Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Biden Impeachment Inquiry, the President's 9/11 Claim, California's Trans Battle, Guest Riley Gaines, the Aaron Rodgers Lesson, & More
Episode Date: September 13, 2023Hey BillOReilly.com Premium and Concierge Members, welcome to the No Spin News for Tuesday, September 12, 2023. Stand Up for Your Country.Tonight's rundown: Talking Points Memo: Bill breaks down Ke...vin McCarthy's announcement launching an impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden. President Biden claims he was at Ground Zero the day after the September 11 attacks. California schools are revolting against the state over informing parents whether their child is transitioning into another gender. Former college swimmer and activist Riley Gaines joins the No Spin News. Bill on the lesson that can be learned from Aaron Rodger's tragic injury. This Day in History: Joe Biden's Plagiarism. Final Thought: Bill's near-death experience. In Case You Missed It: Read Bill's latest column, "The Sting." Get tickets to Bill and Sid Rosenberg's live show this October: "A New York State of Mind" at The Paramount in Huntington, NY. They are on sale NOW! Fall Madness is here! Go to BillOReilly.com to take advantage of the latest deal, including Killing the Killers, Killing the Legends, and mug, all for $42.95. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey, Bill O'Reilly here, welcome to the No Spin News, Tuesday, September 12, 2023, stand up for your country.
Well, once again, I feel like an Oracle, and you know, it's not that complicated, but when I do predict
something and it comes true, I want you to know about it. So you'll know why you're investing
your time to watch and listen to this program. So last week I told you that September, October
into November, autumn, not going to be kind to President Biden. And today, one hammer dropped.
That is the subject of this evening's talking points memo. The House of Representatives leader,
Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy, has endorsed an impeachment inquiry.
Now, what does that mean?
Okay.
An impeachment inquiry is simply an investigation into charges of, quote, high crimes and misdemeanors.
That's in the Constitution that might lead to a full-blown impeachment.
No, it's an investigation, okay?
So the Republicans in the House believe that Joe Biden did something impeachable with his son and brother in the financial area.
Okay, you all know this.
There are three committees investigating because the Justice Department will not.
Very important.
So the FBI is not involved as far as we know, Attorney General Merrick Garland wants.
It's no part of it, so it's a partisan investigation.
But if the Republicans didn't do it, nobody would.
So the three committees are House Oversight, House Judiciary, House Ways and Means.
There will be a full House vote, McCarthy has suggested, on whether this inquiry should take place.
You may remember Nancy Pelosi did not have a vote.
She just said, we're going to have an impeachment of Donald Trump, and it happened twice.
Because back then, the Democrats controlled the House.
Now, the Republicans have 10 more seats than the Democrats, so they control the House.
But Pelosi didn't put up to a vote.
She just said, we're doing it.
McCarthy a little shrewder than that.
He's going to have the House vote on whether this inquiry should move forward.
And I can't imagine one Republican in the House of Representatives not voting.
for that no democrats will i don't believe one democrat will because the democratic part does not
care what joe biden did as vice president or even as president they don't care they want to retain
power okay so here's what kevin mccarthy said today go through our investigations we have found
that president biden did lie to american people about his own knowledge of his family's foreign
business dealings.
Eyewitnesses have testified that the president joined on multiple phone calls and had multiple
interactions.
Dinners resulted in cars and millions of dollars into his sons and his son's business
partners.
We know that bank records show that nearly $20 million in payments were directed to the Biden
family members and associates.
through various shale companies.
That's why today, I am directing our House committee
to open a formal impeachment inquiry
into President Joe Biden.
This logical next step will give our committees
the full power to gather all the facts
and answers for the American public.
Now, the key there is full power
because in an impeachment inquiry,
the House then has subpoena power,
and a lot of other things it does not have now.
So in our history, there have been four presidents subjected to this.
Andrew Johnson, the guy after Abraham Lincoln, he escaped being convicted by one vote.
Richard Nixon, he resigned.
Bill Clinton beat impeachment, and Donald Trump beat it twice.
That's it.
So no mention of Joe Biden's border situation where he has ignored immigration law.
And I mixed feelings about that.
You know, I don't know what the House committees have on Biden actually getting gratuities from his family.
