Behind the Bastards - CZM Rewind: How Sam Bankman-Fried Conned the Crypto World & The Sam Bankman-Fried Update
Episode Date: November 25, 2025Part One: Robert sits down with Jamie Loftus to talk about the collapse of one of the great financial criminals of our time. Original Air Date: 11.22.22 Part Two: Everyone's favorite crypto conman is ...back behind bars! Robert sits down with Jamie Loftus to talk about his plans to buy an island and make he and his friends living gods. Original Air Date: 8.15.23See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is an I-Heart podcast, Guaranteed Human.
On this week's episode of Next Chapter, I, T.D. Jake, sit down with Denzel Washington,
a two-time Academy Award-winning actor and cultural icon for a conversation about change, identity, and the moment everything shifted.
I mean, I don't take any credit for it. It's nothing I did as special.
know, then knocked down a few pegs and recognize it, but I just didn't put me first.
I just put God first, and he's carried me.
Whether you're rebuilding, reimagining, or just trying to hold it together, this one will
speak to you.
Listen to the next chapter podcast on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get
your podcast.
new episodes drop weekly.
Don't miss one of them.
What up, y'all?
It's your boy, Kevin on stage.
I want to tell you about my new podcast called Not My Best Moment,
where I talk to artists, athletes, entertainers, creators, friends,
people I admire who had massive success about their massive failures.
What did they mess up on?
What is their heartbreak?
And what did they learn from it?
I got judged horribly.
The judges were like, you're trash.
I don't know how you got on the show.
Check out Not My Best Moment with me kept on stage on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, YouTube, or wherever you get your podcast.
On the podcast health stuff, we are tackling all the health questions that keep you up at night.
I'm Dr. Priyankawali, a double board certified physician.
And I'm Hurricane de Bolu, a comedian and someone who once Googled, do I have scurvy at 3 a.m.
And on our show, we're talking about health in a different way, like our episode where we look at diabetes.
In the United States, I mean, 50% of Americans,
are pre-diabetic.
How preventable is type 2?
Extremely.
Listen to health stuff on the IHeart Radio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
The Big Take podcast from Bloomberg News
keeps you on top of the biggest stories of the day.
My fellow Americans, this is Liberation Day.
Stories that move markets.
Chair Powell opened the door to this first interest rate cut.
Impact politics, change businesses.
This is a really,
stunning development for the AI world and how you think about your bottom line.
Listen to the big take from Bloomberg News every weekday afternoon on the IHeart
radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
CallZone Media.
Ah, God is dead and you, Jamie Loftus, have killed him.
I did it.
I finally did it.
You did it.
You did it.
No, God was a hymn.
And Jamie killed him.
Hammer to the back of the head.
And people are going to be critical at that.
But, you know, you don't know my story.
And in my six-part mini-series in which I'm played by Amanda Seafried,
I think you're going to start to see my side of the story.
Courageous.
I think I'm definitely not going to jail for what I did.
That's good.
Unlike founder of Theranos Elizabeth Holmes, who we just found out has been sentenced to 11.25 years in prison.
I'm kind of like
Yeah I have mixed like
I have mixed feelings because it's like
People don't go
First of all
The prison industrial complex in general
No
It doesn't make anyone better
To the extent that there's value in the present day
And putting people in prison
It's people who are like a severe ongoing danger
And I don't see this making anything better
Like at the same time
I hate her so I don't
I'm not gonna
She's horrible
It's not going to be the top injustice I, I rue today.
I do kind of like that her, after being exposed as an unrepentant criminal,
she's like, oh, I think I'm just going to kind of be like a normie girl for a while.
And I'm going to go to Coachella with my new boyfriend.
Yeah.
And you're like, Liz, it's too late.
It's too late for that, Liz.
You defrauded people with a fake medical device that led folks to see, to get treatment for things they didn't have.
and ignore illness as they did, which is bad.
You got caught before too many bodies hit the floor, but that would have stopped you.
But you didn't really care.
You applied Steve Jobs logic to something that was not just a silly box to keep in your pocket.
Oh, Lizzie.
Lizzie.
You know, Lizzie, Lizzie's fucked is what we learned.
Also putting her in prison for, you know, probably nine years when you consider all of the other things is like,
not going to help anything.
It'll just mean that that kid she has grows up without a mom for nine years, and that's not
going to make the world better.
It's like, it's a huge moment for many things can be true at once, and less having to hold
all of those truths and still record an episode of Behind the Bastards.
Can I tell you about a legal case?
This actually will be relevant to the episode, but yes, please, please.
Wait, really?
Yes.
Okay, this is definitely not going to be relevant.
So let's pivot.
it. I was a legal case I was thinking about today was the Beanie Baby's billionaire when he
was taken to court in 2013 for holding money in a Swiss bank account. He, so it was like a tax
illegal. Oh, a tax evasion. Tax evasion charge. So he was up for as many as five years in
prison for tax evasion. Then he got off with, I mean, he's a billionaire. He's never going to
suffer a consequence, right? But like, he, uh, ended up getting a two years of probation on the
ground that it had been too publicly humiliating. So he didn't have to get to go to jail because he
was awesome. So funny. It was so embarrassing that he didn't have to go to jail. What?
That's absolutely fucking weird. Anyways. I'm going to, I'm going to see how far this goes by committing
murder and then having my pants fall down and like, well, judge, look, yes, I did stab that.
man 47 times but then everybody saw my underpants yeah I peepied myself so I feel like that
yeah can we can we just zero this one out man I love the Beanie Baby's story so much I'm surrounded
by my beans feeling safe wow that's good you do literally have one on your shoulder right now yeah
paddy the platy just just like I have this rifle next to me I think that we both have our comfort
objects at the ready. That's right. So, Jamie, speaking of Elizabeth Holmes, because the person we're
talking about today is going to be the next story like that. By this time next year, there probably
is going to be an HBO documentary about this guy. Oh, God. Maybe Taylor, Taylor Kitch could
probably play him, actually, if he wanted to really, like, round that out. Taylor Kitch played
hot David Koresh in the Waco show. Oh, Jay walked into that one. I'm so prepared.
Yeah, they'd have to give him like a belly suit or something.
That's not anti-fat.
I'm just being accurate.
But he could do it.
I'm pissed.
Maybe that is, yeah.
I don't want to see this man ever again.
No, I'm mad.
Taylor Kitch, you don't want to see Taylor Kitsch again?
No.
You don't want to see those cum gutters again?
Unbelievable.
God damn it, Robert.
There's plenty of, in this town, Robert, there's a million cum gutters.
I don't need those.
I don't need those in home.
Oh, that, that is true.
But anyway.
Come runs through the street.
That's, that, that is.
That is true of Los Angeles and no other city.
Today, we are talking about a guy who absolutely never comes.
Sam Bankman-Fried.
Do you know this guy?
Do you know this guy?
I don't know this guy.
You don't know this guy.
You don't know this guy.
Have you caught any news in the last week about how, like, a massive cryptocurrency exchange has collapsed plummeting all of the...
I did hear about that.
This is that guy.
Oh, my.
This is the guy with his, like, polyamorous sex ring that was running a big cryptocurrency.
Bank in the Bahamas and it all fell apart.
Now billions of dollars are gone.
You've lost me again.
Oh, great.
Okay.
Well, I'll try to, this is still breaking.
Okay.
We are, because this is a Thanksgiving week episode, we only do one episode on Thanksgiving.
I needed a single one.
So I just want to give everyone background on this guy.
We may come back to this story because there's a lot we don't fully understand about how he did what he did and the degree to which.
But the gist of this is that this guy, this guy.
ran a trading service called Alameda Research and a crypto exchange. An exchange is basically like
a bank, right? It's a cross between a bank and like a trading platform called FTX, which was
one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the world and was also considered by most people
to be the most stable and like ethical and legitimate, right? People who are just kind of on the
outside looking at. When everything collapsed earlier this year, right? You remember that? We had that big
No, I was engaged in that.
It's just that I get a lot of my news from journalists on Twitter, and they've been
busy this week.
Yes.
So when crypto, like, fell apart, when a lot of crypto fell apart earlier this year and, like,
a bunch of places went under, FTX was one of the ones that stayed stable and actually
were buying up a bunch of, like, failing crypto companies to try to, like, prop up the industry.
They just collapsed and, like, the value of all, everything has been plummeting for the last
several days it's a big disaster it is very like yeah in in in as in words that will annoy me
as little as possible can you explain why fts remains solvent and other it is not solvent oh now
why it did it outlast oh because they lied um so they were they were operating the short end of
how to describe it and and we may there will be more details to come but at present it seems fair to say
that it was a giant Ponzi scheme
where they were they were taking in money
promising unreasonable returns
using other investor money
to gamble on stuff to try to provide anyway
and it worked well the other crypto guys
they were dishonest
yeah it is it is very likely
what differentiates this is the scale
because this is very likely a financial crime
on the level of what Bernie Madoff did
we are talking in the 10 to 20 billion dollars stolen
holy cow a lot
of money. This is a serious financial crime.
I'm going in on this pretty cold, so I'm listening.
So the other kind of mass of, like, touchstone of this is that it has led to a class action
lawsuit against Larry David, Shaquille O'Neal, Tom Brady, and a number of celebrities
who were all in a Super Bowl ad for FTX.
I remember that ad. That was so embarrassing for my man, Larry.
Yeah. So the lawsuit is basically saying this was a high dollar Ponzi scheme and you guys were using your name recognition to sell unregistered securities, which they were. Which they were. Which they definitely were.
Sorry, I just want to circle back to Shaquille. Shaquille O'Neal will put his name on anything to the point where to the point where I worked at Ahana Hayride this year, which we don't talk about because.
It was a bad idea.
But the rival...
I told Sophie that.
What?
You told her it was a bad idea?
I told her was a bad idea.
Well, guess what I'm alive, bitch.
Bitch, I lived.
I supported it.
I lived to tell the tale.
It's very unclear who is right in the side of should I work at a haunted hayride or not.
I still haven't really landed on an answer.
Point being, our closest rival haunted hayride-wise was Shacktoberfest.
It was a shack-themed haunted hayride.
attraction in which the only
Shaq-related thing was a
gigantic inflatable Frankenstein
that looked like Shaq, which did sound awesome.
That sounds actually like the best time
anyone's ever had.
Shack will put his name on anything, including
crypto and Halloween.
He sure will.
What a king.
Probably not. I'm sure there's horrible
things about Shaq that have come out. That seems
almost unavoidable. Anyway,
Sam Bankman-Fried is the guy
behind this gigantic financial
crime that is still unraveling as we do this
episode. And I want to talk about, less about what happened on the exchange, because none of us
want to talk about how somebody carries out the nuts and bolts of a cryptocurrency scam.
But I want to talk about the social elements of the scam. I want to talk about how he conned the
media, how he conned celebrities and how he conned regulators. And I just want to talk about also
the way some of these people talked and wrote about him. Because there's a lot, about, I don't
A week or so ago, we did an episode on The Daily Show we do what could happen here about ethical altruism, which is in brief a theory that like the instead of trying to help people just because they need help, you should only help people after you consider the way to help people that is like the absolute most beneficial way for like the least amount of effort.
It's utilitarianism, right?
How can I do the greatest good with the least resources and whatnot?
amount of yeah and it's it's the way a lot of these like it in it's merged with this kind of
thinking towards what billionaire types call long termism and the gist of this is like it's not
worthwhile for me to do stuff like pay taxes to have a society or guarantee like universal
health care instead um i should make instead the most ethical thing that i should do is make
as much money as i personally can and then put that money into things that i believe will save
the world like research to stop ai's from killing everyone and getting to mars and shit it's
It's a way for billionaires.
It's a way for billionaires and the other mega-rich to justify, like, continuing to do exactly
what they want and feel like they're saving the world.
Anyway, Sam Bankman-Fried.
Do you know what the Beanie Babies billionaire did to improve the world?
He made a lot of Beanie Babies?
And then he bought the Four Seasons Hotel and kept making Beanie Babies.
He didn't do shit.
That's, well, you know, that's, I'm fine with that compared to these guys.
Because they're all doing the Elon Musk thing where they're pretending.
Sam Bankman-Fried is one of these guys.
And we're going to get into that.
But we did this episode on It Could Happen Here, where he was kind of a tangential character
in this very unsettling and insidious movement that is behind guys like Elon Musk who are
claiming to be saving the world while just fucking over people.
And then, like, four days after it came out, his entire life unraveled and his fortune
disappeared overnight because he was a giant con artist.
What a treat.
It's very funny.
So that's why we're talking about him right now.
Yeah, he's like 30 years old.
and looks like Mark Zuckerberg and David
Dobrick's love child. He's
30 years old. I feel great
about myself right now. He looks like he looks like he was a Mark Zuckerberg and
David Dobrick's love child. Look, I
shouldn't call anyone a schlub, but he
looks like a schlub. I forget
what David Doebrook looked like because my
brain protects myself.
Respectfully.
I understand. Two villains. Two villains love
child. Yeah. Anyway,
so I
uh, yeah, Sam Bankman-Fried
was born in 1992.
on the campus of Stanford University,
continuing a long and proud tradition
of absolutely nothing good
ever coming from that hellhole.
His parents are both extremely prominent Stanford professors.
His mother, Barbara, is a lawyer
who clerked for the Second Circuit Court
and graduated from Harvard.
She founded Mind the Gap,
a somewhat shady and mysterious democratic fundraising group.
I think it's shady in that people don't exactly know
where all the money comes from
or like what their goals are.
Yeah, that sounds shady.
Yeah, yeah.
She also pinned an essay in 2013 that the right wing is going nuts about because she was basically arguing that, like, good and evil are less a factor in what people do than environmental factors and all that stuff.
Like, when people do things that are bad, it's more often a product of their invite.
It was kind of a, oh, God, what's that fucking psychologist?
It was like a Skinner type argument where it's like, well, if people have bad inputs in their youth, then that's going to determine.
Anyway, I think that's funny given what happens.
I'm going to guess she sucks at what she sucks.
And so does his dad, Joseph Bankman.
Oh, good.
Joseph is also a lawyer. He is a graduate from Yale.
vote after heavy lobbying from Intuit, a tax prep, prep software company.
One vote.
No shit.
Yeah, it kind of is, it's total bullshit because stuff, it's the thing everybody agrees
with on paper, but nobody will actually fight the tax prep companies, which is like,
hey, the IRS, like, knows more or less what I make and like knows more or less what I owe.
Why don't I just get a thing from them?
Why do I have to go through this?
Like, anyway.
There's no need.
But it's like, that's the only-
Other countries do it that way.
We don't, though.
Right, well, because there has to be a convoluted system that's expensive and where they can charge you if you make the tiniest mistake because you can't read size one font.
Well, and more to the point, because I don't actually think the IRS is advocating to keep it a pain in the ass.
I think it's these tax prep companies because they have an entire industry based on charging people to do the thing that they have to do to avoid going to fucking prison.
Anyway, I said he's an asshole, and I'm sure he is, but he was right about this, and I don't know what to say about that.
Like all of us, Joseph is also a podcaster.
He is the host of the co-host of the Stanford Legal Podcast.
Oh, insufferable times, too.
And he's a nerd.
If it wasn't the holiday season and I wasn't like getting ready for friends and family and all that good stuff, I would have listened to his podcast, and we would probably be making fun of him.
but you can do that on your own.
Oh, my goodness.
I believe in you.
Isn't it, doesn't it feel so horrible when you think of how many people do what we do,
but they're the worst person you've ever heard of?
It's so sad.
It's embarrassing.
Yeah.
It's like, I don't know.
I avoid self-identifying as a podcaster as it is.
It's still not a system.
But then on top of that, they're like, oh, like what, like, what I mean, you know,
the only, you know, the only thing that I can compare it to is like,
when I started making a living as a writer 15 years ago and I would say that at like a at like a
party or something someone asked like well what do you do and I'm like well I'm a writer and like four
other people would say yeah me too uh and then you wind up listening to everybody's pitches for their
novels that they're never going to finish um oh it's so eventually I just started lying and saying
that I still worked at special ed well I like I mean it's the same thing with like if you say you're a comedian
in a party, you're about to have a
life. No, never, never identify
as a comedian in public. Oh, me too.
Do you, and I've done one whole
open mic, and my joke
was very offensive. And isn't
a comedian's job to push boundaries
and be a, oh, tell me
your joke. You know how Lenny Bruce
read that list of curse words?
Well, I just do that with slurs. Here, let me
show you. Yeah, you're like, yeah,
like, Lane Bruce was
not funny in that period
of his career, even a little.
Anyways, our jobs are embarrassing, is what I'm saying.
Anyway, our jobs are indeed embarrassing.
So as you might guess from all of that, Sam was born into what amounts to America's, like, liberal aristocracy.
He is a fucking coastal elite, right?
This kid grows up on the Stanford campus to Stanford professors.
One of his aunts teaches at Columbia University is, like, a professor there.
Oh, so he's like...
He has close family connections to employees at Yale and at...
Harvard as well as Stanford like his parents both go to Harvard I think he's a little Kennedy he is a
yeah he's he's he's that he is as yeah you do not get much more of a rarefied like intellectual air
he's wearing he's wearing linens around this is how I think about yes this is this is a child who
at age eight has strong opinions on a manual Kant um which again will a cheer for him at the table
no oh we're about to get into that Jamie love this I just had a I just had a
vision of a child sitting at like a holiday dinner and saying derivative and then someone
going oh that's amazing wow he is really coming along isn't he yeah this is a little kid that
when he like sits down at the doctor's office pulls out a fucking i don't know derrida or something
book just just so you know just so you know he knows fancy philosophers yeah god damn it
board book so his parents and his raised him and his brother to be utilitarians uh one of the
articles about them I was raised to be into SpongeBob. Okay. Yeah, I was I was raised to
hassle cows in our back 40. His parents, nights, so this article notes that nights around the
family dinner table often focused around debates about how to do the greatest good for the
greatest number of people. In later interviews with, I'm going to get to this guy in a second,
the absolute Dick writingist journalist to ever ride Dick. Sam would claim that his most
formative moment came at age 12 when he was weighing arguments around the abortion debate.
So, first off, no.
Hold on.
No.
No, because not only no, because not only no, also like in the context of like, where would he have been doing this?
I'm guessing it like around the family table or when they have the all, you know, everybody's got their brandy and he's drinking some sort of fucking tea that's insane.
sufferable. And they're all talking about people's rights as if it's like a fun intellectual problem,
like how to fix an engine. Because for them it is. Because wherever they land, the rules aren't
going to apply to them anyways. Where does he fall? Where does you fall in the debate? That's a great
question. So I'm going to quote now from an article previously published by Sequoia Capital and
written by Adam Fisher, who should never be allowed to lift this article down. When I say the dick
writingist like fucking PR
flack journal. It's on it's
shameful.
Quote,
a rights based theorist might argue that there aren't
really any discontinuous differences as a fetus
becomes a child. And thus fetus murder is
essentially child murder. The utilitarian argument
compares the consequences of each. The loss of
an actual child's life, a life in which a great
deal of parental and societal resources have been
invested, is much more consequential than the loss of a
potential life in utero. And thus to a
utilitarian, abortion looks more like birth control than like murder.
SBF, that's what they always call him, the kid, Sam.
SBF's application of utilitarianism helped him resolve some nagging doubts he had about
the ethics of abortion and made him feel comfortable being pro-choice, as his
friend's family and peers were.
He saw the essential rightness of his philosophical faith.
So that's very fucked up.
That is so deep, like, the term choice is used at the very in there, but it's clear that
like he's not thinking about this in terms of like the actual value of human bodily autonomy
that does not weigh into utilitarian calculus for him whatsoever no that is to quote my friend
robert no no no and again even like look i i i shit reflexively sometimes on utilitarianism not
because of the inherent value or disvalue of thinking that way but about the way it gets talked about
by these people but like if you're actually a utilitarian and you care about the greatest good
for the greatest number of people then bodily autonomy should factor into that right like human
bodily autonomy is should be hugely important to you yes but no that's not logical all that matters
is like well how many if you've if if less resources than this have been invested in the fetus
then it's not a person so abortion makes that's fucking bullshit logic fuck you're doing too much math
Stop.
This isn't a math problem, Sam.
Like, this is not a fucking math problem.
Not everything's a goddamn math problem.
Robert, he won't listen to you unless you call him SBF.
And I was like, why is Robert talking about sunscreen?
SBAF?
Yeah, we'll get that.
They all call him fucking SBF.
