Bankless - When Ethereum ETF? | Matt Hougan & Ryan Rasmussen of Bitwise
Episode Date: April 1, 2024The Bitcoin ETF was a huge win for Crypto. What’s next? Will an Ethereum ETF be approved? We brought Matt Hougan & Ryan Rasmussen of Bitwise to explore exactly that. We go through what made the ...BTC ETF so successful, what we need to replicate the process for Ethereum and what comes after the ETH ETF. ------ 📣 PERMISSIONLESS III | BUY TICKETS NOW Bankless Citizens get 30% off: https://www.bankless.com/tools/perks Use BANKLESS10 for 10% off: https://bankless.cc/PermissionlessIII ------ 🎧 SPOTIFY PREMIUM RSS FEED | USE CODE: SPOTIFY24 https://bankless.cc/spotify-premium ------ BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS: 🐙KRAKEN | MOST-TRUSTED CRYPTO EXCHANGE https://k.xyz/bankless-pod-q2 🔗CELO | CEL2 COMING SOON https://bankless.cc/Celo 🗣️TOKU | CRYPTO EMPLOYMENT SOLUTION https://bankless.cc/toku 🛞MANTLE | MODULAR LAYER 2 NETWORK https://bankless.cc/Mantle 💸 CRYPTO TAX CALCULATOR | USE CODE BANK30 https://bankless.cc/CTC 🦄 UNISWAP | SWAP SMARTER https://bankless.cc/uniswap ------ TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Intro 6:50 Bitcoin ETFs So Far 10:40 BTC ETF 2nd Acceleration 22:56 Crypto Default Allocation 26:31 Who’s Buying the BTC ETF? 28:59 Bitcoin vs Gold 36:46 When ETH ETF? 46:39 Forces at Play 53:25 ETH ETF Derivatives 58:38 ETH ETF Price Impact 1:02:10 ETH Narratives 1:08:31 What’s Next 1:12:02 Closing Thoughts ------ RESOURCES Matt Hougan https://twitter.com/Matt_Hougan Ryan Rasmussen https://twitter.com/RasterlyRock Bitwise https://bitwiseinvestments.com/ ------ Not financial or tax advice. This channel is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. This video is not tax advice. Talk to your accountant. Do your own research. Disclosure. From time-to-time I may add links in this newsletter to products I use. I may receive commission if you make a purchase through one of these links. Additionally, the Bankless writers hold crypto assets. See our investment disclosures here: https://www.bankless.com/disclosures
Transcript
Discussion (0)
My view is that ultimately we will get an Ethereum ETF.
The core logic on which the Bitcoin ETF approval rests,
which is that futures and spot track each other very well and are tightly correlated.
So I think we'll eventually get it.
I would guess I'm over 50% by the end of this year.
Welcome to Bankless, where we explore the frontier of internet money and internet finance.
And today we're exploring the frontier of ETFs, specifically the Bitcoin ETF and the
Ethereum ETF. We have Matt Hogan and Ryan Rasmussen from Bitwise to help us out with that.
A few things we talk about today. Number one, the Bitcoin ETF, was it a success? How successful
was it in the grand scheme of things? And why Matt and Ryan still think there's a lot of juice
to squeeze out of the Bitcoin ETF. Number two, flipping and gold? Not only is the Bitcoin
ETF flipping gold in line of sight, maybe we go far beyond that, potentially three X or more beyond that.
Number three, the Ethereum ETF. Is it coming this year? What are their honest predictions? This is by far
the best analysis I've heard yet. And number four, what's next for the institutions after the
Ethereum ETF, after the Bitcoin ETF? Where do we go from there? There's so much to unpack in this
episode, especially with the conversation around the Ethereum ETF, which has been going around
in the crypto-Twitter versus a lot of the conversations and just around Ethereum these days is
about the ETF. First, before we get into this conversation with Matt and Ryan, get this podcast
on the premium RSS feed, where you get every single bankless podcast without the ads and all the
bonus episodes that you don't get if you're listening to the free RSS feed, which you are,
if you're hearing this. If you're listening to Bankless on Spotify, you can sign up for the
premium RSS feed directly inside of the Spotify app, and you get all the other perks of being a
bankless citizen, of which there are too many to mention here. You can use Code Podcast 24 to get
10% off of this subscription forever, but this code expires at the end of March. So go do it right now.
Lately, in the ETF conversation, there has been discussion about the decreasing likelihood
of the Ethereum ETF approval at the end of May, where the first deadline is up,
after going through the gamut that is the Bitcoin ETF conversation, of which there is plenty
to talk about. And we do unpack all of that conversation. We get into the Ethereum
ETF conversation. And the crypto industry really has just always a perpetual short-term focus
because of how fast things move in the crypto industry. And so thinking in like multiple quarters
is generally not what we do. But Matt and Ryan and generally people speaking all understand
that the Ethereum ETF is going to get approved.
I saw a matter of if it's a matter of when.
And so we ask some of the questions about that approval.
Of course, we start asking by when,
but then we asking about further things like,
what about staking inside of the eth ETF?
How much demand is there, will there be for the ETHETF,
and how are they positioning the ETHETF to their broader clients?
Matt is coming to us from Digital Assets Summit over in London,
where he's talking to all of TradFi and about what their interests are.
and he's got a lot of outfit to share here on the podcast today.
So we're going to get right into all of that information.
But first, I want to talk about some of these fantastic sponsors that make the show possible,
especially the place where you can still front-run the opportunity with Bitcoin and ETH
and all the other tokens that you can buy on Cracken are preferred exchange for crypto in 2024.
If you do not have an account with Cracken, consider clicking the links in the show notes
and getting started with Cracken today.
If you want a crypto trading experience backed by world-class security and award-winning support teams,
then head over to Cracken, one of the longest-standing and most secure crypto platforms
in the world. Cracken is on a journey to build a more accessible, inclusive, and fair financial
system, making it simple and secure for everyone, everywhere to trade crypto. Cracken's intuitive
trading tools are designed to grow with you, empowering you to make your first or your
hundredth trade in just a few clicks. And there's an award-winning client support team available
24-7 to help you along the way, along with a whole range of educational guides, articles, and
videos. With products and features like Cracken Pro and Cracken NFT Marketplace and a seamless app to
bring it all together, it's really the perfect place.
to get your complete crypto experience.
So check out the simple, secure, and powerful way for everyone to trade crypto,
whether you're a complete beginner or a seasoned pro.
Go to crackin.com slash bank lists to see what crypto can be.
Not investment advice, crypto trading involves risk of loss.
Mantle, formerly known as BitDAO is the first Dowled Web3 ecosystem,
all built on top of Mantle's first core product,
the Mantle network, a brand new high-performance Ethereum Layer 2 built using the OP stack,
but uses Eigenlayer's data availability solution instead of the expensive Ethereum Layer 1.
Only does this reduce Mantle network's gas fees by 80%, but it also reduces gas fee volatility,
providing a more stable foundation for Mantle's applications.
The Mantle treasury is one of the biggest Dow-owned treasuries, which is seeding an ecosystem
of projects from all around the Web3 space for Mantle.
Mantle already has sub-communities from around Web3 onboarded, like Game 7 for Web3 Gaming
and Buy Bit for TVL and liquidity and on-ramps.
So if you want to build on the Mantle network, Mantle is offering a grants program that provides
milestone-based funding to promising projects that help expand, secure, and decentralized Mantle.
If you want to get started working with the first Dow-led layer 2 ecosystem, check out Mantle at
mantle.xy-Z and follow them on Twitter at ZeroX Mantle.
It's everyone's favorite season in crypto, tax season, and Crypto Tax is always an absolute headache,
especially for all you D-Gens out there. But it doesn't have to be a nightmare. That's where
crypto tax calculator comes in. The software built for D-Gens by D-Gens. As Coinbase's official
global tax partner, Crypto Tax Calculator focuses on making complex transactions into easy ones,
supporting over 300,000 currencies across Ethereum, Arbitrump, optimism, as well of 1,000 other
integrations as well. It's as simple as connecting your wallet, pulling in all your transactions,
and following the automated suggestions to quickly and accurately calculate your tax obligations.
Plus, for all the airdrop farmers out there, Crypto Tax Calculator has your back, as they
are consistently adding support for new and upcoming layer 1s, layer 2s, and all the airdrops
that you're currently farming.
