Bill Meyer Show Podcast - Sponsored by Clouser Drilling www.ClouserDrilling.com - 01-20-25_MONDAY_6AM
Episode Date: January 21, 2025Nick Fondacaro joins me from MRC Newsbusters, CNN has been found liable for defamation against Navy veteran Zachary Young, later what would MAHA look like under RFK Jr, Trump? John Richardson discusse...s - Operation World Without Cancer.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The Bill Myers Show podcast is sponsored by Clouser Drilling.
They've been leading the way in Southern Oregon well drilling for over 50 years.
Find out more about them at clouserdrilling.com.
Here's Bill Myers.
Good morning. It is Inauguration Monday and, of course, Martin Luther King Jr. Day.
But, yep, we're definitely going to be here and working hard for you.
Join the conversation at 770-5633.
Nick Fondacaro joins me. He's the associate editor for MRC Newsbusters.
You know something, Nick?
Welcome to the show.
So you're in the Beltway, what?
So you must be freezing and icing your way like crazy this morning, huh?
How are you doing this morning?
Welcome.
Yeah, Bill, thanks for having me on.
Yeah, so it is a cold morning today.
It's going to be really cold for the inauguration.
Basically, I had just come back
to this cold from down in Panama City, Florida, covering this CNN defamation case.
Oh, man. I wanted to ask you about that, too. By the way, we're sharing a bit of your cold
this morning. Freezing fog in 25. I don't know if you're that cold in the swamp or not, but
we're pretty cold this morning ourselves here for the day. But I wanted to get in touch with you because you are the person who first broke the news of the trial here
on this defamation trial against Navy veteran Zachary Young,
and the decision came out on Friday, and I was wondering if you could explain why this is a big deal,
other than the $4 or $5 million in damages awarded. What's the story?
Yeah, so basically Mr. Young was helping evacuate people from Afghanistan.
He was working with corporately sponsored Afghans to help get them out.
He worked for Audible, Bloomberg, several other NGOs.
And basically CNN got wind of this guy from a person who they label in the filings as an activist who accused Mr. Young in messages didn't like that his security contracting company was making money while trying to evacuate people.
Because, you know, you've got to pay for cars, different sorts of safe houses, stuff like that to get people out.
And, you know, your network is putting their lives on the line in country, so it should be worth a little bit of something to them.
And CNN didn't like that.
They even argued in court that that kind of stuff is, like, immoral
and that they're not sorry for it.
And then they ended up catching a defamation suit,
and they are now permanently known as adjudicated defamers.
Wow, okay.
Now, was it one of these things where there was just an error in the original reporting
and they wouldn't correct, or was it repeated several times?
Because you can always get something wrong, especially when you're doing some live reporting
from an area, right?
I mean, you know about that.
There's things like that.
You can have honest mistakes that are made, but when does it rise to the level of defamation, I guess, is what we're talking about.
Well, the biggest aspect of the case is that four judges and in two different courts, and then the jury themselves, found that CNN acted with actual malice, expressed malice, and used outrageous behavior. Because basically when they were doing the investigation here, going through discovery for the case,
Mr. Young's team found messages from Katie Bolilis from CNN, Alex Marquardt,
and a bunch of editors where they were calling Mr. Young all sorts of horrible names,
saying we're going to get this Zachary Young MF.
He's an S-word.
Oh, man.
So, in other words, they just had it in for him right from the very beginning.
The evidence showed that.
Oh, boy.
Yes.
Oh, boy.
Okay.
So, $4 million in economic damages, $1 million in emotional damages.
Is this the first time CNN's been nailed this way, or has it happened before?
Do you know?
Off the top of your head?
Off the top of my head, I think this might be the first time, but this is, or at least
there's something that has been publicly adjudicated.
You have the Sandman settlement.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
And another settlement.
I believe this is the first time, because even with the Fox Dominion one, they settled
that before they even went to trial.
I think they just happened to,
I think it was just before the jury selection or just after. So the trial didn't even go through.
In this instance with CNN, the trial went all the way through and the jury found that they
committed defamation. They did it with malice and that they should be punished. So there was
supposed to be, basically there was a settlement for punitive damages with Mr. Young,
but the jury did say that they should face punitive damages and that they should be punished for this.
That ended up being an undisclosed settlement.
But basically the jury is on the record saying defamation, malice, CNN should be punished for it.