And I hate it, but also as this went on, I started using it more and more because
it's a pain in the ass to type his whole fucking last name out.
All right.
Look, this is one where I'm not going to give him a pass, but I get it.
If you write about this fucker a lot, it does make it easier.
So, anyway, all of this is very bad.
But you know what's not bad, Jamie?
Well, the products and services to support this podcast.
No, that's not true.
They are.
That's, well, that might be true.
Hold on.
I just ran a quick check on that, and you can't guarantee that even 1%.
But what about the greatest good for the greatest number of people?
And given that I'm a people, so it works out pretty well.
It works out very well for me.
I think that if you actually have more
advertising revenue, you will actually
build a really fast train like you've
been promising me you would.
Yeah, I'm going to build the hyperloop.
Yeah, yeah.
And you've been saying that.
I'm going to promise you one thing.
It's going to kill a hell of a lot more people
than that Simpsons Monorail did.
And I'm going to, and look,
not everyone is going to hold you to task for that,
but I am.
Thank you, Jamie.
Thank you for keeping me honest.
and ensuring that we really make a memorable disaster.
Look, I'm available anytime I'm not visiting my friend Liz in jail.
A decade ago, I was on the trail of one of the country's most elusive serial killers,
but it wasn't until 2023 when he was finally caught.
The answers were there, hidden in plain sight.
So why did it take so long to catch him?
I'm Josh Zeman, and this is Monster, hunting.
the Long Island serial killer, the investigation into the most notorious killer in New York since
the son of Sam, available now. Listen for free on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, wherever you get your
podcasts. What up y'all? It's your boy, Kevin on stage. I want to tell you about my new podcast called Not
My Best Month, where I talk to artists, athletes, entertainers, creators, friends, people I admire
who had massive success about their massive failures. What do they mess?
up on. What is their heartbreak? And what did they learn from it? I got judged horribly. The judges
were like, you're trash. I don't know how you got on the show. Boo. Somebody had tomatoes.
I'm kidding. But if they had tomatoes, they would have thrown the tomatoes. Let's be honest.
We've all had those moments we'd rather forget. We bumped our head. We made a mistake.
The deal fell through. We're embarrassed. We failed. But this podcast is about that and how we made
through. So when they sat me down, they were kind of like, we got into the small talk and they were
just like, so what do you got? What? What ideas? And I was like, oh, no. What? Check out not my best
moment with me, Kevin on stage on the Iheart radio app, Apple podcast, YouTube, or wherever you get your
podcast. I'm Robert Smith. This is Jacob Goldstein. And we used to host a show called Planet Money.
And now we're back making this new podcast called Business History about the best ideas and people and
businesses in history and some of the worst people, horrible ideas and destructive companies
in the history of business. Having a genius idea without a need for it is nothing. It's like not having
it at all. It's a very simple, elegant lesson. Make something people want. First episode,
how Southwest Airlines use cheap seats and free whiskey to fight its way into the airline
business. The most Texas story ever. There's a lot of mavericks in that story. We're going to have
Mavericks on the show. We have plenty of robber barons. So many robber barons. And you know
what? They're not all bad. And we'll talk about some of the classic great moments of famous
business geniuses, along with some of the darker moments that often get overlooked. Like Thomas Edison
and the electric chair. Listen to business history on the iHeart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever
you get your podcast. Hey there, Dr. Jesse Mills here. I'm the director of the men's clinic at
UCLA Health. And I want to tell you about my new podcast calls.
the mailroom. And I'm Jordan, the show's producer. And like a lot of guys, I haven't been to
the doctor in many years. I'll be asking the questions we probably should be asking, but aren't.
Because guys usually don't go to the doctor unless a piece of their face is hanging off or they've
broken a bone. Depends which bone. Well, that's true. Every week, we're breaking down the unique
world of men's health, from testosterone and fitness to diets and fertility and things that happen
in the bedroom. You mean sleep? Yeah, something like that, Jordan.
We'll talk science without the jargon and get you real answers to the stuff you actually wonder about.
It's going to be fun, whether you're 27, 97, or somewhere in between.
Men's Health is about more than six packs and supplements.
It's about energy, confidence, and connection.
We don't just want you to live longer.
We want you to live better.
So check out the mailroom on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your favorite shows.
are back. What a good time. So Sam Bankman-Fried is above all else a numbers guy. And I guess as a
kid, he was a numbers kid. His parents sent him to Crystal Springs Uplands, a fancy prep school in
Hillsboro, California. I looked through the website because I wanted to make fun of it, but it just
kind of seems like a really fancy school. I don't know. I'm sure it's a great place to get an
education. They put a lot of, I will tell this, they devote a lot of screen resources to letting
you know that they are not racist and that most of their students aren't white.
Um, they also have a French, they also have a French cinema class for sixth graders, which is fine, but the cranky asshole in me that still has a little piece of my soul raised by right wing radio wants to say shit about it.
I was raised by, by left wing people. And I still think that that's some loser shit, man.
I think that that's fucking dorky and goofy and like should, it's like, it's like what you know, you meet, because you meet people like that in the.
wild and they're sometimes there and it may even often very sweet people but i'm like trying to be
like oh you know who plankton is and they're like no and then but they've been watching french
movies since they were like seven and i just don't really respect that if i made a sixth grader with
yeah if i meet a sixth grader with strong opinions about french cinema like i'm just gonna leave
i'm gonna leave i'm just gonna walk away wow right robert that's really brave of you to march out of
a conversation with an 11-year-old.
I am not.
I'm not putting up with that shit.
Absolutely not.
I'm leaving this sixth grade class.
My name's Robert Evans.
Getting the fuck out of here.
Dufuses.
Fucking go watch your what,
Renoir, is that one of them?
That sounds like one of them.
Cloudwin, Renoir.
Is he a painter or he need to make movies?
No, Renoir's a painter.
I know the one you're looking for it, too, but I don't remember.
But guess who, do you know who Plankton is?
Of course you do.
I know who Plankton is, and I also know that at least one of the directors they study
as a pedophile, just knowing a little bit about French cinema.
That's unavoidable.
So he does well.
Again, the school is probably fine.
He does well at the school.
He was notably insular.
He avoided most of his classmates to play StarCraft, which is good.
And League of Legends, which objectively sucks.
He also played a lot of Magic the Gathering, so I am confident he did not get late in high school.
This is based on extensive personal experience.
We're like, I just actually did some field research and...
Yeah, about four years of it.
Okay, interesting.
Yeah.
For college, he was accepted to and attended MIT,
which marked out his family's elite North American University punch card.
They really hit them all now,
now that they've got an MIT kid in the family.
they get a free coffee there used to be an MIT so when I was doing comedy in Boston there was like
MIT had like a secret comedy club that was just for MIT students and it was awful.
Oh I'll bet that's oh god yeah.
They paid you okay but it was like they're like if you like knew someone who like met someone
who went to MIT and they came to your shows and they were like, oh we we've we did the math and
you are allowed to come to art.
They called it their speak easy.
I wonder if it's still around.
It was so, it was, I mean, it was not fun.
Yeah.
Not a fun crowd, I will say.
But best of luck to whatever was going on there.
Yeah.
So he goes to MIT.
He goes to MIT.
He might have been at one of those shows.
We're on the same age.
He might have because he joins a fraternity there.
And, and MIT, well, Jamie, it's an MIT specific co-ed nerd fraternity.
So.
Nice.
What could go wrong?
Epsilon Theta.
And here's how Adam Fisher, the guy I hate, described them in his article, which was bad.
Quote, a co-ed fraternity of super geeks, similarly interested in magic and video games.
Thetons are fond of debating math, physics, computer science, linguistics, philosophy, and logic problems for fun at alcohol-free parties.
Now, I do know a little bit about MIT, and I know another thing these nerds often do is kill themselves using nitrous oxide because they will try to flood entire rooms.
with nitrous to do like a 20% nitrous to 02 ratio and killed themselves?
It's a thing that happens.
Look it up.
MIT nitrous debts.
Yeah.
All I did in college was drink too many blue moons.
Wow.
It's quite a thing.
Yikes.
So, I don't know.
What are you doing over there?
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know how much I believe that they were always alcohol and drug-free parties.
Because if there's one thing I know from nerds,
it's that they do a shitload of drugs.
I definitely didn't hear of this one because I went to a couple of MIT frat parties
and they were not sober.
Fun fact, one of the MIT frat parties I went to,
for some reason when I was in college and when I would get really drunk,
I would always, I would like, I would like to like steal things from wherever I was.
And so I stole two critical pool balls from an MIT frat house.
And someone was able to trace it back to me and they demanded their pool balls back.
And I, embarrassingly, I think I capitulated.
I think I did give them back.
I shouldn't.
Wow.
Wow.
Actually, so this one kid I'm finding in 99 died because he put a bag over his head to inhale
nitrous, which is the fuck man.
How did you get into MIT?
I don't know any.
I was like, I don't know anything about drugs.
I don't know anything about.
But don't put bags over your head, kids.
Yeah.
I learned that.
In public school,
less.
So many other ways to do whippets than putting a plastic bag over your head.
Anyway, whatever.
Next, according to the popular Sam Bankman-Fried endorsed version of the story,
he pivoted towards an almost obsessive devotion to ethics in his freshman year.
He went vegan.
He organized a protest against factory farming.
And he worried obsessively over how he could change the world for the better.
And it was at this point that Sam met a man who was going to change his life forever.
William McCaskill.
If you want to learn more about this guy, I do recommend the episode of it could happen here on Effective Altruism.
This guy is today the pop philosopher of effective altruism and long-termism.
He is in Elon Musk's text messages that we all got as a result of the Twitter lawsuit.
Oh.
At this point, he was also at MIT.
And he met with Sam at a cafe in Cambridge, Massachusetts, where McCaskill works.
Which one? Which one?
I don't know.
I'm sure it's out there somewhere, Jamie.
Um, it's, I'm sure you've gotten a hot dog there.
Um, that's, that seems likely.
No, any place this guy's going, it doesn't have hot dogs.
They're not ethical.
That's right.
That's right.
So, yeah, you're probably right.
So McCaskill explained the concept of effective altruism to him, which is again,
this idea that like, what matters is, you, you should like think kind of coldly and robotically
about how you do help to make sure that your charity money does the, the most that it can do.
But one of the big, like, arguments about it is that, like, you should, like, you should,
like, okay, well, what if you, you know, should you save a drowning child instead of
saving, like, three kids from a burning building?
And it's like, that's a nonsense choice.
Nobody's ever been presented with that choice at any point in the history of the human
race.
It is not a reasonable, that is not a, there's no point to that ethical argument.
You're not smart for debating it.
New trolley problem just dropped, Robert.
Yeah.
And it makes no sense.
Yeah.
It makes no fucking sense.
There's like bits of it that are reasonable, which is that like, well, you know,
it makes sense to like look at the.
the best thing you can do financially, you know, in terms of donating money is, you know, malaria
prevention because it winds up being the most cost effective thing. But it's like, okay, does that
mean we shouldn't put money into making the water in Flint, Michigan drinkable? And a lot of
these guys will say no, because that's not the best use of money. And it's like, well,
we can do many things with money, especially if we tax billionaires and put it towards
rebuilding infrastructure. A number of things can be done. What? Sorry, I had to go with my friend
Elon's shitty McMansion. McCaskill, McCaskill kind of pills.
this guy on effective altruism.
He frames it as a strategic investment
whose success
was measured in population's worth of human
lives. He estimated, using back
of the envelope math, that $2,000
could save one life, and so a million
could save 500 people, a
billion could save half a million, and a
trillion dollars could theoretically save
half a billion lives.
Based on that totally legitimate
math, Robert. People are math, Robert.
People are math. It all works out
that way. Yeah. Based
based on that absolutely real math,
the only ethical way for a genius like Sam
to use his time and talents
is to become the world's first trillionaire.
And I'm going to quote again from that article that I hate.
SBF listened, nodding,
as Ms. Caskell made his pitch.
The earned-to-give logic was air-tight.
It was, SBF realized, applied utilitarianism.
Knowing what he had to do,
SBF simply said,
yep, that makes sense.
But right there, between a bright yellow sunshade
and the crumb-strewn red brick floor,
SBF's purpose and life was set.
He was going to get filthy rich, for charity's sake.
All the rest was merely execution risk.
His course established.
McCaskill gave SBF one less navigational nudge
to set him on his way,
suggesting that SBF get an internship
at Jane Street that summer.
And so...
For the good of mankind.
For the good of mankind,
get in the finance industry and gamble like a motherfucker.
This little asshole, I swear to God.
I fucking hate these people so much.
What, oh, God, makes sense.
Yeah.
You know, look, I think that.
Airtight.
Airtight, you can't debate that lot.
There's no argument to be made about that logic, Jamie.
I mean, I know that this is the wrong person to be turning on in this moment, but this is the dick writingest language that ever heard.
This is the, Jamie, he has not begun to ride dick.
He's choking.
He's choking on the thing.
This man's got no gag reflex and no sign of slum.
Jamie, I'm going to read you some passages from this that are going to make you gag.
It is unbearable.
Nice.
And it's like, this article is like 10,000 fucking words.
It took me like an hour to get through this thing.
It's massive.
Who is? He's like, maybe if I do it, he'll give me a kiss on the mouth.
Well, basically, this was published by Sequoia, which is a massive, like, investment
fucking fund thing on their website.
I'm sorry, don't you mean journalistic entity?
Yeah.
It looks like that.
It looks exactly like an article from like Wired or something.
Like, they clearly laid it out like that.
But I think it was done because they put, like, $200 million into his company.
So they needed to justify it by making them look like a genius.
It's like those articles that like are occasionally.
I mean, it's more scary when they're on actual journalistic outlets.
And then there's just a little tag saying like, hey, this is sponsored by Rupol's fracking farm or whatever the fuck.
And it's like, why.
Why fracking?
RuPaul and Exxon Mobil.
LGBT icons.
So.
So Sam Bankman Freed gets into finance, and he's a very good trader as, I mean, I have no way to judge this, but Sequoia says he was a good trader.
He was good at making a lot of money for other people and also a lot of money for himself besides.
And for all that, yeah.
He gave away 50% of his income to his favorite charities, but those charities were mostly the Center for Effective Altruism and 80,000 hours, which is also an effective altruism charity.
What do they do with money?
That's a great question, Jamie.
It allows guys like McCaskill to live very well,
while also saying they only take $30,000 in salaries
and give away the rest
because their lives are heavily subsidized
by these organizations that allow billionaires
to pretend to be heroes.
Oh, so like charity.
So like charity, yeah.
Yeah.
So he remains there happily for years
until 2017 when he begins to feel
as if something is not right.
Now, spoilers.
He's having a quarter-life crisis.
He is having a quarter-life crisis.
And this kid absolutely is a con artist.
And what I am giving you is the polished press-friendly version of the story for a guy
whose entire life, as far as I can tell, was one long setup for an ambitious con.
So when I say stuff like he gave a lot of money to charity, because there's like other
charities he gives to, some of which sound reasonable, but I have actually no evidence that
he did.
Like, I have no evidence that he did.
And I haven't seen it.
One of those.
So when I say stuff like he felt like that or when I say stuff like he felt unfulfilled
at Jane Street, that doesn't mean he actually did because we are at present reliant
on a lot of reporting from back when this kid was the toast of Wall Street.
Now, after his life fell apart and his company crashed,
and it became clear that he was a financial criminal,
it also came out that the guy who wrote the big short
has been following him for six months.
So I suspect at some point, that's got, that's going to be fun.
We're all going to be in for a real treat when that book hits.
I love, I love when you're like, and guess who is following him around.
You're like, oh, he's got Michael Lewis on his tail.
It's like, and also, if you're an investor, shouldn't, like,
It's somebody involved in one of these companies probably should have been able to find out, like, oh, hey, the big short guys hanging out with him.
That probably means this is a giant financial crime.
That guy's not going to just hang out with a dude who's good at legally making money to write about how good he isn't making money legally.
That's not Michael Lewis's beat.
I'm kind of going for like a change of pace this time.
I'm just kind of try to see a guy who's like doing something right.
Yeah.
Michael Lewis, aren't you the guy who only writes about financial crimes on like a gigantic scale?
Kale? No, no, no. I think that this is, he's just probably just trying to network.
Yeah. She just really liked this guy's attitude towards altruism. So anyway, yeah, anyway,
here's how that, again, very dick-writing PR-flack motherfucker wrote about what happens next.
Quote, he was, he realized, too secure. SBF's mind had been trained almost from birth to
calculate. As a schoolboy, the hedonic calculus of utilitarianism,
had him trying to maximize the utility function measured in utiles, of course, for abortion.
During his teenage game, I know, I know, that's a sentence.
That's a sentence.
Does he say, of course?
No, no, I said that.
Oh, wait, no, he does say, he does say, of course, yes, measured in utils, of course.
Of course.
Oh, suck my ass, you fucking loser.
During his teenage gaming years, his mathematical ability,
allowed him to sharpen his tactics and win.
And of course, every trade SBF ever made it, Jane,
was the subject of a risk-reward calculation.
All of it boiled down to expected value.
The formula is fairly simple.
If the amount one multiplied by the probability of winning a bet is greater
than the amount lost multiplied by the probability of losing a bet,
then you go for it, irrespective of units.
Utils, euros, dollars, were all subject to the same reckoning.
But at Jane, SBF, osmost, another trading principle.
He learned to be risk-neutral, in simple terms,
a trader, given a choice between a $50 and a 50% chance at $100,
must be agnostic if they want to maximize the expected value of earnings over a lifetime.
Those who prefer that sure win are risk averse,
and those who would rather gamble are risk lovers.
But both risk lovers and the risk averse are suckers equally,
because over the long run, they lose out to the risk neutral,
who take both deals without prejudice.
That makes no sense.
That makes no sense at all, because you're assuming you have to, like, choose between one?
Can you just take both?
Is that the offer?
Because it seems like the whole thought experiment is about choosing between one.
None of this makes very much sense.
I had a brain hemorrhage in the middle of that.
And then I couldn't stop thinking about,
do you think that utilitarians,
how do utilitarians feel about kissing with tongue, do you think?
How many utils does it take to kiss with tongue?
Or don't waste your fucking time.
Let me write the equation out, Jamie, and try to sketch out the math on.
I think they wouldn't be into it.
I think they would be like, what's the point?
Yeah, that's, that seems real.
I only have five utils.
So, okay.
Jamie, I got to continue this.
What the fuck did that sentence say?
I don't know, but we have to read another one.
Quote, here SBF realized was the rub.
When he applied this principle to his own life, he came up short.
There was little chance he'd get himself fired from Jane Street.
Thus, the decision to stick with Jane was a risk-averse preference.
It was the logical equivalent of being offered a.
choice between $50 and $50% of $100 in saying,
Give me President Grant.
SBF was risk neutral on behalf of Jane Street, but not, he realized, for his own life.
To be fully rational about maximizing his income on behalf of the poor, he should apply
his trading principles across the board.
He had to find a risk-neutral career path, which, if we strip away the trader jargon,
actually means he needed to take on a lot more risk in the hopes of-
Oh, Jamie, you need to hear this.
At this point, we're stripping it away.
I've been asleep for six minutes.
Come on.
Which if we strip away the traitor jargon
actually means he felt he needed to take on a lot more risk
in the hopes of becoming part of the global elite.
The math couldn't be clearer.
Very high risk multiplied by dynastic wealth.
Trump's low risk multiplied by mere rich guy wealth.
To do the most good for the world,
SBF needed to find a path on which he'd be a coin toss away
from going totally bust.
So the path is risk neutral,
but that means taking a lot of risk
because the most risk is the only way.
way to become the wealthiest person in the world and only by becoming the wealthiest person
in the world can you avoid risk you get it jamie yeah and that's the most ethical thing you
can do right that's that clearly the most logical ethical way to live so do you think that they
kiss with tongue or not i mean i think what he's saying is order in order to avoid the risk of
catching an s d you have to take on a job as the bathroom mat at a brothel um oh that's the risk of
reverse, yeah, or risk neutral presentation.
Oh, frantically rubbing my final brand cells together, trying to make heads or tails of that.
And just like, nothing is sparking.
It is, it is howling clown shit.
It is absolute barking nonsense.
It is like a vortex of bullshit to be like, so anyways, it's really clear.
And the math couldn't be clearer that he has to be the most richest guy or everyone is going to die.
It's actually really urgent.
You know, it's one of those things, because I have known a number of rich guys in my life.
And some of them are in ladies.
Good for you, Robert.
There's two kinds.
