Big Technology Podcast - What Should An AI Device Look Like? — With Alex Himel

Episode Date: June 10, 2026

Alex Himel is Meta’s VP of Wearables. Himel joins Big Technology Podcast to discuss the future of AI wearables and why Meta believes glasses could become the next major computing platform. Tune in to hear how AI assistants might help with daily tasks, meetings, reminders, fitness, photos, and real-world context without pulling people out of the moment. We also cover the competition from OpenAI, Google, Apple, and Amazon; the privacy questions around facial recognition; on-device AI; and the story of how Mark Zuckerberg pushed Meta to turn Ray-Ban glasses into an AI product. Hit play for a sharp look at whether smart glasses are finally ready to break through, and what they could mean for the future of personal AI. --- Enjoying Big Technology Podcast? Please rate us five stars ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ in your podcast app of choice. Want a discount for Big Technology on Substack + Discord? Here’s 25% off for the first year: https://www.bigtechnology.com/subscribe?coupon=0843016b Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

What does the future AI device or devices look like? Let's talk about it with the head of wearables at Meta right after this. I'm just back from ServiceNow's Knowledge, 2026 in Las Vegas, and the conversations I had there are ones you're going to want to hear. I sat down with their president and CPO Amit Zaveri on the platform strategy powering enterprise AI, chief people and AI enablement officer Jackie Canney, and chief digital information officer Kelly Romack, on what AI really means for the workforce.

The technical leaders behind social. ServiceNow's Nvidia partnership on shipping AI at scale and Alta Beauty on deploying ServiceNow's technology across 1,300 stores. If you want to know where Enterprise AI is actually headed, not the hype, but the real story, you can find these videos on my YouTube channel. Search Alex Cantorowitz on YouTube. Depending on who you ask, between 80 and 95% of Enterprise AI projects fail. To get AI to work for you, you don't need more tokens. You need better people. A board pairs powerful proprietary tools with senior engineers who've seen it all. That combination means your project doesn't stall, doesn't drift, and doesn't fall.

It ships. Whether you're a startup that needs to get to market or an enterprise with complex legacy challenges, Aboard delivers exactly what your business needs fast. Aboard is your partner for AI transformation. Visit Aboard.com, and let's build something together. Welcome to Big Technology Podcast, a show for cool-headed and nuanced conversation of the tech world and beyond. We have a great show for you today. We're going to talk about what the future of AI device,

or AI devices looks like with the person who's been running the effort at Meta, Alex, Hymel. Alex, welcome to the show. Hey, thanks for having me. Always great to meet someone else named Alex. I'm very excited to be here. Well, it's great to have you here. We're going to talk about the new models, especially the Rayban meta optics, which I have in my hand here. And if you're on audio, we'll talk about the products that we're holding. These are slimmer models that are meant to be used indoors or can be used indoors in a way that the others haven't been and it really opens up a whole new set of use cases for these AI wearables, which is what your line of glasses are. But to begin with,

I just want to start broad because these glasses that have had the meta assistance have been within them have been in market for a long time. But I think folks are still trying to, and I personally am trying to figure out what the use case is. I mean, it's obviously great for photos and you can listen to music on them, but this broader idea of an AI device is yet to really shape, take form in a lot of our minds. So can you just begin by paint a picture for me of in the future, maybe it's a few months or a year, a couple years down the line. How am I going to go about my daily life if this product works in a way that's different from the way that people are going about their daily lives today?

I'll get there, but can I go backwards first? A little bit of happy. we got there no no backwards we go forward we're only going forwards it look look everybody wants to do it take a step back we'll we'll do that over the course but i'd love to hear your perspective from the start here and then we can work our way backwards all right i'll go forwards first the only reason i hesitated is that i think when a lot of companies and people have have tried to get in the space and say hey what's going to be possible with this i think they try to jump too far into the future and ignore kind of how to get there so i won't go that where let's get there in a bit I think what you're going to see is that if you've got a pair of glasses that is already comfortable to wear,

is already providing value as sunglasses or as obstacle glasses, like we're launched with the ones I'm wearing and the ones you're just talking about, then you're going to get more help and assistance with going about what you're trying to do during the day from your glasses. They can see what you see. They can hear what you hear. You can talk to them. Right now I use mine a ton to ask simple lookup questions. like if I'm driving and my six-year-old son is in the back, just pegging me with questions,

I can ask my glasses without having to take my eyes off the road and hands off the wheel. And you're going to see more use cases develop as the AI is getting better insanely rapidly. And so you'll be able to do things like instead of saying, what am I looking at? You'll be able to say, help me do this thing that I would normally have to look up a YouTube video

to walk me through or look at a real online. Or you'll be able to say, hey, summarize the conversation that you and I just had to give me kind of the highlights from it. And so it'll be this proactive assistance that you can get. And it'll feel like you have an assistant that's always with you, not taking you out of the physical world, but just helping you do what you're already trying to do. Okay, but walk me through a day in the life of Alex Himmel, wearing these glasses and having the technology be where you want it to be.

You wake up in the morning, put the glasses up. and talk a little bit about the things that you're going to do. Like, give us, like, tell us a story, basically, of, like, how your life will be different wearing a pair of these. Yeah, I'm waking up in the morning. The first thing I do is go for a run. So I'm putting on my Oakley Meadow Vanguard sunglasses. I'm wearing my Garmin watch.

As I'm running, the glasses are automatically taking a few videos as I go, stitching them together as a reel for me. That feature is already live. As I'm running, I can ask my glasses for stats, for how far, I've run for updates in the training program that I'm doing. That's also live and getting better. When I get back, I'm starting to make lunch for the kids to pack it, for them to go to school. I notice I've run out of Ziploc bags and Nutella, and I ask my glasses to order those for me to replace them. They arrive a few hours later at my house. I'm driving the kids to school. They're

asking me some questions about what they're doing after school, what time is their practice, who are they playing in their little league game today? My glasses tell me the answer to that. So I don't need to look it up on my phone. I go to work. I'm in a series of meetings. Notes are taken on my behalf by the AI with next steps, people who own action items. That's automatically sent out to the people who are present and we're able to follow up on those. I'm in a conversation with you. I can't remember the name of someone that I think we both mutually knew from New York where we're both from. My glasses helped me remember what I was trying to remember in the moment.

