Behind the Bastards - Part Two: The Pol Pot Episodes: How A Nice, Quiet Kid Murdered His Country
Episode Date: April 30, 2025Robert continues the story with young Pol Pot's years in France where he and his friends radicalize themselves in what has to have been the deadliest book club of all time.See omnystudio.com/listener ...for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Oh, welcome back to Behind the Bastards, a podcast about really our first genocidal bastard
who is legitimately considered a nice guy, which is a nice writer to everybody.
That nice does not mean good.
Lots of nice people who are evil.
That is so true.
Oh, I was going to say, also a reminder of course,
you don't have to be an asshole to be the top of your field.
So. Yeah.
No, no, no.
You don't have to be an asshole to be the top of your field.
Yeah, Robert.
What?
I don't know.
Why are you saying that to me?
I'm still mad about last episode.
You're still mad about the fact that I wanna see
what Pol Pot looks like producing a podcast.
Yes.
What if we just put him on 16th minute for a week?
No, I would never replace Jamie Loftus.
Never.
Maybe Pol Pot and Jamie will find out
that they're like a Fleetwood Mac deal,
like just like perfect musical partners, you know?
Like just a historic talent match
You've you've watched that spring that that silver springs video one time. I've been watching the 1997 silver springs a million times
I know you have honestly what if pole pot had been in Fleetwood Mac, you know, could that have had could that have been good?
Almost certainly not Stevie Nicks would have come out on top just like
Is this good? Almost certainly not.
Stevie Nicks would have come out on top
just like she did in real life.
I'm just imagining pole pots sitting down
all a Fleetwood Mac and being like,
guys, this is way too toxic.
You need to learn how to have healthier
interpersonal boundaries.
I learned this one at my time at the temple.
Yeah, let me tell you.
So one time we were shooting 20,000 people to death
and I got angry at my friend.
It's not what it's about. Yeah, it's not what it's about. So one time we were shooting 20,000 people to death and I got angry at my friend.
It's not what it's about. Yeah, it's not what it's about.
Speaking of shooting 20,000 people to death,
our guest Andrew T. never did that.
Oh, my God.
No, I never did it.
I said he didn't.
He said, yeah.
I knew where he was going.
I can't prove he did.
I knew, no, you would know.
That's a thing. You would know.
That's a thing, yeah.
For one thing, that's 20,000 bullets.
That's not cheap these days, right?
Like you're talking several months even of LA rent,
you know? With tariffs.
Yeah, with the tariffs, my God.
Yeah, all that cheap Turkish ammo
is gonna be a lot more expensive.
So you're gonna have to shoot people
with homegrown American bullets, which, you know.
Anyway, Andrew, how are you doing today?
I'm okay.
I'm alive, I'm alive.
I'm alive.
Yeah, you're alive and we're talking about the Doge of Indochina, the Khmer Rouge, which
is not as far from the truth as it would be comforting for it to be.
It's closer to the truth than we want it to be, by a lot.
Something unexpected happened after Jeremy Scott confessed to killing Michelle Schofield in Bone Valley Season 1. Every time I hear about my dad, it's, oh, he's a killer. He's just straight evil.
I was becoming the bridge between Jeremy Scott and the son he'd never known.
At the end of the day, I'm literally a son of a killer. Listen to new episodes of Bone Valley Season 2
on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Soledad O'Brien.
And on my new true crime podcast, Murder on the Tow Path,
I'm taking you back to 1964, to the cold case of artist
Mary Pinchomire.
She had been shot twice in the head and in the back.
It turns out Mary was connected to a very powerful man.
I pledge you that we shall neither commit nor promote aggression.
John S. Kennedy. Listen to Murder on the Toe Path with Soledad O'Brien on the iHeartRadio app,
Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Specifically, we're talking about Salahzad, the man who would become Pol Pot, who at this point
is living in Paris, and he is a bon vivant whose purpose in life is to have a good time.
He's drinking the wine, he's reading lots of books, and he's not doing a whole lot of
radio technician school, which is why he is ostensibly in Paris in the first place.
He would later recall spending all of his spare money on French language books during
this period of time.
He is a real hound to the used bookstore crowd. He shows a particular
interest in the work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Rousseau is among other things, like the big idea
from Rousseau that seems to have left the primary mark on Sarr's psyche is this concept of the noble
savage, right? This almost idealized human that lives close to nature and hasn't been polluted by these concepts of modernity.
This is a big idea for Rousseau,
obviously influenced by European colonialism
in the Americas.
And it's going to have a big mark on Pol Pot.
He's not in the least bit interested in the Americas,
but there's this idea he starts to get in his head
of idealizing the Khmer peasantry,
who he was technically born into, but not really.
Like, you know?
Technically born just above.
Just above and immediately bounced
to go hang out with the royal family, right?
Right.
But he's really going to like,
and it's not just, he's not doing this in isolation.
They're all reading guys like Rousseau.
They're all getting involved
and knowledgeable of these French thinkers.
And so this would not,
he would have been having conversations
about these concepts with his friends at the time, right?
He also, one thing I learned in the interview he did
with Nate Thayer later in life,
and this is not in his earlier biographies,
they talk a lot, he reads Mao, he reads Stalin.
We'll talk about that.
He's also for a period of time,
really interested in Mahatma Gandhi.
Like he kind of keeps up obsessively
with the story of Gandhi
and the successful fight to decolonize India.
Not a Gandhi figure,
Povpot you could say,
but he's very, and it makes sense
that he's interested in it
because India is a colonized country
that throws off the shackles of its colonial oppressor
and that's what he's gonna wanna do, right?
He does reject the Gandhi route.
Well, you know, it's about that
that ends justifying the means, right?
This is where this goes, right?
And you know, here's the difference.
Pol Pot, I do think could have been a pretty good podcaster.
Gandhi, terrible podcaster.
Absolutely dog shit.
Could have had a YouTube channel.
Could have been pretty good on YouTube, you know?
He's more for Twitch.
Instead of freeing India,
he would have gotten really successful on Patreon
and then started- He's a Twitch guy.
Yeah, a Twitch streamer.
He'd be more on Twitch.
Gone be playing Gears of War,
but just refusing to shoot the whole time.
Yeah, doing the pacifist run of Cyberpunk 2077.
So much funnier than it should be.
So Pol Pot would later say of his time and the impact that all this reading had on him,
I started as a nationalist and then patriot and then I read progressive books.
Before that time, I had never read La Humanité the French Communist Party newspaper
It scared me but I got used to it because of the student movement
So he describes kind of being an initially frightened of like communism and some of these ideas
And I wonder how much of that has to do with the fact that very clearly his family and background is like
The enemy as often described in like a lot of communist writing right like people like him are not who you're
Messaging to primarily right
Like he is there's not much of a bourgeoisie in Cambodia, but he definitely is part of it right
Yeah, he's sort of like the yeah get him and, and then melting slowly out of the back of the
craft.
