Behind the Bastards - Part Two: How Nuisance Streamers and Rage-Baiting Ate the Internet
Episode Date: October 22, 2026Robert explains how live streamers went from pranks, to acts of insane violence and public cruelty, and eventually turned them into a lucrative industry.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy informa...tion.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome back to Behind the Bastards.
This is part two of our episodes on the Rise of the Nucent Streamer.
Welcome back, Jason Pargin.
Thank you so much for coming back on the show.
You've got a new book in the John Dies at the end series out.
So let's plug that up at the top and then we'll get back into it.
Yes, book five in the John Dies at the End series is called There Are No Giant Crabs in this novel, a novel of Giant Crabs.
If you're unfamiliar with the series, I feel like the title conveys the tone pretty well.
They are extremely profane in graphic.
Should be available in almost any format.
Although at the time we're recording this, there's word that there are book shortages.
Paper shortages.
Paper shortages.
And because America is just so feverish about reading, we just can't get enough.
We're buying up all the books.
So it's a crisis that you see this every day on the news.
Americans reading too much.
That's the main problem with this country, is literacy.
But I suggested this topic, because if I was going to come on here and promote something along with my lighthearted horror action novels, I didn't want it to be covering a genocide.
But part one of this episode, kind of a bummer.
Going to be frank.
It's a real bummer.
It's got to get worse.
This is an I-Heart podcast.
Guaranteed Human.
I'm Melissa Jeltson, host of the What Happened to Her podcast.
We're kicking off the season with the Sandra Birchmore story,
a case the police rode off as a suicide in a snowstorm.
Her family never bought it, and the man they suspected wore a badge.
You never know who that devil is because he's wearing in disguise.
Sometimes it's a police uniform.
And you can get access to all episodes 100% ad-free
with an I-Heart True Crime Plus subscription, exclusively on Apple Podcasts.
available only to Iheart True Crime Plus subscribers.
So don't wait.
Head to Apple Podcasts, search for IHeart True Crime Plus, and subscribe today.
How do you know that Claude won't become manipulative?
This is a constant worry.
And you can actually catch the model thinking I think X is actually true, but I'm going to tell
the user why.
I'm Walter Isaacson.
On my new podcast, The Builders, I'm going inside the minds of the people shaping our future.
Listen to the Builders starting October 13 on the Iheart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Didn't catch the latest Roland Martin unfiltered podcast?
Here's what you missed.
People wake up and go, oh, damn, wait a hold up.
They change all of that?
Yes.
It's real.
This is a wholesale attack.
It is targeting black people in every federal agency.
It's raw.
White folks have never allowed that reckoning to last more than a decade.
Catch Roland Martin's daily commentary.
on the Black Information Network.
And download Roland Martin unfiltered on the IHart radio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
In 1986, a man named Scott Macklam was killed in broad daylight.
Police quickly found their suspect.
Prosecutors convicted him.
But now, almost 40 years later, I'm re-examining this case.
I really didn't believe any of it was real.
And I was like, well, they're going to figure out this is not me.
They're going to do their police job.
Has the wrong man been in prison this whole time?
Listen to Examine the Backfire Effect on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
On recent episodes of The Questlove Show, I chat with Jojo about her music and Wallow 267 about his story, everything in between.
Don't invite me to karaoke.
I'm going to make it weird.
Someone's going to try to sing, leave it out, or too little too late, or baby, it's you.
Oh, no.
And I'm going to be like, okay, cool.
Check out my conversation with Jojo, Waddle 267, and more on the Questlove show.
Listen to the Questlove show on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast.
Peace.
So I would appeal back a little bit and talk about some other things that are kind of at the foundation of this broad, kind of amorphous industry of nuisance and rage baiting that we've been sort of grappling with this week.
You've probably heard the term attention economy.
I think people are generally have heard the phrase.
It was coined by a psychologist and economist named Herbert Simon in 1971.
Decades before the Internet was a thing regular people knew or cared about, Simon, undoubtedly
looking at the mass media of his day, wrote about how the discrepancy between the amount
of information available to modern consumers and the biological limitations of our ability
to like process that information was going to lead to some conflicts, right?
proposed it would lead to a wealth of information but a poverty of attention, right? And that that would
make the ability to draw and command attention incredibly valuable. That's what an attention
economy is. It's the only economy pretty much that I've ever worked in, right? Like at least in
my career as a creative, you know? If you were a writer, if you're a musician, if you make
TV or movies, you are in some way, or if you're a streamer, you are in some way participating in
the attention economy, right? All of our ability to make money relies on you listening to this
podcast, you reading Jason's books, you watching the movie Digger, which you did not.
But like it is all attention.
That's like the most monetizable thing in the world.
In an article for Forbes, Kurt Steinhors turned me on to a conference presentation by a guy named
Michael Goldhaver.
Goldhaver is a former theoretical physicist turned internet Cassandra, and in the 1990s,
he put together a paper called The Attention Economy and the Net.
And in it, he described online spaces as the places where, quote,
We will increasingly live our lives.
What counts most is what is most scarce now, namely attention.
The attention economy brings with it its own kind of wealth, its own class divisions, stars
versus fans, and its own forms of property, all of which make it incompatible with the industrial
money market-based economy it bids fair to replace.
Success will come to those who best accommodate to this new reality.
He's saying this in the 90s.
It's definitely like one of the most prescient things anyone ever said about the internet.
that like that is the new haves and haves-nots is attention-based.
And people my age have been hearing some version of this going back to the TV era.
People forget that like that opening credit sequence of The Simpsons, the joke is that they're all leaving their daily life and they're all rushing, rushing, rushing to get somewhere.
And then the punchline is to rush in front of the TV.
Yeah.
They're rushing back in 1987.
That can't be how old that show is.
Like that.
Yeah.
Like that everybody knew what that joke was because all of the sitcoms from the 70s, 80s were all like referencing this, this box rots to your brain because of this fundamental idea that they're now competing for your eyeballs on this stupid box.
And the stuff that is meaningful information and news now is having to compete with entertainment.
So now the news has to be more entertaining.
And now you can't discern the difference between.
between information that's important, which is, like, from an evolutionary point of view,
is this actually a threat, something I need to know about or whatever?
Yeah.
Versus something that is merely weird or novel, something that catches your eye because it's,
so now everything becomes just a string of distractions rather than the things you actually
need to know about.
And it also, you get this situation where whose opinion on the climate matters more?
A climate scientist who is incredibly well-educated and has done a tremendous
amount of work and knows a great deal about his his field, but has no ability to, like,
communicate that to a mass audience or some guy who just has an opinion, but is really good
at getting a couple hundred thousand people to, like, watch him on Twitch, right?
Or, like, listen to him on a podcast.
It's the dude with the podcast is more influential in, like climate policy.
That's how the world works today.
Or health policy.
Look at RFK Jr., right?
Like, this is Goldhaber described attention in the future of the internet as a kind of
enduring wealth, perhaps the most enduring kind of wealth in the brave new world the internet
would create. I don't really think there's an argument about whether or not he was correct anymore.
One of the best pieces of evidence for this would be the fact that the current wealthiest man on the
planet, Elon Musk, is the wealthiest man on the planet in large part because of his ability
to draw and dominate our attention. This is not just like, because I don't like Elon Musk be having
an opinion, look at the actual money that Tesla or SpaceX or X has actually made. And in most cases,
his companies do not make a profit. His wealth is a product of stock valuation, and the valuations
of his stocks are tied directly to his ability to convince people his ventures will be worth
tremendous amounts of money in the future. Don't just take my word for it. Graham Cole of
Neomomom Labs recently published an analysis of what they call the Musk effect, tracking the value
of his companies over the last 15 years. They noted that after Tesla's IPO, quote, growth was
slow, but Tesla did have a unique selling point. It made electric cars sexy, and it had a frontman
who got them into the headlines.
Tesla wouldn't spend a penny on traditional advertising until 2023 when it was already
a half a trillion dollar company.
Like, this is not just me not liking Elon Musk.
He is rich because of his ability to command attention, right?
Like, that is the main skill that he has, really.
And this is the thing that when people try to explain what Donald Trump did for a living
before he was a reality show star, and it's like, well, he's a real estate developer.
It's like, yeah, but what is that?
What is that?
He's kind of a business guy.
But honestly, it's like, well, why does he put his name on everything?
Why does he wear a Halloween costume?
Why does he have like crazy hair?
Like, he's making himself very distinct and memorable.
Why does he have it?
Why does he bring it everything with his name?
Because that was his business was the attention.
Everybody knew who he was.
Everybody in New York knew who he was.
In the 80s, he was on TV all the time.
He showed up in home alone.
Being a big name is how he got projects done.
Yep.
And having a golf course.
or Castino or whatever that had the word Trump on it, that branding was everything.
So that's why some of us, including, I will confess right now, somebody who had an important
platform in 2015, 2016, I did not think Trump was actually seriously running for president.
I thought it was a stunt.
I thought it was an Elon Musk like, yeah, I'm getting my face out there to boost my stock
price to get money coming into whatever.
I thought he was going to launch like a Fox News alternative.
Yeah.
And that his run for president was a pure publicity.
viral publicity stunt. Like when Kanye ran. No. And I think to be, to give credit words, do, I think the
first person had cracked who really, and one of the first people that saw on the internet, who really
saw where things were going was Adam Todd Brown. He wrote a column that was like, I think Trump's
going to win, and I think he's going to win doing this. He was very right. Let me, let me say it now on
here, Netflix, wherever this is broadcast. Adam knew I did not. Absolutely. He was ahead of me.
I probably told him he was crazy at the time or thought he was crazy.
He was right.
I wasn't.
He was completely right.
Unfortunately, that article is also lost media now.
Oh, yeah, we can't prove it.