The grift is a parent.
All right.
He did it.
He enabled his family to make between $20 and $30 million from foreign countries make to get.
Get is a better word.
They didn't do anything for the money.
but whether Biden himself got gratuities, got direct financial assistance somehow, that has not been proven.
Okay, so, and that's a smoking gun.
I hate to use a cliche, but there it is.
And to speculate about it, you know, it's a waste of your time and my time.
So in the face of this, Joe Biden now is on the defensive, obviously.
Okay. So the media will downplay it if you watch cable news, and I don't know why you ever would,
two of the cable networks will diminish this is foolish, this is this, this is that,
and one will say he's guilty, guilty, guilty. Actually, if you count newsmax, it'll be two.
So it's kind of divided equally, but not really. Anyway, and then the print press, New York Times,
Washington Post, LA Times, USA Today, all of that, oh no, oh no, oh no.
protect, protect Biden, protect Biden, protect Biden, protect Biden.
So I don't know why you want to drive yourself crazy watching either or.
We'll tell you the truth here.
Now, the pros for the Republicans are two.
Okay?
It will get more facts on the table about then-Vice President Biden's behavior.
It will.
Because they'll be able to speak in bank records.
They'll be able to bring people in to testify on oath.
and this will go on for a while.
And because it'll go on for a while,
it then takes some of the heat off the Trump prosecutions.
Now, you'll see tonight on television,
even on the network news,
they'll veer away from this Biden stuff into Trump
almost immediately.
Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump.
We've been seeing that for what?
Now, two and a half years, that's what they'll do it again.
But it does take the Biden stuff, some of the heat off Trump.
Okay, that's the pros.
The cons are it might make Joe Biden appear to be a victim.
Just as Donald Trump's poll numbers have gone up
when the Justice Department and the two locals, New York and Atlanta,
have gone after him, this might do the same for Biden.
Because independent Americans are going, okay, what do you got?
And if you don't have it, that he took a gratuity, then they might feel sorry for it and
Biden's numbers might go up.
It's very possible.
So those are the pros and the cons.
Summon this up.
It has to be done.
It has to be done for the betterment of the republic.
You can't have all of this money.
You know, $30 billion.
a lot of money. You just can't have it pouring into the family of a vice president and not know
everything about it. You just cannot. The Democratic Party should be ashamed of itself because
they don't care. If you have that level of influence peddling and you don't care, you don't
love your country. You love yourself and your party and your ideology, but you do not love your
country. If this were a Republican, I want to know every single grift, everything about it,
because I'm a historian, and there have been some corrupt presidents. But this is big. When you look
back at history, this is big. That kind of money, 30 million? Because that's what I think the number
is going to come in to be in the end. You count up the cars, the this, that, the perks. And Biden,
knew. He knew. Had to know. And that's a memo. Hey, I'm Caitlin Becker, the host of the New York
Postcast, and I've got exactly what you need to start your weekdays. Every morning, I'll bring
you the stories that matter, plus the news people actually talk about, the juicy details in the
world's politics, business, pop culture, and everything in between. It's what you want from the New York
Post wrapped up in one snappy show. Ask your smart speaker to play the NY Postcast podcast. Listen and
subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey, it's Sean Spicer from the Sean Spicer Show podcast, reminding you to turn into my show
every day to get your daily dose inside the world of politics. President Trump and his team
are shaking up Washington like never before, and we're here to cover it from all sides, especially
on the topics the mainstream media won't. So if you're a political junkie on a late lunch
or getting ready for the drive home.
New episodes of the Sean Spicer Show podcast drop at 2 p.m. East Coast every day.
Make sure you tune in.
You can find us at Apple Podcast, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast.
All right.
He got back.
The president did at 1235 Eastern Time this morning, Tuesday morning.
So he didn't have anything today.
He's taking a nap.
I take a nap too.
It's a long trip back from Vietnam, even though he stopped in Alaska.
And, of course, when he stopped in Alaska, he made remarks about 9-11, which were dubious.
Roll the tape.
Each of those precious lives stole one too soon when evil attacked.
Browns are in New York.
And I remember standing there the next day and looking at the building.
I felt like I was looking through the gates of hell.
