Bankless - Will The Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) Rebuild $ETH Dominance? | Gnosis Martin Koppelman & Friederike Ernst

Episode Date: April 9, 2026

Can Ethereum become one economic zone again? Martin Koppelmann and Friederike Ernst from Gnosis explain how real-time proving and the Ethereum Economic Zone could reconnect fragmented rollups, unify liquidity, and give specialized chains seamless access to Ethereum’s settlement and security. ------ 📣SPOTIFY PREMIUM RSS FEED | USE CODE: SPOTIFY24 https://bankless.cc/spotify-premium ------ 🔮POLYMARKET | #1 PREDICTION MARKET https://bankless.cc/polymarket-podcast  🪐GALAXY | INSTITUTIONAL DIGITAL FINANCE https://bankless.cc/galaxy-podcast  🏅BITGET TRADFI | TRADE GOLD WITH USDT https://bankless.cc/bitget 🎯THE DEFI REPORT | ONCHAIN INSIGHTS https://thedefireport.io/bankless 🐇MEGAETH | 1ST REAL-TIME BLOCKCHAIN https://bankless.cc/megaeth ------ TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Intro 0:18 Fixing Fragmentation 7:49 Ethereum Economic Zone Explained 26:19 EEZ Thin Layer 30:30 Block Builders 33:06 The Bull Case 35:18 Ethereum Reorg 42:56 Layer2 EEZ Adoption 50:47 A New Age for Builders 55:54 How to Get Involved 57:42 EEZ Rollout 1:00:51 Closing & Disclaimers ------ RESOURCES Martin Koppelman https://x.com/koeppelmann  Friederike Ernst https://x.com/tw_tter  EEZ https://eez.io/  EEZ GitHub https://github.com/eez-association  Gnosis https://www.gnosis.io/  ------ Not financial or tax advice. See our investment disclosures here: https://www.bankless.com/disclosures⁠

Bankless Nation, I'm joined by Martin Copleman from Nosis. Martin, welcome back to Bankless. Thanks for having me. And we are also joined, first time on the podcast, long time coming, Frederike Erst. Frederike, welcome to Bankless. Thank you. We are talking to you guys because something cool is happening over in your guys' neck of the woods. This was presentation that Frederike, you released at ECC, alongside Jordi Bellina from Zisk.

And I want to learn more about it, because this has been. kind of the the subject of Ethereum, the main arc of Ethereum, and maybe this main quest line of Ethereum has a few next steps that you guys think we should take. Frederick, I'll throw this question to you, since you were the one who presented this topic, we're talking about what you guys have dubbed the Ethereum Economic Zone. Love the name. And I want to start the conversation here, because Ethereum, once upon a time, had a dream of just a network of independent, asynchronous chains that would compose together in a single unified synchronous experience that had boundless scale, you know, low fees,

and it was just one unified united chains of Ethereum. It kind of seems that this dream has been a little dead for a number of years now. Like we tried it, we made a little bit of progress, we tried some things, but ultimately it seems to have stalled out. Frederica, is this dream still alive? I think it's become resurrected. So kind of I do agree that it's been pretty dead for a while. So kind of the idea that kind of you should be able to compose from different domains of

Ethereum seamlessly. This has been sidelined for the last couple of years. Kind of just as a reminder, kind of it wasn't sidelined for no reason. It was sidelined so we could solve scalability. So kind of like before we actually had any L2s and charts and whatsoever, Ethereum composed marvelously, right? Kind of like when there was just one Ethereum, we didn't have these problems. But we kind of, we ended up in a place where transactions averaged $50 a piece.

And obviously this is extremely unfeasible for majority of use cases. So we ramped up scaling via L2s and that broke. the composability between those individual domains. And until recently, it also seemed unfeasible to do it from a technological angle. But this has very much changed with recent advances in real-time proving. Now, Martin, I remember two years ago, a year and a half ago, at DevCon, Bangkok, you talked about native roll-ups. And it seemed very parallel similar to what we are talking about with the Ethereum Economics.

talking about a number of different chains, being able to talk to each other synchronously, share a lot of the state of Ethereum, is what we are talking about today, what you guys release at ETC, the Ethereum Economic Zone. How is this downstream of the effort of native roll-ups? How does these two things couple together?

Yeah, I mean, the first one is the term got a little bit overloaded, so others are using it in a different way, saying native roll-ups are roll-ups that have some specific pre-compile that kind of proves the correctness where it's more natively provenly where you don't have a separate proof system

but kind of that is supported natively by Ethereum. What I was trying to yeah, I was already trying to describe this kind of vision one and a half years ago although then real time proving was not wasn't clear that

this would be possible or how fast this would become possible. So basically back then, I still described it as something where you could do those transactions that affect state on L1 and or two in the same transaction, but you couldn't directly read the result from an L2 transaction and you couldn't do kind of fully complex interactions

like you could do on one chain and all those things are now possible. So essentially it's an extension or it's now, yeah, it's basically one step more. than what we described earlier. So there was buried in there. You said real-time-proving. Is that why we're going to be talking about this subject today

and not like a year ago or two years ago? There is a specific technology that has been unlocked. ZK technology has progressed incredibly fast, faster than most people, I think, in the industry, really ever anticipated. And that's why we are able to talk about the subject today, the Ethereum Economic Zone, because there was a tech unlock with real-time proving.

