Behind the Bastards - Part One: How Peter Thiel Became the Gravedigger of Democracy

Episode Date: October 29, 2024

Robert sits down with Noah Shachtman to discuss the life and times of Peter Thiel, the demon investor of Silicon Valley and would-be assassin of democracy. (4 Part Series) Sources: https://www.newser....com/story/235229/peter-thiel-wanted-innovation-he-got-networking-instead.html https://www.edsurge.com/nhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdrange/2017/01/03/what-happened-to-the-original-class-of-peter-thiels-college-skipping-fellows-nowelcome1/ ews/2023-12-12-how-a-billionaire-s-fellowship-spread-skepticism-about-college-s-value https://theintercept.com/2019/05/02/peter-thiels-palantir-was-used-to-bust-hundreds-of-relatives-of-migrant-children-new-documents-show/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/08/22/war-inside-palantir-data-mining-firms-ties-ice-under-attack-by-employees/ https://responsiblestatecraft.org/peter-thiel-israel-palantir/ https://www.evernote.com/shard/s542/client/snv?isnewsnv=true&noteGuid=46c636b6-b404-45df-ab0a-1f84c6fdc8c2&noteKey=7c94233539b8258d72b395a063f3c589&sn=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.evernote.com%2Fshard%2Fs542%2Fsh%2F46c636b6-b404-45df-ab0a-1f84c6fdc8c2%2F7c94233539b8258d72b395a063f3c589&title=That%2BEssay https://archive.is/ZmTHu https://www.businessinsider.com/peter-thiel-childhood-11-surprising-details-the-contrarian-max-chafkin-2021-9 https://archive.is/ZmTHu https://www.quora.com/How-was-Peter-Thiel-in-high-school https://archive.is/ncwwe#selection-887.0-891.775 https://medium.com/indian-thoughts/my-conversation-with-peter-thiel-about-apartheid-and-its-aftermath-3fdf4249b08d#.xz4kamaam https://newcriterion.com/article/the-diversity-myth/ https://www.latimes.com/books/jacketcopy/la-et-jc-peter-thiel-20161026-story.html https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/peter-thiel-silicon-valley-contrarian-max-chafkin.html https://archive.is/0CtR2#selection-487.0-509.305 https://archive.is/QPFbm#selection-1173.0-1189.97 https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/19/jp-morgan-reportedly-had-to-oust-a-security-chief-backed-by-palantir.html https://archive.is/WCWeQ https://www.reuters.com/world/us/peter-thiel-republican-megadonor-wont-fund-candidates-2024-sources-2023-04-26/ https://archive.is/ncwwe#selection-1933.0-1933.1393 https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/04/inside-the-new-right-where-peter-thiel-is-placing-his-biggest-bets https://archive.is/ncwwe#selection-2085.0-2085.515 https://archive.is/ncwwe https://archive.is/ncwwe#selection-1913.0-1913.1159 https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/books/story/2021-09-17/contrarian-review Chafkin, Max. The Contrarian: Peter Thiel and Silicon Valley's Pursuit of Power (p. 11). Penguin Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Call zone media. Ah, what's Dick My Chaney's? This is Behind the Bastards, a podcast where every week we talk about the great decisions being made by the Democratic Party, which this week includes really, really burnishing their Dick Chaney credentials. We'll see how that works out in about three weeks.
Starting point is 00:00:24 With me to talk about, you know, something related to this election is our lovely, yeah, is our lovely guest today, a contributing writer at Rolling Stone and contributing editor at Wired, Noah Schachtman. Noah, welcome to the podcast program show. You gave this very confused look in between my first and last name. What was that? I wrote the stuff you wanted me to,
Starting point is 00:00:51 cause we have a different intro for you this time. I wrote it up at the top of the piece. And so the top of the piece is just the words, Peter Thiel, cause that's the subject of our episodes. So at the top of my article, it says contributing writer, Rolling Stone, contributing editor at Wired, Peter Thiel. And I was like, wait a second, what?
Starting point is 00:01:08 So I had to like catch my brain and fix it in between. That's incredible. Look, I welcome my new colleague. Yeah, Peter Thiel would be a great guest on the program, but I wouldn't do Peter Thiel for the, you know what? I might do Dick Cheney for the Peter Thiel episode. I bet he does me. Yeah. Yeah. There we Yeah. Peter Thiel talks.
Starting point is 00:01:29 Noah. Oh, man. So, yeah, Noah, how do you feel about being friendly with Dick Cheney? Is this a good decision? Is this going to work out for the Harris campaign? You know, I am not incredibly bullish on the old befriending war criminal campaign strategy.
Starting point is 00:01:54 It's the I said in part a decision you make if like you don't understand Republicans, because like I grew up loving like with a family that loved George W. Bush, right? He was a hero in my household as a kid. And no one liked Dick Cheney. They didn't hate him, but he was not a figure of admiration to anyone in my family, because that was kind of the point of Dick Cheney,
Starting point is 00:02:20 is he was the guy behind the scenes that you don't need to like very much. It's just confusing to me that they think there's a bunch of Republicans out there who will change their vote based on this. It was wild at the DNC how credible it was that this rumor that George W. Bush was gonna come out and speak at the DNC.
Starting point is 00:02:39 Oh, I would've lost my mind. Everyone was like, oh, he's coming, he's coming. It was like more credible than Beyonce. What's happening here? Hey, there's still time. There's still time. There's still time, there's still time. And you know who, I don't know if he's,
Starting point is 00:02:55 he's got a chance to be worse than George W. Bush. I wouldn't say he's there yet. Is Peter Thiel, Peter Thiel. And that's who we're gonna talk about when we come back from the cold open to warm things up a little bit. John Stewart is back in the host chair at The Daily Show, which means he's also back in our ears
Starting point is 00:03:14 on The Daily Show Ears Edition podcast. Join late night legend, John Stewart and the best news team for today's biggest headlines, exclusive extended interviews and more. Now this is a second term we can all get behind. Listen to The Daily Show, Ears Edition on the iHeart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, it's Mike and Ian. We're the hosts of How to Do Everything from NPR's Wait, Wait,
Starting point is 00:03:40 Don't Tell Me. Each week we take your questions and find someone much smarter than us to answer them. Questions like, how do you survive the Bermuda Triangle? How do you find a date inside the Bermuda Triangle? We can't help you, but we will find someone who can. Listen to the How to Do Everything podcast on iHeartRadio. Muhammad Ali. George Foreman, 1974.
Starting point is 00:04:03 George Foreman was champion of the world. Ali was smart and he was handsome. The story behind the Rumble in the Jungle is like a Hollywood movie. But that is only half the story. There's also James Brown, Bill Withers, B.B. King, Miriam Makeba. All the biggest black artists on the planet. Together in Africa. It was a big deal.
Starting point is 00:04:22 Listen to Rumble, Ali, Foreman and the Soul of 74 on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. Welcome to Gracias Come Again, a podcast by Honey German, where we get real and dive straight into todo lo actual y viral. We're talking music, los premios, el chisme, and all things trending in my cultura. I'm bringing you all the latest happening in our entertainment world and some fun and impactful interviews with your favorite Latin artists, comedians, actors, and influencers.
Starting point is 00:04:52 Each week we get deep and raw life stories, combos on the issues that matter to us, and it's all packed with gems, fun, straight up comedia, and that's a song that only nuestra gente can sprinkle. Listen to Gracias Come Again on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Maria Kondakova. And I'm Nate Silver. And our new podcast, Risky Business,
Starting point is 00:05:15 is a show about making better decisions. We're both journalists whom we light as poker players, and that's the lens we're going to use to approach this entire show. We're gonna be discussing everything from high stakes poker to personal questions, like whether I should call a plumber or fix my shower myself. And of course, we'll be talking about the election to listen on the iHeart radio app,
Starting point is 00:05:36 Apple podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts. Noah, so we're back. Peter Thiel, how would you describe in brief if someone is like, Hey, I hear there's this Peter Thiel guy who's influencing elections or whatever. Who is he? Who? How would you describe Peter Thiel? What would be your like elevator?
Starting point is 00:05:59 Like, Oh, that's who this guy is. Um, it's like the power behind like the weirdest curtain. Yeah, I guess is how I would describe it. Like deeply strange, deeply influential. I think would be my elevator pitch. Yeah, yeah, he's I would say like he's the guy whose money is responsible for getting a, oh, shit, what's his name? The Hillbilly, JD Vance started. He's the guy who backed Trump pretty early on in 2016.
Starting point is 00:06:34 He was the billionaire who came up and endorsed him at the RNC that year and talked about how he was supporting the Republicans as a gay man. These are all facts about Peter T. I'm really glad you're able to forget JD Vance's name. Like that feels healthy to me. Yeah, it took a lot of work
Starting point is 00:06:54 and a lot of gas station substances, but I managed to do it. I managed to do it. It was mixing the Kratom Clamato and then one of those yellow jackets truckers take together. I reached a state of what I think the Buddhists call Nirvana. And yeah, all knowledge of JD Vance fled from my mind. Dude, I'm going to fucking throw up on my keyboard here.
Starting point is 00:07:19 Yeah, I mean, it seems like it's like in the weirdo crypto fascist right, if you follow the roots down far enough. It all comes back to Peter. Yeah. Yeah. And there's a couple of ways of looking at Teal. One of them is he is a capitalist Lenin. And what I mean by that, I'm not comparing the two like ideologically, but Lenin is a guy
Starting point is 00:07:47 who grew up kind of in the upper middle class strata of his society and from an extremely early age hated the system that he lived under because his brother was killed by the Tsar and dedicated himself to its destruction. And he went about destroying that system very methodically and very effectively. Peter is a guy who grew up in the upper middle-class strata of his culture, always seems to have hated the systems that ran the country he lived in and dedicated himself from an early age at getting resources and then kind of methodically destroying the system, you know, which is representative democracy that he lived under.