2024 is the year when the DGens do their crypto taxes with speed and confidence.
Make taxes this year easy and affordable with crypto tax calculator.
Sign up at crypto tax calculator.io and get a 30% discount with code Bank 30.
Click the link in the show notes for more information.
Bankless Nation, we have two esteemed guests from Bitwise today.
Matt Hogan is the chief investment officer at BitWise and Ryan Rasmussen is a senior analyst at BitWise.
Matt Ryan, it's great to have you on Bankless.
Great to be here.
Okay, so BitWise, for context, we've had Matt.
on before is an asset management firm. And do you guys have your own Bitcoin ETF? It's called BitB,
B-I-T-B. So four letters there. It's got $2 billion in assets under management. So congrats on that.
And Bitwise is probably one of our favorite Bitcoin ETFs, if we're allowed to have a favorite.
I don't know. We are. Because we've known Matt and Bitwise for a while. They're crypto natives.
They understand the space. They understand this industry. And so we want to ask you guys a few
questions about the ETF world, about institutional adoption and everything that's going on there.
Does that sound good? I love it. Yeah. Appreciate the support. All right. So first question here is,
how are the Bitcoin ETFs going? Just give us the lay of the land. We are what, like just over 60 days
in, you know, a few more than that. How's it going so far? I'll start and Rasmussen can jump in.
This launch has exceeded everyone's expectations, right? For context, I spent 15 years in the ETF industry
before I moved into crypto full-time six and a half years ago, these are the largest
ETF launches ever by a significant factor. To put it in context, before these ETFs, the fastest
growing ETF for one year inflows, in other words, how much people invested in the first year,
were the NASDAQ 100 Qs, QQQQ, and those pulled in $5 billion in a year. And if you take these new Bitcoin
ETFs, even after you subtract the outflows from GBTC, they've pulled in $12 billion.
in two months. So by far and away, the fastest growing ETS of all time, I was very optimistic.
I spent, you know, three years with the team at Bitwise or five years trying to get one of these
launched. And I didn't expect anything like this. We're at $2 billion. The ecosystems, you know,
pulled in 12. It's just been outrageously great. And I think it will accelerate in the future.
So after maybe a few weeks, a few months, maybe a month or so now where it may be a little bit
quiet. I think there's a second acceleration coming that may even dwarf this first one. So it's good
time in ETF land. Well, if you think these first two months of the Bitcoin ETFs have been quiet,
I can't wait to see what a future acceleration looks like because it doesn't look like it's been
quiet from my perspective. It seems like it's been quite loud. I want to ask just about like
how the success of these Bitcoin ETFs has characterized the industry from the outside perspective.
So like there were two potential worlds going into the approval of the Bitcoin ETF. There was
the flop, and then there was a massive success. And we are in the universe in which we got the
massive success. How has that changed the PR, the optics, the position of the crypto industry to
the perspective of the outsiders? I'll go ahead and take this one. I think that this has been a
massive boon for the industry. I think we hear a lot of stories from whether it's grandparents or
aunts or uncles or parents or siblings who now with these Bitcoin ETFs, look at that as a stamp
of approval from not only the government, but just the mainstream America. You have these big
investors going on CNBC, Larry Fink, and others that are really well known talking about Bitcoin
as an asset class rather than a speculative vehicle or something that like vaporware that's
going to go away in a few years. And I think that just shows what these ETS have done in a very
short amount of time. In two months, we've gone from and crypto's a scam to, oh, this is a
legitimate asset class that could overtake other commodities at some point like gold. And so that
just kind of shows where we're at. And I know the conversations that I'm having on the road with our
team at conferences with advisors are way different today than they were one year ago or two years
ago. And without the ETFs, we wouldn't be in the situation that we're in. So it's been a huge
boost for the asset class. Matt, you called this an overwhelming success. Was Wall Street
surprised by this? I think Wall Street was surprised. I think people thought it would be a success,
right? We knew there was demand. But the scale of the success and the broad-based nature of it,
I think has exceeded expectations. And I think it gets to something that Ryan mentioned, which is
what really changed from traditional finances view is they now accept that Bitcoin is going to be here
forever. Once we have these ETFs, once BlackRock and Invesco and these giant names are in there,
once RAs, investment advisors, institutions are piling in, they've accepted that Bitcoin won't go away.
So I think, you know, we knew it was going to be a success, but the scale is just off the charts.
You mentioned, Matt, the second acceleration. All right. So we've seen the first acceleration.
that got us to 12 billion.
And the second acceleration, can you describe what that actually is?
Why would we be getting a second acceleration?
You know, like if you're looking at this from the outside, you might say, well, you know,
the first wave, everyone who wanted to buy, they probably already bought.
And certainly now the Bitcoin ETF is hyped enough for squarely in a bull cycle.
So why would there be any second acceleration?
Great question.
I can start it and Ryan can finish.
The thing about ETF's approval is it unlocks only a portion of the market.
market. So the day an ETF is approved by the SEC, retail investors can buy it, and independent
financial advisors, people who manage money on behalf of other people, can buy it. But there's a whole
class of investors who still can't buy it. So the largest wealth management platforms in the U.S.
are firms like Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, UBS, Wells Fargo. These have tens of thousands of advisors
and trillions of dollars of assets. And they can't buy it on those platforms until
they complete their own due diligence. So it's not good enough that the SEC approved it.
Each of those platforms has a due diligence process, and they have to approve the ETF as well.
And that process hasn't happened yet. That will probably start to happen in the next few weeks
or the next few months. I would say that maybe 30% of the wealth market in the U.S. can now
access these ETFs, but there's a whole additional 70% that's going to come online, not all at
once, not like the ETF launch. This will be a series of individual approvals at each of these
firms and each of these sort of tiers of wealth until we get to the final opening. I'll make an
analogy that maybe makes sense to people. The closest analogy to the Bitcoin ETF launch was the
gold ETF launch. And the gold ETF launch was a very big deal. And suddenly people could buy gold,
but inflows built over seven years, right, before they reached a local maximum. And actually,
the largest year was year 16. So what we've seen now is retail investors and independent advisors
by these ETS, hedge funds, venture capital funds. It's great, huge success. But there's this whole
other level that we're about to get to in the next month or two months or three months. That's
really where the trillions of dollars of wealth lies. Matt, is that what we're seeing when we see
like Morgan Stanley has kind of opened the gates to the Bitcoin. Wells Fargo has opened the gates to the
Bitcoin ETF. Like all of these gates, I didn't even know these things existed, but is that
basically the process of this second acceleration here? That's exactly right. Yeah, it's like a nuclear
key, right? You need the SEC to turn it and then you need Morgan Stanley to turn it. And we're just
going through that process of the second key turning. I'd give one additional data point here. So I spent
eight years before I joined Bitwise working at a company called Satara Financial Group. This is a large
network of independent financial advisors. They have 10,000 advisors or more. They manage 300 billion in
assets. And they just recently approved Bitcoin ETFs on their platform for those 10,000.
plus advisors to start allocating on behalf of their clients.
And that took two months.
And like I said, I've been in that organization before and organizations like that.
And the wheels just move very slowly.
There's so many executives and teams involved in reviewing what is Bitcoin.
Are we okay with our advisors allocating to it?
How do we feel about them getting exposure on behalf of clients?
Then once they make that decision, they have to evaluate the different vehicles.
They have to decide how they're going to educate the advisors on what Bitcoin is and what it
means to put Bitcoin in portfolio. A lot of time, those advisors have to educate their clients before
they actually make that investment. And so there's all these different hurdles that you have to clear
before you actually make the allocation. It isn't just the platform approval. There's a whole
education process that happens after that. And I think on the retail side, we move a lot quicker because
we're self-directing our own investments. When you have someone managing money on behalf of another,
there's a lot more hoops you have to jump through to make sure you're complying with all the
regulatory requirements and whatnot. So I think that's partly what takes so long. Yeah, this is
certainly probably things that are moving on timeframes that crypto natives, the crypto industry,
doesn't really consider because we are so short-term focus in this industry. But really the Bitcoin
ETFs in general, ETFs broadly are just like a fine wine kind of thing. Like you got to let them
age before they really mature. Matt, I just want to try and get some more numbers on this thing.