Is that correct? For sure. So there was a tech unlock and I think that unlock, yeah, kind of also brought a, brought a unlock in, well, in interest and in, yeah, to some extent funding or commitment to build this. So previously it was just an idea, but it wasn't clear. Is it worth actually building it or investing in it to some degree? And now with the promise of actually having, yeah, all those nice things, shared liquidity, fully, yeah, fully composability. we decided it's now worse actually building it and quickly gathered interests around this project

and yeah and the result was the deaf net at ECC. Are you sitting on USDT or stable coins after taking profits and wondering where to deploy next? What if you could access stocks, gold and ETFs without ever leaving crypto? That's what tokenized stocks on BitGet unlock. Traditional markets still run unlimited hours but capital is moving on chain 24-7.

On Bitget, you can trade tokenized stocks and ETF 24-7 with up to 100x leverage, all settled directly in USDT or USDC. No brokerage accounts, no off-ramps, no platform switching. BitGet has already processed over $18 billion in tokenized stock trading volume, with most of that happening in the past month alone. The platform now captures close to 90% of on-dose tokenized stock spot market share. As gold and silver hit record highs, on-chain training followed. Over the past two weeks, volume in SVL on, tied to silver and IAU on, linked to gold, surged on. This is BitGets universal exchange vision and action.

Crypto equities and real world assets in one place, built with crypto-native speed and flexibility. If you want to trade stocks the way you trade crypto, explore tokenized equities on BitGat. Learn more by clicking the links in the show notes. This is not investment advice. Some exciting news. We are launching a new podcast to help people figure out the crypto cycle, how to navigate it. The best crypto cycle investor I know, his name is Michael Nato. He runs the DeFi report.

This is the guy that sent me a sell alert before the 10-10 price drop happened. His cycle analysis has been absolutely on point. I've been following him for years. And this year, we started recording weekly podcast episodes. Each one we get into his portfolio, what he's holding, the market structure, entry targets, fair market value of Bitcoin and Ether. And where we are in the cycle, there's new episodes that are released every Wednesday. They're 30 minutes. They're short.

They're punchy. I think this crypto cycle is harder to navigate than most. So let's do it together. Go subscribe to this podcast. Search the DeFi report. wherever you get your podcast, YouTube, Apple, Spotify, or find a link in the show notes. There's a new episode waiting for you now. Okay, so I'm going to ask this next question twice.

And the first answer, I want it to be non-technical. I want it to be like broad pattern matching, able to be understood by the layman. And then I'm going to ask you the question again. And we can go into the tech details, the architecture about how it works. Frederica, I'll throw this one to you. What is the EEZ? What is the Ethereum Economic Zone? The Ethereum Economic Zone is the domain around Ethereum where transactions feel like you're on the same network.

So kind of if you kind of, if, I mean, that was somewhat kind of tech minded, if you look at it from an economics perspective, it's kind of the group of people who acknowledge that Ethereum is the most powerful decentralized economic zone in the world and want to be able to settle on. on it natively. Mine, you want to say, add something to that? Yeah, I'll do maybe one more. So, yeah, in the EEZ, you have shared liquidity. So, for example, you can do a trade and you can, in the same trade, in the same transaction, source liquidity from Ethereum and all other chains that are part of the EEZ. So in today's world, you often see it that on different chains, you have significantly

significantly different liquidity, even yeah, different prices, maybe different interest rates on lending protocols and so on. On the same chain, you would not expect that because there's can immediately be arbitrage and basically then on the same chain, you only should have one price for one token. And in the EEZ you will also have only one, let's say, for example, one price per token. And I think this is super, it's a good example to kind of dig in, to because you will still have different liquidity pools on different parts of the network. It's just that they stop behaving like separate markets because you can access liquidity

from everywhere. They start behaving like a single market without any of the infrastructure actually having to move network at all. So everything stays where it is. It's just instantly, instantly accessible from wherever you are in the easy. Everything stays where it is. I think that is a very important line to underscore. So the EEZ, this is not a new roll-up standard.

This is not like the OP stack or the ag layer. You guys aren't introducing. It's like, oh, all the other layer twos are fragmented, come to our layer two. It's unfragmented. This is not that. So technically, let's go into the technical definition of what the EEEZ is. Frederica, how would you explain it technically? technically that's a fantastic question.

So kind of if you look at any one network, a network has a perfect understanding of what its own status, right? So kind of this is kind of how it knows what the current situation is like and kind of like what transactions are feasible and so on. It has zero visibility into anything that happens outside of it. So if you want two chains or two networks to interact with, with one another, you need to give them a way of understanding beyond doubt the state of the other network so that they can work, so they can operate on that state as if it was their own state.

So kind of that has to be the level of assurance you have to have about the state of the other network. And with real time proving, we actually allow the networks to understand the state of the other network so that they can act as one. I would give a simpler, or one simple answer is to say, Lear tooth right now, they process transactions

and kind of once in a while, maybe every 10 minutes, they commit to Ethereum or settle on Ethereum and then kind of to finalize that it often takes even longer than up to a week with a dispute period. Chains that are part of the EEZ, settle essentially every block, so every 12 seconds. So every 12 seconds, they make a, I mean, they can make smaller blocks.

