Better Offline - Monologue: Analyslop And The Death of Critical Thinking
Episode Date: February 27, 2026In this week's Better Offline monologue, Ed Zitron walks you through the "analyslop" phenomenon of speculative, lie-ridden fan fiction that gets framed as meaningful research and promoted by the mains...tream media. Free newsletter tie-in: https://www.wheresyoured.at/on-nvidia-and-analyslop/ Save $10 off a year of my premium newsletter: https://edzitronswheresyouredatghostio.outpost.pub/public/promo-subscription/gzqwkv54e1 - I’d be so grateful! YOU CAN NOW BUY BETTER OFFLINE MERCH! Go to https://cottonbureau.com/people/better-offline and use code FREE99 for free shipping on orders of $99 or more. --- LINKS: https://www.tinyurl.com/betterofflinelinks Newsletter: https://www.wheresyoured.at/ Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterOffline/ Discord: chat.wheresyoured.at Ed's Socials: https://twitter.com/edzitron https://www.instagram.com/edzitron https://bsky.app/profile/edzitron.com https://www.threads.net/@edzitron Email Me: ez@betteroffline.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is an IHeart podcast.
Guaranteed human.
Run a business and not thinking about podcasting, think again.
More Americans listen to podcasts than adds supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
And as the number one podcaster, IHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
Learn how podcasting can help your business.
Call 844-844-I-Hart.
Hello and welcome to this week's better off-line monologue.
I'm your host, Ed Zittron.
Now this week's monologue is about.
something I also just wrote up in my newsletter. A new term I came up with called Annalislav.
Now Analystlob is when somebody writes a long, specious but authoritative-sounding piece of
writing with few facts or actual statements with the intention of it being read as thorough
analysis, researched analysis indeed. Now this week, alleged research group Citrini Research,
not to be confused with Andrew Left, Citron Research, or, well, me, put out a truly awful
piece of writing called the 2028 global intelligence crisis, which is this slop-filled scare fiction
written and framed with the authority of deeply founded analysis, so much so that it caused the global
sell-off in stocks. And I must be clear, if you took this seriously, if you listened to this,
on, I don't know, you had it read out by an LM notebook, or you read it and you kind of furred your brow and
like, oh, this is really provocative. You're a mark, you are being conned. You were in the process of
being conned if you haven't already been. Now,
this piece, if you haven't read it, please do go and read it. It'll be linked in the notes,
my annotated version. Those of you in YouTube won't get the link. Just go to my blue sky. I swear to
God it's there. It spends 7,000 words telling the dire tale of what would happen if AI made an
indeterminately large amount of white collar workers redundant. Now, you read this 7,000 boring,
fucking word long piece. It isn't clear what AI exactly does, who makes the AI, how the AI, how the
AI works, really anything about it, just that it replaces people and then bad stuff happens.
Citrini insists that this isn't bear porn or AI Duma fan fiction, but that's exactly what it is.
Mediocre analysis slop framed in the trappings of analysis sold on a substack with research
in the title specifically written and successfully spooking and ingratiating anyone involved in the
financial markets who wants to be scared of this stuff. Its goal is to convince you that AI,
non-specifically is scary, that your current stocks are bad, and that AI stocks, unclear which
ones those are, by the way, are the future. Also, find out more for $999 a year. I charge 70 bucks,
and my shit's way better than this fuckwear. Now, look, look, okay, let me give you an example.
I'm going to do a voice. It should have been clear all along that a single GPU cluster in
North Dakota generating the output previously attributed to 10,000 white-collar workers in Midtown Manhattan
is more economic pandemic than economic panacea.
Now, he writes economic correctly, I just fucked up saying it.
Now, the goal of a paragraph like this is for you to say, wow, that's what GPUs are doing now.
They're doing that today.
It isn't, of course.
The majority of CEOs report little or no return on investment from AI, with a study of
6,000 CEOs across the US, UK, Germany and Australia, finding that more than 80% detected no discernible impact from AI on either employment or productivity.
Nevertheless, you read GPU and North Dakota and you think, wow, that's a place I know and I know that GPU's Power AI.
Now, I'm a curious little critter, so I know a GPU cluster in North Dakota.
Corwee's one with Applied Digital that has debt so severe that loses both companies' money, even if they have the capacity rented out 24-7.
But let's not let facts get in the way of a poorly written story.
Now, I don't need to go line by line on this.
I'm not going to because I'll end up saying a legally actionable threat of some kind, but I need you to know,
that most of this piece's arguments come down to magical thinking and utterly empty prose.
For example, how do you think that AI takes over the entire economy? And I quote,
AI capabilities improved, companies needed fewer workers, white-collar layoffs increased, displaced workers,
spent less, margin pressure pushed firms to invest more in AI, AI capabilities improved.
