Bankless - The SEC is Suing Coinbase & Binance | Ryan & David

Episode Date: June 6, 2023

Today Gary Gensler and the SEC officially filed lawsuits against crypto exchanges Binance and Coinbase. We break it all down and share some hot takes on what this means for the crypto industry as a whole. ------ 📣 ASYMETRIX | STAKE stETH NOW https://bankless.cc/asymetrix-pod  ------ 🚀 Airdrop Alpha is waiting for you on Bankless.com  https://bankless.cc/Alpha   ------ BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS:  🐙KRAKEN | MOST-TRUSTED CRYPTO EXCHANGE https://k.xyz/bankless-pod-q2   🦊METAMASK LEARN | HELPFUL WEB3 RESOURCE https://bankless.cc/MetaMask  ⚖️ ARBITRUM | SCALING ETHEREUM https://bankless.cc/Arbitrum  👾STADER LABS | ETHX LIQUID STAKING https://bankless.cc/Stader  🗣️TOKU | CRYPTO EMPLOYMENT SOLUTION https://bankless.cc/Toku  🎮IMMUTABLE | GAMING ECOSYSTEM https://bankless.cc/Immutable  🛞MANTLE | MODULAR LAYER 2 NETWORK https://bankless.cc/Mantle  ------ CHAPTERS 0:40 Is This Lawsuit a Surprise? 2:35 Is This Lawsuit a Suprise? 8:41 An Attack On Crypto 12:05 The 4 Big Questions 17:06 Gary's Public Statements 22:20 SEC Charges Overview 27:47 Analysis on Coinbase 30:31 Brian Armstrong's Take 32:58 The Case Against Binance 38:08 David's Take on All of This 43:38 What "Securities" Are Effected? 48:41 News Price Impact 53:35 Where Does Solana Stand? 57:39 Is ETH The Next Target? 1:02:17 Does Anybody Actually Want This? 1:05:15 Twitter Takes 1:09:08 Gary's Icarus Moment? 1:11:10 Closing Thoughts ------ Resources: Binance Sued https://twitter.com/BanklessHQ/status/1665744014081941506?s=20  ----- Not financial or tax advice. This channel is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. This video is not tax advice. Talk to your accountant. Do your own research. Disclosure. From time-to-time I may add links in this newsletter to products I use. I may receive commission if you make a purchase through one of these links. Additionally, the Bankless writers hold crypto assets. See our investment disclosures here: https://www.bankless.com/disclosures   

Gary Gensler and the SEC naming a whole bunch of tokens, tokens that you may own, calling them securities in the complaints issued by the SEC. It seems like the SEC and Gary Gensler is attacking crypto this week and out and out assault. Of course, this comes on the back of months of U.S. government hostility, what we've been calling Operation choke point 2.0. And we want to dive into this subject today. See what's going on. There are a few key questions. we need to ask and to try to answer today. David, where do you want to take this episode? Where should we start?

I think the first big question that everyone is asking is, is this a surprise or did we see this coming? I saw this on like pop up on my Twitter notifications. SEC Sue's Coinbase. And I was like, oh man, today's the day. And I think we should remind bankless listeners and viewers that six weeks ago, Coinbase was served a Wells notice, which means what is a Wells notice? A Wells notice says, hey, we are the SEC and we are going to sue you.

And Coinbase was like, why? Why are you going to do that? And they didn't say anything. So it's worth noting that like we knew that this was coming. The SEC told Coinbase, hey, we're going to sue you. They didn't tell them why. But not only that, about in last March, the SEC told a federal court, court overseeing the voyage or bankruptcy that Binance was operating an unregistered securities

exchange inside the U.S., but they had yet to bring charges. And so they, the SEC had officially stated that Binance was an unregistered securities exchange. And so both of these things we've had in history, recent history. So I think there's a lot of fear out there. This is a, this is a scary headline. SEC sues Coinbase. The SEC sues sues finance. SEC is suing the two largest crypto market places that we have. And so for first cyclers out there who are questioning or having fear, who are scared, I'll say, no, this is, this is not a surprise. Everything in these two complaints against Coinbase and Binance, I'll say Coinbase and Binance both saw coming and are probably prepared for. So I will say this is not a reason to freak out and probably the industry. We've got this.

We've got this under control. That's my high level take for the intro of this. How do you feel about that, Brian. Yeah, I think I want to unpack that with you, David. And before we maybe get to kind of conclusions or how we're feeling about it, I feel like we should get to kind of the intro of what actually happened to get people up to speed because it just started yesterday. Yesterday, the first complaint was filed against Binance. The SEC charged Binance and CZ for operating an unregistered securities exchange and for the unregistered sale of securities. So here's the tweet that David is displaying right now from at SECGov because of course this is where these things are published these days on Twitter. Today we charge Binance Holdings Limited U.S.-based affiliate BAM

trading services, which together with Binance operates Binance.us and their founder, CZ with a variety of security violations. They also, by the way, include kind of apparent tweet, like an influencer tweet. I'm going to read that quote. We are operating as an effing unlicensed securities exchange in the USA, bro, Binance Chief Compliance Officer. Blown up quote, this was a quote from 2018 that somehow the SEC procured via internal Binance chat logs. Of course, they were making a big deal out of this. And you could see details in the press release. So that's what happened yesterday. Okay. So that was June 5th. This SEC filed charges against Binance entities. 13 charges, yes, against all of the Binance entities and CZ himself.

So it's a pretty comprehensive set of charges against finance. So we had that to absorb. And then just today as well, the SEC charged Coinbase for operating an unregistered security exchange broker and clearing agency. Here's the influence where tweet here. Here's a blown up quote coming from the SEC Twitter account. And this was, I think, a quote that this was something also posted in the complaint itself. You simply cannot ignore the rules because you don't.

don't like them or because you'd prefer different ones. The consequences for the investing public are far too great. While Coinbase's calculated decisions may have allowed it to earn billions, it's done so at the expense of investors by depriving them of the protections to which they are entitled. This is the director of the SEC skewering Coinbase for, I guess, ignoring the rules in his words. And that was the charge that came this morning and the accompanying press release. David, we have some market reaction from this already. You want to get into that? Yeah.

So Bitcoin, when this news broke yesterday was at $26,800, fell all the way down to $25,500, so down about $5,000 to 6%. And interestingly, in the last few hours or so, has recovered back to up to $26,000. And a half dollars. So we're seeing some recovery in both Bitcoin and Ether. So here's Ether. Ether is actually back up to the price. It was when this news dropped yesterday about black.

finance. And so it was at $1,870. It got down to as low as 1780. And now it was back back up to $1,70. So interestingly, when the finance news dropped, when SEC announced their lawsuit against finance, Bitcoin dropped about 5 percent, ether dropped about 4 percent. Some of the tokens dropped up to 10 percent. But since the SEC dropped the news about Coinbase, things have recovered. The blue chips are almost back up to where they were. Salana, which is one. one of the tokens listed as a security in both the Binance and the Coinbase charges is still down at the price that it fell to yesterday at $20. So it's down about 8%. Adam, the Cosmos token, recovered a little bit, but it's still down a little bit south. So the blue chips, Ryan,

interestingly, have recovered. The tokens listed, which is a subject of this episode, the tokens listed as securities in both the Coinbase and the Binance suits are still hammered a little bit. But it's interesting to see the market reacts. What are those tokens, by the way, David, can we just list them in the intro here? Because I know we'll get into them a little bit later. Yeah. So there's a number of them. The big ones are Solana, Cardano, Maddoch, aka Polygon, Filecoin, Axi, Flow, DFINITY, and Near. There are other tokens as well, but these are the big ones that got that named as securities. So yes, to be clear, the SEC actually named these tokens, called these token securities in both of their suits, in both of the complaints that they put down.

