Behind the Bastards - Part One: Christmas non-Bastard: The Tupamaros of Uruguay
Episode Date: December 21, 2021Robert is joined by Margaret Killjoy to discuss José Alberto "Pepe" Mujica Cordano.Footnotes: https://pepemujica.com/en/#Pepe_Mujica8217s_participation_in_the_8220gu errilla8221 https://upsidedown...world.org/archives/uruguay/an-interview-with-uruguaysjose-mujica-from-armed-struggle-to-the-presidency/ https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jose-mujica-hitchiker_n_6573532 https://time.com/3608517/uruguay-president-homeless-man-100-dollars/ https://news.yahoo.com/uruguays-mujica-guantanamo-turned-inmates-halfway-vegetables224344221.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmluZy5jb20v&guce_refer rer_sig=AQAAAAZWgpvLwCbf6hmmQQWlA3xWu_MZyFTeGYxHHhcO3AJO2qBXMvj8Sdwkh eQErRgVyOKss5QVZflkaNF4Hb6rZCr-c4Ohyc_Ctyh58oGaoEstnukpGOzWDp_gmNDq1VrqvWn1TEzotD_TIOaQ9wQ5iTFYrUsxN7DcMlAGwByPq RX https://newrepublic.com/article/120912/uruguays-jose-mujica-was-liberals-dreamtoo-good-be-true https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jose-mujica-necktie_n_5365142 https://latinamericanstudies.org/uruguay/tupamaros-uruguay.htm https://www.thoughtco.com/the-tupamaros-2136128 https://warisboring.com/the-tupamaros-were-propaganda-savvy-urbanguerrillas/ https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Uruguays-Tupamaro-Prison-Break-WasLargest-Coolest-in-History-20160906-0037.html https://nationalinterest.org/commentary/jos%C3%A9-mujicauruguays-robin-hood-guerrillas-9066  Join us on 2/17 for a live digital experience of Behind the Bastards (plus Q&A) featuring Robert Evans, Propaganda, & Sophie Lichterman. If you can't make it, the show will be available for replay until 2/24!Tickets: https://www.momenthouse.com/behindthebastards Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Alphabet Boys is a new podcast series that goes inside undercover investigations.
In the first season, we're diving into an FBI investigation of the 2020 protests.
It involves a cigar-smoking mystery man who drives a silver hearse.
And inside his hearse look like a lot of guns.
But are federal agents catching bad guys or creating them?
He was just waiting for me to set the date, the time, and then for sure he was trying to get it to happen.
Listen to Alphabet Boys on the iHeart Radio App, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Did you know Lance Bass is a Russian-trained astronaut?
That he went through training in a secret facility outside Moscow,
hoping to become the youngest person to go to space?
Well, I ought to know, because I'm Lance Bass.
And I'm hosting a new podcast that tells my crazy story and an even crazier story
about a Russian astronaut who found himself stuck in space.
With no country to bring him down.
With the Soviet Union collapsing around him,
he orbited the Earth for 313 days that changed the world.
Listen to The Last Soviet on the iHeart Radio App, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Ho, ho, ho! Merry Christmas!
This is Behind the Bastards, the podcast about Robert trying to do a festive introduction
and then losing steam because he didn't really have a plan.
Hey, Chris, can you insert in a sound of me murdering Santa Claus here?
And some jingle bells, all that stuff.
Jingle bells and stabbing.
Put it all in right here where we're talking, over us talking.
And now I'm going to introduce our guest today, Margaret Kiljoy.
Margaret, you are the host of a podcast called Live Like the World is Dying.
You just published a book through AK Press called A Country of Ghosts, which is fucking awesome.
I read it last weekend in a single long day of obsessive reading.
How are you doing today, Margaret?
I'm doing good.
Good.
Well, Margaret, how do you feel about Christmas?
Very complicated.
I feel very complicated about Christmas.
I think most people have complicated feelings about Christmas.
How do you feel about heroes?
You know, actually also complicated.
Also complicated, right?
Fundamentally problematic idea.
Well, our subject today, I don't know that I would call heroes,
but I think they do the most heroic thing that you can do,
which is change with the times rather than repeatedly doing the same thing
and hoping for different results, which there's an element of heroism.
They're also terrorists, kind of.
So this is going to be a complicated episode, Margaret.
Have you heard of the Tupamaros of Uruguay?
I have not.
Okay.
Well, this is good.
Anyway, if you look up Tupamaros, there's also a Venezuelan Marxist-Leninist political party
called the Tupamaros.
This is a very different thing.
If you've heard much about Uruguay and politics in recent years,
it's probably that they were the first nation on earth to legalize marijuana.
This is back in 2013.
They also legalized gay marriage the same year,
which was about two years faster than the US of A.
Both of these reforms were signed into law
under the presidency of a dude named Jose Mujica.
Now, if you know a single Uruguayan politician,
he's probably the guy.
The most prominent piece of international press relating to him is an article from The Guardian
in 2014 titled,
Is This The World's Most Radical President?
The Guardian article is very much radical from a centrist liberal standpoint.
But he's referred to a lot as Uruguay's anarchist president,
again, in a lot of not-anarchist media,
because he's not an anarchist.
So it is fair to say there's anarchist influences in his politics and his attitude.
You might have guessed that he's not an anarchist by the fact that he's a president.
But he's pretty rad.
It's hard not to love this guy when you read about aspects of his personality.
The thing he's most famous for is his humility.
Is this the guy who drives his own car?
Well, usually he rides a bicycle.
The same bicycle he's maintained for 60 years,
but he has a small Volkswagen. He refuses to have a limo or a driver.
He usually wears sandals and worn all.
He used to wear stained jumpers,
was the only thing he would wear, and they finally got him to at least wear a clean shirt.
So there's photos of him with Hugo Chavez and Obama,
and he's dressed like a dude who lives in Latin America and is just going to work.
He's a farmer a lot of the time.
He runs a farm and has for most of his life.
He's just like, not a guy who looks like other world leaders.
And one of the reasons he's become so popular,
again, is like the every liberal's favorite, quote unquote, radical politician,
was this moment in 2014 when he gave a speech to the United Nations
that included this bit, which Sophie's going to play for us now.
And this is, it's a UN speech.
So he's speaking in Spanish, but the UN is, you know, doing,
they've got like a guy, it reading in English.
So that's not actually Jose's voice, but yeah.
And that allows us to contemplate the beauty of nature.
We have destroyed the jungles, the green jungles, the true jungles,
and we've created anonymous cement jungles.
We have tackled sedentarianism with walkers, insomnia with pills,
solitude with electronics.
Are we happy when we are so far from the human essence?
We have to ask ourselves this question.
Stunned, we have fled from our biology,
which defends life for life itself as the superior cause in itself.
And we've replaced it by functional consumerism and accumulation, politics.
Yeah, so that's pretty rad for a world leader.
That's the most I've ever agreed with anything a president said in a long time.
Especially in the UN.
I think you'll feel that way about this next segment here too.
But today, today it's time to begin to fight to prepare a world without borders.
The globalized economy has no other inclination but private interest.
The private interest of very few and every nation state looks at its own stability.
Yeah, so getting up there, talking about how we shouldn't have borders,
I don't know, that's to me pretty rad to hear a president saying at the United Nations.
Yeah, and you can see why people went gaga for this guy, right?
And why they call him an anarchist.
Because there's anarchist elements of what he's saying,
especially the whole we should be moving towards a world without borders.
But he's also a president.
And we'll talk a little bit more about Jose later,
but one of the things I do think is interesting about him,
because you can find other world leaders saying good shit,
talking a good game about all this stuff,
and then going back home to their mansions and taking private jets places.
And Jose does, one of the things that kind of separates him is he wears,
not only does he not live in a mansion or anything,
but he flies coach like he's not living the sort of like, yeah.
But what if he's like a secret mansion bunker underneath his tiny house?
Well, I mean, it's not impossible,
although most of the time when like journalists come to visit him as his home,
like there's a couple of different stories,
like some Japanese or Korean film crew will come
and he'll like meet them at his front door and they'll go drink Jim Bean under a tree,
which is how I would create a film crew if I, yeah.
That's good, because people always talked about how George Bush was like,
the president you drink a beer with,
that was like his whole thing was like,
he's the one you'd want to drink a beer with,
but I think that the president that you drink Jim Bean under a tree.
I don't know.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I think that would be, I would prefer that to like having a staged photo op beer
with a president at the White House, which seems horrible.
Again, we'll cover later.
There's a lot of criticisms of Jose from the left primarily,
most of the people who have issues with him are like leftists.
But what I find more interesting than his presidency is where he came from
and the kind of intellectual and moral journey he represents,
not just from himself, but for the political organization that he came from.
Because Jose Musica got his start in politics
through what you might call non-traditional means.
He was a terrorist as a young man and not like in a light way,
like in a got shot repeatedly in gunfights with the cops way.
Like he went as hard as he possibly could have without dying.
And the group that he was a member of is one of the most fascinating
insurgent organizations I've ever heard about, the Tupamarros.
So in order to explain the Tupamarros,
we're going to have to get into a little bit of what Uruguay is.
It's the second smallest country in South America.
It's like middling sized as countries go.
It's about the size of Washington state,
which is bigger than a lot of European countries.
So it's not a tiny country, but tiny for South America.
Before white folks showed up and started doing what white folks do,
the indigenous inhabitants of Uruguay were the Charua.
They had been pushed into the area by another tribe up in Paraguay
in the generations before European conquest.
And when the Spanish showed up on their shores in 1516,
their overall response could be best characterized as,
fuck this shit, you know, they did the fight thing.
And they were really good at fighting.