They can be faster in between, but every 12 seconds they synchronize or settle with Ethereum. And so with every Ethereum block, they settle with Ethereum. And those settlements allow for, yeah, for transactions between Ethereum and those chains. And it's notable that it's a very thin layer, right? So kind of like, as you said, it's not kind of like an entire OP stack and it's kind of like come to our solution and kind of like everything is wonderful here. It can be retrofitted onto existing tools. If you are willing kind of like the main concession that kind of you have to make as an L2 is that you kind of have to acknowledge superior, that you have to acknowledge Ethereum as your superior.

So kind of if Ethereum reorgs, you have to be willing to potentially reorg to. if you're willing to do that, you can become part of the Ethereum Economic Zone, regardless of what kind of roll-up you are. I see. I see. Okay. So maybe to just to zoom out a little bit, the thing that separates the Ethereum network of networks, the network of chains, the network of L-2s, and a seamless,

united state that's synchronous and composable, the thing that separates those two things is all of the independent chains are slow to understand this state of other chains. So like the uniswap USDC-Eth pool on Arbitrum is slow to understand the uniswap-USDC-Eth pool on base. And if we can get that timing down to real-time and Ethereum block, then we start to look like the Ethereum Economic Zone. And so it's not necessary, it sounds like it's not really like a binary, but it's like if we can get all networks, all Ethereum networks, layer 2s, to update the state of its knowledge of other layer 2s

inside of one single Ethereum block, then we produce this thing called the EEZ. Is that a fair interpretation of what you guys are saying or does something need to be amended? Yeah, but the good thing is also it's enough if one chain starts. So, or at least for that chain, it already gives significant benefit, and that is accessing Ethereum's liquidity. So even if you had the first chain and the only chain,

but you are part of this, or I mean, you have this, this, yeah, real time or every, every block settlement with Ethereum, it allows you, or your users of the chain already to, yeah, to interact natively with Ethereum. So practical example, we place an order on, let's say, cowswap on such a chain. then the solvers or the router would dynamically decide, is it worse or can I settle this or should I settle this locally

with the liquidity on my chain, which would potentially mean even less gas costs because you don't need to touch Ethereum state. But if it's worth it, the extra gas costs of Ethereum, let's say gas cost on Ethereum might cost 20 cents or something like that. So if those 20 cents are, well, worse it to kind of the price improvement is big enough, then such a chain would decide to,

yeah, create a transaction that both uses L1 and L2 state. Yeah, and that means even a single chain benefits, in my view, significantly from joining easy. Then, of course, it can go beyond. As soon as you have one chain joining, then in a way the aggregate liquidity is now Ethereum plus that chain, and the next chain joining would join both kind of in a way, because they already are the shared chain, shared zone.

And by that, the EEZ overall could become, yeah, significantly bigger than Ethereum today. So kind of just as a rough idea, if you just look at Dex trading volume, then roughly 50% today are on Ethereum and 50% are on the layer 2's combined. So, yeah, by that metric, you would already double the kind of liquidity trading volume. I see. I see. So it sounds like what the Ethereum Economic Zone is today to kind of extend your guys's idea of it. The Ethereum Economic Zone starts at the layer one. What is the EEZ right now? It's the Ethereum layer one. And then with when one chain buys into the EEZ by adhering to the standards, well then the number of chains grows grows by one. Now there's two. Now there's two chains. If the second layer two agrees to that standard, well, now there's three chains. And. There is liquidity interoperability between the two layer twos and also, if necessary, the Ethereum layer one, if the output is more valuable than had it been just the layer two's. And it sounds like there's kind of just like a math problem of just if we're doing cross-chain

trades, what's the most optimal trade, accounting for all the gas fees across all the chains. And then as more and more chains grow in the EEZ, then the possibilities of what is the best outcome also grows for the users doing all of these trades. Both of you are not in your head. So it sounds like I'm on the right track here. Absolutely. But it kind of, it actually extends beyond even that. So kind of, so far we've kind of talked about trading in financial use cases. And I mean, those are definitely real. So kind of if you have a perp decks on one chain and kind of your ethers on a different chain and kind of you want the, you want to borrow against it on a third chain, that that becomes that becomes completely seamless. So there's no bridging, there's no failure risk. It's kind of, it just becomes one atomic

transaction. But beyond kind of the financial use cases, you also see that chains that are geared towards other use cases. So for instance, if you have a privacy first chain, what you could do is you could have your identity on there. And this privacy chain would probably be very bad at compute because kind of private compute is expensive. So kind of change like ASTEC, they have one or two transactions per second because of this. But if you kind of, if you have your identity then you want it private, you can, you can send a proof or kind of you can, you can have a proof from that chain that you're allowed to access a specific, say, five-verse document because of credentials or membership or reputation that you have.

And your identity always stays on the private chain. It's just the proof that kind of leaves the chain. And kind of in that way, you give individual chains much more freedom about how they kind of, what they optimize for, what kind of use cases they target. You no longer kind of have to endlessly replicate table stakes, which is what we are seeing in the L2 landscape today. And I think that will be a huge unlock. Yeah, so actually I think it was also your bankless summit

at well for one and a half years ago last DefCon where I think Eric Wall gave a talk about trying to build an application on Ethereum Layer 2s and it was kind of impossible because he wanted NFTs and he wanted to use the NFT from one chain on. on, from one layer two, on another layer two. And basically that was more or less impossible to build. And that is more less impossible to build today. But yeah, so, so, so basically just echoing that goes beyond the financial use cases,

everything where you need composability. Yeah, those things will become, again, much easier. And it goes beyond even, sorry, David, it goes beyond even that. So kind of if you, if you look at non-public chains, So kind of obviously kind of say you have as tag or so, this is a public chain. But you can even go to consortium chains or prividium. So kind of as long as you're willing to prove your state and reorg, potentially, if Ethereum reorgs, you can compose.