In fact, now that I think about it, I was actually right.
Yeah, no, that was a, yeah, that was Jason.
Because it can't be proven.
I was right about everything.
You just can't.
It's all been deleted.
Yeah, yeah.
All of my correct takes have been deleted.
Only the bad ones are left.
So it's debatable whether,
Musk's increasing addiction to rage baiting has helped his businesses past a certain point.
He did not, I don't think his Tesla wealth came from rage baiting, right?
But he does a lot of that now, especially some of that's he has been affected by the same
social media engine that has also, like, helped him, right?
And in fact, some of Tesla's largest dives and stock value have come as a direct result
of recent public statements.
But Donald Trump also owes a great deal of his presidency to rage baiting, right?
We might, if we're calling these people nuisance streamers, we might rightly call Trump the first
nuisance president, right?
That's kind of how he got to the White House is by creating a series of scandals that
kept his name in the news and, like, electrified his followers, in part because they,
they wanted to be able to do the same kinds of stuff and say the same kinds of stuff,
and also kept all the people who didn't like him talking about him so much that, like,
there was no room for anyone else in the media, you know?
And this is something other Republicans said during.
the primaries. I think it was Marco Rubio saying that the same day he unveiled his economic plan,
not that I think his economic plan would have been good, but the same day he unveiled it,
Trump made a joke about how he had a big dick. I don't know if he said it in a speech or a debate,
and Rubio's like 100% of the coverage went to him saying that, and no one even asked about
this thing that I'm unveiling that would affect every citizen in the country if I want,
like the substance of what you're trying to get out there, there's just no oxygen in the room.
Because every day Trump could go on Twitter and he was on Twitter all hours of the night.
Or could go on some platform and he could go to, he always spoke to the press, never turned down an interview and just always gave them some clickbait that would make them money.
Because, again, that's traffic for them too, for these platforms.
And you just couldn't get a word in.
Yeah, he trolled his way right to the White House.
I realize we are, you know, 11 years late on that conversation.
Into this process, yeah.
But it is, I mean, it's all relevant to this concept of like the attention economy, right?
Which is why nuisance streamers have a job too.
And like that part of why live streaming in general is so profitable is because of how much attention it commands.
People spend hours listening, usually while they're doing something else, but hours and hours every day watching their streamers, right?
As I've stated, I don't think newsist streamers would have become a thing, at least not in the way they are, without the
presidency. And it probably won't surprise you to hear that ICE slash Denino endorsed and voted for
Donald Trump and justified his decision by claiming he found the president funny, right? That was why
he thought he was worth voting for. A lot of people in 2016 voted for Trump because they thought
he was funny. And again, if you can't grapple with that, you're not going to understand why everything
that's happened has happened. It doesn't have to be good. It's just accurate. And likewise, a lot of
Danino's viewers seemed to have fallen in love with him because he represented a break from
liberal, woke-dominated media.
From that New Yorker article by Adrian Chen, one viewer who claimed to be a 35-year-old retired
army sergeant with two kids and two ex-wives wrote on the subreddit, thank God for Paul,
because all cable TV, not some, but all channels for the most part are the same left-wing
pro-gay, anti-American, anti-white garbage.
And, you know, one of the other things that article notes is that a popular activity in the
Ice Poseidon community was to find different phrases like KFC and watermelon they could use as
like replacements for the inward to get around YouTube's ban on the inward. That's also,
that's always a major part of all of these kind of like nuisance guys is being racist specifically
towards black people. It's just like a very enduring through line in all of these types of
content really. It's not the only kind of racism. There is always an element of 4chan that
was this, where I have no idea what percentage of these people would be racist in real life.
If they had an actual opportunity to discriminate versus this is the one thing that makes
mom and dad mad when I say it. It's the one thing that they, you know, because if you've got a
platform that allows profanity, they definitely don't allow slurs. So slurs are what we're using
because you're 12, you're 12 year old boy and you want to feel like you're. So trying to, the difference
between the ones that meant it versus the ones that were 12 was always difficult, because
that was always thinking about 4chan, is you would have people with their little Hitler
avatar, and some of them were actual very well-versed in white supremacy, and some of them
were 11 years old, and you could never tell who was who.
No, and past a certain point, it does stop mattering, right?
Well, when you're building a fan base, because what you do is you create a pipeline,
where this stuff, you start out by saying, ironically,
and we're just trolling, you're in a space with other people who mean to take it seriously.
And so now they're posting just every day, it's a new, here's black crime video.
Look at this black person attacking this elderly white woman or whatever, whatever they do.
And it's just every day, every day.
They've just got this stuff.
And so now you've, now you're saying it unironically.
And I think the other part of that, while that is happening, another thing that's happening is
you are watching streamers and other media people that you admire or like make money.
by saying that stuff, by repeating those phrases, by drawing up controversy, by using slurs
and repeating like racist arguments about like crime and whatnot, right?
That is, I think, also a key part of it is that you also see not only are people not being
punished for that behavior, they're being rewarded for that behavior.
And I want to talk, there's some psychology experiments that are kind of relevant to this
phenomenon.
In 1961, a Canadian American psychologist named Albert Bandera embarked on an experiment
And his goal was to explore the ways in which young human beings learn how and when it's acceptable to be aggressive, right?
At the time, there were a few leading theories.
Everyone was very worried because television was becoming the dominant method of entertainment, certainly by the 60s.
And no one knew is like watching violence on TV or in movies going to make kids violent, right?
This is not, you know, by the time we hit the 90s, there's a lot more panic about it that's less justified.
But in the 60s, like, you have to ask that question, right?
You don't know.
This is a new thing.
even parking kids in front of TVs.
You should want to know what it does to them, right?
So Banduro works up a simple experiment.
He split 70-something little kids between three groups.
One experimental group was modeled aggressive behavior in the form of an adult would be in the room and they would beat the shit out of this inflatable bobo doll.
Another group of kids watched an adult model behavior that did not involve aggression towards the doll and the control group were just kids that were observed playing without any adult coming in, right?
I'm drastically simplifying the study, but Bandura found that,
children who watched an aggressive adult model but aggressive behavior were, per simply psychology,
significantly more likely to imitate aggressive behavior both physically and verbally.
Now, most write-ups you'll find are entirely focused on what this tells us about children,
but I don't think we should just limit it to that.
Per relevant write-up on neurolaunch.com, a child's brain treats the absence of response as information,
not neutrality.
When a behavior produces no negative outcome, the brain files it under safe to repeat,
strengthening the neural pathways tied to that action just as surely as if it had been rewarded
outright.
And I really don't think you should just focus on how that affects kids because I think we
people in general interpret behavior that produces no negative outcome as safe to repeat.
Now, that doesn't mean they're necessarily going to do it.
I might see, I can see right now it is actually safe as certainly as a white person in certain
chunks of the media to say racist things, right?
I don't want to do that, but I know people are not being.
punished for it. They are in fact getting rich for it, right? And other people are making those
calculations and do not have any compunction against engaging in that sort of behavior, right? Because
they see that not only do you not get punished for it, you can get really rich. If you just
like curse out a little eight-year-old boy by saying the inward a bunch, you can get $800,000.
It happened to a lady, right? That influences people's behavior, just like I think seeing Trump,
get away with being Trump, influences people's behavior. And I guess just very quickly, I don't
I never want to portray it like there's something magical about the internet or magical about smartphones that scrambles their brain.
No.
As you said, it's just basic human nature.
You learn how to live by observing other people.
You don't come out of the womb knowing what words are okay to use.
We're social animals.
You observe.
So if you're in a household where there's domestic violence, what you learn is it's okay to respond with violence if somebody irritates you.
And you look because you observe it.
Like, yeah, that's.
Right.
Unless you see your dad get hauled away to jail, it's like, okay, this is how humans hash out disagreements.
Is it if she, you know, she raises her voice and you can slap her and that's how, like, you just learn it.
And to say, well, you should have known better.
It's like, not really.
If that's what you observed every day, that's all you know.
So if your role models are people you're observing on a screen, I'm sorry, I don't care who you are.
If the examples are, if it's made very clear what you're watching as a cartoon, yeah, you can understand art.
You actually cannot stick a bunch of dynamite in a cat's mouth and then the cat just turns black and then he's fine in the next scene.
You get that's a cartoon.
If you're watching something that's supposed to be real life and you see the way this person talks and their attitudes that they express, I cannot emphasize how young the viewership is for a lot of these guys we're talking about.
It is kids in many cases.
and they're just observing, yeah, here's what you can get away with in society.
Yeah, yeah.
And that's, you know, I've been thinking, are you familiar with the comic series crossed, Jason?
No.
They're making it into a movie.
It's like kind of a zombie story, but instead of it being a zombie plague, it's this disease that causes this, like, cross-shape rash on people's faces.
Is it a Garth Dennis?
Yes, it's by the guy who did the boys.
I didn't know what it is.
It just makes people lose all inhibitions and give in to their most violent, sexual and, like, sadistic impulses.
I don't particularly enjoy, they are way too, they're too graphic for even me.
I don't know how they're going to make this shit into a movie.
But I have been thinking about the way the plague works in those comics as I've been reading
this, because there's an extent to which this does seem to work like a contagion.
You see people get away with like that lady who made 800 grand saying the inward, and you
see other people start glomming on and start engaging in equally like violent and aggressive
or at least like cruel public behavior because they're chasing that money and that,
not a riot. It's not just that late. You know, it's Donald Trump. It's people are, I'm sure,
now copying Chud the builder as he's raised hundreds of thousands of dollars, right? But I do,
I keep thinking about that it as a contagion now. I almost can't stop. And I, I don't mean that in like
a literal biological sense, but I do think it's actually kind of a useful way to look at how
socially maladactable, well, it's not even maladaptive, unfortunately, but how socially negative
behaviors get reinforced and become adaptive, right?
