, A, they can't charge a high enough price to earn a return,

or, you know, this, they just think they're not going to make money, enough money. Or, you know, the market says the bank stopped lending to them or the U.S. government stops giving them preferential treatment. So like all these things are the variables. Oil does affect those. I think if I'm going to be wrong, it's that people don't care.

$150 oil, cool. But AI is going to usher in Utopia where none of us do any work anymore. So what do we care about oil? And Elon's building the space, building in space where there's infinite sun. Yeah, I mean, there's orbital mechanics that come into play there that you haven't really understood. But okay, maybe. So like, if, this is what you believe, then does terrestrial prices of dead dynos really matter? And so I think that's, that would be the pushback against my bearish thesis on AI. Yeah. What are you looking at?

What indicators are you looking at to kind of like measure how much time left we have in this, in the AI trade, in the AI bubble? Is that how you think of it? Yeah, so I see that this is a bubble. We are either in the late stage or the early stage of a bubble, whatever, right? So when I put my hat on the trade, I'm like, okay. I got to think about the exit from this thing. I fundamentally believe that humans are always over-optimistic

at the beginning of any technological build-out. I believe that this could be bigger than the railroads in terms of percentage built. Okay, what happened with the railroad build-out? You had two financial crises in sort of the mid-to-late 19th century, 1873 and 1893, basically predicated on credit-griven to railroads and sort of an over-indexing about the return that these things could generate.

So, you know, I think that we could be, this could be the first little test, maybe this summer, we'll see, and then, you know, you rally off of that, and we're still believing the hype in terms of what AI can deliver. And I think, you know, you read Michael Burry and a lot of these guys about what's wrong with this situation, it's all these circular revenue deals.

It's that, you know, Google invests in a lab, or Nvidia invests in the lab, the lab takes an investment and buys the chips. Google is underwriting the credit of the data center that is going to provide them the compute, right? So it's all just circular accounting. The depreciation is pushed off in the future, right? You're taking a chip that depreciates every two years,

pretty much, which we've seen over time, but you're giving it a six-year life or five or six-year life. That doesn't make any sense to amortize a loan based on that. You're saying that this CAPEX will continue indefinitely, even though you have Chinese competitors with models that are good enough charging 1% of the price. And so I think a lot of investors have sort of bought into the America of, you know, is the biggest badass country, best tech, da-da-da-da-da.

It's the same fallacy you thought about cars, right? Do you give a fuck if you were a driver of Ford or a B-YD? give me the BID, it's cheaper. It's just as good, if not better. So I think people have bought into the brand of the USA, but they forget that the brand value erodes when a customer is faced with a product that's good enough and 1% of the price,

which is what a deep seek or Kimmy model can deliver. And so I think these are some of the things that eventually the market will recognize. I don't know when that is. And then they'll say, okay, I don't believe that I should be, paying this multiple for this company or the executives at these hyperscalers. I don't believe I'm earning the return.

I need to earn. I need to scale back my cap, my capex projections. And that's when the whole edifice starts to break. And you can add on top of that anti-AI politics. TBD on whether or not that becomes a thing in this election. I've been reading, you know, different things and some publications that I like to get a mood on what's going on in the U.S.

unfortunately for my thesis on sort of Trump turning on AI bros, I still think that the Democrats haven't leaned into this issue enough because they're just bought and paid. They're just as bought and paid for as Republicans from, you know, big energy companies, AI data center people and all that sort of stuff. But there's anger there. I mean, I don't live in the U.S. I'm just reading magazine articles, but you live there.

You know, there is this pent up. I'm afraid of losing my job. Why is this data center coming into my town, making stuff more expensive, polluting my water, fuck these guys. I don't own any of these stocks. I'm not up 50x in my portfolio. I'm struggling.

