Better Offline - Radio Better Offline: Mia Sato & Dave Lee

Episode Date: July 30, 2025

Welcome to Radio Better Offline, a tech talk radio show recorded out of iHeartRadio's studio in New York City.Ed Zitron is joined in studio by Mia Sato of The Verge and Dave Lee of Bloomberg to talk how companies like TikTok and Google change the web with their incentives, the nihilism of Pop Mart's viral Labubus, and why people are more game to pay independent writers.Mia Sato, The Verge https://www.theverge.com/authors/mia-satohttps://bsky.app/profile/miasato.bsky.socialhttps://www.instagram.com/miasato.2/Story around “dupes”https://www.theverge.com/cs/features/709635/knock-it-offStory around “Labubus”https://www.theverge.com/analysis/710047/labubu-pop-mart-blind-boxes-scarcity-marketing Dave Lee, Bloomberghttps://www.bloomberg.com/authors/AWQ3soOJK0Y/dave-leehttps://x.com/DaveLeeBBGhttps://bsky.app/profile/davelee.me Story around Google and AIhttps://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2025-07-28/google-is-reaping-the-rewards-of-its-unfair-ai-advantage?srnd=undefinedGoogle “Web Guide”https://blog.google/products/search/web-guide-labs/ YOU CAN NOW BUY BETTER OFFLINE MERCH! Go to https://cottonbureau.com/people/better-offline and use code FREE99 for free shipping on orders of $99 or more. --- LINKS: https://www.tinyurl.com/betterofflinelinks Newsletter: https://www.wheresyoured.at/ Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterOffline/  Discord: chat.wheresyoured.at Ed's Socials: https://twitter.com/edzitron https://www.instagram.com/edzitronSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is an IHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human. Run a business and not thinking about podcasting. Think again. More Americans listen to podcasts than adds supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora. And as the number one podcaster, IHearts twice as large as the next two combined.

Learn how podcasting can help your business. Call 844-844-I-Hart. Another podcast from some SNL late-night comedy guy, not quite. Unhumor me with Robert Smygel and friends. Me and hilarious guests from Bob Odenkirk to David Letterman help make you funnier. This week, my guest,

SNL's Mikey Day and head writer, Streeter Seidel, help an a cappella band with their between songs banter. Where does your group perform? We do some retirement homes. Those people are starving for banter. Listen to humor me with Robert Smigel and friends on the I-Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

or wherever you get your podcasts. Why are we all so obsessed with romance? On the Radio 831 podcast, join us, Sanjana Basker, and Tyler McCall, as we unpack all. the trending tropes, fuzzy adaptations, book talk drama, and celebrity love stories with hot takes and sharp guests. Each episode digs into what these stories reveal about desire, fantasy, identity, and how we love now. Listen to the Radio 831 podcast on the IHeart Radio app,

Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. American soccer is about to explode. The World Cup is coming. Ramel's sending on the Army Store at the Chip. I'm Tab Ramos. I'm Tom Boca. On our podcast, Inside American Soccer, you'll get the real storylines, the biggest decisions, and the truth about the U.S. national team. It wouldn't be a huge surprise if our team ends up in the quarterfinals or potentially a great run into the semifinals. Listen, Inside American Soccer with Tom Bogart and Tab Ramos on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, wherever you get your podcast.

Also Media. Locally hated, globally loathed, chosen by God and perfected by science. I'm Ed Zittron, and this is Better Offline. Today I'm joined by an incredible duo. We've got Mia Sato of the Verge and Dave Lee of Bloomberg. Thank you both for joining me in the studio. Happy to be here. So before we go any further, of course, please subscribe to the newsletter, the premium one as well.

Please help me. And for a limited time, you can buy a Better Offline Challenge Coin and a bunch of other staff links in the episode notes. But you too, I'm so excited to have you here because you were. two of my favorite opinion columnists as well, but also feature, like you've, I've known your work for many years, so I'm very, very excited to have you here. Mia, I wanted to start with a simple question, though. What is a Laboooo? You've shown me this creature, this horrifying, like, little evil thing, and everyone

wants one, and I don't under, every time I try and look it up, it makes me upset. This could be the first time a Laboooo-Boo-Boo-Hat-Rat radio offices. I think we record in the same room as last... Something shifted. Oh, okay. So Labibu probably has been in the Las Caltreases area. Yeah, I would assume. Yeah.

Labubu's are little plush dolls. They have kind of like a hard plastic, human-like, mean face, but then are wearing like a bunny suit. They come in all different colors. And I think the most important thing to know about Labubu's is it is just gambling. It's just gambling for kids. And kind of adults now. Elaborate. So they come in blind boxes, which is like they are all in like a little plastic or a

paper carton and you have like a one in six chance of getting a certain, you know, these colors. And then there's one rare one that's like a one in 72 chance. And it says it right on the box. Like it is just straightforward betting. Who makes it? They are sold by this company called Pop Mart and they're based on like a cartoon, I think, like a broader umbrella called The Monsters. So Laboooooo is one character in the monsters. And the others did not take off, I'm guessing. Not the same way. But I think there are some fans for the other characters. Is the Labubu on your back? The Labubu is looking at us.

No, it's real. It's real. Is it one of the 72? No, no, no. Obviously not. So, is the normal one. Is there a secondary Labubu market? Well, this is where it gets interesting.

And this is why I think Labibu's are funnier and kind of stupider than they appear on the surface. Because from my observations and from talking to friends who are like good at flipping things, there is no really no. resale value for opened Labuboos. So if I wanted to sell this pink Labibu, it would go for maybe like 40 bucks, 50 bucks. And they retail for like 2799, not including shipping and tax and all of that. So not a huge margin. No, not at all. Assuming you can even sell. Exactly. The ones that do go for some money are the rare ones, which is like, you know, they're special colors and unopened boxes. Because

again, it's about gambling. It is about the chance that you might have a rare one. Do they sell out? Is that way They're all sold out on Pop Mart's app, which we can talk about. Like, I think it is, like, the funniest thing ever to do to parents of young children and to teens to, like, make this app. But, I mean, I feel like this is my life with Pokemon cards. Yes, it's exactly the same. It's a sort of game with Pokemon. Right. There's like Trump's, right?

Yeah, yeah, yeah. And there is some, like, downstream liboo-culture where people will dress them. I'm streaming through culture. That's great. Jesus Christ. In this essay, I will. Yeah, we live in hell. But people will, like, dress up their looboos.

They'll, like, get accessories. There's a crazy kind of, like, off-brand black market for, like, labubu-related things. Foebooboes? Lafoufus. The fufus are the fake laboos. Okay, that's pretty good. I also own a lafufu that I bought outside the Statue of Liberty, as God intended. But, yeah, the labubes are interesting because it's not about the doll.

It's about how you acquire it. And it's about the odds, the odds that you're taking, really. I quite like there's nothing more to it. Yeah. Because I feel like two years ago, this would have got, this would have had like an NFT element to it. I mean, don't say that. Don't speak that into existence. I think it's quite wholesome that it's just the thing.

Yeah. It's just like collector culture. It's also like. Very nihilistic. It's pretty nihilistic. There's no IP related to it that people are familiar with. There's no film like Laboobo movie that people. people are obsessed with, like, you know, Paw Patrol, like kids see Pop Patrol and they want stuff.

And, like, 10 years ago, this would have already, remember with Angry Birds? Yeah. Rovee was like, we're going to do a TV show, we're going to do a movies. Or like Grumpy Cat. I just wrote about Grumpy Cat. So I'm like, there's a grumpy cat. There's a whole ass on this show. This will come.

Yeah, that's kind of what I'm waiting for. Also, it does seem there is a Labubu fan connect collection on Magic Eden. It's 0.04 soul. If you buy one of these, they should put you on a list. It's fascinating as well. because I've done everything I can to avoid this. And I've mostly seen like city spy Diana, classic Instagram account. I've seen Labubu pop up on there and being like, no one will save you.

It's like that kind of brain rot style thing where it's like a cutesy voice being like, no one will save you. The world will collapse. And it's just Labuboos. Yes. But it is, I thought there'd be more. I thought there would be more to it. But it just see, it's just gambling.

We've found a way to give children gambling. Yeah. And this isn't the first one either. Like they're blind boxing. Yeah. Yeah. Like, Sunny Angels were the last blind box thing that was kind of a craze. They're little cherub-like dolls, probably like two or three inches tall, and they're all naked.

And I think that's why adults felt weird about owning them, but Lubbubu's are not naked, so people feel comfortable putting them on their, like, expensive handbags. So, as far, what is it that has enabled this, though? Is it like very tick, is like, this is a very TikTok-driven movement? It's definitely on TikTok. I think also a big reason. they're so kind of like zeitgeisty or buzzy is because they're impossible to buy. They're sold out all the time.

I went through the steps of trying to buy a Lubu on the Pop Mart app and it was hell. Why don't you walk me through that? How do you actually, like, how do you actually allegedly buy these things? Okay, well, I didn't realize that you have to play like a mini game basically. What?