You said 30 and 70 percent in terms of like 30 percent of capital is available. And just want to make
sure that I'm understanding that correctly. In terms of the acceleration that you were referencing,
the 30, 70% is like total available like pools of capital as in like the 30% is the available
and interested capital and that acceleration that you're talking about is like there's roughly
70% more capital available to buy the Bitcoin ETF as the BTC ETF ages. Can you just
shed a little bit more light on that? Yeah, I mean, that's a back of an envelope calculation,
but that's around right. If you look at the US wealth management industry, people have different
measures of how big it is, but let's call it, you know, 40 to 50 trillion.
dollars somewhere in that zone. Yeah, I think about 30% of that can access these
ETFs today, which is great. That's trillions of dollars that can access these ETFs,
and it's turned into billions of dollars of flows, and those flows are just getting started.
But there is this whole other group that haven't even crossed the chasm into being able to
access that. It's certainly the larger contingent, so the majority of wealth, whether it's
60 or 70% of the wealth that's still waiting.
And they're doing their due diligence.
They're actually moving faster on these Bitcoin ETFs than they do on most ETFs.
Usually this would be a six-month or a year-long process, and it's going to be a quarter-long
process or a four-month-long process.
So it's great.
But as you said, that's sort of glacial from a crypto perspective.
But they will get there.
The progress is happening.
They're going to approve them.
And we'll start to feel those flows build over months and quarters and years.
I will say one of my favorite parts of this whole story, the whole crypto story and what's
happening with Wall Street sort of discovering crypto is something we say at the beginning of every
single bankless podcast. This is an opportunity to front-run the opportunity, right? And this is like
bankless listeners will know we are fans of the crypto natives, the believers, kind of the underdogs,
you know, like retail over institutions wherever possible. And retail has had a solid decade to front-run
Bitcoin price appreciation. And even now, there's still time for retail in their 401ks,
for instance, their IRAs, to get ahead of that 70% that still has no access to capital.
And I'll juxtapose this with basically almost all 99% of the opportunities that you sort of
see for investment opportunities where institutions have an edge.
If a company is going to IPO, first of all the VCs get in first, and you have to be
an accredited investor and all of that rigmarole.
And then the banks that are issuing the stock, they get their cut ahead of time to.
They get preference.
And by the time the thing is IPOed, right?
It's like all of the juice has been squeezed out of it on the institutional side.
And what's retail left with with just like, you know, Facebook stock that's already done,
it's 10,000 X appreciation and you just get a measly like, you know, 5 to 10x after that.
And just like, thank you very much.
Crypto is the exact opposite of that.
And that is one of the things I've been most excited about for every single moment of joining.
Retail, the small guy, gets first dibs on this.
The believer, the person who's using.
it, and then institutions are left to kind of like come buy our bags.
I'm sure you wouldn't phrase it like that, Matt.
No, but I think that's exactly right.
I mean, this is an empowering technology, and institutional capital has so many sort of behavioral
biases against it, you know, inherently anti-tech, inherently disruptive, difficulty
getting their heads around digital things.
This was one of the few places where retail had advantages and has taken advantage of it.
And kudos to them.
Like, kudos to everyone who was early and has been in this for years through bull and bear markets.
Kudos to everyone, as you mentioned, still getting in now because, you know, it's not the end.
It may be the end of the beginning, but we're not quite there yet.
There still has a little bit of time, even on Bitcoin, much less on ETH, which, you know, I'm sure we'll get to.
But yeah, I love that about crypto as well.
It's really a beautiful thing.
It warms my heart.
We've got a two-part question for you, Matt.
I was looking for some like timelines on that 70% is this like that 70% will be accessed by the end of this year, end of 2024, or is it even longer than that?
And then zooming into the fullness of time, like once this like acceleration phase is over and we strike some equilibrium with flows.
Like I don't want bankless listeners to like perceive like, oh, like, oh, the fun is over.
Like in the old world of the stock market, there is constant flows into people's just like 401ks into QQQ, into QQQ,
into SPY. And so like these indices and even just like the general stock market is up only because
there's persistent flows into them. And this is where Bitcoin is going. This is where the Bitcoin
ETF is going. Any sort of crypto asset within an ETF gets access to this flows. And so
the two part question is like this acceleration period, what's the timeline on that? And then once
that closes, what does the final equilibrium of flows into the Bitcoin ETF look like? Yeah, great
questions. Let's say it's a year-long process.
evenly distributed with unlocks along the way at each phase of that. It may be till the end of
2025. It may be an 18-month process and a little bit gets unlocked every time. It's not like the
shotgun start of the ETF launch, which was the SEC said go. These are probably 50 individual
decisions that each unlock a little bit of this additional pie, some more important than others,
but it will take some time. I think the point you made about one difference of these Tradfai
markets, they're probably actually two. One, you mentioned continual investment, which is absolutely
true. What we're seeing at Bitwise is people putting these ETFs into models. And what that means
is they have a sort of theoretical allocation to stocks, bonds, real estate, and now a little bit
of crypto that they put all of their investors into. And as they save money for retirement,
as they save money in taxable accounts, a little bit goes in on a continual.
basis. The flip side of that is a lot of these people rebalance, which is if crypto goes up a very
lot, they may sell a little bit to bring it back down to that target weight. I think the effect of this
will be sort of upward push on crypto prices, long term, sustainable upward push, because it's a
continual flow of capital. As you mentioned, that's why stocks are up only over long periods of
time and a diminution in volatility. I don't mean that crypto is going to be boring. I just mean it
will be less volatile than it was in the past because you'll have people who invest a little bit every
month. You'll have people who systematically sort of buy low and sell high because they're
rebalancing. And so you should see volatility compress a little bit over time, which it already has
been. But it's hugely positive for crypto. Persistent inflows that will, you know, match or
overwhelm supply, I think is what you should expect.
And I just think you should expect that to build over multiple years.
Like, I don't think 2024 will be the peak year for Bitcoin ETF flows.
I think that'll be many years out.
I think it's going to build over time.
I think there's this idea, Matt, you said earlier that, well, crypto, Bitcoin's not going
away, right?
Anytime soon there's this realization.
I think there's also this realization that, you know, crypto is now has to be part of a portfolio.
I think I saw this was Fidelity Canada, by the way, not Fidelity U.S. yet, but you can imagine
coming. Now, you know, they have their default growth funds, right? You know, the typical 60-40, 60-60-
stocks, 40-per-bonds if you're doing something, high growth, for instance. Well, now it's like
60-43, or it's like, you know, it's not 60-40, obviously, you know, that's 103%. But we've got like
3% allocated to crypto by default. So we're starting to move to this world where not only is
crypto not going anywhere, it's part of a default portfolio construction.
And that is, I think, the world that you're describing here.
That's absolutely right. And it's a complete game changer. But, you know, it aligns with sort of the most conservative stayed pinstripe suit dyed in the wool investing methodology, like sort of the Jack Bogle vanguard methodology to evoke a firm that is now very much disliked by crypto.
But their view is that your starting point is you should own everything. You should own every stock. You should own every bond. You should be just invested in the global economy because it grows every year.
year. Just own everything. And from that perspective, you have to own crypto. If you don't own crypto,
you're actually short crypto versus your global benchmark of asset allocation. And so what that
3% in a model portfolio tells you is that's sort of the baseline. If you're below that,
then you're making an active bet that crypto is not going to matter in the future. Most people don't
want to do that. They just want to own the market. And it's a complete game changer. I mean,
you know, like I save for my kids college education every month X dollars. And there's no
crypto in that exposure yet because the products don't exist. But I suspect that will change
in the next couple of years. And that means everyone who's a parent will be, you know,
saving X dollars every month for their children and a little bit will go into crypto. I think
that's the world that we're moving into. Right? Crypto, well,
help us pay for the rising cost of education. I mean, but like, you're talking about the truth here.
Just a quick side quest, though, Matt, since you invoke the name of Vanguard and the Bogleheads,
okay, so CEO Vanguard has says no Bitcoin. Yeah. We're not doing that. Double down multiple times,
it seems like. Why? Can you explain that? Oh, anchoring bias, you know, a desire to seem
conservative. Vanguard also said no ETFs, right? Jack Bogle was famous for hating ETFs. They thought
tempted shareholders to trade too much and destroy themselves. And they stayed out of the
ETF game for the long time. Now it's their largest area of the market. Vanguard will come over
as well. Look at BlackRock. Larry Fink called Bitcoin an index of money laundering.