It kind of goes from there. But you can see it's a companion. It's always with me. And it's taking the things I'm already doing and just making them a little bit easier for me. Okay. First of all, thank you. That was a very well-detailed example of how this could change. And I think as we start thinking about the way that an AI assistant might end up helping us in life,

like these examples really help. For instance, just obviously sports has been something that we've seen wearables in for a long time now. So those of us who are like runners, we know what the wearable world is about. I know you have a garment. I'll just say I've been wearing the garment too. And the thing I hate is having to check the watch, like looking down at the watch while I'm running. because it's just like it is an unnatural movement. And so if you could see that on the glasses, that's great.

But let me challenge you for a moment on whether glasses are the right form factor. So, you know, I'm going to think through some of the use cases that you're talking about, for instance, getting updates about the run. And if you're wearing the Oakley's, well, can't you do that on headphones? And then you're working on preparing lunch.

Can't you do that on like a smart speaker? speaker like Alexa and then you know potentially you're in the meeting maybe your headphones is taking that as the input and I don't think a laptop is going away so you will see that on the laptop so obviously you know we're here again we're at meta headquarters here in Menlo Park California we have a bunch of different models of glasses in front of us they initially weren't conceived as an AI device these were mostly for you know taking photos and and videos and listening to music and then AI came about later.

And it's kind of a fun story about how that happened. We can talk about that. But why glasses in particular and why not the other form factors that other companies are talking about? That's an invitation to take a step backwards. So now you can do it. Now I can do it. Not too far back.

I won't go too far back. But I think one of my favorite analogies is that an escalator never breaks, it becomes stairs. And so similarly, the glasses, even if they run out of battery or they're just turned off. There's still something you would wear if you wear optical glasses or you wear sunglasses. They're still providing value to you.

And I think the approach that we took with glasses, which is different from what I think some other companies have taken, where it was really about how do we leapfrog forward massively with technology. It's that, look, even if the glass are doing nothing, they're ray bands, which is the rayband Wayfair, is the most popular brand and style in the world of all time. So they're comfortable, they're good looking.

We have a number of different colors and styles and skews. You can find something you like and looks good on you. And so even when they're doing nothing, they're providing value. So part of the bet there and part of the thesis is this is something you'd wear anyway as you're going about your activity. You're right that I could go running with headphones. And if it's early in the morning, it's dark out, I don't want to wear sunglasses. I want to wear either nothing or clear lenses.

But the Oakley Meta Vanguard's here, they're not only sunglasses, which I do like to run to wear when it's bright out. They're also headphones. So if I want to listen to music, they are playing music for me. And so they're providing a few different pieces of value. And then on top of that, I can use the AI. So that's part of the bet.

And so some of the devices that you mentioned, I could put a smart speaker in my home, I could do other things, but that's an additional device on top of something I'd already be using. We don't think glasses are gonna be the only form factor. I do think they're the most common form factor when I think, how many people do I know,

kids included, who do not, who do not wear sunglasses or obstacle glasses. I have to, I can think of one person, literally only one that I know. What's that person's deal? They're a unique human, I'm not gonna go into it, I will say they wake up and stare into the sun

for 20 minutes because I think it's good for their eyes in the morning, so they're a unique person. We're not gonna take their advice on that. Yeah. Folks do not work directly into the sun, okay. But most people do, then when you look past that, you know, we like to look at other form factors. When we say wearables, the way I like to think about this, space is I think humans have already evolved to what works well, what form factors are comfortable

to wear. And so we think that you'll kind of see popularity in that order. What are things you're already wearing and using? Glass is number one, but excited about other things that people are already wearing and not very excited about ones that you don't see people using frequently. Like some of these devices that you clip on or that you, if you don't see a lot of people doing that already with analog versions, I think it's unlikely that you're going to see an AI version take off. Okay, so the fact that it's a common device, it has utility outside of the AI, means that it won't be too much of an addition to put on your body to wear, and therefore it has the best chance of winning. Yeah, if it's providing value outside of the AI, and then the AI is going to keep getting better and providing more value as it gets better. So let's talk about that AI. Meta's in the process of developing personal super intelligence, as the company describes it.

Yeah. And I imagine that personal superintelligence will go into these glasses. So I'd love to hear your perspective on what personal super intelligence is. We like to think of it as how can the AI empower you to be the best version of you? Really, so that's the way we think about it in wearables. And so we don't, we're not envisioning a world where the devices you're using or the wearables you're wearing are taking you out of the world that you're in. So how can we, we talk about being present yet connected.

You want to be connected so you have tools that help you. But it's really about being present with the people you're with, the local businesses that you're in, the experience that you're in. One of the best examples is, you know, I go to my kids' performances at their school and instead of holding my phone up to watch the thing they're doing through a video screen, I'm watching it through my glasses and the glasses are recording it. So it's allowing me to be more present in that moment rather than having to be removed from it just so I can have a video of it.

