Barron's Streetwise - 3 Small Cap Picks. Plus, Balancing the Magnificent 7

Episode Date: December 1, 2023

Jack speaks with Alger fund manager Amy Zhang and answers a listener in “big tech purgatory.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices...

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Calling all sellers, Salesforce is hiring account executives to join us on the cutting edge of technology. Here, innovation isn't a buzzword. It's a way of life. You'll be solving customer challenges faster with agents, winning with purpose, and showing the world what AI was meant to be. Let's create the agent-first future together. Head to salesforce.com slash careers to learn more. The reason why small cap growth has been in a bear market for almost three years is mainly because we experienced the fastest and most furious rate hikes. So now, whether we pause or cut,
Starting point is 00:00:42 big picture is that we are at the end of the rate hiking cycle so the headwind is going to turn into a tailwind hello and welcome to the baron streetwise podcast i'm jack how the voice you just heard that's amy zhang she manages a variety of small and mid-cap funds for alger and in a moment she'll share a few of her favorite stocks. We'll also talk a bit about what to do about AI bloatphobia. That's the fear that a handful of giant tech companies are making up too large a percentage of your index fund. There's no pill for AI bloatphobia, but we will explore some, let's say, financial therapies. Listening in is our audio producer, Meta. Hi, Meta. Do the therapies include reflexology?
Starting point is 00:01:35 That's the one where, is that with needles, reflex, what is it now? Feet. Feet. It definitely includes feet. We'll come to it. How about we start with a listener question? Yeah, we have one from Michael. Hi, Jack. My name is Michael. I live in Bluffton, South Carolina. My question for you is where I can look for growth outside of big tech because I feel
Starting point is 00:02:00 like I'm living in a sort of big tech purgatory. For years, I've been told that the best way to invest is to put my family's money into a diversified ETF or an index fund, and that the best way to do that is to buy the S&P 500. The problem is, by doing that, I'm not really buying a diversified asset. I'm really buying the S&P 7 with a few hangers on, and that feels perilous after so long. Given that I'm in my early thirties and have a long time horizon, I've searched for alternative paths for growth. Unfortunately, value ETFs continue to be disappointing. Equal weighted S&P 500 funds
Starting point is 00:02:35 seem to be a way just to miss out on the magnificent sevens returns. I've been hearing that it's time for small cap ETFs to shine for years, but that doesn't seem to happen. If I go to growth focused ETFs, whether they're passively or actively managed, they all have most of the Magnificent Seven as their top holdings. Do I accept that this is the Magnificent Seven's world and I'm just living in it? Or can an investor with a long timeline like me confidently buy an ETF that avoids those stocks and still get growth? If so, where do I look? Thank you, Michael. And shout out to Bluffton, South Carolina, which bills itself as the heart of the low country. Although you say you feel like you're living
Starting point is 00:03:19 in big tech purgatory, and I can see what you mean. Those big seven tech companies, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Nvidia, Tesla, they continue to run ahead of the rest of the S&P 500. I saw a chart recently from Apollo, the private equity manager, it said the S&P 7, which is their term for the magnificent seven, they said it's up 80% so far this year, whereas the S&P 493, that's the rest of the index, is basically flat. It also said that the S&P Seven is priced at about 50 times earnings, which makes it as expensive as the Nifty 50 in 1972. Matter, that's the year I was born. Don't do that math in your head. It's also the year that the nifty 50 peak, these were a group of blue chip companies that investors came to believe
Starting point is 00:04:13 would just be kind of a good deal at, I guess, any valuation. They included names like Coca-Cola, McDonald's, Texas Instruments, IBM, Xerox, and Polaroid. Obviously mixed results since then for that group. Coca-Cola has done great. Polaroid, not so much. I'll tell you two interesting things about the Nifty 50. One is that they went on to do poorly for the rest of the 1970s. I guess because the starting point was pretty expensive. But two is that they have done all right since then for people who bought at the peak in 1972. And that's even considering that some of the companies fell out of relevance over the years. And I guess the lesson there is that if you buy good enough companies like Coca-Cola and McDonald's and you hold for a long, long time, even if you're paying lofty prices when you buy
Starting point is 00:05:02 them, you can still do okay in the long run. I really couldn't tell you if that's going to be true today of the S&P 7 or Magnificent 7, as you say. People are paying 36 times earnings for Microsoft, which seems ambitious, but could it work out well over the long term? Sure it could. 25 times earnings for Alphabet, 31 times for Apple. Amazon is up there at 68 times, but that's a company that is building quickly from what has historically been a lower base of profitability. We mentioned in a past episode about how free cash flow for all of these companies is rising quickly. The two names that stand out on the list as having a long way to go economically to justify those share
