Betwixt The Sheets: The History of Sex, Scandal & Society - Vasectomy
Episode Date: May 24, 2022What do you think of when you think of birth control? Is it condoms, IUDs, the pill? What about vasectomies?From monkey testicles to possible cancer treatments to ties of honour, over the past 150 yea...rs ‘the snip’ has had a few variations and uses … not all of them scientifically sound. But what is it? And how did it come about?Kate is joined Betwixt the Sheets by Georgia Grainger (https://twitter.com/sniphist) to discuss the vasectomy’s place as a contraceptive, as well as its relationship with eugenics and masculinity.*WARNING this episode includes mentions of mental illness, eugenics and themes of an adult nature* Produced by Charlotte Long and Sophie Gee. Mixed by Pete Dennis. Betwixt the Sheets: The History of Sex, Scandal & Society. A podcast by History Hit. This podcast includes music from Epidemic Sound and archive clips from Singer Sewing Machines “Three Smart Daughters” advertisement, 1940, and Beich Whiz Bar “Party Magic” commercial, 1938. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Do you want even more shocking and scandalous history?
Like why the ancient Greek statues had such small manhoods?
Or what went on behind closed doors in the Georgian era?
We'll sign up to History Hit,
where you can see me discover the scandalous side of history,
as well as hundreds of hours of original documentaries,
plus new releases every week,
covering everything from prehistoric Scotland to the Treaty of Versailles.
Sign up to join me in locations around the world and explore the past.
Just visit historyhit.com forward slash subscribe.
Hello, dear listener, this is Kate Lister jumping in here with a warning for you
that this episode of Betwixt the Sheets contains absolutely no adult themes or sexual content whatsoever.
I'm kidding. I am kidding. Honestly, there is loads of it in this episode.
So if you don't want historical, smutty talk or pretty graphic descriptions of how Vesectomies are carried out,
then you are perfectly welcome to sit this one out.
To anyone else who's still with me, let's do this.
And here's a pretty scene, a father and his five daughters.
You can only see three of them.
The other two are behind him, and he's behind the eight ball, the coin of prey.
He bends the straw and straightens the string.
Next, he clips off the peak of the straw and throws it away.
The snip?
That sounds pretty simple, doesn't it?
Although mentioning that in public might bring a wince to the eyes of anyone with a necessary equipment.
But what is a vasectomy, exactly?
How might it be the answer to all of our contraceptive problems?
And why wouldn't it be?
I'm Kate Lister, and today on Betwixt the Shoots, I am going to find out.
What do you look for a man?
Oh, money, of course.
You're supposed to rise when an adult speaks to you.
I make perfect confidence of whatever my boss needs by just turning it up and pushing the button.
Yes, social courtesy does make a difference.
Goodness, what beautiful time.
Hello and welcome back to Betwixt the Sheets, the history of sex scandal in society, with me, Kate Lister.
A vasectomy is a 99.99% effective method of contraception, carried out under local anaesthetic in just a couple of minutes.
By a trained professional, by the way, don't give that a go yourself.
But how does it actually work?
Charlotte and Sophie went out and about to ask some entirely unqualified people how they thought vasectomies are performed.
I think they put something in your willie.
By a very soft-hand man with a nice gentle voice
and the smell of burning pigfish.
Tying of tubes?
Ties up, ties up the knot, so does everything back up.
Job done.
Far under general anaesthetic through your genitals, I guess.
Today I am joined by Georgia Granger.
who's been studying the social history of vasectomies
at the University of Strathclyde.
We explore how vasectomies have impacted eugenics and contraception
and what it means to be a man and masculinity in general.
So hold on to your scalples, kids.
We are going in.
So Georgia, I'm so thrilled that you are here
and that I can speak to you about this.
First of all, let's introduce you
and then we're going to introduce the subject,
which is amazing.
So you are Georgia Granger.
and you are a third year PhD student at the University of Strathclyde,
and you are researching the history of vasectomy?
Yes, I am.
That's just spectacular.
How did you get into that?
Kind of a roundabout way.
So I had focused a lot on masculinity in my undergraduate and my master's,
but primarily on, like, gay masculinity and queer masculinity,
and stuff like that.
So I was kind of interested in studying men,
but I was looking usually at marginalized men.
And then this kind of opportunity came up
to look at vasectomies
because it's not really been studied.
There's been a lot of study of contraceptives
and like abortion and that kind of thing.
That's been a growing area of study.
But nobody's really looked at vasectomies.
It's so true.
And I thought that was really interesting
because for as much as I was looking at the hidden histories of marginalized men and silenced men,
this was like a silenced area of history for the dominant group, predominantly straight men.
And so that really interested me.
So that's kind of how I got into it.
It's so true because when you think about birth control and about surgery around birth control
is you immediately go to hysterectomies, contraceptive pills, all of those things.
And there's this whole history of vasectomy that we don't really think about, do it?
And, you know, when I knew I was going to be talking to you, I suddenly had that moment,
which I'm sure you did, have like, God, yeah, why aren't people talking about this?
But I want to start right with basics, as far back as we can go.
What's a vasectomy?
Let's just start there.
So a vasectomy is where the vast deference, which are the little tubes that come out of the testes where the sperm are made,
It goes into the bit where the sperm's incorporated into the semen, so to make it nice and gloopy.