So kind of as kind of a banking consensureum, you can have a private chain that with validators that are run by the banking consensorship members. but you can interact synchronously with everything that's on Ethereum. And if you kind of speak to these institutions, and often kind of they are into minds of kind of what to do because obviously the liquidity that's very interesting to them is on Ethereum, but they do not want to give up all of this administrative power they have from running their own infrastructure.

They don't want to be at the mercy of kind of Ethereum validators. And you can kind of now have the best of both. I could even see this kind of extend to nation states. So kind of if kind of, for instance, you are a nation state and you want to issue someone a form of identity on chain, but you don't want to do it on Ethereum, you can now do it on your own chain and have it composed with everything that's on Ethereum kind of.

It's also kind of if you want to issue T bills natively or CBDC, kind of all of this kind of gives you a way of having some amount of control, but still allowing it to compose with everything that is already out there. Okay, let me, there's a lot in there. That's definitely worth underscoring. So let me trace over everything. make sure I listen, I understood, and the listener is always also keeping up with us. It sounds like in the current way of building where, or maybe the 20203, 2024 era of Ethereum

roll-ups, it was all about kind of Ethereum equivalents. Let's build arbitram. Let's build optimism. Let's build base. Let's deploy Uniswop there. Let's deploy Avey there. Let's deploy all of the big apps that made the Ethereum layer one successful and deploy it on the layer two's.

And then what did we get? we got, you know, 15 different mini-etheriums on top of one big Ethereum, and there wasn't that much differentiation there. And so we were all kind of like sucking up each other's oxygen. And ultimately, we never solved the problem that needed to, that we were trying to solve in the first place, which was scaling at the Ethereum layer one. And so we ended up just like replicating the patterns without producing the solutions here. And so now I think in, in 2026, we have that recent state of layer two statement from the EF, which I think Frederike kind of echoed what you just said, which is we need layer twos to be more unique and differentiate between themselves.

And I think we can go even further and say, like, there needs to be very narrow roles for specific L2s that they optimize strongly for. And the vision that you were kind of painting that I got in my head is like, there is an identity layer two, maybe it's Aztec, because I want my identity to be on the Aztec layer two. There's unichain, which might be optimized for uniswap. Maybe there's AVE chain to optimize for AVE. And if all of these things are in the Ethereum Economic Zone,

I might be able to put my assets in the Avey chain. And then I could also, using the excess margin that I have, because of the deposits, I could swap it on the uniswap chain. that activity could be tied to my private identity on Aztec, and then in all one transaction, I might be able to buy access to this file verse document, which is somewhere else. And there's a separation of responsibilities here

that we don't have to conflate. And so in the old world, we had all of the same responsibilities, all replicated across 15 different chains. And I think with the image, the idea that you painted in my picture, is actually chains can now focus on their individual responsibility, but all of that can be synchronized with real-time proving,

and this is what we call the Ethereum Economic Zone. But wait, there's more. It goes into the private consortium chains as well, and so you can still have some of the permissioned banking stuff that is very in vogue in 2026. They can also be a part of the Ethereum Economic Zone, access the same composability, liquidity, everything else that makes Ethereum Ethereum,

but they still have all of their private, you know, permissioned networks, all of that is retained, but they can still access the zones for what's relevant to them. That's what I just heard. Is there, again, is there anything that needs to be updated or amended? I think that was, I wish I had said it like this. I'm sure we, as we all talk about the EEZ more, I think we're all going to get better at talking.

talking about this stuff. Frederica, I want to go back to something that you said. You said it's a very thin layer. The EEZ is a very thin layer. That means like the EEZ is actually something. It's not just like smart contracts that are spread across all the different chains. There's actually a thing that is the coordinating substrate between there's not. Okay, maybe you could actually talk about like what that thin layer is and what that role is and like where that actually lives.

Kind of on a very high level, it's basically a standard for how different networks talk to each other. And that's all there is to it. So kind of there's, there's, yeah, it's just a standard. Well, kind of, yeah, to some extent, it is a standard. So kind of, I mean, we kind of, we have this unlock with kind of real time proving. And obviously kind of like with any technology, there's different ways of architect. it, but kind of the obviously kind of like you have to kind of if there's multiple players, you kind of have to agree on one way. The EEZ is one way. Kind of we're aiming for kind of for

this coordination layer. We're aiming for less than a thousand lines of code. At least kind of like this is what what Jodi kind of is has in his mind. But kind of it will be, it's free open source software. kind of it's published by a new association in Switzerland. It's all free. It's in the public domain. It doesn't belong to anyone. Yeah. I would say, yes, that is correct.

On the other hand, to make it work, there's still, so there is the, there is, there will be some coordination effort needed. So essentially, let's start with one chain. So you are one chain and you want to have the synchronous as composability with Ethereum. Then essentially you are doing a transaction that might affect Ethereum and your chain. So, again, that needs to be tightly coupled. And the way Ethereum blocks are produced nowadays is mainly through builders.