Starting point is 00:08:30 That's one way of looking at Peter. The other is that Peter is a guy who is fairly intelligent, has okay instincts, but not as good as he thinks they are. And he's just kind of been careening from point to point, making gambles that have like led him to this position where he is now backing the Republicans to the hilt in order to hopefully crumble the system of democracy enough that like he gets to rule his own little bitty city somewhere on the West Coast, right?
Starting point is 00:09:02 Like one of them is Peter Thiel is the master plotter and the other is that he's this kind of like reactive figure. And I don't actually know which is the better way to look at this guy. Some of it's gonna come down to like personal preference, but he's an interesting character. And I think he's probably of all of the figures on the right now, one of the ones that it's more, it's easiest to kind of respect at an intellectual level because
Starting point is 00:09:30 he's, he's very smart and he's succeeded in a lot of his, like the reason why the master plotter thing kind of has a lot of traction is he's, he's been very successful in a lot of his goals over time. Like he's been willing to, he's been able to, he has a degree of like focus and discipline that's fairly rare on the right. Yeah, it's pretty weird. I also, isn't he also like drinking the blood of younger people or something like that? We're going to talk about that later on in the series. It's unclear to me if he's ever drank any young people's blood, but he's definitely been accused of it and has like expressed an interest in it.
Starting point is 00:10:07 I think the guy who definitely is drinking young people's blood is Brian Johnson, that like rich founder dude who's obsessed with reducing his biological age back to 17. He takes his son's blood as a supplement. Ew, really? Yeah, oh yeah, yeah. I mean, he brags about it. Yeah, like he's blood as a supplement. Ew, really? Yeah, oh yeah, yeah. I mean, he brags about it.
Starting point is 00:10:27 Yeah, like he's very open about that. Peter is on the record of saying, I don't do that. He was just kind of, he's invested in a lot of companies that did anti-aging stuff, some of which like were looking into plasma replacement, right? But it's unclear if he ever did it. And if he didn't do it, it would be because like,
Starting point is 00:10:46 he just didn't think it worked. He is a big advocate of taking human growth hormone as an anti-aging supplement. So I think it's one of those things where if he doesn't, if he hasn't done the young people's blood thing, it's just because he decided the science wasn't there. Or he's just so fucking roided out that he couldn't sit down enough.
Starting point is 00:11:05 Yeah, the roids have given him enough blood. There's no more room for blood in Peter's body. So, Noah, like many of the worst things on this earth, Peter Thiel began in Germany, Frankfurt to be specific, where he was born on October 11th, 1967. His father Klaus was a chemical engineer who the very next year, 68, got hired by a consulting firm that specialized in heavy industry, including oil and gas refining. The founder of the company, Arthur G. McKee, had owned a series of steel foundries in the Cleveland area where the Teals moved in 1968.
Starting point is 00:11:47 So now at this point, and I think this is probably clear to most of our listeners, in 1968, Cleveland is just a series of river fires with some suburbs attached, right? Like it's not the city we know and tolerate today. It's nothing but the Cuyahoga burning and a couple of drenched houses. And the reason the Cuyahoga is always on fire is guys like Arthur McKee who runs steel boundaries, you know
Starting point is 00:12:11 So that is the the teal Peter grows up with his dad kind of working in the destroying the planet industry Like he's an oil and gas man working for an industrial magnate in fucking Cleveland So Klaus works for a firm in Cleveland for a couple of years while he gets his graduate degree. And in 1971, when Peter was four, his parents have a second child, Patrick. Now, Teal's biographer, Max Chafkin, author of The Contrarian,
Starting point is 00:12:39 which is a book that will be a sizable source for this, although I do have some disagree. I think Chafkin's a very good writer, good biographer. There's a couple of areas where I disagree with him that we'll talk about here, but yeah, he has described Klaus and Peter's mom, Suzanne, as fanatical Republicans who were absolutely gaga for Nixon.
Starting point is 00:13:01 That may be true, you know, Chafkin certainly knows more about this than me. However, Peter disagrees with that characterization of his parents. He doesn't seem to consider them to have been fanatical Republicans or religious extremists. And Chafkin also kind of paints them as Christian, like hardcore Christian conservatives. Peter is an outspoken Christian. It's unclear to me, again, if this is just Peter disliking the description of himself and his parents as extremists, or if this is that Chafkin maybe doesn't have all of the context.
Starting point is 00:13:35 We don't get a lot of detail about Teal's parents, so it's not perfectly clear. Chafkin describes his father as cold, bordering on cruel at times. Again, this is a characterization Peter would disagree with, at least publicly. In terms of like stories that that paint that picture of his dad as cruel, I don't see a lot of really good detailed evidence about it. The story that Chafkin cites as kind of evidence of how cold and cruel Peter's dad was is a story that Peter tells a lot to biographers,
Starting point is 00:14:10 I've seen this or to interviewers. I've seen this story recounted in a couple of different articles that interviewed Peter before Chafkin's biography came out. And the story is that one day when Peter's a little kid, like maybe four or five, he was looking at a rug in the family home that was made from a cow hide. And he four or five, he was looking at a rug in the family home that was made from a cow hide.
Starting point is 00:14:26 And he asked his dad, where did this rug come from? And Klaus matter of factly explained that it was made from a dead cow. Peter asked like, what does it mean that something's dead? And his dad told him, quote, death happens to all animals, all people. It will happen to me one day. It will happen to you one day.
Starting point is 00:14:43 And Chafkin describes this as a moment of like brutal honesty and he kind of insinuates that it may have done some damage to Peter, writing that he quote, would return to the cow and the brutal finality of the thing again and again, even in middle age. Now it does seem to be accurate that Peter this stuck in his mind. I just don't know that I consider that a brutal description of death. That seems like, you know, kind of just factual, right? Like I had a conversation with my dad about death that wasn't all that different from this, right?
Starting point is 00:15:15 Like it happens to everything. It'll happen to me, it'll happen to you. Like how else do you explain death to a kid, right? Yeah. Yeah, I mean, I don't know. That feels like pretty, like a pretty weak antecedent for everything that's about to transpire.
Starting point is 00:15:30 I think what's going on here is that Peter is obsessed with death and dying, right? He's put a huge amount of money into like reversing aging and anti-sinicence and all this kind of stuff. So like, he clearly is a guy who's obsessed with his own mortality. And like you're looking for evidence of that in his childhood.
Starting point is 00:15:49 And he does tell this story. He told the New Yorker in 2011 that this was a quote, very, very disturbing day. So obviously this does stick in his mind, but I don't know that that makes the case that his dad is like cold. Cause this, I just don't see it from that anecdote. You know, obviously it from that anecdote.
Starting point is 00:16:05 Obviously that's one anecdote, we're talking about a whole childhood. So that doesn't mean that he was not cold. I just don't, I feel like what we may get from the fact that this story fucks Peter up so much, says less about his dad and more about like who Peter is as a person, because I think most of us have this experience
Starting point is 00:16:24 and like don't grow up dedicated to conquering mortality. We're just kind of like, oh yeah, everything dies. All right, well, I better figure out something I'm gonna do with my life, right? Yeah. Yeah. You know, like gas station drugs. That was my decision,
Starting point is 00:16:40 which I think if Peter had gotten into that, just buy some of these trucker pills, Peter, you know? Yeah. Yeah. They'll keep you alive forever as well as HGH will. So anyway, Peter has never made peace with death or what he calls the ideology of the inevitability of the death of every individual.
Starting point is 00:17:02 I also love that description. The ideology? The ideology, it's not an ideology, man. I also love that description. The ideology? It's not an ideology, man, it's just a fact. What? That's like seeing some people who are staying back from a cliff's edge on a windy day and be like, oh, you've fallen for the ideology of dying in a fall. Come on.
Starting point is 00:17:18 The ideology of the inevitability of the death of every individual. Yeah. I think I've had conversations with anti-seatbelt guys about like the ideology of safety of like a nanny state culture. And it's like, no, man, I just don't want to die in a car crash. This dude's all libertarian, right? Oh, yeah, as all hell.
Starting point is 00:17:39 Well, you see, nowadays, I don't know if you'd call it that, but he definitely comes out of libertarianism. Yeah. And so and when I think of libertarians, I think of like people who never evolved past like second semester freshmen dorm room ideology. And that feels very much like the, like the, the, the ideology of the inevitability of death feels very like third bong hit, freshman year, dorm room, yeah dude, kind of deep thoughts. Yeah, I agree with that. What I will say for libertarians, I always have to give a little bit of pushback just
Starting point is 00:18:23 because of where I come out there. You've got your two kinds. You've got your like dorm room. I'm going to read fucking Murray Rothbard and basically become a fascist whenever anyone suggests I pay my fair share in taxes, libertarians, which Peter is. That's your kind? No, no, no. My kind, the kind that I respect are, I'm not, I wouldn't say I'm there now, but I have,
Starting point is 00:18:44 I do have a degree of respect and love for like after the big hurricane in North Carolina, you had like several dozen guys who own their own helicopters and often built their own helicopters, who like flew in just because they're like, they're like helicopter libertarians. I like my helicopter libertarians,
Starting point is 00:19:01 where it's like, I just don't trust the state, so I bought my own helicopter to do disaster rescue those guys are fine yeah although are those the same guys that also were the militia that tried to interfere with those guys were in trucks those guys were in trucks that might be yet another they're different kind of libertarian. Yeah, helicopter male libertarians in your truck, libertarians. Never the same. We're very pro helicopter libertarian in this house. Okay, yeah, no, those guys are cool. Those guys are fine.