What? This is what people don't understand. It's like, I have been through the trenches to buy the stupid doll. You have to, so on the Pop Mart app, they're always sold out. Right. And they have like drops at,

certain times. And the company, I think, wanted to sort of recreate the experience of going to a store and seeing an empty shelf where you're like looking for the doll or looking for the product. Right. So when they drop, there are like digital shelves or boxes where individual like six boxes of Labibu's will be placed, like digital ones. And you can watch them sell out and you just scroll through the boxes to find a Labibu for sale. And most of the time, they're all like, grayed out so that's something like it's in someone else's cart and then they'll get released like someone will abandon it or whatever and then you can you have to like spam click the box it's crazy and then you can shake it and it will give you hints about like what it's not what doll it's not

I'm sorry I feel like I'm speaking in tongues no no this I'm following you it's just horrifying it's really hard and the other thing I mean popmart is they're sick they're so sick and brilliant because they also get thousands of people watching their their TikTok lives for hours waiting for them to drop Labibu's in TikTok shop. And that is engagement. It's just like straightforward engagement. You know what I mean? It's pretty insane.

So when does this jump into being, I mean, so there's no other IP around it? Yeah. But I think of like Minecraft that kind of stuff. I mean, I have a very sort of different product. But eventually they went, hmm, that's, that's, Microsoft bought it. And then they made a movie and all that stuff. And the commercialization was massive after it's like very organic. Is there a point?

Do you think where that just suddenly people go, all the kids are crazy about these things. We can't just let this go by. Maybe. Like maybe, but also it feels so straightforwardly consumeristic that like I could see it just dying down in like two months. Recession indicator is when they stop selling these out. Yeah. Well, honestly, I feel like people being obsessed with buying Labuboos instead of like groceries or whatever is a recession indicator. Like these are cheap.

You know what I mean? I also feel like China just leads the world in this kind of. Yeah. Like 90s style evil consumerism. Like this is some shit you would see in a mid-90s film about evil tech CEOs. Like we've created a devil doll. Like China has created. I mean, I feel like when I used to buy football stickers as a kid.

Yeah, but this is so much. They were blind. I didn't know whether there was a good players in there or bad players in there. Oh, no. I fully agree. Different scale and different level of a session from what you're describing there. But isn't there just this part of a young person's brain that says, I want to collect these. My friends are going to collect these.

It's fun, right? I mean, I don't see it's that dramatically different. Oh, it's not. Like, you're totally right in that it's kind of clicking into that. You had a bit of that with the NFTs, and you've had right at the beginning, especially, and with top shots as well, which was the NFTs for basketball games that they then expanded and then failed. It was exactly the same thing.

It was the kind of top trumps, well, not top trumps. It were football stickers. The difference is that they've built like an economic layer to it to, like, torture the people trying to buy them. The disappearing boxes. That is incredible. And they can shake them. Like manipulative.

Yeah. It's really interesting. It also feels very much like what a lot of shopping is these days. It's like a stand-in for a hobby. Collecting. Like, I feel like Labu-Boo's and Stanley Cups are like the same thing. Do you all know what Stanley Cup? I'm sorry.

Sorry. For the water. I think the hot. No, no, no, no. But that means your brain is good. You pass the test. Like, your brain is not fried. That is.

Like, the women. who collect dozens of Stanley Cup colors. And there's no reason to have them, but that is their form of, you know, it's a hobby. Yeah. And I just want to read something from the Wikipedia page for Laboubu. The Federation Council of Russia proposed banning the sale of Lubbos. The reason was their frightening appearance

and potential hunt for children's mental health. In Russia, a Katarina Alta Beva, deputy chair of the Committee of Science, Education and Culture, state that the figures cause children to feel fear. I just want to say that that was just a very funny sentence. Russia's founded red line, I see. But, yeah, Russia's massive ethics calls there.

It's just, I think it, you've really mentioned something with, like, collectibles that reminds me of NFTs as well, where it's, I collect comic artwork. And I, original comp, I fucking delight in it. I've filled my walls.

I won't be getting anymore. But, like, it has meaning. And those I know, like, sports memorabilia, they collect stuff because, oh, it's a meaningful game, whatever, or the player. With this, it's like,

NFTs, it's that, with all of the culture, moved. It's just strip mind to the core of you want what everyone else wants. You want it now. How will you get it? Only us. And the fact that there's not another thing that Pop Mart has done like, this is so strange though. Yeah. Like it's almost like they're being a little bit cautious with it. They don't want to overfill and push their luck a bit, which is fascinating. And also, the reason I mentioned is China is American e-commerce companies do not have that killer instinct. I feel like out in China, They'll fucking roll our asses with making this kind of stuff.

They made an evil-looking doll with no IP that they're just like, we own this, buy it now. And people are obsessed. How did it take off? Was it they're like one, is it just something that appeared? Okay, the weirdest thing is that from what I understand, one of the black pink girls were seen, she was seen with a Laboooooooo. And that's a Korean pop group. Yes, K-pop group, one of the, probably the biggest acts of the world. Insane videos.

I can't remember if it was Jenny or Lisa, but I think maybe Lille. Lisa from Black Pink had a Lubbubu, and it had been kind of percolating already, but that really like blew it up in a crazy way. But yeah, my prediction is like this will be not a thing anymore when they're easy to acquire, because again, my theory is that it's really just about the process of acquisition and the process of purchasing rather than like the actual thing. And I think also a lot of other, especially like American toy makers are desperate, right? Like what is their What is, I don't know. And the things it's, it's, they're trying, they're going to solve it by going, well,

we'll just make a better one. It's like, no, the actual thing you need to do is engage your killer instinct and call Fangiole or one of those companies. They, fan jewel has more in common, I think, than any like Mattel as far as creating a product like Laboooooo. It's just this thing of scaring people, say, oh, if you don't get in on now, this now, you'll miss it. Just the thing with NFTs, things with crypto.

And now they've brought it for children, which is great. I think it's good. It's also, I think, the natural end point of this bullshit fandom culture we've been in the last 10, 15 years. Maybe, whereas just like, it's just one. I think you underestimate the degree to we see things just cycle around again and again and again. I don't disagree on that. It is a cyclical thing. But I think it's also just like, why do we have this?

Because everyone has this. Why do we do this? Because everyone does this. Accelerated by things like TikTok and TikTok live in particular. Yeah. The urgency is interesting. Yeah. And I think the, if there's one thing.

Even if the toys go away, that mechanism seems like an enduring thing. But it would be interesting to see if an American brand does try that fully here, because it's kind of similar to, do you ever remember, you used to use like booking.com and you would say three people booked this room in the last 20 minutes. You better get it. Otherwise, you're not going to do it. And we sort of, that was, you know, got a lot of scrutiny as has been an unfair way to force people to buy things in a hurry.

And I suspect we'd see the same with it. Yeah, it's like the natural growth of e-commerce and all the ways you can kind of push a customer. You see it with like every single Instagram drop chip thing. If you click them, it's like 62 people are buying this right now. You need to buy this special code. Looking at it, right? Yeah, and if you don't, they're going to sell out. This is the pans that sold out.

There are so many pans that sell out on Instagram. But leading into another thing, actually both of you have kind of covered as well, it feels like this is almost humanity trying to move with the algorithm, to fit what people would be going after, a growth of, as you put, Dave, that the fact that, yeah, we are trend seekers, we all want to kind of fit in. But it leads to this thing of this got popular because it got popular and it hit the algorithmic side. You were mentioning before we came in here, Mia, that there is almost an SEO level to posting on TikTok now. Yeah, for sure.

I mean, you know, I think it goes back to, do you remember like two years ago, everyone was freaking out that people were using TikTok like a search engine, which now feels like so quaint. I think like a Google exec mentioned it at some of it. Well, they mentioned it. This is one of my favorite parts. During their antitrust hearing. Right, right. Where we say lost eventually.

They argued that Google isn't a monopoly because kids are turning to TikTok to search. And it was just, it was, and Google had this slide they were briefing journalists with and others that had all the sort of supposed competitors. Yeah. And it was just things that they weren't competitive. And TikTok was one of them. And it was this idea, because here's the thing, someone might go on TikTok and say, oh, good restaurant, New York and get like a couple of, you know, videos or whatever. But the idea that there was like a utility that's replacing Like for like was very, very hopeful to me. But it was, as a point, sort of picked up by all these kind of trends analysis being, oh, Google's in trouble because people have searched on TikTok.

And it's like, well, not really. You know, it's, it's, that'd be like saying I'm searching on television. It's not, there's not, there's not the same thing at all. Yeah, absolutely not. And it's obviously like, it was deployed very strategically by, Google, you know, like bringing out very specific statistics or whatever. But I think the point stands that like the same thing, I've written about sort of the degradation of Google search as a window into the web. And part of that is because people spam the web with horrible things, like things that kind of suck and are not useful because they're trying to appease an algorithm.