Now, there can be, of course, conflicting transactions. So let's say there's an Ethereum kind of regular L1 transaction that touches a specific liquidity pool. and then there is this transaction coming from L2 that also wants to kind of go through EZ into this specific liquidity pool. There needs to be some, yeah, ordering, which ultimately does the, ultimately the Ethereum validator or builder does.

But here there needs to be some, yeah, if you want to do this efficiently, ideally you have some coordination between the sequencer of the L2 and the builder of L1. And there are ways to start, or we will start the EZ kind of with just submitting bundles

so kind of without additional required protocols or without additional required standards. But as soon as you want to have, when to go beyond one chain, you have multiple chains, then it absolutely does make sense that this coordination layer which is implicitly already there

through kind of block builders and their protocols, that that will become more important to actually build proper blocks that have all the aggregated proofs. You can have all the chains having separate proofs, but of course it's also more efficient if they aggregate the proof. So long story short, it can be thin,

but to make it work well and to make it work efficient, there will probably be some layers. So what I'm hearing is that there is a naive, worse way of implementing the EEZ that still works. And with optimizations and coordination between the different parts of the stack, there is a central coordinating role that can make everything better

and that takes this existence of like some level of something doing some inter-party quarterback, and then we can get even more benefits. Is that correct? Yes. Okay. The good thing is that all major block builders, that's currently Titan, Beaver Build and FlashBots,

already opted into this. So kind of they will support this. We have the people. So kind of they very much see the upside of this for Ethereum and also for themselves. So kind of they are on board and they will support this from, day one. So it's not this kind of Martin, it sounds a little bit like an uphill battle, but kind of like it's, it's kind of the, we are already kind of pretty, pretty high up on the, on the peak. Yeah, I think what you're saying is the incentives kind of make sense for these players.

Titan. Who are the two block builders, Titan and, and. Beaver and Flashbots. Beaver and Five Flots. Together they kind of build in excess of 90, 95% of all blocks. Right. Okay. And, okay. And you said that, they see the upside for themselves, maybe you could illustrate what that upside is because if the blockbuilders of Ethereum are getting upside, that means that people like me are transacting more on Ethereum, right?

Like to illustrate what that upside actually looks like. Yeah, so kind of, I mean, obviously block builders are long-eath, right? Kind of everything that kind of pulls economic activity onto L1 or kind of into the L1 adjacent domain. is both good for block builders and validators. And I think this is something that kind of we have deliberately not over-emphasized, but if you look at L-2s today, often the economic incentives are not well aligned with Ethereum.

And I think this is a way of remedying that situation. I think if you are a classic Ethereum bowl, you'll see the Ethereum Economic Zone and you'll say, okay, synchronous composability, synchronous date, better decks executions, you know, composable apps. I'm seeing Ether as the money of the internet. And if you're more in like kind of the Blockworks camp and you're like fees or everything, well, I think the EEZ has an answer for that too, because if we can have composal, networks, we can have this like festival of the commons, this synchronized United States chains of Ethereum, where all the independent value of independent chains all are composed into one

ecosystem, that ecosystem is going to incur a lot of demand because you're aggregating bespoke value into the same place. And so there's going to be fee demand. That's probably why the block builders are in on this. So depending on your flavor of bullishness, I feel like there's something here for both parties. Martin, what do you think? Yeah, for sure. I know. basically on the second one. So right now, L2s essentially create relatively little L1 demand. So kind of they, I mean, yeah, they use blobs, but they sometimes only settle every 10 minutes.

So basically just a couple of transactions every now and then, every few minutes. In this world, essentially every L2 user has the option at any time to do a transaction that also uses L1. liquidity and if there's enough interesting things on L1, which they usually are or still are, then then the expectation would be that let's say there are 200 L2 transactions in a 12 in a 12 second time, then at least a couple of those three, four, five, 10 will actually also want to access L1 state. So definitely much more yeah, much more but ultimately transaction

fees and yeah, MEV or kind of just economic relevance of building those L1 blocks. Certainly, certainly. I want to go to this metaphor that my co-host Ryan uses a lot, that we've used a lot on the show, which is, you know, we have this united chains of Ethereum, but one of the reasons why this kind of model broke down in past eras was that the coordinating power, the authority of the layer one was just not that strong. it's like we had these very, you know, fishing lines, loose, weak ropes that are tying together Ethereum's layer two to the layer ones.

They're just not that strong. And while, you know, we all kind of share the EVM, there's nothing really strongly uniting these independent factions. It's kind of like NATO, you know, it's like the coordinating might isn't that strong. Like people do their own things. Members of NATO kind of still do their own thing no matter what. Frederica, you said something where in order for this EEZ to work, you have to give up some power to Ethereum. You emphasize the reorg.

If Ethereum reorgs, then any chain in the EEZ, in order to be a part of the EEZ, must also reorg. And it sounds like we're just elevating Ethereum as like the canonical source of truth. And so long as all of the chains in the EEZ see Ethereum as the source of truth, not a source of truth, not a source of truth, but the source of truth. That means that they're a part of the EEZ. Maybe you could just go into that a little bit more. Like, why is that important? Why must that be the case?

