BibleProject - God's Wisdom in the Law - Law E4

Episode Date: May 20, 2019

In part 1 (0-17:00), The guys quickly recap their conversation so far. Tim then dives into a third perspective on the Hebrew laws in the Old Testament. The third perspective is that the laws embody an...d revolutionize ancient Eastern conceptions of justice. The laws are formulated in the language and categories of ancient Near Eastern law, so that Israel’s law was comprehensible to their neighbors while also representing an irreversible cultural revolution. Tim notes that in all the other ancient covenant documents (Hittite, Assyrian) only one is between a king and a people, while dozens of others are between one king and another king. Covenants are agreements between kings. But the Biblical story depicts the laws as stipulations between God and all the Israelites: “I will be their God and they will be my people.” This is the same kind of language we find in the Song of Solomon, “I am my beloved’s and he is mine” (Song of Solomon 6:3). This is marriage covenant language. Tim uses some quotes from Joshua Berman to make his points. “In the ancient near east, various gods had consorts and goddess wives, while the common man was subject, a slave and servant of the king and the tribute-imposing class. For these cultures to conceive of the marriage between a god and a group of humans, would have been as unthinkable as for us to imagine the marital union of a human and a cat… The Bible’s most revolutionary idea… is the idea of God as a personality who seeks a relationship of mutuality with human agents. In the neighboring cultures of the ancient Near East, humans were merely slaves of the king. In the Bible, they are transformed into a servant king who is married to a generous sovereign, a wife in relation to her benefactor husband. When God seeks “love” from Israel, it involves both the political sense of loyalty between parties to a treaty as well as the kind of intimacy known in a faithful, intimate relationship between a man and woman.” (Berman, Created Equal, 46) This concept of a human family married to God is founded on the concept of humanity in Genesis 1-2. All humanity, male and female, is the divine royal image over all creation. And while the Davidic king could be called the “son of God,” it was only as the representative of all Israel who is the “son of God” (Exodus 4:22). The king and all the Israelites are themselves equals under their “divine king” Yahweh. Tim again cites Joshua Berman: “While in Egypt and Mesopotamia, the bridge figure between the divine and human was the king, deified (as in Egypt) or more of a demi-god (Mesopotamia). He was the top of the socio-religious structure with the economic elite, and this was mirrored by the hierarchy of the gods. NOT SO in biblical Israel. God’s covenant was with the entirety of Israel, focused on the “common man.” I maintain that it is in the covenant, properly conceived in in ancient Near Eastern setting, that we may discern a radically new understanding of the cosmic role of the common man within the thought systems of the ancient Near East, one that constituted the basis of an egalitarian order.” (Berman, Created Equal, 29) In part 2 (17:00-25:15), Tim explains why Israel’s law codes consistently downgrades the role of the king in contrast to their neighbors. The king is not the sole, chief, divine authority; rather, Yahweh is king, and the human king is subservient to the Scriptures (Deuteronomy 17) and to prophets who speak on Yahweh’s behalf. He is a leader in war, but he is not the chief. He can participate in the temple, but he is not the high priest. He is subservient to the law, but he is not the lawgiver. This is all in contrast to Egypt and Babylon. Tim also explains that the laws allowed Israel’s economy to be oriented toward landed families, which were called to include the immigrant, poor, and orphans. It is the first ancient example of “welfare society.” You can see examples of laws about not maximizing profit to allow work in the fields in Ruth chapters 2-3. Other examples include laws about the seven year debt release, Jubilee land and debt release, not charging interest on loans for the poor, giving a tithe for local loans for failing farmers. Tim again cites Berman: “The biblical laws about land and assets introduce a reformation of the ancient worldview aimed at achieving a social equality, but of a very specific king. It is not the egalitarianism developed since the French Revolution with its emphasis on the individual and inalienable human rights… Rather, it takes the form of an economic system that seeks equality by granting sacred value to the extended family household, where people assist one another in farming labor and in granting relief to other households in need. Ancient Israel was a tribal association of free farmers and ranchers, living in a single and equal social class with common ownership of the means of production. This system was a rejection of statism (= the nations state owns all land) and feudalism (= military lords own all land), demonstrated by the fact that it was free of tribute to any human king, and their tribute was a shared burden of funding the temple. Israel defined itself in opposition to the empire of oppression embodied by Egyptian slavery, and also in opposition to the centralized monarchies that surrounded and took up residence in Israel.” (Berman, Created Equal, 87) Tim points out that a scholar named David Bentley Hart has influenced his thinking on this subject. Tim says that the Judeo-Christian heritage is the most beautiful thing about Western civilization. In part 3 (25:15-30:00), Tim teaches through a specific law that is usually very disturbing to modern readers. Deuteronomy 21:10-14 10 When you go to war against your enemies and the Lord your God delivers them into your hands and you take captives, 11 if you notice among the captives a beautiful woman and are attracted to her, you may take her as your wife. 12 Bring her into your home and have her shave her head, trim her nails 13 and put aside the clothes she was wearing when captured. After she has lived in your house and mourned her father and mother for a full month, then you may go to her and be her husband and she shall be your wife. 14 If you are not pleased with her, let her go wherever she wishes. You must not sell her or treat her as a slave, since you have dishonored her. Tim points out that this law does not promote the practice it seems to promote. Instead, it creates boundaries for a common cultural practice, which are eventually designed to obliterate the practice all together. This law is in reaction to other ancient cultures that didn’t have any rules or give any thought to how soldiers should treat their captives. In part 4 (30:00-43:10), Tim brings up an important point to keep in mind when reading biblical law: The laws play an important but ultimately subordinate role in the plot of the larger biblical storyline that leads to Jesus. Humanity’s failure to obey the divine command is part of the plot conflict that prevents them from being God’s image-partners in ruling creation. The laws illustrate the divine ideal while also intensifying that conflict, creating the need for a new human and a new covenant. Tim notes that the first divine command is in the garden of Eden: Genesis 2:16-17 16 The Lord God commanded the man, saying, “From any tree of the garden you may eat freely; 17 but from the tree of knowing good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat from it you will surely die.” Tim says the failure to “listen to the voice of God” (breaking the divine command) results in exile from the Eden-mountain, leading to death. Genesis 3:17, 24 17 Then to Adam He said, “Because you have listened to the voice of your wife, and have eaten from the tree about which I commanded you, saying, ‘You shall not eat from it’; 24 So He banished the human; and at the east of the garden of Eden He stationed the cherubim and the flaming sword which turned every direction to guard the way to the tree of life. In part 5, (43:10-end) Tim notes that this theme of listening or not listening to the divine command continues through the Bible. Exodus 19:4-6 4 ‘You yourselves have seen what I did to the Egyptians, and how I bore you on eagles’ wings, and brought you to Myself. 