And I think that same thing is happening on TikTok. It happens on Instagram. And a lot of it is user, like, comes from the user, we have to be honest that, like, people make shitty content. Yeah. You know what I mean? It's not just the tech companies who, like, make the systems bad. But there also is, like, sort of the guiding hand of TikTok where it will give creators ideas for types of content to make. These are what people are, these are the terms that people are searching for. What if you made a video about trending restaurants in your neighborhood or Labu-Boo? Right. And part of it is, like, people, want to want ideas for what to make. TikTok is a very punishing algorithm, at least in my experience.

Like if you stop posting, it's really hard to regain views. I wasn't sure. Yeah, I've actually always been getting it. So there's a momentum almost. There's a momentum, for sure, for sure. And this is something creators have talked a lot about. But you need ideas for what to post. And if TikTok is saying a bunch of people are searching for this one specific restaurant

in New York, why wouldn't you make a video about it? right? It's like sort of it's it's a almost like a, it's backing into SEO. Yeah. Where you kind of, instead of searching for, you know, terms related to what you make, you take the terms that the platform is giving you or telling you, suggesting you make content based off of. Yeah, it's the kind of incentive driven web at this point. Because I think that with S, the thing with SEO especially is there were, there were people always made shit content. But there were also people who genuinely like, here are 10 things I really like in, in, in,

York. I mean, one of my, one of the saddest, like, deaths of a brand that's still around as like Zagat. That used to be, or time out, especially. I mean, there's so many, Sports Illustrated. You know, they're just these places that were making good content, the business model didn't work. And one of my grievances with Google at the moment strongly is that what they're selling now is the solution to the web they created. Yes, exactly. We've got all these disgusting websites out there. You go on a local news website. My God. It's... Your phone is like 150 degrees.

And there's pop-ups everywhere and you get to stuff and Google's saying, oh, the web's bad. We're going to summarize that as an AI overview. Isn't that great? And so, well, the web's bad because the design had to be, you know, the way we made content had to change in order to appease the platform. And that's the thing. You did a great piece actually about they're reaping the rewards of its unfair advantage and also

kind of like selling Hugh Swill and being like, yeah, we'll we'll find the dog, we'll find the diamond in the turds that we created. And I think... It's quite the tone of French. That's why they give me a microphone. But it's so sad as well because there is an innocence to it. It's like, yeah, if you know people are looking for New York stuff and you know New York, of course you'd say that timeout.

Reason they brought up the cigar as well is it used to be that you pick up timeout and be like, oh, what are these people think they're cool? Like it was a big degree of that. And I think TikTok has leaned into that as well with content creators like that. I have seen TikToks of stuff in New York. I've moved to America in 2008. I've spent many, many hours in New York. That's shit I'm surprised by.

It's cool. And then you get the people who are doing it chop shop style. And it's unfortunate but kind of inevitable that you'd see this on social networks. What's confusing to me is why TikTok feels like the first one to really give it the actual try. Because Instagram's sort of half-assed it. Twitter's never really, like people try and appear for algorithms, but it didn't feel like the companies were as serious about it as, say, maybe a Google or indeed TikTok.

Yeah. I think, I mean, Instagram at least, the search has always sucked. Yes. And it doesn't, I don't know that it makes sense to optimize that same way. That said, Instagram also does have, like, creator tools where it will be like, this is how you should edit a video or this is how you should make content. YouTube does this. So it's not that, I just think that search on TikTok is something so different.

I did something recently where I was, I searched for something on TikTok, and there was like a little pop-up that the app gave me that was like, if you're not finding an answer that's satisfactory, why don't you ask people to make content based off of it or something? It was crazy. You know, it was so many levels of optimization that I was like, this is really an experience. It doesn't exist on other platforms. It's such a bi-design thing with TikTok search, because one thing is really, I find really aggravating. As someone who, you know, isn't as clued up on the online culture as evidently you guys both are. And nobody has Labubu's here by me. I'll often see on TikTok some reference or something.

And I'll go, what are they talking about? What is that about? And TikTok doesn't allow you just to link to another video, right? And so what it forces you to do is there'll be the search suggestion, there'll be people doing searches. There'll be people that know that people are looking for searches so they will reference something else that was sending you somewhere else entirely. And it's just the net effect of that is instead of going to the video that explained the thing that I'm confused about, I end up watching maybe five others with ads in between every second or third one. And I still don't really know.

I mean, although some of the things I think if I did see the explanation, I still wouldn't understand it. But just trying to get there in the first place is really, really tricky. Another podcast from some SNL late-night comedy guide, not quite. Unhumor me with Robert Smygel and friends, me and hilarious guests from Jim Gaffigan to Bob Odenkirk to David Letterman, help make you funnier. This week, my guest, SNL's Mikey Day and head writer Streeter Seidel, help an acapella band with their between songs banter. The worst singer in the group? The worst?

Yeah. Me. Is there anything to the idea that because you're from Harvard, you only got in because your parents made a huge donation. The yard herds, right? That's the name. The Harvard Yard. They're open. Do you have a name suggestion?

We're open. Since you guys are middle aged, one erection. Listen to humor me with Robert Smigel and Friends on the I-Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. Humor me. I need some jokes to make me seem funny. Run a business and not thinking about podcast. Podcasting, think again. More Americans listen to podcasts than ads supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.

And as the number one podcaster, IHearts twice as large as the next two combined. So whatever your customers listen to, they'll hear your message. Plus, only IHeart can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio. Think podcasting can help your business. Think IHeart. Streaming, radio, and podcasting. Call 844-844-I-Hart to get started. That's 844-Ehart.

Hey, I'm Deanna Maria Riva, actress, mother, lover, and a Gen X woman walking through life one hot flash and hormonal crying jag at a time. You ladies know what I mean. I'll bet you a parameda apostle chin here you do. So let's talk about it. Join me on my new podcast. How hard can it be with Deanna Maria Riva, where I call on my Gen X squads from Ohio to Hollywood as we navigate midlife's most fantastic BS. All of a sudden, I'd had hanginess happening on my own. I was like, what the hell is that?

I was married when I had her, so I didn't even consider how empty that nest was going to be. Mood swings, night sweats, fupas, sex drive. Wait, what sex? Dating at 45. How high can it be getting naked at 50 with the new guy? That one's kind of hard. Well, that's lighting. They say we can't polish a turd, but we're sure going to try.

So let's get blunt with laughs, tears, or tears of laughter, and dive into it, unfiltered and unbothered and ask, how hard can it be? I cannot believe I'm about to say this out loud in public. Listen to How Hard Can It Be with Diana Maria Riva as part of my Cultura Podcast Network available on the IHart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Will Ferrell's Big Money Players and IHart Podcasts presents Soccer Moms. So I'm Leanne. Yeah. This is my best friend, Janet. Hey.

And we have been joined at the hips since high school. Absolutely. Now a redacted amount of years later, we're still joined at the hip, just a little bit bigger hips, wider. This is a podcast. We're recording it as we tailgate our youth soccer games in the back of my Honda Odyssey. With all the snacks and drink. Sidebar. Why did you get hard seltzer instead of beer?

They had a bogo. Well, then you got it. Do you want a white collar or something here? Just take it. What are y'all doing? Microphones? Are you making a rap album? I would.

Come on. I would buy it. Cuts through the defense like a hot knife through sponge cake. That sounds delicious. Oh, you're lucky. I'm not a drug addict. You're lucky I'm not an alcoholic. You are.

You are. I love this team. And I'm really. trying to be a figure in their lives that they can rely on. Oh. Listen to soccer moms on the Iheart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. It's when you get to the point of like, why are they creating search tools on their platforms? Is it so that you can find the thing you need or so that they can find, like, they can kind of get you halfway?

I don't think it's, I'm just be clear, I'm not front-loaded this and suggesting they're evil and everything, everything they do. The tweaks they make kind of are. One of the funny things, Mia, you actually put in the article about Jubes, though. That excellent. I'll link all of these in the notes. Don't worry. You don't have to email me. If you look for Apple Jupes on Instagram, you get this thing saying, protect your favorite brands.

The sale or promotion of counterfeit goods is not allowed on Instagram. So funny. But if you just type in Dupes, it goes summarizing. If you're looking for alternatives to high-end products, jupes are the way to go. A jup is a product that replicates the quality end or appearance of price. Your alternative. So funny. And then you get a bunch of videos that are selling Jubes.

Sometimes it feels like they don't really care that much. They just kind of like mailing it in. Yeah. TikTok it for Jubes. I find I wrote a column months ago now, but it was, I saw one video and there was this guy. And he hadn't even got out of bed, right? And he said, oh, Apple's selling these AirPods maxes for 300 bucks,

but these ones are only 20. And he was holding his hands. Oh, you can't obviously see it on a pocket. He was holding his hand in the air. And he didn't have a product in his head. hand, he just had a screenshot of the Apple, the official Apple AirPods maxes, and it was just sort of floating around with his hand. And then what he was selling on TikTok shop was, you know, a $20 knockoff.