Starting point is 00:19:35 So yeah, that's Peter's kind of inciting incident, right? If you're making the Peter Thiel movie, you started with his dad explaining death to him while looking at this cowhide rug. Now, shortly after that conversation, his dad decides to move the family away from Cleveland, usually a good decision, and live every engineer's dream, which is of course helping South Africa build a uranium mine.
Starting point is 00:20:00 You know, what engineer doesn't want to live that? So the Teal family moves to South Africa, kind of. Yeah, I mean, they're technically in South Africa. Peter's parents sent him to an expensive whites only private school called Prydwen. According to the school's website, it was founded in 1923 as a non-denominational school rooted in Christian ethics and values.
Starting point is 00:20:27 Today, the Pridwin website prominently features numerous stock photos of non-white kids. So it does seem like maybe things have been forced to move forward there. But when Peter went there, it would have taught racial separation as an obvious good and a necessity, right? This is, we're talking South Africa in the seventies, right? After Pridwin, Peter went to a German language public school. He was a good student. He always does well in school, but these are not happy years for him, at least as Chafkin paints it.
Starting point is 00:20:59 Quote, a picture from that era shows a sullen boy in shorts, knickers and a tie carrying an adult sized briefcase. A grade school classmate in Namibia, George Erb, recalled Teal as smart but withdrawn. He had that distinct, striking, smart look about him, almost like he seemed bored, Erb said. We didn't really mingle a lot with Peter in school, though. We always knew the minors' kids would not stay long in town. Now, as he noted here, I said that they moved to South Africa.
Starting point is 00:21:25 They are though actually not in what, in South Africa, they're in Namibia, which a big chunk of Namibia is governed and run by South Africa at this point, right? At the time, a lot of what we call Namibia today was known to South Africans as Southwest Africa. And it was governed under a military occupation as if it were essentially the little brother of the apartheid state. The whole reason that South Africa has a uranium mine
Starting point is 00:21:53 comes down to environmental regulations in Western nations around this period. Some of the very earliest waves of uranium had been mined in places like the US and Australia, but pretty quickly, once it becomes clear that we're going to need a lot of uranium, it also becomes clear that like uranium mining is really bad for the environment.
Starting point is 00:22:11 So we better do that a lot in Africa, right? Like a big, actually King Leopold's old colony in the Congo becomes a major source of uranium mining. And Namibia in this period becomes the fourth largest global producer of uranium during like the Cold War when we are using up quite a lot of the stuff. So that's why South Africa is, big part of why South Africa is so hesitant
Starting point is 00:22:34 to give up their occupation of Namibia is like Namibia has a shitload of uranium and South Africa wants that for several reasons, none of them good. Now the managing and engineering staff at the mine where Klaus worked was white. The workforce were largely migrants on one year contracts. For white families, this was a good job. You had good access to medical care.
Starting point is 00:22:56 You had nice houses. You're basically living in a company town that is built for the white employees of this mine. There's a country club there. There's quality schools. Things are a lot uglier for the contract workers who are being brought in to do a lot of the heavy lifting at the mine.
Starting point is 00:23:13 Now, much of this ugliness came from the fact that South Africa was not allowed to be in Southwest Namibia, right? They are not supposed to be occupying this chunk of Namibia. The UN had ordered them to leave in 1966. But by the time the Teals moved into the country, South Africa had yet to move their troops out. This is like 1971 or two. Right.
Starting point is 00:23:36 So they've overstayed their visa by quite a while, but you don't really need a visa if you have enough guns. Yeah. This whole thing is fucking grim, man. Yeah It's our tide uranium mine Just fucking grim Childhood in an apartheid uranium mine like I thought Elon Musk had like in uh-huh kind of like super villain origin story with the emerald mine
Starting point is 00:24:03 But the uranium not really trumps this. Honestly, bro, I'll take an Emerald Mine over this any day in a fucking week. So in 1973, the ICC, the International Criminal Court, upheld that UN ruling and said again, South Africa, you've got to leave Namibia. This is not your country. What are you doing there?
Starting point is 00:24:24 To which South Africa says, we are getting a lot of uranium and we're not going to leave Namibia. This is not your country. What are you doing there? To which South Africa says, we are getting a lot of uranium and we're not going to leave. This leads to sanctions against the sale of minerals from mines in occupied Namibia. Sanctions that are ignored by much of the West. And I'm going to read about that via a quote I found on the website, Mining Sea.
Starting point is 00:24:43 The decree warned that anyone found extracting and selling minerals from Namibia would be held liable. Beneficiaries to Namibia's minerals, including Britain and the United States, except Sweden, did not honor the decree when uranium production from Rossing would satisfy Britain's 10% demand. So because uranium was so needed for this buildup, basically a lot of the West was like,
Starting point is 00:25:06 no, fuck what the UN says, we're going to keep paying South Africa for their uranium because we really need it, right? Tale as old as time. Now, the company that ran the mine where Klaus worked as a contractor was called Rio Tinto. And they had, you're not gonna be surprised to hear that this illegal uranium mine company has an evil history,
Starting point is 00:25:28 but they have like a comically evil history. Yeah, like I feel like I've heard that name before. Oh yeah. Oh yeah. So in the late 1930s, Rio Tinto had called on Francisco Franco to use his soldiers to crush left-wing miners protesting against bad working conditions in Spain.
Starting point is 00:25:46 The head of the company at the time, Sir Auckland Geddes, which is such an evil mine owner's name. What an amazing evil mine owner name. Sir Auckland Geddes, Jesus. Geddes bragged that, quote, miners found guilty of troublemaking are court-martialed and shot. Big fan of Franco, the leaders of Rio Tinto. As another interesting side note, Noah, Rio Tinto was also a major source of raw materials for the Nazi rearmament campaign. These are the guys that build the Wehrmacht back up into fighting shape.
Starting point is 00:26:19 Thank God, you know, where would we be without Rio Tinto? My God, it's like Lex Corp or something. Yes. It's incredible. Now, by the early 70s, there were no more Nazis to arm. So Rio set about finding their next best equivalent, which is of course, subpar tide South Africa, right? Now, since they're running in a legal uranium mine and occupied Namibia,
Starting point is 00:26:42 they're like, why not go full fascist? And they decide to operate their facilities in Namibia like a concentration camp. And I'm going to quote from an article by the London Mining Network here. Black workers constructing the Rossing uranium mine lived in appalling conditions in temporary camps which researchers found akin to slavery. By akin to slavery, it means that actually leaving work for any reason, but being dismissed by your manager, was a crime. Workers who misplaced or forgot their ID badge could be jailed.
Starting point is 00:27:16 Now, the fact that someone might get hired to consult at such a mine doesn't imply that they were involved with setting up or executing any of these policies, but it does suggest that one was broadly fine with them, as Max Chafkin writes. A contract laborer on the construction project, the project Klaus's company was helping to oversee, who said workers had not been told they were building a uranium mine and were thus unaware of the risks of radiation. The only clue had been that white employees would hand out wages from behind glass, seemingly trying to avoid contamination themselves.
Starting point is 00:27:48 The report mentioned workers dying like flies in 1976 while the mine was under construction. So- This is so bad. This is pretty evil. Pretty evil. So it's an illegal apartheid uranium mining concentration camp.
Starting point is 00:28:04 Yeah, yeah, that's Peter's dad's job and some of his earliest memories as a kid. legal apartheid uranium mining concentration camp. Yeah, yeah, that's Peter's dad's job. And some of his earliest memories as a kid. And he's disturbed by like Bessie the cow getting killed to be a rogue? He's disturbed by cows dying? What? Peter, if you want to end death,
Starting point is 00:28:18 the first step might be ending illegal uranium mines. Right. If you just care about death as a concept. I cannot believe how cartoonish this is. It's so funny. It's like the funniest backstory he could have. Just being the guy he is coming from this as a background. Like a lot of these guys, like Elon Musk,
Starting point is 00:28:40 there's this period of time in Musk's backstory. He's like, oh, well, he has this kid who's moved around a bunch, his family sucks, his dad's he has this kid who's moved around a bunch, his family sucks, his dad's this abusive monster, he's bullied as a kid. It's a really sad, like I can see how he, you know, I can see how a couple of different kinds of kid could have come out of this.
Starting point is 00:28:56 Some of them who would have been a lot better than Musk was, right? Maybe he wasn't always destined to be the kind of guy he is. With Teal, you're like, oh yeah, no, this is, this childhood was tailor made to produce Peter Teal. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, totally. You know what else was tailor made
Starting point is 00:29:12 to produce Peter Teal, Noah? Mm, I bet I'm about to find out. Yeah, the sponsors of our show are attempting to breed clones of Peter Teal in a tank. It's kind of like that, the fourth alien movie, Alien Resurrection, down to the fact that they are mixing Peter Thiel's genes with Sigourney Weaver.
Starting point is 00:29:32 So let's see what happens, everybody, you know? We'll see what happens. Hey, it's Mike and Ian. We're the hosts of How to Do Everything from NPR's Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me. Each week, we take your questions and find someone much smarter than us to answer them. Questions like, how do you survive the Bermuda Triangle?
Starting point is 00:29:51 How do you find a date inside the Bermuda Triangle? We can't help you, but we will find someone who can. Listen to the How to Do Everything podcast on iHeartRadio. Hola mi gente, it's Honey German and I'm bringing you Gracias Come Again, the podcast where we dive deep into the world of Latin culture, musica, peliculas, and entertainment with some of the biggest names in the game. If you love hearing real conversations with your favorite Latin celebrities, artists, and culture shifters, this is the podcast for you.