And is that the complete story about the chains in the EEZ giving up power to the Ethereum Layer 1 or is there anything else we should talk about as well? Yeah, I mean, this is correct. So kind of you need to give up some power to the Ethereum Layer 1. In practice, this probably is not going to change. lot for you. So kind of if you look at, if you look at how many reorgs there are on a daily basis on Ethereum, there's about 10 one block reorgs. And then kind of as an L-chu, you only have to adjust your chain if kind of anything that touched your state kind of gets re-oaked out. So kind of if it's

just sending sabers from one place to another, probably not that important. If you kind of touched upon an automated market maker whose state was altered, then yes, it's possible. It's more of a principled thing. So kind of in order to kind of all be able to kind of orchestrate, you need one conductor, right? And kind of acknowledging Ethereum as the conductor explicitly to actually not just kind of like have the woodwinds on kind of like

one side and then kind of the percussionist on the others and kind of the violinist kind of like in the middle somewhere, you kind of, you need the conductor, right? And kind of like acknowledging Ethereum as the conductor is very much implicit in the easy. Maybe you had this metaphor of what is tying it together. So here it's really the interest of being able to access this state of Ethereum. So for example, the liquidity. So if you want to allow your users to do a trade on your layer two, that in that trade also accesses Ethereum liquidity and touch a state,

then you need to have this settlement kind of with Ethereum in the next block or essentially every block. So again, the big benefit is that also kind of for bridging. So essentially you send tokens from Ethereum to your chain and they are immediately available. You can immediately, in that sense, there is no bridging. Of course, again, where practically this re-orch thing comes from. So if now something comes out of Ethereum, let's say tokens are sent to your chain

and you are immediately using them on your layer 2, sending them forward, using them in a Dex. And then it turns out this Ethereum transaction never happens because Ethereum gets re-auged. Yeah, then you have to deal with this. And the easiest way to deal with this is to reorg your chain to this level as well. So I would say this is the only downside, essentially, coming from EZ. And I would also say, I would say, well, if I had a wish for an Ethereum roadmap, I would say single slot finality would essentially solve that problem. But yeah.

Right, that was exactly my next question is like, what does the EEZ ask of the capacity of the Ethereum layer one protocol? single slot finality seems to just, Frederike said, while, you know, there is potentially a problem, it's not really the biggest problem. It's a very infrequent problem, a problem nonetheless,

but an infrequent problem. And I think, Martin, what you're saying is that if the Ethereum Layer 1 introduces single slot finality, then the small remainder of the reorg problem actually just gets eliminated. Is that correct? Yeah, I would say it's largely a complexity problem.

So in practice, reorgs happen very rarely. so a couple of times a day and only for one block so deep reorgs basically never happened in the history of Ethereum so let's say five, ten blocks that

never happened but theoretically it is there and then you theoretically if you want to build it properly you have to deal with this theoretical case so it does add a bit of fair chunk of

a developer complexity but once you handled it practically will not have big relevance. If you're already holding soul, here's something you may want to pay attention to. Galaxy 1 just launched Solana staking and you can earn up to an estimated 6.5% in variable staking rewards on your soul

with no platform commission fee charged throughout December 31st, 2026. While many other platforms charge up to 35% commission fees on staking rewards, Galaxy 1 offers you 0% platform commission through December 31st. Other fees may apply. You should see the terms. This is powered by Galaxy Digital's own validator

infrastructure, one of the largest salon of validator operations in the world, and now available to individual investors directly within the Galaxy One platform. Once you stake, rewards accrue and compound automatically. No active management needed. You can track everything in one place, including balances, rewards, and tax reporting through Tax Bit. Getting started is straightforward, you can buy sold directly in the app or transfer it in. If you want to put your soul to work, you can now start staking on Galaxy One today. Click the link in the show notes to learn more and get started, not investment advice. Bankless isn't just a name. It's a genuine belief that you shouldn't need permission from an institution to use your money. Metamask has been around since

the beginning of Ethereum, and they carry the same DNA we do. Metamask was my first wallet, and well, if you haven't opened up the app recently, let me tell you, they've been shipping, creating the one app to finally replace your bank and exchange. You can trade just about everything, right from within MetaMask. Leverage purpose via hyperliquidion, prediction markets to polymarket, tokenized stocks like Nvidia, and you can swap tokens gasslessly and across networks and even spend your crypto with your MetaMask card at real merchants all around the world. It's better than institution services, but from a self-custodial wallet. And this is what we've been talking about for years.

Money, that's open and is happening. So give MetaMath's trading features a look at the link below. What will it take to get a lot of the layer twos as we know it today, the big ones? Because it'll be great if we can get some chains to adopt the EEZ. But the EEZ as a vision won't be successful until we get the dominant layer twos, the arbitrums, the bases, the world chain. is it reasonable to assume that these parties will be interested in joining the EEZ and will it be difficult for them to join the EEZ? Yeah, so I think to some extent,

it will probably be the somewhat smaller ones that start first because they have more to gain, because to some extent the bases and or base and, yeah, I think it's really just maybe base arbitrum and polygon that really have their own ecosystem that's still smaller than Ethereum, but they have, basically, they have dexes, they have lending protocols,

they have oracles, they have essentially the full stack. All other chains, smaller chains, are trying to do this as well, but are somewhat struggling. So they usually have their niche, and then they have other things where they basically can't at all compete with Ethereum. So for them, it will be,