They fought like hell and that synergized well with the fact that Uruguay
didn't have anything colonizers wanted at that time.
There was no like gold or silver there.
So the locals were pretty good guerrilla fighters
and there wasn't anything valuable.
So it didn't really get settled when all, it didn't get colonized
when like all of the areas around it were getting colonized.
It took longer.
So there were some light attempts by the Europeans to settle there in the 1500s.
But the first permanent Spanish settlement there wasn't founded until 1624
at a place called Soriano.
About 50 years later, the Portuguese came and built a fort
and this sparked an Uruguay rush between Spain and Portugal
who started gobbling up chunks of land as fast as they could.
And again, the reasoning seemed to be less.
There's stuff here we want and more.
The other guys are starting to take stuff here.
So we should, we should do that.
It's great.
So.
That went really well for everyone, right?
Yeah.
I mean, it goes, it goes the way it goes in all of what's now Latin America.
Oh, so terribly.
Yeah, terribly.
Yeah, terribly.
Although I mean, I guess less bad Uruguay kind of gets off better than,
well, no, not really.
So today the capital of Uruguay is Montevideo,
which was founded by the Spanish in the early 1700s
as like a fortress city and trading port.
And it was specifically founded because the Portuguese had Buenos Aires.
And so the Spanish needed a port near there that could be their port, right?
Like that's, again, it's all part of this like cold war kind of,
kind of shit going on between Spain and Portugal.
And so for the next century or so Uruguay wound up in the crosshairs
of a bunch of different spats between colonizing powers.
And it wasn't just the Spanish and the Portuguese,
the British occupy Montevideo at some, at one point,
like everybody's going through here now, like, right?
They get kind of a hundred years off compared to everybody else.
But once colonizing comes for Uruguay, it comes hard, you know?
So people don't often like being battled over by foreign powers.
And by 1811, a guy named Jose Artigas launched a revolution against the Spanish crown,
which Uruguay won. Artigas was adamant that the new government
should be a federal system with high levels of political autonomy for each region.
This led to a civil war between the people in Buenos Aires
and the people in Montevideo.
And there's all of this fighting between forces,
most of which is like less, it's not quite like states fighting as much as it is.
Like it's these Codillos, these warlords, right, who have like,
are kind of aligned with one side or the other and control regions,
and they're all kind of murdering each other.
It's a civil war, but it's between Buenos Aires.
Buenos Aires and Montevideo are kind of broadly speaking,
it seems to be like the main sides here.
And there's a bunch of murdering.
And all of the fighting in this period effectively wipes out
most of the remaining indigenous people in the region.
And so I think a lot of people in Uruguay have some like,
like a lot of Latin America have some indigenous ancestry down the line,
but like the communities are just wiped out.
And most Uruguayans are actually Spanish and Italian heritage,
kind of as a result of this.
Like again, we're talking in really broad terms.
So when Uruguay fought for its independence,
sorry, when it fought for its independence,
it wasn't indigenous folks, it was instead kind of like the US Revolution.
I mean, I'm sure they considered themselves that,
but it was like the children of children of children
of people who had come to colonize.
And there was again, some like intermarrying and stuff between communities.
But yeah, it was the people who I'm sure at that point considered themselves
the indigenous people of Uruguay fighting against the colonial power,
but who were also the descendants of, yeah, you know,
this is like all a lot of Latin American history, you know.
Yeah.
So things started to settle down by the turn of the next century.
And in 1903, the fairly new state of Uruguay
elected a president named Jose Baze.
He's generally just known as Baze, was a socialist,
or at least close enough.
And the New Republic credits him for building, quote,
perhaps the most perfectly rendered socialist society the world has ever seen.
Now that's how the writer from the New Republic describes it.
I have found actual academic theses on Uruguayan politics,
none of whom say anything close to that.
So I don't know, like the writer from the New Republic
actually went there, did a lot of work.
I'm sure knows more about Uruguay than me,
but I'm sure these scholars know more than that person.
So I think it's probably fair to say that it's a little overstated
to call it the most perfectly rendered socialist society the world's ever seen.
But Baze did do a lot of rad shit.
He taxed the landowners and he put the money into pensions for working people.
He was an advocate of unions.
Healthcare in Uruguay was ruled to be a universal right.
And this is like in 1911 or something like that.
Higher education was made free and under him the literacy rate hit 95%.
And I'm going to quote from the New Republic here, quoting a historian.
His idea, Gerardo Queitano, Uruguay's foremost historian of the Baze era,
explained to me was that you can't have liberty without equality.
There is no psychic liberty, in other words, for the poor
unless they can imagine themselves equal to the privileged.
One of the many new laws Baze implemented was to correct perceived imbalances
and gave women greater rights to request divorce than their husbands.
The logic was that men are more powerful, Queitano said.
So to treat men and women equally would result in an outcome that still favored men.
So this is like, again, 1903 to 1903.
Like this guy's pretty, you keep running into this in Uruguay history.
These dudes were like, well, I didn't expect that from somebody saying this in like 1905.
Yeah, people are still struggling with that basic concept.
Yeah, like that's incredibly controversial today.
And this guy is like, yeah, we're all rubbing dirt into our wounds.
And also you can't just treat men and women equally because structural inequality
means that men will still have more power, which is like, it's pretty dope.
I would say pretty dope.
And it's fair to say, like it is, the New Republic overstates things,
but it is, I think, fair to say that like most recently colonized nations
and most recently colonized nations in Latin America,
because like the 1800s is kind of the period where a lot of them, you know,
have their revolutions and get free from the Europeans who had dominated them.
Uruguay winds up better off than a lot of places.
But the New Republic does give an incomplete idea of Bizet's time and power.
I found a master's thesis from Thomas Moore of Texas Tech,
which goes into a lot more detail and cites a lot of other scholars
and notes that Bizet's socialist reforms weren't just incomplete.
They also carried with them the seeds that would sprout right there violently
in a few generations.
Quote,
No matter how democratic the government appeared to be,
there were some serious drawbacks and flaws.
The main problem, which plagued the government for years,
was that executive responsibility was divided between a president and a national council.
This division of responsibility created no serious problems
so long as things ran smoothly and all the council members were in agreement.
This was apparent during the prosperous 1920s.
Presidents and councils could toss problems back and forth with no damaging effect
because of the evidence of economic affluence during that period.
It was during the Depression years, 1929 to 1933,
that the Collegiato, the national council,
demonstrated its incapacity for coping with the rising inflation and employment.
And basically, when there's not factionalism and strong political party disputes,
this works okay.
When there is, everything grinds off, grinds down to gridlock.
And in Uruguay, you have kind of two broad parties
and the history of these parties goes back to the Civil War period.
We don't need to get into a lot, but it's the Colorado party and the Blanco party.
And I think the Colorado party is kind of broadly liberal-ish
and the Blanco party is a little more conservative.
Not that they don't like graft onto the Republican and Democratic parties, obviously, right?
But that's probably broadly right.
So the president at the time, when the Great Depression hits
and like shit gets fucked up, is a dude named Gabriel Terra.
And he gets pissed off at the fact that council members couldn't come to any solid ideas
about how to deal with the economic collapse, right?
Like nobody can agree on anything.
And so this system that had worked when everyone was rich stops working
when the money stops flowing, which happens a lot in world history.
All of his attempts to remedy the situation got shut down by the council
because of political divisions.
So in 1933, he bypasses the political gridlock in the council
by doing a coup d'etat against his own government.
He dissolves the National Council and Congress.
He censors newspapers and he basically makes himself a dictator for a while there, right?
But not quite because he also calls for a new constitution, which is written in 1934
and establishes a new one-man presidency with a Senate,
which would be permanently divided in half between the two major parties.
I don't know that this, I'd say this helped, but like also by 34,
things are starting to get better economically.
So it may be that this reduced gridlock somewhat,
it may just be that like money starts coming in again.
And so all of the problems are lessened because there's money.
I don't know, politics are kind of like a relationship in that regard.
Things can work great until you're broke.
So the problem though with this new constitution
is that it completely enshrines a two-party system into law
because like you have to have the Senate split between the two parties.
It's a very immovable two-party system.
But still, like even though this has got to create problems later,
kind of during the late 30s, Uruguay starts doing a lot better.
They are in the 30s up to the 40s.
They're the most urbanized and prosperous nation in Latin America.
And this is a very urban country.
Most of the population lives in cities, like the vast majority.
So it's not like a lot of Latin America
where you have like this really geographically spread out populations
and a lot of them are in the mountains or something like that.
Kind of everybody lives in the cities in Uruguay.
And it has the lowest level of social inequality in Latin America
and one of the lowest levels of social inequality in the world.
Some of this is due to government policy
because Bezay does do a lot of like good socialistic stuff.
But it's also a lot of it has to do with Uruguayan culture,
which I'm not an expert on, but sounds fascinating.
One of the cool things about it,
it's considered to be like the classic car capital of the world,
not because everybody's like collecting old cars,
but because it's considered shameful to not keep a car working.
Like to buy in, if you're buying a new car,
it should be because your old vehicle cannot be fixed under any circumstances.
Or at least this was the culture version of like the Cuba thing.
Yeah, exactly, where it's just like,
well, no, you keep fixing the car.
You don't buy a new car.
Like unless your car is just like shattered, you know.
But in this case it's more like chosen
instead of just because the car goes.
Yes, and there's rich people and there's poor people,
but they often, especially throughout most of the 20th century,
you couldn't necessarily tell the difference
apart from on them based on how they travel or how they dress,
because there's this distaste culturally for displaying your wealth.
So even if you're super rich,
you kind of dress like a working class person because that's, again,
there's just kind of like cultural mores against showing off when you have money.