Yeah.
And he says that basically just the fact that it is so, not just among, by the way, when
we say the student movement, he's not just socializing with other Khmer, he's socializing
with a lot of young French radicals, right?
And so he just kind of through immersion gets more comfortable with socialism and then communism.
But he was also very engaged with the non-educational opportunities afforded to him, including a
free work trip to war ravaged Yugoslavia.
Now, he actually had two different options for a vacation during this first year that
he's in France.
One was a month long backpacking trip in Switzerland, which costs $70.
And boy, if I could get that deal today, I'd be gone in a fucking heartbeat.
But that is a lot of money for the time
and he has no money, right?
So he picks a labor trip to go help rebuild Yugoslavia
which had just become a thing.
If you think about Yugoslavia is the Balkans.
It's the Balkans all being a state
that's an independent state for basically the first time.
And it's like the least governable territory on earth
is finally being governed by a guy, but it's all the least governable territory on earth is finally
being governed by a guy, but it's all been blown to fuck by World War II.
So you can come here for free and we'll kind of feed you even though we don't have much
food, but it'll be free if you help rebuild.
And so that's what he does, right?
This was not a political thing.
He doesn't go to Yugoslavia because they're communist.
He later wrote, I didn't have money, so I couldn't do as the others and go to Geneva
or to the sea or to the mountains and have a holiday there.
A group of us poorer students went instead to Zagreb.
Now, this is a seminal moment for Salah Tsar.
Tito, who is the dictator of Yugoslavia, was a communist who had fought as an insurgent
against the Nazis.
Tito, we'll talk about him one day.
He's one of these guys where I can't say he's not a bastard
because he's a dictator.
He does some bad stuff.
He's also like the best case scenario for a dictator.
If you're gonna live under a dictator in the 20th century,
you fucking want it to be Tito, right?
He does know what he's doing, which is extremely rare.
And he's also legitimately like the hardest son of a bitch alive in his day.
Like he fights the Nazis.
And then my favorite Tito story, because he breaks away from the USSR, because Stalin
obviously wants Yugoslavia to basically be an extension of the USSR.
And Tito was like, yeah, the Balkans have had enough being other people's property.
We're going to be the bulk.
You know, we're going to be our own thing for a while.
And Stalin keeps sending guys to kill him.
And finally, Stalin, or Tito sends back,
I think it's a piece of one of the assassins
with a note that's like,
you can keep sending guys and I'll keep killing them.
But if you do, I'm gonna send one guy
and you're not gonna send him back, right?
Like he's gonna get you, right?
Right, right.
Like Tito is legitimately one of the scariest dudes
who ever lived and also shockingly competent
at what he does because like Yugoslavia collapses
immediately after his death into a hideous civil war, right?
But it's like the only time the Balkans
is a unified peaceful thing more or less
while Tito's in charge.
And again, he has a police state.
He's not a nice man, but you can't help but be like,
well, shit, that motherfucker knew what he was doing, right?
Good at his job at least.
He's like Tom Cruise, right?
I'm not gonna say Tom Cruise is a good man,
but the son of a bitch loves cinema, right?
I'm definitely not going to say Tom Cruise is a good man.
And he cares about COVID policy.
Look, Sophie, beggars can't be choosers anymore.
I don't like that man.
No, no, no, but he's the Tito of movies.
We can all agree on that.
I think that's a fair way to look at him.
Yeah, yeah.
Sure.
This is good, this is good.
Historians will agree with me.
He's the Stannis Baratheon of Earth.
Yes, yes, he's our Stannis. Yes.
Perfect.
These are all Stannis, except for Stannis again loses. Tito never fucking does.
Right.
So at this point though, Tito is in charge. And the Soviet Union really doesn't like that like
young kind of socialist leftclined kids in France
because the Communist Party still does try to, and to a degree, exercises a lot of control
over these national Western Communist parties and Paris and stuff.
They think that Tito was a traitor to the cause, right?
And so there's an effort among French socialists to discourage young people from volunteering
in Yugoslavia, but for whatever reason, Tsar does not get the memo or he just doesn't give
a shit.
So, he goes, Saloth and a bunch of his friends, they go in there.
At this point, the whole population of Yugoslavia is basically organized into these massive
labor brigades that are rebuilding the part of the country that had been ruined in the
war, which was all of the country that had been ruined in the war, which was all of the country. The world, it's the least covered theater of war
in World War II.
The shit that went on in the Balkans in World War II
is nuts by Eastern front standards.
Like there were like SS guys who tried to go to the East
because the Balkans was so fucked up.
Like I cannot exaggerate how bad World War II
was for the Balkans.
Tsar's particular crew helped to rebuild a motorway
and the impression he took away from the experience
was stirring, this powerful sensation of being engaged
in a great real-time task of building a modern nation
from the ground up, using only the raw human material of its populace.
As Pol Pot, years later, he was emphatic
that he had no political interest in planning the trip.
It was purely for pleasure,
but the experience left an impact anyway.
Short quotes from one of his friends at the time
who wrote about the experience highlights kind of the impact
we can assume this probably had on Pol Pot.
Quote, everywhere, this guy wrote, the people's federal Republic of Yugoslavia resembles an
enormous work site where factories, roads, railways, and hydraulic centers are being
built.
This effort is also worthy of praise because strength of all the people united around their
leaders gives them the chance of gaining successive victories, knowing that it is a question of
national survival.
And the post-war rebuilding of Yugoslavia
has a lot of successes, right?
Now, obviously there's more to it
than just throwing together huge work gangs,
and that's kind of gonna be lost
on Salah Sar and his comrades, right?
But this idea of mobilizing a nation
to remake a country from the ground up,
and that's very much what it would have,
that's not accurate to literally what was going on in Yugoslavia,
but that's accurate to what they would have been aware of as foreigners coming in.
That leaves a mark.
And they were at the that they were at the forefront of seeing the that action. Yes.
Salat Saar and his friends, as I said,
represented a sizable chunk of the entire educated adult Khmer
population at this point in time. Right. But due to the isolation of Cambodiaable chunk of the entire educated adult Khmer population at this point in time, right?
But due to the isolation of Cambodia and some of the cultural realities inherent to having
your education conducted entirely in a second language, most of these guys arrive in Paris
with no real understanding of Marxism or communism, and they never get a very good—these guys
are not what a Marxist today would call super educated Marxists in that
a lot of them are kind of bored of Marx and a lot of them are like, in part because like,
I don't really get this.
This is not, this has like been translated several times.
Marx is not the communist who speaks to them the most, right?
And that's not primarily what they're going to base.
Stalin and Mao are going to be the communist writers who have the biggest direct impact
on this crew, right? base. Stalin and Mao are going to be the communist writers who have the biggest direct impact on
this crew, right? So after getting back from Yugoslavia, Tsar increasingly falls in with
his friend, Yang Tsarie, and Tsarie's friends. And these guys are better students. They're at
more prestigious schools, getting more prestigious degrees and like the humanities and stuff.