Yeah, I had the experience. I was in Thailand and there was this beautiful sunset and I wanted to reach from my phone, but I remembered I had the glasses on and I just filmed it there and I have that. memory but I was there just like living it and not looking at it through a screen which was really nice yeah and and that's where we're going to and I think the you can imagine stuff like that you can imagine little ways that the AI can start to make it better we auto capture is something that we're launching and that it's the same thing but the glasses can automatically detect that there's a

moment worth with with captain you can imagine you're at a kids birthday party and rather than constantly having a trigger photos or videos or a plow to device, it can seize a smile, there's a birthday cake, it can capture those moments that you want to make sure you didn't miss. Really? But then the question is like, do you trust it, really? Because that gives it the opportunity to capture images

whenever you're doing anything. And there are times where even if I'm wearing those glasses, I don't necessarily want it to record. Yeah, so you explicitly enter a live, you explicitly enter a session where you say start live capture. So it'll be, let's say, you're at a party, then you'll say you can capture it and it will. At a birthday party or sunsets coming up or some moment where you think something's going

to happen that I want to make sure I don't miss. I'm sure you've had some experiences where something will happen and you're like, oh my God, I cannot believe I didn't get my phone out or my glasses out to capture that. Yeah, that's pretty cool. So let's talk a little bit about the history here. Like I think for us, you know, we're deep into the tech world, it sort of makes sense to be wearing an AI around. But there is an argument, looking at history,

that there have been attempts to do it, and it hasn't worked. Thinking about the Humane Pin, for instance, or the Google Glass. So what do you think is different about this time? I mean, I think the biggest thing is that at the core, it's a good looking, comfortable, stylish pair of glasses. I mean, it's the reason we're partnering closely

with Esselaerl Exotica. There are a partner we've been working with for years. They're the makers of Rayban, Oakley. They have many other brands, both owned and licensed. They have a number of stores. They are experts at lenses, experts at manufacturing. And working with them is because they deeply understand what it means to have a good looking, stylish, comfortable pair of glasses that works well for people.

And that is the core of what we're trying to do with the glasses. And so we've launched the Rayban Wayfarer was the first. Then we had other Rayban styles. We've launched the Oakley Metta Vanguards, which are sport, the Oakley Meadow Haustins, which are lifestyle Oakley's. That's just the beginning of what we want to be a really broad selection of brands and styles and skews. We want them. Everyone's face is shaped differently.

Everyone has a different sense of style. We need to make sure that they're comfortable and people like how they look at them. So I definitely agree with you that the way that these things have looked has been a major impediment to them. Google Glass, for instance, didn't win any fashion awards. And you look at a pair of Rayban Metas and, you know, they look nice. Like I would like look at them at a glass store and be like, you know, maybe these. But the other part of it is function, right? Like, what can they do for you?

And I think that the lift that they would give you was never enough, even if they were stylish, to merit charging up another device and putting it on. And I mean, if you think about what it takes to, I mean, this is a company that knows consumer behavior so well. What it takes to change consumer behavior is crazy. Yeah. People sort of get set in their ways. And so, and that's the way that they operate. And if you think about them using phones, for instance, to be able to have AI functionality on your phone and then to move to start using it somewhere else, it has to be more than it's just, it just looks a little bit good. So how do you think about creating what effectively you're trying to do is create a brand new consumer behavior? Well, our top use case on the glasses is audio.

It's talking on the phone or it's listening to music. The thing I usually tell people is, hey, if you're going to be walking outside, which you should do, it's healthy for you. It's good to move around during the day, get some sunlight, and you've got to make phone calls. This is a great product view. We've got, it's comfortable, the audio is very loud. the mics perform better than any earbuds you could get because we've got five microphones and we have amazing noise suppression.

And so if you're going to do phone calls, it's great. I was just skiing and I was going downhill at 40 miles an hour where in my Oakley met at Vanguard's and got a call for my friend I was trying to meet up with. And had a conversation with him while I was on my way. And I asked him in the middle, can you tell that I'm skiing right now or they actually didn't realize? Wow.

So it's great for those use cases. Or if you're on the beach, throw the football around. It's just, it's listened to some music. It's a great way to make the experience better. Photos and videos are the other thing. We see a lot of content shared on Instagram that otherwise wouldn't have been, wouldn't not be captured. We saw some great footage from the Olympics that just happened with practice rounds. One of my good friends is a firefighter who was setting me a video yesterday from the fire truck that he was driving to the scene and rescuing someone. I mean, you're just seeing some great footage that you otherwise would miss.

And then the AI is where I think you're going to see the next real trajectory of growth as people find that they're able to do things that they never thought were possible and are just really convenient with their glasses. And so it's interesting to hear you say, okay, use case number one is the speaker, use case number two, photo video. Is the reason why AI is below that because, is it because the AI isn't good enough yet? What do you think is holding AI back? I mean, if you think about the power that people say AI has,

you would imagine that it should be use case number one. The potential of AI is undoubtedly way higher than anything else right now. If you just look at the sheer rate of improvement in the industry, it is mind-boggling. I think for a lot of people, when, for a lot of people, still, when they're looking at AI, it looks like a blank canvas on a wall.

It's like, if I handed you a, piece of paper and a marker and said, all right, make me something great, kind of don't know what to start with. And so part of what we're doing while we start with auto capture and we'll have some other things launched shortly that are very relatable. It's just trying to give people easy to understand, easy to use things with AI. And over time, you'll be able to do more and more complex in advanced tasks that really take advantage of the underlying capabilities. I think people are still learning how to best use the AI. I mean, it started a, in general it started as a tool to help you write things and I think now you're seeing people are coding with it in new and crazy ways you're starting to see agents and agentic behavior take off or you can give the AI a goal and it will go

accomplish something for you while you're not actively prompting it so I think we're seeing that progress happen quickly and we believe that wearables will be the best form factor eventually for the AI because they're always with you, they can see what you see, they can hear what you hear, and there's something you can talk to throughout the day when you need it, and they can be proactive, and they can do things that you didn't ask them to do, but that are helpful. And it's interesting, so we talk talking about this new world that we seem to be heading in into where AI is agentic and doing stuff for us. The older versions of the raybans,

the meta-ray bands, were mostly for outdoor use. I mean, I have a pair here, right? These are Oakleys. They're great for sports. Great for sports. And actually, I had spoken with the person who ended up leading the Google Glass project. And one of his biggest regrets was actually starting it

as an indoor product because these things are much better. People feel much better about them if you're outdoors with them, as opposed to if you're indoors with them. But that brings us to this new pair, the Rayby meta optics. They are smaller. They're lighter. The battery life runs longer. Clearly, they're much more indoor than they are for outdoor use. And that just sort of opens up the aperture of what you can end up doing with this, again, going back to this idea of this AI assistant or this personal superintelligence that's with you all the time. So can you talk a little bit about the product decisions behind building a pair like this?