And that contributes to the lessened levels of social inequality in the country.
So when World War II comes a knock,
an Uruguay winds up producing meat, leather,
and a handful of other goods for the allies.
And this is one of the things Bazay gets,
like the scholars I've been reading criticized Bazay for.
He kind of started this attitude of like,
we have this socialist welfare state,
and it's going to be entirely supported by providing these products to western countries.
And in fact, Jose Mujica, the president of Uruguay,
a former president of Uruguay,
says that basically the big mistake Uruguay made
was turning itself into a lackey of the British Empire
and supplying all of their needs and kind of tying its welfare state
and its prosperity to the British Empire continuing to need these supplies, right?
But during World War II,
it's great to be selling shit to the British and the Americans, right?
It's a good time to be selling them shit.
They're buying up everything.
There's this big economic boom,
and it again kind of hides the gridlock of the...
that has been put under this like second constitution with a permanent two-party state.
So again, as long as there's cash to blow
and cash to keep the welfare stuff going, everything's all right.
And in fact, Europeans in the 40s and 50s
call Uruguay the Switzerland of South America,
which is not accurate and based, you know, on Eurocentrism and shit,
but because they're very much doing their own thing.
And also not neutral.
Not neutral, not primarily a place for rich people to store their money.
You know, like there's a lot of reasons
why that's not a good way to describe them.
Not surrounded by mountains that they've turned to the hollowed out fortresses.
Yeah, it's just because it's nice there compared to...
like a lot of places they're having wars and like difficulty,
like fighting between the government and Uruguay.
There's a lot less conflict socially in this period,
so that they're just like,
oh, basically they're saying we didn't fuck up Uruguay
as much as we fucked up a lot of places around it.
So it's the Switzerland of South America.
Yeah.
You know who else didn't fuck up Uruguay?
And definitely isn't neutral.
Yeah.
It's around the mountains.
Yeah.
Yep.
During the summer of 2020,
some Americans suspected that the FBI
had secretly infiltrated the racial justice demonstrations.
And you know what?
They were right.
I'm Trevor Aronson,
and I'm hosting a new podcast series,
Alphabet Boys.
As the FBI sometimes, you gotta grab the little guy
to go after the big guy.
Each season will take you inside an undercover investigation.
In the first season of Alphabet Boys,
we're revealing how the FBI spied on protesters in Denver.
At the center of this story is a raspy-voiced,
cigar-smoking man who drives a silver hearse.
And inside his hearse was like a lot of guns.
He's a shark.
And not on the good-bad-ass way.
He's a nasty shark.
He was just waiting for me to set the date, the time,
and then for sure he was trying to get it to happen.
Listen to Alphabet Boys on the iHeart Radio App,
Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Lance Bass,
and you may know me from a little band called NSYNC.
What you may not know is that when I was 23,
I traveled to Moscow to train to become the youngest person
to go to space.
And when I was there, as you can imagine,
I heard some pretty wild stories.
But there was this one that really stuck with me.
About a Soviet astronaut who found himself stuck in space
with no country to bring him down.
It's 1991, and that man, Sergei Krekalev,
is floating in orbit when he gets a message
that down on Earth, his beloved country,
the Soviet Union, is falling apart.
And now he's left defending the Union's last outpost.
This is the crazy story of the 313 days he spent in space.
313 days that changed the world.
Listen to The Last Soviet on the iHeart Radio App,
Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts.
What if I told you that much of the forensic science
you see on shows like CSI isn't based on actual science?
The problem with forensic science in the criminal legal system
today is that it's an awful lot of forensic
and not an awful lot of science.
And the wrongly convicted pay a horrific price.
Two death sentences and a life without parole.
My youngest, I was incarcerated two days after her first birthday.
I'm Molly Herman.
Join me as we put forensic science on trial
to discover what happens when a match isn't a match
and when there's no science in CSI.
How many people have to be wrongly convicted
before they realize that this stuff's all bogus?
It's all made up.
Listen to CSI on trial on the iHeart Radio App,
Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Alright, we're back and we're...
This game ad was good.
...talking about Uruguay.
So, things are going great in Uruguay through the 40s.
World War II is great for them and they keep making bank.
They kind of transition from serving the British Empire
to servicing the American Empire through the Korean War.
So we keep buying a shitload of stuff from Uruguay
through the Korean War.
And then the United States enters a permanent era of peace
that was completely unbroken for the next 70 years,
which is, you know, everybody knows about that period.
The Pax Americana, where we weren't involved in any wars.
But Uruguay...
Was that protest movement to try and get us to be involved in wars?
Yeah, all those people who wanted us to get into Vietnam.
Yeah, John Lennon had a big song about that.
Yeah, war is starting, I think, if you want to...
Yeah, Merry Christmas. Let's get into a war.
Yeah.
So Uruguay stops getting big fat government paychecks
after the Korean War and the economy contracts heavily.
Like, it kind of goes into free fall.
The government's short on money.
It can't pay for these social programs they've built.
And they don't want to do austerity.
So they like burn through the country's currency reserves
and they start taking on debt from international lenders
at kind of ruinous rates.
This happens to a lot of other places in this period of time.
This is kind of like the birth of the kind of global debt system
that exists to this day, because a lot of countries
get quote-unquote liberated from the colonial powers
and then take on loans from those powers to like...
Anyway, it's a fucked up period.
A bunch of fucked up shit's happening in this period.
And it's happening to Uruguay too.
So this is kind of disastrous
and it leads to a massive political reorganization.
Members of Congress push a plebiscite that the country votes on
and this plebiscite reinstitutes the National Council
and uses it to replace the presidency.
So they get...
Now they don't have a president anymore
and they have this National Council and the Senate
who are trying to do everything.
And even though this is a plebiscite
because kind of the social stability
is starting to crumble in this period of time,
the mid to late 50s,
most Uruguayans don't vote for the plebiscite.
So it passes narrowly
and it completely changes the political situation.
Okay, what's up with the plebiscite?
I'm sorry, I was trying to...
That's when the government says,
hey, we got to make a big change
and instead of doing normal political things,
everyone in the country gets to vote.
Yay or nay on this thing that we're going to do.
It would actually be rad if we could do some stuff that way
because things might...
We might be able to do some good stuff that everybody agrees on,
but we can't seem to pass.
But we'll never...
There's a bunch of reasons why it's not really possible
in the U.S. right now.
And it wasn't great there
because this is a plebiscite,
but most Uruguayans don't vote.
And it's...
Anyway, all it does is kind of reinforce the factionalism
that's been getting worse and worse and worse
throughout the 20th century in Uruguayan politics.
And in the late 1950s, there's just massive unemployment
and there's these huge labor protests,
hundreds and hundreds of them,
as a result of the fact that this welfare state
and this kind of very pro-union environment
has broken down.
A lot of workers aren't unionized at this point
and a lot of them are starving basically.
And the National Council,
this new government with the National Council
proves that they can be as vicious as a government
with the president and they crack down horribly
on these protesters.
Uruguay doesn't have a lot of police or a big military,
but they throw them out there to just beat
the absolute piss out of people who are protesting.
That's kind of where the government immediately goes
and Uruguay has its first mass civil disobedience campaigns.
What they couldn't...
The more they outnumber people,
the more they outnumber people, the less violent they have to be.
Some of the most violent police are the ones who...
That's the way that they can take control.
Yeah, there's not a lot of police in Portland,
but they're pretty fucking violent.
So, what's interesting to me is that
this National Council government,
despite being very split by the two-party system,
they still agree, well, yeah,
we have to have the police brutalize protesters.
But they can't agree on anything...
any ways to fix the economy.
They can't get that together.
They're just like, well, the poor people are getting organized,
so we should fuck them up.
So you said this doesn't map to Republicans and Democrats?
It does a bit.
Only just in this one way,
and that everyone agrees.
I think I've got this right.
I've read scholars who are smarter than me
and this seems to be what they're saying,
I never want to be saying too directly,
it's just like here,
even though there's patterns throughout different countries
in history that are similar,
because people are all basically the same.
People in power agree that you should beat up the people
who are trying to stop them from being in power.
That is the thing that maps on to every country ever.
Yeah, exactly.
It's everything from...
Yeah, it's everything.
It's every country, it's every government,
socialist or capitalist.
People are angry, send the cops in to fuck them up.
It's the people's stick.
Yeah, it's the people's stick in this case.
So in 1950...
Well, kind of, because this is also...
It's not really the people's stick,
it's way too much to call this.
It is a country with a lot of socialist policies.
It's certainly not like a socialist nation.
In 1958, there's another election
and the party that wins
is the party who had kind of been slightly
in the minority before
and had never been the party in power.
And they win election by promising
and take
control over all of the government.
By promising to fix a bunch of shit
that they'd been the minority party for years
and had thus gained power by saying,
look at how much the people in power suck.
We'll do it differently.
Now they're in power and they have to reform everything.
So they try to fix the welfare system,
which was going broke, but nothing they do works.
And nothing they do stops
the protests and the labor marches.
Now, all of this comes to pass
in the late 50s as the first generation
to truly benefit from Uruguay's
massive educational reforms
grows into adulthood.
Because remember, Bazay had made college free
and people after him, too,
they'd been repeated.
They built up a really good educational system
in the country.
And widespread literacy and whatnot.
And in the late 50s, the people who were
18 to 30 or so
are the first generation
who had really taken full advantage of this.
And Uruguay in this period has one of the
percentages of
individual print publications
per capita of anywhere in the world.
And they had,
for an idea of how big this educational boom was
between the 50s and the 70s,
the number of students receiving college degrees in Uruguay
increased by 117%.
