Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Biden's Raid Role, FBI Insight, Trump Deposed in NYC, DHS Ending 'Remain In Mexico,' & More

Episode Date: August 11, 2022

Tonight's rundown: Bill breaks down how President Biden fits into the FBI's raid of Donald Trump's Florida home Former FBI special agent Stuart Kaplan joins Bill to discuss the Bureau's actions Former President Trump was deposed in New York City today The Department of Homeland Security is ending the 'Remain In Mexico' policy This Day in History: President Ronald Reagan sign Civil Liberties Act Final Thought: Hillary Clinton's Hat - The Height of Arrogance In Case You Missed It: Read Bill's latest column, The Unholy Alliance. Get a BillOReilly.com Premium Membership today and get "Killing the Killers" free! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hey, Bill O'Reilly here. Welcome to the No Spin News for Wednesday, August 10th, 2022, stand up for your country. Well, we had a huge crowd last night watching and listening to the No Spin News. It's still going on. If you're not a member of concierge or a premium. member of Bill O'Reilly.com, you can watch that anytime you want. Now, now a lot of you across the country are listening on the radio. That's a 9 to 10 or whatever it may be, time. And then on television with our distribution all over the world, that's a set time. But if you go to

Bill O'Reilly.com, and you can watch us anytime. And again, a lot of people watching last night. And I think it's because that we analyze this Trump thing very precisely. So if you watch The Net and Cable News, you get a lot of speculation, you get a lot of very impassioned opinion. Nothing wrong with impassioned opinion. But speculation, conspiracy theories, all that, no, we don't do that here. So tonight we're going to top what we did last night because I know more. And I'm going to know more tomorrow because I'm talking to some people who were there at the rate. I don't believe I'm going to be able to tell you who they are. I might be, but I am assembling as much

information, accurate information as I can't. Because this is, as I said yesterday, an unbelievably important story for every American. It really comes down right now to Biden versus Trump. And that is the subject of this evening's talking points memo. So President Biden says he did not know about this raid. And that's probably true, as we explained yesterday, because there's the Justice Department would give him cover, but he knew in general he had to know President Biden if he can retain information at all, and that's, you know, a legitimate if. You had to know that the Justice Department of Grand Jury is looking into Donald Trump as far as removing documents that he should not have removed. So Biden had to know that, all right? But did he know about the precise

rate and all of that? Probably not. Now, Donald Trump He's making it real personal as far as Biden is concerned. Here's what he said. Quote, Biden knew all about this, just like he knew all about Hunter's deals, unquote. Okay. So a lot of people agree with Donald Trump. And maybe Donald Trump is right.

Maybe I'm wrong. But again, let's delineate it. he didn't necessarily know about the timing of the raid, but he did know about the Justice Department looking into the allegation that Trump removed documents he should not have removed. But that's not the big story. Okay, I'm going to get to the big story. So after Trump accused Biden of knowing all about it and orchestrating it, then of course, the Biden team had to respond.

So you know the White House spokesperson Corinne Jean-Pierre is very, very weak. all right and here's the first question yesterday go it is the White House if the president believe would be helpful both domestically and single-med sense abroad or the Department of Justice to be more open about the reasons for that search warrant the underlying evidence again this is not something I'm going to comment on today or from here at all this goes to the Department of Justice and that's where I refer you to absurd insulting it's insulting it's insulting Joe Biden's the leader of the country.

Okay? Does he want transparency here or not? I mean, this is ridiculous. It's ridiculous. It's stonewalling. I'm not going to talk about it. It's the biggest story, lady in the country, it affects every American, and you're not going to talk about it? Roll the second clip.

Former Vice President Pence called on the Attorney General to provide a full accounting of the FBI search. at Marlago, is that something the White House would support? I'm not going to comment on the department. I'm not going to comment on this. It's going to, I'd refer you to the Department of Justice. And have the president spoken with the attorney general today? I'm just not going to speak further on any, any conversations. Outrageous.

It's an absolute outrage. Okay? So now, yesterday initially, Donald Trump was embarrassed, but now the needle is going back. That's embarrassing. She is an embarrassment to Joe Biden. You just can't dodge everything in a story this big. That affects everybody. But she is.