That's right, they just get better. I need to discuss anything happening today. Even AI 2027 had the
balls to stop making stuff up about open brain or some such bullshit. This piece literally just says
stuff, including this particularly egregious lie I'm about to read to you. In late 2025,
agenetic coding tools took a step function jump in capability. A competent developer working with
Claude Code or Codex could now replicate the core functionality of a mid-market SaaS product in
weeks. Not perfectly or with every single edge case handled, but well enough that the CIO reviewing a
500,000 annual renewal, started asking the question, what if we just built this ourselves?
Now, quick thing, what annual contract? There are tons of SaaS contracts, though, far longer than
that. But this is also a complete and utter lie, a ball-faced lie. This is not something that
Claude Code can do. The fact that we have major media outlets quoting this piece
suggests that those responsible for explaining how things work don't actually bother to do
any of the work to find out. And it's both a disgrace and an embarrassment for the tech and business
media that these lies continue to be peddled. As I went over in last week's monologue, the entire
AI replacing software story is a con. It's clear that the market's an alarming amount of people in
the media simply do not know what they are talking about or are intentionally avoiding thinking
about it. The AI replaces software story is literally Anthropic has released a product and now the
resulting industry is selling off, such as when it launched a cybersecurity tool that could
check for vulnerabilities, a product that's existed in some form.
for nearly a decade, and this caused a sell-off in cybersecurity stocks like CrowdStrike.
You know, the one that had a faulty bit of code caused a global cybersecurity incident
that lost the Fortune 500 billions and resulted in Delta Airlines having to cancel over 1,200 flights
over a period of several days.
There is no rational basis for anything about this sell-off,
other than that our financial media and markets do not appear to understand the very basic things
about the stuff they invest in or talk about.
software may seem complex, but especially in these cases, it's really quite simple.
Investors are conflating an AI model can spit out code with an AI model can create an entire
experience of what we know as software or is close enough that we have to start freaking out,
which it isn't. It obviously isn't. Anyone who builds software knows this. Anyone peddling this
is just wrong. And it's this replet, vibe coding shit. I swear to God, people in the media use it,
and they just go, wow, this is the future now.
All software will be built like this,
as they failed to build any...
Calm down it.
Calm down the software, can not, you know.
I think we really need to think deeply
about how, for the second time in a month,
the markets in the media have had a miniature shit fit
based on blogs that tell lies using fan fiction.
As I covered in my annotations of Matt Schumer's bullshit
something big is happening piece,
the people that are meant to tell the general public
what's happening in the world appear to be falling for ghost stories that confirm their biases
or investment strategies, even if said stories are full of hearth, truths and outright lies.
I'm despairing a little. When I see Matt Schumer on CNN, or hear from the head of a PE firm about
Citrini research, I begin to wonder whether everybody got where they were, not through any actual
work or knowledge, but by making the right noises. We're in a grifter economy, and the people that
should be stopping the grifters are asleep at the fucking wheel.
Another podcast from some SNL late-night comedy guy,
not quite.
Unhumor me with Robert Smygel and Friends.
Me and hilarious guests from Bob Odenkirk to David Letterman
help make you funnier.
This week, my guest, SNL's Mikey Day and head writer Streeter Seidel
help an a cappella band with their between songs banter.
Where does your group perform?
We do some retirement homes.
Those people are starving for banter.
Listen to humor me with Robert Smigel and friends
on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I actually drop better when I'm high.
It heightens my senses, calms me down.
If anything, I'm more careful.
Honestly, it just helps me focus.
That's probably what the driver who killed a four-year-old told himself.
And now he's in prison.
You see, no matter what you tell yourself, if you feel different, you drive different.
So if you're high, just don't drive.
Brought to you by NHTSA and the Ad Council.
Therapy is fantastic, but once again, it does not have a monopoly on healing.
That's why I create the resources and that's why I create the community because I really just want you to have more access.
On the podcast, cultivating her space, Dr. Dom and Terry Lomax create a space where black women can show up fully and be heard.
It's tough because we're suppressing our emotions and so many of us are like high achieving individuals.
Listen to cultivating her space on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
This week on Crimless, Rory and I welcome a very special guest.
When I did podcasts, I wear my sleep masks.
I like where this is going.
So if you guys will indulge me.
That's right, the incredibly talented and hilarious Will Ferrell on an episode dedicated to crimes committed by people named Will Ferrell.
You're good for 300 crimes?
We're doing it.
We got two.
I'm ready to go right up to present day.
Listen to Crimless on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
This is an IHeart podcast.
Guaranteed human.