Why should I essentially underwrite this expansion when I get nothing from this? Where's mine? And I think there's going to be a whole class of politicians that are going to tap into that anger and that'll be the number one issue that Americans are voting on. Maybe in this midterm, maybe not,

but definitely for the 2008. presidential election. And that should scare the shit out of investors. Yeah. Because you can take a look at what happened in the late 19th century, early 20th century, with all of the action against sort of the industrial revolutionaries, the robber barons. And yeah, they all still were wealthy after the fact, right? John Rokhov, John D. Rockefer still the richest man in the world after they split up his companies. But like, if you were just an ordinary secondary market holder of these shares, you know, you could have gotten battered and bruised as sort of capital and labor. where it came to these sort of agreements about how we're going to police this new economic

productivity that has been created. Maybe I'm reading tea leaves here, but what I was thinking about while you were saying that is like, look at what happened to the crypto industry after we had our big run-up and bubble and like rise to fame in 2020 and 2021. Like we were on top of the world. Like crypto bros, you know, ran the world. The whole world thought crypto was cool for a brief moment. And then in 2022, interest rates came.

the bubble popped. And then the regulators came at crypto when we were weak, you know, when we were down, bad, and out. Not while we were on top of the world in 2021, but Elizabeth Warren built her anti-crypto army in late 2022. And Gary Gensler came in 2023.

And it was when we were kind of like, just like, you know, licking our wounds from the market is when the regulators came. And so maybe we could project forward into the AI world where you have a lot of, you see Tom Shonatsey's tweet about like one possible way the AI bubbles pops,

which is a little bit what you were talking about, which is everyone shifts away from like this, the paid plan where you pay $50 a month and you get to type into chat at ChbT as much as you want, which just doesn't appropriately price these things. But when you go is you go to the API model or you just pay per token. And the pay per token,

you're going to be charged a lot more because the whole plan subscription-based model is just not at all reflecting the actual cost to the company. So everyone is going to be, it's like a pay per use thing. and all of a sudden usage is going to dry up because it's actually way more expensive than all of this stuff is getting subsidized.

And so you do have like a couple like dominoes getting lined up of like ways to pop the actual revenue metrics of these like super-scaler AI companies followed by just like exactly where you're saying just like AI politics just like being the second of a one-two punch into the whole industry. What do you think about that? Yeah, for sure.

And it's going to take time. This is not an immediate thing. Yeah, it's a two-year plus thing. And I don't think people really appreciate that the effect that China will have on this. It will commodify the token market, just like it's commodified every other market. Like China builds a gigawatt of electricity at one-sixth the cost of the U.S. So they can essentially, when they want to, well, they're already doing it, right? You can use deep seek, you can use, you know, those many other Alibaba tests or whatever, By-Doo models.

And as long as you don't talk shit about the Chinese Communist Party, you can pretty much get all the same answers that you want, if not more. Yeah, their tokens are going to be free compared to ours. So it's like, okay, I'm trying to find out the cheapest rental car. Do I need to use the chat, GBT, Claude, Sonnet, Opus, Grock, whatever the fuck model that's 100x more expensive? Or do I guess go to the Chinese one? That's super super cheap.

Maybe they are practically free. And I get the same answer, right? I just care about rental cars, right? Most people aren't doing super duper secret like, I'm going to build the next missile to destroy the world kind of shit, right? Like they're just trying to optimize their lives. Same with businesses. Do you really care if you use the U.S. or Chinese model?

At least the Chinese model is open source. You could theoretically like put that open source model on your own bare metal server racks and run this. Or you can give all your data to anthropic open AI, Gen. I'm like, do you really want to do that? So I think it's it's an interesting thing and it's the same sort of mental fallacy that a lot of people fell with a lot of other things outside of luxury or a high high in luxury which is the end consumer doesn't care about brands when the competing product is good enough and is a fraction of the cost. Like your brand value goes to zero. Do you care what your brand of car is if you're not driving a Lambo or Ferrari? no. Get me from A to B. Tesla's fine. B.D. is fine. Decker's fine. I don't give a fuck what the car brand is. I want to be safe. Get me from A to B. Cheapest price possible. Right. Right. And I, but yeah, okay, fine. The broken bag, I'm going to go pay Ermes a bunch of fucking money. But apart from that, there is no brand value. So stop talking about like USAI if you're