Now, we did a little investigating on the judge. You signed off in a warrant. We don't know what was in the warrant. Okay? It was sealed. I'm trying to find out, but I don't know yet. I do know about Judge Bruce Reinhart, okay? So he signed it. I believe they judge shopped. Okay, that means the FBI and the Justice Department looked for a judge they knew would sign this for

whatever reason. So Reinhart, he donated $1,000 to President Obama's campaign. and 1,000 to his victory fund. You also donated $500 to Jeb Bush in 2016 when Bush was running for president. But here's the headline on Reinhart. He was tied in with Jeffrey Epstein. He was not a judge at the time. He was a defense counsel, and he represented some employees of Epstein. Now, that's not necessarily a negative. Everybody deserves representation. But he was roundly criticized for his deportment in the Epstein case. Leading up to that, Reinhart spent more than 11 years as an assistant U.S. attorney, so he knows a lot of people in the Justice Department. Trump's lawyer, Christine Rob, Bob, B-O-B-B, was on the scene.

A lot of people say, and I'm going to get to this in a minute, she was denied access to what the FBI were doing. She couldn't go in and watch them. I don't want to say anything about that until I get the facts, but we're going to have it for you. All right? according to the Trump people themselves, they were given a heads up that this raid would take place. So we told you that yesterday. So now it's all on Merrick Garland. Biden, and we'll tell you a minute, he's out of there. He's on vacation now. Okay. He didn't want any part of this because this could boomerang back on him. It already is. So,

Garland, within a week, has got to say, this is what we were looking for, and this is what we found. He won't, he won't, but that's the responsible thing to do. And then he presents whatever he found to a grand jury. But he can tell the American people what he found. No law against that, but he won't. Okay, so let's sum this up. Big, big story. Biden administration stonewalling the story.

Okay? Trump trying to put it on Biden. He knew he did it. It's all Biden, Biden, Biden. One further thing. When you watch these cable news programs, listen, you all know, I did this from more than 20 years, the most outrageous things in the world are said on both sides.

All right, so the hate Trump, they're already convicted Trump, but God knows what, but they've convicted them. And then the people who like Trump, they were saying, well, the FBI made it planted evidence. That's, and I said to Hannity on a radio show, and we have it posted on Bill O'Reilly.com, and it's a good back and forth about this between Hannity and me today on the radio. I said to Hannity, look, anybody's saying that the FBI planted evidence of Maulago yesterday is irresponsible. Number one, be almost impossible to do because you would have to get classified documents somehow and then bring them to Florida and then put them in a drawer or whatever.

That didn't happen. And then there's all these other people, FBI agents. They're all going to say, oh, yeah, let's plant evidence. All 30 of them are going to go, yeah, let's plan it. Come on, come on. This is the dopey conspiracy stuff that we talked to. about yesterday. You weaken your case by doing that. Okay? Is it possible? Yeah, but it's a thousand a one. Because we get out and you can't get the original documents anyway. You can't get them.

FBI agent can't just walk in to the National Archives and grab a document. So anyway, craziness, but not here. So we got a good guess for you. His name is Stuart Kaplan. He's a private attorney, but he was an FBI agent from 1995, 2006, 11 years. And he knows what he's talking about, which is why I'm putting him on here tonight. So, Mr. Kaplan, we appreciate you taking the time. I'm going to ask you a series of dumb questions, okay? But we need to clarify things. So number one, when the FBI goes in with a warrant to search a home, do they ever let counsel for the home owner follow them around and watch the search? Yes, sir, with the caveat that when there is the execution of a search warrant, the first and main focus,

is to clear the location that's to be searched, to ensure the safety of the agents who are going to enter into or onto the premises. Once the agents have been satisfied that the location to be searched is safe, basically free from any weapons, the target of the search warrant, vis-a-vis being the owner of the premises

or the person in control of that premise, would have the right to remain on-premise to view or watch the search. However, that individual could not impede or instruct the search. So that's the only issue. Now, Ms. Robb says she was allowed to stay on the premises, but FBI did not want her watching them go into Melania's closet or other places. Is that unusual? That would be unusual. And so I've been, yes, and if I could just put it in real time, I have been case agent on many different searches

or executions of search warrants where lawyers have shown up and it would not be within my right to prohibit that lawyer from following around to make sure that it is done in a dignified and orally manner so that people are not ripping, you know, things out of the wall or just you just being unprofessional.

