Big Ideas Lab - JASPER
Episode Date: April 21, 2026In a remote corner of the Nevada desert, scientists at JASPER study one of the most consequential materials on Earth: plutonium. This is the story of how a bold experimental concept became a trusted n...ational asset. By utilizing a two-stage gas gun, researchers create extreme conditions for less than a microsecond, generating the precise data that helps to validate and strengthen U.S. science-based stockpile stewardship. The work demands extraordinary precision, complete containment, and an unwavering focus on national security. Guests featured (in order of appearance): David Bober - JASPER Team Lead, LLNL Ricky Chau - JASPER Execution Lead, LLNL -- Big Ideas Lab is a Mission.org original series. Executive Produced by Levi Hanusch. Script by Caroline Kidd. Sound Design, Music Edit and Mix by Matthew Powell. Story Editing by Levi Hanusch. Audio Engineering and Editing by Matthew Powell. Narrated by Matthew Powell. Video Production by Levi Hanusch. Brought to you in partnership with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
As the car door slams shut, dust scatters.
90 miles one way deep into the Nevada desert has coated everything in a fine layer of grit.
It's 7.06 a.m.
A scientist from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has just arrived at a remote facility built for a single purpose,
to measure an event that no human can fully witness.
A dry wind gusts across his face one last time before he steps inside the doors of the concrete building.
He runs through his checklist, materials shaped and delivered, systems aligned, and diagnostics tuned to capture a moment too fast for human senses to register.
The data collected will ripple far beyond the harsh Nevada desert and directly influence national security.
He's made this trek many times before.
But today is different.
Today is the day that three years of preparation culminate in less than a microsecond.
Today is the day a two-stage gas gun drives a radioactive, hazardous material into conditions
too extreme to observe directly.
Today is the day they measure plutonium.
Today is Shot Day at Jasper.
Welcome to the Big Ideas Lab, your exploration inside Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Hear untold stories, meet boundary-pushing pioneers, and get unparalleled access inside the gates.
From national security challenges to computing revolutions, discover the innovations that are shaping tomorrow today.
An unmanned test vehicle tears out of the atmosphere.
In the vacuum of space, it's silent as it makes its way back to Earth.
Then it hits.
Reentry.
The air doesn't part.
It compresses.
Temperature spikes.
The surface begins to burn.
The vehicle.
And whatever it could have told us.
Gone.
Back in the 60s, the space race, people wanted ways to test reentry,
nose cones. As missile programs and early spaceflight pushed beyond the atmosphere,
reentry became one of the hardest problems to solve. Typically, if you have something from space
falling back to Earth, there might be 11 kilometers per second. The U.S. government turned to
General Motors looking for another way. Not to chase a moment in the sky, but to recreate it
on the ground. Using the same principle as a cannon, they compressed gas to launch a projectile
at extreme speeds, fast enough to mimic the shock of re-entry.
Gas guns, eventually making their way to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
where the technology was expanded, refined, and adapted for entirely new kinds of experiments.
That gun should have a Chevrolet stamp on it because it was made by General Motors.
Ricky Chow is the execution lead at Jasper.
General Motors, what they were done with these test guns, they donated them to the Department of Energy.
So the guns that we have here were prototypes of the launcher.
But what they were built for then isn't what they're used for now.
For more than 20 years, far removed from city lights and ordinary laboratories,
the Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research Facility, or Jasper,
has done something no other place on Earth can do.
Study plutonium with extraordinary precision,
in complete containment, with ever.
without nuclear testing.
In the old days, you could use rough guesses for the data
because, well, if you're not sure,
we're going to blow one of them up
and then we'll just verify our models against the test.
Once you stop being able to do that
and the further you go away from that,
then your models have to get better.
Few materials arrive with as much baggage as plutonium.
You are the target.
You will be prepared.
Mushroom clouds, fallout shelters,
waiting out decay,
yellow and black radiation signs,
and the long after image of the atomic age.
Atomic bombs could call...
It's a highly radioactive heavy metal.
Plotoneum!
Are you telling me that this sucker is nuclear?
It's handled under some of the strictest protections the U.S. government can impose.
And it's toxic.
At Jasper, every step must be controlled.
Jasper is the only gun in the United States that can hit this broad range of velocities
and be used on plutonium.