5 ‘Now then, if you will listen listen to My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be My own possession among all the peoples, for all the earth is Mine; 6 and you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.’ These are the words that you shall speak to the sons of Israel.” Tim notes that the story immediately after this story is the story of the golden calf, which shows Israel’s obvious failure to listen. Tim points out that Israel’s covenant choice is the same as Adam and Eve and all humanity. Deuteronomy 30:15-20 15 “See, I have set before you today life and good, and death and evil; 16 in that I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in His ways and to keep His commandments and His statutes and His judgments, that you may have life and multiply, and that the Lord your God may bless you in the land where you are entering to possess it. 17 “But if your heart turns away and you will not obey, but are drawn away and worship other gods and serve them, 18 I declare to you today that you shall surely perish. You will not prolong your days in the land where you are crossing the Jordan to enter and possess it. 19 “I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. So choose life in order that you may live, you and your descendants, 20 by loving the Lord your God, by listening to His voice, and by holding fast to Him; for this is your life and the length of your days, that you may live in the land which the Lord swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, to give them.” Tim notes that Israel’s inability to “listen to the voice” of God, leading to death and exile, traps humanity in the power of death, which necessitates the messianic age and the new covenant. Jeremiah 31:31-34 31 “Behold, days are coming,” declares the Lord, “when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, 32 not like the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, although I was a husband to them,” declares the Lord. 33 “But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days,” declares the Lord, “I will put My law within them and on their heart I will write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. 34 “They will not teach again, each man his neighbor and each man his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they will all know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them,” declares the Lord, “for I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more.” Ezekiel 36:26-28 26 “Moreover, I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; and I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh. 27 “I will put My Spirit within you and cause you to walk in My statutes, and you will be careful to observe My ordinances. 28 “You will live in the land that I gave to your forefathers; so you will be My people, and I will be your God. Tim concludes by sharing that the law isn't about an "Old Covenant or New Covenant" question. Instead, the law illuminates and explores the portrait of humanity repeatedly failing to listen to the divine voice. Show Produced by: Dan Gummel, Jon Collins. Show Music: “Defender Instrumental” by Tents “Cartilage” by Moby “All Night” by Unwritten Stories “Good Morning” by Unwritten Stories The Pilgrim
 Show Resources: Our video on the law: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sew1kBIe-W0 Joshua Berman: Created Equal: How the Bible Broke with Ancient Political Thought


Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Hey, this is Cooper at Bible Project. I produce the podcast in Classroom. We've been exploring a theme called the City, and it's a pretty big theme. So we decided to do two separate Q and R episodes about it. We're currently taking questions for the second Q and R and we'd love to hear from you. Just record your question by July 21st
Starting point is 00:00:17 and send it to us at infoatbiboproject.com. Let us know your name and where you're from, try to keep your question to about 20 seconds and please transcribe your question when you email it in, try to keep your question to about 20 seconds, and please transcribe your question when you email it in. That's a huge help to our team. We're excited to hear from you. Here's the episode.
Starting point is 00:00:39 If you lived in the ancient Middle East, the overwhelming odds are, you were a peasant. Very likely a bonded servant to another family. Life was hard, your life expectancy was low, there was famines, diseases, and wars. And the land you lived in would have been ruled by a king, the ultimate authority. That king would call himself the image of God. And that was a political theology. It let him rule the way he wanted to. But there was one family in the ancient Middle East, but a different story.
Starting point is 00:01:17 They didn't have a King, not at first anyway, and they viewed everyone as equally valuable. They considered every human as the image of God. The biblical narrative is transparent as a kind of political theology, but it's one that elevates the common person to the status of the king. Their story was of a God who wanted to rule with all of them, and he wanted them to rule with wisdom and justice. All of these laws are about a covenantal marriage between God and every Israelite. So every Israelite has a royal obligation to
Starting point is 00:01:52 the covenant. That's a brand new idea. I'm John Collins and this is the Bob Project Podcast. We continue our conversation on the biblical law. And we're going to dive into the way that the ancient Jewish law codes pushed the boundaries for justice in our world. We're going to look at some of the most uncomfortable parts of Israel's ancient law code. The classic example is slavery. So slavery is not abolished. These laws in Israel are adopting a cultural framework and practice for the ancient New Yorker's neighbors.
Starting point is 00:02:24 But there's a world of seismic shift happening on the world view level that will sow the seeds of the abolishment of slavery happening in Deuteronomy. And so we need to just honor that it doesn't do it the way we think it ought to be done in the modern world, but how presumptuous of us like think of what somebody a thousand years from now
Starting point is 00:02:42 is going to say about our use of whatever fossil fuels or contemporary forms of slavery and debt. And in our discomfort, we're going to find something really surprising. It helps you see these laws that feel like a moral embarrassment in the modern world, but to realize the ethical ideals, and we're now living in a culture built on the foundation of the ideals. What's most beautiful in Western society and its ideals are the Jewish Christian heritage. And of course much of the horror of Western history is also wrapped up in an abuse of the heritage, but the problem isn't the ideals.
Starting point is 00:03:18 It's stupid humans. And we're going to end the conversation talking about the ultimate purpose of the law. It's not even that you know good and evil, you know me. Your life becomes just a natural expression of what the commands were all about. And Ezekiel says it's by this God's Spirit that replaces your heart that compels you to follow the laws of the Torah. Let's just say it this way. The Torah is a new covenant document. This is why I don't like to use the word Old Testament anymore these days. It's because that is saying that these texts are somehow the Old Covenant. And that's precisely what they are not. They're a narrative about how humans perpetually fail.