So you've got
the economy collapsing,
inequality growing,
protests in the streets, increasing government crackdowns,
and the largest
most educated generation in the country's history
comes of age, right?
Historically, what happens when all those things
go down at the same time?
Awesome shit.
Yeah.
Oh, Margaret, you're going to like some of the graffiti
we're about to talk about.
So by the late 1960s,
you've got this situation where Uruguay is
a decade into the,
well, mid-1960s.
You've got this early to mid-1960s.
You've got a situation where Uruguay is in a decade
into economic contraction.
Uruguay, but like the left all over the world
in the early and mid-60s, is engaged
in an increasing series of protests
and revolts.
Domestically, Uruguay has this huge population of educated people
who've all spent a lot of time reading Marx
and Mao and Guevara and Bakunin,
and they're watching this two-party
system tilt rightwards
and get more violent and militarize
the police for it. Everything keeps getting
worse, right?
A situation no one else in the world can identify with.
And all of these trends
kind of coalesced as they sometimes do
into a single person,
or at least they kind of washed through this person.
And his, because of
unique things about him, it kind of colored
the way that they flooded over the rest of the population.
And this guy's name
was Raul Sindic.
He was an agricultural law student from Montevideo.
And in 1963,
he decided to do something about the fact
that all the sugar cane and beetcutters,
like, sugar cane, cutting sugar cane
and sugar beet is like this horrible,
really unpleasant
job that is necessary to process
a cash crop, right?
And these people are, despite, you know,
how socialized Uruguay is supposed to be,
they're not unionized, they're barely getting by
on poverty wages, and they're attempting
to unionize and protesting against unfair
working conditions. And Raul Sindic
is kind of like a middle class,
upper class, like, law student,
and with a bunch of other law students
he tries to help organize these workers.
And they gather a bunch of these people together
into a march, and they have a
350-mile protest march into Montevideo
that ends in a huge fight
with the cops.
And stuff like this is happening
all over the place. Raul is just like one of the
organizers who's part of this massive
labor, like, labor protest surge
at the time.
The fact that the government had used such violence
to stop a union drive leads Raul
to kind of reconsider, again,
he'd been a law student, he was planning to, like,
work within the system to change it
and seeing the police beat the shit out of all these
these people
makes him decide that the two-party system is hopeless.
He's like, well, they're both willing
to beat us when we
try to organize for better conditions, so why
would I try to work within that system?
It's kind of what Raul
thinks. I know, wild, right?
That you would
come to a reasonable conclusion.
Come to a very reasonable conclusion.
So he's not the only guy thinking this way.
He's kind of, I think, the most
charismatic guy to think this way and the best
and probably the best organizer of them.
And he starts getting together small
numbers of like-minded men and women.
This is a very gender
equality group that he starts to build, but they're all
kind of
agreed about the fact that they should affiliate
together and find ways to
execute their desire to overthrow the government,
right? That's the conversations these people
are having. And their numbers
start to grow. Protests overtook
Uruguayan streets in the early 1960s
and
yeah,
all of the state violence keeps bringing more
and more people to Raul's way of thinking
and they start to kind of formalize
their attitudes towards like, we should be organizing
to overthrow this system. Now
one of the positives about Raul is that
he fucking hated explosives.
He was like, did not like bombing
things. In the group
they would eventually use some explosives, but
they kind of landed on firearms
as the natural tool to seek
to execute some of the things that they wanted
to do and overthrow the government.
Guns would enable them to carry out a variety of
actions and do it in a way that would target
people rather than killing like random civilians
as much.
Yeah, it's slightly more discriminant
forms of violence.
It always goes well.
It always goes well.
Yeah, and he was also very committed
to the idea that you don't target people,
you target institutions.
Like banks, the police
and the impotent government that had been
squandering their future. So as they
increasingly talk and increasing
things get more and more formalized, they
eventually decide to like form an organization
which they call the Tupamaros.
Now this was actually
an acknowledgement of the history of indigenous
resistance in Latin America.
Tupac Amaru was the last
living member of the Incan royal family
and he led an insurrection against Spanish
rule and was murdered in 1571.
So they kind of,
as they are starting to form
what becomes this insurgent organization,
they're kind of looking back to specifically
to get even though most of these people are like
primarily Spanish and Italian descended
Uruguayans, they're
very much identifying with the history of
indigenous resistance to colonialism.
It's not for nothing that
they name their group that.
Which is real
blurry.
You know, it's like, there's a lot
that could be said about
that that I don't quite know how to say.
And I'm certainly not nearly enough of
an expert on like indigenous
struggles in Uruguay to like try to make
more of, I just think it's worth noting
that's who, that's what they're
trying to signal. Like that's important
for understanding how they conceive of themselves.
Yeah.
The first Tupamaros were largely middle-class
young white-collar workers
and students. Since more than half
of the Uruguayan population lived in Montevideo,
most
successful insurgent groups, and the groups that they're looking
at, because they're directly looking at like Cuba
and Shea Guevara and stuff, and like
a lot of the successful insurgent
groups in Mao that they're
they're modeling themselves
after are mountain fighters, right?
Like, because it's the best
place to be if you're an insurgent, it's the mountains, right?
And they're in Switzerland, so.
It's why there's Kurds, right? It's because
mountains are a good place to fight in.
Yeah.
But Uruguay, the places where people
live at least, there's not really mountains.
Everybody lives in the city.
More than half the population, like 60, 70%,
live in Montevideo. So these are urban
gorillas. And in fact, in Latin America,
if I'm not mistaken, they are the very first urban
gorilla organization.
And so they have to
carry out and plan and organize themselves
very differently as a result.
They carry out their first attack
in 1963 against
the Swiss Gun Club in Montevideo,
which is like a rich person gun club in the
capital. Nobody gets harmed
in this attack, but they steal dozens of guns,
which they then start. It's always the first move.
Yeah, of course, you've got to get guns, right?
You find the place with the guns and you
rob it with the one gun you happen to have,
or a pointy stick. I think in this case
they just kind of burgle it because
none of these people were expecting them to
break in and steal their Mausers.
So they get a shitload of guns from the
Swiss Gun Club. They get handed out to people,
yada yada.
And from the start, Raoul and other early members
of the group
knew that there was going to be state repression
at some point. The way it's organized
is there's a bunch of
independent cells that are like five to
I think the biggest ones were like a couple of dozen people,
but usually like five to fifteen people.
And each cell is supposed
to have its own
find its own sources of funding, usually robbing
stuff, find its own weapons, and be
able to completely replicate the entire
organization from within itself
and also be unaware of the other cells.
Although there is like a nine person
coordinating council that's responsible
for organizing stuff.
So they, you know,
they set this up in, and again, they're
very consciously patterning themselves off
of other insurgent groups at the time.
They are not, while a lot
of their inspirations are Marxist-Leninists,
they're not really Marxist-Leninists, a lot
of their inspirations are anarchists. They're not really anarchists.
They're very much
not, while there's a lot of
theory and ideology and they're reading all
of these guys, it's very kind of like a
pan-left insurgent movement.
Oh, interesting.
Yeah, which is interesting to me.
So from 1963 to 1968
their attacks gradually escalate.
Again, their first actions
get them guns, which they then use to carry out
what they call armed propaganda.
Now this is a local idea in
Uruguay and radicalism that is influenced
by the old anarchist idea of propaganda
of the deed, right? In the late 1800s
and early 1900s, anarchists are murdering
presidents and kings
in the hope of inspiring other
people to do more of that, so that eventually
there's no presidents and kings. I think that's like a fair
broad strokes
description of the idea.
The idea was like, these people don't know how to
read texts, so let's show them
what we mean, which actually didn't
start out as, didn't actually start
out as assassination, to start out as like
burning property records and like
anyway, sorry. And what's interesting
to me about the Tupemaro, as you said, the
propaganda of the deed didn't start out as being based
on murdering people. Tupemaro
armed propaganda is
never focused primarily around
killing people. That's aspects of it later on.
But from the beginning, they have a very different
attitude for what armed propaganda should be.
And I'm going to quote from a write-up by a War
is Boring article about their first
action, one of their first actions. Quote,
one of the group's first actions involved
hijacking a truck filled with chickens and
turkeys that was headed to a Christmas banquet.
Twenty Tupemaros holding revolvers and
knives attacked the truck. They called
themselves Junior Jose Artigas Unit,
a reference to Uruguayan independence
fighter Jose Gervasio Artigas.
The Tupemaros left a note that read,
revolutionary share in the Christmas
of the poor and call upon them to form
committees in each district to fight against rising
prices. They handed out the turkeys and
chickens in poor neighborhoods of the capital.
Yeah, so like that's the armed propaganda.
Like we are going to use our guns to
rob a banquet for rich people
and redistribute the food to the poor,
which is great. That's awesome.
No notes. Hard to
have an issue with that, right? Yeah.
Yeah. So over the next couple of years
the Tupemaros engage in
ever-grander acts of armed propaganda.
They would rob banks and take piles of cash
and redistribute it immediately to the poor.
They would also rob banks to like fund their
operations, but a lot of time they're taking cash
and then immediately handing it out to poor people.
And it's like they're robbing specifically often
investment banks and saying like, these
people have been robbing you, so let's
rob them and give it back to you.
At one point they heisted a popular
casino for foreigners in the resort town
of Puente del Este, and they
realized after they get away with the bag
that they'd also stolen the employee pool of
tips, which they return
because they're like, we're not here to fuck with
working people. Like your tips are yours.