It looked so devastating because the way you could, from where you could stand.
Okay, I remember being there the next day looking at the building, but he wasn't there the next day.
He wasn't in New York City on September 12.
Okay?
So he doesn't always talking about.
Literally does not know what he's saying.
Words come out of his mouth, but he doesn't know.
So we traced it, and the earliest we can find,
that then-Senator Joe Biden came to New York City
was on the 20th of September,
nine days after the attack.
We can't find any record.
Seasman did an investigation.
New York One did an investigation.
So Biden, again, isn't telling the truth.
All right?
But he doesn't know he's not telling the truth.
He didn't go out there and tell his age,
hey, I'm going to lie in the speech about 9-11.
That isn't know what he's saying.
saying. I said on a radio program this morning, how can any American vote for a person who does
not know what they are saying? I mean, it's just insane, and I mean that word literally.
All right. In California, there is a revolt against the state. Okay, so six school districts led by
Chino Valley, which is a suburb of Los Angeles, have now passed resolutions that say
if a child in a California school district, there's six of them, tries to change his or her
gender by using different locker rooms, different bathrooms, different names, whatever it may
be. Parents have to be alerted. Very simple. So six districts in
California passed it. The Attorney General there, Rob Bonta, crazy left progressive, has sued
the Chino Valley District, and a judge, Thomas Garza, has temporarily suspended the order
to tell the parents. Now, all of this, when it gets into the federal courts, is going to,
the parents have a right to know what their children are doing in public schools.
that's what it comes down to.
And so all it is going to be thrown out.
But the progressives hate this.
Why do they hate this so much?
Why do they want to erode parental authority?
I spoke about it on News Nation last night.
Go.
So now we have the secular progressives almost solely driving this.
Independent, conservative Americans, they don't want any part of this.
And if you understand the societies in,
the Soviet Union and Red China, Cuba, they want the state to have the ultimate authority
over children, not the parents. Stalin and Mao encourage students to inform on their parents,
to tell the government their parents were dissenters or whatever. So that's what's happening
in America. You've got the progressive left that doesn't trust particularly traditional
parents to raise their kids, and they're using this LGBT.
trend in school to try to give more power to the school and less to the parents.
That's exactly what's happening.
By the way, I'll be on News Nation tonight with Cuomo talking about the impeachment inquiry
about Joe Biden.
So we looked around for a guest to try to put this gender stuff into some kind of
perspective, and we don't want ideologues, okay?
we don't we don't do that here it's just boring and one of the problems with cable news is
when you turn on a certain show you know what the guests are going to already say and the
host is already going to say and we don't want that so we selected a young woman of
distinction named Riley Gaines you have heard the name she was on the University of
Kentucky swim team nominated she was actually the diving scholar athlete of the year
in 2022, and she objects to competing against people born male. And she joins us now. She's the
director of the Riley Gaines Center at the Leadership Institute. So do you disagree with my analysis
of why this gender thing is suddenly exploded in this country? No, you're entirely
correct. As you mentioned, look at China, look at Russia, look at Germany, Cuba, Venezuela, Brazil, North Korea. It's the exact same tactics. Have a conversation with people who have fleed those countries and see what they say. See what they say about where we're at. About the changing of the language that we use. As you said, and I think it's been pretty apparent. We have a Biden appointee, Rachel Levine, who now refers to women as egg producers because a parent.
women is way too controversial. So if you look at all the different pieces, let's lay them out.
The changing of the language, the denying of objective truth, biological reality, the silencing,
which I know firsthand, because I was silenced. Really, we were emotionally blackmailed.
I think the best were to describe the silencing that we as female athletes face in regards to keeping us
quiet about not wanting to participate against men, the best way to describe it is criminal.
Okay, let me, let me, I want to, I want to refresh people's memories about your story.
How long ago was it when you first competed against someone who was born a male in the pool?
How long ago?
It was in March of 2022, so about a year and a half ago.
So that's recent, all right?
So when you saw that happen, you brought it your objection to the attention of whom?
I made it pretty public.
All season, I talked amongst my teammates and my coaches and my parents and my competitors.
And we all agreed.
We were all on the same page, yet we were kind of whispering about it.