How about the price of coin shares? I heard that took a nosedive after the complaint against Coinbase was released this morning, maybe like down 17% at one point in time. Yeah, that's right. I don't have that pulled up. Actually, yes, I do. Just kidding. Coin down 17% as of this morning following the SEC lawsuit.

So down, it started the week at about $66. dollars is now at $48.5. So that's pretty rough. That's a big bleed of the market cap. How about some of the other tokens, David? I know B&B token was down bad. Of course, B&B was another one of the tokens that was listed as a security. And maybe the SEC has more like to stand on with that one as opposed to others.

I'm not sure. But what are we looking at here? What's this chart showing us? Yeah. So this is all of the tokens that were listed named as securities. So Cardano, Maddoch, Filecoin, Adam. The best one of the case, Maddoch is down 5.5%. The worst one of the case, which is sand, which is, I think, one of the lowest market cap ones,

is like a Metaverse token, down 10%. Let's see, Filecoin down 9.5%. Cardano down 7%. We don't have Sol in here, but we do have Sol up on the Cracken charts. So like I said, Sol is down how much? Not too bad. It could be worse. Yeah.

Down 6.5%. I think the markets are still reeling and trying to figure out how to react to this. One high-level take I have in the intro before we kind of get into the specifics here, I know there's four big questions we really want to ask in this episode. But one high-level take I have is that this is an attack on crypto. So yesterday, I was sort of thinking this was, you know, maybe this in the rest of crypto industry is maybe thinking this was an isolated incident, right? this is maybe maybe the SEC is trying to clean things up on the binance side of things they certainly

um very explicitly made some comparisons with z to s bf and to binance to ftx right and they're certainly using that as much as they could drawing from that comparison um but one thing i want to draw everyone's attention to you that they didn't but the binance uh complaint and then this is that they named specific tokens they declared specific tokens a security and to me that is not an isolated incident that is not an isolated attack on Binance as a whole in CZ or on a particular set of products at Coinbase, when you name specific tokens that are in kind of top 10, top 25 market cap that have existed for a very long time in crypto. And you declare them securities, Seoul, Ada, Maddo, AXS, that to me is a direct attack on crypto.

And here's why I'm reeling from this is, I was even looking at Binance and like, I trust Binance at this point more than I trust the SEC. And I don't put a lot of trust in Binance, David. You know what I mean? Like this agency has lost a ton of credibility in its response to this space. They have not provided clear guidelines. Instead, they're taking this kind of rogue enforcement action. And it seems like Gensler is on a warpath to absolutely tear into crypto, to try to kill it in the U.S., to try to damage it, to try to rein it in, to try to completely control it.

And that is why this is more than an isolated complaint against two particular exchanges. This, to me, is an all-out assault on crypto, and it couldn't be more clear. Look at these events Monday and then Tuesday, we get a Coinbase attack. It goes without saying that Coinbase has tried its best. I mean, their thing is being like, you know, the kid in the class, hand always up, always answering the question, kind of teacher's pet with respect to compliance, and they are getting busted as well. That's why this feels like an attack on crypto. It goes straight to the roots of why we are here in this industry, like one of our favorite podcast, Ryan, the crypto renaissance. Crypto is powerful because we can now make financial assets.

Anyone can make financial assets without asking for permission. Like it or not, that technology. that cat is out of the bag and now people are experimenting with this ability to produce new tokens, to produce new assets and to deem these things broadly, sweepingly saying, that's a security, that's a security, that's a security, go straight to what makes this technology so powerful. And it is exactly what this is predicted by when this new disruptive technology comes to power, the incumbents say like, hey, we're going to make that illegal.

And so this whole like your asset is. a security like the bitcoins are saying like ether is a security this is not the time to be tribal there are the having the nation state name certain crypto asset securities is not for any one tribe's victory over the other this is like you are saying an attack on crypto our an attack on our fundamental right to do finance on the internet and to produce an experiment with new crypto assets uh even though that offends gerry gensler that is that is too bad uh for him uh so i've four questions, Ryan, that I think the rest of this show is going to be thematic under, four big questions, right? And so the first one here is Binance questions. It's like, okay,

so the suit against finance, the complaint against Binance has facts and circumstances that is unique from the suit against Coinbase. What about the Binance suit is alleged? And is this really a case against Binance versus the people, which is one perspective to have? Or is Is this Binance versus the law? What are we trying to unpack here? Did Binance offend humans? Did they aggrieve customers? Did they do something wrong to people's monies?

Or did they just violate the law in a bureaucratic way? So that's a big theme of the whole Binance suit. And so that's a topic of conversation that we'll go through when we talk about Binance. Then there's the CoinMace questions. The big one to me is, why did the SEC allow Coinbase to IPO if they knew that it was an unregistered illegal securities exchange. Yep. And if it did know that, why?

What is the motivation to going back on that choice now? So that's the Coinbase question. The third question, is everything a security now? Because apparently that if you put these two suits together, that is the common denominator. Is that both Binance and Coinbase are illegal, unlicensed securities exchanges. And they're now naming which tokens are securities now for the first time ever. So that is a development and clarity, even though they're saying everything's a security. security.

It's also on the list. Either not on the list, but that is a topic of discussion is like, well, does just Gary Gensler have one more hat, like one more trick to pull out of his sleeve? Maybe that's the last thing here. And then the big question, the final big question is, why is the SEC doing this? They haven't even won their case against Ripple, but now they're taking on both Coinbase and finance. Like Gary Gensler, he's no idiot.

He knows that Coinbase will fight him tooth and nail. same with Binance. So what's his edge? Why does he feel so confident in this? Like what his motivation? These are the big categories of questions that I have. Is there anything you want to add to that? No, I just think we're going to want to conclude as well with where do we go from here? Like what happens next? And how can we as residents of the United States, at least for a subset of bankless listeners or worldwide in whatever jurisdiction you're part of, how can we fight back? How can we resist? What can we do as individuals. So we'll conclude with some of those thoughts. David, we got to cut to sponsors real quick before we get to the rest of this episode. So let's do that now. Cracken Pro has easily become

the best crypto trading platform in the industry. The place I use to check the charts and the crypto prices, even when I'm not looking to place a trade. On Cracken Pro, you'll have access to advanced charting tools, real-time market data and lightning fast trade execution, all inside their spiffy new modular interface. Cracken's new customizable modular layout lets you tailor your trading experience to suit your needs. Pick and choose your favorite modules and place them anywhere you want in your screen. With Cracken Pro, you have that power.

Whether you are a seasoned pro or just starting out, join thousands of traders who trust Cracken Pro for their crypto trading needs. Visit pro.crakken.com to get started today. Mantle is a brand new, high-performance Ethereum Layer 2 network, built differently from the other Layer 2s

you may be familiar with. Mantle is a modular layer 2, built on the OP stack, but uses eigenlayers data availability solution instead of the expensive Ethereum layer 1. Not only does this reduce Mantle's gas fees by 80% compared to other layer 2s, but it also reduces gas fee volatility. Mantle has a decentralized sequencer set,

eliminating the risk of downtime and censorship on the network. And because Mantle implements multi-party computation nodes, layer 1 settlement execution is shortened from 7 days to as low as just 1 or 2. Mantle is the first layer 2 built by a Dow, and is backed by one of the biggest Dow treasuries in the world. Bit Dow. Mantle already has sub-communities from around Web3 onboarded to help the growth of Mantle, like Game 7 for Web3 gaming or EduDow for the world of D-Sai, and ByBit for TVL, liquidity, and on-ramps.

Check out Mantle at mantle.xy-Z and follow them on Twitter at ZeroX Mantle. Immutable is at the forefront of Web3 gaming, on a mission to bring digital ownership to every player, offering the world's best games and game development platform. Immutable lets game builders and players focus on great gaming experiences, So, build your next Web3 game on Easy Mode with Immutable's leading full-stack Web3 gaming platform. It's built-in Ux features, like the Immutable Passport, are designed for games to scale to the next billion players coming to Web3. With Immutable, players can sign up with an email, pay with a credit card, and experience a frictionless purchase flow inside of games. So, discover your next favorite game and explore a network of 150 games building on Immutable, including such titles as Gauzin Chains, Guilds of Guardians, Illuvium, Embersword, and Metalcore.