going to say it's 100x more expensive than the Chinese version and does the same stuff. Right. Yeah. Ultimately, at the day, people are just going to want the Toyota Corolla. of models. And that's going to be supplied by the Chinese. Yeah, absolutely. I suppose like in this moment right now, like AI company equity value is up only. Like you can go trade Anthropic on hyperliquid.

It just goes up and they just raise it higher and higher round. Everything related to AI just goes up. In addition to that, they're subsidizing the actual usage. And so the cost of a token isn't actually really the cost of a token. And that only really works when, you know, number goes up, when there's some free money, like flying around. I'm sure being in the crypto, in the AI industry kind of feels like being in the crypto industry in 2021.

Like all money's fake and you just have to like build and execute as fast as possible. And so as soon as that kind of stops and the marginal consumer or consumers broadly start becoming price sensitive, then a lot of this effects will start to actually like show up and people start to look at like fundamentals and reality rather than kind of the hype in the narrative.

But we're not in that phase in the market. right now, people aren't price sensitive to tokens. AI labs aren't even price sensitive to tokens. And so everyone is in this kind of like euphoric state. How do you know how long we are in this state? Like what do you look for as an investor? I think the biggest tell is going to be this depreciation schedule, right? So a lot of these financing deals, like we're like, you got to care about the debt

because usually it's the debt and the credit that's going to force the, you know, mark fiction to reality. Okay. And close that gap. and right now you have people underwriting, amortizing GPU deals with a five to six year period when things are getting better in a two to three year time frame. So that is mathematically going to start really biting us in,

you know, late 2007, 20208 timeframe. If you think about the pace of which CAPEX and loans were issued, 2025 to 2025 to 26 for the banner year, so add two to three years under that, you really get into this 2028 timeframe, which is the critical period where either demand has so ramped up so high and that, you know, that doesn't matter,

or it disappoints and just the math of if I amortize an asset at six years, but it has a useful life of two, then all of a sudden, all those H-100s and Blackwells that you underwrote are essentially worthless. And it's not as if, the frontier labs can train on anything bad

because if it's all about I need to have the best model and a one or two or five percent incremental improvement could lead to a compounded permanent moat of my competitors, I cannot use the NeoCloud with H-100s and Blackwells. I need to have whatever they meant the newest Nvidia or Huawei chip is and I have to do that. I cannot use these other chips. And I think that's from the real.

where it meets the road, and that's when we mark to market on this. And we see, okay, where's the revenue, where's the capital returns? Does this make sense? And I have a feeling that that will be the test. And the greatest part for crypto is that if we do get an AI credit event, number one, it'll be bigger than 2008 because the whole world is on this dilution that AI is the biggest technology ever. We're going to build more CAPEX per percentage of GDP.

than we did with the railroads, much bigger than subprime. And the Fed can't print Moore's law. I don't care how much money that you throw at this thing. You can't change the fact that a chip gets better every two years if you pump $10 trillion into the economy. So what's the first response going to be by the financial authorities to try to save the banks? We're going to say, oh, we just need to shovel Fiat money in.

And at that point, investors are going to say, I do not want to put any new capital, whether it's free or not into AI because it does not meet its cost of capital. So therefore, this capital goes straight to crypto. And this is the implosion of the AI bubble and the follow-on money printing that's going to happen, especially in the United States,

to try to stick-shape the system from this gross capital misallocation that's happened over the last, let's call it six to seven years by that point is going to dwarf subprime and is going to take us to Bitcoin a million or whatever, right? This is the big print. If you get this, if this thesis is correct and you time this well, you'll never work again.