Tsarie introduced Tsar to a guy named King von Sack, who was one of the most, probably the most senior Khmer student in France.
He'd been there the longest.
At 25, he is the old man of the Cambodian expat community, right?
And Van Sak was, as a result, one of the executive committee members of the student union.
So there's like this Khmer student union that he is helping to run.
And the way the organization works is you've got this central union
and then there's a bunch of what are called circles.
And each circle is a kind of,
additionally at least,
there's not really a hierarchy in each circle.
It's a student discussion group
based around a specific topic.
So you might have a circle for the kids
who are doing radio stuff
or a circle for the kids who are into French literature,
a circle for the poetry students, right?
And you kind of like meet ad hoc and you do, you know, stuff that way.
These are, I think the best, these are the analog version of how things get done today
for most young people, right?
Imagine this is a bunch of different signal loops or discourse, right?
Right.
That's what these are, except for you have to like meet up in person, right?
Oh, but yeah.
But that's basically what's happening here. So a month or so after meeting Tsar, Vansak convened a private gathering to create a new
circle dedicated to discussing Cambodia's future.
By this point, the Viet Minh were escalating their war for independence against the French.
And there was widespread interest in what this might mean for Cambodians.
And also because the Viet Minh are communist and because Mao has just announced the start of the People's Republic.
All these guys are being like, shit, you know, there might be this whole like global communist
uprising that we could be a part of that could like free us from the shackles of French domination
while still like being a part of this greater international community.
And that sounds kind of dope, right?
It is so funny to actually hear like the other side of domino theory.
Yeah, and it's interesting because the correct,
like the thing about domino theory
that was kind of accurate is that other people
in other countries in Asia were influenced
by communism taking off in Vietnam and China,
and it made them think about the things that were possible.
The thing that we're wrong about is that all of these guys,
as soon as they're in power,
wind up primarily hating other countries near them,
including communist countries, right?
It's how like, oh God, obviously communist China
and the USSR are gonna form a unified bloc.
Oh no, they nearly nuked each other.
They're literally shooting each other on the border.
China is inviting Nixon over
because of how pissed they are at the Soviet Union, right?
Like, all of this shit is very wrong in that regard.
If you knew anything about the left,
you'd knew that the left was never gonna get along
with each other.
Like.
I mean, that's the whole problem.
They don't, they know nothing about the left.
No.
So, Van Sachs starts this circle,
which is initially about like the future of Cambodia
and maybe independence.
And they start talking about Marxist communism a lot too.
Yang Sary attends as does a number
of future influential Khmer politicians,
including Salah Tsar.
So they're beginning to talk more about communism.
And again, mostly focused around Mao and Ho Chi Minh.
In January of 1950,
China became the first country to recognize North Vietnam,
which was still a couple of decades away
from just being Vietnam.
The USSR followed and this prompted an equal
but opposite reaction from the US
and her capitalist allies,
who then turn recognize Cambodia, Laos and South Vietnam
as part of the so-called French Union.
Maybe not the wisest move.
Yeah.
All these guys wanna be independent
and that seems to be a big part of the appeal of communism
is getting a pen, let's recognize them as part of France.
That'll stop this, nip this in the bud.
Oh God, classic I guess.
Yeah, so everyone in the area
is increasingly prodded to choose sides.
Thailand, for example, picks the US, right?
In part because the US is like, we
will give you guys so many fucking guns. So many fucking guns. France controls the union
for a while. And Vietnamese leaders as a result see a strategic benefit in starting to seed
allied communist movements in these neighboring countries, right? Because these places are
part of the French Union, these Vietnameseiet Minh leaders are like, okay,
so we should start sending some like cadre leaders to Cambodia and Laos, maybe with some
weapons and see if we can start making local communist movements in the imitation of the
Viet Minh so that they can start their own uprisings, which will overall help us in our
goal and just getting the fucking French out of this goddamn place, right?
So from the outset of this, the Vietnamese communists coming into Cambodia and trying
to start their own communist organizations, it was understood by the Vietnamese that Cambodians
were incapable of generating their own autonomous communist party as Vietnam had.
There was no proletariat, right? Which is the Marxist idea is that is where a communist movement comes from, right?
Everyone is the peasantry basically within Cambodia.
That means there's no base of education or convenient way to reach and organize large
numbers of Khmer in any reasonable timeframe.
A decision is made, these are their conclusions, And by the way, they're not going to prove broadly accurate, but this is how the Vietnamese
are thinking.
And this is a very chauvinistic, paternalistic attitude, which is exactly how everyone in
Cambodia feels about the Vietnamese.
They're arrogant, they don't think we're really people and they don't listen to us.
And the Vietnamese are like, well, yeah, we can't let these people make any decisions.
Right?
Like, so this is, they're not wrong.
Right? History never changes is is, they're not wrong. Right?
History never changes is the important thing.
Yeah.
Oh, God.
People are always the biggest dicks to their neighbors.
So a decision is made that these Vietnamese leaders are going to build communism in Cambodia
from the top down, which is not how it generally works.
The Khmer National United Front is the result.
This organization was patterned off of the Viet Minh,
but it had some local characteristics,
including an embrace of the King,
who it argued must be liberated from French territory.
And that doesn't really fit
with traditional communist ideology, right?
The fact that we actually love the King,
but the King is super fucking popular
with the regular people of Cambodia, right?
And so this is one of the wiser things.
The Vietnamese are like, well, we can't just like
shit talk the king because they will immediately
stop listening to us.
We have to do this thing.
And they're kind of, I think, recognizing a lot
of what people said about the czar pre-revolution
and even Hitler where it's like, well, he must not know
about all the shitty stuff his dudes are doing, right?
And so I think the Vietnamese are like,
let's just say the king's really good and the French are the ones making him make that, dudes are doing, right? And so I think the Vietnamese are like, let's just say the King's really good
and the French are the ones making him make bad,
making things suck, right?
Fuck it, right?
Like, this doesn't hurt us.
The first Khmer Vietnamese Communist Party member,
Nguyen Thanh Song, was put in charge of this party in May,
and he issues a proclamation of independence
that means absolutely nothing at the time
because they control no real territory.
There is an actual Cambodian Communist Party started a year later.
This is eventually going to be the Khmer Rouge, but it's not right now.
Vietnamese fighters liberate a few small border areas and again because there's a lot of
strategic benefit in them having this area to like to, and to hold supplies and stuff.
They set up in these areas, they quote unquote liberate a system that imitates the Viet Minh
People's Committees that are run by Vietnamese revolutionaries.
Every decision made by Cambodian assemblies and committees in these territories has to
be approved by the Vietnamese.
You cannot join the Cambodian Communist Party without Vietnamese approval,
right? So this is very centralized and very much not something in which the Cambodians
have a lot of say, even though it's their communist organization.