Meet David Bober, the team lead for Jasper.
A Jasper target typically starts its life cycle as some source of plutonium.
It could be a casting that we've made specifically for these sorts of science experiments.
And that will then be brought into a glove box.
The image in the public mind is the intro of Homer Simpson.
All I need is some plutonium.
He's got his hands in the gloves and the big window.
It's that, but done by professionals.
Once it's prepared, the experiment begins.
Jasper is an impact-driven launcher, impact-driven experiments.
So we throw a projectile at up to 8 kilometers per second at the target.
18,000 miles per hour, ejected by a two-stage gas gun.
You hit a fire button, it sends a fire pulse through the electronics, and in Jasper's case, it sets off a debt, commercial detonator.
The first stage is like a large cannon, like a howitzer or a battleship gun.
It works the same way.
You have a propellant charge, we wrap it up, it looks like a giant burrito.
We fill it with priming powder.
We use commercial sporting goods like hunter powder, and then we fill in a 30-od-6 cartridge with the same powder and stick it in the back.
And all we do is we have a solenoid that acts like a hammer of a gun that hits the back of the 30-od-6, and that's what fires a gun.
The primer on the cartridge, it lights the primer powder.
The primer powder burns, the flames go out the holes, and then it lights the main charge.
The fire command starts the first stage.
The second stage comes only milliseconds later once the piston has compressed the high.
hydrogen gas. The propellant starts to burn and it's in a breach which is a sealed volume.
So as you create more burn gases, pressure builds up. Then the pressure is going to push on a piston.
And then so this piston start traveling due to the burning gases. At some point, you increase the pressure so high and then the gases escape into a
tapered section and it acts just like a perfume nozzle so that you have gases going through and accelerates the gas.
And that accelerated gas then pushes on a little inch in diameter projection.
The pressure going through is so high that it ruptures a pedal valve that launches the projectile.
And that's what gets launched at 8 o'clock per second.
Fire.
And then it goes down to a barrel, comes out of the gun, and it smacks the target.
And then it flies, do some X-ray and laser diagnostics just to measure the velocity, you know, like basically like two eye beams.
You break one beam, get a counter, break another beam, that gives you your velocity.
The whole sequence is designed to do one thing relentlessly well.
Well, turn stored energy into extreme speed.
The old magic trick where the magician pretends to catch a bullet in their teeth,
we're really doing that.
But this bullet is traveling 10 times faster than a rifle bullet.
The portion of time where we are collecting useful data is less than a microsecond or one millionth of a second.
And that's actually, maybe for our slower experiments.
Some of the more typical experiments, it's more like 100 nanoseconds.
So a typical experiment for us would be we may be measuring the speed of a second.
shockwave as it transits through a sample. So we'll measure very precisely the moment of impact,
and then we'll measure how long it takes for that shockwave that's generated to transit across the
sample. And that tells us something important about the thermodynamic state. In a fraction of a
microsecond, plutonium is pushed into extremes too fast to see and too important to guess at.
You can imagine a shockwave like, imagine a snowplow driving down the street. The snow has fallen
overnight, the road is covering a nice, even layer of it. As the snowplow goes, the snowplow blade
moves at a certain velocity and the snow piles up in front of it, and it compacts. And as it
compacts, you can imagine that wave starts to move forward away from the plow. So the farther
the plow moves, now there's this wave traveling forward of compacted snow. That disturbance is
what we're looking at, where you go from unmoved snow, it's a compacted slab. The shot only matters
if the diagnostics can capture it clearly enough to make the result repeatable,
credible and useful.
And when you do that, it makes an astounding mess.
When a projectile hit something going eight kilometers per second, people sometimes ask me what's
left afterwards.
What's left is almost nothing.
The target's essentially exploded.
So you've taken your target, you've in some cases vaporized it, you've mixed it with
soot, everything else is more or less burned, and it's embedded as tiny particles around
whatever it was in when you shot it.
Which is why creating the shot is only half the challenge.
containing it is the other half.
What makes Jasper really audacious
was that the people who conceived of this knew that.
They had experience with those sorts of gun experiments,
and they imagined a way in which they could do it on plutonium
and capture every last tiny speck of that material
and prevents it escaping into the environment.
At Jasper, containment is not just part of the design.