Starting point is 00:04:00 Thanks for joining us. Here we go. Okay, we're talking about how to read laws in the Bible, biblical law. Yeah. You'll find it in the first five books of the Bible. Yeah. There's 600 some odd laws. Yeah. Theising of somewhere around 6 to 10% of the Bible. And it is often the most difficult stuff to read. And we've been, this is our fourth episode in it. And in the last couple episodes, we're talking about paradigms or perspectives to bring to the biblical law, or you you're reading it that will really help you
Starting point is 00:04:46 understand how to read it and how it works with the entire story of the Bible. The first one we talked about was that what we find in the Bible isn't some comprehensive law code. And even if we did have the comprehensive ancient Israel yeah, ancient Israelite law code, what you would have there isn't what we think of as law code in that we come from a judicial society where the written law is the final authority, statutory law. statutory law, even though that's seeking after a higher authority,
Starting point is 00:05:21 what's written is what we go to. In this ancient culture, written law are really just illustrations. Yeah. And- They're one way to express your ideals of justice. Yeah. So even if the Bible was a comprehensive set of biblical codes, laws, we still shouldn't go to it and say, okay, now we have to just follow everything here yeah ancient ancient people never did that the biblical authors didn't even treat the laws the
Starting point is 00:05:49 the biblical authors didn't even treat the law they saw them as a source of divine wisdom guiding God's people towards a divine Ideal of justice but so are the narratives and so are the Proverbs and so are the Psalms and so on. The second perspective, which we talked about last episode, is that all these laws could be categorized into smaller buckets, themes, or what did you call them? I just said there's a handful of core ideals being expressed in different types of laws. Yeah, and ideal. Yep.
Starting point is 00:06:27 So we looked at those as a really cool conversation. But if you have those uploaded in your brain as these kind of frameworks, then when you get to a law, you can go, what is the ideal that this specific example, this specific illustration of what these people did in their time and place in history. That's right. Or I think to accept the claim of the divine and human partnership and making of the Bible inspiration, is that God's revealing a higher calling for human existence.
Starting point is 00:07:01 And these ancient laws are expressions of a higher ideal that all people of all time should strive for. We looked at the calendar laws, the sacrificial laws, the purity laws, civil laws, and the criminal laws. Yeah. And we talked about the ideals behind all of those, which is such a cool conversation. I want to make videos about each of those. The third perspective. The third perspective. The biblical laws. Laws? This one's a little bit harder for an average reader of the Bible to do, but it's crucially important to know that somebody is doing this. And that is reading. That somebody's thinking this way.
Starting point is 00:07:42 Somebody's thinking about this and helping others understand it, is that these laws are a part of an ancient Near Eastern cultural tradition. The laws embody ancient Near Eastern concepts of justice. While at the same time, they are revolutionizing those concepts. Yeah, there you go. So for example, the classic example is slavery.
Starting point is 00:08:05 So slavery is not abolished. The abolishment of slavery was as imaginable as the abolishment of electricity in the modern world. Or the abolishment of fossil fuels. Yeah, yeah, that's proving a pretty hard one to kick for us. What the pattern that you see, however, is these laws in Israel are adopting a cultural framework and practice for the ancient New Recent Neighbors,
Starting point is 00:08:31 but there's a world of seismic shift happening on the world view level that will sow the seeds, for sure, of the abolishment of slavery, happening in Deuteronomy. You can see the seed's son, and there wasn't an ancient culture that even thought to think about the nature of human relationships. In the way that Deuteronomy is doing. And so we need to just honor that it doesn't do it the way we think it ought to be done.
Starting point is 00:08:59 In the modern world, but how presumptuous of us, like think of what somebody a thousand years from now is going to say about our use of whatever fossil fuels or contemporary forms of slavery and debt our economic system right It slaves a lot of people in debt to function well Yeah, you know, yeah, and we think it's fine. Yeah. So just don't be too quick to travel. Yeah. So the revolution, the moral ethical revolution. Essentially what this, what you have, what somebody has to do is sit down and study ancient
Starting point is 00:09:35 Babylonian law codes. The ones are available to us, a Syrian law codes, hit tight law codes. Those are the majority. There's a couple dozen that have been unearthed in the last hundred years, and then compare the 600 laws of Zatora to them and make observations. Yeah. That's essentially what you do. Yeah, that sounds like...
Starting point is 00:09:57 Does that sound fun? You know what sounds fun is listening to what those people discovered. Yeah, totally. Yeah. Okay, so here's, okay, so two books I want to recommend. Once, Lumor Scolarly in Intense, and then once a little more popular. Once by a Jewish scholar named Joshua Berman,
Starting point is 00:10:15 called Created Equal, how the Bible broke with ancient political thought. One that's a little more on the popular level, meaning he's writing a little more on the popular level, meaning he's writing a little more accessible to a wider audience is a guy named Jeremiah Unterman called Justice for All, how the Jewish Bible revolutionized ethics. And what actually both of these scholars are doing
Starting point is 00:10:39 is some original work, but mostly they're dis summarizing generations of discovery and scholarship here. So here's just a few things that are very interesting, that again, they've reframed how I think about the laws. First of all, remember how the laws in the Torah are in the narrative context of the covenant relationship. Right. Here's something interesting. In all of the ancient covenant documents that we have from ancient Near East, which are Hittite,
Starting point is 00:11:05 Assyrian and Babylonian, out of all of them, they are almost always between a king and another king. Covenant relationships. Covenant relationships. Some of them read very similar to the covenant texts in the Hebrew Bible. Covenant curses, agreements. If you listen, the word love is often used to show love is a way of talking about covenant loyalty. That's an important word in Deuteronomy. So, this is Joshua Berman's point. He says, of the dozens and dozens of ancient covenant documents, they're all between a
Starting point is 00:11:35 king and another king. Only one is between a king and a whole people group. So on the whole, covenants are agreements that kings make with each other. Independent of their people, on behalf of their people, but independent. So the biblical story, however, depicts all of the laws as covenant terms between God and a whole people group, and it's represented as a marriage. The phrase, I will be their God and they will be my people, is the variation that we find in the song of songs. I am my beloved and my beloved is mine.