A lot of Khmer nationalists do not like this. And a lot of Khmer who are budding communists
are like, all right, like I agree with the basic idea, but like, why the fuck are we
listening to these goddamn Vietnamese people, right?
Like, why do they get to be in charge
of our communist revolution?
We're Khmer, right?
Like, Salatzar and his comrades know very little
about what's going on in this regard at the time.
According to Van Sachs, Zar spent quote,
most of his time reading or going out to the movies,
very relatable.
But then he falls in love with a history of
the French Revolution, which he reads cover to cover, even though his French isn't great.
And he admits, I didn't get a lot of it, but I felt compelled to read through it. Right?
And there are a few things that really stick in his mind. Right? One of them is the concept
of a revolution as a historical reset. As in, once you succeed in a revolution means you can make a, you can break history, right?
Right.
In 1792, the French revolutionaries had instituted a new calendar, right?
And this was them attempting to be like, the past is done.
We are never going back.
This is a totally new world that we are creating and a new kind of human being that we are creating in this new world and obviously
Napoleon comes around not that long later. They didn't create a new world, right?
Like no one no one creates a new man people will always be people this this ideology that you can like we're fundamentally broken with
The past things will never go back things will never change
We have heralded in a new world and it's always going to be this way.
Everyone who thinks that is always wrong. Change is the only guaranteed constant. You can't stop it.
But that's the idea that some of these French revolutionaries have and that's the idea Saar comes away with, right?
And one big thing he takes away from the history is that what doomed the French Revolution is that it didn't go all the way.
It didn't tear down every structure of the previous old world.
It kept too much alive from the old days of the king, and that's why it eventually failed.
So you do want to have a total break with the past.
A revolution should be that, but you have to destroy absolutely everything that had
existed previously.
Right.
And this is a common, he's not coming up to this on his own.
This is a lot of stuff that he and his circle are talking about.
This is their, they are more influenced in a lot of ways by the French revolution than
what's happening in Vietnam because they're in France, right?
Right.
They're studying in French schools, you know?
Now over the course of 1951, the circle Vansack had started turned into a Marxist circle,
which itself began to exert direct control on the rest of the student union.
And they kind of turned the student union into a stealth communist vanguard party, right?
Like that's the goal.
And they're executing, they're kind of secretly planning it from the circle, but exerting
control over the other circles in order to get them in line, right?
In his book on Pol Pot, Brother Number One, Chandler writes,
recollections about Salahzad's behavior at the meetings are contradictory.
In several interviews in the 1980s, after Pol Pot had been identified as Salahzad, King
Van Sak recalled that Saar attended irregularly, kept in the background, and made little impression
on his colleagues.
In 1975 to 76, an unnamed source spoke with journalist Francois Deborah.
The source who had attended the discussion groups remember that Salahzad was the most
intelligent, the most convinced, the most intransigent.
It was he who animated the debates and most impressed the newcomers.
Now there's some evidence that this unnamed source mixed up Pol Pot with a different kid
and was actually talking about someone else. We really don't know.
The guy, Deborah basically claims that this dude he talked to stated that like,
I knew immediately this guy was going to wind up leading the Communist Party in Cambodia.
And that Pol Pot even said at the meeting, I will direct the revolutionary organization.
I will be its secretary general. I will hold the dossiers.
I will control the ministers.
And I will see to it that they don't deviate
from the line fixed in the people's interests
by the central committee.
I don't think this is likely.
I'm bringing it up because it's one of the reports.
Most of the people who survived from these days were like,
yeah, he was like a part of it.
He was there, he was engaged.
He was pretty quiet.
He like, he was always happy to do work and like help,
but he wasn't a big-
The guy.
That reminds me of a lot of guys.
We talk about Ceausescu, who,
if there's ever a guy in your revolutionary organization
who's really quiet, really friendly,
and always willing to do bullshit work,
you need to kill that man immediately,
because he's going to murder all of you and take power
once the revolution's over.
That's the way these things go right yeah speaking of
murder instead of killing anyone no kill your wallets with these products
something unexpected happened after Jeremy Scott confessed to killing Michelle Schofield in Bone
Valley Season 1. I just knew him as a kid. Long silent voices from his past came forward. And he
was just staring at me. And they had secrets of their own to share. Um, Gilbert King? I'm the son of
Jeremy Lynn Scott.
I was no longer just telling
the story. I was part
of it. Every time I hear about my dad
is, oh, he's a killer. He's just
straight evil. I was becoming
the bridge between a killer
and the son he'd never known.
If the cops and everything would have done their job properly,
my dad would have been in jail.
I would have never existed.
I never expected to find myself in this place.
Now, I need to tell you how I got here.
At the end of the day, I'm literally a son of a killer.
Bone Valley, season two.
Jeremy.
Jeremy, I want to tell you something.
Listen to new episodes of Bone Valley, season two, iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
And to hear the entire new season ad-free with exclusive content, subscribe to Lava
for Good Plus on Apple Podcasts.
I'm Soledad O'Brien, and on my podcast, Murder on the Towpath, I'm taking you back to the
1960s.
Mary Pinchot-Meyer was a painter
who lived in Georgetown in Washington, D.C.
Every day, she took a daily walk along a towpath
near the E&O Canal.
So when she was killed in a wealthy neighborhood...
She had been shot twice in the head
and in the back, behind the heart.
The police arrived in a heartbeat.
Within 40 minutes, a man named Raymond Crump Jr. was arrested.
He was found nearby, soaking wet, and he was black.
Only one woman dared defend him, civil rights lawyer Dovey Roundtree.
Join me as we unravel this story with a crazy twist
because what most people didn't know
is that Mary was connected to a very powerful man.
I pledge you that we shall neither commit
nor provoke aggression.
John F. Kennedy.
Listen to Murder on the Toe Path with Soledad O'Brien
on the iHeartRadio
app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Oh, and we are returned back. So yeah, most of the accounts of Sarr during this period,
again, he's a quiet, friendly,
easygoing dude.
But as short notes, Philip short notes in his book on Pol Pot, Tsar did start reading
a lot of Stalin around this time.
And that's because he in a circle, there's a lot of Stalin going around.
Particularly there's a history of the Communist Party in Russia that Stalin wrote, right?
And this is, it's a Stalin book, right?
So we could assume, like there's a couple of things you can just infer even if you haven't
read it.
It's very paranoid.
It is very focused on the internal enemies, right?
His history of the Russian is very focused on the need to, like how necessary it was
for him to get rid of internal enemies within the party who were counter-revolutionary, right? Who were dangers to the success of the revolution because he was Joseph Stalin, right?
Right. And the fact that this book is seen as like very inspirational to Salah Sarr and a lot of his
young... Not great. Not getting in well. Not getting in well. Now, Sarr also becomes very
acquainted with Mao's writings, which are the most directly relevant both to the kind of communism he's going to preach and to the kind of war he's
going to orchestrate.