the initial incentive will be much bigger because finally they don't have to, I don't know, kind of incentivize liquidity for this pair where naturally liquidity would just not be there or kind of get an Oracle protocol. For those things, they could basically just say, fine, we have here our niche,

and if you need anything else, you can easily get it from Ethereum. So that's essentially the first wave I would expect to happen. Yeah, then I do think those, once they are successful, or that works successfully, I think then the time will come

that the arbitrums and bases of this world will, yeah, kind of face this decision and, yeah, probably, probably, yeah, will consider whether it's worth giving up this, to some extent they're giving up the guarantee of fast, fast block time. So currently again, because they don't essentially have reorgs. They can say after a second or half a second

your transaction is final. With this reorg possibility, there's still this additional complexity. Yeah, it's kind of final, but theoretically Ethereum might reorg and then your transaction might still be replayed. I think that will be possible to also give here strong guarantees that even if it's reawed,

you can have protocols on top that still guarantee that the transaction will be executed nonetheless. And then it depends on if it's a simple payment, then it should not. in no way be affected by a reorg, but if it's his trade that touches liquidity that might change its state,

then yeah, it gets a bit complicated. So long or short, eventually I do expect them to join, but maybe not first. I actually, I think this is correct, but I would also predict these L2s to become much less important

in the grand scheme of things. Because so, kind of having kind of this full set of table sakes, this gave you a very significant leg up. But as soon as kind of you no longer have to be a mini-ethyrium, as soon as it's completely fine to be different and just compose with whatever else is out there, kind of the gravitational pull of a base is going to become much smaller. and I think we will see a lot of different sex chains in kind of the EEZ. I think we will see app chains.

I think kind of like this generalist chain I see on the way down. Hmm. Hmm. One thing we have learned by now, I think, in this industry, is that we are no longer in the era of building it and then they will come. I think in order for the EEZ to be successful, somebody has to do the job of pushing it forward, like taking ownership of growing the EEZ.

With the announcement of the EEZ at ECC, there was, you know, inside of the announcement was something called the EEZ Alliance. Who is that, what is that entity who is composing it? Is this the entity that its job is to grow the EEZ? What's going on over there? Yeah, so the EZ Alliance is not a formal entity. It's more group of projects. I mean, there is an association that kind of owns the IP, kind of, it's free open source software.

And so kind of that entity is doesn't matter at all. For the Alliance, it's an informal group of projects who have said, we will support this from day one. We will leverage this from day one. So kind of as we kind of explained earlier, kind of it's important that block builders kind of execute to this standard ASAP. It's also important that DAPS know of this possibility. So for instance, say, you are an AVE, and what you can now do is kind of you can look at the user deposits across all EZ chains, have one global balance that you can borrow against

rather than having different AVE incendiations on different chains where kind of the relevant collateral is the collateral that is on that chain with kind of the parameters that kind of are set for that chain. But in order to do that, AVE actually has to know to look, right? Kind of they have to know to look. These are the chains in the EZ, and this is the collateral and has to understand that logic from a business perspective. And this is exactly what the depths who are in the alliance will do.

So kind of Avey is one of them. Spark is one of them. Safe and cow, obviously. the monarium, X-stocks, centrifuge. So kind of there's a whole host of well-loved applications. Also outside of the financial realm, so for instance, Fivers also will adopt this from day one. So from the perspective of depths,

this is fantastic new primitive because you now longer, you now no longer kind of have to maintain 15 different instances of your protocol, you can just act across all easy chains. And that makes operations easier and user experience better and they very much see that. So so far, yeah, we've, we've had only great feedback from DAPS. And the good thing is on the DAB side, integrations are not that heavy. So kind of if you want to retrofit your chain, it can be a larger lift depending on what your situation is like today.

But for Depps, it's a minor upgrade. I want to emphasize, I think the point that you're making, Frederique, is that this changes what it means to be a builder. It changes how apps need to be built. And there is, it's just a kind of just like a perspective shift, a philosophy shift of just like what makes an app an app when one app is built that instantaneously has seamless access to the state of all other apps on different chains,

there needs to be a kind of, you know, under this success scenario of the EEZ, which we all want, I definitely want, you guys absolutely want. Builders are going to have to think differently about what resources are available to them because all of a sudden the state of other chains

is something that's at their fingertips. That's been the whole vision of the United Chains of Ethereum, you know, since from Genesis, we've never been living under that context. But in the context of the EEZ, being a builder is going to have to be a little bit different. There's going to be more resources, more tools, more powers that an application has because it can access state on other chains. And this kind of brings, I guess this goes back actually, maybe we were living under this context. It was the Ethereum layer one back in like the pre-2020 era where, you know, the state of all things was available to the,

the fingertips of all other app builders. And I don't think there's been a generation of app builders that has been used to that kind of paradigm. Martin, what do you want to say here? No, exactly that. So people, or at least the previous generation was used to that state, that kind of everything was available and composable. And yeah, we are trying to get as close as possible to that feeling back.

So essentially there will just be a translation. So if you have an address on another chain, there will just be a translation of how you convert this address to a proxy address, so kind of a representation on the chain you are at. And then the promise is you can just call this proxy representation, as if it would live on your chain. And kind of everything behind the scenes is kind of then abstracted from you

or from the app. So, yeah, ideally it will not be, Yeah, that complicated and it works. It doesn't require apps to build or to build from scratch on you. I think that would be a terrible mistake. We have 10 years of smart contracts that are available and we want all of this to work with those contracts that are already out there. And to be fair, kind of like it fully does.