And what will it enable when you start wearing it indoors? let's say while you're at work. Yeah, we're very excited about the Rayben meta optics that we're launching right now. I mean, there are a number of reasons to start with sunglasses. One, which is kind of the, there's a practical one, the use case one. On the use cases, you know, I started with,

hey, talking on the telephone, taking photos and videos. A lot of those are outdoor scenarios where you're out and about. You want your hands to be free. You're talking on the phone. Sunglasses work very well there. Also, as you're trying to, a lot of what we do is take electronics and squeeze them into really tight form factors. And sunglasses tend to be a bit bigger in style than optical frames do.

You wear them for shorter periods of time so they can be a little bit heavier, but also they just style-wise. They tend to be thicker than the optical frames that you wear all day. We've made a lot of advances in miniaturization and just optimizing where we place the electronics that we now have a smaller lighter frame, which is the optics that we're announcing here. But that's not it. We already see the, when we measure engagement and retention on our glasses, so how often do you use them? And then after some period of time, are you still using them actively? Those numbers are highest when we have clear lenses or transition lenses, which means that we're already seeing the behavior that people are trying to use them indoors or from outdoor to indoor. Transition means it works great

where I'm outside doing something. I'm on the phone. I walk inside the, the lenses go clearer and I can keep doing what I'm doing. So the Raven Met Optics, they're not just so there's a lot of things to like about them. I'm wearing them here. You have, we're able to thin out the arms. The front frames are thinner. They're also a little bit flatter to be more optical friendly. The nose pads are replaceable.

They come with three or four different pads that you can put in, so it's the right fit on your nose. The tips are adjustable, so an optician can warm these and then bend them to help make sure that they stay on your face well. The temples, you have over extension hinges so that they're more comfortable to put on and they squeeze against your head comfortably. So there's a lot of advances, and this is just the hardware to make sure

that it's very obstacle friendly. We just had an event. The S.O. Exotica has a switch event in Orlando. I was at a few weeks ago where we announced this to optician, so we expect this to be in optical channels, if you, wherever you go to buy your optical glasses now, your optometrist should hopefully have these glasses

that they're able to help get you the right lenses for your prescription and help work for you. So we're really going on and we think that we're seeing all these trends in the data that people want the opportunity to wear them inside is their everyday optical glasses. And we hope this is a product that people like for that. And then to talk a little bit about the,

I mean, we're kind of living in this open, moment in a way where people are thinking about giving AI access to a lot of what they do to be able to take action for them. And I'm thinking again, like if I'm at my work computer all day long and have a pair of, you know, these optics on with my prescription, maybe there's going to be new use cases for me. So have you thought through those and how does that sort of fit into your vision of building AI wearables? I mean, I think there's a lot of it's, I mean, the, when you think about, so when you get, go from AI the way we've experienced it to agents. That leap is that instead of prompting the AI saying, write me something that does this or write code that does this,

you can give it a goal and it will figure out how to accomplish that. So you can say, I'm trying to debug why I'm a music coding one, I'm a software engineer by background. So please bear with me. But I can say something like the behavior I get when the battery is low doesn't feel right. It currently says this when it's low on battery in my ear and I would like to change it to this. And the agent can go and figure out where, you know, what piece of code

that's defined in and how to adjust it and create a diff that you can then prepare to submit as an engineer. The advance to OpenClaw is you see, you see a few things. One is that you're able to, what engineers would call, creating a Cron job. but you're able to schedule things that happen regularly on your behalf. So, for example, every day at, in the middle of the night right now, I have, well, every Sunday right now, I have my claw go and help create a schedule for the week that I then send to our nanny, which has, you know, the kids schedule each day of the week and does that automatically. It's scheduled, which is a new thing.

And the second is the claw can figure things out that it doesn't yet know how to do. So it's able to reason through things and develop new skills that didn't have previously. I think for wearables, that creates a bunch of possibilities. I mean, you think about, I go through my day and I'm constantly writing down things that I need to remember to do later. Like you and I can have a conversation. We were just talking before this about pizza that I'd like to try in New York that your buddy's open. And normally I'd write down, you know, pizza, Detroit pizza in New York, you know, write down the name and plan to follow up with the on it, I could just tell my qua, here's what,

here's the follow-up I plan to do, and it can take care of that for me. Similarly, I can give you a number of examples that are down that line, but I think that- Let's hear more actually. I am interested in the examples. For example, you'd say, you know, this weekend's an exciting weekend for me.

The Yankees are in town for opening weekend are playing against the Giants who there Wednesday through Saturday. I've got tickets for Saturday. ordered that many months ago because I'm a Yankees fan, born and raised in New York. My kids, I'm working on them being Yankees fans as well. We've organized a big thing. I have 20 tickets, inviting friends.

And normally you'd write down, remember to send an email with the ticket details to people who are coming. But you can just tell your claw, hey, draft an email for me to these four people, just say their names, don't say their email, just to these four people with the ticket details. that you can find in my email. And it just does it. And it should just be able to do that. And this is the way you use it?

This is, you know, we've got, we're trying out a whole bunch of different tools. I certainly am, I'm using them. And yeah, using that today. And so when your vision of, with the glasses, could be instead of having to, because I think the way that you speak with open clause through WhatsApp, most people do it through WhatsApp.

That's, yeah, you can use many different chat apps, but a lot of people use WhatsApp. So is your thought then, again, if just I'm trying to flesh out the product vision here, you have a pair of glasses like this with you while you're working, right? Which I guess is the case for you right now. You could just say something to it and then some agentic engine on the back end will be able to do these use cases for you. That's, yeah, I mean, that's a pretty good articulation of it. I mean, I think of it in two ways.