Because Mao, unlike Stalin and unlike a lot of other communists, Mao runs a peasant insurgency,
right?
Because that's how things go in China, right?
It is a peasant uprising, you know, in a lot of ways.
That's a big part of what's going on.
And so Mao was really relevant for what
Sao Lhasa is going to be doing
in not too long from now, right?
And there's also a lot that Mao writes about,
theorizing about how to remake a society from the bottom up.
And as we know from the great leap forward,
not always a great idea.
Maybe backyards shouldn't be where we make steel, you know?
Maybe factories are better for that.
I don't know.
You know?
Maybe we need sparrows.
I don't know.
You know?
I mean, your big society where we're making ideas
tend not to be good.
No, it's, yeah.
It's like what we're trying to do now.
Like what if we get rid of everyone who researches
how to stop diseases and instead make them build iPhones?
Feel like we're all gonna have a lot stop diseases and instead make them build iPhones?
Feel like we're all gonna have a lot more diseases
and probably less iPhones.
Which might work out for us.
Maybe the less iPhones will eventually lead us back
to having people who learn how to cure diseases.
That'll be the silver lining,
but we don't cash that in for a couple of decades.
Yeah, it's gonna take a little while.
So in late 1951, there was a huge Marxist gathering
in East Berlin.
It's like this big burning man for Marxists in the 50s.
Tsar does not attend,
but several of his Khmer comrades do.
And for the very first time,
they meet with this Marxist group
and they are told about the establishment
of the Khmer communist resistance
in Cambodia.
Right?
So this is the first time and they bring this back to their circle.
So now everyone knows there is a communist movement in Cambodia that is organizing and
arming and they've taken some territory even.
Right?
So for a year or so after this point, these kids are going to continue reading books and
discussing their ideas and making plans for how they're going to get involved in the revolution.
That becomes the focus.
Now we know it started.
We are the educated, you know, Khmer.
We need to figure out how we're going to help direct and lead this, right?
Now what we've got here is a group of people who are isolated within Paris because they're
Khmer.
French is not their first language. They're even isolated from a lot of their fellow Khmer Paris because they're Khmer, French is not their first language.
They're even isolated from a lot of their fellow Khmer students because they see themselves
as in charge of radicalizing them and directing them.
They see themselves as engaged in a dangerous clandestine effort.
They're isolated socially and they're all constantly talking about their beliefs and
reading radical politics.
The same thing happens to them that happens to similar groups of people on, let's say,
Twitter, which is that they make each other more and more extreme and less and less rational.
They're only going to get crazier.
One thing that a lot of them, including Sara, become obsessed with is this idea that will
eventually become known as year zero, which is the concept that we can, with a revolution, force a clean break
with history that creates a new kind of human.
This is not limited to Cambodian communists.
This is not limited to communists because there's some, you can find some stuff that
the Nazis were talking about that's not all that different, but there's this concept of
the new Soviet man that's less eugenic for the communists. But like there's this idea that if we remake society
radically enough and break what had existed radically enough,
we can make fundamentally different people that way.
And-
It really is like,
these people just simply cannot hear themselves.
Well, it's, look, I think everyone believes a degree of this, which is one of the reasons why
nobody should ever get the power to try, right?
Yes, yes, yes, yes.
Like when I'm watching Star Trek.
If we just did it my way.
Yeah.
Yeah.
When I, when I and others watch Star Trek
and are like, oh, what if we could be like that?
You're not not thinking people can be radically remade.
And I'm not saying I don't think people can be made better,
but it doesn't happen like
this.
It happens very slowly and carefully.
And if you want them to add, if you want to actually improve the quality of people, you
improve their quality of life and you don't do that by shattering everything that makes
it possible for them to survive at the jump.
Right?
Right.
It's people can get better both as individuals and as societies.
But the most important thing is not to kill them all.
While you're doing that.
The means create a different end than you think.
Yes, yes.
And these, this is going to,
like the idea that's going to be like particularly prevalent
is that like, because of the danger of Vietnam, we're going to have
to do this very quickly.
Once we get independence, we have to remake ourselves into a society that can withstand
our foreign aggressors as quickly as possible.
In a paper on the subject, historian Andres Ayers writes, Maoism also provided the Khmer
Rouge with an activist perspective on history, something that sheds considerable light upon their own year zero.
This activist perspective, as opposed to the orthodox Marxist representation of history
as a rational process of necessary advances, emphasized human will and the triumph of determination
over material conditions.
Put differently, not so much learning from history as overcoming it, diverting history
in the right direction, as it were were by means of superior will and resolution.
The French Revolution, as already noted, had met with failure by stopping halfway.
Yet even Mao, argued Qishan Fan, the movement's chief theoretician, had not been radical enough
to overcome history by definitively abolishing private property, the family, received knowledge
and traditional teaching."
So again, this is where we see the real dangerous thing is there's like number one, you're definitively abolishing private property, the family, received knowledge and traditional teaching.
So again, this is where we see like the real dangerous thing
is there's like, number one,
you're never gonna learn from history.
It's like, no, we're going to transcend it.
Not possible.
No one ever has.
And you really should pay attention to the shit
people try to do in the history.
Like for example, every time in the past
when someone's decided, I, a guy who's never farmed
is going to remake how my entire country grows food.
That only ends one way,
and it's with everyone starving to death, right?
Yeah, yeah.
Whether it's the fucking East India Company
governing in Bengal,
whether it's fucking Lysenkoism in the Soviet Union in China,
it always ends in mass starvation, don't do it.
I mean, listen, we're on the A side of this you know guys that don't know what the fuck they're talking about
Deciding how social security should be
Distributed yeah, we can fix all this because I'm good at video games. Yeah, it's it's fucking every people a lot of people
This is a very attractive thing to think that you can do right? Yeah
this is a very attractive thing to think that you can do.
So for Semphan, who's again, he's one of Pol Pot's peers in this period of time,
and he's like kind of the chief theoretician
of what becomes the Khmer Rouge,
the task of making communism a reality
entail an ideological zero point,
zero for him and zero for you.
That is true equality.
And this is zeroing in the sense
that you like zero a rifle. We is true equality. Right? And this is zeroing in the sense that you
like zero a rifle, right? We're zeroing to a point where everyone is in the same place
and then we can build up. Right? Now, to be clear, these conclusions I just related aren't
all fully sketched out during the years they're in Paris, right? But this is, they start on
that road in Paris and as these guys filter back into Cambodia, they're going to continue working to that point, right? Paris starts the process
that ends in the ideology of what we now know as the Khmer Rouge.
As things actually stood in 1952, Tsar and his comrades were committed communists, but not
particularly well-read ones. And his writings from this period don't sound like what you would get
from an avowed Marxist.
In fact, one of the weird things is that Pol Pot's first political obsession seems to be
with democracy, which he called, quote, incomparable and as beautiful as a diamond.