I love that.
Before being ejaculated.
And so the little tuby bits are the vast deference and they are cut.
And that stops the sperm going into the semen.
So semen is still produced, but it doesn't have any sperm in it.
Doesn't have the gloop.
Well, it's still gloopy.
It just doesn't have any, I was going to say, nutritional value.
That doesn't have any.
genetic value.
It's no good for you at all.
No, exactly.
So it means that it is sterile and cannot be involved in conception.
Stereil gloop.
Thank you so much.
Because what I was thinking about was this is like,
I don't know much about the history of vasectomy,
but the history of castration, that's quite long, isn't it?
And these are different things.
Yes, so castration is usually where the testicles themselves are removed
or the testes are removed.
Yeah. So that interacts with like hormone levels. That reduces testosterone and stuff like that. Vesectomy does not affect hormone levels at all. So it's kind of, they're quite linked. I don't know a lot of people think of them together, but they are separate things. So vasectomy purely makes it so that the man is sterile, whereas castration affects testosterone levels and other hormone levels.
Custration, there's no gloop at all. There's no gloop at all.
Do you know what I should have said this right at the beginning.
This could be a little bit graphic and that if people are sat there eating their breakfast
to whatever they're doing, just buckle up, just go with us.
Yes, I've got too used to talking about it, but it can be a little bit graphic.
And then also I do talk about eugenics and stuff, which is pretty grim.
So you've got a really like high shock value of just...
Yeah, yeah, I'm just used to writing about the awful stuff and the weird stuff.
Just semen, testicles and castration at 9 in the morning.
Yeah.
Brilliant. So that's what it is. So can I ask you, this might be a bit difficult, but what do we know when the first vasectomy happened? Who it was? And what the hell did they think they were doing at the time? Yeah. So it feels like this should be the basic kind of start of a history of vasectomy. And this took me about three years to start figuring out. Wow. Okay. Because there's no history of vasectomy written, all these different sources kind of mention like, oh, the first vasectomy was performed by so-and-so.
and they all mentioned different people in different years.
So I'm like, okay, great.
So I think the first one was by Felix Gionne, and he was French, and that was 1885.
He performed something kind of like a vasectomy on a human.
Something like a vasectomy.
Well, that's not what anyone wanted to go in for.
I know.
Some sources say that he only blocked the vast efference instead of cutting it, but I don't know how he blocked it.
And also now there are implant vasectomy things that are being trialed that are basically the same thing.
So I'm like if they count as a vasectomy, then what he did count it as a vasectomy.
Basically, he stopped the sperm getting to the gloop.
So that counts.
He blocked it.
Yes, I don't know how.
We do.
A stapler.
Yeah, maybe.
But so he possibly did the first one in 1885 on a human.
It had been tried on dogs before that.
they knew that neutering a dog, so castrating a dog, was helpful in some ways.
Like, first of all, for making sure you don't get puppies unexpectedly.
True.
But also for, like, dog's behavior and stuff, sometimes people do that to lower aggression and stuff because it affects testosterone levels.
Stop them hump in your leg.
Yeah.
And also, they thought that if the dog, or if a human, had an enlarged prostate, that this would reduce the size of the prostate.
Does it?
No, it doesn't. But for a while they really thought it did. So that was actually, Guillons' first one was to reduce the size of a prostate in a man with an enlarged prostate.
Do we know if it worked or if he thought that it worked?
Well, so there were a lot of reports for like 30, 40 years that it worked, but it's not used for that now.
I think we just have much better ways of doing that now.
Do we know who the, I was going to say a victim, do you know who the patient was?
No, I don't know who the patient was.
Trying to find a lot of these medical records or like they're kind of part medical record, part experiment records.
Yeah.
And they're all over the place and quite difficult.
But I do know that there was a doctor in London called Reginald Harrison in 1894 who was doing them quite a lot.
And he wrote about them quite a lot, again, for prostate atrophy.
So if you're listening, just this is going to make me wince and I don't even have this equipment.
but this would have been done without anaesthetic. Is that right?
Yes, that is right.
They would have had cocaine or alcohol.
I've seen stupider things done under the influence of those.
Yeah, I think that would go quite a long way to maybe making it less unpleasant.
But, yeah, they didn't have our, you know, lydicane injections or local anesthetic or whatever.
Oh, my God.
And they didn't have general anesthetic to knock men out.
So this was around the time that chloroform was starting,
so they might have got a wee bit of chloroform to help as well.
So they'd have been groggy or high.
Yeah, exactly.
Cocaine was quite a good local anaesthetic,
so they might have had it injected or massaged in.
Jesus.
That's a hell of a come down that one, isn't it?
That's something else.
Yes.
So they'd have been awake-ish,
and there wasn't antiseptic either.
Was there?
No, there wasn't, and there wasn't really,
antibiotics either. So if you've got an infection in that in the healing process, which happens.
Yeah. Sometimes, like not all the time. But if that happened, you don't have your injections or
tablets of antibiotics. So you just get, I guess, gangrene or sepsis or whatever,
starting in your testicles. Or more cocaine rubbed on your balls. Yeah. See, these are the
pioneers of vasectomy history and we don't know anything about them. These. These are,
poor fellas who had their testicles.