There's people who were poor at one point.
And some of those people are unhinged.
And some of them still remember being poor enough to talk like normal people.
And then there's people like this, who Sam was never rich as a kid, but he lived in this
rarefied air where finance and like the the concept of worrying about money or his economic
status was not a thing because everyone around him when he was a kid was so high status.
And he like he's just lived in this.
It's not even a, it's not even a bubble.
He grew up on a different planet.
Like the world does not exist to him the same way it does to everyone else.
And so he's like that's the only way you can talk about things in this way.
That or you're a giant con man.
thing where you're talking about everything like it is very my thinking it's like it's so easy
for him and people like this to to think of other people as theoreticals because it never had a
problem before so it's like oh problems are a game of chance because they've never met a person
right right right he has never known a human being just stanford professors exactly just stanford professors
and problems in his video games so yeah and not that all nerd i mean i'm not i'm afraid of uh
nerd, you know, people who identify as nerds coming into my mansions.
I'm not saying that that's everybody, but I'm saying like he's not been socialized like a person
and that mostly has to do with class.
Yeah.
God damn it.
So the next thing that SBF did after deciding he had to quit Jane Street is start pondering
how he might change the world in a way that minimized his risk by maximizing his risk or some shit.
Anyway, as he told it, he considered four career fields.
And this is, these are his notes on that.
the four things he might do after being a traitor.
Number one, journalism, low pay, but a massively outsized impact potential.
Number two, running for office, or maybe just being an advisor.
Number three, working for the movement.
EA, effective altruism needs people.
Number four, starting a startup.
But what exactly?
Number five, bumming around the Bay Area for a month or so, just to see what happens.
Now again, it sounds like a bad bumble date.
Like, so what do you do?
He's like, um, well, um, so startup, maybe, but what is a startup, really?
What is a startup?
I don't know.
So, again, he's spent years working in finance.
He's got plenty of money.
He came from the Bay Area.
So five was an option, and it's one he took.
Um, and by the way, like, as a general rule, if you decide to quit your job and you have
the financial ability to putter them out around for a month or two and think things through,
not a bad idea.
Sure.
Um, but Sam is going to do this in the worst way possible.
Uh, he eventually hits upon his great next.
idea, which is to make a shitload of money in crypto. Now, when he quits Jane Street is
2017, and if you guys can remember back that far, that's the first big winter when cryptocurrency
boomed, like kind of all throughout the last quarter or so of 2017, Bitcoin was just
sailing up, like massive rises. Ether had a big rise to. This kind of went around to early 2018.
A lot of Bitcoin nerds who people have been making fun of for years became overnight multimillionaires.
And this was kind of the first point at which normal people started to think,
shit, maybe I should get into this.
Maybe I can make a lot of money, right?
This is the thing that blew up Bitcoin.
And there was a crash after this, but it recovered, yada, yada, yada.
Sam was savvy enough to look at this and know that these moments where this thing
where a lot of funny money is on the table, but there's no regulation.
And regular people have started to get interested because they think they might get rich.
This is the point at which an unethical person can make the absolute most money in a financial market, right?
And you can be unethical.
To quote one of the greats, you can be unethical and still be illegal.
That's the way I live my life.
And you know who else lives their life that way, Jamie Loftus?
You and you're tossing the ads?
Yeah, that's right.
I am indeed.
I am indeed, baby.
Here we go.
All right.
A decade ago, I was on the trail of one of the country's most elusive serial killers.
But it wasn't until 2023 when he was finally caught.
The answers were there.
hidden in plain sight.
So why did it take so long to catch him?
I'm Josh Zeman, and this is Monster,
hunting the Long Island serial killer,
the investigation into the most notorious killer in New York
since the son of Sam, available now.
Listen for free on the Iheart radio app,
Apple Podcasts, wherever you get your podcasts.
What up y'all? It's your boy, Kevin, on stage.
I want to tell you about my new podcast called Not My Best Month,
where I talk to artists, athletes, entertainers,
graders, friends, people I admire who had massive success about their massive failures.
What did they mess up on? What is their heartbreak? And what did they learn from it?
I got judged horribly. The judges were like, you're trash. I don't know how you got on the show.
Boo, somebody had tomatoes. I'm kidding. But if they had tomatoes, they would have thrown the
tomatoes. Let's be honest. We've all had those moments we'd rather forget. We bumped our head.
We made a mistake. The deal fell through. We're embarrassed. We failed.
but this podcast is about that
and how we made it through.
So when they sat me down,
they were kind of like,
we got into the small talk,
and they were just like,
so what do you got?
What?
What ideas?
And I was like, oh, no.
What?
Check out Not My Best Moment with me,
Kevin on stage on the IHeart Radio app,
Apple Podcast,
YouTube, or wherever you get your podcast.
I'm Robert Smith.
This is Jacob Goldstein,
and we used to host a show called Planet Money.
And now we're back making this new podcast
called Business History
about the best.
about the best ideas and people and businesses in history.
And some of the worst people, horrible ideas and destructive companies in the history of business.
Having a genius idea without a need for it is nothing.
It's like not having it at all.
It's a very simple, elegant lesson.
Make something people want.
First episode, how Southwest Airlines use cheap seats and free whiskey to fight its way into the airline business.
The most Texas story ever.
There's a lot of mavericks in that story.
We're going to have mavericks on the show.
We're going to have plenty of robber barons.
So many robber barons.
And you know what?
They're not all bad.
And we'll talk about some of the classic great moments of famous business geniuses,
along with some of the darker moments that often get overlooked.
Like Thomas Edison and the electric chair.
Listen to business history on the Iheart radio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get it, your podcasts.
What do you get when you mix 1950s Hollywood,
a Cuban musician with a dream,
and one of the most iconic sitcoms of all time.
You get Desi Arnaz, a trailblazer, a businessman, a husband,
and maybe, most importantly, the first Latino to break prime time wide open.
I'm Wilmer Valderama, and yes, I grew up watching him,
probably just like you and millions of others.
But for me, I saw myself in his story.
From plening canary cages to this night here in New York, it's a long ways.
On the podcast starring Desi Arnaz and Wilmer Valderrama,
I'll take you in a journey to Desi's life,
The moments it has overlapped with mine, how he redefined American television, and what that meant for all of us watching from the sidelines, waiting for a face like hours on screen.
This is the story of how one man's spotlight lit the path for so many others and how we carry his legacy today.
Listen to starring Desi Arnaz and Wilmer Valderrama.
That's part of the MyCultura podcast network available on the IHard Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast.
And we're back.
So J-loft.
J-Loftus.
Yes, it's actually J-Lo.
It's the first, I'm the first person to use that.
And it's really starting to catch on.
Bold.
Oh shit, Ben Applex calling me.
One sec, Jamie.
Let me take this call.
Oh, that's my boyfriend.
No, he's just weeping outside of a Dunkin' Donuts and pocket dialed me again.
Normal Ben stuff, am I right?
Oh, Ben.
Look, Ben, I, sometimes I meet up.
with my friend Ben at the Atwater Dunks, and I really, I really set him straight.
It's nice.
Yeah.
Ben Affleck, sober for years and looks like he's hung over in every single photograph.
Oh, World's Puffers, man.
I love him.
I know.
I do.
I do.
I have a lot of, there's just a something about him that warm is my heart.
It's his back tattoo of a Phoenix.
I was going to say you love his back tattoo.
It's just, that takes courage, you know, moral courage.
I just think it's so amazing.
He's fucked up.
I think we need to add him.
back tattoo and still got to marry Jennifer Lopez.
I think, I think we should put his name on the Vietnam Memorial in honor of the courage that it took to get that, that back tattoo.
I mean, he is braver than the troops.
And he did for a while hold, hold the status of most divorced men in America.
But that is now, but he fixed it by hot time.
I feel like the contest.
I was going to say, I was going to say, they did, to be fair, they did get married.
at a plantation.
I don't know.
Yeah, I mean, that's all very fucked up.
But I do feel the contest for most divorced man.
Did you ever watch Dragon Ball Z as a kid, Jamie?
Yes.
I didn't.
No, I didn't go up with Dragon Ball Z.
Well, there's this thing.
Dragon Ball Z would always do this thing where, like, you have this guy and he's like
the most badass person ever that everybody has to figure out how to fight.
And it's this big problem because this is the most terrifying thing in the universe.
And the next season, like, there's something that's like a thousand times scarier.
It's just this like power creep kind of thing.
I feel like we've all been dealing with that with a divorced guy
because divorced guy Ben Affleck doesn't even register on the divorced guy
scale next to Elon.
We're living in the age of Kanye and Elon.
They're so really divorced guy.
And look out because Tom Brady is about to fucking hit the World Trade Center on that one too.
Tom Brady's going to go super saying divorced.
It's amazing.
That is going to, a third divorce man has hit the World Trade Center.
It is bad.
It's bad.
Oh, incredible.
So back to Sam Bankmanfried.
Right, right, right.
He has just decided to get into crypto.
Now, the first way to make money in crypto that occurred to him, because he spends a
bunch of time looking into the market, and he sees that there's this thing called, I think
it's like the kimchi premium or whatever like that, they come up with some weird kind
of racist name about it, which is basically Bitcoin is worth a lot more in Japan and Korea
than it is in the United States, right?
It's like worth 15 grand in Japan and Korea, and it's like 10 grand.
in the United States, something like that.
Why is that?
There's a variety of complicated factors.
Basically, there's a bunch of different laws around banking
and who can and cannot hold accounts
and execute trades in those areas
that leads to this premium.
Because normally, if a premium like that,
if the markets were kind of accessible to each other,
if Bitcoin's worth 15 grand in Asia and 10 grand in the U.S.,
then you buy Bitcoin in the U.S.
and you sell it in Asia and you get free money, right?
Very obvious.
Um, if you can, but you can't do that because you can't get access to the, as an American,
you can't like get a Chinese account in order to buy Bitcoin there, right?
Um, or a Korean account or a Japanese account.
There's all these laws that make it difficult to trade.
So you can't just do like a banking VPN.
No.
You can't, you cannot do that.
And no one can figure out how to do it, how as a westerner to sell Bitcoin over in these parts
of Asia and get that premium, right?
And like, just get a bunch of free cash.
Sam figures out a way to do it.
which is basically like picking up a pile of free money, right?
If you're buying Bitcoin for 10 grand and other people want to pay 15 grand for it,
you're just making cash, right?
And primarily the way he does that is through friends in the effective altruism community
who are like placed in banks and stuff over in Asia who like help him figure out how to do this.
I'm not going to go into the details.
I mean, this fucking dick writing article spends a long time explaining how he figures this out.
And it might even have been legal.
He may not have broken the law to do this,
although it's kind of hard to know
because all of this is complicated finance, gibberish.
By the way, this is called...
Honestly, I'm not getting a word of this.
Finance guys call this an arbitrage,
and it's basically the ideal that if you can...
If there's a resource that's worth a bunch more money
one place than it is the other place,
you buy it where it's cheap,
and you sell it where it's expensive
and you get free money, right?
That makes sense?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
If I am...
Jamie.
Jamie.
Do I sound panicking defensive?
Because I'm lying.
drug dealer sells me ketamine for like 40 bucks a gram, right? And I don't know, at a house
party, you're hanging out at a couple of blocks away. Somebody says that they'd pay $70 a gram for
ketamine. You can make 30 free bucks by taking the ketamine you bought for 40 bucks and selling
it at that other house party, right? Okay. So that was you speaking to me in terms that you would
understand, but I do think I got it. Yeah, yeah. Ketamine makes everything make sense.
Yeah, you just gave it to me in Robert speak. I got it. I got it.
He makes a shitload of money doing this. And he decides to roll this money into a company, which will allow him to hire employees to gamble with cryptocurrency at scale, to try and find different fucked up little areas like this where they can make a bunch of money by executing trades.
He picks members of the EA community as his first employees, including Carolyn Ellison, a former co-worker at Jane Street, who we will be talking about in a little bit.
and Nishad Singh, a former Facebook employee.
Industrial scale dick writer, Adam Fisher,
lets you know that Singh is an incredible,
almost impossibly good human being
by describing him this way.
He often wears a T-shirt with the words
compassionate to the core,
printed in diminutive all-lowercase font over his heart.
Do you think that this guy, this writer, like,
just at this point, he's on like a bucking bronco of SBF's dick.
Like, it's just absolutely ridiculous.
He is, he is, he is, he is,
50% this guy's dick by weight.
It is unbelievable.
What does he think is going to happen for him?
He's going to get paid by Sequoia to write a 10,000 word article that they then pull from their website when it becomes clear this man is a massive financial criminal.
He's like, no, my greatest work.
It's extremely funny.
No, look, I don't know sing, but based on the description that guy gives, I am convinced he's murdered a child with his bare hands.
And that is my head canon for this man.
No one else would wear that shirt.
So these EA nerds all form a trading firm called Alameda.
And in doing so, they came down on one side of probably the biggest split within the
crypto community.
See, the core of the idea that's not bad that exists within cryptocurrency is that
decentralized state-controlled money is like has problems, right?
You know, there's things about that that are bad.
And it could be cool.
and useful to be able to separate the money from the state if you could do that, right?
If you could do that in a way that reduce the state's power to like, you know, just lock down
the bank accounts of dissidents and stuff like that.
There's cool benefits to it.
Well, wait, I just had an idea.
What if we did that, but then we gave all the money to one guy?
Well, that's kind of what keeps happening.
Oh, I see, I see, I see.
But also, like, SBF's on the other side of this argument, right?
Because obviously, most of the actual benefits of a truly decentralized.
online currency are just you can buy drugs with it over the internet but still that is a real
value people do in fact buy drugs using cryptocurrency and that's fine um and the committed
ideological crypto people tend to keep their money offline in a wallet only they can access right so
you basically you have like a hard drive that has all of your crypto on it and that that only touches
the internet when you plug that into your computer and you use it to make a transaction right and
otherwise it's completely offline, and so people can't just take it from you, right?
Right.
That's the smart people.
This is a pain in the ass, though, right?
Like, keeping it in this thing, like, there's all these security, you can lose your password.
People actually do lose their money this way, too.
But anyway, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's a, a measure to which it,
it makes sense and is secure, but most people don't want to go through that pain in the
ass.
So they put all of their crypto currency in what are effectively crypto banks, these exchanges.
And these exchanges are places like Mount Gox, which a few years ago all of the money got stolen from, and FtX, which Sam Bankman-Fried makes, which also all of the money gets stolen from, right?
So the people who are like, no, you shouldn't do what Sam is doing.
You shouldn't make an exchange because that's not decentralized.
And we like this because it's decentralized.
They are the ones who get robbed less often because they're a little smarter.
And that's part of the point.
These exchanges, they're meant for people who don't see crypto actually.
is like, well, I want to fight the state by removing my money from the banking system,
they're for people who are like, I want to try to get rich quick by gambling, right?
And that's why those people are also the most vulnerable to scams.
Robert, anytime you explain crypto with me, to me, even though I know I need to understand it
for the context of the episode, I just feel like I'm in a corner at a house party and I'm
holding a clammy bud light and it's mostly empty.
And you're like, just one more thing, though, because I, you know, I mean, the important.
important thing to understand is that what Sam has done, so crypto is like unregulated, right? It is
detached from any state, okay? Right, which is why people like it. Which is why people like it.
Yeah. Sam has, what Sam has done has come in, and he's not the first person, the only person
to do this, and said, I have built a place where you can keep all of your crypto and you can trade it
with other crypto to try to make money the same way people do with the stock market, right?
Where it is more secure. No, because here's the thing, Jamie. He's
says it's secure, but here's the thing.
So you know how the banking system, how banks used to just go bust and everyone would lose
their money and it caused a great depression?
You get that part of the history of finance, right?
Oh, yeah.
One of the characters from Titanic killed themselves over that.
Exactly, exactly.
So that was a big problem.
And we developed a bunch of regulations so that, among other things.
I know this part, Robert.
So what Sam has done is he's built a bank that has none of that so that people can gamble on
the internet, right?
Okay.
So he can just create a crypto great.
Depression.
Yeah.
Got it.
Yeah, exactly.
That's all you need to understand is that Sam has built a big unregulated bank for people
to gamble with.
Awesome.
Yeah.
Anyway, and this is, it is, it could not have been clearer that this was a Ponzi scheme.
In 2018, they put out an advertisement to investors, and I'm going to read it right now.
I think you'll be like, we offer one investment product, 15% annualized fixed rate loans.
We can accept both fiat and crypto and can pay interest denominated in either.
These loans have no downside.
We guarantee full payment, the principal and interest, enforceable under U.S. law,
and established by all parties' legal counsel.
We are extremely confident we will pay this amount.
In the unlikely case where we lose more than 2%, anyway, again, I'm not a finance expert,
neither are you, Jamie.
Banks offer, like, a 3% return on, like, a fucking, if you're, like, putting a pile of cash
in a bank and you're getting 3% back, you're doing okay.
15%'s nonsense.
that nobody no one can guarantee that it's not a real product i was pretty struck by their use
of the language like we're pretty confident we're going to be able to play it sounds like that's
it just sounds like someone who is not actually very confident and also if this is if you are if
you are investing in a in the stock market right and someone says this investment has no downside it's
impossible for it to fail that person's lying to you and breaking the law because it could and often
does like oh right because then you're just you're you're you're making an almost guaranteed false
promise yes yes you cannot do you cannot say this stock can't go down right if you're a stock
broker you cannot tell a client it is impossible for your investment in this company to fail
because that would be a crime um but with crypto but with crypto it's uncharted territory
baby it's uncharted territory you can do anything this is also a Ponzi scheme right what what um
what fucking Madoff was doing is he had this investment portfolio that
I forget what the exact, but it was promising an unbelievably high return and guaranteeing that
people would get it, right? And what he was doing is as new people put money into the investment,
he was using their money to pay the old investors so that nobody noticed that things were
fucking up. But eventually, new people stopped putting money into the thing and it all fell
apart. And a lot of people lost billions of dollars, right? Like, yeah, I'm back. He was also using
a lot of that money to live, you know, an incredibly lavish, rich guy life. Anyway,
Sorry. I only understand financial concepts when Selena Gomez breaks the fourth wall and explains it to me.
I'm doing my best to be your Selena Gomez, but I just...
Or do you know who Selena Gomez is?
Yeah, she's that chick from the thing. Nailed it. She's kind of in the middle of a fun scandal right now where she's in a feud with someone who donated her a kidney.
What? Which is a very funny online feud dynamic. How do you get in a feud with that person?
because she okay if you asked robert this is something i can explain to you this so so what happened was
selina gomez needed a kidney donated her close friend who works in the industry i don't know who it was
but i guess she's like sort of famous gave her a kidney a couple years ago then selina gomez turns around
a couple weeks ago and says i have no friends in the industry except taylor swift in comes her kidney
donor being like, oh, that's interesting, because I'm one kidney later.
Dude, like, I'm not quoting it, but yeah.
And then Selena, instead of apologizing, Selena Gomez is like, oh, sorry I didn't
thank every person I've ever met in my life.
Yeah, but I mean, Selena, she did give you a kidney.
Yeah, that's a special kind of friend.
You guys weren't just like drinking buddies.
She literally gave you a kidney.
And that's what I can share with you.
you would use as like a joking description of someone who'd done a lot for you to like
hyperbolicly say that you owed them a lot you know who's done and implying that taylor swift
has done more for you than your kidney donor is so uh i just think it's the funniest
of all time all right we were talking about a cryptocurrency we weren't um we were talking about
selina gomez let's let's get back to cryptocurrency okay um so to talk about what came next uh
establishing Alameda, I'm going to quote again from that Sequoia write-up.
At this point, mid-2019, SBF decided to double down again and scratch his own itch.
He would bet Alameda's multimillion dollar trading profits on a new venture, a trading exchange
called FTX.
It would combine coin bases, solid, stolen, regulation-loving approach with the kinds of derivatives
being offered by Binance and others.
He only gave himself a 20% chance of success.
But in his mind, SBF needed extreme risk to maximize the expected value of his
lifetime earnings. And therefore, the good his earned-to-give strategy could do. The fact that he was, by
his own lights, overwhelmingly likely to fail was besides the point. The point was this. When SBF multiplied
out billions of dollars a year, a successful cryptocurrency exchange could throw off by his self-assessed
20% chance of successfully building one, the number was still huge. That's the expected value. And if you
live your life according to the same principles by which you'd trade an asset, there's only one way forward.