And democracy and communism in his eyes are very, not just compatible, they're the same
thing and they're the same thing in that they stand in opposition to the monarchy.
He published his first political article, the first thing we know he wrote was called
Monarchy or Democracy. And it was a strident argument against the king in favor of a democratic
system. And he gives examples of democratic systems that Cambodia should be made in the image of. And
his examples are China, France, and the USSR. All classically democracies.
Well, when you've been looking at a king,
you know, everything looks like democracy to you.
Comparatively, right?
And his actual knowledge of what's going on in China
and the USSR, and to be honest,
like France is not perfect, right?
But this is how he's thinking at the time.
So while they're reading and talking,
events back home have continued to evolve.
Sun Nokhthan, the nationalist leader, got allowed back into Cambodia by the king in
the hope that he could be used as a figurehead, right?
The king is like, I think that, you know, there's a lot to say of this nationalist thing
because maybe that's going to work out better for me, you know, having more power as the
king.
So I'll bring this guy in who was popular,
after the Japanese got kicked out.
But Than is a very smart guy who really believes
in something and he realizes the king's just using me.
So he fucks off into the jungle to fight with the guerrillas.
And again, he's not an ideologue.
His goal was to unite the communists
and the nationalists of other stripes
into a broad anti-French coalition.
Right?
Again, he's a, let's get our independence from these fuckers and then I don't care.
We'll figure it out.
Whatever works, we'll do.
Right.
You know?
King Sahanak responded like the big 10 theory of getting our freedom.
Yeah.
So Sahanak responds by carrying out a coup against the Democratic Party when it wins
the elections that year and backed by the French, he sets him up as the absolute ruler.
The French begin conducting pacification campaigns against the Viet Minh and Thanh's
rebels who had not yet managed to agree on the whole coalition thing.
The circle back in Paris only learned what was going on in snatches of brief conflicted
reports.
It was unclear which groups were doing what and who was who and who this circle
of educated young communist radicals could support, right?
It's very hard for them to tell who's actually fighting,
what do they actually hold, you know?
They don't have great info.
It's not like they can look at like the telegram chats
for these different groups in the jungle, right?
Like they have very little opportunity.
Or the telegram telegrams.
Or even the telegram telegrams, but with even the telegram telegrams, right?
so they're like we need on-the-ground intelligence one of us needs to go there and figure out who we should be backing and
Salah Tsar this is really the first time he identifies himself as special and not just another dude sitting around bullshitting
It's like okay
Right and let that be a lesson to you kids.
If you want to one day kill a third of the people
in your country, you gotta start by volunteering.
No one ever got anywhere sitting on their butt.
Get out, be active, starve your entire country to death.
I probably bad things to encourage people to do.
Get out there in the community, you know, make a difference.
Make a difference, he made a difference.
You can't say Pol Pot didn't make a difference.
He left a very different Cambodia.
Yeah, the make a difference part of just get involved,
really, I feel like the public messaging,
we should be concentrated more on the direction
you make a difference.
That is one of like my big issues with like,
a lot of the stuff we were raised with as kids
in like the nineties and early 2000s,
is like, anyone can make a difference.
That's true.
We should have higher standards than just difference.
Different.
Yeah, I can leave ground beef out overnight
and it's different, but that doesn't mean it's better.
Speaking of rancid ground beef, here's our sponsors.
Something unexpected happened after Jeremy Scott
confessed to killing Michelle Schofield
in Bone Valley season one.
I just knew him as a kid.
Long silent voices from his past came forward.
And he was just staring at me.
And they had secrets of their own to share.
Gilbert King, I'm the son of Jeremy Lynn Scott.
I was no longer just telling the story.
I was part of it.
Every time I hear about my dad,
it's, oh, he's a killer, he's just straight evil.
I was becoming the bridge between a killer
and the son he'd never known.
If the cops and everything would have done their job
properly, my dad would have been in jail.
I would have never existed.
I never expected to find myself in this place.
Now, I need to tell you how I got here.
At the end of the day, I'm literally a son of a killer.
Bone Valley Season 2, Jeremy.
Jeremy, I want to tell you something.
Listen to new episodes of Bone Valley Season 2 on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
And to hear the entire new season ad-free with exclusive content, subscribe to Lava
for Good Plus on Apple podcasts.
I'm Soledad O'Brien and on my podcast, Murder on the Towpath, I'm taking you back to the
1960s. Mary Pinchot Meyer was a painter who lived in Georgetown in Washington, DC. Every
day she took a daily walk along the towpath near the E&O canal.
So when she was killed in a wealthy neighborhood...
She had been shot twice in the head and in the back, behind the heart.
The police arrived in a heartbeat.
Within 40 minutes, a man named Raymond Crump Jr. was arrested.
He was found nearby, soaking wet, and he was black. Only one woman dared defend him.
Civil rights lawyer, Dubby Roundtree. Join me as we unravel this story with a crazy twist,
because what most people didn't know is that Mary was connected to a very powerful man.
I pledge you that we shall neither commit
nor provoke aggression.
John F. Kennedy.
Listen to Murder on the Toe Path with Soledad O'Brien
on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Oh boy, howdy.
We are back and we're talking about eating
rancid ground beef because look,
the FDA is no longer gonna be,
you know, Andrew, it's actually good that you're back
because you're the person I first told on the air
my story about eating dozens and dozens of rancid muscles
at a Vegas buffet and getting horribly ill with my friend
in a muscle-leading competition.
Forgot about that.
Yeah, well, who's the smart one now?
Who's getting ready for the RFK Junior future now, baby?
It's me. Yeah.
Yeah, I got an iron stomach.
I don't care how bad our food gets.
You know you can live through it, we don't.
Uh-huh, uh-huh.
I was molded by this, you know?
Yeah.
I've had Giardia.
I don't give a fuck anymore.
A lot of kids are gonna die.
Anyway, back to the podcast.
Jesus Christ, Robert.
It's important to note that Salazar's back,
part of the reason why,
you know, he volunteers to go travel back home
and make contact.
And part of why everyone agrees he's a good guy to do it
is he's got the contacts, the whitest is he's got the whiteest breadth of contacts
because his dad is a farmer.
He did grow up in a rural villages.
He knows rural people.
He's able to talk to rural Khmer people.
He also was able to talk to urban people.
He was educated in the city,
but he also spent a lot of time in the palace
so he can talk to that chunk of the population.
He's really good at talking to everybody, right?
Like that's a big thing.
He's charismatic and he's charismatic in the way
that matters, which means he can within seconds
of meeting someone new, figure out the best way
to communicate with them, right?
Like that's the kind of skill that he has
and you can't teach that.
It almost, you can't learn it after a certain point
in your life.
It really is just a product of during your formative years running into enough different
kinds of people that you can get very good at that.
And Salath Sar has that ability.