Starting point is 00:05:42 prices are Nvidia and Tesla, but we'll see. Okay, so Michael, you're essentially asking, how could you go about diversifying away from these seven stocks? But then you say value hasn't worked, the small caps haven't worked, so you don't want to do those. That's going to be tricky because what is the nature of the S&P seven? What's the nature of the weighting of the S&P 500 right now? It's dominated by large companies and it's dominated by growth companies. So if you wanted to counterbalance that somehow, you would have to have more of a weighting in value in smaller companies. And the fact that they've done poorly to me is not a reason to avoid them. In fact,
Starting point is 00:06:20 it might even be a reason to buy them. But it has been a long wait, as you say, for investors who've been told that those two groups of stocks are about to come around any minute now. Let me give you two answers that try to thread the needle for what you're talking about, which is diversifying away from those seven stocks without really going into small caps, without really going into value. One is a NASDAQ 100 equal weight ETF. There's one out there with the ticker symbol QQQE. We just talked on this podcast recently about buying a NASDAQ index ETF. I don't get it. I don't know why people would want to have stocks that trade on one particular venue as their investment
Starting point is 00:07:05 theme. But one reason might be that you want more tech exposure. The NASDAQ certainly has it. But with the equal weighting of this index, you don't get that dominance by that handful of big companies. So you're getting an index that still has 36% weighting in information technology. I'm not recommending that ETF. I'm just saying maybe that kind of does what you're thinking about doing. Another approach, but you have to have a
Starting point is 00:07:30 lot of money, is to go to a financial advisor that offers custom indexing. This is a service usually provided for, let's say, executives at companies that are members of the S&P 500. They might have compensation plans that leave them loaded up with their company shares, and they want to pursue indexing as a strategy, but they don't want to buy even more of their company's stock through their indexing strategy. So they might go to a financial advisor that can use individual stocks to mimic the performance of the index minus their company's stock. You could do that and just say that you want to mimic the performance of the S&P 493. I don't know, by the way, why there is not an S&P 493 ETF out there.
Starting point is 00:08:13 There seems to be an index ETF for everything under the sun. I know we've spoken in the past in this podcast about the meme ETF. The ticker, I think, was meme. That's from Roundhill Investments. And that popped up in response to people chasing after shares of GameStop and other meme stocks. I just saw an announcement that that ETF is closing this year. So that thing was kind of like a pop-up taco truck, financially speaking, in that it appeared and people put money into it and they followed a trading strategy and now it's going away. I don't know why you couldn't have a pop-up financial taco truck for the s&p 493 and see if people are into it maybe there will be one at some point meta what would it be called magnificent sevenless the leftovers the leftovers etf from pop-up advisors ticker meh with two h's
Starting point is 00:09:08 so michael your other choices are you could buy your own individual stocks or if you want to stick with indexing and you don't want to buy a value index and you don't want to buy a small cap index, I suppose you could buy a fundamental index. Do we all know what those are, Meta? Should I explain? Yeah, I think it's good to explain. It's basically, we've mentioned research affiliates, and that's one company that does it. You basically create an index where you weight it by something other than stock market value. You use some other factor. So some people call these factor ETFs, factor funds. Let me give an example. There's a fund called Invesco FTSE Raffi US 1000 ETF.
Starting point is 00:09:56 That's an atrocious name with way too many acronyms. Invesco is an investment company. FTSE stands for Financial Times Stock Exchange. RAFI is the company that developed the index that stands, I believe, for Research Affiliates Fundamental Indexes or Indexation. And then you've got US 1,000 or 1,000 companies in here, and it's an ETF. The ticker, that's what you need. It's PRF. PRF, like pretty run-on fund. Anyhow, that fund holds, like I said, 1,000 companies and it weights them according to four different measures of firm size that are not stock market value. And the four are
Starting point is 00:10:40 book value, cashflow, sales, and dividends. So these are four measures of economic value, and the index uses a blend of them to select the companies or to weight the companies. And that's a pretty easy to understand methodology. There's also a fun company out there called Dimensional Advisors, and their goal is to produce better returns in the overall stock market using academic research. They look for things that studies have shown to produce handsome returns over time. And the approach is flexible. It can change over time as new research comes out. I spoke recently with Gerard O'Reilly. He's a co-CEO and CIO at Dimensional. Here's Gerard on what the company does.