Yep.
Rubbed with cocaine and then, oh my goodness.
And the dogs as well.
We'll give a shout out to them.
Yes, the dogs went through a lot.
There was a doctor who did a lot of vasectomies on dogs in like the 1820s and 30s or something.
Oh, it would never pass ethical review now, would it?
I don't think so.
All right, I could spend a long time going into the real gaw stuff with this, but I'll try and move it along.
Why were they doing this?
So the first one was to try and reduce an enlarged prostate.
Yes.
So in the beginning, was it about not getting people at the duff?
No, not really.
It was mainly for the prostate stuff to start with.
So enlarged prostate can quite often come with age as well.
Older men are more likely to have an enlarged prostate.
So it was kind of seen as like maybe it would help older men to reduce their prostate size.
But then there was also this doctor who started doing.
a lot of essentially early endocrine research, so early hormone research.
Right.
And he did a lot of stuff around injecting blended testes into people to give them like,
what would we now seen as like a testosterone injection?
Yes.
But they hadn't quite got to that stage.
So it was just, we'll take the whole testes of like a monkey and blend it up and inject them.
This doesn't work by the way.
Please nobody try this at home.
Please don't castrate animals and blend them up.
That's not good.
No, no, no.
Go and see your GP.
They also did guinea pig testes.
Oh my God.
The literal guinea pig.
And I have guinea pig and they are tiny.
Like, why?
That's not going to do anything.
You need a lot of guinea pigs to get an injections for.
Not to do anything for the guinea pigs either.
No.
So they were doing this in the idea that by sort of like boosting their own testosterone levels,
they would be kind of rejuvenated and vital.
Exactly.
So they had connected some of the impacts of testosterone
without quite realizing it yet.
Yeah.
So that was things like increased strength, supposedly,
and increased virility was one of them.
So like...
Is this about erections?
Yes, stronger erections.
Yes.
And curing erectile dysfunction and stuff like that.
And now these things, you can get prescribed testosterone.
for them. So we do think that works to some extent. But not like this is a bad method.
This is not a good method. And so this guy who was doing all the blending up of animal testicles
and stuff, he also then decided that it would be a great idea to give vasectomies on the basis
that maybe it's the sperm getting reabsorbed that is giving these incredible health benefits.
I see.
like rejuvenating the men.
So that the sperm, instead of going to the goop and coming out of the body and being wasted,
you're wasting all this life energy and life force that you reabsorb that.
And suddenly you're going to be 20 years younger and stronger and amazing.
Okay.
So we've got people who are liquidizing monkey testicles to try and be better in bed.
And we've now got vasectomies being used to kind of like stop the sperm getting.
out and allow it to flow through your body and kind of transform you into like a sexual
Hulk. Yes. Yeah. So this is the same guy. He's called Eugene Steinach and he was nominated for the
Nobel Prize in physiology like six times. He never got it. But for some of this research,
he also had research that was around supposedly curing homosexuality with some of these injections.
Cancelled. We've cancelled him. Yeah, he's very cancelled. I mean, for so many reasons. But yes,
injecting people with animal testicles to try and cure homosexuality is not great out there, isn't it?
I mean, who was being injected with this? Like, is there famous people? Do we know of any high profile?
The injections really took off. They became quite trendy in a lot of Europe and America, actually.
There was people across Europe and America that were getting these injections. There were also
some famous people got the Steinachvicectomies. So sometimes the Steinachvicectomies were,
one-sided so they'd only snip one vast deference.
Is that half price? Yeah. So you're reabsorering 50% of your sperm, but you can still get someone
pregnant, I guess, is the benefit of that. Oh, I see the logic. Yeah. Right. Okay. So you can
put your improved directions to good use. Um, hashtag science. Yes. So Floyd actually got a
stinactvicectomy, Sigma Freud. Sigmund Freud Freud. Oh my goodness. And, insh
it was not for a
Fordian reason, because when I first
found out that he got one, I was like, oh, is it some
sort of weird, you know,
his thing was imagining it was
his father or something, I could know.
But it was actually because he had
jaw cancer. Oh, and this was
to cure his jaw cancer.
Now, that is some struggled
thinking to get there,
isn't it? How does
having a vasectomy help your
jaw? Well, first of all, doesn't.
But the thinking was
that cancer was a part of an aging process.
So, you know, it's your cells degrading and stuff.
So you're more likely to get cancer as you get older,
and therefore it's an aging process.
So something that is anti-aging is going to reverse the effects of cancer.
And he had already had like radiotherapy.
He'd had surgery and stuff.
This wasn't his first choice.
God no.
But he obviously wasn't getting anywhere with those things and was like, well,
may as well.
Maybe a vasectomy will help and it didn't.
Okay, so this is about reversing the aging process,
which is kind of ironic, isn't it?
Have you ever heard that thing that semen's supposed to be really good for your skin?
Yes.
Yeah, and they're having these operations to, you know, mangle their goop.
Well, so that they get the benefits instead of giving them to all their wives.
Of course, of course that's what's going on.
You don't want to waste it on your wife.
Oh, my God.
Poor, no, I was going to say porthroid, but no.
Silly, silly man.
Yes.
So Freud did this.