So join Web3's largest ecosystem of games and players. Build, play, and connect at immutable.com. So Ryan, Gary Gensler was on Squawk Box this morning, making his influencer debut, made some statements about the two suits that just dropped in the last 48 hours. Let's hear what he's got to say. In public, these trading platforms, they call themselves exchanges, are co-mingling a number of functions, which in traditional finance, We don't see the New York Stock Exchange also operating a hedge fund, making markets.

And as we alleged in Binance, having a sister organization flooding the platform with transactions called was trading and the lack of controls on the platforms is really a web of deception. Oh, my God. Alex, along with a control person, Mr. Zal, trying to evade U.S. law. So he was talking about Binance, not Coinbase, in that. I'm pretty sure he talks about Binance in all of these clips. It's so much easier for him to talk smack about Binance, by the way, than it is Coinbase. And he knows that, and he's using that to his advantage, isn't he? So a web of deceptions.

Right. Deception is what he just called Binance right there. And I think the in timing of the Binance yesterday, Coinbase today, is a strategy to Coinbase's disadvantage because now Coinbase is shoulder to shoulder with Binance. And Binance does have skeletons in the closet. It makes it a lot harder to defend against. And so here's another clip. I'm pretty sure Gary Ganser is just talking about Binance once again. There's a lot of question.

There's 10 to 20,000 tokens. It's actually in the Coinbase complaint. We note that they have through the Coinbase wallet, you can trade 16,000 different tokens. And there's a lot of debate. The use cases, oh my God, shut up. Look, we don't need more digital currency.

We already have digital currency. It's called the US dollar. It's called the Euro. What? Oh, wow. Why does he get to decide? And you have digital, you have entrepreneurs representing digital investments on this program all day long. And it's whether it's the big tech companies, the automobile companies, you name it.

It's all digital right now, the investing world. Wow. Is the real underlying value of these tokens? And that's why you need full, fair, and truthful disclosures. And that's the regime, the securities loss was. set up when there's a group of entrepreneurs those entrepreneurs should be able to put their case in front of the investing public in what's called a filing and what is called a filing wow this guy just cannot let the market determine the price for things can he he has to control it all what is

the use case of all of those coins and tokens that's the did you hear the transition he goes what is the use case for these coins and tokens that's why we need this Those are, you can question the value of crypto, but you just can't question the value of crypto and then also bridge that to and everything is like undisclosed, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, those are separate issues. This is a guy like as if he is responsible for like aOL, regulating AOL. And he's going and he's looking at the rest of the internet. And he's like, what's the use of all of these websites?

We have everything we need already in America Online. And so there's no utility to go outside of our closed garden. All right. You ready for the last one? I don't know. I'm getting sick. One set of conversations between the agency and a company, but we've had discussions with literally dozens of crypto incumbents,

including the wines that you just mentioned. And what we find is this is a field that's built. The whole business model is built. on non-compliance with the U.S. securities laws. And we're asking them to come into compliance, and they're going a bit of catches if you can. That's a sort of generalization. So that's talking about Binance.

And like that's what this problem is, is like if you go and look at the Binance, what's in the suit and the messages that they apparently got from Binance Internal Coms, that was the strategy of Binance, of Binance. There's like evade regulations, evade controls. But like the regulations suck, David. All right?

Here's the thing. Why do we need a Binance.us? Why do we need like a dot US version of all of our exchanges? Why is there a separate coin base institutional and then a coin base US? And we get the kind of the Fisher Price version that's made for kids rather than like grown ass adults. It's because this guy. It's because this guy does not make it easy to comply, has not offered any clarity as just using stick. Oh, okay. So let's go, let's get into the SEC charges Coinbase for operating an unregistered

securities exchange broker and clearing agency. And so there's a formal complaint that you can read. There's a will be a link in the show notes. This is a very, very lengthy document. But Mike Selleg, our friend and lawyer at bankless here, not our lawyer, but our lawyer, free recurring guest. Good specification there. Yeah, good specification. He tweets out this thread and so I'll summarize it here. First, the SEC. C's complaint against Coinbase says that Coinbase is operating as an unregistered exchange, broker-dealer and clearing agency. The staking programs are securities offering. So that's CBEath, Ryan, which is a, there's a lot of CBEath out there.

And then several coins, including new ones that were not named in the Binance suit from yesterday, like NIR, were dubbed as securities. And so I think the interesting tweets are tweet number six. Let's see, where is that? an interesting aspect, and you heard this in the clip just now, interesting aspect of the complaint is the assertion that Coinbase offers brokerage services via Coinbase wallet, a non-custodial digital wallet. Novel theory in asserting that offering a non-custodial software product is somehow providing

a brokerage service. Oh my God. So he's going after the wallet too? He's going after the non-custodial independent wallet. Yeah. SEC bases its conclusion that offering a wallet is broker-dealer activity on the fact that The wallet enables users to access defy trading protocols outside of the coinbase platform that offer securities. So MetaMask is an unregistered securities exchange.

Anything that I connect to any decks. Because a decks connects to unregistered securities. Your ledger hardware wallet is you are an unregistered exchange, my friend. Hey, I hate to break it to you, but you are too, brother. What? Well, where's my wells notice? I want one. This is crazy.

So I didn't realize it went that deep. It went that far. This is a treat number nine from Mike Selle. This I thought was a pretty big deal. The SEC uses risks disclosures from Coinbase's S1. You want to pop this to full screen, by the way, so everyone can see. Oh, is this is not full screen? Oh, this is my desktop browser.

Oh, that's not too. Well, that's not too that at all. One more time. The SEC uses risks disclosures from Coinbase's S1 registration. The S1 is what you need. need to file with the SEC in order to be a public company, which the SEC approved. So the SEC is using risk disclosures from Coinbase's S1 against Coinbase, despite having allowed Coinbase's registration statement to go effective.

The complaint asserts that Coinbase knew of the risks based on S1 disclosure that certain crypto assets may be deemed securities because the law is so unclear. Wait, so do you get this? So the, the SEC approves Coinbase's S1 and then uses. Coinbase's S1 as evidence against them. Coinbase knew that there were potentially securities on the exchange because Coinbase knew that the SEC's law was so unclear. David, how much more bad faith can you actually get here?

It is unreal. It is unreal. So like first, Coinbase states in their S1 that there is a risk to the company that they might have securities on the exchange because the SEC is not providing any guidance or clarity so they don't know. And the SEC is using that statement in the S-1 that they approved that saying like, oh, well, you guys knew that you had securities because you guys said that. It says that right here. It doesn't take a rookie files with us.

Right. It is, this scripting on this could not be any better. Okay. Okay. And then the last week that I think that is worth pointing out is Coinbase has expressed willingness in its well's response and elsewhere to register with the SEC if the SEC believes that this is needed. The SEC complaint does not appear to.

acknowledge this fact that Coinbase is trying to be so responsive to the SEC, but instead attempts to characterize Coinbase as knowingly attempting to evade securities laws. So this is why just now, when we listen to Gary Gensler on Squawk Box, Gary Gensler was like, oh, these crypto trading platforms are trying to operate intentionally outside of regulatory control. Yeah, the whole industry was founded on noncompliance and not, you know, playing by the rules. and just like scamming investors out of their capital. Yeah, Gary.

Right, which is why the timing on Coinbase and Binance is so dubious because they're trying to use the dark gray cloud of Binance to shroud Coinbase's sparkly, clean, good attempt to come into compliance and talk to the SEC. But even Binance before that, I mean, they're using SBF and FTX and saying, hey, there's another one. We caught another one, right? Here it is.