And I think that's why everything else that happens to him happens to him.
So on December 15th, 1952, Salath Sar left Paris just as things in Cambodia reached a
boil.
Several assassinations and grenade attacks in the provinces provided the pretext for
King Sahanak to announce a rule by decree and the suspension of civil liberties.
His French backers expressed their hope that Cambodia's pacification will make continued
progress.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I think that's going to work out great for you guys.
So decades later, Pol Pot would claim that his real political awakening came not as a
result of anything that had happened in the reading circle in Paris, but what he experienced
after he returned home to Cambodia during this tumultuous period.
And I want to quote from an article by journalist Nate Thayer here.
Before I went to France, my relatives, they lived comfortably.
They were middle peasants. When I came back, I went to my village by bus. When I got off the bus, my relatives, they lived comfortably. They were middle peasants.
When I came back, I went to my village by bus.
When I got off the bus, I met someone with a wagon.
He asked my name and he said, ah, you've come back.
And I look at him and see he's my uncle.
And he asks me, do you want to go home?
I was shocked.
Before he had a piece of land and a buffalo.
Now he had become a rickshaw puller.
I met and talked with the relatives who used to have land and buffaloes and had nothing
now. What influenced me most was the actual situation in Cambodia." I don't
think that's untrue, but it does make me think of that is not a... I reckoned with the suffering
of the common man and it allowed me to realize that I had grown up in a privileged position.
That is my family was supposed to be doing better than this and they're not, which is
really familiar to like modern conservative radicalism in a lot of ways.
I find that interesting.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's the me of it, not the like us of it.
Right.
And it also is worth noting in terms of how accurate is this to what really radicalized
him.
This is Pol Pot near the end of his life in the late 90s talking to journalist Nate Thayer, who also, by the
way, passed pretty recently about a year and a half ago.
Interesting guy, but a really groundbreaking, he was the only guy who got in to do this,
right?
So we'll be quoting from Nate quite a bit here.
Over the next eight years, Tsar is often in the provinces.
He's moving around, he's connecting these different groups
as the rebellion against the king and then the prince,
Seehanuk, goes through several stages.
The Red Khmer or Khmer Rouge proved to be the most resilient
of kind of the different nationalist rebel groups
against the repeated pacification campaigns.
Salat Tsar rose through the ranks for the same reason.
He was hard to fucking kill.
And he was hard to kill because from the beginning,
he's really, he's the first of the guys in his circle
who's like, well, I'm not gonna ever go by my real name.
I'm gonna start, like from that first article he writes,
he picks a fake name and he picks fake names
as he's doing this on the groundwork,
meeting these rebels. He doesn't call himself Salat Sar. Pol he's doing this on the groundwork, meeting these rebels.
He doesn't call himself Salah Tsar.
Pol Pot's one of the names he uses, but he has a couple of different nicknames.
We'll go over them later.
This means he's anonymous and he's good at being anonymous.
He's one of these guys who's kind of forgettable.
That's what everyone in Paris talks about is you don't notice him in a room and that
means he doesn't get spotted and killed by the security forces.
Be kind of blending in and being forgettable,
great asset for a guy who's trying to build
a revolutionary movement under like constant bombardment
from the French.
Yeah.
You blend in, you blend in.
I mean, that's the spy thing.
That's the real life spy thing I guess, but yeah.
And again, folks, if you're trying to overthrow
the government and there's a guy in your cell
and you can never remember his name,
you need to murder him immediately.
He's going to wind up taking power, right?
I mean, the problem is it's always one of those guys,
but not all of those guys is gonna become the problem.
Some of those guys are just really good
at like keeping their mouths shut.
It's done.
Or they just have nothing to say. Or they just got nothing's done. Yeah, or they just have nothing to say.
Or they just got nothing to say. Yeah, yeah, they're just vibing.
So, Tsar was amongst the first Khmer revolutionary leaders to take pains to keep himself anonymous.
As a result, nobody realizes that he's steadily moving up the ranks of the insurgency.
In 1960, he is added to the Communist Party's Standing Committee.
Now in the same interview I just quoted from with Pol Pot near the end of his life, Nate
Thayer writes, and this is Nate Thayer quoting Pol Pot, the secrecy that made the Khmer Rouge
so effective was, Pol Pot said, second nature to him.
Since my boyhood, I never talked about myself.
That was my nature.
I was taciturn.
I'm quite modest.
I don't want to tell people that I'm a leader.
I didn't tell anybody, not my brother, not my sister, because I don't want to tell people that I'm a leader I didn't tell anybody not my brother not my sister because I didn't want to worry them if anything happens to me
I didn't want them to have any connection to it. So some people think that I don't care about them
But on the contrary, I respect I love my relatives, but I never revealed my political thinking to them and I gotta say
Obseck King here
What you can't take that away from Bullbot.
This motherfucker would have been incredible
at using Signal.
Like nobody would have known this son of a bitch's name.
He would have had burner phones
for his fucking burner phones.
This guy is really good at staying secret.
Oh my God.
Imagine having that discipline.
He's very disciplined, right?
Like he doesn't, this isn't an accident
that he winds up where he is.
He's smart.
He continues to live.
He has a, in addition to this private,
hidden revolutionary life,
he has a very public life and career.
He is a teacher at a private school.
Like he's like a high school teacher
during this period of time.
And he's a pretty good teacher.
I'm gonna quote from Chandler's book here. As a teacher he was
remembered as calm, self-assured, smooth-featured, honest, and persuasive,
even hypnotic when speaking to small groups. Among his students and his
colleagues in the clandestine communist movement, he seemed in these years to
have gained some of the moral authority and stature he enjoyed among his
followers up to 1997. A man who met him in the late 50s, for example, said,
I knew immediately that I could become his friend for life.
Yeah.
By the way.
Yeah.
That's what they say about presidents and dictators alike.
And there are people he kills who like that is their recollections.
Like I knew he was my friend and they die being like, wait, this can't happen.
No, I know, I know, pull bot, you gotta let me, you gotta let me talk to him.
And pull bots doesn't give a fuck. Wait, this can't happen. No, I know, I know Pol Pot. You gotta let me, you gotta let me talk to him.
And Pol Pot doesn't give a fuck.
Now what is interesting to me about Salazar
is that these recollections of him
as a kindly, decent, sweet man
aren't a product of later propaganda.
Like most revolutions, the Khmer Rouge
heavily attacked their own people,
which caused a lot of Khmer Rouge to defect.
And like when these guys were interviewed later,
basically none of them said Pol Pot was why they left, right?
And in fact, even after the extent of his crimes were known,
most of the people who had defected from the Khmer Rouge,
according to Chandler, described Pol Pot as quote,
"'A man they regarded almost as a saint.'"
So they're like, oh yeah, I mean,
the regime killed all these people and like,
I had to leave, it was so fucked up.
But that Pol Pot, basically Jesus.
Yeah.