Freud got one.
The Irish writer W.B. Yates got one as well.
Was this a cancer thing?
No, it was not a cancer thing.
It was just an aging thing.
He had found that he had like real writer's block and he also had low libido.
Well, who wouldn't get an operation on the genitals when they've got writers block?
Exactly.
Well, he was like, you know what?
I'm feeling very uninspired both in my creative work and also sexually.
So maybe I need a resex.
me and it worked for him.
Okay.
He said that he went through a second puberty because he was like a horny teenage boy.
Right.
He didn't use those words.
But there's no medical evidence that that would actually work.
Not really.
So this is a placebo.
This is placebo.
There is evidence that a lot of men do report better sex lives after a vasectomy.
Oh, I didn't know that.
But it's because they don't have the worry about pregnancy.
So it takes away any of the stress.
and that kind of thing.
Okay.
So a lot of them report finding it more fulfilling and satisfying and everything
because they're not having to worry about that.
So it could be to do with that.
But also there is a whole, like the fact that he started writing a lot more as well.
And he had some really creative writing moments and stuff.
Because of his goop.
Yeah, because apparently...
His magic goop.
The creativity is in the sperm.
Who knew?
Creative juices were not flowing.
No.
Or they were.
And they were just, wow, okay.
I mean, if it worked for him, ish.
Although he did say that his general health got worse afterwards
because of the stress of keeping up with his second puberty.
No.
Yes, so I think he was having so much sex that it was affecting his health.
I'm too tired to write.
Yeah.
Oh, bless him.
So we've got people using it to reduce prostates.
There are vasectomies.
to try and improve libido, vasectomies to reverse the aging process, vasectomies to aid writers block,
which is an interesting one. When did it stuck, because I wouldn't have thought of any of that
when it came to a vasectomy. So when did it start being used as contraception to stop babies?
Yes, so it started being used kind of as involuntary contraception.
Oh, that doesn't sound good. During the eugenics movements. Yes.
Right, okay. Tell me about that.
Not super fun.
So this was at the same time.
So in the very early 1900s in the US, it started being used.
There was a doctor in Indiana who, without any legal backup or anything,
just decided that he was going to vasectomize a bunch of prisoners.
He vasectomized like 500 of them.
Wow.
And then started pioneering laws across the US to bring this in as a general.
general thing. What was his name? He was called Dr. Sharp. That's not funny. That's not
I know. Terrible man, extremely cancelled, but very much nominative determinism. Oh, that's unfortunate.
Can you just explain a little bit about what eugenics is? So we're really clear on that. What is it?
Yes. So eugenics comes from the belief that a lot of traits are passed on and therefore if we sterilize
or kill or otherwise stop certain people passing on their genes,
that we will create a cleaner and purer race.
And it is quite often used specifically against disabled people
and mentally ill people and those kind of groups
and also against non-white people.
So it is what Hitler was doing with a lot of the sterilisation
and the killing and that kind of stuff.
It started in the US.
It started mainly in California
had the biggest sterilization program
for eugenic reasons.
And it wasn't a fringe quack movement, this, was it?
No, it was huge in America and Canada
and in a lot of Europe, a lot of Western Europe,
it didn't get legalized in the UK,
but they had a committee on voluntary eugenic sterilization,
they called it, which was basically
if you were institutionalized for health
or mental health or something like that, behavioral stuff,
that you would be offered sterilization,
and if you took it, you might be freed.
Oh, my God.
So it's coercive because you want your freedom,
so you'll do what it takes to get your freedom.
But they said it was voluntary because you're agreeing to it
instead of it being forced on you.
So forced slash voluntary slash not really voluntary.
Yes.
Vesectomies starts in American prisons as part of this.
idea that we can breed a better race by stopping undesirables from breeding? Well, it started actually
because they thought it might correct the behaviour of the prisoners. They thought that like dogs,
when you castrate them, it doesn't even work on dogs when you give them a vasectomy, but they thought
that maybe violent offenders would become less violent or sexual criminals would become
less sexually motivated and stuff like that. That didn't work. But at some sort of,
stage just kind of morphed into, well, these people would be bad parents anyway, so we should
stop them from being parents. And do we really want more people like this in society? We should
stop them passing on their genes because they clearly have bad genes. Wow. And obviously,
this completely ignores any influence on people's behavior that might come from like class or
poverty or, you know, abuse or anything at that. It was like, no, it's in their DNA and we want to
stop it. They were sterilizing women as well, weren't they? They were. Yeah, so they were sterilizing
men and women. Different countries had different balances. So some countries sterilized more
women than men and other countries sterilized more men than women. And give me an idea of dates.
When did this start? So Dr. Sharp did his first ones in 1890, I think it was. And then this continued
until Canada had eugenic sterilization laws into the 1970s.
70s?
Yes.
Holy, wow.
Okay.
So the decade Star Wars came out.
They were still...
Yeah.
It was still legal in some cases.
In fact, in the UK and in other countries,
you can get a court ruling to sterilize someone against their will
because they have a disability or something like that.
So depending on your perspective, it is still going on.