Right. That's normal. All right, so that's good. I'm glad you cleared that up. So Donald Trump's lawyer. Christina, Bob, all right, had the right, and the FBI would have you, but she says, and I don't have this nail down tight, I don't have a sound bite on it, but it's out there that they didn't want her in certain places. Okay. Secondly, what I just said about planting evidence,

that's very hard to do, is it not? I think you hit the nail right on the head with respect to narration that in my lifetime and certainly in my prior experience, I would never ever concede that any single FBI agent or certainly a group of up to 30 FBI agents would conspire to plant evidence and certainly given the level of scrutiny that anybody would have to anticipate that did not happen. Okay. There were surveillance cameras in Malago and they did capture the FBI raid. Now the FBI, apparently, wants to see, some people say sees, again, this is all anecdotal that's floating around, the footage. Does that make sense to you at all? So when you take a look at the affidavit in

support of the search warrant, that search warrant must have particularity with very specific facts. And that judge, and as you mentioned, magistrate Bruce Reinhart, would only give the lawful authority to seize those items that have. been specified within that warrant. Now, it begs the question, was the surveillance video part of what was addressed in the warrant? So it had to be in the warrant for the FBI to take it. That is correct. You cannot just grab innocuous things. And we don't know. That's correct, sir. Now, you are in Palm Beach. You must know this Reinhardt guy, right? I have the highest regard for Bruce Reinhart. I knew him when he was an assistant United States

attorney, and I certainly have appeared before him when he was a United States magistrate. Now, I just want to make some correction here because you touched upon it. In West Palm Beach, in the Southern District of Florida, there are only two magistrates that sit. They work on rotation. So I will assume that it was not necessarily maybe shopping for a particular judge. It may have just been that he was the duty magistrate. Could have been.

But with his resume, it just, look to me, and they didn't have to go to West Palm Beach. I mean, they could have gone to other jurisdictions in Florida, could I or not? Well, sir, the general rule is that where the property or premises to be searched are located, the FBI will go to that district of where that property is located. This property happened to be in West Palm Beach or Palm Beach County. It would be consistent with going to the Southern District of Florida. Now, with saying that, in fairness to your viewers. That could have been Broward County or in Miami. That's what I'm talking about. Yes. But just so I just want to be clear, there are various. If the Justice Department

had approached the judge and the judge didn't sign a warrant, the whole thing would have gone up in smoke. So you've got to feel that they knew who would sign. I'm not casting aspersions on Reinhard. I'm just saying that one misstep here and Garland blows the whole thing, whatever he's trying to accomplish. Now, let's move it along to other things. The Wall Street Journal is editorial today, and they are no fans of Donald Trump. They say that this whole thing about the National Archive document, okay, could have been done with a subpoena. They could have subpoenaed what they believe Trump is holding, and they didn't have to raid his house. How do you see that? I think you're absolutely correct and actually even a less intrusive manner in which to issue a spina would have been to issue in order to show cause, which could have been filed, whether up in New York or in Florida, wherever they believe those records were being maintained to compel him to come before a United States district court judge and explain either, number one, are you in possession? And if so, why are you unwilling to return those documents?

So Trump would have to then appear before a federal judge and explain. what the National Archives is alleging. Is that correct? That is correct. But that didn't happen. No, sir. They came in with a bulldozer to clear an answer. That's true.

All right. So now, people are going to think it's political because they had another reason, okay, another way to go without blowing this up worldwide. I'm making America look bad. Now I'm going to get to my speculation. I don't like to speculate. I'm fact-faced guy. I think they were looking for stuff about January 6th. That's what I think this is all about,

because if you look at what happened to Hillary Clinton, no doubt Hillary Clinton removed classified documents from her office in Washington and Secretary of State. She did it, 2,000 of them. And the only reason the FBI didn't lodge charges was they said, well, she didn't do it on purpose. I know Trump, he doesn't sit in the wrong. room with documents, okay, but that's either here nor there. I think, based upon what I know