It's Binance. They're using that as well. I, you know that parent tweet too, and I know we'll get back to this, but the, Mike mentions that it's increasingly clear that SEC agrees with Chair Gensler that virtually all cryptos except Bitcoin or securities. Yeah. So again, that list of tokens that they named, this isn't the complete list, but Solana, Ada, Madic, Filecoin, Axi, Infinity, Stan token, C, HZ, what's that, Flow, ICP, Near, VGX, Dash, Nexo, just a random assortment of coins. Just like, yeah, these ones. Yeah.

Absolutely infuriating. We'll get back to that. But you've got some more analysis on Coinbase still. What's this? Yeah, this is Colin Belton's another lawyer that we've actually also had on banklets. He also pulled out the wallet part of this complaint and said, like, hey, this is actually pretty significant. He says wallet mentioned in a few places as essentially being part of their exchange infrastructure.

I suspect that they are trying to position themselves to go after some defy apps or interfaces that are non-custodial with this approach. Basically, if they do this, you can't be a crypto wallet or a crypto company or do anything in the United States of America. It goes back to that. I can't remember when this was, but it was like that law that was proposed that would have made every single node operator, a custodian and broker-dealer because they were processing transactions.

It goes bad to. Yeah. Like, you know, attempted this. Okay. So that's crazy. One thing we should mention, though, is, of course, Coinbase actually has, actually has to prove this in court. So these are complaints. These are lawsuits. Sorry, the SEC. It needs to actually prove these allegations in court. Okay. So Gary Gensler, even though he seems

to think he's God King and the SEC seems to think that they can kind of dictate everything in the space, they actually have to prove these allegations in court. And for a judge and a court system to actually agree with them. So this is still at the allegation phase. It does seem like the SEC is throwing everything they can at the wall here. This is a meta law man who is a reoccurring law, a lawyer who's tweeted out about the Coinbase and SEC and all these other subjects that have themed 2022 and 2023. He goes, the SEC alleges that Coinbase has acted as an illegal unregistered securities exchange since 2019, but in April of 2021, the SEC approved Coinbase going public with a listing

on the NASDAQ. And in May of 2021, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler testified before Congress that under the current law, the SEC has no regulatory authority over crypto exchanges. Interesting. He concludes in saying the SEC should lose this case. So he's just as a lawyer predicting that the SEC's grounds just aren't strong. So some respite there. How do you feel about that? I mean, if they are if they are just throwing spaghetti at the ball and Gensler and the SEC expect to lose. this case, if they have nothing kind of backing this and the court system just turns them away, then you have to wonder, like, what is the point? Right. That is such the, like, I, we've called this like Gary Gensler's Icarus moment, but he's not dumb. He's strategic, right? He's not that dumb. He's got a- What's he doing then? What's he doing? What's he doing, Ryan? I don't know. Okay. Brian, I'm strong tweeted out not too long ago, like within the last few hours, a pretty long

tweet. So I'll do my best to read it quickly. Regarding the SEC, Brian Armstrong, the CEO of Coinbase, by the way, regarding the SEC complaint against us today. We're proud to represent the industry in court to finally get some clarity around crypto rules. Thank you, Coinbase for going toe to toe to toe with the SEC. Brian continues, goes, remember, the SEC reviewed our business and allowed us to become a public company in 2021. Two, there is no path to, quote, coming in register, end quote. We tried repeatedly, so we don't list securities. We reject a vast majority. assets that we review. Three, the SEC and CFTC have made conflicting statements and don't even agree on what is a security and what is a commodity. And four, this is why the U.S. Congress is introducing

new legislation to fix the situation and the rest of the world is moving to put clear rules in place to support this technology. Instead of publishing a clear rule book, the SEC has taken a regulation by enforcement approach that is harming America. So if we need to avail ourselves of the courts to get clarity, so be it. By the way, in case it's not obvious, the Coinbase suit is very different from the others out there. He's talking about the Binance suit. The complaint filed against us is exclusively focused on what is or is on a security implying that we're not doing any other shady things. It's just about the assets that is on the marketplace. We are confident in our facts and the law. We'll get the job done. In the meantime, let's all keep moving forward and building as an industry.

America will get this right in the end. Refreshing. That makes me feel good. Refreshing. Yeah. He's like, Gensler and the suit doesn't have a case. In fact, it's kind of good that they've made this, that this is just about what is the definition of the security. Right. And, you know, Brian portraying confidence that they'll be able to beat the SEC in court. That's optimistic. Yes. So that is the more optimistic of the two cases.

I think we're all feeling good about Coinbase. They are feeling good about themselves. They are happy from Grand to Stand on. And they are prepared for this because Coinbase told them that they were. were going to sue them six weeks ago. Are you ready for Binance? Yeah, okay. So the Binance, different situation, still part of the same kind of attack and assault,

certainly has a component where Binance is being labeled as an unregistered security exchange. And so all of the tokens that we previously mentioned were in this case as well. But there are some different facts and circumstances that the SEC is alleging against finance. So what's this one, David? Yeah. So Binance, SEC accuses Binance of mishandling funds.

in lying to regulators. So this one's a different beast. So this document, 136 page document, much longer than the Coinbase suit, makes some pretty big claims about Binance. Some of them are kind of par for the course, more or less the carbon copy of why the SEC is suing Coinbase. But there's also a bunch of additional stuff, which kind of goes to represent like the differences between, you know, if I'll just go back to the intro where we have our two

influencer tweets out of the SEC. see the first one. Today we have charged finance holdings and then we have this the graphic right. We are operating as an effing unlicensed securities exchange in the USA Pro which is Binance's chief compliance officer a quote from a Binance executive member.

I'm sure from this person's internal telegram account or signal account or something to a friend or something. Yeah. This is not tweeted out or like you have a formal statement by this executive. Exactly. And then if you compare like the tweet about Coinbase, it is a quote from the SEC about how you simply can't ignore the rules. And so like I feel like that kind of like summarizes the difference in vibes of these two things is

Binance is like Binance is the Wild West. Yeah. Coinbase is is the east. It is suit and tie. It is playing the same, the regulatory game. Binance is like, Valanance is a cowboy. And these two suits reflect these two things. And so the SEC suing Binance due to Blanense due to Blatian.

and disregard of federal securities laws. The defendants have enriched themselves by billions of dollars while placing investors' assets at significant risk. Finance has unlawfully solicited U.S. investors to buy sell and trade crypto asset securities through unregistered trading platforms available in Binance, U.S. What does enrich themselves with billions of dollars mean? That just means ran a profitable exchange, right?

No, it means they ran an illegal securities exchange, Ryan, according to the SEC. Sorry. I didn't know what a security was. Okay, so it does get worse. It does get worse. Go on. So hold your breath a little bit. Binance defrauded equity, retail, and institutional investors about purported

surveillance controls over manipulative trading on the Binance US platform, which were in fact virtually non-existent. Binance under CISI's leadership unlawfully offered three essential securities market functions, exchange, broker-dealer, and clearing agency on the finance platforms without registering with the SEC, acutely aware that U.S. law requires registration for these functions. Defendants nevertheless chose not to register so that they could evade critical regulatory oversight designed to protect themselves investors and markets. Here's where it gets a little bit worse. Binance has unlawfully engaged in unlawful, unregistered offers in sales of crypto asset securities, including BNB and BUSD, as well as profit generating programs called the BNB vault and so-called staking investment schemes available in the Binance U.S. So that's eastaking.

That's actually not the worst part. The worst part is, let's see, let me skip down to this. part. SEC also alleges that CZ and finance exercise control over the platform's customers' assets, permitting them to co-mingle customer assets or divert customer assets as they please,

including to an entity CZ owned and controlled called Sigma Chain. Further, the complaint alleges that the defendants concealed the fact that it was co-mingling billions of dollars of investors' assets and sending them to a third party, Merit Peak, Limited, that is also

owned by Zau. And And so this is kind of like, oof, SBF, FTX, mislabeled bank accounts. We'll send customers money wherever we need to whenever it suits us because it's the Wild West, and we can kind of do whatever we want. So it's not, finance is not nearly as squeaky clean as Coinbase is. You're muted. They're definitely not nearly as squeaky clean. I mean, the first set of those allegations, it was just like you didn't file the

paperwork, right? And you did do AML KYC types of things and you listed unregistered securities and that sort of thing, right? Okay, that's one piece. The most concerning bit is what you said about co-mingling funds. But to be clear, like, I don't know fully what that means. Do you know what that means? I mean, it's freaking impossible. Right. Verging on impossible to actually get a bank account for crypto in the United States of America. I mean, like, again, I have no idea whether finance is clean or not. I'm guessing that there was some fast and loose. I'm guessing that there was some issues here. But like I just, David, I have zero trust in the SEC to actually paint a fair picture here and to actually trust, actually protect investor interests. So like my faith in any of the

SECs like charges here is like at an all time low. So I don't know who to believe. But you're right in that Coinbase had kind of no skeletons in the closet. Right. But it seems like Binance has some that you can pull out and card around and, you know, tweet about and, and show the world, you know, and try to make an example of. So it's a different situation. I don't know. What's your take when you hear all of this? I think that's right.

And so here's a line from the complaint. Lacking regulatory oversight, defendants were free to transfer investor assets as defendants, please. at times co-wingling them and diverting them in ways that properly registered broker-dealer's exchanges and clearing agencies would not have been able to do so. So my take on this is the line, properly registered brokers, dealers, exchanges, and clearing agencies would not have been able to do. They wouldn't have been able to do anything of value for the crypto world. Like, because of what they are, they could not have been Binance.

They could not have given, like, however many hundreds of millions of people, the private keys that Binance did. So to me, this is one big point. for this is a case of Binance versus the law, not Binance versus the people. The commingling funds bad. That's not great. Like, you don't touch users' monies in ways that they don't want.

Here's where, here's the other half of this part, Ryan, where I haven't brought this up yet. Okay. There's this BUSD issue where the complaint is that Binance used customer funds to purchase BUSD. So the SEC complaint that that's not good. Billions of U.S. dollars of, U.S. dollars of customer funds from both Binance and Binance U.S. were co-mingled in an account held

by a CZ-controlled entity known as Merit Peak Limited. Binance then funneled these customer funds to Merit Peak to purchase Binance's own stable coin BUSD. The SEC said that the use of Merit Peak as an intermediary to transfer platform customers to buy BUSC, BUSD presented an undisclosed counterparty risk for investors. The regulator also said that Merit Peak's U.S. bank account held at the now defunc Silvergate Bank received as a passer account over $20 billion that included customer funds from both finance platforms.

Those funds were then sent out to an unnamed trust company in transfers that appear to relate to the purchase of BUSD. Oof, not great. This is using customers funds, passing through various entities in ways that like the protections of a broker-dealer and into all that stuff would have prevented and in order to use customer funds in ways that the customers would not have approved of. They did not sign up for the counterparty risk of all these companies. They did not sign up to have their money end up ultimately purchasing BUSD.

This goes to one point towards this is actually Binance versus the people. And so that that's bad. No, I agree. I agree. I mean, so one, I'll say allegedly, of course. Allegedly. This is a court filing. This has to be proved.

But secondly, yes, if they did indeed do those things, that is bad. And actually, that is what we want someone like the SEC. Right. This part of the complaint, this section. of the complaint. This is exactly what we want an agency like the SEC to go after. But they didn't stop there. If this suit and this complaint was just that, then I don't think I would have a problem with it. Go investigate. Go figure this out. That would be great. That would be fantastic. Thank you for doing your job. Would have been nice if you helped with FTX and did some of the same

work with FTX months before all of those events happened. But for that part, so here's the thing, It's like them declaring Sol and Cardano and Maddo and Maddo and Adam as securities and calling both finance and Coinbase an unregistered securities exchange that tells you that the intent is broader than rooting out bad actors and protecting investors and finding out where the frauds are, that this is like a collective action to bring all crypto under the SEC's control or like maybe worst case scenario. try to stifle it, try to stymie it, try to kill crypto in the United States. That's why I don't trust these guys, David. Right. It does not appear that the motivation for this suit is actually Binance's like skeletons in the closet. It appears that that is just a really convenient fact for the SEC.

So Binance put out a statement yesterday responding to the SEC complaint. And like the quotes are kind of like more or less like to like Binance's benefit of being indiscernible from what Coinbase would say. So we are disappointed in the SEC. We have engaged in extensive good faith discussions to reach a negotiated settlement to resolve their investigations. We intend to defend our platform vigorously. The SEC is misguided and continues to not provide clarity and guidance of the digital asset industry. They regulate with blunt weapons of enforcement. The SEC's actions undermine America's role as a global hub for financial innovations and leadership. Alongside the industry, we will defend crypto from misguided lawsuits and will continue to deliver

very safe and trusted platform for our users that holds true to our core value of furthering the freedom of money. So like the, this is the stump speech. And I think finance is actually benefiting from the fact that Coinbase also has to fight this fight. But like Coinbase is like, you guys, we have to deal with your skeletons in the closet. And Binance is like, yeah, you do. You're muted. Didn't they make a comment here, David, that this is like, something to the effect of like the SEC chasing clout as well. Like they were doing this for like posturing rather than actual substance. There's certainly an element of that too.

All right. So where do we go from here? We talked to Coinbase. We talked to finance. Well, now we got to talk about the tokens. I mean, excuse me, securities. All the securities that are out there. Everything's a security, I guess.

Everything's a security. Yeah. So really just to drive this point home, these are not just a long tail of crypto assets that are definitely. scams and pump and dumps. This is not the low-hanging fruit. This is Gary Gensler and the SEC going after the big ones. The brothers in arms that we have in the crypto industry, these are the big chains, the top 10 crypto market caps, the ones that we as an industry need to defend from the SEC because this is just an embrouchment of power. So we're going to talk about all of the tokens

that are now listed as securities, not listed as securities. They're now deemed to be securities by Gary Gensler, God Gensler. Alleged, we should. He saw us to prove this in court. I'm being facetious here. And so like Solana, Polygon, Adam, near Cardano. So we're going to talk about the details in these suits and really the discussion about like, all right, what does this really mean? And like how, how does this impact us? So we're going to get to that part next in the conversation. But first, a moment to talk about our fantastic sponsors that make the show possible. If we have used any confusing words because we are a Web3 podcast talking about WebCree, web three, go check out Metamask, learn. And that will help you out.

Learning about crypto is hard. Until now, Introducing MetaMask Learn, an open educational platform about crypto, Web3, self-custity, wallet management, and all the other topics needed to onboard people into this crazy world of crypto. Metamask Learn is an interactive platform with each lesson offering a simulation for the task at hand, giving you actual practical experience for navigating Web3. The purpose of Metamask Learn is to teach people the basics of self-custity and wallet security in a safe environment. And while Metamask Learn always takes the time to define Web3 specific vocabulary, it is still a jargon-free experience for the Crypto-Curious user. Friendly, not scary.

Metamask Learn is available in 10 languages with more to be added soon, and it's meant to cater to a global Web3 audience. So, are you tired of having to explain crypto concepts to your friends? Go to learn.menomask.io and add Metamask learn to your guides to get onboarded into the world of Web3. Hiring people worldwide, paying them in crypto, providing them access to benefits, it all is so complex. But it doesn't have to be. Complying with labor laws, payroll rules, tax obligations, and crypto regulations in every country that you employ someone is difficult, time-consuming, manual, and costly. And it's drawing more and more attention from regulators and governments. But there is good news. Toku is here. Toku is the first employment and compensation platform for the

crypto industry that makes this easy. Toku helps you hire employees or contractors and pay them in fiat or crypto legally, compliantly, and with all the taxes handled, in over 100 different jurisdictions. So whether you're an early stage company with just a team of two, or you're an enterprise with 200, Toku has a solution that meets your needs. Toku is already working with the leading companies in the space.