But it was major...
programs were up until the Second World War. The fact that the Nazis used it made it fall a bit
out of favour. People didn't want to do what the Nazis were doing. Okay, this is quite a dark and nasty
history then, isn't it? It is. It's pretty grim. And even though it wasn't legalized in the UK,
they were super aware of it. You know, these discussions were taking place in the medical journals,
like the Lancet and the British Medical Journal,
they were having back and forth discussions about
look at Sweden bringing in eugenic sterilisation laws
or look at the Californian experience, they quite often called it.
And this was involuntary, a lot of it.
This was different levels of voluntary.
That just doesn't sound good, does it?
No.
Exactly. And the British eugenicist quite often said
that it was going to be voluntary in Britain
if they got what they wanted.
But then when they brought private members,
Bill to Parliament, the MP who was kind of presenting it, said, oh, but this would just be a step on
the way to involuntary sterilisation. So he kind of scuppered it for them, because they were
trying the whole way to be like, no, we would only ever do voluntary. This would only ever be a
voluntary thing. And then he said, oh no, no, this is part of the plan. So funny enough, that
didn't really help. And it was part of the reason that it didn't get passed in the UK.
Well, thank God. I'll be back in a bit with Georgia.
Oh, right, okay.
So vasectomies, we've got guinea pigs and monkeys and jaw cancer and writer's block
through to eugenics, Nazis, preventing birth.
When did it start getting to the point where people would go,
this sounds like a good idea that I will voluntarily.
When you think of vasectomy, I don't think of all of this awful stuff.
I mean, I don't know why I don't, but it's just...
I didn't until I started this. My project was originally going to be from about 1970 to 2000.
And all of this happens. I mean, what we've covered so far goes up to about 1945, you know, Second World War.
And I was like, no, I really need to include all this stuff that happened in the early 20th century because it's so interesting.
And then there's kind of a quiet period after the Second World War.
It's going, we'll leave people's nuts alone. They've been through enough.
Yeah, I think they were kind of like, we've got more important things to do. We're still rationing.
we still need to like rebuild the country, all that kind of stuff.
Yeah.
But so then in the 1960s, it starts to become a little bit more acceptable.
There's an organization who were actually for population management.
Oh, that sounds dodgy.
This was part of the overpopulation crisis of the 1960s and 70s.
Okay.
And this was driven by the belief that developing countries were having too many children
and that we were going to run out of land and food and everything.
And this became quite a big deal in the US again, mainly.
And they started funding contraceptive programs around the world.
Oh, did they?
Yes.
Because America doesn't have a great rap for doing that at the moment, does it?
No, I mean, when I say they were funding contraceptive programs,
I mean they were saying to India that they would deny food relief
if they didn't provide sterilization en masse to their population.
Just as I was thinking, well done, America, that's quite progressive.
No, no, no, no, you can't have food unless you get this done.
Some of them were progressive because of the people involved in them,
but they were not especially picky about how they were carried out.
And they would wait until there was a major scandal and then they would say like,
oh, we didn't know that was happening.
But no, so they were funding mainly in like India, China, a lot of Asia.
they were funding these population control programs.
But this is around the time that in Britain,
an organisation called the Simon Population Trust is funded,
again, to control the population.
They were looking to find methods that would be more favourable
to more conservative and religious audiences.
Okay.
You know, Catholicism tends to teach that contraception is bad.
Were they all right with a vasectomy?
No, they weren't, but the Simon Population Trust thought that they might be.
Ah, like the soft cell.
Okay.
Yeah, so they thought, well, this sounds better than abortions.
And this sounds better to conservative audiences than abortions.
So what we'll do is we'll start sterilisation programs.
And they were kind of founded on the kind of global idea,
but they actually mainly operated in the UK.
And they started the first vasectomy clinic in 1967.
See, when you just start,
in these Pandora boxes of madness, it just goes on and on and odds.
The first Rhexatomy clinic was actually being funded by a religious interest organisation, trying to control.
Kind of mostly just overpopulation concern, but yeah.
And the chairman of that organisation was a guy called Dr. Carlos Patton Blacker.
They've got great names, if nothing else.
They do.
They've got great names.
He had been the chairman of the British Eugenic Society in the lead up to the Second World War.
There it is. See, just as you're thinking, yeah, and it's just all going back to eugenics, isn't it?
Yeah, it was still very much based on the fact that we need to control how much the, quote, undesirable people are repopulating and are reproducing.
But it kind of shifted from being specifically disability-based and specifically health-based and specifically criminality-based to being just more generally, like, people should.
shouldn't have children unless they can afford them. It's irresponsible to have lots of children if you
don't have a really high wage, you know, that kind of attitude. So the targeting skint testicles at this
point? Yes. Nice, right. Okay. Exactly. And making it more of like a social concern. So it becomes
much more pervasive as a influence in society rather than saying, okay, well, we're going to put you in a
prison and we're going to deceptize you. Instead, it's much more like, should you really be having more
children. Can you afford them? More children? Wow. So there's a shift in the narrative as like this is
your responsibility. Were vasectomies about this time seen as like a good thing or were they sort of like
you've been studying masculinity? How does that sort of tally up with have a vasectomy and now you're
no longer fertile? How does, like were they positive things? Yeah. So there's a lot of conflict about
this throughout especially the 60s and 70s as it's becoming more popular.
because on the one hand, you've got people like the Simon Population Trust
who are really pushing that it is great for men to be able to choose their fertility and everything.