Like we're not taking your fucking tips. Don't
worry guys. That's how to be
classy. That is classy as hell
where they're like, well we wanted to steal from
this casino, but we didn't like, we understand
you guys work in there like, you didn't do
nothing wrong. Here's your tip money back.
And
the fundamentally pro-social ends of
most Tupamaro crimes
endear them to people, right? Like they're
extremely popular, obviously.
Their antics make them famous
the world over. One time they robbed a fancy
nightclub and spray, so like
they go into this rich person nightclub in a nice
part of Montevideo and like rob it at gunpoint
and then they spray paint on the wall
everybody dances or nobody
dances. Yeah.
Which I fucking love.
Yeah, that's just incredibly
incredibly cool.
Time magazine declares them the Robin Hood
gorillas and their motto events
they also had a motto that kind of
I was saying they're very pan leftist and
open-minded towards questions of tendency
and political theory and their motto is
words divide us, action
unites us.
Okay.
Like in these guys so far.
Yeah. Yeah, they're pretty
dope. So one of these
gorillas is a young Jose
Mujica.
You know, the future president of
Uruguay. Pepe, as he's
most commonly known, was born on May
20th, 1935 to a poor
farming family outside of Montevideo.
He was the first born of several brothers.
His family was Basque on one side
and Italian on the other. His dad
was the foreman for a small farm which went
belly up when Jose was five.
When he was in third grade at I think age eight
his dad dies which throws the family
into total poverty. It forces
young Pepe to take to the streets selling
flowers and working as a bakery to support
his siblings and his mom.
He was from an early age a generous
person. Walter Pernas Mujica's
biographer notes that as a child
Jose offered all of his toys to
other kids in the neighborhood because he
wanted to share everything that he had.
He was born about six
years after the death of Bazay, that president
who had made all those lovely policies.
And even though he grew up
during what is generally seen as Uruguay's
golden years, his family is dirt poor
and he is mired in poverty.
So he doesn't have like a rosy
lens towards the past. He's very
progressive in part because he comes up
during Uruguay's golden age and like
yeah, life's fucking hard for poor people.
One of the most
influential moments in his young life is
there's a butchery near his house
and the union for it is
an anarcho-syndicalist union
and the workers there go on strike
and during a negotiation
they get angry at their employer so they hold
up his trucks at gunpoint and
redistribute all the meat in them to the poor.
So this is like one of the
defining moments of Jose's childhood is
being like, oh, that's pretty
you see why this guy becomes a Tupamaro because
he's like, oh yeah, that fucking rules.
Yeah, that's how I
ate one day. Yeah, that's how I ate one
day. I know what makes
people appreciate an organization is
when they help you eat. Yeah.
Yeah, it's pretty
rad. The action stirred
something in him and given the similarities
between this and a lot of Tupamaro actions, again, it's easy to see
why he winds up where he is. He's
also political in kind of the legal
sense from an early age. His uncle
is a nationalist and part of the national
party and he becomes a general
secretary for the youth of that
party. There's a passage from the guardian
that gives good insight into how his initial
foray into legitimate politics led to
his radicalization. Quote,
as a young man, Mujica went
to work for Enrique Aero, a popular
left-wing politician, but had a political
epiphany when he met Che Guevara in
post-revolutionary Cuba. As much
of Latin America fell victim to crises and
decline, it was an Uruguayan writer, Eduardo
Galliano, who penned a new Bible
for the continent's left wing, the open
veins of Latin America. The
human murder by poverty in Latin America
is secret, Galliano wrote in
1971. Every year, without making
a sound, three Hiroshima bombs explode
over communities that have become accustomed
to suffering with clenched teeth.
Which is a
good way to phrase the
devastation that poverty wreaks in a
population. Like, the West
is nuking us every year,
you know, as a result of
and our leaders are nuking us every
year as a result of, like, starvation.
By 1964, after
a year of escalating Robin Hood raids
by the Tupamaros and several years of escalating
police violence, Jose II decided
that his country's political system had left him with
no peaceful option. So he tries to get into
legitimate politics, but he's very influenced
by Che Guevara in particular.
And in 1964,
he decides, like, fuck it,
I'm going to join the gorilla. And he
joins the gorilla. He receives
training and he's soon living a split life.
By day, he's a humble farmer.
And by night, he's a revolutionary, robbing
banks and shit. He joined
at a period when the Tupamaros were rapidly
expanding and growing more comfortable
with increasingly extreme acts
of armed propaganda. In 1965,
the Tupamaros bombed
a local Bayer factory.
And their justification for this, so they blow up
this factory because
Bayer internationally is making
gases used by the U.S. military in
Vietnam. So it's very much an attack.
And I think it's their first attack where it's not
like, we're doing this to protest local
things. We're doing this to
assert ourselves as part of the international
struggle.
Yeah.
Pretty interesting.
And things escalate from there. I want to quote now
from a graduate thesis by Thomas Moore
of Texas Tech University.
Quote, the Tupamaros
suffered their first fatality in December
1966. Two weeks after a robbery
at an armory, police located a vehicle
that was suspected to have been involved
while in pursuit of fierce gun battle erupted
between the police and the occupants of the vehicle.
During the battle, the vehicle ran
into a tree and the occupants fled on foot.
One of the occupants, later identified
as Carlos Flores Alvarez, remained behind
and covered his comrades' retreat with machine
gun fire. The police returned fire
and Flores Alvarez was killed.
Inside the vehicle were two more machine guns
and two pistols. Less than a week later,
another shootout with police cost
the life of Mario Rabiano Mendes,
another Tupamaro.
So, the first couple
of years they've got going on, nobody
gets killed, everything's pretty
I mean, like violent, like violent
in that they're using weapons and stuff,
but like, it, it, they
avoid things escalating to that level.
66 is when like, now we're
getting into gun battles in the cops and people
are, and people are dying. And occasionally
it's like people who are
bystanders, who are shot by either the Tupamaros
over the, or the cops, not intentionally
but because they're firing machine guns
at each other wildly in a city, you know?
Yeah, like car chases are not exactly
safe for people on the city. It's not safe for anybody.
No. Yeah.
And again, they, they avoid as much as
possible direct gun fights
with the police. Like this is never something they
seek out. They are never like, let's ambush
a bunch of cops and kill them kind of
group. Like when they ambush police,
it's generally to let's take their guns
and like, then rob this place
and tie them up and stuff. Right.
And this is largely just like, it's not
smart to get into a bunch of gun fights with the cops
because your guys get killed.
Yeah, it's usually
yeah, not the most strategic
choice that one could make. Yeah. Your guys
and your ladies, because kind of like the PKK
but much earlier, the Tupamaros
are like very gender
equal. And
like one of the decisions they come
to early on is like, there's no reason women
shouldn't be fighting too.
So a lot of the people, some of the people who die
are like women who are getting into machine gun fights
with the cops in this
group. It's a very like egalitarian
insurgent organization. We can
all get murdered by this. We can all get
murdered by the state. Everyone's able
to do that.
Now, the Tupamaro
organizational structure, the fact that there's all these
independent cells allows for a tremendous
amount of group autonomy and experimentation.
I haven't found much about this, but one of
the cells is led by a priest and I'm really
interested in like how that went down.
Yeah.
I mean, like the whole liberation theology thing
going on. And that's big in Uruguay.
Yeah.
In 1966, a Montevideo theater
was putting on a production of a play
that necessitated military uniforms
and rifles for some of the actors.
Because it's good PR, the military's like, yeah,
we'll loan you guys outfits and we'll give you some Mauser
rifles. And so they're just being like stored at this
theater. And so one day before
the play, a group of pistol armed Tupamaros
like busts in and steals all
the guns and the uniforms, then they dress up
as soldiers and they rob a bank
making off 301,000 pesos.
Which is fucking very funny.
Yeah.
I hope it was somebody who worked at the theater or tipped
him off. I think it was.
I believe it was an employee at the theater
who was like a Tupamaro or sympathetic who
like tells them there's this stuff here.
Yeah. Who was probably like, oh, yeah,
yeah, yeah, give us some Mausers.
The show would be more authentic if you
give us real ones. Yeah.
Machine guns, real.
A lot of ammunition for set dressing.
Yeah.
In 1967,
the government struck back rounding
up several dozen Tupamaros and
building what they thought was an accurate
picture of the group's membership. So
this big bank rate like
inspired like the government does
a huge crackdown. They actually catch
and arrest a bunch of Tupamaros
and they feel like, oh,
we know everyone, we know everything
now. We've got like this whole organization
dead to rights. Let's roll them up.
And they arrest a bunch of people
and think that they've destroyed the organization.
And so they announce in the press that they've
dealt a mortal blow to the Tupamaros.
Now, this
was a mistake for the state because
they actually had not.
And the Tupamaro proved that with the launch
of their next major operation,
the incredibly named Plan
Satan.
Wow.
I hope it was the priest who came up with it.
Yeah, I hope it's the fucking priest.
Yeah.
So as their war
had escalated, a number of gorillas
had suggested they start assassinating
government officials in the street.
A decision was made. From Plan Satan.
Well, that's not what Plan Satan
is because they don't, they do eventually
do that. They don't start doing that because
they're like, well, that might backfire. Maybe like
they're never. So that's not that operation.
It just starts to escalate towards
it does because they decide
instead of assassinating people,
they're going to carry out a campaign
of kidnapping prominent business
leaders and politicians and then
ransoming them back to fund the revolution.
And also this will this will
show that the state is ineffective, right?
Like you can't even stop us from kidnapping
government ministers. Like clearly
you're not capable of running
this country, right? That's like the big idea
behind this is like we will show
the people that the state is not capable
of governing them
by proving how impudent it is.
That's kind of their like
the propaganda justification of this.
I mean, that could also backfire really easily.