Starting point is 00:30:19 We're talking real conversations with our Latin stars, from actors and artists to musicians and creators sharing their stories, struggles and successes. You know, it's going to be filled with cheese man laughs and all the vibes that you love each week. We'll explore everything from music and pop culture to deeper topics like identity, community, and breaking down barriers in all sorts of industries. Don't miss out on the fun and life stories. Join me for gracias come again, a podcast by Honey German,
Starting point is 00:30:46 where we get into todo lo actual y viral. Listen to Gracias Come Again on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast. Muhammad Ali, George Foreman, James Brown, BB King, Miriam Makeba. I shook up the world. James Brown said, said loud. And the kidiam Makeba, I shook up the world. James Brown said, said love. And the kid said, I'm black and I'm proud.
Starting point is 00:31:08 Black boxing stars and black music royalty together in the heart of Zaire, Africa. Three days of music and then the boxing event. What was going on in the world at the time made this fight as important that anything else is going on on the planet. My grandfather laid on the ropes and let George Foreman basically just punch himself out. Welcome to Rumble, the story of a world in transformation.
Starting point is 00:31:34 The 60s and prior to that, you couldn't call a person black. And how we arrived at this peak moment. I don't have to be what you want me to be. We all came from the continent of Africa. Listen to rumble Ali Foreman and the soul of 74 on the I heart radio app Apple podcast or wherever you get your podcast. Hey everyone, it's Katie Couric. Well, the election is in the home stretch and I'm exhausted.
Starting point is 00:32:09 But turns out the end is near, right in time for a new season of my podcast, Next Question. This podcast is for people like me who need a little perspective and insight. I'm bringing in some FOKs, friends of Katie's, to help me out like Ezra Klein, Van Jones, Jen Psaki, Astaed Herndon. But we're also gonna have some fun, even though these days fun and politics seems like an oxymoron. But we'll do that thanks to some of my friends like Samantha Bee, Roy Wood Jr. and Charlemagne the God. We're gonna take some viewer questions as well. I mean, isn't that what democracy is all about?
Starting point is 00:32:48 Power to the podcast for the people. So whether you're obsessed with the news or just trying to figure out what's going on, this season of Next Question is for you. Check out our new season of Next Question with me, Katie Couric, on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
Starting point is 00:33:08 Daphne Caruana Galizia was a Maltese investigative journalist who on October 16th 2017 was murdered. My name is Manuel de Lilla. I am one of the hosts of Crooks Everywhere, a podcast that unearths the plot to murder a one-woman WikiLeaks. Daphne exposed the culture of crime and corruption that were turning her beloved country into a mafia state. And she paid the ultimate price. Listen to Crooks Everywhere on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your We're back!
Starting point is 00:34:02 And in the time that we were off air, the Peter Thiel Sigourney Weaver clones escaped containment in our sponsor's orbital base. Things do not seem to be going well. Sorry. Grave error. That was probably predictable. Anyway, we'll keep you updated on the situation. So we're talking about uranium mining in South Africa,
Starting point is 00:34:29 which is getting South Africa in trouble. And it's one of those things where if it had just been about the money South Africa could make exporting uranium, it probably wouldn't have been worthwhile to piss off the whole international community to keep this mine open. But that's not the only reason why South Africa wants a uranium mine. A big part of why they insisted on keeping this thing operational was that they are an
Starting point is 00:34:53 unpopular apartheid government that is in the process of becoming a global pariah. They are dealing with something of an existential PR crisis because of all of like the racism and violence that the world is watching them do. And the white rulers of the country decided the best way for them to gain long-term security for the regime was to get nuclear weapons, even if they had to break international law to do so. And South Africa does eventually construct a handful
Starting point is 00:35:23 of very illegal nukes, right? They are not supposed to have these internationally. No one's supposed to be allowed to be arming themselves with new nukes. South Africa makes their nukes. And it does not, as you may be aware, keep the apartheid regime in power. You know, the government does in fact fall. And in a kind of unique historical case, before the government hands over power to the ANC, which is the party that takes over as apartheid goes out, they disassemble all of their nuclear
Starting point is 00:35:56 weapons. To this day, this makes South Africa the only nation to have ever made nuclear weapons and given them up voluntarily. Obviously Ukraine had nuclear weapons when the USSR crumbled and gave those up, but South Africa actually like makes their own nuclear weapons independently and then disassembles them and stops being a nuclear power.
Starting point is 00:36:18 And that's a unique thing in history. Although they do it, I think mainly for reasons of racism. It's still pretty wild. I never heard that before. Yeah, yeah, it's an interesting story. So while Peter's dad was, I don't know how you, again, how you want to parse out his complicity here, but he is adjacent to some very bad things, right?
Starting point is 00:36:38 Well, his dad's doing this. Peter himself gets very little that seems to be good from his two and a half, three years in Africa. He mostly claims to have played alone a lot near the family house. He started to develop a habit for competitive chess and he became a voracious leader. Less than three years,
Starting point is 00:36:56 after less than three years away, the family decides they just haven't had enough Cleveland and they move back. Then as soon as they're back in Cleveland, they're like, oh shit, Cleveland is still not a great place to live. The rivers have not stopped being on fire. So they move one last time to the Bay area.
Starting point is 00:37:15 Their specific final residence is Foster City, which is just Northwest of San Jose and South of San Francisco proper. It's a fairly affluent town. And in the late 1970s, Teals family seems like they probably would have qualified as upper middle class, right? And this is what you tend to see
Starting point is 00:37:32 with the first and second generation of tech industry giants, guys like Gates and Jobs, all come from or move to similar parts of California. And they're all kind of at a similar level of family affluence, right? Their parents are not like rich they're not going to inherit generational wealth but they have their parents have enough money to shower their kids with attention and educational opportunities that really weren't available before and in part because of some of the decisions guys
Starting point is 00:37:58 like this make aren't going to be available after you know please not do as many kids. Now, in terms of the parenting situation, because Bill Gates' parents, doting, absolutely like obsessed with his development and health. Steve's parents, again, doting, like really, really like caring parents who were very much focused on their child doing well.
Starting point is 00:38:23 It is unclear to me how much attention Peter gets. This is kind of an open question. It's left as an open question in Chafkin's book. Peter does not seem to embrace like the claims that his parents were very strict or fanatical conservatives, but we also get very little of them in his stories, right? Which is very different from like Steve Jobs
Starting point is 00:38:41 told a lot of stories about his parents, right? And so did Gates. So I don't really know if this is a case of, you know, he didn't want to say much about his parents, that this is an area of insecurity for him, or if it's just he's not a guy who's super talkative about his background, which he definitely isn't, you know, that may just explain it. But it does seem that his parents are not kind of central to his feelings or ambitions in the same way that they really seem to have been
Starting point is 00:39:10 for a lot of other tech industry icons that came up at a similar place in period. We do know as a child, Peter Thiel is a massive nerd. He is one of the first wave of really big nerds. And he's particularly a fantasy nerd for his kind of fantasy and sci-fi. He reads the Lord of the Rings as a little kid. He falls in love with Tolkien.
Starting point is 00:39:32 He would later claim that he memorized the Lord of the Rings trilogy, which I suspect is probably overstating things. That's a lot to memorize. Yeah, that's like 3000 words. I mean, 3000 pages. Yeah, 3000 pages. Yeah, that might be a little much.. I mean, 3,000 pages. Yeah, 3,000 pages. Yeah, that might be a little much.
Starting point is 00:39:46 I don't know how much I believe that, but I can- Do you just memorize the English or the Elvish and the English too? Yeah, did he have the Elvish down? Does he know the black speech by heart? Maybe that's all he speaks at home. Maybe that's why he couldn't talk about his folks that much. Yeah, yeah.
Starting point is 00:40:06 The very few journalists know the black speech. As you might imagine from a kid who at least probably memorized passages from the Lord of the Rings, Peter gets bullied a lot, right? Not super surprising from this kid. He's also very small and skinny. And according to one peer, he gets pushed around a lot surprising from this kid. He's also very small and skinny.
Starting point is 00:40:25 And according to one peer, he gets pushed around a lot as a little kid. This may have had something to do with what seems to have been a flair for escapism. In addition to loving Tolkien, Peter is one of the very first Dungeons and Dragons players, right? He and his, cause D&D has just come out while he is a kid
Starting point is 00:40:42 and he and his friends are playing it. Well, it is very new. They played every single weekend, and this may have caused a degree of conflict with his parents, because there are at least some stories that his parents, they couldn't play, he couldn't play at his house, because his parents, being very strict Christians, thought that D&D was evil.
Starting point is 00:41:04 Again, this is one of those things, is that totally accurate? I don't know. He definitely played a lot of D&D. It may have been a kind of thing that he had to skirt around his family because it is. And there's this thing that you get from Peter that everyone will say about him, which is that he's a habitual contrarian. Whatever people are doing, he has to be doing the opposite. There's this big moral panic against Dungeons and Dragons at the time.
Starting point is 00:41:29 It very much fits in with that, that he would want to be playing this game that a lot of people in his life and like maybe even his parents consider to be evil. That is very like fitting with the guy Peter Thiel is like whatever the people around him are saying is bad. That's what Peter's going to want to do. Right. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:41:47 Outside of that, his main hobby seems to have been chess. He's extremely good at this. He was generally ranked number one by his school chess club. He plays a lot of speed chess. He probably could have been a professional chess guy, but he has some, there's some quotes he makes later where he's like, I had to choose between chess and everything else in life. I just get too obsessed with it. George Packer writing for the New Yorker summarizes,
Starting point is 00:42:13 his chess kit was decorated with a sticker carrying the motto, born to win. On the rare occasions when he lost in college, he swept the pieces off the board. He would say, show me a good loser and I'll show you a loser. So maybe not a guy you wanna play with, right? Jesus Christ.