It is adaptive in our society to say a racial slur at the right time if you're the kind
of person who can monetize that.
That's not good, but if you make $800,000 doing it, that's an adaptive behavior, right?
That's a benefit to your fitness in our society.
That's the message that's been transferred, right?
Whether or not you like it, and that is just tremendously dark.
Sorry.
Sheesh.
Let's go to ads.
Radio presents the soundtrack to your October.
From spooky podcasts and chilling playlists to non-stop Halloween radio and more.
We have all the thrills and chills you're craving this season.
Press play.
I'm Melissa Jeltson, and in my new podcast, what happened to her,
I'm bringing you new stories and conversations every week.
Stories about women whose deaths were too quickly ruled a suicide.
She was starting to get worried and get scared for her safety.
Stories of survival.
The only difference between me and her, frankly, was a little bit of luck, because by all rights, I should be dead.
Cases that everyone else called closed.
They can't convict her, right?
Like, she has so much evidence.
These stories all start in the same place, with a woman failed by a system that didn't believe her, that didn't protect her,
that didn't see her.
No child should ever experience that.
And we were babies.
She did all of these brave things
and came out and spoke about it
and he got a year.
You never know who that devil is
because he's wearing in disguise.
Sometimes it's a police uniform.
Listen to what happened to her
on the Iheart radio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
If there's a million times more
digital intelligence than there is
biological intelligence, it's hard to imagine
humans being in control
in that scenario.
I'm Walter Isaacson, host of the new podcast, The Builders.
Right now, we're living through an AI arms race.
So I went directly to the people shaping that future.
Elon Musk, Dario Amade, Alex Carr, Faye, Faye, Faye Leap, Homer Lockie,
because I wanted to understand what the most consequential builders believe,
what they fear, and where they think this is all headed.
Silicon Valley is always saying the cliche thing about the way.
way to predict the future is to create it. Well, yeah, it's up to us. But when you say us,
who's us? Is it 400 people that you know in Silicon Valley? Is it me down here in New Orleans?
They're brilliant, controversial, and they're already shaping the future. The question is,
whose imagination do we want to live in? This is going to determine the fate of nations and economies
and the future of humanity. Listen to the builders on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast,
or ever you get your podcasts.
I'm Hamza.
And I'm Martin.
And we're the hosts of Out of Character.
It's a podcast.
I know.
There's a lot of them to listen to these days.
How are you going to get to us?
Well, there's a specific reason why you should listen to us.
We are the best podcast in the entire world.
I swear.
I know, bold.
But why don't we list some of the things we might talk about on a regular episode?
So sometimes we'll talk about, I don't know, the Uber driver we just had.
And how nice they were, or if we tipped them or not, come and find out.
Sometimes we'll talk about that weird news story from last week.
It's the one you're thinking about, trust me.
Or maybe we'll talk about music and what's happening in the underground or drama and music or TV shows or the Met Gala and what the actors wore.
What we're saying is we're not afraid to talk about everything under the sun.
And if you want to see what that's like, come join us.
It's a place where everyone can hang out, anyone.
Wherever you're from, whatever you're like, you're welcome.
Listen to out of character from Will Ferrell's Big Money Players Network.
on the IHeart radio app, Apple pods, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Didn't catch the latest Roland Martin unfiltered podcast?
Here's what you missed.
And the argument is, do you want to win?
If you don't win, you have no power.
It's real.
Those are the very people who I always say vote against their own economic interests,
and they complain about the very thing to receive.
It's raw.
I knew that the issue of transgender athletes was not going well.
with a lot of black men.
Roland Martin Unfiltered.
I went off, I said, this is exactly what I'm talking about.
Y'all going to scream at Chanel,
but you don't want to see a black luxury company in the same vein.
Catch Roland Martin's daily commentary on the Black Information Network.
12 seats, those are moving south.
So if you Democrats, you don't wait to 2030,
you better be hitting the ground going hard in the South now.
And download Roland Martin Unfiltered on the IHaw.
Radio app, Apple Podcasts, wherever you get your podcasts.
And we're back.
Yeah.
I was trying to control my face during that.
I was like, okay.
Yeah.
No, but we don't have to prove the idea that a social contagion is real.
I mean, when I went to journalism school, we learned that you don't cover suicides.
Because there's a known phenomenon where, like, one famous youth suicide causes, you see,
you spike in suicides because it's like you give someone permission to do it. It's,
it mass shootings tend to come in bunches because it's like one happens in somebody else who
had been considering it or planning that they see it. They see the coverage they got.
See how got their message out there. So see it how, you know, all the little slogans they painted
on their assault rifle made them famous. It's like, well, I can top that score. It's just the way,
it's the way people are. It's when people talk about social contagions, they're not making up
something. It's as reliable a factor in human behavior. Riots work this way. Take your,
you know, take your pick. Yeah. So there is a growing body of scientific research to kind of support
the social contagion theory of why this sort of like rage baiting behavior is more common than ever.
University of Chicago and UCLA researchers recently published a paper on what they call the
inferential psychology of morality and punishment. Through experimentation, they concluded that
punishment in a society provides a psychological cue. Seeing someone punished for behavior does not
necessarily make people conclude that it's morally wrong, but they often conclude that it's
undesirable because it has negative externalities. Now, that doesn't tell us about how to, much
about how to deal with like modern day murderers or robbers, because those behaviors are currently
illegal and at least theoretically punished. But I think it has a lot to do with why so many influencers
today won't bat an eye at, say, running a crypto pump and dump that literally robs their fans of
hundreds of thousands of dollars. They see other people do it, and I'm not.
avoid punishment. Why wouldn't they follow suit? And this brings me back to Ice Poseidon.
This is a little bit of a detour, but I think it's relevant. And late 2021, ICE partnered with a
group of mysterious backers to launch CX coin, a cryptocurrency meant to allow streamers and content
creators a safe and easy method of receiving support through cryptocurrencies. Now, at this point,
a whole bunch of e-selebs had already done rug, pull, pump, and dumps just like this, which is why
ICE insisted to his fans he was creating a long-term platform and that he absolutely wouldn't
pull his money out of the project as it was locked in.
Now, obviously, he does a pump and dump and he robs everybody.
Kofi Zilla, who I guess you'd call him a journalist, he does a really good job of reporting
on like scams and crimes in the crypto world.
He's a very reputable source on this stuff.
Did a report on Ice Poseidon's cryptocurrency and claims that he pulled his money out
of it after just a few weeks, cashing out $500,000 and leaving a liquidity pool of just
$40,000 left in the cryptocurrency.
per an article on Invin Global by Aaron Alford.
In Coffeyzilla's interviews with Ice Poseidon,
ICE admitted to draining the money while laughing.
He showed no remorse for his decision to scam his fans,
despite all but admitting to carrying out the scam.
Part of the responsibility is on them as well,
for putting too much emotion into it, Ice claimed,
in defense of himself scamming his investors.
Coffeezilla repeatedly attempted to get Ice Poseidon
to return the money when he confronted him in his call.
If you want the answer, yeah, I could give the money back.
It is within my power,
but I'm going to look out for myself and not do
that, ICE replied. In his video on all this, Coffeezilla's conclusion is hard to argue with.
When you don't have law enforcement consequences for what is essentially theft and fraud,
you end up with people like Ice Poseidon realizing they can do the same without consequence,
right? Like, of course, why wouldn't he?
It's the same reason you can right now go into a gas station and get pills that claim to keep you
awake all day or they increase such performance. It's like five-hour energy. And it's not caffeine
because they've tested them. It's like, oh, this is a powerful opiate.
straight up
opioid.
Or whatever.
This is a banned substance.
To be clear,
it's not cratum.
It's a derivative.
It's a synthetic derivative of cratim called
70H.
But like,
yeah,
they're selling it like five-hour energy
and people are getting dope sick.
It's fucked up.
Yeah,
it's worse than Craig.
I believe than Craterp.
But there's nobody watching the store.
So there's money to be made.
That's just incentives.
If you put it out there and nobody
rips it off shelves,
nobody comes and kicks down your door,
then what is legal is what doesn't get enforced.
Like,
That's the way it is.
No, and it's, you know, because they've, they've, they've scheduled now.
The DEA is scheduled 7.0.H.
So it's no longer legal to sell.
But there's a whole wide variety of other that even have nothing to do with like opioid
derivatives, all sorts of weird chemicals that are being put into like energy drinks and
pills and sold over the counter that you often have no fucking idea what you're getting
because there's absolutely no regulation of this industry whatsoever.
It's probably a bad idea.
Yeah.
want to start talking now about a guy we haven't discussed yet in these episodes.
His name is Vitaly Zorvetsky.
He goes by the name Vitaly ZDTV on YouTube.
And he's like an early streamer e-seleb.
He's a prank streamer e-seleb.
He's one of like the biggest prank streamer guys.
Like many early streamer celebrities, he was born in the 1990s, 92 to be exact,
and as the name might suggest, he was born in Russia,
although his family moved to the U.S. in 2004, so he could try to become an actor.
Vitale soon realized that the internet was where he wanted to be.
Aaron George gave an able summary of his career for an article on Neo Future.
Vitaly initially pursued professional skateboarding before turning his attention to video content.
Launching his YouTube channel, Vitaly ZDTV, he tapped into the burgeoning genre of prank
videos, quickly distinguishing himself with elaborate and often confrontational setups.
One of his earliest major successes and a sign of the controversy that would follow him
was the Miami zombie attack prank in 2012, inspired by a real cannibalistic
attack that had shocked the city, but Talit dressed as a zombie, chased unsuspecting people,
primarily in poorer neighborhoods.
And when Aaron says poorer, people will note that he's usually chasing black people, right?
Like, after a guy just, like, bit someone's face off, right?