All right, so there's four million and one million
in emotional but you say that there's more punitive damages that we don't know about
then so cnn's having to write bigger checks than we thought right yes okay yes yeah um do you think
that um it was one of these things where cnn wouldn't settle or do anything with this guy
because he figured what just another small fish?
It's like, what are you going to do?
Is it that kind of thing?
Is there kind of a corporate arrogance that comes with a bit of that?
How did you read the room, I guess, Nick?
So from my reporting, so I've been September, CNN did try for a settlement before this went to trial.
And obviously, since we made it this far, that settlement was rejected back then.
And now they ended up settling for the punitive damages.
Didn't the reporting just absolutely kill Zach's business, Zachary's business,
from what I understand, or did it pretty much got rid of it, right? Yeah, because he's a security contractor, and he's somebody who has sort of come up in the course of this trial that he has
some connections with the CIA and stuff like that. So when you're a person who operates at a very high level,
you're supposed to conduct yourself in a certain way.
And basically he had contracts that said you can't be involved in black market stuff.
And CNN's report accused him of being involved in black markets.
So his entire network of people who wanted to work with him dried up because they looked at him and said, oh, there's this CNN report
that says we
basically shouldn't be working with you because you're doing all these bad things.
And they stopped talking to him. CNN was actually complaining that like, oh, you had nobody come to
defend you. It's like, well, you turned everybody against him. Oh man. So he was able to prove that
the attorney was able to prove that actual damages. It wasn't just like, well, you know,
you hurt my feelings. This was serious, serious stuff that happened with him all right exactly and
the ruling i think should help him be able to go to some of these people sort of try to rekindle
those contacts a little bit to be like see a jury adjudicated this and said i wasn't doing
what cnn was doing they defamed. Maybe we can pick up where we
left off in a business arrangement. Now, you've talked to Zachary since that time. How is he
looking at things moving forward? He's definitely hopeful for the future. I was the first one to
get an interview with him. He's very hopeful for the future, because like I was saying,
now that he has this
case to point to and been like, I was wronged, the stuff about me is not true, he's hopeful that
things can sort of meter out ahead of time, but at the same time, that emotional damages that he
was awarded for, that's going to be with him for a long time, if not permanently, because what came
out during the trial is this sort of riled him in a way that a lot of his training wasn't able to prepare him for because it's one thing if you're trying to
like defend yourself from like a more of like a physical torturous interaction with an adversary
but this is cnn basically turned his entire life upside down he found himself alone
without a way to support his family. And it was a way that
sort of shook the bedrock of his life in a way that he wasn't prepared for. And now he's on
different types of medications, diagnosed with major depressive disorder, and a few other things
that he's now basically taking these heavy duty drugs to try to mitigate where he's not getting
a lot of sleep, he gets panic attacks that are – he's coping with those and they're sort of down now,
but he has all these sort of permanent mental effects on him now.
Oh, man.
I've got to tell you.
Well, especially when this is done to you on a national stage.
On a national stage, there's really something to be said for this.
Nick Fondacaro is the associate editor for MRC Newsbusters.
Do you see CNN, the revamped CNN? This is under the old regime of CNN.
And I'm detecting a different tone out of CNN these days. Is it just me? I mean,
you guys watch a lot of television over at MRC Newsbusters, so I don't have to. But do you
detect a different tone over there with the new regime there at the network?
Yeah, so, well, one thing that I do want to note was that the reports did go nationally,
but they were also shared on CNN International.
So he was defamed on an international level, which is part of the stuff with his contacts
internationally saw it and been like, oh, no, we're not going to do this.
Yeah, we're not working with you.
You're poison, right?
That kind of thing.
Exactly.
And to go back to your second point there, honestly, there might be a slight shift in
tone, but you had Acosta the other day talking about basically resurrecting the 2016 lines
that he was using against Trump, like we're going to be the bulwark against lies and disinformation
and all that stuff. But also in court, you had Alex Marquardt, Katie Bo Lillis, Jake Tapper, who was sort
of broadcast via his deposition testimony from November.
And a bunch of the different editors, Tom Lumley, Adam Levine, their vice president
for news gathering, all on the stand saying we're not sorry.
The apology that CNN put on a couple months after or three months after the report, we don't agree with it.
That was legal's decision, and we stand by it as a legal decision to try to avoid a suit.
But we don't like it.
We're not sorry.
And we would do it again because we stand by the reporting.
Wow.
Now, currently.
Boy, they stand by the report.
Okay.
All right.