That was terrible. And I wrote about basically how the TikTok shop is, I think it's kind of insulting to TikTok users. They really shoved it in. They put it right in the middle. Oh, and it looks terrible. It looks terrible. The products are just awful. Some of the marketing people do is so trashy.

It's like got all this like sexual innuendo in it. and all this kind of stuff. And TikTok were just like, well, no, we're happy with it, basically. And they actually tried to force a big correction on a column. They had nothing wrong with it other than the fact it was calling out that it was a terrible place to shop online. I think that TikTok should lean more into the excellent Chinese business owners, though. I don't know if you've seen any of these insane ones where it would be like, we're selling giant houses, you can, no permit needed.

There was one where it's like four people stand. It's like, one says, I'm racist. One says, I'm ablest. and one goes, I'm Stefan, if you need to buy high-quality cables with your logo on it. And I love those. Because they're funny. They're funny, but they're also just like, yeah, we're trying to do the algorithm, but fuck you. And at the end, they're just like, we have a bunch of cables with you.

That's respectable. That's commerce. We should support that. Not this weird QVC. It almost feels like we're trending towards what every music video in the 90s was making, like this very kind of like greasy consumerism. Though I will add, this isn't me, suggesting anyone specifically has decided to be evil.

This is just what happens when incentives for people, I think, when you get like the slop shop in TikTok. I think the incentives of all the major networks have been so interesting and shaping. I mean, we're talking earlier about Twitter. They never really pushed people in much of a direction in terms of what to sort of be talking about, but one thing they did reward constantly, the algorithm was anger. Yes. And Facebook got into that problem with, you know, when they, you know,

for the longest time they thought any engagement is good engagement, Until they realized it was your auntie and uncles, like having to go at each other over politics or whatever. That's when they realized that was bad, and I'm still not convinced they do realize how bad that is. Twitter was all about anger. I did for a short while, and this was years ago, I think, now. But, like, TikTok did seem to sort of push people towards doing stuff, right?

Which I thought was quite healthy. How do you mean? Well, the things that did well were, you know, friends getting together and dancing. It was being out and about. It was being funny. But the stuff that worked was actually quite entertaining. Kind of like Vine almost. But yeah, just like Vine in terms of just the sort of the humor that traveled,

I think what's happened, though, is they've turned the screw and the monetization and the amount of sponsor stuff. And also like the, and I never quite know what drives it, right? Because is it that some people come up with a format for a format for a video that works? And then TikTok goes, oh, that's good. We'll get others to do it. What do you think sort of TikTok is trying to nurture it itself first? I mean, I guess it's a bit of both. I imagine, yeah, it's chicken and egg because I had this theory.

about a year ago, maybe actually 2023, where it's like at some point how much of content is just going to be geared towards what they think the algorithm wants. And because the algorithm, with good reason, they don't want to just publish exactly what would work, because then people would only do that. And I think that there's just this weird battle between, I think any content create, I think all of us, like, there's a certain degree of what's going to do well. And personally, as everyone knows from this show, I've just done what I want since the beginning, regardless of what people said, but there is a pull of like, what will do well? What do people want? And what is a person in this case? And so you've just got this people probably, I reckon for the most part, people are making

honest content. I think it's like, but it's impossible to quantify. Yeah, it's impossible to quantify. And also, I don't think it's that like, it makes a lot of sense when you think of the internet or these platforms as a workplace, which for a lot of these people it is. For me, it is in some ways. The Verge employs me and pays my bills, but part of my work, part of how my work travels is based on my ability to ride algorithmic waves when needed, right? And it's the same way that you still see journalists on threads. I don't really post on threads very much, but you see journalists on threads post screenshots of their articles, and then in the replies they'll post the link because they think that they're going to get downvoted, right?

You're downranked for putting a link in there. She's insane. And that's the same way that, like, you know, sometimes. Twitch is like that as well now. Yeah, yeah. And I mean, Elon Musk has just come out straightforwardly and said, like, you know, it's, I can't remember the term he used. But yeah, he's acknowledged that. But, you know, the same practices sort of carry over to video platforms where you need to start a video in a certain way if you want it to get traction. What way is that? Well, there are different ways to do it. Some stuff that goes really, does really well is like, you know, selfie style, selfie style video. And it starts, okay, story time.

I'm sure you've seen. What's the Gen Z shake? You know, like, Oh, where you put it down. Like, millennials get it ready, right, and have it, and they go, Hello, everyone, right? Yes. The Genzi sake is the, is like,

So you guys, it doesn't really put down. Well, that's a perfect example of, like, people, the shake is this thing where people were, I guess, surmising that if you put your camera down, like you start recording and you put your camera down in a way that feels like you were just caught in the moment, yeah, and you were just recording, jumping into record a video, like, that is effective for people, or it makes it feel organic, or it makes it feel organic, or, it makes it feel relatable, like whatever. But, yeah, everyone does some, like, some level of optimizing.

I think the dark side of this is that trying to predict what works is turning people completely loopy, isn't it right? Like, so I saw, and I won't say who is, my assessment on how this person feels might be wrong, but I saw a singer who made a short video, maybe 30 seconds where she had, like, one verse of a song, and she's like, oh, guys, you like this. And it was wonderful. And it got, like, you know, over a million views. And everyone's going, oh, record this, record this, record.

And so she did, right? She sort of took time off the platform, made like an EP and put the songs out there, came back on TikTok to make the content about the song being ready. And it got next to nothing engagement. And you can just see, at least my impression was you could see her kind of going, why? Like, I've done the song, I've done the actual work of releasing a song. And the algorithm, for some reason, maybe it seems less organic, or maybe people just didn't like the song, maybe I'm ugly now, maybe all these.

And people go, what is it that's preventing it? And I think that's where it's kind of troubling to me. I agree. And I think that it's really hard sometimes to see the difference between the algorithm and the reader or the viewer. Right. Because it's like, what did you like? Did people actually like it? As well as the question there.

There was also a YouTube video that went up a couple months ago where someone was investigating why lots of videos have a person holding the tiny microphone, the Lavalier microphone. And it really... I'd do that. On the Bloomberg TikTok account, I'd do the whole mic a thing and people would take the mic out of me. It's weird though. Apparently so. Apparently the algorithm likes it. I also don't think it's that.

Dan over a morning brew as well does. He holds like a full scale like old newsman microphone. I think people need to go back to that. I love that. The subway text guy has it on like a little thing. Yeah, yeah. No, he has it. I think that that's lovely as well.

But it's like, I hadn't really thought about how it drives people insane, but it does. Even early days of the newsletter, I had text, Matt Weinberger, a friend of the show, be like, is this shit? Do people? He's like, just keep writing. Just ignore. Just keep writing. It will grow.

actually, but we've been conditioned for this thing where we're constantly, even me and I try and pretend I don't get affected by stuff like this, but it's like you see something do well or don't do well. Your natural inclination is, why? What can I do to, am I wrong? Am I somehow? And it's interesting how so much this comes back to the platform incentives. Right. And the human inside you assumes people don't like it. That's your initial reaction to it. I'd say I always find your boss, Nile, Nili. He's always talking about how. diverge, it just has to be true to what it's doing and not sort of bow to any of the platforms as they go. And I think it's always been a very good lesson because I think too many media outlets, we sit here and we go, oh, okay, this is the thing that's working on TikTok. We're going to sit down, we're going to act in a certain way, we're going to do it in a certain tone. And I've had previous employers where they're like, oh, just trying to do it off the cuff. And I'm like, well, when you work for, and I stress a previous employer, I would like, I would argue with my editors and saying, authentic for us was to not.

do that. And it's a very sort of hello fellow kids thing that happens. It's like, when these serious places tried to be all like, hey, you know, like in the same way that when a politician, like Chuck Schumer tries to do some TikTok joke, it's like it's not real. It doesn't. And it's embarrassing and it's patronizing to the people. So, yeah. Also off, yeah, can you just do something off the cuff? Oh, you would like me to fake spontaneity? Absolutely.

But it's, and it gets back to, to credit to Neely here, the term Google Zero. I think is really interesting because this idea that, and as you wrote about recently, though, that Google is basically possibly taking away the traffic from everyone or dictating who gets traffic

down in a very direct way. They're not one they control because it's a large language model or at least controlling it's indirect. And I think it's almost like a final mutelike boxer in Animal Farm being marched to the glue factory. The final way,

you've outlived your usefulness. And I feel like the media, and by the way, I say this with a great deal of sympathy. Yeah, you're going to chase which would get you clicks for your click. business. But I think you've seen where at the end or the beginning of a dark kind of like

semi-dark era where we're seeing the cost of orienting journalism around trends and clicks so aggressively. And we're kind of now, with the boo-boobos and everything, we're seeing the natural result of orienting things around trend chasing because it's like, here's a thing that has no real resale value. The owning it is just symbolic. Do you care about the show? No. Why are you making these news stories? Well, it's because people are going to be looking for them. Why are you covering the same thing as everyone else? Because everyone's looking. And there's a fair argument for that.