And this was a guy who the first time I saw, I saw clips of his, then this, he goes back
away, right?
Like, this is not 20, 21 era.
This is.
No, no, no, this is like the 2010s.
Like, yeah, I think from like the 20s teens, yeah.
The first viral pranks of his, he had at least actually done pranks.
Yeah, some of them were pranks.
There was like a chainsaw attack, and he had like somebody who's like an amputee and
made it look like he chopped their legs off or whatever.
Like it may be cruel and tasteless or whatever, but he actually staged a thing.
There is like a joke there, right?
Yeah, there was a joke to it.
Yeah.
Although, again, you can see the danger, too.
Like, just among other things, in a country with as many guns as we have, I would not
pretend to be attacking people with a chainsaw in public.
Right.
Don't do that.
If people who are not from the United States and don't, if you visit here, I cannot emphasize
enough how likely it is the person you pass in the street has a gun.
I rarely go to the grocery store without 30 rounds of 9mm on me.
There are lots of things that you might think you could get away with wherever you're
from in the United States.
There's somebody in the vicinity who might shoot you dead.
And also, they may be itching for the opportunity to do it.
I'm just saying that as a warning.
Yeah.
Don't do this kind of.
quite honest, if you see someone cutting off a limb of another person with a chainsaw,
you should probably shoot them if you can.
Yeah, that is a good guy with a gun situation probably.
But anyway.
Or a good guy tragically intervening in a badly thought-out prank.
Although, honestly, also probably fine.
Okay, no, don't take that.
Don't take that out of context.
I'm not saying shoot a YouTube prankster.
No.
We're just saying there's instances in which it could be understandable why you might.
And there's at least one case where the jury actually let the guy off when he shot the pranksters like, no.
If you do that to someone, you might get shot.
Yeah.
We're not saying we approve, but.
No.
You know.
So in 2012, the same year he did that zombie attack video, he was also arrested for a racist prank.
Per Huffington Post, quote, according to the arrest report, police arrested Vitale after watching his speeding ticket pranks video posted on March 5th.
In the video, police say Vitali approached three black males, accused one of the arrest.
of being involved in a robbery in the area and told all three they were getting a ticket for
wearing their pants too low. Officers note that at one point, Vatali touched his earpiece and said,
you guys coming now as if calling for backup. He also told the three men that he would believe
their innocence if they walked around a pole and said, I didn't do it. One of them encircled
the pole five times as Vatali watched. So again, you see a lot of the things we've been building.
He's really focused on like going after black people and like trying to embarrass and scare
them. And also like that's just impersonating an officer. This is the kind of thing that should
have legally gotten him in trouble?
It doesn't. Not really.
You'll notice that the element of the prank kind of went away to where now he's just harassing
black people.
And this is the evolution of a lot of these where it's like, I'm just going to cut out the
middleman.
I wonder how much of that is him recognizing that's a safer thing that like, well, because
people are fucking scared of the police, if you pretend to be one, they're not going to shoot
you, right?
And they'll probably do whatever shit you say because they think you're a cop.
Um, he, this is, again, the kind of thing, based on the way the law is written, he should have gotten serious consequences for. I don't think this arrest ever turns into anything. It's hard to tell. I'm not sure, like, but, but none of this ever seems to result in him being, like, put behind bars or suffering serious consequences. The arrests are never a serious, like, barrier to him continuing to put out content and make money. Now, Vatelie is using YouTube initially, but I do think it's noteworthy that his first massive prank success came in 2020.
the year after Twitch launched.
That's not causative, but it's evidence that they're both kind of propelled by similar trends, right?
Later that year, Vatali was arrested for the first time in Boko Raton,
after he approached a man outside of a store with a briefcase he insinuated, had a bomb in it.
Now, that write-up does also note that early on Vatali tried a mix of positive and negative content.
He did a homeless man makeover video in 2013, where he actually, like, befriended this homeless guy
and, like, helped him out, and it led to a job offer for the guy.
Like, it's a nice piece of content.
But clearly the negative pranks, like the mean ones, are what make the most money and get the most views.
He did a gold digger prank in 2013 that became a very popular sensation.
Yeah, he dressed his leather face for a prank in 2014.
He jumped on the car of the Croatian prime minister as he left prison in 2015.
And this all, like, makes it, like, it makes him really famous, right?
He winds up getting a movie deal with Lionsgate to make the movie Natural Born Pranksters in 2015.
So he's now being rewarded with a movie deal for doing mostly like really mean, cruel things, right?
And I think we can rightly view YouTube prank content as an interstitial like content evolution between the beginning of the social media era and like the birth of in person live streaming.
And natural born pranksters might well represent the high watermark for this kind of content.
The movie was a failure.
It netted about $300,000 on a million dollar budget.
Katie Walsh, writing for the LA Times, gave a review that might as well be a review of the whole nuisance streaming concept.
In borrowing the model of Jackass and Punk, this film lacks the essential DNA of what made those shows appealing.
These pranksters aren't nearly so generous, and their sadistic stunts display a mean-spirited streak,
resulting in a racist, sexist, and homophobic harassment, right?
I can remember, like, the old's got pissed off about Jackass.
when I was a kid.
Sure.
But it was never like cruel or mean, right?
The boys are doing stuff that like messes them up sometime.
But the joke is not on like random innocent people.
It's on them being jackasses.
No, no.
Like, Steve-O's covering himself and shit, not making a unwilling somebody who's desperate
for money on houseperson do it for because they desperately need money.
Johnny Knoxville would never.
Yeah.
Stivo would never.
We man would never.
They weren't that kind of guys.
Yeah.
And there's, I mean, there's Eric Andre style stuff where you captured the reaction of people in public.
Yeah.
But it's because you've staged a surreal scene.
Like, and Eric Andre had this thing where he, like, went and tore the door off of a cop car, made it look like he had superhuman strength.
Yeah.
To capture people viewing something surreal and magical happening in front of them.
And that's, yeah, fun and creative.
And he did.
You know, I was there at the RNC in 2016.
when he crashed in Alex Jones rally.
And you could look at that as kind of in the nuisance streaming thing.
But the target he's picking is also someone who is a public figure putting themselves out in public
and putting themselves in a position where it's very different from going up to a homeless
person on the street or like some random person who doesn't know what's happening.
Right? Like it's just a different kind of thing.
It's a lot crueler and a meaner kind of thing.
But the fact that Vitale and his friends get a movie deal for harassing strangers and
endangering themselves sends another message, right?
This shit pays and is rewarded by society.
Unfortunately for Vitale, YouTube decided not longer after his movie came out that prank
content was getting a little risky.
All it would take is one prankster getting gunned down and suddenly Google would be fielding
questions their PR team did not want to answer.
So Vitaly's video start getting removed and demonetized.
But he keeps pranking, right?
And his pranks begin to turn over time to things that put him in more personal and legal
jeopardy.
In 2016, he climbed up a top of time.
the Hollywood sign for a video stunt.
He's arrested.
Later that same year, he's arrested for streaking during game four of the NBA finals.
And the next year, 2017, he gets arrested for running onto the field of the World Series.
Then in January of 2020, he's arrested and jailed in Egypt for climbing the pyramids of Giza
to make a three-minute Instagram video.
I think this was probably inspired by the fact that Egypt had made doing that a crime the year before.
But the penalty was at most a month in jail and a fine of like no more than $6,300.
dollars, well worth it giving the economics of social media.
A few months later, in April of 2020, he was arrested in Miami and charged with felony
aggravated battery after he leapt out of the bushes and assaulted a random woman he had never
met before while she was jogging.
He punches her repeatedly in the face.
I've seen pictures of this woman.
She is brutally injured.
This is an incredibly cruel and violent attack.
There's not a joke here.
Did he filmed himself doing that, or is that just an attack?
I don't know.
This is really weird to me
My suspicion is that someone was filming
And they probably didn't put it on
Because the content went wrong
He kind of comes out with his like arms wide
And like trying to like grab her
I don't know what his goal was here
His victim claims he just jumped out at her
And started beating the absolute hell out of her
Right?
He only stops because her screams draw bystanders
I don't know what he was trying to do here
Right?
What was the date for that incident?
That's in 20 April of
2020. Okay. I think anything having to do with streaming, there is a very, very important event that
happened in early 2020. Where if you look at total traffic to Twitch, I think it went up like 500%.
You look at any streamer, you look at the timeline of when they got popular, all these people at
home who had nothing else to do. And again, these streamers are not their entertainment.
And April's right at that sweet spot. Those streamers are their friends. The streamers are their friends.
the streamers are their social interaction.
That chat is their social interaction.
And so the competition between these guys,
because you have to keep upping the spectacle.
Your stunt has to be dumber than the last one you did.
It has to be more dangerous.
Because this is now about spectacle now.
It's about seeing something you've never seen before.
It's about the potential to see something live on camera
that you've never seen before.
And so suddenly there's all these new eyeballs
and the amount of money coming in.
I think you look at early 20,
2020, the great derangement of streaming, I believe, started right there.
There were actually other things in society that happened to as well.
But streaming is one area.
Yeah.
But that was mainly streaming.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That really makes sense because this seems – and I don't fully know what he was going for, right?
Like, it's not clear that he was making video content, but given the rest of his history,
I assume this was supposed to be a prank that went wrong or, like, I don't know what else
he would have been doing unless he was just lived.
literally trying to beat up a random woman for no reason and didn't want it filmed,
but that seems less likely than that this was like content that went badly,
just given his history, right?
I don't fully know.
He gets charged with a felony.
I'm unaware of what happened with this case.
There have been no public update since he bonded out.
He doesn't seem to have done any time.
He keeps right on streaming.
And the fact that he consistently avoided serious consequences
while growing his YouTube following to more than 10 million people,
clearly inspires others to follow in his footsteps, right?