And then... Did he really? When was this?
It was a while ago.
2017. An index of money laundering. And then to his enormous credit, I mean, really his
enormous credit, we compete with them. But to his enormous credit, he studied it, talked to smart
people changed his mind and developed a team to integrate Bitcoin into BlackRock. So, you know,
I think Vanguard will eventually be here, just like they eventually became a large ETF issuer.
And everyone gets the Bitcoin price they deserve. And apparently the CEO of Vanguard deserves a higher price.
I will never get tired of that line, by the way.
Bitwise, Ryan, I want to ask you about through your travels and conversations with just these buyers of the Bitcoin ETFs, who are they?
I'm sure there's like the regular cast of characters that I could also guess.
but are there also any like surprises in there? And what kind of like data do we actually have to talk about
like who are the actual buyers at the Bitcoin ETF? Yeah, that's a good question. So we go on the road.
We have a sales team about 25 people that go around every day. They're meeting with financial advisors or
RAs at their offices or at state dinners or at lunches. And so on the research team, we travel with them
sometimes. Recently I was in Denver ahead of Eat Denver with our sales rep out there. And we went into a large
RAA. They managed 350 million in assets. And we catered some sushi lunch. We sat down.
with them and then we did a Bitcoin 101 presentation. What is Bitcoin? How does it work? What is mining?
How does Bitcoin fit in a portfolio? And you can just walk them from the very beginning through where we're at
today, why Bitcoin ETFs exist, why those are a big deal. And then what you see in the room is a wide
variety of people, some that are crypto-interested. There's generally one or two people in a room of
10 or 12. That's a diehard crypto fanatic. They own it in their portfolio. They start asking about
NFTs and like go down a rabbit hole. And then you see some other people on the
other side of the spectrum that are likely to afraid to ask questions because in a room of their
colleagues that are supposed to be, you know, well-versed financial professionals, maybe they
haven't taken the time to study Bitcoin and crypto and they don't want to seem that they don't
know what they're talking about. And so it's really a wide variety, but those one or two people that
are crypto fanatics in the firm is what allows us to get our foot in the door. And then from there,
it's just an educational journey. And I would say that those individuals that are into crypto,
they're probably advocating for three to five percent of portfolios to be invested.
in Bitcoin or invested in a crypto index. And then you have the skeptics who think 1% is outrageous.
And that's where we show them the models and the portfolio simulations that say, look,
if you have 3% or 5% or even 10%, that can add a lot of risk adjusted returns to your portfolio
while barely increasing volatility. And I think once you show them that kind of data,
you really start to see their eyes opening, especially the people that were more versed to
adding Bitcoin to a portfolio going into the conversation. You start to see their eyes opening
and they see the sharp ratios, the risk-adjusted returns, and they start to realize, oh, this is a real
asset that can really boost a diversified portfolio versus add unwanted risk and unwanted volatility.
And that's when they start to come around to adding it into their client portfolios.
Just out of curiosity, is there any just like comparative conversation being made about gold
ETFs? And just like, how has the PR around gold as a commodity changed now that Bitcoin is like
this sparkly new digital gold that's all.
also got an ETF. Like, what are people saying about gold these days? I get the same critique.
When we try to make the comparison of Bitcoin to gold, I think you often have, similar to
if you have a Bitcoin bug in the room, you have a gold bug in the room. And they try to argue all kinds
of things like it's been around for a thousand years. It's 10% of it's used in electronics. And so,
you have to kind of fight that narrative. But we ran a really interesting simulation at the beginning
of this year. We said instead of adding 5% of Bitcoin to a traditional 6040 portfolio,
what if you added 5% of gold? And the impact that gold has on a portfolio is,
is actually negligible. It doesn't do anything for your portfolio. It doesn't add any risk-adjusted
returns. It doesn't increase volatility, but yet it doesn't boost returns. And so we start to show
that kind of data that says, look, I understand that you like gold. We understand that you
may be allocating to gold. But if you just take a small portion of that, maybe 50% of your 3%
gold allocation or 50% of your 1% gold allocation, and you shift that over into Bitcoin,
the impact it has on the potential for returns without really impacting the downside is really
hard to ignore, and they almost have a fiduciary responsibility to listen to that argument and to look
into it because they really have to do what's best for their clients. So that's certainly what we're
seeing, definitely seeing outflows from gold into Bitcoin as they think about what part of their
portfolio and their alt sleeve, they're carving off as they're investing in Bitcoin as well.
Yeah, and I just add two things on top of that. We're seeing some advisors have an inflation bucket
or a U.S. government debasement bucket that's 50% gold and 50% Bitcoin, which I think is great, right?
that's fine. That's an easier sell to their clients. We're worried about a government
pritting trillions of dollars of debt every few months. Let's hedge it. Who knows how it's going to
work best? I think that's fine. The other narrative change, which I find really interesting,
is for the last five years, mostly you could talk to advisors about Bitcoin taking a
percentage of the gold market, 10% of the gold market, 20% of the gold market, 50% of the gold market.
Increasingly, I find you can convince them that it may be multiples of the gold market. Increasingly, I find, you can convince them
that it may be multiples of the gold market.
The Bitcoin is everything that gold is, plus the ability to teleport it around the world,
and that has more applications.
So is it 2x the gold market?
Is it 3x the gold market?
And I think that's an interesting change.
So you couldn't really get that across to people before the Bitcoin ETF.
Now I think you can.
You can start to talk about multiples instead of percentages, and I think that's pretty exciting.
I think inside of the crypto industry, we're all pretty good at thinking in parabolas, much
more than the Tradfai community. And so when we see the gold market cap, gold being the number
one asset by market cap and Bitcoin as like number nine, number 10, as crypto natives, we're like,
oh, we could dethrone gold, which is probably like unheard of to like Tradify, just like in their first
like gut reaction. But like right now, I think the next milestone on this is like the Bitcoin
ETF AUM flipping the gold ETF's AUM. I actually don't know where we stand on this current race,
but like also in crypto world, we are used to using this word.
called the flippinging. So like when, which I'm guessing is just inevitable, when the Bitcoin
ETF does flip the gold ETF, is this like a big deal or is this more of a milestone for
fundies that us crypto natives talk about? Like how will that change the conversation in traditional
finance world? Oh, I love that. I think the flippinging will happen next year. And I do think it's a big
deal because ETFs are how investors today express their preferences for what to allocate to.
And what that will signal is that more of them want to allocate to Bitcoin that, you know,
nostalgia is not an investment strategy, and gold is in the past. So I think that will be an important
moment, and I suspect it could happen as early as next year. How close are we, Matt? And how does that
even happen? Where do we stand? Well, we have about, what, $50 billion plus in the Bitcoin ETFs,
you know, inclusive of GBTC. I think gold is north of 100, if you add them all up together,
or right around 100. So we only need a 2x. We need a 2x. And that's price and inflows.
We'll do that this year. There you go, exactly. We'll do that this year. We'll do that before Q3.
Let's flip it. Let's flip it. Yeah. It's going to happen. I think it's inevitable. As Ryan mentioned, Bitcoin's just so much more valuable in a portfolio context than gold has been historically. Not to mention it has sort of better underlying sort of fundamental growth patterns. But yeah, we might flip it this year. I love it. Beautiful. Beautiful. I know Bitcoin is not the only crypto asset that you guys at Bitwise find interesting or valuable. In fact, I think, Matt, we've had you on the podcast before.
We were talking about how to talk to our IAs and institutions about defy, decentralized finance,
and some of the tokens surrounding it, these new cash flowing assets that are not stocks,
but something different, you know, protocol network assets, something like this.
So let's talk about the next set of assets that we think we can create an ETF wrapper around,
like a trad ERC20, as we call it sometimes on bankless.
So the next one in line feels like it needs to be, it should be, the Ethereum ETF.
And I'm coming from the perspective that nothing else is close to that at this point in time.
We don't yet have futures for any other ETF.
So the next in line, apart from Bitcoin, would be the Ethereum ETF.
And I want to get your take on when that's going to happen.
Could it happen this year?
There's been a lot of conversation about this recently.