and what I'm seeing, that this raid, they were hoping to get some kind of text or some kind of piece of paper or some kind of printout Trump talking about January 6th. Does that make any sense to you? Well, in a movie or a novel, maybe so, but in the real world, you don't go in with the hopes of then trying to find some criminal activity. You have to allege that the crime already has occurred. No, I know that. You know that. You know and I know fishing expeditions exist. I know that. Yes, sir. But I know the temperature of the FBI with respect to January 6th proceedings personally. And I know they have had a hands-off position letting Congress do this show. And the FBI really has taken a back seat. The other thing is, and Bill, just so your viewers fully understand

the real world, a search warrant that it was executed two days ago must contain information that the Supreme Court of the United States has defined as ripe, meaning fresh, something that may have occurred within the last 30 to 45 days. The fact that he may have been in possession of materials that go back since he left office a year and a half ago would not be sufficient to escalate it to being able to sign off on a warrant. But he hasn't been there since May. Well, but someone had to have been able to corroborate with particularity, actual facts. This is the real world.

No, I understand. Someone on the inside had to say yesterday, I saw X, Y, and Z, and I believe he's going to either destroy it or hide it or transfer it or do something. It can't be something that someone. and saw a year ago. But that, that is so far-fetched because the man is in New Jersey and has been since early May. Which then shows that he would not have been in a position to destroy any document. Right. Okay. And that brings us to the next thing. That if you have a, what you call fresh information, all right, you give the man under suspicion, Donald Trump, the ability to explain.

Blaine it, right? 100%. I agree with you. Because if you don't, it looks like we're a fascist country. Kick the door in. Find anything. Now, last question on this,

and then I want to get into the FBI in general. Merrick Garland is the boss. Ray works for him. Okay, in the Justice Department. In the next week, I am calling for the attorney General to put forth specificity about this case. Should he? 100%. I felt that this case was synonymous with someone pulling the pin on an hand grenade

and throwing it into a crowded room and just walking away, appreciating and understanding and anticipating what the collateral damage would be. And they did exactly that without any regard, knowing that there was going to be a significant fallout. Look, Bill, the FBI's reputation, going back to May of 2017, has been irreparably harmed when then-director James Comey was fired. They've been trying to rehabilitate their reputation, and unfortunately now in August of 2022, the legitimacy, not only the integrity. Right. And Christian Faris cannot, he cannot continue. He can't. If you look at his, That's true. If you look at what he did last week in front of that Senate committee on Thursday,

stonewalling everything, and then you add this to it, again, more than half the country thinks it's a political persecution to a former president. How can this guy continue? He can't. And you mark my words. Mr. Kaplan, you mark my words. It isn't going to be Garland taking a fall for this. He won't because Biden. But Ray, where do you see? Now, let me get, you brought up Comey. I thought Comey should have been charged. Do you disagree? I don't know if I necessarily would say that he committed any sort of criminal acts,

but it is the first time, and I believe I worked on the then director, Lewis Free and Bob Mueller in completely a different atmosphere. That was the first time that it was evident crystal clear that a director of the FBI lost his sense of moral compass with respect to being neutral, detached, unbiased, untouchable. Clearly, he crossed the line. There's no doubt about it. But in my opinion, what he did, all right, you can't, I would have charged him with abuse of power.

McCabe, all right, his deputy, whose wife was deeply involved with Democratic politics in Virginia, who now works for CNN, he was. pretty much steering this into a political area, and he got away with it. So look, and this is what I want your viewers to understand. There's the field agents across the United States. Everybody knows that. I don't want to be.

And then there's this, but here's going to volunteer some information. There's the seventh floor at headquarters. They needed to clear out with a bulldozer, that. And unfortunately, there is a systemic, problem that still is there. And there's a culture that goes and acts with impunity. And that's what we're seeing way out. Some of that is Trump's fault because he hired Ray and didn't fire him when it was clear Ray was incompetent. Last one, struck and page with all of the memos going back and forth that we got to get Trump, shouldn't they have been charged with some kind of

violation? Well, you would think at least minimum with OPR and office. professional responsibility charges to have at least, you know, come down hard on them, they got a pass. Yeah. They got a free pass. It's outrageous. All right. But you were one of our best guests that we've had in years, Mr. Cap.