It does.
We need the state because
people are running around kidnapping people.
Yeah, it doesn't quite. I mean, we'll talk
about there's a lot of debate over the
degree to which this backfires.
But
Pepe, our future Uruguayan president
is intimately involved in Plan Satan.
And I'm going to quote from the Guardian here.
I love that someone managed to get elected
after being part of Plan Satan.
Yeah, a guy who was part of Plan
Satan get selected president.
It's it is.
It's pretty dope. It's
it's extremely dope. Yeah.
So from the Guardian quote
on a spring day in 1969,
Manus was at home with his sister Beatrice
when the future president burst out
of the lift outside of their penthouse
in Montevideo with a pistol in his hand.
Turn around, shut your mouth,
and keep your hands above your head, he barked.
Manus immediately recognized the pinched eyes
and thick wavy brown hair of one of the
most notorious members of the daring
violent Tupamaro guerrillas.
After his initial sense of panic subsided, he recalled,
he felt strangely calm.
I remember telling the young gunman who was with him
not to worry that I wasn't going to do anything.
The 62-year-old travel agent told me
when we met in his favorite Montevideo bookshop,
a short distance from the murky waters
of the immense River Plate,
his sister who suffered from polio and used a wheelchair
was taken off to another room.
Don't worry, Muzika told her.
You'll be fine. This has nothing to do with you.
And yeah, Manus' stepfather,
Jose Pedro Purpurra, was a notorious judge
with ties to Uruguay's far right
and a stock of pistols.
After the gang had left, taking documents
and weapons, Manis told his relatives
that he was only upset that the Tupamaros had stolen
a typewriter he used for his schoolwork.
The following day, the phone rang.
It is us, the same people from yesterday,
a voice said. He suddenly felt scared again.
Somehow, they knew about the typewriter.
If he wanted it back, the voice told him,
he could find it in the lobby of a nearby building.
Sure enough, it was there, he said.
They had left a typed message in it
for my stepfather.
Careful, doctor. It read, we are watching you.
It's fucking...
Hey, kids, we know this isn't your fault,
but we got to take your stepdad's guns.
Oh, we stole your typewriter.
We'll give it to you back, but we're also going
to send a threat for your stepdad.
It's pretty neat, pretty fun stuff.
Yeah, I'm glad they kept it classy longer.
They keep it very classy.
Because most groups start a little classy
and get real bad real quick.
We can debate. I don't think they ever get real bad.
They do get much more violent,
and they do get comfortable assassinating people.
You can feel about that the way that you want.
They are never like the IRA,
where they're setting off bombs and bars
filled with just random people.
They do not do that kind of shit.
There are civilians who get killed
as a result of their actions,
never intentionally more.
It's not that we're not going to set off a bomb,
and it kills people, and we're fine with that,
but we are going to get into gunfights
with the cops sometimes,
and people will die as a result of that.
Right, but they don't plan the people's death.
They do not plan the people's death.
I don't want to make an ethical...
No.
There's an ethical line somewhere,
and I don't know where to draw that kind of line.
My ethical line, I guess,
is they do not, as far as I've read,
they do not target groups of civilians
for murder in order to create fear.
That's not a thing that they do.
Which is good. People shouldn't do that.
Which is good. I think that's a bad thing to do.
I think it is worth stopping people who do that.
Yeah, for all of my enjoyment of IRA music,
I think bombing random bars
is bad behavior.
No, sir.
Some other people have done similar, anyway.
A lot of people have done similar things.
Yeah, and it's never a good thing.
I don't like...
I call them terrorists,
because they are,
but there's a spectrum
of things that you can do as terrorists,
and they are not like,
let's set off a suicide bomb
in the middle of a packed market.
That's not these dudes.
And ladies. Oh, yeah.
You know who does set off bombs?
Robert? No.
Savings bombs?
Yeah, savings bombs.
Bombs of financial...
Margaret, with the line!
Responsibility.
Those kind of bombs. The best kind of bombs.
Are
products
and services.
And on that one, my friend.
Yeah, no, that was much better.
During the summer of 2020,
some Americans suspected
that the FBI had secretly infiltrated
the racial justice demonstrations.
And you know what?
They were right.
I'm Trevor Aronson,
and I'm hosting a new podcast series,
Alphabet Boys.
As the FBI, sometimes,
you gotta grab the little guy
to go after the big guy.
Each season will take you inside
an undercover investigation.
In the first season of Alphabet Boys,
we're revealing how the FBI
spied on protesters in Denver.
At the center of this story
is a raspy-voiced,
cigar-smoking man
who drives a silver hearse.
And inside his hearse was like a lot of guns.
He's a shark. And not in the good badass way.
He's a nasty shark.
He was just waiting for me to set
date, the time,
and then, for sure, he was trying to get it to happen.
Listen to Alphabet Boys
on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
It's 1991,
and that man, Sergei Krekalev,
is floating in orbit
when he gets a message that down on Earth,
his beloved country,
the Soviet Union,
is falling apart.
And now he's left defending
the Union's last outpost.
This is the crazy story
of the 313 days he spent in space.
313 days
that changed the world.
Listen to the last Soviet
on the iHeart Radio app,
Apple Podcast,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
What if I told you
that much of the forensic science
you see on shows like CSI
isn't based on actual science?
The problem
with forensic science
in the criminal legal system today
is that it's an awful lot of forensic
and not an awful lot of science.
And the wrongly convicted
is a horrific price.
Two death sentences and a life without parole.
My youngest,
I was incarcerated two days after her first birthday.
I'm Molly Herman.
Join me as we put
forensic science on trial
to discover what happens
when a match isn't a match
and when there's no science
in CSI.
How many people have to be wrongly
convicted before they realize
that this stuff's all bogus?
It's all made up.
Listen to CSI
on trial on the iHeart Radio app,
Apple Podcast,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
All right, we're back.
And I'm going to continue to try to pronounce
Jose Mujica's name right.
I keep needing to listen to the pronunciation
because I keep drifting as I read it.
But Jose Mujica was part
of some of the more creative acts
of propaganda that the Tupamarros
breached out into.
And I'm going to quote from that same article,
the Guardian article.
In the summer of 1969,
a police officer knocked on the door
of a small Montevideo investment bank
which was partially owned by a government minister.
The employees let him in only to discover
he was a Tupamarros.
Several other gorillas followed.
They took the equivalent of $100,000 in today's money,
but also demanded the bank's account ledgers.
One of the employees,
Jose Mujica was doing illegal currency deals.
Her twin sister, Maria Elia,
was one of the gorillas who conducted the raid.
The Tupamarros dropped off the ledgers
at the home of a public prosecutor,
and some of those involved in the illegal trading
were subsequently jailed.
That's fucking awesome.
We're going to rob this bank
to get evidence of corruption
in government, and then we will hand that over
to a prosecutor.
And again, you see, this is,
they are such a creative
political group that they're like,
we are trying to overthrow the state.
We're also not against recognizing,
oh, this prosecutor is an honest man.
We'll give him information that will
reduce corruption and stuff,
because that's also good.
They're very pragmatic
and willing to embrace a real diversity of tactics.
They're doing a lot of different shit.
And also very like, I think that shows
the sort of non-ideological nature,
because I have a hard time coming up
with someone with almost any isms,
who would do that.
Do that, yeah.
But they're very much,
they're very good at pivoting.
And this is the thing throughout, they're up to the modern point.
They're really good at just kind of flowing,
which I think is why
they have the impact that they do.
That said, 1969
was what you might call the last good year
for the Tupamarros, because after this point,
things get a lot less fun and creative
and a lot more violent and fucked up and scary,
which is inevitable when you are trying
to overthrow a government using force, right?
Like that is every single
one of these stories.
Things come to a head first
near the end of 1969,
when the Tupamarros execute a raid
on a town called Pondo, which is like a part,
I think it's like, it's kind of a neighborhood of,
it's called a town, it's kind of like,
I think it's more of a town at this point.
It's now, I often hear it referred to as
like a part of Montevideo, but it's like a,
it's high income, right?
It's an area in this urban sprawl
where people with a lot more money live.
And on October 8th, the Tupamarros
carry out their largest action ever,
more than 100 guerrillas,
a symbol inside Pondo.
And in order to all get together
and into position without being noticed,
a lot of them dress in a costume
as members of a funeral entourage
in order to elude suspicion.
Once the signal was, once they're
in Pondo, groups of five to 10 guerrillas
assemble outside a series of targets.
And at one o'clock, a signal is given,
they identify themselves in the event of a gunfight
and they carry out simultaneous attacks
on the police commissary, the police station,
the fire department and two local banks.
And again, they never, their goal
is never to get into gunfight.
So these are not, they're not just like coming
and shooting to murder people.
There's almost no resistance and so nobody gets killed
initially, like they're just taking guns,
tying up people, you know, like they're there
to raid and rob and take shit.
They're not attempting to murder everybody.
And another group, one of the groups
is the bank armed with machine guns and pistols.
And while two Tupamaros remove
money from the bank, a third hands
out leaflets to civilians at the bank
explaining why they're taking the money
and what they're going to do with it.
Which is, again, awesome.
So everything works out.
The initial stage of this raid goes great.
They steal millions of pesos.
But as they're exfiltrating, they've got
like a caravan of vehicles leaving,
the police catch up basically.
And there's a series of gunfights,
and like the founder of the two,
Raul gets away with the money,
but like a group of Tupamaros
get their vehicle stopped
and like have a big gunfight with the cops.
Three Tupamaros get killed and 20 get captured.
So it's a very like
pyrrhic victory, right?
Yeah, and it things get a lot
uglier for the Tupamaros after this point.