It is the thing the entire experiment depends on.
The diagnostics matter.
The timing matters.
The data matters.
But none of it matters unless the material stays contained.
At Jasper, containment is non-negotiable.
If you want to reuse your gun, your containment strategy has to somehow cope with that.
You have to admit the projectile, but not emit the contamination.
The shot has to get in, but nothing can come out.
Something that at one point sounds.
It sounded impossible.
Sometimes when I drive to work, I try and imagine, how was that meeting when this was proposed?
And I think what I come back to over and over again is that when you want to know how important
this is, it's important enough that someone was able to propose that idea.
And the answer was, yeah, let's think about that.
And then it got done.
The team at Jasper has not only met the goals of their original mission, they've gone far beyond its original expectations,
cutting uncertainty by more than 50% from its initial targets.
I can smack plutonium all you want.
If I don't have diagnostics, all I've done is created nuclear waste.
Trust is not a feeling.
It is built shot by shot through repeatability, transparency,
and uncertainty small enough that other programs can confidently build on the result.
We're using really well-proven tools.
So the science behind this dates back decades.
So we try to be very open about how big our error bars are, and we try to be really transparent
in everything that goes into that uncertainty.
I can tell you a thing is an inch long, but if it's an inch plus or minus a mile, that's not
that useful.
Historically, the shock physics community has not maybe done as good a job about that as we
should.
I think that has changed, and I think Jasper was one of the ways that helped that change.
Jasper's mission is to generate data precise enough to reduce uncertainty and strong enough
to anchor decisions across the stockpile stewardship and modernization community.
By the time we actually produce the data, there's a lot of evidence to show that what we claim
to be measuring really is what we're measuring. I make an effort of going out there periodically,
giving these briefings to people so that they understand how their work impacted the overall
program. And I will show them the data and show them the impact. This is data we took.
This is how headquarters received it. This is the result of this measurement. And when you tell
those guys that your measurements prove that the P.U. Behaved properly. Do you see it in their eyes?
The success also depends on a close partnership with the Nevada National Security Sites, or the NNSS,
whose operational expertise and support help make these complex experiments possible.
In practice, that relationship works better than you might think, because while we have
separate budgets coming from the federal government, I think both sides of that relationship
realize that you can't row with one or. We do a good job.
job cooperating. As diagnostics improved, the picture sharpened. As priorities shifted, the questions
expanded. And as the data became more precise and repeatable, Jasper's role grew with it.
Other questions like temperature, that's a much harder question. That's been a holy grail for the
shock physics community, not even just plutonium, it's almost anything. Shocking anything and trying to
measure accurate temperature. We've had to develop new street cameras that are coupled with
spectrometers, infrared detectors for lower temperature.
So the needs of the experiment drive the development of diagnostics.
What started as a way to answer a narrow set of questions became a facility capable of answering
many more about aging, manufacturing, material strength, and the future needs of the stockpile.
It came online in the early 2000s.
We were in the middle of obtaining the data on the various materials.
How Jasper fits in now versus then is that once you've created the capability,
other problems pop up.
And then Jasper was the right facility to answer these questions.
So the first one that was outside the original Jasper program was an idea that's still with us today is the idea of what happens when your botonium gets old.
Does it behave the same?
And Neil Holmes says, well, we have this JASPR facility that we're getting very high accuracy.
We can do an experiment that we can compare new and old plutonium.
And that was the first branching off point.
The future of Jasper is not only new questions, but,
new ways of measuring them.
There are changes of foot in the nuclear weapons complex.
We're building new pits, for example.
Many of the existing weapons are quite old.
The questions that are being asked related to things like new manufacturing and aging,
those have influenced the sorts of science that Jasper and facilities with similar missions
are doing.
What began as a way to answer shock physics questions has transformed into one of the
nation's most trusted tools for understanding plutonium.
The event at its center unfolds in less than a microsecond,
and yet that moment becomes data scientists can trust.
What leaves Jasper isn't the shot itself.
It's the understanding that remains after it.
Thank you for tuning in to Big Ideas Lab.
If you loved what you heard, please let us know by leaving a rating and review.
And if you haven't already, don't forget to hit the follow or subscribe button in your podcast app
to keep up with our latest episode.
Thanks for listening.