You calculate the expected values, then aim for the largest one, because in one, but just one,
future universe, everything works out
fabulously. To maximize your expected
value, you must aim for it and then march blindly
forth, acting as if the fabulously
lucky SBF of the future can
reach into the other parallel universes
and compensate the fail-sun
SBFs for their losses. It sounds crazy
or perhaps even selfish.
But it's not. It's math. It follows
the principle of risk neutrality. Yes,
it actually is crazy. That's not math.
I'm sorry. That's actually not math.
That is nonsense.
But that was a lot of words all at once.
That is like, oh my God, the spiraling logic of this.
You are using hundreds of words and high-minded bullshit rhetoric to be like,
gambling is the best way to make money.
He used fabulously three times in one sentence.
Yeah, man, you know who I've heard this basic argument from?
My friend's drunken Las Vegas explaining what they're trying to play at the crap stable again.
Why they don't want me to leave the little horsey game.
this is some yeah someone's like no don't leave the sex in the city slot machine no and here's why you want to hear my mathematical thinking on gambling jamie loftus because this will make more sense than anything that happens in the sequoia article okay when i go to las vegas i find me the penny slots where i can see the most waitresses walking around with those little trays that they have the drinks and stuff on then i sit down at them and i don't start to play until one gets close to me and then i press the button as soon as she walks past and i like catch her attention and then i i
get a free drink. And the way that it works out is that as long as I can get more free drinks
than I'm spending at the penny slots, and mostly I'm just reading a book and hiding it while
I'm at the penny slots and I only press it when the waitress gets near. Then I can drink
effectively for free, right? It works out to be like 25 cents a drink if you're really smart
about it. That is pretty smart. And that's my financial advice to all of you. I do, I do respect
that. How you make it even better. I used to go with a bag because
When I was poor, what I would do is I would go to Vegas once every couple of years, usually for work.
And I would get all the free drinks, which came in glasses a lot of the time.
And I would keep the glasses.
And so I was able to furnish my apartment with stolen Las Vegas glasses.
I love stealing glasses.
I've stolen my fair share of glasses in Vegas.
Sometimes I would get up to the floors where there were the nicer hotel rooms.
And I would find all the people who'd set out their plates and stuff from, like, room service.
And I would just take those and take them back to my house.
I respect that.
I'm trying to think.
I was like, I don't have a real system for, well, actually, when I go to Vegas,
I always stay at the hotel with a roller coaster on top.
And here's what I do.
I go on the roller coaster, once, sometimes twice.
Then I go see one show, usually it's horrible.
The last time I went to see the Backstreet Boys, and guess what?
I found out one of the Backstreet Boys is in Q&ON.
And then I got bummed up for this.
It was a real bummer of the trip.
The point I want to make, Jamie, is that what I just described to you, my Vegas strategy,
has made me infinitely more money in net profit
than Samuel Bankman-Fried is actually going to make in crypto currency.
Oh, fun foreshadowing.
Yes.
So that's all.
He would never hang out near waitresses, though,
because he's probably afraid of women.
He's probably afraid of them,
but I am fine with asking women for a free drink
as long as I'm paying at the penny slots, you know, so it's not weird.
Wow, feminist icon Robert.
The feminist icon, Robert Evans.
Getting those shitty Vegas Irish coffees
Because they come in the glasses
I want the most
Those are nasty
Yeah but I like the glasses
They used to come in
They do have I know
But then there's the consequence
Of having to drink what's inside
Well you know Jamie
That's why they call me a hero
Nobody does that
The Mahatma Gandhi of the West
They call me
The Jesus Christa podcasting
These are all things people call me
If you're gonna lie
Make it realistic
James Sof
Anyway let's continue
That sounds right.
I'm like, yeah.
I think it's hard to justify being risk-averse on your own personal impact.
SBF told me when I quizzed him about it, unless you're doing it for personal reasons.
In other words, it's selfish not to go for broke if you're planning on giving it all the way in the end anyway.
Again, just clown shit.
So all of this is a con, spoiler.
So you don't have to think that much about it.
In a recent series of text messages with a Vox journalist after his entire exchange,
changed exploded and everyone found out he was a financial criminal.
Sam Bankman-Fried more or less admitted that everything he'd had to say about effective altruism
was a con, meant to get people to trust him and invest in his company.
And I'm going to read the text.
Yeah, I'm going to read the texts to you between him and this journalist.
Who, by the way, he put money in the Vox, so he helped fund this journalist.
Wow.
So the ethics stuff, this is the journalist.
So the ethics stuff, mostly affront, people will like you if you win and hate you if you
lose, and that's how it all really works.
Sam. Yeah. I mean, that's not all of it, but it's a lot. The worst quadrant is sketchy and lose. The best is win plus question mark, question mark, question mark. Clean plus lose is bad, but not terrible. He also misspels terrible, but whatever. The journalist then replies, you were really good at talking about ethics for someone who kind of saw it all as a game with winners and losers. Yeah, he-he. I had to be. It's what reputations are made of to some extent. I feel bad for those who get fucked.
by it, but this dumb game we woke Westerners play where we all say the right shibboleths and so
everyone likes us.
And that's the actual truth here, right?
That's the thing that's honest about it.
It's like, yeah, man, it was all of this talk for everyone.
That's the entire, this Miss Caskell motherfucker.
The only reason his effective altruism thing exists as a funded thing is as a fucking
shiboleth for billionaires who don't want to pay taxes and want to let the world crumble
around them while sucking as much value out of the working class as they can and want to
pretend like their heroes at the same time so that people write.
their dicks and articles like that fucking sequoia piece.
That absolutely fucking ridiculous text actually is like a very important document.
It's incredibly important.
It's deeply crucial.
I hate that there's such a crucial document that also includes he he in it.
Yeah.
There's nothing to be done about that one, Jamie.
Look, there's, it doesn't feel good.
But, you know, our previous most important document to that effect was an I.M.
That said, ha, ha.
So a text with he he is kind of the logical progression.
And that is fast.
Is, do you have any, like, insight into, like, why he would so freely admit that now?
I don't actually.
One of two things has to be happening.
Because, again, spoilers, it, this all falls apart.
His exchange goes from worth $32 billion to worth basically $0 in the space of literally.
I hear a Lincoln park in my head anytime you say it falls apart.
Like, like, 24 hours this happens.
His net worth falls 94% in a day.
Like, it is, it all, it collects, because they realized that all of the money is gone,
that he'd been taking money from one business.
and using to gamble in another and also to pay him and his friends and all of the money
that the investors had put in when they tried to withdraw it, like their money that was
supposed to be in there on paper, none of the money existed, because again, he'd stolen
it.
Anyway, the context of this article makes it clear that he felt like, I don't know, whatever.
This was all a confidence game, right?
That's the key.
All of this could work.
And the balance sheets, because people were looking at their balance sheet, I'm making money,
I'm making money.
These returns are great.
And that money existed on paper until they tried to take it out because then it actually wasn't there because he had already frittered it away.
It's a confidence game.
And we have an, you know, that's the way it actually worked.
We also know, and this is all still coming out, so I'm not going to get too much into it.
But we know that he had FTX loan himself, Sam Beckman-Fried, about a billion dollars.
Like his paper value was like $22 billion, but he gave himself basically a billion dollars in other people's money.
Although he may have gambled that away
It's really unclear how much money he actually has
Liquid at the moment
Okay
Do we think he has any?
I have no idea
Okay
Either he was like actually a gambling addict
And a narcissist and he really did lose it all
Or this was a con from the beginning
Knowing it would all collapse
And he got as much as he could out of it
And he's going to wind up someplace without extradition
Right like that was the goal
If you asked me a couple years ago
I would have said it's the latter
But I feel like the last couple years
have demonstrated so often that, like, people are just straight up not smart and don't have a plan
and it is all a narcissist shell game.
It's very, it's unclear at the moment.
I'm going to read you some things at the end here and you can kind of make your, anyway,
whatever.
So after, you know, starting FTX, the company moves to Hong Kong and then the Bahamas.
And they use, they buy these very, like a $39 million mansion that he lives in with his friends
using FTX tokens, which is like internal cash that his company issues based on the perceived
value of the company.
They don't, how many rooms is that?
It's a shitload.
And they're able to buy it because everything's like their paper on paper they've gone
from nothing to worth $32 billion in like a year or two.
And these, these idiot like property owners in the Bahamas are like, well, clearly the
best thing we could do is buy this building using the fake money they created for their
own company that they tell us is worth a lot of money.
This is worth it.
So since.
everything collapsed. Some people that SBF had like reached out to as early investors have commented
about why they didn't invest in this company in the early days. And most of them it's because
like what they could see of his investments, the tens of millions that he promised to charities and
the long positions in risky cryptocurrency companies didn't make sense. They would look at like
the things he was buying with the company assets and the things that like he was investing in and
be like, well, there's no way he could have that kind of liquidity if this is a legitimate
exchange right he can't have that kind of cash on hand it doesn't make any sense rich fucking assholes
always telling themselves like that yeah that's funny and what's funny is that like i found one of
these guys who like yeah i didn't invest because i could tell it was a con and then was like but i
didn't tell anybody because i didn't want to get yelled at it's no that's unfortunately i do
see myself in that statement a little bit where i was like oh someone might be
Someone might send me a rude text.
Yeah.
I guess I won't say anything about this.
Yeah.
Oh my God.
It's very funny.
What spinesless goofy bullshit?
I don't know.
I'll tell you one thing, Jamie.
He's a spineless guy who still has his fucking money.
Wow.
You're in love with him.
That's what?
Wow.
Yeah.
You know, whatever.
It's the finance industry.
They're all ghouls.
So from what we can actually tell now, because again,
And this fucking Captain Dick Ryder, the bad writer, like, I have to read you another quote that I didn't have in my script.
To give you an idea of just how much he fucking, how much he loves SBF.
Here's a quote from him.
Okay, yeah, this is actually Jamie.
Oh, boy.
This is when this is when this is when the writer, Captain Dick Ryder, is hanging out with him.
in the Bahamas at his office.
Quote.
And he's like, what have we kissed?
Sensing an opportunity for connection.
I chip in with my own to Satoshi, which is two cents, but a Bitcoin term.
Anyway, whatever.
I'm going to walk into the ocean.
Wow.
Okay.
I don't pay any attention to social media.
Not because I have any moral case against it, I say, but because for me, reading
books is the highest bandwidth way I know to get quality information into my brain, which
just craves the stimulation.
I'm addicted to reading, which explains how I ended up being a writer.
Oh, yeah, said SBF, says SBF, I would never read a book.
I'm not sure what to say.
I've read a book a week from...
I hate them both, because I'm not sure what to say.
I've read a book a week for my entire adult life, and I have written three of my own.
I'm very skeptical of books.
I don't want to say no book is ever worth reading, but I actually do believe something pretty
close to that, explains SBF.
I think if you wrote a book, you fucked up, and it should have been a six-paragraph blog post.
Meanwhile, this guy's writing a 10,000 word article writing his dick
That he will not read
This is like two hit
It's like two guys whose heads are made out of rocks
Just like clonking against each other repeatedly
Just wait, Jamie
Jamie, it hasn't gotten as bad as it's going to get
Oh no
Whatever the case
I hate books
Whatever the case
I find myself sad for the man
And it occurs to me that my reaction
Is exactly what might be expected
from a beta in the brave new world crypto is creating.
Whoa.
How can you write that and not leap off the top of a building?
He literally self-identified as a beta to what?
What I love about this is just like what we have to take it as given that crypto is creating
a brave new world and none of us has any choice in that.
It's inevitable.
It's unstoppable.
It's going to dominate everything.
I will capitulate to our beep, beep, boobo overlords.
Yeah.
So I think again, what I wonder? Does he think I think? Wouldn't someone with IQ points to spare
realize that dismissing books, all books, is essentially worthless, might rile a writer? Was he playing with me? Is this fun? Is this humor? I'm satisfied with my meta-analysis until I realize that one can always increment the level of strategic play in this sort of game. It's like poker. Level one is just thinking about how to strengthen your own hand. Level two is thinking about what your opponent's hand is. Level three is thinking about what your opponent thinks your hand is, and so on. And since SBF is obviously a
genius, I should simply assume that, compared with me, SBF will always be playing at level
in plus one, which was made, which makes my analysis of the intent behind SBF's books for
losers idea spiral into infinity and crash like a computer, like,
Lever, is how you write about me in your diary?
No, Jamie, because you know, do you know what the only ethical, speaking of ethics, you know
what, if you think this way about conversations, the ethical thing to do is fill your pockets
with rocks and walk into the ocean.
Wow, you're wolfing this guy.
Yeah, I absolutely am.
You are wolfing this guy.
I could not hate these people more.
I mean, they're both, there's never been too wronger people having a conversation.
And of course, it came out.
He's just like, well, obviously he's a genius.
We have to assume that because he became a billionaire.
And he's like, no, he was never a billionaire.
Robert, in his defense, that's math.
He did the math.
He faked a balance sheet.
Like, we've now gotten access because he had to, like, go to the bank.
and step down.
So, like, now there's a caretaker trying to get people's money out of the company.
And we know shit.
Like, we've seen the Excel files where they kept their financial records.
And it's him being like, this is basically bullshit.
Like, sorry about this.
We fucked this up.
We weren't actually keeping records here.
The company balance sheet, there was no accounting department.
People would file their like, like, when they would spend tens and hundreds of millions
of dollars and things.
They would just message each other on signal about it to get approval and had deleted messages on.
So there's actually, like, no record of a lot of the accounting.
They did at one point hire an outside accounting firm to handle their accounting of this $32 billion company.
And the firm they hired is the, it bills itself as the only Metaverse-based accounting firm.
Oh, my God.
The accounting firm for this $32 billion company exists entirely within a crypto-themed video game called Decentraland.
It is so fucking stupid.
I feel worse and worse with everything.
you're saying okay so this is really this is bad and this feels bad to hear um i have a question
yes jamie um who is i guess because i am i am kind of back in in lizzie holmesland because that
whole last i mean like departments that should be you know taking care of shit don't even exist
which is very theranos adjacent uh to me phara nosi yeah theranosian if you will as uh we're
With both written books, we can just make up.
Yeah, of course.
Yeah, that's mostly what writing a book is, for sure.
I view myself as the beta of this conversation, and so I feel comfortable asking you, Robert.
Who is ultimately affected by this?
Like, what is the, like, trickle-down of this?
What happens?
Is it just other rich assholes, or does it affect regular?
Like, does it affect people?
Probably there will presumably be some, here's the thing.
And here is why there's that lawsuit against like Larry David and all those other guys who appeared in the FTX ad.
Yeah.
Presumably a bunch of regular people got suckered into putting their money on FTX and those people have probably lost some money.
That said, for the most part, it's fine.
Because most of the people who lost money are like gamblers who probably suck as much as this guy did.
And it's one of those things.
There's just an article, I think at Financial Times, where someone was like, actually, and I think
they actually had a good point, we shouldn't regulate the crypto industry, because if we regulate it,
it will be brought in closer to the actual financial industry as it exists, and banks will put more
investments into crypto, and it will get seen as, like, legitimate and backed by the state.
And so when these conmen destroy tens of billions of dollars overnight and cause panic in the
industry, it will affect the real economy, and right now it doesn't seem to.
And like, yeah, I guess that is kind of, that's not a bad point.
Maybe we just let it die on its own.
I don't know.
It seems like we'll know more.
Yeah.
So, yeah, we will continue to learn more.
One of the things that's funniest about this is that Sequoia, this investment firm,
put like $200 million into the company, which they have all written off now.
They're accepting it as a total loss.
Oh, they're going full that girl on this.
Okay.
Now, when you hear this very serious investment firm put $200 million into this business,
you probably assume, Jamie, wow,
I bet he had a good pitch, right?
I actually, I don't know.
If we're talking, Theranos, I actually don't think that that is, that's not just qualifying
to have a dog shit pitch.
You know, you know who can make this clear for us is Captain Dick Ryder.
Oh, thanks.
SBF told Sequoia about the so-called super app.
I want FtX to be a place where you can do anything you want with your next dollar.
You can buy Bitcoin.
You can send money in whatever currency to any friend anywhere in the world.
You can buy a banana.
You can do anything with you, you want with your money from inside FtX.
It's literally an arrested development.
It's also like, how much did a banana cost?
I don't know.
I feel like I can do anything I want with my debit card.
Like, I've never run into a thing I wanted to buy and been like, ah, I cannot.
No, how do I act just this banana?
I can even buy drugs with it by going to an ATM.
If I were to be a person who buys drugs, which I'm not, I could go to an ATM and take out cash and purchase drugs with them.
Support your local drug dealer and banana vending.
for crying out loud.
So he gives this banana pitch.
Quote,
suddenly the chat window on Sequoia's side of the Zoom
lights up with partners freaking out.
I love this founder, typed one partner.
I am a 10 out of 10, pinged another.
Yes, exclamation point, exclamation point, exclaimed a third.
What Sequoia was reacting to was the scale of SBF's vision.
It wasn't a story about how we might use fintech in the future
or crypto or a new kind of bank.
It was a vision about the future of money itself with a total addressable market of every person on the entire planet.
I sit 10 feet from him and I, I know, it's, these people are just, they're jokes.
I imagine like three executives doing lines of Coke and one swallowing a banana with the peel still on.
They're like, yes.
Yep.
Oh my God.
Okay.
Yeah.
So it's, I mean, which does kind of continue with the trend of like, you know, as, SBF has never had a.
problem or a like anything to overcome like if it's this easy for him to con people into shit like
of course you would have a god complex you've never you've never been told no yep yep yep yep yep
it's cool so what sequoia was react yeah sorry uh i have to continue this this fucking quote
and next he's going to talk about a person who works at sequoia and is in the room for this
i sit 10 feet from him and i walked over thinking oh shit that was really good remembers aurora
And it turns out that fucker was playing League of Legends through the entire meeting.
And this is framed in the article and in all the coverage before everything fell apart is like so awesome.
He's so cool.
This writer talks a bunch about how like Sam never stops playing video games.
When he's talking to this writer, when he's having corporate meetings, he's playing video games basically 100% of the time.
And this has always mentioned as like, he's always working.
He's always in the office.
He sleeps in a beanbag chair at his desk.
And it's like, no, dude, he's not always working.
he's conning you and he plays video games all the time and pretends that that's a fucking job
which is great great con good for you buddy always working and always there two very different
flavors of things happening exactly yeah um it's all part of the fucking con so is the fact that
he always he always wore like ratty old athletic shorts and like a wrinkled t-shirt because like
that's for if you are a young man in the tech industry that makes people think you're a genius right
because geniuses dress like shit.
Yeah, he's like, now, if I bring a real stink into the room,
people are going to, like, jack up my already fake IQ score about 20 points.
Yeah, this is fucking horseshit.
And it's like, you know who else dresses like shit?
The guy I used to buy weed from.
Oh.
Like, yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Does he also have a pet snake?
You know who wears the same outfit as Sam Bankman-Fried?
My old buddy who once at a party got into an argument.
with a guy and broke 15 bones in his face
because they were both drinking.
Not a corporate genius.
I do like that shared aesthetic
where it's like really the difference is the pet snake.
That is, that's the, that's,
that's how you truly can sniff out.
Yeah.
The millionaires from the average.
Yeah.
So anyway, I don't want a pet snake.
He's based, like he's the same kind of person as Elizabeth Holmes.
And he was, again, he's a confidence man.
And this gets us into the Larry David shit,
Because the thing about being a confidence man is that as long as people are convinced their money is safe and most of them don't try to pull it out, then you can keep the con going and you can keep the fake numbers increasing and everyone will think you're richer and you can actually get real money out of this.
So one of the things that he did is he would pour shitloads of money into sponsorship deals and to other ventures to make his companies seem legit.
One way he did this.
Yeah, he spent 17.5 million through FTX to sponsor the athletic.
teams at UC Berkeley.
He launched a $20 million ad campaign
with Tom Brady and Giselle Bunchin.
He offered NFTs at Coachella.
Uh-huh. And he spent
$135 million on the naming rights
for the Miami Heat's home arena.
And the purpose, this is all to build
confidence, right? You see, you see it's
the, the fuck, it's the same thing Crypto.com did,
by the way, with the arena in y'all's neck of the words.
I was like, I feel like the Crypto.com
arena is not long for this world.
And we don't, we don't recognize that as an act.
Is my money?
safe in this thing that's a bank
but not a bank? Well, their name
is on the arena, so it's probably
legit. Here's the thing.