We were kind of walking on eggshells talking about it.
And so after really directly facing the injustice at that national championships, competing against Leah Thomas, who let me just say, a six-foot-four fully intact man, who we were also forced to undress in front of, who competed three years on the men's team at University of Pennsylvania, ranking 462nd at best, and then, of course, to no one's surprise, winning a national title when competing against the women, after we tied Thomas and I.
We had tied at this meet, and we go behind the awards podium, and the official looks at both Thomas and myself, and says, great job, but you guys tied.
And we only have one trophy, so we're going to give this trophy to Leah.
And, of course, there was a lot of feelings, but when I asked the question that no one dared ask all season of why, you know, I know we tied, I know we don't necessarily account for ties, but why are you giving this trophy to Thomas?
the official looked at me and said, well, we've been advised when pictures are being taken, Leah has to have the trophy.
Okay, but who was behind?
Who do you think, Ms. Gaines, was behind all of this?
There had to be, look, it never happened when I was competing in college athletics.
It just never happened until a short time ago in history, maybe two or three years ago.
Who is behind all this?
I don't know if it's as much as a who as it is a what.
What I think is behind all this.
I think, of course, because it's not limited to just one who.
Of course, the NCAA was the culprit here.
But it's so much bigger than that.
It's corporate America.
It's media.
It's churches.
It's academia.
It's extended far beyond the who.
But I think the what, why this is happening, is they're following the money.
um these these large governing bodies and again corporations they don't follow red or blue they follow green um the esg scores federal funding all of these different things people are terrified of losing that so they'll throw their moral compass entirely out of the window and i know these people know this is wrong because they've admitted it even the president of the NCAA himself publicly he released the statement saying and i remember it word for word because i find it comical he said i unequivocally stand in my decision to allow lee
Thomas to swim with the women because it's based in evolving science.
But privately, Mark Emerd, who has now stepped down, has the audacity to tell me to keep going and
keep fighting, keep pushing. These men, and I say men, because most of these people in these
positions are men, but it's not limited to just men. They're cowards. They are spineless and they
have no backbone. And ultimately, it's gotten to the point where we as women have become
collateral damage in the process.
All right. I think you're right about that.
I think there's another tailwind on it that the politically correct atmosphere on most college
campuses, and you were competing at the college level, is far left.
And so any kind of politically correct virtue seeking, got to give the trans people,
everything or whatever, that's going to take deep root.
Final question, and you're a young woman, and once again, I want to promote Riley Gaines Center at the Leadership Institute.
You can get it at Riley Gaines Center, one word, dot org.
Now it's filtered down to the children.
Now seven or eight-year-old kids who may be unhappy or getting bullied or whatever go, well, I don't want to be a girl, I want to be a boy.
I mean, which is insane.
But kids will do that when they hear and see all of this.
kind of crazy stuff. Do you see this as a real danger?
I certainly do think it's a real danger, not even necessarily because of what it is,
because we're denying truth. And as you mentioned in your intro, which you said off camera
might bore me. I think it's incredibly interesting. That's a pretty chilling thought.
When we start to deny objective truth, it's pretty Orwellian, actually.
It's as if they're trying to make us say 2 plus 2 is 5.
And we know 2 plus 2 is not 5, but so many people are adhering.
And keep in mind, this is the most basic of truth, man and woman, boy and girl, mother and father, male versus female.
It's the most basic of truth.
It's the essence of humanity.
It's how we're all here.
And they're asking us to deny that.
They themselves are denying it.
The people leading this country.
You haven't seen anything yet.
Wait a little this AI stuff comes in.
Oh, whoa.
Well, we wish you the best, Miss Gaines.
Thank you very much for speaking out and being courageous and putting your point in front of the nation.
And we appreciate you helping us out tonight.
So let's get back to The World, U.S. News and World Report, ranked the best and worst countries we told you about earlier.
And by the way, if you are a bill o'Reilly.com premium or concy urge member, you get transcripts of everything we do.
and you can see everything we do at any time you want.
Okay?
And the transcripts are free.
So there's an unbelievable deal for you.
So anyway, people from 36 countries were polled by U.S. News and World Report.
And they were asked, who's the most dangerous country in the world?