Starting point is 00:12:09 So just think in a context where covenants are things that kings make with other kings. And then you read the Hebrew Bible and you see a divine king making a covenant with the people. The people. In that cultural context, the people go in the another kings lot. Kingdom of priests. Kingdom of priests. Or a kingdom of kings. A kingdom of kings. Yeah. Or in Genesis 1, the image of God. It's the same thing happening with the image of God. That's a royal title given to kings only in Babylon and Egypt. And it's given to. Here it's given to all of Israel. The populace.
Starting point is 00:12:47 Yes. Actually, the key point in Joshua Berman's whole book is to say the covenant terms, these laws are not just for the kings. These laws are for all of the people. All of the people are elevated to the role. The common Israelite is elevated to the role of a royal covenant partner with King of the universe. These laws elevate the average Israelite's
Starting point is 00:13:12 sense of themselves and their value. That's powerful. This powerful. But to us who come from culture where we have raised all men are created equal. Ah yes. That it seems like a no brainer. Yeah, that's how it should be. Just take that for granted. We take that for granted. Yeah. And that's not how it always was thought. No, there would be no more ridiculous idea.
Starting point is 00:13:35 Then all men are created equal. Then all humans are created equal to say that to an ancient Egyptian king. Yeah, they would be like, you'd be like, get out of here. Yeah, no, you would kill you on the spot. I'll show you how equal you are. Totally. There's nothing in nature that teaches you something like that.
Starting point is 00:13:53 And nothing in the history of human relationships prepares you for that. I mean, it's, this is revolutionary stuff. Yeah. Yeah. Here, this is a quote from Joshua Burman. He says, an ancient Erys, various gods had consorts and goddess wives, while the common man was a subject, a slave and servant of the king, and of the tribute imposing class,
Starting point is 00:14:15 tribute imposing, meaning that the majority of the lower class exists to serve and to pay tribute, monetary tribute. For these cultures, he continues, for these cultures to conceive of the marriage between a God and a group of humans, which is what the Israelite covenant is. That would have been as unthinkable as for us to imagine the marital union of a human and a cat.
Starting point is 00:14:41 Mm. The marriage of a God and a whole people, a covenant people. I mean, you see what he's saying here. The Bible's most revolutionary idea is the idea of God as a personality who seeks a relationship of mutuality with human agents. In the neighboring cultures of the ancient Near East, humans are slaves of the king. In the Bible, they are transformed into a servant king who's married to a generous sovereign, a wife in relation to her benefactor husband. When God seeks love from Israel, it involves the political sense of loyalty between parties, as well as a kind of intimacy known and faithful intimate relationship between a man and a woman.
Starting point is 00:15:25 I mean, just try to imagine when this was a brand new idea. Yeah. Right, you live in a society where you have a very small elite ruling class. Yeah. The king being the highest of those who finds his authority as that like a God. And everyone else exists to pay tribute to it. So, yeah, and your cultural mythology, like Babylonian creation story, is that the gods got tired of feeding themselves. So they murder one of their own.
Starting point is 00:16:05 They slit the throat, pour his blood into the dust, and make humans to be slaves. So they make a freedom. In your cultural mythology, everybody as slaves accept those who are related to the divine, which, oh, happens to be the king, who's an image of God and those in his family. So the mythology is that God's God lazy and violent and so... Made human to slay. So made human to slay us. Yeah, that's the Babylonic creation story called the Autohausus.
Starting point is 00:16:36 So it's transparent as a political ideology. Yeah, exactly. And it also helps us see that the biblical narrative is transparent as a kind of political theology as well. But it's one that elevates the common person to the status of the king. Right. To have called humanity the image of God when only the king gets that status. Yeah, would have been gets that status would have been revolutionary. And to tell the narrative where all of these laws are about a covenantal marriage between God
Starting point is 00:17:09 and every Israelite. So every Israelite has a royal obligation to the covenant. That's a brand new idea. That's just, yeah, it's amazing. music music This also explains why in Israel's law codes, the priests and the kings are extremely downgraded compared to their Canaanite neighbors and Egyptian and Babylonia. I mean the kings are embodiments of the gods. The priests, where the clothing of the gods, they dress up like gods and such.
Starting point is 00:18:15 And the only law about the king in Deuteronomy says... Yeah, don't... Yeah, don't amass all this wealth. Don't have all these wives from other No standing army. Yeah. Yeah. Be a Bible nerd. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:18:30 Study the Bible. Study the Bible. Yeah. Yeah. The priests are given extremely narrow range of authority. Important. Yeah. But extremely narrow.
Starting point is 00:18:39 They can't even own land. Hmm. priests can't own land. Yeah. They can't even Israel. Right. Right can't own land. It makes it Israel. Right. And that's how you gain wealth and influence power. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:18:50 So think, this is an active turning upside down of an ancient Near Eastern culture to downgrade kings, subservient to the covenant and to downgrade priests. Yeah. We had some iconoclasts writing biblical laws. Oh, totally. Their whole economy is aimed at achieving a level of social equality that was unheard of. This is the laws about debt release every seven years.
Starting point is 00:19:15 Slave's being freed every seven years. No interest loans. It's against the law to charge interest on loans and ancient answer. Yeah, like our society couldn't exist with that law. Yeah, totally. So here's Berman again, we can, I just, this is so helpful for me. Here's what it does, it helps you see these laws
Starting point is 00:19:35 that feel like a moral embarrassment in the modern world. Yeah. But to realize the ethical ideals, in their context were just revolutionary. Revolutionary. Revolutionary. And we're now living in a culture thousands of years. realize the ethical ideals and their context were just revolutionary. And we're now living in a culture thousands of years that benefited from that more revolution built on the foundation of the ideals underneath these laws. Yeah, totally.