Man, he's good at this.
He's really good at this, right?
Like you can't take that away from him.
The motherfucker knew his business, right?
Now, as I noted, Pol Pot made it
to the standing committee in 1960.
The party leader was a guy he'd known from the Paris days
called Samoth, who was assassinated probably
by the King's security services in 1963,
although a lot of people theorize Pol Pot did it,
because Pol Pot succeed Samoth as the leader of the party
in 1963, and now he's in charge of the Khmer Rouge, right?
This is how he rises to run things,
and he will retain that position for more than 30 years. And now he's in charge of the Khmer Rouge, right? This is how he rises to run things.
And he will retain that position for more than 30 years.
He is now in sole command of the communist revolution.
Later in life, Pol Pot spoke of this rise to the peak of power as a chance accident
of history.
There was nobody else to become secretary of the party.
So I had to take charge, right?
Like, what else was I going to do?
You know, like I didn't have a choice.
I had to be in charge.
Someone had to do it.
And Nate Fair, I really recommend,
we'll have it in the links there.
Cause Nate posts about the article he wrote
about his interview and the raw interview transcript.
And Pol Pot's like, Samoth was my best friend.
I loved him.
Why would I have had him killed?
And I think the broad agreement is it was probably
the French security services,
but I can't not be suspicious because Pol Pot
talks about a bunch of people he loves,
and then there will be like,
but you had his entire family killed,
including his like infant grandchildren.
And he'd be like, well, yeah.
Like, yeah, well, yeah.
That's just how things go sometimes
here in the Khmer Rouge, right?
You gotta kill someone's whole family, sure.
Doesn't mean I didn't love him.
That's right.
That's right.
Imagine getting like, yeah, the genocide conducted by like,
not, I was gonna say Ned Flanders, but not even that.
Just like a, like a Mr. Rogers ass.
Yeah.
Yeah, he was getting up there and being like,
you guys are my best friends.
I can't tell you enough how grateful I am.
Now you're all going to be machine gunned in a second.
Right?
But don't think that means I don't love you.
Yeah. Right?
That has nothing to do with me.
It has nothing to do with me.
This has just got to happen for reasons
I can't really explain.
Anyway, I'm going to go bounce.
I got to change the way we farm so everyone starves to death.
Oh, well, I think that's a good place to end for part two.
We're gonna just run all three parts this week
because it was a longer script,
but not quite enough for a four-parter.
So you fuckers are getting a bonus.
But you know, as we end,
Pol Pot has risen to the leader of the Khmer Rouge.
And I think it's gonna go well, you know?
I know I wrote another nine pages,
but my guess right now is everything's good, you know?
What could possibly go wrong?
Yeah, exactly, exactly.
Cambodia becomes the world's
greatest industrial and agricultural power.
Nobody dies.
In fact, they invent the cure to immortality.
That's my assumption.
We'll see how it bears out.
Yeah.
Anything can happen.
That's the important thing.
Find out in part three.
I've got this book next to me called the killing fields.
And I think it's because they made a killing
in the biotech sector.
Killing it, yeah.
Yeah, they're killing it.
Yeah.
The show is called,
Chex Notes, Behind the Bastards.
Oh no, is that what we called the show?
Oh fuck, oh no.
Andrew, how are you feeling?
Oh man, I mean, you know, we're still positive.
Still positive is the important thing.
Yeah, yeah, so far great guy.
Yeah, great, good dude.
Wow, this is so bizarre.
Truly, I never, I guess my knowledge of Pol Pot
not sufficient, because this is fucking fascinating.
Yeah, yeah, he is a really interesting monster.
Yeah.
The degree of agreement that like,
yeah, he was really chill.
As far as I knew him, he was nice.
There's a lot of people who like,
when they finally see him on TV are like,
wait a second, that guy has been killing everybody?
Like, yeah, it'd be like if you had like a friend
that you like smoked weed with and played Grand Theft Auto
when you were like 19 and then like 40 years later,
he winds up killing a million people.
Like, huh, him?
But that is most of those guys.
Right, right, right.
Or most of that situation.
Yeah.
You never know.
He was always nice to me.
He was always so nice to me.
He seemed chill. I don't know, man. We didn nice to me. He was always so nice to me.
He seemed chill.
I don't know, man.
We didn't ever talk about how many people he wanted to kill.
Yeah.
How many people do you want to kill, Andrew?
Less than 20K.
Less than 20K?
That's where we left.
Listen, that's where we left at some point.
I can't remember if it was last episode or-
No one's in the position of,
I don't want anyone to be killed, right?
Yeah, exactly.
If you say zero, it's more suspicious than if you say five.
Zero is suspicious.
Yeah, less than 20K, I'd say that's very, very, you know,
that's not, that's minimalist, right?
Yeah, yeah, that qualifies you as a good person.
I bet the Pope would wanna kill less than 20K people
if he had his choice.
Oh my God, well, you know, Pope's...
Pope's probably- That would make him
still on the lower end of Pope body counts.
Pope means, Pope would say,
I would love to only have to kill 20,000 people, but-
See, that's the great thing about being a Pope
is you're grading on a curve
where if you were to kill 20,000 people as a pope today, you're still in like the upper 20%
of popes in terms of not killing a lot of people.
Top quartile pope, that's right.
Yeah, it's like being the leader of Germany.
There's a lot of room where you can like,
yeah, I fucked up on some things,
but no one's gonna remember me as the worst.
I mean, or owning an American auto manufacturer.
Right.
Makes you like more Nazis than not.
Not more Nazis than not.
Or in the future if we have any others.
Whole number of Nazis.
Being the president of the United States.
Yeah, yeah, we'll see.
Or whatever the position is called after this.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, whatever.
Anyway, Andrew T, where can people find you?
Yo, is this racist, Andrew T. on whatever social media?
I'm not looking at it that much.
Yeah, well, do that.
And let's all go not...
Well, you know what?
If you know somebody who's quiet and nice and...
And that's the episode. Behind the Bastards is a production of Cool Zone Media.
For more from Cool Zone Media,
visit our website, coolzonemedia.com,
or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Behind the Bastards is now available on YouTube.
New episodes every Wednesday and Friday.
Subscribe to our channel, youtube.com, slash, at, Behind the Bastards.
Something unexpected happened after Jeremy Scott confessed to killing Michelle Schofield in Bone Valley Season 1.
Every time I hear about my dad, it's, oh, he's a killer. He's just straight evil.
I was becoming the bridge between Jeremy Scott
and the son he'd never known.
At the end of the day, I'm literally a son of a killer.
Listen to new episodes of BONE VALLEY season two
on the iHeart radio app, Apple podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Soledad O'Brien, and on my new true crime podcast, podcasts. connected to a very powerful man. I pledge you that we shall neither commit nor provoke aggression.
John F. Kennedy.
Listen to Murder on the Toe Path with Soledad O'Brien on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcast.