Better Offline - Exclusive: Here's How Much OpenAI Spends On Inference And Its MSFT Revenue Share

Episode Date: November 12, 2025

In a Better Offline exclusive, Ed Zitron reveals how much OpenAI spent on inference in 2024 and 2025, as well as how much it paid Microsoft as part of its 20% revenue share. Inference costs are much h...igher - and implied revenues much lower - than previously reported.(Free) Newsletter: https://www.wheresyoured.at/oai_docs/ The Information - OpenAI’s First Half Results: $4.3 Billion in Sales, $2.5 Billion Cash Burn - https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openais-first-half-results-4-3-billion-sales-2-5-billion-cash-burn?rc=kz8jh3 The Information (reference to $6bn inference spend) - http://theinformation.com/articles/openai-forecasts-revenue-topping-125-billion-2029-agents-new-products-gain?rc=kz8jh3 Want to support me? Get $10 off a year’s subscription to my premium newsletter: https://edzitronswheresyouredatghostio.outpost.pub/public/promo-subscription/w08jbm4jwg it would mean a lot! YOU CAN NOW BUY BETTER OFFLINE MERCH! Go to https://cottonbureau.com/people/better-offline and use code FREE99 for free shipping on orders of $99 or more. --- LINKS: https://www.tinyurl.com/betterofflinelinks Newsletter: https://www.wheresyoured.at/ Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterOffline/  Discord: chat.wheresyoured.at Ed's Socials: https://twitter.com/edzitron https://www.instagram.com/edzitron https://bsky.app/profile/edzitron.com https://www.threads.net/@edzitron Email Me: ez@betteroffline.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 This is an IHeart podcast. Guaranteed human. Run a business and not thinking about podcasting. Think again. More Americans listen to podcasts than adds supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora. And as the number one podcaster, IHearts twice as large as the next two combined. Learn how podcasting can help your business. Call 844-844-I-Hart.
Starting point is 00:00:22 All-Zo Media. Hello and welcome to a very special episode of BetRof-Line. I'm, of course, your host, Ed Zetron. For years, I've been hunting down the core details behind OpenAI's costs and revenues, and today I'm going to bring you some of them. A lot of what I say today is going to be reflected in my newsletter, which I'll link to in the notes. Based on documents viewed by my newsletter, I'm able to report OpenAI's inference spend on Microsoft as Yore, in addition to its payments to Microsoft as part of its 20% revenue share agreement,
Starting point is 00:00:58 which was reported in October 2024 by the information. In simple terms, that last bit means that Microsoft receives 20% of OpenAI's revenue in addition to whatever it spends on GPUs and servers. As a reminder, inferences the process through which a model creates an output, which I'll be reminding you of a few times, because it's actually kind of important. Now, a few notes. I don't have OpenAI's training spend, nor do I have information on the entire extent of OpenAI's revenues, as it appears that Microsoft shares some percentage of its revenue from Bing, as well as 20% of the revenue Microsoft receives from selling OpenAI's models on this year.
Starting point is 00:01:33 What I do have, as I've mentioned, is its inference spend. And if you're new to this, like I said, this means all the computations OpenAI does when processing requests sent to its services like Chat, GPT and SORA. Now, before publishing, I asked the Financial Times reporter to help corroborate some of the data in the documents. They reached out to Microsoft and Open AI, who both declined to comment. Now, the following will be a lot of numbers, and it might be easier for you to read them. However, I'm going to try and make things as easy and clear as possible, because the documents I seen calling to question what we actually knew about OpenAI's business and the sustainability of said business. To keep things simple, all the years in this piece are calendar years. Microsoft
Starting point is 00:02:13 has fiscal years. I'm not going to play that game. It's impossible to follow along with. Nobody thinks this way. Anyway, now we've done that. Let's get to him. According to the documents viewed by my newsletter, OpenAI spent $5.02 billion on inference alone with Microsoft's year in the first half of calendar year 2025. This is a pattern that has continued through the end of September 2025, by which point OpenAI had spent $8.67 billion just on inference. OpenAI's inference costs have risen consistently over the past 18 months too. For example, OpenAI spent $3.76 billion on inference in 2024, meaning that OpenAI has already more than doubled its inference costs in just the first nine months of 2025.
Starting point is 00:02:59 These costs are dramatic and significantly higher than has been previously reported. According to the information, OpenAI's computer-on models, which I understand to mean inference, was $2 billion in 2024. Additionally, an April 2025 piece from the information stated that OpenAI's inference costs for 2025 would be around $6 billion, or roughly $2 billion less than OpenAI appears to have spent through the end of September. I want to be clear as well. I'm just reporting what these documents have said. This is not a statement about the information. They do great reporting. But then there's the issue of the revenue
Starting point is 00:03:34 share. As I've previously stated, the following numbers are based on the revenue share paid to Microsoft as part of its deal with OpenAI, where it gives Microsoft 20% of its revenues. According to the documents, Microsoft received $493.8 million in revenue share payments in 2024 from OpenAI, implying revenue, for 2024 for OpenAI of at least $2.469 billion, or around $1.23 billion less than the $3.7 billion number that's been previously reported in multiple outlets. Similarly, for the first half of 2025, Microsoft received $454.7 million as part of its revenue share agreement, implying OpenAI's revenues for that six-month period were at least $2.273 billion, or around $2 billion less than the $4.3 previously reported for that period. Through September, Microsoft's revenue share payments totaled
Starting point is 00:04:29 $8.8 million, implying OpenAI's revenues are at least $4.329 billion through the end of Q3 2025. To be clear, and I'm going to say this, Microsoft also pays Open AI a cut of Bing's revenues under certain circumstances I could not confirm, as well as a cut of about 20% of all OpenAI models sold through Azure, just to be clear, Microsoft is the only party that can sell OpenAI's models other than Open AI. I don't have the details on those payments, like I said, but I'm skeptical that they can account for the massive difference between those numbers that have been leaked and the ones in the documents in question. I do not know, nor will I speculate on why these differences are so distinct. What was important about today was getting you these numbers and shedding light
Starting point is 00:05:12 on the differences I see between the story told about Open AI and the reality of its spend and potential revenues. You've also probably noticed that this podcast is a bit of a different tone to the usual. No insults, no jokes. I haven't called anyone clammy, haven't even said a swear word for the first time in maybe 100 episodes. The reason's simple. These numbers are serious and seriously different to those reported. Open AI's costs are dramatically higher than previously reported and thought, and based on the extrapolations from Microsoft's revenue share, its implied revenues are also seemingly dramatically lower than we knew. The ramifications. applications of these numbers are severe. Open AI's inference costs are incredibly high,
Starting point is 00:05:52 absorbing any and all revenues and seemingly scaling with every increase in chat GPT's user numbers. As revenue goes up, so does their inference costs. Conversely, if these implied revenues are indicative of the larger financial picture, Open AI is not as successful a company as we previously believed. In any case, the reality of the AI bubble is becoming clearer. Influence, the process of creating outputs for a model, appears to be an incredibly burdensome cost. And if these implied revenues are any indicator, the actual business of selling generative AI services and models doesn't really seem to be
Starting point is 00:06:27 as good at business as we thought either. It's all looking a little bleak out there. I don't want to editorialize too much because I want this information to sit on its own self. But it's strange being here. It's strange getting these numbers and seeing them myself. And I have to wonder how things work out from here. I truthfully have no idea, but I do know I'll be happy to do this every week, and I will tell you what happens now. These numbers allow us to kind of see the real picture of the AI bubble, and I have to wonder what other companies look like now that I've seen these numbers. Email me, contact me, EZittron.76 on Signal if you ever want to tell me anything, if you ever want to show me anything. I'm always interested to hear, and I'm honored to do this.
Starting point is 00:07:22 Another podcast from some SNL, late-night comedy guy, not quite. Unhumor me with Robert Smygel and Friends. Me and hilarious guests from Bob Odenkirk to David Letterman helped make you funnier. This week, my guest, SNL's Mikey Day and head writer, Streeter Seidel, help an a cappella band with their between songs banter. Where does your group perform? We do some retirement homes.
Starting point is 00:07:44 Those people are starving for banter. Listen to humor me with Robert Smigel and Friends on the I-Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Life is full of hurdles, so how do you keep going? On Hurtle with Emily Abadi, we're talking with the most inspiring women in sports and wellness from professional athletes, coaches, and Olympic champions about the challenges that shape them and the mindset that keeps them moving forward. At our level, at this scale, being able to fail in front of the entire world.
Starting point is 00:08:12 Like, I can do anything. I can do anything. Listen to Hurtle with Emily Abadi on the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Presented by Capital One, founding partner. of I-heart women's sports. Hey, I'm Diana Maria Riva, and on my new podcast,
Starting point is 00:08:26 How Hard Can It Be? I call on my Gen X squad from Ohio to Hollywood as we navigate Midlife's most fantastic BS. Unfiltered conversations from night sweats to fupas to scheduling sex.
Starting point is 00:08:38 Wait, what sex? Is it just me, or does every woman, my age, want to look at Pinterest instead of having sex sometimes? They say we can't polish a turd, but we're sure going to try. So let's get blunt with laughs,
Starting point is 00:08:50 tears, or tears of laughter. Listen to How Hard Can It Be with Diana Maria Riva on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. American soccer is about to explode. The World Cup is coming. Ramers sending on the only store at the chip. I'm Tab Ramos. I'm Tom Boe. On our podcast, inside American soccer, you'll get the real storylines, the biggest decisions, and the truth about the U.S. national team.
Starting point is 00:09:20 It wouldn't be a huge surprise if our team ends up in the quarter. or finals are potentially a great run into the semifinals. Listen, Inside American Soccer with Tom Bogart and Tabramos on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, wherever you get your podcast. This is an IHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.