So some of the Bloomberg analysts who we've had on the podcast before recently came back and they said by May, low probability, something like 30%.
I saw Jake Trevinsky and others kind of weigh in on this as well. They think that it will be politically very difficult, probably untenable for Chair Gensler to do this with the current kind of administrative setup and some of the political pressures he feels. Let's remember, Gensler is kind of like the third vote of five. He was the one that got majority for the Bitcoin ETF.
across the finish line. I know I'm pretty sure you guys have a filing in. Is that correct? And so we do not yet.
You don't yet? No, we do not yet. Oh, not yet. Which is that something you want to announce, Matt,
on the podcast today. How much work is that yet word doing? Yeah, that yet work is doing a lot of work.
And we've talked about in the past. We intend to have an Ethereum ETF filing when we think it can be
approved. And we're really excited about Ethereum. We love the asset. As we've discussed, Ryan,
And I think for many in TradFi, it's easier to get their hands around.
ETH and the cash flow generating nature of ETH and the real world use applications that are being built on the Ethereum network.
I think that's easier for many people to understand.
So we absolutely intend to be in this space.
The good thing about not having a filing is I can talk about it.
If I had a filing, I couldn't actually say anything.
So we have some freedom before you file.
Once you file, you'll have a little bit like zipper on the mouth.
But now it's more open.
That's exactly right.
Yeah, once you file...
All right, because I've got some questions.
Let's do it.
Let's do it.
Fill us in.
Let's go.
Let's go.
So the recent meta has been a decreasing in the probability of the approval of the ETH
ETH ETF in May.
I think there was something previously like 60 to 70 percent sometime late last year, early this
year.
Now that has decreased, you can see this in the polymarket.
The ETF bros, Eric and James, have also decreased their probability down to 35%.
Maybe without any sort of question in specific, just like comment on that.
Comment on like the likelihood of the ETA.
approval happening like in this year, for example. Yeah, sure. So I can start, Ryan, you can jump in
afterwards to set up, the reason people talk about May is because ETF filings for crypto ETFs move on a
240-day review cycle. And so by the 240th day, the SEC has to say yes or no. And the first of those
days ends up in May. So May would not end up in a delay. It would end up in either an approval or
denial, correct? That's correct. Yeah. They can't kick the can down.
the road after May. It's a great part of the process because they have to say yes or no.
The reason you're seeing the odds decrease is because Eric and others are reading the tea leaves.
What are the tea leaves? Usually when you get to this point in the process, if you're going
to get an approval, you're having direct engagement with the SEC where they're asking you a bunch
of questions and then you're updating your prospectus to reflect those changes. So they'll ask you
like 40 or 50 or 60 questions. And if you look back at the Bitcoin ETF approvals, what you
started to see was Amendment 2 to our prospectus, amendment three to our prospectus, amendment
four, amendment five. Between those amendments, there's this back and forth with the SEC.
And I think the reason they're downrating the likelihood, and I think the reason they're approximately
accurate in those expectations is because we're not seeing any of that, right? There's no amendments.
there's no discussion. There's no obvious updating of all the prospectuses at once to answer the same
questions. There's just none of the indicia. There's general indifference from the SEC.
Yeah, or they're listening. Like, they're in listening mode. They're meetings with the SEC,
and you see them listening, and they did that with Bitcoin for years, but there's no two-way flow.
And that's really what you want to see. That doesn't mean it's impossible. We're not yet in the
window where it's impossible. If this were still true in late April, we'd be in the window where it's
impossible, right? They just can't move that fast. At this point, it's still theoretically possible.
That's why it's 35 and not zero, but it's trending down because we haven't yet seen this in the
public filings. My view is that ultimately, we will get an Ethereum ETF. The core logic on which the
Bitcoin ETF approval rests, which is that futures and spot track each other very well and are
tightly correlated applies into Ethereum. And to give kudos to a competitor Fidelity recently updated
their filing with some really good data demonstrating this. I think it's probably the best
shot on goal that the ETH world has had for a Bitcoin ETF was the new Fidelity update.
So I think we'll eventually get it. I would guess I'm over 50% by the end of this year.
I think it's probable this year. And I'll add one more nuance and then I'll stop talking because I've
going on for a while, I'll let Ryan speak.
Poor guy over there.
I think Ethereum ETFs will pull in more assets if they launch in December than if they launch
in May.
I think TradFi is still in the process, as we discussed, of digesting this Bitcoin
ETF.
And they're not yet ready for the next asset.
So I actually think the ETFs will be more successful at the end of the year than if they
launch in May.
And I think it's more likely we'll get a launch at the end of the year than we get a launch in
May.
Are you launching a token?
Is it already live?
How are you managing the legal and tax obligations for providing token grants to your team?
It's no secret that token management gets complicated.
Between learning all the legal language and tax obligations in every country that your team is in,
token grant management can feel like an obstacle course.
But it doesn't have to.
That's where Toku steps in.
Toku provides practical tools to handle token grants,
allowing for effective oversight of token distributions and payroll tax compliance for employees,
contractors, advisors, and investors.
They also handle tax withholdings through their real-time tax.
tax calculations that can be done by Toku or integrated into any payroll EOR providers in any
jurisdiction. Toku is a trusted provider of protocol labs, DYDX Foundation, MENAProtocal, and many
more. Get started for free and make token compensation simple at Toku.com slash bankless.
Uniswap is revolutionizing the DeFi space, not just by enabling swaps, but by empowering
you to swap smarter with a comprehensive suite of products for faster, safer, and more
informed swapping. Say goodbye to pop-up wallet extensions. The Uniswap extension is coming soon.
And this extension is not a pop-up.
It is a sidebar in your browser that persists no matter where you are on the web.
This means you can swap, sign, or send, and receive crypto anytime, anywhere, without obstructing your browser window.
But that's not all.
The Uniswap web app now features limit orders.
So you can buy and sell any token at your price on your terms without having to watch the market.
And the best part, limit orders are built on Uniswap X, which means no gas fees.
Also new to the web app is the data and insights pages with real-time candlestick charts,
price data, transaction logs, and detailed pool data
all integrated into the Uniswaffe web app.
All of these new releases come together to create one platform
to help you swap smarter every time,
no matter where you are, on web, mobile, or on the extension.
Click the link in the show notes to sign up for the extension waitlist
and download the mobile app.
Start swapping smarter with Uniswap.
Selo is the mobile-first EVM-compatible carbon-negative blockchain
built for the real world.
Driving real-world use cases like mobile payments and mobile defy
and with Opera MiniPay as one of the fastest growing web-free wallets,
SELO is seeing a meteoric rise with over 300 million transactions and 1.5 million monthly active addresses.
And now SELO is looking to come home to Ethereum as a layer 2.
Optimism, Polygon, Matter Labs, and Arbitruma have all thrown their hats in the ring for the cello layer 2 to build upon their stacks.
Why the competition?
The cello layer 2 will bring huge advantages like a decentralized sequencer, off-chain data availability,
secured by Ethereum validators, and one block finality.
What does that all mean for you?
With Sello Layer 2, gas fees will stay low and you can even pay for gas.
natively using ERC20 tokens, sending crypto to phone numbers across wallets using Social Connect.
But SELO is a community governed protocol.
This means that SELO needs you to weigh in and make your voice heard.
Join the conversation in the SELO forums.
Follow SELO on Twitter and visit SELO.org to shape the future of Ethereum.
So TradFai is just like currently reeling, overwhelmed from what's going on with the Bitcoin
ETF hasn't completely processed it, still digesting it.
And so it would be more bullish if we just sat on our hands as an industry and waited for
them to like kind of catch up with the times and then we can improve the eth ETF. That's your most
bullish version of the future. That's my most bullish version of the future because Ryan can only
do so many meetings and he still has to get through his Bitcoin meetings before he can do his
Ethereum meetings. I mean, it's a joke, but it's true. So I do think if these launch at the end of the
year and we've had Denkun and we've started to see the applications bubble up and we're getting those
real-world applications and user counts are growing, I think it's a perfect scenario for
of course, the sooner we get it in some way, the better. But I do think there's a bullish case to be
made for end of the year. Bitwise, Ryan, tell us about your perspective on just the conversations around
ETH and the ETH, and ETHETF as a resident boots on the ground here. Yeah, I think that's right.