If there is a big funding round or a big news story, of course everyone's going to cover it. She just needs the traffic. And it's like the functionality of journalism. And I think this Google AI thing is, it's scary, man. I think like, Nilai got there early. I'll give him this one. One thing I'll say about the Google Zero, this idea that, you know, the traffic will go down until it hits nothing. I don't think it will hit nothing.

I don't think for some people it has basically hit nothing. However, I will say that like, and I posted this on Blue Sky, but this has just been the M.O. for Google and with search for years before AI overviews. The idea that Google is self-dealing, right? That it creates products that then replace the things that other people were doing in search. That is old news. And it's funny that, you know, people are kind of, that the AI overview of it all is what kind of finally makes people realize it. When I worked at the markup, up. We ran this story by some great former colleagues that measured the percentage of the first page of Google results on a phone screen. How much of that space was taken up by Google products itself? And it was like 41%. And that killed websites like celebrity net worth. You know what I mean? Or like travel companies because Google had flights, shopping, right? Like all of these services that other sites were Google just made its own version and they were like, we're going to put this at the top. That's what that's happening with AI. It's the exact same thing. In those cases, in Europe, they regulated against it. So when these companies come on and say, oh, Europe's being so overbearing or everything, that's what they're talking about.

They're talking about the fact that Google shopping can't dominate the top 20% of a search page when you search for, you know, iPad or whatever. So that's what they were so aggrieved by. But now with all the AI, I mean, I was on my mobile, on my software on the other day, and it was, it was on the other day. It was, I was scrolling for days before I got to organic content. And now they're doing the entirely AI generated whole page. Did you see this test that they announced? AI mode. Oh, is this beyond AI mode?

Yeah, it's called. I forget what it's called. I would have to look it up. But they announced it last Friday, Thursday or Friday. And basically, it's separate from AI mode. You search for something. And it creates, honestly, exactly what web pages look like, websites. And it is, you know, it'll have a section. If you search, I think the example they gave was like solo traveling in Japan.

And the top part will be like Reddit and YouTube posts. So like communities or forums. Then there will be a whole different section of the SERP, the search engine result page. That is, yes. It's called Web Guide. Web guide, web guide, web guide. And then it'll be sort of like, you know, top places to go and it will pull stuff in from Expedia or not Expedia, trip advisor, things like that. It basically subsections the SER to look like an SEO generated or like an SEO driven article.

It's really crazy. It's the snake game. That is actually... Who needs websites anymore? No, but it's all over, isn't it? But that's the thing. It's ironic as well, because the origins of Google were based on this idea that there was too much original content for you to find it alone. And it was kind of noble.

And also within the original paper, they were like, yeah, if ads ever get involved with this, it's fucked. Man, were they right? But it's this sense of they've never had much gratitude towards the web. And you made me actually think of something with traffic dropping away. This is also, if you read like search engine journal and like these are great publications by the way. You want to see some real like journalist or journalists. People that read SEO and talk to SEO people all day. Jesus Christ.

Rusty over there. But there are so many situations where traffic has just disappeared from a concept and they just Google went, no, not today. The idea that they're building pages like this is fascinating as well because it's like, wow, we don't need you anymore. Yes, you fucking do. Dick Wad. How is it going to generate? the page, what's it going to be based on? And their thought I imagine, I'm guessing, is likely, oh, people won't notice. I think people will, I think people will see AI results, which is why

the traffic's dropping, okay, that answers my question. But I think an entire fake page, people are going to be like, okay, and maybe they'll click them, but they're not going to stick around on them, they're not going to read much, it's not going to be particularly enjoyable. But maybe I'm wrong, and I hope I'm not wrong, because if this is an idea of something, in the web, that is Google. Like, that's more Google zero-e than anything I've ever seen. It's grotesque. It's just part of a pattern of reducing any need to go off that.

Yeah. And one of the most egregious examples of it, isn't even the AI. Every time I see it, it annoys me more and more. So one of the things that some publications have been quite successful at, Bloomberg, one of them, The York Times famous, is games, right? Wordle, connections, whatever. A little thing that would make people subscribe to the app, open the app every day, maybe catch a bit of news while they're there.

Right. And now, LinkedIn are doing mini games. Apple News is it. And I'm like, why? Can you explain this LinkedIn game? Because I got the pop-up for the Apple News thing, and I think I posted it on Instagram, and I don't know what this shit is. I'm just like, fuck there.

But what are these LinkedIn games? Please walk me through. I mean, they're just little word games. I mean, they're just trying to sort of capture. Do you know what? I've not played the LinkedIn ones. But the Apple ones are just mini crossword, that kind of stuff. The thing with the LinkedIn one, which I find quite funny,

is it will tell you how many of your, colleagues have that and it's like oh 300 of your colleagues at Bloomberg have done the mini crossword oh how that's that's really useful information i imagine the crossword answer for every single day on LinkedIn is just like hustle rise grind work that would be quite fun though yeah that would make me sort of go for it that would require too much like charm and thought behind your own so it's probably LinkedIn if you're listening I can write your games I also they added vertical video to LinkedIn evil and I think that if you post one of those someone should come visit your house.

Yes, like that's wellness check. They're like, no, I'm thinking more like the FBI. It's like, what do you got on the laptop? Let me check that hard drive real quick. But it's, it's so funny as well because all this is just coming down to, please click our website. Please don't leave our website. Our website is the most important.

It almost feels just desperate. Like it feels the TikTok generally, and I don't say this with any, I, TikTok upsets me when I use it. I need the, at the page to end. There's just a weird thing in my brain. And I'm like, no, infinite makes me, I don't want to look at this forever. Have you ever reached the clip that says, hey, you've been scrolling for a while? No.

See, I get upset. I get upset. I get it. Yeah, okay. Isn't that the most depressing? It does work though, doesn't it? Yeah, at that point I'm like, God damn, I need to go outside. Do you know what we're talking about?

There's like a clip you get. If you've been scrolling, and it must be like an hour and a half, maybe. I get really anxious. It will say, please, you know, you've been doing this a long time. I need to hit the end. If I get the sense that there's no end, I'm like, I can't look at it. Like, I require time to end, please. But that sort of limitless space is why we get derivative content.

You know what I mean? Like that's kind of... Because people want more. People want more. And also, it just, if there's space, someone will fill it. And that was kind of what I was trying to get at in my dupe story, which is like, the same thing that happens on an infinite scroll feed on recommendation-based social media platforms is happening to, like, our physical goods, simply because there is Amazon space.

There are Amazon pages to fill. and you need ideas, the same way that a content creator needs ideas to post every single day. Like when it is so algorithmic and recommendations based and taste-based, it's just like, just throw whatever. And I think, and I hate to defend the platforms at all. I think the thing you said earlier about people did make shit content before, actually really did resonate because it's, there's also a degree here of, yeah, there's a bunch of derivative content, but there's also consumer demand. And yeah, as human beings, we want to see more of a thing we're interested. I do think part of the unhealthy parts of the internet is we can fuel just about anything,

perhaps not for the best. But it's, and there's a goodness to it as well as many alternative communities that have found good things online and then others. But it's interesting because it's fulfilling the need of needing an infinite scroll, which is a need that they created on the platforms themselves. And I also found that story interesting because you didn't really have sympathy with any. Like it felt like you were empathetic for everyone, but not sympathetic to anyone. It was like you recognized why people did these things and why people want jupes of expensive things is probably because the things too expensive.

But then you had the skirt worn by the by Taylor Swift. Yeah. And the scort. The scort. It's a scort. Thank you. Sorry, my bad. Yeah.

I really like stories where you read it and your allegiance changes. I think that's like one of my favorite things to write. And when I can figure out ways to put it into that format, I really enjoy it. But yeah, I mean, like, I don't really love the. debate going into like who's right and who's wrong because it's just like not that helpful or not that interesting. That feels more like, you know, just gossip or something. But I like this idea that like everyone is a little bit being taken advantage of and everyone also sucks a bit here. Another podcast from some SNL late night comedy guy, not quite. Unhumor me with Robert Smygel and

friends, me and hilarious guests from Jim Gaffigan to Bob Odenkirk to David Letterman, help make you funnier. This week, my guest, SNL's Mikey Day and headwriter, Streeter Seidel, help an a cappella band with their between songs banter. There's that worst singer in the group? The worst? Yeah. Me. Is there anything to the idea that because you're from Harvard, uh, you only got in because your parents made a huge donation. The group, the yard birds, right? That's the name. The Harvard yard, but they're open. Do you have a name suggestion? We're open. Since you guys are middle age.