The danger to the world.
72% say Russia is the biggest threat.
66% China, 50% the USA.
Now, the 50% that think the USA is a danger to the world, got to be the socialist cruise.
Got to be that.
It's not the migrants, millions of people trying to sneak in here.
They're not saying that, right?
Okay.
So when people go, oh, look, 50% think America is the biggest danger.
It's one mentality.
And that mentality is all over the world.
Is Russia a bigger threat to the world than China?
No. China is the biggest threat because it is far more powerful than Russia.
Russia can't even defeat Ukraine.
Okay? So there you go.
Talking about Putin, Kim Jong-un, the North Korean dictator, a total crazy guy.
He left North Korea for the first time in three years because he's afraid of COVID,
and he's meeting with Putin in Vladabakhstok.
I think that's where they are.
Kim left Yongyang in an armored train.
And they're going to commiserate about nukes or something.
I don't know what they're doing, but it just shows you Putin.
Oh, my God.
Power, politics, and the people behind the headlines.
I'm Miranda Devine.
columnist and the host of the brand new podcast, Podforce One.
Every week I'll sit down for candid conversations with Washington's most powerful disruptors,
lawmakers, newsmakers and even the president of the United States.
These are the leaders shaping the future of America and the world.
Listen to Podforce One with me, Miranda Devine, every week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever
you get your podcast. You don't want to miss an episode. Smart life. All right. Here is I think the most
important story of the day for you personally. Okay. Obviously the Biden impeachment inquiry is
the most important story of the day, but for you, smart life. So there is a football player
named Aaron Rogers. The New York Jets hired him for about $40 million a year.
a two-year contract, and he is a Hall of Fame quarterback.
In four snaps last night here in New York,
Rogers is injured and out for the season,
ruptured as Achilles heel.
Now, this is a disaster of epic proportions for the New York Jets,
the National Football League, and all of that.
And it was so stunning, the people, I was watching the guy, I just couldn't believe it.
Now, it's not about sports, not about sport.
I'm sitting there going, all the hype and all the money, and all the stuff, and four plays, he's done.
Not only for the season, but maybe for his career, the man is 38 years old.
Okay?
So, I'm saying, when, and then, you know, the sports guys, blah, blah, blah, that's not important.
What is important is that no matter how wealthy you are,
no matter how powerful or skilled you are,
disaster could hit you at any time.
Any time, bang, right out of nowhere.
Alan Rogers did not ever think that he was going to be on the ground
and his season ruined, okay, after four plays.
So how do you prepare for that?
Most people don't.
They don't want to think about it, okay?
because it is pretty harrowing.
You prepare for it by mentally strong.
So there's another Rogers can do about his Achilles.
Whether he tries to come back or not, I don't know,
but it would be a long, hard road for him.
But psychologically, you've got to accept disaster
because there's nothing you can do about it.
So tomorrow, if you're not feeling well,
you go to the doctor, and doctor says,
you have pancreatic cancer, you're going to have to accept it.
And it could happen, all right?
Just like a car accident could wipe you off the face of the earth.
So once you train yourself, no matter how big or even small the disaster is, disasters or disasters, your house burns down, whatever it may be, then you take a deep breath, all right, and then you figure out how to get up.
if you don't and most i would say most people don't a disaster you wipe them out so they turn to
drugs or alcohol they lash out of people who aren't responsible they become psychological
basket cases because of the disasters okay but if you train yourself i said that to my son today
he's a young man and got tremendous future it's it and he's a
a big New York Jets fan. I said, this is the lesson. So we are not guaranteed safety or security
or success in this life. The only person I know who has not been the victim of a disaster is my
mother. And maybe having me was the disaster. But my mother didn't have to go through it.
Now, she was a saint and so kind and everybody loved her. Maybe that saved her.
But certainly my father, disaster befeld him, and everybody, pretty much everybody I know,
have had some kind of disasters in their lives.
Some of them rise up, and some of them don't.
So you want to prepare yourself and hiding in your house and, you know, trying to regulate the world is never going to work.
You've got to live your life.
It's another lesson I said.
I said, look, this stuff happens.
And if it ever happens to you and we pray it doesn't happen, all right, then you just regroup and rise up.