You don't want to overwhelm these advisors with choices. You have to think about, even though we're
talking about and researching on Twitter, talking about Ethereum every single day, and talking about
crypto every single day, these investors spend a very small percentage of their time actually thinking
about crypto, actually thinking about investing in it. They're over there trying to grow assets.
It's really a business development business when you're in the world of managing assets.
And you're just trying to find clients who want to entrust you with their assets. And then you
go and invest them. And if you're only investing in 1% of your portfolio or 5% of your
portfolio into crypto, you're spending less than that thinking about those assets as a whole
because you're spending most of your time thinking about marketing and growing your business.
And so I think you have to let them get their arms around Bitcoin. When we go back to Denver,
when I was in the room with that large RIA, almost every single question was about Bitcoin.
And they weren't deep down the rabbit hole around Bitcoin. We were still getting questions that
says, how do we know that Bitcoin isn't a Ponzi scheme? How do you know they can't increase
the supply to more than 21 million? Right. And these are questions that we've maybe all grappled
with our first few months. Satoshi's just going to come and dump it all. Yeah, exactly. And so then you
try to tell them, okay, look, the whole case around Bitcoin is it's limited supply, increasing
demand. It's a commodity similar to gold. Then you try to explain Ethereum, which is this decentralized
version of the internet where all these crazy crypto applications are going to be built on top of it.
They don't really know how to think about that. And when they're trying to allow the Bitcoin
brain drain to come in, it's really difficult to also have this new internet come in,
defy crypto applications. And so I think that conversation coming later would help, like Matt said,
allow them to get some exposure to Bitcoin first, let that settle, let them talk to their clients
about it, have some of their quarterly meetings or bi-annual meetings that they have with their
clients to go over their portfolios, get them used to Bitcoin. And then the next best thing comes up,
which is Ethereum, and they can then have that opportunity to say, look, we carved off some of your
inflation hedge and we put it into Bitcoin. What if now we carve off some of your technology sleeve,
maybe some of your NASDAQ sleeve and put that into Ethereum, which is a tech version, kind of of the
crypto ecosystem. In our job here, Ryan and Matt, just so it's clear, is when that time comes,
to make sure that there are some bankless listeners implanted in the audience. You talked about those
Bitcoin fanatics. We want some Ethereum fanatics in the audience who are allocated to Ether to
either to speak up for it and to explain it to their colleagues. That's what we're here to do.
Matt, I want to ask you about your percentages. So understand, like you're not predicting May right now
you don't think that's going to happen. So you think maybe the 35% is along lines of accurate
unless we see some real activity in April. But you still give it over three.
50% probability for the year, maybe towards the end of the year. And I want to ask you about sort of
the pro side, the likelihood that it happens versus kind of the against side. So on the pro side,
a few facts, I guess I would say, are things of interest. I'm wondering how you weight these.
One is that Black Rock wants it. And so one thing that we used to say in 2023 is what Black Rock wants,
Black Rock gets. And that's probably like kind of a binary way of understanding it, but it's no small
thing to have a Black Rock filing. And their filings have proven very successful over time. They
usually don't lose. And so this would be in the camp that, hey, Black Rock is behind this.
They definitely want this. So how can the SEC say no at this point? Another fact that I'll enter
into the matter is there have been ongoing court cases. So it seemed like the grayscale win for where I
believe the court called the SEC's action arbitrary and capricious, which is just a brilliant line.
We could apply that in many SEC decisions. Don't comment on that. Of course, you guys are in the
filing process. That was me saying that. So, like, court cases could come up against the SEC if they
do decide to reject an Ethereum ETF in May. Like, what reasons do they have to reject that when we
have a trust out here and Ether ETrust from Grayscale as well? So some of these things factor in,
I think at least they wait highly in my mind. Do they actually make a difference? Do they actually make a
Is this more force to the pro that we'll get in Ethereum ETF by the end of the year?
Yeah, I think the lawsuit makes a lot of difference. And I love the words arbitrary and capricious.
I should like get a couple dogs and name them that. I think it's wonderful. So I think the lawsuit is real
because it did establish that if you have a futures based ETF, which we do in ETH, and if the futures
are highly correlated with Spot, that it's very difficult not to allow a Spot ETF. It's not
impossible, right? There are differences around ETH, but it's very, very difficult. And I think
we have those things, yes? We have those things, absolutely. And the data is very convincing.
And the ETH futures market is very liquid. And the correlations are arguably even tighter than they
are in Bitcoin. So it's a very compelling case. And I ultimately do think that will be the winning
argument. And that's why I don't think we need a regime change to get an Ethereum ETF.
Because I think that's established. It's also the case that there is then a nice dividing line.
where they don't need to go any further because there are no futures on other assets.
There's futures on Bitcoin and ETH.
And so it's not like they're opening the floodgates to, you know, meme coin ETFs.
That's not the case.
They're doing the two blue cap assets and they're letting people gain exposure to them.
And so I think that will matter.
I think the other thing that matters is that the ETFs have worked so well.
They've worked perfectly.
They've lowered the cost for investors by 90%.
they've raised security.
They've improved trading and liquidity.
And the SEC is supposed to consider that in its reviews as well.
So those are the big things.
I don't put too much into the BlackRock piece.
You know, that's a correlation causation thing.
You could also argue that they only file when things look promising.
I don't think they have any sort of magic inside sauce.
But I think the lawsuit thing and the investor protection thing mean we will get them.
I just think the SEC can take its time.
Okay.
So now I'm going to ask you to take the other.
of that argument. So if we don't get the Ethereum ETF by the end of the year, why won't we get it?
I think some have pointed out political pressure being a reason. I'm sure no one in the SEC would
ever acknowledge this. They are purely merit-based, aren't they? But some have pointed to you
kind of like the political anti-crypto army, maybe playing a role here, indicating that there was
some political cost for various regulators approving this nasty crypto asset, this nasty Bitcoin thing.
and I'm wondering if that factors in, or if not that, then what other factors would, like,
create conditions where we don't have an Ethereum ETF by the end of 2024.
Yeah.
I think the anti-cry army is a lot less scary now than it was a year ago.
There's been a lot of desertions from that army.
It's now sort of five people waving ratty flags into the wind.
So I wouldn't worry too much about the political pressure, at least not as much as I would in the past.
I do think from the SEC's perspective, allowing an ETH ETH.
sort of recrosses that line of ETH is definitively not a security. And they've been
uncomfortable with that post-Hinman, right? Hinman said it was not a security. Gensler has been
unclear on that. And there'd be some sort of re-endorsement of its status as a non-security by the
SEC that I think they may be uncomfortable. Again, I don't think that's going to happen.
But if it did happen, I think that would be the behind-the-scenes reason. That wouldn't be
the explicit reason. The explicit reason would be something to do with, you know, data quality
or data history or liquidity or something like that. But I think behind the scenes, what they would be
wanting not to do is establish that precedent if they didn't allow it, you know, within the next
12 months. To be clear, the industry is ready for this now, right? At least from kind of the industry
side, if they approved in May, we would be good to go. Absolutely. These ETFs would work perfectly.
Again, they would lower costs. Again, they would improve security for many investors and
improve access. So it would be a win for American investors and a win for American technology
and a win for America if they approved it. And I think eventually they will. I just don't know
if they'll be quite ready yet. We talked about the Bitcoin ETF kind of aging like wine and there's
this extra nuance in the ETH ETF that it actually has its own endogenous reason why it would
improve over time. And that's because I think in the fullness of time, we will see staking be a part of
the Ethereum ETF.
And so in addition to all the regular tradfai just needs to absorb it, comprehend it, figure out how to filter it out to all of its distribution arms, which are the brokerages, the advisors, etc.
There's also the evolution of the ETH ETF itself, I would assume would start at the vanilla ETH asset and then evolve into a staked ETH asset in the fullness of time.
Matt, do you agree that this is like the long-term conclusion of the ETH ETF just to really start this conversation?
100%. That's exactly right. And you're right. It will probably start without staking.
And you're right that it will add it over time.
That's what investors want.
And is that like a trivial evolution or is this going to take like another number of years in order to get like the SEC and regulators and just people on board with this?
So I don't know is the answer, but I'd be surprised if it was years.
Year, a year seems like a more reasonable number, right?
And they're likely to go with the simplest version first because that's what you do when you're getting something new out the door.
Think of it as an MVP of an ETF.
right? It's a minimum viable product. I don't think it's that far of a leap to staking,
and you can see it used in other markets around the world. But I do think it's, you know,
it's a year, it's 18 months. It's something on that timeline if I were forced to guess.
I would just add to that. I think an analogy you can make here with the vanilla and then getting
more complex from there is other ETFs that initially launch, whether it's Bitcoin ETFs or
simple ETFs, that you then have short or inverse ETFs launch that are focused on those products.
You then have leveraged ETFs launch that are focused on those products. And so you tend to always have,
this kind of simple approach first and then you get more complex out there. And so while staking is a
little bit more complicated than just creating a leveraged or inverse ETF, I wouldn't be so shocked
that we see the ability to have a staked Ethereum ETF in the future. It's kicking a dividend down
to the investors, ultimately, which again is good for the investors. And as long as you disclose the
risks in the fund prospectus and all of that documents, really it's up to the investor to make that
decision. And the SEC shouldn't be playing gatekeeper when it comes to that. And so I think we'll
eventually get there, but definitely we'll have that vanilla ETH ETF before we have anything.
Man, Ron, I think you just opened up like a whole entire, like, rabbit hole of like ETF permutations,
ETF derivatives. Spark our imaginations here. What kind of other types of crypto ETFs merely even
just off the Bitcoin or the ETH assets? What types would you expect to see emerge on the floor,
like sooner rather than later? If you look at the futures ETFs, we had Bitcoin futures ETFs,
We had Ethereum futures ETFs.
Then you have maybe 50-50 futures and Bitcoin futures ETFs that just split it down the middle
so that with the purchase of one share of an ETF, you have 50% exposure to Bitcoin.
You have 50% exposure to Ethereum.
You could have that as a market-weighted ETF or, you know, you could have some sort of
moving average built into that fund where it trades in and out of one and into the other
based on moving averages.
We also will have options for the Bitcoin ETF soon, which will unlock an entirely new category
of demand and traders and, you know, call it wall.
Street bets are just institutions that love buying and selling options. I think that'll bring new demand
into the market. And so covered call strategies, ETFs will emerge and all kinds of fun things like that.
And yeah, it'll be interesting to see what happens to inverse Bitcoin ETS when those hit the market.
Beautiful. I want to get back into some more questions about just the nature of the ETH ETF.
This is like starting to get into like some fog of war stuff. We just don't really have too many answers or
clarity here. But Matt, any insight on like how the staking mechanism would actually work inside of a staked ETH.
ETF. Is this like, what's the most likely outcome here? Like, ETH is just basically going to be
be staked by Coinbase. Is this going to be like a Lido-staked ETH-denominated ETF?
Like, do you have any sort of insight as to how the yield actually gets into an ETF?
Really complex question. Made more complex by the fact that the structure of these ETFs is something
called a grantor trust. You can sort of think of as a box that doesn't want to do anything.
All grantor trusts want to do is just sort of sit there. And so making a grantor trust
do something like steak, eath is complex. I think it's liable to be at the custodial level.
That's the most likely outcome is sort of through the custodial level. The analogy, for what it's
worth, there is an analogy in traditional equity ETFs. So what many traditional equity ETFs do that
hold like Tesla stock or Apple stock, et cetera, is they actually lend that stock out to short sellers
and earn a yield on it. And that's typically done, you know, through the issuer, through the
custodian. And I think the similar model will fly here, but we don't know for sure yet.
And then the last question, and I think is like the most important question about this whole
ETF thing. When it comes to ETH is, of course, the price impact on it. ETH is, of course, one third
of the market cap of Bitcoin. It also has less ETH on secondary markets, simply because
there's plenty of ETH in DFI, plenty of ETH in DeFi, plenty of ETH in Lear 2s, plenty of
ETH in EGN layer. So you have any sort of notion as to like how the relative price impact would be
on an ether ETH in comparison to what we've seen in the Bitcoin ETF. So you have any
of commentary on this map? It's a great question. You know, look, I think ETFs will gather billions of
dollars of long-term capital that buys it and holds it. And East market cap is not that large.
So over time, I think the impact could be really significant. Right now, I'm not sure that the
ETF tail is what's wagging the Ethereum dog. I really still think it's the use cases and the technological
progress, which has been massive and overwhelming. And maybe I'm just so bullish on the growth of
those things that I think that that's more important than the ETF. I think of the ETF as like a
nice, important catalyst that will impact price. Future catalyst, not current catalysts.
Future catalysts that will impact price. But ETH has other really important catalysts,
almost in a way that Bitcoin doesn't, right? Bitcoin has the halving. But the ETF was really
important for Bitcoin because it's fundamentally a store of value.
you, and that's its use case. Ethereum has so many use cases, and the technological story is so good
right now, and the app development is so exciting right now that I think, you know, that's probably
the primary driver. But look, it'll be billions of dollars. It'll impact price. I'm really
bullish on ETH. Okay, so Bitcoin is 50 billion right now, and we're expecting maybe by the end of the
year it could flip gold. What do we think if we got an Ethereum ETF? Do you think it would be
comparable to that? Do you think it would be smaller? Some have described this as,
sort of the, it's more like the opener, right? And whereas like people go to the concert for Bitcoin
and this is just kind of a side act, right? And it's not going to accrue nearly the interest
that the Bitcoin ETF. And they point to, I think, the Ethereum futures, which have been
fairly paltry to this point. What do you think of that argument, Matt? And what are your expectations
for a future Ethereum ETF? They'll be way more successful than the Ethereum futures ETFs were,
which were very disappointing. Those launched that
a nadir in the market and a period of disinterest, and they were rushed to market. So I don't know
that that's a good analogy. I don't think they'll be out of the gate as big as Bitcoin, but I think,
you know, they'll attract billions of dollars in their first year. That's my guess. I also think
they'll have a slower ramp in terms of their terminal flows will be more upward sloping,
because there's more education around Ethereum than there is around Bitcoin. But I think it'll be
billions of dollars. Look, I think they'll be very successful. And you'll have BlackRock, and you'll
bitwise and you'll have others talking about Ethereum and real world use cases, I think it'll be
broadly additive for the space. But I don't think it'll be, you know, $50 billion in year one.
You know, it'll be billions. It'll be a success. Ryan, you're on the front lines of institutional
education here, and you've certainly been doing your share of education around Bitcoin.
I'm not sure what narrative is sticking the most, but if I had to guess, it'd be like, you know,
store value, hedge against the dollar. We've talked about some of those things here.
Digital gold. That seems to be a lasting meme that you.
you can kind of transport. How do you think the Ethereum narrative will land among that crowd?
Like, what words will you use? What analogies? What narratives you think are the stickiest for that
tribe? I think you got to look at it like a technology investment. That tends to resonate the most
with the advisors that we're talking about when we explain what Ethereum is. We don't get so into the
weeds. It's a blockchain that's a decentralized database that allows anyone to build,
you know, any kind of decentralized application with smart contracts. You kind of zoom out and you say,
look, this is a new technology platform that's going to fundamentally change.
the way that we interact with each other, that companies interact with their customers,
and that we interact with data and value online in a way that Bitcoin just today can't touch.
And when you talk about it like that, and then you get into things like emerging AI and
other kind of technology narratives that are emerging, blockchains don't seem that crazy.
And Ethereum doesn't seem that crazy.
And the more it becomes the household name, the more that people are talking about that
as they talk about Bitcoin when they go on CNBC or Fox Business News, the more that word
Ethereum comes into the mainstream and the minds of investors. And really, you just need to educate them
on the potential use cases on top of Ethereum. If you have this decentralized internet, look what you
could do with stable coins. Look what you can do with things like Farcaster or prediction markets.
And that starts to really get the wheels turning in their head of, oh, man, if I could have invested
in the internet in the 90s or in the early 2000s, what would that have looked like for my portfolio,
for my client's portfolios? And maybe it's not so crazy to carve off a bigger part of your
technology sleeve to invest in Ethereum, then what you're doing with your alt sleeve to invest in
Bitcoin. And that's where I think will really start to see the demand for Ethereum ETFs when they
launch is, okay, now this thing's real. We have an ETF around it that is issued by some of the
largest asset managers in the world. And if I invest in that ETF, I have exposure to this new
technology platform where there's thousands of developers and millions of users and thousands of
applications being launched and being used every single day. And all I have to do is buy this one
asset, invest in this one asset. I don't have to pick the individual winners. It's kind of a,
it's an index on that future growth of the crypto ecosystem beyond just a store of value.