This is the John Paulson subprime trade. This is the big shore Michael Burry trade of this particular epoch. And that's kind of how I'm thinking about us. I don't know when this is going to happen, but I know I got to get this right. Because if you're able to be liquid at this situation and when this Fiat money floods into this system, it's not, it can't go to the AI trade anymore because again, the Fed can't print more's law, can't make a fucking, uh, depreciation schedule change, no matter how much money you print. And I think that's the best argument for why crypto is going to do so fucking well when

AI completely implodes. And that's, that's what I believe. I don't know when this is going to happen. Right. And I'm going to continue updating my mental model, but that's kind of where I'm at right now. Huh. I find this incredibly compelling. I, What I love about this is that it is so countercyclical. It's like we have two opposing waves happening. You have the AI at the top and crypto at the bottom. And a lot of the timing is for the future escaping that we are doing right now. We don't know, we don't know, but we're future escaping.

The timing of everything where if you give a one to two year time horizon, that kind of aligns with the political fears that we might have in about two years. So your window for opportunities between zero and two years for the, AI bubble to pop. It's like it could happen tomorrow. It's happened two years from now. If you think, if you go back to Subprime, subprime started

in 2007 with the failure of those two hedge funds, right? We started to mark, housing prices stopped rising in 2006. So you had the first cracks in 2007 and then the crisis in 2008. So, you know, and you had essentially a panicked

bailout where Bush was not elected, so Bush was in, office. He rolled out tarp. Obama came in this supposedly more equitable Democrat, whatever, continued the bailout, right, because he had no other ideas on how to solve this thing. And they did it anyways. Did it put any beggars in jail,

all this kind of stuff, right? So like, if you think about the perfect storm for this is marked a reality in terms of underwriting GPUs at six years versus two, that chick has come home to Roos, in 2027, but probably will limp on until 2028, and then you have a presidential election, which could be a referendum on AI. You know, what has AI done for me lately? Okay, quit. I can book a travel. I don't need my assistant to book my travel anymore, but my water's dirty. And, you know, I didn't have enough money to buy Tesla or, sorry, SpaceX or Anthropic or, you know, SK Hyenex or

whatever the fucking stock you want to pick that's up 20, 30, 40x from 2000. 2022. I'm just some poor American person living paycheck to paycheck, you know, with dirty water and hearing a buzz outside my house because of this fucking data center. And I don't own any of this shit. So fuck these guys. Then, you know, it could be a Democratic, could be a Republican. And there'll be some smooth talking politician who's going to tap into this anger. And again, I think the 2008 presidential election will be a referendum on on AI. And it doesn't really matter who wins or loses. But just the fact that it is a referendum on AI. you as an investor are afraid that this, you know, guy or gal is going to be successful and then tax you to oblivion and all of a sudden there goes you're all your returns, right? And so you should sell ahead of that event. So I think if this is going to happen, the perfect storm for a big prane yield curve control back the fucking truck up situation would be sometime in, you know, the fall of 2008. So, you know, obviously. I don't want people to lose money, but at least for my portfolio, if this thing were to happen

and the way that I see it, that would be my perfect storm of a situation. Right. And the time to have sold your AI stongs would have been well before that because by the time a big print comes along, it's like AI songs are already in trouble, correct? Yeah, because the S&P happened in whatever it is, September of 2008. SEP didn't bottom until March 2009. Right. So, and they were printing and printing.

and printing and printing, QE was announced in December, printing and printing and printing. You need to already be into Bitcoin, into ether, well before this. And so, like, not necessarily, because again, everything's correlation one on the down draft, right?

Investors are going to sell everything. Oh, you're trying to go, you're trying to ride the AI bubble into cash, let everything correlate to one on the down, and then buy the bottom. Is the pseudo plan? That's, that is the ideal plan. I think that's the ideal plan.