Starting point is 00:11:23 Our kind of goal, I would say, has always been each day can we build a more perfect portfolio? Each day can we curate a more perfect client experience? That's what we charge ourselves with every day. And in pursuit of that more perfect portfolio, it's can we actually get the returns that you see from academia? When the academic does an experiment using historical data, they might show small caps having higher returns than large caps, but can you accomplish that in real world investing?
Starting point is 00:11:53 And what we've been able to demonstrate over time is that by pursuit of that more perfect portfolio, or more perfect client experience, that we've been able to deliver the returns that are out there for markets are delivering that academics have been able to deliver the returns that are out there for markets that are delivering that academics have been able to identify. Thank you, Gerard. Two things I could tell you about Dimensional.
Starting point is 00:12:13 A few years ago, they launched some ETFs based on their processes, so it's become easier for individual investors to buy in. Also, Barron's each year publishes a ranking of fund families, and in its most recent ranking, that's early this year, Dimensional was listed at number 17 for the five-year ranking, but at number one for the one-year ranking, based on its performance in 2022. I'm reading from that story. It says, last year's volatile conditions fit right into the Austin, Texas-based firm's wheelhouse. Dimensional is known for its roots in academic research on factor investing, particularly involving value investing and its tendency to favor smaller
Starting point is 00:12:56 companies that are highly profitable. As such, the firm sidestepped the meltdown in mega cap growth names and companies with few, if any, profits. Okay, so Michael, that's dimensional fund advisors and research affiliates. Those are two ways to go about factor investing or fundamental based investing, which is it exists somewhere in the middle between pure index investing and active management. It's a way to go about being more selective on stocks, but with a process rather than full-on stock picking. So those are some other ways for you to get out of, what was it called again?
Starting point is 00:13:33 Meta big tech purgatory. Yeah, that's what Michael called it. Yeah. I want you to get out of big tech purgatory and into... Small cap value limbo. No, definitely not. Large cap value limbo. No, definitely not. Large cap value abyss. No, that's even worse.
Starting point is 00:13:50 I was going to say balanced allocation paradise. Yeah, that sounds better. Coming up after the break, we'll speak with Amy Zhang of Alger about small cap stocks. Welcome back. Let's get to some small cap stock picks. I had a chance recently to speak with Amy Zhang. She manages small and mid cap funds for Alger let's play part of that conversation now I heard recently from a listener who said what do I do about this heavy waiting in these big seven tech stocks and the SP 500 how do I diversify away from that and he says I know you're gonna save value stocks for
Starting point is 00:14:39 small cap stocks but people have been saying that forever and when are they gonna come around so I wonder what are your thoughts on that? How attractive do small caps look right now? And do you have any sense of when their day is coming, when they're going to begin, you know, shining versus large caps? Right. That's an excellent question. I think small cap is, small cap rose particularly is extremely attractive just in terms of valuation. The S&P 600 small cap growth is trading roughly as of now around 22% discount to S&P 500. So, you know, historically in the last 20 years years, it's been trading at, on average, like a premium about 14%. So you can see, you know, the valuation gap is so wide that a truck can drive through it.
Starting point is 00:15:36 And we've already seen some reversion to mean, right, just in November. because the reason why small cap growth has been in a bear market for almost three years is mainly because of we experienced the fastest and most furious rate hikes right so now whether we pause or cut but no matter what the big picture is that we are at the end of the rate hiking cycle. So the headwind is going to turn into a tailwind going forward, I think. The rate hikes have been a headwind. Is that because that an investor might worry, well, you know, smaller companies don't have the same levers to pull as large companies when it comes to raising capital or refinancing debt, and they might have a more difficult time refinancing their debt? What is it that you think has been more of a headwind for these small caps and small cap growth stocks with the rising rates? When people think about small cap, right, and they just immediately
Starting point is 00:16:36 associate with risk, and then they feel like, you know, recession. Recession is about like waiting for Godot, right? We've been talking about for so long. And I think just generally, people's perception sometimes is a bit misguided is all small caps are risky, and they are highly levered. And they cannot control their own destiny. They're going to have a tougher time in the higher for longer, you know, the interest rating environment. But I think for small cap growth, especially at Alger, you know, we focus a lot of companies that, you know, very science-based, you know, innovation-driven, they're very capital-light, strong balance sheet, and they can control their own destiny because they usually have something truly differentiated. They're very small, love small numbers, right? That's one of the key
Starting point is 00:17:24 reasons I love small cap, that they can gain a lot of market share in a large expanding market. And regardless of the economic cycle, right, they actually can do well. So that's a difference between small cap versus small cap value. But I think this year has been, or even last year, you know, broad brush, you know, people sort of just want to wait for the recession to be over to invest in small cap. But I think it's turning around a little bit because, again, it's highly correlated to rates and the rates were, you know, at the peak or close to peak. So you could see the catch up is already happening. And we think there'll be more catch up going forward. Earlier, you made a reference to Waiting for Godot when you talked about the recession.