Starting point is 00:42:31 Yeah, a little bit of a dick. This is the kind of guy who, I don't know. Again, I'm a big believer in the fact that everyone who's proud of their chess performance should get into the real game of skill, Warhammer 40,000. You know, show us your real skill, Peter. Paint some fucking orcs. Do you have Born to Win sticker on your Warhammer?
Starting point is 00:42:54 I have it actually tattooed. You can't see it, the camera blots out my tattoos, but I've got like one of those throat tattoos. I got a stick and poke when I was in prison that just says born to win. And it's got a picture of an orc on it. Yeah. Congrats.
Starting point is 00:43:08 Yeah. Yeah. It's good. It really makes me popular at the gaming store with the 14 year olds. So Chafkin has my favorite story of Peter and his chess phase because it is the one that makes me actually kind of hopeful that we can beat this guy eventually. Quote, once at a tournament, he was playing a scrimmage match for fun in between games
Starting point is 00:43:31 and seemed to be only half paying attention. His opponent was inexperienced and, not aware of what was happening, put Peter in check. Then he realized, to both of their surprise, that it was checkmate. Peter became visibly distraught and was unable to regain his composure for the rest of the tournament and lost the rest of the matches he played. A defeat, even a meaningless one, was too much to handle. Huh. Yeah. Okay.
Starting point is 00:43:54 That's a little hopeful there, a little bit of motivation for you kids. Yeah. Maybe I wasn't so born to win. Yeah. So among the nerds, Peter was king. He was the most academically gifted of his friends, and I suspect was the best at doing things like cooking up overpowered characters in Dungeons and Dragons. He had a fantastic memory, and he expounded upon different short stories and novels by
Starting point is 00:44:18 guys like Asimov and Clark with a faculty that would have embarrassed most adults. He's the kind of guy who can like quote passages of stories He likes from memory one of Peter's nerdy peers said that he and others were quote in awe of teal But added I don't know that he had any close friends So he's got like some peers, but maybe not a lot of people that he like actually Entrusts any pieces of himself to in any meaningful way. Right? Again, a lonely person in a lot of ways.
Starting point is 00:44:49 Peter is generally described by the kids he spent time around the way wizards were in Peter's favorite fantasy novels as this mysterious figure who can do great and terrifying things, but who's also fundamentally separate from all of the people around him. Right? That's your characterization? You're calling him a wizard or he called himself a wizard?
Starting point is 00:45:08 No, no, no, no. That's just kind of my description based on what other kids said about Peter, right? That he's like, we're in awe of him. He could do all these amazing things, but we didn't really understand him. He seemed to be like someone who was fundamentally separate. It's kind of like the way Gandalf is written
Starting point is 00:45:23 in the Lord of the Rings, right? Wizards are these like mysterious and kind of frightening figures that you can't ever really get that, like they're kind of a knowable in certain senses, right? That's just kind of the way other kids talked about Peter. Seems more Saruman than Gandalf. He's definitely, I mean,
Starting point is 00:45:41 he's gonna build a company named Palantir. So yeah, that's probably a fair, fair note, Noah. As he became a teenager, the bullying changed from physical violence to sillier shit that was also calculated to make him feel unwelcome and othered. One example would be that a group of kids frequently stole for sale signs from around the neighborhood and set them up on Peter's lawn. And then they would harass him about it the next day at school, being like, Hey, when are you moving? Right.
Starting point is 00:46:09 And like that actually legitimately does suck, Peter, if you're listening. That's like a really shitty thing those kids did to you. I'm sorry. That's a bummer. You know, you can like that's that's kind of like probably more devastating than the physical violence. Like people stealing lawn signs to like make it clear We want you and your family to leave like yeah Yeah, I can see I can see how that feeds into a guy becoming like Peter is
Starting point is 00:46:35 Yeah By the time the high school years come around you've got this Kind of misanthropic genius who spends his free time escaping reality and competing in order to show everyone how smart he is. The only times he wants to engage with other people is when he can beat them in a contest of wits. Otherwise he likes to kind of focus on his fantasy worlds. One friend described his general attitude as, fuck you world.
Starting point is 00:47:04 Now I think we all knew or were to some degree, kids like that, right? This is going to sound very familiar. Like as a kid who grew up like bullied and nerdy, aspects of this are familiar to me. Sure. Peter also, it's interesting, maintains this attitude while managing to be the best student in his school, right?
Starting point is 00:47:23 He is going to be the valedictorian. He is an exceptional student academically. So he has both this kind of anger at normal kids and the world around him, and also this attitude that's reinforced by the social structures of his world that like, he's better than everyone else in an important way. Now his classmates interviewed by Chafkin
Starting point is 00:47:44 seem to suggest that Peter and kind of everyone at their school are obsessed with getting, like this is a school where the kids, their parents are high achievers. Everyone is obsessed with getting into good colleges. This was seen as the path to success at the time. And Peter's parents, if they were strict, were probably pushing him hard to get the best grades possible so that he could get into the best school, right?
Starting point is 00:48:07 This is, and this is going to be important later. He grows up being told by all the authority figures in his life, what matters most is getting into a good college, right? That is like the number one priority you have to have as a kid. I don't know, when I went to school, that was the priority that was really rammed home
Starting point is 00:48:24 to me by my parents. So I don't have trouble believing that this is the case for Peter. He's going to get very angry at this later in his life. This is going to be a major motivating factor in his life. The idea that he was forced to value higher education, which he fundamentally thinks is not a valuable thing in the same way that his parents did. And he's really angry about it. He's kind of never forgiven the concept of academia for this. He graduates in 85 as the valedictorian of San Mateo High.
Starting point is 00:48:56 During the later years in public school, he had moved on from Tolkien and Asimov to Ayn Rand. And, you know, this kind of helps nurse the strain of vigorous anti-communist sentiment that would have, this would have been a part of his upbringing anyway. We're talking like Silicon Valley in the seventies, it's a lot of defense industry stuff is out there. It is not a radical left hotbed. So he probably didn't need the Ayn Rand to make him into an anti-communist, but this
Starting point is 00:49:27 definitely makes him into like a libertarian anti-communist. During one article in 2011, he described his ideology as so strictly libertarian that for a time he was against all government spending, which he's not now. He's very supportive of like the government spending money to research how rich people can live longer. So that's good. It's nice to see that people can grow. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:49:49 It's an evolution. Yeah. You know who else has evolved since the last time we talked about them? Is the sponsors of this podcast. They're moving past their mistakes of like 20 minutes or so ago, losing control of that orbital habitat to the Peter Thiel clones. And they're moving on to greater pastures,
Starting point is 00:50:13 blowing up that orbital habitat primarily. So we'll check back in with them later. Once again, we find ourselves in an unprecedented election. And with all that's happening in the lead up to the big day, a weekly podcast just won't cut it. Get a better grasp of where we stand as a nation every weekday on the MPR Politics podcast. Here are seasoned reporters dig into the issues that are shaping voters' decisions and understand how the latest updates play into the bigger picture. Listen to the NPR Politics Podcast on the iHeartRadio app
Starting point is 00:50:46 or wherever you get your podcasts. Hola mi gente, it's Honey German and I'm bringing you Gracias Come Again, the podcast where we dive deep into the world of Latin culture, musica, peliculas and entertainment with some of the biggest names in the game. If you love hearing real conversations
Starting point is 00:51:00 with your favorite Latin celebrities, artists and culture shifters, this is the podcast for you. We're talking real conversations with our favorite Latin celebrities, artists, and culture shifters. This is the podcast for you. We're talking real conversations with our Latin stars, from actors and artists to musicians and creators sharing their stories, struggles and successes. You know, it's going to be filled with cheese man laughs and all the vibes that you love. Each week we'll explore everything from music and pop culture to deeper topics
Starting point is 00:51:21 like identity, community, and breaking down barriers in all sorts of industries. Don't miss out on the fun, el té caliente, and life stories. Join me for Gracias Come Again, a podcast by Honey German, where we get into todo lo actual y viral. Listen to Gracias Come Again on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts. Muhammad Ali, George Foreman, James Brown, BB King, Miriam Makeba.
Starting point is 00:51:49 I shook up the world. James Brown said, said love. And the kid said, I'm black and I'm proud. Black boxing stars and black music royalty together in the heart of Zaire, Africa. Three days of music and then the boxing event. What was going on in the world at the time Here, Africa. Three days of music and then the boxing event. What was going on in the world at the time
Starting point is 00:52:07 made this fight as important that anything else is going on on the planet. My grandfather laid on the ropes and let George Foreman basically just punch himself out. Welcome to Rumble, the story of a world in transformation. The 60s and prior to that, you couldn't call a person black. And how we arrived at this peak moment.
Starting point is 00:52:28 I don't have to be what you want me to be. We all came from the continent of Africa. Listen to Rumble, Ali, Foreman, and the Soul of 74 on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. video app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey everyone, it's Katie Couric. Well, the election is in the home stretch and I'm exhausted. But turns out the end is near, right in time for a new season of my podcast, Next Question.