You're the fucking best trader ever. Right, right, right. You just fucking crushed it. We'll see if you do that. Because why I enjoy this, while I enjoy this story, I am looking at the crypto, Bitcoin and the blue chip prices, Bitcoin and Ether, they are strictly deals in this moment. They are off their highs.

Again, Ether is 30% below the 200-week moving average. So what catalyst brings them higher? If the incremental unit of Fiat is going to fund CapEx or going to some bank that's going to lend to... Yeah, companies, where it's the capital that's going to be available to push Bitcoin to 200,000 or ETH to 10 or 15,000? Yeah. Like, they may rally a bit, but I think this is the reason why people are so disappointed. It's like, okay, yeah, Bitcoin took out its all-time high.

It was, you know, from 69 to 125. So it's like, you know, it doubled from this all-time-time high. That's probably one of the most shitty bull markets ever. It sucks. It sucks. Yes. Why? No one was thrilled.

Because AI took all the money. Yeah. We printed a lot of money globally and what happened, all that capital was funneled into AI. The only thing that investors want to allocate to is AI, whether that's on the debt or the equity side. And I don't see that changing if this AI story continues to be the only theme that you're investing in, especially if AI can survive higher oil prices.

You're definitely going to be, oh, wow, AI survive. It's a hundred and oil's at $150,000 and the NASDAX at $40,000, then, and it doesn't matter. It's all about AI. Nasdaq 100,000, right? And so I think, yeah, Bitcoin could rise because it's, you know, a shittier version of a tech stock, but it's not going to be that explosive rally that you expect, given the trillions of dollars and euros and yen and yuan that had been printed. And so that is why I think investors are still going to choose AI as the fastest horse to sort of exchange a infinitely debased Fiat unit of Fiat. for some financial asset that will outperform the debasement. In order for crypto to kind of just have the vitality and energy just, and the funness that we once had in the markets, do you think like AI needs to just stop sucking all the oxygen out of the room? Yeah, exactly.

I don't see why, I don't see how on a broad says you can get Bitcoin at 500,000 with this AI story in play. Because again, okay, if Bitcoin went to 500,000, that's, let's call it a 10x return, right? Was it Sandist at 50X this year? Yeah, something crazy. SK-Hin-X? Yeah.

Went up 10x? Yeah. Right? So, like, you could find some second or third derivative down from some component that's necessary for data center buildup. Put your entire net worth into that, and you can be 20x in six months. why would you buy Bitcoin?

I think that's how you have to think about this. It's always an opportunity cost. Again, it's all the same trade. Everyone knows that this unit of fiat will be worth less in the future. What can I buy now that's going to outperform that? And I want the fastest horse. AI is the fastest horse.

And it's proven itself to be the fastest horse. And therefore, an investor with this, you know, marginal unit of fiat is going to continue to choose AI, especially if SpaceX 180 Anthropics does well, Open AI does well, the oil price goes up and the rally and the party continues, it's only going to make it harder for some of these cryptos to do extremely well. Like it still do okay. But then you're like, oh, I made 50% on my crypto, but like this other tech stock was up 20x.

I messed up. I do remember doing some podcasts, end of year podcasts in like December. January six months ago. And there were a lot of, there were a lot of consensus takes at the time of like crypto is just not going to be that exciting because the AI trade is going to suck all the oxygen out of the room. And that I remember that. I remember doing a handful of podcasts like that. And that's exactly what happened. And like here we are. And, you know, Bitcoin is down $40,000. You know, ether is down 50% from where we started this year. I think, I think that math is correct. And the only tokens that have made all-time highs are like somewhere between $500 million and

$2 billion market cap coins with the exception of hyper liquid. And really, the only activity has really been down market in like the one to two billion market cap range. Yeah, I mean, it makes sense. Yeah. Let's talk about hyper liquid. What's it like, did you create perps or were you just the first person to implement them?