Starting point is 00:18:09 I think I get the reference. That's a play about people who are waiting around for someone who doesn't show up. I saw a version of that play. It had John Goodman in it in Broadway. And I sat pretty close to the front. He has a very loud voice when you sit close to him like that. I don't remember all the details of the play, but I've got that right. People are waiting for it, and it doesn't come. Is that the idea? Yeah, it's one of my favorite plays. I watched it
Starting point is 00:18:32 in middle school in Shanghai, actually, you know, where I grew up. So I feel like it's waiting for Godot, right? Because we talk about recession forever. And a lot of it, I think, is machine driven in terms of the volatility of small cap. But I think this is a great time to find those gems in the rubble, so to speak. How do you find the best small cap growth stocks? What kinds of attributes are you looking for? And when you go looking for those attributes, what parts of the market do you find that your search is bringing you to again and again? You know, I think at the core of what we do is identify investing in exceptional small companies that have the potential to become exceptional large companies. Most of small
Starting point is 00:19:18 companies are junkie, right? They don't make it to the end. And so we look for a company that can really sustain transactions and mutual benefits. So how do they do that in a durable, sustainable way? And they usually will need to have very, you know, strong and wide moat, you know, that typically those companies are science based. And that lead us to, you know, sort of healthcare and technology that is truly innovation driven, like the product can disrupt or transform a market because of a lot of small numbers. Usually, you know, we define smallness in terms of revenue, which is also very unique from our peers, because I think revenue is a better
Starting point is 00:19:56 indication of size and market cap. So we typically would invest in company with 500 million or less at initial point of investment. So it's really about the company gaining market share, because they're truly differentiated in the larger growing market. And a lot of times they go from one product to a platform of products, you know, they have both unit growth and expansion wallet shares. But at the core, you know, we pay a lot of attention to the competitive advantage of a company and only through a strong and wide mode that we believe that company can sustain their revenue and profitability growth over the long term. Of course, management is very important to a small company. You have limited resources. So how to allocate capital and balance, and balance profitability and growth is extremely
Starting point is 00:20:47 important. Can I ask you for some examples of stocks that you like? What are your favorites right now within your portfolio? Well, we have a lot of companies, but maybe we can illustrate one of our top positions, a long-term holding is called Proz Holdings. The ticker is PRO. It's a software SaaS company that specialize in price optimization. SaaS meaning software as a service, meaning that they're doing some sort of recurring billing, like a subscription service for what they do. Is that the idea?
Starting point is 00:21:24 Yes, exactly. Over 80% of revenue is recurring. But what is really special about pros is that they've had like over 30 years of utilizing AI and machine learning platforms, both generative and predictive AI to turn data into actionable information for insights for the sellers. And that's a common theme I want to say, you know, we always want to invest in companies, especially in the tech area, a company can turn data into actionable insights for their customer and really address the pain points for their customers. And for pros, for a small company, they spend a lot on their R&D. They spend, you know, 25 to 30% of their revenue in their R&D, and now they're reaping the rewards of that.
Starting point is 00:22:10 And in terms of fundamentals, the company is now at the inflection point of becoming cash flow positive. So we really believe that they are really well positioned for accelerated growth and the margin expansion in the years to come. Let me ask you about that. That's a difficult thing for investors to figure out. Investors get used to saying, okay, this company is 15 times earnings, this company is 25 times earnings, what have you. But when you've got one of these smaller companies, which as you say, this is a company that has been loss making in past years. It is expected to begin turning a profit and generating free cash from this year and then a rising amount going forward.