Starting point is 00:53:02 This podcast is for people like me who need a little perspective and insight. I'm bringing in some FOKs, friends of Katie's, to help me out like Ezra Klein, Van Jones, Jen Psaki, Ested Herndon. But we're also going to have some fun, even though these days fun and politics seems like an oxymoron. But we'll do that thanks to some of my friends like Samantha Bee, Roy Wood Jr., and Charlemagne the God. We're gonna take some viewer questions as well. I mean, isn't that what democracy is all about? Power to the podcast for the people.
Starting point is 00:53:37 So whether you're obsessed with the news or just trying to figure out what's going on, this season of Next Question is for you. Check out our new season of Next Question with me, Katie Couric, on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, I'm Bruce Bozzi. On my podcast, Table for Two, we have unforgettable lunch after unforgettable lunch with the best guest you could possibly ask for.
Starting point is 00:54:04 People like Matt Bomer. Thank you for that introduction. I'm going to slip you a couple of 20s under the table. Dang. Emma Roberts. When it came into my email inbox, I was like, OK, I know I'm going to love this so much that I don't even want to read it.
Starting point is 00:54:16 Because if I can't be in it, I'm going to be bummed. And Colin Jost. You know, your wife was the first guest on Table for Two. It's come full circle. As long as I do better than her, I'm happy. Table for Two. It's come full circle. As long as I do better than her, I'm happy. Table for Two is a bit different from other interview shows. We sit down at a great restaurant for a meal, maybe
Starting point is 00:54:33 a glass of rosé, and the stories start flowing. Our second season is airing right now, so you can catch up on our conversations that are intimate, surprising, and often hilarious. Listen to Table for Two with Bruce Bozzi on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast. And we're back. Noah, have you seen Alien Resurrection?
Starting point is 00:55:00 Do these Alien Resurrection jokes hit you? I don't know if anyone's seen that movie. I don't remember. I cannot recall this alien movie. And I thought I used one of the- Oh man, it's great. I feel like I saw some spin-off with a Roman name. Oh God.
Starting point is 00:55:17 Prometheus, is that a name? Prometheus, yes, no. That's one of the ones that was made by Ridley Scott again, though. I don't know, man. This was the fourth alien was the alien movie that was written by Joss Whedon as kind of a backdoor pilot for Firefly. It's a very strange movie, but it's got Ron Perlman in it.
Starting point is 00:55:37 I don't know what to say in response to any of these words. No one knows what to say in response to alien resurrection other than it's the fourth movie in the Alien series. So, one particular, yeah. Probably shouldn't have hung so many jokes on the fourth Alien movie. You're a kid, go watch it. I feel like if you're hanging Alien jokes,
Starting point is 00:56:02 it's gonna end with, you know, game over, man. Yeah. I am the Hudson in this series. like if you're hanging alien jokes, it's gonna end with, you know, game over, man. And that's kinda- I am the Hudson in this series. Like I'm realizing that I've gotten us into a, or we're in this horrible disaster that I'm not gonna get out of. And now I'm just firing my gun blindly at the ceiling, trying to escape.
Starting point is 00:56:19 Noah and I both have no idea what you're talking about, but someone in the subreddit- What, he just brought up Hudson. Someone in the subreddit will be really excited that you're just keeping going on this. Oh my God. Someone. It really is game over, man.
Starting point is 00:56:31 Game over. Game over. Unbelievable. So, one particularly baffling segment from the Chafkin book involves Peter's senior yearbook quote, which he credited to The Hobbit. The greatest adventure is what lies ahead today and tomorrow are yet to be said. Now you know, that seems like something a nerdy kid would do. And that's a perfectly fine yearbook quote.
Starting point is 00:56:54 I would go so far as to say maybe even a little like stereotypical. But when it comes up in Schafkin's book, Schafkin actually, this is one of the areas where I think his analysis of Peter is a little unfair. Here's what Schafkin writes about Peter putting that quote in his yearbook. Years later, he'd say that he memorized the entire passage, which continues, the chances, the changes are all yours to make. The mold of your life is in your hands to break. It would become in a way the motto of his life, though it was still at this point a
Starting point is 00:57:20 confused life. The passage is not in fact from Tolkien, who wrote The Hobbit, as well as the Lord of the Rings trilogy, books Teal obsessed over. It's from a theme song written by Jules Bass, creative genius behind the 1980s cartoon Thundercats for the animated version of The Hobbit, which came out in 1977. Now I think maybe because it's not clear to me that Peter was being dishonest or making a mistake. Like if he attributed that quote to The Hobbit, that quote is from The Hobbit.
Starting point is 00:57:50 It's from The Hobbit movie, but like, I don't know if you'd necessarily care to be that specific about this in like your fucking yearbook, right? This isn't an essay you're writing. I think like Chafkin kind of wanted to point this out as maybe like Teal not really being a Tolkien fan or something like that. It's kind of unclear to me.
Starting point is 00:58:08 I don't think it's particularly weird that like an 18 year old kid would credit The Hobbit animated movie for a quote as The Hobbit instead of like specifying that like it was, it was, you know, not the book. I think that that may be a little bit like reaching, but anyway, I guess you can see this as evidence that Peter wasn't a big Tolkien fan and just like the animated movies. But to be honest,
Starting point is 00:58:32 if you are quoting from the fucking Hobbit animated movie of 1977, you're a pretty big Tolkien nerd, right? It was not a wildly popular movie. Although better than the Hobbit movies we would later get, arguably. So, yeah. So there you go. I don't know, this whole thing seems like nerd, like, score-setting. I think it's a little bit of nerd fighting. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:58:55 You're not actually memorizing the books, you're memorizing the movie. No, that was from the Hobbit animated movie. How dare you? It's not even canon. And he brings up that the song was written by the Thundercats guy to kind of like make it more, Jen's like, man, the Thunder Cats was fine.
Starting point is 00:59:08 Like we don't need to be shitting on the Thunder Cats here because of what Peter Thiel does in 2016. The Thunder Cats were incredible. What are you talking about? Come on, man. Come on, Chafkin. Look, I like Chafkin. I just disagree with him here.
Starting point is 00:59:22 Wait, there was a Hobbit movie? I thought there was only a Lord of the Rings movie. No, there's definitely a Hobbit movie. There were three. We are not talking about the Peter Jackson Hobbit movie, Sophie. We are talking about the animated Hobbit movie, which is wonderful. You know what?
Starting point is 00:59:37 I did watch that one. I did watch that one. Oh yeah, Noah. I'm gonna recommend like half a hit of acid and just sink down into your couch and let it happen to you. That's how. From what I know of you, you would recommend a half a hit of acid and just sink down into your couch and let it happen to you. That's how- From what I know of you, you would recommend a half a hit of acid
Starting point is 00:59:49 and literally anything. You know, it keeps my hands steady when I'm driving, especially if I've got a trailer. You know, I don't trust anyone who toes on less than half a hit of acid. That's my advice to kids out there. Yeah, going shooting. Oh man, you don't even need tracers
Starting point is 01:00:16 So anyway, whatever I don't need we don't need to continue down this Peter teal Reading into somebody's yearbook quote. Yeah reading it is like a little much. Yeah, maybe Peter did specify the animated version and then yearbook editor was like, no, like we'll just say the Hobbit, it's fine. Anyway. It's that much thought into your yearbook quote. Yeah, it's a yearbook, come on. So a much better story of Peter actually being a weirdo,
Starting point is 01:00:38 which Chafkin does also share, comes from one of his few female friends who apparently shared with Peter at some point that she'd been the result of an unplanned pregnancy, right, that her parents had had her without meaning to. Peter wrote in her yearbook, quote, I could never even hypothetically have aborted you. Love, Peter Thiel.
Starting point is 01:00:59 That is an odd thing to write about your friend based on them sharing this with you. That is an odd line. Now I will say that's not a cold statement. It's just weird, right? Like that is in a way kind of a warm statement, right? So I don't know. It doesn't entirely comport with like
Starting point is 01:01:21 Peter can't connect with people, but it definitely comports with like, nobody, Peter doesn't quite talk like anyone else, right? Like nobody else would say this to a friend. Yeah. Unless you wrote in everybody else's yearbook, like I would have aborted you. I would have aborted you,
Starting point is 01:01:39 that's everyone else's Peter Thiel signature. Big red X. Yeah. Now, Peter was accepted by Stanford and started his freshman year at the beginning of Reagan's second term. Now, Stanford at this period was a major source of thinkers and doers among the conservative movement. The Hoover Institution, which is a right-wing think tank on campus, gave the world Martin
Starting point is 01:02:03 Anderson, who helped create Reaganomics. He's like the author of Reaganomics as a concept. Many Institute fellows were members of the Reagan administration. Peter definitely seems to have seen this as kind of maybe the path he wanted for himself. And even though what's interesting to me is because he has this sort of emotional need
Starting point is 01:02:24 to be seen as a contrarian, as the guy going against the grain, he will always frame higher education in his time as Stanford as like this den of liberals and like leftist frivolity, right? Where it's like, this is the school that gave us the Reagan administration, right? Like fucking Stanford is not a hotbed of leftists, you know? There's like liberals and leftists on campus and leftist clubs, but like one of the most influential conservative think tanks in the country is based out of Stanford, right?
Starting point is 01:02:54 I think the main reason why Peter has to kind of characterize college this way is that he just doesn't like college, right? He doesn't like Stanford. And he primarily seems to dislike Stanford, not because of a political thing, but because all of the kids there acted like kids, right? They're all teenagers.
Starting point is 01:03:13 They're not quite grown up, which is what college students are. And this is annoying to Peter. One of his chief bug bears was that there was a campus hide and seek game, which made him very angry, right? The fact that other people are like, well, he's trying to learn campus hide and seek game, which made him very angry, right? The fact that other people are like, well, he's trying to learn playing hide and seek. Peter doesn't like this. He avoids most parties.