It's like, yeah, it's like now walking into the
crypto.com arena, I couldn't
feel less safe. I couldn't feel
less secure. Nobody comes. Unlike when it was
the Staples Center. I'm like, oh, you know
what's never going to go out of style? Little
notebooks. People have been
using staples since we were cavemen,
I assume. So, yes.
The early technology. Just like the worst
fucking name on earth.
It's just, yeah.
It infuriates me.
These people.
Yeah, Sophie has a dog in the fight.
I don't.
I do.
In his interview with Vox, Sam basically admits this, albeit in a slightly careful way.
Journalist.
So, FTX technically wasn't gambling with their money.
FtX had just loaned their money to Alameda who had gambled with their money and lost it.
And you didn't realize it was a big deal because you didn't realize how much money it was.
Sam responds.
And also, I thought Alameda had enough collateral to reasonably cover it.
Journalist says, I get how you could have gotten.
away with it, but I guess that seems sketchy even if you get away with it. Sam, it was never the
intention. Sometimes life creeps up on you. Um, so same- He literally said life comes at you fast.
Yeah, life comes at you fast. Wow. So Sam's net worth tops out at around $22 billion on paper.
In reality, neither Alameda nor FTX had ever taken an even close to that much money. The valuation
was based entirely on nonsense calculations that were themselves based on lies from FTC's extremely
cooked books. There's a lot more about this than we're getting into. People are still finding
this all out. There is one thing I should probably read, which is, so, you know, when his company
collapsed, he had to step down from running it, right? And because a lot of money is still in there,
and a lot of, like, investments are still tight up in that. They put a guy in charge of the
company again, right? And there's, like, there's specific dudes in the business world whose, like,
job is to come in when a company fucks up like this and like try and get as much money back
out for the shareholders as possible to minimize the bleeding. So they kind of have like a like how
they they had like old Hollywood. They have like a fixer guy. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. They have a
and this is this fixer guy specifically he is the guy that they brought in when in Ron. He took over
in Ron after it fell apart in order to try and like minimize the damage from it. So he is the guy who got
brought in to deal with like the fact that this massive fucking crime happened with inron um one
sec my my favorite um my favorite enron memory not that you asked rude um was um the women of nron
playboy spread that i got to archive during my time there oh god boy did those nron girl bosses
have their they're so as second only to women of seven 11 which is my actual favorite spread
continue. First off, you know, this company has about a million creditors. So about a million
people possibly lost their entire investment in this company, which is a stunning amount of
people to take money from. And again, we are probably looking at like five or ten billion
dollars stolen, something like that. It's kind of unclear the exact amount. But anyway,
this is what the guy in the Delaware bankruptcy court filing, this is what the guy who was,
the guy who took over Enron after it became clear that the whole company was a criminal enterprise,
This is what that guy wrote about Sam's company.
Oh, no, okay.
Never in my career have I seen such a complete failure of corporate controls
and such a complete absence of trustworthy financial information as occurred here.
From compromised systems integrity and faulty regulatory oversight abroad
to the concentration of control in the hands of a very small group of inexperienced,
unsophisticated, and potentially compromised individuals,
this situation is unprecedented.
Again, that's the guy who took over in Ron.
I was like, that is literally like Bill Clinton dropping a notes post being like,
never have I seen a more cheated on my wife in any of like that is so absurd.
Well, I will say it's a different.
This guy did not commit any of the Enron crimes, right?
This is the guy who comes in.
No, no, no, no, no.
This guy is after.
He's brought in the, it becomes clear that.
That guy starting a sentence with never in my career.
This guy, yeah.
It's probably best to look at this guy as like an.
When it becomes clear that a company that has a shitload of money in it and is central in the economy has collapsed because people broke the law, he comes in to minimize the damage.
But he was not working at Enron previously, right?
Like, he's not trying to, like, stop anyone from getting in trouble.
He's trying to minimize how many people are hurt by this.
Yeah.
No, of course.
Yeah.
I just want to make clear, like, that guy's job.
Anyway, whatever.
Yeah, he's not, he's not the Enroner.
He is not the Enroner.
He did not make Enron bad.
He just was there afterwards and was like, this company's even worse.
He bought the issue of Playboy and then he took to push in.
Yeah.
So I should, God, there's, yeah, we're getting close to done.
I should note that before everything collapsed, Sam, again, he's in the effect of altruism.
He promised to donate like a couple of hundred million dollars to these EA causes.
A lot less than that actually wound out.
Some of them were good.
But a lot of it was like, so he made a huge point that he was like his one of his major priorities was
pandemic prevention, right?
We have to stop the next pandemic.
I'm going to put as much money as I can to pandemic prevention.
That's the best effective altruist thing that I can do.
To talk about how well that actually worked, I want to quote from the Washington Post here.
FTX-backed projects ranged from a $12 million to champion a California ballot initiative
to strengthen public health programs and detect emerging virus threats amid lackluster support,
the measure was punted to 2024, to investing more than $11 million on the unsuccessful congressional primary campaign of an Oregon
biosecurity expert, and even a $150,000 grant to help Monclef Slough, the scientific advisor
to the Trump administration's Operation Warp Speed Vaccine Accelerator, write his memoir.
So that sounds like a giant waste of money, right?
That sounds like a lot of money.
Even if it was like good, it sounds like it didn't account.
Like even if the goals were good, like, well, the ballot measure failed, like it got punted,
so it's not like it worked.
And it gets worse because SBF's fund also put a lot of money like $5 million into pro
Publica. In ProPublica, they've done a lot of cool stuff. They also recently published an extremely
flawed investigation that backed the lab leak hypothesis. I'm going to, the LA Times and their analysis
of this deeply flawed piece of reporting. And also, you know, we've got some notes for the
LA Times as well. Yes. Nobody's perfect. The LA Times called it a train wreck, noting, the article
is based heavily on Chinese language documents that appear to have been mistranslated and
misinterpreted, according to Chinese language experts who have piled on via social media
since its publication.
It also takes his gospel a report by a rump group of Republican congressional staff members
asserting that the pandemic was more likely than not the result of a research-related
incident.
And this has been the fact that ProPublica published this has like provided a shitload of
fuel to the, it was all a fucking lab leak from China.
It's China's fault.
I wasn't aware that.
That's, yeah.
Sam Bankman-Fried funded that shit.
Oh, my God.
Yeah, basically, none of the shit he was putting money into that was supposed to be good really worked.
And a lot of it was, so another thing the right is doing right now is they're talking about,
he was like the number one or number two donor to Democrats during the midterm elections.
Right behind Seth McFarland.
Yeah.
Yeah.
But none of his donations worked.
And also he gave, it was like $32 million he gave to the DIMs.
He gave like $24 million to the Republicans.
And the reason he was giving this money, number one,
There were some, like, pro-pandemic response candidates he wanted to back, most of whom didn't, you know, do well.
But also, like, a lot of the money was towards Republican and Democratic candidates who were going to be part of the regulation of the crypto industry because he wanted to have a seat at the table and push regulations in a way that.
Okay.
So any candidate that would enable that is someone who's getting money down.
Yeah.
Exactly.
So, anyway, in general, nothing at Alameda or FTX was as it seemed.
in that Dick writing Sequoia article, Carolyn Ellison, the CEO of Alameda, is he talks about her a bit
and like, she frames her as like this quintessential innocent nerd girl, plucky, and ethical
and optimistic to show like these are the kind of, you know, smart, young, jinsey kids that are,
you know, building this great company and like, she showed up in Larpgear to meet with Sam and
talk about the future of their great financial enterprise, and she's an ethical altruist.
Since everything fell apart, it's come out that she and Sam were dating each of
other and possibly other members of the company.
And also people have found her...
Now we have the full Liz Holmes.
Look has been completed.
Here we go.
People have found her Tumblr.
And boy, is she sketchy as hell.
I'm going to quote from a report on her Tumblr activity in decrypt.com.
Boy, howdy.
When I first started my first foray into Polly, I thought of it as a radical break for my
trad past, the account wrote in February 2020.
But TBH, I've come to decide that the only acceptable style of Polly
is it best characterizes something like imperial Chinese harem.
The account went on to detail how a polyamorous dynamic should ideally function
as a cutthroat market of sexual competition and subjugation.
None of this non-hierarchical bullshit, the account elaborated.
Everyone should have a ranking of their partners.
People should know where they fall in the ranking,
and there should be vicious power struggles for the ranks.
Oh, my God.
It gets worse, Jamie.
The Ellison linked account also demonstrated a substantial preoccupation with HBD or human biodiversity,
an online euphemism for the discredited fields of race science and eugenics popularized by the alright oh boy give me one more paragraph and then we can talk about this jamie ellison has for years vocalized her diehard obsession with harry potter in one post her affiliated tumbler account tied her love of online character quizzes to her penchant for sorting indians by their cast which she presumed to indicate genetic distinction oh my god holy shit
even jk rowling wasn't thinking something that fucked up and that's really saying something
there someone needs to tell amazing astonishing tumbler is exclusively for sherlock fan
fiction and things that trigger my eating disorder that's it i cannot fuck like oh that's so
dark it's i almost can't fathom it right and again there's so much we probably will do a follow
up at some point because like the fact that the fact that it was this easy for like some
fucking crypto rag.
They're not the only ones
we reported on it.
To find her tumbler
where she talks about race science
makes me think
these guys were all probably
into a lot more fucked up shit
than they let on.
Yeah.
So we'll see.
We'll see.
I just,
we don't have the hour
for me to decompress
the way I need to
after hearing that sentence
specifically.
Yeah, I need a cigarette.
I'm going to start smoking
today.
And I hope she's fucking
happy. Oh my God. That is that is that is so funny brutal place to land. Thanks for fucking
nothing Robert. Jesus. Anyway, hopefully they're all all of their money's gone but they probably
squirled away millions and stuff for themselves. Although I at least one of the articles I've read says
that like his net worth is effectively zero now. But I don't think anyone actually knows what his net worth is
right now like and how much he got like his company went from valued at 32 billion dollars to
most recently, there's something like $650,000 in actual assets left.
But I also kind of think he and the others probably have millions or tens of millions
that they set aside in shady ways for themselves.
Wow.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, well, that does sound like what the Beanie Babies guy would do,
and that is my yardstick for morality.
That is so, that is very, very scary to consider.
I feel like guys like that, the thing that is, I mean, I don't know, whenever you hear about, like, it is so carmically satisfying to know that someone like SBF can be completely bottomed out and like destroyed by something like this.
But the thing is like when rich guys like that lose everything, they just come up with worse, more hateful ideas and then come back.
And that is like always what kind of scares me about that.
Yeah, it is so funny.
I don't know, Jamie.
I don't know what the solution is.
It's not like I want them to have money again.
I just, you know, how can you make someone say less?
Again, I think the solution is.
The podcaster's dilemma.
I think this, look, here's where I'll land on this.
You know, I don't think people should be thrown into cages generally
unless there's literally no other way to stop them from harming folks.
And I don't think that's the case with these people.
So instead, I think the actual solution is to close from the outside all of the doors
to that the fucking rich person apartment complex they occupy in that Bahamas development.
Lock it from the outside and once a week drop in food and necessities via a helicopter
and never let them leave or use the Internet again.
Have them all just be with their friends.
their in their weird little compound going increasingly insane with their Chinese harem shit.
I don't know.
I guess that's another kind of prison.
But if we film it, we can make money.
Well, but then SBF may have to face his worst fear, which is reading a book.
Yeah, I guess, like, my serious answer is what do you do to people like this, is you stop them
from ever being able to have access to money again or start companies again.
And hopefully, eventually they find something to do that actually helps.
human beings and is like, of any kind of use, like working at a grocery store, that's
a real benefit.
People need to get food and people need, like, that's a respectable, honest way to make a living.
And if any of these people were to get a job working at a safe way, they would be providing
an infinitely greater benefit to the human race than they could ever have performed working at
FDX.
Perhaps a bit more of that ethical side of the ethical altruism you were looking for.
Yes, yes.
I'll be honest.
I did not come to the recording today
with a solution for the prison industrial complex
but I don't have it. I still don't like it.
I still don't love it.
Yeah.
Yeah, I have no solution.
But you know what I do have, Jamie?
What?
You're plugables.
No, you don't. I have those.
Well, you have them, but I'm letting you have them.
Oh, my God.
I'm giving...
I mean, I could probably do them if nobody wants to take this job.
I'll do it. I can, I'll do them.
Sophie, do you want to do them?
Yeah, I mean, you can pre-order Jamie's book, and that is linked in her Instagram bio.
That's true.
You can follow her on Instagram at Jamie Christ's superstar, and you can follow her on Twitter at Jamie Laughness Help, if Twitter's still around.
She has a podcast that she co-hosts with Caitlin Durante called The Bechtocast.
You should listen to her many limited run series, including her.
most recent run, which is Ghost Church.
Which Sophie produced, along with the vital cast and everything, every podcast on the planet.
This has now become a plug for me.
Did I get everything, Jimmy?
Yeah, that's exactly what I would have said, except worse.
Yeah, so pre-order raw dog.
Yeah.
Thanks, Sophie.
Yeah, pre-order raw dog.
If you listen to the hot dog episode of bastards and didn't like it, you did like it.
Now, buy the book.
Yeah.
Legally, you did like it.
And if you disagree with that statement,
we will send the CIA to kill your family.
Yeah.
And let's make sure to attribute that quote to Robert Evans specifically.
There we go.
And speaking of Robert Evans specifically, Robert Evans specifically,
Margaret Kiljoy specifically,
and myself will be doing a Behind the Bastards virtual live stream show on December 8th.
You can get tickets at moment.com.
BtB.
Yeah.
Also, I have a substack now because Twitter's not doing great.
So that makes me so sad.
Why?
I like writing things.
I got to write a thing last night.
So if you don't you want me to write more things?
I subscribe.
It's better for me than being on Twitter all the goddamn time.
Yeah, you can find it at shatterzone.
Substack.com.
Go there and I will be writing.
I'll try to write something every week.
Maybe I won't.
Maybe all of this will be.
fall apart, be lost in time like tears in the rain, or maybe you'll get a new thing for me
every week. There's no way to know. Every time, half the time when I get something from someone's
substack, because I subscribe to quite a few, but every time I get a message from someone's
substack, it's always like, I'm so sorry. I'm like, I didn't notice. Just give me the content
and I'll see me about. Yeah, yeah, it's fine. Look, we all, I don't know. I've been meaning to
write more stuff, uh, as opposed to just tweeting shit posts. So maybe it'll happen. Maybe it
won't. There's no way to know. Perfect. Bye.
A decade ago, I was on the trail of one of the country's most elusive serial killers,
but it wasn't until 2023 when he was finally caught. The answers were there, hidden in plain sight.
So why did it take so long to catch him? I'm Josh Zeman, and this is monster, hunting the long
Island serial killer, the investigation into the most notorious killer in New York, since the
son of Sam, available now. Listen for free on the IHeart radio app, Apple Podcasts, wherever you
get your podcasts. What up y'all? It's your boy, Kevin on stage. I want to tell you about my
new podcast called Not My Best Moment, where I talk to artists, athletes, entertainers, creators,
friends, people I admire who had massive success about their massive failures. What do they mess up
on. What is their heartbreak? And what did they learn from him? I got judged horribly. The judges
were like, you're trash. I don't know how you got on the show. Boo. Somebody had tomatoes.
I'm kidding. But if they had tomatoes, they would have thrown the tomatoes. Let's be honest.
We've all had those moments we'd rather forget. We bumped our head. We made a mistake.
The deal fell through. We're embarrassed. We failed. But this podcast is about that and how we made
through. So when they
sat me down, they were kind of like, we got into
the small talk, and they were just like, so what do you got?
What? What ideas? And I was like, oh, no.
What?
Check out Not My Best Moment with me, Kevin on stage,
on the Iheart radio app, Apple Podcast,
YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Robert Smith. This is Jacob Goldstein.
And we used to host a show called Planet Money.
And now we're back making this new podcast
called Business History, about the best ideas
and people and businesses in history.
and some of the worst people, horrible ideas, and destructive companies in the history of business.
Having a genius idea without a need for it is nothing.
It's like not having it at all.
It's a very simple, elegant lesson.
Make something people want.
First episode, how Southwest Airlines use cheap seats and free whiskey to fight its way into the airline business.
The most Texas story ever.
There's a lot of mavericks in that story.
We're going to have mavericks on the show.
We're going to have plenty of robber barons.
so many robber barons. And you know what? They're not all bad. And we'll talk about some of the
classic great moments of famous business geniuses, along with some of the darker moments that
often get overlooked. Like Thomas Edison and the electric chair. Listen to business history on the
iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
Hey there, Dr. Jesse Mills here. I'm the director of the men's clinic at UCLA Health. And I want
to tell you about my new podcast called The Mailroom. And I'm Jordan, the show's producer.
And like a lot of guys, I haven't been to the doctor in many years.
I'll be asking the questions we probably should be asking, but aren't.
Because guys usually don't go to the doctor unless a piece of their face is hanging off or they've broken a bone.
Depends which bone.
Well, that's true.
Every week, we're breaking down the unique world of men's health, from testosterone and fitness to diets and fertility and things that happen in the bedroom.
You mean sleep?
Yeah, something like that, Jordan.
We'll talk science without the jargon and get you really.
answers to the stuff you actually wonder about. It's going to be fun, whether you're 27, 97, or
somewhere in between. Men's Health is about more than six packs and supplements. It's about
energy, confidence, and connection. We don't just want you to live longer. We want you to live
better. So check out the mailroom on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get
your favorite shows. Welcome to the movies you liked as an adolescent and are now ashamed.
of shame cast. I'm Robert Evans and today in the seat of eternal self-hatred. Jamie Loftus,
Jamie, you have just admitted prior to the show starting that you once loved the Dana Carvey
vehicle, Master of Disguise. What do you have to say for yourself? I feel fucking sick with
myself, Robert. I haven't been able to sleep in the 20 years since its release. In my defense,
it came out on my birthday, which I feel like had a lot to do with why I considered it my favorite
movie. I felt a kinship with it. Yeah. Birthdays are like a performance enhancing drug for movies
that you see when you're 11. It's absolutely true. Yeah. It's the blood doping of positive movie
memories. And furthermore, it's the most famous children's movie that was shooting on 9-11. And so
I think in that way, it also felt like it would have been disloyal to my country. And so, I think, in that way,
to say a word against the master of disguise, particularly the turtle turtle scene.
However, you know, I think the movie certainly doesn't hold up and I feel fucking sick with
myself every single day.
Yeah.
I wonder, because famously, Dana Carvey was dressed as the turtle man when those planes hit
those towers.
And James Cameron was 20,000 feet below sea level exploring the bottom of the ocean.
And I wonder if they ever cross paths at like a Hollywood event and started talking about 9-11.
So what were you up to on that day?
And then Mark Wahlberg just leans in apropos of nothing and is like if I was there.
I would have stopped it.
Oh, Jamie.
You know, I can honestly say 9-11 was the first time I felt like this country let me down because it delayed the release of the seminal Tim Allen film, Big Trouble, which.
It sure did. It sure did.
Features a classic Patrick Warburton performance, by the way.
It sure does.
God damn right.
You see his ass, everybody.
If you want to see Patrick Warburton's ass, it's in that movie.
He is so underrated.
I tell me what I love that man.
A total king.
What a talent.
Um, look hard.
Friends, just to say, this is behind the bastards.
This is behind the bastards.
A podcast about none of the things that we were talking about.
And today, actually, Jamie, I've got you back in the hot seat, back on the office, which is more of an ephemeral feeling than a physical space these days.
Making me answer for my sins right off the jump.
Yeah, by talking again about our friend Sam Bankman Freed, who you and I chatted about right after his life collapsed last year.
And I felt like we should do an update.
I think we should too, because I'll be honest, I have done truly everything.
everything I can to avoid knowing more about him.
So I would say I know basically nothing about him since we last spoke.
Yeah, it's amazing because normally, you know, I'm an empathetic being.
Like, Sam has a face that I've just always wanted to hit from the first time I saw a picture of him.
And normally when somebody goes through this much shit, when like their life is this ruined, right?
Like, I might, I feel a little less like hitting them because the world has hit them.
But I still kind of want to sock him in the fucking jaw.
every time I see this guy
Let me just check it
Has his face
Changed
He wears suits sometimes now
When he goes to court
He's not wearing the basketball shorts
Well that's not helpful
Oh that's true God
Yeah that's like two different versions
Of an embarrassing
Desperate way to present
Okay he's wearing a he's wearing a suit now
Yeah he's wearing a suit now
It looks like shit but whatever
I try not to judge people on how they look
Unless that's part of their con
And Sam as a guy for whom the dressing like a slob was always part of his
His like tech bro genius
You know persona that he was putting on like
Did we fooled everybody?