Starting point is 00:22:52 So what do you look at to figure out whether you're getting a good deal? Are you projecting those free cash flows out into the future? Yeah, that's an excellent question because I think the key difference between small cap versus large cap is small cap, a lot of it's sort of like, you got to see things under the hood, right? So PE is usually not a good measure, because especially for SaaS companies, right? Like,
Starting point is 00:23:16 you know, the E is usually depressed. So it's really more about like knowing the company well, I think, you know, and for pros, they would have been profitable much sooner, but COVID, you know, disrupted their growth trajectory, right? Because they started in the airline industry, right, like doing the price optimization, real time predictive analysis for airlines, and then they've been expanding to other verticals. Now, finally, they're successful, but because of COVID, their growth was derailed. So sometimes, you know, I think for a small company like that, I really believe understanding reduces risk. Okay, so that's Proz Holdings. What other stocks do you like? You know, we've been long-term holders of Wingstop as well.
Starting point is 00:23:59 We've owned it for over seven years. Now, that's a company I think I can get my head around. You said Wingstop. That is a sports bar, but it's kind of like a family atmosphere. I'm not sure. I feel like Wingstop is more for takeouts. It's sort of like you watch Superbowl, you will order Wingstop. Oh, you know what? I got my wing restaurants confused. I'm sorry. I've never had the pleasure of taking out wings from there. What makes that business special? I really feel Wingstop is like a technology company that sells chicken wings because they're very innovative, right? Their aspiration is to become 100% digital. Like every transaction will
Starting point is 00:24:37 be digitized. And now they're well in their way because they're already about 70% transaction digitized. And it's also a great business model. Most of the business is franchised. They have unique economics, which leads to the highest cash on cash return, about 60%, which is the highest in restaurant industry. So they have a rare combination of durable and strong unit growth and same store growth. We think, you know, they still have a long, long wait for growth. Now they have a little over 2000 restaurant, we think they can grow to 7000 restaurants, and largely due to, you know, a lot of international expansion. So this is really a kind of company to exemplify what we look for as a long-term compounder. Have you tried the wings there?
Starting point is 00:25:27 Yeah, absolutely. We order takeouts, and they have all sorts of flavors, and they also expanded the menu as chicken sandwiches. Fantastic. So I think this is a great example of small-cap consumer company that really has durable and sustainable revenue and profitability growth. I'm getting a little hungry.
Starting point is 00:25:48 What about one more stock that you like? Yeah, of course. One of our other large holding is Afolio. Afolio is also a cloud-based software company that really focuses on the property management vertical. What's the ticker on that one? APPF. Appfolio.
Starting point is 00:26:06 Got it. So, you know, we always want to invest in a company that can address the pain point for customers, right? Like the property management industry is very paper-based. So they really provide a system of record to automate a lot of business processes and really cut down a lot of costs and improve efficiency and productivity for their customers. And they're very small companies still, but its addressable market is really large and growing because the digitization of real estate management is still in its early innings. And then also they have a significant leadership of using AI in the space. So it's very important, I think, to invest in companies who will be beneficiaries, whether
Starting point is 00:26:50 it's user or enabler of AI, because I think AI is truly disruptive and transformative. And the company itself that really optimized their cost structures. They also invest a lot in R&D in the past years are coming to fruition. So we're expecting to see a significant, you know, margin expansion going forward. And when you say real estate software, I'm looking at the website here. I'm trying to think, what do you need your software to do if you have a lot of real estate? They list maintenance, they list accounting, staffing. I suppose you use this to screen potential tenants, maybe to collect rent from tenants. So there's a lot going on here in this suite of software.
Starting point is 00:27:31 Yeah, and they're expanding their software, right? So initially, well, just like you said, it's back office reporting and accounting, right? And they also get into payment. But over the years, they really expand it. So we always look for both depth and breadth in our companies. Only through that they can truly grow. I think they're really in a very sweet spot doing that. Thank you, Amy and Gerard and Michael. And thank you all for listening. Meta Lutzoff is our producer.
Starting point is 00:28:02 Meta, you might not be here next week you might not be here for a little while should I give a hint? sure, give a hint double babies have I said too much? they'll never guess incoming babies
Starting point is 00:28:21 well it's very exciting. Congratulations. And we can't wait to hear more. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen. If you listen on Apple, you can write a review. My voice went up there like I'm going to say something else, but I think I'm out of things to say. That's kind of it, right? Going to bring the voice down now. Ready?
Starting point is 00:28:41 Thanks and see you next week. See you next week. See you next week. That feels very satisfying.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.