I'm not just saying that because you were. So I hope you will do me a favor and just track this story. And when you see something that doesn't stack or you see something that the folks need to know because you're a straight shooter, you're obviously that, very knowledgeable. Give us a call, we'll get you right on the air. I want to offer one thing, man, I offer one last thing. Absolutely. The president of the United States, either him personally or his chief of staff,

is debriefed every morning by a deputy director of the FBI on current events or national security matters. I am going to tell you, there is no doubt unequivocally that prior to the ex-year, of this search warrant, either the President of the United States or his chief of staff, was fully debriefed on the fact that this warrant was going to be executed. Right. But what they did, and I know this to be a fact, was that don't tell us exactly when it's going to happen. So we have, quote, unquote, deniability. That's what happened. As I said, they knew that the Attorney General was going in this direction,

but they said, you know, we've got to have that wiggle room, which is with, they all do in the swamp. And it's disgusting. Stuart Kaplan, he is an attorney in West Palm Beach right now. If you need a good representation, you look him up. All right, I will if I ever get in trouble down in Florida. All right, well, reaction to this. The BBC is the most powerful news agency in the world. Apart from the American press, varying, depending on where you are in a world, CNN, unfortunately, is everywhere. But the BBC, outside of the USA, is the most powerful. Here's what they did on this story yesterday.

Go. President Trump was one of the biggest critics of Hillary Clinton when she used her personal email as the Secretary of State. And potentially, you know, some people think she violated some of our laws related to only using government official emails so that those documents become records. And here we have President Trump, having done something potentially, much more egregious that this may be much ado about nothing the reality is that not much is going to come of this it seems that the justice department as it has been for the last decade or so has

become much politicized okay so at least they balanced it I was expecting the worst from the BBC but they balanced it all right by so Biden goes to uh South Carolina, Kiowa Island, very nice place, on vacation. Why? He's got a house in Rojobah, same ocean, all right? And it's much, much hotter in South Carolina right now and more humid. I'm not getting this at all. Why would you go to South Carolina? We don't know. They won't say how long he's going to be down there. We do know, according to press reports, that Hunter's there. Hunter. He's getting a little vacation. Now, I'm not going to speculate further than that.

I'm just saying to myself, why would you go from your residence on the beach in Delaware to another residence, we don't know where he's staying, in South Carolina in August, when the weather there is a lot worse in Delaware? I don't know. Now, before he left, there was some rather disturbing video,

tape. I had to think about whether run this or not, but I think we have to roll it now and voice it over. Those on a radio, I will describe. So President Biden gets out of the helicopter, Marine 1. He's on a tarmac. He can't put his jacket on. All right? So he's got his mask on. He turns to his wife. She helps him put his jacket on. But he still, having trouble despite her actually putting his arm in the sleep. All right? So it takes him a full 30 seconds to get the jacket on. And now he drops his sunglasses, leans over, picks them up. This is not a good look. Now, I'm not being mean. All right? I'm not nasty and snickering. That's not what I'm in business to do here. I am telling you this man is infirm.

Let's face it, the U.S. economy is under stress. National debt rising, trade war, shaking the markets. And meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver through the only dealer I trust, American Hartford gold. And you can do this. Precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax advantage, gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401K, tax and penalty-free. With billions in precious medals delivered thousands of five-star reviews and an A-plus from the Better Business Bureau, you can trust American Hartford Gold as I do.

Please call 866-326-55-7576 or text Bill. to 998899. Again, that's 866-326-5576-5576 or text bill to 998899. Donald Trump is opposed in New York today. This is a case about his real estate operation in New York State, the Attorney General Letitia James fanatical, progressive leftist, is trying to pin some kind of fraud on Trump and his corporation by saying that it overvalued property in tax-free terms. Now, that's what this is all about. So Trump came in, he answered the

subpoena, and then he took the Fifth Amendment, which I would have done, any, anybody would have done it. Because no matter what you say in an interview like that, it's going to be used against you. So he took the fifth. Not a big deal. Okay, new Monmouth University poll, a shaky operation there in New Jersey. And they asked about the January 6th Committee. House of Representatives create a select committee to investigate U.S. Capitol incident that has recently been holding public hearings. How much have you been following?