One erection. Listen to humor me with Robert Smygel and Friends on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. Humor me. I need some jokes to make me seem funny. Run a business and not thinking about podcasting, think again. More Americans listen to podcasts than ads supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora. And as the number one podcaster, IHearts twice as large as the next two combined. So whatever your customers listen to, they'll hear your message.

Plus, only IHeart can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio. Think podcasting can help your business. Think IHart. Streaming, radio, and podcasting. Let us show you at iHeartadvertising.com. That's IHeartadvertising.com. American soccer is about to explode. The World Cup is coming.

Ramers sending on to earnies. I'm Tab Ramos. I'm Tom Boe. On our podcast, Inside American Soccer, you'll get the real storylines. I'm not worried about Policic. I'm not worried about Balagan. I'm not worried about McKinney.

My only concern is what happens in the back. The biggest decisions. If you're going to look at stats and numbers, he has no shot at making this World Cup team. And the truth about the U.S. national team. It wouldn't be a huge surprise if our team ends up in the quarterfinals or potentially a great run into the semifinals. The World Cup is almost here.

Experience it all with us. Listen, Inside American Soccer with Tom Bogart and Tab Ramos on the IHart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, wherever you get your podcast. Will Ferrell's Big Money Players and IHart Podcasts presents soccer moms. So I'm Leanne. This is my best friend Janet. And we have been joined at the hips since high school. Absolutely.

Now a redacted amount of years later, we're still joined at the hip. Just a little bit bigger hips, wider. This is a podcast. We're recording it as we tailgate our youth soccer games in the back of my Honda Odyssey. with all the snacks and drinks. Sidebar. Why did you get hard seltzer instead of beer? Oh, they had a bogo.

Well, then you got it. Do you want a white color or something here? Just hit it. What are y'all doing? Microphones? Are you making a rap album? Oh, I would. Come on.

Can you move? I would buy it. Cuts through the defense like a hot knife through sponge cake. That sounds delicious. Oh, you're lucky. I'm not a drug addict. You're lucky I'm not an alcoholic. You are.

You are. I'm not a killer. I love this team, and I'm really. trying to be a figure in their lives that they can rely on. Oh. Oh. Oh. Listen to soccer moms on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

And I also think that there is a certain degree of human beings take advantage of other human beings too. They rip-offs the I'm the I'm the LeBoooooo Whisperer. That's a great quote there. Like, I'm the person that can help you find the thing. There are all of these channels about how you can, like, gambling tips about how you can buy and resell stuff. There are ethically dubious things that pop up on the internet, but it's also hunger for it. Those people are taking advantage just as

much as the incentives as the platform take advantage of people. I think the platforms are generally more evil because they have more capacity for harm, but that doesn't mean that these small-time people would not do evil things even given that scale. I feel the platforms, the difference between how the platforms behaved and how what people describe as what the legacy gatekeepers from yesterday year is that they don't have any sort of standards of what's good, right? Right.

So if you're, you know, you're running a children's television company, Nickelodeon, children's BBC, whatever, you're not commissioning a show like Mr. Beast or whatever. No. Because you just, something makes you going, is this really what we want here? Is like, do we want to make it that everyone's obsessed with money

and they're willing to sort of do these crazy stunts, embarrass themselves, whatever? And you make those decisions, despite knowing that people would lap it up, people would go crazy. And I think you can say the same thing about sexualized content. You can say the same things about gambling. I think, yeah, you could do a great show about people gambling on sports. Oh, we have one of back during the Super Bowl. And many listeners did not like that.

I talked about sports. But it gets back to the same incentives, like you're saying. It's people take advantage of people. But I think there used to be this idea that the major companies, when they even was down to say 60, minutes, right, on CBS, they would say, right, is this genuinely important and do we need to do it? And I think when the platforms don't apply those same standards, what it means is that the people with just completely nonsense theories and opinions, just get on that same surface where any TV producer worth their salt at all would go, okay, well, we're not going to put this guy on,

because what are his qualifications? We don't, you know, we don't know if he's talking gibberish or not. So there's been problems with that in terms of who gets on, but like, I think it's, I think it's better maybe in some respect. No, and I think the, but you're also touching on something, which is these platforms have, despite what they're doing right now have always acted as if they're never going to be the arbiters of what is used as content. It's just like we're helping you find stuff. But it's very clear that they want to be the producer or at least mimic being a producer as well. And it's very interesting as well, because everything we're discussing is just incentives.

It's incentives and how people are drawn by it. Because you mention nutters. like people like did I mention nutters? No, no, I mean just like people of dubious intent and content. People like Curtis Yavin or Eliza Yudkowski or these less wrong freaks

they were 10 years ago they would have never had them I would say they would have likely not got a New York Times call whatever but I think what that is is actually a mashing between everything we're talking about which is 10 years ago there wasn't perhaps the pull of SEO, there wasn't the pull of tons of online

content suggesting that we need to talk to this guy and humor him. Seriously, there was tons of reporting saying these people were evil. But now I genuinely think some of these things also might get clicks or they'll see the interviews that these people get 500,000 views. So they're drawn by all these new incentives versus having a natural quality bar. I do think it is funny, though, that these companies to this day are still pretending that they have no responsibility for the content. They have no quality standards they need to maintain. And indeed, they will tweak them to whatever level. I'm not even saying that anything has changed.

I mean, there's been changes in the sense that they, I think, well, I struggled to give Facebook too much credit on this, but, you know, they definitely have made tweaks around just having, you know, a regular family member talk on Facebook and that being driven to, but what they've kind of pivoted to, and maybe they've done it not out of any sort of obligation to improve the problem, but because they realize now that content made by people you don't know that's sort of made in certain way you're going to look at that for longer anyway, so they don't care. There's more of it. There are more people you don't know than do. Which is a really interest. I mean, I find now, the only time I get any utility from the

Facebook app is when it says, here's what you're doing 10 years ago. And I'll take a screenshot of that, send it to wherever it was. And go, look, can you believe that was 10 years ago? And that's going to start running out soon, I think. I'm going to run out of those sort of, you know, members because people don't post it. But that time when it used to be a platform where you'd have like a party, and the next day there'd be, you know, 100 photos of people tagged I mean, that feels like a completely different website. It was so nice. It's great.

That's the thing, like, as angry as I am at these platforms, it's broken heart of romantic, because when I got on Facebook, it was genuinely magical. Like you said, you'd go to a party, somewhat like 10 shit webcam photos would be up there. You'd say, tag it.

I'm tag me in that one, or like an idiot. Or just like you'd see someone that you talk to for a minute and you were friends. I had tons of friends at Penn State, for example. And there was something like nice about that. And I guess that that was just before they realized how much money they could.

make or before they went public. And they realized, too, that, you know, humans have an endless appetite for slop, not even AI slop. It's just like if you give them a scroll-y feed, they will just keep going until we hit the danger zone pop-up. Does Facebook have a danger zone pop-up? I don't think it does. I don't think so.

I don't think so. I've never looked at that long. They're just like, don't look at this. Yeah. No, it's, and I think it's the shift away from their claimed utility towards their real one that they want, which is they all want to be entertainment network. Because this concept of we ran out of stuff, that is it. It's like you go on Facebook, you check Facebook and you go, oh, this, this and this, okay, I'm done because my utility here is social networks.

On Google, like, I go and look for something. People might do idle looking, but they're like generally with a target. Now you've TikTok was, I think, created within the realm of people want to see stuff. Like it was never tried to sell itself as a place where you meet your friends. A place we interact with others. Yeah, in fact, it was distinctly, this is a place where you are not by people you know. You know what I mean? You're posting things to an assumed audience that does not include your parents or your friends.

Yeah, yeah. And TikTok doesn't, compared to the other networks, TikTok doesn't really encourage you to post, right? If you do one video, then it would say, oh, do this, this, this, this is. But it's quite content for people just to consume if that's what they're pattern there. But it's an entertainment now. There's not like a huge sort of, you know, nudge in the app to say, oh, get, get posting. Yeah. And I think we're, and even with Google now, it's like, what is Google anymore?

Is it, are they trying to not making it a search? Is it going, is a place where Google, I mean, it always was a place where Google served you ads. But now it's, you're in the Google zone. And I have to wonder if I say this with some optimism, whether someone might go, huh, what if we made a search engine that helped you find things? It could be a billion, two billion annual revenue business. You know, it's not a hundred billion, but we also don't need to do antitrust shit every year. I'm even saying these words out loud, I'm like, no, that's not going to happen.

I mean, people are trying to make different. I mean, duck, duck goes kind of in that vein. Yeah, I like that. But people just don't use them. That's the problem. And that's the thing. It's like, do they not use them or it's just not as many as Google use them? I'm not even saying you're wrong.

It's just when you say people. you mean most people. And yeah, most people use Google. Most people stop their internet journey on Google. I mean, the thing that ties a lot of these platforms as problems together is the point in which they go public, it all just goes nuts so, right? Because you have, I mean, Facebook is the classic example of this. It just, then it just became massive growth every single quarter. And that's all, and I think, I mean, and this is such a sort of basic observation, I guess. But, you know, I think if you applied that model to say the, the bodega on your street, right? Okay, every year you need to grow by 10%. Imagine what that business is going to go mad, isn't it?

