Bill Meyer Show Podcast - Sponsored by Clouser Drilling www.ClouserDrilling.com - 07-22-25_TUESDAY_6AM
Episode Date: July 23, 2025Morning news and opinion and later a talk about cellphone radiation safety. Cory Hillis is President of EMF Services, which consults and detects radiation problems in your home with WIFI, cellular, et...c.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The Bill Myers Show podcast is sponsored by Clouser Drilling.
They've been leading the way in southern Oregon well drilling for over 50 years.
Find out more about them at Clouser Drilling.com.
My email is Bill at Bill Myers Show.com.
Facebook.com slash Bill Myers Show is up here too this morning.
Been trying to get a hold of John O'Connor.
He's, of course, the author of Postgate and Postgate the Book.com.
And we were going to talk with him.
And he's been trying to call me he's out of that he's actually
out of town he's normally in the Bay Area but I'm hoping to bring you some
some legal analysis on the latest the latest push to get Adam Schiff indicted
and possibly in big trouble of course now he's a senator now he's a sitting
senator and they want to try to get him for mortgage fraud. I think it's quite interesting. So
hopefully we'll get a hold of John and we'll get some good conversation going
on that too. A little bit later this hour, this is something that, you know, I've
had various listeners and, you know, not just Lucretia, even though I'm sure
Lucretia would go down here, but many people I've talked to over the years have had issues with cell phone radiation.
And there was an interesting case that ended up just getting shut down.
And they're calling it at least those within the electromagnetic radiation issue.
This is like the latest big tobacco kind of
deal. They were suing Apple.
And what they were trying to get Apple to do is just put warning labels on
phones. They wanted warning labels. This was the ask.
And the federal government just shut this case down.
And I'm going to talk with Corey Hillis about this. He's the president of EMF
Solutions. EMF Solutions.
EMF, of course, Electromagnetic Force or Electromotive Force.
I'm not exactly sure.
I'll talk with him about this.
But he's one of these guys, kind of like what Tom and Talon, who
calls in every now and then, and talks about taking his meter
and going around and measuring the electronic radiation
of the various electronic devices in our home.
And he has the latest on this one because the federal government ended up shutting down this lawsuit against Apple.
And what's interesting is not that Apple proved that its cell phones were safe, and by the way, this is also involving Samsung too. But that nobody
has any right, the federal government is there to preempt. The federal government says you
can't do anything about this first. The federal government has the first shot at it, which
I find really interesting. So I'm looking forward to talking with with Corey about this here in the next
few minutes. So we'll have that coming up. I'm also going to have Professor
Alan Sanders. He's a professor emeritus and also an attorney. We've got a
lot of political news that we're digging into this morning too. There's all sorts
of things going on in the political realm here involving President Trump and he's going to weigh in on this call to
declassify or get more information out on the Epstein case. And the last time I
talked with Alan Sanders, you could tell that he's not a particularly big friend
of President Trump, I don't think, but he has a reputation of being kind of straight down the middle.
And so we're going to have that talk with him coming up also.
Former state senator, Herman Bertruger, is also on the program.
We're going to get him back on.
And he's saying that the Democrats are very active here in Southern Oregon, very active,
very smart.
When I say very smart, very smart-ing,
they're not real happy about what has been going on. So we'll have him and get the latest on it.
And of course, with your calls and opinion, because it is Pebble in Your Shoe Tuesday.
770-5633, let me grab a quick call here. Hi, before the break. Hi, good morning. Who's this?
Welcome. Hey, this is Mark. Mark, how you doing buddy? Good.
The phone thing.
Yeah.
I'm a contractor and I buy an OtterBox all the time and I carry my phone on my hip.
Right.
The muscles in my hip went absolutely batshit.
Sorry.
Anyway.
That's okay.
I have a dump. I have a dump. I have a dump button, Mark. That's okay. I have a dump. I have a dump up. I have a dump
button, Mark. It's okay. So what happened next after that? Well, it worked its way
around to the front of my hip and then down my leg and all the way to my knee.
And I went to the doctor and he said, yeah, that's your cell phone. Quit wearing
your cell phone on your hip. Really? So your doctor even told you that huh?
Yeah
Huh, so there you are. That's the end of my story. Well mark. I appreciate you sharing that
Of course I wonder about people who put the cell phone in their pocket all the time. Hmm
Well, don't put it in the same place all the time
Yeah, move it around if you're gonna have damage move it around around from different place to different place, right? Not just one. I guess. Actually, now I'm just leaving it
laying around. You know, that tends to be the way I do most of the time. Sometimes I'll stick it in
my back pocket and I'll put it away. I'll put it on top of my wallet so that it's away from my skin
a little bit. But I think this is what Cory's going to be talking about here in the next few minutes and he's going down that road.
Now the FCC will tell you that all it does is heat tissue, you know the radio
frequencies from the cell phone because they are just
little radio transmitters in our pockets and in our purses and you know
everywhere else like that and there's been controversy about this for several years now overseas the rules
are considerably stricter
on exposure the way they tested but the uh... the Washington in washington dc
the fcc has control of this
and they've been kind of love to do much about it
so pretty interesting huh
it was painful and it still is it hasn't't gone away. Now it's settled in my kneecap.
Now are you going to a natural path or is this just a conventional everyday old doctor?
No, the regular doctors just look at you like you're weird. So no, I'm going to a nature path.
Okay, I had a feeling because I had a feeling that it was only going to be the natural type positions
that were probably going to even think that you weren't crazy.
Right.
All right, Mark.
Hey, I appreciate the call.
Thanks for that.
Help me know, okay?
Thank you.
You're welcome.
All right.
18 minutes after 6, 7705633.
We'll talk with Corey about that here in the next few minutes.
Attorney General Dan Rayfield, this is our top state story.
It's a state versus federal kind of story this morning.
He put out a press release and I had this here.
I'm just going to share a few thoughts of it here with you.
Attorney General Rayfield and a coalition of 20 other attorneys general yesterday ended
up suing the Trump administration and what
they're doing is stopping, they're trying to stop what they say is the unlawful attempt
to restrict access.
And of course, you know what, you know when someone in the government says that, well,
someone's trying to restrict access, in other words, that is trying to say someone doesn't want to take taxpayer money and pay for it,
that's restricting access. In other words, I don't have access to health care, meaning
that you don't have access to somebody else paying for your health care is
usually what they mean, but I digress here. So, Rayfield is suing, along with 20
other probably blue states, I would imagine,
to restrict access to, in other words, the Trump administration is restricting access to critical
health education and social service programs. Earlier this month, Rayfield says, in a chaotic
reversal of agency policy, the administration issued notices prohibiting state safety net programs
issued notices prohibiting state safety net programs from serving many residents. And here's the money shot here, regardless of immigration status. Okay, so
here we go. This is the battle on the sanctuary state thing going on again, folks. The change threatens access. In other words, you paying
for someone, someone else's service, access to critical services such as Head Start, Title
IX, family planning. In other words, abortion, adult education, mental health care, and community health centers.
I find that interesting.
So the community health center, non-profit sort of situation here that doesn't ask, and
I would imagine there is a lot of illegal immigrants that are using these health centers.
By the way, Attorney General Ray Field and the coalition are asking the court to halt
the new federal rules and act quickly to ensure continued access.
And you know what access, once again, is.
You pay for them.
That's what access is.
Ray Field says the federal government's actions
threaten the basic services that thousands of Oregonians
rely on every day, child care, health care, housing, and more.
And of course, he just refers to illegal aliens
as just Oregonians.
Thousands of Oregonians rely on every day, child care, health
care, housing, and more.
These changes were issued with no notice,
no legal justification, and no plan for how states are supposed to comply. Okay, all right. This has to do
with immigration status. This is the part they're not going to say, they're not
going to do the quiet, say the quiet part outside. This is mostly about illegal
immigrants. And naturally the Trump administration wants to make sure that if you are getting American services, American taxpayer paid for
services, that you are an actual American. Not just someone visiting, not just
someone doing the jobs that supposedly no other Oregonians will do, that sort of
thing, that you need to be an American citizen. And so it seems pretty simple.
Dan Rayfield says, we don't know how we could possibly,
how could we comply with making sure that these people are American citizens
in order to provide access to services. I think all of the Oregon bureaucrats,
I think all of the Oregon bureaucrats, there are just certain bureaucraties that they, you know, services, access, resources, you know, you hear them say stuff over and over
again.
All right.
Okay.
So how could Attorney General Dan Rayfield comply with the Trump administration, who
he is suing right now, which he is suing right now, because they don't know how
they can comply.
How can they comply and keep American citizens only getting these services like Head Start
and access to the community health centers, etc.
Well, I don't know, the Department of Motor Vehicles seems to have been able to figure
it out with the Real ID program.
I just went and got my Real ID the other day and I brought in an American birth certificate.
An American birth certificate.
It was pretty easy.
I think what this really translates as is Attorney General Dan Rayfield does not want to comply
with the Trump administration and wishes to find and get another pliable federal
court judge to say you don't have to. Nationwide court injunction they'll
pride to certify it as a as a class action right? Only half kidding. But that
is our top story statewide at the moment. Other than we have a hundred thousand acre wildfire, but don't worry about that, that
wildfire over in central Oregon, Oregon rather, because that's the smell of the forest being
restored.
We'll hear that from various other state officials too.
24 minutes after six, you're on the Bill Meyers show on Pebble in Your Shoe Tuesday.
That's a big pebble in mine today.
Just look at that.
Interesting story I caught this morning about a California benefit concert.
Remember when he had the big Palisade fires just a few months ago down in Southern California?
The aftermath of the Palisades and Eaton fires.
National worldwide news, more than 2,000 homes, businesses destroyed
and 30 killed. Well there were a couple of fire aid concerts and there were live streams
and they were held at the Intuit Dome and the Kia Forum late January in Los Angeles.
And they had an aid list of performers donating their time to raise money
for fire victims. More than 100 million came through donations. And then an editor that
was covering the story reached out to the Annenberg Foundation, which was tasked with
distributing the money in April to find out how the fire victims could receive direct financial help. The answer that oh
my gosh what a racket! All that hundred million dollars that was donated in
those fire concerts in Los Angeles, people thought that they were donating to get people back on their feet, right?
The money ended up going to nonprofits.
Nonprofits. The nonprofit rackets that were always fighting here in Southern Oregon,
kind of like, you know, the one that always comes to mind is the, you know, providing services.
And yet it's their business like stabbing wagon, you know, you provide needles to the homeless.
And of course, you call, you're helping out with the homelessness community, et cetera, et cetera.
Nothing personal, but it's just like, you know, there are many of these kind of Democratic front
organizations that are festooned all throughout this system.
So a hundred million dollars.
And people thought they were donating to donating to these concerts and that they were
going to help the fire victims, and it ended up going to the non-profit Democratic Rackets.
No individual could get money, even though the money was intended for the fire victims.
Fire victims losing everything, not a single buck, not a penny from the $100 million ever
got to any of them.
And the California Democrats have funneled it to the nonprofits instead.
Kind of like what I was talking about before, Dan Rayfield suing the Trump administration
because he's trying to be a meanie and restricting access and services and access to resources,
meaning he wants illegal aliens to pick your pocket. I don't know how else could
you describe it, but there we go. But same thing happening in California, too.
630, this is the Bill Meyers show on KMED 993 KBXG. Just had to get you up on that
story. Couldn't believe it, you know, reading that one. Now then, your cell phone.
Federal government ended up shutting down a lawsuit against Apple.
And we're going to talk about why.
And maybe you can protect yourself about this.
I'm going back to what Mark was talking about just a few minutes ago on the show.
Harper, GLP.
GoodRx is not insurance, but can be used instead of insurance, including Medicare and other
federal and state funded programs.
This is News Talk 1063 KMED and you're waking up with the Bill Myers show.
Corey Hellas joins me.
He's president of EMF Solutions, a certified EMF specialist and trainer.
We're going to be talking about cell phones and apparently there's some information out
there that Apple and Samsung don't really want you to know too much about apparently. Cory, welcome to the program. Good morning.
Super glad to be here. Thank you so much for having me. All right, so you have
an issue and have been digging into the cell phone radiation, the radiation issue,
and I'm assuming that you do not have a cell phone next to your head right now.
Would that be fair? Well, we have ways to protect ourselves. So I'm glad you brought that up. I'm not against the technology. I'm all for it. It's
awesome. I was one of the first in line to get a 5G phone. But I protect myself. That's why my
five-year-old is allowed to have one or use one. But I do like to talk on speaker anyway,
because every little bit helps. Yeah, I would agree with you. There is a quiet shutdown of a lawsuit against the Apple Corporation,
which just happened recently apparently. I'm wondering if you could tell me a bit more about
that, please. Well, let's back up a step because this is a key for people to understand what's
going on. So the FCC sets the safety guidelines for how much
radiation can come off of a cell phone that's safe versus unsafe, meaning harms
you. Okay, and the harms are significant and lengthy if we have time to get into that.
Yeah, yeah, go ahead if you don't mind. I don't mind getting off into the
weeds a little bit because it is an important subject and this I the this preemption issue is something which has been a little
irritating to people people have tried to in the communities regulate cell
phone towers location and they've been more or less told by the federal
government that nope you have nothing to say about something like that and of
course I mean I have a foot in both sides of this because here I'm in the
broadcast world so I'm working around this stuff all the time. So I get it. I understand. Yeah big time big time
So the neat thing about the FCC is they did something smarter than the FDA and they decided instead of the level of radiation
That they're gonna test they say the safety is based on how much does it heat your head?
Okay, okay. They call it the star rating or the
specific absorption rate. And don't they have a dummy named Sam that actually
that they actually test you to use at the FCC? Yeah. So they don't even test it on
real people which would be much more accurate and worse. So they're, you know,
they test it on a mannequin made of liquid and a couple chemicals mixed in
and they call that a person. Oh. a person, but it's something to start.
Yeah, but I guess, you know, who's going to volunteer to be the dummy to get baked by
your cell phone to a delicate crunch, I guess, for a testing purpose?
I don't know, Corey, but you have to wonder.
Well, it's easy.
We've done tests.
You can go to our landing page on our website and you can see people's heads heating up
over a 10-minute
period as the phone's on their head.
Okay.
What's your website?
I'm talking all day on the phone.
Okay.
What's your website, by the way?
Sure.
What's your website?
Oh, emfhometest.com is the place to go.
The landing page where people can get more information on there, plus sign up for a free
home test.
And if we have a rep local, they'll literally test your home, your phone, and all that for free. If they're not local,
they'll do a consultation with you and answer questions for free.
Okay. So this is your business then, detecting radiation and trying to lower it, right? That's
how you work it. We're not lowering it. We're actually addressing it and protecting people from it.
Okay, so let's get back to the FCC. Let's go back to the FCC testing then.
FCC tests cell phones with Sam the dummy. It's not a human. And if Sam the dummy doesn't overheat,
then everything's okay? Yeah, but it's much, much more interesting than that. So
Yeah, but it's much, much more interesting than that. So the way your microwave oven uses microwaves, radar,
same basic thing, radio waves, all synonymous,
used to be called a radar oven.
The way it heats is it shakes, vibrates,
and spins molecules.
They smash into each other two and a half billion times
a second.
That creates friction and it heats your food
from the inside.
Right. Yeah, it's the friction, the water molecules vibrate against each other.
That's how your potato gets baked, right? Exactly. So let's fast forward to your
Wi-Fi router. The same exact frequency as your microwave oven
with no walls on it. And that's what your phone uses. that's what your tablet uses, that's what your laptop
uses, the same frequency.
How is it heating your head then?
Well, it's heating your head, not like next to a radiator where heat gently comes in and
warms you.
It heats your head by shaking and vibrating and spinning molecules that smash into each
other to create friction and that creates your heat.
So a lot of experts say there's no
acceptable level of that from radiation. I don't want that going on in my brain.
I don't know about you. The thing is though you're talking about what 2
gigahertz? I know we're getting into the weeds right now. Wi-Fi is 2.5.
There's 2.5 gigahertz and then there's the 5 gigaHz Wi-Fi. And the 5 GHz is not near the frequency of water.
The 2.5 arguably could be, right?
Well, both are because 5 is just double 2.5.
So you have twice the wave.
So every other wave is the exact same frequency as 2.5.
Oh, so you're saying there is sympathetic vibrations even though it's twice the frequency.
That's interesting. I'd have to think about that one and ponder it. So you're saying there is sympathetic vibrations even though it's twice the frequency.
That's interesting.
I'd have to think about that one and ponder it.
But where do we go here from this point?
Why has the FCC squashed any attempt to label anything for safety when it comes to cell
phone radiation?
Well, that I can't answer, but your guess is probably correct in what you assess.
But here's the wild
thing the FCC has never tested SAM with the phone touching SAM it's always at a distance a small
distance but even a small distance away it exceeds their safety guidelines of 1.6 it actually goes
300 and 500 percent over the safety guidelines without even touching you
or touching Sam. Oh so the FCC tests cell phones in a way that nobody uses cell phones?
Well it's called a touch screen right? I mean I think you'd touch it.
Yeah. Yes they say no this mimics what people, how people use their phones better. I mean, I don't know how
you use your phone, but I think you've got to touch it, right? Yeah. I mean, to get on it,
to get on the internet. How far away does the FCC get the cell phone? Does it keep it away from
your head in order to do the radiation testing? How far? Well, first of all, the level that they set
is ridiculously high if you ask non-biased professionals
that have studied this for years,
and I can quote those organizations.
But let's assume their safety guidelines are okay.
Okay.
They test it five millimeters away,
which is pretty close.
And then you're right on the borderline of being
unsafe. But as soon as they go from five to two millimeters on the Apple phones, they went over
300% over. An investigative journalist at Chicago Tribune called them out. So they retested, you
know, at that two millimeter and they said, yes, we're actually 300 and some percent over the safety guidelines that they set.
Okay, so two millimeters is about a half an inch, right around a half inch, maybe a little bit
more than a half inch. So that's where...
To me, it doesn't matter much because all of it is like 1.6 is already way too high.
All right. But if you're not using the speakerphone, let's be honest here, Corey,
if you're not using the speakerphone, you got it shoved up against your ear so that you can hear.
At least that's the way most people, I would think, would be using the cell phone, would
they not?
Yes, and here there's a lot of factors here.
So, one, your radiation increases when you're farther from a cell tower.
Are they using it at different distances from a cell tower? I have no idea. Two, radiation is the highest when
you're live streaming video, pretty darn high on a phone call and then it goes
down from there. What are they testing? They don't really say all this stuff.
Okay. So what do you do about this? Because you know I know people who
don't seem to quite understand
radio propagation that'll say, I just put my cell phone in a Faraday cage.
And it's like, yeah, that means it doesn't work. Okay. It has to be able to radiate.
What are you doing then to try to ameliorate what the federal government
apparently doesn't want to touch right now. Too hot to handle. So we are the first to figure out how... so we weren't the first to figure out that radiation
like this is causing a malfunction in something called the voltage-gated
calcium channels inside of our cells. That causes a snowball of effects. You
can see that on our website. But we were the first to figure out how the
radiation is causing those effects.
And by doing that, it's key because instead of guessing, we're actually addressing that
root cause, which we call subatomic chaos, which has to do with that shaking and vibrating
of molecules.
When you address that, the snowball effects don't happen.
And one of the neatest things visually you can see on our website, not the most key study,
but a neat one, because we have many studies, is the thermal image.
You can see people's heads heating up every two and a half minutes on a phone when they
use our chip on it, on the back of the phone.
You can see that there was no heating.
And that's pretty key, because that means that shaking and vibrating subatomic chaos,
which causes the problems, is being addressed by our
products really well. Okay, what do you mean? You put a chip on the back of the cell phone?
Really? Yes, a chip. Okay, what does this chip do? Well, that's proprietary. I can give you
examples of what it does, but on my website we have three meters we
balance with certain properties and these are natural properties. I can show
you one of the videos on my website it's a meter we had specially made so I don't
tell you what it's measuring but you can drop rocks and sand and different
particles in there and you'll see the meter reading certain readings and when
we balance it a certain way, we create a field which
corrects that subatomic chaos.
It's kind of like if you had, here's an analogy, if you had forces, like say, because every
EMF is an electric and a magnetic force that shakes and vibrates.
If you had a magnetic force that was shaking up and down and left and right and back and
all random chaotic,
that's the chaos that causes our voltage-gated calcium channels to open. It's a lot without a diagram, but that's what goes on. Yeah, now the calcium ion channel that you were talking about
is an actual physical effect that has been researched on this. I mean, I will give you this,
but I will also say though, but I will also say though,
but I hear the, hey, let's take the magic little chip and put it on the back of the
phone. I mean, this just sounds like, and all of a sudden all the bad stuff goes away.
As a broadcast engineer and someone hit us a ham radio operator and studies this kind
of stuff, it kind of sounds like nonsense to me, Corey. I'm sorry to be this way, but
I have to ask you. All right?
No, yeah, no problem. I love talking. I'm not just a scientist fixing their
house with our products after they talk to me, so I have no problem getting in
the weeds. So we have experiments showing all kinds of things. Our best one is
tested on human cells. We put a Wi-Fi router near human cells. We saw the
malfunction in the calcium channels and the calcium levels
going up or down in the cells.
This is a lab in Texas.
And then they put our products on and for the first time in history that experiment
was done and it was fixed.
So that calcium channel was fixed.
That's just one of many experiments, but that's I think the most key one because the biochemists
and experts in the EMF world
like Dr. Martin Paul from Washington State University and others, they say this is like
kind of the root cause of how it snowballs into symptoms that we have.
So let me talk, Corey, then about how do you just reduce the overall impact in your home,
even if you don't have the magical, mystical cell phone
chip on the back of your cell phone, which you're marketing here?
So when someone fixes everything in their life, their home, their car, their work, their
phone, has a personal protection product on them, we get a testimonial literally half
the time.
I mean, we don't fix medical conditions,
and that's how often when we reduce this giant stress
off people and this environmental invisible elephant
in the room that's huge.
Yeah, but there's kind of,
there's sometimes an effect though of something.
If you know that you buy something
and you've spent money on it and you put it up there,
hey, I feel better, right?
Because we wish for it to feel better.
Yeah, that's a great point.
And that's in studies, that's the placebo effect.
Yes.
So you can fix your house, watch your children
that you didn't tell, watch your husband have testimonials,
and this happens all the time,
I have tons of these testimonials.
I fixed the house, I didn't tell my husband,
he wakes up and he says, I sleep better, I have more energy. The pain in my shoulder is gone. All these great
things. This is the norm. And better sleep, more energy is the number one testimonial that we tend
to get. I don't know. It sounds a little bit too good to be true, Corey. Doesn't it? Yeah. Until
you see all the testimonials. We have thousands of testimonials. It Corey. Doesn't it? Yeah. Until you fail the testimonials,
we have thousands of testimonials.
It's so long, it's crazy.
And if you're a holistic practitioner
and you're a chiropractor,
which almost all chiropractors learn
how to do something called applied kinesiology
or muscle testing in school,
that's another way that you can test
to see that the products are working
and actually working better than anything else out there.
Corey Hill is with me. He is the president of EMF Solutions. We're talking about this shutdown
of the Cohen versus Apple lawsuit that would have forced Apple to actually disclose
more of the radiation that's coming out of its units. And Samsung, of course,
they're all pretty much the same
technology here. You're claiming you can actually reduce that. Are there non-chip involved ways
that you can actually clear up RF radiation, this EMF radiation within your home from the
connected world that we're in here at this point, Corey?
Well, to answer your question a minute ago, we put a box on your electric meter,
just kind of next to it, adjacent to it, you clamp it on, and it uses the electric wires
to spread our field for every room in the house, and that's how we protect your whole
house from spell towers, from Starlink, from a scatter pole, from if you have a transformer
in your front yard or extra large power lines and all the rest of it.
Okay, and you're not having a shaman coming over and doing a cleansing with Sage or anything?
No.
No.
We're real science-based.
Okay.
All right.
Because I'm sorry to sound skeptical about this, but RF is RF and it either gets shielded
or it doesn't... Radio frequency energy either gets shielded or it doesn't, radio frequency energy either
gets shielded or it doesn't get shielded.
It's not going to go someplace.
That's not it at all.
I can give you so many examples.
First let me tell you that every single person in the audience right now, the small print
in their phone contract does say that their phone is over the safety guidelines as soon
as they get less than five millimeters from it.
They're already admitting it. They're already having to. And you're right. And you're right. They do. And even then, the FCC is testing because the
assumption is made that there's a problem with it. Otherwise, they wouldn't be concerned about
SAM the dummy and the distance involved, etc. etc. Okay? So I'll concede your point there.
And I'm not saying there's not a problem but but let me ask you a question so all
radiation is not created equal so when you have let's say you walk in out in
the Sun okay if you have unpolarized radiation like from the Sun especially
analog radiation like smooth waves if you mapped it out. That is not the same, that doesn't produce
the subatomic chaos that digital,
man-made polarized radiation creates.
So you could go out in the sun,
it's about the same amount of radiation levels
as your cell phone when it's on a phone call.
But it doesn't do the same thing that your cell phone does
in the same way.
Now you have some of the high frequencies that has a whole different thing, because if you have an X-ray, that does in the same way. Now you have some of the high frequencies
that has a whole different thing, because if you have an x-ray that does a whole different
thing. And also if you look at the output of a cell phone, if you were to examine it
electronically, it's spiky, impulsed, and various other issues. I understand that. I'll
concede your point there. I'm not saying that sun radiation is the equivalent of your cell phone, even though you could say it's the
same level overall of average. So, all right, it's interesting. It sounds interesting. I
don't know if I'm just ready to bite on that at this point. Tell me why I should.
It's a little hard, a short conversation without the graphs and things to explain, but trust
me, we explain it, we've proved it, and we have thousands of testimonials more than anybody
you ever saw before.
Some of the testimonials, 25% of the time when people fix everything right, they actually
detox for usually one to three days unless they're sick.
It's quite a bit longer sometimes because they're going from a world of radiation that is humongous compared to what it was in 2000 back to, you
know, we do a really good job and they're almost not having the stress at all and their
body says, wow, I got all this extra energy, what am I going to do? And then you flush
stuff out. And so the detox effect is quite significant on our products too.
There's so many things, evidence of our products working, it's kind of fun.
I'll tell you what I'm going to do.
I'll put the website up there.
I don't know about this.
I really don't, Corey, but I've talked to enough people over the years that say that
there's an issue, but it does sound, I'll give you my honest
opinion that it sounds a little too good to be true that we do this all of a sudden.
All bad stuff goes away.
I don't know.
Do you have a patent on this?
I have a patent pending and I'm not planning on finishing it because then China will see
what we do and then they'll just do it.
And then, you know, what I've created, what we've done that is unique compared to anybody
else doing it is just, you know, just going to be taken over by every company in China.
I can't sue them.
So it doesn't protect me at all.
The one thing that has been clear though from court activity though is that the phone manufacturers have been trying to hide a lot of this
of the issues involved and saying you know nothing to see here and the
federal government has and this is the part that has bothered me has decided
to preempt absolutely anybody else doing anything about it also right I mean
that's really the problem that we the people face in this issue of cell phone radiation. Of course the federal government did the
most expensive national toxicology program for 30 million dollars proving
cell phones were causing tumors and rats, tumors and cancers in rats and mice. So
that's one study the European Union paid three million euro for 12 institutions
across different countries in Europe to participate, professors, not like one dude So that's one study, the European Union paid 3 million euro for 12 institutions across
different countries in Europe to participate, professors, not like one dude in the basement.
And they showed many years ago that 24, and your audience isn't even going to believe
what I'm going to say, but look it up, reflex study, 24 hours on a cell phone, that radiation
caused the same DNA damage as 1600 chest x-rays.
So if you look at the studies you can see that this is a major issue it's not
a little one. The bioinitiative.org is a great website because they are a they
don't sell anything they're a non-biased organization, they're members from across
the world for decades studying EMFs and they have over 4,000 studies.
You want to read a quick summary of a massive amount of information from non-biased people,
go there and if you add forward slash conclusions to that website, they'll take you right to
a page that summarizes 1800 studies.
So you can look this stuff up quick and educate yourself quickly.
Corey Hillis, president of EMF Solutions.
We'll link to all of your information.
Give me your website one more time on this one, Corey.
Yeah, sure.
EMFhometest.com is our landing page.
EMF, Edward Michael Frank. Hey, I appreciate you being a... You know, like I said, I'm not going to poo-poo the issues of potential EMF radiation.
I'm really not.
I'm just concerned...
And hey, maybe you got something there.
I don't know.
Like I said, I'm just going off the...
Spitballing off of my knowledge of RF
propagation and how it tends to work for a lot of situations. And I
don't know how something like this could do what it claims, but that's your job.
Okay? I appreciate the call. Thanks for being on, all right? You be well.
Absolutely. All right. Thank you for having me. Yeah, and keep using a speakerphone.
Okay, 656. This is the Bill Myers. Thank you for having me. Yeah.
And keep using a speakerphone.
Okay.
656.
This is The Bill Meyers Show and you're on KMED.
Stephen Westfall Roofing is growing, now proudly serving Brookings, Gold Beach, and the entire
Southern Oregon Coast.
Skills training and prep for college and career.
That's my Easter Seals.
Make it yours.
Join us at Easterseals.com.
The Bill Meyers Show is on. News Talk 1063 KMED. Join us at Easterseals.com. Hill is. And like I said, I'm not doubting that there are issues with cell phone radiation. I know that there have been enough studies, generally speaking,
done outside the United States. The United States has tended to be a laydown
a bit for the cell industry, in my opinion. And yes, I have a
cell phone, so I mean I use it too. But that being said, I don't know. Granny
ends up writing me this morning,
Bill, I used to carry my 911 flip phone in my pocket. My hip began to be painful.
Turning over in bed was painful. Getting in and out of the car was painful.
Began walking bent over because straightening up was painful. This all
stopped once I left the phone at home. Hip hasn't hurt since. I guess it was all
my imagination. All right, thank you for that.
Carrie on the other hand is, now I know Kerry works in the electronics world. He says, Bill,
this product, Corey's product is complete BS. Sorry, you can't change the law of physics just
because someone thinks you can. It only works if you can actually prove it. Nope, he has not
presented any proof. All right, Kerry. I appreciate the call and the email bill at BillMeyersShow.com.
Emails of the day sponsored by Dr. Steve Nelson,
Central Point Family Dentistry,
CentralPointFamilyDentistry.com.
It's on Freeman Way in Central Point.
And good people.
And if you're looking for a crown, boy, great place.
I had one replaced the other day
and it took me 30, 45 minutes, I think.
And about a half hour hour it was just the the
lab grinding up they have it right there made the tooth fit perfect boom I'm a
happy camper okay let me go to Vicki hey Vicki you wanted to talk about the the
cell phone call I had there with Cory go ahead yeah you know I don't have a cell
cell service at my house or internet or any of that.
So I think we're already pretty protected by not even having that at the house.
But when my husband started his business about 17 years ago, he's a contractor, he had to
get a cell phone obviously so he could get phone calls for call jobs. And within, I would say, probably about eight months of having a cell phone constantly with
him.
And we normally, we never, when we use our cell phone, we don't put it up to our ear.
We don't have Bluetooth.
We don't put it in our back pocket. But when he started having it for about eight months, he started feeling sick, like very
irritable, just not feeling well, very like stressed.
So after about eight months, he turned his off.
He left mine on for emergencies or so we can use it in town or in Ruche.
But he, like Corey was saying, within a matter of days, he felt so much better.
And I've noticed that a lot of people that are on their cell phones or have their Bluetooth are very preoccupied,
they're not like present and... Well, you know, a lot of that could just be just be
the interruptions of that. I don't understand this focus on the Bluetooth.
You know, you stick, you know, you stick the 2.5 GHz transmitter in your ear.
I don't quite get that.
I really don't.
I've not gone down that route for some reason.
That seems dangerous.
And I see so many people from little girls to older women that have their cell phones
in their back pocket.
Well, it used to be guys would always like the Bluetooth thing in their head because
it made them look important when they walked into the restaurant.
That kind of thing.
Right.
And as far as Cory's chip, I know that when we live out being out here with limited cell
service, you can purchase a chip that will extend your service. So it makes me think that there is a possibility,
if they can extend your service
where you wouldn't normally have service,
that they could make something that would protect you
from these radiation, just like...
Yeah, but it just seems to me
that anything that would protect you from the radiation
would also protect the cell phone
from actually communicating with the other radiation
that it needs to work. But all right,
we'll agree to disagree on that one, okay? Thank you for the story there, Vicki.
I'll go next. Hi, good morning. This is Bill. Who's this? Hello? Good morning, Bill.
Hi, Tom. How are you? Welcome. All right. Yeah, I've been examining this issue for
the last 15-20 years. I was thinking about you when I was talking with Corey. Yeah, and it's very interesting. I don't either not having
his product to products, I guess, to examine and so forth. I don't either
refute them or endorse them. But what you tend to try to do when you go out
and survey places is to reduce the radiation, isn't that right? Well, yeah,
certainly in a house there's a lot of things you could do. You can get ethernet
cables instead of having a wireless router and so forth. Yeah, I advocate that and so forth. There are literally hundreds of
organizations or groups or people coming out with a product that says you do this or you
attach it to your cell phone and neutralize it. So, the bad stuff.
That's where I tend to draw the line that doesn't make sense as far as physics go and
the laws of electronics and radiation.
But I could be wrong.
But I use something called applied kinesiology or muscle testing.
I think Corey mentioned that.
And I've used that through the years to evaluate people's electrical energy body, if you will.
It's kind of an interface between acupuncture and chiropractic, and you can evaluate a lot
of the electrical activity of the human body and find out what's going on where.
And I have several incidences where people I'd test put their cell phone on their belly and
then do a little muscle testing and then work with various chips and so forth.
I have seen a couple where the chips seem to change the strength of the arm and so forth
where they're to the positive where it was where it was okay. Normally you put a cell phone on somebody's stomach and then
blows out their whole electrical muscular system. That's a pretty big claim.
Wow. Well I do it you know I see it all the time constantly. I mean the other
thing that I'm seeing with the EMS and forth, I used to find a weak spleen
maybe two or three times a year.
Now I find it many times a month where someone's spleen.
The spleen is the part where the body recycles red blood cells and so forth.
It seems that the EMF particularly hits the functioning of the spleen energy.
And it's only theoretical on my part that the proliferation of all this microwave radiation
we're getting from multiple sources all the time is particularly affecting the spleen
and part of your immune system and so forth.
All right. Tom, thank you for your call. I know you've talked about this issue off
and on for years and I appreciate your opinion there. I kind of have doubts about a trip,
but we'll see. Seven minutes after seven, hi, who's this? Good morning.
This is not so crazy.
This is right down your alley, isn't it?
Yeah, it is. Watch out. But yeah, I would just call on a God said, let there be light.
The fact that he said that, he vocalized something which caused a vibration. I say we're stepping on
God's toes by vibrating all this stuff around and not at ourselves.
That's an interesting point of view on that one, Gene. You're a great clean-up batter on this one. Thanks for the call.
KMED, KMED HD1, Eagle Point Medford, KBXG, Grants Pass.
Professor Alan Sanders joins me here in just a few minutes, and we're going to have an
interesting talk about what is next for the Epstein files and various other issues that
Trump is releasing.
Trump administration released Martin Luther King Jr. files to this morning too.