So there was a paper written by Robert Schiller about a perpetual thing, right? That's from like 1993, right? That's like the early one. Something like that, right? And, you know, we didn't actually cite that paper, and I never read it before, but when we came up with the idea, but we kind of arrived at the same conclusion. And initially it was we took the BitFenex Bitcoin and dollar rates

and then created this never-ending thing, but it wasn't responsive enough to the market. And so the real innovation that we invented was this self-correcting mechanism, the funding rate. How you look at the past X period, their premium rate discount, apply that going forward as the funding rate. That is what really made the perpetual SWAT work in a crypto high-paced, highly-leverage environment

because you had this very quick resetting of what the rate should be in the real market. And it's completely self-contained. You don't need to reference outside prices to arrive at this mechanism. So that has a new invention that myself and the team of Bitmex created starting in 2016.

So I would say, yes, we invented the perpetual swap. This is not a Robert Schiller product. Yeah. What's it like to be in 2026 in Perps? are just the narrative. What's it like to be the creator of perps? I love it. I mean, I think I can't, I love that like Terry Duffy and, you know,

the Nizy guys are like freaking out about hyperliquid and, you know, all these perps. Like, go fuck yourself. What does it mean to be freaking out? I'm there. Oh, regulator come hyperliquid. They're taking all my money. Like, get the fuck out of here. Like, Jeff and his team of, you know, 11.

an engineer is they've completely whooped your ass. Like, good on them. I love it. And so I'm really proud of Jeff what they've done and all the other entrepreneurs that have taken this perp thing into a new level. And now we have perps on SpaceX, perps on Anthropic, like perps on oil, perks on whatever. Like, it's great. I love it.

I think it's great. Markets don't move one asset at a time. One day it's Bitcoin, the next Nvidia, then gold, and then the S&P. But most traders are still managing their portfolio across different platforms, different accounts, and different pools of capital. BitGet just changed that.

Their new Stocks 2.0 products lets you trade tokenized equities directly with USDT, all inside the same map you already used for crypto. This is not just another tokenized stock product. Stocks 2.0 is designed around deeper liquidity, faster execution, and the lowest fees in the market at just 0.04% and one-to-one economic exposure to. Dividend, stock splits, and other corporate actions are reflected automatically, helping your position stay aligned with the asset you actually want exposure to. One platform, one account, multiple markets, crypto equities, commodities, and more, all accessible with, USDT. BitKat. Trade Smarter. Start trading today through the link in the show notes. This is not investment advice. Some exciting news. We are launching a new podcast to help people figure out the crypto cycle, how to navigate it. The best crypto cycle investor I know, his name is Michael Nato. He runs the Defi report.

This is the guy that sent me a sell alert before the 1010 price drop happened. His cycle analysis has been absolutely on point. I've been following him for years. And this year, we started recording weekly podcast episodes. Each one we get into his portfolio, what he's holding, the market structure, entry targets, fair market value of Bitcoin and Ether, and where we are in the cycle, there's new episodes that are released every Wednesday. They're 30 minutes. They're short. They're punchy. I think this crypto cycle is harder to navigate than most. So let's do it together. Go subscribe to this podcast. Search the Defi Report wherever you get your podcast, YouTube, Apple, Spotify, or find a link of the show notes. There's a new episode waiting for you now. Can you paint the bull case for the perpetual as an instrument? Like, why will perps, I don't know if you believe this, but like, why will perps eat the world? Why will, like, Wall Street eventually get perpified? Like, why are perps good? Because retail investors love them.

At the end of the day, Wall Street is about extracting value from dumb retail to smart institutional investors. And so if the dumb retail says, I want a 24-7 product with 100x leverage on whatever financial price there is around the world, and I don't want to have to understand futures curves and all these sorts of things. The perpetual swap is a product for them combined with socialized loss mechanism, which is basically what we have invented in the crypto ecosystem. That's hyperliquid, that's Binance, as Bitmax. That's all of us, right? We've done, you know, starting in 2014, up until the present, we sort of refined this system,

everybody doing their part to sort of like make this the perfect product. So if all the retail, if the marginal retail person says, okay, I want high leverage, is trade 24-7, and the only way that have that happened is on a perpetual swap with socialized loss, I'm not going to open my Robin Hood account and trade there or trade some leverage features contract on the CME. And without the dumb retail, then you just have Ken Griffin hitting against Don Wilson. And that's not the game that they want to be in. They're going to figure it out, okay, fine.