And I think when you talk about it like that, you start to see them really, you know, start to
turn the page on what's possible with this technology. You don't have to understand everything it
does and everything that will happen on it to know that it will have a fundamental impact on the
way that we interact with technology in the future. And that's really the best selling point that I've
seen resonate when I'm talking to advisors and walking them through it. Okay, so you're basically
saying this is a piece of the internet, maybe the decentralized internet, that's part of the narrative.
When it comes to valuation, though, did they think about this as like a tech play, like similar
to maybe an Amazon, a high growth tech stock or like, how do you talk about valuation?
I'm wondering if specifically the meme that we've been working on that some others have been
kind of working on for narrative understandings, like the internet bond, right?
This thing does have a yield.
It is sort of a share of the internet.
Do you think that that has a chance or is that too far?
Is that a bridge too far, Ryan?
No, I think that has a chance.
We kind of talk about it in two ways.
We say, look, in some ways, when there's more and more activity on this network,
you start to have this burn mechanism, which acts a lot like a share buyback, right?
And traditional investors can understand share buybacks.
The largest companies in the world spend billions of dollars buying their shares off the market
to reduce the flow and to reduce the supply.
And you have the same thing happening when ETH is being burned when usage goes up.
So we talk about there's value accrual from the fact that you have this burn mechanism,
which is very similar to a share buyback.
And then we talk about the yield from stake.
which is very similar to a dividend. And when you put it into analogies, they can understand that are very
similar to investment in dividend stocks or in stocks that do share buybacks, they can really start to
see how value will start to accrue to the underlying asset. And so an internet bond is a great way
to think about it. I think simpler terms for financial advisors who really think about things from
a cash flow, value, accrual dividend perspective also works. Does the one to punch of a asset that
has a native stock buyback component to it that is also yielding dividends at the same time.
Because like both of these things are great in silo. But the cool thing about ETH is that you get both.
You get a deflationary asset that's also producing yield. Does that one two punch land or how do
people react to that? I think that one two punch land. It's kind of like the setup for the haymaker,
which is then when you show them the revenue that Ethereum's generating. It's billions of dollars
in revenue every single year. And so I think those three things together, it's like,
sure, great, there's a buyback, and sure there's a dividend, but where's all that actually coming
from? And what's going to make that happen? You say, well, look, here's thousands of applications.
Here's millions of users. Here's billions in revenue being generated on this platform.
Then they have that aha moment, and they really start to understand this isn't going away.
It's only going to get bigger. And I should have some exposure to this on behalf of my clients.
What we're really asking you for, Ryan, is that you would take David and myself on the road with you
so we can help fight the good fight and convince some folks.
Matt, what would you add to this discussion around kind of narratives and positioning of ether,
the asset for the institutional tribe? Yeah, I think you all have touched it really well.
I mean, the beautiful thing about that buyback and dividend thing is it puts it into familiar
ground, right? It makes it just like a stock. And it makes it like an early stage technology
investment, which all of these people are used to. And that just makes it very comfortable.
There is a set of institutional investors who will never be comfortable with Bitcoin because
it doesn't have those characteristics. And this makes Ethereum very comfortable for them.
I'd also add that, you know, most of these people are 45, 50, 60 years old. And they experience the
rise of the internet from something that was weird and quirky and no one used to something that
they use every day. And so this is a narrative that fits in their mind with historical patterns.
And I think that's really valuable as well. Those analogies really work with this audience.
Guys, this has been fantastic. And maybe I'll close this out with a final question. So we are maybe
in the first inning of the institutional adoption, let's say, of crypto. And maybe I'll put some
milestones or benchmarks behind that. First inning is Bitcoin ETF approved, right?
Second inning is Ethereum ETF approved, which of course is most famous for tokenization and smart
contract capabilities. What is the third inning of this thing? Larry Fink has talked about
tokenization as one of the things. I don't know if this is implying real world assets
on Jane or what that is, but after the Ethereum ETF, what do you think is next on this roadmap of
Tradfai adoption of crypto? Yeah, it's a good question. I mean, certainly the real-world asset
tokenization narrative, I really see that resonate when I'm talking to institutional investors,
because they can understand the concept of just wrapping some kind of structured product around
something that already exists. So for them, you think about a tokenized real-world asset on chain.
that's kind of like taking a on-chain asset like Bitcoin or Ethereum and wrapping an
ETF wrapper and bringing it onto the rails of traditional finance.
And so that really resonates with them.
So I think real world assets will be a big boost.
Not only because it brings efficiencies into a market that's inefficient and that's opaque
and not very transparent, but because you're seeing these large asset managers like J.P.
Morgan and like Franklin Templeton experiment with tokenizing real world assets.
And I think that's what gives them that stamp of approval or that can.
conviction that, hey, this is real technology, it could really have a difference in the world.
And if institutions like JPMorgan, if institutions like Franklin Templeton are really starting
to invest resources into bringing assets on chain, then there must be value on chain that we can
go after. And so I think real old assets will be huge. I mean, we have the continued growth of
stable coins. We've already seen stable coin transaction volume in 2023 hit about 67% or 60% or so
of visas total payment volumes in 2023. So we're seeing this like crazy emerging.
of stable coins, which is another use case. We're seeing this emergence of real world assets,
which is now a billion or multi-billion dollar market. I think just more and more of these
use cases that pop up and have real traction in the world will just bring advisors into the
concept of investing in assets that are on chain and investing in the underlying infrastructure.
Yeah. Good answer. It touched on what I was going to say, which is I think massive mainstreaming
of stable coins is inning number three. And I think from two perspective, both from a payments
perspective locally and then a U.S. bank account in every pocket around the world perspective
globally. And I think the massive mainstreaming of stable coins is sort of the last hook that we need
before crypto and blockchain completely reinvents the financial ecosystem. So Bitcoin ETF,
ETHETF, stable coins everywhere. And then we'll get tokenization in real world assets.
You want to call a timeline on that, Matt? Are we a couple years out? Or is this going to
longer than that? I think stable coins are probably this cycle where they really start to go mainstream
and tokenization is probably the final cycle, which is the next one. That would be my guess.
But I think stable coins could 10x from here from an AUM perspective by the end of 2025.
I really think the growth could be off the hook.
Guys, this has been absolutely fantastic. Thank you so much. I'm sure the bankless audience will
appreciate it. Matt Ryan, will we see you guys at the permissionless conference? I know you're
at a conference right now, Matt, but permissionless happening in October.
Salt Lake City, October 9th. You guys going to be there? Absolutely. Wouldn't miss it.
I'll be there. Favorite conference of the year. Amazing for the bankless nation. Matt, you're at Das right now
is the conference that you're at. Just really quickly, give us the lay of the land. Like what's going on
over there? What's the sentiment like? Yeah. Huge bull market, early bull market vibes. Two things
stand out to me. I mean, one, it's sold out. It's oversubscribed to give you a feel for the
bull market vibes. It's much more institutional than any crypto conference I've been to in the past.
and the quality of projects are exceptional.
There's still some discussion of sort of the fun aspects of crypto,
but there are serious people building real world projects.
I'm more bullish coming from this conference than I have been.
At any conference I've gone to for the past three or four years,
really suggests that the industry has made a big step forward.
Hell yeah.
Well, if that's an early stage bull market conference,
then permissionless in six months in October,
man, that mania is going to be pretty well crescendoed
by then. So I'm looking forward to seeing you guys there. Yeah, 100%. Looking forward to it.
For the Bankless Nation, as always, we'll include a link in the show notes where you can get a
discount on those permissionless tickets if you want to join us all. And got to end with this,
some spectacular news, I think, for you. There is still some time to front run the opportunity.
The institutions are coming, but they're not all here. And got to end with this, of course,
some more sobriety injected in the podcast toward the end. Crypto is risky. You could lose
what you put in, but we are headed west. This is the frontier. It's not for everyone,
but we're glad you're with us on the bankless journey. Thanks a lot.