Protocol Labs, Hedera, Gitcoin, and many more. So transform your employment and token payroll operations with Toku. You can reach out to Toku at Toku.com slash bankless or click the link in the show notes. Introducing ETHX from Stater. ETHX is a liquid staking token designed to maximize rewards, all while securing Ethereum. With Stater, you can run an Ethereum node with just 4Eath, an 85% lower capital requirement versus the 32 ETHs required for solo stake. With Stater's 4Eth nodes, you can get a 35% average higher yield, since you charge fees

to those who use your node to stake their ETH. By running a node with Stater, the ETHX staking derivative token can get minted on your validators and can flow into the world of D5, which Stater is actively building integration and partnerships into to increase the utility of ETHX. Stater allows for both permissioned and permissionless nodes to join the network, maximizing its potential scalability for ETHX, while preserving the values of decentralization and openness behind its liquid-staking token. Go to Staterlabs.com slash ETH and sign up to get access to the Stater Staking protocol.

Arbitrum 1 is pioneering the world of secure Ethereum scalability and is continuing to accelerate the Web 3 landscape. Hundreds of projects have already deployed on Arbitrum 1, producing flourishing defy and NFT ecosystems. With a recent addition of Arbitrum Nova, gaming and social daps like Reddit are also now calling Arbitrum home. Both Arbitrum 1 and Nova leverage the security and decentralization of Ethereum and provide a builder experience that's intuitive, familiar, and fully EVM compatible.

On Arbitrum, both builders and users will experience faster transaction speeds with significantly lower gas fees. With Arbitrum's recent migration to Arbitram Nitro, it's also now 10 times faster than before. Visit arbitram.io, where you can join the community, dive into the developer docs, bridge your assets, and start building your first app. With Arbitrum, experience Web3 development the way it was meant to be. Secure, fast, cheap, and friction-free. Okay, so guys, the question Gary Gensler has now foisted upon us is, is everything a security now? It seems like Gensler and the SEC think that everything is a security, except maybe, for now, Bitcoin? David, how do we even begin talking about this?

we maybe start with price. Yeah, it's interesting that Ether, we started this episode of Ether was at the same price it was right before the Binance news dropped. It's not higher. Bitcoin is basically back up to where it was. So it's interesting that the Ether also was not named, although everyone is kind of waiting with baited breath because like, all right, is there one more shoot-a-drop that Gary Gensler goes after Ether?

Can I ask you if it was named? Do you think it would completely tank the markets? or do you think there'd be some sort of like a, you know, a quick tank and then a V-shaped recovery, as we're seeing here? I think that. I barely a tank at all. In fact, I, does this mean the market thinks all of this is smoke? I think so.

Also, we're just tired of selling. Like, we're at the depths of the bear. Like, for other reasons, like, we're kind of done just being bearish. Let's see what the sole price is doing right now. So Salon, I think, is like, it's recovering like a little bit. Like, people are tired of selling that one. What else is there out there? ADA. Let's look at Cardano. Cardano. Yeah, so the ones that got listed as securities are kind of

hammered. Maddo. Let's see what Maddox like. When you say hammered though, it's like we're talking down like five, ten percent kind of thing. Yeah. Uh-huh. Exactly. Okay. Well, hammered by comparison. I need to log in the Cracken Pro. So yeah, like between negative five and negative 10 percent are for all the ones that are listed named as securities. Uh, and And so interestingly, both the Binance and the Coinbase suit has like 30 to 40 pages each dedicated to naming certain tokens and saying why they are securities. They both start with Solana. And some of these were like they were like copy pasted between both complaints, right? Exactly.

So yeah. They go through like, so here Solana created. Solana was created by Solana Labs, founded in 2018 by Anatolia Yacobanko and Raj Gork, how you pronounce it? It's Raj's last name, go call. And then they go through, like, the sale details, all that stuff. And then some claims about the Solana blockchain. Like, here's Cardano. Cardana blockchain was created in 2015 by Ethereum co-founder Charles Hoskinson.

And then, like, here's, like, the roadmap. These three entities have used the proceeds from 80s sales to fund the development. Screenshot of the roadmap from the website. Yeah. Right. Then there's Maddoch, right? Polygon Network originally called Maddoch, rebrand. in 2021, named the founders, sold at 0.26 cents per one Madik. And so I thought this was funny.

In line number 159, Polygon has explicitly encouraged Madik purchasers to view Madik as an investment in other ways. For example, in a February 5th, 2021 tweet, 14 months after Maddox's biggest single price drop, Sandeep, compared the token to a prize fighter that came back from defeat to become a champion. Oh, my God. So if I, if I, if I, if I, to me, this is what just gives crypto Twitter culture and and, and like, yeah, we, this is what happened when you give us the ability. It's stupid, man.

You give us when we discover the ability to have a printing press for financial assets. Like, this is what happens. Like, for better or for worse. You could take like, uh, I mean, Pokemon. You could, you could, you could, Pokemon cards. You could take like baseball collectibles. You could take just about any asset. And like, people are excited.

when price goes up, of course. Just because price goes up does not make it a security. And the SEC is not given any clear guidelines with respect. And nor do they have kind of a like to stand on. This is why I think they're doing these in these types of filings. And I mean, David, they haven't even told us in Congress. They were asked the question. Gensler was before Congress.

Is ETH a security? And Gensler stands. Well, that question is still answering that. Yeah. So file coin and the protocol labs and Juan Bonae are named. This is in the Coinbase suit, I believe. Let's see what else. Oh, man, that was a long one.

San tokens. That's like one of the Metaverse tokens out there. Axi Infinity. So these are also some of the tokens that have some of the most trading volume on these platforms. Both of that Sand Deep quote that I read out is in both the Binance and the Coinbase suit. So like, because there's so much overlap between both. of these complaints between Binance and Coinbase. Like a lot of this work is just copied and pasted and included in both.

Here's Zach Manion who tweets out, the SEC's facts on Adam are pretty poorly researched. The SEC claims that Adams were sold in 2017. No one received an Adam until April 2019 when the network voted to enable transfers. So he's just saying like, hey, the SEC's labeling Adam as a security is dumb and bad. Interestingly, here's somebody who tweets out part of the Solana. suit in either the Coinbase or the Binance. I think they're relatively interchangeable. Further, Solana Labs markets that the burn or destroys of the sole tokens as part of a

deflationary model. As Yacavanko explained in April 14th, 2021 article entitled Solana, scaling crypto to the masses, posted on Gemini.com, Solana transaction fees are paid in Sol and burnt as a deflationary mechanism to reduce the total supply and thereby maintain a healthy sole price. As explained on the Salana website, since the Solana network launched, the total current supply of soul has been reduced by burning transaction fees and a planned token reduction event. This marketed burning of soul as part of the Salana's network deflationary mechanism has led investors who reasonably view their purchase of soul as having the potential for profit to the

extent that there is a built-in mechanism to decrease the supply and therefore increase the price of soul. Does that sound familiar, Ryan? Do these words sounds like something that, I don't know, perhaps your favorite cryptocurrency podcast talks about. I guess where's the Wells notice, huh? This is so depressing, man. So everything's a security just because it has a price attached to it, and it's a digital token.

And according to Gensler, you know, in his CNBC interview that we opened with, nothing else needs to be created other than the... We already have digital finance. We already have the digital dollars. And the dollar... We have digital brokerages. Wall Street. Everything's already digital.

Then how come this thing is worth a trillion dollars? Like how come the market values it differently? It's just, this is just gatekeeping. Yeah. By the way, one point I want to make is like, this is uniquely an American problem here. This debate as whether all these assets are security. Like the Mika legislation. Yeah.