It's also around the time of the supposed sexual revolution,
you know, contraceptions coming on the scene, the pill comes into Britain,
that kind of thing.
So there's more discussion about this generally,
and it's seen as like a progressive new masculinity or something.
Oh, okay.
So kind of like the pill,
sexually liberated, you know, and now you can have sex with loads of people and not get pregnant.
Exactly. But then because of that, there was a lot of concerns, well, there were concerns that men should
not want a vasectomy, that they were somehow like psychopathic or sexually deviant just for wanting
of asectomy. So people argued this in Parliament and stuff when it was being brought on the NHS.
No, really? That, you know, no sane man. You must be a psychopath. Yeah, that you must have something wrong with you.
to agree to it.
Because when you think about sort of, now there isn't really a sort of an equivalent of the
vasectomy, but I suppose like a hysterectomy would be a sort of comparable, but it's a much
more invasive operation. But you hear a lot about women not being able to access a hist or getting
their tubes tied without permission and doctors just won't give them one because they can't
possibly know their own mind about blah, blah. But there was an equivalent for vasectomies.
Yeah, so it was very difficult for men to get vasectomies.
It was brought in with the expectation that you would only be allowed of a
a septim if you were happily married, your wife gave permission.
Oh, well, oh.
And you already had at least two children, but that was up to the discretion of the doctor.
So sometimes they required you to have more children.
I did not know that.
So the qualifiers would be, you must be happily married.
I'm not sure how you prove that.
I think it's just that your wife agrees that you can have a vasectomy
and that she's not worried that it's going to enable you to go and cheat.
Oh, clever, sneaky.
Because that was definitely a concern that kept coming up in newspapers
and came up in a lot of the debates around it was,
well, isn't this just going to enable men to go and cheat?
Because they don't have to worry about getting their mistress is pregnant anymore.
Because we all know that men don't cheat if there's no chance of getting anybody pregnant.
Exactly, because that's the only reason that all these men aren't cheating
is that they might get people pregnant.
Oh my God. Right. Okay. With these things you can kind of see, there's a straggled, weird logic to it.
Yeah. Like the logic doesn't make any sense. It's complete bollocks. But if you follow it, you can kind of see what they were saying. Oh, my goodness. Right. So you've got to be happily married. You can't be trying to just run around like a dog with two dicks. Yeah. Because you won't get people at the duff. That's fine. You have got to already have had children and a doctor has to have signed off on this.
Yeah. Two doctors have to sign off on it. Because usually you had to get you.
your GP's permission. Yeah. And then they would refer you to either a general surgeon or a urologist
or whoever was going to do the vasectomy. And they would also have to agree. And when they were
bringing it on the NHS, there were a lot of MP saying, oh, we should also have a psychiatrist's opinion.
See, you just don't hear this. You hear this a lot about when people want to get their tubes tied or
have a hysterectomy. But this is very much the vasectomy. And this is the 60s, the 60s, 70s? This is 60s,
70s, but right the way through, like, I know men now who, because they're not married,
have been told that they can't get a vasectomy until they're into their 30s or so.
You know, doctors won't agree.
They are reversible, right?
They are reversible in most cases, but it's not guaranteed and it's a much more invasive procedure,
and it usually isn't done on the NHS.
Oh, that's interesting.
Yeah, so you would have to pay for it to be reversed.
it's a much more complicated procedure
because basically the ends of the vast deference
that they've cut and usually cauterized
so burned to stop them rehealing
they then have to like cut them off and reattach them
so it's quite fiddly
so some doctors are very good at it and say that they have like
95% plus success rates right
but a lot of them don't have success rates that high
okay so it's not as reversible
as I just assumed that it was
I just had this idea that you could just kind of go in and present to the doctor and just be like, sort it out.
And then, oh no, sorry, I made a mistake.
Please reverse this.
But it's not like that.
I mean, a lot of men can get it reversed and have good experiences and can get their partners pregnant after that.
But it's usually, if you go in to get a vasectomy, the doctor says, like, you need to think of this as a permanent thing.
We might be able to reverse it after, but you need to think of it as permanent.
And I'm going to assume that the surgical methods have got better.
over time at reversing it.
But in the early-ish days when people started using a vasectomy for birth control,
were there cases where it didn't work?
Yes, there were.
So they hadn't got quite as good at figuring it out when it had worked.
So at the minute, if you go and get a vasectomy, in the weeks afterwards,
you will have to provide semen samples, which they will check to see if they're living sperm.
And they say you have to use, you know, condoms or your partner on the pill or whatever
until they can say you don't have any living sperm coming out.
All clear.
They hadn't quite realized that in the olden days in the 70s or whatever.
The olden, everybody who lived the 70s is now going to write Angry.
I know, I'm sorry.
The old and olden times.
The past times.
It's not true, everybody.
They're not so distant past.
It's counted as late modern history.
And people are now turning off in their drive.
I know.
Sorry.
Anyway, in the 70s, they hadn't quite realized that.
So there were quite a lot of newspaper articles that were saying,
shock baby following vasectomy.
Oh dear.
And it was usually that the man hadn't done the testing and stuff.