I'm going to deal with whatever compliance complexities there is and the tech issues and the custody issues. I now need to trade on hyperliquid or whatever the dominant perp decks is. And they'll get there because the clients are there. The people that they want to make money off of have migrated. And so that's why it's a structural trend. And I think

the problem that a lot of these traditional exchanges they don't understand why they're not going to be successful with the perks that they're launching. Number one, a lot of them don't do 24-7. So it's automatic, like, what the fuck are you even thinking? This is a 24-7 market. Number two, you have

an attack custody. No, not clearing. The clearing situation has to be socialized loss. That's the only way this is going to work for you as an exchange to offer the high leverage and the notionals that are trading. If you continue to cling to this guaranteed settlement clearinghouse model that's been around since, you know, probably, you know, 50 to 100 years, you will not be able to, from a risk perspective, get to the point where you can offer a compelling product to

the average retail trader, hyperliquid, finance, everyone else. will just be a better compelling product because they're able to offer the high leverage. Yes, you do have this issue where you could get your ADL or your profit cap and all that sort of stuff. And I know there's a lot of institutional investors who don't like that uncertainty

about their profit payoff, but that's the tradeoff to get the retail person excited about trading on this. And the fact that triad fight doesn't understand that it doesn't get why these products are successful, means they're going to launch all these perks. They'll trade a bit. But again, the marginal retail punter is not going to trade that.

They want the high leverage. They're perfectly happy giving up some of their profit in adverse scenarios, and they'll continue to trade more and more on hyperliquid. Can you talk about the socialized loss mechanism and why that's so fundamental to the purpose? Why do you emphasize that so much? Because the exchange cannot lose money, right? You can't offer a product where the exchange is put at risk.

And when you do guaranteed settlement, the exchange is at risk because you're saying at any price, at any velocity of getting any of that price, I will make sure that the person in profit, even if all the other treas of bankrupt gets paid. How do they get paid from my balance sheet? So to rectify that, we built all of these clearing organizations. And the clearing members put up bonds,

and they got a little bit of a fee for this risk capital that they put up. And that worked fine in sort of a bounded time frame market. And you have sort of a central banking government that can bail you out if things get really, really bad. I see. Now, in crypto, right, we have highly volatile assets, bearer assets. You can't print crypto.

And you're not going to see your clients. And so if you have 100x leverage, you have to protect yourself for the exchange. The only way to do that is socialized loss. And so unless you put a socialized loss mechanism into your clearing situation or your margining, then you, from a risk perspective, cannot offer this product. And this is the same mechanism that makes these things like a protocol rather than needing to have like illegal entities in K-O-I-C because hyperliquers not going to come, knock on your door, saying, hey, you owe money.

We're just going to ADLU instead. said the same mechanism. Correct. You have it to say whatever you put in as a max you can lose. Your initial margin is a maximum loss. Right. And if you get ADL as a trader, all that really means is like you won as much as possible and there are no more chips to give you because you won them all.

Correct. And so no one can really be like, are you really upset? Like, sorry other people didn't take this out of your trade. Well, you're really upset if you didn't understand how the mechanism worked or maybe the implementation wasn't as advertised. But any sophisticated trader by this point, like ADL has been around since 2014. Right. Like you don't understand how this works.

You should want to get ADLed in the sense that like that means you. Oh, no, you shouldn't. You should ever want to get ADL. What I'm saying is you should understand how it works and have modeled this out. And if you lose money and you didn't know what was going on, then you deserve to lose the money. Okay. There's hyperliquid. There's lighter.