Did we ever get a mugshot?
Oh yeah, yeah, I believe there's a mugshot of him out at this point
Certainly when he went at the Bahamas
So when we last left our buddies,
Sam in November of 2022, he had been arrested in the Bahamas and extradited to the United
States, where he was charged with so many financial crimes that he might theoretically spend
more than 115 years in prison.
Wow.
Now, in the days and months since, a lot has happened, and a lot more has come out about
how the former crypto mogul behaved before and after his fall.
I want to start with some of the latter information, because by far the most entertaining
story to drop as a result of these serried legal filings against Sam is that he, you
was using the non-profit arm of FTX to attempt to buy a sovereign nation he could use as an
apocalypse shelter. That is by far the funniest story that's dropped about these guys in the
months since. What was the plan there? Oh, that's a great question, Jamie. So let's talk about
the island of Nauru. It's an island in the southwest Pacific. I think it's about 2100 miles away
from the coast of Australia, which given the fact that Australia is really out in the middle of
nowhere, is pretty close to Australia.
It is presently the world's smallest island nation.
It's got a population of about 12,000 or so, not a ton of people.
And as an incredibly tiny country, one of its primary assets is simply the fact that it is
a sovereign nation, because there's things that countries can do, that nothing else can do,
like issues certain kinds like passports and visas and do certain kinds of things with
banking, right?
So if you're a really tiny country that doesn't have like a shitload of natural resources, one thing you can export is the benefits of your sovereignty to say really rich people who might want certain things that you can do as a country.
The plan is coming together.
So there's a number of ways in which Nauru has kind of taken advantage of this to get by.
One of them is that they've sort of sold access to their land to Australia to use so that Australia has used.
them for years as an offshore processing center for asylum seekers.
I think this stopped most recently in 2019, but there's been a couple of waves of this.
And it was not a pleasant place, right?
Conditions were so brutal in sort of the offshore processing center on Nauru from 2012 to
2019 that several residents carried out like deadly forms of protests, sewing their own
lip shut or lighting themselves on fire as a protest of the conditions they were facing.
pretty ugly scene.
In the late 1990s, kind of prior to this period,
Nauru was the chief money laundering location
for the emerging Russian oligarch class.
They helped a lot of these oligarch types
you've heard about in the context of Putin
laundered about $70 billion in ill-gotten funds
during the early stages of the Russian Federation.
I love a good bastard's cameo.
Oh, yeah. No, Nauru's adjacent
to a whole lot of shitty people.
Great.
Yeah, here it's a lovely place.
Nauru was also designated a money laundering state by the U.S. Treasury in 2002, which led to sanctions, which I think is probably why they moved to, like, letting Australia offshore migrants there for a while.
And since Australia stopped doing that in 2019, Sam Bankman-Fried and his fellow effective altruists felt like they might have had an opportunity there, right?
Like, Nauru is kind of looking for some new cash flow.
They're looking for a sovereign nation to do some things for.
It's an opportunity to be effective.
Yeah, yeah, to be effectively altruistic towards yourself.
Specifically, Sam and his brother, Gabriel Bankman Freed,
is actually the guy sort of like organizing this attempted endeavor using FTX's
charitable donations arm.
And their goal was to purchase the entire island in order to construct what Gabe called
a bunker shelter that would be used to, quote,
ensure that most effective altruists survive in the event that between 50% and 99.99% of
the world population perish in a catastrophe.
Jesus.
And that's like a pretty common.
This, I feel like the game of the situation is a very common character in bat.
Like, just the devious brother.
I mean, I hate the bastard most of all, but I really detest the devious brother as well.
There's just, it just wreaks of insecurity.
Get your own grift, man.
Especially since they're framing it not as, look, you know, when you got like a guy like Peter Thiel, right?
And everybody knows Peter Thiel's got like an evil rich guy.
bunker to wait out the end of the world if it happens and like fuck peter teal but at least that's
oh peter teal's not pretending i have a bunker to like save the world by putting aside just the best
people he's like no i'm a giant piece of shit and i'm going to save myself if things go wrong okay
like fuck you peter teal but at least it's honest they're framing it's like this is like
this is my blood bunker for just boys yeah it's me and my blood boys game is like no we have to in the
event there's an apocalypse we have to save all the eAs because they're the best people and
that's what's best for the world that we'll do we're utilitarians right the greatest good for the
greatest number of people is to save all of the best people which is me and my friends the other
finance kids who call themselves effective altruists so they don't have to feel bad for the fact
that all they do is play the stock market like every other piece of shit anyway so lucky that
they all met each other so lucky that they're all friends all the good people yeah i would love i would
love honestly like look when the when the strike is over somebody at a network bring me on i will
write you a banger fucking script about an apocalypse where just the EA guys are left in
their bunker trying to figure out society.
Okay.
Another incentive to end the strike, that would fucking rip.
Yeah, yeah, we could do quite a tale.
We could have some fun with this one, Jamie.
And you know, I don't, I think that there would be some effective altruous, like,
ridiculous enough to do cameos.
Oh, yeah.
We could get, we could get fucking William McCaskill in there.
No problem.
Bring his Scottish ass on board.
Vane little perverts.
Each and every one of them.
And they're all, I'm going to be honest, kind of stupid.
So I bet we could trick him.
Like, you don't have journalistic ethics with an HBO show.
Yeah, we could just say we're bringing them on for an interview.
We could like film around them like an, what was that fucking movie with Steve Martin,
where they have to film a fake movie around, what is it, Chris Rock?
Shit.
Oh, it's the, it's, um, um, um, um, um, oh, fuck.
See, now you're, now, now, now it's, I know, it's driving me nuts.
We have to figure this out.
Uh, I rewatched it recently.
It holds up.
It does hold up.
It's like one of the best movies.
Bofinger.
Fucking dope yet.
We could do a bowfinger with William McCaskill where he thinks he's getting
interviewed for a documentary and we're really making him the bad guy of our HBO series.
Bring in Steve Martin.
too. Fuck it. He's still got it.
Yeah. He's got good politics. He'd be great.
Yeah.
Glad we remembered it. Watch Bowfinger, guys. It holds up.
Truly. If you take anything away from today, it really does. I was shocked at how well it helped.
Yeah, startlingly good movie. Pretty good like Scientology joke.
So, Gabriel Bankman-Fried ran FTX's charitable donations wing, which included a ton of money for what many people have characterized as political bribes.
I'm not saying that he was bribing politicians for FTX.
I'm saying that's what a lot of people have characterized what he was doing as.
Now,
that much has been known for a while,
but it was not until the current management of what remains of FTX sued Sam,
because again,
there's new management that's trying to recover as much money as possible,
and they're throwing Sam under the bus because why wouldn't they?
And that's how all this stuff got revealed,
because they have all of FTX's internal communications.
So they found a bunch of shit,
like that Sam was having Gabriel try to buy the island of Nauru.
Now, it is unclear how serious their attempt to buy this island was.
A representative of the island's government has been like, no, no, no.
We were never putting our island for sale.
This was never a thing that was going to happen.
And maybe that is the case.
Maybe they were just being idiots fucking around.
But in a memo between Gabriel and an FTX officer, the discussion was centered around the idea of buying the island, of being in control of it as a sovereign country, not just purchasing land.
I mean, that's a lot of work for a business.
bit. Not that I put it past him, but I'm just like, it's not sounding like it. Yeah. No. And I think,
I don't put it past. It's possible that Nauru, whatever is telling the, whatever government
official is telling the truth, they were never considering selling the island. But it's also
possible that Gabe at all believed they could buy the island, right? Right. They may, in fact,
be that dumb. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Now, there were discussions between these FDX guys about using
Nauru as a base for human genetic experimentation.
You get the feeling that their goal was to create modified post-human godlike bodies
for their fellow effective altruists so that they could live forever and dominate mankind
after the collapse as undying immortals.
That just sent the ugliest photoshopped image.
Like it was involuntary how quickly the like no neck huge chest.
Photoshop's Super Soldier image team to mine.
Absolutely.
Okay.
Hey.
Yeah.
It sounds like a mix between that one video game with the big robot dinosaurs and
those sci-fi books by that guy who wound up being real anti-Muslim.
But yeah.
Oh.
I thought there could be a lot of guys.
I wonder which guy.
Oh, it's I think Iliam and Olympos.
Okay.
I forget the name of the author.
But the premise of the book is that like in the future,
a bunch of rich guys turn themselves into gods and decide to like recreate the
Trojan War with themselves as the Greek gods and they like resurrect a bunch of
dead archaeologists to make sure that they get the details right it's it's fun it's
it's quite a series except for the weird moments of bigotry oh that'll happen good stuff
Dan Simmons I think is the author anyway so yeah they're talking about we want to
create a human genetic experimentation base and they're like we want to figure out
what the sensible regulations around human genetic enhancement are,
but we also want to build a lab.
And while they're talking about this, Gabriel adds cryptically,
probably there are other things that's useful to do with a sovereign country.
I don't know what he means by that, but yeah, probably, huh?
So that could be as banal as just like money laundering,
which Nauru obviously is quite a history of,
or issuing things like passports,
but given the fact that all these dummies are permanently poisoned
by a mixture of sci-fi fandoms and weird futurist cults,
I think it's safe to say we all dodged a bullet
by the fact that they never got too far in this scheme.
Now, my favorite thing about this whole idea
is how dumb it is on its face.
There are some countries that could act
as really good apocalypse shelters for the super rich, right?
Switzerland is one.
A lot of rich people have their apocalypse shelters in Switzerland.
New Zealand is another.
But the problem for that is that, like,
Switzerland and New Zealand are both functional states.
Obviously, if you're a billionaire there, you can have some outsized influence, but you're not just going to run everything because there's other interests and like a functional system of government in place in all of those places.
I think Sam and them were hoping that since Nauru's small enough, they could just utterly dominate the government.
But they ignored the fact that it's like one of the worst places imaginable to have as an apocalypse shelter.
For one thing, the island does not grow much food, which means it has to import 90% of what it needs to sustain its very small.
population. It's all good. We have so much money. It's okay. We'll just keep importing
it. Yeah. It also has very little freshwater and most of its infrastructure is on the coast and
vulnerable to both rising sea levels and hurricanes. It is very close to the bottom of places
that you would want to have as a shelter. So very funny. All these people are silly. Now,
Jamie. The main reason current FTX is revealing all this is that they are super.
the old management of the country, a company, i.e. Sam, to try and reclaim a billion or so
dollars, they argue, was funneled illegally into nonsense like this and into the pockets
of Bankman Freed and his lieutenants in the months before FTX collapsed due to insolvency.
The lawsuit against Sam also includes some more confounding lines, described in this paragraph
from an article on the suit by CryptoNews site, Decrypt.
The lawsuit further says that the projects run by the FTX Foundation were frequently misguided
and sometimes dystopian.
These included a $300,000 grant to an individual
to write a book about how to figure out
what humans' utility function are,
as well as a $400,000 grant to an entity
that posted YouTube videos related to
rationalist and effective altruism material,
including videos on grabby aliens.
Now, does that all seem like nonsense to you, Jamie?
I don't know, Robert.
Let's hear them out about the grabby aliens.
Don't worry. I'm going to explain all of this horse shit to you.
Oh, my God. What kind of Rick and Morty ass nonsense?
It is some Rick and Morty ass nonsense. It's much dumber than anything in Rick and Morty
because at least some of the people there understand story structure.
And at least understand that it's a joke.
That it's a bit, yes. So if you aren't terminally adhered to one of the stupidest subcultures
in the broader tech sphere, that probably does seem like nonsense.
and it is, but let's start with a bit about paying someone 300 grand to write about what a
human's utility function is.
Now, what is a utility function?
Great question.
In economics, a utility function is the measure of welfare or satisfaction of a consumer
as a function of the consumption of real goods like food.
In simple terms, it's a way of describing the satisfaction or other benefits gained by
consuming a specific resource.
This is important to rational choice theory, which is a theory that states,
that individuals use rational calculations
to make rational choices
to achieve outcomes aligned with their own objectives.
Now, most people who aren't economists
think that talking about the economy this way is silly
because people are not, in fact, rational actors.
And in fact, we make shitty decisions all the time
guided by misinformation or pressure
that causes us to inaccurately interpret
the potential value of something
like a college education versus the cost of, say, student loans, right?
One could argue that Sam Bekman-Fried and co are a great example of...
Wonderful example of the irrationality.
But that's economics.
This is not an economics podcast.
I'm not an economist.
And the way that Bankman-Fried and his fellow EAs talk about utility functions is not the
same as how economists talk about it, right?
So when economists are talking about this, it's part of how to kind of figure out
why people might make rational choices by understanding, like, the value of sort of
the ranked, like, preference they give to certain things that they might expend resources
on, broadly speaking.
When Bankman Freed and EAs talk about utility functions, what they mean is something even more
abstract.
And I'm going to quote from a summary from a write-up on a effective altruism.org, a website
you should avoid at all costs.
Quote, I'm really not looking forward to finding out how this somehow relates to the
grabby aliens.
Okay, sorry.
Yeah.
In a very dumb way, Jamie.
Quote.
Okay, good.
EA's and rationalists love dropping the term in every conversation.
Using the term utility function can be immensely helpful when aiming to maximize positive impact or do the most good.
The concept of a utility function provides a systematic way to quantify and compare the potential benefits of different actions,
thus helping to guide decision-making toward the most effective outcomes.
By representing values, goals, or beneficial outcomes numerically, utility functions allow for a structured comparison and prioritization of actions.
If, for example, your goal is to alleviate global suffering, you could assign values to different
charitable actions based on their estimated impact, thus creating a utility function.
This function can then guide you to allocate your resources like time or money where they
will generate the greatest utility or good.
Now, that just seems like you're saying you should try to figure out how your money is going
to be spent best, right, before you spend it.
But that's not actually what they're saying.
What they are doing here is they are set like a utility function in this context is
way of assigning a number that you have made up.
There is no objective value to this number.
There's no rigor to this.
You are making up a number to,
to, like, determine the value of spending your money in certain ways.
And you are doing this so that whatever it is you want to do with your money,
you can justify numerically as the scientifically best way to spend your money.
So you can argue in this way by assigning these values whenever wonky way you want.
No, me paying taxes to fund roads and a health care system is a shitty use of my money because it doesn't
optimize this thing that I consider to be of higher long-term value.
And the thing that's of higher long-term value to me is spending money on fucking space travel
research so that I can be a demigod on Mars, right?
That's best for human beings in the long term.
So in utilitarian speak, you know, the greatest good for the greatest number of people is that's
getting to Mars as opposed to feeding starving people right now.
You know, the utility function of getting to Mars is much higher.
so that's where my money ought to go.
Well, it's all, yeah, it just like comes down to like the great, the greatest good is me
smiling a little bit.
Yeah, exactly.
There's literally some writing on that, in that vein.
So it is through math like this that EAs are able to look at a world where millions face
death by famine or disease or rising sea levels and say, the best way to help the planet
is for us to become finance bros and then spend our money investing in AI companies or whatever.
The fundamental selfishness of this whole community is made clear when you read the essays these people write on their websites, like Less Wrong, a blog founded by self-declared AIX, yeah, Eliza Yidkowski.
Yudkowski is a rationalist, which is a related subculture to the EAs.
There's a lot of bleed over.
Sam and a lot of his people were rationalists or rationalist adjacent.
And yeah, to give you an idea of how these people talk about utility functions, I'm going to read an excerpt from an article on this website.
titled Your Utility Function is Your Utility Function by David Udell.
I've been thinking a lot lately about exactly how altruistic I am.
The truth is that I'm not sure.
I care a lot about not dying and about my girlfriend and family and friends not dying
and about all of humanity not dying and about all life on this planet not dying too.
And I care about the glorious transhuman future and all that and the 10 to the 50th power
or whatever possible good future lives hanging in the balance.
And I care about some of these things disproportionately to their apparent moral
magnitude. But what I care about is what I care about.
Rationality is the art of getting more of what you want, whatever that is, of systematized
winning by your own lights. You will totally fail in that art if you bulldoze your values
in a desperate effort to fit in, or to be a good person or in the way you're a model of
society seems to ask you to. So you see what he's saying, if you read between the lines
there, what the most rational thing for me to do is whatever makes me feel best.
Whatever gives me a little smile. Don't let people shame you for spending your resources
you know, entirely on yourself and your own whims.
Like, you're actually a hero if you do that.
Oh, it is, it is so fascinating to me to watch, like, I don't know,
it seems like this like self-conscious reflex where they feel the need to define
rational by something that is more closely aligned with reality and then
immediately be like, but what that actually means is.
The core of it is always being able to say that like, well, if you suggest that number one,
I have a responsibility to other people and that that responsibility is to some extent out
of my hands, which is what we all say when we're in a society, right?
I don't have kids.
I don't have a choice not to spend some of the significant amount of money I pay in taxes
educating other people's kids.
Now, I'm not a complete piece of shit, so I'm fine with that because like I've done very well
for myself and kids need
educations. That's just a nice way
for the world to work. But
these people are more of the feeling that like
no, I should do whatever is possible
to avoid paying for
a public school system. And in fact
I'm often going to advocate for some sort
of like weird voucher based system
that allows me to not fund public
schools because the greatest
good for the greatest number of people is for me to
ensure that like me and my
rich kid friends all get to send our kids
to special schools where like
What, you know, fuck anybody else.
Like, I don't have any other responsibility for the broader population.
All that actually matters is, like, me maximizing, you know, my own personal happiness.
But I still want to feel like, like, I'm a hero for doing it, right?
If I avoid paying taxes in order to, like, spend all of my money investing in open AI so
that I can, like, take people's jobs away, like, I want to feel like a hero for doing that
because what I'm arguing is that it's best for, you know, the people 500 years from now.
And there's going to be more of them than there are today.
So I'm a hero for, like, getting rich off of this company today, you know?
Yes.
Well, because there's, first of all, there's definitely going to be people in 500 years.
Sure, for sure.
If these EAs get their way, sure, yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
If we are doing the most good, they're, that's so fucking exhausting.
I mean, it does like your Peter Thiel example, not that, you know, doing evil is good in any capacity,
but the most exhausting kind of evil
is the one that also insists on you validating
that it's not actually evil all the time
that it deserves to shut the fuck up and ruin my life or don't
it's the same thing with a lot of these
fucking right wing media grifters
where like it's not enough for them to be rich
it's not enough for them to like get their way politically
they they feel like they have like an ethical
their owed like being cool and respected
and it's the same thing like these people
are all finance goals. They are all, like, actively fighting to avoid paying taxes and to be
able to concentrate ever more power and an ever smaller number of people to destroy the lives
of, you know, artists and people who are, like, working folks in order to, like, make more
short-term profits. This is all what they actually care about personally. But they want to feel
like Gandhi while they do it, right? Because what they're doing is guaranteeing what they'll
argue, Jamie, is that like, well, you know, this may hurt this company, you know, me getting
involved in this company. Sure, we may destroy a lot of jobs in the short term, but by doing
so, we'll be able to make sure that the AI we build that eventually becomes our God, uh,
is one that cares about the future of humanity. And that's better for the most people in long
run. Yes. And history should remember me, uh, as the greatest man to ever live. And people will,
you know, that'll be on television someday when my computer is writing every television show.
I fucking hate these people. So, um,
Yeah. It's cool stuff. And I think the fundamental selfishness of these people, because all that effective altruism and rationalism are really about is by, is creating a made up system of numbers to justify you pursuing your own benefit as like science, right, as like scientifically rational. This is really, it's not as if that doesn't, you know, like math problems to serve a very small group self-interest. It's not as if that doesn't exist out.
side of this circle, but it's just like bizarre how uniquely, like, they lack any sort of
self-awareness or, I don't know, it's just, they're so fucking annoying is what I'm trying to
say.
That's very true, Jamie.
And this is all really clear when you look at how the movement, the EA movement,
treated Sam Bankman-Fried before and after his fall from grace.
If effective altruism can be said to have a pope, and it can, because all of the
these Silicon Valley philosophical movements are just Kirkland brand Catholicism. That
Pope is Will McCaskill, an Oxford moral philosopher and co-founder and co-founder for the
Center for Effective Altruism. When FDX collapsed and Sam got arrested, he was quick to put out
a statement of outrage. I don't know which emotion is stronger. My other rage at Sam and others
for causing such harm to so many people, or my sadness and self-hatred for falling for this
deception. Now, the only reason I would hesitate to call this horseshit, Jamie, is that
Horshit, by virtue of being inanimate waste, possesses a fundamental honesty that McCaskill is
incapable of.