If they're panning out the flyer,
someone designed it and so somewhere,
there's someone who went to school for graphic design
who's like, this is my contribution.
I'm going to make the flyers.
I'm really excited about that person.
I hope that person made it through the entire thing,
totally unscathed.
Her grandkids are like,
you wouldn't believe what grandma used to do.
Yeah, she was in that gunfight with the cops.
Yeah.
She made the flyers.
So everything gets uglier though after this point.
Now, for their part
in terms of things getting uglier,
the Tupamaros start carrying out target assassinations
of some government officials
and police officials at this point.
And for its part, the government cracks down
by going ultra authoritarian.
And I think the Tupamaros would argue
we started assassinating people
when the government started torturing our people, right?
I think the police would say that
like the Tupamaros were so violent
that like we had to use these radical measures.
I think the torture comes first.
From what I can read,
the Tupamaros are being tortured
by the time they start carrying out assassinations.
And the government also cracks down
by restricting freedom of speech.
So the news media is forbidden to refer
to the Tupamaros by name.
And in order to get around this,
the Tupamaros set up a radio transmitter
in Montevideo to hijack
government-run radio channels
and broadcast propaganda about their actions.
Which is again...
How popular are they during all this?
Quite. We'll talk about that in a bit.
But that's part of why they get away with it
is most of the people seem to be
pretty supportive of this.
They're extremely popular.
In July 1970,
the Tupamaros made what would prove to be
one of their worst strategic decisions.
They kidnapped Dan Mitrion,
an American citizen,
which is always a dicey thing to do,
especially for a leftist movement
in 1970s Latin America.
Yeah.
Now, one source I found
described Dan Mitrion as
quote, an American policeman
on loan to the Uruguayan security forces.
I've also heard him described as an FBI agent
working with him. When you hear an American
policeman on loan to the Uruguayan
security forces, what do you assume
was his actual employer?
The CIA.
Yeah! It's the CIA!
And Dan Mitrion's job
is to teach people how to do torture.
He had previously consulted for the
Brazilian government and his specialties
like electrocution and slow strangulation.
I feel really good about that
having chosen this technique.
I can see how it wasn't a strategic plan.
It's not a good strategic move. Morally.
If your job is to travel to different
countries and teach them how to strangle people,
I don't think you getting kidnapped
is bad.
That is my moral line.
Yeah.
And I'm going to quote from a write-up
by warisboring here.
While torture was part of the government's
policy, prival to Mitrion's arrival,
he is often credited with making it
widespread among the Uruguayan police
force and extolling the value of applying
quote, and this is Dan, the precise pain
and the precise place and the precise amount
for the desired effect.
He was known in particular for his expertise
in applying as much electrical shock as possible
to the genitals without causing death
and for pioneering the use of thin wire
that could be placed between the teeth
to intensify pain during electrocution.
So a cool dude, Dan.
He is probably not just the fodder of
every trashy spy movie
ever.
You know that this guy has black gloves
that are very tight.
And some weird sexual hang-ups.
Probably a serial killer back in the US.
Yeah.
And very particular about where everything
in the apartment goes.
So the Tupamarros responded
to the escalation of violence and kind
and specifically targeted Mitrion.
They kidnapped the CIA agent in July of 1970.
The Tupamarros rarely killed anyone
and did not have a reputation for killing
those they kidnapped. Instead, they would
exchange them for cash ransoms or
release of imprisoned
Tupamarros. However, with the
government assault on them proving more effective,
several leaders of the movement were killed
or arrested while Mitrion was being held in
the Tupamarros' underground people's prison.
When the deadline for Mitrion's ransom came
and went, the new Tupamarros leadership
was uncertain of how to respond.
They executed him.
And I should note, there are allegations,
at least. I don't know how credible...
I haven't found a lot of detail on this. There are allegations
that the people's prison tortures folks as well.
Probably.
I don't know, again, there are also allegations
from, in a lot of cases, guys doing
torture. So like, I don't know,
but probably, right? They're probably
doing some of that themselves.
Which, you know, nobody's
a good guy when it comes time
to be a war.
There's a better guy, and I think the people
who are not being helped by the traveling
electrocute your testicles, dude,
are probably the better people
in this situation.
People who kidnap the strangler
are often better than the strangler.
Yeah, I would say better than the strangler,
even though, as things get brutal,
perhaps they do some strangling themselves.
Or at least, like, holding people in
solitary confinement and shit.
Look, I'm sure the people's prison isn't nice
either, you know?
So they execute Dan.
Which, again,
I don't
have a moral problem
with that, if your job is to hook up
electrodes to people's testicles and like
torture her, you're torturing, like,
kill you. I don't
have a moral issue with that, but it's not a great
I don't think it's a good idea for them
for a couple of reasons. Like, it doesn't work.
It didn't go well, I guess.
It doesn't go well. A lot of the sources you'll find,
especially like the Guardian, kind of more liberal sources
will say that this is what leads to a loss
of public support. And they
often are kind of sources that leave out the fact
that Dan tortured people for the CIA, the ones
that are like, this was like a bad move for them.
I don't know how
badly this hurts them locally.
I don't know how much this is actually
an unpopular move.
We get one hint in that in 1972
there's an Uruguayan Gallup poll.
And this is two years or so after they kill Dan.
And after
two more years of, because the violence
escalates after they kill Dan. And this
1972 poll finds that there's still widespread
support for the guerrillas,
even though the majority of Uruguayans want
nonviolent resolution to their political yields.
So most Uruguayans do not
support violent revolution, but they are also
broadly feel fondly towards the Tupamarros,
right?
In a lot of cases because
the government is increasingly
militarizing, they're like carrying out these huge
dragnets that impact people's lives.
So like, the Tupamarros rob a bank
and that doesn't really fuck with people
living in the area, but then the police set up a huge
dragnet and that fucks up things for everybody.
And so like, they're angry at the cops
more so than the Tupamarros.
I don't know that killing Dan hurt
the Tupamarros with Uruguayans,
but
it's not good for another
reason, which is that
now a CIA agent has been killed.
And so the United States is like,
well, that's all the justification we needed
to get way more involved in this shit.
So the US
accelerates their support of the
increasingly right wing Uruguayan government.
The CIA funnels money and equipment
in and they funnel all of their
money and equipment in manpower through one of their
favorite vehicles, the US Agency
for International Development or USAID.
Like that is how all of their
like, here's how to torture people guys
get like ledgered out as like,
this is part of an aid package.
I want to quote from a paper called
Racking the Tupamarros by Lucas Hall of Union College.
The United States began to offer its assistance
in the form of military aid to the Uruguayan government
throughout the 1960s and into the 1970s
throughout the civic military
dictatorship. Although the United States
initially provided military aid in order to
squash the Tupamarros, eventually it provided
aid in order to suppress the left in general.
For example, the Uruguayan government
first declared a state of siege
government limitation on personal freedom in
1963 following a worker strike
at an electric company in Montevideo and
thereafter in 1965,
1967, 68 and 69
in response to various protests organized
by laborers or insurgent
activities perpetrated by the Tupamarros.
Such governmental decrees intensified
conflicts among laborers, guerrilla movements
like the Tupamarros and the increasingly
authoritarian government. Moreover, following
the 1966 elections Uruguay
reabandoned the National
Council and reinstituted the presidential
system which reinforced executive power
following the death of the newly elected
Colorado president and military general
Oscar Diego Gastido
pose a year later, Gastido's vice
president George Pacheco Areco
assumed the presidency and used his
executive power to pursue and defeat
the Tupamarros. In 1971
he decreed that the armed forces
would intervene in the battle against
the military, against the guerrilla movements.
So
that's kind of like the political
and this is one of the points
a lot of people will say that the Tupamarros
brought on the dictatorship that is coming
because of their resistance and as
kind of that passage points out, they were
a part of the process by which
the state became increasingly dictatorial
but a lot of the state's dictatorial
decrees are in response to just workers
protests that are not
organized by the Tupamarros because other stuff
is happening in the left here.
And I think that like when
primarily western sources
but although not entirely there are some Uruguay
ins will blame them for it too but when
I think primarily when like western sources
say well we got the
dictatorship because of the Tupamarros
they're ignoring the fact that
the dictatorship came in
and was backed by the US as part of a broad
attempt to stop all left-wing
organizing in the country including all of these
like workers movements and the
Tupamarros because they were the guerrilla
movement are a really convenient group
to blame because kind of liberals
always like to blame the people who are accepting
violence even though like well
they also instituted states of emergency
because they were fucking protests
like don't put this
all on the Tupamarros.
It's a very very classic
means by which to
try and get the left to eat itself.
Yes and it doesn't really
work in Uruguay which is interesting
but we're getting to that so
Areco the president who like brings the
military in to fight the Tupamarros
isn't quite a dictator
although Uruguayans make quibble with that
like I don't think he doesn't he's not
quite as far as the next guy is what I'll say
How did the guy die in the
in the reading you just did? I don't I don't
I think it was natural causes though. Oh okay.
I'm trying to figure out if you got it.
I don't think so.
Yeah so Areco
Was it the strangler?
He preps the path for dictatorship
and he kind of ushers Uruguay into
the dictatorship that's coming.