And then there's Coinbase and Robin Hood as a centralized end. There's all of these different players. And the Polly Market and Kalshi are in this race. There are so many players. racing for the U.S. perps market. And like with a lot of the statements, we just had Mike Seleague from the CFTC on the show. There's a lot of just like positive perp statements

from Mike coming out out of the CFTC. What I'm trying to get a grasp on is like how valuable the U.S. market is or is the perp inherently like an offshore thing? Like where do you think the perp thrives better? Onshore or offshore? I mean, I'd say that probably most U.S. people will still trade perps.

I mean, we'll see the incremental uplift on what any of these platforms get. if they have a, you know, they can properly market these things. But, I don't know. It's big. Obviously, the U.S. retail trading market's a massive market, biggest in the world, or one of the biggest in the world. So it's a massive market. And the ability to advertise freely will be a great boon for whoever is allowed in that space.

Yeah. One of the, the question that I asked is like, what you said earlier was, like, the purpose is just fundamentally a retail instrument because it just works well with what retail traders like. And that's why everyone else is going to come and center around the purpose. because retail's there. But like if we put the perp inside the United States, there's going to be regulations on it.

Like you're not going to get 100x leverage. Maybe you get 10 because that's just what it means to operate inside the United States. And so if retail really wants all the bells and whistles that make the perp a good product for retail, don't they need to go offshore and therefore isn't the perp of fundamentally offshore instrument? That's why I thought process.

Maybe, but at the end of the day, if you have distribution and you can market, like people love marketing. getting marketed to. And so that's something that an offshore platform can't do effectively. And so I think that is one thing,

okay, they might have lower leverage, but you're able to reach a different user that was not going to be finding hyperliquid on the web, right? They need to see the ad on the bus station or the train or whatever and that kind of thing before they're going to onboard.

Do you think there would be an offshore winner and an onshore winner? Sure, for sure. I mean, hyperliquid's already going to be an offshore winner. finance is already an offshore winner you know, well, the problem with the enture is going to be highly

commoditized, right? It's going to be 5, 10 licenses given out or whatever it is and everyone's just going to blow a bunch of money in marketing and, you know, it's going to be very difficult to make money. Do you think hyperliquid flips finance? Eventually.

Eventually. It'll take time. Why will it do that? Because it's a better product. And, you know, you don't have to deal with all the other things of operating in the exchange and at the bare minimum,

you outsource security to the layer one where finance has to secure their environment, which is extremely expensive. It's only going to get more expensive. But the client doesn't understand that. They can see the rate. They just see the fee. Right.

And that is the fundamental reason why decentralized exchanges are better is because a client pays for the security of the L1 but then pays again for the trading fee. Do you trade on lighter at all? the ZKL2 PURPTX? I mean, I was investor in it or have I, investor, I think we invested in some of it.

I don't, I mean, I don't trade on hyperliquid either. I don't trade using leverage. You invented the perp and you don't use perps? No. Should I, should we take a lesson from that? Are you spot only? Yes, spot only. If you're not into trenches, you know,

living the shit day and day out, alarms on your phone, don't use leverage. Okay, so why are you a spot guy just because This thing is already so fucking volatile You don't need leverage to make good returns I find it so funny The guy who made Purps doesn't use Perps But okay, but you can lend to the perp market

You can be the you can do like the automatic AEMS Essentially lending to you know Do you like doing that as like a barbell strategy where you like I mean when the rates are high enough yeah I love sticking USDA. Right now the rates aren't that high, so I don't do it. Sure. Arthur, I got no more questions for you, my man.

Thanks for coming on the show. I appreciate it. Thank you. I always learn a lot. Bankless station, you guys know the deal. Crypto's risky. You can lose what you put in, especially if you use a perp, don't use leverage. You heard it from Arthur Hayes.

This is Frontier. It's not for everyone, but we're glad you're with us on the bankless journey. Thanks a lot.