But my favorite one was actually not a failed vasectomy,
although it was reported like it was.
It was a man went to get a vasectomy.
And two days later, found out that his wife was pregnant with triplets.
Oh.
And obviously, she was pregnant.
already, you know, she didn't get pregnant in the two days after.
That is unfortunate.
So he'd have been lying there with his nuts on an ice block
to get over the pain just as his mrs. turns out.
It's just like, darling, some news.
Exactly.
So she was already pregnant.
Well, like, what happened then?
Was there any, like, recompense for...
I mean, obviously, she was already pregnant,
but, I mean, if there was a failed vasectomy.
Yeah, not for her, but there were other cases.
It was called wrongful birth case.
cases.
Wrongful.
So that you were wrongfully born.
Oh, that's terrible.
You were wrongfully born.
There's a few different cases of these.
Some in England, the most famous one was in Tayside, which is where I live at the minute.
So I enjoy that.
But they were cases where a couple had chosen not to have any more children.
The man had got a vasectomy.
And for whatever reason, the vasectomy had failed.
So I think one of them was actually that the,
the vasectomy had reversed itself after a couple of years, which is very rare but can happen,
where the tubes like reheal themselves.
Like wolverine testicles, like, you know, just healing itself.
Yeah, extremely determined fertility there.
That is determined, isn't it?
Yeah.
Okay.
But because the couple said that they hadn't been warned that this was a possibility,
the wife didn't realize she was pregnant.
Like, she knew something was going on, but she was like,
no, I couldn't possibly be pregnant because my husband's had a vasectomy.
years ago, why would this be an issue?
So, you know, she completely ignored all the signs of it
until it was essentially too late for her to get an abortion
if she wanted one or to have any other options.
So they sued the health board
and also they sued the health board for quite a lot
because their other children went to private school
and they said, well, we have to send this child to private school now
because it would be mean to not send her to private school
but also we weren't expecting this expense,
so you should have to pay for her to go to private school.
And they won.
Oh my God, that's genius.
I don't think you could do that today,
but then you're all right.
Your child should go to private school if the others did,
but you've also just had them officially labeled as a wrongful birth.
Yeah, like, what does that do to a child growing up
knowing that your parents sued because they weren't meant to have you?
Mudge, if you were eaten, you'd probably get over it.
I mean, yeah, there's probably.
other issues going on there as well. But I think the health board argued, well, you could have put her up
for adoption from birth. Oh, nice. That's compassionate. Yeah. And the family were like, no, we're not
doing that, but also you should have to pay for this. So yeah, there's a few cases. But obviously then
doctors got a lot better at warning around that. You know, they would like make sure that their
patients knew that it might heal itself or that these things might happen so that they didn't get sued again.
I wonder if that person's still out there today, presumably wandering around.
Probably.
That's, wow, okay.
So is there any point where it has been,
vasectomy is really good, I'm dead proud that I've got one, this is brilliant,
I don't know, like a vasectomy club, I don't know.
So there were vasectomy ties.
Like a tie around your neck tie?
No.
Yeah.
So.
I thought you'd just like something you tied around your testicle for a second.
Like a home DIY kid.
Oh my God.
Right.
I'm very glad that that's not.
Do not try that at home.
What you mean?
So tell me about the ties.
So this was in the mid-70s, the height of fashion.
And a man who'd had a vasectomy decided to design a tie to advertise that.
Wow.
And this became supposedly a trend.
I've only found a few newspaper articles of it.
and I've not found any evidence that anyone actually wore them.
But there were newspaper articles about it.
So there were a few different tie designs.
Go on.
One was just a V.
Nice.
Yeah.
One was a V with the two legs of the V being snipped.
No.
Oh no.
Because that's like the vast difference.
I've heard my spermatic cord.
Yeah.
And then one was an apple with incision lines and stitches on it.
And then underneath it said I.O.
which stood for, I only fire blanks.
That is a statement piece.
It is.
They're quite striking.
And this caused like a moral panic because suddenly, you know,
men were supposedly buying all these and wearing them.
And there were a few newspaper columnists who were concerned that men would wear these
when they hadn't had a vasectomy to trick young women.
Oh, that's very naughty.
I was just listening to that story thinking, well, at least, you know, they're being responsible and they're kind of advertising it in a weird way. Maybe it's supposed to be funny. But there are people using it just to get their end away. Well, I don't know that anyone used it for that. But there were definitely concerns around it. So there was one newspaper writer who said that the way that some men would wear eaten ties when they hadn't gone to Eaton, apparently this was a thing. I don't know. But apparently they would wear Eaton ties or whatever.
when they hadn't gone there to make themselves seem posher and whatever,
that maybe men would wear a vasectomy ties when they hadn't had a vasectomy to lure a woman.
Because obviously if we saw somebody with a tie that said, I'm firing blanks, they'd be irresistible.
Exactly. They said the only contraceptive benefit of these ties would be to hold up trousers.
I like that. But what about, so no one's doing that, at least I hope that they're not doing that.
Maybe there's something to be said for reviving, you know, putting your own fertility status on a piece of your clothing, possibly. I'm on the pill. I think so. I would love to have, you know, some badges that are the little vasectomy symbols. There's a lot of cards. So if you go on like online shopping places and stuff, there's a lot of vasectomy celebration cards where I guess when a man gets a vasectomy.