So kind of like even if you kind of if you want to do something on one chain, you want to kind of deposit something in Avey, borrow against it, use that liquidity. on a third chain, that still works even if Ava does nothing. Okay? So kind of the kind of, but what kind of what brings it to the next level is if Avey understands that kind of it has all of this at its fingertips and kind of that can make it even better. But even if daps do not adapt to this at all, which, which I mean they will, but kind of even if they wouldn't, it would still make the state of affairs immeasurably better than it is today.

Yeah. I think maybe there's one illustration that we can make to really drive this point home is like, say there's AVE chain. You know, the AVE the app is now AVE chain. There is no AVE app. And I want to, you know, put, I want to deposit like a thousand dollars into the Ave app and withdraw something. But my assets are on like a different chain. They're on the Ethereum layer one. I think in, correct me if I'm wrong, in the EEZ context, AVE can lock my assets on the Ethereum Layer 1. I can move money on the Ethereum Layer 1 and deposit it into the AVE contract on the Ethereum layer one. The AVE chain registers the state of $1,000 of deposited money, and I can get a withdraw from the Ave chain, which is on a different chain. And I think that's the

illustration of like, this is a new way to build for builders of recent generations where nothing all has to be in the same place. It can be spread out across the ecosystem, yet composable nonetheless. Is this correct? Absolutely, yeah. And first, this is correct, also saying kind of even in this setup,

even if you would have to kind of move tokens or that would also work within one transaction. So kind of theoretically both setups are possible that you keep your tokens there but still kind of borrow against them on this other chain or just within the same transaction, you move the tokens, lock them there,

borrow against them, and again, but do it all in one transaction. Very cool. Very cool. It feels like this unlocks a bunch of possibility. I hope that's the case.

Frederique Martin, I want this to work. This feels like not, this doesn't feel like a side quest. This feels like the main quest line of Ethereum. And so I'm behind you guys. I want to support you guys.

what can the listeners do to help move this effort forward? You know, we have listeners across the Ethereum ecosystem, as I'm sure you guys know, chains listen to this, application builders listen to bankless, users listen to bank lists. Who do we need support and help and buy-in from to help grow the EEZ? Who do you want to hear from? Yeah, absolutely. So kind of if you have a dab that can profit from this, be in touch with us.

So kind of the website is eZ.io. If you're an L2, same. if you're a user and you want a feedback on this, or you just want to look at our GitHub, eZ.org, this is where everything is at. You can also, if you are a well-resourced project, you can also contribute funding. So kind of we as noses have contributed funding.

So has the Ethereum Foundation, Octant, Titanus, considering contributing funding. So kind of it's very much a community project. kind of we initiated this as NOSS this together with the group around Jodi, who does, who builds ZISC, but it's, it's for everyone. It's kind of, we're building it because it needs to exist. So if you want to contribute to it in whichever way, we appreciate it. How does the EEC actually roll out? So when would I, when would it impact me? Is this, I don't feel like there's a go live date. That doesn't, doesn't, doesn't, doesn't,

seem like that makes sense. How does it actually come to be? No, to some extent there is. So we will, we will work on a new roll-up that is, yeah, kind of maximally kind of Ethereum, in a way is very similar to this native, native roll-up talk. So kind of it will have, there will be no, no sequencers or no, no, no one has a special role in this new roll-up other than

kind of Ethereum validators and Ethereum so that is at least meant to be a proof of or kind of first one chain that fully supports

is easy but then in parallel other chains and Nosis will be one of them will join so essentially there will be a moment when a chain

in some form needs to upgrade and in some form needs to upgrade their settlement mechanism or bridge mechanisms to enable those synchronous, yeah, synchronous composable transactions. And I would say the first chain that enables that, that will be kind of the launch of EZ.

And that's in the summer. So it's not kind of a multi-year project, kind of we're well underway, and it's coming very soon. Great, great, great, great, yeah. There's an old meme, an old gift that me and Ryan, Usa reference a lot where there was just like one guy at a concert dancing in a grassy field all by himself for a really long time. And then a second person comes and starts dancing. And

then there's two people dancing. And then a third person comes. And now there's three people dancing. And then everyone else looks around and starts to kind of get it. And then a fourth, a fifth, 10 more people, 20 more people come and everyone's dancing. And that's kind of what I want the future of the EEZ to be, is like, you know, first a few chains, buy-in, and then everyone else just understands that this is what we need to do. In a way, the analogy here is

that it was always one of my criticisms of the previous, or this L2 roadmap so far, that it wouldn't really create a network effect. So kind of this effect of, well, more people dancing makes it more attractive to dance with them. That wasn't really the case. So kind of if there's yet another L2 launched somewhere, that doesn't make, has not necessarily immediate impact on all other tools in a positive way.

And that equation changes here because, yeah, well, the more people dance, the more fun it is to join. That's right. That's right. That's right. Martin, Frederike, thank you so much for joining me on the show today. Thank you. Thank you for having us. Banklessation, you guys know the deal. Crypto is risky. You can lose what you put in. But nonetheless, we are headed west. This is the frontier. It's not for everyone. but we are glad you were with us on the bankless journey. Thanks a lot.