But they've lost several million, if not lots of millions of dollars out of all of this.
So not sorry, don't care, we'd do it again.
That doesn't sound like a reformed CNN to me.
Never mind.
Okay.
Just thought at least ask, you know, never hurts here.
All right.
So Nick, great coverage on this.
I'm going to put all your information up to Newsbusters on this.
And what are you working on this particular morning?
I know it's a holiday, but it's also Inauguration Day.
Are you able to actually get inside that very small inauguration event, the internal event today, or is it one of those
things where we're all going to have to be looking from the outside in? I am not going to be part of
the inauguration coverage inside of it. I'm going to be trying to cover the media side of their
coverage of the inauguration. I've got a few more phone calls to talk about with the CNN stuff,
and I'm probably going to be watching the View's reaction today as well.
Oh, gosh.
Oh, no.
You know something?
That's hazard pay just to have to watch the View every day.
You're probably not paid enough over at MRC.
Okay, seriously, Nick.
I appreciate you coming on, though,
and sharing a little bit about some good news on someone who was attacked by one of the major networks.
Okay?
Thanks so much.
Good talking with you.
Thanks for having me on.
Nick Fondacaro.
He is the associate editor for MRC Newsbusters, newsbusters.org.
It is 622.
Hi, it's John at Wellburn's Weapons.
The only thing better than shooting is shooting.
And I'm on KMED.
626-770-5633, 770-KMED.
You working for the holiday like we are here, or are you taking the day off?
Just sitting around watching the inauguration? I don't know.
By the way, inauguration watch parties going on this morning in Jackson County will be at 8 o'clock.
That's at the Central Point Library main meeting room.
And Commissioner Colleen Roberts and others will be running that.
And in Josephine County, it's going to be at the Josephine County Republican headquarters right across from the Josephine County Courthouse.
That's going to start around 8.30 or so is when they're going to have that.
It's going to be a lot of fun.
I know that Holly Morton has just been probably cooking and baking
or doing crazy stuff all weekend, getting ready for it.
So anyway, we've got parties, and there's all sorts of stuff going on
if you wanted to just hang out with some friends and watch the inauguration
you know i thought it was interesting that um that defamation suit against cnn over the
afghanistan withdrawal reporting and which of course was a very sordid part of a very sordid
biden administration it was almost like a piece of excrement on the excrement Sunday.
Boom.
Like the excrement cherry on top there.
But they have CNN go and just get nailed like that.
And the fact that they're still not even, sorry, not even a little bit, sorry,
just fascinates me, but I guess maybe it shouldn't.
But it seems a very apropos.
Now, the story did break here just a few minutes
ago that president biden who is president only for a few more hours fortunately he has pardoned
dr anthony fauci janitor uh general mark milley and a bunch of other people here
including members of congress and staff who served on the select committee
and the U.S. Capitol and D.C. Metropolitan police officers who testified before the select
committee.
So this would also include all the people who lied and got rid of witnesses and destroyed
evidence, probably like the Liz Cheney types of the world.
Yeah.
So they have all been given a pardon.
Is it fair to say this morning that they were guilty of the crimes that many on the right thought were accusing them of?
You don't pardon people that you don't think were guilty.
I mean, there's no reason, right?
Unless it's one of those things, well, we don't want them to have to go through the trauma of having to revisit their crimes.
Yeah, that's the way it works.
Yep, latest out of the Biden administration, a bunch of people.
Now, Fox News reporting, though, what is really interesting is that Special Counsel Jack Smith, former FBI Director Christopher Wray, and Attorney General Merrick Garland are not included in this pardon,
in spite of the speculation that they may face backlash from the incoming administration.
Woo-hoo-hoo-hoo-hoo-hoo is what I would say.
It is 6.30. We are going to catch up on the rest of the news here from a town hall in just a moment, SRN. And by the way, SRN, we're going to go to SRN about 8.30 this morning for the live national coverage of the presidential inauguration.
That'll be after where PassMeetsPresident with Dr. Powers.
Dr. Powers and I are going to talk about it.
We were going to have a gentleman from Crescent City who was going to be in the inauguration situation.
And he ended up canceling his trip. He says, well, gosh, there's going to be no parade and I can't be in the inauguration situation and he ended up canceling his trip
he says well gosh there's gonna be no parade and i can't get inside the inauguration that's a very
exclusive uh very exclusive thing now so what was the point of going that's too bad we were kind of
hoping to talk to people there but sounds like it's just gonna be kind of frozen over kind of
a frozen over event but we'll have that coverage of that up. We're also going to talk with Noah Robinson, state senator,
and as good as it's looking for some possible change in Washington, D.C.,
and the positive vibes coming there,
it's going to continue to be a challenge here in Oregon.