A lot, 23%, a little 38%, not at all 39%. okay so that 76% not really paying attention which is about right second question I have the recent house January 6th committee hearings change your mind about what happened at the capital that day yes 8% no 89% so this is purely for the media this January 6th thing purely for the media folks are all right Department of Homeland Security Oh, yeah. Do you feel safe with these people? Mayorkas? Oh, I do. So they've knocked out the remaining in Mexico policy completely. It doesn't matter because about 5,000 in a year and a half asylum seekers were returned to Mexico after a federal judge said, hey, President Biden,

you just can't knock this out. You've got to have a little legal basis to do so. The Biden administration then came up with the legal basis and the judge lifted the injunction. So now, person in the world who wants to come to America, all they have to do is go to the southern border, sneak across, and when they're caught, say, I want asylum, and they're released into the USA, unless they have a criminal record or something like that. Open border. Okay. So you know about the brawl between Texas? and Arizona, it's among Texas, Arizona, D.C. and New York, busing migrants from Texas and Arizona to D.C. and New York. Well, three more buses showed up. Today, the Deport Authority Bus Terminal

in Manhattan. We don't have a headcount, but about 4,000 migrants have come to New York City so far on these bus trips. All right. And the mayor, Eric Adams, is now threatening to go to Texas. do that because he would not be well received down there. And he wants a Biden administration give money to house the 4,000 people. So this is ongoing, ongoing. And it's a culture war play. So Texas and Arizona go, look, we're tired of you left-wing people up in the northeast, espousing and supporting open borders and sanctuary cities and all that. So these people we have to deal with every day, hundreds of thousands of them in Arizona. Mexico, California, and Texas. So now we're going to bust them up to you. The program is voluntary.

Migrants have to sign a paper saying, yeah, I want to go to New York or I want to go to D.C. All right, you remember on October 1st, 2020, actor Rick Moranis, he was in Ghostbusters. He's a good guy. He's walking down the street in Manhattan, Upper West Side. And a guy comes over and punches him in the face. Okay, boom. And Moranus is hurt. Had to go to the hospital. So that was almost two years ago. Finally, now the guy has pled guilty to assault because he did it to six others, not just Rick Moranis. And he's going to be a sentence on August 23. Now, he wasn't out on bail like all the other people who punch you in the face are because they kept them in psychiatric evaluation because he's punching people in the face. They had to. Or the city of New York would have been sued, which it probably will be anyway. So I'm going to follow it.

I'll let you know what this guy gets on August 23rd. Smart life. So this is a segment where we want you to prosper in a very, very difficult time. You know what this Fitbit thing is? It's a little device. It's like a smart watch that tracks your physical activity. All right. It tells you how many steps you walk, how many miles you walk.

it tracks your sleep it does all that it costs from 70 to 280 bucks if you want look the key to good health is not eating garbage especially sugar not drinking and smoking I mean you can have a cocktail every now and then and a beer that's fine but you don't want to pollute your body but you got to walk and so this Fitbit incentivizes that you'll see how much you're doing and you can set a goal. Smart life. Fifth bit. This day in history, August 10th, 1988, President Reagan gives retribution, okay? Not retribution. What am I talking about O'Reilly? Reparations. President Reagan gives reparations to Japanese Americans who were interned by FDR during World War II. 34 years ago, today, they got the equivalent to $50,000 in today's money. It was $25,000. It was

20,000 back then, 82,000 Japanese Americans who were taken out of their homes in Oregon, Washington, Arizona, California, and Alaska, and put in little camps, they got reparations from Ronald Reagan. Okay, mail segment, you know, a lot of it on the Trump thing. And a final thought that you will like coming right back. Becker, the host of the New York Postcast, and I've got exactly what you need to start your weekdays. Every morning, I'll bring you the stories that matter, plus the news people actually talk about, the juicy details in the worlds of politics, business, pop culture, and everything in between. It's what you want from the New York Post wrapped up in one snappy show. Ask your smart

speaker to play the NY Postcast podcast, listen and subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcast, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, it's Sean Spicer from the Sean Spicer Show podcast, reminding you to turn into my show every day to get your daily dose inside the world of politics. President Trump and his team are shaking up Washington like never before, and we're here to cover it from all sides, especially on the topics the mainstream media won't. So if you're a political junkie on a late lunch or getting ready for the drive home, new episodes of the Sean Spicer Show podcast drop at 2 p.m. East Coast every day. sure you tune in. You can find it's at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. All right, let's go to the mail. Gerald Brooks, Boynton Beach, Florida. You're reporting on the raid at Maulago was superb and without peer O'Reilly. Seems to me the raid was partially