One is, and it's in two directions. One is, as I'm going through my day, and there's something I, you know, a lot of, it's funny how many people in tech decide that the thing that they need to invent at their next startup is a like a task app to just help you, you know, track the things that you need to do. And I think instead, as things come up, like, oh, shoot, I forgot to, you know, I forgot to send out the email with the details for the game or I forgot to send out a birthday invite for, you know, my kid's birthday. coming up you can just say hey I forgot to do that draft it for me and I'll look at it tonight at some point you can say send it on my behalf but I think we're still not done of a draft version I think that's that's one end of it the second is I like to describe it's you know imagine if you had the perfect person sitting right next to you who will whisper in your ear at the right time so like you know my

wife is very good at you know elbow in like if I'm about to say something that I'm gonna regret, my wife is really good at letting me know that I'm about to do that. That's good. I'm too quick. I always just blurted out. I feel bad for her. See, so, I mean, this is a scenario that might work for you. Yeah, oh, maybe, okay, you're saying the glasses can be like, don't say that.

You know, I'm about to, I'm about to say that I'll regret, or I just can't think of the work, you know, I cannot think of the movie or the actor or the restaurant or the thing that I'm trying to think of. Or you have these, I mean, another example, I was like, how often you have a conversation with someone and we're like, oh, you're going to St. Louis?

Let me tell you, I'll send you a thing later that has the places that I recommend in St. Louis. I do that maybe 5% of the time. Like I promised everybody to, I was gonna send you the name of the pizza place that I'm recommending, Nates Detroit Pizza, Brooklyn and Manhattan, but I could have just said it to this smart thing

and then it would have sent it for me. And it could have sent it. Yeah, it could have sent it. it could have sent me a WhatsApp or a text message or something that just so then I had it it wouldn't forget it but you know if you if you put it out there on your podcast I think you'll still get a lot broader distribution than the agent I hope so but you never know but that is interesting I mean like again with this idea of reminders you know I think it would be great for instance if I'm wearing something that is sort of paying attention

and what I'm doing. And it can, you know, when I was with Bosz, Andrew Baas with the CTO of META year and a half ago, two years ago, maybe at this point, one of the things he talked about was these glasses can be aware of your situation. So it could potentially be something that is like an open claw functionality, but we'll wait until that conversation that I'm having is over. And I say bye, and then it can whisper in my ear, hey, by the way, like, do you want me to, do that thing you were saying. Exactly. I think a lot of us right now are feeling like we just get too many notifications

as we're going through the day, whether it's your phone buzzing or your watch buzzing or. And, you know, one of the things people are nervous about for good reason is that, hey, if you're wearing more wearables or ones that are, you know, even more intimate, meaning if you've got display glasses on, what you don't want is a one more place to put a bunch notifications that distract you as you're going through the day but the potential of the wearables is that if they have context of are you taught by whether or not I'm talking at the moment or what am I saying or who am I talking to they should be able to really intelligently filter out whether it's the right moment to

deliver something or the wrong moment too right you know it's interesting because we I mean we're already my wife and I are already using like smart speakers in our house to do some of this mm-hmm But yeah, I think it could be interesting if it is something that's done in glasses. And, you know, I think the one, especially contextually aware, and I think the one thing that I wonder is, you know, so much of the talk around AI is it's a level, it's going to level things up and it's, you know, sort of this revolutionary thing. And I wonder, is that that revolutionary? Like, shouldn't we be expecting more of it? And maybe I'm just like perpetually dissatisfied and underpriculatory.

appreciative of what's happening. But I'm curious what you think. Like, is that really a revolution or is that something that just helps us be a little bit more productive? AI in general or smart notification, more intelligence around notifications? I think that just the AI again that we talked about, that's listening and can handle these tasks for us.

I think it's going to be pretty revolutionary. I think, well, I think it'll be both. I think there'll be a number of things that each individual one is tiny. Like, it's just a, yeah, that's like a small improvement but if you add that up throughout the day or throughout the week or throughout the month it's the sum of that will be meaningful and then similarly I do think there the AI will do things for you that you're shocked it was able to

do and we'll find pretty revolutionary I mean there is small things I mean the the minute I stopped running with my phone and I go for some pretty long runs and I do need to be able to contact other people while I'm out there because things can go sideways also I'm a father And so if I need to be reachable. I need to be reachable. The day I was able to stop bringing my phone with me because I had a cellular connected watch was a pretty big thing.

I think for many people that feels like, oh, big deal, you can do phone calls on your watch now. I usually have my phone. But for me, that was a major thing. But that's an example of small things that add up. I do think agentic AI is really going to be able to do a lot of things for people that will feel like it, is super helpful.

Okay. There is a question about whether, like, the best device will work or the best AI assistant will work. And I want to cover that when we come back right after this. This episode is brought to you by Orchestra. A couple of weeks ago, I sat down with David Pluff, two-time Obama campaign manager, senior White House advisor, and now a partner at Orchestra for a conversation about AI democracy and the massive gap between how this industry sees itself and how the rest of the country sees it.

It's one of the most honest conversations I've had on this topic. You can watch the full thing on my YouTube channel. Just type in Alex Cantrell's. Orchestra is a strategic communications firm helping organizations navigate exactly this moment. Check them out at orchestraco.com. Most leaders know how work is supposed to happen, but when it comes to how it actually gets done day-to-day across tools, teams, and handoffs,

they're mostly guessing. That's exactly the problem Scribe Optimize was built to solve. Trusted by over 80,000 enterprises, including nearly half of the Fortune 500, it gives leaders a live view into how work is really happening across approved business apps without interviews, manual process mapping, or extra effort from the team. And because it's continuously analyzing real workflow activity, the insights stay current instead of going stale the moment a process changes. You can see which workflows are happening, where time is going, and which tools are involved. It automatically surfaces top issues, explains why they're happening, and even recommends ways to fix them with estimated time savings.

And importantly, it's built with privacy in mind. So activities only captured in admin-approved business apps, and user-level data is anonymized by default. The kind of visibility that used to take months, now it's just always on. If you're ready to stop guessing and start seeing, visit scribe.how slash big tech. That's s-c-r-I-B-E-D-H-Tek.

Morning Brew Daily breaks down the biggest news in business every morning so it fits seamlessly in your day. I'm Toby Howell. And I'm Neil Freyman. And each morning we cover everything from the latest tech headlines to why nobody can afford a house right now. You'll leave each episode of Morning Brew Daily smarter and ready to take on the world around you. And some people are saying it's the best part of their morning. Because we know something you don't. Business news doesn't have to be boring.

Join millions of monthly listeners and check out Morning Brew Daily wherever you get your podcasts. And we're back here on big technology podcast with Alex Himmel. He's the VP of wearables at Meta. Alex, before the break, we were talking about what will enable a company to win this AI wearable, you know, battle. Will it be the form factor? Will it be the sleekness of their device or will it be the assistant inside? And I think we're going to have a handful of companies going after this. Obviously, you guys are far out in front of people. You've had this in market for a long time. But it's no secret that Open AI is planning, you know, not just a device, but a family of devices. Google has their own set of devices.

And Amazon has the echo in market. And Apple may be adding some form of maybe it's internal Apple models. Maybe it's a version of Gemini into their headphones. That's just the dog. So I think there's a strong argument to be made that the company that has the best assistant will be the one. that takes everything. Because, again, if you're trusting this with, like, to be deep in your life and to be responsible

for some of your activities, you're going to want to use the best option. So I'm curious if you agree with that, and if you do, does that mean that meta to win this battle needs to have the best AI assistant on the market? I think it's going to be a combination of things. I think that when we talk about

wearables, I think if people don't like the device, they're not going to wear it. True. I think it needs to be comfortable. It needs to be stylish, especially if it's glasses or even watches. If you don't like the way it fits on you and what it says about you, then you're not going to wear it. Even if it's 20% better in terms of functionality than the alternative. I also think the software needs to be really amazing.

And so, I mean, we're, it's also no secret. I mean, there's a lot of, a lot of the devices you mentioned where, you know, these are rumors. I think I've heard, heard those rumors from many places, so there's probably some credibility to them. Well, I will say actually, open, opening eye for sure is not a rumor. They are building a family of devices. Fair. Google is building these devices. Google has announced publicly.

Yeah. I think the only one that's rumored is Apple. That's a fair point. The Apple ones are rumor, a number of other. have been some announcements so that's fair I was just coming out that you know they're not actually in the market yet so I can't can't really react to what exactly they're doing or right pros and cons the devices also pretty well known that we're investing heavily in AI here here at meta that's we've

recruited quite a team we're investing heavily in model training and other things and I think we've got I think our AI and our software needs to be really good I mean, we're going to be, assuming everyone enters the market, we're going to be competing with companies who have released devices with really high quality, you know, good performance devices you can depend on every day. So our quality needs to be really good. And then the AI needs to be amazing. And, you know, we've been working on it internally. I think that's pretty well known. We're using a bunch of the new models internally and feeling pretty good about the progress we're making.

I think we're going to have some really exciting things to show people in the first half of this year as we start to launch new models and new features on top of them, new features on mobile phones, but also new features and wearables that I think are going to be pretty good. All right, looking forward to that. I guess the point I'm making is it seems more than more than in this more than other types of computing. It's kind of winner-takes-all. That might be my perspective. Like if you're going to have an agent that you so trust with everything, you're probably going to have one. Doesn't that sound right? Like it's like you'll have one inbox.

It doesn't really work to have multiple email addresses. I think there's a number of reasons why I think you'd use, why many people use one assistant more than many. I mean, one is you pay for each of them and so you probably want to pay for fewer rather than more. Second, like the more you work with it and it learns about you, the better it'll perform outside of underlying capabilities. So I do think that people will, for the most part, choose one assistant, but they may also choose one assistant for different tasks. Right. I mean, I'm sure I'm a bit of an outlier since I'm right in the middle of the technology, but I use a bunch of different assistants and I use different ones for different things that I'm trying to do. That could be point in time based on what's better at what right now.

and maybe that'll consolidate as the models mature. But we are very focused on, we want our glasses to be the ones that offer people the broadest selection of brands and styles that we think people will like to wear and in making our software the best. And we've been, I mean, there are other devices in the market,

but we have been, there's going to be a lot more competition coming than I think that we've been, than we faced to date. Part of it is that a lot of people have tried to build glasses, and it didn't work out at first. Ourself included, our first launch didn't go as well as we had hoped it to. But then when others pulled back from the market,

I think we doubled and tripled down. And I think when you're looking at, it seems like now every year, or maybe more frequently than that, we're launching new hardware. It's because we've been investing heavily for many years, and you're starting to see the fruits of that come to market. I was in here, I think, 2017 or 2018, and myself and my editor, we had a long conversation with Mark Zuckerberg about some tech-related thing or a new launch at Facebook. And towards the end, it was almost like a throwaway, but he was talking about how important it was going to be to have a computing wearable like a pair of glasses.

And I was like, oh, that's a story. And we didn't end up writing it, but it just does go to show that meta has been thinking about this. for a very long time. And I guess what we're seeing today, the devices that work and are good and people enjoy using, it's probably like an outgrowth of the Metaverse and the Oculus work here, but also not just like, let's try this.

Like to me, it seems like it's been kind of core for almost a decade here. That's definitely true. When we acquired Oculus, part of the logic was, it wasn't, you know, Oculus, it's virtual reality. headset where you're looking at an immersive view at the time when we acquired ocula as part of the rationale was there was a research division led by Michael Abrash that was looking at augmented reality technologies augmented reality

translates into glasses and wearables and right out of the gate we started investing in the Orion prototype which is what we showed about a year and a half ago now publicly and have continued to show and that's been in the works for as long as Oculus has been here and that was always part of the big vision. Marks had incredible conviction that this is something that was going to be critical and that we were going to invest in this space. Even when we certainly, a lot of invention we've been working on here, we certainly had some highs, we had some lows where certain piece of technology didn't hit the progress

that we were hoping to at various stages. Even through that, we really continued to invest. even when, you know, there were reasonable times to put doubt in it. I think we're glad, certainly glad that we did. But it really took a lot of conviction. I give a lot of credit to Mark, also to Baz, for having a lot of conviction in what we were doing. So speaking of Buzz, I was listening to you on the Buzz to the Future podcast. And you spoke about the ambition.

And to me, it's pretty interesting because you talked about how I think it was the Orion glasses, which have the screen in them, which are not publicly. available yet, but there is a version with the screen available, the display that is available to folks to pick up. But you said, like, when people tried on Orion, it was the first time that they felt like a pair of glasses could replace a phone. And so I am curious because, you know,

with the big question about AI devices, is it a new category and everyone has one and the so-called legacy devices, or is it a replacement? So is the ambition here to replace the phone? I mean, I think the ambition of the phone at some point was to replace laptops and desktops. And I think those certainly haven't gone away. I actually found myself using them more and more

in the world of AI right now. Oh, yeah. But mobile phones have taken off. I mean, the number of devices sold and used. And I mean, they're ubiquitous for all kinds of things. I think wearables should be similar. I mean, we're expecting them to be ubiquit. At some point, we think that they'll be ubiquitously used by people providing a ton of value.

That it doesn't mean phones are going to go away. But I think you'll see wearables be used for some of the things that you do on phones today and a bunch of things that you don't use phones for today. I mean, there's certain things you just wouldn't do because it's, you know, one of the crazy things is that some of the technology around being able to recognize what you're looking at has been around for quite some time on mobile phones, but you don't hold up your phone to try to make sense of the world in the front of you, because it's just kind of a weird

behavior. Some people do, but it's not a normal thing to do. I might be one of those people at times, but I don't see it. I might be guilty as well. Yeah, I don't see it very quickly. Whereas with the wearable, it's a pretty natural behavior. And it's one of the most frequent AI use cases that we see on our glasses, just what is it that I'm looking at?

Oh, it's this building, it's this landmark, it's this type of plant, don't eat that mushroom. That's important. Or do eat that mushroom. Also, you shouldn't be randomly in a mushroom that's in front of you, but we're trying to give advice where we can. So I think that, and then I think the reaction that people had with Orion was because, you know, you did the demo, we show you a bunch of example things that you can do with the glasses.

And I think with the really big field of view display and the ability to place content in the space in front of you, it's easy to imagine all the other things that you can do with it. show in there is a bad example i'll use it anyway because of the time we're in in the year we didn't show that you could watch march madness basketball games on a virtual television while still in room with other people that was an awesome use case last week as the you did that it's pretty great you put a browser window and you just kind of put it like if you're around me i can put it right there and watch uh the tournament games also the wrestling tournament the ncala wrestling tournament at the

same time and my alma mater stanford did great in that too so that's another thing you watch What is your facial recognition plans? There was a New York Times article talked about this feature called Name Tag, the Times that it would let, whereas of the smart glasses identify people and get information about them via Meta's artificial intelligence assistant. I saw the article, I'm familiar with the one that you're mentioning. I mean, it's worth noting just out of the gate, you know, we do not have a feature that's launched that helps you, right?

We don't have a feature called that or that does that feature that's launched in the glasses. It is one of the most frequently requested features from people. I mean, we hear from our blind and low vision community that they wish they knew who was in front of them, who was walking by. We hear from people who go to conferences and events. It would be great to be, you know, you're going there to meet people. It would be nice to be able to recognize the people that you're meeting. We hear from just a number of people, you know, just anecdotes,

totally, hey, I wish, unprovoked. What I really wish these could do is help me remember the names of the people I've met before. And so we get a lot of, we get a lot of asks. I don't think we're the only company that's heard that before. You know, it's certainly been developed and prototyped by a number of companies that we've heard about. But to launch a feature like that requires being really thoughtful

with how it works, making sure it's privacy first, making sure that it's not creepy, making sure that it's providing value while not making people uncomfortable. I mean, the fundamental talent of these devices, if I'm wearing them and you're uncomfortable with me wearing them, I'm probably going to stop wearing them. Yeah, they're not worth anything. Yeah.

And so we've got to be really conscious of that. And with each feature that we're looking at, that's something that we're going to have to be conscious of as we go. So this is one of the things that has come up. It's one of the trickier, trickier things for privacy reasons. user comfort reasons, there's also some legal consideration. So it's certainly not something we take lightly and it's something that we, when you think about.

There are versions of that feature out in the wild right now. You see it a lot for communities, the blind-livision community especially, you see versions of that, I think Microsoft has an app that you can use for that. But I don't know, we're not, we don't have something ready to launch, we don't have something launched,

it's just one of the things that we're thinking about. Well, first of all, I'll say this. You know, I think a year and a half ago I was at Nolan Arbo's house in Yuma, Arizona. He's the first Neurlink patient. And he's paralyzed and can use computers thanks to Neurlinks. So I think that's one of the more underappreciated parts of wearables or even brain computer interface is that the accessibility component is amazing. He's been paralyzed.

He was paralyzed for eight years before he was able to use that device. And then, like, literally couldn't use the internet. could only you do a voice on like an echo. And then he started playing video games again. He played a video game against me and he beat me. And that's amazing. But I definitely sort of the privacy concerns, and obviously you're aware of them.

I see why people would not want to live in a world where somebody can wear a device that can identify me. Yeah, totally understand. And I think if you end up in a place where, you know someone you've never met before walks up to you on the street and says hi Alex you know and ask your question it's weird it's really weird and that you know that goes against a whole bunch of social norms and it feels creepy and I think a lot of the features all the features we're trying to build are taking things that are normal

interactions and trying to make them a little bit easier so like the idea of a tag is like what is it what is a time where you wouldn't wear a name tag right you could have a virtual version if I were at the office right now it would not be weird at all for a co-worker to know my name because I walk around with a badge that has my name on it the whole time and so a digital version of that would not be weird at all like it's common behavior similarly like where where get knowing someone's name is most useful is I've met you you've told me your name and I just cannot remember it. It could be it's a it's a new meeting I'm in. We're meeting for

the first time. We just went around the table of 10 people and I got nine out of 10 in my head and I'm missing the 10th. Or you know you're we have kids in the same class and we've met once two months ago and I just I know your kid's name and I cannot remember yours. If only there was an app that would allow me to maybe add you as a friend and we could connect that way. The, you know, it's, this is the time the AI should help. I can think of some apps like that, but I can't remember the names of them. You might have to help me out. It's not meta.