I don't know if there was a first nuisance streamer
as much as guys like Vitale and our friend Ice Poseidon
started triangulating their new content
to converge closer and closer to that ideal.
And you're right, a lot of it is happening
in like the spring and summer of 2020
is when that and after that point
is when a lot of that like shift starts to happen
towards outright nuisance streaming.
And these are all guys who had done pieces of that before
but things get a lot more aggressive and a lot meaner after that.
For his part, Ice Poseidon took his fan base to YouTube after Twitch banned him,
and this would prove a significant moment for a couple of reasons.
He kept streaming in real life, and as he did, it became clear that he got the majority of his attention
from being a huge asshole in public.
In 2018, he visited Europe and, of course, streamed everything, including himself getting kicked
out of multiple hotels.
On October 17, 2018, he posted this.
I made the most red newspaper in Switzerland.
I have no idea what it says, but probably something along the lines of being an international criminal genius after I fled the country because it's illegal to stream there, L.O.L.L.
The article title is YouTube star Nerfed Zercher Hotels.
And I don't speak German, but basic Googling reveals this headline translates roughly to YouTube star annoys Zurich Hotels.
Like that is the headline.
There must not have been a lot going on in Zurich back there.
Yeah, check it out for the Netflix folks.
and Jason.
Yeah, I think Nerfed pretty, the most direct translation would be like a noise.
Yeah.
But you're going to see this trend of going international with these stunts.
And I got the sense, and you're probably going to get into it, but I get the sense that for the authorities over there,
it's easier to just tell you leave the country as opposed to trying to go through a trial.
And ultimately, when the charge is just going to be some sort of disorderly conducting.
So there, again, it's very little.
downside. It's like, okay, so they're going to make me leave. And now I've got all this footage
and made how much money off those streams. So, you know, even in the States, though,
we've talked about a bunch of arrests in the States, none of which seem to stop people or lead
to any real consequences. They don't do time. They don't lose enough money that it's not worth
it for them, right? Like, but I can see it. But if you, for example, somebody dresses up as a cop and
annoys or intimidates some random poor people on the sidewalk, it's like, okay, it's,
disorderly conduct, it's, again, did not pull a gun, didn't threaten it, didn't take money from them, didn't, didn't restrain them, which would have been like a kidnapping charge, didn't put them in handcuffs, just annoyed them. And so ultimately it's like, yeah, it's gonna, who wants to deal with all that?
It is weird that impersonating an officer is a serious crime, but it's very rarely punished when people do it. Like, that is surprising to me.
I think because if you didn't use it to try to get into someone's home, to try to restrain someone, to try to get someone to go with you somewhere.
You know what I'm saying?
Like if it was in the course of committing another crime, if you just went out in a public in a police uniform, you could be a stripper.
It could be all sorts of things you're doing that are, again, it may technically be illegal, but are they going to actually pursue that?
In general, I think most of these guys have a pretty good instinct for, it's the same as the bullies you had in high school.
They have a sense of what they can get away with.
They have a sense of what the authorities are actually going to punish versus they'll just tell you, get out of here, don't do it again.
Or you get a fine.
Again, that's a fraction of what you made off that one stream.
Yeah.
And I do think you are right that like a big part of why a lot of this nuisance stuff starts occurring overseas is that people do start encountering enough consequences for it.
Like Ice Poseidon spends 2016 and 2017, like in Hollywood, a cost of.
passers by and just trying to like piss people off for content. That's a big part of his,
his shtick. And then in 2019, his LA home is raided by the FBI in response to spoof phone
calls that made bomb threats and seem to have come from his place. This was not actually that.
This was the result of like a toxic fan spoofing his number because Danino, like they,
he doesn't get prosecuted for this. I don't think he actually did anything here. He makes at the time
a show of promising to reform his once toxic community. But then in the early 2020,
he starts doing like, I mean, he does debut as a boxer in this weird influencer contest, as I said,
he gets into like crypto scamming. But in 2023, he decides to head east to Southeast Asia.
By this time, Ice Poseidon had moved his content to Kik, which as I noted last episode was Twitch
with less moderation. Kik was founded in 2022 after crypto billionaires Ed Craven and Bejan
Terani were kicked off Twitch during a crackdown on gambling advertisements.
Craven and Terani had formed steak, which Wikipedia,
tells me is the largest online casino in the world.
Per an article in Huck magazine,
they decided to start it as a challenger platform in 2022,
prioritizing freedom of expression,
which some viewed with a thinly veiled disclaimer.
Basically, this is where you can go to say slurs, right?
Like, we're fine with that here.
Ice Poseidon started streaming himself gambling,
presumably because Kik paid him to,
because we know they made deals like that.
They would like pay people in sometimes multi-million dollar deals
to like gamble on stream, right?
But this must not have been enough, or at least he may have seen his numbers slip,
because he also keeps making nuisance content and traveling overseas to do it.
In June of 2023, he took his entourage to Bangkok, Thailand.
We're doing a live kick broadcast.
He performed an explicit lap dance for his girlfriend in a hotel restaurant.
The hotel, and this is like a really nice hotel in Thailand, right?
Like a world-class one.
And the hotel manager confronts them and tells them that what they're doing was disrespectful to Thai culture.
Because they don't stop, she calls the cops on them.
and Danino and his friends were arrested.
At one point, they were looking at up to five years in prison.
But a few days later, he makes an apology video,
and then a couple of weeks after that, he's freed.
I think the apology video was probably something his lawyer made him, advised him to do.
Danino credited a nice judge for choosing to release them once they had their day in court.
He tweeted, fuck the haters, wanting injustice.
I hope you're mad.
I'll keep killing it on kick.
Within days, he and his crew were in Queensland, Australia,
where they invited a sex worker into their hotel room
and offered to pay her $500 for having sex with another streamer.
The whole thing was, of course, live streamed secretly.
They were in another room commenting on it while like this is going on.
I think the woman had been paid to be filmed,
but I don't think she understood that she was being live streamed to the internet.
Per an NBC news article.
After several minutes of the encounter,
the woman then said she received a message from a friend who warned her the meeting was a setup
that the two other men, Danino and Pepper, who was one of his buddies,
who the man said were sleeping in another room,
were actually watching the stream.
The woman became visibly uncomfortable and tried to leave, but the man blocked her, telling her she had already been paid.
She protested, calling the situation creepy and tried again to leave.
Why is it creepy?
The man asked before insisting it was just the two of them in the apartment, even though Danino and Pepper were in the next room.
Eventually, the woman left the apartment while the man followed her.
After she left, police appeared wait to be waiting for Danino and Pepper outside.
Viewers reacted with shock in the live chat as the stream captured the pair's subsequent arrest.
They were initially charged with sexual assault, but the charges were dropped.
and they were released.
So again, something obviously not acceptable and just zero consequences, right?
One thing you'll, you're going to see a pattern that came up very briefly,
where if they do face some sort of consequences, they'll often issue some sort of a public
apology.
Yeah.
And then they may reference mental illness or something, say that, well, you know, he was suffering
from some episode or whatever.
That seems to be a playbook for getting, as long as you can get out of the country and back
to the United States.
to what are the next country you're going to terrorize?
They've got a process down for how to do that because usually the country is just happy to see
them gone.
Yeah.
I think they go for claiming mental illness because Ambien is no longer as widely prescribed.
That was the old way to justify doing something fucked up.
Oh, the Ambien Walrus got me.
Speaking of the Ambien walrus, maybe Ambien's advertising on our podcast.
Probably not because I don't think people get prescribed it anymore.
but I don't know, Ambien.
Wow.
Hello.
Radio presents the soundtrack to your October.
From spooky podcasts and chilling playlists to non-stop Halloween radio and more.
We have all the thrills and chills you're craving this season.
Press play.
I'm Melissa Jeltson, and in my new podcast, what happened to her,
I'm bringing you new stories and conversations every week.
Stories about women whose deaths were too quickly ruled a suicide.
She was starting to get worried and get scared for her safety.
Stories of survival.
The only difference between me and her, frankly, was a little bit of luck, because by all rights, I should be dead.
Cases that everyone else called closed.
They can't convict her, right?
Like, she has so much evidence.
These stories all start in the same place.
with a woman failed by a system that didn't believe her, that didn't protect her, that didn't see her.
No child should ever experience that.
And we were babies.
She did all of these brave things and came out and spoke about it and he got a year.
You never know who that devil is because he's wearing in disguise.
Sometimes it's a police uniform.
Listen to what happened to her on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
If there's a million times more digital intelligence than there is biological intelligence, it's hard to imagine humans being in control in that scenario.
I'm Walter Isaacson, host of the new podcast, The Builders. Right now, we're living through an AI arms race.
So I went directly to the people shaping that future. Elon Musk, Dario Amade, Alex Carr, Faye, Faye Leap, Homer Lucky.
Because I wanted to understand what the most consequential builders believe, what they feel.
and where they think this is all headed.
Silicon Valley is always saying the cliche thing about the way to predict the future is to create it.
Well, yeah, it's up to us.
But when you say us, who's us?
Is it 400 people that you know in Silicon Valley?
Is it me down here in New Orleans?
They're brilliant, controversial, and they're already shaping the future.
The question is, whose imagination do we want to live in?
This is going to determine the fate of names.
nations and economies and the future of humanity.
Listen to the builders on the IHart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Hamza.
And I'm Martin.
And we're the hosts of Out of Character.
It's a podcast.
I know there's a lot of them going around.
But why should you listen to ours?
Well, we're only the best podcast in the entire world.
And we talk about pretty much everything under the sun.