It's going to be selling porn and it's going to be selling drugs. Just to get the margins up, right? And he's thinking, well, holding a set. Respectfully and with love. No, this is the rot economy. This is the growth. It's everything driven around growth. It's the moment that growth must be perpetual.

Because in 2017, there was an internal Facebook thing I reported out last year. Big up to Jeff Orwitz, broken code, great book, where there's a whole thing where Zuckerberg needed 12% perpetual growth. When you just really sat and thought about this, that is an insane fucking thing to put on a social network. I must have more friends. I must connect with more. And now when you look at everything, that is the incentive of everything.

It's not really about do we buy toys, do we search for things? How do we keep people here or get the credit card? Which is, I mean, the age old capitalism thing. The problem was with Facebook is that people didn't have enough friends. Yes, exactly. You run out. Yeah, it's that you run out of stuff. And so then it became, okay, well, how do we make them, when they're looking at this site, look on it for longer? And that's when we started to get all the mad videos.

It was crazy. It was profitable before they took it public. I have read stories which suggest that Mark Zuckerberg didn't want to take it public. And I'm like 50-50 on whether he did because there's enough evidence that suggests that he was quite happy with it being a $50 billion private company. And then I think he realized, oh, wait, I control this whole thing. I can never be fired. But it's like trying to give a soul to... There's regret, though.

I mean, Jack Dorsey is probably the famous one there, right? And he's funny. He should never have been a public company, and he's right. If only someone... Twicken could have been a fine business. But the VCs need their payday, right? That's the whole ecosystem. I always wonder why we don't have more interesting venture capital models

with, like, revenue shares or like something that is more interesting than if I give you a bunch of money, you might sell them. in the future. It's sad, but it's, you know what, I want to ask a good question of, are there any parts of the internet you enjoy right now? I truly want to know.

You should have prepped me with this one before. It's interesting having the gap. I'm sort of gravitating towards old style blogs, like weblogs. Do you ever see, and I think, I don't know how to pronounce it. I think it's Kotka.org. Oh, yeah, Kotke. Cockkey. Is that it?

And it's just a blog. There's maybe three or four entries a day, and he's been doing it. And he's got a team. 20 years or something. For a long, long time. Yeah. And it's just a beautiful design. And the stuff is just interesting stuff.

It's kind of reminds you of the days when you just have a few weblogs that you'd rate. And he sends real traffic as well. Yeah. I mentioned it does. But it doesn't be, you couldn't launch that site today and gain popular. I think you have this sort of legacy of people that have always visited that website. I actually, I... Although I'm a new reader, so maybe I don't know.

No, but I kind of, I agree with 98% of it other than I think you could do something like this. It's just that starting a new thing. fucking sucks. Like I went and I have some personal experience with this in. I went and looked back where I was five years ago, 300 subscribers, 60 views on my first piece, but you have to have the ability to do a bunch of shit until it makes money. And I had a main job, had a PR firm. And I think just making money in creating anything is so difficult. But I love cook. I actually, I had not thought of it in a while, but it's just a place where someone thoughtful has said you should check this out. Kind of mimics, I don't know, friendships or I can't.

Conoclasts, like the idea of someone who... Yeah, and there's a tone as well. Yeah. You just kind of know you're going to get, it's going to be sort of mildly nerdy, but not too much so. And that's what you get when you go there. And I think it's, yeah, it's when people get nostalgic for the web, I think it's that kind of discovery that they're thinking about. Yeah. And it's, it is the thing that I think a lot of listeners miss as well.

It's like, we're not, we don't just hate arbitrarily. We're not just angry. It's just there's something taken away. Like we mentioned Facebook, the quality. He also used to be Google. You used to be able to dick around on Google and find some. bizarre stuff. I remember back in college, I lost this, 2006, I want to say. I was in my, in my Dustin Pangas for college roommate. We randomly typed in, you know you're right,

by Nirvana into YouTube. And there was just this, I think it's like, I don't even remember it had view. It was this grainy video of this, like, young Asian guy singing this like really kind of like slightly out of tune version of something. It was so interesting and grim. Like, he seemed very sad. I can never find it again. But that was the kind of internet. I kind of missed, like, just these arbitrary moments where you find these weird things. You can't find that clip on YouTube, but would you be interested in two hours of Joe Rogan instead? Yeah, five hours of Lexington. Because it will help you find that.

Lex Fried. And then if you watch that, then maybe Charlie Kirk. And then you're in. Oh, you've learned three times of racism. We get Lex Friedman going, how you are on computer on website. I won't do that for too long. That's why the episodes are so long. It's 10 minutes per question.

So, Mia, what are you enjoying? Oh, man. I feel like there are a few content creators that I really like and really tune into. There's a woman who makes, like, sort of YouTube video essays that are very well researched. Her name is Mina Le. And she does sort of, like, fashion and consumerism and culture and art and stuff. And I think she is really fun. and just like clearly, I saw this thing the other day that someone was like,

if you can't write a normal essay, you should not try to do video essays. And she can do both. It's clear she can do both. And I'm like thank you so much. That's very good. You know what I mean? So I really like her. There's another person that I follow on TikTok and other platforms named Ryan Finn.

And she is also really great. Also kind of writes about like a, she talks about fashion. clothing and culture in a really like heady kind of it's it's the type of content that people who don't read would see it and be like it's really not that deep but it is you know and I appreciate that someone takes things seriously like that there are also like corners of the internet even on platforms like TikTok or Instagram that I just like find the nerds and they still are just plugging away and doing whatever they want and their posts get like 50 views. and they're fine with it.

And like, that's, I think, where it's special. Where I don't like it when I follow a creator and suddenly everything is SponCon. Or I follow a creator and clearly they're just sort of like jumping on trends. I also like websites where there's still like new content being posted, but you can clearly find the markings of like 2006. Like I'm a big knitter and ravelry is the, was the place to find knitting patterns in like the early to mid-2000s. and sometimes I'll find photos clearly from that era, and it's like really delightful. You know what I mean?

Like they were posting to a different internet. They were thinking of the web as a completely different space. Before the algorithms, I imagine. Before the algorithms. And Rabelry also, like, it has some algorithmic stuff, but like a lot of it is sort of pure, I think. They're like forums, you know what I mean, that people post on. This is why one of my favorites is baseball prospectors. I know you're a Dodger fan, right?

No Dodgers. They suck right now. I know. It's everyone's really sad. that's a dead. But baseball prospectus, I think, has looked the same way since it was made. And it's just like really specific, nerdy stuff. But I think you can even see it in sports. You've got people like, Chad Morayama over at Dodgers Digest, I think it is. You've got these like really specific. And you know that they're already doing okay, but they're not like millions of views every month or anything. But you've got this kind of niche strength. And my hopium, I snort aggressively, is that these will never stop being made because they're still being made now. There's never been a more bleak time. to make niche specific content and keep making it, but people keep doing it. I mean, Carl Brown from Internet of Bugs, he, like, does the most straightforward thing and just talks, and it's great, and he has a growing audience, but he does very specific developer-focused

stuff with a very straightforward explanation, lovely fella, and it's nice seeing those, and it's what gives me a bit hope, because if those people, if you never find any of that stuff anymore, if everything is just mainstream, I think that's terrifying. But even look at gamers Nexus, big, hot, Steve, Burke over the legend, hog run box as well. You've got millions of subscribers. There is hunger for this stuff. There's hunger for passionate people,

storytelling. I mean, I was always a big fan of British guy, Tom Scott. I feel like you might have. And he's done it for years and years made YouTube videos. And he did like 20 minutes on the design of the British plug for like an outlet. And how it's got three products.

And he makes the case that it's, you know, one of the finest things that Britain's ever got up with because it, you know, you can't. electrocute yourself by putting it in. And I remember watching you thinking, God, I've just watched 15 minutes about the history of the plug. And I, and I,

but he's just such a sort of a resting, interesting guy, bona fide nerd, but a great presenter. One of the things I take from the sort of substack era, if you like, is like I imagine, and I'm not going to make you get into numbers, but I imagine the verge with its paywall now, has a lot of people saying, oh, why are you paywalling? And I find it really interesting that

when big publications put up a paywall, everyone gets a little bit mad, right? They say that's, you know, and like whenever I post a link to Bloomberg, it's like, oh, it's paywarded. And yet when one person launches a substack and says, right, this is 10 bucks a month. Oh, my God.