Has this already figured out? I mean, the Europeans have already figured this out. Like no other jurisdiction is, talking about securities in the way that the U.S. regulatory apparatus is. And there's a clear understanding of the difference between a commodity and a security and any other type in it, like a stable coin for that matter. And we don't have any legislative clarity in the U.S. So this gives a hole for Gensler to, you know, a security-shaped hole that Gensler can go fill.

And he can indiscriminately, he feels like he can just name whatever token he wants a security. And then suddenly it's his. This is mine now. This is under my jurisdiction. It's so ridiculous. So I want to go back to put on our 2018 to 2019 caps on when you and I were like pounding the table like, hey, eth is money. Heath is valuable.

Heath and Ethereum are inherently intertwined. And we need, Ethereum needs ether to be valuable in order for Ethereum to be secure. And so I want to reread the same sentence about Solana with the framing of not sole price, but Solana security. Um, let's see, uh, Solana transaction fees are paid in Seoul and burnt as a deflationary mechanism to reduce the total supply and therefore maintain a healthy Solana security level is similar is the is a synonymous statement with healthy sole price. And so to Gary Gensler and the SEC that says, Hey, Solana is a security because of a deflationary mechanism. You are basically saying, hey,

you cannot make your crypto system secure. You are not allowed to create secure and healthy ecosystems in your crypto networks because that makes them security securities which goes against like it's basically saying you cannot have crypto at large it goes back down to the very roots of why we are here in in order to have secure blockchains we need to have healthy healthily valued crypto assets which in the eyes of gonzler makes them securities so we cannot have neither we cannot have our cake and neither can we eat it like we can have that have neither of them and so this goes just straight to the heart of why we're here in crypto. And Gary Gensler just doesn't care for that. So this is the big elephant in the room. Why didn't Gensler in the SEC name Eith, David, as one of their, you know,

you know, 10 or 15 or so tokens that they named in these complaints? And that is a fantastic question because like I would like to answer that question that Gary Gensler doesn't want to bite off more than he can chew. But that's fine with it. It seems to be fine. He seems to be fine with that. So Pete Kim tweets out, the SEC will come for ETH next. The SEC lawsuit mentions the burning fee mechanism of Solana and Polygon, stating that the deflationary effect has led investors to view their purchase of the tokens that have potential for profit. Polygon's fee burning mechanism is particularly literally brought over from Ethereum. This is a moment for us in crypto community to lay aside the petty differences in tribalism to unite and take a stand to protect our economic and technological freedom. This is the right point.

DeGerry Gensler is not allowing for these. crypto networks to exist because there is an inherent, like I said, an inherent relationship between the healthy price of a crypto asset and the security and sustainability of the network that it runs on. And so his whole like, we already have digital finance. We already have the digital dollar. I want to skip forward in a conversation to a tweet from a Jake Trevinsky. Let me see if I can find it. Is it this one? Yes. I often think of a line, This is Jake Chavinsky. We've had them on the podcast.

I often think of a line Matt Levine wrote last September about SEC Chair Ginsburg. His message is basically, I should be the main regulator of crypto. And as the main regulator, my plan is to mostly ban it. Oh my God. Or get regulation by enforcement. The SEC once banned by enforcement. Wow.

He's coming to ban crypto. This is not Coinbase. It's not Binance. This is crypto. That's exactly what it is. His message is basically, I should be the main regulator of, crypto and as the main regulator, my plan is mostly to ban it. Because as he says, it's pointless. There's no need for it. There's no need. We already have digital finance. We already

have the dollar. We already have digital finance. You don't need any capital assets outside of what the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ provide. We already have full transparency. Like I've solved it. It's done. It's called the SEC and the US government. How absolutely ridiculous. Okay, so is everything a security? I guess the answer to that question is certainly the SEC thinks so. And so they want everything under their control at this point in time, and they don't see any use case for crypto, so they want to ban it. I guess this brings in the last question that we are hoping to answer in this episode, David,

which is, why are they doing this? Why are they doing this? Why is Gensler fighting this fight? Like, what's the point? Is it really all about, you know, control about him kind of enlarging his regulatory apparatus, him scoring political points? Is this part of, you know, some shadowy group of Elizabeth Warren's anti-crypto army? Like, what is going on here?

Does any of this make sense to you? I tried to take a moment and just, like, reflect on this question and really think about this answer. And like, the only thing I can really do is look at the actions, of course, Don't bother with what Gary Gensler is saying. Nothing coming out of his mouth is worthwhile. Look at his actions. So here's another tweet from Jake Stravinsky. The SEC, our mission is to protect investors.

Also the SEC, reviews Coinbase's business model, approves Coinbase to go public, allows Coinbase to sell stocks to retail investors. Then the SEC alleges Coinbase's business model is illegal, tanks the stock by 20%, causes losses to investors. And these are not crypto investors. These are Tradfai equity investors, who bought their Coinbase security on all the legal brokerages that that Gary Gensler is saying are so great.

And he's willing to trash 20% of those investors money, even under when the guise of the SEC is to protect investors. And so he's on a rampage and we'll stop at nothing. And there's not, he won't, he'll, he'll bite off as big as a cookie as he can chew. He'll destroy capital in the traditional securities market, which he is also the regulator of. he's just on a rampage to end crypto. And my big question is, why is he so confident that he can do this?

It's the same question I asked a while ago. It's like, why does he feel like he can actually get away with this? Like, who is supporting him in the background? Well, that's kind of what I want to know is like, who actually wants this? Right. What is the co? Like, you would think that if he was doing something to protect investors, right? The crypto community, we are the investors.

in this asset class, mainstream doesn't care about crypto. Like, especially during a bear market, they're gone. All the tourists have left. It's just the crypto community. It's the settlers. It's the true believers. Which of us as retail investors are asking him to do this? None of us.

So who wants this? Who is what, like, what is the hidden force pushing him towards doing this? Because I can't think of any investors. It's like, Main Street doesn't care about this. somebody who doesn't have any crypto assets doesn't care about this at all. It's just the one in 10 Americans that hold crypto assets that are affected by this. And from what I can tell, none of them want this. None of them want Gary Gensler to interfere in the ways and get crypto assets banned.

Like, who is he protecting? Where is this coming from? So we said this on before, and this will be just reiteration because this theme of the last year has been the SEC versus crypto. So this is another tweet that I thought was useful. Let's be clear. the SECGov complaint does not mention this, but there's currently no way for a platform like Coinbase to register as a securities exchange broker or clearing agent. That's why they've been begging the SEC for years to give them a path to compliance. Instead of working constructively with U.S. market participants to come up with a working model and knowing that Congress is actively considering legislation to the same, the SEC sues.

No allegations of fraud, just accusing Coinbase of failing to do the impossible. Failing to do the impossible. And so like we've like previously the crypto industry is like hey coin bait or hey SEC like you're doing you're doing this wrong. Like you need to provide more guidance. You need to provide more rules. And I think Gary Gensler's like, yeah, that's the point. It's supposed to be impossible. You don't get to exist.

It is impossible by design and I want you to die. Like that is the logical conclusion. If you judge Gary Gensler and the SEC by their actions, there's no. no other incentive or no other outcome for the crypto industry to die. They want to kill the biggest crypto exchange inside of the United States. They want to kill the biggest crypto exchange in general. They want all of the tokens other than after ether. And like I'm holding my breath on ether at this point to be securities.

Like they just want the whole industry to go away. So like is Gary Gensler like once upon a time? We thought he was just trying to ladder climb his way into a bigger and bigger position of power. And man, is that pretty sociopathic? like what other industries are out there that really benefit from this stance by the SEC and also the Biden administration. So he just wants to kill it. We don't know why, but we can tell by his actions, he just wants to kill the SEC,

wants to kill it. And if that's the case, David, I got to say that is some bleak authoritarian shit right there. And what else can we do but resist this? I mean, I think that's what we have to do at this point. Oh, my God, is this? You remember this? You remember this meme?