Starting point is 00:19:55 Yeah, so here, here, here, Berman is talking about the economic equality created by the Jubilee and the debt release and so on. He says the biblical laws about land and assets introduce a reformation of the ancient worldview aimed at achieving social equality. But he says it's interesting. It's not the egalitarianism developed since the French Revolution with its emphasis on individual and inalienable human rights. Rather, it takes a form of an economic system that seeks equality by granting sacred value
Starting point is 00:20:34 to the extended family household, where people assist one another in farming labor and granting. Here he's talking about leaving the edges of your field for the immigrants. They're the relief to other households in New York. Yeah, granting relief to other households. So, I think ancient Israel's a tribal association of free farmers and ranchers in our modern terms. Living in a single equal social class with all common ownership of the means of the production land.
Starting point is 00:21:01 This system was a rejection of statism, that is, the nation-state owns all the land. This system was a rejection of statism, that is, that the nation state owns all the land. And it's a rejection of feudalism, which is military lords own all the land. And those two systems summarize the ancient and medieval human history. And also, this whole society is free of tribute to any human king. And their tribute was a shared burden of funding the temple, not a king. So Israel defined itself in opposition to the Empire of oppression embodied by Egyptian slavery, but also in opposition to centralized monarchies. And eventually the monarchy takes up residence in Israel. So think about this. This is in the narratives of the book of Samuel and Kings. The monarchy is an institution born out of deep compromise, and the only ruins the covenant.
Starting point is 00:21:51 Yeah, they weren't supposed to have a king. They have one. Who liberated them from slavery and Egypt, God's their king. So just think about how that narrative reads in its original context 2,500 years ago. It's a whole narrative critiquing human monarchies. When human monarchies are the only thing that humans have ever known. And the most powerful things on the planet.
Starting point is 00:22:14 Totally. Yeah. This is remarkable stuff. Yeah. So, yeah. This stuff is very, this has been really helpful for me. Yeah. There's a moral ethical revolution that without which the concept of human rights, the concept of welfare, social equality, these are biblical concepts that are modern. They came into human history. Yes. Yes, that's right. This revolution. Via this revolution, ethical monotheism, as well, while some people would describe it.
Starting point is 00:22:45 Yeah, and this would have been screaming out loud and clear to ancient people reading this. To us, it's completely buried, because we've actually separated it from even a religious worldview. We separated what? We separated these concepts from their religious... We think the concepts come from, I don't even think we think about where they come from. No. Yeah
Starting point is 00:23:08 We just take them for granted Yeah, and then if you don't see them as clearly as you'd want to see them in the Bible Yeah, you think the Bible actually is fighting against them correct versus the seed bed Yeah, of the revolution. Yeah, and this is you know right up to our current moment But when you see a culture that wants to highlight equality and justice for all, but separate it from the religious narrative that makes that reasonable. You have a living contradiction that is the West
Starting point is 00:23:41 that wants to live by these Jewish Christian ideals, but separate them from any of their Jewish Christian heritage. And it remains to be seen whether culture can actually sustain those ideals without the religious worldview underneath it. Because there's nothing in nature that says human kingdoms ought to seek equality. No. Yeah. If anything, you would argue that it will be a slow regress back into what is a more natural state. Yeah, I don't. Well, I don't think humans will put up with that. I hope not. I hope not. But we live in a crazy world. It's just it's a fascinating moment in the history of the West that it's both
Starting point is 00:24:26 simultaneously rejecting much of its religious heritage, but wanting to maintain its ethical ideals. You. Of justice for all. I wonder what a guy like Sam Harris would say about that. Well, it's a good question. Well, actually, we know exactly what he would say. What would he say? Oh, what he would say is those ideals aren't the sole property of the Jewish Christian tradition. They're what reasonable people would
Starting point is 00:24:52 come to. And secular, reasonable society can carry forward those ideals. Commit that is his claim. Yeah. Another's like him. And the deep contradiction in that point of view has been pointed out to them. It's a different, they just have a different view of the universe. Yeah. This is where a lot of optimism about our rationality. Totally, that's right. This is where, for me, the work of David Bentley Hart has been very
Starting point is 00:25:17 helpful to me. He's helping Westerners wake up from our almost willful amnesia that what's most beautiful in western society and its ideals are the Jewish Christian heritage and of course much of the horror of western history is also wrapped up in an abuse of that heritage but the problem isn't the ideals it's stupid humans. I think I've heard you teach on, and you mentioned this law in the last episode of when you take a woman's slave, you shavourhead. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, that's right. And it sounds very demeaning, but it's ancient context is actually part of the revolution. Yep, this one bothered me for a long time.
Starting point is 00:26:22 Deuteronomy 21, verse 10. When you go to battle against your enemies and the Lord your God delivers them into your hands, and you see, actually this language is all keyed into the design pattern of Genesis 3. When you see a woman beautiful of sight, it's exactly the phrase and the woman saw that the tree was beautiful of sight. Genesis 3, crazy. And you see among the captives, they woman beautiful of sight and you desire her.
Starting point is 00:26:49 Hmm, desire, keyword. And take her for yourself as a wife, then bring her home. For new listeners. Yes. That's a design pattern in that it's exact same language. Totally. That you find in the Genesis story with Adam and Eve in the fruit. Correct.
Starting point is 00:27:08 And then repeated in all sorts of stories. Correct. So the point would be some people might mistake this law as promoting this. Right. But that design pattern describing a soldier seeing what's beautiful, desiring it, taking it for himself. Yeah. That whole sentence is modeled after the humans taking from the tree in Genesis 3,
Starting point is 00:27:28 which means that's an author giving you a clue that stupid, lustful soldiers taking women, they're gonna do it. So if they're gonna do it, let's at least regulate it and make it as humane as possible. That's what's going on. It's painting this activity negatively, not endorsing it. So here's what you do. You take her home, you shave her head, trim her nails,
Starting point is 00:27:49 remove the clothes of her captivity, let her mourn her father and mother a whole month. After that, you may become her husband and she shall be your wife. If you're not pleased with her, you shall let her go wherever she wants. You cannot sell her for money. You cannot mistreat her. So on one reading, this is like, like, man, terrible. You're out in battle. You take this woman, shiver head. Yeah. And then you make her be your wife. Yeah. Yeah. And if you're not happy with it, you just, you get rid of her.
Starting point is 00:28:22 Yep. That's right. Yeah. It's disgusting. It's is. It feels situation. You get rid of her. Yep, that's right. Yeah. It's disgusting. It is. It feels disgusting. I agree. And that's a Jewish Christian moral conscience that thinks behavior like that is disgusting.