They kind of go, oh, great, good for you. And definitely get behind you. And I think what that's showing us is, one, it's a kind of, you know, middle finger to the mainstream media, fine. But then the second thing maybe is that I think people have respect for depth and niche. And love for a really,

content as well. Yeah, because I think, I think they want to sort of, they love the idea that someone gives up and gives up, you know, a steady thing, goes into a substatt. I mean, I think of Paul Krugman who left the New York Times. I remember thinking, are there's, on the show, Paul. Well, I remember thinking, okay, Paul, you're being a cranky old man just because the editors don't want you to do that. But now his substack is brilliant. It goes to such length. If you know Paul Krugman, please get him in touch. But it's great. And I think I'm much more inclined to Chuck, you know, When the New York Times wants to upgrade my subscription, I'd rather send that to Paul on his own. Yeah.

Get the entirety of the New York Times. Because you're incentivizing this individual voice and you know the person kind of parisocially. And the way that I think bigger publications kind of lean into that is to have these sort of niches. Well, the verse just started following, right? Yeah. Oh, yeah. Everyone should follow me on the verge. You should follow me.

You can follow me and all the topics I write about. But I'm glad you said that, Dave, because I think that is it shows a thing that mass media or big media companies have failed to do, which is explain what we're actually do. day to day. And I, that's why I am active on TikTok. You know what I mean? I talk to people who will never probably read my story and probably will never subscribe to The Verge, truthfully. Some do. Thank you so much. But a lot of them will just watch my videos. And that is a way for me to explain to them what it takes for me to write a story. This is how I talk to people. This is, like, I think people don't realize that like when I'm writing stories, I'm actually sometimes

going in person to interview the person. You know what I mean? Like it's, and I don't blame them really for not knowing because media has done a really bad job of explaining it historically. And I hope that, you know, folks who read my work know that, like, I'm a one person and I write these stories. And obviously there's copy editors and editors and photo editors and, you know, dev, like, dev folks who make my stories come to life. But, like, we are just people making shit that we like and we think is worth your time. And every media company should be showing that off. You made a post quite like maybe it was last year, forgive me, where it was saying we're kind of journalists are seeding ground to content creators

who are reusing their stuff. And I think it comes down to a failure of, I'm not saying anything specifically about any given out there, but a failure to realize that people want people, they want to read people. And I think that large broadsheets tend to fail. Actually, I will give big props to the FT for doing this, that they let their freak flags fly. Bryce Elder, the legend. and like Alphaville as well because people want to read people

and I think that what should be table stakes now is that every outlet should get everyone a good microphone, get everyone a good camera, media train them, joshim up a bit so that they can sound good

and represent the work of the publication in a personal way that makes people more willing to understand there's a paywall which is a reasonable thing however you feel about the verge or any other outlet yeah money

the things cost money to do money So expensive. It's really fucking expensive to write 6,000 word features. That's like months of my time, many, many people's work and resources. And I think also like if we don't feel that, and I know a lot of people disagreed with me when I said like we're seeding ground and people didn't like it for a lot of valid reasons. But if we are not there, something will fill the space. I was basically just sick of seeing my stories super, you know, behind someone's head. And you made this point very clearly. It's what. You said, like, if someone taking my stuff. It's someone taking my stuff. Yeah, exactly. It's someone taking my stuff. They're misrepresenting it, getting basic facts wrong. And, like, I have 30 minutes in my day.

I will just make the fucking video. You know what I mean? Like, I don't care. But they should get, there should be the space for, they should have, like, A HAL Radio gives me a studio at least because it's like, oh, imagine my, might want to do an in studio thing. Might make for good content. It's just, when you have resources, share them.

Do you're going to say something? Well, I think part of all of this as well is showing the process. is the most, it travels almost more than the story. Totally. And it breeds a ton of trust. I mean, I'm always surprised you can be, you know,

in rooms of people who are, you know, incredibly successful. And they'll ask the most rudimentary questions about the journalistic process, like, oh, who tells you what to write? Yes. And I'm like, my job would be much easier

if someone did tell me what to write as opposed to it being the other way around. Things like, do you let people read things? I think just going into the process is really, really useful. And I always, there was, I was at a dinner thing once in this one going, made this point that I've always thought of when I're talking about this is if you said to

somebody, when was journalism in America the most trusted, right? My assumption, most people would say Watergate, right? Yeah, yeah. And he said, no, it wasn't Watergate that made Journalism trusted. It was a very good film about Watergate that made journalism trusted because all that film was, was just them trying to get this stuff in the paper and them going through hell to make it happen. And if you want a more modern example, that the, um, the, the, um, the, um, the, um, the, the, um, the book she said by the New York Times reporters that did the Jeffrey Epstein, sorry, no, it was Harvey Weinstein.

I get all the different people. Yeah, disgusting men. But their book, they knew what Harvey Weinstein had done within about 10 pages of the first chapter. Right. The rest of the book was get it in the newspaper. And I just think that is the more of that process that journalists share off the cuff constantly. It's super powerful. That's what Twitter used to be very good at.

There's a big shift in newsrooms among bosses that went, hold on a second, the official account is getting no engagement. But when this random person on one of our UK desks starts tweeting about it, that gets loads of pickup. Why is that? It's because people respect hearing the process more than the end result, the eventual story. They want to also know, and I know that this is difficult for different. Like, your opinion stuff is fucking fantastic, by the way, at Bloomberg. It's really, like Bloomberg has actually been very impressive in how they've grown out the opinion stuff. So this is not a detraction of that.

I, at least in my writing, have found that people really like to know why you care. And I think that explaining that, even on here talking about your work, mate, it's like hearing it just a little bit about the things that draw you into the story. I think it's so powerful. It's also people love it. I mean, after CES, I know I see like Victoria's Song and Sherlyn Lowe. Both of them get the loveliest comments and people, I just found you work for the show. It's lovely. And it's also, I feel like most readers like to know and appreciate it.

It's not like most people are like, oh, these fucking idiots just tired. When they actually know what goes into it, I feel that there's more goodness in people around this than they know. And now you've made that comment about Watergate and be thinking about it all fucking day. I'm obsessed of it. No, it's such a good point. So I'm going to wrap it there. It's been so wonderful having you both. Mia, what can people find you?

I'm on Blue Sky, TikTok, Instagram, and Theverge.com, where again, you can follow me. Dave? I'm on all those places except Theverge.com. I'm Bloomberg.com. opinion but sky is the ground the rest yeah and i must recommend both of their work both of you are two my favorite right i've no like i'm actually so excited i go this is one of my favorite episodes recorded i'm just gonna be honest um i'm ed zitron you can find me on the podcast better offline you go better offline.com click newsletter click all the stuff uh get the challenge coin if you want uh

but really just i'm so grateful to have all of you love you all thank you for listening and then you're gonna hear it say thank you for listening again i'm gonna get an email i'm gonna ignore it i'll respond and thank you for listening. But thank you for listening. Thank you for listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song is Mattosowski. You can check out more of his music and audio projects at Mattersowski.com. M-A-T-T-T-O-S-O-S-K-I.com. You can email me at easy at betteroffline.com or visit Better Offline.com to find more podcast links and, of course, my newsletter. I also really recommend you go to chat. Where's Your Ed dot at to visit the Discord and go to R-slash Better Offline to check out

our Reddit. Thank you so much for listening. Better Offline is a production of Cool Zone Media. For more from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com, or check us out on the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.

Another podcast from some SNL, late-night comedy guy, not quite. Unhumor me with Robert Smigel and friends. Me and hilarious guests from Bob Odenkirk to David Letterman help make you funnier. This week, my guest, SNL's Mikey Day and headwriter, Streeter Seidel, help an a cappella band with their between songs banter.

Where does your group perform? We do some retirement homes. Those people are starving for banter. Listen to humor me with Robert Smigel and friends on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Why are we all so obsessed with romance? On the radio 831 podcast, join us, Sanjana Basker and Tyler McCall, as we unpack all the trending tropes, fuzzy adaptations, booktops.

drama and celebrity love stories with hot takes and sharp guests. Each episode digs into what these stories reveal about desire, fantasy, identity, and how we love now. Listen to the Radio 831 podcast on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. American soccer is about to explode. The World Cup is coming. Ramos sending on an historicer chip. I'm Tab Ramos. I'm Tom Boak.

On our podcast, Inside American Soccer, you'll get the real storylines, the biggest decisions, and the truth about the U.S. national team. It wouldn't be a huge surprise if our team ends up in the quarterfinals or potentially a great run into the semifinals. Listen, Inside American Soccer with Tom Bogart and Tab Ramos on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, wherever you get your podcast. Hey, I'm Deanna Maria Riva, and on my new podcast, How Hard Can It Be? I call on my Gen X squad from Ohio to Hollywood as we navigate mid-level. life's most fantastic BS. Unfiltered conversations from night sweats to futas to scheduling sex. Wait, what sex? Is it just me or does every woman my age want to look at Pinterest instead of having sex sometimes? They say we can't polish a turd, but we're sure going to try. So let's get

blunt with laughs, tears, or tears of laughter. Listen to How Hard Can It Be with Diana Maria Riva on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This is an IHeart podcast. Guaranteed human.