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Somebody with a chippy. Oh, it's Perchie, Perchie, the creative chippies, tweeted this out. This is how today feels. And this is like the Star Wars meme of Gary Gensler as the Sith Lord. Elizabeth Warren is Dark Vader. Brian Armstrong is Han Solo. I still do, by the way, I think that this is kind of episode one of kind of the war with the nation state.

And he is just like the first boss of many. But he's certainly proving to be a pretty. big boss here in our boss fights. All right, we have some takes here too, David. Where should we get to next? So Jake Trevensky again, I sense two reactions to the SEC's case against finance and Coinbase. One, outrage at the SEC's underhanded tactics and open hostility and a flagrant disregard for its own mission. And two, relief that the SEC finally took its shot and it's not really that bad. Life and business goes on. And I will pull back up the charts. I've loaded up too many charts.

But the last time we looked at the charts, they were pretty good. So Jake is saying that this is the SEC shot. This is the worst that they can do. Right. Crypto assets, Bitcoin and Ether are higher than they were when the Binance suit dropped. Interesting.

I mean, this is why I'm like, man, like that would, the SEC is suing Coinbase and crypto assets went down 10% and now are higher. And you know if they could find anything else in the Coinbase lawsuit. They would cram it all in that 140 page report. Yeah.

If there was any skeleton in the closet, Coinbase, it would be there. Here's another take. June 1st, Hong Kong government approves trading for the following tokens. Sand, Cardano, Polygon, Solana, Axis, Adam, Dot, Uni, Link, Lightcoin, Avax, Eith. June 5th, SEC sues, Suez, Finance for having the markets for Sand, Cardano, Maddox, Hold on. It's just like a tale of two hemispheres at this point. The land of the free, huh?

I mean, how is America falling behind Hong Kong with respect to financial freedom? That's incredibly disappointing here. Yeah. This is a longer take from Charles Hoskinson, but there'll be the first legit take that I accept from Charles Hoskinson. With respect to finance, I'm reading through the SEC complaint is over 130 pages, but seems to be like the next series of steps to implement chokepoint 2.0 in the United States. The end goal is an agenda-based C-Based.

BDC partnership with a handful of massive banks and end-to-end control over every aspect of your financial life, a regulatory event in where you have a debate about compliance with a law or guidance. The event seems to be a political, philosophical disagreement with the very existence of cryptocurrencies and what they represent. An unelected group of people have decided that concepts like self-sovereign identity owning your own wallet and the freedom to control your economic agency should be removed from the masses and given to an enlightened few. However, what is happening isn't anything new. It's always the same fight between freedom and authoritarianism, just like with different players, technologies, and words. And it does seem like this event is a perfect

opportunity for the entire industry to set aside its fragmented nature and to unite for a common sense set of rules and guidelines that can prevent the United States from slipping into a dystopia that would make 1984 look like a vacation. Oh, Charles Hoskinson, giving me shivers. Good job, Charles. This is a time to kind of unite and fight the comments. an enemy here. And maybe we should have Charles on the podcast. Maybe we should re-extend that invite. I think that's right. And have him on the podcast to talk more about this. What else we got, David? This guy, Ryan Sean Adam says, I think we might have already talked about this. We did talk about this where you say, you're not sure if Binance is clean here, but man, I'll take CZ

over Gary Gensler any day of the week. I mean, if we had to pick, right? It seems like they're making us picture. One other question I have, David, is if you think this is the top of Gary Gensler's personal stock. Has he outstretched his hand too far? Is this his icorice moment? Is he doing the Doquan Suu thing of like just dropping lawsuits? And again, who is this for? And we'll, I mean, instead of just going after Binance and the scams, he's just decided to take on the entire crypto industry. And let me remind listeners in the United States, that's one in 10 Americans who own crypto assets. I mean, I feel pretty determined at this. point, the market is kind of strugging this off too. Like, I'm not going anywhere. So,

um, maybe this is his Icarus moment. Maybe he will no longer be here in the near future. And, uh, the settlers and the crypto investors will, will remain when he's out of a job. Um, what do you think about that? You think we, we could be rid of him through the events, maybe not now, but like, but be, but because of these events. Because of these events. Yeah. Uh, I, uh, I, it, I hope the best for humanity. And so therefore, I think that that is inevitably true. There was a time where we didn't think SPF was going to jail, and then he went to jail.

There is a time where Gary Gensler seems invincible and immune, but eventually due process, court of law will get him. And I'm going to hold my breath and assume that that just happens over time. Courts take time. This will take time. The Coinbase will take time. Props to Coinbase for sticking up and fighting this fight because if they didn't, there would literally be no one left. I do think that this is like the inverse of SBF. So SBF was once at his peak and now he's in jail or house arrest.

Gary Gensler is at his peak. It's got to be down only from here. It's got to be down only. There's nothing left. Well, let's wrap this up. Any other concluding thoughts? That was really the episode I think we needed to do just to update everybody. I want to maybe echo Charles Hoskinson's thoughts.

I didn't think I'd be saying this, but he ends his tweet with this. Everything's all right and the future is bright for this industry. I feel like that too. Like I feel like Jake said it too. Gary Gensler has shot his shot. The SEC has fired all its missiles. What more can they do? And we're still here.

And the markets haven't reacted that poorly. And what else he got? I mean, go next week. You're going to call ETHIS security and try to cancel, ban the bankless podcast. I don't know, man. Bring it is what I have to say. So I feel like doubling down. And on that note, David, I also feel like it's time for us to take action and fight back.

I feel like we've been on the defensive too much. I think we have to file the lawsuits. I think we have to call the senators. I think we have to send money to organizations that will push this in D.C. I think we have to ask our legislators to do their job and actually legislate so that rogue regulators can't get away with this. I think we have to coordinate. And so I put out a tweet asking, what's the best way for U.S. citizens to push back? A bunch of people are giving their suggestions.

We have Ryan Selkis on the podcast tomorrow, and he is in the midst of launching a new organization, a nonprofit that is going to help education and marketing in crypto. I think that's an exciting opportunity as well. And I think what we need to do, you and I and the rest of the bankless community is wrangle together all of these legitimate ways to push back and fight back against Gary Gensler and the SEC. If you're in the United States, that's important. Of course, if you're in another jurisdiction, it's important for you to do what you can outside of your jurisdiction. So maybe we need to rally the troops and organize in the U.S.

and then outside of the U.S. as well and publish this information so that people can take an active hand in their future and can actively push back. That's where I am right now in conclusion. Like, I'm ready to fight. Like, let's go. I mean, that I think is where we are. But do you have any final takeaways for us? Yeah, for the 700 people that are watching us live on the YouTube,

thanks for tuning in. Appreciate y'all, y'all being here. We are in talks with Paul Graywall, the chief legal officer of Coinbase, to be on the show at 5, a little bit after 5 p.m. Eastern that's not totally confirmed, but we're talking with the Coinbase team so we can hear

from Coinbase. So if you want some more SEC versus Coinbase commentary straight from the source of Coinbase, that'll be happening around 5pm Eastern time here on the YouTube. So thanks everyone for tuning in. Make sure to subscribe to the channel for that. I don't have any further

thoughts for you, Ryan, but I do have a meme. You ready? I'm ready, yeah. Show it to us. I think this is the right thing. And this is the South Park. I didn't hear no bell meme. We're not going anywhere. That's a good way to end it.

Guys, risk and disclaimers, got to let you know. None of this has been financial advice. It's not even regulatory advice, but we know what not to do, and that is whatever Gary Gensler is doing, do the opposite. I got to remind you that crypto is risky. You could always lose what you put in, but we are headed west.

This is the frontier. It's not for everyone, but we're glad you're with us on the bankless journey. a lot.