We have to continue to focus on that, too.
Of course, state senator Robinson just coming in,
and Dems have a pretty much majority, so there's a lot going on.
Also coming up, Operation Cancer.
Operation No Cancer.
I think I got the name wrong on this, but John Richardson.
John Richardson, Operation World Without Cancer.
That's the name of his group, all right?
And one of the brightest lights of the trump administration could be
having hhs run by rfk jr right and what's some of the stuff that he might be doing
to help make america healthy again we'll have a little talk about that with john richardson
more along the way anytime you want to join in 770-5633 this is the bill meyer show your smile
is the key to your health and confidence.
As well as the release of dozens of Palestinian prisoners, they had been jailed by Israel.
More details at srnnews.com. 633, John Richardson will be joining me here in a couple of minutes. I
wanted to get Monica here. Monica, I was just talking about all those people preemptively pardoned, even without crimes being charged with them, like Millie and various other people here.
What are you thinking about that?
Well, I was watching Fox News, and I heard on there that our president right now, Bideniden whoever he is anyway the reason why he is doing this for the june 16th
committee and all these other people millie and everything he doesn't want any illegal
lawfare going on yeah i had the first laugh i had in a long time i just said i just looked at the tv
and just started laughing and i don't even know what they said afterwards.
Okay.
It's like the administration filled with lawfare.
Well, we're going to pardon all these people to prevent the lawfare attacks of them.
Okay.
All right.
Hey, thanks for that.
All right.
Bye.
I appreciate the laugh.
Deployable Patrick.
Hello, Patrick.
Go ahead.
It's on your mind.
Good morning.
You messed me up.
I was going to call you from the watch party, but you said now you're going to go away at 830.
So I'm calling you now.
And I heard earlier on that preemptive pardons were no such thing.
I was particularly interested in that Mark Milley guy.
He should have been busted down to private and thrown in the brig but uh is there such a thing as a preemptive you know what i'm going to do i'm
going to talk to dr powers about that because i don't think there's anything you know that the
the pardon power though is very broad so there may be it i guess it's there's a preemptive pardon
if um if they say so.
But I'll talk with Doc about that a little later, okay?
I really can't say.
I'm not aware of it.
All right?
Thank you.
At any rate, Trump ought to denounce those people.
Very good.
Thanks for the call, DP.
We're going to talk with John Richardson here in just a couple of minutes.
John Richardson is the founder of the Richardson Nutritional Center and Operation World Without Cancer.
You've got to be real happy about what's going on right now.
Life's busy, and you need to be on, on time, on the road, on schedule, and where you need to be.
Power on with trusted, dependable car batteries from Batteries Plus.
700-plus locations nationwide.
Just how clean is your water? 700 plus locations nationwide. other bacteria, protozoa, and viruses. So ask Grants Pass Water Lab to test your water for E. coli.
Find locally owned, independent Grants Pass Water Lab online at gpwaterlab.com.
You're hearing the Bill Myers Show on 106.3 KMED.
636, John Richardson is the founder of Operation World Without Cancer.
How are you doing this morning, John?
It's great to have you on. And how did you, now what is the family connection with
Operation World Without Cancer? Your father was deeply involved in this same kind of battle,
if I recall, back in the day. Give us a little bit of that, please. Yeah, dad was fought from
the early 70s, but with the truth and the answer for cancer, he treated over 6,000 patients
with natural B17 products. And was that also, was he one of the Laetrile guys too, or was someone
pushing that, if I recall? Yeah, he was kind of the original MD that was willing to put his name
out in the world, saying that we had the answer to cancer. It had been proven since the 1920s by
Dr. Krebs, and then dad's good friend,
G. Edward Griffin, wrote the book War Without Cancer that was released in 1974. It's 50 years
old this year, and we've known the answer to cancer for 50 years. And so the question is,
why are we still fighting it? And the reason we're still fighting it is because of these people that just got
preemptively pardoned. So when you heard the story about preemptively pardoning, it's just like,
yeah, they were guilty of bigger crimes than even we know. Absolutely. It's kind of humorous. So
why doesn't, you know, when President Trump leaves and he'll just pardon every single person that
ever worked for the government for the last four years.