For example, music we're listening to, underground music, trending music, drama in music.
worlds. Yes, sometimes we even talk about just everyday mundane situations in our lives, like the
cool Uber driver we just had. Or the food we just say, that is surprisingly delicious. Or we'll talk
about the med gala and the looks that they wore. Are they awesome? Are they trendy? Come find out.
Because our opinion matters. And so does yours. And this is a place where all of our minds can come
together and connect. So what are you waiting for? Come connect with us. Listen out of character from
Will Ferrell's Big Money Players Network. On the iHeart radio app, Apple.
pods or wherever you get your podcasts.
Didn't catch the latest Roland Martin unfiltered podcast?
Here's what you missed.
And the argument is, do you want to win?
If you don't win, you have no power.
It's real.
Those are the very people who I always say vote against their own economic interests
and they complain about the very thing to receive.
It's raw.
I knew that the issue of transgender athletes was not going well with a lot of
black men. Roland Martin unfiltered.
I went off, I said, this is exactly
what I'm talking about. Y'all going to scream
at Chanel, but you don't want to see a black
luxury company in the same vein.
Catch Roland Martin's daily commentary
on the Black Information Network.
12 seats, those
are moving south. So if you Democrats,
you don't wait to 2030,
you better be hitting the ground going
hard in the South now.
And download Roland Martin Unfiltered on the
IHart Radio app, Apple Podcast.
wherever you get your podcasts.
We're back.
Sophie's telling me that we are not being paid by Ambien.
We are not.
So that's, I mean, reach out to us, Ambien people.
Maybe we could get you back in Roseanne's hands.
So at the same time, Danino is engaging in this stuff.
Nucent streaming has fully taken off as an internet phenomenon.
And a weird number of these streamers decide to pick Japan or South Korea in particular as the location for their abusive videos.
The reason you'll most often see.
cited by people who live in Japan and South Korea for why this is happening is because these
countries have a culture of politeness and avoiding direct conflict. They also have very low rates
of personal weapon ownership, and that makes them very safe places to troll, right? That is the real
reason. And neither of those countries are you going to get shot? It's so funny watching a, like,
a Korean drama on Netflix or something, and there will be a plot point where the detective
opens the desk drawer of the guys like, there's a gun.
He had a gun in that drawer.
My God, what was he up to?
Where in the United States, the cop would just like move the gun aside to try to find, like, what's, it has to be something here.
His guns in the way, but move the pile of guns to see if there's evidence.
But yeah, I can't, I really want to hit that point.
The fact that, one, the whole concept of going to a high trust society and intentionally breaking it,
because you know that they don't want to confront you,
but also just knowing that you're in a place where, you know,
not to signal boost the right-wing talking point of, you know,
yeah, come try that in a Texas small town,
but seriously, don't try that in a Texas small town.
They will shoot you.
And they won't go to jail for doing it.
No, there's a reason why they're doing it in these places, right?
And there are other reasons, right?
Another possible reason why Japan has become a fixture dates back to 2017.
As you mentioned in episode one, when a YouTuber Logan Paul then 22 filmed and published a YouTube video in the Okigahara forest in Japan, better known as the suicide forest, because a large but deliberately unknown number of Japanese people choose to end their lives there.
The government actually doesn't publish statistics on how many do because they don't want to, the social contagion thing, right?
They don't want to encourage it.
And you probably, I think most people are aware of this, right?
Logan and his crew come across a dead man hanging in the forest.
They film it.
They publish it for their millions of YouTube followers.
And it blows up.
And there, Paul is forced to apologize repeatedly.
One of the telling things about this is that a lot of his apology tour is him arguing with
his own fans who are often being like, I thought it was awesome.
He's like, no, no, it wasn't.
Guys, it was bad.
It was bad.
Like, please.
Stop saying this was good.
Sophia Holloway, writing for Huck, suggests this also helped to make Japan a destination
for streamers.
Because, again, for a lot of these people, they're not thinking, oh, Logan had to apologize
and it pissed people off.
They're thinking, he got a lot of attention.
Right?
Because legally, what were the consequences of that?
Nothing.
Nothing.
Yeah.
He just got a lot.
Like, he did apologize, but he got, again, that's how I heard of him for the very
first time was that controversy.
I bet for millions and millions of people, that was the very first time they heard the
name Logan Paul.
I bet my, you know, my grandma, my dad.
I would like to forget the name Logan Paul.
Yep.
Yep.
That's how I heard about him.
Again, it's, you know, if you look at the stuff he got to do since then,
that was the best thing that happened to his career.
Absolutely.
Objectively.
Massively beneficial to him.
Now, the nuisance streamers don't really start showing up in Japan in numbers until after
2020, particularly after the pandemic lockdowns start to fade.
In March of 2023, a video of a prankster licking a soy sauce bottle on the conveyor of a
Kaitzen sushi restaurant, which is like one of those Japanese sushi restaurants where like
the stuff comes by in a conveyor goes viral.
An article in the BBC summarized what happened next.
In the video, he can be seen squashing sushi dinners at a kura sushi restaurant branch.
Since then, dozens of such videos have proliferated sparking public concern.
Now, a lot of these copycats are Japanese, but a ton of foreigners are increasingly traveling
over to Japan and in the coming months sniffing out potential content.
And they start doing this too.
In Japan, the viral trend becomes known as sushi terrorism, and it's forced permanent changes
to the way that these restaurants operated.
It's just kind of one example of how the social contagion thing worked.
And as more foreigners start traveling to Japan to piss off.
people, the locals develop a term, nuisance foreigners, that soon came to encompass any foreigner
or pissed off the locals.
And this is actually where the phrase nuisance streamer comes from, right?
I think it's deliberately descended from what Japanese people are calling these, like,
nuisance foreigners coming around to like piss people off, right?
And this brings me to another one of the assholes you specifically asked about when
you suggested this topic, Jason, Johnny Somali, right?
We are talking about Johnny's adventures in Japan and South Korea now.
His real name is Ramsey Khalid Ismail.
He was probably born on September 26, 2000, although I've seen 1999 claimed as well, I don't really know.
Ismail has given different and conflicting claims about his background on streams.
He has at different points claimed to have been a former Somali pirate or former child soldier.
There's no evidence of this.
He's also claimed to have grown up in Scottsdale, Arizona and graduated from ASU, which I think is probably a lot likelier than the former pirate thing.
Johnny Somali is the name that he adopted for Twitch, where he started streaming nuisance content during a
23 trip to Japan. An article for the UK standard describes his content this way. During a trip to Japan last
summer, a masked Ismail and another man entered the construction site of a hotel in Osaka and filmed
themselves shouting Fukushima, referencing a 2011 nuclear power plant disaster at workers.
Ismail was arrested, released, and then arrested again a month later for disrupting a restaurant
with loud noises on his phone, although the charge of the charge.
charges of trespassing on the construction site were dropped,
the court found him guilty of obstructing a business and find him 200,000 yen,
around $1,000 euros, before kicking him out of the country.
This wasn't his only scandal during his Japan visit.
His streams in the country often depicted him taunting locals in public by repeating phrases
like Hiroshima and Nagasaki at them, and loudly threatening to bomb the country,
resulting in him being physically assaulted on the street again.
So part of what you see is how crude this is.
He doesn't speak the language, so all he can shout is like the name of several disasters.
to try to offend people because it'll make him angry.
But also, he's not, again, he's not being a little scamp thumbing his nose at authority.
He's not mocking celebrities or billionaires or even, you know, like the snooty rich people at a hotel.
These are people working at a construction site.
Yeah.
These are regular people.
You know, it's a running thing I think is going to be going after just restaurant workers.
Like the people at the very bottom rung of employment, you know, having to tolerate.
enough crap in the course of a shift, and you're going to go there, start throwing food on
the floor, whatever, where the joke becomes how inappropriate the target is.
Yeah.
And it's, you know, one of the other things he did.
He visited Tokyo Disney in June and recorded visitors without consent while using a speaker
to play music that repeatedly referenced the atomic bombings of Japan.
Like, he's bringing up the thing that will piss people off the most because he wants to
get hit.
He wants that kind of a reaction.
That's good content.
his behavior ultimately saw him kicked out of the country and attacked online by PewDiePie
who moved to Japan and accused him of ruining Japan for other foreigners.
So we've come full circle.
Because PewDie Pye at this point is like a grandfather.
He's an old man.
He's settled down with the family and he doesn't stream or anything anymore.
So he's become something of an uncle type, I think, amongst that crowd.
Yeah, he still does some sort of content.
But like he's definitely not this kind of streamer, right?
that was not his business.
Like what he did, like, it's not my kind of content, but like playing a video game while
being entertaining is like an artistic skill to some degree, right, as opposed to shouting
Hiroshima at a bunch of people, right?
Like, after all of this, Johnny Somali went to Israel, where he was banned from Jerusalem
for 50 days for pinning photos of Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein to the Western Wall.
At some point in all of this, he was banned from Twitch and made the move to kick, who gave him
a permanent ban while he was in Israel because he kept making on-air death threats.
He was arrested later in his trip for accosting, like physically accosting a female police officer
and telling her he planned to slap her ass, saying, I'll grab it too. Donald Trump told me to
grab it by the pussy. I'll grab that too. So he wants to get arrested then. He's trying to,
he wants to, this is intentionally trying to get, he's trying to get arrested because again,
knows that he's just going to get turned loose 72 hours later or whatever after, yeah. Yeah, and that does
happened. That happens to Vitale. He actually got deported from, I think, the Philippines,
I might have been in Indonesia to Russia because he was doing some bullshit like this. And it worked
out great for him, right? Because he was able to talk about how horrible the jail conditions were and how
he got his phone smuggled in. And so the story was about like problems in the jail system as
opposed to like, well, this guy was deserved to have something done doing. Right. Also, Johnny Smiley
got banned from kick. The place. Yeah. It's not easy. It's like getting kicked out of Australia.
yet. Like, that's where we put
the criminals. What are you talking about?