He and SBAF, yeah, fuck, yeah.
Robert, that's the bitchiest thing I've heard you say in a while.
That's awesome.
Thank you.
He and SBF met back at MIT when Sam was an undergrad.
McCaskill convinced him that he could maximize his impact in humanitarian causes by earning
to give, you know, making as much money as possible so that he can give it away in a way
that presumably will help the world.
Now, when Sam ultimately launched Alameda research,
it was an EA project from the start,
staffed by Sam's friends in the community.
One software engineer told time,
almost everyone who came on in those early days
was an EA.
They were there for EA reasons,
says Naya Buscal,
a former software engineer at Alameda.
That was the pitch we gave people.
This is an EA thing.
I know.
I'm once again thinking about sports video games,
and I know it's not sports video games.
It is,
It is basically a sports video game.
I just had the flashback to the interview you did.
I was thinking, okay, it's true, it's true.
In the early days, Sam's pitch was that 50% of the company profits would be donated to EA causes.
And the initial round of investing that got the company off the ground was funded entirely by rich EA types.
Publicly, McCaskill talked about Sam like he was the EA Messiah, probably because FDX's future
Fund provided a huge amount of support for his movement.
In just nine months in 2022, the Future Fund, run by Nick Beckstead, a moral philosopher
who used FTX money to support various causes, gave more than $160 million in other people's
money funneled through FTX to effective altruism, including $33 million to organizations
that McCaskill had a direct interest in.
So that's why McCaskill spoke so positively about Sam, which is made even more fucked up
when you realize that, like, other people in the EA movement had started warning McCaskill
about Sam Bankmanfried and about him being a conman as early as 2018.
And I'm going to quote again from time.
This is about from, like, the very start of Alameda research.
Within months, the good karma of the venture dissipated in a series of internal clashes,
many details of which have not been previously reported.
Some of the issues were personal.
Bankman Freed could be dictatorial, according to one former colleague.
Three former Alameda employees told time he had inappropriate romantic relationship.
relationships with his subordinates.
Early Alameda executives also believed he had reneged on an equity arrangement that would
have left Bankman Freed with 40% control of the firm, according to a document reviewed by
time.
Instead, according to two people with knowledge of the situation, he had registered himself
as sole owner of Alameda.
So basically, Sam has unethically taken control of the firm and all of the money invested in it.
He is like fucking his subordinates.
And he's also a sex pest, which is the least surprising thing that I've ever.
heard in my entire life. He's taking money from people's what are effectively bank accounts
in FTX and he's using it to prop up the value of different crypto tokens on Alameda to make
shit look like it, which is money laundering, right? That's all, it's like theft and money. It's
fraud, you know? Or is it the future, Robert? Remember that? I mean. Yeah, remember what Larry
David taught us all. I know. There were some really unforgivable moments. It's pretty funny. It is
Of all, it is, like, I am on team, like, I can't be angry at Larry David, because honestly, if
Larry David advertises a financial product and you decide, he seems like a good guy to,
this seems like a credible company to me, I don't know, that's a little bit on you, right?
That's a little bit on you.
Who else was in that commercial?
There was, that was a, that was a damning commercial.
Yeah, it is.
I still say arrest Larry David, but that's for a variety.
of reasons.
I'm curious what your other reasons are, but that's for another day.
Yeah, that's for a different day.
So this caused, so again, all of this shit, that is why this is like everything that was
obvious in Alameda in 2018, this is all the stuff that he gets arrested for in 2022.
And when they become aware of this, of the fact that he's fucking his subordinates and
money laundering, a bunch of EA people start raising alarm bells.
in 2018, several Alameda executives try to force him out of the company and accuse him of gross
negligence.
Sam wins the power struggle, though.
And so most of the EA management team and half of the company resign.
Now, this might be, you can see this as like, well, maybe these effective altruist types were
just in it for the altruism.
And once they saw Sam was shady, they packed up.
And that's true for those individual people.
You know, there's some decent people who just got caught up in the movement.
And they clearly had some degree of moral integrity.
but the broader effective altruism movement including it's incredibly low there including
will mccaskell its pope never disaffiliated from sam mccaskel was saying talking about sam
like the second fucking coming up until late 2022 and in exchange for laundering sam's reputation
sam sent tens of millions of dollars 160 million to ea causes in 2022 alone and that's why mccaskel
maintained movement ties with bankman freed quote
In the weeks leading up to that April 2018 confrontation with Bankman Freed,
and in the months that followed,
McColley and others, who was one of the executives that left, warned McCaskill,
Beckstead, and Karnovsky about her co-founder's alleged duplicity
and unscrupulous business ethics, according to four people with knowledge of those discussions.
Bouscal recalled speaking to McColle immediately after one of McColle's conversations
with McCaskill in late 2018.
Will basically took Sam side, said Bouscal, who recalls waiting with McCau
in the Stockholm airport while she was on the phone.
Will basically threatened her,
Huskal recalls.
I remember my impression being
that Will was taking
a pretty hostile stance here
and he was just believing
Sam's side of the story
which made no sense to me.
So Will, again,
perfectly willing to like throw down
against, you know,
the more honest people
in his movement
and personally threaten them
in order to keep the money flowing
to his fancy cause
so that he can...
Right.
And then the second that it becomes,
you know,
PR inconvenient to keep the associate...
There should be some...
Maybe there is like a term
for that of just like even the cadence of what you read earlier of just like the disingenuousness of like oh I had no idea like you're like okay no you knew damn well what was going on and you knew that that's you were willing to continue pretending he was a good guy and aligned with your movement as long as the money kept flowing right it no yeah it no longer serves your best interests to stand by him so yeah so yeah now you'll yeah
Anyway. So, Sam, we don't actually know if he's completely bankrupt.
We know he took about a billion in payments and loans from FTX.
He claims not to really have any of that money and that he's working on getting what
assets he does have to try to make a few more of the investors that they had whole.
That said, we know that a big chunk of the money that he made was funneled into real estate
in his parents' names. So that's fun. Speaking of his parents, one of the big early
mysteries of his case was that when he gets out on $250 million bond, his parents are signed
on to the bail agreement with their house as collateral, but there were also two mystery
co-signers.
And their house, we'll be talking about this in a second, is on the Stanford campus.
The two mystery co-signers were Larry Kramer, a family friend and the former dean of Stanford,
and Andreas Popkei, who signed a $200,000 bond.
Popke is a senior research scientist at Stanford and an advisor to several
Valley startups.
Um, so Stanford is very invested, uh, primarily because of who Sam's parents are in,
in this case, which is interesting to me.
And, okay, because I was, I mean, that is my outside of his parents, I guess,
realistically, what is in it for them by taking that risk?
I think it's actually just that these people are close with his parents who are professors
at Stanford and deeply tied into that community.
I can, I mean, I can very much see, like,
boogey parents with influence being like,
Sam's just a boy.
Anyone could have made this mistake.
He thought he was doing the right thing.
He got mixed him with the wrong crowd.
This has to just be, like, some sort of crazy mistake.
Because they can't imagine he just, it's so dumb and blatant.
Like, all he did was rob people in order to, like, gamble, right?
Like, fundamentally, there's not a difference between, like,
him taking people's money claiming that he's, like, got a sure stock.
tip and then gambling it in Vegas.
Like legally, there's no difference between that and what he did.
But they can't because his parents are like ethicists basically at Stanford.
And I don't think any of the people they are social with can imagine that his crimes were that
venal and foolish.
But you know whose crimes are not venal and foolish, Jamie?
Oh, tell me, Robert.
The products and services that support our podcasts.
I've never encountered a problem.
product I didn't love.
No, that's, uh, that's exactly right.
That's exactly right.
Uh,
and we are back.
So initially, the reason why these other Stanford people's are secret signers on to this
bail agreement, uh, is because they were afraid that they would be attacked because
of how angry people are at Sam.
And there was a reason for this.
Shortly after he was sent to house arrested his parents' home,
someone drove their car into a barricade set up outside of their house on the Stanford campus.
Now, as I stated earlier, both the elder Bankman Freeds are former Stanford professors,
and their home is on campus, which has created issues for the school.
The university still will not officially acknowledge that one of the world's most famous accused felons
currently resides in their prestigious walled academic garden.
I feel like Stanford, like, really.
fumble shit constantly.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
Like, it's absurd.
It's because they're not really that smart, but.
Well, yes, this is, again, another great case for it.
It's also like, I don't know, just the arguing like, well, his parents are like ethicist.
How could he be fucked up?
It's like, have you ever met someone raised by therapists?
No offense.
Yeah.
The most fucked up people in the world.
Fucked up people on earth.
I'm not trying to call out any of the lovely, but it's like, they know.
They know. They know. They have the language. Yeah. Yeah. So one Washington Post article I found noted,
Stanford Law School didn't respond to request for comment. When asked whether they could confirm a rumor that nearby student co-op had attacked the Bankman Freed home with eggs, Stanford campus police did not respond.
Socially, however, Bankman Freed is a source of deep fascination. There are party flyers with his likeness. He's a punchline in campus comedy sketches.
Students ride their bikes buy on dates. The campus community is well aware he's there.
an annotated map located the Bankman-Fried home
was posted on a student-only social network.
Okay, I be honest, if someone asked you out
and they're like, here's my concept for a first date,
we're going to go watch Sam, Sam Bill Bankman Free on.
We're getting married that night, Jamie.
Right.
I was like, we're going, like bring a flask,
watch one of history's stupidest villains.
And then go figure each other in a parking lot.
Absolutely.
Exactly, Jamie, that's the dream.
That's the dream.
It's true.
That's effective altruism right there.
That's the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
Sam could stand to learn a thing or two from these people watching him be.
These theoretical Stanford students.
Yes.
So if you've, so again, Sam's parents are both well-respected teachers and experts in different fields of ethics.
Both were recruited to the university in the 1980s and they almost immediately hooked up.
Barbara Freed made a name for herself as a, she's like a philosopher, basically.
Her big thing was she wrote a paper dissecting the ethics of the trolley problem, whereas
Joe Bankman is a finance ethics guy.
He writes a lot about like, again, like not breaking the law with finance shit.
It seems to be a big focus of his.
This is a very obvious thing to say, but I do, in defense of the Bankman family, I do appreciate
it when someone really rolls with their last name.
I think that that is a very fun quality.
This is an example of it not working out.
I think it's also equally bizarre
when someone has a last name
where you're like, why are you not doing that job?
For example, maybe I've told you this before.
It's one of my favorite facts I've learned in my life.
My childhood dentist's name was Dr. Vigenis.
Great.
Nevertheless, he resisted in going into teeth for some reason.
And I found it infuriating.
I'm like, just roll with it, man.
That's your last name.
You are an OPEC board needs to go after this guy.
No, I'm sorry.
I know you don't know how to do this job, but that's your life now.
People will trust you until you figure it out.
You are the labia doctor, man.
I'm sorry.
determinism. Joe Bankman would be a, I wouldn't trust Joe Bankman as a drug dealer,
but I would, I would trust Johnny Cocaine as a financial expert.
Like, like as a stockbroker, Johnny Cocaine, yeah, let him invest my money. He knows what he's doing.
I just, you know, say what you will about Joe Bankman, and I'm sure you should. I know nothing
about this man, but at least he got into the right business. Yeah, he does. He does. Now, I,
People talk with, like, awe about this guy.
Like, he's so ethical.
He's such, like, a decent man.
He thinks so much about doing the right thing.
When the Washington Post is, like, giving examples of noteworthy things in his past, one of the ones they list is that.
Like how people talk about Ted Lassow.
In 2002, he wrote a tongue-in-cheek suggestion on how to avoid a major league baseball strike.
And his solution in this paper that's supposed to be a joke was to levy taxes on teams and players who struck that could only be avoided if the players donated money
to charity or the teams agreed to sell nickel hot dogs to Giants fans.
Now, I don't know what the joke is here, but it apparently tore it up among upper
middle class Ivy League finance academics.
They all talk about this is very funny.
Wait, it comes up again as like, remember when he said hot dogs?
It was in the Washington Post article about this guy as like, look at a, look at this.
This is like a noteworthy moment from his career, this like bad joke that he made.
But I guess that's what fucking Stanford people find funny.
Imagine it's hilarious that's...
Yeah, I don't get it.
Jesus Christ.
Maybe Stanford people were just like, think it's hilarious.
Just like the word hot dog.
They're like, oh, poor people food.
Like, I don't know.
Now, everything you find about these people is like, wow,
like, is their friends talking about like,
it's so shocking that this could happen.
You know, these were like the best people we knew.
They were so concerned about ethics.
They raised their sons like little adults, and they were always talking about utilitarianism.
How could this have gone wrong?
I don't know.
I feel when I read anecdotes about them, like it's pretty obvious why it went wrong.
And to kind of make that point, Jamie, here's a quote from an excellent write-up by Puck News.
Quote, Bankman, who once boasted to a friend that his father had dutifully recorded every cash receipt,
wrote three case books on tax shelters and tax evasion,
becoming one of the country's leading experts on the subject.
One of Bankman's law students in those early years was Peter Thiel, who later told Bankman that his tax law class was his most valuable because he was able to put a lot of his Facebook stock in an IRA, as Bankman would later recall in a podcast.
This modest feat of financial engineering would save Peel more than a billion dollars.
So ethics, Jamie, avoiding a billion dollars in taxes so that Peter Thiel can spend it giving Joe swastika money to write New York Times columns on racism.
I love ethics
Holy shit
Yeah and I and here I was
A clown a fool about to be like
Well everyone wants to rebel against their parents
That's probably why he's a cartoon villain
When he talks ethics
It's not getting busted for being a piece of shit with money
That's what it seems like to me
Not an expert on ethics
And an expert on being a piece of shit though
So yeah
But you're a far different piece of shit
Thank you Jamie
And I celebrate that about you
I, like, that is, but I mean, I'm not, I guess, shocked that that is exceedingly ethical to
the Stanford crowd, but, wow, damning.
So anyway, Barbara Freed, being a good liberal, was horrified by the Trump election and
chose to fight back by founding a political fund raising group, Mind the Gap, which was extremely
successful during the Trump years and is rumored to have acted as the model for FTC's own
political donation machine.
Both of Sam's parents have seen their reputation suffer with his arrest, and I'm going to continue with a quote from Puck.
Official property records show that Joe Bankman and Barbara Freed were the named owners of a $16.4 million beachside vacation home in Old Fort Bay,
part of a broader real estate portfolio owned by FTX and senior executives totaling hundreds of millions of dollars.
They may have stayed there while working with a company sometime over the last year, Sam said,
though he denied knowing any details about the $300 million worth of real estate that FTX and his parents bought in the
Bahamas. Oh, okay. So they know about absolutely everything in the night. Yeah, it sounds like
it. Sounds like. Now, Joe and Barbara have said that they've been working to return the property
to the company for some time, working to. Joe Bankman in particular has hardly been a passive
observer in his son's scandal and may now be exposed to some legal risk himself. Bankman
interviewed and hired the first lawyers for Alameda research back in 2017 and effectively served
as FTX's first attorney. He handled the inbound that came and made the resulting introduction that
helped FTX raise $130 million from his former law student,
private equity mogul Orlando Bravo, spent his free time on FTCS's charitable and regulatory
efforts and was ultimately in the room before Sam made the fateful decision to sign the
documents that declared Chapter 11.
So they seem very involved in shady themselves.
I don't buy, oh, they're so innocent, their son just broke, you know, made a mistake or whatever.
They're all, they all just didn't think that this was criminal because the people's money
they were taking were poor and they're fucking.
Stanford brats. Like, I have no respect for them. I hope they lose their fancy Stanford house.
They hurt a lot of people. Yeah. Particularly because, I mean, it sounds like this was their
M.O. from the start anyway. So why would we now think that they would be above this behavior?
If they're like, oh, no, here's a way, like, I don't know, it seems like their definition of ethics
is things you can technically get away with. Yeah. It's not illegal for Peter Thiel to get this
billion dollars that he doesn't pay taxes on because, you know, fuckery.
Anyway, Mr. Bankman and Mrs. Freed have joined now the expanding cast of disgrace Stanford
affiliates.
This includes recently university president Mark Tessier Levine, currently accused of manipulating
images on research papers in a way that is equivalent to falsifying lab data for Alzheimer's
research.
Obviously, there's also Bastards Pod alumni, the Theranos lady, another famous Stanford
disgrace.
And then there's the fact that their alumni keep.
My favorite Stanford disgrace.
Yeah.
And then there's all their alumni who have created companies or helped run them that have shattered
the foundations of our democracy in pursuit of a quick buck.
Stanford's current reputation is so grimy that a Washington Post article on SBF's
associations with the school ends with these lines.
And this is very funny, Jamie.
Adrian Dobb, a Stanford professor of comparative literature in German studies and the author
of what tech calls thinking, sees an encouraging sign in Stanford being only peripherally
involved in the Bankman-Fried scandal.
That might not have been the case 10 years ago, he notes,
when the Silicon Valley hype machine operated it more of a fever bitch than it does today.
Other than his physical location, it's actually not that connected to us for once, Dobbs said.
And that way, it's a sign of progress and also a little bit melancholy.
Stanford was a place where the future was shaped, so it's quite possible that's not happening anymore,
that it's happening in the Bahamas now and only comes to Palo Alto once it gets indicted it.
That's so funny.
I'm hug up on other than its physical location
Yeah other than the fact that he's here
He's not very involved
That's a big one babe
That's a big one
That does seem significant to me
No if they're happy I'm happy
That's great
It's funny
We have to return to
To Elizabeth Holmes at some point
Because I'm very uniquely interested
In her rebranding as Liz
Yeah genius
Because now I've forgotten her horrible crying
I forgot about all of her crimes once she had a cool and relatable name and had cool and relatable babies.
Well, she did scam Henry Kissinger and started going by Allen.
That's true.
We can't take away that she scammed Henry Kissinger.
Yeah, that is scam people out of their lives, but, you know.
Yeah.
But the Henry Kissinger thing, we cannot forget.
I say we give her six months off as a result of the Kissinger scam.
Yeah, that seems fair to me.
So this brings us to the subject of what precisely Sam Bankman-Fried has been up to in the nine months or so since his fall from grace.
The short answer is that he has not had a wonderful time.
In January, a month or so after he was granted bail under house arrest, the Southern District of New York accused him of inappropriately contacting former N-C-FTX employees in order to influence their testimony on his case.
Sam tried to frame all of this as part of his ill-advised apology tour that he embarked on last year in the lag period.
between FTX collapsing and his formal charges?
Yeah.
Did he hit the notes app?
What happened?
Oh, he's like calling them.
Actually, I'm going to read a quote from Puck in order to describe how he's illegally contacting
people.
On December 12th, the same day he was arrested in the Bahamas, Bankman Freed emailed FDX bankruptcy
CEO John J. Ray the 3rd, offering potentially pertinent information concerning future
opportunities and financing for FDX and its creditors and asked to work constructively
with Ray in the Chapter 11 team to do what's best for customers.
No response.
Then after his extradition, the crypto mogul sent another email to Ray on December 30th,
in which he offered advice accessing Alameda funds.
Still no response.
Then, while being summoned to court in New York, SBF tried Ray again on January 2nd.
Mr. Ray, I know things haven't gotten off on the right foot, but I really do want to be helpful.
As I'm guessing you've heard, I'm in NYC for the next day.
I'd love to meet up while I'm here, even if just to say hi.
Ray did not take him up on this offer.
And he has-
No, shit.
He's reached out to several people, and it's always like, I just want to
help, you know, get as much money as we can for the customers.
I just want to, you know, help you deal with the confusing aspects of this.
But it's like, you're not supposed to be talking to people when you're in Sam's situation
who were involved in the company like this because they're probably going to testify against you.
I don't feel convinced that he understands that.
I don't know.
He's talking like a fucking spam email.
Yeah, he really is.
And in general, Sam has opted to take all of the actions under how.
arrests that are likeliest to cause stress ulcers in his lawyers.
In addition to repeatedly contacting FDX employees, he decided to start a substack where he
planned to explain how FTA, and it's like there's that famous line from the wire, are you
taking notes on a criminal conspiracy?
But in this case, it's like, are you publishing blog posts about your criminal conspiracy
after being indicted?
He's just growing in audience, Robert.
Yeah, yeah.