done to enrage some folks to push back in an unproductive way. I don't think it was bare-baiting, you know, pushing the conservatives to go crazy. They did, some of them. But they, you know, they really want get Trump. Joe Poland and over Connecticut, is it a possibility that the reason we have no public explanation from the Department of Justice or the FBI is because it truly was a fishing expedition? It's possible, you know, as we said. Our guests didn't think that was it. I do. A little slight disagreement there. They're looking for January 6th. On a message board, Scott, there is no way the FBI and DOG can recover from this. Jack, on a message board, sickening, this nation has never been in such absurd,

topsy-turvy conditions, socially, politically, culturally as it is, and a present lawless, corrupt, and morally bankrupt era. It's bad. That's the way you got to stay here. Gotta be with us. Bill O'Reilly.com should be your home for information. Stephen Stone, Las Vegas. Billy FBI is so dug in trying in their failed attempts to get Trump. No Russian collusion, nothing on the impeachments. In order to save face, do you think there's a possibility? They will plant evidence. We dealt with that today, and we did so partially off your letter, Stephen.

But there were other commentators that I saw on him. No. Eileen Pia, Ocean Saudi California. How much can one man take? I marvel at her former President Trump is standing up to so many attacks. I don't know how he does it either. Charles, your final thought on money, spot on. Discipline is learned over time and once begin as a young age.

urchins must earn their own money. Yes. My kids work. Have to. Okay? They have to. Let them hang around. Zach Russell, Oxford Mississippi, just signed up for premium membership. Loving the content on the site. Thank you, Zach. Got killing the killers free. What a book it was, enlightening and informative. Killing the legends, I can't wait. Killing Legends out. September 27, September 27, sign up for Bill O'Reilly.com, you get it free. Ria, you get it free. This is going to be the most talked about book of the year.

Guarantee it. All right, word of the day, do not be banal. B-A-N-A-L. Right back with a final thought. Power, politics, and the people behind the headlines. I'm Miranda Devine, New York Post columnist, and the host of the brand new podcast, Podforce One.

Every week, I'll sit down for candid conversations with Washington's most powerful disruptors, lawmakers, lawmakers, and even the President of the United States. These are the leaders shaping the future of America and the world. Listen to Podforce One with me, Miranda Devine, every week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. You don't want to miss an episode. Okay, final vote of the day is Hillary Clinton. Throw it on up there. She's got a hat.

She wants you to buy her hat. The hat costs $32 bucks. The hat says, but her emails. Oh, come on, come. Why do you need a hat for $32, Mrs. Clinton? Why? Why? all right so after the FBI raid Hillary Clinton went out there with the stupid hat is that arrogant

I believe so you got away with it madam you got away with it I wouldn't be doing any hats karma I know you don't believe in karma but it does exist how obnoxious is this I mean really on a scale of one to 10 it's got to be 10 right it's got to be 10 she got away with it She took classified information, put it on her personal service. Her staff destroyed stuff. All right, call me, let her walk. Well, she didn't really know what she... Oh, yeah.

Sure. And then she's got a hat? Uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, no shame. And you know why? Because the media get a letter, get away with it? You're not going to say anything about it. I bet she didn't even know that hat. Did you know it?

write me. Bill at Bill O'Reilly.com, name in town, please wish you a point. Did you know about that hat before I told you? Okay, that happened yesterday. Do you hear it anywhere? No. Okay, so tomorrow, as I told you, I have a very interesting conversation coming up. I haven't done it yet. But I'm on this now as a reporter. You know, most of the time I'm an analyst because I don't have time be a reporter, but this story is so big that I'm back in my repertorial mode. And I've got, and I'm hoping, you never know, but the person agreed to talk with me. I don't know if a person is going to go on a record or off the record. I don't know, but I'm going to find out some really interesting stuff.

And I will tell you what I found out on Thursday's No Spin News. Thank you for watching and listening this evening. We will see you tomorrow.