It's like getting kicked out of prison.
Yeah. I thought that was the whole point of kick is
like this is the free speech platform. How
lonesome do you have to be? That's like
Kick being scared of legal
action. Like, no, this is a liability
even for us and we're degenerates.
You have to really be
crossing a line. And he's
about to cross another line. In October
of 2024, he traveled to South Korea.
announcing online beforehand, his
intention to find a member of the K-pop band
BTS and punched them in the face.
Since actual pop stars don't tend to walk around just like where random streamers can hit them,
he moved on to other targets and livestreamed himself twerking on and kissing a statue
meant to honor Korean comfort women.
These were women and often girls abducted by Japanese forces during World War II and used
as sex slaves.
The issue of comfort women in Korea and elsewhere in territories conquered by the Empire of Japan
is still very much alive.
The Japanese government does not do a good job of acknowledging that this happened.
This is a massive cause.
conflict between Japan and its neighbor is up to the present day. And this is taken very seriously
in South Korea. This is a horror. This is like a 9-11 level, like, traumatic cultural crime, right?
Japan gets off too easy in the cultural reputation, just as, just as Britain gets off too
easy in how we remember certain empires. Yeah. Like, I get it. I get it. They, you know,
they suffered their own disasters there in the end, but they get off too easy, is all I'm saying.
They were pretty out of pocket.
There was, yeah.
Yeah.
And it's, yeah, before everything blew up for him, Johnny made it clear that he knew this history.
He knew why what he was doing was offensive because he visited a unification church facility in Seoul.
And he posed with a picture of Shenzhou Abe, who as prime minister of Japan, refused to acknowledge the reality of what had been done to these comfort women, right?
There's a reason why, number one, Abe was also associated with that church, which is why he was assassinated.
So there's a number of reasons why he's doing this.
But the fact that he can't have not known the implications of all of this, of bringing Abe into it, of defacing effectively this statue that represented a horrific crime.
He posted RIP Shenzhou Abe, I defeated the Koreans for you.
So it's pretty clear he knows what he's doing.
This guy sucks.
He definitely does.
He did like a brief Wikipedia search to see what would be good trolling material.
This is like bare surface level.
It's like, okay, what offends this country?
And that's it.
He got a couple of points and that's...
Yep, yeah.
My guess would be he read an article about Abe after the assassination that brought up
the comfort women.
He was like, oh, great, that's a way I can really piss people off.
Yeah.
Per an article in the Economic Times, Somali deliberately sought to provoke South Koreans,
including Kyeonghi University students and bystanders by displaying a drawing of the
Japanese rising sun flag, a symbol widely considered.
offensive in the country due to its ties to Japan's wartime aggression.
Additionally, Somali played explicit content loudly while riding the subway, drawing considerable
attention.
The music was often North Korean marching tunes.
So, again, he's just really, he's pushing all of the obvious buttons, right?
Yeah.
When people would get angry, he would shout at them to speak English.
Johnny was assaulted repeatedly, and initially the police acted to protect him from his
assailants.
In one video, after he got, like, attacked while kissing that Comfortwoman statue, he
shouts from the back of a police car, Americans have way more freedom here. These inwards
protecting us. We're in the back of a police car. Come and get us. Come get us. Somali was initially
taken into custody by the police for his own safety. After he was attacked for kissing that
statue, he was later charged with a bunch of crimes, for which he might have been imprisoned for up to
10 years. But those charges relied heavily on him possessing drugs, and ultimately he only got a six-month
sentence. Although as his conviction comes with a fine, he may find himself stuck in South Korea for
while until he can pay it. I don't know what his finances are like. He's not able to stream right now
and hasn't been for a while. He is currently incarcerated, right? Is that the first one we've
come across? It's actually had charges stick. That's interesting. I wonder this is the first one I
finally got fed up with the trend and wanted to make an example because how else are you going to?
I read a lot of in South Korean papers. I read a lot of discussion along that line of like we have to
really go after. We have to punish this kid because we can't have people continuing to do this,
right? Like, this is really unacceptable. Now, that said, I've seen a lot of speculation that
Johnny's punishment might discourage other nuisance streamers, and I don't know that it will. While he did
face real consequences, including the destruction of his business, the brouhaha around his arrest
and conviction created content for countless other streamers and YouTubers. In April of 2025,
directly inspired by Johnny's example.
Ice Poseidon, Paul Donino, visited South Korea the very month that Johnny went on trial for his own actions.
Per the Korea Herald?
American YouTuber Ice Poseidon came under fire that same months for a live stream in Busan
where he and his companion shouted in public, kicked trash, and mocked Korean food, saying,
kimchi is disgusting.
When writing in a taxi, he also spoke Korean in an exaggerated mocking tone, seeming to ridicule the elderly driver.
And another article that I read in Google translated form by Korean reporter Kim Hjun-jung
notes that Ice Poseidon made direct reference to comfort women, shouting on stream that
Japan gave good genes to Koreans through comfort women.
And it's clear to me from all this that the only long-term impact so far that Johnny's
example has had was to warn other streamers away from directly touching the statues.
But it also convinced them, well, going to Korea and doing this kind of stuff is really good
business, right?
It gets attention.
Johnny's famous right now for it.
I want to get some of that attention.
I'm just not going to go quite as far, right?
Which is upsetting.
And Danino was not arrested or punished for his behavior in any way.
All across the world, nuisance streamers continue to piss people off in public, often driven
by headlines.
For example, in France, there's an ongoing issue with what some people call injection panic, right?
This is a rash of crimes where bystanders are injected with random shit at nightclubs.
And that these real crimes is a real problem that they have in France right now.
inspired a French influencer, a mean mojito, 27, to make a series of TikTok and Instagram
videos in which he approached pedestrians with a fake syringe and chased them on camera, right?
Like, the fuck, man?
He was sentenced to six months in prison for his actions.
And if there's ever a time in which modest carceral punishment could have stopped this
shit, I think we're past it now.
Even though some people are getting punished, there's just too much fucking money in it, right?
I opened this episode with the case of Chud the Builder, who committed his crimes a few months
after Mojito was convicted in October of 2025.
And whatever happens to Chud, I doubt it's going to dissuade the next nuisance streamer or
videographer or whatever we want to call them for one reason, the money.
Per an article on News Channel 5 Nashville by Levi Ismail, more than $300,000 has poured in
through donations for Dalton Etherly since his May 13th arrest.
So he's still, I mean, he might go to prison, right?
but he's also making hundreds of thousands of dollars.
That's why he was able to bail out,
even though he was put in like $1.2 million bail or something like that.
It's because his fans raised so much money.
And yeah, I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know what else to say here.
But that's the end of it?
I thought you were going to circle back around to some kind of a solution that would make me feel better.
Not that kind of show, Jason.
Not that kind of show.
I have a solution.
in mind, Jason, but it's not
what I can say on air.
Well, no, but I, like, I don't
want us to constantly be,
of course, these two episodes
sounding like we're saying, well, you know what
would have fixed this whole problem?
Prison. More police and more prison.
It clearly hasn't. It's like, that's,
that's not the
vibe of this show.
Like, you know, incarceration solves
everything. It teaches people a lesson.
But you have a system that's created
incentives. It's the same.
with you're seeing a lot of things with new technology.
Like the same thing with the gambling, where suddenly, like, the gambling ads are everywhere.
You watch a football game.
Every ad break is now just a gambling app ad.
And then the gambling is in your pocket.
And it's like, well, yeah, that's where the money's going to go unless that's just, you know, there's money to be made.
People like to gamble or they can't stop gambling.
So that's where the technology and the incentives have combined to drive people in a certain
direction. And here you've got a generation of kids who find movies boring. And when they,
you think about spectacle, they're not thinking like when I was a, you know, I saw Jurassic Park
the first time and saw a special effect that looked like a real dinosaur. It's like, yeah,
that's spectacle. That's what Hollywood Spectacle, that same kid would watch Jurassic Park
and would have fall asleep because like it's a CGI dinosaur. I've seen that a billion times.
But spectacle is you're watching something.
live and this guy's on the street and he could die.
The one I referenced a situation, I think in the last episode,
that I think there was a streamer called Tanner Cook,
one that got shot at a shopping mall.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I should have brought that into these scripts,
but yeah, it was that same kind of thing.
Yeah, he was confronting just shouting slurs at a guy who, again,
just like a delivery driver or something, an Uber driver or he's like Uber eats,
and just kept telling him back off, back off, back off,
and then finally pulled a gun and shot him because the guy apparently is like,
oh, this is great content, how upset this guy's getting.
This is great spectacle.
Look at the emotion.
Look how angry he is.
And then he gets shot.
And then the jury, they let him off of shooting them.
The jury was like, well, the crime is discharging a gun in a shopping mall because, again, the ricochet could have hurt, could have hit someone who didn't deserve to be shot.
Right.
But this guy clearly did.
You know, again, we're not saying we want you to be shooting people that are.
YouTube pranks, but that's an outcome that you should anticipate.
Yeah.
And to be clear, quite frankly, if one of these guys get shot and killed, it won't stop anybody, right?
Because again, what would stop them, if you want to know, like, what would stop this?
And I don't have a way to make this happen.
What will stop this is if there's not money in it.
Yeah.
That'll stop this.
And the platforms, that's part of it.
And I think people are probably asking, well, who, like, are they getting paid through Twitch?
Are they getting paid through kick?
are they getting paid through?
What are the other degenerate, like rumble?
Oh, I forget.
There's one that's even a rung down from kick, right?
That's like the even more socially unacceptable one.
I'm forgetting its name right now.
It's rumble, I think.
Rumble, rumble, yes.
But so there's layers to this, because for one thing, there's always another platform.