That's the only thing you can do.
So that's the smart live commentary on this.
I feel bad for Woody Johnson is a good guy who is the ambassador to the Court of St. James, Great Britain, under Trump.
He owns the Jets.
And this guy has tried everything to make this team successful.
And he invested all of this money and all of this built the whole team around him.
And then boom, he's gone.
And you go, oh, geez.
But what do you'll pop back?
All right?
And I hope this never happens to you.
I really do.
But if it does, remember this commentary.
Pull back, regroup, rise up.
This day in history, September 12, 1987, reports surface that presidential candidate, Joe Biden,
plagiarized a speech by British labor leader Neil Kenock.
36 years ago, there's Kenock.
So Biden's on a campaign trail, and he wants to run against Bush, the elder.
Okay?
and he plagiarizes Kinnock's speech.
And then people start looking back.
So in 1965, first year at Syracuse University,
Biden submitted a paper and plagiarized five pages of it
from a article in the Fordham Law Review.
And then in 1987, okay, in a speech in California,
he stole words from Robert Kennedy.
And then in 1987, again, he stole words from JFK.
Now, in the 1987 plagiarism thing, so it was three plagiarisms in 87, was on a campaign trail,
the Democratic Party panicked, and they told Biden, you're out, you can't run,
and you can't even come to the Democratic convention, can't come.
And do you remember who was nominated?
Michael Dukakis, Massachusetts Governor.
K, Bush the Olu, wiped him out, 426 electoral votes to 1-11.
So Joe Biden in the news, 36 years ago today.
Good mail segment and a final thought.
I almost got run over by a car.
What do you hear this?
Back in a moment.
Okay, here is the male, Dan Don Goodwin, Sarasota, Florida. Any thoughts on Chuck Todd in his career? I don't watch NBC, but I'm interested in your opinion because of the great Tim Russert. You know, I usually don't answer questions like this, Don, but I will tonight. So Tim Russert was a legendary journalist, good guy, and drove meet the press to its highest esteem ever.
Russard very well, was on the program, we had a good relationship.
Russell was a liberal, but he wasn't crazy left.
So then Chuck Todd took over from Russer.
Now, Russard was a liberal, but did not impose his liberalism on his audience.
Todd is a liberal, but did.
Okay, by leaving stuff out, by skewing his presentation.
So I'm glad Todd has gone.
I like people who do their job the way it should be done.
Okay, Linda, illegal migrants all over this country is by design.
All right, you're correct.
Wouldn't be happening if Donald Trump were in the Oval Office.
Wouldn't.
The remain in Mexico policy would still be in place.
So the Democrats win.
First day on the job, Joe Biden strips all of that Trump's.
stuff out and opens the border and here we are. So you're absolutely like. Jan Cubist
concierge member, we hope you'll check that out. It will enhance your life. It's an insurance
policy for disasters. That happens to you. Tell me about it. I'll try to give you
some guidance. Leftists like Chuck Schumer are not interested in solving problems for Americans.
They're interested in power buying votes and dismaling America's
customs traditions, exceptionalism, freedoms, and individual liberties. I wouldn't put Schumer in that
category. He's not Ocasio Cortez or Bernie Sanders. All right. But you're right in your first
paragraph. It's all about Chuck. Not about the USA. Not about Brooklyn where Chuck's from.
by Chuck, Chuck getting more power, Chuck playing the Democratic machine game.
Elena, I have a comment on the 9-11 charities because as a member who lived most of my life on Long Island, it hits close to home.
You make me feel proud, Bill, that you step forward and helped retrieve the monies due to the families of 9-11.
I totally understand how difficult it is to get over how George Clem.
Clooney attacked you verbally, and I also would have a difficult time letting it go.
However, you won and can be proud of your accomplishments with regard to the survivors of 9-11.
I really appreciate that note.
That's a very, very nice note.
And I think it is a character flaw that I don't let it go with Clooney.
But every time I see the man, I just, you know what Irish Alzheimer's is, right?
the guy
forgets everything but degrudges.
It's an old joke.
Apropos to me,
Georgia Christensen, Anaconda, Montana,
why can't the Supreme Court step in to close the board?
It does not have any power on policy.