Starting point is 00:28:33 Aside from that religious worldview, this is normal human behavior for most of human history. Yeah. And the biblical author agrees. That's why he's painted this scene with the colors of Genesis 3. Taking this woman is just like humans taking from the tree in the garden. However, so here's ways that I think this law is introducing the revolution into this. One is you give her a month where you can't touch her. Yeah, that's himself control for a soldier.
Starting point is 00:29:06 Yeah, I mean, just, you know how these stories go. Yeah. Sexual abuse when it comes to war crimes. Yeah. It's horrific. Yeah. In Israelite soldier, you respect her, you bring her home, and you don't touch her. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:29:20 For a month. Wow. And you let her grieve her loss. And then, if you marry her, and then all of a sudden, don't want to be married to her anymore, you don't get to sell her as a slave. Yes, she's not your property. She's not your property, and she never was. I mean, really, this is pretty revolutionary stuff. And it's a good example of a divine ideal being introduced into a really bad situation. And it's working the revolution.
Starting point is 00:29:45 Yeah, it's working the revolution from within. Yeah. You can see a Solomon, a wise figure saying, you know what, we should just not allow this all together. Right. You could, that's a takeaway. It's a point where you're like, yeah, don't take women in battle. Correct.
Starting point is 00:29:59 And then you can see a wise Solomon centuries from then or maybe they're going, Hey, let's not go into battle. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Let's keep going. All right. So, the previous three points have been about the laws in the Old Testament in their
Starting point is 00:30:55 ancient cultural context. They're not a lot of code, but covenant terms and a source of wisdom about moral ideals. The laws embody a set of theological ideals underneath all of them. That was the second point. The third one is they're part of an ancient ethical revolution that God's introducing into human history. This fourth point is more about reading the Torah as a narrative and understanding how divine commands fit into the plotline in the narrative plotline. Because the 611 laws all come with Passover and Mount Sinai and on in the story. But they're not the first divine commands. God has given a few commands already. In fact, one is on page two.
Starting point is 00:31:47 In other words, the theme of the divine command and the human being tested as to whether they will obey the command. That's the Garden of Eden story. And so it's important to see the laws that are given to the people of Israel play a subordinate role in the biblical storyline They are given to the people of Israel play a subordinate role in the biblical storyline that leads to Jesus. They're just one moment of a bigger pattern in the plotline of the story. Does that make sense?
Starting point is 00:32:14 Yeah, does make sense. It just helps to see him that way. There's a story happening. It begins with creation. God bringing order from chaos and it ends with new creation. God bringing order from chaos and it ends with new creation. And the laws play it a role in that story, which is the paradigm of they're not put in there so that you can have a sampler of law code. So at least you have some things to live by. Yeah, by. Yeah, to live by. Yeah. They're there to play a role in this story.
Starting point is 00:32:46 Correct. And what is the role that they have in the story? Yeah. Okay. Well, let's look at the first divine command given in the Bible. Yeah. God calls. Don't need apples.
Starting point is 00:32:58 A beautiful garden out of nothingness creates a wonderful mountain garden temple, appoints the humans as his images to rule it and enjoy it. And he gives them one command, in this the word command, Sivah and Hebrew. The Lord God commanded the human, saying. Because there's no Hebrew word for law. Is that what you said before?
Starting point is 00:33:18 Oh, not quite in the concept that we have it. Yeah, command would just be, it's the thing that I'm telling you to do. Yeah, do it. Yeah, command would just be, it's the thing that I'm telling you to do. Yeah. Do it. Here's the command. Eat from any tree. All the trees of the garden are yours to eat.
Starting point is 00:33:31 That's a great command. It's a great command. But from the tree of knowing good and evil, do not eat because warning, it will kill you. In the day that you eat from it, you'll die. So it's first command. So enjoy God's good world, but the authority of knowing, discerning on your own, what is good and not good, don't take that. It will result in death. And this is included in the list of 611 or 13 because it's not part of the marriage covenant between God and Israel. Yep, that's right.
Starting point is 00:34:08 But in terms of the thematic structure of the biblical story, here we are. Number one. God gave you a gift. Enjoy it. Just, here's one thing. It's the one and only command, I guess. It's the only command. Yeah, that's right.
Starting point is 00:34:21 So, obviously they break the command. And when God comes to, he addresses the snake and then the woman and the man individually in Genesis chapter three. And to the man, what he says is, because you have listened to the voice of your wife and you've eaten from the tree about which I commanded you saying, don't eat it. Yeah. You know, it's essentially you'll work the land and it will be hard to work the land the tree about which I commanded you saying don't eat it.
Starting point is 00:34:45 You know, it's essentially you'll work the land and it will be hard to work the land and then we turn to the dust from what you're meant. So it's all about listening. You listen to the voice of another human instead of listening to my voice. So right here in this story, listening to the voice of God is synonymous with obeying the divine command. So what's the problem? The problem is humans don't listen to the voice of God and obeys command.
Starting point is 00:35:10 They listen to each other's voices, which spin narratives. Which is being influenced by the voice of a greater evil. That's right, by a lie, yeah, of a greater force of evil. So the fundamental biblical plot conflict, then, is about humans not obeying the divine command, failing the test. It's about a test of listening, listening test. So that sets up the core pattern of divine commands,
Starting point is 00:35:38 the test, human failure, to not listen. Yeah. So, and that phrase, listening to the voice is really key, key within it. So you walk away from that story going, oh, man, and that phrase, listening to the voice is really key within it. So you walk away from that story going, oh man, okay, well what we need is some humans who will listen to the voice of God. It would be nice. It would be great.