Because there's always another platform to take the people who have been banned from the last
platform for doing porn, gambling, violence, whatever, racism.
there's always some other, you know,
there's some company run out of Estonia or whatever
saying, yeah, we'll take you.
But the other thing is, there's so many mechanisms
because the fans are sending money directly.
So, for example, if you do a GoFundMe,
a lot of times they will shut down a fundraiser
if you're a dirtbag.
Right.
But there's always another-
There's give-send go.
Yeah, which is where that lady raised 800 grand.
The racist lady shouting at the child,
and I still, I think you have listeners
who think you had to have made that up
because why would people donate to shouting an eight-year-old?
$800,000 for shouting slurs at a child with autism.
But that wasn't GoFundMe.
That was, or Kickstarter.
Give Send Go.
Okay.
But even if that one got shut down, there's always a crowdfunding platform or there's a crypto platform.
Crypters are going to find a way.
The technology means that you don't have to convince Coca-Cola to run a 30-second ad against this content.
You can get the money directly from the fans.
There's always another platform.
There's always another fundraising mechanism.
You could just do it through crypto.
Like, you kind of can't stop the flow of money.
That's where I was saying to the very, very start of last episode is that the technology
made a new type of bad behavior possible.
And it's very, and society has not adjusted to it yet.
Nope.
No, and I do want to be clear, I don't think this is a situation in which, like, creating
new laws is going to, for one thing, all of these people we've talked about have repeatedly
broken the law and not gotten in trouble, including for like beating a woman badly.
Like, I don't know.
I assume he got some sort of like community service or some shit, but he didn't stop streaming.
Vitale like kept doing his thing.
And like, if you were to make, if someone were to make like a law against like nuisance,
causing a nuisance for content, it's just going to get used against like protesters and
shit.
None of these people are going to get punished by it, right?
Like, I don't think that that's, this is a problem that has to be solved to some extent socially by making this both unacceptable and thus unprofitable.
And I have no idea how to make that happen.
It's similar to like this, one of my most unpopular political opinions is that I think passing new laws to make, like, hate speech a felony, I know who they're going to target.
And it's not the people you think they're going to target.
Like, I know how that's going to get used.
I'm sorry.
They're going to decide that, like, calling somebody a Zionist is a slur.
And so they're going to apply it toward, it's not the people you think it's going to apply to.
Sure.
And it's like, I'm sorry.
I don't want to give the government that ability.
I don't trust, depending on what administration's in charge, I don't trust that it's going to.
No.
To the extent that I think there's any sort of like carceral or legal thing that would help, it's like, well, I guess if somebody personates a police officer, you should probably punish them.
If somebody beats a woman half to death on the street, you should probably punish them.
as opposed to letting them continue to make money online?
A lot of things come down to enforcing rules that we kind of already have.
It's just, again, certain people are always going to be very good at finding the gaps to slip through.
It's just that, you know, your society ideally has a way to handle sociopaths or amoral people who have just decided this is the only way they can make money.
And going to be frank, all the examples you used here.
If they weren't doing this, it's not like they would be brain surgeons.
No.
I'm thinking this is probably the maximum amount of money they could make.
I don't, not thinking they have other talents.
They're hiding from the world.
But yeah, it's, so this show just doesn't end with like a hopeful note at all, does it?
I don't really have anything hopeful to say about this, Jason.
My hopeful note is that you have a book coming out.
That's my hopeful note.
You do have a book coming out.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And these books.
Maybe if we all get back to books.
Yeah.
And these books are fun.
They're not about, by design, this is what I do to escape the real world.
Yeah.
I've got a neon crab behind me holding a little knife.
I know that only the video watchers can see it.
It is a great little crab.
You sent me a nice plastic crab that I have on my table, actually.
Oh, there we go.
Yeah.
Well, Jason, this has been a fun, depressing.
conversation about, I don't know, what kind of feels a little like a death spiral culturally.
I don't see this getting better before it gets worse.
Yeah, we'll see.
Trends come and go.
I'm sure you go back to the 1960s.
You'll find, you know, where are the serial killers gone?
They became mass shooters.
Like stuff comes and goes.
There's a brief period in the 60s when all these teenage girls decided that hitchhiking
was the best way to travel.
And a whole bunch of men were like, hey, that would be an easy way to kill 300 women.
And then, but what's the last famous serial killer you've heard of?
It's a thing that, you know, you adjust, people start to keep an eye out a little bit better.
They become a little bit more vigilant.
And this will get boring at some point, right?
Like, everything does.
Yeah, because the spectacle goes away because it's the, yeah, it's the hundredth time you've seen somebody run up and try to yell racial slurs at a bunch of construction workers.
It's like, okay, whatever, dude.
I guess that that is where I do.
feel some of the future danger comes is that as this does at some point start having diminishing
return, some of these guys will try way more extreme things, right, in order to, like, move
the needle.
And I don't think it'll, obviously, that never works in the long run.
But you're going to see, you're going to see some more Chud the builder like stories before
this is over, right?
That is definitely true, I think.
I got to say, I think it was on reels.
I saw somebody had made, like a very, because you can still kind of tell AI right now.
Not for much longer.
But they made a bad AI video of like it was in a gym and there was a woman with like a big butt.
And the guy ran up and like slapped her on the butt and she like turned around and yelled at him.
But it was all AI.
And I remember thinking, yeah, no real woman was slapped there.
There you go.
It's all just a bunch of pixels.
Yeah, yeah, it's depraved.
Yes, there's people watching it and it's making them worse people because they're like getting off on the idea.
You were just relieved it didn't happen to an actual woman.
Yeah.
Yeah, I was.
I get it.
I do wonder, maybe stuff like that will reduce somewhat the amount of both the profitability
of doing this for real and the number of people doing it.
Maybe we'll just transition to very off putting AI videos of pranks.
I guess that's optimistic.
That's the best I can offer you.
I'm so sorry, I realized that in a perfect world, that would not exist.
Yeah, we don't have a good episode ending here.
Yeah.
All right, everybody.
By Jason's book.
Jason's book. Also, there are no James Crabs in this book. I'm Jason K. Pardgeon on TikTok Reels,
YouTube, all of them, every platform that has video I'm on there. Find Jason's videos,
read Jason's books, and I don't know, don't become a nuisance streamer. Be nice to other people.
Touch grass. Where sunscreen. It is the saddest job I've ever heard of, I think, in my entire life.
This is the worst possible job, I think. I like it. I think. I like it. I think. I. I
I can't think of going in shouting slurs of people for donations.
I can't fathom.
Oh, yeah, this job, yes.
I wasn't talking about a podcaster being the worst possible job.
Seems weird, Jason.
No, yes, absolutely.
I agree.
Sorry.
This is a noble profession, what you're doing.
Yes, yes.
It's the only real job.
I often say this to surgeons.
Yeah.
You're proud to tell your grandparents that you do this.
That's right.
Yes, my brother, the oncologist.
I'm not joking.
See, that's a fake job.
I'm not sure.
The motherfucker
wants to cure cancer. It's so good.
It's crazy.
Hot cast.
All right.
We're done.
Behind the Bastards is a production of CoolZone Media.
For more from Cool Zone Media,
visit our website,
coolzonemedia.com,
or check us out on the IHeartRadio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
Full video episodes of Behind the Bastards
are now streaming on Netflix,
dropping every Tuesday and Thursday.
Hit Remind me on Netflix.
so you don't miss an episode.
For clips in our older episode catalog
continue to subscribe to our YouTube channel,
YouTube.com slash at Behind the Bastards.
We love about 40% of you, statistically speaking.
I'm Melissa Jeltson,
host of the What Happened to Her podcast.
We're kicking off the season
with the Sandra Birchmore story,
a case the police rode off
as a suicide in a snowstorm.
Her family never bought it,
and the man they suspected wore a badge.
You never know who that devil is.
because he's wearing in disguise.
Sometimes it's a police uniform.
And you can get access to all episodes 100% ad-free
with an I-Heart True Crime Plus subscription
exclusively on Apple Podcasts,
available only to IHeart True Crime Plus subscribers.
So don't wait.
Head to Apple Podcasts, search for I-Heart True Crime Plus,
and subscribe today.
How do you know that Claude won't become manipulative?
This is a constant worry.
And you can actually catch the model thinking, I think X is actually true, but I'm going to tell the user why.
I'm Walter Isaacson. On my new podcast, The Builders, I'm going inside the minds of the people shaping our future.
Listen to the Builders starting October 13th on the Iheart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Catch the latest Roland Martin Unfiltered Podcast.
Here's what you missed.
There should not be a single law enforcement agency.
It does not have body cameras.
It's real.
Black farmers have been under attack.
This is just the latest example of them just slapping DEI on anything.
It's raw.
And I'm sitting here going, they are playing y'all for fools.
Catch Roland Martin's daily commentary on the Black Information Network.
And download Roland Martin unfiltered on the IHart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
In 1986, a man named Scott Macklem was killed in broad daylight.
Police quickly found their suspect.
prosecutors convicted him. But now, almost 40 years later, I'm reexamining this case.
I really didn't believe any of it was real. And I was like, well, they're going to figure out this is not me. They're going to do their police job.
Has the wrong man been in prison this whole time? Listen to examined the backfire effect on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
On recent episodes of the Questlove show, I chatted with Jojo about her music and Wallow 267 about his
story, everything in between.
Don't invite me to karaoke. I'm going to
make it weird. Someone's going to try to sing,
leave it out, or too little, too late, or baby it's you.
Oh, no. And I'm going to be like,
okay, cool. Check out my
conversation with JoJo, Wilo 267,
and more on the Questlove show.
Listen to the Questlove show on the
Iheart radio app, Apple Podcast,
or wherever you get your podcast.
Peace.
This is an IHeart podcast.
Guaranteed Human.