The Supreme Court only rules
whether laws are constitutional or not.
It is not proactive.
It does not take any role
in formulating policy.
Eliza Owens,
Forest City, North Carolina,
you have been my favorite commentator for years.
I'm 72 years old.
Your honesty and fairness and reporting,
you've proven record of looking out for the folks,
and your current dismay are among the surest
indicators of the sad demise of our cherished nation.
Yeah, but it cycles.
Everybody asked me this.
It cycles, okay?
Abraham Lincoln was the best president ever.
The guy after him,
Andrew Johnson, boop, bang, okay? Up, down. I still have confidence that we will remain the country
with the most opportunity in the world. I'm going to not give you the name and town of this
person because I don't want to embarrass them. The question is, should a 10-year-old be reading
killing the witches? So killing the witches out in two weeks, two weeks from
today? No. The answer is no. Maybe 13 if the urchin is perspicacious, which means beyond his
years and wisdom or her years. But killing the witch is scary book. Ten-year-olds, no.
Now, we had to really describe what happened in Salem. And what happened there is
almost beyond belief. But it happened in America. And then the ramifications of that up to the
present day is the rest of the book. So we get into the history of the witches. We open in Scotland,
an unbelievable scene, put you on a Mayflower, Puritans come over here, some of them emigrate
to Salem, and then 20 human beings are executed. I mean, when you read this, every page you're going to
go, holy you know what. But it's all true. Unbelievable Halloween book. I mean, you want
boogie stuff. And the last part of the book is about the movie The Exorcist. And what went on
on that set? I mean, I'm reading this thing going, whoa, and it's all documented. We document
every single thing. So 10-year-olds know, 13 would be the minimum, and they'd have to be a
bright person. You know, I think 15 and up probably. And then some people shouldn't read it at
all. If you're a real sensitive person, it's an explicit book. Okay, which is out, again,
September 26th, Bill O'Reilly.com. We've become a premium or a concierge member. Get the book
free. Amazon, Barnes & Noble, all of that, you know the drill. And we have a great fall madness bundle,
killing the legends, killing the killers, which we talked about yesterday, about 9-11, and how we got
those people. Any mug of your choice, the mugs are great, made in America, 4295, great deal.
And then we have, I'll be at live, doing a live show on October 27, kicking off Halloween weekend,
Huntington Theater, sorry, Paramount Theater in Huntington, New York, Bill O'Reilly.com, ticket,
right to the theater. It is going to be a very funny but meaningful program. So it's a good time
to be on Long Island, leaves a changing, go up to see Teddy Roosevelt's house on Sagamore Hill,
it's right nearby. You have a good time. Do not be virulent. Word of the day, V-I-R-U, L-E-N-T.
No. Okay, final thought. I almost got killed yesterday. Back in a moment. All right,
there is a final thought of the day. So I'm walking down to sidewalk in my.
town on Long Island, right? And a woman backs out, big SUV, and this close, talk about sudden
disasters, and I jump back, I still have my hockey goalie reflexes, I couldn't believe it. Okay,
number one, she's illegally parked. Number two, I'm on the sidewalk. And so I go, hey,
what are you doing? And she got the big screen, you know, you don't even have to turn your head
need more to look back. You'll look at the screen. The screen's got you covered.
You didn't bother doing that. And I said, what are you doing? You know,
what she says? You know what she says? God's honest truth. You should have seen my taillights
go on. What? So this is a narcissist. Right away, I knew it. So the definition of a
narcissist is a person who is extremely self-centered with an exaggerated sense of
self-important.
Okay.
But here's a better definition of a narcissist.
Someone who never admits a mistake under any circumstances, it's all somebody else's
fault.
So immediately I knew that this woman, mid to late late,
30s, urchin in the back seat. So I tempered it. I should have seen the taillights. I'm walking
on the sidewalk. You're illegally parked. No. No, I'm the problem. If I had been hit by her
and had two broken legs in the hospital, it would have been my fault. Not hers. No. How many
people you know like that. Come on, be honest. How many people do you know who will never
admit a mistake? Run. I hope you're not married to one. Thank you for watching and
listening on the radio to the No Spin News. We'll see you again tomorrow.