Are they really? And some of them say, all juice no bits with an orange on them.
Oh no
At least people can laugh
That's amazing
So you can get these today
Yeah you can get some of them today
I have not brought back the vintage designs yet
That might be a post PhD project
Congratulations on your vasectomy
Oh I love that
Right this sounds just weird
But after everything we've been talking about
Probably not
Are vasectomy still popular today
Like are people still having them
Or is the rate decreased
Or I mean if there's a card
business behind this. They must still be quite popular. They are popular. They have decreased since the
early 2000s. It's thought that some of that is because there's more options that are reversible
for couples to choose. So for example, IUDs and stuff have become more available. Yeah. And that means
that there's less need for a permanent decision than there was before. Because if your only options are
the pill, condoms and vasectomy, which is kind of.
of what it was for a lot of the 60s, 70s, even 80s, then yeah, usually after marriage, men don't want to
use condoms. After having a couple of children, women don't want to be on the pill for another
15 years potentially until they don't need it anymore. So vasectomy becomes the kind of obvious
choice. Whereas now there's a lot more choice around IUDs, injections, implants, that kind of stuff.
So you said IUD and just for a second there, I thought that was an explosive device that
the U, that's not.
That's IED.
I was going to say, that would do it.
When I went to get my first IUD, I said, I'm here for a UTI.
I was not.
She was like, to get it treated or, and I was like, no, no, no, like the one.
The one, oh, bless your heart.
But there is kind of like a big thing at the moment, isn't there, about the male pill and about male contraception.
Yeah.
Like, what's the state with that?
And again, so the thing that I hear about that a lot, and this might be,
completely anecdotal and unwarranted. But a lot of people have propositioned the idea of like,
well, if you were with a lover and they said, don't worry, I'm on the pill. Would that cut it for you?
Well, that's like the vasectomy ties, isn't it? Yes, it is. How much do you trust word over
some sort of proof? And I think that's one of the things it's invisible. How'd you prove that,
right? Yeah, you can't prove it. That's why you have a tie. Yeah, that's why you get a tie.
I wish the NHS was just giving out these ties. It's like the sticker at the dentist. Well, then, you did a good job.
here's your tie. But no, so the male pill, they've done a few trials of it and the problem is that
it's being given quite bad mental health side effects. And I think in one trial, they actually
had a man complete suicide. Oh, Jesus, right. From being on the medication and a few other men
saying that they were thinking about it and that it really affected their mental health. Wow.
So I think there's kind of a narrative that like, oh, you know, women get side effects on the pill all the time.
It's dangerous for women too.
Why can't men kind of suck it up?
But the thing is the female pills came in in the 60s and stuff
when there wasn't as important ethics around these tests.
Whereas now it's like, no, if people are not surviving trials, we tend to end them.
I didn't know that.
That's quite severe, isn't it?
Yeah, but the narrative around it tends to be, oh, man can't cope with the headaches.
A bunch of wimps, yeah.
Whereas actually there's been quite severe side effects.
But I do actually know someone personally who was on two of the trials and said it was the best thing ever.
And after they finished, he went and got vasectomy.
Wow. Okay.
Yeah.
That is interesting.
So even after that, he thought he'd go and get a vasectomy.
Yeah, because he realized that it wasn't going to come on the market.
You know, he wasn't going to be able to get these pills after finishing the trial.
No.
So he said, well, I actually really enjoyed not having to think about this during the time that I was on the trial.
I didn't get terrible side effects or anything.
Yeah.
So why wouldn't I?
just go and get a vasectomy then.
That's interesting, isn't it?
This has been absolutely fascinating.
We should probably finish by saying
vasectomies are safe.
They are very safe.
They are very good choices
if it's something that you want to do.
A lot of doctors will do
them now if you're single,
if you haven't had children, that kind of thing.
But sometimes it takes a little bit of
yes, I'm very sure that I want it.
But yes, I have interviewed many men
who are very happy with their resectomy,
means for this project.
That is a fantastic place to leave it.
But we will just say if you turn up and your surgeon has got monkeys or guinea pigs in the
back of the surgery, just run.
Unless they're therapy guinea pigs.
Unless they're therapy guinea pigs.
You could hold one to comfort you.
During the operation, just stroking the guinea, it'll be all right, it'll be all right.
Guinea pigs going, if people want to find you after this, and I'm sure that they will,
if they want to follow up on your research, how can people find you?
I am on Twitter at SNIPHIST, it's in the history of the SNP. So S-N-I-P-H-I-S-T.
That is brilliant. A fantastic handle. And thank you so much. It's been an absolute pleasure and horror, but mostly a pleasure.
Thank you. Thank you so much for having me. It's been brilliant. Thank you.
I hope that you've enjoyed joining us today, or maybe if you've not enjoyed it, that it's been educational informative for you.
Thank you so much to our guest, Georgia Granger. And if you like what you've had,
heard, please don't forget to like, give us a review and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
In the next few weeks, we've got episodes on the study of anatomy, corsets and BDSM all come in your way.
Join me again the Twix the Sheets, The History of Sex, Scandal and Society, a podcast by History Hit.
This podcast includes music by Epidemic Sounds.