He mentioned a few times that the Tupamarros escalated
their violence in response to state violence
and a hall credits this less with
desperation than to the again the fact that
this is a very pragmatic group so the Tupamarros
are like let's try
not killing people and then when
it escalates to a more violent more
gunfighting thing they're like well let's become
a straight up insurgent group you know
like they're very willing to kind of like
weave with things and so they pivot
because they don't have a hard and fast ideology
they're kind of happy to be
mostly nonviolent or happy
to be mostly violent depending on like what
the situation calls for and in
the early 70s when the military gets
and they're like well now it's time to kill more people
and not a lot of people
I think about 302 Tupamarros get
killed and they kill about 50 people
so as
insurgent movements go again
these guys are not like
we're not bombing military convoys
and stuff you know
I'm sure they wanted they could have had a more
closer parity
if they if they wanted to
yes but
this doesn't work in any case
violence escalates and the government's much
better at doing violence right the Tupamarros
yeah like
if you're going I think it is this situation
we're like if you're gonna do that
they will probably
be better than you at it it's very
rarely that guerrilla movement
takes on the entire apparatus of the
state and
wins it happens and usually they have to
do some very ugly shit in order to make
that work
and have some other things break their way
and have a lot of foreign aid and all this stuff
anyway whatever it does not work here
President Pacheco grows increasingly
dictatorial everybody knows shit is bad
and again there's a lot of left-wing organizing
outside of the Tupamarros critical
of the Tupamarros there's the what
a lot of scholars I read will call the legal left
in Uruguay who has
this kind of mixed relationship where they
appreciate them they may agree with
overall goals but not the means
and
kind of as the Uruguay hits this point
where like the
military has been brought in we can all
see that a dictatorship is coming
the whole left kind of unifies
behind this idea of like well let's try one last
legal push to stop this
let's see if there is a way within
the democratic system
to to avoid
this before it becomes a
trade-up dictatorship and so all these folks
on the legal left form an organization
called the Frente Amplio
which means broad front and it's
a popular front coalition right we've talked
about this in the behind the insurrections episodes
and like happens in Spain happens in France
happens in a bunch of places so they build
a popular front coalition of left
parties and groups aimed at resisting
the authoritarian creep under Pacheco
Reco by 1971
dozens of Tupamarros have been killed
hundreds tortured and the guerrilla organization
agrees to sit down
with the Frente Amplio with the legal left
and work together in this
effort to try and legally
stop a dictatorship
the Tupamarros announce a sort of
ceasefire for the 1971 elections
like we're not going to
do insurgents shit
we're gonna try to do electoral
shit again they're good at pivoting
right and they form a
political wing the March 26th movement
or 26M which declares
support for the Frente Amplio so the
Tupamarros are like hey we're
not gonna do any attacks right now
we formed a political organization
and we have joined this broad
front coalition of left wing political
parties
this was a really difficult thing
to pull off because again Uruguay
has a two-party system at least
as fucked up as ours is currently it is hard
and they're trying to make a third party right
like they're not unified with kind of the
vaguely liberal party they are trying
to do their own thing
right and it's
it's a significant attempt
right like it is not an easy thing to
pull off quote from Lucas Hall's
article the Tupamarros
beyond expressing their support for the party
through the formation of the 26M
humbled themselves in order to further
strengthen the Frente's electoral position
amid rumors of a military coup for example
the Tupamarros participated
with former members of the armed forces
and other members of the security apparatus
in plan Contra Golpe
a movement intended to prevent the onset
of authoritarian dictatorship
however despite such efforts the Frente
Amplio failed to gain the support
needed to topple the traditional parties
however credible its written
program and general principles might have been
for a large sector of the citizenry
the support of the Tupamarros
party positioned the Frente Amplio
as an extremist option
as a result it was especially difficult for the
Frente to win the support of voters on the
country side even that of voters outside
Montevideo nonetheless the results
of the elections were surprising first
although he received the most votes the
constitution prevented President Pacheco
from serving a second term and the electoral
effort to amend that law was disapproved
as a result Pacheco's hand
picked suppressor Juan Maria
Bordeberry Arrosina won the presidency
second although it only won 18%
of the vote the Frente Amplio
won 30% of the vote in Montevideo
in other words nearly
a fifth of the total population and a third
of the population of Montevideo was
disaffected with the current political system
although the other four fifths of the population
voted for the traditional parties
this figure represents the first time in Uruguay's
electoral history that a non-traditional
party garnered considerable support
from a significant portion of the population
suggesting that at least in the city
the Tupamarros armed propaganda campaign
had been successful
in influencing all sides of the left
to challenge the established order
and this is interesting to me
because again a lot of the
non-scholarly sources who are kind of like
journalists
summarizing the history will say that like
they led to
the failure of the left electorally
and
the left wasn't going to win anyway
some academics at least
I'm not trying to claim that what's in this
Lucas Hall article although he does cite
a number of Uruguayan academics
I'm not trying to say that this is the absolute consensus
but there is a substantial academic argument
that actually the Tupamarros armed propaganda campaign
is why for the first time ever
the left as a third party
gains a really significant
chunk of the vote
that's an argument you can make
that said time had run out
the 1971 election
was sadly their last attempt to
their last chance to forestall a dictatorship
the Frente Amplio did succeed
in destroying the two-party system in Uruguay
but the election of 1971
destroyed democracy
President Borda Berry seized
total power after taking office
although he himself was more or less just a stand-in
for the military this is not really like
a fascist thing where like he's
taking power he is the guy
the military has
being the face of the military dictatorship
right that's kind of how it works in Uruguay
it's less like about the individual and more that like
and not that like he's not
part of the decision-making apparatus
but he's like one of a bunch of
guys making this military
dictatorship be a thing
and from what I can tell the military's
attitude is like well we let you civilians try
to get things under control it's time for like
the military to fuck shit up for everybody
because that'll be better
in spoilers it's not
it's real bad dictatorship
a lot of kind of casual
sources again like the
we'll blame the two-pomaros for the onset of
dictatorship I'm not gonna say they didn't have any
like obviously they are a major part
of Uruguayan politics as the country descends
into a dictatorship of course they had a role
in what happened right
I think saying that because of the two-pomaros
Uruguay gets a dictatorship number one
it ignores that Uruguay
falls to dictatorship alongside Chile, Argentina
El Salvador, Guatemala
like a bunch of other countries all of
whom the US is doing the same
shit they're doing it to Uruguay and
and none of whom have two-pomaros themselves
so I and when you
knock everyone off the fence
when you polarize society
you're like lining up for a fight and you're even gonna
win or lose it's not inherently
like it's not necessarily
the fault of the people who knock everyone off the fence
no they are again
part of this process it certainly would be unreasonable
say they had nothing to do with the
dictatorship right like they're a huge
factor in Uruguay and politics but also
the dictatorship
comes into power in part because the government
is trying to crack down on like unions
and labor organizing and stuff out
that's not people pulling guns
that's a big chunk of what
happens and yeah that is where we're gonna
end part one because thankfully
Margaret unlike a lot of
unfortunately a lot of
Latin American history we're not talking about like
and then they get crushed and right-wing governments
take power for the next 60 years
and the US trains their security forces
over and over again and now they're
burning down the Emma like whatever like
this is not that story it does not have that
ending but we'll get to that
it's a Christmas miracle it is a Christmas
miracle Margaret that's what everybody says
I'm gonna
go get my Uruguay tree
tomorrow
you got any plug-ables to plug
yes I do
I have a new
book out it was actually a book that's been out for a while
but it's been re-released with a new publisher it's called
a country of ghosts and it's my
attempt to answer the question of
people always ask
well we know what you anarchists are against
what are you for and so I tried
to write a book
that's fiction because I don't read a lot
of theory and
yeah and that's
it just came out a couple weeks ago
I think
that's my main plug-able I'm also on the internet
it's good as hell and very
relevant to the story we're telling here
although
more mountains less
urban
it's the Switzerland comparison
yeah it is kind of a Switzerland
sort of deal but yeah
I reckon I tore through it
in a
long weekend day last weekend
and thoroughly enjoyed it
and it's also
kudos to AK on this one of the books that has
like the little flaps on the inside of the cover
so that you can march without folding
the pages over
which I really appreciate
I was really excited it's my first
yeah it's my first book with french flaps
and it's my first book with a painted fantasy
cover on the cover you have such a good
cover yeah I'm so excited
about it and then so now I need to write a book
with a dragon
you do you need to write a sequel to this book
with a dragon but oh that's actually
okay anyway
um all right well
you can find me nowhere
because I'm a gray ghost baby
that's the end of the episode
Sophie okay
hello world
I'm Robert and I'm doing a live stream
with my good friend prop
if you want to listen to that
Sophie won't let me curse so this ad isn't very entertaining
but it's going to be
February 17th at 6pm PST
and you can find it at
momenthouse.com
slash behind the bastards
allegedly
yeah this is a you know
a good holiday gift or
allegedly or not a holiday gift
or allegedly
we'll be doing a behind the bastards
and in a little Q&A
show up be there if you want to
where can people find that again Robert
momenthouse.com
slash behind the bastards
alphabet boys is a new
podcast series that goes inside
undercover investigations in the first season
we're diving into an FBI investigation
of the 2020 protest
it involves a cigar smoking
mystery man who drives a silver hearse
and inside his hearse with like a lot of guns
but are federal agents catching bad guys
or creating them he was just
waiting for me to set the date the time
and then for sure he was trying to get it to happen
listen to alphabet boys on the
iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast
or wherever you get your podcasts
I'm Lance Bass
is a Russian trained astronaut
that he went through training in a secret
facility outside Moscow
hoping to become the youngest person
to go to space
well I ought to know because
I'm Lance Bass
and I'm hosting a new podcast that tells
my crazy story and an even crazier
story about a Russian
astronaut who found himself stuck in space
with no country to bring
him down
with the Soviet Union collapsing around him
he orbited the earth for 313 days
that changed the world
listen to the last Soviet
on the iHeartRadio app
Apple Podcasts or
wherever you get your podcasts