Okay, that's interesting. So just to conclude this part, you said not launch, but that doesn't mean it's not under development. It's one of the ideas that I think comes up with every company in the space. Right. It's definitely not launched. something that's come up a bunch, we would not rule out the idea that we have something in that space, but it would have to be really well thought out and really well done and done in a way that people felt comfortable with it. Otherwise, we just wouldn't make any sense. So we can basically

rule out this idea that I would like be able to, you know, take a look at random people on the street and know their name by looking at them through the classes. Yeah, I just don't think that's a feature that people want or really comfortable with. Okay. All right. It's good to get your perspective on that. Let's talk a little bit about how this kind of changes the AI infrastructure story. You know, it's kind of interesting because we're going to a place where we have smaller models

and some of them don't have to run them in, you know, a multi-billion dollar data center buildout. You can just run them on device. So, you know, Meta is an interesting company because it's in the middle of doing that big buildout, but it also has devices that I would imagine someday would want to run an AI model on device. Do you talk a little bit about that balance

and sort of does one eventually cancel each other out or do you need both? Well, so the servers and data centers that companies are building out, meta included. And there's two kind of core functions that those serve. One is the training of the models. And so that certainly happens in data centers. And that's where it's going to continue to happen.

And that's where a lot of the investment is going right now. And the other, as you said, say it's running the inference. So it's when you're using the model, where are those models running to answer the prompts or to agentically help you with tasks? The former, I think, the model training I think is going to consistently run in data centers. On where inference is served, there's a number of reasons to try to move that to devices that are not in data centers.

One is the latency and reliability will be better. You know, you've used apps on your phone and the more things are less. local, the less network interruptions or low bandwidth or packet loss can cause issues. And so that's one reason to do it. Second is cost to the user. And you're paying the fees to whether whatever assistant you're using right now, you know, a lot of those fees are because it costs real money to be serving you. And usage caps, you wouldn't have that if you use that model a device.

Yeah. And you know, a lot of the, a lot of that cost. goes into power right now and if it's on your device you know you're on the hook for charging your device and you know whatever power it runs and so I think you're gonna see like there's certainly a lot of reasons oh and privacy is the other obvious one you know you're in control of your data if it stays on your device the things working in the opposite direction are smaller models are not as capable certain tasks and so the real math you know an evaluation to do

there is for a given set of tasks, how well does the model perform in a smaller version of it that's run locally? And if it performs well, I think there's a lot of incentive to have it run locally for everyone, for the person using it for the end user, also for the business like us providing it. But I think you'll end up with a bit of a mix. The more complex things are going to have to run on servers or on personal devices that are larger and more capable. I think I want to end on the story of how this integration of AI into the Rayban metas came about because initially they were not envisioned with the AI assistant inside. And then you're driving with your kids one day and what happens?

So we had the Rayban meta glasses, they were the second device that we were on, the second version of RayBans that were launching with Esselael Exotica. And it was one of the most heavily debated devices that we were working on. Because it wasn't a major, the first version hadn't done as well as we had hoped. It wasn't a major technical leap from the first one. And so we're like, I don't know.

Is it worth doing or should we just go straight to the display glasses? Which were under development at the time. Which were already multiple versions of them. We're already under development at the time. And then AI, you know, I just, you know, Gen AI, large language models, took off. I do remember.

I was on a, it was a Saturday. I had my kid in a child seat in the back seat, and I start getting a wall of text from Mark on WhatsApp, which led with, hey, I think these glasses might be a great AI device. And then, poof, just like thought after thought. So, you know, as any responsible parent would do, I pull over to the side of the freeway and went back and forth and forth them. And that was a Saturday by Monday.

We had pivoted 200 people on the team to be building AI for the, these glasses and the rest is history. Although I think the AI gave us an idea for a vision of what the glasses could eventually be with a really high ceiling. Ironically, all the features that we weren't sure if they were a big enough technical leap turned out to be a big enough technical leap.

And I think it would have given us a lot of the initial usage interaction. The audio is cross the threshold where it's loud enough and the sound quality is good enough to be talking on the phone and listening music and the image quality is good enough to be sharing videos to Instagram or the app of your choosing that you feel good about and that people like to engage with.

Just going to imagine the kids in the back getting kind of restless and you being like, listen, daddy's launching a new category of device. We're going to have to relax. Yeah, and fast forward two years. And the number one question of my house is when there's going to be a kid's version of the glasses. Really? They really want to have a pair of their dance glasses

that they can wear out. OK, before we leave, let's just run down the glasses. exist today. So there's the standard Rayband Metas. Then you have the Oakley Versa. Hauston lifestyle. There is, I believe on your side here is the display glasses. That's the pair of glasses with a screen inside of them that are available for sale. How much of those cost? These are $7.99, including the neural band. And there's a band that you can use that takes your neural pulses to be able to control the screen. And then there are these Ray-Ban meta-optics, which are lighter, and they're coming out April 16th?

We're announcing them at the end of March. They hit shelves in the early to mid-April. Okay. And you missed the Oakley Meta Vanguard's, our sport glasses. Okay, that's right. Great for biking, skiing, running. Yeah, now the running use case is definitely fun, and I think maybe we'll save my back from. I was actually running and checking my phone and ended up pulling my back on a run because I kept looking at my pace so often.

So if I could have that in a screen, that alone would be worth, it would be worth all your efforts. I've got to get you a cellular watch too. You've got to stop holding your phone. That's right. All right, Alex, great to see you. Thanks so much for coming on the show. Thanks, Alex. Thank you, everybody for listening and watching and we'll see you next time on Big Technology Podcast.