Starting point is 01:03:31 He does not date. Now he's gay, right? And that's certainly not nearly as acceptable a thing, even in a place like Stanford in this period of time. So it's not exactly weird. And that may play into kind of part of why he's so frustrated seeing all of his peers date and socialize when that is not a thing that's safe for him. I think maybe that does play into it to some degree.
Starting point is 01:03:55 Whenever he could, rather than hang out with anyone he met on campus, he would go back home to hang out with his old friends from high school. Now one of his Stanford peers suggests that he viewed other kids at the school as deeply unserious. I think there's also an element of discomfort, insecurity, and meeting and trying to connect with new people. Whatever the case, Peter is the weird kid on campus.
Starting point is 01:04:18 Every morning, he would leave his dorm room and walk to the water fountain to take a huge number of vitamins one at a time. He seems to do this in a way that's like deliberately exhibitionist. Classmate Megan Maxwell alleges that he kind of does this to confront other kids, right? To set himself apart. Everyone else is partying and drinking and doing drugs.
Starting point is 01:04:39 And every morning, Peter gets out there and slowly takes all of his supplements so everyone can see him. Right? Quote, it was like a ritual, she told Chafkin. He was a strange, strange boy. I don't think she's lying there. He studied philosophy at Stanford, and this is as an undergrad, and was particularly drawn to the work of Rene Girard, a professor and theorist of social sciences.
Starting point is 01:05:05 Girard was particularly focused on the psychology of desire, or why people want things and how they decide they want things. From a 2021 article in The New Yorker by Anna Wiener, Teale was particularly taken with Girard's concept of mimetic desire. Man is the creature who does not know what to desire, and he turns to others in order to make up his mind," Gerard wrote. We desire what others desire because we imitate their desires. Mimetic desire involves a surrender of agency. It means allowing others to dictate one's wants, and the theory goes can foster envy, rivalry, infighting, and resentment. It also,
Starting point is 01:05:42 Gerard wrote, leads to acts of violent scapegoating, which serve to preclude further mass conflicts by unifying persecutors against a group or individual. He thinks this is how people work, right? People's desires are largely based on this kind of herd mentality, right? We're imitating other people's desires that we see. We surrender our agency to let other people dictate once for us. This is why scapegoating is natural and actually is a necessary thing in order to avoid further mass violence.
Starting point is 01:06:16 If you can scapegoat individuals for problems, you can avoid more widespread violence. I think one could extrapolate this into Peter as a member of like the wealthy ruling class, seeing the scapegoating that conservatives do of migrants or trans people as a way to like avoid a potential, you know, mass violence against his class, right, like the wealthy. But maybe I'm reading a little bit too much into it there.
Starting point is 01:06:42 But this is- He's the scapegoat author guy. You'll see also the violence and the sacred guy Gerard that's that that that actually makes so much sense. It makes a lot of sense Yeah, the fact that this gets brought I mean teal brings up Gerard a lot There's a lot of writing teal has done where he quotes Gerard talking about memetic desire. So it is not Chavkin and others, you know, cuz because I'm quoting directly from Anna's article here, they're not going out on a limb, connecting a lot of what he does to Chavkin.
Starting point is 01:07:10 This is a foundational part of his thinking. He's the guy who wrote a book about sacrifice rituals. And he's- Yeah. This makes sense. I'm on board with that. I think we should do more human sacrifice in this country. I'm sure you do.
Starting point is 01:07:26 I think we should, we need to be building more pyramids. We don't build enough. We built that one in a, where is it? Nashville, right? We should have a pyramid in every city and we should sacrifice people on them. That's all I'm saying. No, you're on board with this, right?
Starting point is 01:07:40 I'm more of a ziggurat guy myself. You're a ziggurat guy? No, yeah, yeah, yeah. You've been gotten by big ziggurat, huh? The brick makers have you in their thrall. I have, yeah. There's more material in a ziggurat. That's why they want it.
Starting point is 01:07:51 They're easy to walk up to. They are easy to walk up. Yeah, and then you can throw your human sacrifice off the top. Yeah. Once you do it. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, I do like a ziggurat. A solid ziggurat, a good old fashioned step pyramid.
Starting point is 01:08:06 Hell yeah. Yeah. Now, the concept of mimetic desire and the potential use of violent scapegoating would remain focuses of Peter's thinking on human nature, business and politics up to the present day. Two years into his time on campus, he started a monthly magazine, The Stanford Review, with one of his high school friends who went to college with him. The Stanford Review, with one of his high school friends who went to college with him.
Starting point is 01:08:26 The Stanford Review was a right-wing rag. It featured articles accusing professors of being closet Marxists, columns complaining about non-white authors in a Western culture class, and some very weird takes on the AIDS epidemic. Here's an excerpt from a column in New York Magazine by Chafkin.
Starting point is 01:08:45 The first issue featured a satirical column, Confessions of a Sexual Deviant, about a young straight man who'd chosen to be celibate. According to the review, it was almost impossible to visit a men's restroom without witnessing a gay sex act, or to cross the quad without having fistfuls of free condoms pressed into your hand. In 1987, presenting homosexuality as an addiction, a columnist wrote that unnatural gay men had yielded to temptation so many times that the fires of lust burned within them, making it indeed difficult for them to control themselves.
Starting point is 01:09:16 During Teals' last year on campus, his close friend and review collaborator, Keith Raboy, stood outside the home of a Stanford residential fellow and shouted at the top of his lungs F word you are going to die of AIDS you are going to get what's coming to you two days later the review published the rape issue with an impassioned defense of a student who'd pleaded no contest to statutory rape so what's he's this is he's the guy that he's going to be the rest of his life by 87. We can save that. There's a lot. And because Peter doesn't like to talk about, and I, you know, we'll talk about the Gawker stuff later. I actually think he's less in the wrong on that than he tends to be painted as, which
Starting point is 01:09:57 is not to say that he's in the right there, but like, he doesn't like talking about his sexuality. There's a decent little chunk of, even up to this day, and this is not exactly Peter's kind of thing, but I've interviewed a couple of gay conservatives who are celibate. They're Catholic. They accept that they're homosexual. They're open about that, but they think it's immoral to do anything about it because they're also extremely Catholic. And I see shades of that, at least in Peter's thinking here.
Starting point is 01:10:33 The fact that he is putting out these articles about celibacy and about the unnatural and evil lusts of the gay community and AIDS very much feels in line with that to me here. But you know, we just don't get a ton of Peter himself talking about, but you can see, like, he wouldn't be putting out these articles about like, how AIDS is the, like by this guy yelling about how like AIDS is your fault, right? If you're gay, if he didn't, if there wasn't an element of that in his thinking, right? Yeah. This young man is extremely broken. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, this is, this is the, yeah, the, the fact that you're defending a guy who pled no contest to statutory rape,
Starting point is 01:11:24 the anger about condoms over a guy who pled no contest to statutory rape, I don't know. No, look, I mean, you don't wanna judge someone too much by their corny campus newspaper. If they move on from it, yeah. Yeah, I mean, I say this as someone who started a corny campus newspaper, but I mean, that's really, it's really beyond the pale and it does seem to connect to who this dude is later, which is like this weird
Starting point is 01:11:47 like there's so much like Like hate both internal and external Happening you really get why he becomes the guy he becomes because so much of Peter's modern politics is the like the right wing hating the normies, like fuck the normies kind of politics. And a big part of just how much anger there is at Marxists on campus, they're handing out columns in the quad. It's just like whatever he sees the people around him are fine with makes him angry.
Starting point is 01:12:22 There is a degree of that in being this kind of dude in Stanford in this period of time. The late 1980s are a period in which public rage over the injustices of apartheid had started to reach a fever pitch too. This is one of the most salient public issues at the time. The entire Western international community is lining up against the apartheid regime. There were regular protests on campus and calls to divest the school from South African financial interests.
Starting point is 01:12:53 According to one source, Peter was not supportive of this. He was very angry that all of the kids on campus are anti-South Africa. And I wanna read now, this is a very interesting chapter of his life, from a Medium post by one of his classmates at Stanford, Julia Lithcott-Hames. She wrote this about an encounter in 1986, and this is going to be very relevant. Julie is a black woman.
Starting point is 01:13:18 We ran in different circles. His fiercely libertarian views were often a topic of conversation among those of us living in Branagh Hall. One day I heard a rumor that Peter defended apartheid, which was then still the law of the land in South Africa, which I found morally repugnant. To know that a fellow student, a dorm mate for that matter, might defend such a brutally oppressive race-based caste system gave me the willies. But I wanted to give Peter the benefit of the doubt, so I mustered the courage to go to his room and ask him about it.
Starting point is 01:13:45 He said, with no facial affect, that apartheid was a sound economic system working efficiently and moral issues were irrelevant. He made no effort to even acknowledge the pain the concept of apartheid could possibly raise for me, a black woman." So that's, and it's very in line with the kind of like, well, it works economically. The system is economically successful. That's all that matters. The moral, the moral issues are irrelevant, right?
Starting point is 01:14:13 Just completely that kind of guy. I mean, how much of this is just like, that's my dad. Yeah. Well, I mean, how much of it is that's my dad and just like this reflexive contrarian thing all of these kids hate South Africa. I've been there. I know it's actually a good system because it works economically. Yeah. What's my dad?
Starting point is 01:14:33 Yeah. Yeah. Great stuff. Uh, when Julie posted this in 2016, it went sort of viral and Peter issued a response through a spokesperson. Peter has no recollection of a stranger demanding his views on apartheid. He has never supported it, but he can easily see how a conversation
Starting point is 01:14:48 might be misremembered 30 years later. And that's interesting, like, I don't recall talking to this stranger, but you can easily see how someone could misremember the conversation that I'm not sure happened. If I did it. If I did it, yeah. Apartheid edition.