It's just it's kind of getting to the point of ridiculousness.
But I'm not going to let anything dampen my spirits today because I've been fighting this battle my entire life.
I'm 60 this last year.
My dad was 63 when they took him out.
So I've told my dad I'm going to be living twice as long as he did.
You know, I tell him in my prayers because my dad gave his life for this mission and we're seeing it.
And so I'm not going to let anything dampen my spirits today, Bill, which seems to afflict our medical industrial complex, that kind of thing.
And you start to see little green shoots about things even beyond maybe what you've been working with, that even ivermectin, the conspiracy theory that was helping so many people during the COVID time may have some anti-cancer qualities, too.
Have you been keeping up on those kind of things over at Operation World Without Cancer?
Yeah, I ate the horse paste during the whole COVID thing because I knew the truth about it.
Yeah, me too.
Me too.
For me, it was drinking the injectable.
I didn't eat the horse paste, though, but good enough.
All right. So I grew up on a
farm. So I know ivermectin was around 10 years in humans working successfully before veterinarians
asked to have it make a horse version. So I knew as someone grew up on a farm that it was a dewormer
or anti-parasitic. And that's exactly what ivermectin is for cancer. Cancer is a deficiency disease.
Your audience has heard me say that before. A lot of people are like, oh, John, it can't be
that simple. It is that simple. But once you have a deficiency and your immune system is destroyed,
then an antiparasitic like ivermectin or fenbendazole works great to kill the parasites.
It doesn't actually work on the nutritional deficiency
that causes cancer, which is primarily vitamin B17, but it does act on the parasites that attack
the immune system. So typically when someone has cancer, they also have parasites, especially in
this world. There's so many parasites around that when someone has an immune-suppressed disease like cancer, then the parasites will attack.
That's why ivermectin has been so effective and so many people are talking about it right now.
Yeah, I was talking to a doctor and looking up on it back in the day during the COVID time. was telling me, well, you understand that ivermectin is a protease inhibitor, which is part
of the reproductive part of a virus, you know, the reproductive section of a virus. And if you
inhibit the protease inhibitor, that you stop the reproduction of viruses. And I've also read that there are many who are suspecting that
some cancers are virally induced. Would you agree with that in what you've known over the years?
I would not agree with that. You would not? No, I would not agree with that viruses cause cancer.
No, some viruses they were talking about, some viral. Yeah, viruses cause the immune system to
be lowered. As far as I'm not a virologist, I'll say that. Okay, all right. And I have a good friend,
Dr. Sherry Tampeni, who is an expert at viruses, and she and I talk about it all the time. But
here's the key. If you can keep your immune system up to a level that is defending, God's
made this amazing, absolutely amazing immune system. Considering all the... Wait a minute.
Wait a minute.
After COVID, the human immune system, that was a conspiracy theory.
Don't you remember?
Come on, John.
Don't you remember this?
Come on, man.
I know.
It can't be that God made an immune system.
It's a miracle that we're alive, Bill, to be quite honest with you, because of all the
poisons he hit us with and the shots and the pharmaceutical drugs that cause more damage than good.
You know, ivermectin is considered pharmaceutical, but I must throw a flag on the play because
it's been around 40 years.
It's made from natural, God-given substances.
It's been, it's had, you know...
Yeah, well, but I think that the thing is, though, is that you pick and choose.
I mean, just because something is pharmaceutically based
doesn't necessarily always make it evil, nor does it make it always good, too.
But I have to tell you, though, that there are probably many more substances
on this earth that can help us if we just knew more about it and used more about it.
And that's what you're kind of working with over at Operation World Without Cancer.
Is that a fair assessment there?
All right.
So you have to be pretty pumped about the possibility.
In fact, it's looking like a strong possibility of RFK Jr. getting in to run HHS.
What are you thinking about this, and what kind of policy would you be looking or are
you thinking might be fostered
through his appointment? I have a feeling he's going to have an easier time getting through than
Tulsi Gabbard from the sounds of it, but we'll see. Yeah, I think it's all a big grand play that
we're watching. I believe RFK is going to fly through. It's going to be like my Super Bowl.
I'm going to love to watch these
senators that really don't have a clue try to go up and ask questions of RFK and try to come up
with a reason. I just can't see. Oh, you want us healthier? You want our country healthy? You want
us to be less sick? You want our children to be healthier? You know, it's going to be a very fun
time. But I know I'm quite involved with, and I know a lot of people that are already involved with the administration and the MAHA movement.
And so a lot of the things that I was calling for a month ago, I'm already hearing Trump talk about in his speech last night.
So we –
What's an example of what you – I didn't hear all of the speech.
I must have missed that part.
An example – it wasn't mentioned – this was not mentioned in the speech,
but an example is the new FCC chairman is coming in and saying it's ridiculous that pharmaceuticals in our country are allowed to advertise directly to the consumer.
What do we need doctors for if the pharmaceutical companies can just advertise to the consumer
and they can say, you know, ask your doctor about this pharmaceutical medication?
So the number one thing is we're going to stop direct-to-consumer advertising from Big Pharma.
Yeah, that's only been in existence, what, 30 years, 40 years maybe?
Yeah.
Something like that?
Yeah, it's been in existence for 34 years, but the key is that they don't even say anything really, basically.
It's just a bunch of fluff talking about asking your doctor
well you know ask your doctor if phallum buoy buoy is good for you or some other name i i don't know
where they come up with the names i really don't but uh it's quite fascinating department some
marketing department comes up with it but but it makes no sense that the only way you can get it
is go to your doctor why would you need to do advertising and they've been asked many times
how many how many bottles of pills sell to a consumer from these advertisers?
None.
The only way it works is to fool people into believing that these are well-accepted.
Go ask your doctor.
Your doctor knows less about it than you do,
and that's what keeps the marketing engine going.
And so that's one of our top seven MAHA things that we know is in process right now.
The new FCC.
Well, you do understand, though, that even that would be a direct shot across the bow of the major television networks, especially the news networks.
Because if you watch any typical news network, Fox, CNN, all the rest of them, wouldn't you say at least half of the ads, if not more of them, are pharmaceutical drugs?
Yeah, and that's exactly it because that proves that they can't be fair about reporting on
these drugs either because exactly what you just said, it's a shot across the bow.
They're going to lose revenue.
And that's the threat when they try to do a report about a problem with a pharmaceutical.
It's just a direct hit to our truth.
Now, would this also include the lobbying money that pharma gives to Congress?
Because Congress gets a lot of it every year.
Yeah, that's going to have to be another overhaul.
That's not part of our top seven, but that's going to have to be a large overhaul
because all of the people that spend
money, whether it's big, big pharma, big tech, big government, I mean, big medicine, all
of them spend a ton of money, you know, trying to convince their senators that whole system
has got to change.
And, you know, that that that that may or may not change.
But, you know, if if, you know, we can lobby them to do truth and do truth and honesty, we should be able to fight against that.
But that's a whole other section we could talk about.
Does it give you pause that RFK was on record as kind of backing away from bagging on the childhood vaccines?
Or am I wrong about that?
No, I haven't seen that.
I hear these things that he's backed off. I don't believe – I believe it's being – internally they love to get us, our side, fighting.
They're saying, well, he's concentrating on food so much he's forgotten the fact of the vaccines.
Everybody that I know that's involved with the administration, including some names I could name today, but they'll be named later on.
For example, we're getting out of the WHO, the World Health Organization, which sponsors and promotes and profits off of vaccines. And we're getting out
of it and moving to the Global Wellness Forum, which is all going to be chock full of amazing
nutritional doctors that have nutritional answers for disease, not pharmaceutical answers. So I don't see RFK backing away. And I
want to remind everybody, RFK wrote the book, The Real Anthony Fauci, where he...
Who, by the way, has been pardoned this morning, right?
Yes, exactly. Yeah. But he's only been pardoned for federal crimes. He hasn't been pardoned in
the court of public opinion, and he hasn't been pardoned for state crimes or financial crimes
so uh you we will still we one of our calls is that we remove all the government security
protection and legal protection of people who are complicit in the covid vaccine scandal like
anthony fauci he's just one of them you just saw patrick dasik got fired on January 6th. That organization that did the whole gain of function got sanctioned and told they were never going to get funding again ever from the U.S. government.
So things are happening in front of the scenes and behind the scenes, but he's not going to be able to get away from the court of public opinion. How is that man going to be when they release the statistics that they're going to be releasing very quickly?
I talked to RFK's attorney, Mary Holland, two weekends ago on Saturday, and she said they have all the receipts, Bill.
They have all the receipts.
And what do those receipts indicate that, you know, that Anthony Fauci was involved in?
The receipts indicate that he knew what he was doing. He knew about the treatments that he was
recommending. He knew that they were not truthful. He knew that the viruses were created in the labs.
But most importantly, he knew the statistics. He knew people were dying from these vaccines and still he was pushing them and still would be pushing them if you could speak to him today.
By the way, was he the one that actually pushed the remdesivir, which I would talk to even nurses here locally.
They would nickname it run death is near is what you always heard from them in other words whatever you do you know
don't uh whatever it was during covid time don't give your relative remdesivir because i think that
what they said is it blew the kidneys out what they always saw it did it was they had the studies
were proven they know that fauci knew this they have the the documents that he knew that 50 of
the people that got remdesivir i'll'll never forget run, death is near now.
You've got my brain stuck on that.
He knew that 50% of the people died within seven days, seven injections of remdesivir, they died.
And that's why the proof is there that the COVID solution, the COVID treatments are what killed people more than the COVID itself and the
COVID virus. Because otherwise, why did people that were less financially able, why did street
people, homeless people not die of COVID in droves? They didn't die at all. There was no
death among homeless people for COVID. It was almost like the worst thing that happened is
when you got the treatment, when you got the hospital protocol.
And that was very sad you were able to notice this.
And I remember I had a friend of mine or a colleague, I guess,
not even a colleague, didn't work with this person,
but kind of in a distance way, who ended up,
when he was taken to the hospital and when he went to the hospital,
they more or less were able to do very little with him other than send him home with an oxygen bottle.
In his particular case, he didn't get the remdesivir, but he ended up getting ivermectin, ended up helping him and saved him quite a bit.
He sounds like he went to a good doctor because if he got oxygen and ivermectin. He went to a doctor that was progressive, you know.
Yeah, no, what he did is that he just ended up getting it from the, well, from the veterinary side,
like you and I were talking about and joking about in the very beginning.
But I knew a lot of people that did that during that time.
So we have that part of Make America Healthy Again to come clean with the truth about the problems then.
What else do you see then as part of the rfk
policy setting possibilities here they mean absolutely a comprehensive plan to overhaul the
insurance big insurance all the insurance that we have out there so that we can choose
both allopathic and natural so if you go to a doctor an MD, and he offers something that's a natural answer to your disease, whatever it is, vitamin C, ozone therapy, a hydrogen water system, whatever he's seen as a doctor that has seen to give people a break from their disease.
So this is a shot across the bow of the American Medical Association's stranglehold on treatment protocol.
Is that what this is? Well, it's not the, yes, the AMA's stranglehold, but also the insurance. Because
remember, if the AMA doesn't approve it, then the insurance doesn't cover it. So there's so many
people that would be offered a much cheaper natural answer to a disease that can't choose
it because they can't afford it. Even if it's $20,000 for the natural and $500,000 for the allopathic, the insurance only covers the allopathic.
So that is what we need. Not only need, it has to happen that that's overhauled.
Every answer to a disease should be covered as long as the doctor and the patient agree on it together.
So that's another one of our platforms. But we also want to overhaul big education,
meaning take big pharma sponsorship out of Harvard Medical School education. 110% of the Harvard
Medical Education, I know that sounds ridiculous, is covered by big pharma support. That needs to
be pulled out. And so that naturally means that doctors are trained then in only one thing.
The solution to health is nothing other than the latest pharmaceutical drugs.
Exactly.
If we were talking about any other industry, it would be laughable.
If you went to college for a degree in public speaking,
but you only got trained by uh the cia
or here's another one if you were studying to be a nutritionist but you're a care but your
education was sponsored by hostess right you know there you go that's it in which you know
hostess twinkies are uh are the most nutritious food on the earth and will help you avoid cancer
i don't know i'm just having fun with you on that thing.
No, you're absolutely – that's exactly what happens in big –
so we take big pharma and big medicine out of the educational system,
and actually that's happening.
They're actually out there looking for a campus right now
where they would be teaching a medical doctor, an MD, 80% naturopathic answers, God-given, available, cheap answers
to disease, and 20% allopathic, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, those type of allopathic
medicines.
That is actually going on so that within four years, we not only might, we will have MDs
that are out there that are smarter than we are about nutrition.
Right now, you and I are both smarter than most of our MDs are about nutrition because they got
about a week of education in their entire career prior to this. So that's another one of our
platforms that we're expecting RFK to put into. Or RFK is going to be the head of HHS. But even if he wasn't, the groundswell of people that are there is unbelievable.
It's not going to stop.
He's going to have some powerful position, even if they figured a way not to approve him.
But they are going to approve him.
Let me just tell people, it's almost a assured thing.
Yeah, all I would care about is that he stay in this particular lane and avoid the environmental lawyer kind of talk, which he's very, very big on, too.
You know, I could agree.
I agree.
He needs to stay in this lane.
I agree.
Yeah, very good.
So, once again, John Richardson is the founder of Richardson Nutritional Center.
And, by the way, you can find out more about that at rncstore.com.
And also, you can find out more about that at rncstore.com. And also find out more about Operation World Without Cancer.
Wouldn't it be interesting if someday we end up finding out you don't need $30,000 a dose chemotherapy drugs to get out of this stuff?
Well, we're in the process of finding that out.
We've known it for 50 years.
I keep repeating it.
And people sometimes don't believe me because they don't know who I am. They think I'm being
self-serving, but this is a God-given mission. You don't need John Richardson. You don't need
Bill Meyer. You need God's nutrition, meaning you need to bring your immune system back up.
And vitamin B17 that's found at rncstore.com is readily available in 1200
different foods we just make it easier for you to get it that's it well the thing is i mean it
makes sense though that uh from what i've read from other doctors that there are always cancer
cells circulating within your body but it's up to your immune system to always ferret them out and
get rid of them right that's%. That's exactly the whole thing.
And RNC is the God's natural, excuse me, B17 is God's natural, you know,
seek and destroy for those cells that are floating around.
And once you understand the science of it, you can never take it out of your brain.
All right.
Hey, John, good talking with you.
It'll be interesting to see what happens with RFK Jr. for sure, naturally.
And just to be clear, you know, John, i'm not giving medical advice or things like that we're
just you know alpining on our issues here but you can certainly head to rncstore.com and operation
without cancer.com and find out more about the wonderful things that john is involved in okay
john good talking with you as always and uh let's pray for a good outcome here in the coming weeks. Okay? Thanks a bunch.
Oh, my gosh.
It's going to be amazing.
All righty.
You take care.
Positive guy.
657 for sure.
This is KMED at 99.3 KBXG.
As a business owner, you likely do a lot of driving around town.
CCB number 250730.
Good morning.
This is News Talk 1063 KMED.
And you're waking up with the Bill Myers Show.
7 o'clock at KMED and KMED HD1.
Eagle Point, Medford, KBXG, Grants Pass.
You're on the Bill Myers Show.
And we're going to check town hall news here in just a moment.
And then we're going to talk with State Senator Noel Robinson, who is in studio.
If you've noticed him, of course, here, I'll expand the camera.
There he is.
You can see him behind the microphone deal.
We'll get this so that people can see you there, Noah.
But we'll get him on here in just a minute.
We're going to talk about the upcoming session.
And one of the challenges, or some of the challenges we're going to be facing, because as good as it's looking nationally for some positive change,
we have the state legislature, the state bureaucracy, which is very much gearing up to fight everything about what is going to be coming out of D.C. Fight, fight,
fight. But they're fight, fight, fight in a way that maybe they shouldn't be. So we'll have a
good conversation about this. Maybe do a little bit of fire map talk to your calls and opinion
also on the way. And Dr. Powers will be joining me at 810 normal time. We'll do a past meet presence.
And then at 830, we're going to go to SRN news coverage,
live coverage of the inauguration and carry it through the inauguration.
And then we'll join Mark Lee Van Camp and Robbins show after the inauguration has completed.
And so that's what we're kind of looking at this morning.
Oh, by the way, we're also going to have a Diner 62 quiz sometime probably between now and 8.
That's when we're going to do that.
Not right now, but a little bit later this hour.
We can do this, okay?
Hey, want to give you a heads up here that the 14th annual Wipeout Hunger Drive is going on at Kelly's Automotive Service.
And they do this every year.
They've been doing it, I don't know how many years now.
But they have helped a lot of people get proteins.
And what they're about is getting peanut butter.
So all you have to do is just donate 40 ounces or more of peanut butter and 10 or more ounces of jelly to either the Grants Pass or the Medford location of Kelly's.
And they will put a brand new pair of windshield wipers on your vehicle.
And it's valued up to $35, okay?
And this week, all the donations up to $500 are matched by Ellie George and HomeQuest Realty.
Good people.
That means your donations are going to be doubled, okay?
Kelly's Automotive Service and Ellie George with HomeQuest Realty making a difference for Wipeout Hunger.