Starting point is 00:35:53 Abraham is called out of the scattering of Babylon and God speaks to him a poem in the beginning of Genesis 12 that actually I don't have this in the notes, but it systematically goes through and addresses all of the poems from Genesis 1 to 11 and reverses them, turns the cursing into a bless, a bless, it's really cool, how it works. But the one condition is leave your land and leave your family. It's like separating you from your old humanity,
Starting point is 00:36:23 a new and different kind of human, leave your family behind, and we're told Abraham leaves the land, and then we're told, and Lot, his nephew went with him. Yeah, so he didn't leave all his family. He didn't leave, he left his land, but he did he fully listen. So you're supposed to clue in right there, like,
Starting point is 00:36:42 yeah, he didn't listen to the whole command. He didn't listen to the whole command. That's all the narrator says, it's just the last little line, and Lot went with him. And you're like, wait, well that, I just... He's supposed to go by himself. The hip is supposed to go just he and his wife. So, and the narrator's way of showing you the results of that, not listening, is Lot lot becomes the source of innumerable problems in the narratives to follow. So he doesn't fully listen, and it's not the first time. In the story about Hegar, their Egyptian slave, God said, I'm going to give you a family and a great nation,
Starting point is 00:37:20 and Sarah and Abraham get impatient, and so they decide to, in their own wisdom, create a family. And it's another design pattern of Gen.3. Yeah, they see, hagar, take her, and do what is good in their eyes to her. Oh, and specifically in that story, it says that Abraham listened to the voice of his wife. Oh wow.
Starting point is 00:37:44 Which is exactly the phrase from Genesis 3 Yeah, you're like, oh no. Here we go. Here we go. It's another Genesis 3 and it totally it's huge mess That comes from that situation. So now Abraham and Sarah have done great evil in trying to fulfill the divine promise in their own wisdom Yeah, they abuse an Egyptian woman. You know, he sleeps with her, trying to get his own air out of it. Then he has to downgrade her son.
Starting point is 00:38:13 It's just a terrible situation. Yeah, it's all these problems. It creates all these problems, broken relationships, and it's all based off of their own fall, their own failure to obey the divine command. And so, when Abraham and Sarah finally do get a son, you know, they've done terrible things to other people to get this son.
Starting point is 00:38:33 And so what God asks is, he puts Abraham to the test, another test. Yeah, a big one. A big one, this is Genesis 22. And all did, all the language of Genesis 22 is riffing in creative ways off of the language of Genesis 3 This is Abraham's tree in the garden moment and So the whole point in Genesis 22 is where God asks Abraham. Yes, sacrifice. Well the narrator says God tested Abraham So you know this is a test, but what God tests is
Starting point is 00:39:08 did Abraham. So you know this is a test. But what God tests is just how far are you willing to go to have your own son? You've been willing to abuse Najip and slave and disenfranchise her son to do it. So the whole thing is about whether he's he listened to the voice of Sarah. That's what got him into this mess So he does it. He's about to offer up Isaac as an Ola Mm-hmm going up offering Yeah on his behalf and then God Which you the reader knew was had to happen at some point God says stop. Yeah, and then here's what here's what happens in Genesis 22 verse 16 God says by myself.'ve sworn, because you've done this thing, you haven't withheld your son, your only one. Indeed, I will greatly bless you, I'll multiply your seed as the stars of the heavens and the sand and the sea shore. Your seed will possess the gate of your enemies and your seed, all the nations of the earth will be blessed, it's a pause, that's the fulfillment.
Starting point is 00:40:07 It's a restatement of what God said in the first place. Yeah, right, it's the art promised, yeah. So God said earlier, I'm gonna do these things for you and lot went with him. Yeah, and then he listened to the voice of his wife. Yeah. And you're like, oh, and so here, this story is Abraham's, he passes the test. He's the only character in the Bible that does us.
Starting point is 00:40:29 Oh, he's the only character up to this point, up to this point, who passes the test. And when he passes, when a human passes the test, it releases blessing to the nations. And then the last line is, because you have listened to my voice, because you listen to my voice. So watch this. Four chapters later, God is Abraham just died and Abraham's son Isaac, whose life exists because of the mercy of God, right, after Genesis 22. In a miracle of God. In a miracle.
Starting point is 00:41:01 Genesis 26, God's restating the promise to Isaac. He says, I'm going to establish those that I swore to your father Abraham. I'll multiply your descendants as the stars of the heavens. I'll give your descendants these lands. By your descendants, all the nations of the earth will be blessed. And you're like, oh, yeah, that's what God said to Abraham. Because Abraham listened to my voice and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my Torah. And you're like, wait, the commandments and statutes and the Torah, they don't exist yet. Are you with me?
Starting point is 00:41:38 Yes. But you're reading this in a story where you're just 30 or so pages away from the revelation of the laws. Yeah. So this is very important, the story of the Garden in Abraham and Abraham listening to God's voice is equivalent to keeping the laws of the Torah. And that is the narrative that set in, as the introduction to the covenant story of God in Israel and the laws of Sinai.
Starting point is 00:42:06 Doesn't Paul kind of refer to this where he said Abraham? Does he have a phrase where he had it written on his or like he like? Well, yeah, we'll read him. Yeah, we'll read this later. Yeah, Paul's whole point is the Torah is trying to teach you about the life of faith. Yeah, and that's what Abraham was doing. The life of Abraham, and all he's, what Paul's clueling into, so let's back up.
Starting point is 00:42:31 Most people, when they read the first five books of the Bible, they think, oh, look at all these laws. The Old Testament is about how God wants you to obey laws. The New Testament is about how God wants you to live by faith. Yeah. And that's exactly the opposite point that Jesus and Paul have. Yeah, and that Genesis is making here when it introduces Abraham as the first one
Starting point is 00:42:54 to follow the Torah by listening to God's voice and living by faith. Yeah. To live by faith is to obey the commands of the Torah without even knowing them. They haven't even been revealed yet. In other words, this is kind of a little narrative, the narrative is winking at you when he says, Abraham kept my charge, my commands, my statutes, and the laws of the Torah. He's winking at you.