Starting point is 01:15:05 Now obviously I don't know that Julie's recollection of events from 30 years ago is perfectly accurate. No one's are ever, right? But there is some outside corroboration for aspects of Julie's story. And I'm going to quote from an article in NPR here. Liffkate Hames' account of Teal's opinion about apartheid was backed up by Megan Maxwell, a freelance editor who also attended Stanford with Teal. Liffkate Haymes' account of Thiel's opinion about apartheid was backed up by Megan Maxwell, a freelance editor who also attended Stanford with Thiel. Maxwell, who was also an African American, told NPR that in a separate incident, Thiel
Starting point is 01:15:32 also told her that morality and governments shouldn't be connected and that you shouldn't judge a government based on whether it fits your view of morality. I don't know, man. Shouldn't you? Isn't that part of how you should judge a government whether it's like it's moral. So wait, he's doing Anti-morality or a morality on the way It should just matter if it's economically efficient, right and then but but then gays are bad on the other hand Yeah, if he's he's publishing other people
Starting point is 01:16:06 who are writing about the immorality of homosexual life. Right? Right. Yeah. I think that would be the- Those two things don't- Interesting, interesting, Peter. Part of what's going on here is like,
Starting point is 01:16:19 Peter is an outspoken Christian and he is up to the present day. And that means some very odd the things for a guy who is also Like gay and a libertarian, you know that that's going to like well He's an outspoken Christian who doesn't believe that We should judge things by their morality That's what he says here because he definitely seems to in other instances Believe that we should judge things
Starting point is 01:16:46 based on whether or not they're his definition of moral. And this is not just Peter, this is everyone. He's not consistent. Nobody is, right? We found a point of inconsistency here, sure. Now, Peter's present political situation, I will say when we're talking about his classmates talking about 30 years ago,
Starting point is 01:17:07 you should always read any quote about someone like this with the perspective of like the fact that his modern day political stances might be deep like post facto coloring people's recollections of him, right? As a kid, because nobody's memories are perfect. So I did go looking for other accounts of the man at Stanford,
Starting point is 01:17:25 and I found a few from former classmates of his on Quora. In one post, Chris Gray recalled, he was very interested in constitutional law and wanted to clerk at the Supreme Court. He was serious about religion. He went to the gym frequently to work out. Peter was always what I would describe as thoughtful and civil in his dealings with people,
Starting point is 01:17:44 which is unusual in my experience. He had a stubborn side and did not typically change his mind about things." And you know, maybe he was more friendly to this guy because this guy was more simpatico to his beliefs, but a lot of that seems like pretty consistent with other stories you get about Peter. Chris also recalled that Peter was very interested in another thinker, Leo Strauss. I recall the most interesting thing Peter said was derived from his understanding of Strauss, which was that there are not really any facts, just values.
Starting point is 01:18:15 Another classmate, Lance Ishimoto, recalls Peter as an outspoken conservative who was a part of the Federalist Society and hung out with Greg Kennedy, Justice Kennedy's son. He went on to note, his entrepreneurial nature was also apparent from the way he and a friend decided to make their own version of Stanford Law sweatshirts and sell them at a price, $40 that was cheaper than the official ones at the bookstore, $75. So there you go. Peter got his BA in 1989 and then got his law degree from Stanford Law.
Starting point is 01:18:46 Now that's quite a lot of schooling for a guy that as an adult would declare his own personal war on the higher education system. From Chafkin and others, it certainly sounds as if some of this was related to his annoyance with liberal classmates. But I wonder if a larger reason wasn't the disillusionment he felt later because of his law career, which as a spoiler, doesn't work out the way he'd hoped. As Chris recalled, Peter was obsessed in this period as he's getting out of college, as he's finishing his law degree.
Starting point is 01:19:14 The thing that he wants for his life is not to be an entrepreneur or a founder, it is to clerk for the Supreme Court. And one kind of assumes he's maybe hoping to eventually get on the Supreme Court. George Packer, writing for the New Yorker states, quote, after graduating from law school and clerking for a federal judge, he was turned down for a Supreme Court clerkship by Justices Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy. And if we're looking for like the inciting incident of like Peter's turn towards evil for like his desire to destroy higher education, what makes him choose the path of becoming like
Starting point is 01:19:51 a corporate founder, a venture capitalist, this is why, right? His first choice is he wants to be working in and around and with the Supreme Court and he gets shot down. He's not, this guy who has always been the best at everything isn't good enough for Scalia or Kennedy, right? And that's kind of what sets him on the path that he's going to go down later, at least according to a lot of people
Starting point is 01:20:16 who knew him at this point in time. Wow, like Scalia, the font of so much not good Wow. Like Scalia, the font of- Scalia. Of so much not good does one good thing and it backfires utterly and completely and fucks us all. Yeah, and I wonder if it's just that they could see the, cause like even if you're Scalia, right,
Starting point is 01:20:38 you don't really wanna work every day with a reflexive contrarian, right? Like they're not, that's not a guy who's always, his whole thing is always, I have to be doing a different thing than everyone else. Like I have to be smarter than everyone else. Everyone else who has to be wrong and I have to be right. You don't wanna work with that guy.
Starting point is 01:20:57 Like that guy sucks. Or maybe just his work wasn't good enough. Yeah, or maybe, yeah, maybe his law shit wasn't good enough, right? Like, I don't know, I'm not a lawyer. I don't have the ability to judge Peter Thiel's like writing on law. But whatever the case,
Starting point is 01:21:14 because he's the valedictorian of his high school, he does very well at Stanford, he's friends with Kennedy's kid, he's doing everything he should be doing to make this work, and it just doesn't work for him. Right. And that does seem to be like the thing that fucks him up. Anyway, Noah, how are you feeling about Peter so far? I feel like right now we're kind of like
Starting point is 01:21:39 only somewhat harmful toxic nerd stage. And if the story ended there, be like, okay fine, you know Go ahead buddy. Now you get to grow up and live. Yeah Like you'd be a person. Yeah. Yeah, like I feel like there's still Like, you know, the fate is not set at this point, right? Yeah, I would say the fate is not set. There's there's a lot of ways that this guy could go after this. But I also feel like you can tell. A guy who runs that kind of newspaper and whose goal is to work for Scalia or Kennedy probably isn't going to wind up being like a guy.
Starting point is 01:22:19 You'd want to have dinner with, you know, like, no. This isn't behind the guys you don't want to have dinner with, you know? Like, no. This isn't behind the guys you don't want to have dinner with. No, no, no. We're not guaranteed he's going to become a bastard yet. So we'll be hitting that increasingly by part two. And I'm excited for you to see where Peter goes after this. Noah, where are you going to go after this? I feel like I'm going to have like several shots of whiskey
Starting point is 01:22:49 after this. I feel like I need it. Yeah, it's 1 p.m. So that's the right time for a nice, nice stiff drink. It's four o'clock over here, man. Yeah, yeah, yeah. It's four o'clock somewhere. That's why I can start drinking.
Starting point is 01:23:05 All right, well, I'm gonna go listen to some Jimmy Buffett. You go also go listen to some Jimmy Buffett and then come back on Thursday for part two. I'm going to need six drinks if it's Jimmy Buffett. Behind the Bastards is a production of Cool Zone Media. For more from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com, or check us out on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Behind the Bastards is now available on YouTube.
Starting point is 01:23:34 New episodes every Wednesday and Friday. Subscribe to our channel, youtube.com, slash, at Behind the Bastards. John Stewart is back in the host chair at The Daily Show, which means he's also back in our ears at Behind the Bastards. is a second term we can all get behind. Listen to The Daily Show, Ears Edition on the iHeart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, it's Mike and Ian. We're the hosts of How to Do Everything from NPR's Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me. Each week, we take your questions and find someone much smarter than us to answer them.
Starting point is 01:24:21 Questions like, how do you survive the Bermuda Triangle? How do you find a date inside the Bermuda Triangle? We can't help you, but we will find someone who can. Listen to the How to Do Everything podcast on iHeartRadio. Do you ever wonder where your favorite foods come from? And like what's the history behind bacon wrapped hot dogs? Hi, I'm Eva Longoria. Hi, I'm Maite Gomez-Rejon.
Starting point is 01:24:42 Our podcast Hungry for History, is back. And this season, we're taking a bigger bite out of the most delicious food and its history. Seeing that the most popular cocktail is the Margarita, followed by the Mojito from Cuba, and the Piñu Colada from Puerto Rico. Listen to Hungry for History on the iHeart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Starting point is 01:25:08 Welcome to Gracias Come Again, a podcast by Honey German, where we get real and dive straight into todo lo actual y viral. We're talking música, los premios, el chisme, and all things trending in my cultura. I'm bringing you all the latest happening in our entertainment world and some fun and impactful interviews with your favorite Latin artists, comedians, actors, and influencers. Each week we get deep and raw life stories, combos on the issues that matter to us, and it's all packed with gems, fun, straight-up comedia, and that's a song that only nuestra gente can sprinkle. Listen to Gracias Come Again on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast. I'm Maria Kanakova. And I'm Nate Silver. And our new podcast, Risky Business,
Starting point is 01:25:48 is a show about making better decisions. We're both journalists whom we light as poker players, and that's the lens we're going to use to approach this entire show. We're going to be discussing everything from high stakes poker to personal questions. Like whether I should call a plumber or fix my shower myself. And of course we'll be talking about the election too. Listen on the iHeart radio app, Apple podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.