It's all a part of the plan.
Yeah, it's like if Al Capone had started a New York Times column on having people machined gun in alleys after he'd gone away to fucking Alcatraz.
Hear me out, you guys.
It actually makes way more sense when I explain it.
Yeah.
So neither.
He only writes like, I think, two posts before he gives up because they're, they're bad.
He's bad at blogging.
I tried to read him.
He's dog shit writer.
Look.
Well, can I, I mean, not to be aggressive, but that's most substack people.
It's two and then they're out.
By the way, find my substack.
Yeah, not you, Robert.
There's more, no, I know you have more than two.
But I'm just saying the average friend of mine that harangues me into, you know, these damn emails, it's two.
And then they're done.
Anyways, but I'm not, I'm probably going to start one.
I'm just being insecure.
I think what I'm going to do in a couple of months.
I think you'll beat Sam Bankman-Fried.
No question there.
Robert, your substack is great.
Thank you, so.
Robert, your substack is great.
Thank you, Jamie.
This has been wonderful for my ego.
Those are much better substack.
Those are two that I actually read.
So, Sam's is bad, though.
And it's bad, like, and part of what he's doing is, like, he's been charged with a bunch of
specific crimes, right?
And the posts that he puts up, he does not acknowledge any of the charges against him.
He doesn't, like, defend himself from them.
Instead, he lays out a bunch of misleading in our.
Kane spreadsheets to try and, like, argue that the company shouldn't have collapsed the way it did and that he, like, didn't realize, like, why he didn't realize it was so bad.
He's doing, it's the same thing as, like, the EA shit we open the episode with, right?
This throwing out, like, confusing piles of numbers in order to distract people, right?
Like, this is just, like, chaff, you know?
That's what he's doing is he's throwing out chaff in the way of a bunch of poorly formatted spreadsheets.
They don't convince anyone that he's innocent.
I was going to say, but it sounds like it also, it did not work.
It did not work at all.
You should not do this if you are being indicted for numerous financial crimes, BT-dubs.
So in early February, the judge overseeing Sam's case forbade him from using encrypted messaging apps like Signal because he was so frequently trying to talk to other people who were part of this case with him in secret, which is illegal.
He also got in trouble because he was caught using a VPN, which could have potentially allowed him to hide his communication.
communications. Sam argued he was just using a VPN to access his international NFL game pass
account so he could pay attention to football. Did he just say he was trying to watch Canadian
Netflix? Yeah, that would be fucking classic. Hey, officer, I just had a lot of shit to Torin,
homie. Like, you get it, my man. He has since been limited to a normal flip phone
due to his repeated inability to abide by his bail conditions. Now, some might note that Sam has
already gotten more second chances than most accused criminals get with their bail conditions.
It seems accurate to say that the leniency he has received gave him reason to feel as if he
could act with impunity, which is why a couple of weeks ago, he leaked his ex-girlfriend's diary
to the New York Times.
Witches, take me through the Witches, why.
That wasn't what I thought you were going to say.
I know, I know.
Nobody thought it was going to head here.
You know, I mean, it's, although it seemed like we were due for another.
spiteful action against a woman for seemingly no reason.
Oh, absolutely, absolutely.
Very much his MO.
Now, I will say, I don't like this woman either.
Carolyn Ellison is, I think, a pretty shitty person.
I remember we spoke about her last time, right?
Yeah, yeah.
She's unpleasant lady.
She was the former CEO of Alameda.
I've been fucking listening to this podcast called Spellcaster, which is like a
wondery podcast about Sam Bankman-Fried.
I don't like it.
The woman who does it, like, was at a, was at a,
a bachelorette party with Carolyn Ellison
right before the charges dropped and was like
oh she's so smart she's so
and she repeats the same bullshit everyone says about Sam
they were such they were like geniuses and it's like
no they just like blew out a bunch of numbers you didn't
understand and convinced you they were smart
because they said numbers right like
there's nothing these people have done that
is smart with situations like that
I'm like I guess I appreciate the disclosure
but like why the fuck
were you hired to do this show
Well, it's because big media is just as tiny and insular a world full of rich people as finance.
And in fact, a lot of the same families have people at the Times and people and fucking investment banks,
which is why here at Cool Zone Media, we exclusively hire people who used to sell ketamine on their college campuses in order to get by.
You know, that's the cool zone guarantee.
Or Adderall!
You know?
Lucy's of Adderall.
Yeah.
And I appreciate that you made an exception for some of us that you didn't have to be good at it.
You just had to try.
No, in fact, we will not hire you if you were good at selling drugs under college campus.
Why did you even apply to this job?
Mediocre part-time campus drug dealers.
That's our hiring pool.
Yeah, that's our like, I don't know, whatever.
I don't know the names of enough fancy New York schools.
It's really not that big of a stretch.
Let's be honest.
And I'm fucking proud of that.
So am I
So Carolyn Ellison
Former CEO of Alameda
And also Sam's on again off again
Bo.
She immediately turned state's witness.
I don't like you using the term
Bo but continue.
Why not?
That's what it means boo?
Should I use boo?
I kind of like boo.
I was like, I was like
That doesn't really make sense
but I like it.
They were co-boos.
So she immediately turned state's witness
and admitted guilt for her share
of the illegal activities
committed by Alameda.
And she apparently,
as a part of immediately rolling,
handed over her diary.
I think that's how they got her diary.
It was part of the terms of like the,
yeah.
So it gets introduced into evidence,
which obviously Sam,
I think,
will get access to as a result of that
because that's the way discovery works.
I believe that's how he got her diary.
Was she also a Stanford head?
I don't think she went to,
I think her parents were professors
at MIT.
Oh, wow, lower losers over at MIT.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Fucking hobo university right there.
Until it happens to me, I love when someone's diary is introduced into evidence.
And that brings me back to Elizabeth Holmes yet again when she, like, her creepy little sex with Sunny Belwani.
Ooh, some of the worst sects.
Some of the very worst sex.
That is maybe the moment that I felt closest to her.
That's when Liz almost got me
Because she was sending
Walls of text to this guy
And then he was sending back, okay
And it's like, you know what?
Oh, brutal.
No, no, she deserved a man like Jeff Bezos
Who would call her the most unsettling nickname
I've ever heard.
You know?
But at least he responded, a live girl.
Oh, that's right.
That's right.
Wow.
Oh, Jeff.
I think we
I think we as a collective blocked that out intentionally.
Yeah, it's very funny.
It does make it clear that he's not a robot because, like, nobody, nobody fakes that.
That's, that's evidence that he feels something.
What he feels is off-putting.
It's frightening.
It's like profoundly unsettling, but he does feel something.
But unfortunately, yeah, chat GPT could have outdone that in terms of sounding like a person.
Absolutely.
So anyway, Sam gets access to her diary one way or the other.
And then he hands her diary to the New York Times so that they can write an article about it.
Now, that is unethical as fuck and possibly illegal.
The prosecution has asked that he be jailed, that his bail will be revoked because of what he did here.
Sam's, this is still going on as we talk.
I'll record a little update if he does go to jail as a result of this.
Hey everyone. Robert here. I just wanted to update you that since we recorded this episode a couple of days before you're hearing it, Sam Bankman-Fried was remanded to custody. He is incarcerated now and he will remain in jail after violating his bail conditions until his trial in October at least and possibly well beyond that, depending on how the charges and sentencing and all that stuff go.
I should note that kind of the most recent story after that is that his lawyers requested
that he be allowed to have his ADHD medication and depression medication, which he ran out
of soon after being taken into custody.
The judge has ordered that he be given that medication.
Obviously, I'm always in favor of people who are incarcerated having access to medication.
If anyone's interested, I don't actually think putting Sam in jail is going to do much good.
I'm a little bit more mixed on this than I normally am, just because of the case of
Adam Newman, the, the WeWork guy who got off Scott Free from his giant financial crimes and
is now starting another giant grift company and we'll probably fuck with a bunch of other people's
lives.
But I do kind of think it's unlikely that we're going to get much benefit out of this.
That said, I don't really feel for Sam.
He had many, many chances not to be in this situation.
and he fucked all of them up.
So, you know, fuck the guy.
Sam's lawyers have argued he was not attempting to discredit a witness,
but just to respond to a toxic media environment,
which he says unfairly portrays him as a villain.
And I guess we're part of that toxic media environment.
Although, Sam, free tip here,
handing your ex-girlfriend's diary to the New York Times
is a bad way to seem like not the villain.
That's kind of villain behavior, homie.
That's...
I hate to tell you.
I again, but it's like again, you can imagine his like doofy loser fucking logic of like,
no, officer, I was just being a petty bitch.
Is that the law?
And you're like, in this case, yes.
Yes, it is actually, sir.
So humorously enough, that is the legal argument his lawyers are making.
And they kind of have a point because they're like, look, if you read the New York Times
article based on her diary, he seems like a piece of shit.
So clearly we weren't trying to.
influence the prosecution?
And like, they do have a point because he does come across as the bad guy in that article
that he made happen.
So that's funny.
He comes across as the bad guy in most things.
Yeah.
I'm going to quote from some of that New York Times coverage here.
Mr. Bankman Fried and Ms. Ellison have started an unsteady, also started an unsteady romantic
relationship with multiple breakups and reconciliations.
At times, Ms. Ellison worried that Mr. Bankman Fried thought she wasn't
good enough. When he was around, she wrote in February 22, in a Google document she had,
an instinct to shrink and become smaller and quieter and defer to others. After one split,
Ms. Ellison cut off communication with Mr. Bankman-Fried. I felt pretty hurt rejected, she wrote
in the April 2022 Google document. Not giving you the contact you wanted felt like the only way
I could regain a sense of power. Miss Ellison was compensated far less generously than other
top executives at FTX and Alameda, though it's unclear whether she was aware of it. According to court
filings, the exchange's founders and other key employees received $3.2 billion in payouts and loans.
Of that total, $6 million went to Ms. Ellison, compared with $587 million for Mr. Singh,
FtX's head of engineering, and $246 million for Mr. Wang, one of the founders.
Mr. Bankman-Fried received $2.2 billion.
So, Ellison is definitely not innocent here.
She has admitted guilt in this case, but the reporting makes it seem as if her main role was to act as a patsy,
Sam knew she was in love with him and deeply insecure, so he put her in charge of Alameda so that he could use it as part of his grift to manipulate the value of his crypto empire using customer funds.
And basically the $6 million he gave her, which is a tiny fraction of like the $3 billion they funnel to executives, that's like him paying her to be a smokescreen, right?
She's not an equal partner in this enterprise.
And one of the things that had happened right before this fell apart is he had stopped paying attention to her in Alameda in order to,
to start throwing money
through another crypto exchange
run from a woman
he was fucking now
that he had like,
so it seems like this was a pattern for him.
Why, stop, stop.
What?
I'm not doing this.
I'm just talking about what he did.
I just don't want that.
It's well, it's bad.
He's a bastard.
That's why we're talking about him.
He sucks.
I just really, I just really need,
I don't know who needs to hear this,
but we just really need people
to stop fucking Sam Pinkman.
That's my, that's my point.
This is very bad, gross behavior.
It's gross and it's bad for the world.
Yeah, yeah.
So, you know, fuck this guy.
One bit of Schadenfreude, I can give you all, is that according to Puck News, Sam's
present situation is so unpleasant that he considers his trips across the country to go to
court in New York, the highlight of his life now.
Because he gets to, like, go out in the street, he's surrounded by lawyers and private
security, so it's like he's got an entourage again, he gets to travel.
This is like the closest he gets to feeling like what he used to be a billionaire.
So that's kind of fun.
The downside is from the perspective of an FSPF hater.
The downside is that recently one of his charges was dismissed.
The campaign finance violation.
This was not due to him being innocent,
but due to some legal weirdness involving the letter of the extradition agreement,
the U.S. signed with the Bahamas.
Basically, when we put together the agreements that they'd extradite him,
that was not on the document.
So the feds had to drop the charge in order to not deal with a bunch of other bullshit.
It's a technicality, but it means that his brother Gabe and several members of the philanthropic team at FDX probably will not be charged for very likely committing crimes.
And I say they likely committed crimes because FTX executive Nashad Singh already pled guilty this spring to participating in a straw donor scheme.
So he is, yeah, and he pled guilty before they drop this charge, which he's got to feel like an asshole for doing.
Because now he is going to get punished for that, even though SBF is no longer.
longer being charged for it. Wow. That's, I mean, look, sometimes you do the ethical,
altruistic thing and it comes back to bite you in the ass. What are you going to do? Yeah, what are you
going to do? Hey, everyone, just wanted to note that since we recorded this, the prosecution has noted
that they will be seeking to add those charges back on that were dropped. So it's possible that
both Sam and other members of his inner circle will be charged with all that stuff.
We just really kind of don't know at this point.
But I do want to note that the prosecution is at least saying, hey, like, despite this
little mess up, we are not just giving up on this charge.
So heads up about that could change in the future.
Well, Jamie.
Yeah.
How you doing?
I have a question for you.
I have an answer for you.
Well, I sure fucking hope so.
No, my question is that I'm curious, what do you see happening here?
What feels plausible to you at this time?
You know, I've been seeing a lot of people be like, oh, he's going to get off, he's going to get all.
He's got too many connections, too many, you know, people who he could roll on.
I don't think he has many people he could really roll on.
I don't think he was like, especially since these finance charges have been dropped,
I don't know that I really think he's got the savvy.
to have, like, a guy like John McAfee, I believe John McAfee killed himself.
I don't believe there's anything shady there.
I know a lot about the guy.
It makes sense to me that when his fucking running finally stopped, he would do that.
But McAfee probably did have some dirt on some people.
He was that kind of cunning, right?
I wouldn't be shocked if John McAfee had put together some dirt on some people, right?
I don't think Sam Bankman-Fried is that cunning.
I don't think he was, like, smart enough to have dirt on anyone who
could get him out of this situation, I think there's a pretty good chance he does hard time.
I think he fucked with too many people. He fucked with the money and he fucked with it in too
dumb of a way. So I think he's screwed. Okay. That's, that was my instinct as well because I feel
like he doesn't even have, I mean, he doesn't have any sort of like, I think sometimes with
these types, you get some sort of press narrative that it's like they're playing 4D chess and like
even if that's not entirely true, there's like a media narrative that sticks to them that makes
them seem more plausible, but I just feel like everything that's, like, all of his actions and
all of the media surrounding him, except for a very, very small amount, seems to reinforce the
fact that he's completely incompetent and malicious in, uh, in every way. Yeah. Yeah. I, uh, I would
say that. Well, good. Um, I, God, I mean, not that I, you know, I don't know. I mean, it seems like
he's fucked. I certainly hope he's fucked.
I hope he's fucked.
I hate him.
I think he's a gross person.
I hope Will McCaskill goes away or gets like eaten by a large fish would be my pick.
If I got it.
If like God is like, what do you want me to do to Will McCask?
I'm like, you remember that thing you did with a whale back in the day?
What if he didn't get out?
What if a whale just eats him, you know?
And then God would be like, oh, amazing.
I love playing the hits.
Great pitch.
You know what, Robert?
I'm going to give you that HBO series you've been asking for.
Robert, you are an amazing collaborator.
Oh, yeah, me and God, co-creators of my HBO series.
I am hoping if the strike goes on, they take my reality show pitch, Super Soaker Full of Piss,
which I really think has some potential, Jamie.
Yeah, the premise is...
No, go ahead.
Tell me the premise of Super Soker full of piss, Robert.
I'm ready.
So I'm in a van.
I filled a Super Soaker with my piss, and I drive around, like, Rodeo drive.
and I get out when I see someone who looks famous
and I squirt them with a super soaker full of piss
and then we film it and then I leave very quickly
okay I mean I'm on top with that
yeah I think it's a great I think it's you know
I will get you know I don't know I would be kind of pro
like if you could get I think the sound track
is going to be really key there like I think if you could get
some like jock jam situation like going out of car
all live
editions
of Blink 182 songs
because you know
because they are
one of the worst
live bands
that ever played
so it's really
just upsetting
to the viewer
that's the goal here
and you know
given who
Blink 182
like rolls with
these days
you may in fact
run into
Travis on Rodeo Drive
and what beautiful
poetic
piss right in the face
just a
full load of it
you know
just to say
I hate this idea
because it means
that some fucking celebrity
will murder you
and then you'll be gone
and then I'll be sad
I'm gonna be honest
I'm not great at recognizing
celebrities
so I'm anytime
I could just see someone
in a suit
and spray them with the piss
yeah Jamie
I know
I feel like we can sell
this go
let's take my other bestie
no
we just roll down the street
it's Nick Jonas Roberts
spray spray spray
get the fuck out of here
wow
I'm like no no
that's the good one
that's Kevin
That's right. That's right. That's right. I'm going to rely on Jamie to recognize him, though.
Oh, my God. I did see that, Jamie. Yeah.
All right. Well, the Jonas Brothers have their own vanity popcorn brand now. Isn't that something?
These are the amazing things I can teach you, Robert.
And you've already taught me so much about hot dog through your best selling book, Raw Dog.
Wow, perfect transit. That's a fucking pivot. You're welcome.
What a spicy plug.
that was.
Nice job.
Gorgeous plug.
Hey, it's never too late
to start reading about hot dogs.
It's never too late to start learning.
Reading about hot dogs
and also America.
Fascinating story.
Raw dog.
Find it wherever books are found.
Yeah.
Well, thank you so much.
I truly, I was, I mean,
as you know,
I did a bastards episode about hot dogs
as I was writing that book
so that I would remain focused.
And that's right.
It's the best way.
And I have heard that the subject of that episode, George Shea, that the hot dog eating community is actively protecting him from its existence.
He does not know it exists.
He does not know the book.
I love it.
Love to hear it.
And everyone in his life is really actively trying.
Like every hot dog eater or many hot dog eaters I talked to.
We're like, yeah, no, we know about the Bastries episode and we know about the book.
But we really don't want George to know about it.
I was like, okay, fair enough.
Beautiful.
Jamie, that made me feel great.
You can sign up for this show and all other Cool Zone shows ad free at Cooler Zone Media.
That's for Apple subscribers.
We are working on the Android option.
You can find my novel after the revolution by typing after the revolution into whatever book buying site you use or just walk into a bookstore and demand it from the manager at Sword Point.
Anyway, goodbye.
Goodbye.
Behind the Bastards is a production of Cool Zone Media.
For more from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com.
Or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Behind the Bastards is now available on YouTube.
New episodes every Wednesday and Friday.
Subscribe to our channel, YouTube.com slash at Behind the Bastards.
If a Lenovo gaming computer is on your holiday list, don't shop around, just go directly to the source, Lenovo.com.
You'll find exclusive deals on the gaming PCs you want, like the Lenovo Legion Tower 5 Gen 10 gaming desktop and Lenovo Lock Gaming Laptop.
So avoid all that shopping chaos and price comparing, and just go directly to the source, Lenovo.com, where PCs are up to 50% off.
That's Lenovo.com.
On this week's episode of next chapter,
I, T.D. Jake, sit down with Denzel Washington,
a two-time Academy Award-winning actor and cultural icon
for a conversation about change, identity,
and the moment everything shifted.
I mean, I don't take any credit for it.
It's nothing I did as special, you know,
I didn't knock down a few pegs and recognize it,
but I just didn't put me first.
I just put God first, and he's carried me.
Whether you're rebuilding, reimagining,
or just trying to hold it together,
this one will speak to you.
Listen to the next chapter podcast on the I Heart Radio app,
Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast.
new episodes drop weekly.
Don't miss one of them.
What up, y'all?
It's your boy, Kevin on stage.
I want to tell you about my new podcast called Not My Best Moment,
where I talk to artists, athletes, entertainers, creators, friends,
people I admire who have had massive success about their massive failures.
What did they mess up on?
What is their heartbreak?
And what did they learn from it?
I got judged horribly.
The judges were like, you're trash.
know how you got on the show. Check out
Not My Best Moment with me kept on stage on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, YouTube,
or wherever you get your podcast.
On the podcast Health Stuff, we are tackling all the health questions that keep you up at night.
I'm Dr. Priyankawali, a double board certified physician.
And I'm Hurricane de Bolo, a comedian and someone who once Googled,
Do I Have Scurvy at 3 a.m?
And on our show, we're talking about health in a different way,
like our episode where we look at diabetes.
In the United States, I mean, 50% of Americans,
are pre-diabetic.
How preventable is type 2?
Extremely.
Listen to health stuff on the IHeart Radio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
This is an IHeart podcast.
Guaranteed human.