Starting point is 00:43:17 Because he knows he's going to tell you a story continuing on about people who actually get continuing on about people who actually get very clear statements of the laws and statutes and commands and they've been rescued from slavery in Egypt and they don't listen to the voice but they're for Father dead. Yeah it is. So, this theme continues on, oh yeah, well actually here, let's just get to it. When you get to Mount Sinai, when the people of Israel are sitting about Sinai, and this is the prologue to the first laws, this is prologue to the 10 commandments. And when this is, is relight throughout Mount Sinai, God says, you saw what I did to the Egyptians. I carried you on Eagles wings and brought you to myself. Now then, if you will, in Hebrew, it's repeated twice. If you will
Starting point is 00:44:25 listen, listen to my voice, which is synonymous, he says, by keeping my covenant, to listen to the voice is to keep the covenant. Then you'll be in my own possession among the nations, you'll be in my kingdom of priests and a holy nation. You get a narrative of the laws of the covenant, kingdom of priests and a holy nation. You get a narrative of the laws of the covenant. And then the first narrative after that is the making of the golden calf. Yeah, a foreign god. Yeah. That they want to worship. Yeah. And that golden calf story, all the vocabulary in that story, is patterned after the fall narrative in Genesis chapter three. Here we go again. Here we go again. So you can see the narrative argument of the Torah
Starting point is 00:45:07 is about how humans don't listen, but there was one moment when Abraham did, and that act of obedience was an act of faith that released blessing to the nations, and it was in that act, Abraham, it was as if he was obeying all the laws of the Torah in one act. It is possible. It is possible. But Abraham has one moment of success among a lifetime of failures. But it gives you a category of like, oh, okay, so a human who always and only listens to the voice of God, if that's what we need around here, so that blessing can permanently be released to all of the nations.
Starting point is 00:45:51 All right. Maybe it's the people of Israel at Mount Sinai. Oh, wait, no, they just do the same thing everybody else does. They made the golden calf. Yeah, totally. So here, let's just summarize this. Here, I'll let you read, this is a paragraph from Deuteronomy 30. Okay.
Starting point is 00:46:06 What summarizes this point well? Deuteronomy 30, 15. See, I've said before you today, life and good and death and evil, and that I command you today to love the Lord, your God, to walk in His ways and to keep His commandments and His statutes and His judgments. See, that's what Abraham obeyed. That list right there. Those are the same list.
Starting point is 00:46:26 That you may have life and multiply, which is what God wanted them to do. Adam and Eve multiply. In the garden. And that the Lord your God may bless you in the land where you are entering to possess it. But if your heart turns away and you will not obey, which is the same word for listen, right? You will not listen to the voice, but are drawn away in worship other gods and serve them. I declare to you today that you surely shall perish. That's exactly don't eat of the tree. The day that you eat of it, you'll die. It's the same thing. Same
Starting point is 00:47:01 pattern. You will not prolong your days in the land when you're crossing the Jordan to enter and possess it. I call heaven and earth to witness against you today that I have set before you life and death the blessing and the curse. So choose a life in order that you may live you in your descendants. By loving the Lord your God, by obeying his voice, and by holding fast to him. Remember, listening to his voice, that's the phrase. That's the phrase. The word Shema. Yeah. Shema, the voice. Yeah. This is your life. Your life is listening to the voice. Which is so connected to living by the Spirit. Yes. Totally. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:47:46 In fact, that's where this goes in the book of Jeremiah and in the book of Ezekiel. When the people are sitting in exile after having for 400 years not listened to the voice, Jeremiah and Ezekiel, the only thing they can imagine of how this is solved is in Jeremiah's words of God writing the laws of the Torah on the heart so that everyone knows me. So it's not even that you know good and evil, you know me. And Ezekiel says, yeah, your life becomes just a natural expression of what the commands were all about. And Ezekiel says that's by this God's Spirit that replaces your heart, that compels you to follow the laws of Torah. So let's just say it this way.
Starting point is 00:48:35 The Torah is a new covenant document. This is why I don't like to use the word Old Testament anymore these days is because that is saying that these texts are somehow the old covenant. Right. And that's precisely what they are not. They're a narrative about how humans perpetually fail to listen to the voice. And that's always been the covenant, to listen to the voice. The covenant is to listen to the voice, which means that you can have Abraham obeying.
Starting point is 00:49:06 There isn't an old covenant of obey lies and now a new covenant of listen to the voice of God through the Spirit. There is just always been just to test and listen to the voice. And a series of covenants, one of them has 611 examples of how to listen to the voice. But it's couched in a narrative of how they failed to do it, creating a need, as Moses says, for the transformation of the heart. So the whole testament is a new covenant document
Starting point is 00:49:35 in that it and create shows you why we need fundamentally different kind of divine human relationship, which is what the incarnation of Jesus and the work of the Spirit is all about. So this is what I mean, the laws at Mount Sinai. This makes me want to read some of Paul and Romans or something right now just to kind of connect those dots. Well, great. I have them on the next page. But is it part of the next point?
Starting point is 00:50:00 Yes. Okay. Well, then we'll do that in the next episode. Great. Thanks for listening to this episode of the Bible Project Podcast. We've got two more episodes about reading the law. But next week we want to stop and answer some questions from you. I'm sure a lot of things have come up for you as you've been listening through these
Starting point is 00:50:19 conversations. So if you have a question, you can send it to us, send it to info at jointhebibelproject.com. We'd love to use your voice, so record yourself, asking the question. Please keep it to around 20 seconds and let us know your name where you're from, and we'll get to as many as we can. Today's episode was produced by Dan Gummel, the theme music is by the band Tense. The Bible Project is a non-profit where in Portland, Oregon, we believe the Bible is one unified story that leads to Jesus. We make free resources that show the literary structure of the Bible and the themes that carve their way through the entire biblical narrative.
Starting point is 00:50:55 We're a crowd-funded organization, so this is all made possible by people like you. So thanks for being a part of this with us. Hi, my name is Maseo Davi La Ferrer. I'm from La Coma, Alberta, Canada. I first heard about the Bible project. I think about four years ago from a fellow pastor, and he told me about the materials. And now I use them for like everything.
Starting point is 00:51:17 I use them with students when I do one on one Bible studies. I for sure always use them for my sermon prep. It makes me sound really smart, like I did a lot of research by myself. And my favorite thing about it is that it's just so rich, so inspirational, and just like, it's just all about the Bible, and I think that transcends any separations that we have. We believe the Bible is a unified story that leads to Jesus. We're a crowd-funded project by people like me.
Starting point is 00:51:43 Find free videos, study notes, podcasts, and more at thebyepproject.com you

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.